DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Reintroduction of Bull Trout to the Clackamas River, Oregon Environmental Assessment Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office June 2011 Photo: Joe Maroney, Kalispel Tribe Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction Environmental Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction, Purpose and Need.............................................................................. 5 1.1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose of the Action.......................................................................................... 9 1.3 Need for the Action............................................................................................. 9 1.4 Consultation and Coordination ........................................................................... 9 1.5 Scoping ............................................................................................................. 10 1.5.1. Issues and Concerns.................................................................................. 10 2.0 Alternatives........................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Alternative A: Proposed Action........................................................................ 11 2.1.1 Goal of the Proposed Action..................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Geographic Scope of the Proposed Action ............................................... 12 2.1.3 Release Locations, Timing, Techniques ................................................... 12 2.1.4 Numbers and Life Stages.......................................................................... 13 2.1.5 Timing and Duration of Reestablishment Activities ................................ 14 2.1.6 Monitoring ................................................................................................ 14 2.1.7 Adaptive Management.............................................................................. 18 2.1.8 Experimental Population........................................................................... 19 2.1.9 Nonessential Experimental Population..................................................... 21 2.1.10 Take........................................................................................................... 22 2.1.11 Geographic Boundaries for the Proposed NEP......................................... 22 2.2 Alternative B: No Action.................................................................................. 25 2.3 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated from Detailed Study......................... 25 2.3.1 Reintroduction to Historical Habitat in Other Willamette Basin Tributaries................................................................................................................. 25 2.3.2 Reintroduction Utilizing an Alternate Donor Stock ................................. 25 2.3.3 Reintroduction of Bull Trout Without 10(j) Designation ......................... 26 2.3.4 Reintroduction of Bull Trout Under 10(j) Essential Experimental Population Designation............................................................................................. 27 2.3.5 Reintroduction of Bull Trout to the Clackamas River Under 10(j) NEP Designation with Alternative Boundary Areas......................................................... 27 3.0 Environmental Consequences............................................................................... 28 3.1 Alternative A, Proposed Action........................................................................ 28 3.1.1 Physical Environment ............................................................................... 28 3.1.2 Biological Environment............................................................................ 28 3.1.3 Social Environment................................................................................... 48 3.2 Alternative B, No Action .................................................................................. 50 3.2.1 Fish and Wildlife....................................................................................... 50 3.2.2 Land Use................................................................................................... 50 4.0 List of Preparers.................................................................................................... 51 5.0 List of Agencies, Organizations and Persons Contacted ...................................... 51 6.0 Literature Cited..................................................................................................... 53 2 Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction Environmental Assessment 7.0 Appendix A – Public Comments and Responses on the Draft Environmental Assessment and Proposed Rule on the Reintroduction of Bull Trout to the Clackamas River ……………………………………………………………………………………61 8.0 Appendix B – Non-Significant Issues Identified During Stakeholder Meetings and other Coordination ............................................................................................................ 78 9.0 Appendix C – Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction: Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation Plan ...................................................................................... 