On the Media Battlefield

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Israel Watchdogs on the media battlefield Pro-Israel media monitors say they are on a mission to keep the world’s pressBy Tibor on Krauszits toes 18 THE JERUSALEM REPORT FEBRUARY 25, 2013 THE JERUSALEM JERUSALEM THE R EPOR T FEBRUARY 25,2013 19 COURTESY HONEST REPORTING Israel Her reasoning: The disproportionate num- as a terrorist organization or a bus bombing ber of Palestinians released in return for a as a terror attack in the name of avoiding single Israeli soldier “tacitly acknowledges ‘value judgments.’” what so many Zionists believe – that the lives Selective omission: Foreign reporters rou- of the chosen are of hugely greater conse- tinely cite Israel’s “occupation” of Gaza, quence than those of their unfortunate neigh- even though Israel unilaterally withdrew bors.” A fact the journalist – described by her from the territory in 2005, uprooting all its employer as “one of Britain’s leading social settlements in the process. “Often the BBC and political commentators” – conveniently omits relevant context that would help to ac- overlooked is that Hamas, not Israel, had in- curately present Israel’s case,” says Simon sisted on the terms of the prisoner swap. Plosker, the Jerusalem-based managing edi- “Orr resorted to the anti-Semitic ‘cho- tor of the influential media watchdog, Honest All sen people’ canard,” Levick says. “It was Reporting. “That matters because the British atrocious.” media has a global influence far beyond its Faced by an outcry, the journalist issued an size,” adds the British Jew, who moved to Adam Levick requires for his job is a laptop apology. Writing in the passive voice of art- Israel in 2005. – and a touch of masochism. He employs ful evasion favored by bureaucrats and poli- Such complaints against the BBC have both to peruse The Guardian, one of Brit- ticians the world over, she noted, “My words been voiced for years. In 2004, senior BBC ain’s so-called progressive dailies, and its were badly chosen and poorly used.” She news editor Malcolm Balen was even tasked popular online spinoff, Comment is Free, then went on to lament the “problematic” with investigating the BBC’s reporting from or CiF. Levick is managing editor of CiF circumstances of Israel’s creation in 1948, the Middle East over persistent allegations Watch, which monitors bias against Israel in before implicitly chiding Israelis for not be- of anti-Israeli bias. His report’s findings are the two publications. He doesn’t have to look ing more open to criticism. rumored to be damning of the corporation, too hard. The editors of CiF and The Guardian did and the BBC has fought against their release. The Guardian is well known for its hostil- not respond to The Report’s repeated re- Subtle verbal cues: Members of Fatah or ity towards Israel, and, despite perfunctory quests for comment. In a recent column, Hamas known for their past involvement in protestations of balance, wears its anti-Zion- however, readers’ editor Chis Elliott ac- terrorism and openly genocidal anti-Semitic ism bias proudly on its sleeve. The newspa- knowledged the use of anti-Semitic termi- views are often labeled “moderate” as long per has eulogized Palestinian terrorists, and nology in certain Guardian articles. “These as they pay lip service to “the peace pro- CiF has posted flattering comments about included,” he wrote, “references to Israel/ cess.” Meanwhile, Israelis who insist on unabashed Jew-haters like Israeli-born saxo- US ‘global domination’ and the term ‘slav- reciprocal concessions from Palestinians in phonist/conspiracy theorist Gilad Atzmon ish’ to describe the US relationship with Is- the land-for-peace scheme may end up being and Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh. rael.” Journalists, the editor added, “have to labeled “right-wing.” “In The Guardian and especially on CiF, be aware that some examples involve coded “The common media labels include ‘Ne- Israel is the subject of rebuke and moral op- references. They need to ask themselves, for tanyahu is hawkish,’ ‘Abbas is a moderate,’ probrium quite out of proportion to any other example, if the word Zionist is being used as ‘Settlers are all religious fanatics,’ ‘Pales- country,” Levick, a Philadelphia native, who a synonym for Jew.” tinians just want to harvest their olives in now lives in Jerusalem, tells The Jerusalem Bias against the Jewish state, say pro-Israel peace,’” a prolific American Jewish blogger Report. “Their criticisms of Israel contain media watchdogs, comes in several forms who goes by the pseudonym Elder of Ziyon classic anti-Semitic tropes about the danger – from purposeful slants to selective omis- tells The Report. of ‘Jewish power,’ the old charge of dual loy- sions, from subtle verbal cues to outright Outright hostility: In a discussion ahead alties, and sometimes even the insidious sug- hostility. of the US presidential elections last year on gestion that Jews are inherently racist.” Purposeful Slant: