Cave Biology: Life in Darkness Aldemaro Romero Index More Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cave Biology: Life in Darkness Aldemaro Romero Index More Information Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82846-8 — Cave Biology: Life in Darkness Aldemaro Romero Index More Information Index Acari 98 Ambystoma mexicanum 154 Acarina 98 American continent 15, 71, 92, 99, 114, Acarimorpha 98 115, 116 Accidentals 16, 114, 116, 132 Amphibians 120 Accidental-entrapment hypothesis 140 blind 9 Actinarctus 105 Amphipod Actinobacteria 63 cave 6 Adaptive-shift model 140, 141–2 Amphipoda 94 Adiantum sp. (venus maidenhair) 75 Amsterdam 4 Aerodramus 124, 157 Anaspidacea 93 hirudinaceus (mountain swiflet) 73 Ancient Greece 6 sawtelli 158 Andes, the 68, 73, 74, 75, 123 Africa 51, 92, 116 Anguilla anguilla 7 Kenya (Shimba Hills National Animals Reserve) 76 Blind cave 23, 39 African continent 71, 99, 116 cave 8, 14, 20, 23, 25, 28, 31, 34, 53, 55 Agaricus eyeless 19 arvensis (snow-ball or horse Anisolabis howarthi 111 mushroom) 70 Annales de Speleologie 56 bisporus (white-button mushroom) 70 Annelida 85 Agassiz, Alexander 28 Anophthalmic 116 Agassiz, Jean Louis Rodolphe (Louis) 18, Antromysis 92 19, 20, 23, 28, 29–30, 32–4, 37 Aphotic 68, 90 Agastoschizomus lucifer 101 Apodidae 124–5, 163 Alabama 120, 121 Apogon imberbis 174 Key Cave 189 Appalachian areas 167, 190 Alberti, Leandro 6 Apulian coast 79 Albinism 137–8 Aquifers 88, 178 Albiorix anophthalmus 102 Arachnida 97, 98 Algae 67–9 Arachnocampa luminosa 104, 118 Edaphic 68 Araneae 100 Alona 91 Archeobacteria 62 Amblyopsid 29, 35, 36 Arizona Fishes 20, 176 Karchner Cavern 84, 203 Amblyopsidae 29, 120, 148, 157 Aristotle 7, 20, 24 Amblyopsis Arkansas 107, 176, 199, 200 rosae 39, 173, 200 Artesian area 160 spelaea 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 29, 35 Asbestopluma spp. 79 spelaeus’ 16, 19 Ascension Island 116 Amblypygi 100 Ascomycota 70, 71 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82846-8 — Cave Biology: Life in Darkness Aldemaro Romero Index More Information Index · 279 Asellidae 95 Behavior 132 Asellus aquaticus 144 Belize 77, 137, 148, 155 Asellus aquaticus subterraneus 145 Bergson, Henri Louis 48–9, 51 Asia 50, 71, 92, 124 Bermuda 91, 92, 94, 95, 199 Astroides calycularis 81 Bentham, George 22 Astrosclera willeyana 79 Benthic 91 Astyanax fasciatus 120, 131, 134, 137, 141, Besson, Jacques 7 142–3, 145, 147–9, 151, 153, 154, Biofilm communities 68–9 155, 157, 172, 210–11 Biokarst 67 Australia 71, 76, 89, 91, 92, 93, 105, 108, Bioluminescence 104, 107, 118 141, 164, 193, 199 Biospeleologica 51 Bat Cave 206 Biospeleology 15, 50, 51, 56, 58–61 Sinkhole 92 Biota Austria 4 Cave 21 Aves 123 hypogean 8 Azores, the 175 underground 8 Terceira Island 74 Bird (see also Aves) cave 8, 15 Bacillariophyta (diatoms) 68 Bird nest soup 124 Bacteria (see also Archaeobacteria and Bishop, Stephen 11, 13 Eubacteria) Bison 3 Ammonia and nitrite oxidizers (in Bison bonasus 3 caves) 64 Bivalvia 86 Chemolithoautotrophic (in caves) Blaberidae 112 64, 65 Blattellidae 112 ecological role (in caves) 65–7 Blattidae 112 heterotrophic (in caves) 64, 65 Blattodea 112 In caves 63 Blind 4, 16, 18, 20, 22, 81, 91, 92, 93, 95, Iron and Manganese Oxidizing (in 100, 102, 121, 131, 133, 147, 176 caves) 65 -fish 137 phototrophic sulfur reducers (in caves) -ness 14, 25, 36, 95, 132, 134, 150, 165, 64 171, 210 purple sulfur (in caves) 64 -ness among cave animals 38, 40 sulfur-oxidizing (in caves) 64 -ness among cave vertebrates 40 Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi 63 -ness of cave fauna 36 Bahamas 