Appendix A Study Design Report

427 Transitway From Highway 407 to Highway 7 Class Environmental Assessment G.W.P. 2229-09-00

STUDY DESIGN REPORT

SEPTEMBER 2011

427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA ...... 1 1.2 STUDY BACKGROUND ...... 2 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT ...... 4 1.4 STUDY PROCESS ...... 4 2.0 TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS AND OPPOTUNITIES ...... 6 2.1 STUDY PURPOSE ...... 6 2.2 PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES...... 6 3.0 ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ...... 9 3.1 ALTERNATIVES TO THE UNDERTAKING ...... 9 3.2 ALTERNATIVE METHODS (DESIGN ALTERNATIVES) ...... 10 3.3 IDENTIFY STUDY AREA FEATURES ...... 10 3.4 GENERATING AND REFINING ALTERNATIVES ...... 13 3.5 ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ...... 13 3.6 CONCEPT DESIGN OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ...... 15 4.0 PUBLIC AND AGENCY CONSULTATION ...... 16 4.1 GENERAL PUBLIC / INTEREST GROUPS ...... 17 4.2 GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ...... 19 4.3 FIRST NATIONS / ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES ...... 20 4.4 MUNICIPALITIES ...... 20 4.5 TRANSPORTATION SERVICE PROVIDERS ...... 21 4.6 ISSUES / CONCERNS AND APPROACHES TOWARD RESOLVING CONCERNS ...... 22 5.0 PROPOSED DOCUMENTATION ...... 23 6.0 MONITORING STRATEGY ...... 25 7.0 STATUTORY AND POLICY CONTEXT AND APPROVALS ...... 26 7.1 STATUTORY CONTEXT ...... 26 7.2 GOVERNMENT POLICIES POTENTIALLY AFFECTING STUDY ...... 27 7.3 FORMAL APPROVALS REQUIRED ...... 27 8.0 FUTURE WORK ...... 28

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 i | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Ontario Ministry of Transportation is undertaking two environmental assessment processes to address the planning gap on Highway 427 between Albion Road and Highway 7 and to determine a long-term strategy to address the needs in the transportation corridor. The main study limits extend 2.5 km from south of Albion Road to Highway 7 however, to tie into the design completed to the south, the study limit extends to Finch Avenue as shown in Exhibit 1. The first study will address the interim and ultimate needs of Highway 427. The highway improvements will follow the approved environmental planning process for Group “B” projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). The second study will address the planning and corridor protection for a proposed transitway on the west side of Highway 427 from Highway 407 to Highway 7 and will follow the approved environmental planning process for Group “A” projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). This Study Design Report (SDR) is being prepared specifically for the Transitway project, to meet Group “A” Class EA requirements.

1.1 Study Area

The study area, as shown in Exhibit 1, covers lands within the City of Vaughan, the City of Toronto and the City of Brampton. The area is currently transitioning from agricultural to urban with much of the lands adjacent to Highway 427 designated as Employment Areas. Additionally there are two cemeteries within the study area, one on each side of Highway 427. Approximately mid-way between Highway 407 and Highway 7 there is a 4-line high-voltage hydro corridor extending east-west through the study area, across Highway 427. The CN Rail Weston Subdivision Line extends in an east-west direction crossing Highway 427 just south of the study area. The CPR Vaughan Intermodal Facility is at the north end of the proposed Highway 427 Extension at Major Mackenzie Drive. The study area lies within the Humber River watershed; specifically within the Albion Creek and “Highway 50 Tributary” subwatersheds. The Highway 50 Tributary flows in a south-easterly direction through the Highway 7/Highway 427 interchange. This watercourse does not support direct fish use within the project limits (Ecoplans 2009). The Albion Creek tributaries have been heavily modified upstream and downstream of the study area. There are no natural channel elements remaining upstream of Highway 427; the system consists of a series of online ponds and ditches through the former „Ultimate Golf Centre‟ lands that are currently being redeveloped. Downstream of Highway 427, the Albion Creek tributaries occur as diffuse flow through dense pockets of cattails and have relatively short sections of defined channels. The main Albion Creek tributary crosses Highway 427 just north of 407 ETR and flows as ditch

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 1 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00 drainage along the Highway 427 on ramps before crossing the 407. Based on the modifications upstream and downstream of Highway 427 and the lack of defined flow channels in large portions of these tributaries, it is anticipated that the Albion Creek tributaries do not support direct fish use within the study area however this will be confirmed through the study. Vegetation within the immediate vicinity of Highway 427 is dominated by culturally derived vegetation communities, primarily maintained lawn, cultural meadow, planted trees, and regenerating shrub / tree zones comprised mainly of weedy, ornamental, and / or exotic species. There are no Provincially Significant Wetlands within or adjacent to the study area although there are scattered small pockets of cattails present along drainage ditches. According to the York Region Official Plan, there are no Regional Greenlands, no Environmentally Significant Areas and no significant woodlands within the study area.

1.2 Study Background

The Ministry has completed a number of transitway planning studies within the vicinity of the study area, recognizing that the Highway 427 corridor can form an important part of a region- wide network of high-capacity rapid transit facilities. The corridor has the capacity to carry both provincial and municipal transit vehicles and serve passengers travelling within and between Vaughan, Brampton, Mississauga, Toronto, and beyond. The following points summarize some of the transit initiatives planned in the area:  Along the Highway 407 corridor, MTO has protected property for a transitway facility from the city of Hamilton to Highway 35/115, which included property for a station between Highway 50 & Highway 427 south of Highway 407; MTO has competed Environmental Assessments for the segments between Highway 400 and Kennedy Rd. (Markham) and Markham Rd. and Hwy 35/115  North of Highway 7, as part of the 427 Transportation Corridor EA MTO has protected property for a dedicated transitway along the west side of the highway;  There are also various municipal transit plans within the area, most notably York Region is planning for a dedicated Bus Rapid Transit facility along Highway 7 that can ultimately be converted to Light Rail Transit and Metrolinx is currently working with the city of Brampton and York Region on evaluating options for rapid transit on the Queen Street/Highway 7 corridor. The purpose of this study is to examine and protect for transitway connections from Highway 7 to the 407 Transitway in the vicinity of the Highway 427 Corridor.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 2 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

Exhibit 1 – Study Area

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 3 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

1.3 Purpose of the Document

This Study Design Report (SDR) outlines the planning process that is proposed for the planning and corridor protection for a proposed transitway on the west side of Highway 427. In providing a focus for early and meaningful consultation, this Study Design Report is an important element in the Environmental Assessment (EA) process for this study, incorporating the study principles and processes of the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). In addition to documenting the planning process this study will follow, the SDR specifically addresses the following elements of the EA Process:  The study area to be considered (See Section 1.1);  The purpose of the study – problems and opportunities (See Section 2);  The generation and evaluation of Alternatives to the Undertaking (See Section 3);  The process to generate and evaluate Alternative Methods of Carrying Out the Undertaking – Alternatives Designs (See Section 4); and  The public and agency consultation process (See Section 5).

