DOCSLIB.ORG

September 14, 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MALAYSIA ACCORDING TO LKY chedet.co.cc September 14 , 2010 1. Mr Lee Kwan Yew, the Minister Mentor of Singapore is three years my senior. That means he and I practically grew up in the same period of time. That also means that I have been able to watch the progress of Mr Lee, and in fact to interact with him on various occasions. 2. His assertion in his interview with the New York Times that "Race relations (would be) better if Singapore (had) not (been) "turfed out" (of Malaysia) is worth studying. Is it true or is it fantasy? 3. Before Singapore joined the Peninsular, Sabah and Sarawak to form Malaysia, there was less racial politics in the Federation of Malaysia. In 1955 the Malays who made up 80 per cent of the citizens gave a large number of their constituencies to the few Chinese and Indian citizens and ensured they won with strong Malay support. As a result the Alliance won 51 of the 52 seats contested. 4. The Tunku then rewarded this willingness of the Chinese and Indian citizens to support the coalition concept by giving them one million unconditional citizenship. This reduced Malay majority to 60 per cent. 5. In the 1959 elections the Alliance of UMNO, MCA and MIC won easily though Kelantan was lost. PAS with only Malays as members was rejected. Racialism even when implied failed. 6. In 1963 Singapore became a part of Malaysia. Despite having promised that the PAP will not participate in Peninsular, Sabah and Sarawak politics, Kwan Yew reneged and the PAP tried to displace the MCA in the Alliance by appealing to Chinese sentiments in the Peninsular. Of course the slogan was "Malaysian Malaysia" which implied that the Chinese were not having equal rights with the Malays. If this appeal to Chinese sentiments against the Malays was not racial, I do not know what is racial. 7. But the Peninsular Chinese favoured working with the Malays in UMNO. They totally rejected PAP in 1964. 8. Following the Malaysian Malaysia campaign a few UMNO leaders tried to rouse Singapore Malay sentiments. There were demonstrations in Singapore where before there were none. Kwan Yew accused Jaafar Albar for instigating the Singapore Malays. Although I never went to Singapore, nor met the Malays there, I was labelled a Malay-ultra by Kwan Yew himself. 9. By 1965 racism had taken hold and the Tunku was forced to end Singapore's membership of Malaysia. But the seed of Chinese racialism had been sown, so that even after the PAP left, the "Malaysian Malaysia" war cry was picked up by the DAP, an offspring of the PAP. 10. With the background of Singapore's activities in Malaysia in the short three years of its membership, can we really believe that if it had not been "turfed out" race relations would be better in Malaysia? 11. But proof of what would have happened was shown by the politics leading up to the 1969 Election. The MCA began to criticise the Sino/Malay cooperation especially on so-called special rights and demanded for a Chinese University. UMNO then began to clamour for a greater share of the economy of the country. The UMNO/MCA conflict resulted in the Alliance faring very badly in the 1969 Elections. 12. DAP and Gerakan, a new party largely made up of MCA dissidents made gains. The Alliance were shocked and rattled. 13. Then the Gerakan and DAP held their victory parade near the Malay settlement of Kampung Baru, hurling racist insults at the Malays. The result was the 13th May race riots. 14. Till today the racist slogan "Malaysian Malaysia" is the war-cry of the DAP. Racism in Malaysia is clearly the result of Singapore's membership of the country for just three years. Can we really believe that if Singapore had not been "turfed out" Malaysia would have no racial problem. 15. While Kwan Yew talks about his belief that all ethnic communities should free themselves from the shackles of racial segregation in order to promote fairness and equality among the races, he also said that "once we are by ourselves (out of Malaysia) the Chinese become the majority". 16. Singapore's population is made up of 75 per cent Chinese and they own 95 per cent of the economy. It is therefore not a truly multi-racial country but a Chinese country with minority racial groups who are additionally much poorer. 17. In Singapore dissent is not allowed, People who contest against the PAP would be hauled up in court for libel and if they win elections would not be allowed to take their places in Parliament. Whereas in Malaysia opposition parties invariably win seats in Parliament and even set up State Governments (today five out of the 13 States are ruled by the opposition parties) the PAP in Singapore has to appoint PAP members to represent the opposition. 