DOCSLIB.ORG

New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images [Book Review]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images [Book Review] This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Stadler, Jane (2013) New philosophies of film: Thinking images [Book review]. British Journal of Aesthetics, 53(1), pp. 131-133. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/131437/ c British Society of Aesthetics 2010, 2012 This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ays025 BOOK REVIEW Stadler reviews "New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images" by Robert Sinnerbrink, Continuum, 2011. pp. x + 247. ₤17.99 (pbk). In its exploration of the relationship between image and thought, Robert Sinnerbrink’s new book, New Philosophies of Film: Thinking Images, joins a steadily growing body of work at the intersection of film and philosophy. The past decade has seen the publication of a number of titles in this fertile area, including Kevin Stoehr’s edited collection Film and Knowledge (2002), Richard A. Gilmore’s Doing Philosophy at the Movies (2005), Daniel Frampton’s Filmosophy (2006), Thomas Wartenberg’s Thinking on Screen (2007), Stephen Mulhall’s On Film (2008), Daniel Shaw’s Film and Philosophy (2008), James Phillips’ edited anthology Cinematic Thinking (2008), and The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film (2011) edited by Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga. New Philosophies of Film canvasses and contributes to this spate of film‐meets‐philosophy texts that emerged in the wake of the psychoanalytic and ideological theories of film that dominated the 1970s. With a focus on cognitivism, romanticism, film form, and thematic analysis, Sinnerbrink traces the development of philosophical approaches to film from Stanley Cavell’s influential work through to contemporary debates. Sinnerbrink’s critical engagement with key interdisciplinary thinkers provides a thoughtful and sophisticated synthesis of scholarly work spanning film theory and philosophy as he mounts a convincing defence of cinema’s aesthetic significance. One aspect that distinguishes Sinnerbrink’s book is that he seeks to level the hierarchy of film and philosophy by acknowledging both parties ‘as equals whose union preserves their particular differences’ (120). While this is an important corrective to previous work that has tended to privilege philosophy, it is worth noting that Sinnerbrink is talking about the equal standing of film and philosophy rather than arguing the discipline of film studies is on equal footing with philosophy. Much fine work in film theory and analysis is disregarded by philosophers who focus on film narrative at the expense of film style and the cultural and industrial contexts that govern the production and reception of screen texts. Although Sinnerbrink’s careful attention to screen aesthetics as well as narrative content means that he does not fall into this trap, his disciplinary location is still firmly in philosophy. The book is organized in three parts: part I provides an overview of the ‘Analytic‐Cognitivist Turn’ in film studies; part II examines the shift from cognitivism to ‘Film‐Philosophy’; and part III, which is titled ‘Cinematic Thinking’, puts Sinnerbrink’s own mode of philosophically informed criticism into practice in the course of his considered analysis of three films. The first section of the book revisits Nöel Carroll and David Bordwell’s critique of screen theory, introduces new ontologies of film, and gives a thoughtful overview of philosophical approaches to narrative. The second part of the book offers a detailed account of cognitivist perspectives on film as well as reviewing Stanley Cavell’s and Gilles Deleuze’s important contributions to the disciplines of film and philosophy and introducing the idea of film as philosophy. Part III deserves careful consideration as it marks Sinnerbrink’s original contribution to the field in the form of illuminating analyses of three films directed by leading art cinema auteurs: this section examines David Lynch’s Inland Empire (2006), Lars von Trier’s Antichrist (2009), and Terrence Malick’s The New World (2005). I take the last three chapters of the book to demonstrate several means by which film might provoke and express philosophical insights in ways that are not readily formulated as philosophical propositions or expressed as systematic arguments. In this sense, in terms of what Sinnerbrink calls ‘cinematic thinking’, philosophical meaning can be communicated and grasped through aesthetics and affect as well as thought. Sinnerbrink interprets the fragmented narrative, doubling of identity, and film‐within‐a‐film conceit of Inland Empire as Lynch’s criticism of Hollywood and his celebration of the artistic prospects of the digital age, describing it as a film that contemplates its own nature and experiments with the possibilities of the medium. Akin to self‐reflexive ‘films about film’ such as Rear Window (Hitchcock, 1954); Strange Days (Bigelow, 1995); Peeping Tom (Powell, 1960); and Lynch’s own Blue Velvet (1986), Lost Highway (1997), and Mulholland Drive (2001)—Sinnerbrink claims Inland Empire is a film that ‘engages in its own distinctive kind of cinematic thinking; an intuitive, affective, aesthetic reflection on the possibilities of cinema today’ (152). To approach Inland Empire from a purely cognitivist perspective that contemplates the clues and cues to meaning that are encoded in the narrative, Sinnerbrink argues, is to fail either to acknowledge the aesthetic and affective dimensions of the film or to account for the holistic response it elicits. Even when applied to a film that explicitly invites serious intellectual engagement, Sinnerbrink’s romantic‐reflective perspective on the subjective experience of cinema and the philosophical insights that it can evoke is distinct from ‘the disengaged, intellectually curious, puzzle solving attitude’ of analytic‐cognitivist approaches to film and philosophy (154). Even more so than Inland Empire, Lars von Trier’s Antichrist, with its highly stylized treatment of anguish, anxiety, and guilt, is a deeply disturbing and ambiguous film. Sinnerbrink’s treatment of Antichrist is in some senses a classic auteur study that situates the film in relation to aesthetic tendencies and thematic preoccupations evident in the director’s previous work. What sets his approach apart from auteur criticism is that Sinnerbrink is not claiming that Antichrist is a conduit for von Trier’s own philosophical thinking, nor does he see the film simply as a narrative thought experiment to which philosophical accounts of horror or tragic art can be applied. Instead, he makes the more interesting point that the experience of psychological trauma into which the film delves is itself resistant to being intellectualized and mastered; furthermore, in communicating a deep sense of trauma’s brutal, confusing, and recurring aftershocks Antichrist somehow instantiates and invites a critique of cognitivism. Due in part to the disturbing affront to reason posed by the protagonists’ tortured psyches and sadistic behaviour following the death of their son, ‘Antichrist offers a cinematic counter‐example to prevailing cognitivist theories of horror’ (163). The film does not offer its audience catharsis and it resists sublimation, cognitive mastery, or the pleasures of aesthetic contemplation; as such, Sinnerbrink argues, ‘it is a violent provocation to thought and a traumatic case of cinematic thinking’ (163). The New World, Terrence Malick’s lyrical retelling of the Pocahontas story, is a very different kind of film from Antichrist or Inland Empire, yet for Sinnerbrink it also ‘enacts a kind of cinematic thinking that invites philosophical and aesthetic responses, while articulating a kind of thinking that resists translation into a ready‐made thesis, position or argument’ (181). Interpreting the film as a form of poetic reflection or ‘aesthetic mythologizing’ that presents nature itself as a sublime ‘subject’ or an agent that participates in the making of history, Sinnerbrink argues that Malick’s own version of cinematic romanticism offers an affective, sensuous ‘experience of cinematic thinking that evokes the possibility of another way of thinking, being, dwelling—if only we are open to the possibility’ (192). New Philosophies of Film concludes by advocating a romantic‐reflective approach to cinema, following in the tradition of film‐philosophers such as Cavell. This ‘transformative hermeneutics’, which Sinnerbrink himself models in the nuanced analyses of the book’s three concluding chapters, reveals that film can rightly be considered an artistic and narrative medium of thought
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prospects for a Historical Poetics of Cinema: David Bordwell, Kristin Thompson, and Neoformalism
    Prospects for a Historical Poetics of Cinema: David Bordwell, Kristin Thompson, and Neoformalism BY GREG LINNELL SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS IN AESTHETICS SUPERVISOR: DR. CALVIN SEERVELD INSTITUTE FOR CHRISTIAN STUDIES TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA SEPTEMBER 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROSPECTS (INTRODUCTION) .......................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1 : THE FORMALIST LEGACY introduction .............................................................................................................5 historical overview ..................................................................................................6 key concepts and scientific-historical poetics ...................................................... ..12 neoformalist appropriation .....................................................................................22 critique and summary .............................................................................................30 CHAPTER 2: A NEOFORMALIST HISTORIOGRAPHY introduction .............................................................................................................36 Formalism, neoformalism, critics ...........................................................................37 Dreyer and Ozu .......................................................................................................41 classical Hollywood cinema ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Author Functions, Auteur Fictions Understanding Authorship in Conglomerate Hollywood Commerce, Culture, and Narrative
