Technology and Raw Material Quality to Underpin the Irish Fresh-cut Fruit Industry

A dissertation presented by

Elizabeth M. Finnegan B.Sc. (Hons.)

in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

under the supervision of

Professor David O’Beirne

Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering

Submitted to

University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

December, 2014

ii

Elizabeth M. Finnegan B.Sc. (Hons.) Technology and raw material quality to underpin the Irish fresh-cut fruit industry

Abstract

The objective of this thesis was to contribute to improving the quality of fresh-cut fruits by identifying how raw material use, processing, packaging and storage might be optimised. Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factor variables on the quality, microbiology and phytochemical content were determined.

Following comprehensive quality evaluations, principal component analysis (PCA) was employed, and the biplots generated were effective in characterising patterns of deterioration and in tracking differences in quality in terms of the rate and extent of change. Ripeness stage/ physiological age, geographical origin, cut size and packaging type had large effects on quality (p<0.05) as did storage temperature and time (p<0.01).

There were significant effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on quality (p<0.05), but little effect on microbial growth or phytochemical (total phenolic, total carotenoid, total antioxidant activity) content (p>0.05). In general, product modified atmosphere (PMA) packs displayed a steadier rate of quality loss with more consistent end- product quality. A CA of 5%O2+5%CO2 was best at maintaining fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon quality, while a CA of 97%N2+3%O2 was best for fresh-cut kiwifruit. Exposure to sub-optimal atmospheres resulted in physiological disorders such as discolouration, loss of firmness and off-odour development.

Cut size (p<0.05) and storage time (p<0.01) had large effects on volatile aromatic compounds (VACs). VAC changes involved increased and/or decreased concentrations of existing volatiles rather than the emergence of new compounds. A total of 18, 16 and 20 odour-active compounds were detected and tentatively identified in the headspace of fresh- cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit respectively. Based on PCA interpretation, the post cutting aroma life of fresh-cut pineapple and kiwifruit was adequate over 7 days for large cut pieces, and limited to less than 7 Days for smaller cut pieces. In contrast, fresh-cut melon aroma was limited to 4 and 7 Days for small and large cut pieces respectively. This was largely due to the presence of fermentative-like off-odours, which were more pronounced for smaller cut pieces.

The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic variables on the respiration rate (RCO2) of a number of fresh-cut fruits were determined. In general, the RCO2 increased initially, peaked, and declined gradually to equilibrium within 24h. The high initial rate was highly dependent on fruit type, physiological age and processing (p<0.05). Using data for fresh-cut pineapple, a mathematical model based on exponential decay was developed in order to predict the RCO2 over time. From this, the oxygen and carbon dioxide transmission rates required in package design were estimated and validated. The model parameters were found to be a good fit with experimental data and could be successfully applied to other fresh-cut fruits to aid in product-package compatibility.

iii

iv

Declaration

“I hereby declare that this dissertation is entirely my own work and effort and has not been submitted to any other institution for any other academic award. Where use has been made of the work of others, it has been fully acknowledged and referenced.”

Signature: Date:

______

Ms Elizabeth M. Finnegan Postgraduate Scholar

Food Science Research Centre, Department of Life Science, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Schrodinger Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

v

vi

List of Confirmation Delegates

Supervisor: Professor David O’Beirne Lecturer, Food Science Research Centre Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Schrodinger Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

External Examiner: Dr. Nigel P. Brunton Lecturer School of Agriculture & Food Science, Science Centre South, University College , Belfield, Dublin 4.

Internal Examiner: Professor Richard J. (Dick) FitzGerald Lecturer Food Science Research Centre Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Schrodinger Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Head of Department: Professor Sean Arkins MVB, MRCVS Lecturer and Chair of Equine Science Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Schrodinger Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Assistant Dean of Research: Dr. Conor E. McCarthy Lecturer MA & BE Department, Materials and Surface Science Institute (MSSI), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

vii

viii

To Granny Kelly ♥

ix

x

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstract………………………………………………………….III Declaration………………………………………………………V

List of Confirmation Delegates…………………………………VII

Dedication………………………………………………………..IX Table of Contents………………………………………………..XI

Peer Reviewed Publications…………………………………….XXI Significant Achievements……………………………………….XXII List of Tables…………………………………………………….XXIV

List of Figures……………………………………………………XXX

List of Equations…………………………………………………XLIII List of Abbreviations and Acronyms…………………………..XLV

Important Definitions…………………………………………...XLIX Acknowledgements………………………………………………LI Epigraph………………………………………………………….LIII

Chapter 1: Review of Literature……….…………………………………...……1

Introduction…………………………………………………………….....…………3

1.1 Fresh-cut fruit……………………………………………....………………..4 1.2 Fresh-cut fruit processing………………………………………………...... 5 1.2.1 Raw materials……………………………………………………....….5 1.2.2 Quality control………………………………………………..……...... 5 1.2.3 Pre-cooling and preliminary washing……….……………………...…7 1.2.4 Peeling and/or deseeding……………………………………………....7 1.2.5 Size reduction……………………………………………………….....8

xi

1.2.6 Washing and/or post-cutting dipping treatments……...... ….8 1.2.7 Packaging and refrigerated storage………………...... ……9

1.3 Components of fresh-cut quality…………………………....……………..10 1.3.1 Appearance……………………....……………………………....…...10 1.3.2 Firmness………………………………....…………………….……..11 1.3.3 Aroma and taste……………………………....………………………12 α- and β-oxidation……………………………………………..…….13 Amino acid pathways……………………………………………..…14 Terpenoid pathway……………………………………………...... …15 1.3.4 Nutritional quality………………………………………...………….16 Phytochemicals……………………………………………...……….17 Polyphenols………………………………………………………….17 Chlorophylls…………………………………………………………18 Carotenoids………………………………………………………….20 1.3.5 Microbial stability………………………...………………………….20

1.4 Physiological, biochemical and microbial effects of fresh-cut processing…………………………………………………………….....…..22 1.4.1 Enzymatic browning…………………………………………...…….22 1.4.2 Whitening and translucency……………………………………....….24 1.4.3 Excessive tissue softening………………………………………....…25 1.4.4 Phytochemical changes…………………………………………...... 27 1.4.5 Changes in flavour and aroma………………………………….....….28 1.4.6 Microbial response to processing……………………………….....…29

1.5 Factors affecting fresh-cut fruit quality……………………………...…...30 1.5.1 Cultivar and growing conditions………………………………....…..30 1.5.2 Maturity and ripeness stage……………………………………....…..31 1.5.3 Respiration rate………………………………………………...…….32 1.5.4 Ethylene………………………………………………………....……34 1.5.5 Processing………………………………………………………....….34 1.5.6 Environmental factors…………………………………………....…..36 1.5.7 Microbial spoilage……………………………………………....……37 xii

1.6 Modified atmosphere packaging…………………………………....……..40 1.6.1 MAP generation……………………………………………...……....40 1.6.2 MAP design……………………………………………………....…..43 1.6.3 Design methodology…………………………………………....……44 Respiration rate………………………………………………...……45 Commercial packaging materials………………………………..….47 Gas permeability………………………………………………..…...48 Perforations for fresh-cut fruit processing……………………...…...51 Needle perforations……………………………………………..…...54 Perforation with electrostatic energy…………………………...…...54 Laser perforation………………………………………………...…..55

1.7 Effects of MAP on the physiological, biochemical and microbiological quality and safety of fresh-cut fruit……………………………….....……55

1.8 Quality evaluation…………………………………………...……………..58 1.8.1 Colour…………………………………………………....…………...58 1.8.2 Texture………………………………………………………...……..59 1.8.3 Analysis of taste and aroma compounds……………………....……..60 Volatile aroma analysis………………………………………...……61 1.8.4 Total antioxidant activity…………………………...………………..65 1.8.5 Sensory evaluation…………………………………...……………....66 1.8.6 Microbial enumeration………………………………....…………….65

1.9 Principal component analysis…………………………....………………...68

1.10 Conclusion…………………………………………………....…………….69

Chapter 2: Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using Principal component analysis………...... ………………71

Introductory page……………………....……………………………………….…73

xiii

Chapter 2.1………………………………………....………………………………75 2.1. Abstract………………………………………………………...... ……...77 2.2. Introduction……………………………………………………...... ……78 2.3. Materials and methods………………………………………...... ……..80 2.3.1. Plant materials……………………………………………....………..80 2.3.2. Fresh-cut processing and packaging………………………....………80 2.3.3. Quality testing………………………………………………....……..81 In-pack gas atmosphere composition…………………..……………81 Moisture loss (%)………………………………………..…………..81 Drip-loss, exudate and cell permeability…………………..……...... 81 Percent soluble solids……………………………………...………...82 Tissue pH and titratable acidity……………………………..………82 Colour………………………………………………………...……...82 Texture………………………………………………………...……..82 2.3.4. Microbial enumeration……………....……………………………….83 2.3.5. Sensory evaluation……………………....…………………………...83 2.3.6. Statistical analysis………………………....…………………………84 2.4. Results………………………………………………………………….....…85 2.4.1. Processes of deterioration……………………………………….....…85 2.4.2. Effects of origin and cultivar……………………………………....…95 2.5. Discussion……………………………………………………………....…...96 2.5.1. Processes of deterioration…………………….....……………………96 2.5.2. Effects of fruit type, cultivar and origin…………....………………...97 2.6. Conclusion………………………………………………....……………...... 99

Chapter 2.2…………………………....……………………………………….….101 2.1. Abstract………………………...……………..…………………………...103 2.2. Introduction………………………...………………………..…………....104 2.3. Materials and methods………………....…………………..………….….105 2.3.1. Plant materials………………....……………………………………105 2.3.2. Fresh-cut processing and packaging……...………………………...106 2.3.3. Quality, microbial and sensory evaluation……....………………….109 2.4. Results…………………………………………………....………………...109

xiv

2.4.1. Effects of ripeness stage and season…………...………………...... 109 2.4.2. Effects of cutting size and dipping treatment…....………………….116 2.4.3. Effects of packaging type and temperature……………....………....124 2.5. Discussion……………………………………………………....………….133 2.5.1. Effects of ripeness stage and season…………...…………………...133 2.5.2. Effects of cutting size and dipping treatment……....…………….....134 2.5.3. Effects of packaging type and temperature…………....…………....134 2.6. Conclusion…………………………………………………....……………135 2.7. Benefits of PCA plots………………………………………....…………...136

Chapter 3: Controlled and modified atmospheres - Quality, microbial and phytochemical response of fresh-cut fruits…………………..……..137 3.1. Abstract…………………….....…………………………………………...139 3.2. Introduction…………………….....………………………………………140 3.3. Materials and methods…………………….....…………………………...142 3.3.1. Processing, packaging and storage of fresh-cut fruit………...….….142 Product modified atmospheres…………...………………………...144 Controlled atmospheres…………………..………………………..144 3.3.2. Quality evaluation………....………………………………………..145 3.3.3. Sensory evaluation…………...……………………………………..145 3.3.4. Microbiological analysis………...………………………………….145 Bacterial strains and culture conditions…………..…………….....145 Inoculation of fresh-cut fruits………………………...…………….145 Microbiological enumeration…………………………...………….146 3.3.5. Antioxidant phytochemical compounds and antioxidant activity determination………..…………….………………………………..147 Methanolic extraction of antioxidant compounds…………..……...147 Determination of total phenolic concentration…………..………...147 Determination of total antioxidant activity: radical scavenging capacity…………………………………………..………………...148 Determination of total carotenoids……………………………..….148 3.3.6. Statistical analysis……………...…………………………………...149 3.4. Results……………………...……………………………………………....150 xv

3.4.1. Effects of atmosphere on quality………...... ……………150 Gas atmospheres………………………………………….150 Effects on drip-loss and percentage weight-loss….……....153 Effects on firmness………………………………………..156 Effects on colour………………………………………….158 Effects on percent soluble solids, pH and titratable acidity...... 161 3.4.2. Effects of atmosphere on sensory evaluation………………..164 3.4.3. Effects of atmosphere on microbial growth………………....173 3.4.4. Effects of atmosphere on levels of phytochemical antioxidants………..……………………………………….176 Total carotenoids…………………………………………176 Total phenolics……………………………………………178 Total antioxidant activity…………………………………178 3.5. Discussion……………………………………………………....………….181 Pineapple……………..…………………………………………181 Cantaloupe melon……………………..………………………...183 Kiwifruit………………………..………………………………..185 3.6. Conclusion………………………...………………………………………187

Chapter 4: Volatile aromatic compound changes in fresh-cut fruits effects of storage time and cut size…………..…………………………………189 4.1. Abstract……...…………………………………………………………….191 4.2. Introduction……...………………………………………………………..193 4.3. Materials and methods…....………………………………………………196 4.3.1. Sample preparation – Processing and packaging of plant materials..196 4.3.2. Sample preparation – Static headspace solid-phase micro- extraction...... 198 4.3.3. Physiochemical analysis……………....…………………………….199 In-pack gas atmosphere composition……..…………………….....199 Weight-loss (%)……………………………..……………………...199 Percent soluble solids…………………………...………………….200 Tissue pH and titratable acidity…………………..………………..200 xvi

4.3.4. Volatile aromatic compound analysis…………...... …….....…....200 4.3.5. Statistical analysis……………………………...... …………..200 4.4. Results…………....………………………………………………………...201 4.4.1. In-pack gas atmosphere and physiochemical attributes of quality….202 4.4.2. Volatile aromatic compound profiles for fresh-cut fruits…....……...204 Fresh-cut pineapple……………...…………………………………205 Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon………...……………………………...207 Fresh-cut kiwifruit……………………...…………………………..210 4.4.3. Principal component analysis……………....……………………….214 Fresh-cut pineapple………………...………………………………214 Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon…………...…………………………...218 Fresh-cut kiwifruit……………………...…………………………..221 4.5. Discussion…………………………………………………………....…….224 4.5.1. In-pack gas atmosphere and physiochemical attributes of quality….224 4.5.2. Effects of storage time and cut size on volatile aromatic compounds...... 225 Fresh-cut pineapple…………...…………………………………....225 Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon……...………………………………...228 Fresh-cut kiwifruit………………...………………………………..231 4.6. Conclusion………………………………....……………………………....236

Chapter 5: Respiration and Product-Package Compatibility…………....……237

5.1. Abstract……………………………………………………………....…....239 5.2. Introduction………………………………………………………...……..240 5.3. Materials and methods…………………………………………....……....243 5.3.1. Plant materials and intrinsic factors……....………………………...243 5.3.2. Processing and extrinsic factors…………………....……………….244 5.3.3. Measuring respiration rate: Experimental setup and procedure….…248 5.3.4. Validation: Packaging of fresh-cut pineapple chunks…………....…249 5.3.5. Statistical analysis………………………………………………...... 252 5.4. Results……………………………………………………………....……...254

xvii

5.4.1. Effects of fruit type, storage time and intrinsic and extrinsic factors on respiration rate…………...... …………...... ………...254 Pineapple……………………………...... ……………………256 Strawberry……….…………………………...... ………………..259 Kiwifruit…………….…………………………...... ……………..260 Melon……………….……………………………...... …………..261 5.4.2. Case Study: Package design procedure for fresh-cut pineapple…...264 5.4.3. Implications for packaging……………….………...... ………….267 5.5. Discussion………………………………………………………....……….272 5.5.1. Effect of fruit type and storage time on respiration rate……...….....272 5.5.2. Effect of intrinsic factors on respiration rate of fresh-cut fruits……274 5.5.3. Effect of extrinsic factors on respiration rate of fresh-cut fruits……276 5.5.4. Product-package compatibility………………………....…………...278 5.6. Conclusion…………………………………………………....……………279

Chapter 6: Summary and Conclusions……………………………….....………281 6.1. Summary………………………………………………………...………...283 6.2. Conclusions……………………………………………………...………...286

APPENDICES……………………………………………………………….....…287

Appendix A: Questionnaire…………………………………………………….....289

Appendix A.1 Copy of Ethics Approval Certificate………..……………….….....290

Appendix A.2 Design methodology…….………………...……………………....291

Appendix A.3 Copy of Questionnaire: “A context for change: Consumers Attitudes and Preferences Concerning Fresh-cut Fruit Products”….…………...... 293 Explanatory Cover Letter (email) ……………………………...... 293 Explanatory Cover Letter (questionnaire) ………………………..294 Copy of Questionnaire……………………...……………………...295

Appendix A.4 Summary of main findings….……………………………….....….298 Future prospects and technical needs………………………...... 307

xviii

Appendix B: Supplementary Data for Chapter 1…………………………….....…309

Appendix B.1 Table of acceptable fruit varieties and their corresponding origins available to Irish processors…………………….…………………...…………...... 310

Appendix B.2 The market for fresh-cut fruit…….……………………….....…….311

Appendix B.3 Evaluation of commercial fresh-cut fruit packs……….……...... 323

Abstract…………………………………………………………………....323

Materials and methods…………………………………………………....323 Results…………………………………………………………………...... 324 In-pack gas analysis…………………………………………….....324 Mixed fruit combinations (%)……………………….…………....326 Drip-loss levels……………….………………………………….....327 General observations………………….………………………...... 328 Colorimetry…………….………………………………………...... 329 Percent soluble solids…………………………………………...... 330 Microbial enumeration…………………………………………....331 Sensory evaluation……………………………………………...…333 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...... 336

Appendix C: Supplementary Data for Chapter 2……………………………….....337

Appendix C.1 Supporting data for chapter 2.2 - Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using Principal component analysis………………...... 337

Appendix C.2 Supplementary data for Chapter 2.2: Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis II: effects of ripeness stage, seasonality, processing and packaging………………………...... 351

Abstract………………………………………………………………...... ….351

Materials and methods………………………………………………...... 352

Results…………………………………………………………………...... 352 Pineapple………………………………………………………...... 353

xix

Strawberry………………………………………………………...... 354 Kiwifruit………………………………………………………...... 355 Cantaloupe melon………………………………………………...... 356

Discussion………………………………………………….……………...... 357

Conclusion………………………………………………………………...... 358

Appendix D………………………………………………………………………..359

Product Specifications for Fresh-cut Fruit…………………………………360

Unit Operations in Fresh-cut Production…………………………………..362

Appendix D.1 Pineapple……………………………………………………363

Appendix D.2 Cantaloupe melon…………………………………………..367

Appendix D.3 Kiwifruit…………………………………………………….371

Appendix D.4 Strawberry…………………………………………………..374

REFERENCES………………………………………………………….....……...377

xx

List of Publications

Finnegan, E and O’Beirne, D. (2014a). “Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis I”. Submitted to Postharvest Biology and Technology (with revisions) August 2014.

Finnegan, E and O’Beirne, D. (2014b). ‘Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis II: Effects of ripeness stage, seasonality, processing and packaging’, Submitted to Postharvest Biology and Technology (with revisions) August 2014.

Finnegan, E. and O’Beirne. D. ‘Effects of controlled and modified atmosphere storage on the quality, sensorial, microbiological and phytochemical response of fresh-cut fruits’. In preparation for submission in Journal of Food Science.

Finnegan, E., Ryan, S., Kilcawley, K. and O’Beirne, D. ‘Volatile aromatic compound (VAC) changes in fresh-cut fruits: effects of cutting size and storage time’. In preparation for submission in Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry.

Finnegan, E., Mahajan, P.V., O’Connell, M., Francis, G.A. and O’Beirne, D. (2013). ‘Modelling of respiration in fresh-cut pineapple and prediction of gas permeability needs for optimum modified atmosphere packaging’, Accepted in Postharvest Biology and Technology, 79: 47-53.

xxi

Significant Achievements

List of Oral/ Poster Presentations

Finnegan, E. (2010). ‘Technology and Raw Material Quality to Underpin the Irish Fresh-cut Fruit Industry’, PhD Confirmation and Progression Seminar, Department of Life Sciences; Faculty of Science and Engineering, December 16th.

Francis, G., Finnegan, E. and O’Beirne, D. (2011). ‘Optimising the quality of fresh- cut fruits’, RELAY workshop entitled ‘Optimising Quality and Assuring Safety in Fresh-cut and Processed Fruit & Vegetables’, January 13th, University of Limerick.

Finnegan, E. (2011). ‘Technology and Raw Material Quality to Underpin the Irish Fresh-cut Fruit Industry’, A comprehensive project progress report presented to DAFM evaluators (July 7th).

Attended the 5th European Short Course entitled ‘Quality and Safety of Fresh-cut Produce’, Messedamm Fairgrounds, Berlin, Germany. February 6th-8th, 2012. http://www.freshplaza.com/article/93225/5th-edition-of-the-European-short- course-Quality-and-Safety-of-Fresh-cut-Produce

Finnegan, E. (2012). ‘Optimisation of Processing and Packaging Conditions for Fresh-cut Pineapple’, an abstract from a paper entitled ‘Modelling of respiration in fresh-cut pineapple and prediction of gas permeability needs for optimum modified atmosphere packaging’ presented to the Department of Life Sciences, Inaugural Research Day, Radisson Blu Hotel and Spa, May 3rd.

Attended the prestigious European Federation of Food Science and Technology (EFFoST) annual conference entitled ‘A lunchbox for tomorrow: An interactive combination of integrated analysis and specialized knowledge of food’, Le Corum, Montpellier, France. November 20th -23rd, 2012.

xxii

Finnegan, E., Mahajan, P.V., O’Connell, M. and O’Beirne, D. (2012). ‘Optimisation of Processing and Packaging Conditions for Fresh-cut Pineapple’, Poster presented at the EFFoST annual conference, Le Corum, Montpellier, France. November 22nd.

Finnegan, E. and O’Beirne, D. (2013). ‘Tracking Deterioration Patterns in Fresh-cut Fruits: Principal Component Analysis’, Abstract of the paper entitled “Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis” presented to the Department of Life Sciences, 2nd Annual Research Day, Radisson Blu Hotel and Spa, 17th May.

Finnegan, E., Ryan, S., Kilcawley, K.N. and O’Beirne, D. (2014). “Volatile aromatic compound changes in fresh-cut fruits: effects of storage time and cut size”. Paper presented to the Department of Life Sciences, 3rd Annual Research Day, Radisson Blu Hotel and Spa, 7th May.

xxiii

List of Tables

Chapter 1

Table 1.1 Fruit Content of Vitamins, Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) and Fibre adapted from Crujeiras et al., 2010: Nutritional value and phytochemical content of fruits, vegetables and legumes, In. Bioactive Foods in Promoting Health: Fruits and Vegetables………………………………………………………………...... …...16

Table 1.2 Fruit pigments, related colour and other constituents………….....……...17

Table 1.3 Microbiological guidelines for Fresh-cut Fruit (CFU/g) ……………...... 21

Table 1.4 Effects of Fresh-cut Processing on levels of Phytochemicals………...... 28

-1 -1 Table 1.5 Respiration rates (mg CO2 kg h ) for various fresh-cut fruits in air at various storage temperatures adapted from Gorny, (1998) ……………………...... 33

Table 1.6 Types of modified atmosphere packaging for fresh-cut produce…....…..42

Table 1.7 Recommended MA concentrations for different Fresh-cut Fruits…...... 43

Table 1.8 Variables used in MAP Design………………………………………...... 44

Table 1.9 Main advantages and limitations of the three methods of respiration rate measurement……………………………………………………………………...... 47

Table 1.10 MAP properties of PLA, PET and HDPE*………………………...... ….48

Table 1.11 Micro-perforation requirements for a typical fresh-cut fruit container……………………………………………………………………….....…52

Table 1.12 Specific maturity standards required for some fresh fruit commodities……………………………………………………………………...... 61

xxiv

Chapter 2.1

Table 2.1 Fruit types, cultivars/ variety, countries of origin and class used…….....78

Table 2.2 Intrinsic characteristics of intact fruit used…………………………...... 84

Table 2.3 Proportion of cumulative percentage variance and inertia for biplots construed for each fruit type and treatment………………………………………....85

Chapter 2.2

Table 2.4: Fruit types, cultivars/ variety, countries of origin and class used…...... 103

Table 2.5 Intrinsic characteristics of intact fruit………………………………...... 106

Table 2.6 Proportion of Cumulative Percentage Variance and Inertia for Biplots construed for each Fruit Type and Treatment…………………………………………...... 108

Chapter 3

Table 3.1 Fruit types, cultivars/ variety, countries of origin and class used…...... 140

Table 3.2 Controlled atmospheres (CA) and ranges of modified atmospheres (MA) developed within packs of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC…………………………………………...... 148

Table 3.3 Effect of controlled and modified atmospheres on colour indices of fresh- cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at

4OC……………………………………………………………………………...... 158

xxv

Table 3.4 Effects of controlled and modified atmosphere of percent soluble solids (SS%%), titratable acidity (%) and tissue pH of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. n = 18……………………...... 160

Chapter 4

Table 4.1 Physiochemical properties of fresh-cut fruits during 14 Days storage at

4OC……………………………………………………………………………...... 201

Table 4.2 Changes in volatile aromatic compound content (peak area) of fresh-cut pineapple during 14 Days storage at 4OC……………………………………....….203

Table 4.3 Changes in volatile aromatic compound content (peak area) of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon during 14 Days storage at 4OC……………………………...... 206

Table 4.4 Changes in volatile aromatic compound content (peak area) of fresh-cut kiwifruit during 14 Days storage at 4OC……………………...………………...... 209

Chapter 5

Table 5.1 Intrinsic characteristics (physiological age and seasonality) of intact fruits used in this study and their initial quality attributes……………………...... 243

Table 5.2 Intrinsic characteristics (origin and cultivar) of intact fruits used in this study and their initial quality attributes………………………………………....…244

Table 5.3 Product and package characteristics for fresh-cut pineapple………...... 251

Table 5.4 Effect of intrinsic characteristics on respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapples at 4°C………………………………………………………………...... 264

xxvi

Table 5.5 Effect of processing and extrinsic factors on respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple at 4°C………………………………………………………………...... 264

APPENDICES

Appendix B

Table B.1 Table of acceptable fruit varieties and their corresponding origins available to Irish processors……………………………...... ………………..….310

Table B.2 Sale of fresh-cut fruit in millions by geography; in the period from 2004-

2009…………………………………………………...……...... …………316

Table B.3 Illustrates forecasted sales of fresh-cut fruits per annum from 2011-2015 which shows a steady increase for Ireland……………………...... ……..316

Table B.4 Overall colour change (DE), browning (BI) and whitening (WI) index values for individual fresh-cut fruit pieces contained within a commercial mixed fruit pack during 7 Day storage at 4OC……………...... ……325

Appendix C

Table C.1 List of quality tests, corresponding PCA data abbreviations and number of experimental determinations (n) ……………………...... …..………337

Table C.2 Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of geographical origin on fresh-cut pineapple quality……………...... …………....338

Table C.3: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of ripeness stage and season on fresh-cut pineapple quality………...... …………..339

xxvii

Table C.4: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of cut size and dipping treatment on fresh-cut pineapple quality………...... ………..340

Table C.5: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of packaging film and temperature on fresh-cut pineapple quality………...... …..341

Table C.6: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of geographical origin and cultivar on fresh-cut strawberry quality………...... …342

Table C.7: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of physiological age and season on fresh-cut strawberry quality……..……...... ….343

Table C.8: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of packaging type and temperature on fresh-cut strawberry quality………...... …344

Table C.9: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of geographical origin on fresh-cut kiwifruit quality…………………...... …….....345

Table C.10: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of cut size and dipping treatments on fresh-cut kiwifruit quality………….…...... ……346

Table C.11: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of packaging type and temperature on fresh-cut kiwifruit quality…………...... ….347

Table C.12: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of geographical origin on fresh-cut cantaloupe melon quality………...... ……..….348

Table C.13: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of cut size and dipping treatment on fresh-cut cantaloupe melon quality……...... ……349

Table C.14: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of packaging type and temperature on fresh-cut cantaloupe melon quality…...... 350

xxviii

Appendix D

Table D.1 Ripeness Class and Characteristics (adapted from Produce Fact Sheets, UC Davis)…...... 368

xxix

List of Figures

Chapter 1

Figure 1.1 Minimal Processing – Diagrammatic Representation of a Typical

Industrial Fresh-cut Fruit Unit Operation……………………………………….....…6

Figure 1.2 Linolenic acid-derived flavour molecules. (Taken from, (El Hadi et al., 2013) ……………………………………………………………………………...... 14 Figure 1.3 The biosynthesis pathway of isoprenoids in plant cell. (Taken from, (El Hadi et al., 2013) ……………………………………………………………...... 15

Figure 1.4 Chemical structure of chlorophyll with the porphyrin ring shown in red with interchangeable R groups for chlorophyll a and b respectively. what is the role of chlorophyll? …………………………………………………………...... 18

Figure 1.5 Different categories of diet phytochemicals with bioactive (antioxidant) properties. (Adapted from, Blasa et al., 2010) ……………………...... 19

Figure 1.6 Spectrometrically measured signals of pigment mixtures (ATB, 2013) …………………………………………………………………………………….....19

Figure 1.7 (A) Fresh-cut golden delicious apples and (B) evidence of enzymatic browning after short period of time……………………………………………...... 23

Figure 1.8 The localisation of phenolic compounds and phenolic oxidising enzymes in a typical plant cell. POD: phenol peroxidase; PPO: polyphenol oxidase. (Taken from Toivonen et al, 2008) ……………………………………...... 24

Figure 1.9 Physiological age line for fruits; source: O’Beirne, (2009) ………....…31

Figure 1.10 The process of respiration (Cellular Respiration, 2013) …………...... 32

Figure 1.11 Postharvest Life of Fruit Commodities as a function of Respiration……………………………………………………………………….....33

Figure 1.12 Examples of novel fresh-cut fruit products…………………………....36

xxx

Figure 1.13 Schematic overview of the dominating mechanisms of fruit spoilage…………………………………………………………………………...... 38

Figure 1.14 Illustrates the optimum or equilibrium atmospheres for a variety of fresh-cut temperate, sub-tropical and tropical fruits. (Data was taken from Gorny, 2001 to manipulate a graphical representation of MA recommendations) …………………………………………………………………………………....…40

Figure 1.15 Simulated examples of changes in O2 and CO2 concentrations: Passive versus Active modification of packaged produce………………………...... 41

Figure 1.16 Basic principles of MAP; key: increasing CO2 production and decreasing O2 consumption; and exchange between product and package…………………………………………………………………………...... 43

Figure 1.17 Needle perforations on polymeric films: (a) Piercing with flap (b) Non- perforated appendix (c) Piercing with crater. (Taken from Danish Technological Institute of Packaging and Transport, 2008) ……………………...... 54

Figure 1.18 Hunter L*, a* and b* values as displayed using a colorimeter. Taken from Ohno, (2000) …………………………………………………….....…………58

Figure 1.19 Illustration of (a) the extraction process by headspace fibre SPME (b) thermal desorption in GC injection port with separation and (c) detection/ identification using MSD Chemstation (Adapted from Kataoka et al., 2000) ………………………………………………………………………………....……63

Figure 1.20 PDMS Stir Bar ‘Twister’ used for SBSE; Picture taken from: (davidcorcoran.com) …………………………………………………………....….63

Figure 1.21 Principal Component Analysis – Axis (PC) Interpretation…………………………………………………………………....…..68

Chapter 2

Figure 2.1(a) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of geographical origin and cultivar on quality evaluation attributes for (a) Fresh-cut Pineapple during 7 Days storage at 4OC…………………………………………………………………………...... ….88 xxxi

Figure 2.1(b) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of geographical origin and cultivar on quality evaluation attributes for (b) Fresh-cut Strawberry during 7 Days storage at 4OC……………………………………………………………………………...... 89

Figure 2.1(c) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of geographical origin and cultivar on quality evaluation attributes for (c) Fresh-cut Kiwifruit during 7 Days storage at 4OC…………………………………………………………………………...... ….90

Figure 2.1(d) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of geographical origin and cultivar on quality evaluation attributes for (d) Fresh-cut Cantaloupe melon during 7 Days storage at 4OC…………………………………………………………………....….91

Figure 2.2 Cutting sizes/shapes used in sample preparation of fresh-cut (a) Pineapple – 10mm, 25mm & 50mm; (b) Cantaloupe melon- 10mm, 25mm & 50mm and (c) 1 melon – 10mm, 25mm & 50mm; (d) Kiwifruit- /8, ¼ & ½, and (e) strawberry – halves…………………………………………………...... 105

Figure 2.3(a) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for three physiological ages and season during storage at 4OC for Fresh-cut pineapple………………………………………………………………………...... 110

Figure 2.3(bi) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for three physiological ages and season during storage at 4OC for Fresh-cut Strawberry Spring & Summer…………………………………………………...... 111

Figure 2.3(bii) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for three physiological ages and season during storage at 4OC for Fresh-cut Strawberry Autumn & Winter…………………………………………………...... 112

Figure 2.4(ai) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of cut size and dipping on quality evaluation attributes for un-dipped Fresh-cut Pineapple during 7 Day storage at 4OC……………………………………………………………………………...... 115

xxxii

Figure 2.4(aii) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of cut size and dipping on quality evaluation attributes for dipped Fresh-cut Pineapple during 7 Day storage at 4OC……………………………………………………………………………...... 116

Figure 2.4(bi) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of cut size and dipping on quality evaluation attributes for un-dipped Fresh-cut Kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC……………………………………………………………………………...... 117

Figure 2.4(bii) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of cut size and dipping on quality evaluation attributes for un-dipped Fresh-cut Kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC……………………………………………………………………………...... 118

Figure 2.4(ci) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of cut size and dipping on quality evaluation attributes for un-dipped -cut Cantaloupe melon during 7 Day storage at 4OC……………………………………………………………………………...... 119

Figure 2.4(cii) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of cut size and dipping on quality evaluation attributes for dipped Fresh-cut Cantaloupe melon during 7Day storage at 4OC…………………………………………………………………………...... 120

Figure 2.5(a) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for five packaging treatments across two temperatures during storage for Fresh-cut Pineapple……………………………………………………………………...... 123

Figure 2.5(bi) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for five packaging treatments during storage at 4OC for Fresh-cut Strawberry……………………………………………………………………....…124

Figure 2.5(bii) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for five packaging treatments during storage at 8OC for Fresh-cut Strawberry………………………………………………………………………....125

xxxiii

Figure 2.5(ci) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for five packaging treatments during storage at 4OC for Fresh-cut Kiwifruit………………………………………………………………………...... 126

Figure 2.5(cii) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for five packaging treatments during storage at 8OC for Fresh-cut Kiwifruit………………………………………………………………………...... 127

Figure 2.5(di) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for five packaging treatments during storage at 4OC for Fresh-cut Cantaloupe melon……………………………………………………………………………....128

Figure 2.5(dii) Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for five packaging treatments during storage at 8OC for Fresh-cut Cantaloupe melon…………………………………………………………………………....…129

Chapter 3

Figure 3.1 Cutting sizes used in Sample Preparation and Experimental Setup of Fresh-cut (a) Pineapple –25mm, (b) Cantaloupe melon- 25mm and (c) Kiwifruit (¼)……………………………………………………………………………....…141

Figure 3.2: Illustration of inoculation procedure used for fresh-cut fruits….....….144

Figure 3.3 Changes in in-pack oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) of modified atmosphere packaged fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit O during storage in Air, 5%O2+5%CO2 and 97%N2+3%O2 for 7 days at 4 C. The values are means for 6 determinations, separated by Fisher’s Least Significant

Difference (LSD) (p<0.05). Error bars show SD. In-pack O2, continuous lines, descending; in-pack CO2, broken lines, ascending…………...... 150

Figure 3.4 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on drip-loss levels within packs of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during storage at 4OC. Broken red line (average fresh-cut drip-loss). Values are

xxxiv means for 6 determinations separated by Fisher’s LSD. Error bars show ± SD………………………………………………………………………...... 152

Figure 3.5 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on percentage weight loss within packs of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during storage at 4OC. Broken red line (maximum loss allowed). Values are means for 6 determinations separated by Fisher’s LSD and error bars showing ± SD. Columns with the same asterisk/ letters are not significantly different (p>0.05); where, NS (not significant), * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001) ………………………………………………………...... 153

Figure 3.6 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on firmness levels (N) of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Broken red line (average firmness fresh-cut). Values are means for 12 determinations separated by Fisher’s LSD. Error bars showing ± SD……………………………………………………………...... 155

Figure 3.7 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on the extent of colour change (ΔΕ Lab) of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Broken red line (>6; obvious colour change). Values are means for 24 determinations separated by Fisher’s LSD with error bars showing ± SD………………………………………………………...... 157

Figure 3.8 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on sugar/ acid ratio values of (a) fresh-cut pineapple, (b) cantaloupe-melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. The values are means for 12 determinations, separated by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) (p<0.05). Error bars show SD. Broken red line denotes average Fresh-cut (Day 0) value…………...... 161

Figure 3.9 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on overall acceptability scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0) ……………...... 163

Figure 3.10 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the visual appearance scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0) ……………...... 164

xxxv

Figure 3.11 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the colour scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0) …………………………………...... ….166

Figure 3.12 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the aroma scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0) ……………………………………...... 168

Figure 3.13 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the off-odour scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0) …………………………………....….169

Figure 3.14 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the firmness of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0) ……………………………………...... 170

Figure 3.15 Effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on total bacterial counts (TBCs) of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Continuous line (CA); dashed line (MA). Dashed horizontal red line (maximum TVC limit: 7 log CFU g-1) ……………………………………………………...... 172

Figure 3.16 Effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on survival and growth of Listeria (L.) innocua on fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Continuous line (CA); dashed line (MA) ………………...... 173

Figure 3.17 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmosphere on total carotenoids(µg g-1) in fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b), cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Vertical dashed red line (average fresh-cut TC concentration µg g-1) …………………………………………………………………………………...... 175

xxxvi

Figure 3.18 Effects of atmospheres on total phenolics, gallic acid equivalent (GAE) on a fresh weight basis (mg 100g-1) in fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Vertical dashed red line (average fresh-cut PC concentration 100g-1 FW) ……………………………………………………...... 177

Figure 3.19 Effects of atmospheres on total antioxidant activity (mg 100g-1) in fresh- cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Vertical dashed red line (average fresh-cut ARP concentration mg 100g-1 FW) …………………...... 178

Chapter 4

Figure 4.1 Cutting sizes used in Sample Preparation and Experimental Setup of Fresh-cut (a) Pineapple – 10mm; 25mm and 50mm, (b) Cantaloupe melon- 10mm;

25mm & 50mm and (c) Kiwifruit- ⅛ , ¼ and ½………………………...... 194

Figure 4.2 Changes in in-pack headspace oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations of packaged Fresh-cut (a) Pineapple, (b) Cantaloupe melon and (c) Kiwifruit as affected by cutting size during storage (14 Days) at 4OC. The values are means for four determinations, separated by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference

(LSD) (p<0.05). Error bars show ±SD. In-pack O2, continuous lines, descending; in- pack CO2, broken lines, ascending……………………………...... 200

Figure 4.3 Principal Component Analysis: Loadings (a) and Scores (b) of the volatile aroma compounds for the biplot generated for fresh-cut pineapple stored for 0, 1 4, 7 and 14 days at 4OC………………………………………………...... …215

Figure 4.4 Principal Component Analysis: Loadings (a) and Scores (b) of the volatile aroma compounds for the biplot generated for fresh-cut cantaloupe melon stored for 0, 1 4, 7 and 14 days at 4OC………………………………………....….218

Figure 4.5 Principal Component Analysis: Loadings (a) and Scores (b) of the volatile aroma compounds for the biplot generated for fresh-cut kiwifruit stored for 0, 1 4, 7 and 14 days at 4OC…………………………………………………...... 221

xxxvii

Chapter 5

Figure 5.1 Cutting sizes/shapes used in sample preparation of fresh-cut (a) Pineapple – 10mm, 25mm & 50mm; (b) Cantaloupe melon- 10mm, 25mm & 50mm and (c) 1 Honeydew melon – 10mm, 25mm & 50mm; (d) Kiwifruit- ½, ¼ & /8, (e) strawberry – whole with stem, whole without stem, halves & slices (approx. 4/ berry); (f) orange – segment; (g) – red and green apple – wedges (16/fruit) and (h) red and green grape – whole (de-stemmed) …………………...... 245

Figure 5.2 Flow-through respirometer apparatus (Barry-Ryan, 1996) ………...... 247

Figure 5.3 Packaging systems used for package simulation and validation (a) macroscopic holes in combination with polymeric film; (b) non-perforated lidding film; (c) impermeable clamshell container and (d) pillow-pouch package. Black and red arrows illustrate O2 and CO2 movement respectively…………………...... 250

Figure 5.4 Effects of raw material type on respiration rate (RCO2) of (a) Climacteric and (b) Non- Climacteric fresh-cut fruits stored in air at 4OC. Values are means for three determinations ± SD (error bars) separated by Fisher’s LSD (p<0.05). Chunks (25mm) ……………………………………………………...... 252

Figure 5.5 Effects of physiological age and season on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple cv DelMonte Gold Extra Sweet (MD2) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD. UR (under-ripe), R (ripe) and OR (over-ripe) ………………………...... …….253

Figure 5.6 Effects of country of origin on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple cv MD2 stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for four determinations ± SD………………………………………...... 254

Figure 5.7 Effects of cut blade sharpness on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple cv DelMonte Gold Extra Sweet (MD2) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD……………………………………………………………………………….....255

Figure 5.8 Effects of cut size and dipping treatment on the initial (Ri) and steady- state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple cv DelMonte Gold Extra Sweet (MD2) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD……………………………………………………………………………….....255

xxxviii

Figure 5.9 Effects of physiological age and season on the initial (Ri) and steady-state O (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut strawberry cv El Santa (Irish) stored in air at 4 C for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD………………...... 256

Figure 5.10 Effects of cultivar and country of origin on the initial (Ri) and steady- state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut strawberry stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD……………………………....….257

Figure 5.11 Effects of cutting and season on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut strawberry cv El Santa (Irish) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD………………………….....258

Figure 5.12 Effects of origin, cut size and dipping treatment (1% ascorbic acid + 1% citric acid) on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut Italian and New Zealand kiwifruit stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD. D (dipped), UD (un-dipped) …………………...... 260

Figure 5.13 Effects of origin and cut size on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut honeydew melon stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD……………………………………...... ….260

Figure 5.14 Effects of cut size and origin on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD………………………………………...... 261

Figure 5.15 Typical changes in respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple chunks as a function of storage time and degree of physiological age (symbols: experimental values; line: predicted values) ………………………………………………....….263

Figure 5.16 Package gas simulations based on variability in respiration rate due extrinsic and intrinsic factors. The dotted lines shows the possible range of O2 and CO2 obtained based on respiration rate variability and continuous lines shows that without any variability in respiration rate……………………………………....…265

Figure 5.17 The effects of physiological age and seasonality on in-pack (a) oxygen and (b) carbon dioxide concentrations of fresh-cut pineapple chunks stored within a high barrier film at 4OC. Values are means for four determinations. Vertical lines represent ±SD. Key HB = high barrier film; UR = under ripe; R = ripe; OR = over ripe; Aut = Autumn season; Sum = Summer season; continuous line, descending (O2) dashed line, ascending (CO2) …………………………...... 265

xxxix

Figure 5.18 The effects of cut size and dipping treatment (1%AA:CA) on in-pack oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of packaging of fresh-cut pineapple chunks stored within a high barrier film at 4OC. Values are means for four determinations. Vertical lines represent ±SD. Key: HB (high barrier film); AA (Ascorbic acid); CA (Citric acid); 10 (10mm), 25 (25mm) and 50 (50mm) cut sizes;

UD (un-dipped) and D (dipped); continuous line, descending (O2), dashed line, ascending (CO2) ………………………………………………………...... …..266

Figure 5.19 In-pack gas atmosphere validation of fresh-cut pineapple packs at 4OC. 25mm cut piece size. shows the EMA time (approx. 2.5 days for optimised packs). highlights the near optimum O2 and CO2 range attained by optimised packs on Day 7. Continuous line, descending (O2), dashed line, ascending

(CO2) …………………………………………………………...... 268

APPENDICES

Appendix A

Appendix A.1 Copy of Ethics Approval Certificate………………....…….……..290

Figure A.1 Percentage of “Fresh-cut” fruits recognised by respondents. (n=90) …………………………………………………………………………....………..299

Figure A.2 Fresh Fruit consumption patterns (n=100) ………………....………..300

Figure A.3 Percentage frequency of purchases of Fresh-cut Fruits (n=99) ………………………………………………………………………………....…..300

Figure A.4 Potential barriers for consumers when purchasing fresh-cut fruits. (n=70) ………………………………………………………………………...... …..301

Figure A.5 Preferred and regular sources of information regarding food products……………………………………………………………………....……303

Figure A.6 Factors influencing decisions to purchase fresh-cut fruits (n=82) ………………………………………………………………………………....…..304

Figure A.7 Overall satisfaction rating of fresh-cut product (n=83) …………...... 305

xl

Appendix B

Figure B.1 Food Pyramid Concepts 1980 (a) and 2012 (b) …………………...... 311

Figure B.2: The 5-a-day logos present on some Marks and Spencer branded foods………………………………………………………………………....…….313

Figure B.3 Estimated worldwide market shares for fresh-cut fruit products in 2003 Source: Purdue New Ventures 2005……………………………………...... 313

Figure B.4 In-pack gas atmosphere concentration ranges (O2 and CO2) for selected commercial fresh-cut fruit packs from different multiples…………...... …323

Figure B.5 Product per package volume……………………………………....….323

Figure B.6 In-pack O2 and CO2 concentrations for selected commercial fresh-cut fruit packs……………………………………………………………………....….324

Figure B.7 Fresh-cut fruit combinations* (%) from fresh fruit salad packs (a) Dunnes Stores Classic Fruit Salad, (b) Tesco Tutti Fruitti Collection, (c) SuperValu Fruit Salad Mix and (d) Marks and Spencer Classic Fruit Salad…………………………………………………………………………....….325

Figure B.8 Drip-loss volumes in a variety of individual and mixed fresh-cut fruit salad packs……………………………………………………………………...... 326

Figure B.9 Percent soluble solids for individual fresh-cut fruit pieces within a mixed commercial fresh fruit salad package…………………………………...... …329

Figure B.10 Effects of packaging on (a) Mesophilic Counts, (b) Psychrophilic Counts, (c) Lactic Acid Bacteria Counts & (d) Yeast and Mould Counts for commercially prepared fresh fruit salad over 7 days storage at 4OC…………...... 330

Figure B.11 Sensory evaluation scores for individual fresh-cut fruits within a commercial mixed fruit salad pack. (a) visual appearance, (b) colour, (c) overall acceptability, (d) aroma, (e) off-odour and (f) firmness………………....…...... 332

Figure B.12 Selection of commercial fresh-cut fruit products available in Irish supermarkets………………………………………………………………….....…335

xli

Appendix C

Figure C.1 Effects of packaging type and temperature on in-pack (a) O2 and (b) CO2 concentrations of fresh-cut pineapple stored for 7 Days…………………...... 353

Figure C.2 Effects of packaging type and temperature on in-pack (a) O2 and (b) CO2 concentrations of fresh-cut strawberry halves stored for 7 Days…………...... 354

Figure C.3 Effects of packaging type and temperature on in-pack (a) O2 and (b) CO2 concentrations of fresh-cut kiwifruit stored for 7 Days…………………...... 355

Figure C.4 Effects of packaging type and temperature on in-pack (a) O2 and (b) CO2 concentrations of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon stored for 7 Days…………...... 356

Appendix D

Figure D.1 Generic Process Flow Diagram identifying suggested Critical Control Points (CCPs) for RTE fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables…………………………..362

Figure D.2 Cross-sectional view of pineapple plant………………………………364

Figure D.3 Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Unit Processing for Pineapples………………………………………………………………………….365

Figure D.4 Cross-Sectional View of Cantaloupe Melon………………………….367

Figure D.5 Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Operations, Production Practices and Risk Factors in Microbial Food Safety of Fresh and Fresh- cut Cantaloupe Melon……………………………………………………………...369

Figure D.6 Mid-cross Sectional View of Kiwifruit……………………………….371

Figure D.7 Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Operations, Production Practices and Risk Factors in Microbial Food Safety of Fresh and Fresh- cut Kiwifruit………………………………………………………………………..372

Figure D.8 Cross sectional view of strawberry……………………………………374

Figure D.9 Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Operations, Production Practices and Risk Factors in Microbial Food Safety of Fresh and Fresh-cut Strawberry Fruit……………………………………………………………………375

xlii

List of Equations

Equation 1.1 Steady-state O2 in a MAP system containing a respiring product……………………………………………………………………………....45

Equation 1.2 Steady-state CO2 in a MAP system containing a respiring product…………………………………………………………………………....…45

Equation 1.3 Estimation of respiration rate (O2 consumed) in a closed system…………………………………………………………………………....….46

Equation 1.4 Estimation of respiration rate (CO2 produced) in a closed system…………………………………………………………………………....….46

Equation 1.5 Arrhenius O2 permeability coefficient model…………….…….....…50

Equation 1.6 Arrhenius CO2 permeability coefficient model…………..……...... …50

Equation 1.7 Total permeation in a MAP system……………………………...... …53

Equation 1.8 Fick’s Law – Diffusive flux (O2) ………………………..……...... …53

Equation 1.9 Fick’s Law – Diffusive flux (CO2) …………………………...... …53

Equation 1.10 Percent weight loss…………………………………………...... ….79

Equation 1.11 Browning index………………………………………………...... …80

Equation 1.12 Whitening index…………………………………………..…...... ….80

Equation 1.13 Chromaticity equation………………………………………...... 80

Equation 1.14 Hue angle equation……………………………..…….………...... 80

Equation 1.15 Delta E (colour change) equation……………………………..….....80

Equation 1.16 Chlorophyll α equation………………………………………….....147

Equation 1.17 Chlorophyll β equation………………………………………….....147

Equation 1.18 Total carotenoids equation……………………………………...... 147

Equation 1.19 Equation for rate of respiration as a function of CO2 using a flow- through system…………………………………………………………………...... 247 xliii

Equation 1.20 Differential mass balance equations describing O2 change inside a package containing a respiring product…………………………………………....248

Equation 1.21 Differential mass balance equations describing CO2 change inside a package containing a respiring product………………………………………...... 248

Equation 1.22 Equation for the calculation of O2 permeability to produce optimum in-pack O2 concentration (OTR) ……………………………………...... 249

Equation 1.23 Equation for the calculation of CO2 permeability to produce optimum in-pack CO2 concentration (CTR).…………………………………...... 249

Equation 1.24 Exponential decay model………………………………….....……262

Equation 1.25 Exponential decay model continued…………………………....…262

Equation 1.26 Gas transfer coefficient equation for O2 through perforations……………………………………………………………………...... 267

Equation 1.27 Gas transfer coefficient equation for CO2 through perforations……………………………………………………………………...... 267

Equation 1.28 Total permeation………………………………………………...... 267

Equation 1.29 Equation for calculating the number of perforations required for a

MAP system considering O2 diffusion………………………………………….....267

Equation 1.30 Equation for calculating the number of perforations required for a

MAP system considering CO2 diffusion………………………………………...... 267

xliv

List of Abbreviations/ Acronyms

% Percent %SS Percent soluble solids & And β Beta βs Selectivity 3Z, 2E-EI 3Z, 2E-enal isomerase A Surface area, m2 AA Ascorbic acid AAT Alcohol actyltransferase ABTS 2,2’-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6 sulfonic acid ACC 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate ADH Alcohol dehydrogenase AEDA Aroma extract dilution analysis AER Alkenal oxidoreductase ALDH Aldehyde dehydrogenase ANOVA Analysis of variance AOC Allene oxide cyclise AOS Allene oxide synthase atm atmosphere Aut Autumn

C2H4 Ethylene CA Citric acid CA Controlled atmosphere Ca2+ Calcium ion CCDs Carotenoid cleavage dehydrogenase CCP Critical Control Point CFU colony forming units CHARM Combined hedonic aroma response measurement CI Chilling injury CL Climacteric cm centimetres cm2 centimetre squared cm3 centimetre cubed

CO2 Carbon dioxide Co-A Co-enzyme A CS Clamshell container CTR carbon dioxide transmission rate DMAPP Dimethylallyl diphosphate DMFH 2,5, dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone DXP 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate DXR DXP reductoisomerase

xlv

DXS DXP synthase e external EB Enzymatic browning ECK Extended Craft Knife EMA Equilibrium modified atmosphere EXP exponential FAD Flavinadenine dinucleotide FAO Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations FC Fresh-cut FCF Fresh-cut fruit FFA Free fatty acids FPP Farnesyl diphosphate FSAI Food Safety Authority of Ireland FW Fresh weight g G force g Gram G3P Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate GAP Good agricultural practices GC-MS Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry GGPP Geranyl geranyl diphosphate GMP Good manufacturing practices GPP Geranyl diphosphate HACCP Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point HB high barrier film HDPE High density polyethylene HMGR HMG-Co-A reductase HPL Hydroperoxide lyase hr hour HS-SBSE Headspace-SBSE HS-SPME Headspace-SPME INDI Irish Nutrition and Dietetic Institute IPP Isopentyl diphosphate JMT Jasmonate methyltransferase kg kilogram L Thickness, m LAB Lactic acid bacteria LDPE Low density polyethylene Log logarithm LOx Lipoxygenase LOX Lipid oxidation LSA Listeria selective agar LSD Least significant difference M mass, kg MA Modified atmosphere xlvi

MAP Modified atmosphere packaging MEA Malt extract agar MEP Methylerthritol phosphate mg Milligram mg/L Milligram/Litre µg Microgram min Minute ml Millilitre µl Microlitre mm Millimetre µm Micrometre MVA Mevalonic acid N Newtons N number of data

N2 Nitrogen NAD Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide NaOH sodium hydroxide NCL Non-Climacteric NCTC National Collection of Type Cultures NHS National Health Service NIF Nasal Impact Frequency OAV Odour Activity Value

O2 Oxygen OC Degrees Celsius OPP Oriented polypropylene OPR 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid reductase OR Over-ripe OTR oxygen transmission rate P Probe P Permeability coefficient PA Perforated OPP PAL Phenylalanine ammonia lyase PBS Phosphate buffer solution PC (I & II) Principal component (axis I & II) PCA Plate count agar PCA Principal component analysis PDMS Polydimethylsiloxane PE Pectinesterase (pectinase) PET Polyethylene terephtaleate PG Polygalactauronase PL Pectic lyase PLA Polylactic acid PLD Phospholipase-D

xlvii

PMA Product modified atmosphere PMAP Passive modified atmosphere packaging

Pmax Maximum probe firmness, N Pmin Minimum probe firmness, N POx Peroxidase PP Polypropylene PPO Polyphenol oxidase PVC Polyvinyl chloride R Ripe -1 -1 RCO2 Respiration rate ml. CO2. kg hr

Req RCO2 at equilibrium RH Relative humidity

Ri RCO2 increase ROS Radical oxygen scavenging

Rp RCO2 peak rpm Revolutions per minute RQ Respiratory quotient RR Respiration rate (consumption/ production) m3. kg-1. hr-1 RTE Ready-to-eat S/A Sugar acid ratio SBSE Stir bar sorptive extraction SD Standard deviation SHA Static headspace analysis SL Shelf-life

Smax Maximum probe firmness, N Smin Minimum probe firmness, N SNIF Surface nasal impact frequency Sp Spring SPME Solid-phase micro-extraction Sum Summer T temperature t time TA Titratable acidity, citric acid equivalents TAA Total antioxidant activity TBCs Total bacterial counts TC Total carotenoids TEAC Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity TP Total phenolics TRAP Total radical-trapping antioxidant power TSA Tryptone soya agar TSB Tryptone soya broth UR Under-ripe VAC Volatile aromatic compounds

Vf Free volume xlviii

WHO World Health Organisation Win Winter Y Volumetric concentration, % v/v

Important definitions

The following definitions are applicable throughout this thesis:

 Fresh fruit: fresh produce that is likely to be sold to consumers in an unprocessed or intact form.

 Fresh-cut fruit: fruits that have been trimmed and/or peeled and/or cut into 100% usable product that is bagged or pre-packaged and stored at refrigeration temperatures.

 Food Quality: the totality of features and characteristics of a particular product that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.

 Deterioration: a series of cumulative, continuous deteriorative changes occurring in a food system over time which may affect the products wholesomeness, result in a reduction of its quality, and/or alter its serviceability and market appeal.

 Food Safety: assurance that food will not cause harm to the consumer when it is prepared and/or consumed according to its intended use.

 Microorganism: includes bacteria and fungi (yeasts and moulds).

 Pathogen: microorganism capable of causing disease or injury in humans, animals or plants.

 Phytochemical: refers to a wide variety of compounds, typically plant based, which exhibit various beneficial properties in humans.

xlix

l

Acknowledgements

 Firstly, my extended and most sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Professor David O’Beirne, for the invaluable opportunities and allowing me to undertake this Ph.D. Your constructive support and guidance throughout the duration of my studies I value deeply. I learned so much. Thank you for everything you have done for me over the past five years. Enjoy your deserving retirement!  I would like to acknowledge the Irish Government under the framework of the Food Institutional Research Measure (08/R&D/UL661) managed by the Department of Agriculture Food and Marine for financial support in funding my research.  I would like to extend a special thank you to Dr. Pramod Mahajan and Dr. Kieran Kilcawley for the wealth of opportunities and advice bestowed onto me and to Dr. Gillian Francis for her valued insight during the initial stages of my research.  Many thanks to all the technical staff and lecturers in the Life Sciences Department; in particular, Valerie, for assisting me in my research in some way shape or form.  To all my friends, in the department and beyond (undergraduates, postgraduates and postdoctorates alike), especially Tara, Roseanne & Alan. I will always treasure the friendship, support and memories we built and shared during our eight/nine years together. I couldn’t have done this without you. Be happy   To the newbies; Bryan, Giovanna, Thanya, Celia, Guo, Adriana, Maria, Dani, Jonay, Eva, and especially Charlie Piggott for the company, emails, banter, nights out and much more that I will never forget. Go raibh míle maith agaibh!  Special thanks must go the Foodies (you know who you are)! Let us never forget where it all started and how it all began…  To the amazing Finnegan and Rourke clans; my wonderful parents Kathleen and Michael, for providing constant love and support and continuously encouraging me to attain the greatest gift of all, education. I will never know stronger persons.  To my sisters, Kellie (& bump) and Áinne… What can I say only your over qualified chef ‘may have’ finally finished school   To Seamus and Sharon (& Floss), thank you for putting up with my antics, for allowing me to slowly take over your house and reside at your kitchen table for the last 4 years. It’s all ahead of you Sharon  I hope you enjoy the read! To SNÓrla, for all the well needed distractions and for making me laugh when I needed to most.  And finally, my biggest thank you of all to David Rourke; for just being you. I wouldn’t be who I am today without you! Here’s to the next chapter(s) xxx

li

lii

“Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments.

The future, for which I have really worked, is mine”

Nikola Tesla

1856-1943

liii

liv

Chapter 1

Review of Literature

2

Chapter 1

Introduction

The minimal processing of fruits, more commonly referred to as “fresh-cut” fruits, is a state-of-the-art technology by which a variety of temperate, tropical and sub- tropical fruits can be made available in ready-to-eat form. In recent years, the fresh- cut market has grown exponentially worldwide due to consumer demands for healthier, nutritious and convenient products (Euromonitor, 2012; Rabobank, 2009; Rößle, 2009).

Dietary guidelines have led to a worldwide increase in consumption of fresh fruits as key sources of vitamins, minerals, antioxidants and dietary fibre. The impetus behind this growth has been the increase in consumer awareness of health issues such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer and obesity, and a demand for preservative-free fresh products with maximum convenience, requiring minimum preparation. As a result, fresh-cut fruit products are therefore considered a valued addition to the marketplace (Ragaert et al., 2004; Willcox et al., 2004; Varoquaux and Mazollier, 2002).

Consumers expect fresh-cut fruit to be without defects, have good sensory appeal and nutritional quality and have exceptional shelf-life, and be microbiologically safe (Watada and Qi, 1999). However, while EU markets (UK, Germany, Spain and Italy) have seen significant growth over the last decade (Appendix B.2), the Irish market has yet to reach the same level of success (Euromonitor, 2012). Rapid introduction of this technology has led to significant knowledge gaps leading to poor, unfavourable, inconsistent end-product quality. These gaps in particular relate to selection of suitable raw materials, optimum processing and packaging techniques and storage conditions.

3

1.1. Fresh-cut fruit

The USDA & FDA define fresh minimally-processed of fresh-cut fruit products as fruits and vegetables that have been freshly cut, washed, packaged and maintained with refrigeration (Beaulieu and Gorny., 2004). The International fresh-cut produce association defines a fresh-cut product as fruits or vegetables that have been trimmed and/or peeled and/or cut into 100% usable product that is bagged or pre-packaged to offer consumers high nutrition, convenience and flavour while still maintaining freshness (Fresh Cut Fruit Europe, 2006).

Fresh-cut fruit commodities, have a relatively shorter shelf life than their whole or intact counterparts as removal of the epidermis and subsequent slicing increases respiration rate, leaving the fresh-cut flesh less resistant to oxidative and enzymatic browning and allowing entry of bacteria (Wiley, 1994). These fruits become highly perishable, with a shelf-life as short as 1-3 days at chill temperatures (Ahvenainen, 1996). Ideally, the shelf-life of fresh-cut fruit should be at least 4-7 days under correct storage conditions, however, in today’s market place, consumers in the catering industry seek some products with sustained shelf-life of up to 21 days, depending on the product (Wiley, 1994).

While conventional food processing methods may extend the shelf-life (SL) of intact fruit and vegetables, fresh-cut processing renders fruits (more so than vegetables) highly perishable, requiring refrigerated storage to ensure adequate SL. Among the limitations of SL of fresh-cut fruits are: discolouration (browning, whitening, and translucency), firmness changes (increased softening, moisture loss and cellular damage), and development of off-flavour, odours and microbial spoilage.

4

Chapter 1

1.2. Fresh-cut fruit processing Fresh-cut processing (Figure 1.1) is the term used to describe non-thermal technologies used to process food in a manner which retains much of the fresh-like characteristic of the processed commodity (Manvell, 1997). It serves two purposes; (1) to retain freshness and (2) to ensure an adequate shelf-life sufficient to make distribution feasible within the region of consumption (Ahvenainen, 2000).

1.2.1. Raw materials

A critical factor in producing a high quality end product is the initial quality of the raw material. Raw materials of optimal quality are not always available due to season, distribution limitations and other reasons. The level of maturity and ripeness are important factors to be considered. A major problem for processors is that the optimal ripeness for harvesting is not always the optimum ripeness for processing (Beaulieu and Gorny 2004).

1.2.2. Quality control

A detailed product specification for problematic fruits of interest (previously identified in Appendix B.3) is outlined in Appendix D. Initial inspection of produce will eliminate any fruit which are not fit for use. In some cases, processors allow for some tolerance i.e.: 10% on bruises or scars per of particular fruits. Fruit normally has to be free from all visible contamination by dust and spray residue. All batches must be of uniform colour with no unusual discolouration i.e.: Granny Smith apples must be uniformly green with no pale or patchy coloured fruit. For some fruits e.g. strawberries the calyx and stalks may be permitted however; for other fruits (such as mangoes) the stalk must not be present. Fruit size is also a factor, with whole strawberries, for example, of 15-25mm in diameter being acceptable for processing.

5

(1) RAW MATERIALS

(Generally trimmed and washed before being received)

(2) QUALITY CONTROL

CONTROL

(3) PRE-COOLING IN COLD STORAGE

(4) WASHING & (5) PEELING, CORING (6) INSPECTION

DISINFECTION &/OR DE-SEEDING

(7) SIZE REDUCTION

(a) ANTI-MICROBIAL AGENTS

(8) RINSED &/OR (b) ANTI-BROWNING DIPPING AGENTS TREATMENT (c) TEXTURE PRESERVATIVES

(9) DRYING (SPIN OR AIR)

(10) PACKAGING

(11) REFRIGERATED STORAGE (3-5OC)

Figure 1.1 Minimal Processing – Diagrammatic Representation of a Typical Industrial Fresh-cut Fruit Unit Operation.

6

Chapter 1

1.2.3. Pre-cooling and preliminary washing

When fruit arrives at the processing site, it is transferred into holding tanks with overhead sprayers to wash and clean away any residual field dust or contamination during transport. Washing can be effectively carried out with untreated water at 5OC (Ahvenainen, 2000). However, the water nowadays may contain a mild sanitiser such as chlorine. Once the cooled fruit enters the cold chain it should not be allowed heat up again. After pre-cooling/ washing, the fruit is passed through a drying tunnel that removes excess water.

1.2.4. Peeling and/or deseeding

Peeling and/or deseeding is dependent on the nature of the raw material. Generally, hand processing is preferred for fresh-cut fruits because of the diversity of fruit shape, size and their sensitivity to damage. However, in large industrial scale practices there are several other peeling methods such as mechanical, chemical and high pressure steam peelers. Mechanical peeling is commonly used for more robust fruits such as apples and oranges, accomplished by subjecting the fruit to a device operating on the principle of a lathe. The fruit is mounted between spikes with one or more fixed rotating blades being brought to the periphery of the fruit in order to initiate manual peeling (FAO, 2010). During high pressure or flush steam peeling, the surface of the fruit, for example pineapple, is generally heated by high pressure stem (1.5MPa) in a rotating pressure vessel. The skin is subsequently removed by release of this pressure causing steam to form under the peel and surface of the fruit (Saravacos et al., 2002; Fellows, 2000; Brâna et al., 1997).

However, removal of the outer epidermal layer of most fruits causes damage to underlying cells which release intracellular enzymes (oxidases, peroxidises and proteases etc), which can affect the flavour, colour and texture of the fruit (Watada, 1996). Cellular sap released in addition to the increased surface area, can also give support to microbial growth. Peeling increases respiration rate and C2H4 induced biosynthesis which for some fruits can accelerate senescence (Abeles, 1992) so is avoided where possible. Furthermore, many authors have reported the development of strange tastes due to the aggressive peeling methods used (Ben-Shalom et al.,

7

1986; Coll, 1996). Therefore, in view of these circumstances, it is quite interesting to consider enzymatic peeling as a novel method. During this technique, enzymatic preparations of polygalactonurase (EC 3.2.1.15), pectin lyase (EC 4.2.2.10) and cellulase (EC 3.2.1.4) which have degradative activities on the structural polysaccharides in the cell wall are employed (Ros et al., 1996). The selection and combination of these enzyme preparations are heterogeneous mixtures of pectinases, hemiceullilases (EC 3.2.1.8) whose activity is the degradation of the cell wall is particularly influenced by temperature and pH (Prakash et al., 2001; Pagan et al., 2005; Pretel et al., 2008).

1.2.5. Size reduction

Fresh-cut processing may involve slicing, shredding or dicing of fruit in order to render them RTE. Prepared fruits are more susceptible to spoilage than their whole counterparts. Cutting of produce destroys internal compartmentation (Artés et al, 2007). Exposing more surface area induces a higher dehydration rate and consequently a greater weight loss. Varoquaux (1991) showed that kiwifruit slices lost 50% of their internal firmness in less than 2 days when stored at 2OC. It was suggested that this integrity loss was due to the enzymatic hydrolysis of cell wall components released due to processing. Furthermore, the surfaces of cut produce can become sites of microbial growth. Therefore peeling and/ or size reduction should be performed with blades that are as sharp as possible, thus reducing the extent of damage to cells, maintaining the cellular integrity and avoiding loss of internal fluids. A study by Bolin & Huxsoll (1991b) showed that slicing with a sharp blade was much more superior to slicing with a blunt blade and either chopping or slicing with a blunt blade as the shelf-life of lettuce was reduced, in some cases by 50%. Barry-Ryan and O’Beirne, 1998, concluded that a sharp blade compared to a blunt blade reduced microbial levels and off-odour development, and prolonged SL of fresh-cut carrots. Portela and Cantwell, 2001) determined that cutting melon pieces with a sharp rather than a blunt borer resulted in a longer shelf-life at 5ºC with notable improvements in colour quality (translucency).

Other novel techniques of minimal processing involve the use of high- pressure water to cut through the fruit, and immersion therapy, whereby the intact

8

Chapter 1 fruit is submerged in water so that turgor pressure is controlled (Allende et al., 2006; Ahvenainen, 1996).

1.2.6. Washing and/or post-cutting dipping treatments

Washing after slicing is an essential step for the removal of cellular sap and tissue debris from the cut surface. Hypochlorite, citric and ascorbic acid are commonly used to reduce microbial contamination and enzymatic browning of some produce. However, there is a strong desire by consumers for products with ‘clean labels’ in the marketplace. This is generally accepted in the EU as being the removal of chemical- sounding ingredients to create a simpler ingredient list that also includes natural- origin-sounding ingredients contributing to a healthier sounding product profile (Robin, 2010). Bearing that in mind, researchers are coming up with novel ways of treating products to accommodate this new market trend with essential oils from lemongrass, oregano and vanillin incorporated into edible coatings (from apple puree-alginate) (Rojas-Grau et al., 2007), animal products (e.g. lysozyme from eggs, milk) (Benkerroum, 2008; Cegielska-Radziejewska et al., 2008) and whey permeate (by-product from cheese industry) all with the potential as to act as microbial and sanitising agents (Ahmed et al., 2010). Furthermore, the recommended quantity of water to be used is 5-10L/kg of product before peeling/cutting and 3L/kg of product after (Ahvenainen, 2000). In addition, washing in flowing or bubbling water (agitated using a stream of air) is preferred over dipping. The turbulence permits the elimination of most foreign matter with much less bruising when compared to mechanical agitation (Dowling, 1991).

After washing/dipping, the excess moisture must be completely removed to reduce microbial spoilage. Drying methods such as draining and spinning are proposed, but care must be taken to avoid unnecessary damage to fruit tissue (Soliva- Fortuny et al, 2003).

1.2.7. Packaging and refrigerated storage

Generally, fresh-cut fruits are packaged in sealed packs/ containers within which modified atmospheres develop. Packs format diversification in recent times has led 9 to an increased demand for improved packaging technologies (see Section 1.6). In addition, these packs are maintained in refrigeration units at 0-4OC storage. There are two different classifications of refrigeration units used to display fresh-cut fruit products in supermarkets; (1) horizontal and (2) vertical. Horizontal units allow for the entire package to maintain a consistent temperature and therefore will not produce a great amount of condensation. Vertical units allow the outside of the package to be in direct contact with air in the supermarket which creates a perfect environment for the generation of condensation. However, in this situation, the most outside package(s) will experience the greatest condensation. Therefore, temperatures are not always optimum, with fluctuations between stores common place (Nunes et al., 2009).

1.3. Components of fresh-cut quality Quality is hard to define and normally exists as a combination of characteristics, often classified as external, internal and latent. External quality attributes refer to visual appearance and firmness. Internal characteristics are determined once a product is cut and/or eaten, and include aroma, taste and texture (mouth-feel). Latent characteristics are usually not determined visually (except where microbial spoilage occurs) and include wholesomeness and nutritional value.

1.3.1. Appearance

The appearance of fresh-cut fruit is a fundamental quality attribute for consumer acceptance and relates to size, shape, colour and glossiness (Kader, 2002). It also refers to cleanliness and the absence of defects which are directly related to spoilage. Fresh fruit defects include evidence of bruising/ crushing of pieces due to improper handling or mechanical damage (Martín-Belloso et al., 2007), shrivelling due to water loss, mushiness, sogginess or tissue softening, sliminess and water soaking due to ageing (Montero-Calderón et al., 2009) or colour changes due to enzymatic browning or other physiological disorders (Montero-Calderon et al., 2008). Microbial spoilage can also induce changes in visual appeal as a result of mould growth and package swelling due to the release of gases by bacteria (Kader, 1989).

10

Chapter 1

Acidulants and reducing agents such as citric and ascorbic acid respectively, are commonly used in the food industry to prevent polyphenoloxidase (PPO)-mediated cut-surface discoloration of fresh-cut apples. Ascorbic acid works by converting quinones (formed by PPO from phenolics) back to phenolic compounds. Unfortunately, once all the ascorbic acid is exhausted, PPO browning will proceed uninhibited. Usually used in combination with citric acid, it also reduces surface pH of commodities, further slowing browning.

1.3.2. Firmness

Firmness properties relating to texture play an important role in the quality of fresh- cut fruits (Cantwell and Portela, 1997; Abbey et al., 1988). A major problem for processors is the susceptibility of fresh-cut fruits to firmness loss during harvesting, handling and storage (DeEll et al., 1999; Soliva-Fortuny et al., 2003; Barrett et al., 2010). In fresh-cut fruit, these changes appear due to increased cellular decompartmentalisation as a consequence of processing (Sams, 1999). Softening in this instance is frequently attributed to enzymatic degradation of cell wall components (Vicente et al., 2007; Varoquaux et al., 1990) and by decreased turgor due to water loss. Calcium (Rico et al., 2007), pectin (Van Buren, 1979) and cellulose (McFeeters et al., 1984) are found in the intercellular region of fruits and are highly influenced by polygalactauronase (PG) and pectin methyl esterase (PE) activity (Prasanna et al., 2007).

However, fresh-cut fruit firmness can be maintained by application of calcium compounds such as calcium chloride (Ponting et al., 1971; 1972) which is attributed to the stabilisation of membrane systems and the formation of Ca-pectates, which increase rigidity of the middle portion and cell wall of the fruit (Grant et al., 1973; Jackman and Stanley, 1995b) thus inhibiting the degradation of the middle-lamella (Buescher and Hobson, 1982) and improving cell strength (Miganini et al., 1995). When combined with mild heat treatments allows the formation of COO- groups from the pectin content of fruits which make Ca2+ ions which form salt-bridge cross link making the cell wall less acceptable to the enzymes that cause softening (Kim et al., 1993; 1994).

11

1.3.3. Aroma and Taste Flavour quality is extremely complex and involves perception of the tastes and aromas which combine to deliver overall flavour. Flavour attributes arise from many sources including sugars (sweetness), organic acids (acidity), bitter compounds and astringency of phenolic compounds and tannins (bitterness). Aroma (and off-odour) attributes on the other-hand are the result of complex mixtures of a large number of volatile aromatic compounds (VACs), whose composition is specific to species and often to variety (El Hadi et al., 2013). Volatiles can be classified as primary or secondary compounds, indicating whether they were present in intact fruit tissue or produced as a result of tissue disruption (El Hadi et al., 2013). They may emanate from either intact or disrupted fruit tissues and influence the aroma profiles and aroma perception. These compounds are a volatile mix of esters, alcohols and aldehydes, terpenes among others which define and separate each fruit (Sanz et al., 1997). These aroma compounds are especially important for fresh-cut fruit products, in particular mixed fruit packs where products, packaged together, gather and concentrate aroma volatiles which are released upon opening (Lamikanra and Richards, 2002). Fruits such as pineapple, melon, banana and kiwifruit owe their aromas to the presence of esters.

There are several pathways involved in VAC biosynthesis. Volatiles important for aroma (and flavour) are typically biosynthesised via membrane lipids, amino acids and carbohydrate pathways. Therefore, an important step in these pathways is the availability of primary precursor substrates, including fatty acids, amino acids and glucosides, all of which are highly regulated during fruit development (Song et al., 1997; 2008).

Fatty acids are primary precursors of aroma volatiles in most fruit (Sanz et al., 1997). Fatty acid-derived straight chain alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, acids and esters, ranging from C1 to C20, are important character-impact aroma compounds that are responsible for fresh fruit flavours. They are formed via three main processes: α- oxidation, β-oxidation and the LOx pathway (Schwab et al., 2002).

12

Chapter 1

α- and β-oxidation

The metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids, commonly referred to as the lipid oxidation (LOx) pathway, contributes to the flavours of green fruits such as kiwifruit. Saturated and unsaturated volatile C6 and C9 aldehydes and alcohols are typically involved. These short-chain aldehydes and alcohols are produced by plants in response to wounding and play an important role in the plants defence strategies and pest resistance (Matsui, 2006; Stumpe, 2006). At least four enzymes are involved in the biosynthetic pathway leading to their formation: LOx, hydroperoxide lyase (HPL), 3(Z), 2(E)-enal isomerise and alcohol deydroxygenase (ADH). When fruit are cut and/or macerated/homogenised, linoleic and linolenic acid are oxidised to various

C6 and C9 aldehydes (Lea, 1995) contributing to green leafy aromas.

Many of the aliphatic esters, alcohols, acids, and carbonyls found in fruits are derived from the oxidative degradation of linoleic and linolenic acids (Reineccuis, 2006). In addition, some of the volatile compounds derived from enzyme-catalyzed oxidative breakdown of unsaturated fatty acids may also be produce by autoxidation. Autoxidation of linoleic acid produces 9,13-hydroperoxides, whereas linolenic acid produces 12,16-hydroperoxides (Berger et al., 2007). Hexanal and 2,4-decadienal are the primary oxidation products of linoleic acid, while autoxidation of linolenic acid produces 2,4-heptadienal as the major product (Figure 1.2). Further autoxidation of these aldehydes leads to the formation of other volatile products (Chan, 1987).

Sanz et al., (1997) reported that β-oxidation of fatty acids is the primary biosynthetic process providing alcohols and acyl coenzyme A (CoAs) for ester formation. (β-oxidation results in successive removal of C2 units (acetyl CoA) from the parent fatty acid. Fatty acid acyl-CoA derivatives are then converted to shorter chain acyl CoAs by losing two carbons in every round of the β-oxidation cycle, requiring flavinadenine dinucleotide (FAD), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), and free CoA. Acyl CoAs are reduced by acyl CoA reductase to aldehyde that in turn is reduced by ADH to alcohol for use by AAT to produce esters (Bartley et al., 1985).

13

Figure 1.2 Linolenic acid-derived flavour molecules.

Taken from (El Hadi et al., 2013). Key of abbreviations: AAT, alcohol acyl CoA transferase; ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase; AER, alkenal oxidoreductase; AOC, allene oxide cyclase; AOS, allene oxide synthase; HPL, hydroperoxide lyase; JMT, jasmonate methyltransferase; LOX, lipoxygenase; OPR, 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid reductase; 3Z,2E-EI, 3Z,2E-enal isomerase.

Amino acid pathways

Amino acids, such as alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine and aspartic acid, are also involved in aroma biosynthesis in fruit as direct precursors. Their metabolism is responsible for the production of a broad number of compounds, including alcohols, carbonyls, acids and esters (El Hadi et al., 2003; Baldwin et al., 2002). Amino acids can undergo an initial deamination or transamination leading to the formation of the corresponding α-keto acid. Subsequent decarboxylation followed by reductions, oxidations and/or esterifications give rise to aldehydes, acids, alcohols and esters (Reineccius, 2006; Tavaria et al., 2002; Beck et al., 2002). These amino acids can also be the precursors of acyl-CoAs, which are used in alcohol esterification reactions catalyzed by AATs. For example, isoleucine could give rise to 3-methylbutanol and 2-methylbutyryl-CoA, both used in an esterification reaction to yield the ester 3-methylbutyl 2-methylbutanoate while it has been suggested that alanine serves as a precursor for volatile ethyl esters, which can be produced by AAT (Perez et al., 2002; Beekwilder et al., 2004).

14

Chapter 1

Terpenoid pathway

The terpenoids compose the largest class of plant secondary metabolites with many volatile representatives being present in a variety of fruits. Terpenoids are derived from the universal C5 precursor isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and its allylic isomer dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), which in higher plants are generated from two independent pathways located in separate intracellular compartments. In cytosol, IPP is derived from the long-known mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway that starts with the condensation of acetyl-CoA (Newman and Chappell, 1999). In plastids, IPP is formed from a MVA-independent pathway (or MEP pathway) with pyruvate and glyceraldehydes 3-phosphate as direct precursors and methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) as the key intermediate (Lichtenthaler, 1999). However intermediate cross- links between these two IPP biosynthetic pathways is prevalent, particularly in the direction from plastids to cytosol (Figure 1.3) (Dudareva et al., 2005; Laule et al.,

2003). Consequently, monoterpenes (C10) and sesquiterpenes (C15) have a high vapour pressure allowing their release into the atmosphere.

Figure 1.3 The biosynthesis pathway of isoprenoids in plant cell.

Taken from (El Hadi et al., 2013). Key of abbreviations: DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5- phosphate; DXS, DXP synthase; DXR, DXP reductoisomerase; FPP, farnesyl diphosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; GPP, geranyl diphosphate; GGPP, geranyl geranyl diphosphate; HMGR, HMG-CoA reductase; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; MEP, methylerythritol phosphate; MVA, mevalonic acid.

Moreover, it is important to consider not just desirable flavour compounds but also undesirable off-flavours/odours which may have developed during storage as a result of growth of spoilage microorganisms or inadequate packaging which leads to fermentation (Kader and Mitcham, 1999). However, usually by the time microbial

15 spoilage occurs, firmness and appearance are also likely to be degraded (Huxsoll et al.,1989).

1.3.4. Nutritional Quality

Fresh fruits contain small to significant concentrations of several important nutrients such as carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals and phytochemicals (Table 1.1). A vast amount of data has been accumulated on the compositional characteristics of different fruits, with compositions varying not only according to botanical variety, (Chen, 1992; Konja and Lovric, 1993) cultivation practices and climate (Nagy et al., 1992; Somogyi et al., 1996) but also due to changes in maturity at harvest (Villanueva et al., 2004), and the condition of ripeness, processing and storage (Gil et al., 1996; 2001). Fruits are important sources of transitional metals that have a role in the synthesis and structural stabilisation of proteins and nucleic acids (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 2007). With regards vitamins, most fruits are low in B-vitamins, but citrus fruits, including oranges and kiwifruit, are excellent sources of vitamin C (Belitz et al., 2004; Ansorena, 1999).

Table 1.1 Fruit Content of Vitamins, Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) and Fibre adapted from

Crujeiras et al., 2010: Nutritional value and phytochemical content of fruits, vegetables and legumes,

In. Bioactive Foods in Promoting Health: Fruits and Vegetables.

Fruit Vit Cb Vit Eb Vit AaµEq TACc Fibreb mg/100g mg/100g retinol/100g mmol/kg g/100g

Apple 12.4 0.40 4.0 3.23 2.3

Grape (red) 4.0 0.70 3.0 11.09 0.4

Grape (green) 4.0 0.70 3.0 3.25 0.9

Melon 25.0 0.1 784 5.73 0.7

Orange 50.6 0.21 49.0 20.50 2.3

Pineapple 20.0 0.1 3.0 15.73 1.2

Strawberry 60.0 0.2 1.0 22.74 2.2 a Source: Belitz et al., 2004; Ansorena, 1999. b Source: Mataix, 2003 c Source: Pellegrini et al., 2003: ferric reducing-antioxidant power (FRAP; mmol Fe3+/kg).

16

Chapter 1

Phytochemicals

The cooperative integration of various antioxidant molecules and minerals is essential in retarding the rate and extent of quality loss and deterioration (Figure 1.4). Some of these compounds also influence the overall organoleptic attributes of fruits i.e. flavonoids and phenolic acids. Fruits are able to supply different non- nutritional components such as polyphenols and chlorophylls which may impart health benefits and positive biological functioning (Pellegrini et al., 2003). Organic acids, in association with sugars, play a major role in taste, while esters of aliphatic alcohols and short chain fatty acids are associated with aroma. In addition to contributing to flavour, pigments such as chlorophyll, carotenoids and anthocyanins which are responsible for the characteristic colour of fruits such as kiwifruit, cantaloupe melon and strawberry respectively. Many vitamins (C and E) also serve multiple functional properties, by acting as antioxidants, preventing undesirable colour changes and retarding rancidity in plant products. Pro-vitamin A (β-carotene) and riboflavin (vitamin B12) contribute to the colour of plant pigments such as pineapple, cantaloupe melon and strawberry (Table 1.2).

Table 1.2 Fruit pigments, related colour and polyphenols

Fruit Colour Pigments Polyphenols

Kiwifruit Green Chlorophyll, Lutein, Vitamin C* Zeaxanthin Cantaloupe Deep Orange α-carotene, Quercetin, Chlorogenic acid, β-carotene Vitamin C, Glutathione, Rutin Ferulic acid Orange Orange β -cryptoxanthin, Hesperidin, Vitamin C, Zeaxanthin Limonene, β -sitosterol, Lutein Glutathione Pineapple Yellow β -carotene Quercetin, Chlorogenic acid Flavonoids Strawberry Red Anthocyanins Quercetin, Chlorogenic acid, Phenolic acids, Gallic acid Grape Blue/Black Anthocyanins Catechins, Myricetin, Red/Purple Proanthocyanidins Vitamin C, Resveratrol (adapted from Blasa et al., 2010). *organic acid

Polyphenols

The term ‘phenolics’ encompasses approximately 8,000 naturally occurring compounds referred to as polyphenols and simple phenols, all of which possess a 17 phenol as their common structure. They contribute to organoleptic qualities of fruits and defence against pathogen attack (Blasa et al., 2010). Approximately one-third of plant phenolics are phenolics acids and the rest are mostly flavonoids (Kris-Etherton et al., 2002). Phenolic acids are divided into two sub-groups which are the derivatives of hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids. The most common phenolic acids found in fruits are caffeic, p-courmaric, vanillic, ferullic and protocateuchuic (Erlund, 2004; Moyer et al., 2002) and are listed in Table 1.2. They are not found in free forms in plants because the carboxyl groups are very reactive and easily transform into esters or amides when combined with aliphatic alcohols and phenols or amino compounds. The majority are linked to cellulose, proteins and lignin or to small organic molecules (e.g. glucose) or large polyphenols known as flavonoids through ester, ether or acetyl bonds (Rababah et al., 2005).

Chlorophylls

Chlorophyll is a compound known as a chelate that consists of a central metal ion (Magnesium; Mg2+) bonded to a large organic molecule, composed of carbon, hydrogen, and varying degrees of O2 and nitrogen. The large organic molecule is referred to as porphyrin and contains four nitrogen atoms bonded to the Mg2+ ion in a square planar arrangement (Figure 1.5). Although not considered an antioxidant, chlorophylls are widely distributed in the botanical world (Ferruzzi et al., 2002; Ferruzzi and Schwartz, 2001). Chlorophyll exists as both a and b forms and foods that are high in chlorophyll are usually high in β-carotene (Total Carotenoids).

Figure 1.4 Chemical structure of chlorophyll with the porphyrin ring shown in red with interchangeable R groups for chlorophyll a and b respectively. Taken from http://www.webexhibits.org/causesofcolor/7A.html; what is the role of chlorophyll? 18

Chapter 1

Total Antioxidant Activity Total Polyphenols

Flavonoids

Isoflavones Phenolic acids Flavones

Stilbenes Flavonols

Lignans Anthocyanins

Flavanols

Flavanones

Phytoestrogens

Glucosynolates

Carotenoids

Figure 1.4 Different categories of diet phytochemicals with bioactive (antioxidant) properties. (Adapted from Blasa et al., 2010)

Chlorophyll a and b are identical in composition apart from one side-chain, composed of a –CH 3 in chlorophyll a, while in chlorophyll b it is –CHO. Furthermore, the high antioxidant capacity of chlorophyll a over chlorophyll b may be due to its high abundance found in plants (ratio 3:1) thus it may play a role in protecting against lipid oxidation (Lanfer-Marquez et al., 2005; Ferruzzi et al., 2002).