18. Whether the PAP admits it or not, the party has always been led and dominated by ethnic Chinese and have won elections principally because of Chinese votes. The others are not even icing on the cake. 19. If Singapore is a part of Malaysia the PAP can certainly reproduce the Singapore kind of non-racial politics because together with the Malaysian Chinese, the PAP will ethnically dominate and control Malaysian politics. No dissent would be allowed and certainly no one would dare say anything about who really runs the country. 20. Amnesia is permissible but trying to claim that it is because Singapore had been "turfed out" for the present racist politics in Malaysia is simply not supported by facts of history. 21. Lee Kwan Yew and I saw the same things and know the reasons why. 180 Comments By Netizen-1 on September 21, 2010 1:45 PM Salam Semua, Salam Tun, I admire your political astuteness Tun. You’re the only one by far who dared spoke out against MM Lee without the fear of reprisals. The simple fact is, your arguments are based on facts not fantasy. Being a Singaporean malay/muslim myself, I need to be specific and objective in my world view. We all must. I understand clearly what both Malaysia and Singapore stood up for. Beyond reasonable doubt, neither country is right or wrong. Tun Abdul Razak, once PM, fought hard to ensure a well-balanced economy where all racial groups deserve a portion of the country’s wealth and that every community is given the opportunity to contribute to nation building. (Correct me if I’m wrong). Things are very much different in Singapore in this respect. The idea of Meritocracy is an idea where every individual are given the chance to succeed regardless of racial background. The disadvantage with this concept however, is the potential threat of social imbalances i.e. Income Inequality Distribution as well as a situation where a minority group may not even be able to slice a portion of the country’s wealth. One must understand that when we talk about Meritocracy, it’s about work performance, appraisals and rankings in office which can be very Subjective in ‘nature’. I’m very sure, that leaves a LARGE room for biasness to occur. Biasness can happen anywhere right? Without racial quotas, without the promise where every racial groups are given a fair opportunity, there will always be economic imbalances, be it in Malaysia or Singapore. I’ve lived in Singapore my whole life and I certainly know for a fact what’s like to be a malay/muslim down here. Now that Singapore’s long been ‘turfed out’ of the Malaysian Federation, we lack the political capital and voice (like yours) to speak up for our plight (if any). I’ve personally seen your interview with History Asia. You said; you had not succeeded in changing the mindset of the Malay society. Actually, what you say is very true, not only in Malaysia, but also in Singapore. We seriously need to start changing our own mindset and be more forward looking or else, we may never be able to catch up with the rest of the world. May ALlah be with us all. :) By difefu on September 21, 2010 12:31 AM Dear Tun, I refer to ve'aken's posting of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ru17SVBtbvI Wonder how you could explain the close relationship between Spore and Brunei, even though Msia and Spore is much closer geographically and in blood ties. How come Brunei never complains abt Singapore? My observation is, politics. Some politicians have been using Spore and race issues to gain votes. Hope you are not one of those.. : | By redrose on September 20, 2010 5:09 PM salam.. menerusi pembacaan komen2 di sini nampak sgt kaum yg sama dgn LKY kebanyakannya akan membidas tun.. saya bukan anti-cina.. tapi mereka yang anti-melayu.. kebanyakan nya.. kalau nk huraikan satu persatu amatlah rumit.. kerana kadang-kala apa yg kita coret banyak terhasil dr perasaan tidak puas hati dan 'hanya kita aje yg betul'. itu lumrah manusia tak kira warna kulit.. namun, nk diingatkan kpd yg komen singaporah lg bagus dr malaysia dr segi ekonomi dan kebersihan bla bla bla.. eh, singaporah adalah lebih kurang saiz melaka ye dak?? ermm.. dlm masa 53 tahun kalo malaysia tumpu perhatian sepenuhnya kt melaka ajer mungkin lebih gah dr singaporah.. pakai otak sket la.. saya rasa yg anti-melayu tak marah dgn komen saya ni kot.. sbb sesetengah mereka bukan pandai bertutur bahasa melayu pon.. belajar bahasa melayu sekadar nk cemerlang dlm peperiksaan ajer.
Recommended publications
  • The Perak Development Experience: the Way Forward