    Author Functions, Auteur Fictions Understanding Authorship in Conglomerate Hollywood Commerce, Culture, and Narrative VOLUME I: ARGUMENTS Thomas James Wardak A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Sheffield Faculty of Arts and Humanities School of English Literature March 2017 i Abstract In 1990, Timothy Corrigan identified a rising trend in Hollywood film marketing wherein the director, or auteur, had become commercially galvanised as a brand icon. This thesis updates Corrigan’s treatise on the ‘commerce of auteurism’ to a specific 2017 perspective in order to dismantle the discursive mechanisms by which commodified author-brands create meaning and value in Conglomerate Hollywood’s promotional superstructure. By adopting a tripartite theoretical/industrial/textual analytical framework distinct from the humanistic and subjectivist excesses of traditional auteurism, by which conceptions of film authorship have typically been circumscribed, this thesis seeks to answer the oft- neglected question how does authorship work as it relates to the contemporary blockbuster narrative. Naturally, this necessitates a corresponding understanding of how texts work, which leads to the construction of a spectator-centric cognitive narratorial heuristic that conceptualises ‘the author’ as a hermeneutic code which may be activated when presented with sufficient ‘authorial’ signals. Of course, authorial signals do not only emanate from films but also promotional paratexts such
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitivism and Film Theory Edward S. Small
    Spring 1992 165 Introduction: Cognitivism and Film Theory Edward S. Small This supplement is designed as an introduction to a movement which I believe is not yet well-known to scholars in either theatre or film. I myself first heard the term "cognitivism" less than three years ago. For me it is still in the process of definition. Each time I set about researching and writing something on cognitivism, I find that I learn a great deal more about the subject and, as a result, wind up refashioning my previous definitions. I do not expect that this process will greatly diminish; in fact, I expect it will greatly increase. Extant publications-books and articles-which fall under the aegis of "cognitive science" constitute a bibliography which is already vast and (perhaps monthly) grows vaster. Much of it deals with matters that have commanded my academic curiosity and concern for many years: issues of mentation and perception coupled with such philosophic mainstays as epistemological and ontological questions. Thus I have the feeling that cognitivism will continue to influence my scholarship and my teaching, at least throughout this current capstone decade. This is not to say that I presently call myself a "cognitivist." As a film theorist, I have spent the past several years studying Derrida's deconstruction and, when asked about disciplinary specializations, tend to characterize myself as a film/video semiotician (devoted to the continental school of Ferdinand de Saussure). Yet the following papers will show that the flourish and fashion enjoyed by, first, semiotics and structuralism, and later by postmodern analytic strategies are often implicitly countered by cognitive science.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Film Theory : an Insider’S Appraisal Carl Plantinga
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 1:34 p.m. Cinémas Revue d'études cinématographiques Journal of Film Studies Cognitive Film Theory : An Insider’s Appraisal Carl Plantinga Cinéma et cognition Article abstract Volume 12, Number 2, hiver 2002 This article appraises the contributions of what has been called cognitivism or the cognitive approach to film studies, and suggests the means by which the URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/024878ar cognitive approach can become more central to film studies than it has been so DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/024878ar far. The author first shows that much of what has been called "cognitivist" film studies is only cognitivist in a broad sense, and could just as well be called See table of contents "analytic." He then argues that the cognitive approach would be most useful when it is thus broadly applied, becoming then more a commitment to the rationality of discourse and human thought than a narrow project within psychology. The article then goes on to appraise the utility of the cognitive Publisher(s) approach in our understanding of the psychological power of film and film Cinémas aesthetics. ISSN 1181-6945 (print) 1705-6500 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Plantinga, C. (2002). Cognitive Film Theory : An Insider’s Appraisal. Cinémas, 12(2), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.7202/024878ar Tous droits réservés © Cinémas, 2002 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cognitive Semiotics of Film