Figure 1.6 Spectrometrically measured signals of pigment mixtures (ATB, 2013)

19

Carotenoids

Most orange, yellow and red fruit such as citrus, peach, cantaloupe melon and tomatoes are known to contain high concentrations of carotenoids which accumulate during fruit ripening (Khachik et al., 1991). The major dietary carotenoids are α- carotene, β-carotene, lycopene and the xanthophylls, β -cryptoxanthin, lutein and zeaxanthin (Potter and Hotchkiss, 1996; Blasa et al., 2010). Dietary carotenoids contribute to both the appearance and appeal of fruit as well as provide additional nutritional value in the form of antioxidants (McGhie and Ainge, 2002). Carotene, takes many forms with β -carotene containing the highest provitamin A activity of all carotenoids. Xanthophylls are yellow carotenoids pigments involved in photosynthesis. Figure 1.6 shows the typical chlorophyll and carotenoid profiles observed spectrometrically.

1.3.5. Microbial stability

Fresh-cut fruits, once considered a relatively safe commodity, are attracting increasing microbiological concern (Brackett, 1999; Westrell et al., 2009; Hong et al., 2014).

In 2007, in the European Union, Salmonella was found in around 0.3% of produce-related samples tested. Large investigations on prevalence of pathogenic bacteria in fruits and vegetable were conducted in the UK, Ireland, Germany and the Netherlands in that year (Westrell et al., 2009). The proportion of produce samples that yielded Salmonella in these studies ranged from 0.1% to 2.3%, with pre-cut products having some of the highest proportions contaminated. Escherichia coli 0157:H7 has been isolated from fresh-cut apple tissue (Janisiewicz, et al., 1999), while Listeria monocytogenes has been cultured on a variety of fresh-cut vegetables and fresh-cut cantaloupe melon (Hong et al., 2014; Farber et al., 1998; Francis and O’Beirne, 1998; Babic et al., 1997;).

Fresh-cut fruit products are not pasteurised and may be consumed raw. The application of minimal processing techniques and the subsequent storage have presented indigenous and pathogenic microorganisms with novel ecosystems in which to grow. Some recent foodborne outbreaks have outlined the seriousness of

20

Chapter 1 these risks resulting in serious illness and high mortalities, e.g. norovirus outbreak in frozen raspberries; Scandanavia, 2006; Escherichia coli 0157:H7 outbreak associated with fresh spinach; US, 2007; Salmonella outbreak in tomatoes, US, 2008 and the Listeria monocytogenes outbreak of 2012 in Colorado, USA that resulted in a 20% mortality rate of infected persons having consumed cantaloupe melons (Center for Disease Control, 2012). A report by the EU scientific committee on food (2002) stated that the prevalence of foodborne pathogens of fruit and vegetable origin and their involvement in outbreaks are not well documented from a European perspective (Abadias et al., 2008).

A diverse community of epiphytic microorganisms that present a further competitive barrier to the spoilage organism typically colonize the outermost fruit surface. External damage such as bruising, cracks, and punctures creates sites for establishment and outgrowth of the spoilage microbes. Lesion development can be relatively rapid, occurring within days or weeks. This presents the risk that rapidly reproducing spoilage microorganisms will arrive within open wound sites at the packing facility, and thereby, through shedding from the asymptomatic wound, present the potential for cross contamination within the facility during handling, culling, washing, sorting, and packing before storage.

The laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation (IFMFP), Ghent University, Belgium, has proposed specific microbiological guidelines for spoilage causing microorganisms (Table 1.3). This will be further discussed in section (1.6)

Table 1.3 Microbiological guidelines for Fresh-cut Fruit (CFU/g)

Parameter Targetc Toleranced Best-Before-Datee Total aerobic psychrotrophic counta 10^5 10^6 10^7

Lactic acid bacteriab 10^3 10^4 10^7

Yeasts 10^3 10^4 10^5

Moulds 10^2 10^3 10^4 a Incubated for 5 days at 22OC b When the number of lactic acid bacteria on the best before date is greater than 107/g the food product can only be rejected on condition that there were unacceptable sensorial deviations c Target is the guideline for the production day, in best conditions produced. d Tolerance is the maximum guideline for production day. e Best-before-date is the end of the shelf-life; above these guidelines notable spoilage will occur.

21

For pathogens, the Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures (SCVM) relating to public health issued an opinion on Listeria monocytogenes. That opinion recommended that it be an objective to keep the concentration of the pathogen in foods below 100 CFU/g. For Salmonella, absence in 25g of products placed on the market during their shelf-life is acceptable, while for Escherichia coli, 100-1000 CFU/g during the manufacturing process is tolerable (FSAI, 2014).

1.4. Physiological, biochemical and microbial effects of fresh-cut processing

Deterioration of food can be defined as a process of changing to an inferior state. In terms of fresh-cut fruit, there are many obvious deterioration patterns, which differ from fruit to fruit with many common characteristics such as appearance, firmness and flavour (section 1.3) susceptible to change. Deterioration exists in the form of many complex processes that occur simultaneously as a result of mechanical damage, biochemical changes, physiological ageing and microbial spoilage.

Fresh-cut processing heightens the perishability of fruits with the mixing of previously sequestered enzymes and substrates resulting in the deterioration of organoleptic properties such as loss of characteristic appearance and firmness (excessive flesh softening), and compositional changes leading to flavour loss and discolouration (Lamikanra, 2002).

1.4.1. Enzymatic browning

Enzymatic browning (EB) is probably the most common defect of appearance in fresh-cut fruits. EB mostly occurs during processing and subsequent storage. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations (FAO), it is estimated that over 50% of losses in fruit occur as a result of EB (Dauthy, 1995). EB is predominantly caused by physical stresses such as cutting or wounding and is initiated when fruit tissue or cell contents are exposed to oxygen, and oxidative enzymes such as polyphenols oxidase (PPO), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) are released. PPO is a group of copper protein complex enzymes that catalyse the

22

Chapter 1 oxidation of phenolics. They are widely found in fruits (and vegetables) and are the most important enzymes associated with discoloration of fresh-cut products. PPO activity was detected in all parts of affected fruits, including the peel, the flesh and the cortex (Alzamora et al., 2000). Since EB is basically due to oxidation of phenolic compounds catalysed by the presence of PPO generating colourless quinones that are later polymerised into melanins which result in brown discoloration, the concentration of phenolics compounds and antioxidants respectively, in the tissue are of high importance (Martín-Belloso et al., 2006; Castañer et al., 1996). The depth of browning depends on the structure of the polyphenolic substrates (Toivonen and Delaquis, 2006). Different fruit types differ in the degree of browning (Yano and Saijo, 1987) with apples and pineapples being most affected (Figure 1.7). Furthermore, the extent of symptoms varies with cultivar, fruit size, temperature and nutritional composition (Weerahewa and Adikaram, 2005).

A

B

Figure 1.7 (A) Fresh-cut golden delicious apples and (B) evidence of enzymatic browning after short period of time. Taken from: (https://geneticmaize.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/okanagan-specialty-fruits/)

Figure 1.8 illustrates the location of phenolic compounds and enzymes within a typical plant cell. The formation of highly reactive quinones enables them to react with amino and sulfhydryl groups of proteins and enzymes as well as with other substances such as chlorogenic acid derivatives and flavonoids (Basta et al., 2010). Many fruits such as apple, peach and pear have high levels of preformed phenolic compounds where, following cutting, very rapid surface browning takes place (Artés et al., 1999). In tissue with low initial levels of preformed phenolics, browning results from the induced synthesis and subsequent accumulation of substrates (Castañer et al., 1999). In the biosynthesis of phenolics compounds, PAL appears to play a fundamental role, whose activity is enhanced by the presence of ethylene

(C2H4). 23

Peroxidises (POx) also contribute directly or indirectly to browning (Lamikanra, 2002; Martin-Belloso et al., 2006). Its main function is to control the level of peroxides generated in oxygenation reactions to avoid excessive formation of free radicals (Alzamora et al., 2000).

Figure 1.8: The localisation of phenolic compounds and phenolic oxidising enzymes in a typical plant cell. POD: phenol peroxidase; PPO: polyphenol oxidase. (taken from Toivonen et al., 2008).

1.4.2. Whitening and translucency

Whitening is a defect frequently associated with oranges, while translucency is associated with some melon varieties (Portela and Cantwell, 1998; Portela et al, 2001). White blush, which is more commonly associated with fresh-cut carrots, can be caused by exposure of outer superficial cells to dry conditions as a result of minimal processing which results in dehydration. Wound response causes post- processing accumulation of lignified material which intensifies the incidence and severity of white blush (Toivonen et al, 2008; Rico et al, 2007; Bolin et al., 1991a). The degree of formation of this lignin-type material is directly related to the severity of processing (Watada, 1986). In fresh-cut lemons, increases in luminosity were observed at smallest cut sizes, and could be attributed to tissue dehydration (Ártés- Hernández et al., 2007).

24

Chapter 1

In the presence of O2, LOx catalyses the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, converting them to a variety of carbonyl compounds and oxygenated derivatives with free radical by-products (Verhagen et al., 1978). Furthermore, LOx activity catalyses the co-oxidation of pigments and has a bleaching effect on carotenoids (Weber et al., 1974), and chlorophyll (Imamura and Shimizu, 1974; Holden, 1974; Klein et al., 1984) which is deleterious to post-cutting quality. However the extent of discolouration differs from product to product and is influenced by factors such as final cut size, cut blade sharpness, mechanical aspects of the size reduction (manual versus machine operated), and physical and mechanical properties of the whole product (Abe et al, 1993).

Loss of natural berry colour was reported to be affected by ascorbic acid (AA) content. Skalsky and Sistrunk, (1973), suggested that anthocyanins may be destroyed either through direct oxidation by quinones formed from catechin by PPO action, or through copolymerization of anythocyanins to tannins (Jackman et al., 1987).

Another factor affecting the appearance aspect of fresh-cut fruit products is the change in homogeneity of the tissue that results in the development of translucent flesh. This physiological disorder is commonly referred to as translucency and is characterised by dark and glassy flesh, and seems to be of particular importance in melons (Aguayo et al., 2003, Saftner et al., 2005), pineapple (Chen and Paull, 2001, Montero-Calderon et al., 2008) and kiwifruit (Agar et al., 1999). Translucency of water-soaked areas is also a frequent disorder of tomatoes stored under MAP (Gil et al., 2002), while development of translucent flesh has been found to be the principal visual deterioration symptom in fresh-cut ‘Piel de Sapo MAP melon (Bai et al., 2001).

1.4.3. Excessive tissue softening

The range of textural traits that are encountered in fresh and fresh-cut fruits is vast, and to a large extent can be explained in terms of changes in specific cellular components. Cell turgidity, determined by osmotic forces, plays an important role in fruit firmness (Dauthy, 1995). This osmotic pressure with cell vacuoles and

25 protoplasts pushes the protoplasts against the cell walls and causes them to stretch slightly, owing to their varying degrees of elasticity. In the protoplasm, water functions as a solvent in which gases, minerals and other solutes enter and move through the plant. As it moves it acts as a reagent in many important physiological processes.

In fresh-cut fruit, mechanical damage due to processing greatly accelerates the rate of water-loss, resulting in a loss of turbidity and permselectivity. Without turbidity and permselectivity, the state of osmotic pressure in the cell vacuoles and protoplast cannot exist and water and dissolved substances are free to diffuse in and out of cells, leaving the remaining tissue highly susceptible to dehydration and softening as a result of increased transpiration. Wilting, mealiness, shrivelling, loss of firmness, and other textural changes depending on the commodity are induced. It is a major cause of reduced quality in perishable products. Extensive water loss can lead to cell decompartmentation, leakage, collapse and eventual death (Littman, 1972).

Mattoo et al., (1983) and Hyodo et al., (1985) concluded that the wounding increased the activities of enzymes such as PG, β-galactosidases, LOx, phospholipase-δ and ACC synthase/ oxidase that attack cell walls and membranes. Pectins are important components of the cell wall and middle lamella in higher plants giving structure and rigidity to plant tissues. The main types of pectic enzymes responsible for pectin degradation in fruits are depolymerises; (PG) and pectic lyase (PL) and PE (Alzamora et al., 2000). PG hydrolyses glycosidic linkages of pectin acids and polygalacturonates within the pectin molecule resulting in softening of fruit tissues.

LOx activity is also directly related to plant tissue softening. Inhibition of this activity has been shown to delay ripening and softening in peaches and kiwifruit and it has been correlated with plant tissue development and pathogen resistance (Lamikanra, 2002). The free radicals by-products generated through LOx activity can cause cell membrane leakage and the release of stored hydrolytic enzymes and organic acids from the vacuole, thus accentuating cellular decomparmentalisation and damage resulting in excessive tissue softening. These free radicals are also

26

Chapter 1 capable of attacking protein moiety of the cell membrane contributing to further membrane disintegration (Basta et al., 2010).

1.4.4. Phytochemical changes

The concentrations of micronutrients and phytochemical compounds found in plant foods at harvest are known to change due to processing. Table 1.4 shows the effect of some major fresh-cut unit operations on key nutrients. Vitamins, carotenoids and some subclasses of polyphenols are more concentrated in the peel or rind of fruits than in the pulp. Thus, preliminary processing operations such as washing, peeling, trimming, de-hulling or de-stemming can discard appreciable amounts of nutrients leading to a reduction in the levels of these substances in samples analysed (IUFOST, 2000-2010). Subsequent cutting and slicing etc., increases flesh exposure to O2 and releasing enzymes that catalyse the degradation of these compounds (Kader, 2002). In a study by Gil et al (2006), the quality changes and nutrient retention in fresh-cut versus whole intact pineapples, mangoes, cantaloupe melon, watermelon, strawberries and kiwifruits fruits during 9 day storage at 5OC were evaluated and compared. Vitamin C losses after 6 days at 5 °C were ≤5% for mango, strawberry and watermelon pieces, 10% in pineapple pieces, 12% in kiwifruit slices and 2% in cantaloupe cubes. No losses in carotenoids in kiwifruit slices and watermelons cubes were observed, but losses in pineapple were the highest at 25% followed by 10-15% in cantaloupe, mango, and strawberry pieces after 6 days storage.

27

Table 1.4 Effects of fresh-cut processing on levels of phytochemicals and organic acids

Unit Operation Carotenoids Antocyanins Polyphenols Ascorbic Acid

Peeling Promotes leaching Promotes leaching EB promotion Exposure to oxidative & synthesis increase in PP and hydrolytic degradative enzymes

Size Reduction Promotes leaching & Promotes leaching PPO activity Promotes leaching Provitamin A activity EB promotion

Blanching POx inactivation Promotes leaching EB retardation Heat destruction

Acidification Xanthophyll Changes in pigment PPO inhibition Concentration transformation Hue and Chroma dependent as may undergo decomposition with CO2 production

Antibrowning agents O2 protection Leaching of soluble O2 protection loss of activity Pigments in alkaline environments Antimicrobials Leaching of soluble EB reduction by pigments sorbates and benzoates

MAP loss of chlorophyll Destabilisation with Retention and/or Transformation to DAA Provitamin A activity elevated CO2 reduction

(adapted from Alzamora et al., 2000; Basta et al., 2010).

Key: EB (enzymatic browning), PP (polyphenols), DAA (dehydroascorbic acid), PPO (polyphenol oxidase), POx (peroxidase), O2 (oxygen) & CO2 (carbon dioxide).

1.4.5. Changes in flavour and aroma

Aroma compounds are often only released upon cell disruption when previously compartmentalized enzymes and substrates interact (Buttery, 1993). Some aroma compounds are bound to sugars as glycosides or glucosinolates. Glycosides of aroma compounds in fruit are mainly O-β-D-glucosides and O-diglycosides, but triglycosides have also been identified (Sarry and Gunata, 2004). In intact fruits, myrosinase and glucosonolates are sequestered within distant subcellular compartments and/or in distant cells. The glucosinolate and corresponding metabolising enzymes only come in contact following cell disruption (Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006). The proportion of glycosidically bound volatiles is usually greater than that of free volatiles, making them an important potential source of flavour compounds. The odorous aglycones may be released from the sugar moiety during maturation, processing and storage, or by the action of enzymes, acids or heat (Reineccius, 2006).

28

Chapter 1

Tissue disruption leads to the degradation of endogenous lipids to fatty acids, then oxidation to yield a hydroperoxide followed by selective cleavage to for certain volatile aromatic compounds (Galliard et al., 1977). Roma-Parada et al., (1991) found that 15% CO2 damaged membrane integrity and accelerated loss of phospholipids (Duan et al., 2013) and polyunsaturated fatty acids from mitochondrial membranes and increased leakage of amino acids. In CL fruits such as kiwifruit and cantaloupe melon, membrane deterioration is accelerated and membrane permeability is increased by cutting possibly, attributed to C2H4 emanating from sites of injury and lipid degradation, especially for lipid peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids.

1.4.6. Microbial response to processing

Microbiological spoilage defects of fresh-cut fruits include visible microbial growth, off-aroma and off-flavour formation, soft-rot/water soaking and sliminess. O’Connor-Shaw et al. (1994) observed mould growth at 14 days on cut pineapples held at 4OC and at 4 days when held at 20OC. White mould colony formation was observed at 11 days on cut cantaloupe held at 4OC and at 7 days on cut honeydew held at 8.5OC. Visual evidence of bacterial spoilage of cut cantaloupes results from the presence of bacterial colonies, slime, juice turbidity, and off-odour (Sapers, et al., 2005).

Bacterial soft rot, which is characterised by water soaking and the formation of a slimy surface on plant tissues, has been identified as the leading cause of storage disorders in many types of whole produce (Lund, 1979), and is frequently observed in fresh-cut fruits (Ukuku & Fett, 2002; O’Connor-Shaw et al., 1994). Many microbes use pectinolytic enzymes to overcome plant defence mechanisms and access plant nutrients. The pectinolytic enzymes, such as PE and PG can degrade pectins in the middle lamella of the cell, thereby resulting in liquification of the plant tissue leading to conditions such as soft rots. Other enzymes such as hemicellulase, cellulases, and proteases are also involved in the spoilage process but are usually secondary to pectinases (Liao, 1997).

29

Water soaking has also been commonly associated with spoilage of cut cantaloupe, honeydew, and watermelon (Ukuku & Fett, 2002), especially under abuse storage temperatures (>4OC). Studies show that spoilage microorganisms such as Gluconobacter and Acetobacter can cause discoloration of whole produce, and fungal spoilage has discoloured cut apples treated with antioxidants and packed in MA.

1.5. Factors affecting fresh-cut fruit quality

Growing conditions, cultural practices, cultivar, maturity, harvesting and handling methods, inspection standards and the duration and conditions of subsequent storage all affect the quality of fruits used for fresh-cut production (Shewfelt, 1987). Cultural factors include growing location, soil condition (nutrient and moisture levels), and climate. These, in turn, determine what crops are grown and when (seasonality).

1.5.1. Cultivar and growing conditions

Without a reliable, consistent cultivar, there will be no quality commodity to process and package. Table B.1 in Appendix B.1 outlines the main varieties of intact fruit raw materials and their corresponding geographical origins available to Irish processors. While uniform size, high yields, harvest ability (mechanical or manual), uniform ripening and reduced wastage are all desirable traits for both whole and fresh-cut produce, there are particular traits especially required for fresh-cut. Cultivar differences exist (Lamikanra et al., 2003; Aguayo et al., 2004), in particular for respiration (Kader, 2002; Gorny, 1998, 2000) that may influence packaging and in- pack atmosphere modification, susceptibility to mechanical damage, browning potential, texture and flavour. The processor must work with what is available during a given season, which slows production, and results in adjustments to processing procedures, packaging requirements and SL expectations. Therefore, choosing a cultivar that performs optimally in a particular season is the first step in the production of high quality fresh-cut products.

30

Chapter 1

Lack of nutrients in the soil can seriously affect the quality of fresh produce at harvest. Phosphorus, potassium and, in particular, nitrogen fertilisation levels can influence a range of quality parameters such as poor visual red colour development when levels are high (Chatzitheodorou, et al., 2004; Crisosto et al., 1997). Bett- Garber et al., (2003) studied the influence of soil type (sandy loam and heavy clay) and storage conditions on the sensory quality of fresh-cut cantaloupe melons. Melons grown in sandy loam were lower in sweet aromas and sweet taste, and higher in exudate with a fermented flavour.

1.5.2. Maturity and ripeness stage Fruits undergo a number of physiological changes during maturation and ripening (Figure. 1.9).

Full Bloom Mature Ripe Death

•growth •ripening •senescene

Figure 1.9 Physiological age line for fruits; source: O’Beirne, (2009).

Fruit factors along with environmental factors contribute to this age line. Fruit factors include type of fruit, species and cultivar, physiological age and seasonality.

Environmental factors may include temperature, O2 levels, CO2 levels, ethylene

(C2H4) levels, orchard chemicals, climate, light and moisture (O’Beirne, 2009; Sams, 1999). Maturity is the stage at which a commodity has reached a sufficient stage of development that after harvesting and postharvest handling (including ripening, where appropriate) its quality will be at the least minimum acceptable. Physiological maturity refers to the development of an organ to the stage where it has the capacity to ripen.

There are many methods to determine the maturity of a fruit and can be grouped into physical, chemical, physiological, computational and electronic (Soliva-Fortuny et al., 2004; Ozanich, 1999). Physical determinats include external

31 colour, internal colour and structure (Portela and Cantwell, 2001), shape of fruit and specific gravity (Kader, 2002), surface morphoogy and structure (Beaulieu et al., 2004), firmness (Gorny et al., 1998; Soliva-Fortuny et al., 2004). Chemical methods include compositional changes such as starch, sugar acid and juice content, astringeny and volatile release (Beaulieu and Lea, 2003). While most fruits, such as pineapples, are better suited to minimal processing when in less mature physiological stages, some produce such as bell peppers and melons may be most suitable at more advanced stages of maturity (Lamikanra, 2002; Saftner et al., 2006).

1.5.3. Respiration rate

Respiration has been defined as a metabolic process which provides energy for plant biochemical processes and is an essential element of normal post-harvest metabolism and an important determinant of storage life (Cliffe-Byrnes and O’Beirne, 2005). The process itself takes place in two phases (Figure 1.10). Phase I is known as glycolysis and is common to both types. Reactions in phase II are either aerobic or anaerobic.

Figure 1.10 The process of respiration (Cellular Respiration, 2013).

When the amount of available O2 falls to 2% or less, the process itself may be inhibited leading to anaerobic respiration or fermentation. In fermentation, sugars are broken down into alcohol with ethyl alcohol (ethanol) being the predominant end- product. This phase causes off-flavours/ -odours to develop in fruits, as well as promoting premature ageing and rapid deterioration.

32

Chapter 1

Respiration rate is affected by cultivar, ripening, ageing, wounding (processing) and storage (temperature and time). The physical damage caused by minimal processing increases respiration rate and ethylene production (Finnegan et al., 2013). As a result, plant tissues with high respiratory rates and/or low energy reserves have a shorter postharvest life (Eskin, 1990) as illustrated in Figure 1.11. Higher respiration rates also result in more rapid losses of sugars, organic acids and other substances which contribute to the flavour of the final product (Kader, 2002).

Figure 1.11 Postharvest Life of Fruit Commodities as a function of Respiration.

Different fruits exhibit different respiration rates which are highly affected by processing and temperature (Table 1.5). A two-three fold increase in biological activity has been reported for every 10OC increase in temperature (Burzo, 1980; Zagory and Kader, 1988).

-1 -1 Table 1.5 Respiration rates (mg CO2 kg h ) for various fresh-cut fruits in air at various storage temperatures adapted from Gorny, (1998).

Stems removed as respiration ~15x higher than berry respiration (adapted from UC Davis Product Fact Sheets, 2010).

33

1.5.4. Ethylene

Ethylene (C2H4) plays an active part in tissue differentiation, fruit ripening and degreening, anthocyanins synthesis, production of volatile compounds (aroma), senescence and the response of plants to both biotic and abiotic stresses (Grichko and

Glick, 2001; Kanellis et al., 2002). C2H4 production can be stimulated by many factors such as ripening, senescence, wounding, fungal infection, water stress and elevated temperatures (Kader, 2002). In addition, certain fruits such as pineapple and bananas can be harvested mature but un-ripe and de-greened or ripened at a later stage by exposure to predetermined concentrations of exogenous ethylene (Ethephon) (Dhall and Singh, 2013). Perishable commodities vary in their sensitivity to ethylene. For some plant responses, levels as low as 4 ppb (Mattoo and Suttle, 1991) can have an effect while most other responses are typically seen between 0.1 to 10 ppm (Wheeler et al., 1996). Common effects of C2H4-induced injury on fruit include; softening and development of off-odours in watermelon, increased ripening and softening of mature green tomatoes and shattering of raspberries and blackberries (Saltveit, 1999). The degree of damage depends upon the concentration of C2H4, length of exposure time and product temperature.

1.5.5. Processing

Harvested fruits are subjected to many forms of handling making them susceptible to mechanical injuries such as bruises and wounding. Bruises can be both noticeable and non-noticeable, both of which can affect respiration and quality. Injured fruits respire and transpire more rapidly and the extent of the increment is directly proportional to the severity of the bruising (Kader, 1987).

The physiology of fresh-cut fruit is essentially the physiology of wounded tissue. This type of processing, involving peeling, slicing, chopping, or shredding, differs from traditional processing in that the tissue remains viable during subsequent handling. Thus, the behaviour of the tissue is generally typical of that observed in plant tissues that have been wounded or exposed to stress conditions (Brecht, 1995).

This includes increased respiration and C2H4 production, and, in some cases, induction of wound-healing processes. Other consequences of wounding are chemical or physical in nature, such as browning reactions, LOx and enhanced water 34

Chapter 1 loss. It is well recognised that the wounding of plant tissue increases the respiration rate and may induce chemical changes and meristematic activity in the region of the wound. Much information has been gathered concerning tissue responses from cut vegetative tubers and tuberous roots (Laties, 1964, 1968; Saltveit, 1997; Surjadinata and Cisneros-Zevallos, 2003).

The response of fruit tissues to wounding is variable, and is highly influenced by fruit type, cultivar and maturity (Ahvenainen, 2000; Aguayo et al., 2004; Gorny, 1998; Kader, 2002) as well as size (Beaulieu et al., 2004), morphology (Nguyen-the and Carlin, 1994) and the permeance of the fruit to different atmospheres (Kader, 1989).

Wounded or stressed plant tissue produce signals that induce a wide range of genetic responses intended to help repair the plant (Hillwig et al., 2008; Dangl and Jones, 2001). Oligogalaturonides, which come from the cell wall (Ferrari et al., 2013), jasmonic acid and methyl jasmonate (Howe, 2004) from cell membranes (plastids, linolenic acid) via LOx; salicylic acid and methyl salicylate from benzoic acid (Mur et al., 1997) and ascorbic acid (Hillwig et al., 2008, Wasternack et al., 2006), regulate signalling pathways that induce wound-response genes. These signals may also give rise to pathogenesis-related proteins and proteinase inhibitors (Fallico et al., 1996). C2H4 has been shown to signal wound responses (O’Donnell et al., 1996).

Therefore, the minimal processes such as cutting and shredding must be performed with blades that are as sharp as possible, reducing the extent of damage to cells. A study by Bolin & Huxsoll (1991b), showed that slicing with a sharp blade was much more superior to slicing with a blunt blade and either chopping or slicing with a blunt blade as the shelf-life of lettuce was reduced, in some cases by 50%. Portela and Cantwell, (2001) concluded that cutting melon pieces with a sharp rather than a blunt borer resulted in a longer shelf-life at 5ºC with notable improvements in colour quality (translucency).

Interestingly, new product development has produced fresh-cut fruits in a wide variety of shapes and sizes (Figure 1.12). This also impacts on the degree of damaged incurred by the fruit, with some shapes and sizes causing more damage to

35 the tissue than others. Finnegan et al., (2013) studied the effects of cutting size on fresh-cut pineapple cv MD2 and concluded that smaller cut sizes caused an greater increase in the wound-response of the fruit, demonstrated by a higher increment in respiration rate initially after processing at 4OC. Rivera-Lopez et al., (2005) compared fresh-cut cubes to fresh-cut slices of papaya at 5OC and 10OC. They concluded that slices presented a slight advantage over cubes when comparing chemical and physical attributes such as soluble solids and weight-loss respectively, with better quality observed at lower temperatures. Aguayo et al., (2004) demonstrated that firmness was greatly affected by shape as well as water evaporation, with cylinders of melon showing higher translucency scores over slices. Artés-Hernandez et al., (2006) found that four cut types of lemons stored at 0, 2, 5 and 10OC remained marketable for up to 7 days, but that wedges, slices and ½ slices stored at 0, 2 and 5OC preserved their sensory attributes for up to 10 days. Ethanol was found to increase up to three-fold in ½ and ¼ slices after 10 days at 10OC.

Figure 1.12 Examples of novel fresh-cut fruit products.

1.5.6. Environmental factors

Since fresh-cut fruits are more perishable than whole, intact products, they should be held at lower temperatures than that recommended for intact commodities. The

36

Chapter 1 optimum temperature for most fresh-cut fruits is generally 0ºC. However, many are prepared, shipped and stored at temperatures of 5OC, sometimes even 10OC (Watada et al, 1996).

Chilling injury (CI) is a physiological disorder that is occasionally reported on fresh sub-tropical and in particular tropical fruits such as pineapple, cantaloupe, honeydew, nectarine and mango. If these intact fruits are stored at temperatures less than 12ºC, increased pathological decay and subsequent physiological breakdown occurs (Montero-Calderón et al., 2008; Beaulieu et al., 2002; Portela et al., 1997). CI is most often characterised by areas of the peel or rind that collapse and darken to form sunken pits (Ritenour et al., 2003). Less severe symptoms may appear as circular or arched areas of discolouration or scalding. Symptoms are typically more pronounced after fruit are warmed to room temperatures (>15OC) following exposure to chilling temperatures (Saltveit and Morris, 1990). However, a significant number of fresh-cut fruits are not as susceptible to CI as the corresponding intact fruit as processing involves removal of outer rind and peel.

Fresh-cut fruit are very sensitive to humidity levels as they have large surface areas, in many cases without any skin or peel, and as a result they lose a substantial amount of weight (water loss), through transpiration, particularly at elevated temperatures (Watada et al., 1996). At an RH below 90%, excess moisture loss can lead to loss of weight with subsequent textural change defects.

1.5.7. Microbial spoilage

Fresh-cut fruit present ideal conditions for the survival and growth of many types of spoilage microorganisms. Minimal processing of fruits removes the natural protection of the fruit epidermis and destroys the internal compartmentalisation that separates enzymes from substrates. Their internal tissues are nutrient rich and their principal storage polymer is starch. Spoilage microorganisms exploit the host using extracellular lytic enzymes that degrade these polymers to release water and the plant’s other intracellular constituents for use as nutrients for their growth. Consequently, plant tissues suffer physical damage that makes them more susceptible

37 to further contamination and heightens their perishability when compared to their intact counterpart resulting in the average SL being decreased substantially. Brackett, (1994) concluded that microbial decay and off-flavour/odour can be a major source of spoilage of fresh-cut produce and, as such, a limiting factor for SL (O’Connor- Shaw et al., 1996). Microbial spoilage including off-flavour development (e.g., fermented aroma with cut lettuce, sour taste with cantaloupe), slimy surface (e.g. fresh-cut melon), wetness and soft rot (e.g., fresh-cut kiwifruit), discoloration (e.g., apple wedges), and visual microbial growth/colonies (such as apple wedges, cantaloupe chunks, and cored pineapple) has been used as a main objective criterion to determine the SL of fresh-cut products. It can result in a 30% to 50% shrinkage of fresh-cut fruits (Barth, 2009). Figure 1.13 illustrates an overview of the dominating mechanisms of spoilage and influential parameters of spoilage associated with fresh- cut fruits.

Physiological Spoilage Microbiological Spoilage

Enzymatic activity Yeast Growth

Browning/ Discolouration Lactic Acid Bacteria

Tissue Softening Metabolite Production

Off Odour/ Flavour

Physiological and Microbiological Interactions

Temperature Process Severity MA and CA

Figure 1.13 Schematic overview of the dominating mechanisms of fruit spoilage.

38

Chapter 1

The predominant microorganisms responsible for the spoilage of fresh-cut produce include: mesophilic and psychrophilic bacteria (TBCs), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), faecal coliforms, and yeasts & moulds (Nguyen-the and Carlin, 1994). For most fresh-cut fruits such as apples, pineapples, strawberries, grapes, and a few fresh-cut vegetables, such as tomatoes, there is sufficient acidity to limit spoilage primarily to fungi (Splittstoesser, 1987) and aciduric bacteria (LAB, Acetobacter, Gluconobacter) (Tournas et al., 2001), while mesophilic bacteria were consistently predominant on fresh-cut honeydew and cantaloupe melon pieces, even at the end of the shelf life (O’Connor-Shaw et al., 1994; Ukuku & Fett 2002) due to the relatively neutral pH of these fruits.Yeasts can grow well in a pH range of 3–10 while moulds can grow from pH 2 to 11, but favour acidic pH. Yeasts of the genera Saccharomyces, Candida, and Hansenula species have been associated with fermentation of fruits. Furthermore, yeasts have a slightly higher growth rate than moulds, are capable of fermenting sugars into alcohols, and are responsible for off-flavours and off-odours. Moulds on the other hand cover surfaces as fluffy, cotton-like mycelia and usually produce masses of asexual, or sometimes sexual, spores (Barth, 2009).

Listeria (L) monocytogenes is ubiquitous in soils, plant matter and water. In addition, animals, including humans, can serve as effective vectors in the spread of listeriosis, carrying the pathogen in their intestinal tract. As a result, L. monocytogenes has been isolated from minimally processed fruits and vegetables at numbers <100 cfu/g-1. Survival and growth of L.monocytogenes on produce is affected by product type, physiological age, cut type, level of contamination and by the native or epiphytic microflora, in addition to temperate and atmosphere (Francis and O’Beirne, 2008a, b). The primary areas for control of this pathogen are efficient implementation of hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) procedures, involving correct monitoring of critical control points (CCPs), proper cleaning and sanitation of work surfaces, personnel hygiene and good, clean air flow within production environments. L.monocytogenes is an important human pathogen associated with fresh-cut produce because the pathogen is widespread in the natural environment. The pathogen is psychrotrophic from nature (minimal temperature for growth is between 0 and 4OC), the minimal pH is 4.5 to 5 and it is not influenced by MAs (Francis and O’Beirne, 1997; Carlin et al., 1996; Zagory, 1999; Rocha et al., 1995).

39

1.6. Modified atmosphere packaging

Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) involves a multidisciplinary approach including, produce physiology, processing technology and polymer engineering, to maintain product freshness. It normally complements refrigeration as an additional hurdle to aid in food preservation. For fresh-cut fruits, reduced oxygen (O2) and increased carbon dioxide (CO2) atmospheres have been shown to significantly extend quality and shelf-life. However, the concentrations of these gases are generally commodity dependent and differ considerable (Figure 1.14).

Figure 1.14 Illustrates the optimum or equilibrium atmospheres for a variety of fresh-cut temperate, sub-tropical and tropical fruits. (Data was taken from Gorny, 2001 to manipulate a graphical representation of MA recommendations).

1.6.1. MAP generation

Modified atmospheres can be generated passively or actively (Figure 1.15). Passive modification (PMA) relies on the respiration rate of the product and the gas transfer across the packaging film used. Thus, depending on the permeability of the film used, varying degrees of atmosphere modifications can be achieved for a particular fresh-cut product.

40

Chapter 1

Passive Modification Active Modification

Figure 1.15 Simulated examples of changes in O2 and CO2 concentrations during passive modification versus active modification of packaged produce.

In contrast, active MAP involves flushing packages with specified gas mixtures (depending on the commodity types) (Zagory and Kader, 1988). It has been said that this technology has considerable potential however, it is considered relatively expensive (Rooney, 1995), and therefore its use in fresh-cut fruit products is limited and rarely observed.

The main differences between the two systems are outlined in Table 1.6. One of the main disadvantages to PMA packaging is the length of time necessary to achieve dynamic steady state or optimal gas composition while the major concerns of active MA is the cost.

A useful MA is one in which reduces respiration rate to the lowest viable level, thus prolonging SL for extended periods of time without generating an in-pack environment favourable to anaerobic fermentation. This concept enabled the development and establishment of ‘optimum’ MAs. These optimum MAs not only change from product to product but also with cultivar, origin and season (Kader and Morris, 1977). Table 1.7 presents a list of recommended atmospheres for a range of fresh-cut fruits.

41

Table 1.6 Types of modified atmosphere packaging for fresh-cut produce

Passive Active Definition Modification of the in-pack Modification of the in-pack gas composition due to gas composition by replacing gradual interchanges between the [air] at the initial moment the product respiration rate of sealing with a specific gas and the gas exchange rate mixture either by drawing a through the package. vacuum or filling a gas mix.

Equilibrium time 1-2 days to 10-12 days 1-2 h

Suitable products Mushrooms, carrots, Cut apples, dry fruits strawberry, spinach,

Cost No extra cost involved if the Extra investment is required package is properly designed for special machinery, i.e. gas

and maintained at optimum mixer, gases, packaging

storage conditions. machine etc.

Labelling No Yes Requirements

Taken from Mahajan et al., (2007)

However despite the known benefits observed for fresh-cut fruit in many studies (Ahvenainen, 1996; Rico et al., 2007; Rojas-Grau et al., 2009; Sandhya, 2010), a comprehensive study of many Irish multiples by Finnegan, 2008-2010, (Appendix B) revealed that most fresh-cut fruit processors do not aim at optimising gas compositions inside packages. As a result, the reported benefits of optimal MA observed in literature fail to materialise in the commercial supply chain and the efforts to achieve optimal MA conditions contribute little to economic gain to the processor and consumer alike. The discrepancy between potential benefits reported in literature and the apparent lack of adoption of this knowledge by industry may be due to several reasons, such as: 1) deficient knowledge transfer, 2) cost reduction measures given the perishability of the products, 3) an attempt to accommodate the diverse array of fruits contained within these packs by allowing the fruits to passively modify the packages themselves and/or 4) simply a safety parameter employed i.e. that in the event of temperature abuse during distribution O2 levels would not fall to anaerobic levels thus inducing fermentation.

42

Chapter 1

Table 1.7 Recommended MA concentrations for different Fresh-cut Fruits.

Fruit Optimum Recommended Atmospheres

a b Apple <1%O2 or <1%O2 + 4-10 % CO2

a b Cantaloupe melon 4 k%O2 + 10 % CO2 or 3-5 % O2 + 6-15 % CO2

a,b Honeydew melon 2 % O2 + 10 % CO2

c Grape * 3-5 % O2 + 1-3 % CO2

a b Kiwifruit 2 % O2 + 5 % CO2 or 2-4 % O2 + 5-10 % CO2

a b Orange AIR or 14-21 % O2 + 7-10 % CO2

b Pineapple 3-5 % O2 + 5-8 % CO2

a b Strawberry 1-2 % O2 + 10 % CO2 or 1-2 % O2 + 5-10 % CO2

* whole (intact); Sources: a Hui et al., 2006; b Gorny, 2001; c Scharnow, 2013.

1.6.2. MAP Design

A useful modified atmosphere can be created and maintained within the package if the product’s respiration rate matches the gas permeability of the film at refrigerated storage temperatures (Mahajan et al., 2007; Hertog and Banks, 2003; 2004; Fonseca et al., 2002). Gas flow is generated through the packaging material (diffusion) and, the ratio between permeability to CO2 and O2 due to film permeability (permeation) is referred to as selectivity (β) (Figure 1.16).

Figure 1.16 Basic principles of MAP; key: increasing CO2 production and

decreasing O2 consumption; and exchange between product and package.

43

Table 1.8 lists important design variables that need to be considered. These variables can be sub-divided into commodity related factors such as product weight, recommended gas atmosphere composition, respiration rate, package system factors such as package geometry, permeability of the polymeric film and environmental factors such as temperature, relative humidity and external gas composition (Mahajan et al., 2009; 2007; 2006; Varoquaux and Wiley, 1994; Kader, 1989).

Table 1.8 Variables used in MAP Design.

Variables Symbol Unit Produce Product mass M kg eq eq Desired gas composition yO 2-yCO 2 % -1 -1 Respiration rate RO2 RCO2 ml kg h

Film-Package Area available for gas A m2 exchange Selectivity β - Thickness X m Volume V m3 Number of holes or N - perforation Diameter of D m hole/perforation Length of perforation L m 2 - Permeability to O and PO2 PCO2 ml (STP) m 1 -1 -1 CO2 h atm

Environmental Temperature T °C out out External gas composition yO 2 yCO 2 % Relative humidity RH %

(Adapted from Mahajan et al., 2007; 2009)

1.6.3. Design Methodology A mathematical model for respiration rate of fresh-cut fruit is usually a function of

O2, CO2 and temperature and is the first and most important factor (besides temperature) to be considered. Respiration rates are usually expressed as weight or volume of gas produced or consumed per kg fresh weight of product per hour. Reducing the rate of respiration can delay the ageing and subsequent quality loss of the product. Different fruits and different parts of a fruit have different respiration rates. Whole fruits differ in their respiration and C2H4 production rates when

44

Chapter 1

compared to their fresh-cut counterparts. Postharvest researchers have developed many methods for the quantitative measurement of RQ. These include methods

based on the production of energy (heat), consumption of O2, loss of substrate, and

production of CO2 (Forney, 2009; Yahia, 2009).

Respiration rate

A respirometer is an apparatus designed to measure oxygen consumption and/or carbon dioxide production. The usual methods of measuring respiration are:

 the permeable system,  the closed or static system &  the flow-through or dynamic system.

Figure 5.3 (chapter 5) illustrates a respiring product stored within a rigid container and housed within a pillow-pouch package comprised of a plastic polymeric film. This is the simplest concept and known as the permeable system which allows a package of known permeability and dimensions, filled with a product of known weight, to serve as the single regulator of gas exchange (Beaudry et al., 1992; Joles et al., 1994; Lee, et al., 1996; Smyth et al., 1998; Beaudry, 1993). The steady state

O2 and CO2 concentrations are determined and a mass balance is performed in order to estimate the respiration rates. Assuming that there is no gas stratification inside the package and that the total partial pressure remains constant, the differential equations

of mass balance for O2 and CO2 in a MAP containing a respiring product can be calculated as follows:

d(Yo2) 푃표2 V × = × Α × (푌푒 − 푌표 ) − 푅표 × Μ f dt 푒 푂2 2 2 or

e RO2 = PO2 * A * (Y O2 – YO2) (1.1) 100 * L * M

d(Yco2) 푃푐표2 V × = × Α × (푌푒 − 푌푐표 ) − 푅푐 표 × Μ f dt 푒 퐶푂2 2 2

or e RCO2 = PCO2 * A * (YCO2 – Y CO2) (1.2) 100 * L * M

45

Where; R = respiration (consumption/production) rate, m3 kg-1 s-1; P = permeability coefficient; A = surface area m2; L = e thickness, m; M = mass, kg; = external and Y = volumetric concentration, % v/v. Vf = free volume within a pack. The subscripts O2 and CO2 refer to the oxygen and carbon dioxide, respectively.

In a closed or static system, a gas-tight container of known volume is filled with product and the container, containing ambient air, is closed (Song, et al., 1992; Gong and Corey, 1994; Jacxsens et al., 1999). Changes in the concentrations of O2 and

CO2 over a certain period of time are measured and used to estimate respiration rates (Equations: 1.3 and 1.4).

ti tf RO2 = (Y O2 – Y O2) x V (1.3)

100 x M x (tf - ti)

ti tf RCO2 = (Y CO2 – Y CO2) x V (1.4)

100 x M x (tf - ti)

Where; R = respiration (consumption/production) rate, m3 kg-1 s-1; M = mass, kg; and Y = volumetric concentration, % v/v; V = free volume, m3; t = time, s; i = initial; and f = final.

In the flow through or dynamic system, a known weight of product is enclosed in an impermeable container ventilated with a gas mixture flowing at a constant rate (Riad et al., 2002; Smyth et al., 1998; McLaughlin and O’Beirne, 1999; Finnegan et al.,

2013). The concentration of CO2 leaving the container increases until as much CO2 leaves the container (concentration x flow) as is produced by the tissue. At that time the system is in equilibrium and usually occurs in the same time it takes for 5-times the volume to flow through the container. In general, gas exchange takes place until dynamic steady-state equilibrium is reached. Equations 1.3 and 1.4 are first-order linear differential equations, which are useful for describing the unsteady-state behaviour of MAP systems during passive modification. The respiration rate (either oxygen uptake or carbon dioxide production) is readily calculated (Chapter 5.2.3) from the overall differences in gas concentrations between the inlet and the outlet. To use these equations in package design, it is necessary to track all design variables that affect this approach. The success of this MAP technique depends on the ability to predict P and R which are respectively the gas transport across the package and the respiration rate of the product. As these two parameters are highly

46

Chapter 1

dependent on environmental factors, such as temperature, O2, CO2, and RH, in effect, proper MAP design must consider all of these factors. However, limitations exist for all three systems and is summarised in Table 1.9. The permeable system is the least accurate method because the determination of many variables i.e. package dimensions, surface area and thickness and permeability of gas exchange material, are involved. In a static system it is extremely difficult to accurately measure the gas volume as the apparatus is very susceptible to leaks. A closed system also doesn’t allow respiration rates to be measured for any combination or mixes of gases. In a dynamic system, flow rates have to be carefully chosen and monitored in order to accurately measure the differences in gas concentrations between the inlet and the outlet.

Table 1.9 Main advantages and limitations of the three methods of respiration rate measurement.

Characteristics System Permeable Static (closed) Flow-through (dynamic) Non-destructive Y Y Y Time and labour intensive Y Y Y Complexity of apparatus Complex Simple Complex Ability to test diff gas atm N Y Y Constant test concentration Y1 N Y1 Suitable for low respiring products Y Y N Suitable for high respiring products Y N Y Accuracy is dependent on: P, L & A V F 1 Steady state conditions adapted from Fonseca et al, 2002.

Commercial packaging materials

Most minimally processed products are either packaged in flexible film pouches which are heat sealed, or in over wrapped trays (made of clear polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polylactic acid (PLA). The materials used for fresh-cut fruit packaging are mainly microperforated oriented polypropylene (OPP) and high or low density polyethylene (HDPE, LDPE). In medium and high respiring commodities such as fresh-cut fruits, use of commonly available films such as LDPE and PP is not ideal due to their low gas transmission 47 rates, which may lead to induction of anaerobic respiration (Cliffe-Byrnes and O’Beirne, 2005). Orienting polypropylene improves its water vapour barrier, dimensional stability and stiffness. Micro-perforating OPP film results in an average protective effect against oxygen and carbon dioxide transmission. Two of these films used are PA90 & PA210, and have an anti-mist coating (Amcor Flexibles Gloucester, U.K). Both films had micro-perforations jagged along the length of the film, with the PA210 having more perforations and being slightly more gas permeable than the PA90 film.

NatureWorks LLC, Nebraska, USA successfully launched a novel low cost PLA packaging system to compete with conventional petroleum-based polymers. PLA’s inherent barrier properties are similar to those of uncoated PET and PLA’s mechanical properties resemble those of polystyrene (Table 1.10).

Table 1.10 MAP properties of PLA, PET and HDPE*

-2 -1 -2 -1 Polymer H2O transmission rate OTR g.mil.100 in .day CTRg.mil.100 in .day

PLA 18-22 38-42 170-200

PET 1 3.0-6.1 15-25

HDPE 0.3-0.4 130-185 400-700

Taken from Sand, (2011)

However, the optimal permeability is dependent on the size of the package compared to the amount of produce and the respiration rate – and thereby all the factors that influence respiration rate (Kaur et al., 2011; Lee et al., 1991; Mahajan et al., 2007).

Gas permeability

Packages with high gas permeability are required for high respiring produce, while low permeability packages are required for low respiring products. The required permeability can be achieved by (1) selection of polymeric films with suitable gas permeabilities, (2) by use of macro-perforated films and (3) by use of micro- perorated films.

48

Chapter 1

Few non-perforated polymeric films are suitable for fresh-cut fruit packaging as their

CO2 permeability is generally 3 to 6 times higher than that of their O2 permeability.

These films are most suitable for less CO2 tolerant commodities such as apples, bananas, grapes and mangoes. Perorated films have much higher gas permeability however; the ratio of CO2 to O2 permeability is much lower. Such films are accommodating of commodities tolerant to low levels of O2 such as fresh-cut fruit products. Perforation-mediated modified atmosphere packaging (PM-MAP) has shown excellent benefits for conventional MAP in packaging of fresh-cut fruit (Rennie and Tavolaris, 2009; Pandey and Goswani, 2012; Xanthopoulos et al., 2012). In this technique, instead of using common polymeric films, a package, container or high- barrier film is used in which the regulation of gases is achieved by single or multiple perforations in an otherwise impermeable hermetically sealed package. Use of PM- MAP has many potential advantages over macro-perforated or polymeric films. It is a flexible system due to its ability to change the gas transfer coefficient of the package by changing the size and number of the perforations, which implies that products with a wide range of respiration rates can be packed in this system (Mahajan et al., 2006). MAP using perforations can be adapted easily to any impermeable container, including large bulk packages. Polymeric films are not strong enough for packs much larger than those used for retail, but perforations can be applied to retail packages as well as shipping boxes because rigid materials can be used (Riad et al., 2002). Rigid packages also can prevent mechanical damage of the product (Kader, 1989). Commodities requiring high CO2 concentrations and relatively low O2 concentrations can be packed with this system (Fonseca et al., 1997).

In gas permeable films, different types of gas molecules diffuse at different rates through a film; in general CO2 permeates faster than O2. The higher permeability of films to CO2 is in part due to the greater solubility of CO2 in the film structure. In industry, permeability is referred to as gas transmission rate of a film of given thickness. Selecting a packaging film with correct permeability is essential to accommodate respiratory gas exchange and ensure that a useful MA is established. Therefore, gas permeability is the most fundamental properties of packaging materials involved in MAP design. Mass transfer through a polymeric film, also

49 referred to as permeation, is associated with a partial pressure difference of gases and/or vapour between two sides of a package. Therefore, it is recognised that permeation is a dual composite phenomenon involving diffusion and sorption which occur simultaneously (Torreiri et al., 2009).

The permeability coefficients of many films obtainable from manufacturers are usually measured at ambient temperatures, i.e. 20-25OC. The data on film permeability must be then converted to the storage temperature used for the produce. In this context, an Arrhenius model is used as follows: −퐸표 푃표 = 푃∗푂 푒푥푝 { 2 2 2 푅 ×푇 and (1.5) −퐸푐표 푃푐표 = 푃∗푐표 푒푥푝 { 2 2 2 푅 ×푇 Where; (1.6) -2 -1 -1 PO2 = permeability for O2, mL.mil.m .day .atm . * -2 -1 -1 P O2 = permeability pre-exponential factor for O2, mL.mil.m .day .atm . -1 EO2 = activation energy of permeability for O2, kJ.mol . -1 -1 R = Gas constant (0.008314 kJ.mol .K ). T = Storage temperature (OC).

The effective change in package atmosphere due to temperature change is governed by the difference in activation energies of both respiration and permeation. Therefore, in order to effectively design a MAP for fresh-cut fruits it is important to compare the activation energies of both the respiring product(s) to the activation energy of the permeation process. When the difference in activation energy is small, fluctuations in temperature do not cause significant changes to the permeability of packages and thus the package atmosphere. MA packaging systems have activation -1 energies between 20-40kJ,mol , while for perforated films the activation energy is less than 5 kJ.mol-1 (Cameron et al., 1995). Packages that use perforations are particularly vulnerable to increased temperature because gas diffusion through macro-/ micro-perforated holes increases with increasing temperature while activation energies for a product can be high. The activation energy values for common fruits range from 29.0 to 92.9 kJ.mol-1, while for fresh-cut fruit, values can range from 67 to 220 kJ.mol-1 (Jacxsens et al., 2000; Lee et al., 1991; Charles et al., 2005) and higher for mixed fruit packs.

50

Chapter 1

Christie et al., (1995) demonstrated the time-temperature permeability effects of polymeric permeable films. In practice, films are taken from room temperature (~20OC and 60% RH), packed with produce, and stored at relevant cold temperature with 90-5% RH. Significant time-temperature dependent changes in permeability were observed with these polymers subjected to the above storage patterns. Therefore, conditioning of packaging films to the appropriate packaging, distribution and storage conditions prior to use should be performed to allow films to adapt to the appropriate conditions and thus maintain their effectiveness is achieving EMA. As a result, the first aspect to be evaluated in terms of film selection is film permeability at testing conditions. Mahajan et al., (2006) claimed that a polymeric film with selectivity (β) within the set interval for βmin and βmax is one best defined for a particular product.

Perforations for fresh-cut fruit packaging

The use of perforations and the development of PM-MAP technology has recently been reported (Fonseca et al., 2002; Rennie and Tavolaris, 2009; Pandey and Goswani, 2012; Xanthopoulos et al., 2012). Films of enhanced permeability are required for the packaging of perishable fresh and fresh-cut products with high respiration rates. A wider range of selectivity β values, especially those below 3, are necessary to better match the respiratory behaviour of man products (Mahajan et al., 2006). The use of perforated systems or micro-porous films presents possible solutions to meet these requirements. The presence of perforations on a film allows the regulation of gas exchange by diffusion as well as convection (Mannapperuma et al., 1991). The perforations provide an alternative route for gas transport, which may be treated as macroscopic diffusion in a cylindrical path filled with air (Mahajan et al., 2007). This is due to the perforation size which have diameters in the order of 10- 4m or greater, whereas the mean free path of gas molecules at atmospheric pressure is considerably less (1 or 2 x 10-7m (Fishman et al., 1996).

While several techniques have been employed by the fresh-cut produce industry to accommodate atmospheric changes in fresh-cut packages, none have been as successful as the introduction of perforations into polymeric films. Macro- and microscopic perforation is a technique whereby holes are made on the film (usually after printing) and during the film converting process. This technique maximises the 51

‘flexibility’ and usability of particular films in order to provide the right type of atmospheric conditions at the late processing stage based on the type of commodity or commodities to be packaged.

The consistency of micro-perforations is very important for fresh and fresh-cut fruit applications (Chow, 2003). Table 1.11 shows an example of an application where there is a limited packaging surface area for gas exchange such as in plastic containers with a lid made from flexible film, i.e. clamshell. Examples of two fresh fruit are shown: Melon, having a requirement for higher OTR vs. citrus (orange) requiring a significantly lower OTR. Because of the limited lid surface area, the highly permeable polyethylene film would only give an OTR value of 254 which is too small for the required OTR value. However, with the perforation of either four or two holes, respectively, for the two containers, the OTR value is nearly achieved. Because of the limited number of perforations that are required, the accuracy of perforation becomes of utmost importance for retaining the freshness of the fruit while avoiding anaerobic condition.

Table 1.11 Micro-perforation requirements for a typical fresh-cut fruit container.

Since the β value of many polymeric films is much larger than that of the RQ of a given product, there will be more CO2 leaving the package than O2 entering. Because

N2 cannot fill this free volume created by CO2 exiting, the package free volume tends to shrink during storage (Mahajan et al., 2006). With perforated films, most mass

52

Chapter 1

transfer occurs through the perforations thus eliminating volume shrinkage and subsequent pack collapse. The gases are therefore diffusing through into air and, as a

result, have similar diffusion coefficients. The effective permeability to O2 is very

close to that of CO2, therefore, in such films, the permeability ratio for these gases is approximately equal to one (Emond et al., 1993; Cliffe-Byrnes, 2000).

The total flow through polymeric film having NH number of holes is defined as Equation 1.7:

푝푒푟푚푒푎푡𝑖표푛 푝푒푟푚푒푎푡𝑖표푛 푡ℎ푟표푢푔ℎ 푇표푡푎푙 푃푒푟푚푒푎푡𝑖표푛 = { } + { } 푡ℎ푟표푢푔ℎ 푓𝑖푙푚 표푛푒 ℎ표푙푒 푥 푁퐻

If the distance between perforations is much greater than their radius, the diffusive path length becomes the length of the cylindrical pore plus the radius of the hole. Diffusive flux in this instance obeys Fick’s Law as follows:

2 푓푖푙푚 휋푅퐻 ×퐷표2 푃표2 = [푃 표2 + × 푁퐻] (1.8) 푒+ 푅퐻

2 푓푖푙푚 휋푅퐻 ×퐷푐표2 푃푐표2 = [푃 푐표2 + × 푁퐻] (1.9) 푒+ 푅퐻

Where: -2 -1 -1  PO2 and PCO2 = Permeability for O2 and CO2 respectively, mL.mil.m .day .atm with perforations  film film - P O2 and P CO2 = Permeability for O2 and CO2 of the film respectively, mL.mil.m 2.day-1.atm-1  π = pi  RH = the radius of the holes, m  2 -1 DO2 and DCO2 = Diffusity of O2 and CO2, respectively, in air, m .sec  e = thickness of the film, m

The number of perforations, cross sectional area of each perforation and the length of the diffusion channel affect the rate and degree to which the EMA can be attained, and thus can be used as control variables to obtain a desired package atmosphere.

53

Needle perforations Perforation can be made with needles (Figure 1.17). of 0.3-1 mm. Calculations show that a single cylinder hole of this diameter will allow far too large quantities of oxygen to pass through the hole (Mahajan et al., 2006), but needles do not make cylindrical holes in a packaging film. Packaging film is tough, so depending on the film material, the shape of the needle and the piercing technique, the hole is as follows:

Figure 1.17 Needle perforations on polymeric films: (a) Piercing with flap (b) Non- perforated appendix (c) Piercing with crater. (Taken from Danish Technological Institute of Packaging and Transport, 2008).

It is important to be absolutely sure that the film is pierced in order to establish a useful EMA. If the packaging film is elastic and tough, an “appendix” may appear increasing the permeability of the film, because the area is increased and the film becomes thinner, however the film may be still far too airtight. If the film is pierced, very different types of holes will appear depending on the type of needle and material as seen in Figure 1.17. Common to these holes is that the film has withdrawn, making the hole considerably smaller than expected. At the same time a “valve” has been made which may partly close when the pressure goes against the perforating direction of the needle (Brandenburg, 2012).

Perforation with electrostatic energy Plastic film can also be perforated by electrical discharge, i.e. a spark. The size of the hole can vary by reducing or increasing the electric charge. This technique is slow and only works well for thin polymer materials (Chow, 2003).

54

Chapter 1

Laser perforation

For industrial lasers, such as CO2 lasers, the intensity of the light is readily absorbed by the polymeric film. The film is heated, melted and instantaneously vaporized, leaving a very small well defined hole on the film. As the laser pulses, holes can be made to obtain the desirable number per unit length as the web advances (Chow, 2003). Depending on the intensity of the laser, different sized holes can be obtained.

1.7. Effects of MAP on the physiological, biochemical and microbiological quality and safety of fresh-cut fruit

Postharvest physiology, including respiration rate, transpiration, senescence and extrinsic stress responses, as well as produce biochemistry such as C2H4 synthesis, EB, chlorophyll degradation, metabolism of aroma volatiles and nutrient depletion, directly determine the quality and shelf-life of fresh-cut fruit produce stored under

MAP. In general, low O2 combined with elevated CO2 reduce respiration rates and prolong shelf-life. Brown discoloration can occur when O2 and CO2 levels are suboptimal for a particular EB prone commodity.

In the absence of O2, anaerobic respiration occurs and generates off-flavours, off-odours and metabolic tissue damage. It can occur when the partial pressure of O2 falls below 10% (Lamikanra, 2002). For some fresh-cut products, the O2 levels can be allowed drop to levels near or at the respiratory quotient breakpoint (RQB) without resulting in injury (Izumi et al., 1997; O’Hare et al., 1995; Varoquaux et al.,

1996). These low O2 levels (0.25-1%) were beneficial in retaining quality of fresh- cut produce. Gil et al., (1998) used low O2 atmospheres (0kPa and 0.25kPa) and air with Fuji apple slices. They concluded that a reduction of O2 within packs delayed oxidative reactions such as the browning that occurs at cut surfaces. Marrero and Kader (2006) studied the effects of MAP on fresh-cut pineapple stored at different temperatures and found that the use of 8% O2; 10% CO2 was successful at retaining fresh-like colour than fresh-cut pineapple stored in air.

In general, CO2 levels greater than 20% (and depending on O2 concentration and commodity type), can result in vast accumulation of ethanol and acetaldehyde (Kader, 1986) and stimulate respiration rate (Varoquaux and Wiley, 1994). Elevated 55

CO2 levels can inhibit mitochondrial activity, thereby diverting pyruvate to acetaldehyde and ethanol formation even when ample O2 is present (Laties, 1978).

Although it is well recognised that high CO2 increases the permeability of a plant to water, many of these influences mediated through effects of gas cytoplasmic pH, suppression or induction of protein synthesis, activation or inactivation of pre- existing enzymes or an antagonism to C2H4 action (Mathooko, 1996) are multifaceted, highly complex and not fully elucidated.

Oms-Oliu et al., 2007 investigated MAP on fresh cut melon and concluded that a 70 kPa O2 atmosphere prevented anaerobic fermentation however under an atmosphere of 2.5 kPa O2 and 7 kPa CO2 fermentative pathways were triggered.

Additionally high O2 levels preserved the colour and firmness of fresh-cut melon better than low levels.

Moreover, MAP can influence the textural quality (firmness) and softening of fresh-cut fruit. The rates of softening and firmness are reported to differ among fruit type and packaging. Chonhenchob et al., 2007 demonstrated that the firmness of fresh-cut pineapples, mangoes and cantaloupe melons stored under MAP decreased during storage at 4OC however the slowest changes were observed in PET containers. MAs do not directly affect water-loss. Since most packaging films used for MAP exhibit low permeability to water vapour, water is accumulated within packs, producing a rise in RH. Therefore, the moisture content of the atmosphere within packs are usually quite high as there is moisture being produced from plant transpiration and this combined with reduced air circulation produces humidity conditions that approach saturation. Thus, the dew-point may be reached with slight temperature fluctuations resulting in condensation on the packaging film as well as the product. Packaging of produce in films therefore can reduce water-loss by providing high RH. Water-loss can lead to the development of off-colours resulting in limited SL of many perishable commodities. Srilaong et al., (2002) demonstrated that water-loss in rambutan fruit cv Rong-Rien has the effect of inducing browning during MAP storage. They found that MAP changes within packs reduced the respiration rate of the fruits so that water-loss decreased in contrast to ventilated and unpackaged packs (control). They concluded that RH inside packages was an important factor in suppressing water-loss and that the MA gas concentrations may have a secondary effect at reducing transpiration. Furthermore, they showed that

56

Chapter 1

MAP reduced ion leakage susceptibility (which is directly related to stress and the development of senescence) therefore delaying the onset of senescence in rambutan fruit thus prolonging SL.

As mentioned previously, MAP is one of the most important extrinsic factors that affect microbial spoilage of fresh-cut produce. The reduction of O2 coupled with an increase in CO2 can have different effects on fruits depending on the native microbial (and/or pathogenic) populations present. Microorganisms such as mesophilic bacteria, LAB, coliforms, yeasts and moulds have been found to be actively growing inside packaged fresh-cut fruit. In addition, while MAP might inhibit the growth rate of many microorganisms, it could permit the growth of other microflora and allow pathogens to thrive under certain conditions. In recent years, several new modified atmosphere packaging treatments have emerged aimed at preventing microbial growth by actively introducing antimicrobial agents into the packages (Han, 2003; Farber et al., 2003).

Several studies have also revealed that high O2 concentrations have been effective in reducing microbial growth, preventing anaerobic fermentation, and also inhibiting enzymatic discoloration (Day, 2000; 2008; Jacxsens et al., 2001; 2010; Allende et al., 2006).

The effectiveness of CO2 is highly dependent upon many factors including the concentration of CO2, the type of product being packaged, the storage temperature and fundamentally, the age and load of the native bacterial populations, i.e. the growth phase of any organisms, present on a given product. The atmospheric conditions used in traditional MAP are usually not high enough in CO2 (>20%) to prevent microbial proliferation and the actual inhibitory effects of traditional MAP

CO2 concentrations have been postulated. Therefore, the greatest safety concern with MAP foods is that the technology might inhibit spoilage bacterial or fungal microflora while allowing pathogenic microorganisms to thrive (Francis and O’Beirne, 1997).

57

1.8. Quality evaluation

In evaluating the extent of quality deterioration in fresh-cut produce, both objective and subjective approaches are often combined.

1.8.1. Colour Colour is a key component of fresh-cut quality (Sams, 1999). Typically, fruits which are red and yellow in colour are associated with ripeness whereas, green colours in fruits are deemed in most cases unripe. Browning, translucency and whitening are all associated with spoilage or deterioration of fresh-cut fruits. Instruments, such as colorimeters, provide a specific colour value based on the amount of light reflected from the surface of the product or the amount of light being transmitted through a product. Colour charts give illustrated details by periodic reference to colour standards or true size colour replicas of a product. The light reflected from the object passes through a red, green and blue glass filter to stimulate the standard observer function for a particular illuminant. A photo detector beyond each glass filter detects the amount of light passing through and the resulting signals are displayed as X, Y and Z values on screen as can be seen in Figure 1.18 (Hunterlab, 2001; Ohno, 2000).

Figure 1.18 Hunter L*, a* and b* values as displayed using a colorimeter. Taken from Ohno, (2000).

58

Chapter 1

The CIE L*, a* & b* values are one of the recommended colour parameters used to perceive the colour of samples (Figure 1.18). L* is the light and dark axis where L* =0 represents black and L*=100 represents white (high reflection). a* is the red and green axis, where positive a* values indicate a red colour and a negative a* value indicates a green colour, b* is the yellow to blue axis where positive b* values indicate yellow colour and negative b* value indicates a blue colour. These L*, a* & b* values can be used to calculate other parameters such as browning and whitening indices. Decreasing L* and an increasing a* & b* values denote browning (BI) in fruits while the opposite, increasing L* and decreasing a* & b* values indicate whitening (WI) of certain fruits. Another parameter Delta E (ΔΕ), uses these L*, a* & b* values to assess quality changes during a period of storage. All these parameters are used in determining the quality of fresh-cut fruit.

1.8.2. Texture Textural characteristics such as crispness and juiciness are of great importance in the enjoyment of fruit. Minor defects such as bruising or mechanical damage due to slicing can deter from the expected textural characteristic of a product resulting in consumer rejection. As a result, instrumental analysis of fruit texture has become one of the essential steps of fruit quality assessment both pre- and postharvest (Harker et al., 2002). Different cultivars vary widely in their rate of textural deterioration and there is not always a relationship between the rate of softening in whole fruit and in its fresh-cut counterparts (Gorney et al., 2000; Aguayo et al., 2004). Firmness is a common parameter assessed by means of empirical mechanical tests used to measure and maintain consumer’s perceptions of texture throughout storage and processing (Alvarez et al, 1997). Puncture or plunger tests (using a pentrometer) are normally used to measure the firmness of fruits to estimate harvest maturity. A thin slice of skin is normally removed from the area to be tested and measurements are made using a rounded-tip probe of specific geometry and of maximum force required to insert the probe into the flesh (Abbott et al., 1992; Bourne, 1974; Haller, 1941; Magness and Taylor, 1925;).

Tissue softening affects fresh-cut fruit firmness which is a very serious problem limiting the quality and shelf-life of products. Optimum harvesting time,

59 dipping treatments and storage conditions can maintain or improve fresh-cut fruit firmness (Portela et al., 1997; Ponting et al., 1971; Beaulieu, 2011).

Textural change is the major event in fruit softening and is the integral part of ripening. Depending upon their inherent composition, particularly cell wall composition, different fruits soften at different rates and to varying degrees (Tucker and Grierson, 1987). Fruit pulp or the mesocarp is the edible part of the fruit, and is composed of thin-walled storage parenchymatous cells. These cells are characterized by a prominent cell wall consisting of complex network of polysaccharides and proteins, which gives mechanical strength to tissues. The primary cell wall contains 35% pectin, 25% cellulose, 20% hemicelluloses and 10% structural, hydroxyproline rich protein (Brownleader et al, 1999). Fruit texture is influenced by various factors like structural integrity of the primary cell wall and the middle lamella, accumulation of storage polysaccharides, and the turgor pressure generated within cells by osmosis (Jackman and Stanley, 1995). Fruits such as mango, papaya and banana undergo drastic and extensive textural softening from ‘stone hard’ stage to a ‘soft pulpy’ stage associated with a change in turgor pressure, whereas apple and citrus fruits do not exhibit such a drastic softening as enzymatic hydrolysis of starch results in pronounced loosening of cell structure (Prasanna et al., 2007; Tucker and Grierson, 1987).

1.8.3. Analysis of taste and aroma compounds

Sugars are the major soluble solids components in fruit juice. The percent soluble solids concentration (%SS) can be determined in a small sample of fruit juice using an instrument called a refractometer. Determining %SS is an important factor in determining the maturity of fruit which itself determines the overall flavour quality of a fresh-cut product. Watada and Qi, (1999) reported that the quality of young honeydew melon cubes with 8.8% soluble solids was lower than that of mature fruits with 13% SS after a storage period of a few days, and then honeydew melon cubes with 8.8% SS deteriorated more rapidly than those with 13% SS.

As the total acid content or titratable acidity (TA) of fruit changes with maturity, determining the total acid concentration of fruits before harvesting is also

60

Chapter 1 important. The acids in fruit have a significant bearing on pH and play a significant role in taste, colour and microbial stability of the fruit, and in turn affect the overall quality and shelf-life of fresh-cut fruit products. TA can be determined by titrating a known volume of the fruit juice with 0.1N sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to an end point of pH 8.2 and calculating % acidity as the primary acid present. The predominant organic acids used for TA calculations of some fruit commodities are malic (stone fruits, apples and kiwis), citric (citrus fruits) and tartaric (grapes) acids.

TA maturity standards required for both domestic and international commerce. Examples of the TA requirements for some fresh fruit commodities are listed in Table 1.12.

Table 1.12: Specific maturity standards required for some fresh fruit commodities.

Commodity Sample Temperature Range TA Range/ 100ml

Cranberry 0 – 35ºC 1.6 - 3.6 g of citric acid

Table Grape 0 – 35ºC 0.4 – 0.9g of tartaric acid

Orange 0 – 35ºC 0.8 – 1.4g of citric acid

Apple / Pear 0 – 35ºC 0.36 – 0.80g of malic acid

Pineapple 0 – 35ºC 0.70 – 1.60g of citric acid

Strawberry 0 – 35ºC 0.60 – 1.10g of citric acid

Mango 0 – 35ºC 0.34 – 0.84g of citric acid Adapted from Mitcham et al., (1996)

The ratio of sugar to acid affects the taste and acceptability of fruit. These measurements assist in determining when a fruit is ready for harvesting and subsequent processing. In the production of fresh-cut fruits, it is essential to use mature fruit with acceptable eating quality for processing; over-mature fruit will deteriorate more quickly (Watada and Qi, 1999).

Volatile aroma analysis Volatile aromatic compounds (VAC) play a major contribution in imparting flavour to fruits and their existence within a fruit system is highly complex. Many factors

61 affect their production during ripening, harvest, postharvest and storage, are reliant on many factors (section 1.5). It is important to know the typical VAC pattern of a fresh product and how it is affected by processing and subsequent storage (Kataoka et al., 2000). Volatiles can be extracted by many different means but static headspace analysis (SHA) coupled with solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and followed by gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis is widely used for fruits.

Snow and Slack, (2002) defined headspace analysis as a “vapour-phase extraction, involving the partitioning of analytes between a non-volatile solid-phase and the vapour phase above the solid sample with this mixture transferred to a GC or similar device for analysis”. Static headspace analysis (SHA) is the same concept and involves letting the vapour above the sample come into equilibrium before extracting it for analysis. SHA has been used for decades for flavour analysis and today remains the most validated amongst headspace analysis techniques (El Hadi et al., 2013).

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a relatively new sample preparation technique using a fused-silica fibre that is coated with an appropriate stationary phase (Harris, 2007). Analytes in the sample are directly extracted to the fibre coating (Figure 1.19). Royer et al., (2001) successfully developed an automated HS- GC method for the determination of dithiocarbamates (pesticides) in plant matrices. Shang et al., (2002) used HS-SPME to determine the aroma components of fresh, frozen and withered Michaelia alba flowers and were able to determine the differences in the compounds present in each one.

In SHA-SPME the sample is placed in a vial which is hermetically sealed using a septum screw cap. The SPME needle pierces the septum and the fibre extends through the needle and is exposed to the vapour phase above the solid sample. The target analytes partition from the sample matrix into the stationary phase. Agitation of the sample is often carried out to increase the rate of equilibrium. After a suitable extraction time, the fibre is withdrawn into the needle, the needle removed from the septum and inserted directly into the injection port of the GC. Desorption of analytes from the fibre coating is performed by heating the fibre in the injection port. Once in the ‘inject’ position, the fibre desorbs the analytes and delivers them to the column for separation.

62

Chapter 1

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 1.19 Illustration of (a) the extraction process by headspace fibre SPME (b) thermal desorption in GC injection port with separation and (c) detection/ identification using MSD Chemstation. (Adapted from Kataoka et al., 2000)

A more recent development in sorbent chemistry employs the use of a magnetic stir bar coated with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (Figure 1.20). Termed stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), this method uses the same practical theory as SPME but with the stir bar being placed in the headspace of the sample. The stir bar has a PDMS phase with a volume of 25-125µl, compared to the significantly smaller 0.6µl of a 100µm SPME fibre. Bicci et al., (2002) used headspace-stir bar sorptive extraction (HS-SBSE) to analyse the flavour components of various coffees. This larger surface area allows increased sensitivity. Stir bars are desorbed in the injection port of the GC in a rapid, high temperature step under inert gas flow which ensures the highest sensitivity and eliminates the need for solvent use and disposal (Baltussen et al., 1999).

Figure 1.20 PDMS Stir Bar ‘Twister’ used for SBSE; Picture taken from: (davidcorcoran.com) In any analytical process it is important to consider the limitations of the methods used. In the case of GC analysis, the weaknesses in sampling or extraction method, the GC separation method and detection methods must be considered. In principle, the method of choice largely depends on the compounds of interest. There are many advantages to SHA. It is fast and simple; reproducible and non-destructive. It also

63 eliminates the need for solvent and non-volatile contaminants such as sugars and organic acids and salts that can partition to the fibre during extraction. Therefore, because the fibre is never in direct contact with the sample it has a longer life span. It also has a shorter equilibration time, but lacks the sensitivity of submersion and, as a general rule, is only used to identify main components (Alves et al., 2005). SHA- SPME also exhibits low background noise and is suitable for the extraction of more- volatile analytes however, is unsuitable for less-volatile or thermally labile compounds. In general, volatile compounds need a thick polymer coating which requires a longer time to achieve extraction equilibrium. Mixed coating fibres containing divinylbenzene (DVB), copolymers such as carboxen (CAR) which is a porous activated carobon support) and a non-polar polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) increase retention capacity due to the mutually potentiating effect of adsorption and disruption to the stationary phase, and can be used effectively for the extraction of volatile low- molecular mass and polar analytes.

In addition, if the previous GC-MS system is additionally equipped with a sniff port (GC-O) it is possible for a human to detect the compounds in the volatile compounds mixture that actually have an odor and therefore may be important in the sensory flavor of the sample. GC-O methods are classified as detection frequency, dilution to threshold, or direct intensity. Croissant et al., (2009) has reviewed common methods for GC-O include aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA), post- peak sniffing, combined hedonic aroma response measurements (CHARM), Osme, and nasal impact frequency/surface nasal impact frequency (NIF/SNIF). These studies often are followed by reconstitution studies of key compounds detected using sensory analysis (Poehlmann, and Schieberle, 2013; Careri et al., 2002). Furthermore, it is sometimes possible to use an “electronic nose” to assess the composition of the volatiles compounds of a sample (Maul et al., 2000; Berna et al., 2005) and determine whether those compounds match predetermined groupings to identify products that may meet certain criteria. An electronic nose is composed of a number of sensors that interact with the volatiles that result in a change in their properties that is recorded and afterwards analysed (Dynerski et al., 2011). Electronic noses do not attempt to identify individual compounds and thus are more of an additional tool to GC techniques and sensory analysis.

64

Chapter 1

In a mixture of odorants we now need to assess which odorants are more important. This will depend on the threshold of an odorant and its concentration. A compound may have a high concentration but if its threshold is large (i.e. a high concentration of this compound is needed to smell it) it will not contribute significantly to the aroma. Conversely, a compound with a low threshold and large concentration will probably dominate the aroma (Chambers and Koppel, 2013). The odour activity value (OAV) is equal to the concentration of a component of the aroma divided by its detection threshold level. The more powerful odorants are very difficult to measure as they occur in very low concentrations. The more powerful odorants are very difficult to measure as they occur in very low concentrations (Parker et al., 2012).

1.8.4. Total antioxidant activity Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) and total radical-trapping antioxidant power (TRAP) are widely used for determining total antioxidant activity (TAA). Because different antioxidant compounds may act in vivo through different mechanisms, no single method can fully evaluate the TAA of foods. The TEAC assay utilises 2,2’-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6 sulfonic acid) radical cation (ABTS), which is oxidised by peroxyl radicals to the stable radical cation (ABTS+), absorbing light at 734nm. From a methodological point of view, the DPPH assay is recommended as easy an accurate with regard measuring the antioxidant activity of fruit. It is based on the measurement of the scavenging ability of the antioxidants towards DPPH which is reduced to the corresponding hydrazine when it reacts with hydrogen donors. It is evaluated on the basis that the DPPH signal intensity is inversely related to the test antioxidant concentration. In the presence of antioxidants, radical formation is inhibited, and the exponential absorbance decay is monitored spectrophotometrically against the presence of a control sample, Trolox, at a fixed point in time. The antioxidant capacity is expressed as Trolox equivalents.

The antioxidant capacity of several substances occurring in plants has been documented in human intervention studies, although most of the work has been directed toward the effects of vitamins C and E and β-carotene (Blasta et al., 2010). Berries and some varieties of apples have a relatively high TAA, which is likely to be associated with the high content of flavonoids such as anthocyanins. Oranges and grapes exhibited intermediate TAA, probably associated with higher concentrations 65 of phenolic compounds and vitamin C, while melons had lowest TAA values. However, TAA assays such as DPPH are performed at non-physiological pH values thus making it difficult to transfer the results from this assay to the physiological environment in vivo; they only serve to give an idea of the protective efficacy of secondary plant products (Schleiser et al., 2002).

1.8.5. Sensory Evaluation Studies which investigate the importance of sensory parameters on consumer acceptability conclude that flavour is the most important component, followed by texture and then appearance (Fillion and Kilcast, 2000; 2001). Sensory analysis applies principles of experimental design and statistical analysis to the use of human organoleptic senses for the purpose of evaluating consumer products and is often correlated with instrumental analysis (Le Calvé, 2000).

Descriptive tests are used to discriminate between different of products. Panellists are required to detect and describe the perceived qualitative and quantitative sensory attributes of a sample. Qualitative aspects define a product in terms of appearance, aroma, texture and flavour. Quantitative ranking scales allow panellists to rate the product using a set hedonic scale. Chapter 2 describes the various sensory attributes used to determine the quality of a given commodity. Numerical rating scales and their descriptive equivalents are described in Section 2.2.

1.8.6. Microbial enumeration

Monitoring microflora changes and determining the type and load of microorganisms present within MA packaged fresh-cut fruits is an important aspect of quality assessment in these products (section 1.5.4; section 3.2).

1.9. Principal component analysis

Traditionally, product quality changes have been assessed in terms of single attributes such as colour and/or textural defects, sugar and acidity changes and the

66

Chapter 1 development of undesirable off-odours through sensory evaluation during storage. However, relating these subjective and objective measurements, as affected by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, to see what pattern exists has rarely been observed for fresh-cut fruit. Furthermore, continuous measurement over an appropriate time scale (e.g. 7 Day storage) generates large data matrices which can be sometimes hard to summarise.

In this instance, principal component analysis (PCA) can be used. PCA is a method of multivariate analysis broadly used with datasets of multiple dimensions. PCA aims to reveal patterns in the data, especially among samples that could not be found by analysing each variable independently. One way of detecting such patterns is to plot the quality attributes in multidimensional space, the dimensions of which are the new derived variables for each sample. PCA allows the reduction of the number of defined variables in a multidimensional dataset, although it retains much of the variation within a dataset. It produces linear combinations of the original variables to generate axes or principal components (PCs). The order of the PCs denotes their importance to that particular dataset, while the loadings indicate how much each variable is involved in each axis positively or negatively. For datasets with many variables, the variance of some axes may be great, whereas others may be small, such that they can be ignored (Swan and Sandilands, 1995). The ordination approach permits the construction of a multidimensional space whereby each vector represents a quality attribute in the study. This multidimensional space is reduced to two (or sometimes three) dimensions for graphical interpretation and communication thus allowing the examination of relationships among samples. Ordination in this manner is often referred to as scaling or factor analysis (reduced space), and the attributes are ordered along each axis with the distance between each one representing their biological dissimilarity (Holland, 2008).

Figure 1.21 illustrates a basic understanding and interpretation of a PCA ellipsoid. PC1 describes the highest amount of variance while PC2 describes the second highest, and so on. PC1 has a dashed line passing through the greatest dimension of the ellipsoid (perpendicular to the x-axis) and is the major axis of the ellipsoid. PC2 has a similar line passing through the ellipsoid (parallel to the x-axis; and it demonstrates the second highest variance. Generally the first three PCs

67 represent the highest variance present in the datasets, giving the best visualisation of the differentiation of the different clusters.

In addition, because all units of measurement in quality evaluation testing are different, the data is frequently centred and standardised to unit variance to have equal weight in analysis with the impending illustration referred to as a correlation matrix. After centring the data, loadings are plotted on the ellipsoid with respect to their means (dashed lines). Each of the loadings represents the axis of the original space.

The can be used to estimate which of the original variables (attributes) contribute strongly to deterioration. Ideally, each loading should load strongly on one component (axis) with the loadings close to a positive or negative one (strong correlation) or zero (no correlation). In terms of interpretation, a negative loading for an attribute on axis I, for example, means that along axis I, all negative loadings correlate positively with other variables in the same axis plane and negatively with other variables loaded positively.

Figure 1.21 Principal Component Analysis – Axis (PC) Interpretation.

68

Chapter 1

1.10. Conclusion

The literature review highlighted that the effects of variations in intrinsic and extrinsic factors on quality of fresh-cut fruits are still poorly understood. It also illustrated inferior quality of commercial products and the need to optimise packaging. The experimental work which follows addresses the effects of both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, namely raw material suitability, processing and packaging, on fresh-cut fruit quality and assesses product-package compatibility with a view to technology optimisation.

69

70

Chapter 2

Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using Principal Component Analysis: Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors

Paper I: Finnegan, E. and O’Beirne, D. (2014a) “Characterising Deterioration Patterns in Fresh-cut Fruits using Principal Component Analysis I.” Submitted to Postharvest Biology and Technology (with revisions), August 2014.

Paper II: Finnegan, E. and O’Beirne, D. (2014b) “Characterising Deterioration Patterns in Fresh-cut Fruits using Principal Component Analysis II: Effects of Physiological Age, Seasonality, Processing and Packaging.” Submitted to Postharvest Biology and Technology (with revisions), August 2014.

70

Chapter 2

This chapter (2) demonstrates the applied use of principal component analysis (PCA) in characterising the processes of deterioration in a variety of fresh-cut fruit as affected by common intrinsic and extrinsic factor variables. For ease of interpretation, it is presented in two parts. Part I is entitled “Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis”. It demonstrates the practical application of PCA in characterising and tracking the deterioration patterns of fresh-cut pineapple, strawberry, kiwifruit and cantaloupe melon during storage. Effects of geographical origin and cultivar were studied to demonstrate efficacy of the application. Part II is entitled “Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis: Effects of ripeness stage, seasonality, processing and packaging”. It demonstrates the applied use of PCA in characterising and tracking deterioration patterns in a variety of fresh-cut fruits as affected by the aforementioned intrinsic and extrinsic factor variables. Supplementary in-pack gas atmosphere data for effects of packaging and storage temperature, used in PCA analysis, is presented in Appendix C.1-4.

71

72

Chapter 2

Chapter 2.1

“Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using Principal Component Analysis: I”

73

74

Chapter 2

2.1. Abstract Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to track quality deterioration patterns in fresh-cut pineapple, strawberry, kiwifruit and cantaloupe melon during storage. Twenty-seven physiological, biochemical, microbial and sensory attributes, reported as indices of quality, were used to successfully characterise and track deteriorative changes. Freshness for all fruits was characterised by PCA as excellent visual appearance, aroma and firmness. Deterioration was characterised, for the most part, by increased tissue breakdown (exudate and cell permeability levels), firmness loss, increased off-odour development, colour loss (browning and translucency) and high microbial counts. Effects of cultivar and geographic origin were apparent in some fruits. PCA has the potential to track the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors of deterioration and could form the basis of future strategies to optimise quality.

Author’s remark:

“Good” and “Poor” quality attributes as interpreted by the author differed from fruit to fruit. However, an over-lapping pattern of the following attributes was noted in all cases:

Good quality attributes for the most part were attributed to:

 Overall acceptability  Appearance  Colour (both instrumental and sensory)  Aroma  Firmness (both instrumental and sensory)

While poor quality attributes were attributed to:

 Loss of firmness reported as increased drip-loss, weight-loss, exudate and cell permeability.  High microbial counts  Off-odour development

 In-pack CO2 accumulation

Keywords: Minimal processing, Quality, Characterisation, Acceptability, Modified Atmosphere Packaging, Geographic origin.

75

2.2. Introduction

Ensuring quality retention in fresh-cut fruits continues to be a challenge. While storage-life and quality are strongly affected by raw materials, severity of processing and storage conditions (Artes et al., 2006), the precise mechanisms and dynamics of deterioration are incompletely understood. Greater understanding may enable optimised or alternative strategies to be identified and applied. Changes in product appearance and firmness are often first observed, followed by development of off- odours and off-flavours and microbial proliferation. Of particular importance are discolouration (browning, whitening and translucency), loss of firmness (membrane degradation, tissue softening and ion leakage) and decreases in nutritional value (Klein, 1987) coupled with development of off-odours, off-flavours and microbial growth (Brecht, 1995; Varoquaux and Wiley, 2004 and Ruiz-Cruz et al., 2010). However these physical, physiological, biochemical and microbial changes occur at different rates and to different extents and are greatly influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, causing significant quality losses between harvest, processing, storage and consumption (Rolle and Chism, 1987; Watada and Qi, 1999; Emonger, 2009; Mahdavian et al., 2007; Mba et al., 2007; Safizadeh et al., 2007; Kazeim et al., 2011 and Shirzadeh and Kazemi, 2011).

Significant effects of production locality and/or cultural practices have been noted in many fruits (Blanpied et al., 1987; Rowell, 1988) attributable to the fact that worldwide fruit production has expanded greatly in terms of traditional and new locations of diverse climatic conditions, cultural practices and harvesting techniques. Therefore there is a need for a dynamic overview of the complex continuous quality tests of traditional evaluation systems, where datasets can be simplified to graphical representations for quality interpretation. Such systems are emerging (Chen et al., 2013; Dong et al., 2013; El Kar et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 2013; Hurtado et al., 2012; Infante et al., 2011 and Rocha et al., 2010) from a biological, sensorial, physiological and microbiological point of view.