92, 93 Bochusacea 93 Balcones Aquifer 122 Body size 138 Balkans, the 187 Bolivia 123 Banta, Arthur Mangun 40 Bol´ıvar, Ignacio 59 Barr, Thomas 59 Bonnet, Charles 27–8 Basidiomycota (puffballs, polypores, gilled Borneo 88 musrooms, boletes, yeast) 70, 72 Bosnia 121 Bat guano 66, 71, 126, 163 Botryolepraria lesdainii 73 Bathynellacea 93 Brachiopoda 89 Bats (see Chiroptera) 125 Bracken Cave 125 Bedrocks Branchiopoda 90 Limestone 160 Brazil 76, 77, 93, 95, 99, 126, 137, 138, Volcanic 160 148, 155, 174, 179 Beetle Sao˜ Dominogos karst area blind cave 13 Breder, Charles Marcus 59 subterranean 51 British Empire 38 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82846-8 — Cave Biology: Life in Darkness Aldemaro Romero Index More Information 280 · Index Brown University 33 horizontal 160 Bryophyta (mosses) ice 143, 159 Bryozoa 89 intertidal 80 Buffon, Georges-Louis 47 karstic 73 karsts 92, 159, 161, 191, 193 Caecidotea barri 95 lava tubes 63, 70, 72, 111, 141, 159, 176, Caecidotea cumberlandensis 95 194 Caecidotea incurve 95 limestone 50, 63, 69, 88, 107, 180, 196 Caecidotea jordani 95 marine 68, 69, 77, 78, 79, 85, 86, 93, Caecidotea paurotrigonus 95 105, 175, 179, 193 Caecidotea teresae 95 marine temperate 77 Caecorhamdia urichi 143 multilayered 160 Caicos Islands 93 reef 79 Calabozoa pellucid 95 saltpeter 64 Calabozoidae 95 sea 84, 128 Calanoida 91 sedimentary rock (in) 69 California 39, 40, 121, 131 shallow water 78 King’s Canyon National Park 107 snail 88 Cambarus aculabrum 199 sublittoral marine 80 Cambarus hubrichti 198 submarine 89 Cameroon (Republic of) 66 subtropical 71 Campbell, George John Douglas, (Duke of systems 10, 14 Argyll) 26 temperate 111, 126, 154, 161, 176 Campodeidae 110 tropical 71, 88, 101, 154, 161, 162, 163, Canada 75, 162 172 Canary Islands 91, 92, 100, 116, 176 Vertical 160 Carabidae 113 Cave spring fish (see Forbesichthys Carbonate dripstone 67 agassizi)84 Carcinophora americana 111 Cave Vertebrates of North America Caribbean 91, 92 40 Carniola See Slovenia Cavernicoles (also see Trogloxenes) Carychium spelaeum 13 56 Caullery, Maurice 52, 56 Ceˇ c,ˇ Luka 13 Cave archetype 132 Central America 115 Cave ecosystem structure 164–6 Cenotes (sinkholes) 68 Cave conservation and Cephalosporium lamellaecola 71 Management 182–208 Ceuthophilus spp. 5061 Anthropogenic impacts 183–7, 197, 198, Cevennes´ 50 203 Character concept 132–9 Atmosphere of caves (effects on) 195–7 Chardin, Pierre Theilhard de 57 Biota (effects on) 199–206 Chelicerata 96 Climate change 206–7 Chilopoda 106 Cultural 206 China 5, 6, 16, 108, 118, 133, 180, 192, Geomorphology (effects on) 187–95 194 Hydrology 197–9 Alu caves 6 Legal Protection 207 Beijing 181 Cave formation 66–7 Luxi County 6 Cave (types) Three Gorges Dam 191 Anchialine 68, 198 Chinese civilization 5, 7 Dinaric 80, 121 Chironomidae 117 granitic 63 Chiroptera 125, 201 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82846-8 — Cave Biology: Life in Darkness Aldemaro Romero Index More Information Index · 281 Cholevidae 113 Croatia 77, 87, 121 Chlorophyta (green algae) 68 Crustacea 90 Chologaster 36 Crustacean 90 agassizi 35 Anchialine 90, 93 cornuta 36 Cave 96 cornutus 29 Hypogean 90 Chordeumida 107 Phreatic 90 Christiansen, Kenneth 59 Cuba 35, 36, 39, 93, 99, 115, 117 Chthonoidea 102 Cuenot,´ Lucien 41, 49, 52, 56 Cimicidae 112 Culcidae 117 Circadian rhythm 108 Culver, David 59 Loss 113 Cumacea 95 Cixiidae 112 Curculionidae 114 Cladocera 91 Cuvier, George 17, 18, 19, 43, 57 Cladorhizidae 79 Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) 67, 68–9, Claparede,` Rene-Edouard` 45 73 Clariidae 7 Cyclopoda 92 Climate