In its online country Exhibit A on that last score: Israel’s deci- profiles during the run-up to the London MANY BAttLES, IF LEFT sion in September 2011 to release more than Olympics, the BBC failed to list any city 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, many of them as Israel’s capital, yet declared “East Jeru- UNFOUght, WOULD LEAD convicted murders, in exchange for kid- salem” to be the capital of Palestine. “The napped Israel Defense Forces soldier Gilad BBC’s culture of political over-correctness to A FAR WORSE sitUAtion Shalit “is simply an indication,” opined The often hampers impartial reporting on Israel,” FOR ISRAEL’S imAGE in thE Guardian columnist Deborah Orr, “of how says Hadar Sela, a British-born Israeli who inured the world has become to the obscene runs the BBC Watch blog, adding, “The or- MEDIA. WE CAN’T LET thAT idea that Israeli lives are more important ganization’s Editorial Guidelines prescribe than Palestinian lives.” that BBC journalists cannot describe Hamas HAPPEN 20 THE JERUSALEM REPORT FEBRUARY 25, 2013 Ireland’s TV3 channel, presenter Vincent branding the ban “petty and vindictive.” Browne opined, “Israel is the cancer in for- Undeterred, Levick maintains his mission eign affairs. It polarizes the Islamic com- on his blog. His aim, he says, is to demand munity of the world against the rest of the not only balance but also an accurate reflec- world.” That statement, Honest Reporting’s tion of the facts. “The disinformation propa- Plosker points out, has put the Irish broad- gated daily about Israel in [some] foreign caster on a par with Iranian President Mah- media outlets is astonishing,” Levick says. moud Ahmadinejad, who has labeled the “It’s our job to make sure that they’re held Jewish state a “cancerous tumor.” Browne accountable and the truth about the Middle later apologized for his “infelicitous use of East is told.” the word [cancer],” before citing, like The Easier said than done: A hatchet job on Guardian’s Orr, the “injustice [of Israel’s Page 1 carries far more weight than a subse- creation] at the center of the conflict.” quent brief correction at the bottom of Page To most Israelis, the second intifada broke 13 – if any editorial mea culpa is forthcom- out as follows: Then-Prime Minister Ehud ing at all. And once a malicious claim about Barak offered historic concessions to Pales- Israel is afforded legitimacy by mainstream tinian leader Yasser Arafat during the Camp media coverage, it will often gain a life of David 2 negotiations of July 2000 to end the its own – even once proven false – by being conflict. After some dithering, Arafat re- repeated endlessly on social media by “anti- jected them, returned home and launched a Zionists.” bloody uprising against Israel. The fact that cause-and-effect relations are routinely ignored or obscured in me- THE INTERNatIONAL media, however, as dia reports, thus masking the reasons for is their wont, had a different spin on cause Israel’s actions, is cause for concern. The and effect: After the failed negotiations, dis- The Sunday Times of London subsequently IDF’s response to a deadly terror attack gruntled Palestinians started rioting, where- apologized after publishing a blatantly or a series of provocations often ends up upon Israel began responding with brutal anti-Israel cartoon by Gerald Scarfe on being presented as just another case of force. January 27 (International Holocaust Israeli aggression, seemingly out of the The dichotomy between reality and media Memorial Day) featuring Prime Minister blue, against long-suffering Palestinians. coverage proved the tipping point for Shraga Benjamin Netanyahu; (preceding pages) It’s invariably described as “dispropor- Simmons, an American-born Israeli jour- Simon Plosker, managing director of tional.” “We [often] see biased headlines nalist. He set up an email alert team whose Honest Reporting, in the Jerusalem office where chronology is inverted and Israeli members would notify one another of in- countermeasures against terror are the fo- stances of biased news coverage and fire off cus rather than the Palestinian terror that letters to editors, demanding corrections. prompted them in the first place,” Plosker The grassroots activism soon mushroomed progressive journals and blogs for anti-Se- notes. into a professionally run nonprofit organi- mitic content. In 2009, he moved to Israel, Similarly, whereas journalists exer- zation. Today, Honest Reporting has some and was appointed editor of CiF Watch a cise a healthy skepticism towards all Is- 150,000 subscribers worldwide. Headquar- year later, dedicating himself full time ever raeli sources, they rarely extend the same tered in Jerusalem, the media watchdog op- since to combating bias in The Guardian “courtesy” to Palestinian ones. They often erates offices in the United States, the United and its online mouthpiece. allow accusations by pro-Palestinian ac- Kingdom and Canada.
Recommended publications
  • Abuse of the Media by Palestinian Propaganda