In postharvest science, principal component analysis (PCA) is an emerging method for routine data analysis (Kienzle et al., 2011; Reichel et al., 2010). It is regarded as an unsupervised method of multivariate analysis, meaning that the model is not guided in a predetermined direction. Furthermore, PCA is viewed as an

76

Chapter 2 iterative measure of ‘real world’ observation through which a dataset is resolved into a matrix in the form of principal components (PCs) that can be handled by classical statistic methods, visualised and interpreted to extract the particular information required (Wang et al., 2012).

By applying PCA to a range of sensory, physical and chemical data, clearer patterns may emerge that cannot be seen with individual measurements over large data-sets. One way of detecting such patterns is to plot the quality attributes in multidimensional space, the dimensions of which are the new derived variables. In this case, the attributes are ordered along each retained principal component (PC) with the distance between each one representing their biological dissimilarity (Holland, 2008).

Typically, only the first two PCs accounts for meaningful variance, hence only PCI and PCII are commonly retained and interpreted in simple structure biplots. Furthermore, because all units of measurement in quality evaluation are different, the data is frequently centred and standardised to unit variance to have equal weight in analysis, with the resulting illustration referred to as a correlation matrix. The loadings produced will show a similar pattern, although their absolute differences will differ, with variables plotted along PCI and PCII displaying different constructs sharing the same conceptual meanings respectively, i.e. good quality and poor quality. In terms of interpretation, a negative loading for an attribute on PCI, for example, means that along PCI, all negative loadings correlate positively with other variables in the same axis plane and negatively with other variables loaded positively.

However, although it is widely used and accepted in postharvest food science and industry, PCA is relatively unpractised when it comes to quality evaluation and factor analysis. The dynamic output from such a system are often visualised as intricate patterns that can neither in detail be predicted nor exactly interpreted by users. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PCA in characterising and tracking quality changes in a number of fresh-cut fruits. Deterioration patterns due to cultivar and geographic origin differences were also determined with a view of optimising intrinsic factors affecting fresh-cut fruit quality.

77

2.3. Materials and methods 2.3.1. Plant materials

Whole fruits were collected from a local wholesaler (Richardson’s Fruit and Vegetables, Limerick, Ireland) the day before each trial and stored at 4OC (for a maximum of 15h for chilling sensitive commodities) until processed. Intrinsic factors (geographical variation of fruit origin and cultivar) of intact fruits studied are shown in Table 2.1 but prior postharvest storage conditions were unavailable.

Table 2.1: Fruit types, cultivars/ variety, countries of origin and class used.

Country of Fruit Cultivar/ Variety Class Season Origin Del Monte Gold Extra Sweet Costa Rica Pineapple Extra Autumn Ananas comosus L. Merr MD2 Brazil Fragaria spp. Elsanta Festival Ireland I Orly Egypt I Strawberry Ethiopia I Summer Camarosa Spain I Morocco I Camarosa Actinidia deliciosa cv Hayward New I Zealand Kiwi I Autumn Hayward Italy I Brazil Hayward Cucumis melo L. var reticulatus Costa Rica I Cucumis melo L. var Melon Brazil I Winter reticulatus Italy I Cucumis melo L. var cantalupensis

2.3.2. Fresh-cut processing and packaging

Fresh-cut fruits were processed at room temperature (~22OC). Peels, husks, stems and hulls were manually removed using a stainless steel knife and the fruits were cut to size as required. All fruits were cut into 25mm (pineapple and melon) and ¼ (kiwifruit) sizes while strawberries were de-hulled and halved (Figure 2.2). All samples (150g) were placed in rigid polylactic acid (PLA) trays within pillow packs (412.9cm2) and sealed using an impulse bench-top heat sealer (Relco, U.K. Ltd.,

78

Chapter 2

England). A high barrier laminate flexible film (PET12/PE55) with O2 and CO2 permeabilities of 62,814 and 212,776 ml. microns/m2.day.atm.was used to make the pillow packs (Amcor Flexibles, Gloucester, UK). This resulted in product modification of the atmosphere within packs.

2.3.3. Quality testing

In-pack gas atmosphere composition

The percent concentration of atmospheric gases within packs was measured at room temperature (~20OC) using a gas-space analyser (Systech Instruments, U.K) fitted with a 50mL air tight syringe. The mean values of duplicate O2 and CO2 concentrations were recorded and the experiment repeated twice.

Moisture loss (%)

Percent weight loss was calculated using the method from Moneruzzaman et al., (2008) and expressed as gram loss per fresh-cut weight using the following equation (1.10):

Initial Weight of Pack − Weight on Day of Analysis (g) 100 × Initial Weight of Pack (g) 1

Drip-loss, exudate and cell permeability

The volume of free liquid released during storage (drip-loss) was recorded as mL/150g fresh weight. Exudate levels were quantified using the method by Carlin et al., (1990) with slight modifications, and recorded as grams per 100g fresh weight. Cell permeability was determined by monitoring leakage of UV-absorbing solutes as reported by Picchioni et al., (1994) with slight modifications. The absorbance of the clarified solution was measured at 260nm against distilled water (UV/Vis spectrophotometer, Varian Cary 100, Agilent Technologies LTD, Dublin, Ireland).

79

Percent soluble solids

Percent soluble solids was measured in clear fruit juice from homogenised fruit pieces using an Atago Digital Pocket Refractometer (Atago Co., LTD., Tokyo, Japan).

Tissue pH and titratable acidity

Tissue pH was recorded from homogenised fruit pulp. Clear juice (10mL) was mixed with 10mL of distilled and deionised water was measured using a Jenway 3510 pH meter. Titratable acidity was calculated as citric acid by titrating juice samples to pH 8.2 using 0.1N NaOH.

Colour

Surface colour of fresh-cut fruits was determined using a Minolta chromameter 5081, fitted with an 11-mm aperture and a D65 illuminant (Konics Minolta, Sensing Inc., Osaka). Three measurements were taken at random locations on each of the fruit samples, and this was replicated three times. CIE L*, a* and b* values were determined and presented herein. Using standard CIE L*, a* and b* values, indices of colour quality were measured. Browning index was calculated as BI = (100(x – 0.31)) / 0.17, where x = [(a-1.75*L) / [(5.645*L) + a - (3.012*b)]. Whitening Index was calculated as WI = 100 - [(100 - L*)2 +(a*)2 + (b*)2] ½. Delta E was calculated 2 2 2 ½ as ∆E = [(Lf – Li) + (af –ai) + (bf –bi) ] Where, f = final & i = initial. Chroma was (b∗) √a2 + b2 O tan−1 calculated as C* = ` and Hue angle was calculated as H = (a∗) where, if H<0O then h = h+360; if H>0O then h = h-360, r = 180/π.

Texture

Firmness was determined using a TA.XT Plus Texture Analyser (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) fitted with a 6mm flat tipped cylindrical probe. The force required to penetrate (F) a piece of fruit was recorded as both the maximum and mean force in Newtons (N). The fresh-cut pieces were of uniform shape and size to allow for repeated accuracy of results. Using the Kramer Shear Cell and Extended Craft Knife (pineapple only) attachments, the maximum force, area and mean force

80

Chapter 2 required to shear (S) through 150g of fruit samples, in duplicate, was recorded in Newtons (N) as an index of product firmness.

2.3.4. Microbial enumeration

The different media used were prepared, plated and stored according to manufacturer’s instructions (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstokes, UK). On each sampling day, 10g of fruit was aseptically removed from each pack and homogenised with 90mL of 0.1% peptone water at high speed for 120s. Serial dilutions (10-1 to 10-4) were prepared by mixing 1mL of the homogenate liquid with 9mL of 0.1% peptone water. Total viable counts (mesophiles and psychrophiles) and yeasts and moulds were prepared in the following way: aliquots (100µl) of each serial dilution were applied on to the surface of appropriate media and were surface spread in duplicate using an inoculation spreader. For lactic acid bacteria (LAB), media pour plates were prepared whereby 100µl of sample was added to the media followed by a molten overlay of media (50OC). Total viable count plates for mesophiles and psychrophiles were incubated at 35OC and 4OC for 48h and 7 Days respectively, LAB plates for 48h at 35OC and yeast and mould plates for 5 Days at 20OC. Following incubation, colony- forming-units (CFU) were counted on plates that contained between 20-200 CFU. Results were expressed as colony-forming-units per gram (CFU/g) of sample.

2.3.5. Sensory evaluation Descriptive tests were used to evaluate the sensory quality attributes of fruit packs. The quality attributes examined were overall visual appearance, colour, aroma, off- odour, texture, and overall acceptability. Evaluation was performed by an untrained sensory panel which consisted of 12 judges (8 female and 4 male), all members of the Life Science Department, University of Limerick. Before the start of each sampling day, panel members were familiarised with the product and scoring procedure. Panellists were then randomly grouped into pairs and given 1 sample pack (as is) to evaluate against that of a fresh-cut sample (control) in terms of the aforementioned attributes. External colour was assessed using descriptors developed by Kader and Cantwell, (2010). For visual appearance and overall acceptability, 81 fresh-cut fruits were evaluated under fluorescent lighting using a 9-point rating scale, where a score of 9 indicated the sample was excellent, 7 represented very good, 5 acceptable/ fair, 3 poor and 1 extremely poor. Evaluation of aroma was performed using quantitative descriptive sensory analysis techniques (Kader and Cantwell, 2010), where; 9 = excellent, normal characteristic aroma, 7 = very good, normal to slightly off, 5 = limit of marketability, 3 = fair, limit of usability, strong off-odours, slightly anaerobic, becoming offensive and 1 = poor, inedible, very strong off- odours, very fermented. In Table 2.2, panellists were asked to remark on the typical aroma noted for each of the samples with a list of the common aroma characteristics described by panellists listed. For texture evaluation panellists were asked to rank firmness (touch) by marking a 100mm line with unanchored terms where a score of 1mm = extremely soft while a score of 100mm = extremely firm. Quantitative results were obtained by measuring the distance from zero to the mark.

2.3.6. Statistical Analysis

Multi-factorial experiments were conducted in duplicate and repeated twice. Data for quality deterioration parameters were processed by analysis of variance (ANOVA, repeated-measures, SPSS 19, IBM, Chicago) with all factors in each experiment reported as fixed effects (p<0.05). Microbial populations and sensory parameters were individually analysed by two-way analyses of variance (paired t-test). For sensory parameters, panellists were reported as random effects and treatments as fixed effects (p<0.05). Tukey’s pairwise comparison test was used for differences between individual treatments (p<0.05).

For each experiment, PCA was performed on all quality and sensory variables (Canoco 4.5; Waigeningen, UR, NL.). The analysis was performed on the response of 27 variables to six to ten sample treatments, each the mean of four replicates. All variables were mean centred and standardised (scaled) to unit variance prior to analysis i.e. correlation matrix. For each component of the PCA, a score for each sample was calculated as a linear combination for each physiochemical, sensory and microbial parameter measurements. The contribution of each parameter to the PCA score was deduced from the parameters loading for the factor. As PCA is performed

82

Chapter 2 on a matrix of Pearson Correlation Coefficients, the data should therefore satisfy the assumptions for this statistic. However, it is often desirable to assess this reliability by computing coefficient alpha as an index of internal consistency and reliability. For that reason, Pearson’s correlation ( ) was performed using SPSS 20, (IBM, Chicago, IL., USA) to better understand the association between monotonic quality (ratio) and sensory (ordinal) variables within a dataset and test the reliability of the technique. Where appropriate; ( ) ranged from inverse (-1) to positive (+1) with small (0.1≤ | | < 0.3), medium (0.3 ≤ | | <0.5) and large/ strong (| | ≥ 0.5) effects noted.

83

Table 2.2 Intrinsic characteristics of intact fruit used

Physiological age Firmness, Soluble solids, Type/ Source Origin Cultivar Aromax x N % External colour, Ripeness class (8) Sweet, Pineapple Costa Rica Del Monte Gold 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) 7.6 12.7 Pineapple 1 (7) Sweet, Pineapple, Brazil Extra Sweet 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) 7.3 12.3 Tart (8) Strawberry, Sweet, Fresh Spain Camarossa 5 Ripe (5) 11.1 8.5 (8) Strawberry, Sweet Morocco Camarossa 4 to 5 Ripe (5) 9.6 9.2 Strawberry 2 (9) Strawberry, Fresh Egypt Festival 5 Ripe (5) 7.0 9.2 (6) Strong, Ethiopia Orly* 6 Ripe (5) 4.4 9.1 Strawberry, Musty Ireland El Santa 5 Ripe (5) 2.4 8.3 (8) Sweet, Strawberry, Fresh (9) Grassy, Green, Sweet, Italy Hayward 3 Ripe (4) 1.5 7.5 (9) Green, Kiwifruit 2 New Zealand Hayward 3 Ripe (5) 2.8 7.3 Grassy, Fresh Brazil Hayward 3 Ripe (5) (8) Green, Grassy, Fresh (9) Pungent, Green, Musky Costa Rica N/A 5 Ripe (5) 8.2 7.7 (8) Pungent, Cantaloupe Melon 2 Brazil N/A 5 Ripe (5) 6.5 7.1 Musky, Sweet Italy N/A 5 Ripe (5) 7.3 6.5 (8) Melon, Sweet, Musky 1External shell colour percentage was recorded against a Dole pineapple colour chart 2External shell colour was recorded against UC Davis colour charts. (Kader, and Cantwell, 2010) X numbers in brackets depict ripeness class and aroma scores * Signs of mould in some fresh packs

84

Chapter 2

2.4. Results 2.4.1. Processes of deterioration

Principal component analysis was carried out on the correlation matrix produced from twenty-seven quality attributes, previously identified as contributing to the quality deterioration of fresh-cut fruits. The factor loadings for the different quality ratings were plotted based on the first two principal components (PCs) with attributes and samples illustrated as vector angles and symbols respectively. PCI accounted for the greatest amount of the total variance (inertia) meaning that (under typical test conditions) PCI was correlated with many of the observed variables loaded on that component. PCII was uncorrelated with PCI and accounted for the largest amount of total variance in the dataset not accounted for by PCI. The proportion of variance accounted for was deduced using the cumulative percent of variance criterion for determining the number of PCs to retain. For the current analysis the cumulative percent of variance must have accounted for at least 90% of inertia in order to be retained and subsequently interpreted. Following this, the orthogonal biplot was reviewed for interpretability. The proportions of variance produced for biplots of each fruit type are presented in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3 Proportion of cumulative percentage variance and inertia for biplots construed for each fruit type and treatment

a data disregarded for subsequent interpretation

1 Inertia is a measure of variation or ‘spread’ within a correlation matrix i.e. the total variance of the dataset (Husson et al., 2008).

85

In order to assess whether categories of variables were different from, or positively/ negatively associated with each other, confidence ellipses were drawn around them (Figure 2.1 a-d). These ellipses enclosed a group of related variables and/ or identified groups of related variables across each matrix.

A consistent trend was observed for all fruits studied in that the rotated factor pattern demonstrated a simple orthogonal structure with variable loadings on PCI and PCII measuring different constructs respectively. Furthermore, variables loading on PCI and PCII respectively share the same conceptual meaning, e.g. PCI refers to good quality attributes while PCII refers to poor quality attributes, with the exception of cantaloupe melon. Observations close to each other in the space of a PC are said to have similar characteristics. Similarly, variables whose unit vectors are close to each other are said to be positively correlated, meaning that their influence on the positioning of samples is similar. Variables distant from each other across an axis plane are defined as being negatively correlated. Poor quality attributes positively associated with increased deterioration were identified as increased microbial counts, increased cell permeability and exudate levels, increased off-odour development,

CO2 accumulation and discoloration. Good quality attributes were reported as good appearance, aroma, firmness and overall acceptability and in most cases were inversely correlated with the poor quality attributes previously noted. Coefficient alpha values ( ) reported indicate the reliability of PCA interpretation using the biplot alone.

Irrespective of treatment, all samples moved in a similar pattern during storage indicating diminished quality and increased deterioration (see also Finnegan and O’Beirne, 2014b). As anticipated and as illustrated by small vector angles within the same component plane, scores for acceptability of appearance, aroma and firmness were highly correlated with overall acceptability for all fruits. For fresh-cut pineapple, poor quality attributes such as increased drip-loss, weight-loss and exudate were positively loaded on PCII, while good quality attributes such as fresh appearance ( =0.869), firmness ( =0.380), and aroma ( =0.780) were highly correlated with overall acceptability and negatively loaded. Tissue breakdown, reported as increased exudate and cell permeability levels, were shown to be negatively correlated ( =-0.612) with instrumental firmness measurements suggesting a direct relationship with deterioration. 86

Chapter 2

For fresh-cut strawberry, poor quality attributes such as increased cell permeability, microbial counts (especially yeasts and moulds and lactic acid bacteria) and off- odour were positively loaded on PCI, while good quality attributes such as visual appearance ( =0.869), aroma ( =0.780) strongly correlated with overall acceptability, and negatively loaded. Firmness loss (both instrumental and sensory) was negatively loaded in PC I and II respectively, with sensory firmness negatively correlated with overall acceptability.

For fresh-cut kiwifruit, discoloration (loss of greenness observed as loss in luminosity (L*) and greenness (a*) with increased yellowness (b*)) and loss of firmness were highly indicative of increased deterioration. There were strong correlations between appearance ( =0.800), firmness ( =0.901) and overall acceptability. Moreover, increased cell permeability levels were positively correlated with instrumental firmness levels ( =-0.800), again suggesting a relationship.

Interestingly, unlike other fruits, quality changes in fresh-cut cantaloupe melon occurred along PCII, moving from positive position to negative during storage. The positioning of loadings so closely together would suggest minimal quality change during storage. The positioning of sample scores on the far left would also suggest that fruit pieces were less affected in terms of quality change than other fruits. An exception to loadings is the positioning of CIE L*, a* and b* values and sensory firmness which appeared to be the greatest attributes affected; observed as loss of luminosity and orange hue and loss of firmness in favour of increased colour change (sensory colour) and increased instrumental firmness. Furthermore, aroma scores were highly correlated with acceptability ( =0.736). Furthermore, increased off-odour ( =-0.865) and microbial counts ( =-0.800) were highly associated with increased deterioration during storage. Sugar/ acid ratio and percent soluble solids were inversely correlated ( =-0.642) indicating the importance of sweetness in melon quality compared to the other fruits studied.

87

88

89

90

91

Figure 2.1 Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of geographical origin and cultivar on quality evaluation attributes for (a) Fresh-cut Pineapple (b) Fresh-cut Strawberry and (c) Fresh-cut Kiwifruit (d) Fresh- cut Cantaloupe Melon during 7 Day storage at 4OC.

Key of abbreviations (attributes): CO2 (carbon dioxide), O2 (oxygen), F (puncture probe firmness - 6mm), S (Shear firmness), max (maximum firmness, Newton), mean (mean firmness, Newton), LAB (lactic acid bacteria), Y&M (yeasts and moulds), L* (CIE L* Lightness-Darkness), a* (CIE a* green-red) and b*(CIE b* blue-yellow).

92

Chapter 2

2.4.2. Effects of origin and cultivar

Depending on the source of the whole fruit used for fresh-cut fruit processing and/or the cultivar, sample loadings were separated out along the PCs according to their initial quality and patterns of deterioration. The data show the relationships between the geographic origin of the raw material, the cultivar (fresh-cut strawberry only), storage time and overall quality loss (Figure 2.1 a-d).

In the case of pineapple (Figure 2.1a), fresh-cut Del Monte Gold Extra Sweet from Costa Rica and Brazil were compared. Fresh-cut fruits from both sources displayed similar patterns of deterioration during storage, with Costa Rican grown fruits having slightly better quality throughout. Deterioration was slowest between Day 0 and Day 1, and more rapid thereafter, showing increasing cell permeability, in-pack CO2 accumulation, off-odour development and microbial counts, slightly more so for Brazilian grown fruit.

In the case of strawberry (Figure 2.1b), the cultivar ‘El Santa‘ (from Ireland), ‘Camarosa’ (from Spain and Morocco) ‘Festival’ (from Egypt) and ‘Orly’ (from Ethiopia) were compared. All samples quickly lost their initial fresh-cut quality characteristics and, by Day 4, were characterised as having very high in-pack CO2 levels, high microbial counts, decreased acceptability and darkening red hue. Irish El Santa strawberries had the greatest rate and extent of deterioration as demonstrated by the positioning of the sample loadings across the axes planes. Compared to the other cultivars, Camarosa samples were located low in the axis plane indicating slightly poorer quality (p>0.05).

In the case of kiwifruit (Figure 2.1c), fruits of the cultivar ‘Hayward’ were compared from three sources and analysed over 2 months (August and October). Fresh-cut New Zealand fruits had best initial quality, and retained good appearance, aroma, firmness and acceptability for longer. Scores were located further down to the right of the good attribute plane, moving towards the poor attribute plane as storage progressed. Fresh-cut Italian and Brazilian fruits had initially poorer quality, and were positioned further to the left of the plane, characterised as having reduced appearance, firmness and overall acceptability. Fresh-cut New Zealand kiwifruit deteriorated later in storage, the greatest rate of deterioration from Day 4 to Day 7. By contrast, Brazilian kiwifruit had greatest quality loss early, from Day 1 to Day 4. 93

Cantaloupe melons were studied from three sources, reticulantus from Costa Rica and Brazil, and cantaloupensis from Italy (Figure 2.1d). Fresh-cut Costa Rican melons initially had best appearance, aroma and acceptability and retained these well until Day 4. Fresh-cut Brazilian fruits also displayed good initial quality, but lost this more rapidly. Fresh-cut Italian melons were positioned lower down towards the poorer end of the axis plane from the start, characterised as having reduced visual appeal and overall acceptability.

2.5. Discussion 2.5.1. Processes of deterioration

The PCA plots combined sensory and instrumental measurements of quality to provide “maps” of deterioration of fresh-cut fruits. The general pattern was loss of initial high sensory scores and the concurrent development of poor quality attributes during storage: off-odours, increased cell permeability and tissue breakdown, translucency, loss of firmness and high microbial growth. Flesh translucency is apparent when the cellular spaces are filled with liquid, giving tissues a more vitreous appearance (O’Connor-Shaw et al., 1994; Chen and Paull, 2001; Montéro- Calderón et al., 2008a, b). In the current PCA plots, this was recorded as increasing lightness and greenness/yellowness in fresh-cut pineapple and kiwifruit. Translucency was usually followed by development of off-odours (melon) and browning at cut edges (pineapple). In general, tissue breakdown and cell leakage, reported as increased drip-loss, cell permeability and exudate levels, correlated well with increased microbial growth and development of off-odours. Products of microbial spoilage and fermentation result in aroma and flavour defects of fresh-cut fruits, during MA storage (Carlin et al., 1989; 1990). High CO2 atmospheres, as observed in fresh-cut strawberry packs, can have contradictory effects on quality as they can damage product firmness but may also reduce bacterial and fungal growth, depending on the product in question (Carlin et al., 1990; Babic et al., 1993; Madrid and Cantwell, 1993; Barber et al., 2000).

94

Chapter 2

2.5.2. Effects of fruit type, cultivar and origin

The relative importance of these different processes of deterioration varied with fruit type, and the rates of quality change during storage varied with fruit type, cultivar and geographic origin. Deterioration in fresh-cut pineapple was primarily in appearance, firmness and aroma coupled with an increase in browning, flesh softening, drip-loss and translucency, and development of off-odours. This is in line with degradative processes known to occur during storage which can cause tissues to discolour and loose moisture (Ártés et al., 2007; Gil et al., 2006; Saltveit, 2000). When the same cultivar was compared from two geographic origins, the patterns and rates of deterioration were similar, though there was a consistent difference in quality throughout.

In fresh-cut strawberry, the plots showed that deterioration was related to loss of firmness/increased cell permeability, weight loss, mould growth and off-flavour development, and that quality loss was rapid in the early stages of storage, between Day 1 and Day 4. When strawberries from different sources were compared, most were similar in their pattern and rate of deterioration, but Irish grown El Santa deteriorated faster than the other samples. Wright and Kader (1997) reported that the visual quality of strawberries decreased during 7 Day storage, and regardless of packaging film and cultivar, decreased in firmness (Rosen and Kader, 1989), with shelf-life limited by discolouration, decay and/or visible microbial growth (Barth et al., 2009).

For fresh-cut kiwifruit, quality losses were associated with a severe loss in firmness (to a mushy consistency) and appearance (colour loss and translucency) coupled with a loss of aroma. In fleshy fruits which ripen during storage, the degradation of chlorophyll is more pronounced with concurrent decreases in total carotenoids (Lodge and Perera, 2011). Plots for fruits of the same cultivar but from different sources, showed that New Zealand fruit had better quality and slower deterioration than fruit grown in Brazil or Italy. The different extremes of quality change could be attributable to harvest seasons, in that kiwifruit from Italy could be stored for up to 1 year or freshly harvested, depending on when they were purchased within season, while kiwifruit from New Zealand could be stored for up to 6 months

95

before purchased. This will be covered in more detail in paper II (Finnegan and O’Beirne, 2014b).

In the case of cantaloupe melon, the plots showed that increased microbial growth, translucency, sponginess and off-odour development were characteristic of diminished quality. Fresh-cut melon lost its initial vibrant colour in favour of a more translucent, water-soaked appearance, especially where fruit was submerged in its exudate. Although the fruit pieces quickly lost their acceptability to panellists, they actually increased in instrumental firmness during storage. This was picked up by the PCA plot. Moreover, translucency, which is commonly reported in melon varieties (Cantwell and Portela, 1998; Portela et al., 2001; Aguayo et al., 2003) was apparent in this study and recorded by PCA as decreasing lightness (L*) and orangeness (a*).

Fresh-cut melon (CH) produced from fruits grown in Italy were of lower quality than those from fruits grown in Costa Rica or Brazil. Yeast counts were high in fresh-cut cantaloupe melon packs (especially Italian fruit), and they developed noticeable off-odours which were successfully recorded by PCA. Babic et al., (1992) reported that large cell numbers of yeasts (>105 CFU g-1) produce off-odours in fresh-cut produce. Beaulieu (2005) previously highlighted the difficulty in procuring cantaloupes of consistent quality, with changes in sugars, colour and volatile ester formation being the main reasons for raw material inconsistency during storage. These variations in quality may be partly attributed to storage conditions as previously discussed for kiwifruit, in addition to pre-harvest factors such as genotype, which will be discussed further in Chapter 2 part II (Finnegan and O’Beirne, 2014b).

Overall, there were significant effects of geographic origin of the fresh-cut kiwifruit and melons studied. Climate, cultural practices and postharvest systems have all been implicated as causes of product variability in fruits harvested from different production zones (Mowat and Kay, 2007; Mowat and Maguire, 2007; Leverington, 1970; Sideris and Krauss, 1933a,b; Miller et al., (1998); Bergqvist et al., (2001); Mazur et al., (2012); Ritenour, (2010).

Furthermore, strawberry varieties studied were ever-bearing ( Camarosa and Festival) and June-bearing (El Santa and Orly) with each having individual

96

Chapter 2 production characteristics and intermittent seasonal effects. In addition, the production season of certain countries helps to explain cultivar effects as in Spain strawberry production starts in mid-Jan lasting until June while in Morocco starts late-Jan lasting until April. For cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit, differences in quality may be attributed to the difference in ripening behaviour of fruit from warmer climates (Marsh et al., 2004). Large changes in a number of chemical and physical parameters have been recorded not only in whole fruits (Marsh et al., 2004; O’Connor-Shaw et al., 1994) but also in the different tissue types within the fruit itself (Montero-Calderon, 2008; Wang et al., 1998; Hallett et al., 1992). Higher respiration rates were recorded in the field for fruit growing at higher temperatures (Walton and DeJong, 1990) which appear to rapidly metabolise a particular acid pool when fruit are first placed in storage (Crisosto et al., 1984; Crisosto and Crisosto, 2001) therefore helping to explain the different behaviour of fruits harvested from different environments. For kiwifruit, in adequate winter-chilling may be one of the main obstacles to productivity and quality which is of particular concern for Hayward which seems better suited to colder climates (Simonetto and Lamb, 2011).

2.6. Conclusion

In conclusion, it is clear that the PCA plots revealed similarities and differences in quality and patterns of deterioration resulting from cultivar or source of fruit. This related in the rate and extent of quality deterioration for each fruit studied with origin having more of an effect on kiwifruit quality than pineapple and melon. The largest effects observed were due to origin, which may have implications for raw material, process, and packaging optimisation. By comparing the effects of these intrinsic factors on rates and extent of deterioration, it is possible to extract estimates of effects on shelf life from the plots. This could allow for careful planning and implementation of optimised processing and packaging conditions given a particular situation, i.e. inconsistent source and/or cultivar variations.

97

98

Chapter 2

Chapter 2.2

“Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using Principal Component Analysis II: Effects of ripeness stage, seasonality, processing and packaging”

99

100

Chapter 2

2.1. Abstract

Previous work demonstrated the benefits of principal component analysis (PCA) in tracking processes of deterioration in fresh-cut fruits, and illustrating differences due to growing region and cultivar (Chapter 2 part I). In this study, PCA showed significant effects of season, stage of ripeness (p<0.05), cut size, packaging materials, storage temperature and time (p<0.01) for a range of fresh-cut fruits. PCA plots were effective in characterising patterns of deterioration and in tracking differences in quality, in terms of the rates and extent of change. Some of the effects studied were large and may form the basis for optimising raw materials, processing and packaging of several fresh-cut fruits. Differences in shelf-life (SL) of up to three days could be attributed to seasonal variation. Reduced process severity increased SL by up to four days, while optimal packaging increased shelf life by about three days.

Keywords: Quality, Characterisation, Acceptability, Appearance, Firmness, Flavour

101

2.2. Introduction

Understanding the mechanisms that drive deterioration and their dynamics is important so that optimised or alternative strategies for optimised product quality can be identified. Our previous work demonstrated the benefits of PCA in tracking processes of deterioration in fresh-cut fruits, and in indicating differences due to growing region and cultivar (Finnegan and O’Beirne 2014a). In this study, PCA was applied to investigate the effects of other key variables: season, stage of ripeness, cut size, packaging materials, storage temperature and time.

Significant seasonal effects on quality have been reported (Montero-Calderón et al., 2008; Cao et al., 2010; Nielson and Leufvén, 2008; Mazur et al., 2012; Finnegan et al., 2013) and ripeness stage of fruits intended for fresh-cut processing, is also known to be a critical factor in determining quality (Beaulieu and Lea, 2005; Beaulieu and Gorny, 2004; Soliva-Fortuny et al., 2002; 2004).

Manual peeling and slicing resulted in some variability in the choice of cut piece size and shape used in commercial fresh-cut fruit processing. There are well known effects of blade type and sharpness on the quality of fresh produce (Bolin et al., 1977; Barry-Ryan and O’Beirne, 2000a, b). Greater size reduction generally implies increased process severity and can have major effects on deterioration (Argañosa et al., 2008; Artés-Hernández et al., 2007; Rivera-López et al., 2005 and Teixeira et al., 2001). The increased surface area potentially creates a greater area for stress response, and also a greater area for liquid and gas exchange. This could have implications for uptake of dipping solutions, for levels of exudate, and because gas exchange is more efficient, for different optimal in- pack atmospheres.

Modified atmosphere packaging is a key underpinning technology for fresh-cut produce. Intended modified atmospheres for fresh-cut vegetables are generally in the range 0.25-3% O2, 3-10% CO2, balance N2. There is a limited literature describing which atmosphere is optimum for different types of fresh-cut fruits, but optimum ranges have been suggested (Gorny, 2003). It is likely that reduced O2 and elevated

CO2 will improve shelf-life and quality in most fresh-cut fruits compared to storage in air (Chohenchob et al, 2007a; Martinez-Romero et al, 2003). Atmospheres that develop within MA packages are determined by respiration rate, product weight and volume, package permeability and area, storage temperature, and related factors 102

Chapter 2

(Mahajan et al., 2006). Ideally these result in optimum/intended atmospheres, but unintended atmospheres frequently develop due to poor compatibility of product respiration and gas permeability of the packaging and/or temperature abuse.

In this study, PCA was applied to determine effects of selected raw materials, processing and storage variables, and indicate opportunities for optimisation.

2.3. Materials and methods 2.3.1. Plant materials

Whole fruits were collected from a local wholesaler (Richardson’s Fruit and Vegetables, Limerick, Ireland) on the morning before each trial and stored at 4OC (for a maximum of 15h for chilling sensitive commodities) until processed. Descriptions of the fruits used are shown in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4: Fruit types, cultivars/ variety, countries of origin and class used.

Country of Fruit Cultivar / Variety Class Origin

Del Monte Gold Extra Sweet Pineapple Costa Rica Extra Ananas comosus L. Merr MD2

Strawberry Fragaria spp. Elsanta Ireland I

Kiwi Actinidia deliciosa cv Hayward New Zealand I

Melon Cucumis melo L. var reticulatus Costa Rica I

To evaluate seasonal variation, fresh-cut pineapples and strawberries were analysed over four seasons, Summer (May-June 2010), Autumn (September-October, 2010), Winter (November-December, 2010) and Spring (January-March, 2011). For experiments where the effects of ripeness stage were studied, under-ripe, ripe and over-ripe fruits were compared. In the present study, the ripeness stage of fresh-cut pineapple refers to the state of ripeness at processing, not at harvest. For over-ripe pineapple samples, fresh ripe fruits were purchased up to 5 days in advance and allowed to ‘over-ripen’ to a near senescent stage at an average room temperature of 103

22OC. For strawberry samples, under-ripe fruits were harvested immature, ripe fruits were harvested at best eating quality while over-ripe fruits were harvested ripe but allowed to ‘over-ripen’ to near senescent stage (as before). Strawberries were obtained from Kearns’ Fruit Farm, Enniscorthy, Wexford, Ireland. Intervening stages in this instance are not to be attributed to ripening but rather to senescence. All fruits were screened for defects (mould growth and softening) and pre-cooled at 4OC overnight before processing.

2.3.2. Fresh-cut processing and packaging

Fresh-cut fruits were prepared as described previously (Chapter 2.I). Common intrinsic effects are given in Table 2.5. For effects of packaging, these fruits were placed in pillow-pouch packs made using flexible films with a range of gas barrier properties. These were: a high barrier laminate (HB), oriented polypropylene (OPP) and micro-perforated OPP (PA90, PA210) from Amcor Flexibles, Gloucester, UK., and had oxygen/carbon dioxide transmission rates (mL/micron/m2/day.atm) of 62,814/212,776; 1,100/4,400; 1,050/5,200 and 6,259/30,800, respectively. A closed clamshell (CS) container was also used (Biopak, Worcestershire, UK.). This container had very high gas barrier properties (not available from supplier). Where effects of packaging type were studied, all laboratory packaged fresh-cut fruits were stored at 4OC and 8OC for a period of 7 Days. All other samples, unless otherwise stated, were stored at 4OC for 7 Days.

For effects of cut size, fruits were cut into various cut sizes (Figure 2.2). Fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon were sliced, de-cored/-seeded and cut into chunks of three different sizes (50, 25 and 10mm) using a hand-held stainless steel slicer. For fresh-cut kiwifruit, the whole fruit were carefully peeled before being cut in halves (longitudinal), quarters (transversal) and eights (longitudinal), where appropriate. For fresh-cut strawberries, the carpel was removed and the fruit de- hulled before being sliced into half pieces (longitudinal). For all other experiments fruits were processed into 25mm (melon and pineapple), ¼ (kiwifruit) or ½ (strawberry) cut piece sizes, where appropriate.

104

Chapter 2

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2.2 Cutting sizes/shapes used in sample preparation of fresh-cut (a) Pineapple – 10mm, 25mm & 50mm; (b) Cantaloupe melon- 10mm, 25mm & 50mm and (c) 1 Honeydew melon – 10mm, 25mm & 50mm; (d) Kiwifruit- /8, ¼ & ½, and (e) strawberry – halves.

For different degrees of sharpness a stainless steel slicer (razor sharp, sharp and blunt knife) was used. The effect of pre-dipping pre-treatment using 1% ascorbic acid: citric acid on respiration rate of fresh-cut fruits (pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit) was tested and compared with un-dipped samples. The dipping solution was prepared using chilled distilled water and fruits were submerged in the solution for 2 minutes with slight agitation and allowed to drain for 2 minutes.

105

Table 2.5 Intrinsic characteristics of intact fruit

Type/ Source Physiological age Season Aromaa Firmness, Nb Total soluble solids, % External colour1, % Ripeness class1a 0 to 25 Under Ripe (0 to 1) (7) Green, Acidic, Insipid 7.2 14.4 Summer 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) (9) Sweet, Pineapple, Fresh 6.3 12.3 Pineapple, 90 to 100 Over Ripe (5 to 6) (3) Strong, Musty, 5.3 13.6 Costa Rica 0 to 25 Under Ripe (0 to 1) (6) Fresh, Acidic, Sharp 8.4 14.3 Del Monte Gold Extra Sweet Autumn 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) (8) Sweet, Pineapple 7.6 12.7 cv MD2 90 to 100 Over Ripe (5 to 6) (3)Pungent, Strong, Musty 5.5 13.5 (5) Green, Grassy, Acidic 1 to 2 Under Ripe (1 to 3) 3.5 7.7 (9)Strawberry, Sweet, Spring 4 to 5 Ripe (5) 2.3 7.1 Crisp >6 Over Ripe(>6) 2.6 6.5 (3) Strong, Strawberry (5) Green, Grassy, Acidic 1 to 2 Under Ripe (1 to 3) 4.0 7.9 (8)Strawberry, Sweet, Summer 5 Ripe (5) 2.4 7.3 Strawberry 2 Fresh >6 Over Ripe (6) 3.2 6.5 Ireland (2) Strong, Sweet, Musty cv El Santa 1 to 2 Under Ripe (1 to 3) (4) Green, Grassy, Acidic 2.3 8.7 Autumn 4 Ripe (5) (7) Strawberry, Sweet 2.1 8.5 >6 Over Ripe (>6) (1) Strong, Alcohol, Musty 1.9 8.3 (5) Green, Grassy, Acidic 1 to 2 Under Ripe (1 to 3) 2.6 6.0 (7) Strawberry, Sweet Winter 4 to 5 Ripe (5) 1.7 5.2 (2)Pungent, Strawberry, >6 Over Ripe(>6) 2.1 7.9 Musky

Kiwifruit 2 Summer 3 Ripe (5) (9) Green, Grassy, Fresh 2.75 7.3 New Zealand cv Hayward

Cantaloupe Melon 2 (8) Pungent, Melon, Summer 5 Ripe (5) 8.23 7.7 Costa Rica Musky, Sweet cv not listed

1External shell colour was recorded against a Dole pineapple colour chart 2External colour was recorded against UC Davis colour charts. (Kader, and Cantwell, 2010) a numbers in brackets depict ripeness class and aroma scores b Max Force, Newtons

106

Chapter 2

2.3.3. Quality, microbial and sensory evaluation

Quality, microbial, sensory evaluation and statistical procedures were carried out as described previously in Chapter 2 part I (section 2.3).

2.4. Results

Principal component analysis was carried out on the correlation matrix produced from twenty-seven quality attributes, previously identified as contributing factors to the quality and deterioration of fresh-cut fruits. The factor loadings for the different quality ratings were plotted based on the first two principal components (PCs) with attributes and samples illustrated as vector angles and symbols respectively. PCI accounted for a maximal amount of the total variance (inertia) meaning that under typical test conditions, PCI will be correlated with many of the observed variables loaded on that component. PCII will be uncorrelated with PCI and account for a maximal amount of the variance in the dataset not accounted for by PCI. The proportion of variance accounted for was deduced using the cumulative percent of variance criterion for solving the number of PCs to retain. For the current analysis the cumulative percent of variance must have accounted for at least 60% of inertia in order to be retained and subsequently interpreted. An exception to this was fresh-cut pineapple (extrinsic factors) where after several unsuccessful attempts at best-fit, 40% was deemed as the best percentage for maximum output and data interpretation. Following this, each solution was reviewed and interpreted in a simple rotation producing an orthogonal biplot for each effect/fruit studied. The proportions of variance produced for each biplot are presented in Table 2.6.

As previously outlined in Chapter 2 part I, poor quality attributes positively associated with increased deterioration were increased microbial counts, increased cell permeability and exudate levels, increased off-odour development, CO2 accumulation and discolouration. Good quality attributes were characterised as good visual appearance, aroma, firmness and overall acceptability and, in most cases, were inversely correlated with poor quality attributes.

107

Table 2.6 Proportion of Cumulative Percentage Variance and Inertia for Biplots construed for each Fruit Type and Treatment

PC I PC II PC III PC IV Inertia Study Fresh-cut Fruit (%) (%) a (%) a (%) (%)1

Pineapple 42.5 19.7 11.9 6.4 80.5 Physiological Age, Ripeness stage and Seasonality Strawberry 41.9 21.7 15.6 8.8 88

Pineapple 27 16.8 12.8 7.9 64.5

Strawberry 53.7 22.1 18.4 2.2 96.3 Packaging Type and Temperature Kiwifruit 53.6 22.2 18 2.6 96.3

Cantaloupe Melon 44.6 36.2 12.8 4.1 97.8

Pineapple 28.4 15.2 12.2 8.0 63.9

Kiwifruit 44.2 29.4 14.6 4.8 72.0

Cantaloupe Melon 67.3 26.4 5.2 0.5 99.3 Cutting Size and Dipping Treatment Strawberry 50.5 35.4 6.7 3.5 96.1

Kiwifruit 49.0 33.9 11.6 3.5 98.0

Cantaloupe Melon 65.8 24.3 8.5 0.9 99.5

1 Inertia is a measure of variation or ‘spread’ within a correlation matrix i.e. the total variance of the dataset (FactoMineR, 2008). a data disregarded for subsequent interpretation

2.4.1. Effects of ripeness stage and season

The effects of ripeness stage and season were studied in fresh-cut pineapple and strawberry (Figure 2.3). Both fruits had similar patterns of deterioration, with fresh samples (Day 0) located to the left of the axis plane, migrating to the right as storage progressed (Day 7). Both ripeness stage and seasonality had large effects on deterioration patterns, with ripeness stage mostly affecting the rate, in particular for fresh-cut pineapple. Samples located left of the axes plane were characterised as having better visual appeal, aroma and overall acceptability while samples located to the right had decreased tissue stability, increased microbial counts and greater off- odour development.

108

Chapter 2

Fresh-cut pineapple prepared from summer and autumn grown fruits (Del Monte Gold Extra Sweet, Costa Rica) were studied. There were significant effects of ripeness in both seasons (p<0.01). The plots show that autumn fruits were more centrally located in the axis plane, while summer fruits were positioned lower down. In Autumn, both under-ripe and ripe pineapple samples remained very central, not migrating far from good quality attributes during storage (i.e. they retained more of their fresh characteristics). By contrast, summer fruit had lower quality initially and deteriorated more rapidly during storage. Over-ripe fruits from both seasons deteriorated quite rapidly, as indicated by the large loading distances between sampling days.

Fresh-cut Irish grown strawberries (cv El Santa) were studied over four seasons. There were significant differences between ripeness stages (p<0.05) during storage, but no significant seasonal effects were observed (p>0.05). Autumn/Winter samples had better initial quality (were located higher up in ‘good quality’ axis plane) and had a slower rate of deterioration than Spring /Summer samples. Over- ripe fruit had poor initial quality (located lower down in the axis plane; Figure 2b) and moved rapidly towards poor quality attributes, remaining there throughout storage. Under-ripe fruits exhibited the slowest rate of deterioration as observed by small vector distances and were characterised as having better retained firmness and higher acidity levels, but their acceptability was poor.

109

110

111

112

Figure 2.3 Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for three physiological ages and season during storage at 4OC for (a) Fresh-cut pineapple, (bi) Fresh-cut strawberry (Spring & Summer) and (bii) Fresh-cut strawberry (Autumn & Winter).

Key of abbreviations (Attributes): CO2 (carbon dioxide), O2 (oxygen), F (puncture probe firmness - 6mm), S (Shear firmness), max (maximum firmness, Newton), mean (mean firmness, Newton), L* (CIE L* Lightness-Darkness), a* (CIE a* green-red) and b*(CIE b* blue-yellow).

Key of Symbols: Day 0; Day 1; Day 4; Day 7.

Pineapple: Summer  Under-ripe Ripe Over-ripe Autumn  Under-ripe Ripe Over-ripe

Strawberry: Spring  Under-ripe Ripe Over-ripe Summer  Under-ripe Ripe Over-ripe Autumn  Under-ripe Ripe Over-ripe Winter  Under-ripe Ripe Over-ripe

113

2.4.2. Effects of cutting size and dipping treatment The effects of cut size and chemical dipping treatment (1% ascorbic acid; 1% citric acid) on quality deterioration of fresh-cut pineapple, kiwifruit and cantaloupe melon were determined. Both cut size and dipping treatment had significant effects (p<0.05) on overall quality deterioration (Figure 2.4a, 2.4b & 2.4c). In the case of pineapple (Figure 2.4a), samples tracked from left to right as they deteriorated; in the case of kiwi and cantaloupe melon they tracked from right to left. In general, the smaller the cut piece the greater the extent of deterioration. Samples which clustered around the middle of the plane had better initial quality than samples located lower down in the axis plane and were characterised as having better acceptability (appearance, aroma, firmness). For fresh-cut kiwifruit (Figure 2.4b), un-dipped pieces were initially characterised as having lesser acceptability than dipped pieces due to brighter and firmer appearance of dipped flesh. However, dipped pieces had greater losses in acceptability and firmness as demonstrated by large vector angles in favour of increasing exudate, cell permeability, off-odours, colour (browning and/or translucency) and microbial counts and decreased firmness as storage progressed. 1 The smallest dipped pieces ( /8) had the greatest quality change, while ½ un-dipped samples had the least change and were characterised as having lower microbial growth, least off-odour development and lowest exudate and cell permeability. When Day 4 samples were compared, quality was in the order of increasing cut size, with smallest sizes having poorest quality. This effect was accentuated in dipped samples. In the case of un-dipped cantaloupe melon (Figure 2.4c), the smallest (10mm) cut pieces had the lowest starting quality, and this persisted to Day 1 and Day 4. The un-dipped samples, mostly positioned to the left of PC I, distanced themselves from initial fresh samples by a loss in appearance and aroma, coupled with increasing in–pack CO2, off-odours and a loss in firmness. Dipping had only small effects on 25mm and 50mm pieces, but significantly improved the quality of 10mm pieces. These dipped 10mm pieces were positioned centrally to the axis plane, not migrating much from initial fresh-like characteristics during storage.

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

Figure 2.4 Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 after analysis of effects of cut size and dipping on quality evaluation attributes for (a) Fresh-cut Pineapple, (b) Fresh-cut Kiwifruit, (c) Fresh-cut Cantaloupe melon during 7 Day storage at 4OC.

Key of abbreviations (Attributes): CO2 (carbon dioxide), O2 (oxygen), F (puncture probe firmness - 6mm), S (Shear firmness), max (maximum firmness, Newton), mean (mean firmness, Newton), L* (CIE L* Lightness-Darkness), a* (CIE a* green-red) and b*(CIE b* blue-yellow).

Key of Symbols: Day 0; Day 1; Day 4; Day 7

10mm + ⅛ cut size 

25mm + ¼ cut size 

50mm + ½ cut size 

121

2.4.3. Effects of packaging type and temperature

The effects of five packaging treatments with different gas permeabilities on quality at 4OC and 8OC were determined (Figure 2.5a, 2.5b, 2.5c & 2.5d). Both packaging type and temperature had significant effects (p<0.01 and p<0.05 respectively), observed as differences in the rate and extent of quality change. Storage was found to have more of a marked effect on deterioration patterns than packaging treatments.

For fresh-cut pineapple (Figure 2.5a), strawberry (Figure 2.5b) and kiwifruit (Figure 2.5c), samples (Day 0) were located to the left of the axis plane, characterised as having good visual appearance, aroma and overall acceptability. Samples located to the right (Day 7) had diminished quality with increased exudate, cell permeability, in-pack CO2 and off-odour development and higher microbial counts. For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon (Figure 2.5d), the pattern of deterioration was the same, i.e. good to poor, albeit the direction was different (right to left).

Low respiring fruits such as fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon were best stored in HB (pineapple), OPP (pineapple & melon) and PA90 (melon only) where these fruits retained more of their fresh-like characteristics. Fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon stored in PA210 (highly permeable) and CS (highly impermeable) deteriorated most. Excessive modification of the CS in-pack atmosphere appeared to accelerate the rate of deterioration, while fruits packaged in micro-perforated PA210 film, which had little in-pack atmosphere modification, suffered rapid loss in original freshness, in this case reflected in loss of appearance and colour but without high levels of tissue breakdown.

When high respiring fruits such as strawberry and kiwifruit were packaged in HB, OPP and PA90, they lost their fresh-cut characteristics by Day 4, and were characterised as having increased exudate and ion leakage, increased weight-loss (strawberry) and poorer colour. For fruits packaged in CS, a much greater rate and extent of deterioration was observed, with significant losses in firmness (kiwifruit) (p<0.05) coupled with severe off-odour development (strawberry) and greatest in- O O pack CO2 accumulation. At 8 C, a similar pattern to that at 4 C was observed, but the rate and extent of deterioration was considerably greater.

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

Figure 3 Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Biplot of the loadings and scores of PC1 and PC2 illustrating the deterioration pattern of quality attributes for five packaging treatments across two temperatures during storage for (a) Fresh-cut Pineapple and (b) Fresh-cut Strawberry (c) Fresh-cut Kiwifruit and (d) Fresh-cut Cantaloupe melon.

Key of abbreviations (Attributes): CO2 (carbon dioxide), O2 (oxygen), F (puncture probe firmness - 6mm), S (Shear firmness), max (maximum firmness, Newton), mean (mean firmness, Newton), L* (CIE L* Lightness-Darkness), a* (CIE a* green-red) and b*(CIE b* blue-yellow).

Key of Symbols: Day 0; Day 1; Day 4; Day 7

High Barrier (HB) Film 

Oriented Polypropylene (OPP) 

Polyamide 90 (PA90) 

Polyamide 210 (PA210) 

Clamshell (CS) 

130

Chapter 2

2.5. Discussion

The data shows that PCA plots were effective in tracking differences in quality, and differences in patterns of deterioration resulting from a range of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. By comparing the length and direction of vectors and the position of plots on a given sampling day, the rates and extent of quality change could be compared. Some of the effects observed were large and can form the basis of optimising raw materials, processing and packaging of different fresh-cut fruits.

2.5.1. Effects of ripeness stage and season

Ripeness stage of fruit intended for fresh-cut processing is a critical factor in determining quality (Beaulieu and Lea, 2005; Cliffe-Byrnes and O'Beirne, 2005; Beaulieu and Gorny, 2004; Beaulieu et al., 2004; Soliva-Fortuny et al., 2002; 2004; Gorny et al, 1998). In fresh-cut pineapple, the PCA plots appeared to demonstrate clear effects of season on quality, and separated different patterns of deterioration due to ripeness stage. This is supported by previous reports of major seasonal effects on quality (Montéro-Calderón et al. 2008; Cao et al., 2010; Nielson and Leufvén, 2008; Mazur et al., 2012. The greater speed and extent of quality loss in over-ripe fruit was clearly apparent, with greater drip-loss, stronger off-odours and increased browning.

Samples prepared from ripe pineapple had greater initial quality and this was better retained during storage. By contrast, under-ripe fruits, although more visually appealing, had bland aroma, high acidity and greater firmness. Aroma scores gradually decreased with storage time, irrespective of physiological age and this decrease related well to the development of off-odours. Spanier et al (1998) observed that fresh-cut pineapple stored at 4OC had excellent visual appearance after 7 to 10 Days storage; however fruit in the lower portion of containers developed off-odours associated with microbial fermentation.

In fresh-cut strawberry, PCA indicated clear effects of season on initial quality and rate of deterioration. Effects of ripeness stage were less apparent than in pineapple. This may have been in part due to increases in firmness in some otherwise poor quality fruits. Such increases have been reported previously (Wright and Kader, 131

1997; Larsen and Watkins, 1995), though softening has also been reported (Montéro et al, 1996; Hernández-Muñoz et al, 2006). Differences may be due to the size of fruits studied.

2.5.2. Effects of cutting size and dipping treatment

As process severity increased, the rate and extent of deterioration also increased. PCA plots showed that larger un-dipped fruit pieces had best quality. The simple acid/antioxidant dips used in this work initially increased quality on Day 0, but subsequently led to more rapid deterioration during storage. This was most apparent in fresh-cut pineapple and kiwi, but less so in cantaloupe melon and probably attributed to the sub-optimal concentrations used. Dipped pieces had a marked increase in cellular sap and ion leakage which resulted in greater loss of firmness across all fruits. However, the results are complex with some smaller dipped cut pieces having better aroma (kiwifruit), improved colour (melon) and reduced browning/ translucency (pineapple) as a result of the greater surface area for diffusion. Therefore, particular consideration must be given when deciding the choice of cut and dip formulation which in turn must truly reflect the product’s needs.

2.5.3. Effects of packaging type and storage temperature

The plots showed that the type, rate and extent of deterioration were directly related to the types of atmospheres formed within packs, and to the storage temperatures. While information on precise optimum atmospheres is incomplete, previous studies by Chonhenchob et al, (2007a,b) and Martinez-Ferrer et al, (2002) found that fresh- cut fruit packaged under reduced O2 and elevated CO2 had longer shelf-life and better quality compared to storage in air. Achieving atmospheres in the optimum range for each fruit requires good compatibility between the gas barrier properties of the packaging films and the respiration rate of the product. The order of gas barrier properties of the packaging used was: CS>HB>OPP>PA90>PA210. Low respiring fruits such as pineapple needed materials in the higher barrier range (HB or OPP) to achieve technically useful atmosphere modification and good control of enzymatic 132

Chapter 2 browning. When packaged in the more permeable micro-perforated PA films, there was little atmosphere modification, and acceptability of appearance declined rapidly. On the other hand, where CS, HB and OPP were used for high respiring fruits, the near anoxic environment combined with elevated CO2 resulted in membrane damage, softening and increased translucency. CS packaging was extremely impermeable and the high CO2 levels were damaging in all fruits except cantaloupe melon.

Deterioration in visual appearance was complex and due to a combination of discolouration, desiccation at the cut surfaces and sogginess of the flesh. In the highly micro-perforated PA films, the atmospheres remained mainly aerobic, displaying little or no change in-pack atmosphere modification during storage, with PA210 having a lesser acceptability than PA90. In the case of CS, HB and OPP packaging systems, the near anoxic environment resulted in elevated processes of firmness deterioration. In this instance, fresh-cut fruits had poor appearance not because of drying and discoloration, but due to increased tissue softening resulting in a more soft-mushy, water-soaked appearance with increased translucency. The damaging effects of mild temperature abuse were also apparent throughout; particularly in fresh-cut pineapple. Allong et al, (2001) demonstrated that a storage temperature of 5OC was more effective than 10OC in delaying ripening and microbial growth and better preserved the sensory quality of fresh-cut mango slices.

2.6. Conclusion

In conclusion, it is clear that the PCA plots showed some large differences in raw material quality, and in the rates and extent of deterioration. The largest effects observed were due to season, cut size and packaging and may have implications for raw material, process, and packaging optimisation. By comparing the effects of these intrinsic and extrinsic factors on rates and extent of deterioration, it is possible to extract estimates of effects on shelf life from the plots. Differences in shelf life of up to three days could be attributed to seasonal variation (pineapple). Reduced process severity increased shelf life by up to four days, and optimal packaging increased shelf life by about three days for all fruits.

133

2.7. Benefits of PCA plots

Recent studies have shown the effectiveness of PCA plotting in genetic classification, volatile aroma compound development, postharvest characterisation/ spoilage and biodiversity studies (Chen et al., 2013; Dong et al., 2013; El Kar et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 2013; Hurtado et al., 2012; Infante et al., 2011 and Rocha et al., 2010). In this study, PCA plots have produced useful information on quality and deterioration of fresh-cut fruits. They were effective in plotting initial quality, and quality differences between samples before and during storage. They highlighted the distinct processes of deterioration characteristic of each fruit type. They provided patterns of deterioration, indicating, for example, whether most deterioration occurred early or late in storage. They revealed similarities and differences in quality and patterns of deterioration resulting from cultivar or source of fruit.

It is concluded that an optimised method for tracking the deterioration pattern of fresh-cut fruits would allow coveted knowledge to be gained in the response of cut fruits to both intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting quality. PCA can form the basis of more in-depth understanding of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on quality of fresh-cut fruits, and help optimise product quality. This could allow for careful planning and implementation of optimised processing and packaging conditions given a particular situation, i.e. inconsistent ripeness stage, seasonal and/or cultivar variations.

134

Chapter 3

Controlled and Modified Atmospheres: Quality, Microbial and Phytochemical Response of Fresh-cut fruits

Paper III: Finnegan, E. and O’Beirne, D. (2014), “Effects of Controlled and Modified Atmosphere Storage on the Quality, Sensorial, Microbiological, and Phytochemical Response of Fresh-cut Fruits” (in preparation for submission in Journal of Food Science).

136

Chapter 3

3.1. Abstract

The effects of storage atmospheres on the quality, microbiology and levels of phytochemicals of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit were determined at 4OC for 7 Days. Products were stored either in controlled atmospheres

(CA) of air, 5%O2+5%CO2 and 97%N2+3%O2 or in packages flushed with these atmospheres (MA). A CA of 5%O2+5%CO2 better maintained the colour, firmness and visual appeal of fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon, while a CA of

97%N2+3%O2 was better at maintaining fresh-cut kiwifruit quality.

Flushed packages had greater accumulation of CO2 than product modified atmospheres (PMA) packs, with values for 97%N2+3%O2 and 5%O2+5%CO2 on Day 7 ranging from 10.5% to 14.5%, 7.6% to 9.4 % and 19% to 20.4% for fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit. Flushing with 5%O2+5%CO2 and

97%N2+3%O2 caused a marked reduction in sensory scores (colour and firmness) of all fruits, with a 1-2 score reduction in visual appearance and colour, coupled with increased translucency. Fruits flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2 and 97%N2+3%O2 attained near anoxic (<1% and 1.5% O2 respectively) atmospheres at end of storage.

Effervescence was also noted upon opening of packs, especially those with high CO2 accumulation.

Although flushing packs resulted in greater total carotenoids for fresh-cut kiwifruit and greater total phenolics and antioxidant activity of fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon initially (p<0.05), no significant effect of atmospheres was observed at end of storage (p>0.05). There was no significant effect of atmospheres on the total bacterial or Listeria innocua counts (p>0.05) with the exception of fresh- cut kiwifruit (Day 7 only) where a 0.5 to 1 log reduction in counts was observed for

5%O2+5%CO2 and 97%N2+3%O2 respectively.

The optimum CA atmospheres identified will form the basis of package design in Chapter 5.

Keywords: optimum atmospheres, gas flushing, anaerobiosis, deterioration, translucency, overall acceptability

137 3.2. Introduction

Fresh-cut fruit continue to respire and alter the in-pack atmosphere in which they are surrounded. Many recommendations for the controlled (CA) and modified atmosphere (MA) storage of fresh and fresh-cut fruits, have been made (Gorny, 2002; Saltveit, 2002).

The optimum O2 and CO2 atmospheres for fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit, recommended by Gorny (2000), were 3-5% and 5-8%, 3% and 10% and 1-2% and 3-5%, respectively. These atmospheres have been found to have beneficial effects on postharvest quality in comparison to air packaging (Kader, 2012).

The effect of MAP on the physiology of fresh-cut produce is well documented (Toivonen and DeEll, 2002; Mir and Beaudry, 2004; Varoquaux and Ozdemir, 2005). In recent years, the increased marketing of fresh-cut fruits has renewed efforts to develop beneficial packaging for these novel products with successful applications made for fresh-cut apples (Soliva-Fortuny et al., 2005), pineapple (Marrero and Kader, 2006), melon (Bai et al., 2001; 2003) and kiwifruit (Rocculi et al., 2005).

A MA can be created passively by using appropriate permeable packaging materials compatible with the natural respiration of the fresh-cut commodity, or actively by flushing with specified gas mixtures. Passive MAP relies heavily on the relationship between the produce respiration rate and the package transmission rates to create and optimal in-pack gas atmosphere for a particular product, i.e. product- package compatibility. This process, also referred to as product modified atmosphere (PMA), generally takes a number of days to reach its desired target atmosphere (Finnegan et al., 2013).

The delay in achieving equilibrium, coupled with product-package incompatibility, is one of the major limitations facing PMA have prompted the development of active packaging approaches such as gas flushing (Forney, 2007).

Exposure to atmospheres outside optimal ranges may lead to anaerobic respiration with the concurrent production of undesirable metabolites and other physiological disorders (Zagory and Kader, 1988). Discolouration (browning,

138

Chapter 3 whitening & translucency), microbial spoilage, off -odour development and dehydration are symptomatic of fresh-cut fruit deterioration. For fresh-cut kiwifruit, accumulation of CO2 within packages has a negative impact on firmness (Finnegan et al., 2014b) while for fresh-cut pineapple, which is prone to enzymatic browning, the delay in O2 reduction may be too long (Saltveit, 2003). Finnegan and O’Beirne, (2014b) concluded that low respiring fruits such as pineapple and cantaloupe melon need to be packaged in medium-to-high barrier films at low temperatures (4OC) to achieve technically useful atmosphere modification. Packaging in more permeable micro-perforated films had little in-pack atmosphere modification with a rapid loss in visual acceptability (discolouration/ firmness). Conversely, high respiring fruits such as kiwifruit when packaged in high barrier films achieved near anoxic atmospheres, with elevated CO2 resulting in increased membrane damage, softening and increased translucency.

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of a number of gas atmospheres on the quality, microbiology and levels of phytochemicals of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit.

139 3.2. Materials and methods 3.2.1. Processing, packaging and storage of fresh-cut fruit

Whole fruits, pineapples (Ananas comosus cv Del Monte Gold MD2: #10), cantaloupe melon (Cucumis melo L. var reiculatus) and kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv Hayward) were purchased from a local fruit and vegetable wholesaler (Richardson’s Fruit and Vegetables, Old Clare St., Limerick, Ireland) on the morning of processing (Table 3.1) and stored at 4OC until used (1-2h). For pineapple, ripe fruit with a shell colour corresponding to stages 2 and 3 of the Dole pineapple colour chart (between 25% and 50% shell colour) were used for all experiments. For cantaloupe melon, fruits with a ½ to full slip (Appendix D), corresponding to a mature ripening to ripe melon, were used. For kiwifruit, fruits that were firm to touch and had excellent visual quality with no symptoms of deterioration (approx.11.5% soluble solids) were used.

Table 3.1: Fruit types, cultivars/ variety, countries of origin and class used.

Fruit Cultivar/ Variety Country of Origin Class Del Monte Gold Extra Sweet Pineapple Costa Rica Extra Ananas comosus L. Merr MD2

Kiwi Actinidia deliciosa cv Hayward New Zealand I

Melon Cucumis melo L. var reticulates Costa Rica I

All fruits were processed at room temperature (18-22OC). For fresh-cut pineapple, the peels of whole fruits were removed with a stainless steel knife which was sanitised in a 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution after each fruit in order to minimise contamination of batches. The blossom and stem ends were removed and discarded and the fruit sliced transversely into rings (24mm). After slicing, the core from each ring was removed manually using a stainless steel cork borer. The slices were cut into triangular chunks of size 25mm using a hand-held stainless steel cutter (Figure 1a). For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, both the slip and top end of the fruits were removed and the melon halved transversely. The seeds were carefully removed using a sanitised stainless steel spoon. Each half was cut into four longitudinal slices and the surrounding peel carefully removed from the flesh. Each section was next cut

140

Chapter 3 by hand into relatively uniform trapezoidal chunks of size 25mm (Figure 1b). In the case of fresh-cut kiwifruit, the blossom and stem ends of whole fruits were removed and discarded and the rest of the peel carefully removed from the flesh using a sharp sanitised paring knife. Fruit were then cut into longitudinal halves, followed by transverse quarters (Figure 1c).

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 3.1 Cutting sizes used in Sample Preparation and Experimental Setup of Fresh-cut (a) Pineapple – 25mm, (b) Cantaloupe melon - 25mm and (c) Kiwifruit (¼).

Cut piece sizes for each individual fruit were pooled and sample packs (150g ± 5g) were prepared in duplicate, each from randomly selected fruit pieces in the lot. For effects of modified atmospheres, fruit samples were placed into rigid polylactic acid (PLA) containers (Biopak, UK) and inserted into pillow-pouch packages (20cm x 20cm x 20cm) prepared from a high-barrier (HB) double-laminate film (PET12/PE55 microns) having oxygen (OTR) and carbon dioxide (CTR) permeabilities of 62,814 and 212,776 mL.microns/m2.day.atm, respectively. This film allowed desired atmospheres to be created with only the respiration of the product responsible for changes during storage.

141 Product modified atmospheres

For effects of modified atmospheres, packages were either hermetically heat sealed using an impulse bench-top heat sealer (Relco Ltd., UK) in air (PMA) or flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2 and/or 97%N2+3%O2 using a compensated vacuum technique before being sealed and stored at 3 to 5OC for 7 days. The flushing was performed on a form-fill machine where evacuation of air was followed by flushing with gas mixture before being heat sealed. Gas pressure was monitored and kept constant at an optimum rate of 4bar.

Controlled atmospheres

For effects of controlled atmospheres (CA), a flow-through atmosphere system was employed to study the effects of different gas atmospheres on fruit samples. Fresh- cut fruit samples, each in duplicate, were placed directly into HB packs. These packs had been previously perforated with 15 uniform perforations (slits) each of 1-inch in length (3 rows, 5 slits/ row). These perforations allowed for even distribution of the gas atmosphere surrounding the fresh-cut fruit pieces without drying the product out. The perforated packs were placed into 2-L chambers for each day of analysis (Day 0,

1, 4 and 7) for each of the following treatments: A = air, B = 5%O2+5%CO2 and C =

97%N2+3%O2. The flasks were hermetically sealed using a modified rubber stopper and connected to each of the three gas lines. The gas flow was maintained at 60-65ml per min and the chambers were stored at 3 to 5OC for 7 days.

Where microbial analyses of fresh-cut fruits were studied, inoculation occurred before packs were sealed and/or placed into control atmosphere chambers (Chapter 2.1 section 2.3.2).

142

Chapter 3

3.2.2. Quality evaluation

Quality evaluation tests were carried out as outlined in Chapter 2.1 section 2.3.

3.2.3. Sensory evaluation

Sensory evaluation was carried out as outlined in Chapter 2.1 section 2.3.

3.2.4. Microbiological analyses

The different media used were prepared, plated and stored according to manufacturer’s instructions (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstokes, UK).

Bacterial strains and culture conditions Listeria innocua strain NCTC 11288 cultures were maintained at -20OC in tryptone soya broth (TSB, Oxoid Ltd., CM0129, Fannin Healthcare, Dublin, Ireland) supplemented with 20% (v/v) glycerol. Resuscitation was achieved by thawing cultures at room temperature (17 to 25OC) followed by successive loop transfer activation (x2) in 10mL of TSB supplemented with 0.6% of Yeast Extract (Oxoid Ltd., L21) in sterile screw-cap tubes and overnight incubation at 37OC. Cultures contained approximately 108-109 bacteria mL-1. After incubation, the cultures were centrifuged (5,000 x g, 15 min), and the cells were resuspended in phosphate buffer solution (1:10), (PBS, Oxoid Ltd., BR0014) mixed and further diluted in PBS (1:10) to allow for contamination of fresh-cut fruit pieces at initial levels of approximately 105-106 CFU g-1 of fruit.

Inoculation of fresh-cut fruits After appropriate dilutions, 100mL aliquots of cell suspensions were distributed uniformly over the fresh-cut fruits contained within each of the packages (Figure 3.2). Following inoculation, packages were actively flushed with the appropriate atmospheres and/or heat-sealed (section 2.1). After sealing, packs were gently shaken to assist distribution of the innocua.

143

Rigid PLA Portion of 100-µl container aliquots uniformly dropped onto each cut piece Pillow-pouch package

Figure 3.2: Illustration of inoculation procedure used for fresh-cut fruits.

Microbiological enumeration

Microbiological analyses were carried out initially on day of inoculation (Day 0) and at regular intervals throughout the storage period (Days 1, 4, 7). On each sampling day duplicate packs from each experiment were analysed for Listeria populations and total viable cell counts (TVCs). Each fresh-cut fruit pack was homogenised and from this homogenate, 25g of fruit was removed (under aseptic conditions) and transferred into a stomacher bag along with 225ml PBS for homogenised at high speed for 120s Steward stomacher 400, (AGB Scientific, Dublin, Ireland). Serial dilutions (10-1 to 10-4) were prepared in PBS and were surface spread in duplicate on to the appropriate media. Numbers of L. innocua were determined on Listeria selective agar (LSA, Oxoid Ltd., CM856 containing a modified Listeria selective supplement) after 48h at 37OC. Total viable counts of mesophilic microflora were made on tryptone soya agar (TSA, Oxoid Ltd., CM131) after incubation at 37OC for 48h. Following incubation, colony-forming-units (CFU) were counted on plates that contained between 20-200 CFU. Results were expressed as colony-forming-units per gram (CFU/g) of fruit.

144

Chapter 3

3.3.5. Antioxidant phytochemical compounds and antioxidant activity determination

Methanolic extraction of antioxidant compounds

Preparation of methanolic extracts of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit was carried out in duplicate from each fruit pack at set intervals (Day 0, 1, 4 & 7) during storage (Kenny and O’Beirne, 2010). Six-grams of homogenised fruit sample was added to 12mL of chilled methanol and homogenised at 20,000 rpm for 60s (Ultra-Turrax T-25) over ice before being centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 10minutes at 4°C. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filters (pore size 0.22μm, Phenomenex, U.K) were used to filter the remaining supernatant. The filtered extract was collected into sterile vials and stored out of direct sunlight at -20OC until needed for quantification of total phenolics and total antioxidant activity.

Determination of total phenolic concentration

The total phenolic concentration (TPC) was determined in triplicate for each sample using the Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) method as described by Singleton and Rossi, (1965). The methanolic extract was mixed thoroughly and made to 1:5 dilutions. From this, 150μl was removed and placed in triplicate into a series of eppendorf tubes. Sample extracts were then mixed with 150μl of MeOH, 150μl of FC reagent (2N, Sigma-

Aldrich Ireland Ltd.) and 1000μl of Na2CO3 (7.5%w/v) (Sigma-Aldrich Ireland Ltd.) in succession (mixed thoroughly after each addition). For sample blanks, 300μl of

MeOH, 150μl of FC reagent and 1000μl of Na2CO3 were prepared, one per sample. All samples/blanks were incubated in darkness for 20 min at 25OC after which samples were centrifuged at 14,000rpm for 3 min and absorbance measured at 735nm. Total phenolic concentration was expressed as mean ± SD (milligrams) gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per 100mL of fresh-cut weight (R2 = 0.996).

145 Determination of total antioxidant activity: radical scavenging capacity

Total antioxidant activity (TAA) in methanolic extracts was quantified using a modification of the 2, 2- diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay described by Goupy et al. (1999). Briefly, 0.7ml of DPPH (47.6μg/mL in methanol) was added to 0.7mL of suitably diluted sample (diluted in MeOH). A series of reagent blanks were used as reference samples consisting of 0.7mL DPPH (47.6μg L- 1 in methanol) and 0.7mL methanol. After 30 min incubation in the dark, the absorbance decrease was measured at 515nm. The instrument was auto-zeroed against methanol while a negative control (neat DPPH working solution) was also run simultaneously.

The efficient concentration (EC50) which represents the amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50%, representing a parameter widely used to measure antioxidant activity, was calculated from the calibration curve (Trolox ((R)-(+)-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-croman-2- carboxylic acid)) (Sigma-Aldrich Ireland Ltd.) (0 to 0.05mM) by linear regression with results expressed as mg of Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) per 100mL of fresh-cut weight (R2=0.997). Efficient antioxidants have high antiradical power, therefore, the amount of total antioxidant activity (ARP) is inversely related to the concentration of the sample required to reduce the initial concentration of

DPPH by 50%. The ARP present was determined as the reciprocal value of the EC50, representing a comparable term for the effectiveness of antioxidant and scavenging capacity. The ARP was recorded on a fresh-weight basis (g-1) and graphed.

Determination of total carotenoids Total carotenoids were extracted using an optimised method of Gross (1991) by homogenising 7g of fruit homogenate with 10mL of acetone containing (0.2%) butylated hydroxytoulene (BHT). Initial homogenate was filtered under vacuum through Whatman No. 4 filter paper under dim light and the residue recovered and re-extracted three times with combined filtrates brought to 40mL with extraction solution. Following extraction, samples were mixed to ensure homogeneity after which 1.5mL of samples (in triplicate) were centrifuged at 14,000rpm for 5 minutes

146

Chapter 3 at room temperature. Samples were measured at three different wavelengths, 470m, 645nm and 662nm with the instrument auto-zeroed against extraction before use. Dilutions were made where necessary. Total carotenoids (fresh weight basis) were calculated and expressed as μg/g-1 using the following equations:

(1.16) Chlorophyll α (Cα) : (11.75)(A₆₆₂) – (2.35)(A₆₄₅)

(1.17) Chlorophyll β (Cβ) : (18.61)(A₆₄₅) – (3.96)(A₆₆₂)

(1000)( A₄₇₀)– (2.27)( Cα)– (81.4)( Cβ) Total Carotenoids (μg/ml extract): (1.18) 227

3.3.6. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was carried out as before (Chapter 2.1 section 2.3)

147 3.4. Results 3.4.1. Effects of atmosphere on quality

Gas atmospheres

Products were exposed to either controlled (CA) or modified atmospheres (MA) (Figure 3.2). In the case of packaged products, oxygen concentrations decreased to 0.2%-8.3%, 1.5%-16.1% and 0.4%-10.2% for fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit, respectively, while carbon dioxide concentrations increased to 10- 14.6%, 5.4%-9.4% and 16.1-20.4% (Table 3.2). For all fruits, packages flushed with

5%O2+5%CO2 had the greatest in-pack modification while PMA stored fruits had the least (Figure 3.3). Significant differences in O2 concentrations was found between PMA and flushed packages on Day 7 (p<0.05).

Table 3.2. Controlled atmospheres (CA) and ranges of modified atmospheres (MA) developed within packs of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC.

Atmosphere O2 (%) CO2 (%) N2 (%) Remarks AIR 20.9 0.04 79.1 - CA 5%O2+5%CO2 5 5 90 - 97%N2+3%O2 3 - 97 - Slow modification; ~8% PMA 20.4 - 8.3 1.2 - 10.0 78.4 - 81.7 O2, 10% CO2 on Day 7 Good modification; Pineapple 5%O2+5%CO2 5.4 - 1.3 4.8 - 14.6 89.9 - 84.1 <1.5% O2; high CO2 (>14%), Day 7 Very low O / anoxic; 97%N +3%O 3.1 - 0.2 0.5 - 10.5 96.4 - 89.3 2 2 2 ~10% CO2, Day 7 Little modification; PMA 19.2 - 16.1 1.2 - 5.4 79.7 - 78.5 ~16%O2, 5%CO2 Day 7 Cantaloupe Slow modification; ~3% 5%O2+5%CO2 5.8 - 3.2 4.9 - 9.4 89.3 - 87.4 MA/ melon O2 and 9% CO2, Day 7 Flushed Low O , 1.5%; high 97%N +3%O 4.3 - 1.5 1.1 - 7.6 94.6 - 90.9 2 2 2 7.6% CO2 on Day 7 Good modification PMA 19.1 - 10.2 1.2 - 16.1 79.7 - 73.7 (~10% O2) High CO2 ~16%; Day 7 Very high CO2 (20%); Kiwifruit 5%O2+5%CO2 5.8 - 1.5 5.0 - 20.4 89.2 - 78.1 low O2 (1.5%); low O2 (1.5%); Day 7 Very low O2/ anoxic 97%N2+3%O2 3.3 - 0.4 1.1 - 19.0 94.6 - 80.6 (0.4%), very high CO2 (19%); Day 7

148

Chapter 3

For fresh-cut pineapple, a steady rate of O2 depletion was observed with flushed packages reaching extremely low O2 concentrations of 1.3% and 0.2% on Day 7

(Figure 3.3a). Both PMA and 97%N2+3%O2 flushed packs displayed similar trends during storage, with CO2 levels higher in 97%N2+3%O2 packs than PMA packs by Day 3 but with no significant differences observed at end of storage (p>0.05).

Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, being a low respiring fruit, displayed the least in- pack atmosphere modification of all fruits studied (Figure 3.3b ). Similarly to pineapple, PMA melon packs had the least in-pack atmosphere change, while

5%O2+5%CO2 had the greatest. PMA stored melon had significantly different O2 and CO2 concentrations than flushed packs at end of storage (p<0.05) with values of

16.1% and 5.4% respectively. Fresh-cut melon stored in 5%O2+5%CO2 had greatest

CO2 accumulation with a value of 9.4% on Day 7. For 97%N2+3%O2 packs, O2 levels decreased to near anaerobic levels (1.5%) on Day 7.

Fresh-cut kiwifruit had the greatest in-pack atmosphere modification over 7

Day storage (Figure 3.3c). Similarly to other fruits, in-pack O2 levels within PMA packs (10%) were significantly different (p<0.01) to those for 5%O2+5%CO2 (1.5%) and 97%N2+3%O2 (0.4%) packs on Day 7. 5%O2+5%CO2 packs had the greatest

CO2 accumulation with a value of 20.4% on Day 7 while PMA packs had the least (16%).

149

25 Pineapple AIR (O2) Pineapple AIR (CO2) 25 Kiwifruit AIR (O2) Kiwifruit AIR (CO2) Pineapple 5%O2;5%CO2 (O2) Pineapple 5%O2;5%CO2 (CO2) Kiwifruit 5%O2; 5%CO2 (O2) Kiwifruit 5%O2; 5%CO2 (CO2)

Pineapple 97%N2; 3%O2 (O2) Pineapple 97%N2; 3%O2 (CO2) Kiwifruit 97%N2; 3%O2 (O2) Kiwifruit 97%N2; 3%O2 (CO2) 20 20

15 15

concentration(%) concentration(%)

2 2

10 10 and CO and and CO and

2 2

5 pack O

5 pack O

- - in in

0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Storage Time (Days) Storage Time (Days)

25 Cantaloupe AIR (O2) Cantaloupe AIR (CO2) Cantaloupe 5%O2; 5%CO2 (O2) Cantaloupe 5%O2; 5%CO2 (CO2)

Cantaloupe 97%N2; 3%O2 (O2) Cantaloupe 97%N2; 3%O2 (CO2) 20 Figure 3.3 Changes in in-pack oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO ) of modified atmosphere packaged fresh-cut (a) pineapple, 2 (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during storage in Air, 15 O

concentration(%) 5%O2+5%CO2 and 97%N2+3%O2 for 7 days at 4 C. The values

2 are means for 6 determinations, separated by Fisher’s Least 10 and CO and

Significant Difference (LSD) (p<0.05). Error bars show SD. In-

2

pack O2, continuous lines, descending; in-pack CO2, broken

pack O 5 - lines, ascending. in

0 150 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Storage Time (Days) Chapter 3

Effects on drip-loss and percentage weight-loss

For all fruits studied, there was an increase in drip-loss during storage; the rate and extent of which was dependent in fruit type and atmosphere (Figure 3.4a). Fresh-cut pineapple accumulated the greatest volume of drip, followed by cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit. On Day 1 there was no significant effect of atmospheres in drip-loss (p>0.05). After 7 Days however, fresh-cut pineapple stored in PMA and flushed packs, had significantly higher drip-loss than samples stored in CAs. The high CO2 of the 5%O2+5%CO2 flushed packs resulted in the highest volume of drip (9.25mL/ pack) with no significant difference between PMA and 97%N2+3%O2 (p>0.05). An increase in drip-loss of 2.5-3.25mL was recorded for CA stored samples with no significant effect of atmospheres observed (p>0.05).

For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, drip-loss was minimal for fruit stored in CA atmospheres (<4mL) (Figure 3.4b). On Day 1, no significant difference in volumes was noted, irrespective of atmosphere (p>0.05). After 7 Day storage, melon flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 had significantly higher drip levels (p<0.05; 6.25mL) than PMA

(3.25mL) and 5%O2+5%CO2 (4mL) flushed packs, respectively.

Fresh-cut kiwifruit had the lowest drip-loss (Figure 3.4c). On Day 1, kiwifruit stored in CA atmospheres had a greater increase in drip than fruits stored in

MA atmospheres, with 97%N2+3%O2 samples having a significant increase

(2.25mL; p<0.05). After 7 Day storage, kiwifruit stored in 97%N2+3%O2 had significantly higher drip-loss levels (22%) than 5%O2+5%CO2 and Air stored samples (p<0.05). No significant difference in drip-loss levels was observed for fresh-cut kiwifruit flushed with different MAs (<1mL), irrespective of atmosphere (p>0.05).

Percent weight-loss (Figure 3.5) correlated well with previously reported drip- loss levels in that the greatest percentage weight-loss occurred for fresh-cut pineapple flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2 (17.5%; p<0.001), and fresh-cut cantaloupe melon flushed with 97%N2+%O2 had the greatest loss (24%; p<0.001). For fresh-cut kiwifruit, fruit stored in a controlled atmosphere of 97%N2+3%O2 had the greatest weight-loss (17%; p<0.01).

151

(a)

(b)

97%N2; 3%O2 MA

97%N2; 3%O2 CA

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA Day 7 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA Day 1

AIR MA

AIR CA

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (c) Volume (mLs)

97%N2; 3%O2 MA 97%N2; 3%O2 CA

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA Day 7 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA Day 1 AIR MA

AIR CA

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Volume (mLs)

Figure 3.4 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on drip-loss levels within packs of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during storage at 4OC. Broken red line (average fresh-cut drip-loss). Values are means for 6 determinations separated by Fisher’s LSD. Error bars show ± SD.

152

Chapter 3

(a)

97%N2; 3%O2 MA **

97%N2; 3%O2 CA N S

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA ***

5%O2; 5%CO2 CA N S AIR MA *

AIR CA *

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 % weight loss (b) 97%N2; 3%O2 MA ** * 97%N2; 3%O2 CA N S

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA * *

5%O2; 5%CO2 CA N S

AIR MA *

AIR CA N S 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 % weight loss (c) 97%N2; 3%O2 MA N S

97%N2; 3%O2 CA **

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA N S 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA *

AIR MA N S AIR CA *

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 % weight loss Figure 3.5 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on percentage weight loss within packs of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during storage at 4OC. Broken red line (maximum loss allowed). Values are means for 6 determinations separated by Fisher’s LSD and error bars showing ± SD. Columns with the same asterisk/ letters are not significantly different (p>0.05); where, NS (not significant), * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001).

153

Effects on firmness

Fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon had similar initial average firmness values of 4.69N and 4.08N, respectively, while fresh-cut kiwifruit had the lowest (1.84N).

Fresh-cut pineapple increased in firmness by Day 1 with no significant effect of atmosphere (p>0.05). After Day 1, there was a drop in firmness for flushed packs

(p<0.05) with 5%O2+5%CO2 flushed packs having the greatest loss (Figure 3.6a). In CA storage, there was a significant increase in firmness (p<0.05), with

5%O2+5%CO2 having a significantly greater increase (p<0.01) than air and

97%N2+3%O2 (p>0.05).

Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, fruits stored in CA and flushed with

5%O2+5%CO2 and 97%N2+3%O2 decreased in firmness by Day 1 (p>0.05). In contrast, firmness increased in air stored (p>0.05) and PMA (p<0.05) melon. After 7 Days storage, all flushed packs had significantly increased in firmness (p<0.05), with

5%O2+5%CO2 samples having the greatest increase and no significant difference in firmness levels between PMA and 97%N2+3%O2 observed (Figure 3.6b). There were minimal changes in firmness in CA stored melon (p>0.05).

Fresh-cut kiwifruit had the most significant loss of firmness (p<0.01) during storage (Figure 3.6c). After 1 Day, CA stored fruit had increased in firmness while flushed packs exhibited little or no change (p>0.05). On Day 7, a significant decrease in firmness was observed for all treatments (p<0.01) with no effects of atmospheres observed (p>0.05). In general, flushed packages had slightly better firmness than CA stored samples at end of storage.

154

Chapter 3

(a) 97%N2; 3%O2 MA

97%N2; 3%O2 CA

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA

Day 7 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA Day 1 AIR MA

AIR CA

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Firmness (N)

97%N2; 3%O2 MA (b)

97%N2; 3%O2 CA

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA Day 7 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA Day 1

AIR MA

AIR CA

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Firmness (N)

(c) 97%N2; 3%O2 MA

97%N2; 3%O2 CA

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA Day 7 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA Day 1

AIR MA

AIR CA

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Firmness (N) Figure 3.6 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on firmness levels (N) of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Broken red line (average firmness fresh-cut). Values are means for 12 determinations separated by Fisher’s LSD. Error bars showing ± SD.

155

Effects on colour

Using the equations for ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*, chromaticity (ΔC) and hue angle (HO), derived from CIE L*, a* & b*, the colour differences during storage (Day 0 to Day 7) for each of the treatments studied are presented in Table 3.3, while the total colour differences (ΔE) are presented in Figure 3.7 . Colour change occurred for all fruits/atmospheres, with samples displaying medium (ΔE ≥ 2) to very obvious (ΔE ≥ 6) colour changes during storage.

For fresh-cut pineapple (Figure 3.7a), no significant effects of atmosphere on CIE Lab* colour coefficients were found (p>0.05), but significant effects on overall colour change (ΔE), Δa*/Δb* redness/yellowness (indicative of browning), ΔL* (luminosity) and absolute colour difference (ΔH) were noted (p<0.05) (Table 3.3).

Pineapple flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 had the greatest overall colour change (ΔE:

20.5; ΔH: 0.03) while fruit flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2 had the least (ΔE: 9.3; ΔH: -

2.9). In contrast, pineapple stored in CA atmospheres of 97%N2+3%O2 and

5%O2+5%CO2 had very similar colour differences, with ΔE values of 16 and 17, respectively; as did CA air stored (10.1) and PMA (11.4) packs.

For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon (Figure 3.7b), significant effects of atmospheres on overall colour change and hue (orangeness) were noted (p<0.05). Flushed melon packages had greater colour change than CA stored melon (p<0.05).

Melon flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 displayed the greatest overall colour change (ΔE: 27); ΔH: 0.03). Interestingly, this fruit had the highest Δa* and Δb* (13) and ΔL* (23) indicative of a lighter orange (more translucent) flesh than other samples. Fruit stored in CA 5%O2+5%CO2 had the least colour change with ΔE value of 2.6 and ΔH value of (-2). In contrast to previous sample, melon in this instance had the lowest overall colour change with ΔL*, Δa* and Δb* values of 1.7, (-1.8) and (-0.8) respectively, indicating little colour change from that of fresh-cut colour.