change (caves as record) Cyphoderidae 109 180–1 Cyphomyrmex rimosus 117 Climatic-relict model 140–1 Cyprinodont Closed system 159 aberrant 20 Cnidarians 80 Cave 69, 80 Dana, James Dwight 23–4 Cobitidae 7 Danielopolina kornickeri 93 Codonorchis octaedrus 80 Dark zone Coleopteran 113–17 Animals in the 14, 16, 25 Collegio Romano 5 Darwin, Alexander 20 Collembola 109 Darwin, Charles 2, 10, 15, 19, 21–9, 31, Collocalia 124, 157, 163 41, 45, 48, 52 Collocalia fuciphaga 200 non-Lamarckian Colorado 102, 207 ’s theory of 20 Competition (in caves) 180 Darwinian 57 Conestoga (River) 32 anti- 27 Congeria kusceri 87 neo- 57, 61 Conidiobolus coronatus 71 pre- 14 Convergence 155 Darwinism 2, 31, 37, 47, 48, 52 Cook Islands Decapoda 95 Atiu Island 157 Demospongiae 77 Cope, Edward Drinker 29, 31–2, 34–6, 48, Derovatellus 114 51 De Vries, Hugo 38 Copelatus 114 DeKay, James 14 Copepoda 91 Dendritic network 165 Coprozerconidae 167 Dendrocoelum beauchamoi 81 Coprozercon scopaeus 167 Depigmentation 14, 25, 132, 134, 150, Corrosion residue 66 165, 171 Costa Rica 137, 142, 148, 155, 157 Cave fauna, of 36, 40 Cottus carolinae 138, 171 Depigmented 4, 16, 18, 20, 22, 81, 87, 88, Crayfish 91, 92, 93, 95, 100, 104, 106, 107, 108, Blind cave 18, 35 111, 116, 119, 121, 131, 133, 147, 176 Cricket Fish 7, 137 wingless cave 3 Dermaptera 111 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82846-8 — Cave Biology: Life in Darkness Aldemaro Romero Index More Information 282 · Index Descrittione di tutta Italia 6 Eubacteria 62 Devil’s Icebox Cave 83 Association with plant and animal Dicytostelium (slime molds) 72 disease 63 caveatum 71 Eurasia 114 Dinetus 114 Europe 3, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 24, 28, 43, 44, Diplopoda 107 50, 51, 71, 75, 83, 85, 92, 107, 109, Diplura 110 116, 144, 160, 161, 189, 192, 193, 201 Diptera 117 Eurycea 121 Dinaric cave clam (See also Congeria lucifuga 10, 15 kusceri)87 neotenes 152 Dispersal distribution 141 spelaea 122 Dobzhansky, Theodosius 53–5, 57 tridentifera 121 Dohrn, Anton 37 Eurycercidae 91 Dollinger,¨ Ignaz von 18 Evolution 9, 16, 17, 19, 20, 27, 28, 30, 31, Dollo, Louis 51 32, 33, 34, 42–60 drobnovratnik 13 Cave biota, of 53 Drosophilidae 117 cave fauna, of 2, 27, 36, 37, 40, 60 Dryopidae 114 cave organisms, of 3, 32, 53 Dysdera 100 convergent 40, 110, 120 Dytiscidae 114 gerontocratic 56 phenotypic 55 Echinoderes cavernus 84 regressive 27, 32, 56, 60, 212 Echinoderes dujardini 84 troglomorphisms, of 213 Echolocation 123, 124, 125, 142, 157, Exaptation 150 163 Extremophile 54 Eclological indicators (of caves via Exumella 91 bats) 201–6 Eye 151 Ecology Absent 32, 88, 104, 108, 114, 116 Cave 67 Degeneration 40, 210–11 Cave fauna, of 36 Loss 91, 98, 101, 103, 110, 112, 113, cave organisms, of 159–81 116, 118, 154, 214 Diversity and distribution 159–64 No cornea 103 Ectopsocidae 112 Reduced 88, 94, 95, 101, 102, 103, 110, Ecuador 230 15, 101 111, 112, 113, 115, 118, 119, 133, Edward’s Aquifer 149, 160 143, 154, 172 Edward’s Plateau 121 Rudimentary 114 Eel 7 underground little (see also petites Fangensis 103 anguilles)7 Fangensis cavernarus 104 Eigenmann, Carl H.
Recommended publications
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) Are Specialist Predators of Snails