83 3 Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction Environmental Assessment Summary The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), jointly with the State of Oregon, and in cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service, Mt. Hood National Forest (USFS), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (CTWSRO), propose to establish a nonessential experimental population (NEP) of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Clackamas River and its tributaries in Clackamas and Multnomah Counties, Oregon, under section 10(j) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The geographic boundaries of the NEP include the entire Clackamas River subbasin as well as the mainstem Willamette River, from Willamette Falls to its points of confluence with the Columbia River, including Multnomah Channel. The best available data indicate that reintroduction of bull trout to historical habitat in the Clackamas River subbasin is biologically feasible and will promote the conservation and recovery of the species. Bull trout from the Metolius River (Deschutes River Basin) have been identified as suitable donor stock and can provide sufficient individuals for release into suitable habitat identified in the upper portion of the Clackamas River subbasin (defined as the headwaters downstream to North Fork Reservoir, RM 30). We anticipate releasing bull trout annually into the upper Clackamas River via a 20-year three-phased adaptive management approach until either: (1) an evaluation of the program shows the goal of the action (Section 1.2 below) has been met, or is on a trajectory to be met; (2) mid-process evaluation suggests the reestablishment of bull trout is unlikely; or (3) evaluation indicates greater than anticipated impacts to federally listed salmon and steelhead in the Clackamas River from predation and competition. The Service, in collaboration with ODFW, conducted stakeholder/scoping meetings in October and November, 2008, to share information from the Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction Feasibility Assessment (Shively et al. 2007), as well as a draft proposed action to reintroduce the species to historical habitat in the Clackamas River. The meetings also provided an opportunity for participants to provide comments and ask questions regarding the feasibility assessment and the possible reestablishment of the species in the Clackamas River. Based in part on the comments received through the stakeholder/scoping meetings, we developed and subsequently published a proposed rule and draft environmental assessment (DEA) on December 9, 2009, (74 FR 65045). We requested written comments on the proposed rule and DEA from the public and appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, Tribes, scientific organizations, and other interested parties. The comment period was open from December 9, 2009 to February 8, 2010. We reviewed all comments received for substantive issues and new information regarding the proposed NEP. Substantive comments have been addressed in the Public Comments section of the final rule published concurrently with this environmental assessment (EA) or were incorporated directly into the final rule or this EA (Public Comments section of the final rule is included as Appendix A). 4 Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction Environmental Assessment In addition to the proposed action and a no action alternative, this EA also considered five other action alternatives, which, while eliminated from detailed study, are summarized in section 2.3 of this EA. 1.0 Introduction, Purpose and Need 1.1 Introduction On November 1, 1999, we published a final rule to list bull trout within the coterminous United States as threatened under the Act (64 FR 58910). The historical range of bull trout in the coterminous United States extended from the Canadian border south to the Jarbidge River in northern Nevada and from the Pacific Ocean inland to the Clark Fork River in western Montana and the Little Lost River in central
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Source Water Assessment Report
    Source Water Assessment Report City of Estacada, Oregon PWS #4100279 January 30, 2001 Prepared for City of Estacada Prepared by � I •l ;(•1 State ofOregon Departmentof Environmental Quality Water Quality Division Drinking Water Protection Program Department of Human Services Oregon Health Division Drinking Water Program Department of Environmental Quality regon 811 SW Sixth Avenue Portland, OR 97204-1390 John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor (503) 229-5696 TTY (503) 229-6993 January 30, 2001 Mr. Bill Strawn Public Works Supervisor City of Estacada PO Box 958 Estacada, Oregon 97023 RE: Source Water Assessment Report City of Estacada PWS # 4100279 Dear Mr. Strawn: Enclosed is the Source Water Assessment Report forthe City of Estacada. The assessment was prepared under the requirements and guidance of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act and the US Environmental Protection Agency, as well as a detailed Source Water Assessment Plan developed by a statewide citizen's advisory committee here in Oregon over the past two years. The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Oregon Health Division (OHD) are conducting the assessments for all public water systems in Oregon. The purpose is to provide information so that the public water system staff/operator, consumers, and community citizens can begin developing strategies to protect your source of drinking water. For watersheds with more than one intake, Oregon completes the assessments by segment and each source water assessment represents the area from the public water system's intake to the next intake upstream. There are .intakes for six water providers in the Clackamas River watershed: The City of Lake Oswego (Lake Oswego Municipal), the City of Oregon City (South Fork Water Board), Oak Lodge Water District (North Clackamas County Water Commission), Clackamas River Water, City of Estacada, and the US Forest Service Ripple brook Ranger Station/Timberlake Job Corps Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Basin Total Maximum Daily Loads (Tmdls)