Figure 3.7c shows the ΔE values for fresh-cut kiwifruit. Significant differences in colour change was observed between CA and flushed packages (p<0.01) with CA samples, irrespective of atmosphere, displaying greater colour change.

156

Chapter 3

(a) 97%N2; 3%O2 MA

97%N2; 3%O2 CA

5%O2; 5%CO2 MA

5%O2; 5%CO2 CA ∆ELab AIR MA

AIR CA

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 Colour Change ΔΕ

(b)

(c)

Figure 3.7 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on the extent of colour change (ΔΕ Lab) of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Broken red line (>6; obvious colour change). Values are means for 24 determinations separated by Fisher’s LSD with error bars showing ± SD.

157

Table 3.3 Effect of controlled and modified atmospheres on colour indices of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC.

O Fruit Atmosphere ∆E Lab ∆H ∆C H ∆L* ∆a* ∆b*

AIR CA 10.13* -3.08 8.24 1.54 -5.90 -0.52 -8.23 AIR MA 11.44* -3.10 7.77 1.53 -8.39 -0.36 -7.77 ** 5%O2 + 5%CO2 CA 17.14 -3.08 17.10 1.55 -1.17 -1.07 -17.06 Pineapple * 5%O2 + 5%CO2 MA 9.33 -2.94 6.09 1.55 -7.07 -1.23 -5.97 ** 97%N2 + 3%O2 CA 15.88 -3.07 12.46 1.55 -9.85 -0.88 -12.43 *** 97%N2 + 3%O2 MA 20.49 0.03 12.00 1.55 16.61 0.36 11.99 AIR CA 6.62* 0.67 4.67 1.09 -4.70 2.90 3.66 AIR MA 8.74* 3.14 7.39 1.53 4.68 0.03 -7.39 5%O + 5%CO CA 2.56NS -1.98 1.95 1.09 1.66 -1.79 -0.77 Cantaloupe 2 2 * Melon 5%O2 + 5%CO2 MA 9.61 -2.94 6.09 1.55 7.43 -1.24 -5.96 * 97%N2 + 3%O2 CA 5.51 -1.74 0.54 1.10 -5.48 -0.53 -0.09 *** 97%N2 + 3%O2 MA 26.61 0.03 12.97 1.55 23.23 12.97 12.97 AIR CA 11.33** -3.07 5.56 -1.38 -9.87 -0.38 -5.55 AIR MA 14.01** 3.08 1.04 -1.41 -12.97 0.31 -5.30 *** 5%O2 + 5%CO2 CA 16.96 3.05 5.88 -1.42 -15.91 0.51 -5.86 Kiwifruit 5%O + 5%CO MA 5.53* 3.08 1.04 -1.39 -5.43 0.07 -1.04 2 2 ** 97%N2 + 3%O2 CA 12.31 -2.23 4.11 -1.44 -11.61 -3.25 -2.51 NS 97%N2 + 3%O2 MA 2.65 0.37 0.74 -1.38 -2.55 0.26 0.69

Values are means for 24 determinations separated by Tukey’s LSD Where, for each individual fruit and colour index (ΔE), values with the same symbols are not significantly different (p>0.05) NS (not significant); * (p≤0.05); ** (p≤0.01); *** (p≤0.001)

158

Chapter 3

The greatest colour change occurred in fruit stored in a CA of 5%O2+5%CO2 (ΔE:

17; ΔH: 3.1) while kiwifruit flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 had the least (ΔE: 2.7; ΔH: 0.4). However, upon analysis of total colour change indices, it was found that flushed packages had more loss of green colour than CA stored fruit (Table 3.3). Fresh-cut kiwifruit stored in a CA of 5%O2+5%CO2 had greater loss of greenness, with Δa* and Δb* values of 0.51 and -5.9, respectively. In contrast, kiwifruit flushed with

97%N2+3%O2 increased in yellowness, with Δa* and Δb* values of 0.26 and 0.7, respectively, which was significantly different to all other samples (p<0.01). Furthermore, both CA and flushed samples lost luminosity, with CA stored kiwifruit having a significantly greater loss than flushed samples (p<0.05).

Effects on percent soluble solids, pH and titratable acidity (%)

The effects of CA and MA atmospheres on the percent soluble solids (SS%), pH and titratable acidity (TA%) are presented in Table 3.4. For fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit, no significant effects of atmospheres on SS% was observed (p>0.05). In terms of pH, no significant effects of atmosphere was observed during storage (p>0.05). Similarly, no significant effect of atmospheres on TA% was found for fresh-cut pineapple and kiwifruit (p>0.05). In contrast, flushing and/or CA storage in an atmosphere of 97%N2+3%O2 resulted in an overall increase in TA% for fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, with the greatest increase occurring in flushed packs from Day 0 to Day 1 (p<0.01). Figure 3.8 illustrates the effects of atmospheres on the sugar acid ratio (S:A). For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, flushing and/or storage in

97%N2+3%O2 resulted in significant increase in S:A (Day 0 to Day 1) (p<0.01). For

5%O2+5%CO2, smaller increases were noted for both flushed and CA storage (44% and 113%, respectively). In contrast, both air stored and PMA packs decreased in S:A from Day 0 to Day 1 (~46%) with a gradual increase thereafter (p<0.05). For fresh-cut kiwifruit, flushing had no significant effect on S:A (Figure 3.7c). In contrast, for CA stored samples, an overall decrease was observed, with

5%O2+5%CO2 having greatest effect (p<0.05).

159

Table 3.4 Effects of controlled and modified atmosphere of percent soluble solids (SS%%), titratable acidity (%) and tissue pH of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. n = 18

Storage Pineapple Cantaloupe Melon Kiwifruit Time Storage Atmosphere (Days) SS% TA% pH SS% TA% pH SS% TA% pH AIR CA 11.7 0.64 3.7 10.6 0.03 6.8 13.5 0.92 3.8 AIR MA 10.9 0.63 3.7 9.6 0.03 6.8 13.6 0.92 3.7 5%O ; 5%CO CA 12.0 0.59 3.7 11.0 0.05 7.0 12.0 1.03 3.8 0 2 2 5%O2; 5%CO2 MA 10.8 0.45 3.8 10.1 0.06 6.7 13.4 0.90 3.8

97%N2; 3%O2 CA 11.9 0.53 3.8 11.1 0.09 6.8 13.5 0.92 3.8

97%N2; 3%O2 MA 13.0 0.48 3.9 11.1 0.02 6.9 13.4 0.84 3.9 AIR CA 9.3 0.63 3.6 9.3 0.05 6.5 10.7 1.10 3.7 AIR MA 11.7 0.54 3.8 8.7 0.05 6.7 13.7 0.92 3.8 5%O ; 5%CO CA 9.5 0.64 3.7 9.5 0.03 6.9 10.3 1.13 3.7 1 2 2 5%O2; 5%CO2 MA 11.7 0.50 3.8 10.8 0.03 6.8 13.7 0.94 3.8

97%N2; 3%O2 CA 10.5 0.52 3.8 10.5 0.10 6.7 12.3 1.05 3.6

97%N2; 3%O2 MA 13.1 0.56 3.7 9.0 0.10 6.8 14.1 0.94 3.7 AIR CA 8.9 0.62 3.7 8.9 0.04 6.7 9.7 1.13 3.7 AIR MA 11.6 0.52 3.8 10.1 0.04 6.9 13.2 0.99 3.6 5%O ; 5%CO CA 8.8 0.62 3.7 8.8 0.05 6.6 9.7 1.13 3.6 4 2 2 5%O2; 5%CO2 MA 12.1 0.50 3.8 9.8 0.04 6.8 13.5 0.90 3.8

97%N2; 3%O2 CA 9.7 0.52 3.6 9.7 0.12 6.7 11.1 1.10 3.6

97%N2; 3%O2 MA 12.7 0.58 3.8 10.8 0.09 6.8 13.7 0.93 3.7 AIR CA 8.7 0.66 3.7 8.7 0.02 6.9 9.1 1.11 3.6 AIR MA 12.1 0.54 3.7 8.4 0.02 7.0 13.2 0.88 3.9 5%O ; 5%CO CA 8.5 0.62 3.8 8.5 0.04 6.6 9.3 1.16 3.6 7 2 2 5%O2; 5%CO2 MA 12.2 0.52 3.9 10.0 0.04 6.9 13.2 0.91 3.8

97%N2; 3%O2 CA 8.0 0.57 3.6 8.0 0.08 6.5 10.9 1.13 3.6

97%N2; 3%O2 MA 13.0 0.57 3.8 9.4 0.08 6.8 13.6 0.89 3.9

SS% (percent soluble solids); TA% (titratable acidity, expressed as citric acid equivalent)

160

(a) (b)

(c) Figure 3.8 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmospheres on sugar/ acid ratio values of (a) fresh-cut pineapple, (b) cantaloupe-melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. The values are means for 12 determinations, separated by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) (p<0.05). Error bars show SD. Broken red line denotes average Fresh-cut (Day 0) value.

161 3.3.2. Effects of atmospheres on sensory evaluation

There were gradual falls in scores for overall acceptability with time for all fruits, irrespective of atmospheres (Figure 3.9), however the rate of decrease was significantly greater for flushed packs (p<0.05).

For fresh-cut pineapple, (Figure 3.9a) flushing with an atmosphere of 97%N2+3%O2 was least beneficial, while PMA and/or CA storage in 5%O2+5%CO2 were best.

Fresh-cut pineapple flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 had a 4 score lower acceptability, with concurrent reductions in scores for visual appearance (Figure 3.10a) and increased colour scores in comparison to PMA packs. Visual appearance scores dropped from excellent to good after initial flushing in 97%N2+3%O2, falling significantly (p<0.05) to below the level of marketability on Day 4 to below levels of usability by Day 7. Similarly, significant differences in colour scores were observed

(Figure 3.11a), with 97%N2+3%O2 flushed packs (p<0.05) having the greatest colour change and PMA packs the least. These low acceptability scores were mainly due to increased translucency and a more water-soaked appearance. In contrast, fresh-cut pineapple stored in a CA of 5%O2+5%CO2 better maintained their characteristic fresh-cut colour and firmness (Figure 3.14a).

In terms of aroma and off-odour (Figure 3.12a; 3.13a), flushed pineapple packs had significantly reduced aroma scores (p<0.05), falling to unacceptable levels by Day 7 for 97%N2+3%O2 packs. For fresh-cut pineapple stored in CAs, similar aroma scores were noted (p>0.05) with 97%N2+3%O2 falling below level of marketability (5) on Day 7. No significant off-odours were noted in CA air stored or PMA packs, while for flushed packs, noticeable off-odours were noted on Day 7, in particular for

97%N2+3%O2 and 5%O2+5%CO2.

162

Chapter 3 10 9 8 (a) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA

MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2

D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 10 9

8 7 (b) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2

D0 D1scores acceptability Overall D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 10 9 8 (c) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

Figure 3.9 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on overall acceptability scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0).

163

10 9 (a) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 97%N2+3%O2MA MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

10 9 8 (b) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR AIRMA MA AIR MA AIR

Visual appearance scores appearance Visual CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

10 9 8 (c) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

Figure 3.10 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the visual appearance scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0).

164

Chapter 3

Similarly for fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, flushing with an atmosphere of

97%N2+3%O2 was least beneficial at retaining sensory characteristics, while PMA and/or CA air storage was the best (Figure 3.9b). In general, flushed melon packs had lower visual acceptability than CA stored melon, with a 2-3 score decrease in visual appearance following flushing with 97%N2+3%O2. This decrease resulted in acceptability falling from “very good” to “good”, with a gradual decline to below the level of usability by Day 7 (Figure 3.10b). Colour scores (Figure 3.11b) reflected this decrease in appearance well, with colour scores for 97%N2+3%O2 falling from very good to fair/acceptable after flushing, decreasing steadily to just below level of marketability on Day7. However, PMA stored melon had the greatest colour change during storage (p<0.05) with heightened translucency and deepening orange hue. These low acceptability scores were mainly due to increased translucency and a more water-soaked appearance. In contrast, fresh-cut melon stored in a CA of

5%O2+5%CO2 better maintained their characteristic fresh-cut colour. Flushing reduced the initial firmness of fresh-cut melon from “very firm” to “firm”, with a gradual decrease to/ below level of marketability on Day 7 (Figure 3.14a). Melon flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 were least firm of all samples, while CA air stored samples were firmest at end of storage. In terms of aroma and off-odour (Figure 3.12b; 3.13b), no significant effect of atmospheres was observed (p>0.05). In general, as aroma decreased, off-odours increased, with flushed packs having a greater loss in aroma and slightly more noticeable off-odours on Day 7, which were greatest for 97%N2+3%O2 and least for CA air stored fruit.

The overall acceptability of fresh-cut kiwifruit (Figure 3.9c) related well the changes in the individual sensory parameters. Flushing with an atmosphere of

97%N2+3%O2 resulted in lesser acceptability, with a 1.5 score reduction initially after flushing and a reduced level of marketability on Day 7 (Figure 3.10c). In contrast, a consistent decrease in visual appearance was observed for all CA samples, with all samples remaining marketable on Day 7. CA storage in air had best acceptability after 7 Days storage, with a CA of 5%O2+5%CO2 best at retaining visual appearance on Day 7, while kiwifruit flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 was worst (<0.05).

165

10 9 (a) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 5%O2+5%CO2MA MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

10 9 8 7 (b) 6 5 4 3 2 1 scores Colour 0

AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 5%O2+5%CO2MA D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

10 (c) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

Figure 3.11 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the colour scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0).

166

Chapter 3

Similarly, fresh-cut kiwifruit flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 had the worst colour scores (Figure 3.11c) exhibiting a 2 score reduction from very good to good initially after flushing, and reduced marketability on Day 7. The low acceptability and colour scores were mainly due to increased translucency and softening. Fresh-cut kiwifruit stored in air (CA) better retained their initial fresh-cut colour. A gradual decrease in firmness was also observed (Figure 3.13c), with flushed packs having a bigger reduction in firmness than CA stored samples. A CA of 5%O2+5%CO2 was best at maintaining fresh-cut kiwifruit firmness, while kiwifruit flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 was worst (reduced level of usability on Day 7). In terms of aroma and off-odour (Figure 3.12c), no significant effects of atmospheres were noted (p>0.05). CA air and PMA were best at maintaining fresh-cut kiwifruit aroma; while a CA of

5%O2+5%CO2 and 97%N2+3%O2 flushing were the worst.

167

10 9 (a) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2MA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

10 9 (b) 8 7 6 5 4 3

Aroma scores Aroma 2 1 0 CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR AIRMA MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 10 9 (c) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR AIRMA MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 97%N2+3%O2MA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 5%O2+5%CO2MA MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

Figure 3.12 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the aroma scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0).

168

Chapter 3

10 (a) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2

10 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 9 8 (b) 7 6 5 4 3 2 odour scores odour

- 1 0 Off

AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 5%O2+5%CO2MA MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 10 (c) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 5%O2+5%CO2MA MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

Figure 3.13 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the off-odour scores of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0).

169

10 (a) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

10 9 (b) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Firmness scores Firmness

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 10 (c) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

CA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA AIRCA MA AIR MA AIR AIRMA MA AIR

CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA 97%N2+3%O2CA CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA 5%O2+5%CO2CA MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 MA 97%N2+3%O2 97%N2+3%O2MA MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 MA 5%O2+5%CO2 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7 D0 D1 D4 D7

Figure 3.14 Effects of controlled atmospheres (CA) and modified atmospheres (MA) on the firmness of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Data are means for 6 determinations ± SD. Broken red line denotes level of marketability. Yellow, orange and green bars illustrate fresh-cut sensory quality (Day 0).

170

Chapter 3

3.3.3. Effects of atmosphere on microbial growth

The effect of atmospheres on the microbial load was determined for total bacterial counts (TBCs) (Figure 3.15) and Listeria innocua (Figure 3.16). For fresh-cut pineapple, there were significant reductions in TBCs (Figure 3.15a) and Listeria innocua counts (Figure 3.16a) (p<0.05). In the case of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, TBCs increased (Figure 3.15b) and Listeria innocua counts fell (Figure 3.16b) (p<0.05).

In general, initial TBC counts for fresh-cut kiwifruit increased slightly from Day 0 to Day 1 (6.5 to 6.7 log CFUg-1) with no significant changes thereafter (p>0.05) (Figure 3.15c). An exception to this was for kiwifruit stored in a CA of

97%N2+3%O2, which continued to increase after Day 1; exceeding the maximum limit for safe consumption on Day 7 (7.1 log CFUg-1). Flushed kiwifruit packs had slightly higher Listeria innocua counts than CA stored kiwifruit (Figure 3.16c). After an initial increase (~0.5 log CFUg-1) on Day 1, the populations within each atmosphere remained relatively consistent until Day 4, after which significant differences in responses were observed (p<0.05). Both PMA and 97%N2+3%O2 flushed packs increased by 0.4 and 0.3 log CFUg-1, respectively, while for -1 5%O2+5%CO2 CA and flushed packs a 1 log CFUg reduction was observed.

171

Figure 3.15 Effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on total bacterial counts (TBCs) of fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Continuous line (CA); dashed line (MA). Dashed horizontal red line (maximum TVC limit: 7 log cfu/g-1).

172

Chapter 3

(b) 8.5

8.0

1 7.5 - 7.0

Log CFU/g 6.5

6.0

5.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Storage Time (Days) 8.5 (c) 8.0

1 7.5 - 7.0

Log CFU/g 6.5

6.0

5.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Storage Time (Days)

Figure 3.16 Effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on survival and growth of Listeria (L.) innocua on fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Continuous line (CA); dashed line (MA).

173

3.3.4. Effects of atmosphere on levels of phytochemicals

Total carotenoids

Cantaloupe melon had the greatest fresh-cut total carotenoids (TC) concentration on Day 0 (1.73 µg g-1), followed by pineapple (0.77µg g-1) and kiwifruit (0.52µg g-1), respectively (Figure 3.17). However, no significant effect of atmosphere was observed (p>0.05).

For fresh-cut pineapple, with the exception of PMA and 97%N2+3%O2 flushed packs, there was an overall decrease in TC concentration during storage (p<0.05) with values ranging from 0.38 to 0.57 µg g-1 on Day 7.

For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, after an initial decrease from Day 0 to Day 1, TC concentrations increased until Day 7 (p<0.05) with values nearing Day 0 values (1.73 µg g-1).

For fresh-cut kiwifruit, no significant differences in TC concentrations were found during storage (p>0.05) with values ranging from 0.6 to 0.7µg g-1.

174

Chapter 3

(a) Pineapple97%N2;3%O2 CA

Pineapple5%O2;5%CO2 CA

PineappleAIR CA Day 7 Day 4 Pineapple97%N2;3%O2 MA Day 1 Day 0 Pineapple5%O2;5%CO2 MA

PineappleAIR MA

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 µg/g Fresh Weight

(b) Melon 97%N2;3%O2 CA

Melon 5%O2;5%CO2 CA Day 7

Day 4 Melon AIR CA Day 1

Day 0 Melon 97%N2;3%O2 MA

Melon 5%O2;5%CO2 MA

Melon AIR MA

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 µg/g Fresh Weight

Kiwifruit97%N2;3%O2 CA (c)

Kiwifruit5%O2;5%CO2 CA

Day 7 KiwifruitAIR CA Day 4 Kiwifruit97%N2;3%O2 MA Day 1 Day 0

Kiwifruit5%O2;5%CO2 MA

KiwifruitAIR MA

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 µg/g Fresh Weight Figure 3.17 Effects of controlled (CA) and modified (MA) atmosphere on total carotenoids(µg g-1) in fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b), cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Vertical dashed red line (average fresh-cut TC concentration µg g-1).

175

Total phenolics

Fresh-cut kiwifruit had the highest total phenolics (64.1 GAE mg kg-1), followed by pineapple (52.8 GAE mg kg-1) and cantaloupe melon (19.5 GAE mg kg-1). There were no significant effects of atmospheres in fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon (p>0.05), but significant effects were observed for fresh-cut kiwifruit

(p<0.05). PMA packs had significant increase while 97%N2+3%O2 packs had a significant decrease during storage (p<0.05). Both CA and MA 5%O2+5%CO2 fruit packs had the greatest increase on Day 4 (p<0.05) with values of 83.55 and 86.85 mg kg-1 falling to 79.38 and 79.47 mg kg-1on Day 7, respectively.

Total antioxidant activity

Great variation in antiradical power (ARP) was observed between fresh-cut fruits studied (Figure 3.19). Fresh-cut kiwifruit had the highest ARP (0.090 g-1 fresh weight (FW)) followed closely by pineapple (0.084 g-1 FW) while fresh-cut cantaloupe melon had the lowest ARP (0.016 g-1 FW). No significant effects of atmospheres on ARP was observed for fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon but significant effects for fresh-cut kiwifruit were found (p<0.05).

For fresh-cut pineapple (Figure 3.19a), significant differences in the ARP of fruit flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 and PMA packs was found on Day 7 (p<0.05) with values of 0.063 and 0.083 g-1 FW, respectively.

For fresh-cut kiwifruit, flushed fruit, irrespective of atmosphere, had slightly higher ARP than CA stored fruit during storage. On Day 1, a significant increase in

ARP was found for CA air and PMA and CA/MA 5%O2+5%CO2 kiwifruit (p<0.01).

After Day 1, fresh-cut kiwifruit stored/ flushed in/with 5%O2+5%CO2 continued to increase with kiwifruit flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2 peaking at Day 4 and having highest ARP at end of storage (0.140 g-1 FW). In contrast, fresh-cut kiwifruit stored in a CA of 97%N2+3%O2 decreased in ARP after Day 1, having lowest ARP of all samples on Day 7 (0.087 g-1 FW) (p<0.05).

176

Chapter 3

(a) Pineapple 97%N2;3%O2 CA

Pineapple 5%O2;5%CO2 CA

Pineapple AIR CA Day 7 Day 4 Pineapple 97%N2;3%O2 MA Day 1 Pineapple 5%O2;5%CO2 MA Day 0

Pineapple AIR MA

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 mg GAE 100g-1 Fresh Weight

(b) Cantaloupe Melon 97%N2;3%O2 CA

Cantaloupe Melon 5%O2;5%CO2 CA

Cantaloupe Melon AIR CA Day 7

Day 4 Cantaloupe Melon 97%N2;3%O2 MA Day 1 Cantaloupe Melon 5%O2;5%CO2 MA Day 0

Cantaloupe Melon AIR MA

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 mg GAE 100g-1 Fresh Weight

Kiwifruit97%N2;3%O2 CA (c)

Kiwifruit5%O2;5%CO2 CA

KiwifruitAIR CA Day 7

Day 4 Kiwifruit97%N2;3%O2 MA Day 1 Kiwifruit5%O2;5%CO2 MA Day 0

KiwifruitAIR MA

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -1 mg GAE 100g Fresh Weight

Figure 3.18 Effects of atmospheres on total phenolics, gallic acid equivalent (GAE) on a fresh weight basis (mg 100g-1) in fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Vertical dashed red line (average fresh-cut PC concentration 100g-1 FW).

177

(a) Pineapple 97%N2; 3%O2 CA

Pineapple 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA

Pineapple AIR CA Day 7

Pineapple 97%N2; 3%O2 MA Day 4 Day 1 Pineapple 5%O2; 5%CO2 MA Day 0

Pineapple AIR MA

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150

ARP g-1 Fresh Weight

(b) Melon 97%N2; 3%O2 CA

Melon 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA

Melon AIR CA Day 7 Day 4

Melon 97%N2; 3%O2 MA Day 1 Day 0 Melon 5%O2; 5%CO2 MA

Melon AIR MA

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150

ARP g-1 Fresh Weight

Kiwifruit 97%N2; 3%O2 CA (c)

Kiwifruit 5%O2; 5%CO2 CA Day 7 Kiwifruit AIR CA Day 4 Day 1 Kiwifruit 97%N2; 3%O2 MA Day 0

Kiwifruit 5%O2; 5%CO2 MA

Kiwifruit AIR MA

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 ARP g-1 Fresh Weight

Figure 3.19 Effects of atmospheres on total antioxidant activity (mg 100g-1) in fresh-cut (a) pineapple, (b) cantaloupe melon and (c) kiwifruit during 7 Day storage at 4OC. Values are means for 12 determinations ± SD. Vertical dashed red line (average fresh-cut ARP concentration mg 100g-1 FW).

178

Chapter 3

3.4. Discussion

In this study, the effects of storage atmospheres on the quality, microbiology and levels of phytochemicals of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit were determined. Storing and flushing fresh-cut fruits in a range of different atmospheres had significant effects on quality, and resulted in different microbiological responses and levels of phytochemicals. For flushed samples, these effects appeared to be directly related to the types of atmospheres formed within packages and were dependent on fruit type.

Fresh-cut fruits, especially kiwifruit, are difficult to package due to increased respiration rates brought about by processing. As a result, a range of different MAs were found within flushed packs during storage (Table 3.2). CO2 levels were high, in particular for 5%O2+5%CO2 flushed packs; and O2 levels were very low, especially for 97N2+3%O2 flushed packs, creating favourable conditions for anaerobic respiration. PMA storage represented the least modified of all packs, and produced a range of atmospheres in between these extremes.

Pineapple

The suggested optimum O2 and CO2 ranges for fresh-cut pineapple as recommended by Gorny, (1997) are 3-5% O2 and 5-8% CO2. In this study, fresh-cut pineapple flushed with air (PMA) developed near optimum O2 and CO2 concentrations during storage with values of 8% and 10% respectively, on Day 7. In contrast, pineapple flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2 had near anoxic O2 levels on Day 7 (<0.5%) and had developed relatively high CO2 levels (11%). Similarly, fruit flushed with

97%N2+3%O2 had near anoxic O2 levels at end of storage (0.4%). Low O2 (1-2%) can lead to the production of off-flavours/-odours, discolouration, potential growth of anaerobic bacteria with concurrent loss of visual quality.

The most significant effects of these sub-optimal atmospheres were direct effects on quality attributes such as drip-loss, colour change, firmness and sensory acceptability during storage (p<0.05). No significant effects on microbiology and/or levels of phytochemicals were observed (p>0.05).

179

The different responses to CA and MA appeared to be related to the benefits or stresses caused by the low O2 and/or high CO2 atmospheres. For example, sub- optimal O2 levels of 0.2% and 1.3% and/or CO2 levels of 10.5 and 15%, resulting from flushing with 97%N2+3%O2 and 5%O2+5%CO2, caused physiological stress in pineapple, with translucency and minor flesh softening two of the major defects noted.

Deterioration of visual quality was complex and due to a combination of browning/ discoloration and increased translucency. Translucency is a physiological disorder characterised by dark and glassy flesh and is a principal sign of deterioration in MAP products such as pineapple (Chen and Paull, 2001). During storage, the high barrier film coupled with flushing created unfavourable atmospheres to be created.

The main effects of reduced O2/ increased CO2 in 5%O2+5%CO2 CA and MA packs was a reduction in the rate of browning and better retention of yellow fruit colour as reflected in greater luminosity and higher chromaticity values. O’Connor-Shaw et al., (1994) reported that fresh-cut pineapple stored in round rigid polypropylene containers at 4OC showed no significant changes in sensory quality during the first 7 Days of storage. Spanier et al., (1998) conclude that fresh-cut pineapple stored in air at 4OC had excellent visual quality after 7 Days storage. However, they remarked that fruit in lower portions of the containers were of unacceptable quality, had greater translucency with noticeable off-odours. Marrero and Kader (2006) studied the influence of MA and storage temperatures on the post-cutting life of pineapple and concluded that excessive restriction of O2 can lead to discolouration with the major colour changes including reduced chromaticity and luminosity. In this study, the very low O2 (<2%) found in 97%N2+3%O2 flushed packs, resulted in the greatest colour change with increased darkening of flesh coupled with increased translucency and a more water-soaked appearance. Discoloration from yellowing has also been previously reported (Mencarelli et al., 1990; Blanchard et al., 1996). Flushing considerably reduced the time at which equilibrium (EMA) was achieved; less than 2 days, compared to 5 days with PMA. This reduction was thought to induce a delay in discolouration (browning) as observed for PMA pineapple during early storage packs. Marrero and Kader, (2006) reported that pineapple chunks held in O 1.5%O2+11%CO2 at 0 C maintained good appearance during 14 Day storage, while

180

Chapter 3 storage at 5OC resulted in anaerobiosis lending to poor appearance and off-odour development.

No significant effects of atmospheres on fresh-cut pineapple TC concentration were observed (p>0.05) while TP concentration increased significantly during storage, in particular for fruit flushed in 97%N2+3%O2 (p<0.05). This increase could be attributed to greater incidence of browning and overall colour change earlier observed for fruit flushed in this atmosphere. In line with these results, a gradual decline in antioxidant activity was observed for fresh-cut pineapple.

Cantaloupe melon

The rapid establishment of optimum atmospheres is critical for the prevention of subsequent physiological disorders such as discoloration and softening (Mahajan, 2006). In this study fresh-cut cantaloupe melon PMA packages were unable to attain beneficial in-pack atmospheres during storage. PMA relied heavily on the respiration of the product to regulate in-pack atmosphere with O2 and CO2 concentrations of 16% and 5% respectively, at end of storage. Fresh-cut melon flushed with

97%N2+3%O2 had O2 had CO2 levels of 1.5% and 8% respectively, at end of storage while for melon flushed with 5%O2+5CO2, O2 and CO2 levels were 3% and 9% respectively. These atmospheres are relatively in line with Gorny, (1997) who recommended an optimum atmosphere of 3%O2 and 10%CO2 to be beneficial at maintaining melon quality. In this study, melon flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2 better maintained its fresh-cut quality over other atmospheres.

During processing, many natural barriers to water-loss, i.e. the skin, rind and peel, are removed, leaving products very susceptible to water-loss and dehydration. For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, the extent of processing is so severe that water-loss and softness can occur at much greater rates than that of the whole commodity. CA stored fresh-cut melon had more of a water-soaked appearance than MA stored fruit. For flushed packs, an overall increase in firmness was observed (p<0.05) with no significant effect of CA on melon firmness observed (p>0.05). Portela and Cantwell (1998) reported that firmness loss in melon cylinders during PMA storage at 5OC was 2.2lb, while CA air storage significantly reduced firmness loss.

181

Significant increases in both total bacteria counts (TBCs) and L. innocua populations were observed during storage (p<0.05) however no significant effects of atmospheres was observed (p>0.05). Fang et al., (2013) previously reported that cantaloupe melon showed an immediate increase in populations of both background microflora and L. monocytogenes with little or no lag phase present following inoculation, and continued exponential growth until stationary phase was established. Francis et al., (2007) showed that L. monocytogenes can survive and grow in fresh-cut products, notably those with high CO2 atmospheres, while products flushed with an inert atmosphere also favoured growth over air storage (Francis and O’Beirne, 1998a,b).

Similarly to pineapple, fresh-cut cantaloupe melon flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 had the greatest colour change (p<0.01) while melon stored in a CA of

5%O2+5%CO2 had the least. Colour change in melon was minor and primarily related to increased translucency and loss of vivid pink-orange colour. Portela and Cantwell, (1998) reported that overall visual quality of fresh-cut melon stored in low O O2 alone or air was unacceptable after 9 Days storage at 5 C, while CA storage with elevated CO2 (7.5%) maintained visual appearance. O’Connor-Shaw et al., (1994) and Ayhan and Chism, (1998) found that, by the end of storage at 4OC and 2.2OC for 11 and 22 Days, respectively, fresh-cut cantaloupe melon chunks were paler than freshly cut chunks and were more translucent with decreased appearance scores. An active MAP of 4%O2+10%CO2 was found to better maintain the bright orange colour of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon (Bai et al., 2001), where similar to this study (CA

5%O2+5%CO2), the initial luminosity, hue and chromaticity values remained relatively unchanged. Therefore, melon flushed or stored in 5%O2+5%CO2 is best at maintaining fresh-cut cantaloupe colour during storage. Bai et al., (2003) also reported that melon chunks flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2 had better visual quality and aroma than PMA storage.

However, fresh-cut melon stored in air (CA) better maintained its sensory appeal with better aroma and firmness values; while 97%N2+3%O2 flushed packs had reduced sensorial traits. Fan et al., (2008) suggested that appearance and aroma limited the shelf-life of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon under MAP storage. Similar to the current study, Ayhan and Chism, (1998) found that fresh-cut cantaloupe melon O chunks stored in 95%N2+5%O2 in high barrier film at 2.2 C had developed off- odours and were translucent with decreased aroma.

182

Chapter 3

Significant increases in total carotenoid concentrations were observed during storage (p<0.05). In ripe fruit, chloroplasts degenerate into chromoplasts, accompanied by increased synthesis of carotenoids (Matile et al., 1997). This change from chloroplast to chromoplast is particularly important in the case of fruits called cartenogenic fruits, characterised by this extensive new synthesis of carotenoids, usually accompanied by a change in the carotenoids profile (Ártés et al., 2000). This de novo synthesis of carotene has previously been described by Lee, (1996) and Berger et al.,

(2008). Weichmann (1986) reported that low O2 atmospheres enhanced the retention of carotene in carrots, air + 5%CO2 caused a loss, while air + 7.5%CO2 and/or higher caused de novo synthesis of carotene. These trends could also be attributed to an increased bioavailability due to tissue decay, as previously reported by Ding et al., (2001; 2002), Marrero and Kader, (2006) and Paiva and Russell, (1999).

Kiwifruit

Fresh-cut kiwifruit has the highest respiration rate of all fruits studied and as a result had the greatest in-pack atmosphere modification. Gorny, (1997), suggested that atmospheres in the range of 1-2%O2 and 3-5%CO2 were optimum. In this study, kiwifruit flushed with 5%O2+5%CO2, had O2 levels less than 1.5% on Day 7 while

CO2 levels were ~18%. In the case of kiwifruit flushed with 97%N2+3%O2, O2 levels were less that 0.5% while CO2 levels were ~20%. Anaerobic respiration can also increase product susceptibility to physiological breakdown. Of particular importance are the possible effects on cell membranes which can affect firmness. As a consequence of the inadequate or injurious concentrations of O2 and/or CO2 developed, different symptoms of physiological injury and/or reduced quality occurred, with severe tissue softening and translucency.

An overall reduction in firmness was observed, irrespective of atmosphere with no significant effects observed on Day 7 (p>0.05). Unfavourable O2 and CO2 concentrations are likely to have contributed to this loss of firmness, as previously reported by Oms-Oliu et al., (2008) for fresh-cut pears. Furthermore, the duration of exposure to low O2 atmospheres can have a direct effect on membrane stability

(Varoquaux et al., 1990). Soliva-Fortuny et al., (2002b) showed that high CO2 concentrations induce tissue breakdown and the formation of significant amounts of

183

exudate in fresh-cut apple and pear. Arpaia et al., (1994) showed that solubilisation of cell-wall softening related components was faster in air stored kiwifruit than in a

CA of 2%O2 + 5%CO2.

There were no effects of atmospheres on microbial growth but flushing with

5%O2+5%CO2 significantly increased Listeria innocua counts on Day 7. Flushing with 5%O2+5%CO2 resulted in high CO2 concentrations (>20%) to accumulate within packs. This concentration has previously been shown to promote the growth of pathogens like L. monocytogenes (Farber et al., 1991; Carlin et al., 1996).

In contrast to other fruits, fresh-cut kiwifruit flushed with 97%N2+3%O2 had least colour change, while when stored in 5%O2+5%CO2 had the greatest (p<0.05). Colour change for kiwifruit was a combination of degreening (increase in yellowness) coupled with increased translucency and slight browning of cut edges. All CA stored fruit developed a deeper green colour during storage, while flushed packs lost their green colour and became much more translucent. Loss of green colour has been reported to occur at 10% CO2 with some evidence that 8% CO2 is the upper limit for maintaining kiwifruit green colour (Arpaia et al., 1994). Yellowing (loss of chlorophyll) was found to be less appealing to panellists than an increase in green colour, contributing to reduced marketability and poor visual appeal on Day 7. In this instance, kiwifruit had poor acceptability due to a combination of deteriorative traits such as tissue softening which gave it a soft- mushy appearance and texture.

No significant effects of atmospheres on total carotenoids were observed for fresh-cut kiwifruit. However, fresh-cut kiwifruit flushed with 5%O2+5%O2 had significant increase in TP concentration during storage (p<0.01). The accumulation of phenolic compounds during storage has been previously observed (Babic et al., 1993; Howard and Griffin, 1993; Klaiber et al., 2005). This accumulation has been shown to result from wound-induced synthesis of PAL (Howard and Griffin, 1993). However, such relationships may also be attributed to the presence of other compounds (Aguayo et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2002) such as ascorbic acid which is found in abundance in kiwifruit.

184

Chapter 3

3.5. Conclusion

It is conclude that:

 Atmospheres had significant effects of quality and sensory appeal but little effects on microbial growth or phytochemical content.  Quality of fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon was best maintained

under a CA of 5%O2+5%CO2.  Quality of fresh-cut kiwifruit was better maintained under a CA of

97%N2+3%O2.

 Where low O2 / elevated CO2 were found within packs, quality suffered.  The optimum atmospheres identified can be used as target atmospheres in package design (see Chapter 5).

185

186

Chapter 4 Volatile Aromatic Compound Changes in Fresh-cut Fruits Effects of Storage Time and Cut Size

Paper V: Finnegan, E., Ryan, S., Yarlagadda, A.B., Kilcawley, K.N., and O’Beirne, D. (2014), “Volatile Aromatic Compound (VAC) changes in Fresh-cut Fruits: Effects of Storage Time and Cutting Size”. In preparation for submission in Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry

188

Chapter 4

4.1. Abstract

The effects of storage and cut size on volatile aromatic compounds (VACs) of fresh- cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit were studied using headspace solid- phase microextraction (HS-SPME) gas chromatography mass-spectrometry (GC- MS). Fresh-cut fruits were packaged in a high barrier laminate pillow-pouch pack and stored for 14 days at 4OC. Anaerobic respiration was not initiated in any of the packs (>2% O2) during the 14 Day storage. A total of 29, 23 and 35 odour-active compounds were detected of which 18, 16 and 20 were tentatively identified in the static headspace of packaged fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit, respectively. Complex mixtures of esters (including acetate and thiol-esters), alcohols, aldehydes, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and hydrocarbons (HC) were observed with esters generally increasing during storage. Cut size (p<0.05) and storage time (p<0.01) had large effects on VAC profiles. Certain compounds such as ethyl acetate increased in concentration, while others such as α-pinene and/or methyl acetate decreased or showed no significant change (p>0.05) and were dependent on fruit type, cut size and storage time.

For fresh-cut kiwifruit, certain compounds such as methoxyacetone, diethyl carbonate, (3-Methyl-oxiran-2-yl)-methanol and ethyl benzoate were present only during the latter storage, while lactamide, 2-ethylfuran, limonene and 2,4-hexadienal were present only in fresh-cut samples (Day 0). Based on PCA interpretation, VAC changes during storage took place at greater rates for smaller cut pieces. Volatiles showed greater diversity in patterns with fruit type with a decrease or loss in some compounds (pineapple and kiwifruit) and an increase or emergence of others (cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit). Using PCA, the postharvest aroma shelf-life (SL) of fresh-cut pineapple and kiwifruit were 7 days for small pieces and up to 14 days for large cut pieces. For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, aroma SL was limited to 4 and 7 days for small and large cut pieces due to presence of fermentative-like off-odours, which were more pronounced for smaller cut pieces. These off-odours were attributed to increased concentrations of existing volatiles rather than the emergence of new compounds.

Keywords: fresh-cut fruit, solid-phase microextraction, gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy, aroma, shelf-life.

189

4.2. Introduction

Fruit flavour is composed of two characteristics: (1) aroma, which is the combined effect of the presence of various volatiles in fruit, and (2) taste, which is determined by the contents of non-volatile compounds such as sugars and acids. It had been suggested by Kader, (2002, 2012) that the flavour attributes of fresh-cut fruits are usually lost or diminished before other deteriorative symptoms appear. The characteristic aroma associated with fresh-cut fruits is often short-lived due to enzymatic reactions that modify aroma composition.

The combination of different proportions of VACs and the presence or absence of certain trace components determines the aromatic properties of fruit (Ayala-Zavalla et al., 2004; Laohakunjit and Kerdchoechuen, 2007) with non- characterising volatile esters quite common across species. Volatile compounds which make up the aroma of fruits are mainly esters, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, lactones, terpenoids and hydrocarbons which can be classified as primary or secondary compounds, indicating whether they were present in intact fruit tissue or produced as a result of tissue disruption (wounding as a result of minimal processing). C10 monoterpenes and C15 sesquiterpenes are the most abundant group of compounds present in the aroma profile of fresh fruit. In some cases, they are also the key compounds determining characteristic aroma (El Hadi et al., 2013). Bound volatiles such as glucosides and/or glucosinolates, are recognised as a potential source of aroma compounds in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). Glucosides of aroma compounds in fruit are mainly O-β-D-glucosides and O-diglycosides, but triglycosides have also been identified (Sarry and Gunata, 2004; Reineccius, 2006). The proportion of free volatiles is usually much lower than that of glycosidically bound volatiles.

Based on AEDA analysis, the main volatile components reported for pineapple include esters, terpenes, ketones and aldehydes, notably ethyl 2- methylbutanoate, ethyl hexanoate, methyl hexanoate, 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)- furanone (DMHF), decanal, ethyl 2-(methylthio)propionate, hexanoic acid, methyl ester, octanoic acid methyl ester and and methyl butanoate (Liu et al., 2011; Wei et al., 2011; Montero- Calderón et al., 2010).

190

Chapter 4

In climacteric aromatic melon varieties, esters are prominent, together with sulphur- containing aroma compounds, sesquiterpenes, norisoprenes, short-chain alcohols

(

Kiwifruit appears to lack fingerprint volatiles. Instead they are characterised by a balance of esters, aldehydes and alcohols, in which branched volatiles or terpenoids are poorly represented (Warrington and Weston, 1990; Paterson et al., 1991). Based on AEDA and other techniques, more than 80 compounds have been identified as contributors to kiwifruit aroma. Methyl and ethyl butanoate, (Z)- and (E)-2-hexenal, hexanal, (Z)- and (E)-3-hexenol and methyl benzoate contribute most to an overall impression with (E)-2-hexenal been reported in some publications as the most abundant compound in ripe fruit (Young et al., 1983; Takeoka et al., 1987; Bartley and Schwede, 1989; Frank et al., 2007) with butanoate having a positive effect (Gunther et al., 2010; Carcia et al., 2013).

Many factors are known to affect volatile composition including intrinsic factors such as fruit type, cultivar, genetic make-up and maturity; extrinsic factors such as environmental conditions (pre- and post-harvest), exogenous ripening (applied ethylene), process severity (intact, sliced or homogenised), storage (Varoquaux and Wiley, 1994; Bolin et al., 1977; Wright and Kader, 1997; Ahvenainen, 2000; Bett et al., 2001; Martin-Belloso and Soliva-Fortuny, 2006; Artés-Hernández et al., 2007; Montero-Calderon et al., 2010; El Hadi et al., 2013; Finnegan et al, 2013) and the analytical method employed (Bruckner, 2008; Buttery, 1993).

Cutting of produce removes the natural protection of the epidermis and is a cause of major tissue disruption, destroying the internal compartmentalization as enzymes and 191 substrates, normally sequestered within the vacuole, become mixed with other cytoplasmic and nucleic substrates and enzymes. The presence of other enzymes (e.g. lipoxygenase) further alters these volatiles, in certain cases, giving rise to off- odours during prolonged storage (Montero-Calderón et al., 2010) which may be accompanied by flavour loss, discolouration, softening, gelling, shrinkage and an overall shorter SL.

Likewise, cut piece size may affect product quality and SL (Artes-Hernandez et al., 2007). The smaller the cut size the greater the respiration rate (Finnegan et al., 2013) and ethylene production, which stimulates the biosynthesis of enzymes related to accelerated ripening and senescence (Hyodo et al., 1978; Martinéz et al., 2006; Artés et al., 2007). Furthermore, increased surface area induces a higher rate of dehydration, and consequently a greater weight-loss. It also increases the synthesis of wound-response metabolites (lignin, cumarins and anthocyanins etc.) (Martin- Belloso and Soliva-Fortuny, 2006; Artés-Hernández et al., 2007).

Thus, the volatile composition is continuously changing in fruits. Current research on aroma and flavour has focused on the identification of volatiles produced by ripe fruits. A desirable, rich, fruity aroma, typical of most fruits, is often used by the consumer as an indicator of quality, ripeness and freshness. In contrast, fermented, mouldy, musty, acidic off-odours as well as insipid and bland aromas are indicators of spoilage, decay, under-ripeness and in general, inferior quality (Forney, 2001). Trace sulphur volatiles have also been recently identified that are thought to play significant roles in the flavour of some sub-/ tropical fruits such as pineapple, melons and kiwifruit (McGorrin, 2011; Schulbach et al., 2004). Therefore, the volatile composition of fruit provides consumers with a relatively good indication of produce quality. However, although these characteristics are highly influential to a consumers’ purchasing decision, there is limited knowledge of factors (intrinsic and extrinsic) affecting flavour development in MAP fresh-cut fruit produce.

The objective of the present study was to determine the extent of change of VACs in fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit as affected by storage time and size reduction using principal component analysis (PCA), and use this data as a base for optimising aroma quality.

192

Chapter 4

4.3. Materials and methods 4.3.1. Sample preparation – Processing and packaging of plant materials

Fresh fruit; pineapples (Ananas comosus cv Del Monte Gold MD2: #10), cantaloupe melon (Cucumis melo L. var reiculatus) and kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv Hayward) were purchased from a local fruit and vegetable wholesaler (Richardson’s Fruit and Vegetables, Old Clare St., Limerick, Ireland) on the morning of processing and stored at 4OC until required (1-2h). For pineapple, ripe fruit with a shell colour corresponding to stages 2 and 3 of the Dole pineapple colour chart (between 25% and 50% shell colour) were used for all experiments. For cantaloupe melon, fruits with a ½ to full slip, corresponding to a mature ripening to ripe melon, were used. For kiwifruit, fruits that were firm to touch and had excellent visual quality with no symptoms of deterioration (approx.11.5% soluble solids) were used.

All fruits were processed at room temperature (18-22OC). For fresh-cut pineapple, the peels of whole fruits were removed with a stainless steel knife which was sanitised in a 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution between individual fruits in order to minimise contamination. The blossom and stem ends were removed and discarded and the fruit sliced transversely into rings (24mm). After slicing, the core from each ring was removed manually using a stainless steel cork borer. The slices were cut into triangular chunks of three different cut sizes (10mm, 25mm & 50mm) using a hand-held stainless steel cutter (Figure 4.1a). For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, both the slip and top end of the fruits were removed and the melon halved transversely. The seeds were carefully removed using a stainless steel spoon (sanitised in a 1% NaClO solution between each fruit). Each half was cut into four longitudinal slices and the surrounding peel carefully removed from the flesh. Each section was subsequently cut into uniform trapezoidal chunks of varying size (Figure 4.1b). In the case of fresh-cut kiwifruit, the blossom and stem ends of whole fruits were removed and discarded and the rest of the peel carefully removed from the flesh using a sharp paring knife (sanitised in a 1% NaClO solution between each fruit). Fruits were then cut into longitudinal halves, followed by transverse quarters and then eights, depending on the size of the cut required (see Figure 4.1c).

193

(a)

10mm 25mm 50mm

(b)

10mm 25mm 50mm

(c)

1/ 1 1 8 /4 /2

Figure 4.1 Cutting sizes used in Sample Preparation and Experimental Setup of Fresh-cut (a) Pineapple – 10mm; 25mm and 50mm, (b) Cantaloupe melon- 10mm;

25mm & 50mm and (c) Kiwifruit- ⅛ , ¼ and ½.

194

Chapter 4

Cut piece sizes for each individual fruit were pooled and samples (150g ± 5g) were prepared in duplicate, each from randomly selected fruit pieces. Samples were placed into rigid polylactic acid (PLA) containers (Biopak, UK) and inserted into pillow- pouch packages (20cm x 20cm) previously constructed from a high-barrier (HB) double-laminate film (PET12/PE55 microns) having oxygen (OTR) and carbon dioxide (CTR) permeabilities of 62,814 and 212,776 mL.microns/m2.day.atm, respectively. The packages were hermetically heat sealed using an impulse bench-top heat sealer (Relco Ltd., UK) and stored at refrigeration temperatures (3 to 5OC) for 14 days. Sealing allowed a passive MAP to develop within packs as a result of the natural respiration of the fruit. At set intervals during storage (Day 1, 4, 7 & 14) static headspace SPME analysis and physiochemical evaluations took place. Duplicate packs were analysed for each treatment and repeated twice (n = 4).

4.3.2. Sample Preparation - static headspace solid-phase micro-extraction

The contents of each pack (approx. 150g fruit tissue) was homogenised to a macerate using a stainless steel grater, stirred briefly using a sterile glass rod and allowed to stand for 1 minute before sampling (to allow foam to settle). Four grams of homogenate was transferred into a 20mL screw capped glass (amber) vial with a silicone/ PTFE liner, 1.3 mm, 45 shore value (Apex Scientific Ltd., Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland). This was done in duplicate per pack analysed.

Variability in analyte recovery with SPME was previously observed with various sampling regimes; thus variation was minimised and the procedure optimised prior to sampling by maintaining temperature, sample weight/ volume, agitation speed, absorption and desorption times using the method by Montero-Calderon et al., (2010). The sample vials were equilibrated to 40OC for 5 minutes using pulsed agitation (3s at 650rpm). Sample introduction was carried out using a CTC Analytics GC Autosampler 80 (Agilent Technologies, Euro House, Little Island, Cork). A single 1cm x 50/30µm, 24 gauge StableFlex divinylbenzene/ Carboxen/ polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/Carboxen/PDMS) fibre was used for all analysis (Supleco, Bellefonte, PA., USA). The SPME fibre was exposed to the headspace above the macerated sample for 5 minutes. The fibre was then retracted and injected

195 via a Merlin microseal (Sigma Aldrich Ireland Ltd., Arklow, Wicklow, Ireland) on a multimode inlet using a Supleco SPME inlet (Sigma Aldrich Ireland Ltd.) at 260OC and desorbed for 2 minutes. The fibres were cleaned between samples using a bake out station at 270C and carry over was assessed by running a blank sample between each treatment. The gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer was an Agilent Technologies 7890A with an Agilent 5975C Inert XL Mass Selective Detector (Agilent Technologies, Ireland) operating in scan mode within a mass range of 40- 450amu at 2.5 scans s-1 (MS Source: 230OC; MS Quad: 150OC). Ionisation was performed by electron impact at 70eV. The column was a HP-INNOWAX Polyethylene Glycol Column (60m x 250 µm x 0.5 µm) (Agilent Technologies, Ireland) and compounds were separated under the following conditions using helium as a carrier (1.2mL/min-1): initial column temperature (40OC for 5 min), heated to 260OC at 20OC min-1 and finally holding for 5 min. An auto-tune of the MS was carried out prior to each analysis to confirm that MS was operating optimally.

4.3.3. Physiochemical Analysis

In-pack gas atmosphere

On each sampling day, the headspace gas composition of packs was determined using a hand-held gas analyser (MAP-PAK Combi, AGC Instruments, Shannon, Co.

Clare, Ireland). This instrument quantifies O2 and CO2 using an electrochemical sensor and a non-dispersive infrared sensor (NDIR). A 5mL sample was withdrawn by piercing each pack with the hypodermic needle through resealable tape.

Weight-loss (%)

Weight loss was determined on each sampling day as per Moneruzzman et al., (2008) and expressed as percentage difference of the weight on initial day of packaging (Day 0).

196

Chapter 4

Percent soluble solids (SS %)

One millilitre of clear juice was taken from the macerated sample and the percentage of soluble solids measured using an Atago Digital Pocket Refractometer (Atago Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Tissue pH and titratable acidity (TA %)

The pH of fresh-cut fruit pulp homogenate was directly measured using a calibrated Jenway 3510 pH meter. Titratable acidity was calculated as citric acid by titrating juice samples to pH 8.2 using 0.1N NaOH.

4.3.4. Volatile aromatic compound analysis

Individual volatile aromatic compounds were identified using mass spectral comparisons in the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) mass spectral library 2008, (Agilent Technologies, Ireland). Individual compounds were assigned quantification and qualifier ions to ensure that only the individual compounds were identified. Quantification was performed by integrating the peak areas of the extracted ions using Agilent Chemstation; where increasing or decreasing relative peak areas demonstrated increasing or decreasing compound concentrations respectively.

4.3.5. Statistical analysis

Repeated measures ANOVA (SPSS Statistics 20, IBM, Chicago, IL. USA) was carried out to assess several measurements of the same fruit under different treatments and at different points in time. Factors were compared to determine differences in the means of response variables using a least significant difference (LSD) multi-comparison test, and significant differences were reported using Duncan’s test for homogeneity at p≤0.05.

197

For each cut size, PCA was performed on all VACs previously identified using UNSCRAMBLER software (Version 9.7, CAMO A/S, Trondheim, Norway). The analysis was performed on the response of each variable (VAC) to three cut sizes per fruit, each the mean of two replicates. The selection of variables was done according to the recurrence or not of the different VACs for each specific cut size during storage. In order to understand the relationship between the headspace aroma profile and cut size and storage time, a score for each sample was generated as a linear combination for each treatment. The contribution of each parameter to the PCA score was deduced from the parameters loading for the factor.

198

Chapter 4

4.4. Results 4.4.1. In-pack gas atmosphere and physiochemical attributes of quality

The headspace gas compositional changes for fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit as affected by cut size during storage are presented in Figure 4.2a, 4.2b

& 4.2c respectively. During 14 Day storage, oxygen (O2) concentrations decreased from normal air concentrations (20.9%) and CO2 concentrations increased from 0.04% while aerobic conditions were maintained.

In fresh-cut pineapple, CO2 levels were approximately 5, 10 and 20% on

Days 4, 7 and 14, respectively while O2 levels remained above 10%. No significant effects of cut size were found (p>0.05). Gas levels in fresh-cut cantaloupe melon were broadly similar except that smaller cut sizes had less O2 and higher levels of

CO2 (up to 20% for 10mm cut size). Fresh-cut kiwifruit, having higher respiration rates, had very high CO2 levels of 20 and 25% on days 7 and 14, respectively. Again, smaller cut sizes had higher CO2 levels, however; O2 levels were >5%.

Weight-loss was highly dependent on fruit type (Table 4.1). With the exception of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, weight-loss increased with process severity, i.e. smaller cut pieces, while for fresh-cut kiwifruit weight-losses reported were relatively minor. Table 4.1 shows the physiochemical or non-volatile component changes of fruit flavour during 14 Day storage. Cut size and storage time had significant effects on flavour attributes such as percent soluble solids and acidity (p<0.001) and was highly dependent on fruit type (p<0.01).

199

(a) (b) (b)

(c)

Figure 4.2 Changes in in-pack headspace oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide

(CO2) concentrations of packaged Fresh-cut (a) Pineapple, (b) Cantaloupe melon and (c) Kiwifruit as affected by cutting size during storage (14 Days) at 4OC. The values are means for four determinations, separated by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) (p<0.05). Error bars show

±SD. In-pack O2, continuous lines, descending; in-pack CO2, broken lines, ascending.

200

Table 4.1 Physiochemical properties of fresh-cut fruits during 14 Days storage at 4OC.

Soluble Solids (%) Tissue pH Titratable Acidity (%) Sugar/ Acid Ratio Weight- Fruit Cut Size loss (%) Day 0 Day 14 Day 0 Day 14 Day 0 Day 14 Day 0 Day 14

a a a a a a c a c 10mm 16 12.3 12 3.4 3.3 0.59 0.82 20.85 14.63 b b a a a a b a c Pineapple 25mm 8 13.1 12.6 3.4 3.3 0.59 0.76 22.20 16.58 50mm 4c 13.6c 13.3b 3.4a 3.3a 0.55a 0.87c 24.73b 15.29d a a d a a a a a d 10mm 4 9.0 8.4 6.8 6.9 0.03 0.02 300 420 Cantaloupe 25mm 8b 9.6c 8.1d 6.9a 6.7a 0.05a 0.02a,b 192b 405d Melon 50mm 4a 9.3b 8.3d 6.9a 6.7a 0.02a 0.03a 465c 277e ⅛ 3b 12.3a 11.4b 3.4a 3.6a 0.99a 0.65c 12.42a 17.54c a a b a a b a b a Kiwifruit ¼ 1 11.7 11.1 3.5 3.6 1.13 0.86 10.35 12.9 ½ 2ab 11.9a 11.2b 3.5a 3.6a 1.05a 0.67c 17.76c 16.72c  Values are the means for 8 replicates.  For each individual fruit type and attribute, same letters within a column(s) are not significantly different according to Duncan’s test for homogeneity at a 5% significance level (p<0.05).  Titratable acidity % reported as citric acid equivalent.

201

4.4.2. Volatile aromatic compound profile for fresh-cut fruits

Fresh-cut pineapple

Table 4.2 shows the volatile aromatic composition in the headspace of fresh-cut pineapple during 14 days storage at 4OC. A total of 29 compounds were detected, of which 18 odour-active compounds were identified and used in further PCA calculations. Fresh-cut pineapple (Day 0 to 14) contained 72% esters, 11% acetate esters, 11% sesquiterpenes, 6% sulphur-ester of which methyl-2-methylbutanoate, methyl-3-(methylthio) propionate and α-copaene were the most abundant, respectively. Trace amounts of other compounds were found but their absolute values varied.

Ethyl acetate, methyl propionate, methyl isobutyrate, methyl butanoate, methyl-2-methylbutanoate, methyl caproate, methyl caprate and methyl heptanoate significantly increased (p<0.001) during 14 Days storage. Methyl-2E-hexenoate (fruity) and methyl valerate (fruity, sweet) decreased in concentration during storage; however, this decrease was not significant (p>0.05).

In contrast to fresh-cut cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit, larger fresh-cut pineapple pieces had higher VAC concentrations than smaller cut pieces, with ethyl acetate (sweet, fruity), methyl propionate (sweet, fruity, rum-like), methyl isobutyrate (fresh, fruity, pineapple), methyl valerate (fruity, sweet) and methyl caprate (fruity) in greater abundance. Smaller cut pieces had significantly lower levels of methyl acetate (fruity) than larger pieces (p<0.01) while methyl caprylate (fruity) and methyl-3-(methylthio) propionate (pineapple) were found in higher levels (p<0.001) in smaller cut pieces.

202

Table 4.2: Changes in volatile aromatic compound content (peak area) of fresh-cut pineapple during 14 Days storage at 4OC.

Peak Area Category IUPAC Name Day 0 Day1 Day4 Day 7 Day 14 RT CAS Descriptors min # 25mm 10mm 25mm 50mm 10mm 25mm 50mm 10mm 25mm 50mm 10mm 25mm 50mm

1 79-20- Fruity, AE Methyl Acetate 5.833 9 Banana, Pear 4.73E+07 1.38E+08 3.64E+07 3.59E+07 2.72E+07 3.28E+07 3.65E+07 3.16E+07 3.11E+07 4.80E+07 5.92E+07 5.20E+07 6.09E+07 6.134 AE Ethyl Acetate1,2 141- Sweet, Fruity, 3.09E+07 2.74E+07 3.31E+07 2.32E+07 2.34E+07 2.50E+07 2.36E+07 2.11E+07 5.46E+07 1.46E+07 5.89E+07 5.73E+07 9.21E+07 78-6 Pleasant

Methyl 6.269 554- Sweet, Fruity, E 5.86E+07 6.22E+07 5.58E+07 8.06E+07 5.37E+07 5.82E+07 6.65E+07 5.22E+07 5.40E+07 6.67E+07 8.08E+07 8.06E+07 9.42E+07 Propionate1,2,3 12-1 Rum-like

Methyl 6.368 97-62- Fresh, Fruity, E 4.26E+07 6.47E+07 4.41E+07 5.09E+07 3.76E+07 4.28E+07 4.41E+07 3.58E+07 3.54E+07 4.95E+07 5.44E+07 5.58E+07 7.83E+07 Isobutyrate1,2,4,5 1 Pineapple Sweet, Methyl 6.802 623- Pleasant, E 1 2,3 42-7 1.51E+08 1.88E+08 1.64E+08 1.99E+08 1.88E+08 2.00E+08 2.09E+08 1.82E+08 1.75E+08 2.02E+08 2.76E+08 2.76E+08 2.72E+08 Butanoate , Acrid, Methyl-2- 6.982 868- E methyl Fruity, Acidic 8.63E+08 8.00E+08 8.21E+08 8.86E+08 8.01E+08 8.28E+08 8.43E+08 7.72E+08 5.29E+08 8.43E+08 1.10E+09 1.05E+09 1.16E+09 57-5 Butanoate1,2,5

Ethyl-2- 7.235 7452- E Fruity 1.02E+07 2.36E+07 2.03E+07 2.07E+07 1.93E+07 2.22E+07 2.13E+07 1.77E+07 2.79E+07 1.97E+07 2.77E+07 2.87E+07 2.92E+07 methylbutanoate 79-1

Methyl 8.333 106- E Pineapple 1.65E+09 7.06E+08 5.63E+08 6.04E+08 5.53E+08 5.72E+08 6.28E+08 5.73E+08 5.72E+08 6.28E+08 1.02E+09 1.04E+09 7.65E+08 Caproate1,2,3,4 70-7 8.682 E Ethyl Caproate 123- Green, Sweet, 5.41E+07 7.99E+07 1.54E+08 8.17E+07 1.32E+08 8.30E+07 5.13E+07 1.01E+08 3.15E+08 5.19E+07 5.86E+08 6.52E+08 7.67E+08 1 66-0 Fruity

Methyl (2E)-2- 8.896 13894- E Fruity 3.25E+07 1.57E+07 1.44E+07 1.32E+07 1.97E+07 1.84E+07 1.62E+07 2.69E+07 2.44E+07 2.38E+07 2.71E+07 2.84E+07 2.88E+07 hexenoate1,2 63-8

Methyl 9.138 624- Flowery, E 1 1.10E+07 1.96E+07 3.00E+07 3.42E+07 5.27E+06 5.13E+06 5.02E+06 3.42E+06 3.56E+06 3.60E+06 2.90E+06 3.12E+06 5.62E+06 Valerate 24-8 Fruity, Sweet

Methyl 9.138 106- E Fruity 5.76E+07 4.36E+07 3.22E+07 3.77E+07 4.31E+07 3.89E+07 3.96E+07 4.56E+07 5.01E+07 5.45E+07 1.64E+08 5.16E+07 5.46E+07 Heptanoate1,3,5 73-0

Methyl 9.926 111- E Fruity, Citrus 3.66E+08 3.79E+08 3.67E+08 4.50E+08 3.86E+08 3.36E+08 4.13E+08 4.51E+08 5.26E+08 5.39E+08b 5.76E+08 5.36E+08 4.46E+08 Caprylate1,2,3 11-5 203

Table 4.2 continued

110- 1 Fruity E Methyl Caprate 11.401 42-9 1.81E+07 1.15E+07 1.10E+07 1.73E+07 1.37E+07 1.07E+07 1.22E+07 1.44E+07 1.54E+07 1.50E+07 1.32E+07 1.12E+07 1.98E+07

4-Methyl 11.648 24323- E Fruity 1.80E+07 1.95E+07 2.36E+07 2.28E+07 4.30E+07 3.65E+07 4.58E+07 4.83E+07 6.53E+07 5.42E+07 4.96E+07 6.28E+07 3.54E+07 Decanoic acid1,3 24-8

Methyl-3- 11.085 13532- SE (methylthio) Pineapple 1.51E+07 5.02E+07 5.79E+07 4.27E+07 5.37E+07 4.25E+07 3.05E+07 4.70E+07 4.96E+07 4.93E+07 6.85E+07 5.94E+07 3.46E+07 18-8 propionate1.4.5

11.042 3856- ST -Copaene1,2,3 Woody 1.87E+07 2.75E+07 3.53E+07 2.77E+07 2.09E+07 1.76E+07 1.90E+07 2.27E+07 3.41E+07 2.54E+07 2.87E+07 3.31E+07 2.44E+07 α 25-5

12.693 24406- ST -Cadinene1,2 Woody 2.01E+07 1.50E+07 1.88E+07 1.73E+07 1.32E+07 1.72E+07 1.87E+07 1.19E+07 1.22E+07 1.57E+07 1.99E+06 1.92E+06 1.97E+06 α 05-1

Total Peak - - - 2.65E+09 2.71E+09 2.57E+09 2.69E+09 2.39E+09 2.50E+09 2.51E+09 2.63E+09 2.78E+09 2.87E+09 4.57E+09 4.14E+09 4.15E+09 Area

Values are means of four replicate fresh-cut pineapple samples. R.T. (retention time; minutes), AE (acetate ester), E (ester), SE (thiol-ester; sulphurous) and ST (sesquiterpene)

10mm (10mm cut size); 25mm (25mm cut piece size); 50mm (50mm cut piece size)

1 - Montero-Calderon et al., (2010)

2 - Zhang et al., (2009)

3 – Liu et al., (2011)

4 - Wei et al., (2011)

5 – He et al., (2007)

204

Chapter 4

Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon

Table 4.3 presents the volatile aromatic composition of the headspace of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon during 14 day storage at 4OC. Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon contained 88% esters (44% acetate esters) predominantly ethyl acetate, methyl-2- methylbutanoate, n-propyl acetate and methyl- and ethyl- butanoate and 6% alkenes and alcohols (fucoserratene and 3-nonen-1-ol, respectively). The results showed that esters were the most abundant volatile compounds, and that their relative peak areas were greatest for smallest cut pieces and increased during storage.

Ethyl acetate (fruity, sweet), ethyl propanoate (fruity), isopropyl propanoate (fruity), n-propyl acetate (melon) and methyl butanoate (sweet) increased significantly in concentration (p<0.001) during storage. Isobutyl acetate (fruity, floral) and benzyl acetate (sweet) were detected in fresh-cut samples only, while fucoserratene ( melon) was found from Day 1 to Day 14.

Twenty-five millimetre cut pieces had greater concentrations of the former compounds in addition to ethyl caproate (p<0.001) than 10mm and 50mm pieces respectively. However, 25mm pieces had a significant loss of n-butyl acetate (p<0.01) and 2-nonen-1-ol (p<0.001) during storage, in contrast to 10mm and 50mm, which both displayed significant increases (p<0.01). Largest cut pieces (50mm) had significant losses in isoamyl acetate (p<0.01) while both 10mm and 25mm pieces had significant increases (p<0.001).

205

Table 4.3 Changes in volatile aromatic compound content (peak area) of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon during 14 Days storage at 4OC

Peak Area Category IUPAC Name

Day 0 Day1 Day4 Day 7 Day 14 RT min CAS # Descriptors 25mm 10mm 25mm 50mm 10mm 25mm 50mm 10mm 25mm 50mm 10mm 25mm 50mm

Fruity, Methyl Acetate1 5.831 6.14E 1.83E 1.42E 1.12E 1.79E 1.40E 1.06E 9.12E 3.14E 8.79E 1.12E 5.98E 7.95E 72-20-9 Banana, Pear AE +07 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 +07 +08 +07 +08 +08 +07

Sweet, Fruity, Ethyl Acetate1,2,3 6.237 141-78-6 Pleasant 3.10E 9.91E 6.48E 5.99E 1.04E 8.67E 3.94E 1.21E 8.75E 5.42E 1.95E 1.29E 3.44E AE +09 +08 +08 +08 +09 +08 +08 +09 +08 +08 +09 +09 +08 Ethyl Fruity, Rich, 6.585 2.15E 5.80E 5.34E 6.73E 7.47E 6.10E 6.07E 8.73E 6.48E 7.14E 1.23E 1.42E 1.26E E Propanoate1,5,6 105-37-3 Pineapple, +08 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +08 +08 +08 Isopropyl 6.641 Fruity 1.56E 5.47E+0 6.72E 7.09E 6.05E 5.23E 8.60E 6.82E 6.32E 9.99E 1.05E 1.14E E Propanoate1,3,5 637-78-5 5.00E+07 +07 7 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +08 +08 Pineapple, Ethyl Caproate1 8.672 123-66-0 Fruity 1.02E 9.67E 5.58E 1.12E 9.89E 4.08E 1.28E 2.37E 9.33E 3.93E 5.10E 2.77E 1.39E E +08 +07 +07 +08 +07 +07 +08 +08 +07 +07 +08 +08 +08

n-Butyl Acetate1 7.35 123-86-4 Fruity 1.19E 1.29E+0 6.81E 1.12E 1.54E 1.81E 6.05E 6.16E 2.02E 1.05E 6.82E 4.42E 1.22E AE +07 7 +07 +06 +07 +07 +06 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 Melon, Fruity, n-Propyl Acetate1 6.705 2.88E 9.58E 7.79E 9.47E 4.64E 9.47E 7.05E 1.13E 9.94E 7.74E 2.03E 2.04E 1.06E AE 109-60-4 Pungent +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +08 +07 +07 +08 +08 +08 Methyl Sweet, Acrid Butanoate 1,5,6 6.797 623-42-7 Pleasant, 4.73E 6.12E 6.57E 9.15E 8.33E 1.00E 1.12E 8.75E 2.75E 1.02E 1.55E 3.12E 1.42E E +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +08 +08 +07 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08

Methyl-3- hydroxybutanoate 6.799 1487-49- Apple 1.82E 5.10E 5.26E 7.04E 8.21E 8.37E 7.11E 9.82E 9.16E 7.37E 1.59E 1.44E 8.13E E 1,3 4 6 +08 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +08 +08 +07

206

Table 4.3 Continued Methyl-2- Methylbutanoate 6.978 Fruity, Acidic 2.08E 5.83E 7.93E 3.05E 5.74E 4.72E 3.14E 4.59E 4.39E 6.42E 5.48E 6.84E 3.97E +07 E 1 868-57-5 +07 +07 +07 +08 +07 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08

Ethyl Butanoate1 7.125 105-54-4 Fruity 9.93E 8.11E 8.91E 8.46E 1.69E 1.71E 1.15E 2.16E 1.86E 1.75E 3.64E 2.88E 3.17E E +06 +07 +07 +07 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 +08 Fruity, Floral, Isobutyl Banana, 3.35E AE acetate1,2 7.451 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110-19-0 pear +08

Isoamyl acetate1 7.734 624-41-9 Sweet, Fruity 6.15E 1.67E 1.05E 2.96E 9.97E 2.04E 8.39E 1.35E 1.89E 6.23E 3.13E 1.39E 8.52E AE +07 +08 +08 +08 +07 +08 +07 +08 +08 +07 +08 +08 +07 33580- Green, Fucoserratene1,2 7.564 8.12E 3.03E 3.89E 7.43E 2.97E 3.65E 7.38E 2.83E 3.57E 6.87E 2.32E 3.10E AlHC 05-1 Melon Fresh, 0 +06 +07 +07 +06 +07 +07 +06 +07 +07 +06 +07 +07 10340- Melon, 3-Nonen-1-ol1,3,4 12.007 1.03E 4.36E 9.96E 2.22E 3.46E 2.81E 2.36E 3.78E 2.80E 4.30E 2.07E 2.72E 23-5 Green, Waxy 0 OH +07 +07 +06 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 +07 Sweet, Benzyl acetate1 6.00E 13.271 140-11-4 pleasant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AE +06

Total Peak Area - - 2.02E 1.83E 1.99E 2.06E 2.52E 2.51E 1.75E 3.29E 2.74E 1.83E 7.20E 3.90E 2.62 - - +09 +09 +09 +09 +09 +09 +09 +09 +09 +09 +09 +09 E+09

Values are means of four replicate fresh-cut cantaloupe melon samples. R.T. (retention time; minutes), E (ester), AE (acetate ester), AlHC (aliphatic hydrocarbon) and OH (alcohol); 10mm (10mm cut piece size); 25mm (25mm cut piece size);50mm (50mm cut piece size)

1 – Burger et al., (2006)

2 – Obando-Ulloa et al., (2008)

3 – Beaulieu and Grimm, (2001)

4 – Aubert and Bourger, (2004)

5 – Perry et al., (2009)

6 – Verzera et al., (2011)

207

Fresh-cut kiwifruit

Table 4.4 presents the volatile aromatic composition of the headspace of fresh-cut kiwifruit during 14 day storage at 4OC. The volatiles detected included 42% esters (including 1 carbonate ester), 21% monoterpenes, 16% alkyl aldehydes, 15% alcohols and 3% of compounds each from amide and furan classes. The results showed that esters were the most abundant volatile compounds, and that their relative peak areas were greatest for smallest cut pieces, and that this increased during storage. Of the three fruits studied, fresh-cut kiwifruit exhibited the greatest change in aroma profile, with the emergence of certain volatiles (methoxyacetone, 3-methyl- oxiran-2- yl-methanol, ethyl-2methylbutanoate, diethyl carbonate and ethyl benzoate) and loss of others (lactamide, 2-ehtlfuran, hexanal, camphene, limonene, 3-hexen-1- ol (Z) and 2, 4-hexadienal).

Significant increases in ethyl acetate (p<0.01), ethyl butanoate (p<0.001), α- pinene (p<0.01), ethyl-2-methylbutanoate (p<0.05), ethyl caproate (p<0.001) and 1- hexanol (p<0.05) were observed during storage, while β-pinene showed a significant reduction in concentration (p<0.01). Levels of 3-hexen-1-ol were significantly lower (p<0.001) than 2-hexen-1-ol, (E,Z) ( p<0.05).

Limonene (citrus) and 2,4-hexadienal (green, citrusy) were only present in fresh-cut samples (Day 0) while camphene (green, sweet, fruity) was detected up until Day 1. Fresh-cut samples also contained low quantities of lactamide and 2- ethylfuran which were absent from the profile on subsequent sampling days. Methyoxyacetone (sweet, cooling) and diethyl carbonate (fruity) were detected in all packs, irrespective of cut size, form Day 7 to Day 14 while 3-methyl-oxiran-2-yl- methanol (sweet, alcohol) was detected in Day 14 packs only.

Both ¼ and ½ pieces had significantly higher concentrations of ethyl acetate (p<0.001) than ⅛ pieces (p<0.01). In contrast ⅛ pieces had significantly higher levels of 1-hexanol (p<0.05). Methoxyacetone, (3-methyl-oxiran-2-yl)-methanol and ethyl benzoate levels were significantly higher in larger cut pieces (p<0.05) while concentrations of diethyl carbonate levels were greatest in smaller cut pieces (p<0.01).

208

Table 4.4 Changes in volatile aromatic compound content (peak area) of fresh-cut kiwifruit during 14 Days storage at 4OC.

Category Peak Area

Day 0 Day1 Day4 Day 7 Day 14 IUPAC RT CA Descriptor

Name min S # s ¼ ⅛ ¼ ½ ⅛ ¼ ½ ⅛ ¼ ½ ⅛ ¼ ½

Sweet, 141- Ethyl Acetate1 Fruity, 1.10E+0 1.21E+0 1.37E+0 1.05E+0 2.82E+0 2.53E+0 2.70E+0 3.59E+0 3.92E+0 4.12E+0 7.71E+0 6.61E+0 6.54E+0 6.136 78-6 E Pleasant 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Methoxyaceto 5878 Sweet, 1.27E+0 1.18E+0 1.15E+0 1.13E+0 1.02E+0 2.50E+0 nex 6.348 -19-3 Cooling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 8 8 8 8 8 8 (3-Methyl- 872- Sweet, oxiran-2-yl)- 3.82E+0 3.54E+0 1.26E+0 6.58 38-8 Alcohol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E methanolx 7 7 8

3208 2-Ethylfuran1 Rum, ether 6.72E+0 7.031 -16-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 6 Ethyl 105- Sweet, 1.15E+0 2.05E+0 1.96E+0 1.21E+0 1.54E+0 2.35E+0 1.75E+0 2.94E+0 2.73E+0 2.52E+0 2.52E+0 3.33E+0 2.08E+0 Butanoate1,3,5 7.128 54-4 Fruity, Citrus E 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Harsh, (1R)(+)-α- 7785 Citrus, 2.42E+0 1.45E+0 1.62E+0 1.37E+0 5.74E+0 1.23E+0 1.13E+0 4.48E+0 4.27E+0 1.29E+0 1.38E+0 1.07E+0 1.02E+0 MT Pinene 1,2,3,4,5 7.194 -70-8 Terpene- like, Minty 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 7 7 8 7 7 8

Ethyl 2- 7452 Fruity, methylbutano 2.13E+0 2.99E+0 3.11E+0 4.87E+0 4.48E+0 4.86E+0 7.227 -79-1 Sweet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E ate 1,3 7 7 7 7 7 7

Fruity, 66- Hexanal1,2 Fresh-cut 8.20E+0 1.84E+0 1.40E+0 3.95E+0 7.523 25-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AL Grass 7 7 7 7

209

Table 4.4 Continued Green, 79- Herbal, Camphene1,2 2.50E+0 5.50E+0 6.82E+0 7.32E+0 MT 7.546 92-5 Sweet, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fruity 8 7 7 7

Diethyl 105- Pleasant, 2.77E+0 4.88E+0 1.09E+0 1.63E+0 1.08E+0 9.18E+0 Carbonate2 7.594 58-8 Fruity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CE 6 7 7 8 8 7 Woody, .beta.- 127- Green, Pine- 5.19E+0 3.12E+0 3.25E+0 3.27E+0 1.52E+0 1.48E+0 1.73E+0 1.55E+0 9.04E+0 2.16E+0 9.01E+0 1.49E+0 1.12E+0 MT Pinene1,2,3,5,6 7.859 91-3 like 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 8

Herbal, 2-Hexenal, 505- Green 9.54E+0 4.22E+0 5.29E+0 6.86E+0 3.35E+0 4.38E+0 5.26E+0 2.36E+0 4.80E+0 4.86E+0 3.33E+0 4.13E+0 3.10E+0 (E)1,4,5 8.787 57-7 AL (Acreolin) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Green, Ethyl 123- Sweet, 5.70E+0 7.01E+0 6.00E+0 4.29E+0 6.32E+0 6.36E+0 4.52E+0 9.69E+0 7.72E+0 1.45E+0 1.52E+0 1.91E+0 1.25E+0 Caproate1,5 8.69 66-0 E Fruity 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8

138- Limonene1,4 Citrus 2.13E+0 9.082 86-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MT 7 Freshly 111- 1-Hexanol1,4 Mowed 9.73E+0 3.03E+0 2.94E+0 3.02E+0 2.87E+0 3.62E+0 2.94E+0 2.79E+0 3.19E+0 3.75E+0 4.31E+0 5.62E+0 3.82E+0 9.543 27-3 OH Grass 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

3-Hexen-1-ol, 928- Green, 9.72E+0 6.07E+0 5.11E+0 5.15E+0 (Z)-1,3,4,5,7 9.653 26-1 Grassy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OH 7 7 7 7 Sharp, 2-Hexen-1-ol, 928- Leafy, 8.49E+0 1.95E+0 2.15E+0 2.45E+0 1.57E+0 2.21E+0 2.18E+0 1.24E+0 2.57E+0 2.80E+0 2.64E+0 5.74E+0 3.51E+0 OH (E,Z)-1,2,4,6 9.951 95-0 Green 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Pungent, 2,4- 142- 10.90 green, 1.54E+0 hexadienaxl 83-6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AL 7 citrusy 7

93- Ethyl 12.24 Fruity 5.37E+0 7.75E+0 8.63E+0 E 89-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 benzoatex 4 6 6 6

210

Total Peak - 2.22E+0 1.84E+0 2.04E+0 2.08E+0 1.72E+0 2.17E+0 2.37E+0 2.77E+0 2.98E+0 3.52E+0 2.92E+0 - - - Area 2.2E+09 1.90E+9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Values are means of four replicate fresh-cut kiwifruit samples. R.T. (retention time; minutes), E (ester), A, (amide), MT (monoterpenes), AL (aldehyde), F (Furan), CE (carbonate ester) and OH (alcohol)

1 /8 (one-eighth of whole fruit); ¼ (one-quarter of whole fruit); ½ (one-half of whole fruit)

1 – Paterson et al., (1991)

2 – Warrington and Weston, (1990)

3 – Young et al., (1983)

4 – Takeoka et al., (1987) 5 – Bartley and Schwede, (1989) 6 – Gunther et al., (2010)

7 – Carcia et al., (2013) x – http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/allodor.html

211

4.4.3. Principal component analysis

In order to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the response of VACs to storage and cut size, principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out on the correlation matrix produced from 18, 16 and 20 volatile aromatic compounds produced for fresh-cut pineapple (Figure 4.3), cantaloupe melon (Figure 4.4) and kiwifruit (Figure 4.5). The factor loadings were plotted based on the first two principal components (PCI and PCII), with VACs and samples illustrated as vector angles and symbols, respectively. PCI accounted for the largest amount of total variance (inertia) meaning that under typical test conditions PCI was correlated with many of the observed variables loaded on that component. PCII was uncorrelated with PCI and accounted for the largest amount of total variance in the dataset not accounted for by PCI. A consistent trend was observed for all fruits studied in that the rotated factor pattern demonstrated a simple orthogonal structure, with VAC loadings on PCI and PCII measuring different constructs. Furthermore, VAC loadings on PCI and PCII share the same conceptual meaning, e.g. PCI refers to fresh aroma while PCII refers to stored or stale aroma, where appropriate. Observations close to each other are said to be positively correlated, meaning that their influence on the positioning of samples is similar and have similar characteristics, i.e. fresh, sweet, and rum-like, etc. Variables distant from each other across an axis plane are defined as being negatively correlated. Loading plot (a) shows the relationship between VACs during storage, while score plot (b) illustrates the relationship between the cut sizes for each of the fresh-cut fruits during storage.

All samples migrated in a similar pattern during storage; however the rate and extent of the pattern was dependent of fruit type and cut size.

Fresh-cut pineapple

For fresh-cut pineapple, the factor loadings were plotted based on the first two principal components (PCI and PCII) explaining 48% of the total variance (Figure 4.3a). Depending on the storage time and cut size, sample scores were separated out along the PCs according to their pace of aroma change (Figure 4.3b). Storage time had a larger effect on VAC patterns than cut size as illustrated by unique positioning 212

Chapter 4 of the sample scores. PCII separated fresh pineapple (Day 1 and Day 4) from Day 7 and Day 14 samples, while PCI separated Day 1 and Day 4 samples from Day 7 and Day 14 samples. Furthermore, PCI also separated Day 7 from Day 14 samples. Samples to the right were characterised as having a sweeter pineapple aroma while samples to the left had a much stronger acidic and heady pineapple aroma.

Day 1 and Day 4 samples had negative loadings across PCI due to the low concentrations of VACs, which increased during storage. VACs associated with fresh-cut pineapple aroma were, methyl valerate (fruity, sweet), methyl- and ethyl- acetate (fruity, sweet), methyl isobutyrate (pineapple), methyl propionate (fruity, sweet), methyl butanoate (sweet, pineapple) and ethyl caproate (green, fruity, sweet). These VACs were highly correlated with early storage (Day1 and 4) and negatively correlated with late storage (Day 7 and 14), signifying that as storage progressed, the former aroma notes decreased in intensity.

Positive loadings across PCI for samples stored for 7 and 14 days were attributed to higher concentrations of methyl caproate (pineapple), methyl caprate (fruity), methyl heptanoate (fruity), methyl, 2-methylbutanoate (fruity, acidic), copaene (rum-like, herbaceous, woody), 4-methyldecanoate (fruity) and the sulphurous compound 3-(methylthio)propanoic acid methyl ester (pineapple). Furthermore, PCI separated Day 7 samples from Day 1, 4 and 14 samples based on higher concentrations of methyl 2-E hexenoate (fruity). Here it was noted that PCI loadings were inversely correlated with early storage samples due to the unique positioning of samples scores.

As storage progressed, there was a loss in FC volatiles with samples moving in an upwardly manner, developing more pungent and intense pineapple aromas. Furthermore, FC samples were not well differentiated from samples stored for 1 or 4 Days meaning that by Day 4, samples still had characteristic fresh-cut aroma qualities.

Interestingly, on Day 14, largest cut pieces (50mm) were separated on PCII from 10mm and 25mm samples (PCI), signifying that larger cut pieces had a significantly different aroma profile than smaller cut pieces with lesser concentrations of sulphurous pineapple notes and greater intensities of sweet

213 pineapple notes. Ten millimetre cut pieces had the greatest aroma change of all samples as demonstrated by the unique positioning of VAC sample scores, with the biggest change occurring after Day 4. A similar trend in aroma change was also observed for both other samples. However, the rate was not the same indicating that process severity greatly affected aroma change. It is also suggested that the aroma shelf-life of fresh-cut pineapple, based on PCA observations is less than 4 days.

214

Chapter 4

(a)

(b)

.

Figure 4.3 Principal Component Analysis: Loadings (a) and Scores (b) of the volatile aroma compounds for the biplot generated for fresh-cut pineapple stored for 0, 1 4, 7 and 14 days at 4OC. 215

Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon

For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, PCI explained 39% of the total variance and PCII explained a further 15% (Figure 4.4). In general, PCI separated Day 0, 1, 4 and 7 samples from Day 14 samples (left to right) while PCII separated FC and Day 1 samples from Day 4 and Day 7 samples. FC and Day 1 samples have negative loadings across PCI due to the lower initial VAC concentrations. Smallest cut size samples (10mm) were largely separated from larger cut samples (25mm and 50mm) during storage. Ten-millimetre cut size samples had the fastest rate of change and 50mm, the least. Fifty-millimetre cut size samples had the greatest VAC change (Day 1 to Day 4) with minor change from Day 4 to Day 7, followed by a steady rate of change to Day 14. Twenty-five millimetre cut size had a steady rate of change from Day 1 to Day 7, and a substantial VAC change thereafter. However, it should be noted that a gradual increase in VACs occurred during storage, irrespective of cut size.

Positive loadings across both axes were attributed to increased concentrations of ethyl acetate (sweet, fruity), ethyl propanoate (rich, fruity), isopropyl propanoate (fruity), n-butyl acetate (fruity), n-propyl acetate (melon, pungent), methyl butanoate (sweet, acrid), methyl acetate (fruity, banana, pear), methyl-2-methylbutanoate (fruity, acidic), 2-methylbutyl acetate (sweet, fruity), 1.3-trans, 5-cis-octatriene (melon) and 3-nonen-1-ol (green, melon). Furthermore, isobutyl acetate and benzyl acetate were found in FC samples (Day 0) only.

PCI separated 10mm and 50mm Day 14 samples from Day 4 and Day 7 samples by higher concentrations of ethyl butanoate, 3-nonen-1-ol and methyl acetate. On Day 14, 25mm samples were separated from 10mm and 50mm by higher concentrations of ethyl propanoate (rich, fruity), n-propyl acetate (melon, pungent), n-butyl acetate (fruity) and ethyl caproate (fruity). Samples located to the left (early storage) were characterised as having a more pleasant, sweet, fruity melon aroma which gradually moved to the right in favour of a more pungent, acrid melon aroma as storage progressed.