1.4 Study Process

The protection for a new transitway will be planned in accordance to Group “A” projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). The study process is shown in Exhibit 2. Public consultation is an important part of the environmental assessment process. Two Public Information Centres (PICs) will be held throughout the study process to allow the public an opportunity to review and comment on project details. Upon completion of the study, a Transportation Environmental Study Report (TESR) will be prepared. The TESR will be made available for a 30 day public review period and will be announced in local newspapers and on the project website. All affected government ministries/agencies, municipalities, property owners, interest groups and other individuals/groups on the project‟s mailing list will be notified of the filing of the TESR. The notice will announce the beginning of the public review period and will notify the public of their right to submit a request for a Part II Order (“bump-up”) to the Minister of the Environment if concerns cannot be resolved in consultation with the Project Team. All interested persons will be encouraged to review the TESR and provide comments. If the Minister of the Environment decides to grant a “bump-up” request then the project will be assessed as an Individual Environmental Assessment (EA) in accordance with the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 4 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

Exhibit 2 – Study Process

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 5 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

2.0 TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS AND OPPOTUNITIES

2.1 Study Purpose

The objectives of this study are:  To determine a long-term strategy to address the needs in the transportation corridor;  To identify a preferred alternative to address problems and opportunities with a transitway on the west side of Highway 427, including a transit station/carpool lot at Highway 7 and a connection to the planned 407 Transitway station;  To incorporate consultation with the public and with any interested or affected agencies/ organizations;

 To identify and design a preferred alternative that has acceptable / mitigable effects on the natural / social / economic / cultural environment which can be implemented at an acceptable cost.

2.2 Problems and Opportunities

Highway 427, one of the busiest freeways in Ontario, is uniquely positioned within the GTA freeway network and is a key priority in addressing MTO‟s requirement to provide for the efficient movement of people and goods within the context of the province's Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe July 2006. The Highway 427 Corridor serves the CPR Vaughan Intermodal Facility at the north end; international gateways via Lester B. Pearson International Airport (LBPIA) and Highways 407, 401, 409, the QEW; and downtown Toronto via the Gardiner Expressway in the south end. A primary focus of this study is to encourage and support sustainable travel behaviour in the GTA by expanding travel choices. The Highway 427 study area holds a strategic importance in preserving and enhancing the economic competitiveness within the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH) and across Ontario and beyond. Transportation improvements in this area will improve linkages between key economic areas in the region such as Pearson International Airport and the CPR Vaughan Intermodal Facility. On a broader scale, the transportation improvements will play an important role in building a more efficient goods movement network that connects the region to the rest of Ontario and to the US market. From a transportation planning perspective, the forecasted growth poses a significant challenge as many of the existing transit and roadway facilities are already operating at or near capacity during peak periods. The Growth Plan provides a framework for implementing the Province‟s vision for building strong, prosperous communities by managing growth in this region to the year 2031 and beyond. The Growth Plan builds on other key government initiatives including the Greenbelt Plan and the Provincial Policy Statement, 2005. The Growth Plan also provides the strategic policy

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 6 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00 framework for a transportation system in the GGH that provides more transportation choices, promotes public transit and active transportation, and gives priority to goods movement on our highway corridors. In addition to the sustainable policy framework, Metrolinx developed an integrated multi-modal transportation plan for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). Metrolinx‟s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) - The Big Move, includes a vision for a comprehensive, integrated transportation system that enhances quality of life, environment and prosperity. In 2009, Metrolinx merged with GO Transit to become one agency with planning and operations responsibilities. The Big Move addresses all forms of transportation: transit, cycling, walking and roads, including a proposal to build 1,200 kilometres of rapid transit, resulting in an extensive system with connected mobility hubs. In addition to improvements planned for the future in the GTHA, several improvements are currently being provided to address today‟s transportation challenges. The following are initiatives from the Metrolinx RTP within the Highway 427 study area: 15 Year Plan from the Metrolinx RTP:  Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on 407 ETR from Halton to Durham;  Hurontario Street / Main Street Rapid Transit from Downtown Brampton to 407 ETR (Brampton‟s Züm service);  Brampton‟s Rapid Transit on Queen Street (beyond current Züm and Viva services);  VIVA BRT Highway 7 from the Peel-York boundary to Locust Hill in Markham;  Spadina Subway extension from Downsview Station to Vaughan Corporate Centre (known as Vaughan Metropolitan Centre);  Jane Street Rapid Transit from Vaughan Metropolitan Centre to Bloor Street;  Rail service between Union Station and Toronto Pearson International Airport;  Peak period rail service to Bolton from Union Station;  Express Rail from Union Station to Downtown Brampton; and

 Numerous improvements to GO Transit service. 25-Year Plan from the Metrolinx RTP:  Rapid Transit along Highway 427 connecting Toronto Pearson International Airport to Queen Street, Brampton;  The first component of the dedicated 407 Transitway providing Rapid Transit service through York Region, continuing as high speed bus service to the east and west along the 407 ETR, and connecting to Toronto Pearson International Airport via Highway 427;

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 7 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