    The Perak Development Experience: the Way Forward

    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences December 2013, Vol. 3, No. 12 ISSN: 2222-6990 The Perak Development Experience: The Way Forward Azham Md. Ali Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Management and Economics Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/437 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/437 Speech for the Menteri Besar of Perak the Right Honourable Dato’ Seri DiRaja Dr Zambry bin Abd Kadir to be delivered on the occasion of Pangkor International Development Dialogue (PIDD) 2012 I9-21 November 2012 at Impiana Hotel, Ipoh Perak Darul Ridzuan Brothers and Sisters, Allow me to briefly mention to you some of the more important stuff that we have implemented in the last couple of years before we move on to others areas including the one on “The Way Forward” which I think that you are most interested to hear about. Under the so called Perak Amanjaya Development Plan, some of the things that we have tried to do are the same things that I believe many others here are concerned about: first, balanced development and economic distribution between the urban and rural areas by focusing on developing small towns; second, poverty eradication regardless of race or religion so that no one remains on the fringes of society or is left behind economically; and, third, youth empowerment. Under the first one, the state identifies viable small- and medium-size companies which can operate from small towns. These companies are to be working closely with the state government to boost the economy of the respective areas.
  • Countries at the Crossroads 2012: Malaysia

    Countries at the Crossroads 2012: Malaysia

    COUNTRIES AT THE CROSSROADS Countries at the Crossroads 2012: Malaysia Introduction Malaysia has over 28 million people, of whom approximately 63 percent are ethnic Malay, 25 percent Chinese, 7 percent Indian, and 4 percent Ibans and Kadazan-Dusun.1 Much of this diversity was created through the British formation of an extractive colonial economy, with the “indigenous” Malay community ordered into small holdings and rice cultivation, while the “non-Malays” were recruited from China and India into tin mining and plantation agriculture. Further, in preparing the territory for independence in 1957, the British fashioned a polity that was formally democratic, but would soon be encrusted by authoritarian controls. Throughout the 1960s, greater urbanization brought many Malays to the cities, where they encountered the comparative prosperity of the non-Malays. They perceived the multiethnic coalition that ruled the country, anchored by the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), but including the Malayan Chinese Association (MCA) and the Malayan Indian Congress (MIC), as doing little to enhance their living standards. At the same time, many non-Malays grew alienated by the discrimination they faced in accessing public sector resources. Thus, as voters in both communities swung to opposition parties in an election held in May 1969, the UMNO-led coalition, known as the Alliance, was gravely weakened. Shortly afterward, Malays and Chinese clashed in the capital, Kuala Lumpur, sparking ethnic rioting known as the May 13th incident. Two years of emergency rule followed during which parliament was closed. As the price for reopening parliament in 1971, UMNO imposed new curbs on civil liberties, thereby banning any questioning of the Malay “special rights” that are enshrined in constitution’s Article 153.
  • 1 Chapter 1 Introduction As a Chinese Buddhist in Malaysia, I Have Been