Interestingly, 50mm cut pieces appeared to retain more of a fresh-cut melon aroma after 14 Days, characterised by PCA as having lesser concentrations of

216

Chapter 4 pungent VACs. Fifty millimetre and 10mm samples stored for 1 Day had similar aroma qualities and were well differentiated from 25mm samples. By Day 4, 25mm and 50mm samples shared similar aroma qualities and were well differentiated from 10mm samples. By Day 7, none of the samples appeared to share similar aroma qualities with 10mm samples deviating considerably from 25mm and 50mm samples.

Based on PCA findings, it is suggested that fresh-cut cantaloupe melon aroma (50mm and 25mm pieces) have an adequate shelf-life of 7 Days storage, while for 10mm samples, shelf-life is limited to 4 Days due to a rapid increase in VAC concentration.

217

(a)

(b)

Figure 4.4 Principal Component Analysis: Loadings (a) and Scores (b) of the volatile aroma compounds for the biplot generated for fresh-cut cantaloupe melon stored for 0, 1 4, 7 and 14 days at 4OC.

218

Chapter 4

Fresh-cut kiwifruit

For fresh-cut kiwifruit, PCI explained 34% of the total variance while PCII explained 18% (Figure 4.5). In this case, there were very clear differences in patterns during storage. PCI separated FC, Day 1 and Day 4 kiwifruit samples from Day 7 and Day 14 samples, while PCII separated FC, Day 1 and Day 7 from Day 4 and Day 14, respectively. Furthermore, Day 1 samples were inversely correlated with Day 7 and Day 14 samples on PCII while Day 7 samples were inversely correlated with Day 14 samples on PCI. Samples to the left were characterised as having a greener aroma while samples on the right had a fruitier, sweeter, more pineapple-like aroma,

FC samples were negatively loaded on PCI and were the only samples to contain limonene, 2,4-hexadienal, 2-ethylfuran and lactamide. Day 1 samples had negative loadings across PCI with VACs such as camphene (green, herbal), hexanal (fresh-cut grass), 3-hexen-1-ol (grassy green), 2-hexenal (herbal green) and α– pinene (minty, acrid) corresponding to fresh-cut aroma. As storage progressed, there was a significant loss in green, grassy aroma notes (left) with samples migrating towards more fruity, sweet aroma volatiles on the right. By Day 4, samples had migrated away from green aroma notes, and by Day 7, were associated with ethyl propanoate (pineapple, fruity, rich), ethyl butanoate (sweet, fruity), β-pinene (woody, pine-like) and methoxyacetone (sweet, cooling).

On Day 14, all samples were highly associated with VACs such as ethyl acetate (sweet, fruity), ethyl caproate (green, sweet, fruity), ethyl isobutyrate (pineapple, fruity), diethyl carbonate (pleasant, fruity), 2-hexen-1-ol (sharp leafy green, fruity) and 3-methyl-oxiran-2-yl-methanol (alcohol-like). There was a clear distinction between storage times, with smaller effects due to cut size. Smallest cut pieces appeared to have the least developed aroma of all samples, but the fastest rate of change. ¼ samples had the greatest extent of aroma change over storage followed by ½ samples. On Day 1, the ½ cut sample was clearly differentiated from ¼ and ⅛ samples, with higher concentrations of VACs such as camphene (green, herbal), hexanal (fresh-cut grass) and 2-hexenal (herbal green). However, by Day 4, a similar pattern to that of ¼ was observed until Day 14, where all samples had similar aroma profiles. Interestingly, methoxyacetone, ethyl-2-methylbutanoate and diethyl carbonate were all only identified in packs from Day 7 to Day 14, while (3-methyl- 219 oxiran-2-yl)-methanol was detected in all packs on Day 14. Furthermore, after Day 1, no trace amounts of camphene, hexanal and 3-hexen-1-ol were detected.

Based on the PCA findings it is suggested that fresh-cut kiwifruit, irrespective of cut size, have an adequate aroma shelf-life of 7 Days. However, it should be noted that smaller cut pieces displayed the greatest rate and extent of aroma change during the storage period.

220

Chapter 4

(a)

(b)

Figure 4.5 Principal Component Analysis: Loadings (a) and Scores (b) of the volatile aroma compounds for the biplot generated for fresh-cut kiwifruit stored for 0, 1 4, 7 and 14 days at 4OC. 221

4.5. Discussion 4.5.1. In-pack gas atmosphere and physiochemical attributes of quality

In general, it was found that the smaller the cut size, the greater the in-pack atmosphere modification, with high respiring fruits such as kiwifruit having greater modification and low respiring fruit such as cantaloupe melon the least. However, none of the samples had developed anaerobic atmospheres, with lowest O2 levels on Day 14 of 10%, 3% and 6% for pineapple (10mm), cantaloupe melon (10mm) and kiwifruit (⅛) respectively. Elevated CO2 levels (>20%) were only observed between Days 7 and 14, suggesting the possibility of physiological disorders (increased membrane instability, ion leakage, exudate), in particular for smaller cut pieces, towards the end of storage-life.

Pesis (2005) suggested that tissue deterioration may initiate anaerobic respiration because of reduced mitochondrial activity associated with membrane damage and loss of cell ability to produce energy. The sudden change in CO2 accumulation from Day 7 to Day 14 for pineapple (and kiwifruit) could be attributed to tissues switching to anaerobic respiration as previously shown by Montero-

Calderon et al., (2010), with a sudden increase in CO2 has been shown to be an intermediate product of fermentation (Budu et al., 2007, Oms-Oliu et al., 2007, Ke et al., 2004). In this study, no ethanol or acetaldehyde were detected in these packs during storage, however, precursors of ethanol formation (ethyl acetate) were detected in increasing concentrations towards end of storage-life. These findings further suggest that fresh-cut pineapple and kiwifruit were able to tolerate elevated

CO2 levels of 20-25% without initiating anaerobic respiration.

Water deficit has been found to induce the generation of certain volatiles (Kimmerer and Kozlovski, 1982) and loss of others (Toivonen, 1997). In this study, increased process severity increased the rate of water loss attributed to the greater surface area of smaller cut fruit, with larger cut pieces retaining and/or increasing VAC concentration. An exception to this was fresh-cut kiwifruit where little to no water loss was recorded and where the aroma profile of smaller cut pieces was greater than larger cut pieces.

Cut size showed significant effects on overall fresh-cut fruit flavour attributes such as percent soluble solids and acidity, and was highly dependent on fruit type. 222

Chapter 4

An exception was tissue pH, where, similarly to Artés et al., (2000), pH values were maintained during MAP storage. Significant differences in percent soluble solids were found on Day 14 between 50mm cut pieces and 25mm and 10mm, respectively. For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, 25mm pieces were significantly different (p<0.01) from 10mm and 25mm, respectively, while for fresh-cut kiwifruit, no significant differences were observed (p>0.05). Differences could be attributable to increased physiological change during storage as sugar/acid ratios showed that smaller cut pieces had greatest changes. In contrast, fresh-cut pineapple had sugar/acid ratio values highest for 50mm cut pieces, followed by 10m cut pieces and 25mm cut pieces.

4.5.2. Effects of storage time and cut size on volatile aromatic compounds

Storage time had a greater effect on VAC changes than cut size (p<0.01). The effects of cut size were also significant for fresh-cut pineapple (p<0.05), cantaloupe melon (p<0.01) and kiwifruit (p<0.01). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time the aroma profile of fruits as affected by three distinct cut sizes has been investigated in this manner. All samples evolved a typical volatile profile during storage with some non-characterising volatile esters such as, ethyl acetate and butanoates, common across all three fruits in different quantities. The volatiles detected were broadly similar to those reported previously.

Fresh-cut pineapple

In this study, the reduction of esters due to wounding appeared to be an important reaction step in the loss of freshness during storage; this was also observed through PCA manipulations. Methyl-2-methylbutanoate (fruity, acidic), α-copaene (pineapple, woody) and methyl-3-(methylthio) propionate (pineapple) were the most abundant volatile compounds in fresh-cut pineapple. Over 280 VACs have been found in pineapple (Žemlička et al., 2013; El Hadi et al., 2013). Methyl-2- methylbutanoate and methyl-3-(methylthio) propionate were previously considered to be characteristic aroma compounds in fresh-cut pineapple (Wei et al., 2011). He et

223 al., (2007) reported that esters and hydrocarbons were the main compounds contributing to overall pineapple flavour. Other previous studies have reported that esters were the most abundant pineapple volatiles, in particular ethyl hexanoate (fruity), methyl butanoate (sweet) and 2-methyl butanoate (sweet, fruity) (Liu et al., 2011; Marta et al., 2010; Akioka et al., 2008; Tokitomo et al., 2005; Elss et al., 2005 and Umano et al., 1992). Takeota et al., (1991), Preston et al., (2003) and Liu et al., (2011) identified many sulphur-containing esters such as methyl-3-(methylthio) propionate among aromatic pineapple volatiles detected. In pineapple, this compound provides background ‘green’ notes; however its overall contribution to fruit aroma is considerably lower compared to most odour-active volatiles (Montero-Calderon et al., 2010). In the current study, it was found to be prevalent in older samples.

VACs associated with sweet, fruity fresh-pineapple aroma: methyl valerate (sweet, fruity), ethyl caproate (green, sweet, fruity), methyl isobutyrate (pineapple, fruity), methyl butanoate (sweet) and methyl propionate (sweet, fruity ; rum-like) were dominant on Days 1 and 4. The subsequent change in the relative abundance of these volatiles was accompanied by the loss of some and emergence of others, with a reduction of certain esters found to be an important early reaction step in the loss of fresh-cut pineapple freshness during storage. As storage progressed further, the level of some esters fell and more intense heady aroma components appeared, including: methyl caprylate (fruity), methyl heptanoate (fruity), α-copaene (pineapple, woody), 4-methyldecanoate (fruity) and 3-(methylthio)methyl propionate (pineapple) indicating loss of sweet aroma during prolonged storage.

The stress-induced hydrolysis of polygalacturonide esters by pectin methyl esterase that takes place during solubilisation of the cell wall is well known. Lamikanra and Richard, (2004) demonstrated this stress effect in fresh-cut pineapple due to processing and noticed significant differences in VAC changes over 24h. Stress-induced enzymatic hydrolysis of esters involves their esterase-mediated conversions to acids and alcohols. Subsequent reactions involve fatty acid degrading enzymes and/ or alcohol dehydrogenase. Alcohols typically make a minor contribution to flavour unless present in relatively high concentration (Heath and Reineccius, 1986). The presence of some compounds with a sharp or pungent note reminiscent of rum, such as ethyl acetate and methyl propionate, when present in

224

Chapter 4 high concentrations were detected in pineapple packs during latter storage. Voon et al., (2007) showed that these compounds were found to be highly correlated with perceived alcohol notes, while Larsen (1994) and Ueda and Bai (1993) showed that an increase in ethyl acetate and ethyl butanoate was associated with an ‘unnatural’ aroma in short-term CO2 treated strawberries.

In agreement with the data presented for fresh-cut pineapple here, Beaulieu and Baldiwn (2002) and Montero-Calderon et al., (2010) observed a temporary increase in ester accumulation in fresh-cut apples and pineapple respectively, explained by the product response to wound stress and increased permeability of exposed fruit flesh allowing less resistance for volatile release, and increased oxidation. Larger cut pineapple pieces, in this study, had higher levels of VACs during storage, with esters such as methyl valerate, ethyl acetate, methyl caprate, methyl acetate, methyl isobutyrate, ethyl caproate and ethyl caproate in significantly higher concentrations (p<0.01) than for smaller cut pieces (10mm) at end of storage. Esters and sesquiterpenes were abundant in the aroma profile of fresh-cut pineapple with the thiol-ester 3-(methylthio) propionate also present in increasing concentrations with cut size during storage. These three compounds may be attributable to the different metabolic routes active in fresh-cut pineapple during storage i.e. LOX (lipid oxidation), MVA (mevalonate) and MEP (methyl-erythritol phosphate) pathways.

Zhang et al., (2009), Montero-Calderon et al., (2010) and Wei et al., (2011) reported that, although the volatile constituent aroma profile was the same across three cross-sectional pineapple pieces and between pulp and core flesh, respectively, their relative volatile content varied significantly (from top to bottom) owing to the progressive ripening nature of the fruit, and was attributable to differences in growing conditions, cultivation practices, harvest techniques etc. Such differences could also explain why ethyl hexanoate, 2,5 dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H) furanone (DMHF) and 1-(E,Z)-3,5-undecatriene were not detected in this study despite being reported as key odourants in pineapple in other studies (Umano et al., 1992; Elss et al., 2005; Tokitomo et al., 2005). Lee and Nagy (1987) reported very small concentrations of DMHF in Costa Rican grown pineapples, as compared with those from Hawaii (cultivars not specified).

225

In summary, all pineapple pieces, irrespective of cut size, had an adequate aroma shelf-life over 7 days. Smaller cut pieces displayed a faster rate and slightly greater extent of aroma change than larger cut pieces. However, after 4 Days storage, all cut pieces lost their characteristic sweet, fresh pineapple aroma in favour of a stronger pineapple aroma. Based on these results, it is recommended that larger cut pieces be used for commercial production of fresh-cut pineapple products in order to better maintain the characteristic fresh-cut pineapple aroma.

Fresh-cut cantaloupe melon

In this study, an increase in ester formation during storage played an important role in the loss of overall sweet melon aroma; increasing with increased process severity. Ethyl acetate, n-butyl acetate, ethyl butanoate and methyl-2-methylbutanoate were identified in early storage (Days 0 to 1), contributing to overall sweet melon aroma. Levels of n-butyl acetate and 3-nonen-1-ol were also attributed to sweet melon aroma. However, levels of these compounds decreased over the 14 day storage period. More than 240 VACs have been identified in different melon varieties (Obando-Ulloa et al., 2008). Of those, volatile esters are prominent, together with sulphur-containing aroma compounds, sesquiterpenes, norisoprenes, short-chain alcohols, and aldehydes (Portnoy et al., 2008; Aubert and Bourger., 2004) with volatiles derived from amino acids the major contributors to cantaloupe melon aroma (Beaulieu and Grimm, 2001). Schieberle et al., (1990) also found that the fruity notes of melon were from ethyl-2-methylpropanoate, methyl-2-methylbutanoate and ethyl butanoate, and contributed to overall sweet melon aroma. Volatile esters, mainly acetate derivatives such as n-butyl acetate, n-propyl acetate and 2-methyl butyl acetate were found to be dominant in the aroma profile (33%), similar to the findings of Aubert and Bourger (2004). Sulphur-containing compounds, which are believed to play an important role in overall aroma expression in cantaloupe (Wyllie and Leach, 1992), were not detected in this study.

Volatile esters in melon mainly result from the esterification of alcohols and carboxylic acids, utilizing Co-A moiety of Co-A-ester as the acyl donor (Ueda et al., 1997; Shalit et al., 2001) with the mixture of esters produced by the fruit dependent

226

Chapter 4 on alcohol acetyltransferase (AAT) activity (Yahyaoui et al., 2002), specificity and preference (El-Sharkawy et al., 2005; Lucchetta et al., 2007).

Many VAC biosynthetic pathways are also regulated by ethylene (C2H4) such as fatty acid and aldehyde reduction and the esterification step in aliphatic ester pathway. Fernandez-Trujillo et al., (2013) found that the pattern of many VACs was correlated with an upsurge in C2H4 production. In this study, the VAC profile of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon appeared to follow an ethylene-dependent pattern due to the biosynthesis and degradation of volatiles as reported by previous authors (Ueda et al., 1997; Brecht, 1995). Ethylene produced upon wounding increases the permeability of membranes, reduces phospholipid biosynthesis (Watada et al., 1990; Brecht, 1995) and induces decompartmentalisation of previously sequestered enzymes and substrates such as phospholipase D (PLD), phosphatidic acid phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.4), lipolytic acyl hydrolase (EC 3.1.1.5) and LOX, which are lipid-degrading enzymes. The response of plant tissues, in particular melon, to wounding involves increased PLD activity (Flores et al., 2002). Melon fruit have been found to contain different PLD isoforms (Whitaker and Lester, 2006) having different effects on volatile production. Ethylene production also increases in proportion with process severity (Kader, 2002). Levels of ACC and ACC synthase activity also increase with increased C2H4 as observed in fresh-cut cantaloupe melon (Abeles et al., 1992). Furthermore, ACC synthase 1 expression, which is normally expressed during ripening, was shown to be enhanced by mechanical stress (Olson et al., 1991; Zhang et al., 2005).

Wounding and the concurrent C2H4 production can also speed up the onset of the climacteric, resulting in a difference in physiological ages between intact and cut tissues (Watada and Qi., 1999). In fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, smaller cut pieces displayed the most distinctive volatile pattern of all the cut sizes studied, with an intense cloying melon aroma developing very early on (by Day 4), suggesting that it had a significantly different physiological age than other cut sizes. The large amount of esters is also consistent with the strong dependence on C2H4 biosynthesis of most of the esters catalysed by several alcohol acetyl transferases (Gonda et al., 2010; Galaz et al., 2013).

227

However, fresh climacteric melons such as cantaloupe have high aroma intensity but a short shelf-life (Perry et al., 2009). Processing and prolonged storage can promote or enhance the progressive enzymatic or chemical oxidation of certain aroma compounds, proceeding at different rates depending on the intrinsic or extrinsic properties of the fruit. Changes in the concentration of desirable aroma compounds can produce off-odour (Poll et al., 2006; Belitz et al., 2004). For example, Larsen and Watkins (1995) and Ueda and Bai (1993) showed that increases in ethyl acetate and ethyl butanoate was associated with an ‘unnatural’ aroma in short-term storage of strawberries. Zhu, et al., (2005) showed that the increased activity of alcohol acyltransferase (AAT) enhanced production of ethyl esters. This further promoted the final stage in ester biosynthesis, and may explain the rapid increase in melon ester accumulation during latter storage in this study. Moreover, Guichard et al., (1992) found that the level of ethyl esters in strawberries increased under elevated CO2 atmospheres. In this study, ethyl acetate and ethyl butanoate had the greatest increase in concentration during storage, possibly contributing to the strong, cloying aroma noted in packs as a result of CO2 accumulation in the order 10mm>25mm>50mm.

Furthermore, wounding results in a loss of membrane integrity with resultant turgor loss within cells as previously reported by Finnegan and O’Beirne, (2014b). As a consequence, smaller cut pieces were rendered more susceptible to microbial spoilage possibly giving rise to undesirable off-odours/ -flavours. Products of LOX pathway (Z)- and (E)- configured hydroperoxides can be metabolised to compounds that are crucial elements of plant defence (Schwab et al., 2008). However, many of the natural volatile compounds that control microbial growth are also products of the LOX pathway (Chung et al., 1993). Microorganisms have been reported to produce high levels of ethyl esters and alcohols on fresh-cut produce (Longo and Sanroman, 2006; Deetae et al., 2007). Previous studies by Finnegan and O’Beirne., (2014b) showed that cut size had major effect on bacterial and yeast growth in fresh-cut fruit, in particular in neutral fruits like cantaloupe melon, which may explain the extent of VAC change in the present study; increasing with increased process severity. The growth of certain bacteria, such as lactic acid bacteria has been shown to increase with increased process severity (Finnegan and O’Beirne, 2014b). This type of bacteria also controls off-odour development (Liu et al., 2008) which may help

228

Chapter 4 explain the higher concentrations of ethyl esters in smaller cut pieces attributable to cloying aroma.

Isobutyl acetate (fruity, floral) is an isomer of n-butyl acetate produced from esterification of isobutanol with acetic acid. Isobutanol is produced naturally during the fermentation of carbohydrates (Peralta-Yahya et al., 2012) and also thought to be a by-product of the decay of organic matter (Atsumi et al., 2008). Isobutyl acetate was detected only in fresh-cut (FC) samples (Day 0). Ueda et al., (1997) found that cantaloupe melons of the reticulatus family had the capacity to convert isobutyl alcohol into isobutyl acetate. Because it was only present in FC samples, it was thought to be released as a direct effect of wounding.

In summary, the aroma shelf-life of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon pieces was limited strongly by increased process severity resulting in greater accumulation of esters during storage. Smaller cut pieces quickly lost their initial fresh aroma and by Day 4 had developed an intense cloying aroma. Larger cut pieces also developed a cloying aroma, however, at a much more reduced pace. Based on these results, it is recommended that larger cut melon pieces be used in commercial production in order to better maintain fresh-like aroma characteristics.

Kiwifruit

The wounding of fresh-cut kiwifruit was considered to have severe effects on plastids, which in turn caused a rapid deterioration in fruit appearance (colour-loss, translucency), firmness (rapid softening) and aroma development. This deterioration is thought to have caused rapid release of cell organelles such as chromoplasts and lipids which could act as precursors in VAC biosynthesis (see section 1.3.3). In previous studies, levels of VACs in kiwifruit were found to increase dramatically (Bartley and Schwede, 1989) following cutting, and Wang et al., (2011) related this increase to the increase in C2H4 production, even at low temperatures (Paterson et al., 1991). The main VAC profile changes observed during storage im this study were more complex than other fruits, with enhanced levels of (E)-2-hexenal over the formation of (Z)-3-hexenol during 14 day storage.

229

Over 80 VACs have been reported for kiwifruit (Garcia et al., 2011), of which 90% were reported to be lipid degradation products such as C6 aldehydes and alcohols, esters and terpenoids (Zhang et al., 2009; Takeoka et al., 1986). Shiota (1982), Young et al., (1985; 1983) and Wang et al., (2011) identified ethyl butanoate (sweet, fruity), hexanal (freshly-cut grass), 2-(E)-hexenal (herbal, green), (Z)-3-hexenol (green, grassy), and 1-hexanol (grassy, green) as the major components of kiwifruit aroma. These VACs have been attributed to the grassy, green aroma of fresh-cut kiwifruit and the tropical, sweet, candy-like flavour (Wang et al., 2011). Sulphurous compounds such as methyl-2-(methylthio) acetate; ethyl (methylthio) acetate (Jordan et al., 2002), hydrogen sulphide (Young and Paterson, 1990; Paterson, 1991) and dimethyl trisulfide (Frank et al., 2007), although identified previously as odour- active compounds in ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit, were not detected in any packs during storage. In this study, ethyl acetate was found to be the most abundant ester which is in agreement with Paterson et al., (1991) who found that stored kiwifruit had ethyl acetate as their most abundant ester, in contrast to ethyl butanoate which was identified as the major ester in freshly harvested fruits.

Changes in VAC were similar to those reported previously by Zhang et al., (2009), partly attributable to the wound-ethylene response which increases with increased process severity. This caused the fruit pieces to age at a faster rate leading to a faster decrease in aldehydes responsible for green aroma, and an increase in esters responsible for fruity aroma. Smaller cut pieces had a greater green intensity initially (Day 0 to Day 1) with a more pleasant fruity aroma on Day 7. Similar results were also obtained by Bartley and Schwede (1989) who found that ethyl butanoate increased dramatically at the same time that (E)-2-hexenal decreased; the former contributing significantly to flavour of ripe kiwifruit. The differences in results of fresh-cut kiwifruit suggest that high levels of aldehydes were generated during sample preparation (maceration), providing an optimal condition for the action of LOX and a higher availability of FFA precursors (Paterson, 1991; Wang et al., 2011). In addition to forming green leaf volatiles in some fruits such as kiwifruit, LOX catalyses the peroxidation of certain FFA to form conjugated hydroperoxides, generating free radicals that can attack intact membranes thus causing further membrane damage. This may help explain the significant loss of kiwifruit firmness observed during storage, in particular for smaller cut pieces.

230

Chapter 4

Certain aroma compounds, such as hexanal, are only released from kiwifruit upon cell disruption, when previously sequestered enzymes and substrates interact (Buttery, 1993). The initial increase in hexanal (Day 0 to Day 1) was thought to be a direct result of cell damage increasing with process severity and resulting in the formation of hydroperoxydes during cutting (Galliard et al., 1977). Brilli et al., (2011) showed that wounding induces a differential production of green leaf volatiles over time. Membrane deterioration and the consequent oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids resulted in a fast transient evolution of C6-9 aldehydes. In this study these C6-9 aldehydes quickly decayed after fresh-cut processing as they are used as substrates for ADH reduction to their corresponding alcohols. Moreover, the formation of an aldehyde over an alcohol, as observed in this study, could also be attributed to the increased physiological age of smaller cut pieces, especially smaller cut pieces, under low O2 and high CO2 conditions within packs, as previously observed by Belitz et al., (2004).

Accumulation of limonene in fruit is a developmentally regulated process whereby limonene accumulation predominates in the early stages of development. At later stages of development competition with other pathways such as LOX, which appears to predominate the aroma profile of kiwifruit, may serve to limit monoterpenes accumulation (Bouwmeester et al., 1998). Sandermann and Bruns, (1965) hypothesised that limonene is an intermediate in the biosynthesis of carvone; however, Von Schantz and Elk (1971) and Von Schantz and Huhtikangan (1971) showed that limonene is no longer available as a precursor once it has been secreted into essential oil ducts. Due to its release upon cutting followed by rapid onset of LOX, this may help explain why limonene was only present in FC samples (Day 0). Furthermore, the compound 2,4-hexadienal is a LOX product of polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic acid, which undergoes auto-oxidation, especially during storage and naturally occurs in kiwifruit (Takeoka et al., 1986; 1987). In this study, it was present only in fresh-cut samples (Day 0) and its dissipation was attributed to rapid LOX. The increase in both pinene derivatives from Day 0 to Day 1 may be attributed to their role in stabilisation and protection of the plant membranes (Loreto and Velilova (2001). Their relative abundance throughout storage was also noted.

231

Wound respiration in some plant tissues is also attributed to α-oxidation of fatty acids (Shine and Stumpf, 1974) which oxidises fatty acids to CO2, and is responsible for the CO2 release in some products (Rolle and Chism, 1987). Roma-Parada et al.,

(1991) found that 15% CO2 damaged membrane integrity and accelerated loss of phospholipids (Duan et al., 2013) and polyunsaturated fatty acids from mitochondrial membranes and increased leakage of amino acids. In addition, CO2 has also been found to have an uncoupling effect on oxidative phosphorylation (Fanestil et al., 1963) and can limit the energy supply needed for tissue survival, which may help explain the reduced rate of CO2 concentration on Day 7 in fresh-cut fruit packs.

Mathooko (1996) suggested that dissolved CO2 can dissociate to carbonic acid in presence of water, existing only in equilibrium. This equilibrium is important for organisms to perform certain vital functions, which may explain why diethyl carbonate (a carbonate ester of carbonic acid and ethanol) was only present in kiwifruit packs from Day 7 to Day 14, thus suggesting the onset of fermentation in these packs.

Ethanol has been reported as a major volatile in stored kiwifruit; however ethanol was not found in this study. Ethanol is a precursor of ethyl acetate, and is normally formed at the beginning of fermentation, and its concentration gradually increases throughout the process. Although not directly acting as an odorant (Garcia et al., 2011), it has been suggested that as a metabolic precursor, ethanol would affect ethyl ester production (Burdon et al., 2005). Ethyl benzoate is an ester formed directly by the condensation of benzoic acid and ethanol (Luebke, 2011). This compound has a sweet, wintergreen, minty odour and during storage was only found in packs on Day 14. Methanol was detected in the headspace of kiwifruit packs on Day 14 storage only. Methanol detected in the headspace of olive brines was attributed to the activity of pectinolytic enzymes that cleave the methoxy group of pectin in the fruit (Montano et al., 1992). Interestingly methoxyacetone was also only detected in packs on Day 14 suggesting that perhaps it was released in par with the pectinolytic activity in fresh-cut kiwifruit. To the best of our knowledge, these compounds have not before been found in fresh-cut kiwifruit samples and could be used as potential indicators of anaerobic respiration in fruit packs.

232

Chapter 4

In summary, the aroma shelf-life of fresh-cut kiwifruit appears to be compromised greatly by wounding and intermittently by the concurrent release of ethylene, which appears to cause increased membrane deterioration and accelerated the loss of green aromas. Smaller cut pieces had better initial green aroma which quickly dissipated in favour of a sweet fruity aroma with an aroma-life of 7 Days. Larger cut pieces retained more of their initial green aroma for longer, but developed less of a sweet aroma during storage. The compounds formed during latter storage could be used as signalling compounds of anaerobic respiration in kiwifruit packs. Based on the data

1 presented above, it is recommended that medium ( /4) cut pieces be used in commercial production practices in order to better maintain fresh green aromas yet allow for development of sweet fruity aromas over a shelf-life of 7 Days.

233

4.6. Conclusion

The main processes involve in aroma loss appeared to be a direct effect of wounding with stress induced hydrolysis of esters, increased ethylene biosynthesis and lipid oxidation the main contributing factors.

It is concluded that:

 The VAC content of fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit varied during storage with differences more quantitative that qualitative.  Cut size had a deleterious effect on aroma shelf-life.  A reduction of esters due to wounding appears to be an important step in the loss of fresh pineapple aroma, with stress-induced hydrolysis playing a major role in this loss.  For fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, wounding appeared to increase the rate of physiological age in an ethylene dependent manner, with increases in ester formation giving rise to undesirable aromas during storage.  In fresh-cut kiwifruit, wounding appeared to accelerate the rate of lipid oxidation, resulting in loss of green aromas and influencing overall aroma development during storage.  The data shows that larger cut pieces result in greater aroma shelf-life.

Given the variability in cut piece size, reduction of which gives rise to increasing surface area to volume ratios, the correlations between this and aroma loss would be of interest to future work endeavours.

234

Chapter 5

Respiration and Product-Package Compatibility

Redrafted from: Finnegan, E., Mahajan, P.V., O’Connell, M., Francis, G.A. and O’Beirne, D. (2013), “Modelling respiration in fresh-cut pineapple and prediction of gas permeability needs for optimal modified atmosphere packaging”. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 79: pp.47-53.

236

Chapter 5

5.1 Abstract

The effects of intrinsic (fruit type, cultivar, origin, physiological age and seasonality) and extrinsic factors (cut size, blade sharpness, dipping treatments and time) on the respiration rate (RCO2) of a number of fresh-cut fruits were determined. The RCO2 was O measured at 4 C for 24h in air using a flow-through system. In general, RCO2 showed an initial increase in respiration rate (Ri) followed by a peak and a gradual decline to steady-state (Req) within 24h. The high initial rate was thought to be due to the wound-response to processing which was short-lived and highly affected by fruit type and processing severity. An exception to this was fresh-cut strawberry and kiwifruit which continued to increase or decrease respectively throughout storage without the initial increase in RCO2. Ri was affected to a greater extent by intrinsic factors, such as physiological age and season, in particular in fresh-cut pineapple and strawberry. Reducing the cut size significantly increased Ri and Req in most fruits

(p<0.05). Cutting with a razor sharp blade versus a blunt blade decreased Ri, while only caused a slight reduction in Req (p>0.05) for pineapple. Neither cut size nor origin affected the Ri or Req of fresh-cut kiwifruit. A mathematical model based on exponential decay was developed in order to predict respiration rate of fresh-cut fruits over time. The model parameters (Ri and Req), were found useful in comparing respiration rates for each of the factors studied.

The target oxygen and carbon dioxide transmission rates required in MAP design were estimated for fresh-cut pineapple, covering variability in respiration rate due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors studied. This model proved to be a good fit with experimental data thus, aiding in the successful package design of fresh-cut pineapple.

Keywords: fresh-cut produce, respiration, wound-response, equilibrium, perforation- mediated modified atmosphere packaging

237

5.2 Introduction Respiration is the metabolic process by which fresh and fresh-cut fruits obtain the energy needed to fuel biochemical processes (Meyer et al., 1973). Aerobic respiration involves the oxidative degradation of carbohydrates and organic acids to simpler molecules including carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapour and the production of energy (ATP) and heat (Fonseca, 2000). In anaerobic respiration (<2%

O2), ethanol production involves decarboxylation of pyruvate to CO2 without oxygen

(O2) uptake (Fonseca, 2002). Thus, respiration rate is a significant factor in physiological ageing, product quality and shelf-life. Control of respiration rate is an important factor in establishing an effective atmosphere modification for optimising the shelf-life of fresh-cut fruits.

Many factors affect the respiration rate of fresh-cut fruit including intrinsic factors such as cultivar, seasonality, origin and physiological age, and extrinsic factors such as process severity (cut size/ shape, blade sharpness), storage temperature, gas compositions and storage time. Wounding caused by fresh-cut processing can lead to modifications of metabolism and increases respiration rate (Antoniolli et al., 2006). This is attributable to increased surface area exposed after cutting, allowing for a more rapid diffusion of O2 to the internal cell compartments, thus increasing the metabolic activity of the wounded cells (Zagory, 1999). The type of equipment used in fresh-cut processing may also affect the physiological response of the tissues. In addition, certain pre-treatments can alter the respiration rate. For example, dipping in ascorbic acid and sucrose has been shown to reduce the RCO2 and improve the visual quality of fresh-cut fruits (Liu et al., 2007; Gonzalez-Aguilar et al., 2004).

Packaging is an integral part of the commercial food supply chain. For shelf- life extension of fresh-cut produce, different packaging materials and technologies are used. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) assists in preservation by reducing respiration rate and the onset of quality deterioration. Respiration rate can be reduced by decreasing O2 and increasing CO2 levels surrounding the packaged commodity (Kader, 1986; Mathooko, 1996; Fonseca et al., 2002; Saltveit, 2003; Tijskens et al., 1999; 2003).

238

Chapter 5

However, when a fresh-cut product is sealed in an impermeable package, the respiration process causes rapid depletion of O2 and accumulation of CO2 inside the package. This could eventually lead to anaerobic respiration and undesirable product quality. Likewise, when the package is highly permeable, then there is little to no in- pack atmosphere modification, and little effect on product quality and loss of shelf- life (Lee et al., 1996; Ártés et al., 2007; Finnegan and O’Beirne, 2014b).

The rate of respiration plays a major role in packaging design. It is known that beneficial MAs within fresh-cut fruit packages are attained by correctly choosing packaging materials that will provide the appropriate levels of O2 and CO2 in the packs. Low O2 and elevated CO2 concentrations within an MA package may reduce the respiration rate of certain produce and improve its SL. Therefore, a properly designed package entails matching the gas permeability properties of the packaging film to the respiration rate of the fresh-cut fruit. The goal of MAP in this instance is to establish an optimal equilibrium modified atmosphere (EMA). However, products vary on their tolerance to O2 and CO2 concentrations and, as a result, the target ranges of O2 and CO2 must be chosen accordingly for each product. Subsequently, each MA packaging system must be designed appropriately for each individual fresh- cut fruit product in order to provide these optimal storage conditions. At a given temperature, these two gases approach steady-state or equilibrium, which is when the rate of gas permeation through the package matches the rate of respiration of the product, i.e. product-package compatibility.

While many commercial polymers are available, few meet the specific permeability requirements for packaging these perishable commodities. One way of overcoming this is the use of micro-/ macro-perforations. The use of macro- perforations is a potentially useful technique for postharvest preservation of respiring produce. In this technique, instead of solely relying on polymeric films with or without micro-perforations, a package is designed in which the regulation of the gas exchange is achieved via deliberate diffusion windows, i.e. single or multiple perforations through a low permeable or impermeable film (Emond and Chau, 1990; Emond, 1992, Silva et al., 1999). Thus, a polymer’s oxygen transmission rate (OTR), and carbon dioxide transmission rate (CTR) are key attributes. In this technique, the gas transmission rates of polymeric films are determined by the size of the individual holes, their position and frequency. The number of perforations required is directly

239 proportional to the desired OTR (i.e. as the OTR requirements increase, so too do the number of holes) (Mahajan et al., 2006; 2007).

Several respiration rate mathematical predictive models have been proposed for use in packaging design (Lee et al., 1991; Fonseca et al., 2002; Saltveit et al., 2003; Mahajan and Goswami, 2001, 2002, and Caleb et al., 2012). More recently, respiration rate has been related to the degree of cutting (Zhu et al., 2001) and notably to wound-induced respiration (Surjadinata and Cisneros-Zevallos, 2003). However, there are various limitations to the development of such models, including limited number of experimental observations, inconsistent raw materials resulting in inherent biological variation, and the dynamic response of stored or fresh-cut produce to environmental changes (Caleb et al., 2013). Another major limitation of respiratory rate modelling is of the lack of adequate respiratory data, with the data available either based in O2 consumption or CO2 production rates in a steady-state environment (Fonseca et al., 2002; Mahajan et al., 2006) which do not consider the surge in respiration observed after processing. Therefore, MAP design requires a suitable model to predict these responses as an accurate function of time, temperature, processing and gas composition (Mahajan et al., 2006; Caleb et al., 2013).

The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on RCO2 for a number of fresh-cut fruits. Using this data, a simple exponential decay mathematical model was elucidated for RCO2, considering the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. This model was then used to demonstrate the principles involved in the design of a macro-perforated MAP system for fresh-cut pineapple. The validity and effectiveness of this model in the design of a MAP for creating previously defined optimum EMA for fresh-cut pineapple was demonstrated. The model could then be used to estimate the target OTRs and CTRs required for optimum packaging for fresh-cut fruits.

240

Chapter 5

5.3. Materials and methods

5.3.1. Plant materials and intrinsic factors To evaluate the effects of intrinsic factors, fresh, whole fruits were collected from a local wholesaler (Richardson’s Fruit and Vegetables, Limerick, Ireland) on the morning of each trial and allowed to equilibrate to testing temperatures. The various intrinsic factors studied are outlined in Table 5.1 and 5.2. To evaluate seasonal variation in respiration rate, fresh-cut pineapple and strawberries were analysed during Summer (May-Aug 2010), Autumn (Sept-Oct 2010), Winter (Nov-Jan 2010/11) and Spring (Feb-Mar 2011). For experiments where the effects of physiological age (PA) were evaluated, the respiration rates of under-ripe: UR (green), ripe: R (half green/yellow) and over-ripe: OR (fully yellow) fruit were compared. In the case of strawberries, PA refers to the stage of ripening at harvest, whereas for pineapple, PA refers to the state of ripeness at processing. For over-ripe fruit, fresh intact ripe fruits were purchased up to 5 days in advance of the trial and allowed to over-ripen at an average room temperature of 22OC before being stored at testing temperatures (5OC) the day before the trial. Ripe fruit were used for all other experiments except where otherwise stated. All fruits were selected based on their initial visual quality (external appearance), pulp firmness and percent soluble solids (SS%). External colour was assessed using descriptors developed by Kader and Cantwell, (2010). Aroma was evaluated using descriptive sensory techniques where 9 = excellent, normal characteristic aroma, 7 = very good, normal to slightly off, 5 = limit of marketability, distinctive off-odour but still OK to eat, 3 = fair, limit of usability, strong off-odours, slightly anaerobic, becoming offensive and 1 = poor, inedible, very strong off-odours, very fermented-like, Firmness was determined using a TA.XT Plus Texture Analyser (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) fitted with a 6mm flat tipped cylindrical probe. One reading was taken from each of three cut-fruit pieces per fruit sampled. TSS% was measured using an Atago Digital Pocket Refractometer (Atago Co., LTD., Tokyo, Japan) previously standardised using distilled water (0% SS). Approximately 50g of fruit pieces were homogenised and after a settling period the clear juice measured for SS%.

241

5.3.2. Processing and extrinsic factors Fresh-cut fruits were processed at room temperature (22OC) on a surface previously sanitised with a 1% Virkon® solution. Peels, husks, stems and hulls, where appropriate, were manually removed using a stainless steel knife which was previously sanitised in a 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution (and again after each fruit). Each fruit was cut accordingly depending on the trial studied (Figure 5.1). For effects of cut size, fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and honeydew melon were sliced, de-seeded/de-cored and cut into chunks of three different sizes (50, 25 and 10mm) using a hand-held stainless steel slicer. For fresh-cut kiwifruit, the whole fruit was carefully peeled before being cut in half (longitudinal), into quarters (transverse) and eights (longitudinal), where appropriate. For fresh-cut strawberries, whole fruits had the calyx removed and were de-hulled before being cut into half pieces (longitudinal). For all other experiments fruits were processed into 25mm, ¼, or ½ (or whole grapes) cut piece sizes where appropriate. For different degrees of sharpness a stainless steel slicer (razor sharp, sharp and blunt knife) was used. The effect of pre-dipping pre-treatment using 1% ascorbic acid: citric acid on respiration rate of fresh-cut fruits (pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit) was tested and compared with un-dipped samples. The dipping solution was prepared using chilled distilled water and fruits were submerged in the solution for 2 minutes with slight agitation and allowed to drain for 2 minutes.

242

Table 5.1: Intrinsic characteristics (physiological age and seasonality) of intact fruits used in this study and their initial quality attributes

Physiological age Percent soluble Type/ Source Season Aroma Firmness, N External colour1, % Ripeness class solids 0 to 25 Under Ripe (0 to 1) Acidic, Fresh, Sharp, Insipid 7.5 11.5 Spring 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) Sweet, Pineapple 6.8 12.1 90 to 100 Over Ripe (5 to 6) Pungent, Strong, Musty 5.5 13.2 (R) Del Monte Gold Extra Sweet, 0 to 25 Under Ripe (0 to 1) Acidic, Fresh, Sharp, Insipid 7.2 14.4 Pineapple, MD2, Summer 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) Sweet, Pineapple, Fresh 6.3 12.3 90 to 100 Over Ripe (5 to 6) Strong, Musty, Acrid 5.3 13.6 Costa Rica 1 0 to 25 Under Ripe (0 to 1) Fresh, Acidic, Sharp 8.4 14.3 Autumn 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) Sweet, Pineapple 7.6 12.7 90 to 100 Over Ripe (5 to 6) Pungent, Strong, Musty 5.5 13.5 Winter 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) Insipid, Sweet, Acidic 7.5 12.7 Fyffe’s Super Sweet(R), Pineapple, MD2, Summer 25 to 50 Ripe (2 to 3) Sweet, Insipid, Pungent 6.9 12.3 Brazil 1 Agricola Agromonte, Pineapple, MD2, Autumn 25 to 50 Ripe (3) Pineapple, Sweet, Sharp 7.4 12.5 1 1 to 2 Under Ripe (>9) Green, Grassy, Acidic 3.5 7.7 Spring 4 to 5 Ripe (5) Strawberry, Sweet, Crisp 2.3 7.1 >6 Over Ripe(1 to 3) Strong, Strawberry 2.6 6.5 1 to 2 Under Ripe (>9) Green, Grassy, Acidic 4.0 7.9 Summer 4 to 5 Ripe (5) Strawberry, Sweet, Fresh 2.4 7.3 Strawberry El Santa, >6 Over Ripe (1 to 3) Strong, Strawberry, Musty 3.2 6.5 1 to 2 Under Ripe (>9) Green, Grassy, Acidic 2.3 8.7 Ireland 2 Autumn 4 to 5 Ripe (5) Strawberry, Sweet 2.1 8.5 >6 Over Ripe (1 to 3) Strong, Strawberry 1.9 8.3 Green, Grassy, Acidic 1 to 2 Under Ripe (>9) 2.6 6.0 Strawberry, Sweet Winter 4 to 5 Ripe (5) 1.7 5.2 Pungent, Strawberry, >6 Over Ripe(1 to 3) 2.1 7.9 Musty 1 External shell colour was recorded against a Dole pineapple colour chart 2 External colours recorded using UC Davis Postharvest Quality Produce Fact Sheets http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/producefacts/

243

Table 5.2 Intrinsic characteristics (origin and cultivar) of intact fruits used in this study and their initial quality attributes.

Physiological age Percent Soluble Type Origin Cultivar Aroma Firmness, N External colour1, % Ripeness class Solids Spain Camarossa 5 Ripe (5) Strawberry, Sweet, Fresh 11.1 8.5 2 Strawberry Morocco Camarossa 4 to 5 Ripe (5) Strawberry, Sweet 9.6 9.2 Egypt Festival 5 Ripe (5) Strawberry, Fresh 7.0 9.2 Ethiopia Orly 6 Ripe (5) Strong, Strawberry, Acrid 4.4 9.1 Kiwifruit 2 Italy Hayward 3 Ripe (4) Grassy, Green, Sweet, Fresh 1.49 7.5 New Zealand Hayward 3 Ripe (5) Green, Grassy, Fresh 2.75 7.3 7.7 2 Costa Rica N/A 5 Ripe (5) Pungent, Green, Melon 8.23 Cantaloupe Melon 7.1 Italy N/A 5 Ripe (5) Pungent, Melon 6.5 6.5 7.9 2 Costa Rica N/A 3 Ripe (4) Fresh, Green, Melon 6.3 Honeydew Melon 7.3 Brazil N/A 4 Ripe (5) Fruity, Sweet, Melon 7.2 6.5 2 Orange Morocco Midknight Valencia* 4 Ripe (>9) Orange, Citrus, Sweet 2.3 12

Apple 2 France Granny Smith 6 Ripe (5) Crisp, Green, Fresh, Sweet 15.9 10.2 France Royal Gala 6 Ripe (5) Apple, Sweet, 13.3 13.5 Grape 2 Spain Crimson* 5 Ripe (5) Sweet, Grape, 5.9 18.3 Greece Thompson* 3 Ripe (4) Green, Sweet, Grape 5.4 16.4 * see dles s 2 External colours recorded using UC Davis Postharvest Quality Produce Fact Sheets http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/producefacts/

244

Chapter 5

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f) (g)

(h)

Figure 5.1 Cutting sizes/shapes used in sample preparation of fresh-cut (a) Pineapple – 10mm, 25mm & 50mm; (b) Cantaloupe melon- 10mm, 25mm & 50mm and (c) Honeydew melon – 10mm, 25mm & 1 50mm; (d) Kiwifruit- ½, ¼ & /8, (e) strawberry – whole with stem, whole without stem, halves & slices (approx. 4/ berry); (f) orange – segment; (g) – red and green apple – wedges (16/fruit) and (h) red and green grape – whole (de-stemmed).

245

5.3.3. Measuring respiration rate: Experimental setup and procedure The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the respiration rate of a variety of fresh-cut fruit was determined at 4OC in air. A custom made flow-through respirometer system was employed (Barry-Ryan, 1996). It consisted of eight chambers connected to a compressed air cylinder (certified <1ppm ethylene, BOC gases, Limerick, Ireland) via a Saffire 230 Series 3 flow regulator (Murex, Herts, England) housed in a refrigerator (Figure 5.2). Six of the eight chambers, 2-L conical flasks constructed from heavy duty pyrex glass (Series 22; AGB Scientific, Dublin, Ireland), were filled with 500g of fresh-cut product. T wo chambers were left empty and used as controls. Each chamber was hermetically sealed with a rubber bung (d; 67mm). The wide neck enabled plant tissue to be easily placed in and removed from the chamber and the gas tight seal was able to withstand pressure of 2bar. Through regulation of pressure at the cylinder head and adjusting the fine metering valves (Nupro, USA), the airflow was controlled (10-15mL/min), in order to prevent the accumulation of more than 0.2% CO2 in the chamber and to prevent the accumulation of ethylene, humidified and sub-divided into eight separate lines serving each of the chambers. The CO2 concentrations at the outlets of each chamber were sampled every 85 min using an automated sampler and quantified using a gas chromatograph (Model GM250, AGC Instruments LTD, Ireland) fitted with a CTR1 column (Alltech, USA) with helium (CP-grade, BOC gas, Limerick, Ireland) at 60mL min-1 used as the carrier gas. The detector current was set at 100mAmps, and detector temperature was run under ambient temperatures (25 OC). The detector had sensitivity to O2 of ≥ 100ppm and to CO2 of ≥ 200ppm. The experiment was conducted for 24 hours. All samples were run in duplicate and experiments were repeated three times.

Data from the GC was integrated using Trend Vision Chromatography Software (AGC Instruments LTD, Shannon, Co. Clare, Ireland) which allowed continuous automated sampling and processing of the data over 24 hours. The data collated was used to calculate the respiration rates (mL.CO2/kg.h) of the samples, taking into account the level of CO2 and O2 in the inlet air, flow rates and sample weights. The CO2 production rates of fresh-cut pineapple was measured in duplicate; replicated three times and deduced using the following equation:

246

Chapter 5

V × 60 R = f .(COout − COin) CO2 W × 100 2 2 (1.19)

-1 -1 Where; RCO2 is respiration rate; mL CO2 kg hr

Vf is gas flow rate, mL/min W is the weight of fruit; kg out CO2 = CO2 concentration at the outlet of respirometer; % in CO2 = CO2 concentration at the inlet of respirometer; %

Refrigerator/ Temperature Control

Gas Chromatograph Automated with CTR 1 column Sampler

TrendVision Compressed Air Ethylene-free air supply Software Gas distribution board

Respirometer

Figure 5.2 Flow-through respirometer apparatus (Barry-Ryan, 1996)

5.3.4. Validation: Packaging of fresh-cut pineapple chunks

Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) is a dynamic process during which the RCO2 of the product and gas permeability of the package determines the changes in O2 and

CO2 levels inside the package. The steps involved in MAP design are outlined in Chapter 1.7. Briefly, package design involves determination of intrinsic properties of the product, i.e. respiration rate, product mass and density, optimal storage conditions, and package characteristics, i.e. film permeability, package geometry and storage. Subsequently, simulation is carried out to predict O2 and CO2 concentrations inside designed packages and to explore different scenarios related to variability within variables such as raw material (origin, season, physiological age), processing

247

(cut size/ shape, dipping treatment) and/or temperature variation during storage. The final step is validation of the package under real-life conditions in order to define product-package compatibility (Torreiri et al., 2009; Mahajan et al., 2007; 2006).

Assuming that there is no gas stratification inside the package and that the total pressure is constant, the differential mass balance equations (Mahajan et al.,

2007) that describe O2 and CO2 concentration changes in a package containing a respiring product are:

푑(푂 ) 푉 2 = OTR. A. (Oout − Oin) − RO .M 푓 푑푡 2 2 2 (1.20)

푑(퐶푂 ) 푉 2 = CTR. A. (COout − COin) + RCO .M 푓 푑푡 2 2 2 (1.21)

Equations (2) and (3) were used to predict O2 and CO2 concentrations, respectively inside a package containing 0.15 kg of fresh-cut pineapple chunks. The package system was a pouch of 20 x 20cm (area: 412.9cm2). The product was stored at 4°C and the recommended ranges of O2 and CO2 for fresh-cut pineapple were assumed to be 5%O2+5%CO2 (chapter 3). The respiration rate model was developed considering all of the factors and was used for predicting O2 and CO2 inside the packages at 4°C.

“Solver” was used to aid in the prediction of the respiration rate. Solver is part of a suite of commands sometimes referred to as ‘what-if-analysis’: a process of changing values in cells to see how those changes affect the outcome of formulas in a worksheet. With Solver it is possible to find the predicted respiration rate of a particular product using the sum of the residuals (ƩRes.CO2) as the optimal value in the set target cell i.e. the difference between experimental and predicted RCO2. Solver then works with a group of predefined cells, namely; Ri, Req and α, that are directly related to the formula in the target cell. Since the experimental data for fresh-cut -1 -1 pineapple is known, (average RCO2 2-5 mL kg hr ), the value of the coefficients is kept in line with the variable results obtained (usually to a minimum of 1 and max of 100). In the case of fresh-cut pineapple, considering all possible variable factors, values of 1.5, 5 and 0.2 were chosen as Ri, Req and α, respectively. Solver adjusted these values in the by changing cells specified (also called the adjustable cells) to produce a result specified by the target cell. In this instance, the value of the target

248

Chapter 5

cell, i.e. ƩRes.CO2, was required to be as small as possible so min was chosen in order to minimise the sum of squares (ƩR2) and produce a good fit.

In order to estimate the target barrier properties required for packaging of fresh-cut pineapple chunks, the Equations (1.20) and (1.21) were treated at steady-state condition making the accumulation term equal to zero. Hence,

out in RO2. W = OTR. A. (O2 − O2 ) (1.22)

in out RCO2. W = CTR. A. (CO2 − CO2 ) (1.23)

out Where, Vf is the free volume inside the package, O2 is the O2 concentration in out outside the package (20.9%); O2 is the O2 concentration inside the package; CO2 is in the CO2 concentration outside the package (0.03%) and CO2 is the CO2 concentration inside the package. A is the net breathable area of packaging film, m2,

W is the weight of pineapple chunks, kg. RO2 and RCO2 are the respiration rate for O2 consumption and CO2 production, respectively. RQ was assumed to be one. OTR and

CTR are required transmission rates for O2 and CO2, respectively expressed in ml/m2.day.atm.

For validation of predicted gas composition, un-optimised, optimised, pillow pouch packages and clamshell containers were evaluated. For un-optimised and optimised packages, approximately 150g (±5g) of fresh-cut pineapple (25mm cut piece size) was placed inside a 250cc rigid polylactic acid (PLA) container (Biopak, UK) and the appropriate film (oriented polypropylene: OPP) carefully sealed around the rim of the container (Figure 5.3a, 5.3b ) using an strong adhesive (Evo-stik multi- purpose clear adhesive 32g, Bostik, UK.) . For optimised packs, the required number of perforations was added to the lidding film after sealing using a disposable hypodermic needle (18g x 40µm; Fisher Scientific Ltd.), before being stored. Clamshell containers were commercially construed from recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) into which the same net weight/ cut piece size of fresh-cut pineapple was placed before being hermetically clamped shut and stored for analysis (Figure 5.3c). Pillow-pouch packages were made from a high-barrier laminate flexible film, commercially used for cheese packaging (Amcor Flexibles, Gloucester,

UK). The film consisted of a double laminate (PET12/PE55 microns) and had O2 and 2 CO2 permeabilities of 2473 and 8377 cc.mil/m .day.atm respectively. An impulse bench-top heat sealer (Relco Ltd, UK) was used to prepare the pouches. The

249 dimensions for each of the test packages were 20cm x 20cm. Sealing allowed for a passive MAP to develop within packs as a result of the respiration of the fruit. Approximately 150±5g samples were placed in a 250 cc rigid polylactic acid (PLA) container (Biopack, UK) which was then heat sealed within the pillow pouch packages (Figure 5.3d). All laboratory packaged fresh-cut fruits were stored at 4°C for a period of 7 days. The gas composition within packs was measured using a gas analyser (Systech Instruments, UK). Gas sample was withdrawn by piercing the pack with the hypodermic needle through the septum. The mean values for O2 and CO2 concentrations of triplicate packs were recorded.

(a) (b)

Macro-perforated No Perforations

(c) (d)

Clamshell

Figure 5.3 Packaging systems used for package simulation and validation (a) macroscopic holes in combination with polymeric film; (b) non-perforated lidding film; (c) impermeable clamshell container and (d) pillow-pouch package. Black and red arrows illustrate O2 and CO2 movement respectively.

5.2.5. Statistical analysis

The experimental results were presented as the mean and standard deviation for three measurements. A two-way analysis of variance using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) multi-comparison test to determine significant differences between factors studied (SPSS Statistics 19, IBM, Chicago). Statistically significant differences were reported at P ≤ 0.05.

250

Chapter 5

Table 5.3 Product and package characteristics for fresh-cut pineapple

Product Characteristics Fruit Type Pineapple Variety/ Cultivar DelMonte Gold Extra Sweet MD2 Cut size/ shape, mm 25, triangular chunk Product weight (M), kg 0.150 ±5 RR Model a Exponential decay -1 -1 Respiration rate; RCO2 (Req; mL CO2 kg h )* 2.62 RQ (assumed) 1

Target/ Optimum MA conditions b min O2 minimum (Y O2), atm 0.03 max O2 maximum (Y O2), atm 0.05 min CO2 minimum (Y CO2), atm 0.05 max CO2 maximum (Y CO2), atm 0.08 Temperature (T), OC 4

Package Characteristics Geometry Round tray Diameter (d), m 0.11 Height (h), m 0.04 Film name Oriented polypropylene Film area, (A), cm2 (πr2) 0.008635 (3.14*(0.055)^2) Film thickness, (x), µ 25.4 3 Total volume (Vt), m 0.000250 (250cc) 3 Produce volume (Vp), m 0.000150 (150g) 3 Free volume (Vf), m 0.000100 (difference of total - produce V) Fill, % 60 OTR, mL/m2. day. atm 7300 - 12500 CTR, mL/m2. day. atm 13900 - 23500 Beta required, (β) 1.9 Number of perforations/ holes (N), m 1 Diameter of perforation/ hole (D), µm 70

Environmental variables Temperature (T), OC ambient (~20) out External gas atmosphere, O2, (O2 ), % 0.21 out External gas atmosphere, CO2, (CO2 ), % 0.003

251

5.4. Results

5.4.1. Effects of fruit type, storage time and intrinsic and extrinsic factors on respiration rate

The respiration rates (RCO2) of a variety of (a) climacteric and (b) non-climacteric fresh-cut fruits over a 24h period are illustrated in Figure 5.4. At 4OC, initial respiration rate (Ri) values for climacteric fruit (Figure 5.4a) were in the range of -1 -1 1.48 to 7.32 mL CO2 kg hr with steady-state (Req) ranging from 0.85 to 5.67 mL -1 -1 CO2 kg hr (achieved in <12hours). For non-climacteric fruit (Figure 5.4b) Ri -1 -1 ranged from 0.85 to 12.99 mL CO2 kg hr , while Req ranged from 0.95 to 11.02 mL -1 -1 CO2 kg hr .

Cantaloupe Melon (a) 16 14 Honeydew Melon 12

10 Galia Melon

) 8 1 - Kiwi (1/4)

hr 6

1 - 4 kg

Green Apple 2 2 (wedge) 0 Red Apples (wedge) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

(b) 16 DelMonte Gold Pineapple (chunks) 14 Agricola Agromonte 12 Pineapple (chunks)

10 Orange (segments)

Respiration Rate (mL CO Rate (mL Respiration 8 Green Grapes (W) 6 4 Red Grapes (W) 2 0 Strawberry (1/2) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Time (hr) Time (hr)

Figure 5.4 Effects of raw material type on respiration rate (RCO2) of (a) Climacteric and (b) Non- Climacteric fresh-cut fruits stored in air at 4OC. Values are means for three determinations ± SD (error bars) separated by Fisher’s LSD (p<0.05). (25mm – cut pieces).

252

Chapter 5

In Figure 5.4a, the RCO2 of both fresh-cut kiwifruit and red apple pieces increased initially (Ri) until equilibrium (Req) was established. For all melon and green apple,

RCO2 decreased until Req was achieved. Ri was in the order of honeydew melon > kiwifruit > galia melon > red apple > cantaloupe melon > green apples while Req was in the order of kiwifruit > red apple > honeydew melon > galia melon > cantaloupe melon > green apple. For non-climacteric fruit (Figure 5.4b), fresh-cut -1 -1 Agromonte pineapple had the highest RCO2 initially (12.99 mL CO2 kg hr ) that -1 -1 decreased until equilibrium was reached (18.42 mL CO2 kg hr ). Del Monte pineapple and red grapes also increased in RCO2 with values of 2.63 and 1.13 mL CO2 kg-1 hr-1 at equilibrium respectively. Both fresh-cut strawberry halves and orange -1 - segments increased initially (8.58 and 6.14 mL CO2 kg hr 1) until a peak was -1 - observed (14.64 and 9.01 mL CO2 kg hr 1) then decreased until equilibrium was -1 -1 achieved (11.02 and 6.04 mL CO2 kg hr ) respectively.

Spring - UR

Spring - R

Spring - OR Summer - UR

Summer - R Req Summer - OR Ri Autumn - UR

Autumn - R

Autumn - OR

Winter - UR

Winter - R

Winter - OR 0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.5 Effects of physiological age and season on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple cv DelMonte Gold Extra Sweet (MD2) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD. UR (under-ripe), R (ripe) and OR (over-ripe).

253

Pineapple

The effects of physiological age and seasonality on the Ri and Req of fresh-cut pineapple were determined (Figure 5.5). Physiological age affected the RCO2 of fresh-cut pineapple in the order of over-ripe > ripe > under-ripe across all seasons.

An exception to this was fresh-cut Summer pineapple, where the Ri was in the order of under ripe > ripe > over ripe (p<0.05) with no significant differences in Req recorded (p>0.05). For Spring, Autumn and Winter over-ripe pineapples, a significant effect on Ri was observed (p<0.05) with Autumn fruit displaying the highest Ri of all (p<0.001). In general, Summer fruit (under-ripe and ripe) displayed -1 -1 the greatest Ri of all fruits (14.78 and 12.63 mL CO2 kg h ) with Spring fruit -1 -1 having the lowest values of 3.04 and 4.81 mL CO2 kg h . Overall, no significant differences in the Req values for all fruit studied was found (p>0.05) with values in -1 -1 the range of 1.32 to 4.06 mL CO2 kg h .

Honduras - MD2

Brazil - MD2 Req Ri

Costa Rica - MD2

0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.6 Effects of country of origin on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple cv MD2 stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for four determinations ± SD.

Figure 5.6 shows the effects of country of origin on the initial (Ri) and steady-state

(Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple. Initial respiration rate values differed -1 -1 significantly (p<0.05) with values of 10.72, 7.81 and 4.77 mL CO2 kg h for Honduras, Brazilian and Costa Rican grown fruit respectively. After 24h, no significant differences in Req values were observed (p>0.05), ranging from 1.89 to -1 -1 2.45 mL CO2 kg h .

254

Chapter 5

Chopper

Sharp Req Ri

Blunt

0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.7 Effects of cut blade sharpness on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple cv DelMonte Gold Extra Sweet (MD2) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD.

Figure 5.7 shows the effect of cut blade sharpness on the initial and steady-state respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple. As anticipated, use of the stainless steel chopper and sharp knife resulted in slightly lower respiration rates than use of the blunt knife, however, no significant differences were found (p>0.05) with Ri values -1 -1 of 5.96, 5.91 and 6.95 mL CO2 kg h , respectively. Similarly, no significant difference in Req values were observed (p>0.05) with final values ranging from 1.78 -1 -1 to 2.18 mL CO2 kg h .

Undipped - 10mm

Undipped - 25m

Undipped -50mm Req Dipped - 10mm Ri

Dipped - 25mm

Dipped - 50mm

0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.8 Effects of cut size and dipping treatment on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple cv DelMonte Gold Extra Sweet (MD2) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD.

255

Figure 5.8 illustrates the effect of cut size and dipping treatment (1% ascorbic acid and 1% citric acid) on the respiration rates (Ri and Req) of fresh-cut pineapple. Cut size affected Ri with larger 50mm cut pieces having significantly lower Ri values -1 -1 (5.83 mL CO2 kg h ) (p<0.05) than smaller 25mm and 10mm cut pieces (7.01 and -1 -1 7.41 mL CO2 kg h , respectively). Dipping the cut pieces caused a marked reduction in Ri, having more of an effect on smaller cut pieces. Dipping 10mm cut -1 -1 pieces resulted in a 58% reduction in Ri (2.92 mL CO2 kg h ) while a 41% -1 -1 reduction was observed for 50mm cut pieces (3.45 mL CO2 kg h ). Dipping also resulted in lower Req values for all cut sizes (p>0.05), with Req values ranging from -1 -1 -1 -1 1.76 to 2.42 mL CO2 kg h for dipped fruit and 2.74 to 3.21 mL CO2 kg h for un- dipped fruit (p>0.05).

Spring - UR

Req Spring - R Ri Spring - OR

Summer - UR

Summer - R

Summer - OR

Autumn - UR

Autumn - R

Autumn OR

Winter - UR

Winter - R

Winter - OR

0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.9 Effects of physiological age and season on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut strawberry cv El Santa (Irish) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD.

256

Chapter 5

Strawberry

The effects of physiological age and season on the initial and steady-state respiration rate of fresh-cut strawberry halves are presented in Figure 5.9. Physiological age affected the Ri in the order of over ripe > ripe > under ripe (p<0.01) with a smaller effect of season observed (p<0.05). Under-ripe fruit had the lowest Ri with values of -1 -1 6.48, 11.75, 14.39 and 6.07 mL CO2 kg h for Spring, Summer, Autumn and

Winter fruit, respectively. In contrast, over-ripe fruit had the highest Ri with values -1 -1 ranging from 12.2 to 22.2 mL CO2 kg h in Spring and Summer to 18.55 to 14.79 -1 -1 mL CO2 kg h in Autumn and Winter. Ripe Summer strawberry halves had the -1 -1 greatest Ri of all (22.14 mL CO2 kg h ). Steady-state (Req) respiration values were significantly different with respect to physiological age (p<0.05) with no significant -1 effects of season observed (p>0.05). Values ranged from 6.66 to 12.83 mL CO2 kg -1 -1 -1 -1 h in Spring, 8.36 to 12.80 mL CO2 kg h in Summer, 8.03 to 13.40 mL CO2 kg -1 -1 -1 h in Autumn, and 5.07 to 11.85 mL CO2 kg h in Winter.

Egypt - Festival

Ireland - El Santa

Spain - Camarossa Req

Ri

Morocco - Camarossa

Ethiopia - Orly

0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.10 Effects of cultivar and country of origin on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut strawberry stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD.

257

Figure 5.10 shows the effects of cultivar and origin on the Ri and Req of fresh-cut strawberry halves. For Ri, no significant effect of cultivar and/or origin was found -1 -1 (p>0.05) with values ranging from 8.88 to 11.23 mL CO2 kg h . Similarly, no significant effect on Req was noted, with values ranging from 8.41 to 10.22 mL CO2 kg-1 h-1. An exception to this was Egyptian cv Festival and Irish cv El Santa whose respiration rate continued to increase during storage with Req values of 9.07 mL CO2 -1 -1 -1 -1 kg h (p>0.05) and 16.7 mL CO2 kg h recorded (p<0.05) respectively.

4 Slices - Aut

Halves - Aut Req

Whole no Stem Aut Ri

Whole + Stem Aut

4 Slices - Sum

Halves - Sum

Whole no Stem Sum

Whole + Stem Sum

0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.11 Effects of cutting and season on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut strawberry cv El Santa (Irish) stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD.

Figure 5.11 illustrates the effects of cutting and season on the Ri and Req of fresh-cut strawberry halves. In general, Summer fruit had slightly higher RCO2 than Autumn fruit. Removing the stem decreased the RCO2, but the change was not significant

(p>0.05). Initial and steady-state respiration values ranged from 8.48 to 8.62 mL CO2 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 kg h and 12.3 to 13.27 mL CO2 kg h in Autumn and 8.33 to 8.79 mL CO2 kg -1 -1 -1 h and 12.97 to 12.63 mL CO2 kg h in Summer. Halving the fruit caused a marked -1 -1 increase in Ri (26%), with values of 10.44 to 12.79 CO2 kg h and 16.72 to 17.44 -1 -1 mL CO2/ kg h in Summer and Autumn, respectively. A similar trend was also

258

Chapter 5

noted for Req (p<0.01) although no significant differences between seasons were observed (p>0.05). Slicing the fruit into 4 slices increased Ri even further (30%) with no significant difference in values observed (p>0.05) between seasons. In contrast, significant differences were observed between Req for sliced strawberries, with -1 -1 values of 20.78 and 14.62 mL CO2 kg h for Summer and Autumn fruit respectively (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were found between Ri and Req for Autumn fruit studied (p>0.05).

Kiwifruit

The effects of origin, cut size and dipping treatment on the respiration rate (Ri and

Req) of fresh-cut kiwifruit is reported in Figure 5.12. The RCO2 of fresh-cut kiwifruit increased during storage. This increase was almost 50% of its initial value. Cutting and dipping slightly increased the Ri and Req of fruits, but the effect was not 1 significant (p>0.05). Larger cut fruits ( /2) had greater Ri values, while smaller cut 1 fruits ( /8) had greater Req values (p>0.05). No significant effect of origin was noted (p>0.05) with Italian fruit displaying slightly higher values than New Zealand fruit. -1 Based on these results, the average Ri and Req values were 4.5 and 8.3 mL CO2 kg h-1 respectively.

Melon

Figure 5.13 shows the effects of origin and cut size on the Ri and Req of fresh-cut honeydew melon. The respiration rate for melon decreased with time to approximately 50% of its initial value at equilibrium. Among origins studied, Costa

Rican melon had slightly higher Ri values than those from either Brazil or Honduras.

In general, the smaller the cut piece size the greater the Ri with values ranging from -1 -1 -1 -1 5.78 to 7.41 mL CO2 kg h and 3.28 to 4.20 mL CO2 kg h for 10mm and 50mm cut pieces, respectively. At equilibrium (Req), no significant differences, irrespective of origin or cut size, was found (p>0.05).

259

Italian D 1/8

Italian D 1/4

Italian D 1/2

Italian UD 1/8 Hayward cv Italian UD 1/4

Italian UD 1/2 Req Ri New Zealand D 1/8

New Zealand D 1/4

New Zealand D 1/2

New Zealand UD 1/8

New Zealand UD 1/4

New Zealand UD 1/2 0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr Figure 5.12 Effects of origin, cut size and dipping treatment (1% ascorbic acid + 1% citric acid) on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut Italian and New Zealand kiwifruit stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD. D (dipped), UD (un- dipped)

Brazil 50mm

Brazil 25mm

Brazil 10mm

Honduras 50mm

Honduras 25mm Req

Honduras 10mm Ri

Costa Rica 50mm

Costa Rica 25mm

Costa Rica 10mm

0 5 10 15 20 25 -1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.13 Effects of origin and cut size on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut honeydew melon stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD.

260

Chapter 5

Brazil 50mm

Brazil 25mm

Brazil 10mm Req Italy 50mm Ri Italy 25mm

Italy 10mm

Costa Rica 50mm

Costa Rica 25mm

Costa Rica 10mm

0 5 10 15 20 25

-1 -1 Respiration rate mL CO2 kg hr

Figure 5.14. Effects of cut size and origin on the initial (Ri) and steady-state (Req) respiration rate of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon stored in air at 4OC for 24h. Values are means for three determinations ± SD.

Similar to honeydew melon, the respiration rate of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon decreased with time, to between 74 and 89% of its initial value (Figure 5.14). However, the respiration rate in this instance was almost three times greater than that -1 -1 of honeydew melon, with an average Ri value of 14.08 mL CO2 kg h . The Req was -1 -1 also higher with an average value of 2.5 mL CO2 kg h . In general, the smaller the cut size the higher the RCO2 with Ri and Req values ranging from 8.02 to 20.35 mL -1 -1 -1 -1 CO2 kg h and 1.19 to 4.17 mL CO2 kg h respectively. Costa Rican cantaloupe melon had significantly higher Ri values (p<0.001) than other origins tested, with no significant differences between cut sizes observed (p>0.05). At equilibrium (Req), no significant differences, irrespective of origin or cut size, were found (p>0.05).

261

5.4.2. Case Study – Package design procedure for fresh-cut pineapple A case study is presented to illustrate the use of the experimental respiration data in MAP design for fresh-cut pineapple.

The first step in the design of any MAP is to determine the respiration rate of the intended product. In this instance, the respiration rate (R CO2) of fresh-cut pineapple as affected by intrinsic and extrinsic factors (Figure 5.5 to 5.8) were determined as outlined in section 5.2.

The parameters of the respiration rate model were estimated by non-linear regression (MS Excel, 2007, USA) analysis of the experimental data obtained through the study of intrinsic and extrinsic factor effects on fresh-cut pineapple. This model for respiration is usually a function of O2, CO2 and temperature. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic data attained for fresh-cut pineapple, a mathematical model based on the exponential decay (Equation 1.24) was applied to predict changes in respiration rate with time for all the factors studied.

eq i eq  t  CO2 CO2 CO2  CO2 eRRRR (1.24)

-1 -1 i where; R CO2 is the respiration rate at any time (t), mL kg h ; R CO2 is the initial

-1 -1 eq respiration rate, mL kg h ; R CO2 is the respiration rate at equilibrium time, ml/kg.h; t is the storage time, h and α is constant coefficient.

A secondary model was built by combining Equations (1.19) and (1.24) yielding Equation (1.25):

eq i eq −αt out [ RCO2+(RCO2−RCO2)e ] W × 100 in CO2 = + CO2 (1.25) Vf × 60

The experimental data obtained at various times during storage was fitted with Equation (1.25). The model parameters such as , and α were estimated using Solver in Microsoft Excel (MS Excel, 2007, USA).

262

Chapter 5

i eq The estimated values of respiration constants ( R CO2 and R CO2 ) are summarized in

Table 5.4 and 5.5 for intrinsic and extrinsic factors, respectively. On average, Ri and -1 -1 Req values were 8.52±4.68 and 2.64±0.68 mL kg h respectively. Although initial -1 increases in RCO2 were observed for all treatments, Req ranged from 1.6 to 4 mL kg h-1. The constant coefficient α varied from 0.11 to 0.27, indicating that the ratio of

i eq R and R was close to 3. The experimental and predicted R 2 for under-ripe, CO2 CO2 CO ripe and over-ripe fresh-cut pineapple chunks is presented in Figure 5.15. The mathematical model (Equation 4) appropriately described the influence of storage time on respiration rate as shown by the high R2 values between 85.9 and 99.89%.

12

Under Ripe (UR) 1 - hr Ripe (R) 1 10 - kg

2 Over Ripe (OR) 8

6

4

2

Respiration rate, mL CO mL rate, Respiration

0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Time, h

Figure 5.15 Typical changes in respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple chunks as a function of storage time and degree of physiological age (symbols: experimental values; line: predicted values).

263

Table 5.4 Effect of intrinsic characteristics on respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapples at 4°C.

Type/ Season Physiological age Ri Req -1 -1 Source (Ripeness class) ml of CO2 kg h (R) Del Monte Gold Spring Under ripe 3.11a* 1.76h Extra Sweet, Ripe 4.80b 2.72hij Costa Rica Over ripe 10.39cd 3.92lm

Summer Under ripe 15.29f 3.32jklm Ripe 13.13e 2.99ijkl Over ripe 10.35cd 3.58klm

Autumn Under ripe 5.85b 2.15hi Ripe 8.75c 2.92ijk Over ripe 23.27g 4.01m

Winter Ripe 10.75d 2.44hij (R) Fyffe’s Super Sweet , Summer Ripe 8.57c 2.76ijk Brazil (R) Royal Coast Gold , Winter/ Ripe 10.75d 2.45hij Costa Rica Spring

Agro Monte, Autumn Ripe 13.83ef 3.07ijkl Honduras *Numbers with the same letters are not significantly different (p>0.05)

Table 5.5 Effect of processing and extrinsic factors on respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple at 4°C.

Factor Variations Ri Req -1 -1 ml CO2 kg h Cut size* 10 mm chunk 2.93a*** 2.00fg 25 mm chunk 4.98b 2.40ghi 50 mm chunk 3.43a 1.59f 1 Blade sharpness** Razor sharp knife 6.19cd 1.57f Sharp knife 6.17cd 2.12fgh Blunt kinfe 7.68e 2.38ghi

Dipping pre-treatment 10 mm chunk 7.02de 3.21j 25 mm chunk 7.42e 2.89ij 50 mm chunk 5.95c 2.74hij * No dipping treatment applied; sharp blade used. ** Cut size 25mm chunk *** Numbers with the same letters are not significantly different (p>0.05)

264

Chapter 5

5.4.3. Implications for packaging

Considering the variability in respiration rate, the predicted range of O2 and CO2 was found to be 12.3-16.2% and 5.1-9%, respectively after 7 Days (Figure 5.16). 21

18

15 12

9 O2

pack atmosphere gas concentration(%)

- 6 CO2 In 3 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (days) Figure 5.16 Package gas simulations based on variability in respiration rate due extrinsic and intrinsic factors. The dotted lines shows the possible range of O2 and CO2 obtained based on respiration rate variability and continuous lines shows that without any variability in respiration rate.

Intrinsic factors (physiological age and season) greatly influenced in-pack gas atmosphere composition (Figure 5.17). A gradual decline in O2 and increase in CO2 concentrations were recorded within all packages. 21 URSum 18 RSum

ORSum 15 URAut

12 RAut ORAut

9 URSum concentration(%) pack pack atmosphere gas

- RSum 6

In ORSum 3 URAut RAut 0 ORAut 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Storage time (days) Figure 5.17 The effects of physiological age and seasonality on in-pack (a) oxygen and (b) carbon dioxide concentrations of fresh-cut pineapple chunks stored within a high barrier film at 4OC. Values are means for four determinations. Vertical lines represent ±SD. Key HB = high barrier film; UR = under ripe; R = ripe; OR = over ripe; Aut = Autumn season; Sum = Summer season; continuous line, descending (O2) dashed line, ascending (CO2).

265

O The effects of cut size and dipping treatment on in-pack O2 and CO2 levels at 4 C were also determined. Figure 5.18 shows a gradual decrease and increase in O2 and

CO2 respectively, within both un-dipped and dipped packages, with greater modification observed for smaller cut pieces.

21 10UD 25UD 18

50UD 15 10D 25D 12 50D

9 10UD

concntration(%) 25UD

pack pack atmosphere gas -

In 6 50UD 10D 3 25D 0 50D 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Storage Time (days)

Figure 5.18. The effects of cut size and dipping treatment (1%AA:CA) on in-pack oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of packaging of fresh-cut pineapple chunks stored within a high barrier film at 4OC. Values are means for four determinations. Vertical lines represent ±SD. Key: HB (high barrier film); AA (Ascorbic acid); CA (Citric acid); 10 (10mm), 25 (25mm) and 50 (50mm) cut sizes; UD (un- dipped ) and D (dipped); continuous line, descending (O2), dashed line, ascending (CO2).

-1 -1 Considering the variability of respiration rate (2.64±0.68 ml CO2 kg h at equilibrium), the target barrier properties required for packaging 150 grams of fresh- cut pineapple chunks were estimated. Based on the results of chapter 3, the recommended modified atmosphere for fresh-cut pineapple was 5%O2 + 5%CO2. For a market size tray (12x7 cm) with heat sealable film at the top (breathable area = 64cm2), the target range of OTR and CTR required to reach an equilibrium within the recommended atmosphere range was found to be 7300-12500 and 13900-23500 ml/m2.day.atm, respectively for one mil of film thickness (Table 5.3). The transmission rates required would have to be doubled for 2 mil thick film.

As there is no flexible film to match the required transmission rates, any packaging film selected would have to be adjusted to include precise perforations for that particular product. The number and size of the holes was estimated from the

266

Chapter 5 target OTR and CTR and their respective gas diffusion coefficients as reported by Mahajan et al., (2007). Without making a hole, there is a risk of anoxia and also high

CO2 concentration inside the package over longer periods of storage. The gas transfer coefficients through perforations can be described as follows (Equations 1.26 and 1.27):

(1.24)

(1.26)

(1.27)

-6 -6 2 -1 where; a = 6.4x10 ; b = 1.45, c = -0.598, ɼ = 1.14; DO2 = 16.4x10 m s and DCO2 = 20.6x10-6 m2s-1.

The microscopic perforation in the polymeric film represents an alternative route for gas transport, which is in parallel to the barrier formed by the plastic material. The total flow through polymeric film having NH number of holes is (Equation 1.28):

Total permeation = {permeation through film} x {permeation through 1 hole x NH} (1.28)

Macroscopic perforations in polymeric films have diameters in the order of 10-4 m or greater, whereas the mean-free path of gas molecules at atmospheric pressure is much less (1 or 2) x 10-7m (Fishman et al., 1996). Therefore, transport through the perforation may be treated as macroscopic diffusion in a cylindrical pathway filled with air. If the distance between perforations is much greater than their radius, the diffusive path length becomes the length of the pore plus the radius of the hole: film 2 PO2 = [PO2 + π RH x DO2 x NH] (1.29) (e x RH)

film 2 PCO2 = [PCO2 + π RH x DCO2 x NH] (1.30) (e x RH)

-2 -1 -1 where; PO2; PCO2 is the permeability for O2; CO2 mL.mil.m .day .atm ; RH is 2 -1 the radius of the hole, m; DO2;DCO2 is the diffusivity of O2; CO2 in air, m .s ; e is the thickness of the film, µm and NH is the number of holes required.

267

Based on these calculations, a package containing at least one micro-hole of size 70 microns is needed in order to achieve the target O2 and CO2 transmission rates required for packaging of fresh-cut pineapple chunks (Table 5.3). In this instance, a rigid type poly lactic acid (PLA) container with a micro-perforated lidding film in combination with macroscopic perforations (as shown in Figure 5.3a) was selected for validation in the present case study. The rigid container was assumed to be more suitable for consuming a ready-to-eat product, such as the fresh-cut pineapple. In addition to the ‘optimised’ packaging system described above, control packaging systems were concurrently evaluated within this study to demonstrate the effectiveness (or not) of the optimised film. A non-perforated lidding film (Figure 5.3b), impermeable clamshell container (Figure 5.3c ) and a high barrier pillow- pouch package (Figure 5.3d ) were employed to mimic sub-optimal packaging systems. Of the commercial polymers available, oriented polypropylene (OPP) was chosen as the lidding film, with a thickness of 25.4µm and a permeability of 1,100 cc 2 O2/ m .day.atm (β: 3.09). The surface area of the lidding film in systems (a) and (b) was equal to the surface area (A) of the container top (πr2 = 9.5x10-3m2). High- barrier film was used to produce pillow-pouch packages (A = 825.8cm2) while recycled polyethylene terephthalate (RPET) was the polymer used in clamshell containers (250cc).

30

25

20

15 concentration(%)

2 10

and CO 5 2 0 pack O - 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 In Storage Time (Days) UnOptimised (O2) Optimised (O2) Pillow-pouch (O2) Clamshell (O2)

UnOptimised (CO2) Optimised (CO2) Pillow-pouch (CO2) Chamshell (CO2)

Figure 5.19 In-pack gas atmosphere validation of fresh-cut pineapple packs at 4OC. 25mm cut piece size. Shows the EMA time (approx. 3.75 days for optimised packs). highlights the near optimum O2 and CO2 range attained by optimised packs on Day 7. Continuous line, descending (O2), dashed line, ascending (CO2).

268

Chapter 5

Clamshell containers (impermeable) attained the fastest rate of EMA, in approximately 1.75 Days (Figure 5.19). However, the EMA was not maintained with

CO2 levels continuing to increase thereafter, reaching 24% by Day 7. In addition, O2 levels continued to decrease reaching near anoxic levels on Day 7 (0.06%).Un- optimised packages (no holes) also attained sub-optimal in-pack gas atmosphere concentrations during storage, achieving EMA by Day 2 but with increasing CO2 levels thereafter (26% on Day 7). O2 levels rapidly depleted reaching anoxic levels (0%) on Day 7. Pillow-pouch packages showed the least in-pack atmosphere modification of all packs studied with O2 and CO2 levels of 12% and 6.5%, respectively, at end of storage. Optimised packages (1 hole) displayed favourable in- pack gas atmospheres during storage, achieving EMA in approximately 3.75 Days.

At end of storage, packs had attained near optimum gas levels (3-5%O2 + 5-8% CO2) with O2 and CO2 values of 9% and 12%, respectively.

269

5.5. Discussion

5.5.1. Effect of fruit type and storage time on respiration rate.

Figure 5.3 shows the respiratory activity (RCO2) of fresh-cut fruits over a 24h period.

The range RCO2 values obtained for most fruits were in line with previous studies.

The RCO2 of fresh-cut fruit was found to vary between cultivar and species and was generally much higher initially, peaking to a maximum with time (Tx) and decreasing to an equilibrium value depending on the type of fruit studied. The initial rates were affected by raw material type, quality and process severity, however, similar trends to equilibrium were observed.

These high initial rates were due to wounding and a short-lived stress response.

When Ri > Req, wound-induced respiration exhibits a 3-phase response; including, an increase, a maximum peak and a decline as observed for fresh-cut pineapple and strawberry. However, when Ri ≈ Req, then wound-induced respiration rate increases and there is no decline as observed for fresh-cut strawberry and kiwifruit. Finally, when tissues show little increase in respiration rate, the Req values remain very low, as observed for red and green grapes. Thus, Ri contributes to initial in-pack modification while Req contributes more to equilibrium modified atmosphere (EMA).

In this study, fresh-cut pineapple showed a gradual steady decline in RCO2 until an equilibrium was achieved in approximately 12-20h. For fresh-cut strawberry, Ri increased until a peak was reached at ~10h, followed by a gradual decline until Req was achieved in <24h. Fresh-cut honeydew melon reached equilibrium in 11-13h while cantaloupe melon took longer, on average, 13-24h. For fresh-cut kiwifruit, origin had little effect on the time it took to achieve equilibrium, ranging from 17- 22h.

Overall, climacteric fruits had lower Ri values than non-climacteric fruits with -1 -1 values ranging from 2.12 to 8.21 mL CO2 kg hr while non-climacteric fruit had -1 -1 lower Req values ranging from 0.85 to 3.70 mL CO2 kg hr . Different varieties of the same product can exhibit different RCO2 (Fidler and North, 1967; Song et al.,

1992; Fonseca et al., 2002). Significant differences in Ri values between both -1 - ripeness classes were obtained, with average values of 5.42 and 6.65 mL CO2 kg hr 1 for climacteric and non-climacteric fruits (p<0.05) respectively. However, no

270

Chapter 5

-1 significant differences in Req were obtained with average values of 2.73 mL CO2 kg -1 -1 -1 hr and 4.28 mL CO2 kg hr , respectively (p>0.05).

Climacteric fruits such as apple, kiwifruit and melon, once cut, had slightly elevated respiration rates. Significant differences were observed in RCO2 of both green and red -1 -1 apple varieties (P<0.001) with average values of 0.98 and 4.53 mL CO2 kg hr recorded respectively. Fresh-cut kiwifruit pieces had significantly higher steady-state respiration rates compared with all other fruits tested (P<0.001) with a value of 8.01 -1 -1 mL CO2 kg hr .No significant differences (P<0.05) were obtained for both fresh- cut honeydew and galia melon varieties with average RCO2 values of 4.16 and 3.87 -1 -1 mL CO2 kg hr respectively. In contrast significant values were obtained for fresh- cut cantaloupe melon (P<0.01) which had an average RCO2 value of 1.75 and mL CO2 kg-1 hr-1.

For fresh-cut pineapple (Del Monte Gold #10) the respiration rate was relatively low to begin with and declined slowly during storage. This is in contrast to fresh-cut strawberry halves which demonstrated a dramatic increase in respiration until Req was achieved. In addition, significant differences were obtained (P<0.01) for both pineapple varieties tested with average RCO2 values of 3.52 and 6.20 mL CO2 kg-1 hr-1 for Del Monte Gold (MD2) and Agricola Agromonte (MD2) respectively.

Fresh-cut pineapple (Agromonte) (NCL) had the highest Ri initially of all fruits -1 -1 tested (13 mL CO2 kg hr ) which saw a dramatic decline thereafter until -1 -1 equilibrium was reached (3.7 mL CO2 kg hr ), similar to that of Del Monte Gold -1 -1 (3.3 mL CO2 kg hr ). The large differences in RCO2 values obtained are likely attributed to the diverse fruit sizes. Agricola Agromonte were marketed as Extra- Large (XL) Pineapple (185mm*130mm) while Del Monte Gold pineapple as ‘size 10’ (150mm*110mm). Gorny et al., (2000) showed that pear sizes greatly affected respiration rate with smaller pears having smaller respiration rate than larger fruit. Similarly, increased fruit size could be attributed to increased cell size, volume and number resulting in greater starch availability for sugar conversion. Interestingly, the RR of halved strawberries continued to increase throughout the initial testing period until a plateau was reached (8-12h) after which time a gradual decrease was observed.