 Additional Rapid Transit services in Halton connecting Downtown Milton to the Rapid Transit service on Dundas Street and 407 ETR;  Brampton‟s Züm Rapid Transit service on Steeles Avenue connecting the Lisgar GO Station to Highway 427;  Necessary transit improvements along arterial road networks to service new growth that will continue to take place in accordance with municipal transportation master plans;  Walking and cycling infrastructure; and  Opportunities for upgrading BRT services to Light Rail Transit (LRT). On an ongoing basis, Metrolinx continues to provide transit improvements along the arterial road network, as well as pedestrian and cycling improvements. MTO has completed Highway 427 Planning and Design studies north and south of the study limits. To the north, the 427 Transportation Corridor Environmental Assessment has recommended the extension of Highway 427 from its existing terminus at Highway 7 to Major Mackenzie Drive, with protection for a dedicated transitway along the west side. To the south, the Detail Design study, from Campus/Fasken Drive to Steeles Avenue has been completed to widen Highway 427 to three general purpose lanes (GPL) and one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, in each direction. Protecting property on the west side of Highway 427 from Highway 7 to Highway 407 will allow the transitway to connect to the previously planned 407 Transitway station at Steeles Avenue, as well as connect to the approved transitway on the west side of the Planned 427 Extension from north of Highway 7 to Major Mackenzie Drive.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 8 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

3.0 ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Two types of alternatives are required to be examined to meet the requirements of the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act; these include Alternatives to the Undertaking and Design Alternatives. These alternatives are fundamentally different in scope and nature. Alternatives to the Undertaking consider a number of different approaches to address a given problem or opportunity and once a preferred approach has been selected, the Design Alternatives look at different ways of applying the chosen approach. To generate and assess these two types of alternatives, the Class EA will involve two phases. The first phase will focus on the problems and opportunities, the identification and assessment of Alternatives to the Undertaking and selection of the preferred alternative to the undertaking. The second phase will involve the generation and assessment of Design Alternatives and the selection of a preferred alternative.

3.1 Alternatives to the Undertaking

Alternatives to the Undertaking are defined as functionally different ways of addressing the identified problems and opportunities. These types of alternatives are also referred to as transportation system alternatives because an “Undertaking” is not fully identified until the end of the process. This term has been used to be consistent with the Environmental Assessment Act even though an “Undertaking” is not fully identified until the end of the process. In addition to „doing nothing‟, alternatives to address deficiencies in the transportation network capacity typically include those that increase network capacity, reduce transportation demand or combinations thereof. The transitway planning alternatives to be considered include:  Travel Demand Management (TDM) – reduce overall demands on the network by shifting demands to time periods outside of the critical congestion periods, and shift demands to alternative modes of transportation (cycling and walking).  Transportation Systems Management (TSM) – optimize the use of existing infrastructure through a wide range of strategies and technology policies and initiatives (e.g., ITS strategies, converting existing lanes to high occupancy vehicle lanes and reserved bus lanes, Park „n Ride facilities etc.).  Improvements to Existing Transit – increase frequency of service on existing GO and local transit routes and/or provide additional transit services either on Highway 427 and / or parallel roadways.

 New Transit Facility – provide a dedicated high speed transit facility that is fully grade –separated with a new transit service on the west side of the Highway 427 corridor with conversion to Light Rail Transit (LRT) or heavy rail.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 9 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

 Combinations of the above – alternatives that represent creative combinations of the above methods. The evaluation of the Alternatives to the Undertaking is presented in Table 1.

3.2 Alternative Methods (Design Alternatives)

The Alternatives to the Undertaking carried forward for additional analysis and evaluation include:  Transitway as a busway; and,  Transitway as a busway with the ability to convert to LRT. These alternatives, in addition to the Do Nothing Alternative, will be carried forward to the Alternative Methods stage. The purpose of this stage is to examine specific design alternatives in order to select the alternative that provides the best set of benefits while attempting to minimize negative effects. This stage of the process will focus on the following study steps:  Identifying significant study area features;  Generating Alternative Methods;  Refining Alternative Methods;  Assessing Alternative Methods (including the refinement of evaluation criteria / measures);  Evaluating and selecting a Preferred Alternative Method;  Preparing the design of the selected Preferred Alternative (including the identification of potential effects and development of mitigation measures); and  Preparation and submission of a TESR.

3.3 Identify Study Area Features

Data necessary to support the generation of alternatives will be collected primarily from secondary sources such as aerial photography, Municipal Official Plans, as well as information collected during previous MTO and municipal studies. This information will be supplemented, as required, by data collected from field reviews and consultation with technical agencies, ministries and interested groups and individuals.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 10 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

Table 1 – Assessment of the Alternatives to the Undertaking

Factor Do Nothing Travel Demand New Transit Services New Transitway Corridor Adjacent to Highway 427 Management / Transportation System Mixed Operations on Mixed Operations on other Busway Busway with conversion to Busway with conversion Management Highway 427 roads LRT to heavy rail

Transportation

 Addresses congestion concerns on the transportation network Does not address Does not address Does not address Does not address Addresses transportation Addresses transportation Addresses transportation through improvements to transportation criteria: transportation criteria: transportation criteria transportation criteria: criteria: criteria: criteria: levels-of-service Does not support the near- or Does not support the near- or Does not support the near- or Does not support the near- or Supports the near- and long- Supports the near- and long- Supports the near- and long-  Minimizes infrastructure long-term objectives of a multi- long-term objectives of a multi- long-term objectives of a multi- long-term objectives of a multi- term objectives of a multi-modal term objectives of a multi-modal term objectives of a multi-modal requirements while modal transportation system modal transportation system modal transportation system modal transportation system transportation system that transportation system that transportation system that addressing operational that includes a dedicated and that includes a dedicated and that includes a dedicated and that includes a dedicated and includes a high speed transit includes a high speed transit includes a dedicated and high problems on the eventually high speed transit eventually high speed transit eventually high speed transit eventually high speed transit system, which will have north- system, which will have north- speed transit system. transportation network system. Does not address the system. Does not address the system. system. south connections to the 407 south connections to the 407 However, the segment from  Maximizes accessibility planning ‘gap’ between the planning ‘gap’ between the Highway 427 is at capacity and The existing roadways would transitway. Maximizes transitway. Maximizes Highway 407 to Highway 7 is and connectivity to planned 427 Extension planned 427 extension would not provide for frequent, not provide for frequent, fast, accessibility to the proposed accessibility to the proposed too short to support heavy rail existing transportation Transitway and the 407 Transitway and the 407 fast, convenient, comfortable, convenient, comfortable, and transit plans in the study area. transit plans in the study area. and is not compatible with other systems Transitway. This alternative Transitway. This alternative and reliable inter-regional transit reliable inter-regional transit Allows for flexibility in meeting transit service in the area. does not provide for balanced does not provide for balanced service. service. future regional transit needs. Additionally, busway geometrics transportation system. transportation system. and closely spaced stations do . not support conversion to a heavy rail system.