    1 Chapter 1 Introduction As a Chinese Buddhist in Malaysia, I Have Been

    Chapter 1 Introduction As a Chinese Buddhist in Malaysia, I have been unconsciously entangled in a historical process of the making of modern Buddhism. There was a Chinese temple beside my house in Penang, Malaysia. The main deity was likely a deified imperial court officer, though no historical record documented his origin. A mosque serenely resided along the main street approximately 50 meters from my house. At the end of the street was a Hindu temple decorated with colorful statues. Less than five minutes’ walk from my house was a Buddhist association in a two-storey terrace. During my childhood, the Chinese temple was a playground. My friends and I respected the deities worshipped there but sometimes innocently stole sweets and fruits donated by worshippers as offerings. Each year, three major religious events were organized by the temple committee: the end of the first lunar month marked the spring celebration of a deity in the temple; the seventh lunar month was the Hungry Ghost Festival; and the eighth month honored, She Fu Da Ren, the temple deity’s birthday. The temple was busy throughout the year. Neighbors gathered there to chat about national politics and local gossip. The traditional Chinese temple was thus deeply rooted in the community. In terms of religious intimacy with different nearby temples, the Chinese temple ranked first, followed by the Hindu temple and finally, the mosque, which had a psychological distant demarcated by racial boundaries. I accompanied my mother several times to the Hindu temple. Once, I asked her why she prayed to a Hindu deity.
  • DAP's Covenant with Middle Malaysia 2010

    DAP's Covenant with Middle Malaysia 2010

    DAP’s covenant with Middle Malaysia 2010 When I first took over as DAP Secretary-General in 2004, my colleagues and I were determined to lead a party that aspires not to be in perennial opposition but to be in government. A political party that has no aspirations for political power to implement programs beneficial to the people has no right to exist. When DAP first put forth this vision in 2005 on being a full partner in power within 10 years, few shared our hopes. But we had pinned our hopes on ordinary Malaysians yearning for change. DAP had persevered since 1966 due to our faith in Malaysians whether Muslims or non-Muslims wanting a fair deal, live in peace and harmony, prosper together and their children to grow up in a better world than they lived in. DAP leaders had labored through those painful years of legal prosecution and political persecution bound by our ideals in a Malaysian nation for all and our faith in the people. Many felt our struggle futile because they lost faith in the people sharing these ideals and wanting a better Malaysia. But the real and tough leaders and members in the DAP never lost hope. The political tsunami that was the 2008 general elections changed everything. No one expected change to happen so fast. The people have put their faith in us and we must repay their trust in us. Inexperienced though we were, we learned how to govern and we believe that Pakatan Rakyat has governed better in these two years than BN has in the last 20 years.
  • K a N D U N G a N

    K a N D U N G a N

    K A N D U N G A N JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN LISAN BAGI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN (Halaman 1) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG DIBAWA KE DALAM MESYUARAT (Halaman 14) USUL Y.A.B. PERDANA MENTERI DI BAWAH PERATURAN MESYUARAT 27(3): – Draf Bagi Perintah Perlembagaan Persekutuan (Persempadanan Bahagian-Bahagian Pilihan Raya) (Negeri-negeri Tanah Melayu) 2003 & Draf Bagi Perintah Perlembagaan Persekutuan (Persempadanan Bahagian-Bahagian Pilihan Raya) (Negeri Sabah) 2003 (Halaman 14) USUL: Waktu Mesyuarat dan Urusan Dibebaskan Daripada Peraturan Mesyuarat (Halaman 61) Diterbitkan Oleh: CAWANGAN DOKUMENTASI PARLIMEN MALAYSIA 2003 DR.8.4.2003 i AHLI-AHLI DEWAN RAKYAT Yang Amat Berbahagia Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Tun Dato Seri Dr. Mohamed Zahir bin Haji Ismail, S.S.M., P.M.N., S.S.D.K., S.P.M.K., D.S.D.K., J.M.N. Yang Amat Berhormat Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan, Dato Seri Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, D.K.(Brunei), D.K.(Perlis), D.K.(Johor), D.U.K., S.S.D.K., S.S.A.P., S.P.M.S., S.P.M.J., D.P. (Sarawak), D.U.P.N., S.P.N.S., S.P.D.K., S.P.C.M., S.S.M.T., D.U.M.N., P.I.S. (Kubang Pasu) “ Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Dato’ Seri Abdullah bin Haji Ahmad Badawi, D.G.P.N., D.S.S.A., D.M.P.N., D.J.N., K.M.N., A.M.N., S.P.M.S. (Kepala Batas) Yang Berhormat Menteri Pengangkutan, Dato’ Seri Dr. Ling Liong Sik, S.P.M.P., D.G.S.M., D.P.M.P., D.P.M.S.
  • Discontinue Beng Hock Inquest 555 Penang to Mark the Young Aide’S Sudden Death