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(1): 145–150, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.016 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Larvae of the water scavenger beetle, Hydrophilus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) are specialist predators of snails TOSHIO INODA1, YUTA INODA1 and JUNE KATHYLEEN RULLAN 2 1 Shibamata 5-17-10, Katsushika, Tokyo 125-0052, Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Hydrophilus acuminatus, feeding preferences, snail specialist Abstract. Hydrophilus acuminatus larvae are known to feed on aquatic prey. However, there is no quantitative study of their feeding habits. In order to determine the feeding preferences and essential prey of larvae of H. acuminatus, both field and laboratory experi- ments were carried out. Among the five potential species of prey,Austropeplea ollula (Mollusca: Lymnaeidae), Physa acuta (Mollusca: Physidae), Asellus hilgendorfi (Crustacea: Asellidae), Palaemon paucidens (Crustacea: Palaemonidae) and larvae of Propsilocerus akamusi (Insecta: Chironomidae), the first instar larvae of H. acuminatus strongly prefered the Austropeplea and Physa snails in both cafeteria and single-prey species experiments. Larvae that were provided with only snails also successfully developed into second instar larvae, while larvae fed Palaemon, Propsilocerus larvae or Asellus died during the first instar. In addition, the size of adult H. acuminatus reared from first-instar larvae and fed only snails during their entire development was not different from that of adult H. acuminatus collected in the field. This indicates that even though the larvae ofH. acuminatus can feed on several kinds of invertebrates, they strongly prefer snails and without them cannot complete their development.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synopsis of the Biology and Life History of Ruffe
    J. Great Lakes Res. 24(2): 170-1 85 Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., 1998 A Synopsis of the Biology and Life History of Ruffe Derek H. Ogle* Northland College Mathematics Department Ashland, Wisconsin 54806 ABSTRACT. The ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus), a Percid native to Europe and Asia, has recently been introduced in North America and new areas of Europe. A synopsis of the biology and life history of ruffe suggests a great deal of variability exists in these traits. Morphological characters vary across large geographical scales, within certain water bodies, and between sexes. Ruffe can tolerate a wide variety of conditions including fresh and brackish waters, lacustrine and lotic systems, depths of 0.25 to 85 m, montane and submontane areas, and oligotrophic to eutrophic waters. Age and size at maturity dif- fer according to temperature and levels of mortality. Ruffe spawn on a variety ofsubstrates, for extended periods of time. In some populations, individual ruffe may spawn more than once per year. Growth of ruffe is affected by sex, morphotype, water type, intraspecific density, and food supply. Ruffe feed on a wide variety of foods, although adult ruffe feed predominantly on chironomid larvae. Interactions (i.e., competition and predation) with other species appear to vary considerably between system. INDEX WORDS: Ruffe, review, taxonomy, reproduction, diet, parasite, predation. INTRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION This is a review of the existing literature on Ruffe are native to all of Europe except for along ruffe, providing a synopsis of its biology and life the Mediterranean Sea, western France, Spain, Por- history. A review of the existing literature is tugal, Norway, northern Finland, Ireland, and Scot- needed at this time because the ruffe, which is na- land (Collette and Banarescu 1977, Lelek 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Polishjournal of Entomolog Y