Socio-Economic Environment

 Minimizes property Does not address socio- Does not address socio- Does not address socio- Does not address socio- Addresses socio-economic Addresses socio-economic Addresses socio-economic impacts (commercial, economic environment economic environment economic environment economic environment environment criteria with low environment criteria with low environment criteria with low residential) criteria and has moderate to criteria and has moderate to criteria and has moderate to criteria and has moderate to to moderate potential effects: to moderate potential effects: potential effects:  Minimize impacts to high potential effects: high potential effects: high potential effects: high potential effects: Improved access to support Improved access to support Potential to improve access to archaeological resources Does not provide opportunity to Does not provide opportunity to This alternative improves transit This alternative improves transit economic development in areas economic development in areas support economic development  Minimize potential encourage greater transit use by encourage greater transit use by services in the study area; services in the study area; influenced by the corridor and influenced by the corridor and in areas influenced by the nuisance effects providing a high quality inter- providing a high quality inter- however, it does not provide however, it does not provide will reduce the density on the will reduce the density on the corridor and will reduce the (increased noise, air regional transit service to regional transit service to opportunity to encourage opportunity to encourage surrounding road system surrounding road system density on the surrounding road quality, etc.) complement the existing and complement the existing and greater transit use by providing greater transit use by providing including Highway 427. including Highway 427. system including Highway 427. planned regional multi-modal planned regional multi-modal a high quality inter-regional a high quality inter-regional However limited station Although, adjacent properties Although, adjacent properties transportation system. transportation system. transit service to complement transit service to complement are directly impacted, are directly impacted, locations would be provided Results in moderate to high Results in moderate to high the existing and planned the existing and planned opportunities to minimize effects opportunities to minimize effects once converted to heavy rail. potential effects to the potential effects to the regional multi-modal regional multi-modal will be assessed through will be assessed through Although, adjacent properties surrounding communities due to surrounding communities due to transportation system. transportation system. consideration of design consideration of design are directly impacted, increased congestion. increased congestion. Results in moderate to high Results in moderate to high alternatives. alternatives. opportunities to minimize No direct impacts on adjacent No direct impacts on adjacent potential effects to the potential effects to the Additionally, a dedicated Additionally, a dedicated effects will be assessed through properties. properties. surrounding communities due to surrounding communities due to busway could potentially provide busway could potentially consideration of design increased congestion. increased congestion. the opportunity for emergency provide the opportunity for alternatives. No direct impacts on adjacent No direct impacts on adjacent services to use facility (e.g., fire, emergency services to use properties. properties. ambulance, police, etc.) facility (e.g., fire, ambulance, police, etc.). This would not be feasible once converted to LRT.

Natural Environment  Minimizes impacts to aquatic and terrestrial species and habitat, Addresses natural Addresses natural Addresses natural Addresses natural Addresses natural Addresses natural Addresses natural including rare species environment criteria with no environment criteria with no environment criteria with no environment criteria with no environment criteria with low environment criteria with low environment criteria with low to low potential effects: to low potential effects: to low potential effects: to low potential effects: potential effects: potential effects: potential effects:  Minimizes impacts to or No change to natural No change to natural No change to natural No change to natural Given the low sensitivity of the Given the low sensitivity of the Given the low sensitivity of the

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 11 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

Factor Do Nothing Travel Demand New Transit Services New Transitway Corridor Adjacent to Highway 427 Management / Transportation System Mixed Operations on Mixed Operations on other Busway Busway with conversion to Busway with conversion Management Highway 427 roads LRT to heavy rail

provides opportunity for environmental features therefore environmental features therefore environmental features environmental features therefore natural environmental features natural environmental features natural environmental features improvement to drainage effects are not anticipated. effects are not anticipated. therefore effects are not no effects to Hwy 427 however, present, adjacent to Highway present, adjacent to Highway present, adjacent to Highway and stormwater anticipated. may require changes on other 427, it is anticipated that these 427, it is anticipated that these 427, it is anticipated that these management roads. effects can be effectively effects can be effectively effects can be effectively mitigated through design. mitigated through design. mitigated through design.  Minimizes impacts to groundwater resources

Technical Feasibility N/A

 Achieves acceptable technical requirements at a reasonable Addresses technical Addresses technical Addresses technical Addresses technical Addresses technical Does not address technical construction/ feasibility criteria: feasibility criteria: feasibility criteria: feasibility criteria: feasibility criteria: feasibility criteria: implementation cost. Implementing improved TDM Implementing improved transit Implementing improved transit A new busway will have higher A new busway with conversion Implementing a new busway and TSM will have low services in mixed operations on services in mixed operations on construction/implementation to LRT, would have similar initial with conversion to heavy rail is construction/implementation Highway 427 will have low other roads will have low costs than operating in mixed construction/implementation the most costly alternative cost compared to other construction/implementation construction/implementation operations. Also, selecting a costs as busway, but will have compared to the other alternatives. cost compared to other cost compared to other dedicated busway as the additional future costs to alternatives. There is a high alternatives. alternatives. preferred alternative will not convert to LRT. However, the capital investment required to require additional cost in the cost of LRT conversion can be convert from busway to a heavy future for conversion to LRT or minimized by providing flexibility rail transit system. heavy rail system and will meet in the initial busway design. current design stands.