    Abuse of the Media by Palestinian Propaganda

    No. 597 September 9, 2013 http://jcpa.org/article/manufacturing-exploiting-compassion-abuse-media-palestinian-propaganda/ Manufacturing and Exploiting Compassion: Abuse of the Media by Palestinian Propaganda Philippe Assouline Israel, a liberal democracy caught between tyrannies and sectarian violence, is increasingly perceived as uniquely evil. In the struggle for hearts and minds, feelings trump facts. Imagery and accusations that automatically trigger public compassion are incomparably more compelling than dry, defensive argumentation. We are “wired” by evolution to support those we perceive as innocent victims in distress, even when the facts do not mandate such support. The portrayal of Palestinians as innocent victims in distress has been the key to Palestinian propaganda’s popular success. Through the mass-production of heartrending imagery centered on children, staged “news,” manipulative rhetoric, and rigid censorship, Palestinian propaganda has successfully used the media to recast Palestinians as entirely blameless victims. Moreover, a number of prominent journalists for international news agencies have concurrently been salaried employees of Palestinian administrations. Both Agence France Presse and the Associated Press have employed journalists with close ties to the Palestinian Authority. Israelis have long tried to win minds with a multitude of defensive arguments and legal justifications, and have lost. Israel will have to define itself to the world in a way that is at least as emotionally appealing as the Palestinians’ saga of victimhood. Rather than fighting spurious accusations with impersonal facts, Israel must fight Palestinian propaganda’s exploitation of public compassion with a touching but morally correct narrative of its own. Blaise Pascal once observed that “people…arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof, but on the basis of what they find attractive.”1 Today this is confirmed by science, and it explains why Palestinians have won the media war.
  • ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT Primer to Understanding the Centuries-Old Struggle

    ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT Primer to Understanding the Centuries-Old Struggle

    ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT Primer to understanding the centuries-old struggle “When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You’re talking anti-Semitism.” Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. HonestReporting Defending Israel From Media Bias ANTI-SEMITISM IS THE DISSEMINATION OF FALSEHOODS ABOUT JEWS AND ISRAEL www.honestreporting.com 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1 History Part 2 Jerusalem Part 3 Delegitimization Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Part 4 Hamas, Gaza, and the Gaza War Part 5 Why Media Matters 2 www.honestreporting.com ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT Primer to understanding the centuries-old struggle The Middle East nation we now know as the State of Israel has existed throughout history under a va riety of names: Palestine, Judah, Israel, and others. Today it is surrounded by Arab states that have purged most Jews from their borders. Israel is governed differently. It follows modern principles of a western liberal democracy and it pro vides freedom of religion. Until the recent discovery of large offshore natural gas deposits, Israel had few natural resources (including oil), but it has an entrepreneurial spirit that has helped it become a center of research and development in areas such as agriculture, computer science and medical tech nologies. All Israeli citizens have benefited from the country’s success. Yet anti-Israel attitudes have become popular in some circles. The reason ing is often related to the false belief that Israel “stole” Palestinian Arab lands and mistreated the Arab refugees. But the lands mandated by the United Nations as the State of Israel had actually been inhabited by Jews for thousands of years.
  • Israel's Military