    P O L I S H JOU R NAL OF ENTOM O LOG Y POL SKIE PISMO ENTOMOL OGICZ N E VOL. 83: 99-107 Lublin 30 June 2014 DOI: 10.2478/pjen-2014-0007 Contribution to knowledge of the distribution of the rare great silver water beetle Hydrophilus piceus (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) in Greece IOANNIS KARAOUZAS, ARGYRO ANDRIOPOULOU, KONSTANTINOS GRITZALIS Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, 46.7km Athens-Sounio Av., 19013 Anavissos, Attica, Greece, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. This study contributes to the currently poor knowledge of the distribution of Hydrophilus piceus (LINNAEUS, 1758) in Greece, an important and elsewhere threatened and critically endangered aquatic beetle. The large great silver water beetle was recorded in various aquatic habitats in the north-western Peloponnesus, being the southernmost record of the species in Greece. Photographs of the adult of the species are presented, and some notes on its ecology are provided. This work highlights the importance of revising the current status of the species in Greece, protecting its habitat and including it as a target species for conservation efforts. KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Hydrophilus piceus, distribution, aquatic beetle, Greece. INTRODUCTION The great silver water beetle Hydrophilus piceus (LINNAEUS, 1758) is one of the largest aquatic insects with a wide Palaearctic range extending from southern Scandinavia to the Mediterranean, in northern Africa (known only in Egypt), most of north-eastern Europe and Siberia to northern India (Kashmir) (HANSEN 1999, 2004). Adults often exceed 40 mm in length, are omnivorous but feed primarily on plant material.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrophilus Harpe Sp. Nov., a Remarkable New Species of Giant Water Scavenger Beetle from Brazil (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 31.xii.2015 Volume 55(2), pp. 665–671 ISSN 0374-1036 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B73DB50-91A3-4052-9230-93D7FE47BE66 Hydrophilus harpe sp. nov., a remarkable new species of giant water scavenger beetle from Brazil (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) Andrew E. Z. SHORT & Charles E. MCINTOSH IV Division of Entomology, Biodiversity Institute, and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. A remarkable new species of giant water scavenger beetle, Hydrophilus (Dibolocelus) harpe sp. nov., is described from Northeastern and Southeastern Brazil. Measuring nearly 5 cm in length, it is one of the largest species of Hydro- philidae in the world. It is superfi cially similar to Hydrophilus masculinus (Régim- bart, 1901) but is differentiated from that species by the form of the male protarsal claw and tibial spurs. A lectotype for Hydrophilus masculinus is also designated. Key words. Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, aquatic beetles, taxonomy, lectotype designation, South America, Neotropical Region Introduction The genus Hydrophilus Geoffroy, 1762, namesake of the family Hydrophilidae, contains some of the largest aquatic beetles in the world. The genus presently contains 48 species distributed in three subgenera: Hydrophilus s. str. that occurs worldwide, Temnopterus So- lier 1834, that contains a pair Afrotropical species, and Dibolocelus Bedel, 1891 with nine species that are primarily Neotropical with one species in the Nearctic Region. SHORT (2010) reviewed and circumscribed the genus, and provided a cladistic analysis of the Hydrophilini based on adult morphology. Despite being relatively common and widespread, the last comprehensive treatment of the genus is more than 100 years old (RÉGIMBART 1901).