    Willamette Basin TMDL: Clackamas Subbasin September 2006 CHAPTER 6: CLACKAMAS SUBBASIN TMDL Table of Contents WATER QUALITY SUMMARY......................................................................................... 3 Reason for action ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Who helped us................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Subbasin 303(d) Listed Parameters Addressed by a TMDL ..................................................................................... 4 SUBBASIN OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... 5 Land Use and Ownership.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Watershed Descriptions ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Upper Clackamas Watershed....................................................................................................................................... 7 Collawash River and Hot Springs Fork Drainages ...................................................................................................... 8 Oak Grove Fork..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Source Water Assessment Report
    Source Water Assessment Report for Oregon City - South Forl( Water Board PWS #4100591 North Clacl(amas County Water Commission PWS #4100580 and Clacl(amas River Water PWS #4100187 January 9, 2003 Prepared for South Fork Water Board North Clackamas County Clackamas River Water Water Commission Oregon City,Oregon Milwaukie, Oregon Clackamas, Oregon Prepared by � � )fDHS 1•1:(•1 · f)n1gon r1!�p;ntmc>nt State of Oregon of Hum(ln 51'rvicc5 Departmentof Environmental Quality Drinking Water Program Water Quality Division Drinking Water Protection Program Department of Environmental Quality regon 811 SW Sixth Avenue Jolu1 A. Kitzhaber, 11.D., Governor Portland, OR 97204-1390 (503) 229-5696 TTY (503) 229-6993 January 9, 2003 Gordon McGhee Clackamas River Water PO Box 2439 Clackamas, OR 97015 Bruce Hemenway, Water Quality/Safety Compliance South Fork 'Nater Board 15962 S. Hunter Ave. Oregon City, OR 97045 Kathy Willis, Water Resources Manager North Clackamas Co. Water Commission 14496 SE River Road Milwaukie, OR 97267 RE: Source Water Assessment Rep01i Oregon City - South Fork Water Board, PWS #4100591 North Clackamas County Water Commission, PWS #4100580 and Clackamas River Water, PWS #4100187 Dear Gordon, Bruce and Kathy: Enclosed is the Source Water Assessment Report for Oregon City- South Fork Water Board (O C-SFWB), North Clackamas County Water Commission (NCCWC), and Clackamas River Water's (CRW) drinking water protection area. The assessment was prepared under the requirements and guidance of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act and the US Environmental Protection Agency, as well as a detailed Source ·water Assessment Plan developed by a statewide citizen's advisory committee here in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Collawash Timber Sale EA Appendix C
    **BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION** for Collawash Thinning Project Collawash River Watershed, Clackamas River District Mt. Hood National Forest Introduction Forest management activities that may alter the aquatic habitat or affect individuals or populations of PETS (Proposed, Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive) fish and aquatic species require a Biological Evaluation to be completed (FSM 267l.44 and FSM 2670.32) as part of the National Environmental Policy Act process to determine their potential effects on sensitive, threatened or endangered species. The Biological Evaluation process (FSM 2672.43) is intended to conduct and document activities necessary to ensure proposed management actions will not likely jeopardize the continued existence or cause adverse modification of habitat for: A. Species listed or proposed to be listed as endangered (E) or threatened (T) by the USDI-Fish and Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries). B. Species listed as sensitive (S) by USDA-Forest Service Region 6. This evaluation addresses a proposal to thin and commercially harvest wood fiber in young plantations and fire generated stands on approximately 292 acres within the Collawash River, 5th field watershed of the Clackamas River Basin. The legal description of the project area is Township 6 and 7 South, Ranges 5 and 6 East, of the Willamette Meridian, Clackamas County, Oregon. The Collawash River is designated a Tier I, Key Watershed under the Northwest Forest Plan. Tier I watersheds have been identified as crucial refugia for at-risk fish species. The Collawash watershed supports populations of spring chinook salmon, winter steelhead, coho salmon, and resident cutthroat and rainbow trout. The proposed treatment area is located within five subwatersheds of the Collawash River.