    Israel's Military

    Israel’s Military: Emotions, Violence, and the Limits of Dissent Submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirement of the degree of Ph.D. Sorana-Cristina Jude Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University Wales September 2017 Word Count Thesis: 76, 351 Declaration This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Candidate name: Sorana-Cristina Jude Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where *correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 [*this refers to the extent to which the text has been corrected by others] STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter- library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signature Date I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan after the expiry of the bar on access, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 Summary The thesis contributes to the feminist and critical engagements with the Israeli military and its violent behaviour against Palestinian civilians. Intrigued by the public, military, and political reluctance to condemn the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for their individual and collective violence against Palestinians, this research presents the artificial and multifaceted construction of a professional, non-threatening, and humanitarian military subjectivity as a material and symbolic figure that constrains local and international dissent against the Israeli military.
  • The KGB's Operation

    The KGB's Operation

    June 30 – July 4, 2019, Jerusalem, Israel THE KGB’S OPERATION SIG: A 50-YEAR CAMPAIGN TO INCITE HATRED OF ISRAEL AND JEWS [RESEARCH IN PROGRESS] Eli Cohen* Informing Science Institute [email protected] Santa Rosa, CA, USA Elizabeth Boyd Informing Science Institute [email protected] Santa Rosa, CA, USA * Corresponding author ABSTRACT Aim/Purpose The paper explores the success of KGB Operation SIG to incite hatred for the purpose of overthrowing a democracy. Background About 50 years ago, the KGB created the means to create upheaval in the middle east. This paper explores one such campaign and reveals some disinformation techniques in use today. Methodology The paper brings together literature from many fields in its exploration of Opera- tion SIG. Contribution The paper reveals the role of the KGB in the PLO’s campaign to replace Israel with an Arab Muslim state Findings Operation SIG is an early and extremely successful example of the Sovi- et/Russian campaign to disrupt democracy. Impact on Society The recurrence of antisemitism, particularly on campus, can be attributed to Op- eration SIG. Keywords Operation SIG, disinformation, Israel, propaganda, bias, KGB, Nazi Received: May 5, 2019 │ Revised: May 13, 2019 │ Accepted: May 28, 2019. Cite as: Cohen, E., & Boyd, E. (2019). The KGB’s Operation SIG: A 50-year campaign to incite hatred of Isra- el and Jews [Research in Progress]. Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education Conference, Jerusalem, Israel, pp. 35-70. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Institute. https://doi.org/10.28945/4357 (CC BY-NC 4.0) This article is licensed to you under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
  • Palestinian Manipulation of the International Community

    Palestinian Manipulation of the International Community

    PALESTINIAN MANIPULATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY Ambassador Alan Baker (ed.) Palestinian Manipulation of the International Community Edited by Amb. Alan Baker ISBN: 978-965-218-117-6 © 2014 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel Tel. 972-2-561-9281 Fax. 972-2-561-9112 Contents Overview: Palestinian Manipulation of the International Community Amb. Alan Baker................................................................................................. 5 Manipulating International Law as Part of Anti-Israel “Lawfare” Prof. Robbie Sabel...............................................................................................13 Universal Jurisdiction: Learning the Costs of Political Manipulation the Hard Way Dr. Rephael Ben-Ari...........................................................................................23 The Demonization of Israel at the United Nations in Europe Mr. Hillel Neuer.................................................................................................47 The Role of NGOs in the Palestinian Political War Against Israel Prof. Gerald M. Steinberg...................................................................................65 Politicizing the International Criminal Court Prof. Eugene Kontorovich....................................................................................79 Degrading International Institutions: The United Nations Goldstone Report Amb. Dore Gold .................................................................................................91
  • Beyond Images Project