    [Show full text]
  • Does Asellus Aquaticus Avoid Sediment Contaminated by the Insecticide Lufenuron?
    DOES ASELLUS AQUATICUS AVOID SEDIMENT KOEN CONTAMINATED BY THE INSECTICIDE WORKEL LUFENURON? Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Department Alterra – Environmental Risk Assessment Does Asellus aquaticus avoid sediment contaminated by the insecticide lufenuron? Master thesis for the attainment of the academic degree of MSc. Hydrology and Water Quality - Aquatic ecology Rapportnr. 010/2011 Koen Workel September 2011, Wageningen Supervisors: Dr. ir. Ivo Roessink Dr. Ir. Edwin Peeters MSc Jacqueline Augusiak Dr. Theo Brock Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Department Alterra – Environmental Risk Assessment Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd en/of openbaar gemaakt door middel van druk, fotokopie, microfilm of op welke andere wijze ook zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van Alterra Wageningen UR. Alterra B.V. aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor eventuele schade voortvloeiend uit het gebruik van de resultaten van dit onderzoek of de toepassing van de adviezen. Acknowledgment ‘Doing a thesis should be fun’, said Ivo in our first conversation. Giving the final touch to this report I realize that it was indeed fun! Did very nice experiments, learned many things about research and worked with pleasant people which that made me feel comfortable that really have great knowhow about aquatic ecology and risk assessment. In the first place many thanks to the ERA team of Alterra and Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Department giving me the opportunity to do my master thesis under their supervision. Special thanks go to Ivo Roessink for his enthusiasm, always good mood and supervision. Many thanks to Jacqueline Augusiak for the nice practical cooperation and supervision and Theo Brock for his critical view and good ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Biology and Structure of the Larvae of Hydrophilus Caraboides L
    On the Biology and Structure of the Larvae of Hydrophilus caraboides L. By E. N. Pavlovsky, M.D., D.Sc, Professor of Zoology at the Military Academy of Medicine, Petrograd. With Plate 27 and 16 Text-figures. IN May 1918 I captured in the vicinity of Petrograd some cocoons of a hydrophilus beetle, one of which I kept for breeding purposes. On June 13 there emerged about fifty small larvae very similar to Hydrophilus caraboides. These latter are characterized by the presence of a pair of lateral (pleural) appendages covered with a dense brush of hairs on each of the seven abdominal segments (Text-fig. 13, pla). In my larvae (Text-fig. 1) these pleural hairy appendages were also present, but with the difference that each appendage bore on its summit a long thin hair. This peculiarity caused me to look for other differences between my larvae and the description of the larvae of Hydrophilus caraboides, as given by Schiodte in his paper, ' De metamorphosi eleuthera- torum observationes; bidrag til insekternes undviklingshistorie', 1861. These differences may best be pointed out by a parallel com- parison of the text of Schiodte's diagnosis and the description of the newly emerged larvae as observed by me, as follows : Hydrophilus cara- Hydrophilus caraboides boides Schiodte Caput —a larva at first stage. Head obovatum. irregularly tetragonal, shaped rather like a trapezium turned with its base forward, and with broken sides. 628 E. X. PAVLOVSKY Antennae articulo primo Mrst joint of antennae long, longissimo, tenui, ciliato slender and flat, inner margin (Text-figs. 6, 7, V), secundo with seven very distinct ft tertio tenuibus, pusillis, teeth (Text-fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insects and Their Potential to Contribute to the Diet of the Globally Expanding Human Population