    The Cognitive Semiotics of Film WARREN BUCKLAND Liverpool John Moores University PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de AlarcoÂn 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain q Warren Buckland 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Palatino 10/13 pt. System DeskTopPro/UX [BV] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Buckland, Warren. The cognitive semiotics of ®lm / Warren Buckland. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-521-78005-5 1. Motion pictures ± Semiotics. I. Title. PN1995 .B796 2000 791.43©01©4 ± dc21 00-026227 ISBN 0 521 78005 5 hardback Contents Preface and Acknowledgements page ix 1 The Cognitive Turn in Film Theory 1 2 The Body on Screen and in Frame: Film and Cognitive Semantics 26 3 Not What Is Seen through the Window but the Window Itself: Re¯exivity, Enunciation, and Film 52 4 The Institutional Context: A Semio-pragmatic Approach to Fiction and Documentary Film 77 5 All in the Mind? The Cognitive Status of Film Grammar 109 Conclusion 141 Notes 145 Bibliography of Works Cited 163 Index 171 vii CHAPTER ONE The Cognitive Turn in Film Theory We have witnessed a number of attempts to by-pass [®lm theory's] most dif®cult conceptual problems by replacing it with something else.
    [Show full text]
  • James Buhler, Theories of the Soundtrack
    Journal of Film Music 7.2 (2014) 47-50 ISSN (print) 1087-7142 https://doi.org/10.1558/jfm.38909 ISSN (online) 1758-860X James Buhler, Theories of the Soundtrack New York: Oxford University Press, 2019 [xiv, 318 pp. ISBN: 9780199371082. $35.00 (trade paper)]. Oxford Music/Media Series. Illustration, figures, and index. JEFF SMITH University of Wisconsin-Madison [email protected] ike proverbial showbiz stories of overnight consider perspectives more broadly associated with success, the sudden rise of “sound studies” contemporary film theory. Buhler begins with theories L within academia is a development several that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s under the decades in the making. The past fifteen years have influence of semiotics, psychoanalysis, and Marxism. seen the appearance of new journals, new scholarly He then turns his attention to several approaches interest groups, new professional organizations, that emerged as a response to this continental strain, and several new compendia of published research. including neoformalism, cognitivism, feminist film Contributions to this field represent a wide range theory, post-colonial theory, and queer studies. of different approaches drawn from a vast array of The sheer breadth of Buhler’s compass indicates more established disciplines: linguistics, semiotics, the richness of film music and sound studies in psychology, musicology, narratology, and media its current constellation. Yet it also illustrates the studies. Its main areas of inquiry also run the gamut, immense challenge that Buhler has set himself. In displaying a concern with aesthetics, technology, and seeking to summarize such a large swath of academic culture. The result of this intellectual ferment is an literature, Buhler attempts to place these theoretical arena ever more difficult to navigate.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Theory Is Always for Someone and for Some Purpose': Thinking Through
    ‘Theory is always for someone and for some purpose’: Thinking through post-structuralism and cognitivism Robert Geal University of Wolverhampton [email protected] ABSTRACT: This essay explores the historical socio-cultural contexts that determine the contending epistemologies of post-structuralism and cognitivism. Debates between these paradigms have focused on a-priori philosophical premises. Synthesis between these premises has not materialised because each paradigm valorises a form of knowledge which its rival cannot match. This essay attempts to position these contested premises within a diachronic background in which theoretical claims can be tested, not merely against fixed deductive positions, but against specific socio-cultural contexts that manifest themselves in epistemology. Post-structuralism and cognitivism can then be thought of as aggregates of thought reflecting broad political, social, philosophical and cultural contexts. KEYWORDS: Ideology, epistemology, discourse analysis, post-structuralism, cognitivism. 1 To say that film studies‟ methodological protocols are highly contested would be an understatement. Reasons given for the lack of consensus range from John Mullarkey‟s assertion that „[a]s a consequence of its infancy no doubt, film-philosophy has been unable to avoid being highly partisan thus far: [...] film being understood entirely through one paradigm, cognitive science, cultural studies, Freudian psychodynamics, rhizomatic materialism, and so on‟ (2009, 6), to Casey Haskin‟s contextualisation of film theory‟s contested „meta-orthodoxy [as] hardly unique to film theory. Its bipolar pattern is a staple of endless histories of intellectual conflict, in philosophy, religion, and elsewhere‟ (2009, 36). These divisions are most starkly delineated between both the a-priori philosophical foundations, and the interpretative conclusions derived therefrom, within two of the discipline‟s leading paradigms, post-structuralism and cognitivism.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay: Cognitivism Goes to the Movies