    Beyond Images Project

    THE BEYOND IMAGES PROJECT www.beyondimages.info Israel website guide: Resources for busy advocates by Andrew White - last updated 28 August 2010 The purpose of this guide…. and how it is organised Many people wish to speak up for Israel. This guide to websites is designed to support advocacy which is coherent, well-informed, humane, pro-active and balanced. The guide is divided into the following categories (and there is some overlap between them): News, analysis and the Israeli government Gaza, Israel and Hamas – specific resources Thinktanks International law, Israel and the Middle East Advocacy tools, resources and techniques Israeli society Israel‟s medical and humanitarian contributions around the world Jewish-Arab coexistence projects in Israel Media monitoring projects on Israel Monitoring media in the Arab and Muslim world NGOs (Non-Governmental Organisations) How have the websites been chosen? There are many websites on Israel. Obviously, this guide is very selective. I highlight resources which focus on education and information. I do not cover the (often excellent) websites of Zionist federations, lobbying or communal organisations or party political groups, because their sites normally have a different emphasis. I have chosen to provide a diverse range of sites, which reflects the diversity of opinion in Israel itself. All listed websites are in English. Many offer multiple languages. See each site for details. Andrew White is a London-based lawyer, founder of the Israel advocacy/education project Beyond Images, and author of the Beyond Images website (www.beyondimages.info). All opinions expressed below about sites, and site selections, are Andrew‟s personal opinions.
  • The Goldstone Report “Reconsidered” a Critical Analysis

    The Goldstone Report “Reconsidered” a Critical Analysis

    the goldstone report “reconsidered” a critical analysis previous publications ngo monitor NGO “Lawfare”: Exploitation of Courts in the Arab-Israeli Conflict Anne Herzberg (expanded 2nd edition, December 2010) Precision-Guided or Indiscriminate? NGO Reporting on Compliance with the Laws of Armed Conflict Asher Fredman (June 2010) The NGO Front in the Gaza War: The Durban Strategy Continues(February 2009) Europe’s Hidden Hand: EU Funding for Political NGOs in the Arab-Israeli Conflict–Analyzing Processes and Impact Gerald M. Steinberg (revised 2nd edition, March 2009) Watching the Watchers: The Politics and Credibility of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Arab- Israeli Conflict (June 2007) jerusalem center for public affairs International Law and the Fighting in Gaza Justus Reid Weiner and Abraham Bell Hamas, the Gaza War and Accountability, under International Law Updated Proceedings of an International Conference on June 18, 2009 The UN Gaza Report: A Substantive Critique, An Expanded Text of Ambassador Dore Gold’s Presentation During an Exchange with Justice Richard Goldstone at Brandeis University on November 5, 2009 Proportionality in Modern Asymmetrical Wars Amichai Cohen THE GOLDSTONE REPORT “RECONSIDERED” A CRITICAL ANALYSIS … edited by Gerald M. Steinberg & Anne Herzberg Foreword by Dore Gold NGO Monitor Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs “The Goldstone Mission – Tainted to the Core,” by Irwin Cotler, Copyright © 2009, reprinted by permission of the author. “The U.N.’s Book of Judges,” by Ed Morgan, Copyright © 2010, reprinted by permission of the author. “Goldstone’s Gaza Report: A Failure of Intelligence,” by Richard Landes, Copyright © 2009, reprinted by permission of the author. “Report of an Expert Meeting which Assessed Procedural Criticisms made of the U.N.
  • NGO Malpractice: the Political Abuse of Medicine, Morality, and Science