    Discontinue Beng Hock Inquest 555 Penang to Mark the Young Aide’S Sudden Death

    For Justice, Freedom & Solidarity PP3739/12/2010(025927) ISSN 0127 - 5127 RM4.00 2010:Vol.30No.8 Aliran Monthly : Vol.30(8) Page 1 COVER STORY Remembering Beng Hock in Penang If the present government does not want to change the system, then the rakyat can change the Government in the next GE by S H Tan crowd of about 400 paign drove all the way up from Lee Lan said that Beng Hock was people packed the forum KL for this event. only a witness to an alleged cor- AAA hall in the Han Chiang ruption case involving slightly College in Lim Lean Emotional appeal over RM2,000 but he paid the price Teng Road, Penang on a lazy Sun- for it with his life. She lamented day afternoon. It was a very en- Lee Lan conveyed her apologies that support for Beng Hock and couraging support from for not being able to be present in his family is slowly waning and Penangites for the “Malaysians for person because of some urgent fewer and fewer people are at- Beng Hock” campaign. business at home. However a vid- tending the inquest. It is begin- eotaped recording of her speech ning to be a lonely fight for justice The panel for the afternoon com- in Mandarin was played. She for Teoh Beng Hock. The authori- prised Beng Hock’s sister Teoh made an emotional and passion- ties appear to be (deliberately?) Lee Lan, Aliran president P ate appeal for justice for her delaying and prolonging the case Ramakrishnan, Lim Lian Geok brother.
  • Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) Is Committed to Defending and Campaigning for Human Rights in Malaysia and Other Parts of the World

    Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) Is Committed to Defending and Campaigning for Human Rights in Malaysia and Other Parts of the World

    Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) is committed to defending and campaigning for human rights in Malaysia and other parts of the world. The organisation began in 1989 as a campaign body for the abolition of the Internal Security Act (ISA) in the aftermath of the infamous Operasi Lalang when 106 Malaysians were detained without trial. Since then, it has evolved into the leading human rights organisation in Malaysia, committed to protecting, preserving and promoting human rights. Produced by: Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) Suara Inisiatif Sdn Bhd (562530-P) Office Address: 433A, Jalan 5/46, Malaysia: Gasing Indah, 46000 Petaling Jaya, Human Rights Selangor, Malaysia. Report 2014 Tel: +603 - 7784 3525 Fax: +603 - 7784 3526 OVERVIEW Email: [email protected] www.suaram.net Photo credit: Victor Chin, Rakan Mantin. MALAYSIA: HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT OVERVIEW 2014 1 Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) CONTENTS Introduction 2 Detention Without Trial 4 Police Abuses of Power 6 Freedom of Expression and Information 10 Freedom of Assembly 14 Freedom of Association 16 Freedom of Religion 18 Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Migrant Workers 23 Death Penalty 27 Free and Fair Elections 27 Corruption and Accountability 30 Law and the Judiciary 32 Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) 36 MALAYSIA: HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT OVERVIEW 2014 2 Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) INTRODUCTION In 2014, the human rights record under the Najib Razak administration has hit a new low. When he first came to power in 2009, Najib Razak introduced several reforms in an attempt to win back votes after the fiasco for the ruling coalition in the 2008 general election. This attempt at reform has been reversed after yet another debacle for BN in the 2013 general election, epitomized by the about-turn decision on the promise to repeal the Sedition Act, with the Prime Minister seemingly bowing down to demands of extremist groups for his own political survival and bent on teaching dissenting voters a lesson.
  • The Short Films of Desmond Bing-Yen Ti