271

For both red and green grape varieties the RCO2 was low ranging from 1.99 and -1 -1 -1 -1 0.95 mL CO2 kg hr initially, and 1.34 and 0.85 mL CO2 kg hr at equilibrium, respectively. By contrast with other fresh-cut fruit in which membranes and cells are damaged, grapes, even though removed from the stem, have their protective membrane/ tissues left intact which prevents direct tissue or cellular interaction of its succulent inner flesh (Kader, 1989).

It is known that wounding triggers key enzymes from the respiration pathway, such as phosphofructokinase (Hajirezaei and Stitt, 1991) and cytochrome oxidase (Nanos et al., 1994), by increasing and decreasing their activity through time, allowing an increase and decrease in respiration rate depending on the product. Wounding may also enhance the synthesis of different enzymes within plant tissues such as phenylalanine-amonia-lyase (PAL) activity (Saltveit, 1997; Toivonen and DeEll, 2002). Wound-induced respiration may also be associated in-part to α- oxidation of long-chain fatty acids from membrane deteriorative processes (Laties,

1964; Laties, 1978). Escalona et al. (2007) found that the RCO2 of fresh-cut kohlrabi sticks increased immediately after cutting (10 ml/kg.h), decreasing steadily to 3-5 ml/kg.h by end of storage at 0°C in air. Iqbal et al. (2008) demonstrated that the RCO2 -1 -1 of sliced and shredded carrots decreased from 8.6 and 10.8 mL CO2 kg h to 3.6 -1 -1 and 3.39 mL CO2 kg h , respectively during 31 h of storage at 4°C.

5.4.2. Effect of intrinsic factors on respiration rate of fresh-cut fruits.

The RCO2 of fresh-cut fruit was found to vary with physiological age (PA), origin, season, cultivar and species. Ri was affected to a greater extent by PA and origin than by season, and each factor had a considerable effect on the rate at which equilibrium was achieved.

The Ri of fresh-cut pineapple in the present study was found to vary significantly (P<0.05) in contrast to Req which did not (P>0.05). The average of RCO2 -1 -1 for fresh-cut pineapple ranged from 5.85 mL CO2 kg h for Autumn under-ripe to -1 -1 23.27 mL CO2 kg h for Autumn over-ripe and 3.11 ml/kg.h for Spring under-ripe -1 -1 to 10.39 mL CO2 kg h for Spring over ripe. This shows an approximately 50% lower Ri value in Spring. However, the values for Req did not differ significantly irrespective season or PA.

272

Chapter 5

Likewise, cultivar effects on RCO2 were also found for fresh-cut strawberry and kiwifruit but the effects were not significant (p>0.05). An exception to this was Irish -1 -1 grown El Santa where the Req value of 16.7 mL CO2 kg h was approximately 82% -1 -1 higher than the average Req of 9.18 mL CO2 kg h for other cultivars. For fresh-cut strawberries there was a 45 to 59% increase in Ri between Spring and Summer fruits, respectively. As in the case of pineapple, the values for Req we affected by physiological age (p<0.05) but not by season (p>0.05). In addition, the Ri for both fresh-cut strawberry and kiwifruit was greater than the Req.

For fresh-cut melon, there were significant effects of origin on Ri (p<0.001) but not on Req (p>0.05).

Variations in consistent raw material supply throughout the year can greatly affect the quality of fresh-cut fruit products. Kader, (1987) explained the differences in respiratory activity in terms of genotype variation, which produced differences among plant parts and that this influenced their gas diffusion characteristics and respiration rates.

Gorny et al. (2000) compared the RCO2 of four different cultivars of sliced pears at 10°C. Among the four cultivars tested, Bartlett pear slices had the highest

RCO2 and no differences in RCO2 values were observed among the three other cultivars tested. Manolopoulou and Papadopoulou (1998) reported RCO2 in the range of 1.0 to 2.5 mL kg-1 h-1 for four different kiwifruit cultivars stored at 0OC. Al-Mughrabi et al., (1995) and Caleb et al., (2012) reported the possible influence of physiological differences between cultivar responses to storage conditions. At 15OC, Caleb et al.,

(2012) observed a spike in RCO2 initially and suggested a possible influence of ethylene as previously outlined by Devlieghere et al., (2003).

As a consequence of differences in respiration rates, different MA’s would develop within packs initially, which would have a profound effect on overall quality and shelf-life. A higher respiration rate generally implies a faster rate of deterioration and subsequent quality loss. However, Cliffe-Byrnes and O’Beirne (2005) reported that the RCO2 of ‘dry’ coleslaw mix prepared with shredded cabbage, cv Marathon was significantly higher than that prepared with cv Lennox but that the storage life of Marathon was better than Lennox. They concluded that the reason was clearly more complex and that pre-harvest factors, such as climate conditions and cultural

273 practices, may have affected the morphological and compositional characteristics of the given genotypes, which in turn influenced the respiration rates.

5.5.3. Effect of extrinsic factors on respiration rate of fresh-cut fruits.

Cut size had a considerable effect on Ri and Req, with smaller cut pieces having higher rates than larger pieces (p<0.05). In contrast, smallest pieces had highest Ri and Req. For fresh-cut pineapple, blade sharpness had no significant effect on RCO2.

For fresh-cut strawberry, significant effects of cutting were observed, with -1 -1 sliced strawberry having the greatest RCO2 in Summer (20.8mL CO2 kg hr ) and -1 -1 halved strawberry having highest in Autumn (17.5mL CO2 kg hr ) (p<0.05). In contrast, whole strawberry with stem removed had lowest RCO2 in both seasons, with -1 -1 values of 12.6 and 12.3mL CO2 kg hr respectively (p>0.05).

In the case of fresh-cut melons, there were significant effects of cutting on Ri

(p<0.05) but not on Req (p>0.05).

Cutting fruit releases previously bound enzymes and other vacuolar substrates which can cause an increment in ripening and respiration coupled with faster deterioration (Kader, 2012). Cut size and dipping decreased the time to reach equilibrium, by almost 40%, with average times ranging from 7-15h depending on fruit type. Wounding plant cells and tissues induces elevated ethylene production rates that may stimulate RCO2 and consequently accelerate deterioration and senescence (Brecht, 1995). The RCO2 may gradually increase over time until a maximum value is reached (fresh-cut strawberry) and then start to decrease again to either the initial value or higher as was the case of fresh-cut kiwifruit. Watada et al

(1990) showed that the RCO2 of intact kiwifruit was about 12.5 ml/kg.h and slicing to 1cm thickness caused a 2-fold increase which sustained for 36 h at 20°C. Lamikanra (2002) studied the effect of angle cut for fresh-sliced banana and reported an increase in RCO2 coinciding with an increase in angle cut which was directly related to the shelf-life. Aguayo et al. (2004) compared cut melon to whole melon, and found that wounding caused an increase in RCO2, and that this was more pronounced at 5°C than at 0°C. Gorny et al., (2000) compared the CO2 and ethylene production rates of

274

Chapter 5 fresh-cut pears as influenced by cultivar, and showed that wounding increased the

RCO2 of all cultivars, and that there was a strong effect of cultivar.

In addition to size reduction, the sharpness of the processing blade is also known to play a major role in the rate of RCO2, with blunt blades showing higher RCO2 than sharp blades. A reduction in mechanical injury will result in better keeping quality of fresh-cut produce by maintaining the cellular integrity and avoiding loss of internal substrates (Artes et al., 2007). Increased mechanical injury can damage many layers of tissue, increasing the mechanical shock or “initial stress response” (Cantwell and Suslow, 2002). In this study however, no significant effects for blade- sharpness on RCO2 was observed (p>0.05) with blunt blades having slightly higher

RCO2 than razor/ sharp blades. This is in contrast to Portela and Cantwell (2001) who found that cutting cantaloupe melon pieces with a sharp borer, resulted in extended shelf life at 5°C compared to cutting with a blunt borer and highlighted the fact that although RCO2 values were affected only slightly by cutting treatment, blunt cut pieces had higher electrolyte leakage (amongst other quality parameters tested) than sharp cut pieces.

Pre-treatment steps during minimal processing are known to affect the RCO2 of fresh-cut produce, with effects depending on the commodity, dipping concentration of agents used and wash water temperature among other variables (Brody et al.,

2008). For fresh-cut pineapple, dipping resulted in a significant reduction in Ri, especially for smaller cut pieces (p<0.05) while no significant effect on Req (dipped and un-dipped) was observed (p>0.05). For fresh-cut kiwifruit, in general smaller cut sizes had lowest Ri initially and greatest Req ultimately. However, no significant effects of cutting and/or dipping were observed (p>0.05), with Req values significantly greater than Ri values (p<0.05) at end of storage, irrespective of cut size. Dipping times normally range from 1 to 5 minutes (Soliva-Fortuny and Martin- Belloso, 2003). In this study, fruit pieces were dipped (~20°C) for 2 minutes with 2 minutes draining, resulting in a marked increase in RCO2. In fruits where the action of polyphenol oxidase is the main cause of browning, the cold chain must be maintained and dipping is usually carried out at temperatures ≤ 20°C (Soliva-Fortuny and Martin-Belloso, 2003). In this present study, it is suggested that the increase in

Ri is the result of greater surface area of the smaller cut pieces allowing for greater diffusion of the dipping solution resulting in greater Req at end of storage.

275

5.4.4. Product-package compatibility

Simulation of the gas atmosphere composition is an important tool in package design. Its aim is to predict O2 and CO2 changes inside the package to verify that the variables were correctly optimised (Mahajan et al., 2006). Due to the weak respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple chunks, equilibrium modified atmosphere was not achieved (Figure 5.16).

In the current study, the predictions of the model represented a good match with the experimental results. For example, the greater the physiological age of the fresh-cut pineapple chunk, the greater the CO2 accumulation. In Summer, over-ripe fruit had the greatest in-pack CO2 levels (10.4%) and lower levels of O2 (9.3%).

However, due to the weak respiration rate of fresh-cut pineapple chunks, equilibrium modified atmosphere was not achieved during the 7 Day storage period using high barrier film alone (Figure 5.16– 5.18). In all situations, the time taken to reach equilibrium was too long in relation to product shelf-life. Indeed, a shelf-life of 7 Days is suggested at 4OC. Thus, the selected variables, i.e. package volume and product weight, do not guarantee an appropriate EMA, since the time taken to reach equilibrium was too long. A wider range of β, especially those below 3, is necessary to better match the respiration behaviour of many fresh-cut products (Mahajan et al., 2006). The β value of many polymeric films is greater than the respiratory quotient, resulting in more CO2 leaving the package than O2 entering, thus causing the free volume to shrink during storage. Therefore, it was necessary to decrease the β value of the film in order to produce an atmosphere within the optimum range for fresh-cut pineapple by making precise perforations in the polymeric film. Perforations allow a convective non-selective influx of air to balance the total pressure inside the package with the air outside, with the concurrent change in in-pack atmosphere. The number of perforations required and their diameter depends on the permeability and area of the film.

Since fresh-cut pineapple has a low respiration rate, it was still quite difficult to achieve equilibrium modified atmospheres within an appropriate time period in relation to shelf-life. The “perm-selectivity” of the perforated packaging film alone, i.e. the ratio of CTR to OTR, is 1.0 as opposed to the original required target of 2.0.

276

Chapter 5

To deal with this situation, it is necessary to make a compromise with one of the gases, normally CO2, and design a package based on O2. However, the perm- selectivity range of most commercially available polymeric films is quite narrow (approximately 4) and therefore not suitable. Some biodegradable films, such as wheat-gluten films, have much higher perm-selectivity, up to 18.0 (Cagnon et al., 2012). However, further tests are necessary to explore the application of such films for packaging of fresh and fresh-cut produce.

5.6. Conclusion

In conclusion, most fresh-cut fruits studied had high initial respiration rates. These initial high rates were due to a transitionary stress response as a result of processing which peaked and then stabilised at equilibrium over time. The largest intrinsic factor effect was physiological age, in the order of over-ripe> ripe> under-ripe. The largest effect of extrinsic factors studied was due to cut size in the order of smallest cut piece to largest. Using the average range of respiration rates found and considering the optimum needs of different fruits, the permeability requirements of packaging systems can be defined. A mathematical model based on exponential decay was found to be useful for predicting the package gas composition and also to estimate the target OTR and CTR required for packaging of fresh-cut pineapple chunks. A similar approach can be used to design packages which deliver optimum MAs to other fresh-cut fruits.

277

278

Chapter 6 Summary and Conclusions

282

Chapter 6

6.1. Summary

The objective of this thesis was to contribute to improving the quality of fresh-cut fruits by identifying how raw material use, processing technology and packaging systems might be optimised.

Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to help characterise and interpret large datasets generated during storage. The biplots produced were effective in characterising patterns of deterioration and in tracking differences in quality in terms of the rates and extent of change as affected by intrinsic and extrinsic factors. They showed that ripeness stage/ physiological age of raw materials was an important parameter in fresh-cut pineapple and strawberry quality, while geographical origin was important for fresh-cut melon and kiwifruit. In terms of extrinsic factors studied, cut size was a major determinant for consistent end-product quality, with smaller cut pieces deteriorating faster than the larger cut pieces.

Packaging fresh-cut fruits within films of different permeability had significant effects on quality and produced products of different shelf-lives. Low respiring fruits such as pineapple and melon needed materials in the higher barrier range (HB and OPP) in order to achieve technically useful atmosphere modification and good control of discolouration. When packaged in more permeable micro- perforated films (PA90 and PA210), there was little atmosphere modification, and acceptability of appearance declined rapidly. On the other hand, where CS, HB and OPP films were used to package high respiring fruits such as kiwifruit and strawberry, a near anoxic environment developed, and combined with elevated CO2 within packs, resulted in membrane damage, softening and poor appearance. Increasing storage temperature from 4OC to 8OC resulted in a faster rate and extent of deterioration with reduced shelf-life.

In chapter 3, the effects of a large number of controlled and modified atmospheres were studied. There were significant effects of on quality and sensory appeal, but little effect on microbial growth or phytochemical content. Exposure to atmospheres outside optimal ranges (<2%O2 and >15%CO2), resulted in physiological disorders such as discolouration, browning, increased softening, aroma loss and off-odour development. For fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon, storage in a controlled atmosphere of 5%O2+5%CO2 was best at maintaining quality,

283 while for fresh-cut kiwifruit, quality was better maintained under a controlled atmosphere of 97%N2+3%O2. These optimum atmospheres identified were used as target atmospheres in chapter 5.

In chapter 4, the extent of change of volatile aromatic compounds in fresh-cut pineapple, cantaloupe melon and kiwifruit, as affected by storage time and cut size, were determined and further characterised using PCA. The data showed that storage time (p<0.01) and cut size (p<0.05) had large effects. The pos-tharvest aroma shelf- life of fresh-cut pineapple and kiwifruit was found to be 7 days for small cut pieces and up to 14 days for larger cut pieces. However, for fresh-cut kiwifruit, smaller pieces had a greater rate of change, with under developed aroma. In fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, aroma shelf-life was limited to 4 Days for small cut pieces and 7 Days for larger cut pieces. This was due to the presence of fermentative like off- odours, and was more pronounced for smaller cut pieces. These off-odours were attributed to increased concentrations of existing volatiles rather than the emergence of new compounds. It is concluded that larger cut pieces are best for maintaining the overall fresh-cut aroma of fruits.

In chapter 2, achieving a technically useful package proved to be a difficult task, while results from chapter 3 showed that besides low temperatures, attaining and maintaining the desired optimum modified atmosphere within packages, was critical in achieving consistently high quality. In chapter 5, developing an optimised packaging system for a particular fresh-cut fruit product was achieved. Firstly, the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the respiration rate of a number of fresh-cut fruits was determined. In general, the respiration rate of fresh-cut fruit showed an initial increase (Ri), followed by a peak (Rp) and a gradual decrease to steady-state

(Req) within 24h. The high initial rates were thought to be due to a short-lived stress response and was highly affected by fruit type, processing and time.

Using this respiration data, a mathematical model based on exponential decay was developed. The elucidated model parameters, Ri and Req, were found to be useful in comparing respiration rates for each of the factors studied. Taking fresh-cut pineapple as an example, the target oxygen and carbon dioxide transmission rates required in MAP design were estimated using the optimum target MA (chapter 3) and taking into consideration the variability in the previous respiration rate

284

Chapter 6 measurements due to the intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The model proved to be a good fit with experimental data and could be successfully applied to other fresh-cut fruits in order to achieve product-package compatibility.

285

6.2. Conclusion

The key determinants of quality in fresh-cut fruits were:

 The use of raw materials of optimum maturity, particularly for fresh-cut pineapple and strawberry products.  The use of raw materials of most suitable geographic origin, particularly for fresh-cut melon and kiwifruit products; noting seasonal variations where appropriate.  Minimising process damage, notably by using larger cut sizes.  The use of optimum storage atmospheres by selecting packaging with appropriate gas barrier properties and ultimately, by employing precise package design methodology to ensure that optimal gas atmospheres are maintained throughout storage.  Storage at 4OC or below.

Attention to these details will significantly improve the quality of fresh-cut fruit products available to Irish and international consumers. This in turn will contribute to the ideation, viability and success of these novel fruit products in the marketplace for years to come.

286

Appendices

These Appendices are an introduction to the preliminary experimentations which determined how this project would progress and/or were supplementary data central to the structure of the major chapters and discussions in this dissertation.

288

Appendix A – Questionnaire

This Appendix (A) gives a brief overview of consumer’s attitudes and preferences towards fresh, and in particular, fresh-cut fruit products. Appendix A is also an introduction to preliminary experimentation (Appendix B) which determined how subsequent research chapters (2-5) would progress and were central to general discussions.

Introduction

The strive for convenience and value for money is ever present, however, the stagnant economic climate in which we reside has slowed sales of fresh and fresh-cut fruits in recent times. These purchases are often viewed as indulgent, luxurious and impulsive with the majority of consumers seeking value for money over nutrition leading to significant differences in dietary patterns. One approach to achieving optimum fruit intake is to serve attractive and convenient fruit based snacks that could easily be eaten out of context of main meals. Therefore optimising already available fresh-cut fruit based snacks may be a valid solution to increasing fruit intakes amongst consumers. Several reports have highlighted the possibility of raising product profiles of fresh-cut fruit by presenting them in a more attractive way. However, this attractiveness, coupled with the increased pace of technology change, has resulted in inferior quality packs that are, in actual fact, not highly sought after by consumers in many cases. In this aspect, sensory and consumer preferences of fresh-cut fruit products are highly appropriate disciplines to engage in. The purpose of this questionnaire was to gain an understanding of the forces that drive consumer purchases with respect to fresh and fresh-cut products. Key areas pertaining to fresh-cut fruit product quality needs and deterioration that might be opened to technical intervention, were identified. Other latent information gathered by this questionnaire aimed to identify consumer segments, strategies and habits which inadvertently would help stimulate the viability of these products, increase fresh-cut sales, all the while improving consumption patterns.

289

Appendix A.1.: Copy of Ethics Approval Certificate

290

Appendix A.2: Design methodology

This questionnaire was sent out during two seasons over a 6 month period (Summer/Autumn 2013 and Winter/Spring 2013/14). The research and information gathered used both quantitative and qualitative methodology in order to get a sense of consumer attitudes in Ireland regarding fresh-cut fruit products. Through primarily random consumer evaluations, one of the aims of this study was to try and define and elucidate important attitudes and determinants as well as consumer responses towards fresh-cut fruit products. It was hoped to try and develop optimisation strategies for these products, targeted at consumers. Many determinants, both conscious and insentient, contribute to consumer food choice. Sensory attributes, as well as social and cultural influences; mood and emotions; product expectations generated from information and packaging; situational and market factors; learning and previous learning experiences; and our bodily state, all contribute to this choice. Therefore, given the huge number of factors involved, predicting consumer food choice is very difficult (Cardello 1995; Gibson 2006). In this survey, consumer attitudes and behaviour towards fresh-cut products were assumed to be highly dependent several determinants, such as, on the product itself (visual appearance, overall quality perception), the person perceiving the product (age, gender, marital status, and occupation), whether or not they consumed fresh-cut fruits and their attitudes towards fresh-cut fruit products) and interrelated determinants i.e. product cost, value for money and safety. These determinants are only a few of many determinants that could possibly affect consumer choices. Other determinants include social context, exposure, labelling and use of media for effective knowhow and were studied to a minimal context. However the previous determinants studied were chosen as they were of high importance from a sensory and consumer science perspective. In context, the overall aim of this evaluation was to assess consumers’ attitudes and responses toward fresh-cut fruits. It was pre-determined that these responses are highly affected by the initial visual quality of the packs, the perceived complexity of the fresh-cut fruit products as well as expectations and perceived determinants of the consumer. The outputs should provide coveted knowledge about consumers and their attitudes in recent times towards fresh-cut fruit products. For research, as well as industry innovation, this knowledge is valued in a sector where consumers have

291 immense influences over the viability of particular products through their own attitudes, preferences and choices. Furthermore, this knowledge should help improve our understanding of fresh-cut fruit quality and perception by consumers and help generate optimum products, with selective availability with exceptional quality and sustained SL.

292

Appendix A.3 Copy of Questionnaire entitled: “A context for change: Consumers Attitudes and Preferences Concerning Fresh-cut Fruit Products.”

Explanatory Cover Letter (Email):

Hi all,

I seek participants from the ages of 18-65 to partake in a short 10 minute questionnaire entitled: A context for change: consumer attitudes and behaviours concerning fresh-cut fruit products.

The survey endeavours to assess consumer’s attitudes and preferences concerning Fresh-cut Fruits.

Please click on the below link to complete the questionnaire. http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/RR6FX2J

Thanking you in advance for your time. Kind regards Elizabeth

N.B.: By clicking the above link, the participant is deemed to consent, though he or she can withdraw at any time.

293

Explanatory cover letter (Questionnaire):

Thank you in advance for your kindness in partaking in this questionnaire and in helping me with my research. I am a postgraduate researcher in the Food Science Research Centre within the Department of Life Sciences, at the University of Limerick. I am currently carrying out studies in the area of fruit quality research. I am very interested in your attitudes and preferences towards fresh-cut fruit products.

Nowadays, strive for convenience is ever present, however, the stagnant economic climate in which we reside has slowed sales of fresh-cut fruit in recent times. These purchases are often viewed by many as indulgent, luxurious and impulsive, with the majority of consumers seeking value for money over nutrition, leading to significant differences in dietary patterns.

The purpose of this survey was to gain an understanding of the forces that drive consumer purchases with respect to fresh and fresh-cut products. Key areas pertaining to fresh-cut fruit product quality needs and deterioration and that might be opened to technical intervention, will be identified. Other latent information gathered by this questionnaire aims to identify consumer segments, strategies and habits which inadvertently would help stimulate the viability of these products, increase fresh-cut sales, all the while improving consumption patterns.

This questionnaire will cover questions relating to consumer purchasing, attitudes towards fresh-cut fruits in terms of the attributes influencing consumer intentions to purchase, as well as the factors that influence consumer preferences concerning these commodities. There is no right or wrong answer. Your opinion is what matters most. The answers are completely confidential and will not connect you to your responses in any way. Participants have the right not to answer questions and can withdraw from the survey at any time. Should you have any queries regarding this questionnaire please don’t hesitate to contact us. The relevant contact details of the primary researcher, primary supervisor and the Chairperson of the Science & Engineering Research Ethics Committee (S&E REC) are given below.

Primary researcher: [email protected] Primary supervisor: [email protected] Chair of S&E REC: [email protected] Phone: +353(0)61-202802.

294

Copy of Questionnaire

1. Tell me a bit about yourself... Gender: Female Male Age: 18-25 26-40 41-65 >65 Marital status: single cohabiting married separated divorced widowed Occupation: Lifestyle: Local shopping district: Average weekly spend on groceries (€): 0-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 >200 Average weekly spend on fresh fruit and vegetables (not including fruit drinks or prepared salad, fruit and/or vegetables) (€): 0-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 >200

Additional information (children, etc):

2. How often do you consume fresh fruit? Never Less than (<) once a month Daily Once a week 2 to 3 times a week More than (>) 5 times a week 1 to 3 times a month More than (>) 5 times a month

If you selected ‘Never’, please indicate reason(s) as to why.

3. When you think of FRESH-CUT FRUIT products, what do you think of? Please list as many FRESH-CUT FRUIT products as you can!

295

4. Please rank in order of choice your preferred or regularly used source of information on fresh-cut fruit products.

Preferred Regular Health Practitioner Package Labelling Friends (word of mouth) TV Radio Internet Social Media/ Magazines Supermarket Staff

5. How often do you purchase fresh fruit in a processed format? Never Less than (<) once a month Daily Once a week 2 to 3 times a week More than (>) 5 times a week 1 to 3 times a month More than (>) 5 times a month

If you selected ‘Never’, please indicate reason(s) as to why.

6. When are you most likely to purchase fresh-cut fruits? Periods of good weather (sunny) Periods of bad weather (rain) All year round None of the time

If you selected ‘None of the time’, please give a reason(s) as to why.

296

7. What influences your decision to purchase fresh-cut fruits? You may select more than one!

Visual appeal of product Lifestyle Health promoting benefits Curiosity Weather Word of mouth Value/ price Other (please specify below)

8. Where do you consume the majority of fresh-cut fruit products At home On the go (travelling – car, bus, train, etc.) In the office Recreational activities (i.e. picnics)

9. If you purchased a fresh-cut product, please rate your overall satisfaction of the product in terms of the following:

Satisfied Very satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Quality

Flavour (Taste & Aroma)

Value for money (price)

If you were ‘dissatisfied’ or ‘very dissatisfied’ with your purchase please give a reason(s) as to why.

10. Based on your overall level of satisfaction (Be it positive or negative), are you likely to purchase a fresh-cut fruit product(s) again? YES NO Please give a brief explanation as to why you selected ‘YES’ or ‘NO’.

297

Appendix A.4: Summary of the main findings from the questionnaire entitled: “A context for change: Consumers Attitudes and Preferences Concerning Fresh and Fresh-cut Fruit Products.”

Consumer analysis is the sensory method that deals with affective and subjective measurements of products. The main objective when using this method is to try to quantify the relative preference or degree of acceptance of a set of products (Lawless and Heymann 2010). This can be done either by determining consumer preference for one product over another (preference testing), or by allowing respondents to rate a certain product on a hedonic scale according to their liking or other relevant affective parameters (acceptance testing) (Lawless and Heymann 2010). Acceptance testing gives interval or ratio data directly unlike preference methods, where choices are given and intervals are indirectly measured (Thurstone 1928). The results retrieved in consumer analysis depend greatly on the evaluation techniques used. Opinion differs as to which of the existing testing methods are the best and it seems to be heavily dependent on particular factors such as sample size and product (Hein et al., 2008; Jaeger et al., 2008; Lim, 2011). In this study, some 66% of 100 participants were female while the remaining 34% were male. Of those, 29% ranged in age from 18-25, 48% from 26-40, and 23% 41-65 and lived moderately active (45%), active (24%) and stressed (13%) lifestyles respectively. Their occupancies ranged from students, educators, healthcare professionals and financiers (in order of percentage).

In general, respondents believe that fresh and fresh-cut fruits are good for you, are somewhat nutritious, prevent diseases, promote energy, and are convenient while some passed comment that processed foods were for “lazy” people. On the other hand, they highlighted that some whole fruits are not so hard to prepare (you can pop a whole apple or banana in your bag for lunch without need for processing), have more superior taste and are better value for money than their processed counterparts. However respondents did comment that some larger fruits like pineapple and melon, although cheaper, are not something they would buy unless they had the time and amenities to prepare them as they were not efficient in terms of convenience and portion control for a particular individual on the go.

298

When asked “When you think of Fresh-cut Fruits what do you think of?” respondents were very detailed and listed a wide variety of fruits. Although, it is worth mentioning that many fruits are not, in a technical sense, “fresh-cut”. Figure A.1 shows the more popular fresh-cut fruits listed by consumers.

50

45

40 35

cut" Fruits cut" 30 - 25 20 15 10 5

listed by respondantsby listed 0

Percentage of"Fresh Percentage Pear Apple Plums Melon Mango Grapes Papaya Orange Peaches Cherries Bananas Kiwifruit Rhubarb Pineapple Grapefruit Nectarines Strawberry Blueberries Raspberries Passionfruit Sharon fruit Sharon fruit Dragon Figure A.1 Percentage of “Fresh-cut” fruits recognised by respondents. (n=90)

It is obvious that the more common fruits traditionally found in fresh-cut form had the greatest popularity amongst respondents with apple, pineapple and melon coming out as clear favourites. However, it wasn’t surprising that many respondents listed strawberries and grapes as fresh-cut, as these fruits, although not minimally processed to the extremes of pineapple or melon are commonly used fresh-cut fruit salad components. Overall, respondents were very aware of the choices of fruits available to them and it is clear looking through the list that the availability of certain exotic fruits is very prevalent in Irish supermarkets. This may be due to the travelling experiences of consumers which in turn provoke supermarkets to accommodate the need for variety/ choice. With 91% of respondents stating they spend in the range of €0-€50 and a further 7% stating they spend a staggering €50-€100 per weekly shop on fresh fruit and vegetables, it was interesting to find out what percentage of those actually consumed fresh fruit on a daily basis, especially when 63% of person’s asked were single and only 30% married (with children). Figure A.2 shows that a pleasing 61% of those asked, said they consume fresh fruit on a daily basis with 14% saying they

299

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fresh Fruits Fresh Daily Never Percentage consumption of consumption Percentage 1-3 1-3 month > 5 a week 5 > a < 1 month < a Once a week Once 2-3 times a week 2-3 times consume fruit 2-3 times a week. A further 11% stated they eat fresh fruit once per week and a worrying 6% claimed they would only eat fresh fruit less than once a month and only do so because it is recommended to. Interestingly, a survey carried out by Bord Bia (2010) found similar results with the average consumer spending €26 on fruit, however an increase in portions being consumed suggested falling prices at retail levels corresponding to earlier suggestions regarding price and profitability. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fresh Fruits Fresh

Daily

Never Percentage consumption of consumption Percentage 1-3 1-3 month 5 week > a < 1 month < a a week Once 2-3 times a week 2-3 times Figure A.2 Fresh Fruit consumption patterns (n=100)

45 40 35 30 25 cut Fruits cut

- 20 15 10 5 0

Daily Never

of frequency Percentage purchases ofFresh purchases 1-3 1-3 month < 1 month < a a week Once 2-3 times a week 2-3 times Figure A.3 Percentage frequency of purchases of Fresh-cut Fruits (n=99)

However, when asked “How often do you purchase fruit in a processed format?” results were not as appetising. Figure A.3 shows the average percentage purchases of fresh-cut fruit (excluding juices, tinned/canned and frozen fruit) and details that 40% of people surveyed only purchased fruit in FC format less than once a month

300

with a surprising 31% stating they ‘NEVER’ purchase fresh-cut fruits while only 16% admitted to purchasing fresh-cut packs once a week. Outlining their reasons as to their previous answer, a pattern in potential barriers was observed and these are displayed in Figure A.4 below. Some of the chief obstacles preventing consumers purchasing these products were price, nutritional and environmental concerns, freshness and trust. Some of the comments made were:  “More expensive than buying whole fruit and cutting yourself; whole melon costs on average 69c in supermarkets while fresh-cut melon costs €2 and what you are getting is the weight equivalent of one slice; price versus volume = rip-off”.  “Overpriced!! Would only purchase when travelling (e.g. at airports) if there was no other option available i.e. whole apple, banana or orange”.  “I am led to believe that buying fruit already prepared does not provide the same level of nutrition as whole fruits. For example: most of the vitamin C of the cut fruit will be diminished after 20 minutes of its exposure to fresh air!”  “Not so fresh, occasionally the unsold, bad fruits are used in the production of these products. Don’t look or taste or smell the same preparing whole fruit yourself.”  “I don’t like the preservatives/ additives they put on them to keep them fresh while the plastic package (toxic) is bad for the environment, so I will not buy these products.” 45 40 35

30 25 20 15 cut Fruits cut - 10 5 0

Cost Purchasing Fresh Purchasing Fresh Not

Potential Barriers for Consumers when Consumers for Barriers Potential Lazy Alternative Lazy Nutritional Value Nutritional Trust/ Confidence Trust/

Poor Quality/Taste

Additive/ Preservative/ Environmental Concern Environmental Figure A.4 Potential barriers for consumers when purchasing fresh-cut fruits. (n=70)

301

In Ireland, many fruits are sold as raw, intact products. Whole pieces of fruits (apples) and a small selection of fresh-cut fruit (sliced apple, combination packs) are such examples. However, in most instances, these fresh-cut fruit products are normally displayed alongside or relatively near whole products. Besides developing an actual fresh-cut fruit product, it would lead one to assume that marketing and exploitation of these products needs to be reviewed as pricing and promotion are high regarded as unequal with significant differences in prices between that of the whole product visibly recognisable and highly observed by consumers. However, while cost and quality remain fundamental obstacles that need to be challenged, the latter obstacles are areas that are gravely misconceived. Most people are of the understanding that the fruits themselves are “bad” quality and are “tampered” with in some way with added ‘harmful preservatives and additives’ to make them more appealing and fresher looking for longer. In a general sense this is not always the case for majority of fresh-cut products in the market as food labelling regulations request that all additives and preservatives are cited on packages. In terms of environmental concerns, most producers are aware that cutting their carbon footprint will not only do wonders for the environment but also their reputation and in turn favour their profit margins. Some 30% of consumers remarked that some fresh produce had too much packaging and that they would only resort to purchasing packaged fruits if indeed there was no other option available to them. Fruit used for fresh-cut processing must be of the highest quality in order to reach the consumer in as fresh like of state as possible (Warren, 2012). For that reason high grades and classes can only be used in processing refuting the claims made by many respondents that the fruit used for fresh-cut production are usually “bad” quality and fruits that are unsold in supermarkets. One can understand peoples’ misconceptions regarding the aforementioned topic when purchasing substandard packages of fresh-cut fruits. The lack of flavour/taste and inferior visual quality is something that processors are trying to amend. Trust and confidence in a particular product is something that is hard to achieve, especially since the recent horse meat scandal that has rocked Europe (2013) and major Listeria outbreak of 2012 in Colorado affecting cantaloupe melons that resulted in many deaths. If consumers see that the products in which they are expected to purchase are not of superior standard or consistent quality how can they trust the product?

302

In addition, the Irish consumer market is also highly weather dependent, with many consumers admitting to only purchasing and consuming fresh-cut fruit products during periods of good weather (39%) and being less interested when the weather is bad (rainy) (4%) which given out climatic reputation does no favours for the industry. Product profile in Ireland is at present limited to a few fruit e.g. soft and pome fruits. In peak season, fresh native fruits such as strawberries are available in surplus and while in glut season (off-season) the Irish availability depends heavily on imports and availability of these produce in certain regions (Bord Bia, 2009). Therefore, technology (such as fresh-cut) has become a necessity to improve consumption of horticultural commodities in glut season. However some 33% of consumers did state that weather was not a barrier and that they would purchase fresh-cut fruit products all year round because they wanted to, provided the product looked good and of sound quality. Similarly, Bourke (2010) found that 57% of consumers said they varied their fresh fruit and vegetable purchases according to season.

Respondents were then asked to list their preferred and regularly used sources of information regarding fresh-cut products (Figure A.5).

100 80

60

40 20 Regular 0 Preferred

PreferredRegularand Sources of Informationregarding Food products

Figure A.5 Preferred and regular sources of information regarding food products.

In terms of preferred sources, food packaging/ labelling led the way with 47% while the internet was the least preferred source coming it at only 19%. A similar trend followed through with regularly used sources with 58% of respondents relying heavily on food packaging/ labelling as their regular source of information on

303 products while social media sources came were regarded as unreliable by some people and came in at 19%. From this it is clear that trust in the food producer (in terms of packaging) is of utmost importance to the consumer when trying to educate themselves on a product/ service. The supermarket and word of mouth are also heavily relied upon; therefore in-store product display and quality need to be superior if a product is to do well.

When asked “What influences your decision to purchase fresh-cut fruits?” those who answered based their decision on price>visual-appeal>health benefits>lifestyle>curiosity (Figure A.6).

35

30 25 20 cut Fruits cut

- 15 10 5 0 Purchase Fresh Purchase Factors Influencing Decision to to Decision Influencing Factors Lifestyle Curiosity Weather Value/ Price Value/ Benefits Visual Visual Appeal Word Word of Mouth Health Health Promoting

Figure A.6 Factors influencing decisions to purchase fresh-cut fruits (n=82)

Again, cost remains as the biggest factor influencing purchasing decisions with 31% of consumers making it their first priority. Visual appeal of the product comes a close second with 21% of consumers remarking that if they can see that the fruit is very fresh and reasonably priced they are more likely to purchase it. Appearance is of great importance in our acceptance and rejection of a food. It is often the first major stimulus that is presented to the consumer and the main one influencing consumer expectations and choosing whether or not to look out for a particular product again. If something looks appetising then it should taste appetising. The visual properties produce positive sensations leading to acceptance or negative sensations leading to rejection. To increase intake of a fruit by introducing fresh-cut fruit products, consumers need to firstly be attracted to them, secondly have them as their first 304 choice and lastly consume them and more importantly enjoy them. In competition with other food brands and products, the appearance of fresh-cut fruit sometimes loses out where packaging needs are concerned as most consumers view the contained products as inferior quality to intact counterparts. Therefore, it is no surprise that the health promoting benefits of fresh-cut comes third in the list of purchasing priorities with 15% of consumers perceiving that whole fruits contain more nutritional value than cut fruit. Lifestyle factors ranked fourth in order of influential priorities with 8% of respondents commenting that convenience and mood as their sole rationale for making this decision. Curiosity, word of mouth and the weather had no significant contribution to consumers’ rationale for decision making ranking 5th, 6th and 7th respectively.

As convenience is behind much of the innovation of fresh-cut products, people were asked ‘Where do you consumer the majority of your fresh-cut fruit purchases?’ Interestingly, Figure A.4 illustrated that of the 84% people who admitted to purchasing FCF products, 44% consume these products at home, while 38% admitted to eating them on-the-go with only 13% and 5% eating them in the office or on picnics respectively. When asked to rate their overall satisfaction of their a fresh-cut fruit product based on quality, flavour/taste and value for money people had more of a concern over their value for money rather than on the quality of the end-product (Figure A.7).

100 90

80 Very Satisfied 70 60 Satisfied

50 Neither Satisfied/ Dissatisfied 40 30 Dissatisfied Percentage Satisfaction 20 Very Dissatisfied 10

0 Quality Flavour/Taste Value for Money

Figure A.7 Overall satisfaction rating of fresh-cut product (n=83)

305

These results are consistent with previous comments made by consumers with 42% of respondents being dissatisfied with their value for money. In terms of quality and flavour, 50% of respondents were satisfied with the overall quality of the products they purchased while 24% and 27% were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the quality and flavour. Most people who said they were dissatisfied remarked on quantity versus value for money as unacceptable while others highlighted that the product was too cold resulting in a lack of characteristic taste. Others commented on the fact that some fruits (example melon) are either un-ripe or over-ripe, while some remarked that you can’t estimate for quality by looking at pieces of cut fruit and with the packs (majority of the time) the fruits don’t taste good so they represent poor value for money. Bourke, 2010 found that display/ or in-store influence has diminished somewhat since 2006 with planned purchasing and price being more influential overall in 2010. Availability of quality produce on display is the largest influencing factor generating sales. Fresh appearance is also a key consideration with 16% of influence being attributed to this aspect.

Therefore, given the opportunity to purchase fresh-cut fruit again the majority was in favour of doing so (70%) while the remaining 30% said ‘no’ remarking that unless processors incorporate premium brands e.g. pink lady apples and high quality raw materials in to their packs, they will continue to purchase whole fruits. Others said they would only purchase the product again if it was on special offer; some people remarked on the inclusion of a ‘spork’ in ALL packs, as eating with your fingers is not very hygienic (especially when you are on the go). Some people would like to see more variety in terms of exotic fruits instead of the more traditional fruits which one could buy anywhere while others said they would only purchase a pack if they were truly stuck for something to eat with no other choices available. Bourke, 2010 found that 71% of respondents would be encouraged to increase their variety of purchases if prices were cheaper. 35% would need to be more aware of choices while 30% said if free in-store sampling were available they would be more likely to expand their purchases.

In summary, the quality of commercially produced fresh-cut fruits is relatively poor (in the eyes of the consumer). In terms of consumer attitudes and behaviours regarding fresh-cut fruit, a lot needs to be exercised in terms of educating the public on the topic. Getting value for money has and always will be at the

306 forefront of the consumers’ agenda when it comes to making purchasing decisions and this over-rides any nutritional benefits these novel products may bring. It can be seen that there is great market potential in fresh-cut fruits to steer us from bad eating habits, however we need to broaden our definition of ‘fresh-cut’ as well as marry these new trends and incorporate innovation into developing novel processing equipment in order to achieve superior quality. In order for a novel fresh-cut fruit product to succeed in the marketplace, it should provide good eating quality and be highly appealing to a range of ages.

Future Prospects and Technical Needs

There are a number of marketing strategies aimed at increasing sales; however, the fundamental ones based on the outcomes of this questionnaire are undoubtedly:

 Quality  Price  Safety

It has been said that the quality and variety of fruits available to the Irish consumer is excellent. In this context however, including the “right cultivar” for the “right consumer” is of critical importance (De la Calle et al., 2010). Moreover, it is known that the fresh-cut processing industry continuously needs to improve their technical support by renewing their processing techniques by introducing novel, emerging and alternative processing and preservation strategies which endeavour to reduce production losses and provide safer and higher quality products. Fruits are forecast to have a barely positive volume growth between 2012 and 2016 even though industry bodies, supported by government agencies, are striving to argue that peoples’ attitudes toward fruits needs to change and that fruit should be a part of everyday diets (Euromonitor International, 2012). Price and value for money play a key factor in this, however while volumes might increase, market value has come down so there is more pressure than ever on producers to come up with safe, innovative products at a reasonable price. In suit, 53% of food companies claim to be diversifying their product range, with 62% investing in new product development (NPD) (Grant Thornton, 2011). Standards still need to be met; and innovation and quality, and convenience and safety, will always warrant concern.

307

308

Appendix B - Supplementary Information for Chapter 1

This Appendix (B) contains supplementary data for Chapter 1 (Review of Literature) including table of available fruits for fresh-cut production in Ireland (Table B.1), the market for Irish fresh-cut fruit (B.2) and evaluation of commercial fresh-cut fruits (B3).

309

Appendix B.1 Table of acceptable fruit varieties and their corresponding origins available to Irish processors

Fruit Apple Melon Pineapple Grape Orange Kiwifruit Strawberry Champaka Granny Smith Cantaloupe Smooth Cayanne Flame seedless Salustiana Hayward Chandler Royal Gala Cantaline MD2 (Del Monte Gold) Tudor seedless Shamouti Festival

Braeburn Charentais Fyffes Extra Sweet Queen seedless Valencia Camarosa Golden Delicious Ruby seedless Navel Selva

Varieties Red Delicious Honeydew Kings Ruby seedless Midknight Evita

Crimson seedless Delta Seedless El Santa

Galia Ralli seedless Navelina Orly Thompson Seedless

France Spain Costa Rica USA Spain Italy U.K Chile Brazil Brazil Chile Israel New Zealand France Spain Israel Italy South Africa France Holland South Africa Ghana Israel Argentina Greece Spain New Zealand South Africa Egypt Uruguay Chile Belgium Honduras Mexico Spain U.S.A

Costa Rica South Africa South Africa Countries of Origin Spain Israel Spain Ireland Brazil Greece Israel Spain Ghana USA

South Africa Honduras Costa Rica

310

Appendix B.2 The market for fresh-cut fruit It has been regarded that consumers are increasingly aware of the health benefits of fresh fruits. Dietary guidelines in recent times have contributed to a worldwide increase in the consumption of fresh fruits as sources of key vitamins, antioxidants and dietary fibre; all of which are known for their own specific health promoting benefits in alleviating and preventing some common known illnesses. Fresh fruit consumption plays an integral part in maintaining a healthy diet. Fresh fruit, if consumed daily in sufficient amounts, could prevent such major diseases such as coronary heart disease, diabetes and even certain cancers. Moreover, consumption of fresh fruit and vegetables is a key component of school curriculum’s designed to tackle the epidemic of obesity (Matthews, 2006). The importance of fruit in the Irish diet was highlighted in a recently published North/South Ireland Food Consumption Survey. Fruit (and nuts) was found to contribute to only 6% of daily dietary carbohydrate intake and 8% of daily dietary fibre intake.

Since the 1980’s the concept of the food pyramid has evolved and transformed itself drastically (Figure B.1a). The traditional long-standing food pyramid contains the four normal food groups and rations within them your recommended daily values (RDV) for each group. People were once encouraged to eat 3-5 servings of vegetables and 2-4 servings of fruit. In 2005, the US food pyramid has had a drastic makeover (Figure B.1b) and as well as been made aware of the importance of healthy eating, the pyramid also promotes our RDV for exercise (USDA, 2005). The Irish nutrition and dietetic institute (INDI) recommend that persons consume 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables per day (Department of Health, 2012). The world health organisation (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organisation recommend the intake of a minimum of 400g of fruits and vegetables a day.

Figure B.1 Food Pyramid Concepts 1980 (a) and 2012 (b).

311

Consumers are encouraged to eat a rainbow of fruit and vegetables as variety is the key to acquiring all the essential vitamins, minerals, fibre, antioxidants and phyto- nutrients all present in different quantities in colourful produce. Green fruit and vegetables contain adequate amounts of vitamins C & E and useful amounts of fibre, calcium, magnesium, folate as well as high levels of healthy mono-unsaturated fat. Blue or purple fruits and vegetables contain anthocyanins which as antioxidants help neutralise free radicals which are responsible for cell damage. White or pale yellow fruits and vegetables are good sources of potassium which maintains fluid balance and allicin which stimulates the immune system. Orange fruits and vegetables are rich sources of beta- (β) carotene which is an antioxidant that is converted into vitamin A (when in short supply). Red fruits and vegetables are rich in vitamin C and contain lycopene.

In the last few decades there have been some major changes in food consumption habits. With the sustained promotion of the healthy eating benefits of fruit consumption, there has been renewed commercial interest and a surge of research in the area of fresh-cut produce. There has been increased consumer attraction to the benefits of eating fresh fruit in recent times and this coupled with travelling experiences and increased media exposure to ethnic foods helped to develop a growing market for exotic and minor fruits.

The effects of poor diets on health and has led authorities to devise strategies to boost consumption and increase the awareness through campaigns aimed at the general public to the benefits of eating fresh fruit and vegetables. The 5-a-day campaign introduced by the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK is one most generally recognised. The 5-a-day programme aims to change the way people think and highlight the benefits of eating more fruit and vegetables. It entitles school-going children to one free piece of fruit or vegetable per day (NHS, 2009). Supermarkets have also gotten behind the initiative, with Marks and Spencer introducing the 5-a- day logo on all their ready meals provided they contain at least 1 of 5-a-day (Figure B.2).

312

Figure B.2: The 5-a-day logos present on some Marks and Spencer branded foods.

(Source: Marks and Spencer, PLC, 2009)

International travelling has led the exposure of people to new foods and food related experiences. Tropical fruits in particular, are of rapid demand in societies where the effects of climate affect their growth (Chonhenchob et al., 2007). Moreover, the growing diaspora of populations and proliferation of foreign travel, immigration and urbanisation fuels the demand and growth of tropical fruit within the EU, in particular the UK (James and Ngarmsak, 2011). Nowadays, many fruits including tropical fruits can be consumed just hours after being harvested thanks to advances in technology and food processing techniques and increased importation in Ireland. In 2003, fruit and vegetable imports into the Republic were valued at €344 million. (SafeFood, 2007) with fresh-cut pineapple, melon (in particular watermelon and cantaloupe) and mixed fruit combinations dominating worldwide market shares (Figure B.3).

Figure B.3 Estimated worldwide market shares for fresh-cut fruit products in 2003 Source: Purdue New Ventures 2005.

Fruits such as blueberries, cranberries and pomegranates are examples of ‘super’ fruits which are now being included in fresh-cut packages. The problem is, with the

313 inclusion of these new tropical fruits with our traditional fruits, product inconsistency problems are emerging. However, innovation of fresh-cut fruits is at the cutting-edge of food processing technology. Emerging consumer trends offer new revenue and profit opportunities for companies. The desire for fresh-like products has toughened the demand for mildly processed commodities which have good sensorial appeal and high nutrient quality. The fresh fruit and vegetable market is of particular relevance since the EU is the largest importer of fresh fruit and vegetables in the world, accounting for 27% of the value of world fruits and vegetable imports (intra-EU trade excluded) in 2007 (UN, 2008). Global trade in fresh fruit and vegetables has increased by 16% from 2003 to 2007 with the EU share of world imports increasing from 26% to 35% for fruits and from 10% to 15% for vegetables in the same period. Typical for fresh fruit, price data is highly volatile with regular incidences of extreme values recognised by processors and consumers alike. This may be caused by the high variability of market supplies resulting from irregular size and timing of harvest caused by changing weather conditions, and seasonality of the supply. Also, the short-run supply elasticity is low and can be balanced out only to a low degree by storage due to the high perishability of the products. Furthermore, seasonally changing composition of the supply of differing origin may imply changing price regimes prevailing in a market throughout a year. These particularities may pose an extra challenge to processing of fresh-cut fruit, especially in Ireland where imports are heavily relied on. For example, seasonally restricted supply implies that the quality of certain commodities is discontinuous which often than not results in inconsistent end-product quality.

Food industries in recent years have focused intensely on cost reduction and improved operation efficiency. All the while, there is a continued need for these novel products to be marketed in a well-defined way to appropriate consumers (Grant Thornton, IBR, 2011). Fresh-cut apples were first fruit introduced to restaurants in the 1980s and marketed as pre-prepared produce in this fast moving foodservice sector (Rabobank, 2009). In the 5 years prior to 2009, the market of fresh-cut ready to eat fruits observed consummate growth. The UK, which is the market leader in fresh-cut produce in Europe, exemplifies how the market may flourish in continental Europe. In 2008, the continental European fresh-cut fruits and vegetable market was estimated as €3.4 billion. Figures for market trends in the UK

314 show a greater than 30% increase in two years with an estimated worth of £8.34billion (Research and Markets, 2009). The retail market in Ireland displayed a similar market pattern and is the most important market for sales of fresh produce. In 2005, the soft fruit sector in Ireland was worth close to €290 million (Dept. of Agriculture and Food Annual Report, 2005). In 2007, the Irish retail market for fresh produce was valued at €1.2billion which was a 14.2% increase compared to 2005 while the retail value of prepared products in Ireland amounted to €55million with fruit making up 45.4% of sales (Bord Bia, 2007).

In Asian markets, fresh-cut fruit is more commonly sold in open-air markets and food stalls and is becoming popular in some supermarkets. Often these products are displayed without refrigeration so their SL is frequently not extended beyond their point of display for immediate consumption. Interestingly this does not compromise on quality with FC produce only being processed in volumes by need rather than excess (James and Ngarmsak, 2011). In Japan and Korea, the fresh-cut produce market reached approximately US $2.6 billion in 2005 and $1.1 billion in 2006, respectively. In the US, the per capita consumption of fresh fruits increased dramatically by 19% in 1999 with sales from 2000 to 2006 jumping from $10billion to $16billion respectively (Research and Markets, 2009; Rabobank, 2009).

This trend in increased consumption was expected to continue through to 2020, with fruit consumption increasing to 27% (Clemens, 2004). A number of consumer market research reports in the past predicted that the demand for FC products would continue to increase both in Europe and the US, with food service facilities and school lunch programs being major customers (Euromonitor International, 2012).

315

Table B.2 Sale of fresh-cut fruit in millions by geography; in the period from 2004-2009.

Millions 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Ireland (€) 0.86 1.03 1.19 1.36 1.47

UK (£) 114.0 136.0 156.06 173.23 186.31

USA ($) 582.0 717.50 781.36 787.40 796.03

Western EU ($) 273.40 379.50 489.90 564.50 585.60

Worldwide ($) 1,404.20 1629.90 1810.80 1980.30 1997.50

(Source: Euromonitor International, 2010)

Table 1.1 illustrates Ireland’s fresh-cut fruit financial sales status and compares it to that of the UK, US, Western Europe and the total world’s sales. It shows steady growth in fresh-cut fruit market 2005-2009, however, in a European and international context, both the fresh-cut fruit market, as seen in Table B.2, and the horticultural industry on the island of Ireland are quite small. Nevertheless, they play a significant economic role as an important, indigenous industry providing full-time employment for around 4500 in the Republic (Bord Bia, 2010). Therefore, continued support and growth of this sector is imperative.

Table B.3 illustrates forecasted sales of fresh-cut fruits per annum from 2011-2015 which shows a steady increase for Ireland.

Millions 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Ireland (€) 1.58 1.62 1.65 1.67 1.73

UK (£) 198.71 203.58 208.05 212.11 217.13

USA ($) 826.98 892.31 1,101.18 1,096.79 1,100.20

(Source: Euromonitor International, 2010)

Table B.3 illustrates Ireland’s forecasted sales per annum from 2011 to 2015 (Euromonitor International, 2010) and compares it to and United States of America, showing expected sales increase. However, due to the economic circumstances in recent time, sales for fresh-cut fruit are now showing slight decline. In the EU, ongoing low profitability at producer and processor levels has been causing significant declines in the production base for some agricultural products

316

such as fresh-cut fruits. From an Irish perspective, any further losses in the Irish supply base will have further long-term consequences for the security of urban and local supplies of certain products on a year round basis (Bord Bia, 2010).

Impact of economic decline on Fresh and Fresh-cut Fruit commodity sales The global market has seen massive changes over the past few of years that forecasted sales as presented in Table B.3 could not have perceived. However, while the EU market has seen unprecedented growth over the last decade, the Irish market has yet to flourish. Many of the fresh-cut fruit products sold in Ireland are regarded as “high-value” or “luxury” items. In each sector of the fresh-cut market, producers compete on quality, variety of fruits, range of products, novelty packages and of course price (Appendix A). The global recession has hit fresh food sales hard and this has impacted greatly on peoples’ behaviour directly. Fresh and fresh-cut fruit sales have not been exempt from these shifts in attitude or behaviour with the economic downturn causing stagnation (in some cases even decline) in fresh fruit sales, with minimal growth rates the best most products can expect.

Lets’ look at the paradox that is Ireland, and problems accumulating to changes in consumer attitudes in recent times:

 IMF (>€85 billion) bailout to be footed by tax payers – announced in November 2010.  Approximately €20 billion taken from Irish economy following subsequent budget cuts (2011-2012).  Reduced services and quality of life with recruitment freezes and closures in public sector services; Gardaí, HSE, Fire Stations and Post Offices etc.  Falling house prices coupled with implementation of household and water taxes leaving >50,000 mortgages in arrears and placing greater than one-third of house owners in negative equity.  Record breaking rainfall and floods (June 2012/ March 2013) leading to catastrophic horticultural losses and product yields with increased prices for perishable goods.  Increase in the numbers of people seeking emigration (numbers not seen since mid- 80s).

317

Therefore, given all these misfortunes hitting our economy in recent times, it is not surprising that people are becoming ever cautious about their money and how they choose to spend it. Finnegan, 2013 (Appendix A.1), highlighted a number of potential barriers for consumers when buying fresh and FCF. These included (in order of importance);

1. Cost 2. Lack of knowledge about raw materials 3. Nutritional status (Fresh Intact versus Fresh-cut) 4. Inferior quality products (Appearance and Flavour) 5. Food safety issues (news headlines, Listeria outbreaks etc) 6. Lack of convenience (exclusion of a ‘spork’ in some packs) and variety.

There is clear evidence that many consumers are trading down their standard weekly shop in favour for value and cutting back on so-called “luxuries” in favour of specific food essentials. Fruit sales in the UK and Ireland declined overall in 2011 with consumers worryingly moving away from healthy foods in favour of cheaper alternatives (canned, frozen and preserved preferences) (Euromonitor International, 2012). This comes as no surprise with pubs and restaurants reporting lower bodies as people opt for eating and drinking at home (Vintners Federation of Ireland, 2012). FCF lost both dollar sales and volume at retail level in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the previous year, according to United Fresh Produce Association’s Fresh Facts on Retail report prepared by The Perishables Group.

In Ireland, decline in fresh fruit and vegetable purchases have been reported across all demographics, though especially in lower income households. The most popular fruits of apples, bananas and oranges all suffered declines in 2011 coupled with figures from the UK’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) showing poor households in the UK cutting back the most. Those in the lowest income bracket bought almost a third (30%) less fruit in 2011 than in 2006. A similar trend was observed in Ireland in 2006-2010 as reported by Bourke (2010), who found that the incidence of shoppers purchasing from convenience stores has fallen back by 6%, potentially driven by changes in consumers’ discretionary spending power. Shoppers are becoming less loyal and impulsive and more restrained in their shopping behaviour shopping around for cheaper prices more

318 often. Furthermore, the level of volatility in global food commodity prices generates significant unease for Irish producers in terms of market returns. While the rise in global food prices, which reached a peak in 2008, is to be welcomed by certain industry sectors, it comes with the negative effect of surging raw material and logistic costs for the minimally processed and prepared food sector (Bourke, 2010). This has hit fresh food prices hard, especially those imported tropical and sub- tropical fruits and vegetables. Bigger retailers have been able to absorb these shocks much better than smaller independent retailers who suffered drastic decline in their market share as they have their already lesser margins cut even more. At the same time, small independent retailers and mid-market companies are becoming increasingly dependent on suppliers and channel partners for innovation, while larger multiples enjoy the financial scale necessary for NPD and technology investment (Grant Thornton, 2011). With growing market competition and greater access to information, shoppers have evolved to cope with the volatility in food prices giving shoppers increased power to shop around and demand more value for their money. This coupled with slower consumer spending means “The Smart Shopper” is coming increasingly to the fore as a key consumer lifestyle trend in Ireland (Bord Bia, 2009- 2011).

Furthermore, against the unimaginable backdrop of the financial crisis which is being portrayed in the media, our food producers and retailers are also struggling to respond accordingly (Bord Bia, 2009-2011). High commodity prices combined with sluggish consumer spends limit the ability of food companies to raise their prices. Retailers are keen to drive costs down in any way they can in order to retain some profit. However, maintaining consumer acceptance at this lower cost is a major challenge to the fresh-cut industry. This may help explain the inferior quality fresh- cut fruit packs which grace our supermarket shelves and the negative response of consumers towards them. Christie (2010) highlighted that nearly every category of the fresh-cut segment lost both volume and dollar sales, with average prices also falling. In effect supermarket multiples are acute to stress they are stocking as much locally produced, Irish food as possible (when in season).

With the Irish climate naturally restricting the growth of many fruits, fruits such as citrus fruits, bananas, grapes and pineapples etc., imports are therefore a necessity to supply the all-year round market needs and demand from major

319 supermarket multiples such as Superquinn, Dunnes Stores, Tesco and Marks and Spencers. Fruits are widely distributed and depending on their distribution are classified into sub-tropical; tropical and temperate. The main advantage of Irish grown fruit is freshness, quality and local availability, however, these traits are sometimes hard to achieve as the location of growers (and processors) is influenced by a range of factors including soil type and climate and this in turn determines crop variety.

As well as tropical fruit imports there are certain domestic fruits, that even though can be successfully grown in Ireland, need to be imported to meet domestic market needs. This can be attributed to seasonal climatic and long-term storage constraints. In addition, EU import prices of some kinds of fresh fruits (oranges) are highly influenced by the EU entry price system (EPS). In combination with ad valorem taxes of up to 20% the EPS aims to protect EU growers of 15 kinds of selected fruits and vegetables against international competition. Although the amount of locally produced fresh fruit and vegetables has in many instances not increased, there has been a proliferation in marketing exploits amongst retail multiples deliberately engineered to show they are more committed to buying directly from the Irish economy than others. In actual fact, this has been in response to fluctuating global prices with many retailers favouring buying goods as close to home as possible rather than risk ambiguity regarding inflation and transport costs (Euromonitor International, 2012).

Widespread domestic production of certain fruit and vegetables such as strawberries and mushrooms exists, however, fruit crops grown in Ireland tend to be seasonal and are categorised under two broad descriptions. Fruits grown on trees or in orchards are referred to as ‘Top’ fruit or fruit grown ‘above the ground’ (e.g. apples, pears & plums), and ‘Soft’ fruit which is the generic description for fruit and berries grown on runners, canes or bushes or ‘at or near the ground’ (e.g. strawberries, raspberries & blueberries). With the majority of fruit crops being seasonal, the arrival of new season Irish grown fruit on the market is widely anticipated by consumers each year thus increasing the demand for fruits, especially soft fruits, in the summer months, hence the term ‘summer fruit’. The main crops grown for further processing in Ireland are apples, strawberries, raspberries and blackcurrants which are commonly used for cider production, juicing, jam making, baking and canning and not FC

320 production. The most important fresh market retail fruit lines sold are eating and cooking apples, strawberries and raspberries.

Nevertheless, the need for convenience and freshness and high nutritional value products still lives on with consumers seeking stronger relationships than ever with the products and brands they regularly buy.

321

322

Appendix B.3: Evaluation of commercial fresh-cut fruit packs

Based on the findings from Appendix A, the quality evaluation of commercially available fresh-cut fruits was undertaken. Fresh-cut fruits were purchased from numerous multiples in the Limerick, Offaly and Westmeath regions, namely, Tesco, Dunnes Stores, SuperValu and Marks and Spencers.

The results from this study aimed to identify ‘key’ problematic fruits of interest, identify what typical deterioration symptoms were observed and assess the general quality of fresh-cut fruits as a whole.

Abstract

An evaluation of commercially available fresh-cut fruit packs was conducted from October 2008 to March 2010. A range of fresh-cut fruit packs from a range of popular supermarkets were evaluated. These evaluations gave valuable insights into the main fruit types, species and cultivars used in fresh-cut processing in Ireland and provided information on sources, seasonality, availability, commercial production practices, product specifications and processing/ packaging difficulties. The review and evaluation helped to identify technical needs, quality problems and problematic fruits of interest, all of which were subsequently investigated in latter studies.

Materials and methods

Quality evaluation tests were performed as outline in Chapter 2.2. Additional remarks on pack size (g), geometry, fruit types, combinations (%) and fruit shape observations were also made.

323

Results In-pack gas analysis 21 MultipleMarket AA MultipleMarket BB

18 MultipleMarket CC

Average optimal atmosphere window Market D Multiple D 15

12 , % 2 9 CO

6

3

0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21

O2, %

Figure B.4 In-pack gas atmosphere concentration ranges (O2 and CO2) for selected commercial fresh-cut fruit packs from different multiples. 0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

Product wt per volume package per wt Product 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Package volume, ml Figure B.5 Product per package volume

Figure B.4 illustrates the in-pack O2 and CO2 ranges for different fresh-cut fruit products from different multiples. In-pack atmosphere concentrations from Multiple

324

CO2 Marks & Spencer Classic Fruit Salad O2

Superquinn Rainbow Fruit Salad

Freshways Fruit Suprise

Dunnes Freshly Prepared Tropical Fruit Salad

Dunnes Stores Fresh Fruit Salad (2)

Dunnes Stores Fresh Fruit Salad (1)

-5 5 15 25 D were nearest the optimal atmosphere winder with Multiple A and B products being significantly outside this optimum window. In general, the amount of product per package volume was found to be between 0.4 to 0.6g.mL (Figure B.5).

CO2 Marks & Spencer Classic Fruit Salad O2

Superquinn Rainbow Fruit Salad

Freshways Fruit Suprise

Dunnes Freshly Prepared Tropical Fruit Salad

Dunnes Stores Fresh Fruit Salad (2)

Dunnes Stores Fresh Fruit Salad (1)

-5 5 15 25

Figure B.6 In-pack O2 and CO2 concentrations for selected commercial fresh-cut fruit packs.

In terms of individual products from different multiples, O2 concentrations ranged from 19.5% to 10.1% for all packs. CO2 concentrations ranged from 4.2% - 11.5%

(Figure B.6). Marks and Spencer had the highest O2 concentrations of all packs analysed on day 0 (19.5%) with Dunnes Stores tropical fruit salad having 15% and

Dunnes Stores fresh fruit salad having the lowest at 10.1%. CO2 values correlated with O2 values with 4.6% for Marks and Spencer, 9.5% for Dunnes Stores tropical fruit salad and 11.5% for Dunnes Stores fresh fruit salad.

325

Mixed Fruit Combinations

(a) (b) Blueberry Grapes, red Grapes, 1% 12% red Cantaloupe 8% melon Pineapple 10% Oranges chunks slices Kiwi slices 40% Pineapple 21% 8% chunks 51% Mango chunks 10%

Apple, green 27% Oranges slices 12%

(c) (d) Grapes, Grapes, red red 10% Honeydew 11% melon Cantaloupe Apple, red 25% melon chunks 15% Apple, green 29% 18%

Cantaloupe melon 8% Pineapple chunks Apple, green 30% Strawberry Orange slices 12% 20% 22%

Figure B.7 Fresh-cut fruit combinations* (%) from fresh fruit salad packs (a) Dunnes Stores Classic Fruit Salad, (b) Tesco Tutti Fruitti Collection, (c) SuperValu Fruit Salad Mix and (d) Marks and Spencer Classic Fruit Salad. *Net Weight of pack (a) 200g, (b) 300g, (c) 350g and (d) 185g.

Great variation in fruit combinations were noted for a typical fresh fruit salad packs (various sizes) with 4 to 7 combinations observed (Figure B.7). Red grapes were found in all packs (8-12%) while pineapple and cantaloupe melon chunks, green apple wedges, and orange slices were present in majority of packs, ranging from 30- 50%, 8-29%, 12-27% and 12-22% depending on pack size. Fresh-cut kiwifruit (8%) and whole blueberries (1%) were present in small percentages for pack (b), fresh-cut

326 honeydew melon (25%) was found in pack (c), while whole (de-hulled) strawberries (20%) were present in pack (d).

Drip-loss levels

Dunnes Stores Pineapple Chunks Tesco Pineapple Chunks Marks and Spencers Pineapple Chunks Tesco Tutti Fruitti Collection Marks and Spencers Tropical Fruit Sticks Marks and Spencers Classic Fruit Salad Dunnes Stores Juicy Melon & Grapes Duo SuperValu Hawaiian Salad Marks and Spencers Rainbow Layers Dunnes Stores Melon, Pineapple & Grapes SuperValu Fruit Salad Mix Dunnes Stores Fresh Fruit Salad Dunnes Stores Apple, Watermelon, Kiwifruit &… Freshways Melon & grapes Dunnes Stores Fresh Fruit Salad Juicy fruit twist Dunnes Stores Melon & Grapes Apple, kiwi, grapes Dunnes Stores Classic Fruit Salad SuperValu Melon, Grape & Apple

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Figure B.8 Drip-loss volumes in a variety of individual and mixed fresh-cut fruit salad packs. *Juicy Fruit Twist (pineapple, apple, strawberry). *Hawaiian salad (pineapple chunks, cantaloupe melon chunks, red and green apple wedges, orange slices, red grapes and pomegranate arils).

Drip-loss levels were more of a concern for multiple fruit packs (>4), especially those containing fresh-cut pineapple, melon and orange (Figure B.8). Individual pineapple packs had the most drip with values ranging from 6 to 11mLs. Packs containing 3 or less fruit combinations had much lower drip levels ranging from 0.2 to 3mLs depending on the fruit combinations.

327

General observations

Fresh-cut Fruit Salad Packs

 Film was hard to peel off in all packs.  Label was transparent and flexible (plastic). In some cases (Tesco) was printed onto lidding film, while for M&S packs label was attached to lidding film and of various sizes depending on the product and pack size)  Label size was the same for all product ranges (Tesco, Dunnes and SuperValu).  Tray size was varied for all products evaluated. . Volume ranging from ~250-450cm3  Film material appeared to be the same for all packs. . No micro-perforations evident  Excessive drip-loss accumulation in all packs (especially those containing pineapple).  Less liquid in melon and grape packs  Most apple wedges were coated in a citric acid/ ascorbic acid dip (although not cited on all packs).  Fruit proportions were within levels cited on packs.  CO2 was within optimal for pineapple and melon/grape packs.  O2 was above optimum range for all products.  Fruit shape and size varied depending on the multiple and/product, especially in mixed fruit packs. . possibly attributed to hand-cut processing as stated on some packs.  Poor aroma with strong odours detected upon opening mixed packs.  Poor visual quality of most mixed fruit packages due to accumulation of drip-loss which resulted in certain fruit pieces having a water-soaked appearance and texture. In addition, colour bleed was evident in packs where strawberries were found, resulting in a pinkish/ reddish tint on lighter coloured fruit pieces.  At end of storage life, sub-optimal atmospheres were found in almost all packs (elevated CO2 and excessively low O2) which heightened the poor aromas previously detected in packs.  Packs where berries were found had greatest atmosphere change while melon packs had the least.  Fresh-cut kiwifruit had significant loss in fresh-cut firmness and visual appeal (grey, dull colour, loss of greenness and increased translucency and yellowness).  Fresh-cut pineapple pieces had darkening at cut edges and were translucent in appearance.  Melon pieces had a bouncy texture (especially cantaloupe) and were translucent in appearance.  Orange segments looked drier in appearance with a whitened flesh.  Grapes appeared to be darker in colour with some showing symptoms of skin cracking/ bursting.  Apples wedges showed increased browning of cut surfaces.

328

Colorimetry

Table B.4 Overall colour change (DE), browning (BI) and whitening (WI) index values for individual fresh-cut fruit pieces contained within a commercial mixed fruit pack during 7 Day storage at 4OC.

∆E BI WI

Fruit D0 D7 D0 D7

Green apple 4.97 29.79 41.65 - -

Red apple 2.41 31.62 35.70 - -

Red grape 1.22 - - - -

Cantaloupe melon 25.59 - - 43.11 43.63

Pineapple 3.33 71.26 81.79 - -

Orange 3.00 - - 43.96 51.27

Table B.4 shows that there was minor to severe colour change during storage which varied with fruit type. Both red and green apple varieties increased in DE with green apples showing greater colour change than red apples. This correlated well with increasing BI values which were also greater for the green apple variety. A similar increase was also observed for fresh-cut pineapple which had minor colour change (DE 3.33), indicative of browning. In contrast cantaloupe melon had the greatest overall colour change of all fruits with minor increase in WI scores. Fresh-cut orange had very minor colour change (3) but had high increase in WI values, corresponding to increase in whitening of segments. Red grapes, which were whole, had the least colour change of all fruits (1.22).

329

Percent soluble solids

20 Cantaloupe Pineapple

15 Red Grape

Strawberry 10 Kiwi

Blueberry Soluble Soluble Solids % 5 Honeydew Orange Green Apple 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Red Apple Storage Time (days)

Figure B.9 Percent soluble solids for individual fresh-cut fruit pieces within a mixed commercial fresh fruit salad package.

The percent soluble solids content varied for different fruit types with only minor changes observed during storage (Figure B.9). Values for red grape ranged from 10.4% – 12.1% with a minor decrease observed during storage. For cantaloupe melon a noticeable decrease was observed on Day 1 followed by a rapid increase which remained relatively constant thereafter with values ranging from 9.5% – 12.8%. Values for pineapple on Day 7 ranged from 8.7% to 9.9%. The soluble solids content for orange, strawberry, kiwi and blueberry ranged from 9.8% - 14.3% on Day 7 with gradual decreases between days 0 and 4. Blueberry and grapes had the highest soluble solids of all fruits with values ranging from 19% and 18% on Day 0 falling to 14% and 17% on Day 7 respectively.

330

Microbial enumeration

green apple red apple red grape orange pineapple melon

8.00 9.00 7.00 8.00 6.00 7.00 5.00 6.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 4.00 log log 10 (cfu/g) 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 (a) 1.00 (b) 0.00 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Storage Time (days) Storage Time (days)

8.00 8.00

7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00

5.00 5.00

4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 log log 10 (cfu/g)

2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 (c) (d) 0.00 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Storage Time (days) Storage Time (days)

Figure B.10 Effects of packaging on (a) Mesophilic Counts, (b) Psychrophilic Counts, (c) Lactic Acid Bacteria Counts & (d) Yeast and Mould Counts for commercially prepared fresh fruit salad over 7 days storage at 4OC.

In figure B.10 (a), mesophilic counts show that melon had the highest counts on Day0 (6.7 CFU/g) and red grapes (5.0 CFU/g) had the lowest. However on Day 7 red grapes had counts of 6.20 CFU/g while green apple had the highest count (7.6 CFU/g). It appears that pineapple had the lowest growth counts on day 7 (5.7

331

CFU/g). All apple varieties had similar counts ranging from 7.15-7.20 CFU/g on day 0 which ranged from 6.46 – 7.57 CFU/g on day 7.

In Figure B.10 (b), psychrophilic counts for melon were the highest counts on day 0 (6.79 CFU/g), while red grapes had the lowest (5.16 CFU/g). Both values corresponded with previous mesophilic counts in Figure B.10 (a). On Day 7 pineapple appeared to have the highest count (8.10 CFU/g) while all other fruits averaged out the same having 7.48 CFU/g.

From the above Figure B.10 (c), it is evident that pineapple and green apple had the highest counts (5.23 and 5.18 CFU/g) on day 0. Orange and melon had the lowest counts (4.15 CFU/g respectively) while all other fruits having counts which ranged from 4.30 – 4.72 CFU/g. On Day 3 all values increased with counts ranging from 5.19 – 6.82 CFU/g and by Day 7 all fruits saw a decrease with pineapple having the lowest (4.31 CFU/g). All other fruits had counts ranging from 5.21 – 5.70 CFU/g.

From the above Figure B.10 (d), yeast and mould counts for melon green apple were the highest recorded with counts of 6.05 and 5.92 CFU/g respectively on Day 0. All other fruits had counts ranging from 5.76 – 5.89 CFU/g. From day 3 to day 7 all fruits saw a steady increase in counts ranging from 6.48 – 7.48.

332

Sensory evaluation

10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 Visual Visual Appearance 0.00

Royal Gala Apple Golden Delicious Granny Smith Pineapple

Moroccan Orange South African Grapes Argentine Grapes Cantaloupe Melon Honeydew Melon Gala melon 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 ColourScores 2.00 1.00 0.00

Royal Gala Apple Golden Delicious Granny Smith Pineapple Moroccan Orange South African Grapes Argentine Grapes Cantaloupe Melon Honeydew Melon Gala melon

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 Acceptability Overall 0.00

Royal Gala Apple Golden Delicious Granny Smith Pineapple Moroccan Orange South African Grapes Argentine Grapes Cantaloupe Melon

Honeydew Melon Gala melon

333

10.00 9.00

8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00

Aroma Scores 2.00 1.00 0.00

Royal Gala Apple Golden Delicious Granny Smith Pineapple Moroccan Orange South African Grapes Argentine Grapes Cantaloupe Melon Honeydew Melon Gala melon 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 odour Scores

- 3.00 2.00 Off 1.00 0.00

Royal Gala Apple Golden Delicious Granny Smith Pineapple Moroccan Orange South African Grapes Argentine Grapes Cantaloupe Melon Honeydew Melon Gala melon

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00

Firmness Scores 1.00 0.00

Royal Gala Apple Golden Delicious Granny Smith Pineapple Moroccan Orange South African Grapes Argentine Grapes Cantaloupe Melon

Honeydew Melon Gala melon

Figure B.11 Sensory evaluation scores for individual fresh-cut fruits within a commercial mixed fruit salad pack. (a) visual appearance, (b) colour, (c) overall acceptability, (d) aroma, (e) off-odour and (f) firmness.

334

The above Figure B.11 (a-f) illustrates the sensory scores evaluated throughout storage. Scores for visual appearance decreased throughout storage. For fresh-cut orange, green apple and cantaloupe were good on Day 0 however kiwi and pineapple were least preferred by panellists (acceptable). By Day 7, kiwi, green apple and honeydew had reduced usability with orange, blueberry and red grapes having reduced marketability. Scores for aroma saw a steady decline throughout storage. Blueberry, orange and red grapes appeared to have best aroma while cantaloupe and kiwi had the least noticeable aroma. By Day 7, honeydew melon, orange and red apple appeared to retain the best aroma while kiwi, green apple and strawberry had the least desirable. Cantaloupe saw no change in aroma from Day 0-7. Initially slight off odours were detected for strawberry, blueberry, kiwi and red grapes. All other fruits had no detectable off odour until Day 4 where red apple scored the highest. On Day 7, orange, and honeydew melon had the least off odour while red grapes and strawberry had the most noticeable off odours. On day 0, all fruit scored relatively “good” in terms of colour. Green apple had the best colour followed by blueberry. However, after 7 Days, red grapes, orange and pineapple had the best colour score and kiwi, green and red apples had the worst. Initially on Day 0, the texture of all fruits was good with red grapes, orange and blueberry having the best texture while red apple and pineapple had the worst. On Day 3, orange appeared to retain a good texture while kiwi and red apple decreased. Red grapes appeared to improve in texture on Day 3. By Day 7, orange and blueberry retained the best texture while kiwi, honeydew and cantaloupe had the least favourable texture. Overall likeness of packs incurred a steady decrease during storage. Green apple and strawberry were liked the best on Day 0, while red apples, red grapes and kiwi were least liked. On day 3 all fruits saw a rapid decrease with likeness scores ranging from 3-5 for all fruits. By Day 7, a further decrease was observed with blueberry, green apple and red apple and red grapes scoring best and kiwi scoring worst.

335

Conclusion

The quality of commercial packs was poor and they appeared to deteriorate quite quickly, especially when multiple fruits were mixed. There was little atmosphere modification initially that decreased to sub-optimal levels during storage. Juice leakage from pineapple, orange and melon resulted in very wet packs and poor product appearance (water-soaked and translucent), especially for fruit where lower portions were submerged in the exudate.

As a result, the sensory quality of all packs was poor, deteriorating during storage. However, commercial packs of mixed fruits had greater deterioration than individually packaged fruits.

Figure B.12 Selection of commercial fresh-cut fruit products available in Irish supermarkets.

336

Appendix C - Supplementary Information for Chapter 2

Appendix C.1: Supporting data for Chapter 2. Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using Principal component analysis.

The additional information for this chapter (2) presents the supporting raw data used in principal component analysis of fresh-cut pineapple, strawberry, kiwifruit and cantaloupe melon as affected by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The data presented are the means for 2 experimental replicates unless otherwise stated. For each quality evaluation test, as presented in Tables C.2-C.14, the values are the means for the following determinations (Table C.1):

Table C.1. List of quality tests, corresponding PCA data abbreviations and number of experimental determinations (n)

Quality Test Abbreviations Unit n In-pack O2 O2 % 6 In-pack CO2% CO2 % 6 Drip-loss Drip mL 6 Pack weight-loss PkWt % 6 Total soluble solids BRIX (SS) % 18 Titratable acidity* TA % 18 pH pH - 18 Sugar acid ratio S:A - 18 Exudate Ex g 12 Cell permeability Cell Per g 12 Luminosity CIE L* - 36 Redness/Greenness CIE a* - 36 Blueness/Yellowness CIE b* - 36 Visual Appearance App - 24 Colour score Col - 24 Aroma score Ar - 24 Off-odour score OOD - 24 Firmness score TEX - 24 Overall Acceptability OA - 24 1 Maximum shear force ECKmax N 40 1 Mean shear force ECKmean N 40 2 Maximum probe firmness P max N 16 2 Mean probe firmness Pmean N 16 -1 Total mesophilic count MESO logCFUg 12 -1 Total psychrophilic count Psychro logCFUg 12 -1 Lactic acid bacteria count LAB logCFUg 12 -1 Yeast and Mould count Y&M logCFUg 12 *reported as citric acid equivalent; 1 Extended Craft Knife; 2 Probe, N (Newtons).

337

Table C.2 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of geographical origin on fresh-cut pineapple quality.

Data is the mean for 3 experimental replicates.

Abbreviations: P (Pineapple), CR (Costa Rica), B (Brazil), H (Honduras), D0 (Day 0), D1 (Day 1), D4 (Day 4) and D7 (Day 7).

338

Table C.3 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of ripeness stage and season on fresh-cut pineapple quality.

Abbreviations: P (Pineapple), UR (Under-ripe), R (Ripe), OR (Over-ripe), S (Summer), A (Autumn)

339

Table C.4 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of cut size and dipping treatment on fresh-cut pineapple quality.

Abbreviations: P (Pineapple), 50mm, 25mm & 10mm (50mm, 25mm & 10mm cut piece size), UD (Un-dipped), D (Dipped)

340

Table C.5 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of packaging film and temperature on fresh-cut pineapple quality.

Abbreviations: P (Pineapple), HB (high barrier film), OPP (oriented polypropylene), PA90 and PA210 (micro-perforated films), CS (clamshell container)

341

Table C.6 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of geographical origin and cultivar on fresh-cut strawberry quality.

Abbreviations: SB (strawberry), ES (El Santa), F (Festival), Cam (Camarosa), Mor (Morocco), Eth (Ethiopia)

342

Table C.7 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of physiological age and season on fresh-cut strawberry quality.

Abbreviations: S (strawberry), UR (under-ripe), R (ripe), OR (over-ripe), Sp (Spring), Sum (Summer), Aut (Autumn), Win (Winter)

343

Table C.8 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of packaging type and temperature on fresh-cut strawberry quality.

Abbreviations: S (strawberry), HB (high barrier film), OPP (oriented polypropylene), PA90 and PA210 (micro-perforated films), CS (clamshell container)

344

Table C.9 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of geographical origin on fresh-cut kiwifruit quality.

Data is the mean for 3 experimental replicates.

Abbreviations: KW (kiwifruit), NZ (New Zealand)

345

Table C.10: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of cut size and dipping treatments on fresh-cut kiwifruit quality.

Abbreviations: KW (kiwifruit), 50mm, 25mm & 10mm (50mm, 25mm & 10mm cut piece size), UD (Un-dipped), D (Dipped)

346

Table C.11 : Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of packaging type and temperature on fresh-cut kiwifruit quality.

Abbreviations: KW (kiwifruit), HB (high barrier film), OPP (oriented polypropylene), PA90 and PA210 (micro-perforated films), CS (clamshell container)

347

Table C.12: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of geographical origin on fresh-cut cantaloupe melon quality.

Abbreviations: CM (Cantaloupe melon) Data is the mean for 3 experimental replicates.

348

Table C.13: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of cut size and dipping treatment on fresh-cut cantaloupe melon quality.

Abbreviations: CM (cantaloupe melon), 50mm, 25mm & 10mm (50mm, 25mm & 10mm cut piece size), UD (Un-dipped), D (Dipped)

349

Table C.14: Raw data used for principal component analysis of effects of packaging type and temperature on fresh-cut cantaloupe melon quality.

Abbreviations: S (strawberry), HB (high barrier film), OPP (oriented polypropylene), PA90 and PA210 (micro-perforated films), CS (clamshell container)

350

Appendix C.2: Supplementary data for Chapter 2.2: Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis II: effects of ripeness stage, seasonality, processing and packaging

In Chapter 2.II, PCA plots accurately illustrated the deteriorative patterns of quality change for a number of fresh-cut fruits as affected by packaging type and storage temperature. Information on ‘actual’ gas accumulation patterns within the different packaging systems was warranted in order to better interpret PCA data. The additional information for this chapter, presented in Appendix C.2, illustrates the effects of packaging type and storage temperature on in-pack gas atmosphere modification analysis of fresh-cut pineapple, strawberry, kiwifruit and cantaloupe melon. These results were central to the structure of Chapter 2.II as the resulting in- pack atmosphere changes formed the basis for many of the subsequent quality, sensorial and microbiological investigations discussed.

Abstract

In this study, in-pack oxygen (O2) levels decreased while carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increased with time at both 4OC and 8OC. As the permeability of the film decreased, little to no in-pack atmosphere modification occurred with lower steady- state CO2 and higher O2 levels established. Use of clamshell (CS) containers resulted in statistically different gas concentrations compared with high barrier, oriented polypropylene and micro-perforated films (p<0.05) at both temperatures. This was O especially true for fresh-cut pineapple (p<0.01) where at 4 C, O2 levels were near anaerobic by Day 4. Similarly, for high respiring fruits such as fresh-cut kiwifruit and strawberry, CO2 levels were greater than 25% and 35%, respectively on Day 7 O (p<0.05). At 8 C, steady-state CO2 were even higher, while O2 levels were anaerobic by Day 7. An exception to this was fresh-cut cantaloupe melon, where, irrespective of film type and temperature, had relatively stable in-pack gas atmosphere modification change during storage. In summary, packaging within a low barrier film (HB) proved to be most beneficial for fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon, while OPP and PA90 were more beneficial for fresh-cut kiwifruit and strawberry, respectively. Elevating the storage temperature to 8OC resulted in loss of all benefits.

351

Materials and methods

In-pack gas atmosphere analysis was performed as outlined in Chapter 2.2.

Results

The effects of using five packaging films of different permeabilities on the in-pack gas atmosphere concentrations of fresh-cut pineapple, strawberry, kiwifruit and cantaloupe melon were determined at 4OC and 8OC (Figure C1-4). Rapid gas levels were observed during the first 1 to 4 Days of storage, after which steady-state gas concentrations were established in most packs. In general, as the permeability of the film increased, modification decreased, while, when permeability decreased, modification increased, in some instances being excessive, especially for high respiring fruits.

352

Pineapple: (a) 45

40 HB-4

35 OPP-4 30 PA90-4 25 PA210-4

20 CS-4 concentrations(%)

2 15 HB-8 OPP-8 pack O 10 - In 5 PA90-8

0 PA210-8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CS-8 Storage Time (Days)

(b) 45

40 HB-4 35 OPP-4

30 PA90-4 25 PA210-4 20 CS-4 concentrations(%)

2 15 HB-8 OPP-8 ack CO 10 - In 5 PA90-8 0 PA210-8

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CS-8 Storage Time (Days)

Figure C.1 Effects of packaging type and temperature on in-pack (a) O2 and (b) CO2 concentrations of fresh-cut pineapple stored for 7 Days.

For fresh-cut pineapple, fruit stored in CS containers had the most significant decrease and increase in O2 and CO2 concentrations, respectively (p<0.001). Oxygen levels were near anoxic by Day 4 while CO2 levels exceeded 10%. By Day 7, CO2 levels at 4OC were 16% while at 8OC were 24% (Figure C.1). Micro-perforated films had the least atmosphere modification (p>0.05) with O2 and CO2 levels ranging from 19-20% and 1-1.4% at 4OC and 19-20% and 0.9-2% at 8OC for PA90 and PA210, respectively.

353

Strawberry: (a) 45

40 HB-4 35 OPP-4 30 PA90-4

25 PA210-4 20 CS-4 concentrations(%)

2 15 HB-8 10 OPP-8 pack O -

In 5 PA90-8

0 PA210-8 0 2 4 6 8 CS-8 Storage Time (Days) 45 (b) 40 HB-4 35 OPP-4 30 PA90-4 25 PA210-4 CS-4 concentrations(%) 20

2 15 HB-8 10 OPP-8

pack CO -

In 5 PA90-8 0 PA210-8 0 2 4 6 8 CS-8 Storage Time (Days)

Figure C.2 Effects of packaging type and temperature on in-pack (a) O2 and (b) CO2 concentrations of fresh-cut strawberry halves stored for 7 Days.