    [Show full text]
  • Clackamas Road Decommissioning for Habitat Restoration, Increment 2
    United States Department of Clackamas Road Decommissioning for Agriculture Habitat Restoration, Increment 2 Forest Service Pacific Preliminary Assessment Northwest Region Clackamas River Ranger District, Mt. Hood National Forest Clackamas Country, Oregon 2010 For information contact: Michelle Lombardo 16400 Champion Way Sandy, OR 97055 (503) 668-1796 [email protected] The photo shows one example of a newly decommissioned Forest Service road on the Mt. Hood National Forest. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents 1.0. Purpose of and Need for Action 1.1. Introduction 2 1.2. Document Structure 4 1.3. Background 5 1.4. Desired Conditions 6 1.5. Purpose and Need 6 1.6. Proposed Action 7 1.7. Adaptive Management 9 1.8. Decision Framework 10 1.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Collawash River
    River Values Report For Nine Wild and Scenic Rivers on Mt. Hood National Forest Preliminary Draft, September 2018 South Fork Clackamas River Falls, along the South Fork Clackamas Wild and Scenic River Segment Forest Service For More Information Contact: Jennifer Wade, Public Services Staff Officer 16400 Champion Way Sandy, OR 97055 [email protected] 503-668-1792 Or Jennie O’Connor Card [email protected] 406-522-2537 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction Feasibility Assessment
    United States Department of Clackamas River Agriculture Forest Bull Trout Reintroduction Service December Feasibility Assessment 2007 Pinhead Creek, a suitable bull trout spawning and rearing tributary to the upper Clackamas River. Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction Feasibility Assessment Prepared by Dan Shively Chris Allen Todd Alsbury Bob Bergamini Brad Goehring Tom Horning Burke Strobel for the Clackamas River Bull Trout Working Group December 2007 Acknowledgements The authors and members of the Clackamas River Bull Trout Working Group (CRBTWG) are tremendously grateful for the expertise and guidance provided by Dr. Jason Dunham (U. S. Geological Survey). Dr. Dunham provided invaluable input, support, and review of the feasibility assessment. Additionally, the authors thank the members of the State of Oregon Independent Multidisciplinary Science Team for their thorough review and input on an earlier draft of the assessment. Tim Shibahara (Portland General Electric) provided water temperature data used in the habitat analysis section, as well as thoughtful insight into other considerations throughout the assessment. Larry Reigel (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service) provided GIS support for final development of all maps presented in the assessment. The authors also thank the following individuals who provided review and input on an earlier draft of the assessment: Jim Byrne (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife), Don Ratliff (Portland General Electric), Bianca Streif (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), and Mark Wade (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife). Suggested Citation Format: Shively, D., C. Allen, T. Alsbury, B. Bergamini, B. Goehring, T. Horning, and B. Strobel. 2007. Clackamas River Bull Trout Reintroduction Feasibility Assessment. Published by USDA Forest Service, Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon and Steelhead Runs and Related Events of the Clackamas River Basin – a Historical Perspective
    SALMON AND STEELHEAD RUNS AND RELATED EVENTS OF THE CLACKAMAS RIVER BASIN – A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Prepared for Portland General Electric Written by Barbara Taylor, Independent Consultant February 1999 For copies of this report, write: Portland General Electric Company Hydro Licensing Department Attn: Marty May (3WTC-BRHL) 121 SW Salmon St Portland OR 97204 [front cover photo: “Hatchery on the Clackamas River at the mouth of Clear Creek” 1897-1898 Oregon State Fish Commissioner Report] [back cover photo: “Day’s catch for local Clackamas River fisherman in May 1929" courtesy of Charles R. Mack] FOREWORD... Over the past 30 years I have had a chance to hike, fish, snorkel, SCUBA, boat and, on many occasions, fly over most of the Sandy and Clackamas rivers. Once you begin to know an area well, some of the most intriguing conversations are with the people who came before you, the "old timers". Invariably these conversations end up on the subject of fish. The knowledge these people have often brings a new perspective to how we got to where we are today. We can only wonder what it was like before today's "old timers". Salmon and trout populations are molded by the environments of the watersheds from which they come. To understand the fish populations of today, we must examine the historical record of activities in the watershed. Now, as the concern for the future of salmon and trout populations become more critical, thousands of new people are moving into the area. Their historical perspective of these rivers may be only the past few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt. Hood National Forest