    insects Review Aquatic Insects and their Potential to Contribute to the Diet of the Globally Expanding Human Population D. Dudley Williams 1,* and Siân S. Williams 2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C1A4, Canada 2 The Wildlife Trust, The Manor House, Broad Street, Great Cambourne, Cambridge CB23 6DH, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editors: Kerry Wilkinson and Heather Bray Received: 28 April 2017; Accepted: 19 July 2017; Published: 21 July 2017 Abstract: Of the 30 extant orders of true insect, 12 are considered to be aquatic, or semiaquatic, in either some or all of their life stages. Out of these, six orders contain species engaged in entomophagy, but very few are being harvested effectively, leading to over-exploitation and local extinction. Examples of existing practices are given, ranging from the extremes of including insects (e.g., dipterans) in the dietary cores of many indigenous peoples to consumption of selected insects, by a wealthy few, as novelty food (e.g., caddisflies). The comparative nutritional worth of aquatic insects to the human diet and to domestic animal feed is examined. Questions are raised as to whether natural populations of aquatic insects can yield sufficient biomass to be of practicable and sustained use, whether some species can be brought into high-yield cultivation, and what are the requirements and limitations involved in achieving this? Keywords: aquatic insects; entomophagy; human diet; animal feed; life histories; environmental requirements 1. Introduction Entomophagy (from the Greek ‘entoma’, meaning ‘insects’ and ‘phagein’, meaning ‘to eat’) is a trait that we Homo sapiens have inherited from our early hominid ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Experimental Design for Predator-Prey Functional Response Experiments
    Optimal Experimental Design for Predator-Prey Functional Response Experiments Jeff F. Zhangy, Nikos E. Papanikolaou∗;∗∗;∓, Theodore Kypraios] and Christopher C. Drovandiy;z y School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Australia z Australian Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS) ∗Directorate of Plant Protection, Greek Ministry of Rural Development and Food, Athens, Greece ∗∗ Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece. ∓ Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Athens, Greece ]School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom email: [email protected] July 22, 2018 Abstract Functional response models are important in understanding predator-prey in- teractions. The development of functional response methodology has progressed from mechanistic models to more statistically motivated models that can ac- count for variance and the over-dispersion commonly seen in the datasets col- lected from functional response experiments. However, little information seems to be available for those wishing to prepare optimal parameter estimation designs for functional response experiments. It is worth noting that optimally designed experiments may require smaller sample sizes to achieve the same statistical outcomes as non-optimally designed experiments. In this paper, we develop a model-based approach to optimal experimental design for functional response experiments in the presence of parameter uncertainty (also known as a robust
    [Show full text]
  • Bijdragen Tot De Dierkunde, 62 (3) 179-191 (1993)
    Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 62 (3) 179-191 (1993) SPB Academie Publishing bv, The Hague Présence d’Asellides stygobies (Crustacea, Isopoda, Aselloidea) dans la région du Primorye, Sibérie sud-orientale J.-P. Henry & G. Magniez Université de Bourgogne, Biologie Animale et Générale, 6, Bd. Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France Keywords: stygobiont asellids, taxonomy, biogeography, Far East and Pacific North America Abstract orientale (région du Primorye). L’espèce nouvelle Asellus (Asel- lus) primoryensisest étroitement apparentée à l’espèce épigéeA. Two species of anophthalmous, unpigmentedasellids have been (A.) hilgendorfiiBovallius, 1886, comme c’était déjà le cas pour found in springs and groundwaters of S.E. Siberia (Primorye tous les Asellus (Asellus) stygobies précédemment découverts region). Asellus (Asellus) primoryensis n. sp. is closelyrelated to dans les eaux souterraines de l’archipel japonais. A. the epigean species (A.) hilgendorfiiBovallius, 1886, as is the L’espèce Sibirasellus parpurae n. g., n. sp. est étroitement ap- case for all stygobiont Asellus (Asellus) species previously parentée à une espèce microphtalme du bassin de l’Oussouri, known from the Japanese archipelago. région de Khor: Asellus dentiferBirstein & Levanidov, 1952 qui devient du Sibirasellus parpurae n. g., n. sp. is closely related to the l’espèce-type nouveau genre Sibirasellus. Ces deux microphthalmousspecies Asellus dentiferBirstein & Levanidov, espèces présentent plusieurs caractères originaux: corps couvert the Basin 1952 from Ussuri (Khor region), now type-species of de nombreuses squamules cuticulaires, palpe mandibulaire the new genus Sibirasellus. These two species show several origi- glabre et réduit à 2 articles, et coxopodites des péréiopodes nal characters: body covered by numerouscuticular squamulae, réduits et ankylosés avec leur sternite.