For fresh-cut strawberry, significant effects of micro-perforated films on in-pack gas atmosphere modification was observed (p<0.05) (Figure C.2). Fruit stored in CS containers O rapidly declined in O2 concentrations by Day 1 (p<0.01), with fruit stored at 8 C displaying

anaerobic conditions on Day 7. In contrast, micro-perforated PA films had little-to-no O2

atmospheric change, while CO2 levels ranged from 10-13% and 4.5-6% for PA90 and PA210, respectively. Fruit stored in HB and OPP had atmospheres in between these extremes, with HB ranges greater than OPP.

354

Kiwifruit: (a) 45

40 HB-4 35 OPP-4

30 PA90-4 25 PA210-4 20 CS-4 concentrations(%)

2 15 HB-8 OPP-8

pack O 10 - In 5 PA90-8 0 PA210-8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CS-8 Storage Time (Days) (b) 45

HB-4 40 35 OPP-4 30 PA90-4 25 PA210-4

concentrations(%) 20 CS-4

2 15 HB-8

10 OPP-8 pack CO - In 5 PA90-8 0 PA210-8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CS-8 Storage Time (Days)

Figure C.3 Effects of packaging type and temperature on in-pack (a) O2 and (b) CO2 concentrations of fresh-cut kiwifruit stored for 7 Days.

A gradual decline in O2 concentrations was observed for fresh-cut kiwifruit during storage (Figure C.3). A rapid decline in O2 was noted from Day 0 to Day 1 for fruit stored in CS packs falling to 14% and 12% at 4OC and 8OC respectively. This decreased was coupled with increases in CO2 to 9% and 15% and continued until end of storage where O2 levels were less than 1% while CO2 levels were 28% and 30% at 4OC and 8OC, respectively. With the exception of micro-perforated PA90 and PA210 packs at 4OC, all other packs had similar atmosphere change until end of storage, ranging from 8% to 11% O2 and 13% to 19% CO2.

355

Cantaloupe melon: (a) 45 40 HB-4

35 OPP-4 30 PA90-4 PA210-4 25 CS-4 20 concentrations(%)

2 HB-8 15 OPP-8 pack O

- 10

In PA90-8 5 PA210-8 0 CS-8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Storage Time (Days) 45 (b) 40 HB-4 35 OPP-4

30 PA90-4 25 PA210-4 CS-4 concentrations(%) 20

2 15 HB-8 10 OPP-8 pack CO - In 5 PA90-8 0 PA210-8

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CS-8 Storage Time (Days)

Figure C.4 Effects of packaging type and temperature on in-pack (a) O2 and (b) CO2 concentrations of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon stored for 7 Days.

Although similar to other fruits, in that modification was greater at higher temperatures, fresh-cut cantaloupe melon had the least in-pack modification of all fruits studied (Figure

C.4). The greatest decrease and increase in O2 and CO2 was observed in CS packs, where values of 4.5% and 10.5% and 9.5% and 12% were noted at 4OC and 8OC, respectively. In contrast, micro-perforated packs displayed the least modification with O2 and CO2 values at 4OC and 8OC ranging from 11.5 to 17% and 2.3% to 6%, and 14.5% to 19% and 7.3% to 19.5%, respectively.

356

Discussion

The kinetics of O2 and CO2 changes within packs depended mainly upon the respiratory nature of the fresh-cut fruit, the permeability of the packaging film and the temperature at which the packs were stored. Fresh-cut fruits are notoriously difficult to package, due to high respiration rates, a direct result of fresh-cut processing. As a result the range of atmospheres that were found within packages varied significantly. HB and OPP films are widely used by the MA packaging sector; however their gas permeabilities range from very low to low. As a result, a range of MAs were found within these packs, with lower respiring fruit (pineapple and melon) attaining better beneficial (near optimum) atmospheres than higher respiring fruits (strawberry and kiwifruit). Similarly, clamshell containers are nowadays commonly used to package fresh-cut fruits due to their convenience for both storage and consumption. The permeability of this packaging system is extremely low and coupled with the variable respiratory nature of different fresh-cut fruits produced sub-optimal atmospheres, resulting in faster deterioration and an inferior end-product quality with diminished shelf-life (Chapter 2). In general, CO2 levels within CS packs were high (>10%) and O2 levels were very low (<2%), creating conditions favourable for anaerobic respiration. In contrast, micro-perforated packs, in particular PA210, represented a somewhat unmodified atmosphere, while PA90 packs produced a range of atmospheres in between these extremes (proving most beneficial for fresh-cut strawberries in that near optimum atmospheres, as recommended by Gorny, (1997) were achieved).

Increasing the storage temperature is said to bring about increases in the permeability of packaging films (Brandenberg, 2012); however, these increases are usually insufficient to compensate for the increased product respiration (Kader, 1989). Increasing the storage temperature from 4OC to 8OC brought about an increase in in-pack atmosphere modification for all packs. As a result, more extreme MAs were produced (near/ anoxic environment + >20% CO2), which caused a marked reduction in the quality of most fruits (Chapter 2).

357

Conclusion

In conclusion, none of the packaging treatments evaluated produced recommended optimal atmospheres. However, at 4OC, packaging within a low barrier film (HB) was better at attaining near optimum atmospheres (as recommended by Gorny, 1997) for fresh-cut pineapple and cantaloupe melon, while OPP and PA90 were more beneficial for fresh-cut kiwifruit and strawberry, respectively. Increasing storage to 8OC, however, resulted in a loss of those packaging benefits and heightened the already detrimental effects of incompatible packaging (CS).

In general, the atmospheres produced were insufficiently modified to be technically beneficial to the product. Therefore, actively modifying the atmospheres to assess potential benefits and/or identifying target atmospheres in order to achieve equilibrium modified atmosphere (EMA), i.e. product-package compatibility, is warranted.

References

See reference section.

358

Appendix D – Product Specifications

This Appendix (D) gives a brief overview of the problematic fruits central to this research and lists some key product specifications for raw material intake. A schematic illustration of the fresh-cut production chain is also included.

359

Product Specifications for Fresh-cut Fruit

360

A brief question and answer session with one of Ireland’s leading fresh-cut producer, Mr Paddy O’Callaghan, CEO Nature’s Best LTD, was held at Fresh Connex (Berlin, 2012). He highlighted some of the more interesting in-house troubles facing fresh-cut processing in Ireland (and Europe) in recent times.

The main problems identified were:

i. Inconsistent raw material supply chain, i.e. variations in incoming product quality and fruit maturity, seasonal variations in cultivar etc., ii. Miscommunication between producers, suppliers and processors, iii. Over-packing of certain fruits during transport leading to inferior quality at warehouse, iv. Temperature abuse during transit, v. Failure of suppliers to distinguish between physical, physiological and pathological causes of injury (scald on apples deemed suitable for FC processing; internal browning, bruising, contamination etc. on some products received at goods inwards), vi. Mismanagement of temperature and refrigerated storage at retail level, vii. Wariness on behalf of consumers regarding the product(s), viii. Limited yields, high waste and high production costs = no profit  reason for forfeiting the industry,

ix. Limited use of postharvest treatments to prolong shelf-life (ex. Apples – CaCl2 to inhibit browning), x. Limited packaging materials, NPD, R&D, most of which are not optimised for FCF storage, innovation and marketing, xi. Huge variety of cut sizes due to hand-cut processing, xii. Value for money questionable? xiii. Inferior quality products when compared to intact commodities,

361

Unit Operations in Fresh-cut Production

Figure D.1 Generic Process Flow Diagram identifying suggested Critical Control Points (CCPs) for RTE fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables

Taken from: Food Safety Practices Guidance for Ready-to-Eat Fresh-cut Fruit and Vegetables, Canadian Food Inspection Agency: available: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/food/safe-food- production-systems/haccp-generic-models-and-guidance-documents/guidance-fresh-cut- vegetables/eng/1371036204069/1371036205913?chap=0#s3c5

362

Appendix D.1. Pineapple

Introduction

Pineapple (Ananas comosus) is a composite, non-climacteric fruit that shows low to moderate rates of respiration and ethylene production (Dull et al., 1967). After banana and citrus fruits, pineapple is one of the most important tropical fruits consumed in the world today.

Each pineapple plant gives a single fruit before producing suckers which could be used for future planting. The plant itself is a perennial herb 50-100cm high with narrow, tapering pointed leaves arranged in a spiral rosette crowded onto a tightly clasped central stem. The pineapple fruit is terminal and cylindrical with a compound structure at the apex of the stem. It is formed by fusion of the berry-like fruitlets that develop from the flowers. Because it is apex, the fruit bears a compressed, leaf shoot called the crown (Bartholomew et al., 2003). It is important that fruits are produced under optimum conditions as the internal and external quality of fruit at harvest is dependent on several intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

363

Figure D.2 Cross-sectional view of pineapple plant

Taken from: http://www.google.com/imgres?start=155&hl=en&biw=1280&bih=769&tbm=isch&tbnid=gIt2u1l9i68l4M:&imgrefurl=http://www.behance.net/gallery/The- Pineapple-Project/4099795&docid=4c- 2yoZiBInU7M&imgurl=http://behance.vo.llnwd.net/profiles15/437871/projects/4099795/5612521048bd6516cc8ca0dd44416eff.jpg&w=600&h=936&ei=BY- SUPzuDdCwhAe8moGQAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=290&vpy=65&dur=3702&hovh=281&hovw=180&tx=92&ty=119&sig=116762786348689048620&pa ge=6&tbnh=136&tbnw=87&ndsp=32&ved=1t:429,r:27,s:155,i:292

364

Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Unit Processing for Pineapples

Figure D.3 Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Unit Processing for Pineapples

Taken from http://www.iica.int/Eng/regiones/caribe/trinidadytobago/Documents/pineapple_publication.pdf

365

Minimum Quality Requirements for Fresh-cut Pineapple Processing

Varieties Considered: Champaka MD2 Smooth Cayenne

Countries of Origin: Costa Rica Brazil

External Conditions: No extremely misshapen fruit (extreme bottlenecks)

No soft, bruised or mouldy fruit.

No shell defects which can affect internal quality e.g. cracked shells, scars, and malformed fruit (section VI).

Fruit must also to be free from all visible contamination by dust and spray residues.

With/out Crown - The quality of the crown is an indicator of freshness and therefore crowns should be green with turgescent leaves without withered appearance x

Internal Conditions: No internal browning.

No translucent flesh.

MD2 Flesh Maturity A - B.

Texture: Soft but not too crunchy. Not dry.

Flavour: Characteristic of the variety (sweet/acidic).

Sugar Level: Minimum brix levels measured 50mm from base of crown:

Champaka 10%

MD2 minimum 11%, maximum 15.5%.

pH: 3.2 – 3.8

Sizes: Count sizes 8 in a 18kg net box

Count sizes 5, 6, 7, 8 in a 10kg box.

Delivery Temperature: 8 - 10oC

FCF Storage Temperature: 0 - 4OC

Packaging: To be delivered in food-grade cardboard containers which minimise damage during transit. All deliveries to be made on Blue Chep pallets.

Processing: 25mm triangular cut sizes is recommended

Optimum Yield: 35% flesh after removal crown, skin and core.

 Pallets to be checked in a spiral pattern covering all sides of the pallet.  Fruit must not be grown from genetically modified plants. Fruit must not have been irradiated at any point.  Use of Ethephon is permitted! A wax which may contain polyethylene/paraffin or carnauba/ paraffin-based may also be applied.  X may be due to insufficient irrigation, extensive refrigerated storage at temperatures <7OC, low RH%, incorrect application of ethephon and marketing delays.  All produce must conform to THE CONTROL OF PESTICIDES REGULATIONS 1986 and THE PESTICIDES (MAXIMUM RESIDUE LEVELS IN CROPS, FOOD AND FEEDING STUFFS) REGULATIONS 1994.

Any deviations from this Specification must be notified prior to supply.

366

Appendix D.2 - Cantaloupe Melon

Introduction Cantaloupe melon belongs to the Cucumis melo L. var Nada group and includes two different types; (1) true cantaloupes (Cucumis melo cantalupensis), and (2) American Cantaloupes (Cucumis melo reticulatus) (Figure 1). True cantaloupes are only found in Europe (native to Italy) and have a beige coloured skin covered in a well-defined grey netting. They have a very sweet pale orange flesh. American cantaloupes are very similar, however are not technically cantaloupes but a netted member of the muskmelon family. They have a green-grey skin covered in netting, protecting a sweet pale orange flesh. In Australia and New Zealand cantaloupes are called rockmelons. Cantaloupe melon is a warm season vining crop, generally requiring 80 to 120 days of warm conditions from seed to maturity. Best melon quality is obtained in areas with high temperatures, high light, minimal rainfall, and relatively low humidity during the growing season.

Outer Pericarp (max10mm)

Exocarp (Rind) 10mm max

Mesocarp (Fruit Wall/ Pulp) Septa*** Pericarp

Ovary Wall Endocarp

Internal Cavity (void) Funiculus*

Locule ** Seeds/ Pips

Vascular Bundles

Columella Figure D.4 Cross-Sectional View of Cantaloupe Melon

367

Maturity Indices for Cantaloupe Melon

Cantaloupe melons are a temperate, climacteric fruit. They are harvested by maturity and not by size. Commercial maturity is ideally at the firm-ripe stage or "3/4 to full- slip" when a clear abscission (slip separation) from the vine occurs with light pressure. Melons will ripen when taken off the plant (provided they are mature enough when picked) but do not increase in sugar-content. Cultivars may vary in their external color during maturity. This skin color typically transitions from gray to dull green when immature, deep uniform green at maturity, and light yellow at full ripeness.

Table D.1 Ripeness Class and Characteristics (adapted from Produce Fact Sheets, UC Davis)

1

368

Harvest and Postharvest Operations and Production Practices

Figure D.5 Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Operations, Production Practices and Risk Factors in Microbial Food Safety of Fresh and Fresh-cut Cantaloupe Melon

Taken from: http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/SafePracticesforFoodProcesses/ucm091106.htm

369

Minimum Quality Requirements for Fresh-cut Cantaloupe Melon Processing

Varieties Considered: Cantaloupe Cantaline Charentais

Class 1 or Class 11 fruit as described below.

Countries of Origin: Spain Brazil Italy Israel

South Africa Costa Rica France

External Conditions: Cantaloupe - Full or partial netting. All melons to be free from soil and evidence of mould or rot Fruit also to be free from all visible contamination by dust and spray residues. Class I Fruit: No visible skin markings. Class II Fruit: Skin scarring, but no rots, moulds, splits or marks which penetrate the flesh.

Internal Conditions: No translucent flesh or extreme colour graduation from centre to skin. No thick green line between skin and flesh. Maximum skin thickness : 10mm. Flesh to be orange in colour.

Texture: No soft or over-ripe fruit acceptable. Also, no firm, crunchy fruit.

Flesh to have initial resistance when eaten but should soften readily in the mouth. Flavour: High flavour profile desired. Flesh to be sweet and scented but not pungent or whiney.

Sugar Level: Minimum average brix level of 11 when 3 samples taken from the seed pod side, centre and outer skin side of a melon slice.

Maximum brix level of 15. pH: 5 – 6.5

Sizes: Count sizes 3, 4, 5 in a 5kg net box, or count sizes 4, 5, 6 in 7.5kg.

Delivery Temperature: 8-10oC

Packaging: To be delivered in foodgrade cardboard containers, which minimise damage during transport. All deliveries to be made on blue Chep pallets. Processing: 25mm trapezoidal chunks is recommended Optimum Yield: 55% flesh after removal of outer-skin and seeds.

 Pallets to be checked in a spiral pattern covering all sides of the pallet.  Fruit must not be grown from genetically modified plants. Fruit must not have been irradiated at any point.  A wax which may contain polyethylene/paraffin or carnauba/ paraffin-based may also be applied.  All produce must conform to THE CONTROL OF PESTICIDES REGULATIONS 1986 and THE PESTICIDES (MAXIMUM RESIDUE LEVELS IN CROPS, FOOD AND FEEDING STUFFS) REGULATIONS 1994. Any deviations from this Specification must be notified prior to supply.

370

Appendix D.3 Kiwifruit Introduction

The kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) is a large, woody, deciduous vine, native to the Yangtze Valley of China. Fruit from the vine are classified as sub-tropical and climacteric in nature, about the size and shape of a large hen’s egg, with a fuzzy, dull-brown skin. Inside, the flesh is emerald green and dotted with rows of black edible seeds. Fruit texture is similar to that of ripe strawberry and the flavour resembles that of a strawberry and pineapple blend (sweet and sharp). Kiwifruit grow on branches of kiwi vines which can be compared to grapevine tendrils. They have a unique and temperamental growing cycle (Figure 1) and will only grow in ideal conditions i.e. fertile, moist and slightly acidic soils, in a sunny climate with not too much wind. Actinidia deliciosa will not tolerate winter temperatures much lower than 10OF, however well-hardened, mature vines have been known to survive temperatures approaching 0OF obtained gradually over a number of weeks.

Almost all kiwifruit cultivars grown in commercial orchards outside of China are descended from two female plants and one male plant and Hayward fruits are borne from a female vine. However, different Male polliniser cultivars of Actinidia deliciosa exist. Most male cultivars have been selected to coincide in flowering with Hayward. Effective pollination, seed set and full-sized fruit require coincident flowering of males and females. However weather conditions have a major effect on the time of flowering of males and for that reason, different males are being selected for the different growing countries.

Outer-pericarp Locule Mesocarp Seed

Central placenta (core) Inner-pericarp

Figure D.6 Mid-cross Sectional View of Kiwifruit

371

Figure D.7 Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Operations, Production Practices and Risk Factors in Microbial Food Safety of Fresh and Fresh-cut Kiwifruit

Taken from: http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/SafePracticesforFoodProcesses/ucm091106.htm

372

Minimum Quality Requirements for Fresh-cut Kiwifruit Processing

Varieties Considered: Hayward Class 1 fruit only.

Countries of Origin: Italy France Chile New Zealand Greece

External Conditions: Fruit must be free from damage or injury caused by pests, weather, disease or other physical damage. Fruit also to be free from all visible contamination by dust and spray residue.

Internal Conditions: Sound intact condition with no excessive white core or translucency. No woody cores.

Texture: Fruit to have a firm texture with a slight ‘give’. Minimum pressure of 3lbs by penetrometer, using the 8mm head. Core and flesh maximum pressure of 6lbs.

Flavour: Characteristic sweet, juicy flavour to be present. Predominately acidic flavoured fruit not acceptable.

Sugar Level: Minimum brix level of 8. pH: To be agreed.

Sizes: Count size 33, 36, 39 in a 3kg box. Count size 90, 100, 110 in a 10kg box. Other sizes by prior arrangement only.

Delivery Temperature: 8 - 10oC

Packaging: To be delivered in foodgrade cardboard containers, which minimise damage during transport. All deliveries to be made on blue Chep pallets.

Processing: ¼ cut fruit pieces is recommended

Optimum Yield: 75% flesh after removal of the skin.

 Fruit must not be grown from genetically modified plants.  Fruit must not have been irradiated at any point.  Pallets to be checked in a spiral pattern covering all sides of the pallet.  All produce to conform to THE CONTROL OF PESTICIDES REGULATIONS 1986 and THE PESTICIDES (MAXIMUM RESIDUE LEVELS IN CROPS, FOOD AND FEEDING STUFFS) REGULATIONS 1994.

Any deviations from this Specification must be notified prior to supply.

373

Strawberry

Introduction

Strawberry fruit (Fragaria spp.) is a temperate, climacteric fruit produced from a low-growing, herbaceous plant with a fibrous root system and a crown from which basal leaves arise. The leaves are compound with three leaflets, sawtooth-edged and fuzzy. The flowers are generally white, rarely reddish, and borne in small clusters on slender stalks arising from the axils of the leaves. As a plant ages, the root system becomes woody, and the ‘mother’ crown sends out runners that touch the ground, thus enlarging the plant (Figure 1).

In a botanical sense, strawberries are the greatly enlarged stem-end, or receptacle, in which are particularly embedded the many true fruits, or achenes (pips). The plant succeeds on a wide range of soils and situations however, most countries developed their own varieties, especially suited for a particular climate, day-length, altitude or type of production required. The soil should be well drained (plants won’t survive in water saturated ground) and rich, with well-rotted manure so as to be as free as weeds as possible with potassium, in some form, also added. Regular attendance of soil is advisable to help improve aeration, drainage and increase moisture-holding capacity. Although a harvestable crop is attainable with as little as six hours of sunlight per day, larger harvest yields and the best quality strawberries come from plants with a good luminance exposure.

Receptacle Epicalyx

Peduncle Perica

Achene (Pip/ seed)

Calyx

Figure D.8 Cross sectional view of strawberry

374

Harvest and Postharvest Operations and Production Practices

Figure D.9 Schematic Illustration of Harvest and Postharvest Operations, Production Practices and Risk Factors in Microbial Food Safety of Fresh and Fresh-cut Strawberry Fruit

Taken from: http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/SafePracticesforFoodProcesses/ ucm091106.htm

375

Minimum Quality Requirements for Fresh-cut Strawberry Processing

Varieties Considered: Chandler Yael Camarosa Selva Evita El Santa by special arrangement

Countries of Origin: U.K. France Holland Spain Belgium U.S.A. South Africa Morocco

External Conditions: Whole fruit should be sound with no mould, soft or wet spots present. Berries without leaves should show no detachment or subsequent damage. Colour to be minimum 90% red with no green or excessive white shoulders. Fruit must be free from damage or injury caused by pests, weather, disease or other physical damage. Fruit also to be free from all visible contamination by dust and spray residue. No sand, soil or straw.

Internal Conditions: No boxy fruit with large cervices in the central core. No discolouration.

Texture: Firm and dry to the touch, eats with little resistance. No soft berries.

Flavour: Characteristic sweet flavour to be present. Predominately acidic fruit not acceptable.

Sugar Level: November to mid-Jan minimum brix level of 6. Mid-Jan to end-Oct minimum brix level of 8.

Sizes: Berry size between 15 and 25mm.

Packaging: No shrink-wrapped fruit. To be delivered in food-grade containers, which minimise damage during transport. No polystyrene trays. All deliveries to be made on blue Chep pallets.

Delivery Temperature: 8 - 10oC Processing: Medium whole sized fruit with caylex removed is recommended

Optimum Yield: 95% with caylex removed.

 Fruit must not be grown from genetically modified plants.  Fruit must not have been irradiated at any point.  Pallets to be checked in a spiral pattern covering all sides of the pallet.  All produce to conform to THE CONTROL OF PESTICIDES REGULATIONS 1986 and THE PESTICIDES (MAXIMUM RESIDUE LEVELS IN CROPS, FOOD AND FEEDING STUFFS) REGULATIONS 1994.

Any deviations from this Specification must be notified prior to supply.

376

References

378

Abadias, M., Usall, J., Anguera, M., Solsona, C. and Vinas, I. (2008) Microbiological quality of fresh, minimally processed fruit and vegetables, and sprouts from retail establishments. Inter. J. Food Microbiol., 123, 121-129.

Abbey, S.D., Heaton, E.K., Golden, D.A. and Buechat, L.R. (1988) Microbial and sensory quality changes in unwrapped and wrapped sliced watermelon. J. Food Prot. 51:531−533.

Abbott, J.A., Affeldt, H.A. and Liljedahl, L.A. (1992) Firmness measurement of stored ‘Delicious’ apples by sensory methods, Magness-Taylor, and Sonic transmission. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 117(4): 590-595.

Abe, K. and A.E. Watada. (1991) Ethylene absorbent to maintain quality of lightly processed fruits and vegetables. J. Food Sci. 56:1589-1592.

Abe, K., Yoshimura, K., and Takashi, I., (1993) Effects of cutting direction on storability and physiological changes in processed carrots. J. Jap. Soc. Food Sci. Technology, 40, 101-106.

Abeles, F.B., Morgan, P.W. and Saltveit, M.E. (1992) Ethylene in plant biology. 2nd Ed. San Diego: Academic Press.

Agar, I.T., Massantini, R., Hess-Pierce, B., Kader, A.A. (1999) Postharvest

CO2 and ethylene production and quality maintenance of fresh-cut kiwifruit slices. Journal of Food Science. 64(3): 433-440.

Aguayo, E., Allende, A. and Artés, F. (2003) Keeping quality and safety of minimally fresh processed melon. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 216: 494- 496.

Aguayo, E., Escalona, V, H. and Arteś, F. (2004) Metabolic behavior and quality changes of whole and fresh processed melon. J. Food Sci., 69: 148-155.

379

Aguayo, E., Escalona, V. H. and Artés, F. (2008) Effect of hot water treatment and various calcium salts on quality of fresh-cut Amarillo melon. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 47: pp. 397-406.

Aguayo, E., Escalona, V.H. and Artés, F. (2007) Quality of minimally processed Cucumis melo var. saccharinus as improved by controlled atmosphere. Europ. J. Hort. Sci., 72(1): 39-45.

Aguayo, E., Jansasithorn, R. and Kader, A.A. (2006) Combined effects of 1- methylcyclopropene, calcium chloride dip, and/or atmospheric modification on quality changes in fresh-cut strawberries. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 40(3): 269-278.

Aguilo-Aguayo, I., Soliva-Fortuny, R., Martin-Belloso, O. (2010) Volatile compounds and changes in flavour-related enzymes during cold storage of high-intensity pulsed electric field- and heat-processed tomato juices. J. Sci. Food Agric., 90: 1597-1604.

Ahmed, L., Martin-Diana, A.B., Rico, D., Barry-Ryan, C. (2010) The antioxidant properties of whey permeate treated fresh-cut tomatoes. Food Chemistry, 124, 1451-1457.

Ahvenainen, R. (2000) Ready-to-use fruit and vegetables. Flair-Flow Europe Technical Manual, F-FE 376A/00, Teagasc (The National Food Centre), Dublin, Ireland.

Ahvenainen, R. (1996) New approaches in improving the shelf life of minimally processed fruit and vegetables. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 179-197.

Aikoka, T. and Umano, K. (2008) Volatile components and characteristic odorants in headspace aroma obtained by vacuum extraction of Philippine pineapple (Ananas comosus [L.] Merr.). In: Food Flavor; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC., 988: pp. 55-67.

380

Akacha, N.B., Boubaker, O. and Gargouri, M. (2005) Production of hexenol in a two‐enzyme system: kinetic study and modelling. Biotechnology Letters., 27: pp.1875–1878.

Allende, A., Marin, A., Buendia, B., Tomas-Barberan, F. and Gil, M.I. (2007)

Impact of combined postharvest treatments (UV-C light, gaseous O3,

superatmospheric O2 and high CO2) on health promoting compounds and shelf-life of strawberries. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 46: 201-211.

Allende, A., Tomás-Barberán, F.A., and Gil, M.I. (2006) Minimal processing for healthy traditional foods. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 17, 513-519.

Allong, R., Wickham, L.D. and Mohammed, M. (2001) Effect of slicing on the rate of respiration, ethylene production and ripening of mango fruit. J. Food Quality, 24: 405-419.

Al-Mughrabi, M.A., Bacha, M.A. and Abdelrahman, A.O. (1995) Effect of storage temperature and duration on fruit quality of three pomegranate cultivars. Journal of King Saudi University, 7, 239-248.

Alvarez, M.D., Canet, W., Tortosa, M.E. (1997) Effects of freezing rate and programmed freezing on rheological parameters and tissue structure of potato (cv Monalisa). Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und- Forschung A, 204(5), 354-364.

Alves, R.F., A.M.D. Nascimento, and J.M.F. Nogueira. (2005) Characterization of the aroma profile of Madeira wine by sorptive extraction techniques. Anal. Chim. Acta 546:11-21.

Alzamora, S., Tapia, M. and Lopez-Malo, A. (2000) Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables, Fundamental Aspects and Applications. Aspen, Maryland.

Amiot, M.J., Tacchini, M., Aubert, S., Nicholas, J. (1995) Influence of cultivar, maturity stage, and storage conditions on phenolic composition

381

and enzymatic browning on pear fruit. J. Agri. Food Chem., 43:1132- 1137.

Ansorena, D. (1999) Frutas u frutos secos. In, J.A. Martinez, & I. Astiasaran, (Eds), Alimentos:Composicion y propieades (pp 219-241). Pamplona: Universidad de Navara.

Antoniolli, L.R., Benedetti, B.C., Sigrist, J.M.M., Souza Filho, Men de Sá M., Alves, R.E. (2006) Metabolic activity of fresh-cut ‘Perola’ pineapple as affected by cut shape and temperature. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 18(3), 413-417.

Argañosa A.C.S.J., Teixeira, P.C.M. and Morais, A.M.M.B. (2008) Effect of cut-type on quality of minimally processed papaya. J. Sci. Food Agric., 88: 2050-2060.

Arpaia, M., Mitchell, F.G. and Kader, A.A. (1994) Postharvest physiology and causes of deterioration. In: Kiwifruit Growing and Handling, pp. 88-93. UC-DANR, Publication 3344.

Artés, F. and Gomez, P.A. (2006) Modified Atmosphere Packaging of Fruits and Vegetables. Stewert Postharvest Rev. 5:2.

Artés, F., Castaner, M. and Gil, M.I. (1998) Enzymatic browning in minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Food Sci. Technol. Inter., 4(6): 377-389.

Artés, F., Escalona, V.H., Artés-Hdez, F. and Luchsinger, L. (2000) Conservacion de hinojo bajo atmosfera modificada. Rev. Iber. Technol. Postcosecha., 2(2): pp. 194-199.

Artés, F., Gómez, P.A. and Artés-Hernández, F. (2007) Physical, Physiological and Microbial Deterioration of Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables. Food Science and Technology International, 13(3): 177- 188.

Artés, F., Martinez, J.A., Marin, J.G. (1999) Quality changes in minimally processed ‘Romaine’ lettuce as affected by several treatments. In: Hagg,

382

M., Avenhainen, R., Evers, A.M. and Tiikkala, K. (Eds.). Agri Food Quality. II. Quality management of fruits and vegetables. The Royal Society of Chemistry, , pp. 115-118.

Artés, F., Minguez, M.I. and Hornero, D. (2002) Analysing changes in fruit pigments. In: Colour in Food. Improving quality. MacDougall, D.B. (Ed.). CRC Press and Woodhead Publishing Ltd. Chapter 10. pp. 248- 282.

Artés, F., Villaescusa, R. and Tudela, J.A. (2000) Modified atmosphere packaging of pomegranate. J. Food Sci., 65(7): 1112-1116.

Artés -Hernandez, F., Rivera-Cabrera, F, and Kader, A.A. (2007) Quality retention and potential shelf-life of fresh-cut lemons as affected by cut type and temperature. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 43: pp. 245-254.

Asada, K. (2006) Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol., 141(2): p. 391-396.

ATB, (2013) iMLR - iterative Multiple Linear Regression Tool for analyzing spectral readings of pigment extracts. Available [online]: http://www.atb-potsdam.de/en/XS/institute/departments/horticultural- engineering/areas-of-expertise/sensor-technology/imlr-tool.html. Accessed: 01.02.2014.

Atsumi, S., Hanai, T. and Liao, J. C. (2008) Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 451 (7174): 86–89.

Aubert, C. and Bourger, N. (2004) Investigation of volatiles in Charentais Cantaloupe melons (Cucumis melo var Cantalupensis). Characterization of aroma constituents in some cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: p. 4522-4528.

Auldridge, M.E., McCarty, D.R. and Klee, H.J. (2006) Plant carotenoid cleavage oxygenases and their apocarotenoid products. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 9: p. 315-321.

383

Ayala-Zavala, F.J., Wang, S.Y., Wang, C.Y., Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A., (2004) Effect of storage temperatures on antioxidants capacity and aroma compounds in strawberry fruit. Food Sci. Technol. 37, pp. 687–695.

Ayhan, Z., G.W. Chism and E.R. Richter. (1998) The shelf-life of minimally processed fresh cut melons. J. Food Qual. 21:29-40.

Babic, I. and Watada, A.E. (1996) Microbial populations of fresh-cut spinach leaves affected by controlled atmpspheres. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 9: 187-193.

Babic, I., Hilbert, G., Nguyen-the, C. and Guiraud, J. (1992) The yeast flora of stored ready-to-use carrots and their role in spoilage. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 27, 473-484

Babic, I., Watada, A.E. and Buta, J.G. (1997) Growth of Listeria monocytogenes restricted by native microorganisms and other properties of fresh-cut spinach. J. Food Prot. 60: 912-917.

Babic, I.; Amiot, M. J.; Nguyen-The, C.; Aubert, S. (1993) Changes in phenolic content in fresh ready-to-use shredded carrots during storage. J. Food Sci., 58, 351-356.

Bai, J., Saftner, R. A. and Watada, A. E. (2003) Characteristics of fresh-cut honeydew (Cucumis x melo L.) available for processors in winter and summer and its quality maintenance by modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 28: 349-359.

Bai, J.H., Saftner, R.A., Lee, Y.S. and Watada, A.E. (2001) Modified atmosphere maintains quality of fresh-cut cantaloupe. J. Food Sci., 66: pp. 1207-1211.

Baldwin, E. (2000) Flavor trivia and tomato aroma. Biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components. HortScience., 35: pp. l013-1022.

384

Baldwin, E.A., Nisperos-Carriedo, M.O. and Moshonas, M.G. (1991) Quantitative analysis of flavor parameters in six Florida tomato varieties (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). J. Agric. Food Chem. 39:1135-1140.

Baldwin, E.A., Nisperos-Carriedo, M.O. and Scott, J.W. (1992) Levels of flavor volatiles in a normal cultivar, ripening inhibitor and their hybrid. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 104:86-89.

Baltussen, E., Sandra, P. David, F. and Cramers. C. (1999) Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), a novel extraction techinque for aqueous samples: theory and principles. J. Microcolumn Separations, 11(10):737-747.

Barber, M.S., McConnell, V.S. and DeCaux, B.S. (2000) Antimicrobial intermediates of the general phenylpropanoid and lignin specific pathways. Phytochemistry, 54: 53-56.

Barrett, D.M., Beaulieu, J.C., and Shewfelt, R., (2010) Color, flavor, texture, and nutritional quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables: desirable levels, instrumental and sensory measurement, and the effects of processing. Crit.Rev.Food Sci. 50, 369-389.

Barry, C.S., Aldridge, G.M., herzog, G., Ma, Q., McQuinn, R.P., Hirschberg, J. and Giovannoni, J.J. (2012) Altered chloroplast development and delayed fruit ripening caused by mutations in a zinc metalloprotease at the lutescent2 locus of tomato’, Plant Physiology., 159, pp. 1086-1098.

Barry-Ryan, C and O'Beirne, D (1999) Ascorbic acid retention in minimally processed Iceberg lettuce. J. Food Sci 61 (2), 201-204.

Barry-Ryan, C. (1996) Factors in deterioration of vegetables processed using novel mild techniques. PhD Thesis, University of Limerick, Ireland.

Barry-Ryan, C. and O’Beirne, D. (1998) Effects of slicing method on the quality and storage life of modified atmosphere packaged carrot discs. Journal of Food Science, 63: 851-856.

385

Barry-Ryan, C. and O’Beirne, D. (2000a) Quality and shelf-life of shredded carrots as affected by packaging film and storage temperature. J. Food Sci., 65(4): 1-4.

Barry-Ryan, C. and O’Beirne, D. (2000b). Effects of peeling method on quality and shelf-life of ready-to-use carrot slices. Int. J. Food Sci., 35: 135-146.

Barth, M., Hankinsin, T.R., Zhuang, H. and Breidt, F. (2009) Microbiological Spoilage of Fruits and Vegetables. In: Sperber, W.H. and Doyle, M.P., Eds. Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages, New York, N.Y.: Springer: Science and Business Media LLC. p.p. 135-183,

Barth, M.M. and Zhuang, H. (1996) Packaging design affects antioxidant vitamin retention and quality of broccoli. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 9: 141-150.

Bartley, I.M.; Stoker, P.G.; Martin, A.D.E.; Hatfield, S.G.S.; Knee, M. (1985) Synthesis of aroma compounds by apples supplied with alcohols and methyl esters of fatty acids. J. Sci. Food Agric. 36, 567–574.

Bartley, J.P. and Schwede, A.M. (1989) Production of volatile compounds in ripening kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis). J. Agric. Food Chem. 37: pp. 1023 – 1025.

Bastrash, S., Makhlouf, J., Castaigne, F. and Willemot, C. (1993) Optimal controlled atmosphere conditions for storage of broccoli florets. J. Food Sci., 58, 338-341.

Beaucht, L.R. and Brackett, R.E. (1990) Survival and growth of Listeria monocytogenes on lettuce as influenced by shredding, chlorine treatment, modified atmosphere packaging and temperature. J. Food Sci., 55: 755-758.

386

Beaudry, R. M. (1993) Effect of carbon dioxide partial pressure on blueberry fruit respiration and respiratory quotient. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 3, 249–258.

Beaudry, R.M., Cameron, A.C., Shirazi, A. and Dostal-Lange, D.L. (1992) Modified-atmosphere packaging of blueberry fruit: effect of temperature

on package O2 and CO2. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117, 436–441.

Beaudry, R.M., Severson, R.F., Black, C.C., Kays, S.J. (1989) Banana ripening: Implications of the changes in glycolytic intermediate concentrations, glycolytic and gluconeogenic carbon flux, and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate concentration. Plant Physiol 91: 1436- 1444.

Beaulieu, J. C. and Gorny, J. R. (2004) Fresh-cut fruits’, Agriculture Handbook, New Orleans, p. 66, Available [online]: www.ba.ars.usda.gov/hb66/146freshcutfruits.pdf>. Accessed: 09 Nov 2010.

Beaulieu, J., (2006) Volatile changes in cantaloupe during growth, maturation, and in stored fresh-cuts prepared from fruit harvested at various maturities. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 131: pp. 127-139.

Beaulieu, J.C. (2005) Within-season volatile and quality differences in stored fresh-cut cantaloupe cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53(22): 8679-8687.

Beaulieu, J.C. (2011) Factors affecting sensory quality of fresh produce. Available [online]: file:///C:/Users/Elizabeth/Downloads/Beaulieu%202011%20- %20Factors%20affecting%20sensory%20quality%20of%20fresh- cut%20produce%20(2).pdf. Accessed 31.08.2013.

Beaulieu, J.C. and Baldwin, E.A. (2002). Flavor and Aroma of Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables. In: Lamikanra O. (Ed.). Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables. Science, Technology and Market. Boca Raton, FL. USA. CRC Press, pp. 391-425.

387

Beaulieu, J.C. and Gorney, J.R. (2002) Fresh-cut fruits. In: Gross, K.C., Wang, C.Y. and Saltveit, M. (Eds.). The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables and florist and nursery stocks. Agricultural Handbook 66. Available [online]: http://www.ba.ars.usda.gov/hb66/. Accessed 24.09.2010.

Beaulieu, J.C. and Grimm, C.C. (2001) Identification of volatile compounds in cantaloupe at various developmental stages using solid-phase microextraction. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: pp. 1345-1352.

Beaulieu, J.C., and Lea, J.M. (2005) Formation of secondary flavor compounds in minimally processed fruits. Institute of Food Technology. 18C-2.

Beaulieu, J.C., Ingram, D.A., Lea, J.M. amd Bett-Garber, K.L. (2004) Effect of harvest maturity on the sensory characteristics of fresh-cut cantaloupe. J. Food Sci. 69(7):S250-S258.

Beaulieu, J.C., Lea, J.M. and Eggleston, G. (2003) Sugar and Organic Acid Variations in Commercial Cantaloupes and their inbred parents. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 128(4): pp. 531-536.

Beck, H.C., Hansen, A.M. and Lauritsen, F.R. (2002) Metabolite production and kinetics of branched-chain aldehyde oxidation in Staphylococcus xylosus. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 31, 94–101.

Beekwilder, J.; Alvarez-Huerta, M.; Neef, E.; Verstappen, F.W.A.; Bouwmeester, H.J.; Aharoni, A. (2004) Substrate usage by recombinant alcohol acyltransferases from various fruit species. Plant Physiol., 135, 1865–1878.

Belitz, H.D., Grosch, W. and Schieberle, P. (2004) Translation from the fifth German edition by M. Burghagen. Third revised edition. Springer, Germany. Food Chem., pp. 342-369.

388

Ben, J. and M. Gaweda. (1985) Changes of pectic compounds in Jonathan apples under various storage conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 7: 45–54.

Ben-Yehoshua, S., Shapiro, B., Chen, Z.E. and Lurie, S. (1983) Mode of action of plastic film in extending life of lemon and bell pepper fruits by alleviation of water stress Plant Physiology, 73: 87-93.

Benkerroum, N. (2008). Antimicrobial activity of lysozyme with special reference to milk. Africal Journal of Biotechnology., 7(25): 4856-4867.

Berger, M., Kuchler, T., MaaBen, A., Busch-Stockfisch, M. and Steinhart, H. (2008) Correlation of carotene with sensory attributes in carrots under different storage conditions. Food Chemistry., 106(1): 235-240.

Berger, R.G. (2007) Flavours and Fragrances-Chemistry, Bioprocessing and Sustainability; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany.

Berger, R.G., Drawert, F. and Kollmannsberger, H. (1986) Geruchsaktive spurenkomponenten des bananen aromas. Chem. Mikrobiol. Technol. Lebensm,. 10: pp. 120-124.

Bergqvist, J., Dokoozlian, N. and Ebisuda, N. (2001) Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of cabernet sauvignon and Grenache in the central San Joaquin Valley of California. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 52(1): 1-7.

Berna, A., Buysens, S., Di Natale, C., Grun, I. and Lammertyn, J. (2005) Relating sensory analysis with electronic nose and headspace fingerprint MS for tomato aroma profiling. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 36, 143–155.

Bett, K.L., Ingram, D.A., Grimm, C.C., Lloyd, S.W., Spanier, A.M., Miller, J.M., Gross, K.C., Baldwin, E.A. and Vinyard, B.T. (2000) Flavor of fresh-cut Gala apples in barrier film packaging as affected by storage time. J. Food Quality. 24: 141-146.

389

Bett-Garber, K.L., Beaulieu, J.C., Ingram, D.A. (2003) Effect of storage on sensory properties of fresh-cut cantaloupe varieties. J. Food Qual. 26: 323-335.

Bianco, V.V. and Pratt, H.K. (1977) Compositional changes in muskmelon during development and in response to ethylene treatment. J. Amer. Soc Hort. Sci. 102: pp.127-133.

Bicci, C., Iori, C., Rubiolo, P. and Sandra. P. (2002) Headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), and solid phase microextraction (SPME) applied to the analysis of roasted Arabica coffee and coffee brew. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50: 449-459.

Blakistone, B.A. (1999) Principles and Applications of Modified Atmosphere Packaging of Foods. 2nd Ed, Aspen Publishers Inc, USA, pp.1-9.

Blanchard, M., Castaigne, F., Willemot, C. and Makhlouf, J. (1996) Modified atmosphere preservation of freshly prepared diced yellow onion. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 9: 173-185.

Blanpied, G.D., Bramlage, W.J., Dilley, DR., Johnson, D.S., Lange, E., Lau, O.L., Lidster, P.D., and Lougheed, E.C. (1987) An international cooperative survey study of McIntosh apple responses to low oxygen and standard controlled atmosphere storage. Fruit Sci. Rep. 14: 155-162.

Blasa, M., Gennari, L., Angelina, D and Ninfali, P. (2010) Fruit and Vegetable Antioxidants in Heath. In, Watson, R.R. and Preedy, V.R. (Eds), Bioactive Foods in Promoting Health: Fruits and Vegetables (pp37-58). 1st Ed. Macmillian Press for Elsevier, USA.

Blum, A. (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Research, 112(2-3): 119-123.

Bolin, H.R., and Huxsoll, C.C. (1991a) Control of minimally processed carrot (Daucus carota) surface discoloration caused by abrasion peeling. Journal of Food Science, 56, 416-418.

390

Bolin, H.R., and Huxsoll, C.C. (1991b) Effect of preparation procedures and storage parameters on quality retention of salad-cut lettuce. J. Food Science, 56, 416-418.

Bolin, H.R., Stafford, A.E., King A.D.Jr. and Huxsoll C.C. (1977) Factors affecting the storage stability of shredded lettuce. J. Food Sci. 42: 1319- 1321.

Bord Bia, (2007) Irish Consumer Attitudes to Fresh Produce. Available [online]: http://www.bordbia.ie/industry/manufacturers/insight/publications/bbrep orts/Documents/Irish%20Consumer%20Attitudes%20to%20Fresh%20Pr oduce%20-%20July%202007.pdf. Accessed 31.07.2010.

Bord Bia, (2009-2011) Strategic Priorities – Growing the Success of the Irish Food, Drink and Horticulture. Available [online]: http://www.bordbia.ie/old/publications/StrategicPriorities/Strategic%20P riorities%202009-11.pdf. Accessed 12.05.2013.

Bord Bia. (2012) Understanding Irish consumer behaviour. Available [online]: http://www.bordbia.ie/industry/manufacturers/insight/publications/bbrep orts/Documents/Understanding%20the%20Irish%20Consumer%20June %202012.pdf. Accessed 05.03.2014.

Borochov-Neori, H., Lazarovitch, N., Judeinstein, S., Patil, B.S. and Holland, D. (2013) Climate and Salinity Effects on Color and Health Promoting properties in the Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Fruit Arils. Tropical and Subtropical Fruits: Flavors, Color and Health Benefits, pp. 43-61. DOI: 10.1021/bk-2013-1129.ch003

Bourke, L. (2010) Consumer Attitudes Towards and Usage of Fruit, Vegetables and Potatoes. Available [online]: http://www.bordbia.ie/industry/manufacturers/insight/publications/bbrep orts/Documents/Consumer%20Attitudes%20Towards%20and%20Usage %20of%20Fruit,%20Vegetables%20and%20Potatoes%20- %20May2010.pdf. Accessed 12.05.2013.

391

Bourne, M.C. (1974) Comparison of results from the use of the Magness- Taylor pressure tip in hand- and machine-operation. J. Texture Studies. 5: 105-108.

Bouwmeester, H.J., Gershenzon, J., Konings, M.C.J.M. and Croteau, R. (1998) Biosynthesis of the monoterpenes limonene and carvone in the fruit of caraway: I. Demonstration of enzyme activities and their changes with development. Plant Physiol., 117(3): pp. 901-912.

Bowers, R.C. and Dewey, D.H. (1960) Further studies of the relation of sugar- acid ratios to the ripening and deterioration of Jersey and Rubel blueberry fruit. Quarterly Bulletin, Michigan State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, 43, 303-311.

Boynton, B. B., Welt, B. A., Sims, C. A., Balaban, M. O., Brecht, J. K. and Marshall, M. R. (2006) Effects of low-dose electron beam irradiation on respiration, microbiology, texture, color, and sensory characteristics of fresh-cut Cantaloupe stored in modified atmosphere. Journal of Food Science, 71: pp. 149-155.

Brackett, R.E. (1988) Changes in microflora of packaged fresh tomatoes. J. Food Quality. 11:89-105.

Brackett, R.E. (1989) Changes in microflora of packaged fresh broccoli. J. Food Quality. 12:169-181.

Brackett, R.E. (1990) Changes in the microflora of packaged fresh bell peppers. J. Food Protect., 53(3): 255-257, 261.

Brackett, R.E. (1994) Microbiological spoilage and pathogens in minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. In: Wiley, R.C. (Ed.). Minimally Processed Refrigerated Fruits and Vegetables, New York: Chapman and Hall, p. 269-312.

Brâna, D., Voldrich, M., Marek, M., Kamarad, J. (1997) Effect of high pressure treatment on Patulin Content in apple concentrate. In: High

392

Pressure Research in the Biosciences, Heremans, K. (ed), Leuven University Press, Leuven, pp. 335-338.

Brecht, J. K. (1995) Physiology of lightly processed fruits and vegetables. HortScience, 30(1), 18–21.

Brecht, J.K., Chau, K.V., Fonesca, S.C., Oliveira, F.A.R., Silva, F.M., Nunes, M.C.N. and Bender, R.J. (2003) Maintaining optimal atmosphere conditions for fruits and vegetables throughout the postharvest handling chain, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 27: 87-101.

Brilli F, Ruuskanen TM, Schnitzhofer R, Müller M, Breitenlechner M, Bitner, V., Wohlfahrt, G., Loreto, F. and Hansel, A. (2011) Detection of Plant Volatiles after Leaf Wounding and Darkening by Proton Transfer Reaction ‘‘Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (PTR-TOF). PLoS ONE 6(5): e20419. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020419

Brody, A.L., Bugusu, B., Han, J.H., Koelsch-Sand, C. and McHugh, T.H. (2008) Scientific Status Summary: Innovative Food Packaging Solutions. Journal of Food Science 73(8): R107-R116.

Brown, A.W. (1985) CO2 and intracellular pH. Plant Cell Environ., 8: pp. 459- 465.

Brownleader, M.D., Jackson, P., Mobasheri, A., Pantelides, A.T., Sumar, S., Trevan, M. and Dey, P.M. (1999) Molecular aspects of cell wall modifications during fruit ripening. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 39, 149-164.

Bruckner, B. (2008) Fruit and vegetable flavour: Recent advances and future prospects. Woodhead Publishing Limited: Abington Hall, Cambridge, UK.

Buescher, R.W. and Hobson, G.E. (1982) Role of calcium and chelating agents on regulating the degradation of tomato fruit tissue by polygalaturonase, J. Food Biochem., 6, 147-160.

393

Budu., A.S., Joyce, D.C. and Terry, L.A. (2007). Quality changes in sliced pineapple under controlled atmosphere storage’, J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 82(6): p. 934-940.

Burdon, J., Lallu, N., Billing, D., Burmeister, D., Yearsley, C. and Wang, M. (2005) Carbon dioxide scrubbing systems alter the ripe fruit volatile profiles in controlled-atmosphere stored ‘hayward’ kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 35: 131-141.

Burger, Y., Saar, U., Paris, H.S., Lewinsohn, E., Katzir, N., Tadmor, Y. and Shaffer, A.A. (2006) Genetic variability for valuable fruit quality traits in Cucumis melo. Israel J. Plant Sci., 54: pp. 233-242.

Buttery, R.G. (1993) Quantitative and sensory aspects of flavour of tomato and other vegetables and fruits. In: Flavor Science: Sensible Principles and Techniques; Acree, T.E. and Teranishi, R. (Eds.). ACS: Washington, D.C., USA. pp. 259-286.

Buttery, R.G. and Ling, L.C. (1993) Volatile components of tomato fruit and plant parts: relationships and biogenesis: In: Teranishi, R., Buttery, R.G. and Hiroshi, S. (Eds.), Bioactive Volatile Compounds from Plants, Chapter 3: p.p. 23-34. doi: 10.1021/bk-1993-0525.

Buttery, R.G. Quantitative and sensory aspects of flavor of tomato and other vegetable and fruits. In Flavor Science: Sensible Principles and Techniques; Acree, T.E., Teranishi, R., Eds.; ACS: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 259–286.

Cagnon, T., Guillaume, C., Guillard, V., Gontard, N. (2012) Nanostructuring and microstructuring of materials from a single agropolymer for sustainable MAP preservation of fresh food. Packag. Technol. Sci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pts. 1973.

Caleb, O.J., Mahajan, P.V., Al-Julanda Al-Said, F. and Opara, U.L. (2013) Modified atmosphere packaging technology of fresh and fresh-cut

394

produce and the microbial consequences: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol., 6: 303-329.

Caleb. O.J., Mahajan, P.V., Opara, U.L., Witthuhn, C.R. (2012) Modelling the effect of time and temperature on respiration rate of pomegranate arils (cv ‘Acco’ and ‘Herskawitz’). Journal of Food Science, 64(1), 49-54.

Cameron, A.C. Talasila, P.C., and Joles, D.W. (1995) Predicting film permeability needs for modified atmosphere packaging of lightly processed fruits and vegetables. HortScience ,30: 25-34.

Cano, A., Acosta, M., Arnao, M.B. (2003) Hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant activity changes during on-vine ripening of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Postharvest Biology and Technology 28, 59–65.

Cano, M.P. Marin, M.A. and De Ancos, B. (1993) Pigment and colour stability of frozen kiwifruit slices during prolonged storage. Z. Lebebsm. Unters Forsh, 197:346-352.

Cantwell, M. and Portela, S. (1997) Comparing varieties and storage method. FreshCut (Oct):14-18.

Cantwell, M., Suslow, T.V. (2002) Postharvest handling systems: Fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Pp. 445. In: A.A. Kader (Ed.) 3rd ed., University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Publication 3311.

Cao, S., Hu, Z., Pang, B., Wang, H., Xie, H., & Wu, F. (2010) Effect of ultrasound treatment on fruit decay and quality maintenance in strawberry after harvest. Food Control, 21, 529 - 532.

Carcia, C.V., Stevenson, R.J., Atkinson, R.G., Winz, R.A. and Yong Quik, S. (2013) Changes in the bound aroma profiles of Hayward and Hort16A kiwifruit (Actinidia spp) during ripening and GC-olfactory analysis. Food Chem., 137: pp. 45-54.

395

Cardello, A. V. (1995). Food quality: Relativity, content and consumer expectations. Food Quality and Preference, 6(2), 163–168.

Careri, M., Bianchi, F. and Corradini, C. (2002) Recent advances in the application of mass spectrometry in food-related analysis. J. Chromatogr. A, 970, 3–64.

Carlin, F., Nguyen-the, C., Abreu da Silva, A. and Cochet, C. (1996) Effects of carbon dioxide on the fate of Listeria monocytogenes, of aerobic bacteria and on the development of spoilage in minimally processed fresh endive Int. J. Food Microbiol., 32: 159-172.

Carlin, F., Nguyen-the, C., Abreu Da Silva, A., & Cochet, C. (1996) Effects of carbon dioxide on the fate of Listeria monocytogenes, on aerobic bacteria and on the development of spoilage in minimally processed fresh endive. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 32, 159–172.

Carlin, F., Nguyen-the, C., Chambroy, T. and Reich, M. (1990) Effects of controlled atmospheres on microbial spoilage, electrolyte leakage and sugar content of ready-to-use grated carrots. Int. J. Food Sci., 25: 110- 119.

Carlin, F., Nguyen-The, C., Cudennec, P. and Reich, M. (1989) Microbiological spoilage of fresh “ready-to-use” grated carrots. Sci. Alim. 9: 371-386.

Castaner, M., Gil., M. I., Artes, F. and Tomas-Barberan, F.A. (1996) Inhibition of browning of harvested head lettuce. J. Food Sci., 61(2): 314-316.

Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.W. Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A.M. Francia, E., Mare, C., Tondelli, A. and Stanca, M. (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research, 105: 1-14.

Cegielska-Radziejewska, R., Leśnierowski, G. and Kijowski, J. (2008). Propertirs and applications of egg white lysozyme and its modified

396

preparations – A Review. Polish Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences. 58(1), p5-10.

Center for Disease Control (2012). Multistate Outbreak of Listeriosis Linked to Whole Cantaloupes from Jensen Farms, Colorado - Outbreak Highlights, August 27, 2012 (FINAL Update Addendum). Available [online]: http://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/cantaloupes-jensen- farms/index.html?s_cid=cs_654. Accessed: 08.12.2012.

Chambers, E. and Koppel, K. (2013) Associations of volatile compounds with sensory aroma flavour: the complex nature of flavour. Molecules, 18, 4887-4905.

Chan, H.W.S. (1987) Autoxidation of Unsaturated Lipids; Academic Press: London, UK.

Charles, F., Sanchez, J., and Gontard, N. (2005) Modelling of active modified atmosphere packaging of endive exposed to several postharvest temperatures. Journal of Food Science. 70(8): 443-449.

Chatzitheodorou, I.T., Sotiropoulos, T.E. and Mouhtaridou, G.I. (2004) Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilisation and manure on fruit yield and fruit quality of peach cultivars ‘Spring Time’ and ‘Red Haven’. Agronomy Research, 2(2), 135-143.

Chau, K., and Talasila, P. (1994) Design of modified atmosphere packages for fresh fruits and vegetables. In: Singh, R., and Oliveria, F., (eds), Minimal processing of foods and process optimization, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 407-416.

Chen, C. C., and Paull, R.E. (2001) Fruit temperature and crown removal on the occurrence of pineapple fruit translucency. Scientia Horticulturae, 88:85-96.

Chen, G.P., Hackett, R., Walker, D., Taylor, A., Lin, Z.F. and Grierson, D. (2004) Identification of a specific isoform of tomato lipoxygensae

397

(TomloxC) involved in the generation of fatty acid-derived flavour compounds. Plant Physiology, 136: 2641-2651.

Chen, S, Xiang, Y, Deng, J, Liu, Y. and Li, S. (2013) Simultaneous Analysis of Anthocyanin and Non-Anthocyanin Flavonoid in Various Tissues of Different Lotus (Nelumbo) Cultivars by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn. PLoS ONE, 8(4): e62291. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062291.

Chen, S.C. (1992) Physicochemical principles for the concentration and freezing of fruit juices. In Fruit Processing Technology, Nagy, S., Chen, C.S., and Shaw, P.E., Editors. Agscience, Inc., Auburndale, Florida. 23– 25.

Cheung, A.Y., McNellis, T. and Piekos, B. (1993) Maintenance of Chloroplast Components during Chromoplast Differentiation in the Tomato Mutant Green Flesh. Plant Physiol., 101: 1223-1229.

Chonhenchob, V., Chantarasomboon, Y., Singh, S.P. (2007a) Quality Changes of Treated Fresh-Cut Tropical Fruits in Rigid Modified Atmosphere Packaging Containers. Packaging Technology and Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, 27-37.

Chonhenchob, V., Kamhangwong, D. and Singh, S.P. (2007b) Comparison of Reusable and Single Use Plastic and Paper Shipping Containers for Distribution of Fresh Pineapples. Journal of Packaging Technology and Science, John Wiley and Sons, DO1: 10:1002/pts780.

Chow, C. (2003) Microperforations for fresh-cut produce packaging. Available [online]: http://www.precoinc.com/PDF/microperforating_Chow.pdf. Accessed 20.04.2014.

Christensen, D. (1995) Quality, efficiency and yield In: Pineapple Field Day Book, Pineapple Industry Farm Committee, Beerwah, Queensland, p. 15- 19.

Christie, G.B.Y., Macdiarmuid, J.I., Schliephake, K., Tomkins, R.B. (1995) Determination of film requirements and respiratory behaviour of fresh

398

produce in modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biol. Technol.. 6, 41-54.

Christie, S. (2010). Market Report. Available [online]: http://freshcut.com/enewsletter/2010-01-freshcuts.html. Accessed 12.05.2013.

Chung, K.T., Stevens, S.E., Jr., Lin, W. and Wei, C.I. (1993) Growth inhibition of selected food bourne bacteria by tannic acid, propyl gallate and related compounds. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 17: pp.29-32.

Cisneros-Zevalls, L. (2003) The use of controlled post-harvest abiotic stresses as a tool for enhancing the neutraceutical content and adding-value to fresh fruits and vegetables. J. Food Sci., 68(5): 1560-1565.

Clark, C.J., McGlone, V.A. and Jordan, R.B. (2001) Detection of brownheart in ‘Braeburn’ apple by transmission NIR spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28: 87–96.

Clemens, R. (2004) The expanding US market for fresh produce. Available [online]: http://www.agmrc.org/media/cms/expandingusmarketproduce_07C66B1 CA5F70.pdf. Accessed 12.02.2014.

Cliffe-Byrnes, V. and O'Beirne, D. (2005a) The effects of cultivar and physiological age on quality and shelf-life of coleslaw mix packaged in modified atmospheres. Int. J. Food Science and Technology, 40, 165- 175.

Cliffe-Byrnes, V., O’Beirne, D. (2005b). ‘Effects of chlorine treatment and packaging on the quality and shelf-life of modified atmosphere (MA) packaged coleslaw mix’. Journal of Food Control, 16, 707-716.

Crisosto, C.H., Johnson, R.S., DeJong, T. and Day, K.R. (1997) Orchard factors affecting postharvest stone fruit quality. HortScience., 32: 820- 823.

399

Crisosto, H. and Crisosto, G.M. (2001) Understanding consumer acceptance of early harvested ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol Technol., 22: 205- 213.

Crisosto, H., Mitchell, F.G., Arpaia, M.L. and Meyer, G. (1984) The effect of growing location and harvest maturity on the storage performance of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 109: 584-587.

Croissant, A.E.; Watson, D.M.; Drake, M.A. (2009) Application of sensory and instrumental analyses to dairy products. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2, 395–421.

Crouch, I. (2003) 1–Methylcyclopropene (SmartfreshTM) as an alternative to modified atmosphere and controlled atmosphere storage of apples and pears. Acta Hort. 600: 433–436.

Crujeiras, A.B., Goyenechea, E. and Martinez, J.A. (2010) Fruit, Vegetables, and Legumes Composition: Role in Preventing and Treating Obesity. In, Watson, R.R. and Preedy, V.R. (Eds), Bioactive Foods in Promoting Health: Fruits and Vegetables (pp359-380). 1st Ed. Macmillian Press for Elsevier, USA.

Cunningham, D.G., Acree, T.E., Barnard, J., Butts, R.M. and Braell, P.A. (1985) Charm analysis of apple volatiles. Food Chem. 19:137-147.

Cutting, J.G.M., Wolstenholme, B.N., and Hardy, J. (1992) Increasing relative maturity alters the base mineral composition and phenolic concentration of avocado fruit. J. Hort. Sci. 67: 761-768.

Dai, N., Schaffera, A., Petreikova, M., Shahak, Y., Giller, Y., Ratner, K. Levine, A. and Granota, D. (1999) Overexpression of Arabidopsis hexokinase in tomato plants inhibits growth, reduces photosynthesis and induces rapid senescence. The Plant Cell, 11(7): 1253-1266. http://dx. doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.7.1253

Dangl, J.L. and Jones. J.D.G. (2001) Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 411: 826-833.

400

Daniels, J.A., Krishnamurthy, R. and Rizui, S.S.H. (1985) A review of effects

of CO2 and microbial growth and food quality. J. Food Prot., 48: 532- 537.

Danish Technological Institute of Packaging and Transport, (2008) Packaging Fresh Fruit and Vegetables: A Guide. Available [online]: http://www.modifiedatmospherepackaging.com/~/media/Modifiedatmos pherepackaging/Pictures/Guide%20%20%20Packaging%20of%20Fresh %20Fruit%20and%20Vegetables%20%20%20PDF%20file.ashx. Accessed 20.04.2014.

Daunay, M.C. (2008) Eggplant, In: Prohens, J. and Nuez, F. Eds. Handbook of Plant Breeding - Vegetables II. New York: Springer. 163–220.

Dauthy, M.E. (1995) Fruit and Vegetable Processing Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations (FAO) Agricultural Bulletin No. 119. Available [online]: www.vouranis.com/uploads/6/2/8/5/6285823/fao_fruit_veg_processing. pdf. Accessed: 24.04.2010.

Day, B. (2000) Novel MAP for freshly prepared fruit and vegetable products. Postharvest News Inform., 11: 23-31.

Day, B.P.F. (2008). Modified Atmosphere Packaging. In Food Biodeterioration and Preservation, Tucker, G.S. (ed). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Ames, I.O. pp 165-192. de Wild, H.P.J., Otma, E.C. and Peppelenbos, H.W. (2003) Carbon dioxide action on ethylene biosynthesis of preclimacteric and climacteric pear fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54(387): pp. 1537-1544.

DeEll J.R., Saad F., Khanizadeh S. (1999) Factors influencing apple fruit firmness. The 42nd Annual IDFTA Conference, 20-24 February, Hamilton, Ontario.

Deetae, P., Bonnarme, P., Spinner, H.E. and Helinck, S. (2007) Production of volatile aroma compounds by bacterial strains isolated from different

401

surface-ripened French cheeses. Appl. Microbiol.Biotechnol., 76: pp. 1161-1171.

Dehghan-Shoar, Z., Hamidi-Esfahani, Z. and Abbasi, S. (2009) Effect of temperature and modified atmosphere on quality preservation of sayer date fruits (Phoenix dactylifera). J. Food Proc. Pres., 34: 323–334.

De la Calle, B., Stanley, J, and Fonts, A. (2009) Analysing the Innovation Process in the EU Integrated Programme, ISAFRUIT. Journal of Horticultural and Biotechnology. Special Issue, 195-200.

Department of Agriculture and Food. (2005) Annual Report of the Minister for Agriculture and Food. Available [online]: http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/publications/2006/annual report2005.pdf. Accessed 31.05.2013.

Department of Health (2012). Your guide to healthy eating using the food pyramid. Available [online]: http://health.gov.ie/wp- content/uploads/2014/03/YourGuide_HealthyEating_FoodPyramid.pdf. Accessed 12.04.2013.

Devlieghere, F., Debevere, J. and Van Impe, J. (1998) Concentration of carbon dioxide in the water-phase as a parameter to model the effect of a modified atmosphere on microorganisms. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 43(1-2): 105-113.

Dhall, R.K. and Singh, P. (2013) Effect of Ethephon and Ethylene Gas on Ripening and Quality of Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) during Cold Storage. J Nutr. Food Sci., 3:244.

Ding, C. K. et al. (2002) Modified atmosphere packaging maintains postharvest quality of loquat fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 24(3), p. 341-348.

Ding, C.K., Chachin, K., Ueda, Y., Imhori, Y. and Wang, C.Y. (2001) Metabolism of phenolics compounds during loquat fruit development. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49(6): 2883-2888.

402

Dixon, N.M. and Kell, D.B. (1989) The inhibition by CO2 of the growth and metabolism of microorganisms. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 67: pp. 109-136.

Dong, D., Zhao, C., Zheng, W., Wang, W., Zhao, X. and Jiao, L. (2013) Analyzing Strawberry Spoilage via its Volatile Compounds Using Longpath Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Scientific Reports [online]: http://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1038%2Fsrep02585.

Dowling, W., (1991) Preservation of fruits and vegetables. UK Patent Application, GB2258993A.

Duan, L.N., Dietrich, D., Ng, C.H., Chan, P.M.Y., Bhalerao, R., Bennett, M.J. and Dinneny, J.R. (2013) Endodermal ABA signaling promotes lateral root quiescence during salt stress in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 25: pp. 324-341.

Dudareva, N.; Andersson, S.; Orlova, I.; Gatto, N.; Reichelt, M.; Rhodes, D. (2005) The nonmevalonate pathway supports both monoterpene and sesquiterpene formation in snapdragon flowers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 933–938.

Dymerski, T.M., Chmiel, T.M. and Wardencki, W. (2011) An odor-sensing- system—Powerful technique for foodstuff studies. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 82, 1–32.

El Hadi, M.A.M., Zhang, F. J., Wu, F.F., Zhou, C.H. and Tao, J. (2013) Advances in Fruit Aroma Volatile Research. Molecules., 18: pp. 8200- 8229.

El Kar, C., Mtimet, N., Ferchichi, A. and Bouajila, J. (2013) Relationships between Fruit Acceptability and Health-Case of Seven Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Juices. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 4(8A) ID:35285, 12 pages.

El Yahyaoui, F., Wongs‐Aree, C., Latché, A., Hackett, R., Grierson, D. and Pech, J.C. (2002) Molecular and biochemical characteristics of a gene encoding an alcohol acyltransferase involved in the generation of aroma

403

volatile esters during melon ripening. European Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269: pp. 2359–2366

El-Sharkaway, I., Manriquez, D., Flores, F.B., Regad, F., Bouzayen, M., Latche, A. and Pech, J.C. (2005) Functional characterization of a melon AAT gene family involved in the biosynthesis of ester volatiles. Identification of a threoninie residue. Plant Mol. Biol., 59: pp. 345-362.

Elss, S., Preston, C., Hertzig, C., Heckel, F., Richling, E. and Schreier, P. (2005) Aroma profiles of pineapple fruit (Ananas comosus [L.] Merr.) and pineapple products. Lebensm.-Wiss. Technol., 38: pp. 263-274.

Emond, J.P. and Chau, K.V. (1990) Use of perforations in modified atmosphere packaging. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 90, 6512.

Emond, J.P., Casteigne, F., Toupin, C.J. and Desilets, D. (1991) Mathematical modelling of gas exchange in modified atmosphere packages of fruits and vegetables. J. Food Sci., 60(5): 1078-1087.

Erlund, I. (2004) Review of the flavonoids quercetin, hesperetin, and naringenin. Dietary sources, bioactivities, bioavailability, and epidemiology. Nutr. Res. 24:851-874.

Escalona, V.H., Aguayo, E., Artes, F. (2007) Quality changes of fresh-cut kohlrabi sticks under modified atmosphere packaging. Journal of Food Science. 72(5), S303-307.

Evensen, K.B. (1983) Effects of maturity at harvest, storage temperature and cultivar on muskmelon quality. Hort. Science, 18: 907-908.

Euromonitor International, (2010) Outlook of US Food Products, Consumption & Export Trends. Available [online]: http://fea.files.cms- plus.com/Presentations/Outlook%20for%20Global%20Food%20Trade.p df. Accessed 10.01.2011.

404

Euromonitor International, (2012) Economic research and corporate development – Working Paper 1 – Indicators for balanced growth. Available [online]:https://www.allianz.com/media/economic_research/publications /working_papers/en/EUROMONITOR2012.pdf. Accessed 31.08.2014.

FactomineR, (2008) Principal Component Analysis’, Available [online]: http://factominer.free.fr/classical-methods/principal-components- analysis.html, Accessed: 11/11/2013.

Fagundes, C., Carciofi, B.A.M. and Monteiro, A.R. (2013) Estimate of respiration rate and physiochemical change of fresh-cut apple stored under different temperatures. Food Sci. Technol., 33(1): 60-67.

Fallico, B., Lanza, M.C., Maccarone, E., Nicolosi Asmunado, C. and Rapisarda, P. (1996) Role of hydroxycinnamic acids and vinyl-phenols in the flavour alteration of blood orange juices. J. Agric. Food Chem., 44, 2654-2657.

Fan, X., Annous, B.A., Beaulieu, J.C. and Sites, J. (2008) Effect of hot water surface pasteurisation of whole fruit on shelf-life and quality of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon. J. Food Sci., 73(3):91-98.

Fanestil, D.D. Hastings, A.B. and Mahowald, T.A. (1963) Environmental CO2 stimulation of mitochondrial adenosine triphosphatase activity. J. Biol. Chem., 238: pp. 836-842.

Fang, T., Y. Liu, and L. Huang (2013) Growth kinetics of Listeria monocytogenes and spoilage microorganisms in fresh-cut cantaloupe. Food Microbiology 34:174-181.

FAO, (2010) Processing of fresh-cut tropical fruits and vegetables: A technical guide’. available [online]: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i1909e/i1909e00.pdf, accessed [20.10.2010].

405

Farber, J.M. (1991) Microbiological aspects of modified atmosphere packaging technology: A review. J. Food Prot. 54: 58-70.

Farber, J.M., S.L. Wang, Y. Cai, and S. Zhang. (1998) Changes in populations of Listeria monocytogenes inoculated on packaged fresh-cut vegetables. J Food Protect. 61:192-195.

Fellows, P.J. (2000) Food Processing Technology: Principles and Practice, 2nd Ed, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK.

Ferrari, S., Savatin, D.V. and De Lorenzo, G. (2013) Oligogalacturonides: plant damage-associated molecular patterns and regulators of growth and development. Front Plant Sci. 4(49): p1-19.

Ferruzzi, M.G. and Schwartz, S.J. (2001) Overview of chlorophylls in Foods. In: Curren protocols in food analytical chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. F4.1.1- F4.1.9.

Ferruzzi, M.G., Bohm, V., Courtney, P.D. and Schwartz, S.J. (2002) Antioxidant and antimutagenic activity of dietary chlorophyll derivatives determined by radical scavenging and bacterial reverse mutagenesis assays. J. Food Sci. 67:2589-2595.

Feussner I. and Wasternack, C. (2002) The lipoxygenase pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 53: 275–279.

Fidler, J. C., & North, C. J. (1967) The effect of conditions of storage on the respiration of apples. I. The effects of temperature and concentrations of carbon dioxide and oxygen on the production of carbon dioxide and uptake of oxygen. Journal of Horticultural Science, 42, 189–206.

Fillion, L. and Kilcast, D. (2000) Concept and measurements of freshness of fruits and vegetables. Leatherhead Food RA Research Reports No. 770.

Fillion, L. and Kilcast, D. (2001) Consumer perception of crispness and crunchiness in fruits and vegetables. Food Quality Pref.,13, 23-29.

406

Finnegan, E. and O’Beirne, D. (2014a) Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis I. Postharvest Biol. Technol. In Review.

Finnegan, E. and O’Beirne, D. (2014b) Characterising deterioration patterns in fresh-cut fruits using principal component analysis II: effects of ripeness stage, seasonality, processing and packaging. Postharvest Biol. Technol. In Review.

Finnegan, E., Mahajan, P.V., O’Connell, M., Francis, G.A. and O’Beirne, D. (2013) Modelling respiration in fresh-cut pineapple and prediction of gas permeability needs for optimal modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 79: 47-53.

Fishman, S., Rodov, V., Peretz, J. and Ben-Yshoshua, S. (1996) Mathematical model for perforation effect on oxygen and water vapour dynamics in modified-atmosphere packages. Journal of Food Science, 61(5), 956- 961.

Flore, J.A. and Layne, D.R. (1999) Photoassimilate production and distribution in cherry. Hort. Sci. 34(6):1015-1019.

Flores, F., El Yahaoui F., de Billerbeck, G., Romojaro, F., Latche, A., Bouzayen, M., Pech, J.C. and Ambid, C. (2002) Role of ethylene in the biosynthetic pathway of aliphatic ester aroma volatiles in Charentais Cantaloupe melons. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53: 201-206.

Fonseca, S. C., F. A. R. Oliveira, K. V. Chau, and J. K. Brecht. (1997) Modelling the effects of perforation dimensions and bed porosity on gas exchange in the perforation-mediated modified atmosphere packaging. In Proc. 7th Intl. CA Res. Conf., Vol. 5. Univ. of California, Davis. p. 77-82.

Fonseca, S.C., Oliveira, F.A.R., Brecht, J.K. (2002) Modelling respiration rate of fresh fruits and vegetables for modified atmosphere packages: A review. Journal of Food Engineering, 52, 99-119.

407

Fonseca, S.C., Oliverira, F.A.R., Lino, I.B.M., Brecht, J.R. and Chau, K.V.

(2000) Modelling O2 and CO2 exchange for development of perforation mediated modified atmosphere packaging. J. Food Eng., 43(1), 9-13.

Forney, C.F. (2001) Horticultural and other factors affecting aroma volatile composition of small fruit. HortTechnology., 11: pp. 529–538.

Forney, C.F. (2007) New innovations in the packaging of fresh-cut produce. Acta Hort. 746: 53-60.

Forney, C.F., Mattheis, J.P. and Baldwin, E.A. (2009) Effects on Flavor. In: Yahia, E.M. (Ed.). Modified and Controlled Atmospheres for the Storage, Transportation, and Packaging of Horticultural Commodities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp 119-158.

Foyer, C.H., Parry, M. and Noctor, G. (1994) Markers and signals associated with nitrogen assimilation in higher plants. J. Expt. Bot., 54(382): pp. 585-583.

Francis, G. A., & O’Beirne, D. (1997) Effects of gas atmosphere, antimicrobial dip and temperature on the fate ofListeria innocua andListeria monocytogenes on minimally processed lettuce. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 32, 141–151.

Francis, G.A. and O’Beirne, D. (1998b) Effects of indigenous microflora of minimally processed lettuce on the survival of L. monocytogenes. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 33: 477-488.

Francis, G.A. and O’Beirne, D. (1998a) Effects of storage atmosphere on Listeria monocytogenes and competing microflora using a surface model system. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 33: 465-476.

Francis, G.A., Scollard, J., Meally, A., Bolton, D.J., Gahan, C.G.M., Cotter, P.D., Hill, C. and O’Beirne, D. (2007) The glutamate decarboxylase acid resistance mechanism affects survival of Listeria monocytogenes LO28 in modified-atmosphere packaged foods. J. Appl. Microbiol., 103: 2316- 2324.

408

Frank, D.& O’Riordan, P.& Varelis, P.& Zabaras, D.& Watkins, P.& Ceccato, C. (2007) Deconstruction and recreation of ’Hayward’ volatile flavour using a trained sensory panel, olfactometry and a kiwifruit model matrix. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), vol. 753, p.107-119.

Fresh Cut Fruit Europe (2006) Welcome to Fresh-Cut Europe… Copyright © November 2006 United Fresh Produce Association [online], available: http://www.freshcuteurope.com/ [accessed 21 Mar 2009].

Friel, E.N., Wang, M., Taylor, A.J. and MacRae, E.A. (2007) In vitro and in vivo release of aroma compounds from yellow-fleshed kiwifruit. J. Agric. Food Chem., 55: pp. 6664-6673.

FSAI, (2014). Bacterial tolerance counts. Available [online]: http://www.fsai.ie/uploadedFiles/Reg2073_2005(1).pdf Accessed: 20.05.2014.

Galaz, S.; Morales-Quintana, L.; Moya-León, M.A.; Herrera, R. (2013) Structural analysis of the alcohol acyltransferase protein family from Cucumis melo shows that enzyme activity depends on an essential solvent channel. FEBS Lett. 280: pp 1344–1357.

Galliard, T., Matthew, J.A., Wright, A.J. and Fishwick, M.J. (1977) The enzymatic breakdown of lipids to volatile and non-volatile carbonyl fragments in disrupted tomato fruits. J. Sci. Food Agric., 28: 863-868.

Garcia, C.V., Quek, S.W., Stevenson, R.J. and Winz, R.A. (2011) Kiwifruit flavour: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology‘, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.08.012.

Gautier, H., Diakou-Verdin, V., Benard, C., Reich, M., Buret, M., Bourgaud, F. (2008) How does tomato quality (sugar, acid, and nutritional quality) vary with ripening stage, temperature, and irradiance? Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56: pp. 1241–1250.

Gibson, (2006) Nutrition Questionnaire. Available [online]: http://www.gibsonpharmacysevenpoints.com/ns/DisplayMonograph.asp

409

?StoreID=20CBC7A682BA43028C6EED2912408BCF&DocID=bottom line-ungraded-nutritionquestionnaire. Accessed 02.09.2014.

Gil M.I., Conesa, M.A. and Artes. F. (2002) Quality changes in fresh cut tomato as affected by modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 25(2):199–207.

Gil, M. I., Conesa, M.A. and Artes, F. (2001) Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh-cut tomato. In: Ben-Arie et al (Eds). Proceedings of 4th International conference on postharvest, Vol. 553, pp. 703-704. Acta Horticulturae, ISHS.

Gil, M. I., Tomas-Barberan, F.A., Hess-Pierce, B. and Kader, A.A. (2002) Antioxidant capacities, phenolic compounds, carotenoids and vitamin C contents of nectarine, peach and plum cultivars from California. J. Agric Food Chem. 50: 4976-4982.

Gil, M.I., Ferres, F. and Tomas-Barberal, F.A. (1998) Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the flavonoids and vitamin C content of minimally processed Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris ssp cycla). J. Agric. Food Chem., 46: 2007-2012.

Gil, M.I., Holcroft, D.M. and Kader, A.A. (1997) Changes in strawberry anthocyanins and other polyphenols in response to carbon dioxide treatment. J. Agric. Food Chem., 45: 1662-1667.

Gil. M. I., Artes, F. and Tomas-Barberan, F.A. (1996) Minimal processing and modified atmosphere packaging effects on pigmentation of pomegranate seeds. J. Food Sci., 61(1): 161-164.

Gil., M.I., Aguayo, E. and Kader, A.A. (2006) Quality Changes and Nutrient Retention in Fresh-cut versus Whole fruits during storage. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54: 4284-4296.

Gonda, I., Bar, E., Portnoy, V., Lev, Shery, Burger, J., Schaffer, A.A., Tadmor, Y., Gepstein, S., Gionannoni, J.J., Katzir, N. and Lewinsohn, E. (2010) Branched-chain and aromatic amino acid catabolism into aroma

410

volatiles in Cucumis melo L. fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany, pp. 1-13.

Gong, S., & Corey, K. A. (1994) Predicting steady state oxygen concentrations in modified atmosphere packages of tomatoes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 119, 546–550.

González-Aguilar, G.A., Ruiz-Cruz, S., Cruz-Valenzuela, R., Rodríguez-Félix, R., Wang, C.Y. (2004) Physiological and quality changes of fresh-cut pineapple treated with antibrowning agents. LWT, 37(3), 369-376.

Gorny, J., Cifuentes, R., Hess-Pierce, B., Kader, A. (2000) Quality changes in fresh-cut pear slices as affected by cultivar, ripeness stage, fruit size and storage regime. Journal of Food Science. 65(3), 541-544.

Gorny, J.R (1998) A summary of CA and MA requirements and recommendations for fresh cut (minimally processed) fruits and vegetables. 5: Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables and MAP. Postharv. Hort. Serv. No. 19, CA ’97, Proc 7th Intl. Contr. Atmos. Res. Conf., 30-66.

Gorny, J.R. (2003) A Summary of CA and MA requirements and recommendations for fresh-cut (minimally processed) fruits and vegetables’, Acta Hort. (ISHS) 600: pp. 609-614.

Gorny, J.R. (1997) A summary of CA and MA requirements and recommendations for fresh-cut (minimally processed) fruits and vegetables. Vol 5, Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables and MAP. J. Gorny (ed) Davis CA, pp. 30-67.

Gorny, J.R., B. Hess-Pierce, R.A. Cifuentes and A.A. Kader. (2002) Quality changes in fresh-cut pear slices as affected by controlled atmospheres and chemical preservatives. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 24(3):271-278.

Gorny, J.R., Cifuentes, R.A., Hess-Pierce, B., Kader, A.A. (2000) Quality changes in fresh-cut pear slices as affected by cultivar, ripeness stage, fruit size, and storage regime. J.Food Sci. 65, 541–544.

411

Gorny, J.R., Hess-Pierce, B. and Kader, A.A. (1998) Effects of fruit ripeness and storage temperature on the deterioration rate of fresh-cut peach and nectarine slices. Hort. Sci., 33: 110-113.

Gorny, J.R., Hess-Pierce, B., Cifuentes, R.A. and Kader, A.A. (2002) Quality changes in fresh-cut pear slices as affected by controlled atmospheres and chemical preservatives. Postharvest Biology and Technology 24, 271-278.

Gorny, J.R., Hess-Pierce, B., Kader, A.A. (1999) Stonefruit cultivars, storage atmospheres and chemical treatments affect the deterioration rate of fresh-cut peach and nectarine slices. J. Food Sci., 64:429-432.

Goupy, P., Hugues, M., Boivin, P., Amiot, M.J. (1999) Antioxidant composition and activity of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and malt extracts and of isolated phenolic compounds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79, pp. 1625–1634.

Grant, G.T., Morris, E,R., Rees, D.A., Smith, P.J.C. and Thom, D. (1973) Biological interaction between polysaccharides and divalent cations: The egg-box model, FEBS Lett., 32, 195-198.

Grant Thornton, (2011) Managing through uncertainty: Food and beverage industry in transition. Available [online]: http://www.grantthornton.at/files/GTI%20IBR/GTI_IBR_Food_and_Be verage_Report_2011.pdf. Accessed 12.05.2012.

Grichko, V.P. and Glick, B.R. (2001) Ethylene and flooding stress in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem, 39:1-9.

Guichard, E., Y. Chambroy, M. Reich, N. Fournier, and M. Souty. (1992) Influence de la concentration en dioxyde de carbone sur la qualité aromatique des fraises aprèsentreposage. Sci.Aliments 12: pp. 83–100.

Gunther, C.S., Matich, A.J., Marsh, K.B. and Nicolau, L. (2010) (Methylsulfanyl) alkanoate ester biosynthesis in Actinidia chinensis

412

kiwifruit and changes during cold storage. Phytochemistry. 71: pp. 742- 750.

Hajirezaei, MR. and Stitt, M. (1991) Contrasting roles for pyrophosphate: fructose‐6‐phosphate phosphotransferase during aging of tissues from potato tubers and carrot storage tissues. Plant Science, 77,177–183.

Hakim A., Austin, M.E., Batal, D., Gullo, S. and Khatoon, M. (2004) Quality fresh-cut tomatoes. J. Food Qual. 27(3):195–206.

Halkier, B.A. and Gershenzon, J. (2006) Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 57: pp. 303-333.

Hallett, I.C., Macrae, E.A. and Wegrzyn, T. F. (1992) Changes in kiwifruit cell wall ultrastructure and cell packing during postharvest ripening. Int. J. Plant Sci., 153(1): 49-60.

Halliwell, B. and Gutteridge, J. M. C. (2007) Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. 3rd Ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Harker, F.R., Maindonald, J., Murray, S.H., Gunson, F.A., Hallett, I.C. and Walker, S.B. (2002) Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: Texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology., 24: 225-239.

Harris, D.C. (2007). Quantitiative Chemical Analysis; W.H. Freeman and Company: NewYork.

Harris, W.M. and Spurr, A.R. (1969a) Chromoplsats of tomato fruits. I: Ultrastructure of low-pigment and high-beta mutants: Carotene analysis. Am. J. Bot., 56: 369-379.

Harris, W.M. and Spurr, A.R. (1969b) Chromoplsats of tomato fruits. II: The Red Tomato. Am. J. Bot., 56: 380-389.

He, Y.D.; Wei, C.B.; Li, S.P.; Li, R.M.; Sun, G.M. (2007) Analysis of aroma component of pineapple with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Fujian Anal. Test., 16, 1-4.

413

Heath, H.B. and Reineccius, G. (1986) Biogenesis of flavour fruits and vegetables. In: Flavour chemistry and technology. Westport, CT: AVI, pp. 43-70.

Hernández-Muñoz, P., Almenar, E., Ocio, M. J. & Gavara, R. (2006) Effect of calcium dips and chitosan coatings on postharvest life of strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa). Postharvest Biology and Technology, 39, 247– 253.

Hertog, M.L.A.T.M., Nicholson, S.E., Banks, N.H. (2003) The effect of modified atmospheres on the rate of firmness change in ‘Braeburn’ apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 23, 175-184.

Hertog, M.L.A.T.M., Nicholson, S.E., Jeffrey, P.B. (2004) The effect of modified atmospheres on rate of firmness change of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 31, 251-261.

Hillwig, M., LeBrasseur, N., Green, P. and MacIntosh, G. (2008) Impact of transcriptional ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways on wounding regulation or RNS1 expression. Molecul. Genet. Genom. 280: 249-261.

Hoffman, P.J., and Smith, L.G. (1994) Preharvest effects on postharvest quality of subtropical and tropical fruit. In: Champ, BR., Highley, E., and Johnson, G.I. (eds.), Postharvest Handling of Tropical Fruits, ACIAR Proceedings No. 50: 261- 268.

Hoffman, P.J., Smith, L.G., Holmes, R., Campbell, T., and Meiburg, G. (1995) Mango fruit quality at harvest is affected by production conditions. Proc. Aust. Mango 2000 Prod. Workshop, Dept. Prim. Ind. Qld. (In Press).