SUMMARY

To ‘Do Nothing’ does not Although, ‘TDM/ TSM’, result in Although, additional transit Although, additional transit A ‘Busway’ addresses the near- A ‘Busway’ addresses the near- A ‘Busway with conversion to address the near- or long-term no significant socio-economic or services on Highway 427 result services on existing local roads and long-term goals of a and long-term goals of a Heavy Rail’ does not provide objectives of a dedicated and natural environmental effects, in no environment effects and result in no environment effects dedicated and eventually high dedicated and eventually high any additional benefit compared eventually high speed inter- this option does not address the low socio-economic and low socio-economic speed inter-regional transit speed inter-regional transit to a busway with conversion to regional transit service to study objectives to improve environmental effects, it only environmental effects, it only service to complement the service to complement the LRT, and will require a high complement the existing and transit services in the area. partially addresses the study partially addresses the study existing and planned regional existing and planned regional capital investment. This mode planned regional multi-modal Therefore this alternative is objectives to improve transit objectives to improve transit multi-modal transportation multi-modal transportation of transit is not ideal for serving transportation system. not recommended to be services in the area. It does not services in the area. It does not system. system. Additionally, the short trip inter-regional This alternative does not provide carried forward. address the long term vision of address the long term vision of Although, a new busway results geometrics requirements of a commuters but rather long opportunity to encourage the regional multi-modal the regional multi-modal in socio-economic and natural busway allow for conversion to distance commuters. greater transit, which would transportation system. transportation system. environmental effects, these are LRT. Therefore this alternative is result in indirect effects to the Therefore this alternative is Therefore this alternative is relatively low and it is Although, a new busway with not recommended to be surrounding communities due to not recommended to be not recommended to be anticipated that these effects conversion to LRT results in carried forward. the increases in congestion. carried forward. carried forward. can be effectively mitigated socio-economic and natural Therefore this alternative is through design. environmental effects, these are not recommended to be Therefore, this alternative is, relatively low and it is carried forward. carried forward for further anticipated that these effects consideration. can be effectively mitigated through design. Therefore, this alternative is, carried forward for further consideration. Least Preferred Most Preferred

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 12 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

3.4 Generating and Refining Alternatives

The alternatives will be generated based on the following guiding principles:  Resolve transportation problems and take advantage of existing and future opportunities recognizing the project needs;  Minimize impacts on existing residential, institutional, recreational and commercial uses;  Utilize existing infrastructure to the extent possible;  Minimize impacts to natural heritage systems, (features, functions, systems and communities);  Compatibility with provincial and municipal policies and initiatives; and,  Consistency with applicable geometric design standards. The objectives and rationale for generating alternatives will be to ensure not only that alternatives are efficient / direct, and meet technical objectives / design requirements but also minimize / avoid impacts to significant environmental and study area features to the extent possible. The first round of consultation will be used to obtain input on the preliminary alternatives. Input received from this consultation will assist in refining the alternatives prior to the formal assessment and evaluation process.

3.5 Assessment and Evaluation of Alternatives

After the various alternatives are generated and refined based on consultation, the evaluation of the alternatives will commence. The evaluation of alternatives is a two-step process. The first step (assessment) entails the identification of advantages and disadvantages of the various alternatives under consideration. At this stage, each environmental feature is examined to determine the extent of impact. Net impacts will be identified; these refer to the effects on the environment that remain after standard mitigation measures have been applied to reduce the extent of the impact. The second stage is the evaluation itself. This stage builds upon the information obtained from the impact assessment stage and involves a comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the alternatives considered to select a preferred alternative. At this stage, the relative significance of the environmental features is determined. A Reasoned Argument method will be used to identify a Preferred Alternative. The Reasoned Argument evaluation component will provide a clear presentation to stakeholders of the key differences between the various alternatives and the reasons why one alternative is preferred over

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 13 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00 another. During the EA study, the decision-making process will be clearly documented to support a traceable process and to ensure that it is understandable to those who may be affected by the decisions. Opportunities for stakeholder input into this process are outlined below, in Section 5. This method highlights the differences in net effects associated with the various alternatives and explores the relative significance of the various potential impacts to assist in making decisions. Based on these differences, the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative are identified. The relative significance of the impacts is examined to provide a clear rationale for the selection of a Preferred Alternative. The rationale that favours the selection of one alternative over all others will be derived from the following sources:  Government legislation, policies and guidelines;  Municipal policy (e.g., Official Plans, Transportation Master Plans etc.);  Issues and concerns identified during consultation with ministries and agencies, municipalities, ratepayer and interest groups and the general public (including input obtained through the discussion of the relative level of importance of evaluation criteria); and  Project Team expertise.

Factor Specific Environmental Inputs to the Evaluation The data collected within the study area will assist in identifying the types of potential impacts each alternative will have on the various components of the environment. The specific criteria and measures will be developed during the course of the EA. Impacts will be quantified according to the components listed below. Factor specific environmental specialists will be responsible for determining the overall impact of the various alternatives on the natural, socio- economic and cultural environment. In determining the overall impact, the specialists will consider how the various factors interact and function together. For example, for the natural environment this would include an overall assessment of the impact on ecosystem form, function and connectivity. In addition, the specialists will identify the relative significance of the various potential effects to assist in the decision making process. The table below outlines the broad environmental and technical aspects that will be considered to address the objective to minimize/avoid potential environmental effects to the extent possible. It should be noted that these represent the minimum when generating and evaluating alternatives and are subject to refinement and modification during the EA based on study findings and input received from stakeholders. Specific criteria and measures will be developed as the study proceeds.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 14 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

COMPONENT Features / Considerations Natural  Aquatic Ecosystems Environment  Terrestrial Ecosystems  Groundwater  Surface Water Cultural  Cultural Heritage Environment  Archaeology Social/Economic  Property Impacts (Commercial, Residential) Environment  Community Impacts (Recreational, Institutional Facilities)  Noise Technical  Adherence to Applicable Design Standards  Compatibility with the Transportation Network  Constructability  Cost