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Ecology: Invertebrate Community Distribution Across the Benthic, Hyporheic and Phreatic Habitats of a Chalk Aquifer in Southeast England
    Groundwater Ecology: Invertebrate Community Distribution across the Benthic, Hyporheic and Phreatic Habitats of a Chalk Aquifer in Southeast England Jessica M. Durkota Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London Declaration of the Author I, Jessica M. Durkota, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. This work was undertaken with the partial support of the Environment Agency. The views expressed in this publication are mine and mine alone and not necessarily those of the Environment Agency or University College London (UCL). 2 Abstract Groundwater is an important resource for drinking water, agriculture, and industry, but it also plays an essential role in supporting the functioning of freshwater ecosystems and providing habitat for a number of rare species. However, despite its importance, groundwater ecology often receives little attention in environmental legislation or research. This study aims to improve our understanding of the organisms living in groundwater-dependent habitats and the influence of environmental conditions on their distribution. Invertebrate communities occurring in the benthic, hyporheic and phreatic habitats were surveyed at twelve sites over four years across the Stour Chalk Block, a lowland catchment in southern England. A diverse range of stygoxenes, stygophiles and stygobionts, including the first record of Gammarus fossarum in the British Isles, were identified using morphological and molecular techniques. The results indicate that under normal conditions, each habitat provided differing environmental conditions which supported a distinctive invertebrate community.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Coleopteran Insects in the Coastal and Noncoastal
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2021; 9(1): 824-833 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Diversity of coleopteran insects in the coastal and www.entomoljournal.com JEZS 2021; 9(1): 824-833 noncoastal environment of Midnapore (East), © 2021 JEZS Received: 01-11-2020 West Bengal, India Accepted: 03-12-2020 Debdas Jana Department of Zoology, Debdas Jana, Dipak Kumar Tamili and Susanta Kumar Chakraborty Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, West Bengal, India Abstract Coleoptera is the largest order in the class Insecta, and contains species that can be found on land, air, Dipak Kumar Tamili Egra SSB College, Egra, Purba and water to a considerable extent. The members of this order occur almost throughout the physiographic Midnapore, West Bengal, India zones of India. Coleopteran insects of coastal areas Midnapore (East) district were sampled from November 2008 to October 2011. Altogether 28 Coleopteran insect species belonging to 26 genera and 9 Susanta Kumar Chakraborty families have been documented from eight different study sites having contrasting ecological characters Department of Zoology, in the coastal areas of Midnapore (East) district of West Bengal, India. The present study has attempted Vidyasagar University, to record the diversity and distribution of Coleopteran insects. Some site specific species have been Midnapore,West Bengal, India described in our study. Keywords: coastal area, coleoptera, diversity, distribution, Midnapore (East), site-specific species Introduction The diversity of life on earth has never been, and never will be static. Global biodiversity has fluctuated through geologic time as evolution has added new species and extinction has taken them away [1]. Biological systems are constantly changing in response to environmental stimuli culminating in species richness [2].
    [Show full text]