    Outreach GS-0462-04/05, Forestry Technician Mt. Hood National Forest The Mt. Hood National Forest is actively recruiting to fill multiple temporary positions at the GS-04 and GS-05 grade levels for the 2013 field season. All positions will be located at either the Hood River or Clackamas River Ranger Districts. Regardless of duty location these positions are part of a forest wide presale team that works throughout the Mt. Hood National Forest. We are hiring four to six temporary seasonal presale forestry technicians for the upcoming 2013 field season. The ultimate number will be dependent on work scheduling and funding. Employment will generally take place in early to mid-May and go through mid-October again dependent on work load, weather, and funding. Major Duties Associated With Position(s) At the GS-04 Level Selects and marks individual trees for harvest using well defined marking guidelines, silvicultural prescriptions, and specific instruction. Traverses harvest units, processes information and produces maps. Designates sale area and cutting unit boundaries on the ground. Interprets Aerial Photos and locates ground features. For timber cruising, serves as tally person and may operate electronic field data recorders. Assists in the measure of limiting distances, tree diameter, tree height, estimation of defect and quality, and related fundamental timber cruising procedures. Timber cruising is done under the direct supervision of a qualified timber cruiser. Observes and reports areas of possible archeological significance, and sightings of sensitive, threatened or endangered wildlife species. Participates in other aspects of resource management support work such as recreation, maintenance, silviculture, tree planting, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Clackamas River Basin Action Plan
    Clackamas River Basin Action Plan Clackamas River Basin Council Clackamas, Oregon 2005 Clackamas River Basin Action Plan Clackamas River Basin Council Clackamas, Oregon 2005 Prepared By: Boise, Idaho www.watershednet.com Steve Bauer, Ed Salminen, John Runyon Editors Note: Supporting maps and appendices are provided in electronic format on a CD Rom. Contact the Watershed Coordinator of the Clackamas River Basin Council for availability. http://www.clackamasriver.org/ Clackamas Basin Action Plan Page ii Acknowledgements Developing the Clackamas River Basin Action Plan was truly a team process requiring the dedicated involvement of many people. Financial and technical support from the Clackamas River Water Providers and the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board made this project possible. Thanks to Sunrise Water Authority, Oak Lodge Water District, Clackamas River Water, South Fork Water Board and the cities of Estacada, Milwaukie and Lake Oswego who provide drinking water to over 200,000 people with water from the Clackamas River. Great appreciation goes to the entire Clackamas River Basin Council, Board of Directors, who participated in and supported the development of the Action Plan. Many individuals participated on technical committees; the Water Quality Technical Advisory Committee, Fisheries Technical Advisory Committee, and the Outreach and Education Technical Team. Their involvement made the Action Plan possible and their effort is very much appreciated. CRBC Council staff, Michael Carlson and Jo Anne Dolan, deserve special mention
    [Show full text]
  • Bagby Research Natural Area
    Supplement No. 21 William H. Moir, Chris Maser, and Jerry F. Franklin2 The Research Natural Area described in this purposes. They are sites where natural features supplement is administered by the Forest Service. are preserved for scientific purposes and natural Forest Service Research Natural Areas are processes are allowed to dominate. Their main located within Ranger Districts which are purposes are to provide: themselves administrative subdivisions of 1. Baseline areas against which effects of National Forests. Normal management and human activities can be measured; protective activities are the responsibility of 2. Sites for study of natural processes in District Rangers and Forest Supervisors. undisturbed ecosystems; and However, scientific and educational uses made of 3. Gene pool preserves for all types of or- these tracts are a responsibility of the research ganisms, especially rare and endangered branch of the Forest Service. Therefore, a types. scientist interested in using one of these tracts in The total Federal system is outlined in "A Oregon or Washington should contact the Directory of the Research Natural Areas on Director of the Pacific Northwest Forest and Federal Lands of the United States of America. '" Range Experiment Station (P.O. Box 3141, Of the 48 established Research Natural Areas in Portland, Oregon 97208) and outline the activity Oregon and Washington, 45 are described in he plans. If extensive use of one or more Forest "Federal Research Natural Areas in Oregon and Service Research Natural Area is planned, a Washington: A Guidebook for Scientists and cooperative agreement between the scientist and Educators,'" vvith details on the Forest Service may be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • River Island Conceptual Design Report
    River Island Conceptual Design Report SUBMITTED TO Metro OCTOBER 2014 River Island Conceptual Design Report OCTOBER 2014 SUBMITTED TO Metro 600 NE Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97232-2736 PREPARED BY Inter-Fluve, Inc. 501 Portway Ave, Suite 101 Hood River, OR 97031 (541) 386-9003 River Island Conceptual Design Report – Clackamas River Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Area .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Framework and Goals ..................................................................................................................... 4 2. Site Analysis ................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Data Collection Efforts .................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Fish Habitat and Use ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Turtle Habitat and Use ................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Geomorphology ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]