3.6 Concept Design of the Preferred Alternative

A concept design will be prepared for the preferred alternative. Design will be developed to the level that will allow MTO to identify design mitigation measures (i.e., minimization/mitigation of impacts through design), environmental impacts, as well as property impacts and ensure overall constructability. In addition, future approval requirements, preliminary construction mitigation and enhancement opportunities/compensation plans and will be discussed with agencies and other stakeholders. Preliminary construction mitigation measures will be identified in the context of all relevant technical guidelines. Appropriate technical and economically feasible mitigation measures will be identified for to address specific characteristics and sensitivities of the environmental features and the related significance (e.g., magnitude, duration, certainty) of the potential impact. Mitigation measures will be developed in consultation with appropriate agency staff and stakeholders and will also include recommendations for a monitoring program.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 15 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

4.0 PUBLIC AND AGENCY CONSULTATION

One of the intentions of the EA Act is to ensure that, from the earliest stages of planning, decisions are made after careful consideration of environmental benefits and impacts. Consultation with interested and/or affected parties is an essential part of this planning process and provides a mechanism for the proponent to identify and respond to issues before decisions are made and documentation is filed with the Ministry of the Environment. Consultation will take place throughout the study process, including formal opportunities at significant study milestones as well as informal opportunities throughout the process. The consultation program for this study will ensure that the consultation principles of the Class EA are met. The purpose of consultation activities conducted during this study is to present and address issues and concerns pertaining to the transportation problems and opportunities in the analysis area, the range and types of alternatives to be considered and to seek input in the development of Class EA process commitments. External agencies provide valuable support by identifying compliance requirements (laws, regulations, policies and programs) and issues or areas of concern within their jurisdiction. These groups offer valuable input and professional expertise and are knowledgeable regarding local issues and can assist in the identification of interest groups that should be consulted. The following section discusses consultation with regulatory agencies, municipal staff and councils, property owners/tenants and the general public/interest groups. The consultation process will provide the opportunity:  to review and comment on the proposed study process, technical analysis, and public consultation process;  to be made aware of the future opportunities to review the study progress and findings of the study at each of its stages; and  to review and comment on the preliminary alternatives. Consultation activities during the EA are expected to be structured around obtaining input on the following three study issues: 1) Purpose Statement and Generation and Evaluation of Alternatives to the Undertaking: Stakeholders will be asked to provide input to and comment on details relating to the purpose statement and the generation and evaluation of Alternatives to the Undertaking. This input will enhance the Project Team‟s ability to recommend the Preferred Alternative to the Undertaking. 2) Generation, Evaluation and Selection of Alternative Methods (Design Alternatives): Stakeholders will be asked to provide input to and comment on details relating to the

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 16 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

generation and evaluation of Design Alternatives. Stakeholders will have the opportunity to provide input on refining alternatives to minimize environmental impacts and will also be asked to comment on the rationale for the selection of the Preferred Alternative. 3) Concept Design and Mitigation of the Preferred Design Alternative: This final step will be to consider concept design details and refinements and address specific impacts of the Preferred Alternative that will require mitigation during design, construction and post-construction.

4.1 General Public / Interest Groups

The public has a major role and responsibility in determining the success of a public consultation program. The extent to which the public participates, the issues they raise and how such issues are resolved all influence the effectiveness of the consultation process. Property owners/tenants will be included in the consultation process for this project. The following outlines the public consultation process. Public Notification Public notification is an essential element in the EA process and will be provided at the following times:  A combined “Notice of Study Commencement/Notice of Public Information Centre 1" (newspaper advertisement and mailings);  A "Notice of Public Information Centre 2” (newspaper advertisement and mailings); and  A “Notice of Study Completion” (newspaper advertisement and mailings) announcing completion of the study and the availability of the Transportation Environmental Study Report for public review, including locations where the report is available. The Notices will be published in the following newspapers:  Toronto Star (for the Study Commencement Notification only)  L‟Express  Local papers (Etobicoke Guardian, Vaughan Citizen and Brampton Guardian) The notices and letters will also be sent to the property owners in the study area at these key study milestones. Project Website A project website (www.427albiontohwy7ea.ca) has been set up to provide information to interested parties and to provide a means to directly contact the project representatives via email at any time during the study. The website is an effective tool for making project information available.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 17 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

The website will host all pertinent project information such as notices, displays from public meetings, draft and final reports etc. The website will also include a “Contact Us” feature to allow the public to submit comments and questions. A response will be provided to all comments received. Public Information Centres and Follow-up Activities Two rounds of Public Information Centres (PICs) will be held at key milestones to present the study progress and receive comments. These will be drop-in (open house) format where representatives of the Project Team are available to answer questions and to discuss the study. This provides the opportunity for the public, agencies, affected property owners and stakeholders to review the study information to date. The timing of the PICs will be arranged so that sufficient information about the alternatives will be available to provide for meaningful review and discussion and yet be sufficiently early enough to allow the Project Team to incorporate comments prior to finalizing recommendations. The first round of consultation will be to introduce the study and present:  a draft Study Design Report  an overview of environmental conditions and constraints;  study background and problem statement for the transitway;  generation and evaluation of the „alternatives to‟ leading to the selection of the preferred alternative to the undertaking; and,  initial thoughts on possible „alternative methods/designs‟ and proposed approach to evaluate alternative methods. The second round of consultation is intended to present:  comments/responses from PIC #1;  generation and evaluation of alternative methods;  preliminary design/concept design of the preferred alternatives for the transitway; and,  a summary of potential effects and proposed mitigation measures. Comment sheets will be available at the PICs to provide an opportunity for the attendees to submit comments, so that they can be considered as the study progresses. Follow-up consultation activities will be held, as necessary, throughout the project. It is expected that these activities will be very helpful to facilitate additional dialogue and attempt to resolve any outstanding concerns and issues during the EA process. The format of these activities will be flexible to reflect the type of Project Team - stakeholder interaction required to address a particular issue.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 18 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

Summary Reports for Public Information Centres (PICs), follow-up activities and other consultation events will be prepared and posted on the project website in a timely manner.