    s6_PROJ-040106 4/5/10 4:27 PM Page 83 Review Essay: Cognitivism Goes to the Movies Robert Sinnerbrink Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga, eds., The Routledge Companion to Philos- ophy and Film (London and New York: Routledge, 2009), xix + 672 pp., $152.00 (cloth). Carl Plantinga, Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2009), xii + 280 pp., $21.33 (paperback). Torben Grodal, Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), viii + 324 pp., $30.78 (paperback). In just under twenty five years, analytic philosophy of film and cognitivist film theory have joined forces in a formidable research paradigm, one that has moved from keen rival to would-be victor in the battle for the “arts and minds” (to quote Gregory Currie) of film theorists and students of the moving image. David Bordwell’s Narration in the Fiction Film (1985), Noël Carroll’s “The Power of Movies” (1985), and Bordwell’s “A Case for Cognitivism” (1989), pioneered the wave of film theory during the 1990s that based itself, not on Lacanian psychoanalysis or various maîtres à penser, but rather on analytic philosophy and cognitive psychology. Noël Carroll’s Mystifying Movies (1988) famously at- tacked what he and Bordwell later dubbed “grand theory” (psychoanalytic, semiotic, and ideologico-critical film theory of the 1970s and 1980s). Bordwell and Carroll followed up with their jointly edited landmark volume Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies (1996), which advocated the kind of empirical mid- dle-level theorizing—shaped by analytic and cognitivist approaches—that aimed to define the future of the discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Part-Time Cognitivist: a View from Film Studies
    The Part-Time Cognitivist: A View from Film Studies David Bordwell Abstract: Understanding how spectators interact with films requires some theory of filmic representation. This article reviews three such theories. The first, a communication model, assumes that an artwork constitutes or con- tains a message passed from a sender to a receiver. The second, a signification model, assumes that the film operates within a system of codes and that the perceiver applies codes to signs in the text in order to arrive at meanings. This conception of film as signification may be found in both classic structuralist and post-structuralist accounts. The third, an empirical-experiential model, assumes that an artwork is designed to create an experience for the specta- tor. This article argues that the cognitive approach to film studies is founded on the third model of representation. The article also traces the strengths and limits of cognitive film theory and its theory of representation. Keywords: cinematic representation, cognitive film theory, poetics of cinema, post-structuralism, semiotics, structuralism How do spectators engage with films? Within film studies, this has been con- sidered a question about film as a system and process of representation. No decisive answers are forthcoming, but we have enough history behind us to sketch out three families of theories about cinematic representation. I do this while tracing some of their underlying assumptions about what representa- tion involves. I follow my rather schematic outline with ideas We have enough history about how the third family of theories has altered my own thinking about film. behind us to sketch out three Three caveats: First, philosophers and empirical research- families of theories about ers won’t find completely familiar ground here, though I cinematic representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Film Theory : an Insider's Appraisal
    Document généré le 30 sept. 2021 09:10 Cinémas Revue d'études cinématographiques Journal of Film Studies Cognitive Film Theory : An Insider’s Appraisal Carl Plantinga Cinéma et cognition Résumé de l'article Volume 12, numéro 2, hiver 2002 Cet article évalue la contribution de l'approche cognitive aux études cinématographiques et indique les voies à emprunter pour que cette approche URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/024878ar soit aussi efficace et utile que possible. L'auteur montre d'abord que les études DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/024878ar « cognitivistes » du cinéma ne sont telles qu'au sens large du terme et qu'elles pourraient tout aussi bien être qualifiées d'« analytiques ». Il fait ensuite valoir Aller au sommaire du numéro que l'approche cognitive serait plus utile si elle était appliquée de façon plus générale, devenant alors davantage un engagement en faveur de la rationalité du discours et de la pensée humaine qu'un projet se tenant strictement dans les limites de la psychologie. Enfin, il démontre l'utilité de l'approche cognitive Éditeur(s) pour la compréhension du pouvoir psychologique du cinéma et de l'esthétique Cinémas du film. ISSN 1181-6945 (imprimé) 1705-6500 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Plantinga, C. (2002). Cognitive Film Theory : An Insider’s Appraisal. Cinémas, 12(2), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.7202/024878ar Tous droits réservés © Cinémas, 2002 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne.