Holcroft, D.M. and Kader, A.A. (1999) Carbon dioxide-induced changes in color and anthocyanins synthesis of stored strawberry fruit. HortSci., 34: 1244-1248.

Holden, M. (1974) Chlorophyll degradation products in leaf protein preparations. J. Sci. Food Agric., 25: 1427–1432.

414

Holland, S.M. (2008) Principal Component Analysis, available [online]: http://strata.uga.edu/software/pdf/pcaTutorial.pdf, accessed [14-01- 2014].

Hong, J.H., Douglas, J.M., Mary, J.C. and Gross, K.C. (2000) Tomato cultivation systems affect subsequent quality of fresh-cut fruit slices. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 125: 729-735.

Hong, Y.K., Yoon, W.B., Huang, L., Yuk, H.G. (2014) Predictive modelling for growth of non-and cold-adapted Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut cantaloupe at different storage temperatures. J. Food Sci. 79(6): M1168- 1174.

Howard, L.A., Wong, A.D., Perry, A.K. and Klein, B.P. (1999) Beta-carotene and ascorbic acid retention in fresh and processed vegetables. J. Food Sci., 64(5): 929-936.

Howard, L.R. and Griffin, L.E. (1993) Lignin formation and surface discoloration of minimally processed carrot sticks. J. Food Sci., 58: 1065-1072.

Howard, L.R. and Hernandez-Brenes, C. (1998) Antioxidant content and market quality of jalepeno pepper rings as affected by minimal processing and modified atmosphere packaging. J. Food Qual., 21: 317- 327.

Howe, G.A. (2004) Jasmonates as signals in the wound response. J. Plant Growth Regul. 23: 223-237.

Hui, Y.H., Barta, J., Pilar Cano, M., Gusek, T.W., Sidhu, J.S. and Sinha, N.K. (2006) Handbook of fruits and fruit processing. 1st Ed. Blackwell Publishing Professional, Iowa, USA.

Hunterlab. (2008) Insight on Color, Hunter L, a, b versus CIE 1976 L*, a*, b*, [online], available: http://www.hunterlab.com/appnotes/an02_01.pdf [accessed 8 Nov 2010].

415

Hurtado, M., Vilanova, S., Plazas, M., Gramazio, P., Fonseka, H.H., Fonseka, R. and Prohens, J. (2012) Diversity and Relationships of Eggplants from Three Geographically Distant Secondary Centers of Diversity. [online] PLoS ONE 7(7): e41748.

Husson, F., Josse, J., Le, S and Mezet, J. (2008) FactoMineR: Principal Component Analysis. Available [online]: www.factominer.free.fr/chemical-methods/principal-component- analysis.html. [accessed]: 12.12.2013.

Huxsoll, C.C., H.R. Bolin, and A.D. King, Jr. (1989) Physiochemical changes and treatments for lightly processed fruits and vegetables. In: J.J. Jen (ed.). Quality factors of fruits and vegetables—Chemistry and technology. Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C. p. 203–215.

Hyodo, H. , H. Kuroda, and F. Yang. (1978) Induction of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and increase in phenolics in lettuce leaves in relation to the development of russet spotting caused by ethylene, Plant Physiol., 62:31-35.

Hyodo, H., Tanaka, K. and Yoshisaka, J. (1985) Induction of 1-amino- cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase in wounded mesocarp tissue of winter squash fruit and the effects of ethylene. Plant Cell Physiol., 26:161-167.

Imamura, M. and S. Shimizu. (1974) Metabolism of chlorophyll in higher plants. IV. Relationship between fatty acid oxidation and chlorophyll bleaching in plant extracts. Plant Cell Physiol. 15:187-190.

Infante, R., Contador, L., Rubio, P., Aros, D. and Peña-Neira, A. (2011) Postharvest Sensory and Phenolic Characterization of ‘Elegant Lady’ and ‘Carson’ Peaches. Chilean J. Agric. Res. [online], 71(3), pp. 445- 451. ISSN 0718-5839.

416

Iqbal, T., Rodrigues, F.A.S., Mahajan, P.V., Kerry, J.P., Gil, L., Manso, M.C., Cunha, L.M. (2008) Effect of minimal processing conditions on respiration rate of carrots. Journal of Food Science, 73(8), E396-402.

IUFOST (2000-2010) Effects of processing and storage on micronutrients and bioactive compounds. Available [online]: http://www.google.ie/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web &cd=8&cad=rja&ved=0CHYQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iufos t.org%2Fiufostftp%2FEffects%2520of%2520Processing%2520and%252 0Storage.doc&ei=bhxwUdqlK4KJhQeMroAI&usg=AFQjCNHUWUaM p01kc6oq057xvMUBljiKKQ&sig2=HHBfFO-bMCl15z8ISvL22w, accessed [10.05.2013].

Izumi, H.; Nonaka, T.; Muraoka, T. (1997) Physiology and quality of fresh-cut

spinach stored in low O2 controlled atmospheres at various temperatures. In: CA′97 Proceedings Volume 5: Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables and MAP; Gorny, J. R., Ed; University of California, Davis, pp 130-133.

Jackman, R.L. and Stanley, D.W. (1995a) Creep behaviour of tomato pericarp tissue as influenced by ambient temperature ripening and chilled storage. Journal of Texture Studies. 26: 537-552.

Jackman, R.L. and Stanley, D.W. (1995b). Perspectives in the textural evaluation of plant foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 6; 187-194.

Jackman, R.L. Yada, R.Y., Tung, M. and Speers, R.A. (1987) Anthocyanins as food colorants: a review. J. Food Biochem. 11: 201–247.

Jackson, J.E. (1980) Light interception and utilization by orchard systems. Horticultural Reviews, 2, 208-267.

Jackson, J.E. and Palmer, J.W. (1977) Effects of shade on the growth and cropping of apple trees. II . Effect on components of yield. Hort. Sci. 52: 25S-266.

Jacxsens, L., Devlieghere, F., De Rudder, T., and Debevere, J. (2000) Designing an equilibrium modified atmosphere package for fresh-cut

417

vegetables subjected to change in temperature. Lebensm.-Wiss. U.- Technology. 33: 178-187.

Jacxsens, L., Devlieghere, F., Van der Steen, C, Debevere, J. (2001) Effect of high oxygen atmosphere packaging on microbial growth and sensorial qualities of fresh-cut products. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 71: 197-210.

Jacxsens, L., Devlieghhere, F., & Debevere, J. (1999) Validation of a systematic approach to design equilibrium modified atmosphere packages for fresh-cut produce. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie, 32, 425–432.

Jacxsens, L., Uyttendaele, M., Devlieghere, F., Rovira, J., Oses Gomez, S., and Luning, P.A. (2010) Food safety performance indicators to benchmark food safety output of food safety management systems. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 141: 180-187.

James, J.B. and Ngarmsak, T. (2011) Processing of fresh cut tropical fruits and vegetables: A technical guide. FAO, Bangkok, pp: 102.

Janisiewicz, W.J., Conway, W.S., Brown, M.W., Sapers, G.M., Fratamico, P. and Buchanan, R.L. (1999) Fate of Escherichia coli0157 : H7 on fresh- cut apple tissue and its potential for transmission by fruit flies Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1-5.

Jiang, Y.M., Joyce, D.C., Jiang, W.B. and Lu, W.J. (2004) Effects of chilling temperatures on ethylene binding by banana fruit. Plant Growth Regul., 43: 109-115.

Joles, D.W., Cameron, A.C., Shirazi, A., Petracek, P.D. and Beaudry, R.M. (1994) Modified-atmosphere packaging of “Heritage” red raspberry fruit: Respiratory response to reduced oxygen, enhanced carbon dioxide and temperature. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 119, 540–545.

Jordán, M.J., Margaría, C.A., Shaw, P.E. and Goodner, K.L. (2002) Aroma active components in aqueous kiwifruit essence and kiwifruit puree by

418

GC-MS and multidimensional GC/GC-O. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: pp. 5386-5390.

Kader, A. A. & Mitcham, E.J. (1999) Optimum procedure for ripening mangoes. In: Kader, A.A. (Ed.), Management of fruit ripening. Post- harvest Horticultural Series No. 9. University of California. p. 20-21.

Kader, A.A. (1986) Biochemical and physiological basis for effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on fruits and vegetables. Food Technol., 40(5), 99-104.

Kader, A.A. (1987) Respiration and gas exchange of vegetables. In: Weichmann, J. (Ed). Postharvest physiology of vegetables, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 25-43.

Kader, A.A. (1995) Regulation of fruit physiology by controlled atmospheres, Acta Horticulturae, 398: 59-70.

Kader, A.A. (2008) Flavour quality of fruits and vegetables. J. Sci. Food Agric., 88(11): pp. 1863-1868.

Kader, A.A. (2012a) Impact of Temperature on Product Quality and Storage Life. 5th European Short-course on Quality and Safety of Fresh-cut Produce, Le Corum, Messe Exhibition Grounds, 2.3., Berlin, Germany.

Kader, A.A. (2012b), ‘Future Research Needs in Fresh-cut Products, 5th European Short-course on Quality and Safety of Fresh-cut Produce, Le Corum, Messe Exhibition Grounds, 3.7., Berlin, Germany.

Kader, A.A. and Ben-Yohoshua, S. (2000) Effects os superatmospheric oxygen levels on postharvest physiology and quality of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 20(1), pp. 1-13.

Kader, A.A. and Cantwell, M. (2010) Produce Quality Rating Scales and Color Charts (#23) 2nd Ed. UC Davis, Dept. Postharvest and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California.

419

Kader, A.A. and Morris, L.L. (1977) Relative tolerance of fruits and

vegetables to elevated CO2 and reduced O2 levels. Mich. State Univ. Hortic. Rep., 28, 260.

Kader, A.A., (Ed). (2002) Post-harvest technology of horticultural crops. Oakland: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3311, 535 pp.

Kader, A.A., Perkins-Veazie, P. and Lester, G.E. (2004) Nutritional quality of fruits, nuts and vegetables and their importance in human health. U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Handbook 66. available [online] http://www.ba.ars.usda.gov/hb66/index.html accessed [30.05.2014].

Kader, AA., Zagory, D., and Kerbel, E.L. (1989) Modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables. CRC Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 28(1): 1-30.

Kalt, W. (2005) Effects of production and processing factors on major fruit and vegetable antioxidants. J. Food Sci., 70: 11-19.

Kanellis, A.K., Chang, C., Klee, H., Bleecker, A.B., Pech, J.C. and Grierson, D. (Eds). (2002) Biology abd biotechnology of the plant hormone ethylene II. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.

Kataoka, H., Lord, H. L., Pawliszyn, J. (2000) Applications of solid-phase microextraction in food analysis. Journal of Chromatography A, 880, 35- 62.

Kaur, P., Rai, D.R., and Paul, S. (2011) Quality Changes in Fresh-Cut Spinach (Spinacia Oleracea) Under Modified Atmospheres with Perforations. J.Food Quality. 34, 10-18.

Kazemi, M., Aran, M. and Zamani, S. (2011) Effect of calcium chloride and salicylic acid treatments on quality characteristics of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv. Hayward) during storage. Am. J. Plant Physiol., 6: 183-189.

420

Ke, D., Saltveit, M.E., (1989) Wound-induced ethylene production, phenolic metabolism and susceptibility to russet spotting in iceberg lettuce. Physiol. Plant. 76, 412–418.

Ke., D.Y.E., Mateos, M. and Kader, A.A. (1994) Ethanolic fermentation of ‘Bartlett’ pears as influenced by ripening stage and atmospheric composition. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 119(5): pp. 976-982.

Kenny, O. and O’Beirne. D. (2010) Antioxidant phytochemicals in fresh-cut carrot disks as affected by peeling method. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 58: 247-253.

Kessler, F. Schnell, D., Blobel, G. (1999) Identification of proteins associated with plastoglobules isolated from pea (Pisum sativum L.) chloroplasts. Planta 208: 107-113.

Khachik, F., Beecher, G.R., Goli, M.B., and Lusby, W.R. (1991) Separation, identification and quantification of carotenoids in fruits, vegetables and human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 63, 71-80.

Khan, A.S. and Singh, Z. (2007) 1-Methylcyclopropene application and modified atmosphere packaging affect ethylene biosynthesis, fruit softening, and quality of ‘Tegan Blue’ Japanese plum during cold storage’. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 133(2): 290-299.

Kienzle, S., Sruamsiri, P., Carle, R., Sirisakulwat, S., Spreer, W. and Neidhart, S. (2011) Harvest maturity specification for mango fruit (Mangiferaindica L. ‘Chok Anan’) in regard to long supply chains. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 61(1): 41-55.

Kim, D.M., Smith, N.L. and Lee, C.Y. (1993) Quality of minimally processed apple slices from selected cultivars. J. Food Sci. 58:1115-1117, 1175.

Kim, D.M., Smith, N.L. and Lee, C.Y. (1994) Effect of heat treatment on firmness of apples and apple slices. J. Food Proc. Preserv. 18:1-8.

421

Kimmerer, T. W., & Kozlowski, T. T. (1982) Ethylene, ethane, acetaldehyde, and ethanol production by plants under stress. Plant Physiology 0981- 9428 , 69, 840-847.

Klaiber, R.G., Baur, S., Koblo, A. and Carle, R. (2005) Influence of washing treatment and storage atmosphere on henylamine ammonia lyase activity and phenolics acid content of minimally processed carrot sticks. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53(4): 1065-1072.

Klee, H.J. (2010) Improving the flavor of fresh fruits: genomics, biochemistry and biotechnology. New Phytologist, 187(1): pp. 44-56.

Klein BP, Grossman S, King D, Cohen B-S, Pinsky A. (1984) Pigment bleaching, carbonyl production and antioxidant effects during the anaerobic lipoxygenase reaction. Biochim Biophys Acta 793: 72–79.

Klein, B.P. (1987) Nutritional consequences of minimal processing of fruits and vegetables. Journal of Food Quality, 10, pp. 19-193.

Kliewer, W.M. and Smart, R.E. (1989) Canopy manipulation for optimizing vine microclimate, crop yield and composition of grapes. In: Wright, C.J. (Ed.): Manipulation of Fruiting, Butterworth & Co. Publ., UK. 275- 291.

Konja G, Lovric T (1993) Berry Fruit Juices ProcessingTechnology. In: Nagy, S., Chen, C.S. and Shaw, P.E. (Eds.). Agscience, Inc. Aubrandale, Florida.

Kris-Etherton, P., Hecker, D.D., Bonanome, A., Coval, S.M., Binkoski, A.E., Hilpert, K.F., Griel, A.E. and Etherton, T.D. (2002) Bioactive compounds in foods: their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Am. J. Med. 113:71S-88S.

Lamikanra O, Juaraez B, Watson MA, Richard OA (2003) Effect of cutting and storage on sensory traits of cantaloupe melon cultivars with extended postharvest shelf life. J. Sci. Food Agric., 83: 702-708.

422

Lamikanra O. and Richard, O.A. (2002) Effect of storage on some volatile aroma compounds in fresh-cut cantaloupe melon. J Agric Food Chem. Jul 3; 50(14):4043-7.

Lamikanra, O and Richard, O.A. (2004) Storage and ultraviolet induced tissue stress effects on fresh-cut pineapple. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 84(1): 1812-1816.

Lamikanra, O. (2002). Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables: Science, Technology and Market. CRC Press, New York.

Lamikanra, O. and Watson, M.A. (2004) Effect of calcium treatment temperature on fresh-cut cantaloupe melon during storage. Journal of Food Science. 69: C468-C472.

Lamikanra, O., Chen, J.C., Banks, D. and Hunter, P.A. (2000) Biochemical and microbial changes during storage of minimally processed cantaloupe. J. Agric. Food Chem., 48: pp. 5955-5961.

Lanfer-Marquez, U.M., Barros, R. and Sinnecker, P. (2005) Antioxidant activity of chlorophylls and their derivatives. Food Res. Int. 38:885-891.

Laohakunjit, N. & Kerdchoechuen, O. (2007) Aroma enrichment and the change during storage of none-aromatic milled rice coated with extracted natural flavour. Food Chemistry, 101, 339-344.

Larsen, M. (1994) Volatile compounds formed in strawberries under anaerobic conditions and their influence on off-flavour formation. In: Maarse, H. and Van der Heij, D.G. (Eds). Trends in Flavour Research. Proc. (7th Weurman Flavour Res. Symp., Noordwijkerhaut, The Netherlands, 15- 18 June 1993. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 421-424.

Larsen, M. and Watkins, C.B. (1995) Firmness and Aroma Composition of Strawberries following Short-term High Carbon Dioxide Treatments. Hort. Sci., 30(2): 303-305.

423

Larsen, M. and Watkins, C.B. (1995) Firmness and concentrations of acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate and ethanol in strawberries stored in controlled and modified atmospheres. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 5:39– 50.

Laties GG. (1978) The development and control of respiratory pathways in slices of plant storage organs. In: Kahl G, editor. Biochemistry of wounded tissues. Berlin, German: Walter de Gruyter & Co. p 421–66.

Laties, G.G. (1964) The relation of glucose absorption to respiration in potato slices. Plant Physiol., 39(3): 391-397.

Laule, O.; Furholz, A.; Chang, H.S.; Zhu, T.; Wang, X.; Heifetz, P.B. (2003) Crosstalk between cytosolic and plastidial pathways of isoprenoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 6866–6871.

Lawless, HT, & Heymann, H. (2010) Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices. 2nd Edition, New York : Springer.

Le Calvé, G. (2000) About some problem arising in sensory analysis and some propositions to solve them. Food Quality and preference 11, 341-347.

Lea, A.G.H. (1995) Apple juice. In Production and Packaging of Non- Carbonated Fruit Juices and Beverages, 3rd ed.; Ashurts, P.R., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, pp. 153–196.

Lee, C.Y. (1986) Changes in carotenoids content of carrots during growth and postharvest storage. Food Chemistry, 20(4): 285-293.

Lee, D. S.; Song, Y.; Yam, K. L. (1996) Application of an enzyme kinetics based on respiration model to permeable system experiment of fresh produce. Journal of Food Engineering, v. 27, n. 3, p. 297-310.

Lee, D.S., Haagar, P.E., Lee, J., and Yam, K.L. (1991) Model for fresh produce respiration in modified atmospheres based on principles of enzyme kinetics. Journal of Food Science. 56(6): 1580-1585.

424

Lee, K.S., Park, I.S. and Lee, D.S. (1996) Modified atmosphere packaging of mixed prepared vegetable salad dish. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 31, p7-13.

Lee, S.K. and Kader, A.A. (2000) Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin C content of horticultural crops. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 20: 207-220.

Leenhardt, F., Lyan, B., Rock, E., Boussard, A., Potus, J. and Chanliaud, E. (2006) Wheat lipoxygenase activity induces greater loss of carotenoids than vitamin E during breadmaking. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54: 1710– 1715.

Lester, G.E. and Dunlap, J.R. (1985) Physiological changes during development and ripening of ‘Perlita’ muskmelon fruit. Scientia Hort., 26 : pp. 323-331.

Leverington, R.E. (1968) Problems associated with pineapple products. Food Technology Australia, 20: 24-29.

Li, B. B., Smith, B. and Hossain, M. M. (2006) Extraction of phenolics from citrus peels II. Enzyme-assisted extraction method. Separation and Purification Technology, 48: 189-196.

Liang, Y.Z., Guang, M.S., Yu, G.L., Ling, L.L., Wen, X.Y. and Guang, M.S. (2012) ‘Aroma volatile compounds from two fresh pineapple varieties in China. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 13: pp, 7383-7392.

Liao, C.-H. and Sapers, G.M. (1999) Influence of soft rot bacteria on growth of Listeria monocytogenes on potato tuber slices. J. Food Prot. 62:343- 34.

Liao, C-H., Sullivan, J., Gardy, J. and Wong, L. J.C. (1997) Biochemical characterization of pectate lyases produced by fluroscent pseudmonads associated with spoilage of fresh fruits and vegetables. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 83, 10-16.

425

Lichtenthaler, H.K. (1999). The 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 50, 47–65.

Limberger, R.P., Sobral, M.E.G., Henrique, A.T., Menut, C. and Bessiere, J.M. (2002) Essential oils from six southern Brazilian Myrcengenic species (Myrtaceae). J. Essent. Oils Res. 14: pp. 302-304.

Littman, M.D. (1972) Effect of water stress on ethylene production by preclimacteric banana fruit. Queensland Journal of Agriculture and Animal Science. 29: 131-136.

Liu, C., Liu, Y. and Yi, G. (2011) Effects of mulching on aroma components of pineapple parts. J. Agric. Sci., 3(3): pp. 196-201.

Liu, C.L., Hsu, C.K., Hsu M.M. (2007) Improving the quality of fresh-cut pineapples with ascorbic acid/sucrose pre-treatment and modified atmosphere packaging. Packaging Technology and Science, 20(5), 337- 343.

Liu, M., Nauta, A., Francke, C. and Siezen, R.J. (2008) A comparative genomics of enzymes in flavor-forming pathways from amino acids in lactic acid bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74: pp. 4590–4600.

Lodge, N and Perera, C. (2011) Processing of Kiwifruit, Available [online]: (http://www.hortnet.co.nz/publications/science/lodge2.htm) accessed 09- 12-2013.

Longo M.A. and Sanroman, M.A. (2006) Production of Food Aroma Compounds. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 44(3) pp. 335–353.

Lopez-Galvez, G., El-Bassuoni, R., Nie, X. and Cantwell, M. (1997) Quality of red and green fresh-cut peppers stored in controlled atmospheres. In: Gorny, J.R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Controlled Atmosphere Research Conference: Vol. 5 (pp. 152-157), Davis, CA., USA.

426

Loreto, F. and Velikova, V. (2001) Isoprene produced by leaves protects the photosynthetic apparatus against ozone damage, quenches ozone products, and reduces lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes. Plant Physiol. 127: pp. 1781–1787.

Luchetta, L., Manríquez, D., El-Sharkawy, I., Flores, F.B., Sanchez-Bel, P., Zouine, M., Ginies, C., Bouzayen, M., Rombaldi, C., Pech, J.C., Latché, A., (2007) Biochemical and catalytic properties of three recombinant alcohol acyltransferases of melon. Sulfur-containing ester formation, regulatory role of CoA-SH in activity, and sequence elements conferring substrate preference. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 5213–5220.

Luebke, W. (2011) Ethyl benzoate - 93-89-0. available [online]: http://www.perflavory.com/docs/doc1004771.html accessed 25.04.2014.

Luna-Guzman, I., Cantwell, M., Barrett, D.M. (1999) Fresh-cut cantaloupe:

effects of CaCl2 dips and heat treatments on firmness and metabolic activity. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 17, 201-213.

Lund, B.M. (1979) Bacterial soft rot of potatoes. In: Lovelock, D.W. and Davies, R. (Eds) Plant Pathogens. Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Tech. Ser. No. 12. Academic Press. London/ New York. pp.315-329.

Luo, Y.G., McEvoy, J.L., Wachtel, M.R., Kim, J.G. and Huang, Y, (2004) Package atmosphere affects postharvest biology and quality of fresh-cut cilantro leaves. HortScience, 39: 567-570.

MacRae, E.A., Bowen, J.H. and Stec, M.G.H. (1989a) Maturation of kiwifruit from two orchards: differences in composition of the tissue zones. J.Sci. Food Agric., 47: 401-416.

MacRae, E.A., Lallu, N., Searle, A.N. and Bowen, J.H. (1989b) Changes in softening and composition of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) affected by maturity at harvest and postharvest treatments. J. Sci. Food Agric. 49: 413-430.

427

Madrid, M. and Cantwell, M. (1993) Use of high CO2 atmospheres to maintain quality of intact and fresh-cut melon. In: Proc. 6th Int. Controlled Atmosphere Research Conf. NRAES-71., Ithaca, N.Y. pp. 736-745.

Magness, J.R. and G.F. Taylor. (1925) Unimproved type of pressure tester for the detemination of fruit maturity. U.S. Dept. Agr. Circ. 350, p. 8.

Mahajan, P. V. & Goswami, T. K. (2001) Enzyme kinetics based modelling of respiration rate for apple. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research’, 79(4), 399–406.

Mahajan, P. V. & Goswami, T. K. (2002) Prediction of respiration rate of litchi (chinensis Sonn.) fruit by the principles of enzyme kinetics. Journal of Interacademicia 6(2), 156–165.

Mahajan, P.V., Oliveira, F.A.R., Sousa, M.J., Fonseca, S.C. and Cunha, L.M. (2006) An interactive design of MA-Packaging for fresh produce. In: Hui, Y.H. (Ed). Handbook of Food Science, Technology and Food Engineering. New York: CRC Taylor & Francis.

Mahajan, P.V., Oliveira, F.A.R., Montanez, J.C., Frias, J. (2007) Development of user-friendly software for design of modified atmosphere packaging for fresh and fresh-cut produce. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 8, 84- 92.

Mahattanatawee, K.; Rouseff, R.; Filomena Valim, M.; Naim, M. (2005) Identification and aroma impact of norisoprenoids in orange juice. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53: pp. 393-397.

Mahdavian, K., K.M. Kalantari and M. Ghorbanli, (2007) The effect of different concentrations of salicylic acid on protective enzyme activities of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 3162- 3165

Mannapperuma, J., Singh, R.P. and Montero, M.E. (1991) Simultaneous gas diffusion and chemical reaction in foods stored in modified atmospheres. Journal of Food Engineering, 14(1991):167-183.

428

Manolopoulou, H. and Papadopoulou, P. (1998) A study of respiratory and physio-chemical changes of four kiwifruit cultivars during cool-storage. Food Chemistry, 63, 529-534.

Manríquez, D., I. El Sharkawy,I., Flores, F.B., El Yahyaoui, F., Regad, F., Bouzayen, M., Latché, A. and Pech, J.C. (2006) Two highly divergent alcohol dehydrogenases of melon exhibit fruit ripening-specific expression and distinct biochemical characteristics. Plant Mol. Biol., 61 (2006), pp. 675–685.

Manvell, C. (1997) Minimal processing of food. Food Science and Technology Today, 11, 107-111.

Marangoni, A.G., Palma, T. and Stanley, D.W. (1996) Membrane effects in postharvest physiology. Postharvest Biol. and Technol., 7: 193-217.

Marrero, A. and Kader, A.A. (2006). Optimal temperature and modified atmosphere for keeping quality of fresh-cut pineapples. Postharvest, Biol. Technol. 39: 163-168.

Marsh, K.B., Friel, E.N., Gunson, A., Lund, C. and MacRae, E. (2006) Perception of flavour in standardised fruit pulps with addition of acids or sugars. Food Quality and Preference, 17(5): pp. 376-386.

Marsh, K., Attanayake, S., Walker, S., Gunson, A., Boldingh, H. and MacRae, E. (2004) Acidity and taste in kiwifruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology., 32: pp. 159-168.

Marta, M.C.; María Alejandra, R.G.; Olga, M.B. (2010) Aroma Profile and Volatiles Odor Activity Along Gold Cultivar Pineapple Flesh. J. Food Sci., 75, S506-S512.

Martín-Belloso, O. and Soliva-Fortuny, R. (2006) Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of fresh-cut fruits. Stewart Postharvest Rev., 2(1-3): pp. 1-8.

429

Martín-Belloso, O., Soliva-Fortuny, R. and Oms-Oliu, G. (2007) Fresh-cut fruits. In: Handbook of Food Products Manufacturing. Principles, Bakery, Beverages, Cereals, Cheese, Confectionary, Fats, Fruits, and Functional Foods. Hui, Y.H. (Ed). New Jersey, NJ., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 879-899.

Martín-Diana, A.B., Rico, D., Barry-Ryan, C., Frias, J.M., Mulcahy, J., Henehan, G.T.M. (2005) Comparison of calcium lactate with chlorine as a washing treatment for fresh-cut lettuce and carrots: quality and nutritional parameters. J. Sci. Food Agric., 85: 2260-2268.

Martín-Diana, A.B., Rico, D., Frias, J.M., Mulcahy, J., Henehan, G.T.M. and Barry-Ryan, C. (2006) Whey permeate as a bio-preservative for the shelf-life maintenance of fresh-cut vegetables. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 7(1-2), 112-123.

Martinéz, J. J., Melgarejo, P., Hernandez, F., Salazar, D. M., & Martinez, R. (2006) Seed characterization of five new pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties. Scientia Horticulturae, 110: pp. 241–246.

Martinez-Ferrer, M., C. Harper, F. Perez-Munoz and M. Chaparro, (2002) Modified atmosphere packaging of minimally processed mango and pineapple fruits. J. Food Sci., 67: 3365-3371.

Martinez-Romero, D., Guillen, F., Castillo, S., Valero, D. and Serrano, M. (2003) Modified atmosphere packaging maintains quality of table grapes. J. Food Sci. 68(5):1838-1843.

Mastrangelo, A.M., Mazzucotelli, E., Guerra, D., De Vita, P. and Cattivelli, L. (2012) Improvement of drought resistance in crops: From conventional breeding to genomic selection. In: Venkateswarlu, B., Shanker, A.K., Shanker, C. and Maheswari, M. (Eds.). Crop Stress and its Management: Perspectives and Strategies’. New York: Springer, Chapter 7.

430

Mathooko, F.M. (1996) Regulation of respiratory metabolism in fruits and vegetables by carbon dioxide. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 9, 247-264.

Matile, P., Schellenberg, M. and Vicentini, F. (1997) Localization of chlorophyllase in the chloroplast envelope. Planta., 201: 96-99.

Matsui, K. (2006) Green leaf volatiles: Hydroperoxide lyase pathway of oxylipin metabolism. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 9, 274–280.

Mattoo, A.K. and Suttle, J.C. (1991) The plant hormone ethylene. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL, USA.

Mattoo., A.K., Adams, D.O., Patterson, G.W. and Lieberman, M. (1982-1983) Inhibition of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase by phenothizinen. Plant Sci. Lett., 28, 173-179.

Maul, F.; Sargent, S.; Sims, C.; Baldwin, E.; Balaban, M. (2000) Tomato flavor and aroma quality as affected by storage temperature. J. Food Sci., 65, 1228–1237.

Mazliak, P. (1983) Plant membrane lipids: Changes and alterations during ageing and senescence. Postharvest Physiol. Crop Preserv., In: Liebermann, M. (Ed.). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 123-140.

Mazur, K.Z., Gajewski, M., Metera, A.M., Wtulich, J.A. and Marcinkowska, M.M (2012) Effect of growing medium and harvest term on yield and several quality traits of two cultivars of “cherry” tomatoes. Not. Bot. Horti. Agro. 40(2): 197-202.

McDonald, B. and Harman, J.E. (1982) Controlled atmosphere storage of kiwifruit. I. Effect of fruit firmness and storage. Scientia Hort. 17: 113- 123.

McFeeters, R.F. and Armstrong, S.A. (1984) Measurement of pectin methylation in plant cell walls. Anal. Biochem., 139: 212.

431

McGhie, T.K. and Ainge, G.D. (2002) Color in fruit of genus Actinidia: carotenoids and chlorophyll compositions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:117- 121.

McGill, J.N., Nelson, A.I. and Steinberg, M.P. (1966) Effect of modified atmosphere on ascorbic acid and other quality characteristics of spinach. J. Food Sci., 31: 510-517.

McGorrin, R.J. (2011) The significance of volatile sulfur compounds in food flavors: An overview. Chapter 1, available [online] http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/bk-2011-1068.ch001 Accessed: 19.03.2014. doi: 10.1021/bk-2011-1068.ch001.

McLaughlin, C.P. and O’Beirne, D. (1999) Respiration rate of a dry coleslaw mix as affected by storage temperature and respiratory gas concentration. J. Food Sci., 64, 116-119.

Meyer, B.S., Anderson, D.B., Bohling, R.H. and Fratianne, D.G. (1973) Introduction to plant physiology. 2nd Ed, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.

Meyer, R.S., Karol, K.G., Little, D.P., Nee, M.H., Litt, A. (2012) Phylogeographic relationships among Asian eggplants and new perspectives on eggplant domestication. Mol Phylogenet Evol: doi: 10.1016/j.y,pev.2012.02.006.

Mignani, I., Greve, L.C., Ben-Arie, R., Stotz, H.U., Li, C., Shakel, K. and Labavitch, J. (1995). The effect of GA and divalent actions on aspects of pectin metabolism and tissue softening in ripening tomato pericarp. Physiol. Plant, 93: 108-115.

Miller, S.A., Smith, G.S., Boldingh, H.L. and Johansson, A. (1998) Effects of water stress on fruit quality attributes of kiwifruit. Annals of Botany, 81: 73-81.

Mir, N. and Beaudry, R.M. (2004) Modified atmosphere packaging. In: Gross, K.C., Wang, C.Y. and Saltveit, M.E. (Eds.). The Commercial Storage of Fruits, Vegetables and Florist and Nursery Stocks, USDA Handbook 66,

432

available [online] http://www.ba.ars.usda.gov/hb66/015map.pdf. accessed [30.05.2014].

Mitcham, B., Cantwell, M. and Kader, A. (1996) Methods for Determining Quality of Fresh Commodities. Perishables Handling Newsletter Issue No. 85. Available [online]: http://ucanr.edu/datastoreFiles/608-295.pdf. Accessed 02.02.2009.

Mitz, M.A. (1979) CO2 Biodynamics: A new concept of cellular control. J. Theor. Biol., 80: pp. 537-551.

Moneruzzaman, K.M., Hossain, A.B.M.S., Sani, W., and Saifuddin, M. (2008) Effects of Stages of Maturity and Ripening Conditions on the Physical Characterstics of Tomato. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 4(4): 329-335.

Montaño, A., de Castro, A., Rejano, L. and Sanchez, A.H. (1992) Analysis of Zapatera olives by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatography., 594: pp. 259-267.

Monteith, J.L. (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London, Ser. B. 281:277-294.

Montéro, T. M., Molla, E. M., Esteban, R. M., and Lopezandreu, F. J. (1996) Quality attributes of strawberry during ripening. Scientia Horticulturae, 65(4), 239-250.

Montero-Calderón, M, Rojas-Graü, M.A. and Martín-Belloso, O. (2008) Effect of packaging conditions on quality and shelf-life of fresh-cut pineapple (Ananas comosus). Postharvest Biol. Technol., 50(2-3): pp. 182-189.

Montero-Calderón, M., Rojas-Graü, M.A. and Martín-Belloso, O. (2009) Mechanical and chemical properties of Gold cultivar pineapple flesh (Ananas comosus). European Food Research and Technology. 230, 675- 686.

433

Montero-Calderón, M.; Rojas-Graü, M. A.; Aguilo-Aguayo, I.; Soliva- Fortuny, R.; Martín-Belloso, O. (2010) Aroma profile and volatiles odor activity along Gold cultivar pineapple flesh. J. Agric. Food Chem., 58: pp. 5042–5049.

Mowat, A.D., and Kay. C. (2007) Geographic patterns in fruit attributes of New Zealand grown kiwifruit. Acta Hort. 753(1): 325–332.

Mowat, A.D., and Maguire, K.M. (2007) Canopy management and dry matter of ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit. Acta Hort. 753(1): 333–340.

Moyer, R.A., Hummer, K.E., Finn an C.E., Frei, B. and Wrolstad, R.E. (2002) Anthocyanins, phenolics, and antioxidant capacity in diverse small fruits: Vaccinium, Rubus, and Ribes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:519-525.

Munné-Bosch, S. and Alegre, L. (2002a) The function of tocopherols and tocotrienols in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 21: pp. 31-57.

Munné-Bosch, S. and Alegre, L. (2002b) Plant ageing increases oxidative stress in chloroplasts. Planta., 214: pp. 608-615.

Mur, L.A.J., Bi, Y-M, Darby, R.M., Firek, S. and Draper, J. (1997) Compromising early salicylic acid accumulation delays the hypersensitive response and increases viral dispersion during lesion establishment in TMV-infected tobacco. Plant J. 12: p1113–1126.

Murata, T. (1989) Relation of chilling stress to membrane permeability. In: Wang, C.Y. (Ed.), Chilling injury of horticultural crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl., USA. pp. 201-209.

Nagy, S., Chen, C.S. and Shaw, P.E. (1992) Fruit Processing Technology. In: Nagy, S., Chen, C.S. and Shaw, P.E., (eds.) Agscience, Inc., Auburndale, Florida.

Nanos, G.D., Romani, R.J., Kader, A.A., (1994) Respiratory metabolism of pear fruit and cultured cells exposed to hypoxic atmospheres: associated

434

change in activities of key enzymes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 119, 288–294.

Newman, J.D.; Chappell, J. (1999) Isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants: Carbon partitioning within the cytoplasmic pathway. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 34, 95–106.

Nguyen-the, C. and Carlin, F. (1994) The microbiology of minimally processed fresh fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 34: 371-401.

NHS, (2009) 5-a-day. Available [online]: http://www.nhs.uk/livewell/5aday/Pages/5ADAYhome.aspx Accessed

Nielson, T. and Leufvén A. (2008) The effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of Honeoye and Korona strawberries. Food Chemistry, 107(3): 1053-1063.

Nitz, S. (1983) Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons in pineapple ananas comosus fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. Pp. 1237-1239.

Nunes, M.C.N., Emond, J.P., Rauth, M., Dea, S. and Chau, K.V. (2009) Environmental conditions encountered during typical consumer retail display affect fruit and vegetable quality and waste. Postharvest Biology and Technoogy, 51: 232-241.

O’Beirne, D. (2009), Fruits & Vegetables’, FT4447: Food Quality, University of Limerick, unpublished.

O'Connor-Shaw, R.E., Roberts, R., Ford, A.L. and Nottingham, S.M. (1996) Changes in sensory quality of sterile cantaloupe dice stored in controlled atmospheres. J. Food Sci. 61:847-851.

O’Connor-Shaw, R.E., Roberts, R.A., Ford, L., Nottingham, S.M., (1994) Shelf life of minimally processed honeydew, kiwifruit, papaya, pineapple, and cantaloupe. J. Food Sci. 59(5), 1202–1206.

435

O’Connor-Shaw, R.E., Skarshewski, P. and Thrower, S.J. (1992) Modified atmosphere packaging of fruits, vegetables, seafood and meat: state of the art. ASEAN Food J. 7: 127-136.

O’Donnell, P.J., Calvert, C., Atzorn, R., Wasternack, C., Leyser, H.M.O. and Bowles, D.J. (1996) Ethylene as a signal mediating the wound response of tomato plants. Science 274: 1914–1917.

O’Hare, T.J., Smith, L.G., Wong, L.S. and Meiburg, G.F. (1995) Low-oxygen storage of whole and minimally processed pak choi. Proceeding of Australasian Postharvest Horticulture Conference, pp. 459-462.

Obando-Ulloa, J., Moreno, E., Garcia-Mas, J., Nicolai, B., Lammertyn, J., Monforte, A.J., Fernández-Trujillo, J.P. (2008) Climacteric or non- climacteric behavior in melon fruit. 1. Aroma volatiles. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 49: pp. 27-37.

Ohno, Y. (2000). CIE fundamentals for color measurement. Paper for IS&T NIP16 Conference, Vancouver, Canada, p 1-6. Available [online]: http://wenku.baidu.com/view/18a92173f242336c1eb95e84. Accessed 10.05.2010.

Olson, D.C., White, J.A., Edelman, L. Harkins, R.N. and Kende.H. (1991) Differential expression of two genes for 1-aminocyclopropane-1- carboxylate synthase in tomato fruits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 88: pp. 5340–5344.

Oms-Oliu, G., Soliva-Fortuny, R. and Martin-Belloso, O. (2007) Effects of ripeness on the shelf-life of fresh-cut melon preserved by modified atmosphere packaging. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 225 (3 -4): pp. 301-674.

Oms-Oliu, G., Soliva-Fortuny, R. and Martín-Belloso, O. (2008a) Modelling changes of headspace gas concentrations to describe the respiration of fresh-cut melon under low or superatmospheric oxygen atmospheres. Journal of Food Engineering, 85: pp. 401-409.

436

Oms-Oliu, G., Soliva-Fortuny, R., & Martín-Belloso, O. (2008b) Physiological and microbiological changes in fresh-cut pears stored in high oxygen active packages compared with low oxygen active and passive modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 48, 295– 301.

Osman, A.B. and Dodd, P.B. (1994) Effects of different levels of preharvest shading on the storage quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne) cv Ostara. I. Physical Characteristics. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 17(1): 55-64.

Pagán, A., Ibarz, A. and Pagán, J. (2005). Kinetics of the digestion products and effect of temperature on the enzymatic peeling process of oranges. International Journal of Food Engineering., 71, 361-365.

Paiva, S.A.R., Russell, R.M. (1999) β-Carotene and other carotenoids as antioxidants. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 18: 426-433.

Pandey, S.K., and Goswani, T.K. (2012) Modelling perforated-mediated modified atmosphere packaging of capsicum. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 47(3): 556-563.

Parker, D.B., koziel, J.A., Cai, L., Jacobson, L.D. and Akdeniz, N. (2012) Odor and odorous chemical emissions from animal buildings: Part 6. Odor Activity Value. Americal Scoiety for Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 55(6): 2357-2368.

Paterson V.J., MacRae, E.A. and Young, H. (1991) Relationships between sensory properties and chemical composition of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). J. Sci. Food Agric., 57: 235 – 251

Pelayo, C., S.E. Ebeler, and A.A. Kader. (2003) Postharvest lifeand flavor quality of three strawberry cultivars kept at 5 °C in air or air + 20 kPa

CO2. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 27:171-183.

Pellegrini, N., Serafini, M., Colombi, B., Del Rio, D., Salvatore, S., Bianchi, M. & Brighenti, F. (2003) Total antioxidant capacity of plant foods,

437

beverages and oils consumed in Italy assessed by three different in vitro assays. The Journal of Nutrition, 133, 2812-2819.

Pellegrini, N., Serafini, M., Colombi, B., Del Rio, D., Salvatore, S., Bianchi, M. (2003) Total antioxidant capacity of plant foods, beverages and oils consumed in Italy assessed by three different in vitro assays. American Society for Nutritional Sciences, 2812–2819.

Peñuelas, J. and Llusià, J. (2002) Linking photorespiration, monoterpenes and thermotolerance in Quercus. New Phytol. 155: pp. 227–237.

Peralta-Yahya, P. P., Zhang, F., del Cardayre, S.B. and Keasling, J.D. (2012) Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels. Nature 488 (7411): 320–328. doi:10.1038/nature11478

Perera, C. O., Young, H. and Beever, D. J. (1998), ‘Kiwifruit’. In: Shaw, P. E., Chan, H. T. & Nagy, S. (Eds.). Tropical and subtropical fruits. Auburndale: AgScience Inc.

Perez, A.G.; Rios, J.J.; Sanz, C.; Olias, J.M. (1992) Aroma components and free amino acids in strawberry variety Chandler during ripening. J. Agric. Food Chem., 40, 2232–2235.

Perry, P.L., Wang, Y., and Lin, J.M. (2009) Analysis of honeydew melon (Cucumis melo var. Inoodorus) flavor and GC/MS identification of (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienyl acetate. Flav. Frag. J., 24, 341-347.

Pesis, E. (2005) The role of the anaerobic metabolites, acetaldehyde and ethanol, in fruit ripening, enhancement of fruit quality and fruit deterioration. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 37: pp 1-19.

Poehlmann, S. and Schieberle, P. (2013) Characterization of the aroma signature of Styrian pumpkin seed oil (Cucurbitapepo subsp. pepo var. Styriaca) by molecular sensory science. J. Agric. Food Chem., 61, 2933– 2942.

438

Picchioni, G.A., Watada, A.E, Roy, S., Whitaker, B.D., and Wergin, W.P., (1994) Membrane lipid metabolism, cell permeability, and ultrastructural changes in lightly prpcessed carrots. Journal of Food Science, 59(3): 597-605.

Pokorny, J. (1989) Flavor chemistry of deep fat frying in oil. In: Flavor chemistry of lipid foods, Min, D.B. and Smouse, T.H (Eds.). American Oil Chemists Society, Campaign, IL., pp. 113-155.

Poll, L., Nielson, G.S., Varming, C., Petersen, M.A. (2006) Aroma changes from raw to processed products in fruits and vegetables. In: Bredieand, W.L.P, Petersen, M.A. (Eds.). Flavour Science: Recent Advances and Trends. Elsevier; The Netherlands, p.p. 239-244.

Ponting, J.D., Jackson, R. and Walters, G. (1971) Refrigerated apple slices: effects of pH, sulfites and calcium on texture. J. Food Sci. 36:449-450.

Ponting, J.D., Jackson, R. and Walters, G. (1972) Refrigerated apple slices: preservative effects of ascorbic acid, calcium and sulfites. J. Food Sci. 37:434-435.

Portela, S., Nie, X., Suslow, T. and Cantwell, M. (1997) Changes in sensory and fermentative volatile concentration of minimally processed cantaloupe stored in controlled atmospheres’. In: Gorny, J.R. (Ed.), Proc 7th Int. Controlled Atmosphere Research Conf., Vegetables and Ornamentals, University of California, Postharvest Hort., Series No. 19 (5): 123-129.

Portela, S.I. and Cantwell, M.I. (1998) Quality changes of minimally processed honeydew melons stored in air or controlled atmosphere. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 14:351-357.

Portela, S.I. and Cantwell, M.I. (2001) Cutting blade sharpness affects appearance and other quality attributes of fresh-cut cantaloupe melon. J. Food Sci. 66: 1265-1270.

439

Portnoy, V., Benyamini, Y. and Bar, E. (2008) The molecular and biochemical basis for varietal variation in sesquiterpene content in melon (Cucumis melo L.) rinds. Plant Molecular Biology, 66: pp. 647–661.

Potter, N.N. and Hotchkiss, J.H. (1996) Food Science, 5th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall pp. 411-418.

Prakash, S., Singhal, R.S., Kulkarni, P.R. (2001). Enzymatic peeling of Indian grapefruit (Citrus paradisi). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture., 81: 1440-1442.

Prasanna, V., Prabha, T.N. and Tharanathan, R.N. (2007) Fruit ripening phenomena—an overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 47, 1–19.

Preston, C., Richling, E., Elss, S., Appel, M., Heckel, F.,Hartlieba, Schreier, P. (2003) On-line gas chromatography combustion/ pyrolysis isotope ratiomass spectrometry (HRGC-C/P-IRMS) of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) volatiles. J. Agric, Food Chem., 51(27): 8027-2031.

Preten, M.T., Sanchez-Bel, P., Egea, I. and Romojaro, F. (2008). Enzymatic peeling of citrus fruits: factors affecting degradation of the albedo. Tre and Forestry Science and Biotechnology., pg. 52-59.

Produce Fact Sheets (in English) – University of California, Davis, (2010) Available [online]: http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/producefacts/#fruitsmelons. Accessed 10.11.2009.

Prohens, J., Blanca, J.M. and Nuez, F. (2005) Morphological and molecular variation in a collection of eggplant from a secondary center of diversity: implications for conservation and breeding. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130: 54–63.

Qi, L., A.E. Watada, and J.R. Gorny. (1998) Quality changes of fresh-cut fruits in CA storage. Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables and MAP. In Saltveit, M.E. (Ed.), 7th International Controlled Atmosphere Research

440

Conference, University of California, Davis, July 13-18, 1997, vol. 4, pp. 98-117. University of California, Davis, CA.

Qi, L., Wu, T. and Watada, A.E. (1999) Quality changes of fresh-cut honeydew melons during controlled atmosphere storage. J. Food Qual. 22:513-521.

Rababah, T.M., Ereifej, K.I. and Howard, L. (2005) Effect of ascorbic acid and dehydration on concentrations of total phenolics, antioxidant capacity, anthocyanins, and color in fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:4444-4447.

Rabobank. (2009). European trends in fresh-cut pre-packed produce. Available [online]: http://www.rabobank.com/content/news/news_archive/013Europeantren dsinfresh-cutpre-packedproduce.jsp. Accessed 12.05.2013.

Ragaert, P., Verbeke, W., Devlieghere, F. & Debevere, J. (2004) Consumer perception and choice of minimally processed vegetables and packaged fruits. Food Quality and Preference, 15(3): 259-270.

Redgewell, R.J., Melton, L, D. and Brasch, D.J. (1989) Cell wall changes in kiwifruit following postharvest ethylene treatment. Phytochemistry, 29: 399-407.

Reichel, M., Carle, R., Sruamsiri, P. and Neidhart, S. (2010) Influence of harvest maturity on quality and shelf-life of litchi fruit (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)’. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 57(3): 162-175.

Reineccious, G. (2006) Flavour Chemistry and Technology, 2nd Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

Rennie, T.J., and Tavolaris, S. (2009) Perforation-mediated modified atmosphere packaging: Part I: Development of a mathematical model. Postharvest Biol. And Technol. 51(1) pp. 1-9.

Research and Markets, (2009) Fruit & Vegetables Market Report Plus. Available [online]:

441

http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/d77bfa/fruit_vegetables. Accessed 31.05.2013.

Riad, G.S., Brecht, J.K., and Chau, K.V. (2002) Perforation-mediated modified atmosphere packaging of sweetcorn. Proc. Fla, State Hort. Soc. 115:71-75.

Rico, D., Mart´ın-Diana, A.B., Frias, J.M., Barat, J.M., Henehan, G.T.M., Barry-Ryan, C., (2007) Improvement in texture using calcium lactate and heat-shock treatments for stored ready-to-eat carrots. J. Food Eng. 79, 1196–1206.

Ritenour, M.A. (2010) Plant Nutrition Impacts on Vegetable Quality. Available [online] http://www.ecofisiohort.com.ar/wp- content/uploads/2010/04/Precosecha-y-calidad.pdf

Rivera-López, J., Vazquez-Ortiz, F.A., Ayala-Zavala, J.F., Softelo-Mundo, R.R. and Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A. (2005) Cutting shape and storage temperature affect overall quality of fresh-cut papaya cv. ‘Maradol’. J. Food Sci., 70(7): s482-s489.

Riveria, J. (2005) Cutting shape and storage temperature affect overall quality of fresh cut papaya cv. Maradol. J. Food Sci. 70 (7): 488-489.

Robin, A-L. (2010). Clean label in the EU. FoodCom, available [online]: http://www.leatherheadfood.com/clean-label-in-the-eu accessed 31.10.2014.

Robles, P.A., Tomás-Callejas, A., Escalona, V.H., Artés, F. and Artés- Hernández, F. (2010) High helium controlled atmosphere storage decreases microbial growth and preserves quality of fresh-cut mizuna baby leaves. Acta Hort., (ISHS) 887: 663-668.

Rocha, A.M.C.N., Brochado, C.M., Kirby, R. and Morais, A.M.M.B. (1995) Shelf-life of chilled cut orange determined by sensory quality. Food Control, 6(6): 317-322.

442

Rocha, F. H. A., Loges, V., Santos da Costa, A.S., Souza de Aragão, F.A. and Santos, V.F. (2010) Genetic study with Heliconia psittacorum and interspecific hybrids. Crop breeding and applied biotechnology, 10: 282- 288.

Rodriguez-Bernaldo de Quiros, A., and Costa, H.A. (2006) Analysis of Carotenoids in Vegetables and Plasma samples: A review. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19(2-3) p 97-111.

Rojas-Grau, M.A., Soliva-Fortuny, R. and Belloso, O.M. (2009) Edible coatings to incorporate active ingredients to fresh-cut fruits: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 20: 438-447.

Rolle, R.S. and Chism, G.W. III. (1987) Physiological Consequences of Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables. Journal of Food Quality, 10(3): 157-177.

Romani, R., Labavitch, J., Yamashita, T., Hess, B. and Rae, H. (1983) Preharvest AVG treatment of ‘Bartlett’ pear fruit: Effects on ripening, color change, and volatiles’. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:1046-1049.

Roma-Parada, L., Vezina, L.P., Charest, P.M., Castaigne, F. and Willemot, C. (1991) Effect of modification of storage atmosphere on phospholipids and ultrastructure of cauliflower mitochondria. Plant Physiol., 83: pp. 664-674.

Rooney, M.L. (1995). Active Food Packaging; Chapman and Hall, London.

Ros, J.M., Henk, A., Schols, H.A., Voragen, G.J. (1996). Extraction, characterisation and enzymatic degradation of lemon pectins. Carbohydrate research, 282, 271-284.

Rosen, J.C. and Kader, A.A. (1989) Postharvest physiology and quality maintenance of sliced pear and strawberry fruits. J. Food Sci. 54 (3):656- 659.

443

Rößle, C., Gormley, T.R. and Butler, F. (2009) Efficacy of Natureseal AS1 browning inhibitor in fresh-cut fruit salads applications with emphasis on apple wedges. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, ISAFRUIT Special Issue, pp. 62-67.

Rosso, S.W. (1968) The ultrastructure of chromoplast development in red tomato. J. Ultrastructure Res., 25: 307-322.

Rowell, A., (1988) Cold storage capacity of avocados from different geographic regions. S. Afr. Avocado Growers' Assoc. Yearb. 11: 41.

Royer, A., Menand, M., Grimault, A. and Communal, P.Y. (2002) Development of automated headspace gas chromatography determination of dithiocarbamates in plant matrices. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 49(5): 2152-2158.

Rubio., A., Rambla, J.L., Santaella, M., Gomez, M.D., Orzaez, D., Granell, A. and Gomez-Gomez, L. (2008) Cystolic and plastoglobule-targeted carotenoid dioxygenases from Crocus sativus are both involved in beta- ionone release. J. Biol. Chem., 283: pp. 24816-24825.

Ruiz-Cruz, S., Alvarez-Parrilla, E., de la Rosa, L.A., Martinez-Gonzalez, A.I., Ornelas-Paz, J.D.J., Mendoza-Wilson, A.M. and Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A. (2010) Effect of different sanitizers on microbial, sensory and nutritional quality of fresh-cut jalapeno peppers. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5: 331- 341.

Ruiz-Cruz, S., Islas-Osuna, M.A., Sotelo-Mundo, R.R., Vázquez-Ortiz, F. and González-Aguilar, G.A. (2007) Sanitation procedure affects biochemical and nutritional changes of shredded carrots. J. Food Sci., 72(2): 146-152.

SafeFood, (2007) A Review of the Fruit and Vegetable Food Chain. Available [online]: http://www.safefood.eu/safefood/files/89/8964f665-9bea-4c05- bacf-79e1eda9cd98.pdf. Accessed 12.02.2009.

444

Safizadeh, M.R., Rahemi, M., Tafazoli, E. and Emam, Y. (2007) Influence of postharvest vacuum infiltration with calcium on chilling injury, firmness and quality of Lisbon lemon fruit. Am. J. Food Technol., 2: 388-396

Saftner, R.A., Abbott, J.A., Bhagwat, A.A. and Vinyard, B.T. (2005) Quality measurement of intact and fresh-cut slices of Fuji, Grann Smith, Pink Lady and GoldRush apples, J. Food Sci., 70, S317-S324.

Salma, El-Sawi A.; Hemaia, Montawae M.; Mohamed, Sleem A.; Abdel- Rahman, El-Shabrawy E.; Amani, Slee. (2011) Investigation of lipoidal matter, antimicrobial and diuretic activities of leaves and fruits of Juniperus phoenicea L growing in Egypt. The Free Library, available [online] http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Investigation of lipoidal matter, antimicrobial and diuretic...-a0275312590 (accessed March 27 2014).

Saltveit, M.E. (1997) Physical and physiological changes in minimally processed fruits and vegetables. In: Tomas-Barberan, F.A. and Robins, R.J. (Eds.). Phytochemistry of fruit and vegetables. New York: Oxford University Press. p205-220.

Saltveit, M.E. (1999) Effect of ethylene on quality of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 15: 279-292.

Saltveit, M.E. (2000) Wound induced changes in phenolics metabolism and tissue browning are altered by heat shock. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 21: 61-69.

Saltveit, M.E. (2003) Is it possible to find an optimal atmosphere? Postharvest Biol. Technol., 27: p3-13.

Saltveit, M.E. and Morris, L.L. (1990) Overview on chilling injury of horticultural crops. In: Wang, C.Y. (Ed.). Chilling injury of horticultural crops. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL., pp 3-15.

Saltveit, M.E., (2002). A summary of CA requirements and recommendations for vegetables. In: Eighth International Controlled Atmosphere Research Conference, 9/11 June, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Acta Hortic., in press.

445

Salveit, M.E. (1993) A summary of the CA and MA requirements and recommendations for the storage of harvested fruit and vegetables. In: Blanpied, G.D., Barstch, J.A. and Hicks, J.R. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Sixth International Controlled Atmosphere Research Conference, Vol. II, pp. 800-818. New York, USA: Itacha.

Sams, C.E. (1999) Preharvest factors affecting postharvest texture. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 15(3), 249-254.

Sand, C. K. (2011) Packaging Sustainability for Modified Atmosphere Packaging of Fruits and Vegetables. In: Brody, A.L., Zhuang, H. and J. Han, H. (Eds.). Modified Atmosphere Packaging for Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.

Sandermann, W. and Bruns, K. (1965) Biogenese von carvon in Anethum graveolens L. Planta Medica, 13: pp. 364–368.

Sandhya. (2010) Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: current status and future needs. Food Science and Technology, 43: 381–392.

Sanz, C., Olias, J.M. and Perez, A.G. (1997) Aroma biochemistry of fruits and vegetables. In: Tomas-Barberan, F.A. and Robins, R.J. (Eds.). Phytochemistry of fruit and vegetables. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, NY., USA. pp. 125-155.

Sapers, G. M., Gorney, J. R., & Yousef, A. E. (2005) Microbiology of fruits and vegetables. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press.

Saravacos, G.D. and Kostaropaulos, A.E. (2002) Handbook of Food Processing Equipment, Kluwer Academic, London.

Sarry, J.E. and Gunata, Z. (2004) Plant and microbial glycoside hydrolases: Volatile release from glycosidic aroma precursors. Food Chem., 87: pp. 509-521.

Scharnow, R. (2013) The product in the container: http://www.tis- gdv.de/tis_e/ware/obst/weintrau/weintrau.htm. In: The Container

446

Handbook - Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft (GDV). Available [online]: http://www.containerhandbuch.de/chb_e/scha/index.html Accessed 20.11.2013.

Schieberle P, Ofner S, Grosch W. (1990) Evaluation of potent odorants in cucumbers (Cucumis sativus) and muskmelons (Cucumis melo) by aroma extract dilution analysis. Journal of Food Science, 55: pp. 193– 195.

Schieberle, P. and Hofmann, T. (1997) Evaluation of the character impact odorants in fresh strawberry juice by quantitative measurements and sensory studies on model mixtures. J. Agr. Food Chem. 45: pp. 227–232.

Schleiser, K., Harwat, M., Bohm, V. and Bitsch, R. (2002). Assessment of antioxidant activity by using different in vitro methods. Free Radical Research., 36(2): 177-187.

Schulbach, K.F., Rouseff, R.L. and Sims, C.A. (2004) Relating descriptive sensory analysis to gas chromatography/olfactometry ratings of fresh strawberries using partial least squares regression. J. Food Sci. 69:pp. 273–277.

Schwab, W., Davidovich-Rikanati, R. and Lewinsohn, E. (2008) Biosynthesis of plant-derived flavour compounds. The Plant Journal, 54(4): pp. 712- 732.

Schwab, W.; Schreier, P. Enzymic formation of flavor volatiles from lipids. In: Kuo, T.M. and Gardner, H.W., (Eds.). Lipid Biotechnology, Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 293–318.

Schwartz, S.J. and Von Elbe, J. (1983) Kinetics of chlorophyll degradation to pyropheophytin in vegetables. J. Food Sci., 48: 1303-1306.

Shalit, M., Katzir, N., Tadmor, Y., Larkov, O., Burger, Y., Shalekhet, F., Lastochkin, E., Ravid, U., Amar, O., Edelstein, M., Karchi, Z. and Lewinsohn, E. (2001) Acetyl- CoA: Alcohol acetyltransferase activity

447

and aroma formation in ripening melon fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49(2): 794-799.

Shamaila, M. (2005) Water and its relation to fresh produce. In: Lamikanra, O., Imam, S. and Ukuku, D. (Eds.), Produce degradation. Pathways and prevention. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Fl., USA. pp. 267-291.

Shang, C-Q., Hu, Y-M., Deng, C-H. and Hu, K-J. (2002) Rapid determination of volatile constituents of Michelia alba flowers by gas chromatography- mass spectrometry with solid-phase microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A. 942. 283-288.

Sharkey, T. D. and Singsaas, E.L. (1995) Why plants emit isoprene? Nature 374: p769.

Sharkey, T.D., Chen, X.Y. and Yeh, S. (2001) Isoprene increases thermotolerance of fosmidomycin-fed leaves. Plant Physiol 125: pp. 2001–2006.

Shewfelt, R.L., 1987 Quality of minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Journal of Food Quality., 10, 143-156.

Shin, Y.; Liu, R.H.; Nock, J.F.; Holliday, D.; Watkins, C.B. (2007) Temperature and relative humidity effects on quality, total ascorbic acid, phenolics and flavonoid concentrations, and antioxidant activity of strawberry. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 45: 349-357.

Shine, W.E. and Stumpf, P.K. (1974) Fat metabolism in higher plants: recent studies on plant α-oxidation systems. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 162: 147–157.

Shiota, H. (1982) Kiwifruit. Koryo, 137: pp. 59-64.

Shirzadeh, E. and Kazemi, M. (2011) Effect of malic acid and calcium treatments on quality characteristics of apple fruits during storage. Am. J. Plant Physiol., 6: 176-182.

448

Sideris, C. P. and Krauss, B.H. (1933b) Physiological studies on the factors influencing the quality of pineapple: II. Physico-chemical variations in the tissue of ripe pineapple fruits. Pineapple Quaterly, 3, 99-114.

Sideris, C.P. and Krauss, B.H. (1933a) Physiological studies on the factors influencing the quality of pineapple fruits: I. Physico-chemical variations in the tissue of ripe pineapple fruits. Pineapple Quarterly, 3, 82-98.

Silva, F.M. (1995) Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh fruits and vegetables exposed to varying post harvest temperatures. ME Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. USA.

Silva, F.M., Chau, K.V., Brecht, J.K and Sargent, S.A. (1999) Tubes for modified atmosphere packaging of fresh fruits and vegetables: effective permeability measurement. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 15(4), pp. 313–318.

Simkin, A. J. Schwartz, S.H., Auldridge, M., Taylor, M.G. and Klee, H.J. (2004) The tomoato carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 genes contributes to the formation of the flavor volatiles b-ionone, pseudoionone and geranylacetone. The Plant Journal, 40, pp. 882–892.

Simonetto, P. and Lamb, C.R.C. (2011) Potential for kiwifruit cultivation in southern Brazil. Acta Hort. (ISHS), 913: pp. 51-56.

Singh, S., Chonhenchob, V. Chantanarasomboom, Y. and Singh, J. (2007) Testing and evaluation of quality changes of treated fresh-cut tropical fruits packaged in thermoformed plastic containers. J. Testing Eval., Vol. 35, No. 5. 10.1520/JTE100166.

Singleton, V. L.; Rossi, J. A., Jr. (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic- phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic, 16, 144-158.

Singsaas, E.L. and Sharkey, T.D. (2000) The effects of high temperature on isoprene synthesis in oak leaves. Plant Cell Environ 23: pp. 751–757.

449

Skalsky, C. and Sistrunk, W.A. (1973) Factors influencing color degradation in concord grape juice. J. Food Sci., 38: 1060-1066.

Smirnoff, N. (1993) The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytologist., 125(1): pp. 27-58.

Smyth, A. B., Song, J., & Cameron, A. C. (1998) Modified atmosphere

packaged cut iceberg lettuce: effect of temperature and O2 partial pressure on respiration and quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46, 4556–4562.

Snow, N.H. and Slack, G.C. (2002) Head-space analysis in modern gas chromatography. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 21(9): 608-617.

Soliva-Fortuny R.C., G. Oms-Oliu, and O. Martin-Belloso. (2002). Effects of ripeness stages on the storage atmosphere, color, and textural properties of minimally processed apple slices. J. Food Sci. 67(5):1958–1963.

Soliva-Fortuny, R. and Martìn-Beloso, O. (2003) New advances in extending the shelf life of fresh-cut fruits: A review. J. Food Sci., 14(9): pp.341-53.

Soliva-Fortuny, R. C., Ricart-Coll, M. and Martín-Belloso, O. (2005) Sensory quality and internal atmosphere of fresh-cut Golden Delicious apples. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 40: 369–375.

Soliva-Fortuny, R., Grigelmo-Miguel, N., Odriozola-Serrano, I., Gorinstein, S. and Martin-Belloso, O. (2001) Browning evaluation of ready to eat apples as affected by modified atmosphere packaging. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 3685-3690.

Soliva-Fortuny, R.C., Alòs-Saiz, N., Espachs-Barroso, A., Martín-Beloso, O. (2004) Influence of maturity at processing on quality attributes of fresh- cut Conference pears. J. Food Sci., Vol.69 No7, pp.290-94.

Soliva-Fortuny, R.C., Lluch, M.A., Quiles, A., Grigelmo-Miguel, N, & Martin-Belloso, O. (2003) Evaluation of textural properties and

450

microstructure during storage of minimally processed apples. Journal of Food Science, 68, 312-317.

Solomos, T. and Kanellis, A.K. (1997) Hypoxia and fruit ripening. In: Kanellis, A.K., Chang, C., Kende, H. and Grierson, D. (Eds.), Biology and Biotechnology of the plant hormone ethylene, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 239-252.

Somogyi, L. P., Hui, Y. H. & Barret, D. M. (1996) Processing Fruits: Science and Technology Vol. 1. Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, P.A. 518 pp.

Song, J., Deng, W., Fan, L., Verschoor, J. and Beaudry, R. (1997) Aroma Volatiles and quality changes in modified atmosphere packaging. In: Gorny, J (Ed.). Proceedings of the seventh international Controlled Atmosphere Research Conference, vol. 5. Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables and MAP. University of California Postharvest Horticultural Series 19, pp. 89-95.

Song, J.; Forney, C.F. (2008) Flavour volatile production and regulation in fruit. Can. J. Plant Sci., 88, 537–550.

Song, Y., Kim, H. K., & Yam, K. L. (1992) Respiration rate of blueberry in modified atmosphere at various temperatures. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 117, 925–929.

Song, Y., Vorsa, N. and Yam, K.L. (2002) Modelling respiration-transpiration in a modified atmosphere packaging system containing blueberry. Journal of Food Engineering, 53, 103-109.

Souci, S. W., Fachmann, W., and Kraut, H. (1989) Food Composition and Nutrition Tables. Wiss. Verlagsges., Stuttgart.

Spanier, A.M., Flores, M., James, C., Lasater, J., Lloyd, S. and Miller, J.A. (1998) Fresh-cut pineapple (Ananas sp.) flavour: Effect of storage. In: E.T. Contis ET, C.T. Ho, C.J. Mussinan, T.H. Parliment, F. Shahidi and

451

A.M. Spanier (Eds.). Developments in Food Science. Food Flavors: Formation, Analysis, and Packaging Influences, pp. 331-343.

Speirs, J., Lee, E., Holt, K., Yong‐Duk, K., Steele, N., Loveys, B., and Schuch, W. (1998) Genetic manipulation of alcohol dehydrogenase levels in ripening tomato fruit affects the balance of some flavor aldehydes and alcohols. Plant Physiology, 117: pp. 1047–1058.

Splittstoesser, D.F. (1987) Fruits and fruit products. pp. 101-128. In: Food and Beverage Mycology. L. Beuchat. (Ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York .

Srilaong, V., Kanlayanarat, S. and Tatsumi, Y. (2002) Changes in commercial quality of ‘Rong-Rien’ rambutan in modified atmosphere packaging. Food Sci. and Technol. Res., 8(4):337-341.

Stumpe, M. and Feussner, I. (2006) Formation of oxylipins by CYP74 enzymes. Phytochem. Rev., 5, 347–357.

Surjadinata, B.B. and Cisneros-Zevallos, L. (2003) Modelling wound-induced respiration of fresh-cut carrots (Daucus carota L.). J. Food Sci., 68(9), 2735-2740.

Suslow, T. and Cantwell, M., (2001) Recent findings on fresh-cut cantaloupe and honeydew melon. Fresh-cut 9 (4), 18, 20, 32–33.

Swan, A.R.H., and M. Sandilands, (1995) ntroduction to Geological Data Analysis. Blackwell Science: Oxford, 446 p.

Takeoka, G. R.; Buttery, R. G.; Teranishi, R.; Flath, R. A.; Guntert, M. .(1991) Identification of additional pineapple volatiles. . J Agric. Food Chem., 39, 1848–1851.

Takeoka, G.R. (1987) Studies on the volatile constituents of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch.) and nectarine (Prunus persica nectarina)’, Diss. Abst. Int., 47 (12): 4845.

452

Takeoka, G.R., Gintert, M., Flath, R.A., Wurz, R.E.and Jennings, W. (1986) Volatile constituents of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinesis Planch). J. Agric. Food Chem. 34(3): pp. 576-578.

Tavaria, F.K.; Dahl, S.; Carballo, F.J.; Malcata, F.X. (2002) Amino acid catabolism and generation of volatiles by lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 2462–2470.

Teixeira, G.H.A., Durigan, J.F., Mattiuz, B. and Rossi, Jr. O.D. (2001) Fresh cut of 'Formosa' papaya. Cienc. Tecnol. Alim., 21: 47-50.

Thomson, W.W. and Whatley, J.M. (1980) Development of non-green plastids. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 31: 375-394.

Thurstone, L.L. (1928) Attitudes can be measured. Americal Journal of Sociology. 33, 529-554.

Tijet N., Schneider C., Muller B.L. & Brash A.R., (2001) Biogenesis of volatile aldehydes from fatty acid hydroperoxides: molecular cloning of a hydroperoxide lyase (cyp74c) with specificity for both the 9-and 13- hydroperoxides of linoleic and linolenic acids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 386(2): pp. 281-289.

Tijskens, L. M. M., Konopacki, P., & Simčὶč, M. (2003) Biological variance, burden or benefit? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 27(1), 15 – 25.

Tijskens, L.M.M., Van Schaick, A.C.R, Hertog, L.M.M., (1999) Modelling the firmness of ‘Elstar’ apples during storage and transport. Proc. Int. Symp. On Effect of Pre- and Post Harvest Factors on Storage of Fruit. Ed. Michalczuk. L. Acta Hort. 485, ISHS.

Toivonen, P. (1997) Non-ethylene, non-respiratory volatiles in harvested fruits and vegetables: their occurrence, biological activity and control. Postharvest Biology and Technology., 12(2): pp. 109-125.

453

Toivonen, P. M. A. (2008) Influence of harvest maturity on cut-edge browning of ‘Granny Smith’ fresh apple slices treated with anti-browning solution after cutting. Food Science and Technology, 41, 1607–1609.

Toivonen, P.M.A. and Brummell, D.A. (2008) Biochemical bases of appearance and texture changes in fresh-cut fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Techology, 48(1): 1-14.

Toivonen, P.M.A. and DeEll, J.R. (2002) Physiology of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. In: Lamikanra, O. (Ed.), Fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Science, Technology and Market. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl., USA. pp. 91-123.

Toivonen, P.M.A., and Delaquis, P. (2006) Low volume sprays to treat fresh- sliced apples with anti-browning solution. Horticulture Technology, 16, 257-261.

Tokitomo, Y., Steinhaus, M., Buttner, A. and Schreberle, P. (2005) Odor- active constituents in fresh pineapple (Ananas comosus [L.] Merr.) by quantitative and sensory evaluation. Biosci., Biotechnol. Biochem., 69(7): pp. 1323-1330.

Torrieri, E., Mahajan, P.V., Cavella, S., Sousa-Gallagher, M.J., Oliveira, F.A.R. and Masi, P. (2009) Mathematical modelling of modified atmosphere package: An engineering approach to design packaging systems for fresh-cut produce’. In: Papajorgji, P. (Ed.). Advances in Modelling Agricultural Systems. USA: Springer US. pp. 455-484.

Tournas, V.H. and Stack. M.E. (2001) Production of alternariol and alternariol methyl ether by Alternaria alternata grown on fruits at various temperatures. J. Food Prot., 64: 528-532.

Tucker, G. A, Grierson, D. (1987) Fruit ripening. In: Davies D.D. (Ed.). The Biochemistry of Plants, a Comprehensive Treatise 12. London: Academic Press, 265–318.

454

Ueda, Y. and Bai, J.H. (1993) Effect of short-term exposure of elevated CO2 on flesh firmness and ester production of strawberry. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci., 62: 457-464.

Ueda, Y., Fujishita, N. and Hachin, K. (1997) Presence of alcohol acetyltransferase in melons (Cucumis melo L.). Postharvest Biology and Technology, 10(2): p.121-126.

Ukuku, D.O. and Fett, W.F. (2002) Behaviour of Listeria monocytogenes inoculated on cantaloupe surfaces and efficacy of washing treatments to reduce transfer from rind to fresh-cut pieces. Journal of Food Protection. 65: p.924 – 930.

Umano, K., Hagi, Y., Nakahara, K., Shoji, A. and Shibamoto, T. (1992) Volatile constituents of green and ripened pineapple (Ananas comosus [L.] Merr.). J. Agric. Food Chem., 40: pp. 599-603.

UN, (2008) Available [online]: http://unstats.un.org/UNSD/cr/registry/regcia.asp?Cl=2&Lg=1&Co=F& p=35&prn=yes. Accessed 31.03.2013

Van Buren, J.P. (1979) The chemistry of texture in fruits and vegetables. J. Texture Studies, 10:1.

Varoquaux P. (1991) Ready–to–use fresh fruits and vegetables. Rev. Gen. Froid. 81 33–43.

Varoquaux, P. & Mazollier, J. (2002) Overview of the European fresh-cut produce industry. In Lamikanra, O. Ed. Fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Science, technology and market. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press. LLA.

Varoquaux, P. and Ozdemir, I.S. (2005) Package and produce degradation. In: Lamikanra, O., Imam, S. and Ukuku, D. (Eds.). Produce degradation: pathways and prevention. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL., USA, Chapter 5, pp. 117-153.

455

Varoquaux, P. and Wiley, R.C. (1994) Biological and Biochemical Changes in Minimally Processed Refrigerated Fruits and Vegetables. In: Wiley, R.C. (Ed.). Minimally Processed Refrigerated Fruits and Vegetables, Chapman and Hall, New York, USA., pp: 226-267.

Varoquaux, P., Lecendre, I., Varoquaux, F., and Sounty, M. (1990) Change in firmness of kiwifruit after slicing. Sciences des Aliments. 10: 127-139.

Varoquaux, P., Maxollier, J., Albagnac, G. (1996) The influence of raw material characteristics on the storage life of fresh-cut butterhead lettuce. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 9, 127-139.

Verhagen J, Vliegenthart JF, Boldingh J (1978) Micelle and acid-soap formation of linoleic acid and 13-L-hydroperoxylinoleic acid being substrates of lipoxygenase-1. Chem Phys Lipids 22: 255-259.

Verzera, A., Dima, G., Tripodi, G., Ziino, M., Lanza, C.M. and Mazzaglia, A. (2011) Fast Quantitative Determination of Aroma Volatile Constituents in Melon Fruits by Headspace–Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. Food Analytical Methods, 4(2): pp. 141-149.

Vicente, A.R., Ortugno, C., Powell, A.L.T., Greve, L.C. and Labavitch, J.M., (2007) Temporal sequence of cell wall disassembly events in developing fruits. Analysis of raspberry (Rubus idaeus). J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 4119–4124.

Villanueva, M. J.; Tenorio, M. D.; Esteban, M. A. and Mendoza, M. C. (2004) Compositional changes during ripening of two cultivars of muskmelon fruits. Journal of Food Chemistry, 87: 179-185.

Vinters Federation of Ireland, (2012). http://www.vfi.ie/Links.

Vishnevetsky, M., Ovadis, M., Zuker, A. and Vainstein, A. (1999) Molecular mechanisms underlying carotenogenesis in the chromoplast: multilevel regulation of carotenoid-associated genes. The Plant Journal 20: 423- 431.

456

Von Schantz M. and Ek, B.S. (1971) U¨ ber die Bildung von A¨ therischem O¨l in Ku¨ mmel. Carum carvi L. Sci Pharm. 39: pp. 81–101.

Von Schantz, M. and Huhtikangas, A. (1971) U¨ ber die Bildung von limonen und carvon in Ku¨ mmel. Carum carvi. Phytochemistry 10: pp. 1787– 1793.

Voon, Y.Y., Hamid, N.S.A., Rusul, G., Osman, A., & Quek, S.Y. (2007) Volatile flavour compounds and sensory properties of minimally processed durian (Durio zibethinus cv. D24) fruit during storage at 4ºC. Biology and Technology, 46, 76-85.

Walton, E.F. and DeJong, T.M. (1990) Growth and compositional changes in kiwifruit berries from three Californian locations. Annals of Botany 66:285-298.

Wan, X.M., Stevenson, R.J., Chen, X.D. and Melton, L.D. (1999) Application of headspace solid-phase microextraction to volatile flavour profile development during storage and ripening of kiwifruit. Food Research International., 32: pp. 175-183.

Wang, C. and Wang, X. (2001) A novel phospholipase D of Arabidopsis that is activated by oleic acid and associated with the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol., 127(3): pp. 1012-1112.

Wang, C.Y. (1990) Physiological and biochemical effects of controlled atmosphere on fruits and vegetables. In: Calderon, M. and Barkai-Golan, R. (Eds.). Food Preservation by Modified Atmospheres. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA. pp. 197-223.

Wang, G.X., Zong, Y.C., Wang, H.J., Liang, L.S., Zhong, Z.P. and Shi, D.J. (1998) The ultrastructure of the chloroplasts in kiwifruit pulp. In: Garab, G. (Ed). Photosynthesis: mechanisms and effects, Vol. V. pp. 3817-3820. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.

Wang, M., Jiang, N., Jia, T., Leach, L., Cockram, J., Waugh, R., Ramsay, L., Thomas, B. and Luo, Z. (2012) Genome-wide association mapping of

457

agronomic and morphologic traits in highly structured populations of barley cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124:233–246.

Wang, S.Y. and Bunce, J.A. (2004) Elevated carbon dioxide affects fruit flavor in field-grown strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch). J. Sci. Food Agric., 84(12): pp. 1464-1468.

Wang, S.Y., Zheng, W. and Galletta, G.J. (2002) Cultural system affects quality and antioxidant capacity in strawberries. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: pp. 6534-6542.

Wang, Y., Wyllie, S.G., Leach, D.N. (1996) Chemical changes during the development and ripening of the fruit of Cucumis melo (cv. Makdimon). J. Agric. Food Chem. 44: pp. 210-216.

Wang, Y.S., Tian, S.P., Xu, Y., Qin, G.Z. and Yai, H.J. (2004) Changes in the activities of pro- and anti-oxidant enzymes in peach fruit inoculated with Cryptococcus laurentii or Penicillium expansum at 0 or 20OC. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 34: 21-28.

Warren, K. (2012) Variety Choice Imperative for Fresh-cut Quality. Available [online] http://www.freshcut.com/pages/arts.php?ns=235 [accessed 05- 12-2012].

Warrington, I.J. and Weston, G.C. (Eds.). (1990) Kiwifruit: science and management. R. Richards in association with the New Zealand Society for Horticultural Science, Auckland, New Zealand.

Wasternack, C., Stenzel, I., Hause, B., Hause, G., Kutter, C. and Maucher, H. (2006) The wound response in tomato – role of jasmonic acid. Journal of Plant Physiology. 163: p297-306.

Watada, A.E. & Qi, L. (1999) Quality of fresh-cut produce. Post-harvest Biology and Technology, 15(3):201-205.

Watada, A.E., (1986) Effects of ethylene on the quality of fruits and vegetables. Food Technol. 40, 82–85.

458

Watada, A.E., Abe, K., Yamauchi, N. (1990) Physiological activities of partially processed fruits and vegetables. Food Technology, 44, 116, 118, 120-122.

Watada, A.E., Ko, N.P. and Minott, D.A. (1996) Factors affecting quality of fresh-cut horticultural products. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 9, p 115-125.

Weber, F., Laskawy, G. and Grosch, W. (1974) Z. Lebensm, Unters. Forsch, 155, 142-150.

Weerahewa, D. and Adikaram, N.K.B. (2005) Some biochemical factors underlying the differential susceptibility of two pineapple cultivars to internal browning disorder. Cey. J. Sci (Bio. Sci.). 34: 7-20.

Wei, C.B., Liu, S.H., Liu, Y.G., Lv, L.L., Yang, W.X. and Sun, G.M. (2011) Characteristic aroma compounds from different pineapple parts. Molecules, 16(6): pp. 5104-5112,

Weichman, J. (1986) The effect of controlled atmosphere storage on the sensory and nutritional quality of fruits and vegetables. Hort. Rev., 8: 101-127.

Westrell, T., Ciampa, N., Boelaert, F., Helwigh, B., Korsgaard, H., Chríel, M., (2009) Zoonotic infections in Europe in 2007: a summary of the EFSA- ECDC annual report. Euro Surveill 14: pi=19100.

Wheeler, R.M., Peterson, B.V., Sager, J.C., and Knott, W.M. (1996) Ethylene production by plants in a closed environment. Adv. Space. Res., 18(4/5): 193-196.

Whitaker, B.D. and Lester, G.E. (2006) Phospholipase D-alpha and lipoxygenase gene expression in fruit, floral, and vegetative tissues of ‘Honey Brew’ hybrid honeydew melon. Hort Science. 41(4):pp. 1081.

Wiley, R.C. (1994) Minimally Processed Refrigerated Fruits and Vegetables, New York: Chapman and Hall.

459

Willcox, J.K., Ash, S.L. and Catignani, G.L. (2004) Antioxidants and Prevention of Chronic Disease. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 44:275-295.

Wilson, A.D., Oberle, C.S. and Oberle, D.F. (2013) Detection of off-flavour in catfish using a conducting polymer electronic-nose technology. Sensors, 13, pp. 15968-15984; doi:10.3390/s131215968.

Wingler, A., von Schaewen, A., Leegood, R.C., Lea, P.J., and Quick, W.P. (1998) Regulation of leaf senescence by cytokinin, sugars, and light: effects on NADH-dependent hydroxypyruvate reductase. Plant Physiol., 116, 329–335.

Winterhalter, P. and Rouseff, R.L. (2002) Carotenoid derived aroma compounds: An introduction. In: Winterhalter, P. and Rouseff, R.L. (Eds.). Carotenoid-derived Aroma Compounds, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, USA, pp. 1-17.

Witney, G.W., Hofman, P.J., and Wolstenholme, B.N. (1990) Effect of cultivar, tree vigour and fruit position on calcium accumulation in avocado fruit. Scientia Hort. 44: 269-278.

Wong, M. and Stanton, D.W. (1989) Nonenzymatic browning in Kiwifruit Juice Concentrate Systems during Storage. J. Food Sci., 54(3): 669-673. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb04678.x

Woodward, J.R. and Topping, A.J. (1972) The influence of controlled atmospheres on the respiration rates and storage behaviour of strawberry fruits. Journal of Horticultural Science, 47, 547-553.

Wright, D.H. and Harris, N.D. (1985) Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on tomato flavor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:355-358.

Wright, K.P. and A.A. Kader. (1997a) Effect of slicing and controlled- atmosphere storage on the ascorbate content and quality of strawberries and persimmons. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 10:39-48.

460

Wright, K.P. and Kader. A.A. (1997b) Effect of controlled-atmosphere storage on quality and carotenoids content of sliced persimmons and peaches. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 10: 89-97.

Wyllie, S.G. and Leach, D.N. (1992) Sulfur-containing compounds in the aroma volatiles of melons (Cucumis melo). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 40: pp. 253–256.

Wyllie, S.G., Leach, D.N. and Wang, Y. (1996) Development of flavor attributes in the fruit of C. melo during ripening and storage. p. 228-239. In: Takeoka, G.R.

Wyllie, S.G., Leach, D.N., Wang, Y. and Shewfelt, R.L. (1995) Key aroma compounds in melons: their development and cultivar dependence. In: Rouseff, R.L. and Leahy, M.M. (Eds.). Fruit Flavors: Biogenesis, Characterization and Authentication. American Chemical Soziety: Washington DC, USA, 74: pp. 421-434.

Xanthopopulos, G., Koronaki, E.D. and Boudouvis, A.G. (2012) Mass transport analysis in perforation-mediated modified atmosphere packaging of strawberries. J. Food Eng., 111(2): 326-335.

Yahia, E.M. (Ed.). (2009) Modified and controlled atmospheres for the storage, transportation, and packaging of horticultural commodities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. USA.

Yano, M. and Saijo, R. (1987) New preservation method for shredded cabbage with special reference to non-browning cultivar. J. Jpn. Soc. Cold preserv. Food. 13: 11-15.

Yapa, P.A.J., Kawasaki, T. and Matsumoto, H. (1986) Changes of some membrane-associated enzyme activities and degradation of membrane phospholipids in cucumber roots due to Ca2+ starvation. Plant and Cell Physiology.27(2):223–232.

Young, H. And Paterson, V.J. (1985) The effects of harvest maturity, ripeness and storage on kiwifruit aroma. J. Sci. Food Agric., 36: pp. 352-358.

461

Young, H. and Paterson, V.J. (1990) The flavour of exotic fruit‘, In: Morton, I.D. and MacLeod, A.J. (Eds.). Food Flavours. Part C. The flavour of fruits, Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 281-326.

Young, H., Paterson, V.J. and Burns, D.J.W. (1983) Volatile aroma constituents of kiwifruit. J. Sci. Food Agric., 34: pp. 81-85.

Yu, L., Haley, S., Perret, J., Harris, M., Wilson, J., & Qian, M. (2002) Free radical scavenging properties of wheat extracts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 1619–1624.

Zagory, D. (1999) Effects of post-processing handling and packaging on microbial populations. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 15, 313- 321.

Zagory, D. and Kader, A.A. (1988) Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce. Food Technology., 43(9): 70-74 and 76-77.

Žemlička, L., Fodran, P., Kolek, E. and Proncayova, N. (2013) Analysis of natural aroma and flavour of MD2 pineapple variety (Ananas comosus L. Merr). Acta Chimica Slovaca, 6(1): pp. 123-128.

Zhang, X.M., Du, L.Q., Sun, G.M., Wei, C.B., Liu, S.H. and Xie, J.H. (2009) Changes of aroma components in yellow Mauritius pineapple during fruit development (In Chinese). J. Fruit Sci., 26: pp. 245-249.

Zhang, Y.M. Peng, F.T., Liu, S.Z., Li, Y.J. and Wang, L.P. (2005) Analysis of aroma compounds from sweet cherry by head-space solid phase microextraction coupled with GC-MS. Chinese J. Anal. Lab., 24: pp. 1- 53.

Zhu, H.L., Zhu, B.Z., Fu, D.Q., Xie, Y.H., Hao, Y.L., Luo, Y.B., (2005) Role of ethylene in the biosynthetic pathways of aroma volatiles in ripening fruit. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 52: pp. 691-695.

462

Zhu, M., Chu, C.L., Wang, S.L. and Lencki, R.W. (2001) Influence of O2, CO2 and degree of cutting on the respiration rate of rutabaga. J. Food Sci., 66: 33-37.

463