    NGO Malpractice: the Political Abuse of Medicine, Morality, and Science

    NGO Malpractice The Political Abuse of Medicine, Morality, and Science Gerald M. Steinberg & Naftali Balanson Alex Greenberg, Editor July 2013 The research and publication of this report was made possible via generous gifts from Steve and Rita Emerson, Jonathan Tratt, and additional donors. NGO Monitor wishes to thank the medical professionals who contributed their valuable time and expertise in reviewing earlier drafts of this report. © 2013 NGO Monitor. All rights reserved. TABLE OF ContEnts 4 Introduction 4 NGOs, the “Halo” Effect, and the “Double Halo” 6 The Durban Strategy 8 NGO Politics and Medical Journals 9 Medical NGOs as Political Actors 12 Malpractice in the Media 12 Mainstream Media 13 Medical Journals 19 Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)-Doctors Without Borders 19 Organizational Structure 19 MSF’s Institutionalized Bias against Israel 22 Masab Bashir and the PFLP Terror Group 23 Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) 23 Organizational Structure 23 Political Advocacy 26 Politicized Fundraising 29 Palestinian Medical Relief Society (PMRS) 29 Organizational Structure 29 Claims of Non-Conventional Weapons Use 31 Medical Claims 33 Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (PHR-I) 33 Organizational Structure 33 Political Advocacy 34 Medical Claims, Torture 37 The International Campaign against Israeli Physicians 38 Gaza Community Mental Health Programme (GCMHP) 38 Organizational Structure 38 Psychological and Medical Claims 40 GCMHP, The Gaza War, and the Goldstone Process 41 BDS and the Free Gaza Movement 44 Mads Gilbert and NORWAC 45 Politicizing Aid 45 Gilbert’s Double Halo 48 Conclusions and Recommendations INTrodUCTion where NGO members may possess a certain level of expertise. he medical community, broadly defined, is morally committed With one exception, the organizations discussed to the highest standards of in this study are openly supportive of Palestinian professionalism and universality, political goals, and exploit their medical treating all those in need credentials as a tactic for furthering this agenda irrespective of any other factor.
  • 1 December 2012 ISSN 1750-0060 / (ASIN: B00AF6Y1AE)

    1 December 2012 ISSN 1750-0060 / (ASIN: B00AF6Y1AE)

    LSPS LONDON SECURITY POLICY STUDY Special Edition: 1 December 2012 ISSN 1750-0060 / (ASIN: B00AF6Y1AE) Israel, Hamas and Gaza 14-21 November 2012: Operation Pillar of Defense; Operation Stones of Shale; Operation Blue Sky. Glen Segell, FRGS Researcher: The Institute for National Security Studies, Tel Aviv Lecturer: Bar Ilan University, Israel LONDON SECURITY POLICY STUDY 1 December 2012 ISSN 1750-0060 © Copyright Glen Segell 2012 London Security Policy Study LONDON SECURITY POLICY STUDY (ISSN 1750-0060) is published on behalf of The Institute of Security Policy and Distributed by Patroon Specialist Booksellers, BM LETABA VIEW, London, WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom. Advertising, subscriptions, back issue requests and submissions may be made to this editorial office. COPYRIGHT All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher. Individual articles remain the Copyright of each Author. Please note, however, that all individuals and institutions may make copies for teaching purposes free of charge providing such copies are not resold. DISCLAIMER The Editor, Publisher and Distributor cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal; the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Editor or Publisher, neither does the publication or advertisements constitute any endorsement by the Publishers or Editor of that advertised. Each article and review is individually Copyright of the said author.
  • On the Otolith Group's Nervus Rerum