    [Show full text]
  • From Theory to Post-Theory and Beyond: Politics & Film
    From Theory to Post-Theory and Beyond: Politics & Film Ana Lomtadze Advisor: Dr. Maurizio Viano Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Prerequisite for Honors In the Cinema and Media Studies Program May 2014 Lomtadze Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………4 Chapter I: Which is Which?............................................................................9 Chapter II: Film Theory&Politics……………………………………….....32 Chapter III: Theory & Film………………………………………………..63 CODA……………………………………………………………………...76 Works Cited……………………………………………………………......78 2 Lomtadze Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank the Cinema and Media Studies Program for providing me with a nurturing and a welcoming ‘home’ over the past four years at Wellesley College. It is through this program and its invaluable faculty that I have grown and learned in more ways than I could describe. Two classes in particular – “Film and Media Theory” and “Films by Godard and Varda”, taught by Professor Dominique Bluher and Professor Maurizio Viano, respectively – have marked my personal and intellectual fascination with film theory. These classes have had a great influence on my thesis project. I must thank my thesis advisor, Professor Maurizio Viano, who has shown unreserved emotional and intellectual support and generosity with his time throughout the year. Without his encouragement and patience, my thesis might have never seen the light of day. I am also indebted to Professor Winifred Wood, who offered invaluable support and helped me immensely with editing and formulating my work. Additionally, I am grateful for conversations with Professor Nicholas Knouf. His suggestions helped me clarify and distill my ideas. My deep gratitude goes out to Sundus-Al Bayati, who did not let me take myself too seriously and supported me with long conversations, many laughs and generous hugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Studies and the New Science
    Film Studies and the New Science IRA KONIGSBERG Abstract: Film theory has been much involved with psychology, especially with the viewer’s perceptual and emotional response to the images on the screen. Psychoanalytic and cognitive film theories, though not exactly kindred spirits, have so far dominated psychological film studies. At the present time, technology offers neuroscience methods to explore the brain that open up the discourse on the mind. This article explains ways in which neuroscience, and its study of the brain, can extend our understanding and theory of film by exploring three areas of our response to cinema. Although the perception of motion is a complicated business, the phenomenon of implied motion sug- gests the brain’s readiness to find movement even when there is none and links together many of the same perceptual mechanisms we use when view- ing film and also the world outside the theater. Attention, focus, and binding are essential for us to make sense of the vast amount of stimuli that bombard our eyes. They explain what we see and do not see when viewing film and also the way film technique controls our understanding of the action on the screen. Finally, the argument about what we feel and do not feel when watch- ing the characters on the screen may receive some clarification by neuro- science’s investigation of “mirror neurons” in our brain. Keywords: attention, brain, cognitivism, emotion, film, motion, neuroscience, psychoanalysis The discussion of film theory often moves us away from experiencing and critiquing individual films. Instead films are used to ground generalizations about the ways we perceive and respond to film.
    [Show full text]