    The Short Films of Desmond Bing-Yen Ti

    Intersections: Queer Sinophonicities in (South) East Asia: The Short Films of Desmond Bing-Yen Ti Intersections: Gender and Sexuality in Asia and the Pacific Issue 38, August 2015 Queer Sinophonicities in (South) East Asia: The Short Films of Desmond Bing-Yen Ti John Wei Introduction 1. Bing-Yen Ti, also known by the name Desmond, is an emerging filmmaker from Malaysia who has studied film production and directed short films in his home country and China. To date almost half of his repertoire focuses on young same-sex attracted individuals and these filmic offerings have been distributed through YouTube and local Chinese (queer) social media. While mainly set in Malaysia, his films have been welcomed by Chinese audiences, to an extent that exceeded Ti's own anticipation. His short film debut Tongchuang Yimeng/Exchange 2012, for example, achieved over one million views combined on several major Chinese video-sharing websites and generated many more comments from these viewers than from their Malaysian counterparts on YouTube.[1] 2. In this paper I investigate and explore transnational intersections of queer screen cultures between Malaysia and China through a case study of Ti's film production, online distribution, and reception. My analysis begins with a critique of 'queer Sinophonicities' as a promising and problematic methodology. Further to a brief introduction to historical Malaysian cinemas, I then situate and scrutinise Ti's films in the context of (queer) Sinophone Malaysia and explore how to make sense of nationhood and Sinophonicities through queer filmmaking. In the following sections I critically discuss Ti's engagement with online (queer) social media and video-sharing services through the lens of Sinophonic conjunctions and disjunctions and include a textual analysis of Ti's Exchange 2012 to further explore queer Malaysian Sinophonicities.
  • Najib Razak - Malaysia's Flip-Flopping PM Malaysiakini.Com January 31, 2013 by Political Studies for Change

    Najib Razak - Malaysia's Flip-Flopping PM Malaysiakini.Com January 31, 2013 by Political Studies for Change

    Najib Razak - Malaysia's flip-flopping PM MalaysiaKini.com January 31, 2013 By Political Studies for Change COMMENT No other prime minister of Malaysia has shown such consistency in back- pedalling on policies, as Najib Abdul Razak has done. What does the future hold for Malaysia under such an indecisive leader? 1. Lynas Background: Lynas is to process rare earths concentrate imported from its mine in Mount Weld in Western Australia, at its Advanced Materials Plant in Malaysia. It will not only produce rare earths for export but also (generate) a huge amount of waste, including more than a million cubic metres of low-level radioactive material. Before Backtrack: Although experts have proof, including declarations by international bodies, that the residue is safe, there are people who are still apprehensive about it. So we have decided that the residue will be moved to another place," Najib told reporters during a visit to Kelantan. International Trade and Industry Minister Mustapa Mohamed said the Australian company had now submitted a letter of undertaking to send its rare earth processing residue abroad if it cannot find a suitable waste disposal site in Malaysia. Backtrack: No residues from the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant will be exported from Malaysia, said the factory's managing director Mashal Ahmad. 2. Mas-Airasia share swap Background: Fernandes and his Tune Air Sdn Bhd partner Kamarudin Meranun are expected to swap a portion of their AirAsia shares for 20 percent of Khazanah's stake in MAS. The share swap was to allow Fernandes to step in and pilot the ailing MAS airline back to profitability.
  • For Review Purposes Only