    On the Otolith Group's Nervus Rerum

    The Right to Opacity: On the Otolith Group’s Nervus Rerum T. J. DEMOS We clamor for the right to opacity for everyone. —Édouard Glissant Taking as its subject the Jenin refugee camp in the Palestinian Occupied Territories, Nervus Rerum (2008) is a thirty-two-minute film by the London-based Otolith Group, commissioned by Homeworks IV: A Forum on Cultural Practices, which met in Beirut in 2007, and recently screened at Tate Britain in February, 2009.1 Juxtaposing excerpts from the writings of Fernando Pessoa and Jean Genet with mystifying imagery of the West Bank camp, the film builds on the artists’ remarkable Otolith trilogy of 2003–2008, for which its two members, Kodwo Eshun and Anjalika Sagar, exploited the critical potential of the “essay film”—a distinc- tive mixture of documentary and dramatic imagery accompanied by poetic, historical, and often autobiographical narration that, in the tradition of such diverse filmmakers and groups as Black Audio Film Collective, Harun Farocki, Jean-Luc Godard, Chris Marker, and Anand Patwardhan, works to disrupt the clear boundaries between fact and fiction, subjectivity and objectivity, the real and the imaginary. In the process, the Otolith Group has invented inspiring new polit- ical and creative possibilities for filmmaking as a critical and conceptual art. Most significantly, Nervus Rerum—its title borrowed from Cicero’s Latin, meaning “the nerve of things”—confronts the problem of the representability of a people confined to a geographical enclave by a longstanding military occupa- tion. Established in 1953, the Jenin refugee camp was built to shelter Palestinians who fled or were expelled from their native towns and villages in the areas that became Israel following the nation’s founding during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War.
  • Palestinian Myths Debunked

    Palestinian Myths Debunked

    $12 SUMMER 2012 VOLUME 19, NUMBER 3 Palestinian Myths Phyllis Chesler and Nathan Bloom Debunked Hindu vs. Muslim Honor Killings Alex Joffe Ofra Bengio Iraq and Turkey as The Rhetoric of Nonsense Models for Arab Democracy? David Bukay Ilan Berman Usurping Jewish History Iran’s Beachhead in Latin America Shaul Bartal Bruce Maddy-Weitzman Denying a Jewish Jerusalem The Arab League’s New Relevance Havatzelet Yahel, Hilal Khashan Ruth Kark, and Lebanon’s Shiite-Maronite Seth J. Frantzman Alliance The Negev Bedouin Reviews by Are Not Indigenous Abrahms, Dann, Güçlü, Himelfarb, Luft, Malik, Michael, Phelps, Rubin and Schanzer • Operationally: The Forum exerts an active in- fluence through its projects, including Campus Watch, Islamist Watch, the Legal Project, and the Forum Washington Project. www.MEForum.org • Philanthropically: The Forum distributes $2 million annually through its Education Fund, help- The Middle East Forum works to define and promote ing researchers, writers, investigators, and activists American interests in the Middle East and to protect the around the world. Constitutional order from Middle Eastern threats. The Forum holds that the United States has vital interests in the The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organiza- region; in particular, it believes in strong ties with Israel and tion under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. other democracies as they emerge. Contributions are tax deductible. For information about • Intellectually: Through the Middle East membership, please contact the Middle East Forum, 1500 Quarterly, staff writings, lectures, and conference Walnut Street, Suite 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19102, calls, the Forum provides context, insights, and E-mail: [email protected]; Tel.: (215) 546-5406; Fax: policy recommendations.
  • Palestinian Popular Struggle and Civil Resistance Theory

    Palestinian Popular Struggle and Civil Resistance Theory

    Unarmed and Participatory: Palestinian Popular Struggle and Civil Resistance Theory by Michael J. Carpenter M.A., University of Regina, 2008 B.A., University of Regina, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Political Science © Michael J. Carpenter, 2017 University of Victoria This dissertation is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 Unported Copyright Supervisory Committee Unarmed and Participatory: Palestinian Popular Struggle and Civil Resistance Theory by Michael J. Carpenter M.A., University of Regina, 2008 B.A., University of Regina, 2003 Supervisory Committee Dr. Scott Watson, Department of Political Science, University of Victoria Supervisor Dr. James Tully, Department of Political Science, University of Victoria Departmental Member Dr. Martin Bunton, Department of History, University of Victoria Outside Member ii Abstract Dr. Scott Watson, Department of Political Science, University of Victoria Supervisor Dr. James Tully, Department of Political Science, University of Victoria Departmental Member Dr. Martin Bunton, Department of History, University of Victoria Outside Member This dissertation advances the literature on civil resistance by proposing an alternative way of thinking about action and organization, and by contributing a new case study of Palestinian struggle in the occupied West Bank. Civil resistance, also known as civil disobedience, nonviolent action, and people power, is about challenging