4.2 Government Agencies

Government agencies to be contacted during the project start up include:  Ministry of Environment (MOE)  Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs (MAA)  Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR)  Ministry of Tourism and Culture (MTC)  Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing (MMAH)  Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure (MEI)  Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing  Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAFRA)  Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration, Culutre, Tourism and Health Promotion  Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC)  Ontario Provincial Police (OPP)  Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC)  Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)  CN Rail  CP Rail Consultation with government agencies will involve reviewing, commenting and providing input to the environmental assessment study, the technical analysis and the ongoing comment/input to the consultation process. Liaising with representatives of provincial ministries and agencies will assist the project team in obtaining information on study area features, and allow for the exchange of pertinent study information. Ministries and agencies will be kept apprised of project activities and be sent notices regarding all consultation activities (e.g., study commencement, each round of PIC, filing of TESR etc.). In addition, agency briefing sessions will be held before each PIC. Agencies will be invited to the agency sessions to review the PIC display material and to provide input into the study process. It is recognized that certain agencies will have more interest in this project than others. Additional meetings may be held with these agencies, as required, to ensure the latest data is

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 19 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00 available and that the Project Team has a good understanding of potentially significant and sensitive issues early in the process to resolve concerns and to develop appropriate mitigation measures.

4.3 First Nations / Aboriginal Communities

The First Nations and Aboriginal groups/organizations to be contacted during the project start up include:

 Coordinator for the Williams Treaties

 Mississauga of Scugog Island

 Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation

 Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation

 Hiawatha First Nation

 Beausoleil First Nation

 Alderville First Nation

 Curve Lake First Nation

 Mississauga of New Credit

 Métis Nation of Ontario

 Credit River Métis Council Notifications will include:  sending letters to all potential interested First Nation Communities early in the study to explain the study and identify issues;  notifying First Nations Communities of Public Meetings; and  attending Meetings with First Nation Communities if requested.

4.4 Municipalities

The Municipalities within the study area include:  City of Vaughan  City of Toronto  City of Brampton  York Region

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 20 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

 Region of Peel The City of Mississauga is adjacent to the study area and therefore has also been included in the project consultation. The above noted Municipalities will be consulted through all phases of the study to obtain information on study area features, exchange study information and obtain input on project issues pertaining to each municipality. Municipalities will be kept apprised of project activities and be sent letters regarding all public consultation activities. Additional individual municipal agency meetings will be held as required.

4.5 Transportation Service Providers

This EA study will require consultation with all the transportation service providers including:  Metrolinx/GO  Brampton Transit  Toronto Transit Commission (TTC)  York Region Transit These transportation service providers will be consulted throughout the study to obtain information on study area features, exchange study information and obtain input on project issues pertaining to each transportation service provider. Metrolinx/GO is recognized as both a government agency and a transportation service provider. During Planning, consultation with Metrolinx/GO will focus on formulating the transitway need and justification and will offer Metrolinx the opportunity to review, comment on and provide input to materials during the study. All transportation service providers will be kept apprised of project activities and meetings will be held with the entire group and/or individual service providers during Planning, as required. Meetings will provide the opportunity for effective two-way communication between the Project Team and the service providers to identify issues and gain a better understanding of environmental conditions, gain input on the process and criteria (including their relative level of significance) to be used in the evaluation of alternatives and gain input on potential impacts associated with the preferred alternative.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 21 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

4.6 Issues / Concerns and Approaches Toward Resolving Concerns

To understand the potential issues or concerns associated with this study, an extensive review and analysis of existing and future conditions is required. The possible issues that may develop will be grouped under the following factors:  Natural Environment  Social and Economic Environment  Cultural Environment  Cost  Constructability To resolve issues as they arise, consultation will be undertaken by the Project Team as outlined in this Section. It is recognized that it may not be possible to resolve all issues and concerns to the full satisfaction of each interested party. The Project Team will strive to balance all of the issues, concerns and opportunities to identify an appropriate, economical and supportable solution. Where issues remain unresolved, they will be documented as such in the TESR. In addition, proposed commitments to mitigation and future steps will be outlined as appropriate. In the event of a Part II Order ("bump-up") request, the Minister of the Environment will take into account the final TESR, how the study was carried out, the overall study recommendations and the conditions surrounding any unresolved issues in making any decisions pertaining to a reclassification of this project.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 22 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

5.0 PROPOSED DOCUMENTATION

To provide a clear, understandable and traceable planning process, the information gathered in preparation for and during the study will be documented as follows: 1) Various technical papers will document the inventory and analysis of existing and planned future conditions (including identification of data sources, methodology, and their limitations) and public/agency input. These will include but are not restricted to the areas of:  Natural Environment  Surface Water  Groundwater  Waste/Contamination  Archaeology 2) A Transportation Environmental Study Report (TESR) will document the following:  Study objectives;  Study Process;

 Analysis and evaluation of alternatives;  Project specific and related work;  Significant transportation engineering issues;  Significant environmental issues;  Alternatives developed and evaluated;  Consultation (initiation and formulation of the study process and the public/agency input into the project);  Changes made as a result of consultation;  The recommended transitway alternative (incorporating environmental protection measures); and  Commitments to future action, including external approvals known to be required. The TESR will be filed on the public record for government agency and public review for 30 days. Reference copies of the TESR will be made available at the MTO Regional and/or District office, and the MOE Regional and/or District office. Copies of the TESR will also be available on the Project Website, at the Clerk‟s office of the municipalities (City of Vaughan,

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 23 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

City of Brampton, City of Toronto), and in other locally accessible institutions such as public libraries. All affected government ministries/agencies, municipalities, property owners, interest groups and other individuals/groups on the project‟s mailing list will be notified of the filing of the TESR. A newspaper notice will also be published in local papers to advise interested persons where the report may be reviewed for a 30-day review period.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 24 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

6.0 MONITORING STRATEGY

The Project Team will develop a monitoring program for the implementation of the selected preferred alternative. The Transportation Environmental Study Report (TESR) will include a comprehensive list of all commitments made during the study to guide future environmental work and consultation as well as effects and compliance monitoring. A monitoring strategy will be developed to ensure that the future implementation of proposed mitigating measures and key design features are consistent with project commitments outlined in the TESR and any subsequent environmental study documentation. The duration of the monitoring and follow-up programs will vary and will depend on the conditions of permits and approvals granted by regulatory agencies.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 25 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

7.0 STATUTORY AND POLICY CONTEXT AND APPROVALS

Previous, concurrent or anticipated approvals as well as legislation or planning strategies for related undertakings may affect or bind the manner in which the EA process for the current study is conducted. In this section, some of those key contextual elements are highlighted as they affect this study.