    For Review Purposes Only

    ONLY PURPOSES REVIEW FOR Understanding the Dewan Rakyat Copyright © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung & Insight News Sdn Bhd. 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the Publisher except in case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Earlier versions of MP Watch: Eye on Parliament reports have appeared in The Nut Graph website exclusively. Images contained in this volume are courtesy and property of The Nut Graph, the interviewees and/or other sources respectively. Permission to reproduce the aforementioned and previously published material is gratefully ONLY acknowledged. FIRST EDITION: March 2011 Published by B-2-19, Merchant Square, Jalan Tropicana Selatan 1, PJU 3, 47410 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.zipublications.com.my ISBN 978-967-5266-18-8 Layout & cover design by creativetrees.blogspot.com /REVIEW [email protected] Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Understanding the Dewan Rakyat / The Nut Graph FOR ISBN 978-967-5266-18-8 1. Malaysia – Politics and government. I. Title. 344.07409595 Printed in Malaysia by Vinlin Press Sdn. Bhd. No. 2, Jalan Meranti Permai 1, Meranti Permai Industrial Park, Batu 15, Jalan Puchong, 47100 Puchong, Selangor, Malaysia Contents West Malaysia Constituencies Map 10 East Malaysia Constituencies Map 12 Foreword 14 Introduction 16 ONLY Part I Knowing Malaysia’s Parliamentary Democracy 20 System of governance and the role of Parliament 21 Malaysia’s electoral system 24 The work of an MP 30 Funding our MPs 38 The speaker: Functions and powers 42 PURPOSES Part II Knowing Malaysia’s MPs 54 MP Watch: who replied, who didn’t, and why 55 MPs and the ISA 63 MPs and the Islamic state issue 68 MPs and freedom of information 72 MPsREVIEW and separation of powers 77 The challenges of being an MP 81 MPs and lawmaking 88 FORStr engthening parliamentary democracy 93 Part III 222 MP Profiles 100 Perlis P.
  • Central Executive Committee Resolutions

    Central Executive Committee Resolutions

    Central Executive Committee Resolutions The Ipoh Resolutions: MUAFAKAT TRANSFORMASI MALAYSIA PREAMBLE i) That the nation is waiting for a profound change is beyond doubt and that it is now a fact that the government-of-the-day is incapable of changing the intolerably arbitrary, self- serving, unjust, cruel and corrupt system of governance; ii) That the world does not stand still to wait for Malaysia, and we risk watching Asia changing and its economy growing not as an active participant but as bystander if we do not catch up fast; iii) That to save Malaysian governance from further deterioration, the economy from further plunder, and the people from further injustices is a shared imperative; iv) That the Democratic Action Party (DAP) therefore, in partnership with other Pakatan Rakyat parties and in cooperation with civil society, is determined to transform Malaysia through a new muafakat (consensus) • by reversing distortions and corruptions of the Constitution, the rule of law and the system of governance, • by restoring mutual respect amongst Malaysia’s multiethnic, multicultural and multi- religious peoples, • by renewing trust in public institutions and in the security services, • by rejuvenating the economy, • by conserving the environment, • by revamping the education system, and • by re-establishing hope in our future as a nation; v) The DAP National Delegates gathered here in Ipoh, Perak, on 17 th January 2010, at the turn of the decade and at a time of a sustained national crisis to chart a new future for Malaysia which departs from the expiring status quo , and thus hereby resolves to: PRINCIPLES 1.
  • Cij Foe Web 160211.Pdf

    Cij Foe Web 160211.Pdf

    Creative Commons license Attribution-Non-commercial 3.0 Writer: Ding Jo-Ann Editor: Sonia Randhawa Published by the Centre for Independent Journalism Contents Foreword 1 Overview 5 Government & political interference 9 Printing Presses & Publications Act 1984 Media control and ownership Increased internet monitoring Freedom of assembly ISA, Sedition Act & other repressive laws Pakatan Rakyat & Freedom of expression Civil society efforts 35 Themes & Trends 41 Police reports Race, religion & royalty Media ethics Looking ahead 49 Appendix: Timeline 2010 51 Foreword Foreword rime minister Najib razak said on 13 Jan 2011 that unfettered access to “negative influence” online could decimate Asian Pvalues and heritage. The prime minister called for greater regulation of the internet saying, “Indecency and anarchy can seep into any environment that is not anchored on any cultural roots and our values.” Najib’s remarks are not surprising. Despite earlier declarations that the media would “responsibly report what they see”, whether or not it is helpful to the government, Najib’s administration’s actions in 2010 clearly show that rhetoric aside, government control of freedom of expression is here to stay. Najib’s deputy Muhyiddin Yasin, when opening an international media forum, captures this doublespeak, “While it is in our best interest to further liberalise the media to increase our global awareness, we must not forget that freedom of the press is not a blank cheque to do whatever we want.” Both leaders seem to suggest that access to information and freedom of expression are “dangerous” if left unchecked. I would respectfully disagree. It is not freedom of information or expression that is dangerous.