7.1 Statutory Context

Environmental Assessment Act of Ontario This study will follow the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act through the application of the MTO Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). The EA Act sets out the required elements of a Class EA and the process by which it may be accepted, reviewed and approved. The EA Act is administered by the Ontario Minister of the Environment. Projects and activities included under the Class EA do not require formal approval provided the process is followed. At the end of the 30-day review period, assuming that there has been no request for a Part II Order (“bump up”) the project will have achieved Environmental Clearance under the EA Act. If a „„Part II Order request is received, the Minister of the Environment will advise the requestor and the proponent of his / her decision to reject or accept the „„bump-up” request within 45 days of its receipt. Other Provincial Statutes This study is subject to, and will be carried out in accordance with, all applicable provincial legislation, including the Endangered Species Act, Environmental Protection Act, the Ontario Heritage Act, and the Freedom of Information Act. Other Federal Statutes This study is subject to, and will be carried out in accordance with, all applicable federal legislation, including the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. Canadian Environmental Assessment Act Requirements The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) is “triggered” when:  Federal authority proposes a project;  Federal authority proposes to sell, lease or otherwise transfer control or administration of land (including First Nation lands);  Federal authority contributes money or another form of financial assistance; or  Issuance of a Federal approval identified on the Law List is required.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 26 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

It is unlikely that CEAA will be triggered; however, it will be monitored as the project progresses. If CEAA is triggered, a CEAA Screening Report will be prepared.

7.2 Government Policies Potentially Affecting Study

Federal Policies Federal agencies with an interest in the project may be represented in the Stakeholder Group. Consultation with these agencies will be maintained throughout the planning process to ensure federal policies are complied with. Provincial Policies Provincial agencies with an interest in the project are represented in the Stakeholder Group. Consultation with these agencies will be maintained throughout the planning process to ensure federal policies are complied with. Municipal Policies Municipal transportation, development, and planning policies as exemplified in the Official Plans or Transportation Master Plans of the affected municipalities, will be considered in the development, analysis and evaluation of alternatives. Municipal policies; however, are not binding on the provincial government.

7.3 Formal Approvals Required

For projects under the Class designation, no formal approvals are required under the EA Act. However, Ministerial approval may be necessary based on conditions or commitments as a result of the recommendations of this study (for example, permits to take water, Fisheries Act Authorization etc.). Decisions regarding funding, construction timing or priority relative to other projects are made within the MTO and are not subject to a formal external approvals process. Such decisions will be addressed following completion of this project.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 27 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

8.0 FUTURE WORK

The following outlines additional work, approvals and studies by MTO or other implementing agency, required prior to construction. Preliminary Design The preliminary design of the preferred alternative will be developed based on the concept design. Additional engineering studies and consultation with agencies and the public will occur to resolve any outstanding issues. Once the preliminary design is complete, the process for property acquisition, if necessary, will commence. MTO will meet with all affected property owners once the details of the required property are known. Detail Design – Contract Package Preparation Additional engineering studies will be undertaken to develop the detail design of the preferred undertaking. This will include geotechnical, structural and environmental studies. Additional consultation with agencies and the public will occur to resolve any outstanding issues. Detail Design – Environmental Requirements Additional environmental investigations will occur at the detail design stage. These investigations will address the commitments to future work outlined in the TESR, develop detailed construction mitigation measures, and assist in obtaining external approvals. Details on the environmental requirements will be included in contract documents. It is anticipated that the following permits may be required:  Ministry of the Environment (MOE) - if temporary dewatering is required during construction that exceeds 50,000 litres of water/day, a Permit to Take Water will be required from MOE.  Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) – if identified, authorization under Section 35(2) of the Federal Fisheries Act must be obtained where proposed works may cause Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) of Fish and Fish Habitat. MTO would undertake an internal assessment of risk of HADD, in accordance with their MTO/DFO/MNR Fisheries Protocol. MTO would complete the appropriate HADD or no HADD notification forms and supporting documentation for DFO‟s review and agreement (and Authorization, as required). Property Acquisition Affected property owners will be contacted once the details of the required property are known.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 28 | P a g e 427 Transitway – From Highway 407 to Highway 7, Class Environmental Assessment Study Design Report GWP 2229-09-00

Advertise and Award Contract The construction contract will be advertised to solicit tender bids from the construction companies. The contract may be awarded to the lowest bid. Commence Construction Construction will commence on a time frame established in the tender documents.

McCormick Rankin Corporation September 2011 29 | P a g e

Appendix B Consultation Record

MEETING MINUTES

2655 North Sheridan Way McCORMICK RANKIN Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 CORPORATION E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca

MINUTES OF MEETING

PROJECT: GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary Design and Class EA MEETING NO: Municipal / Transit Stakeholders Meeting 1 MRC FILE NO.: 3211001 DATE: May 31, 2011 TIME: 9:30 a.m. PLACE: 3rd Floor Boardroom, Building ‘D’, MTO Downsview PRESENT: Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Robb Minnes MTO Highway Engineering Chris Brown MTO Environmental Malcolm Mackay GO Transit / Metrolinx Richard Beck City of Toronto Steve Ganesh City of Mississauga David Kuperman City of Brampton David Stowe Brampton Transit Brian Lakeman Region of Peel Sabbir Saiyed Region of Peel David Schleihuaf York Region Transit Winnie Lai York Region Roy McQuillin City of Vaughan Selma Hubjer City of Vaughan Jim Dowell MRC Heather Templeton MRC Dana Lam Watt MRC Mike Bricks BPE PURPOSE: To provide an overview of the project.

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION: 1. Introduction All attendees introduced themselves and their role in the study. MRC circulated a sign-in sheet.

McCormick Rankin Corporation 1 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Minutes of Municipal Transit Meeting MT1 Preliminary Design and Class EA Date: 2011-05-31

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION: 2. Overview a) J. Dowell provided an overview of the study, highlighting the key issues. i) The study is comprised of two components: 1) Highway 427 Class ‘B’

EA process; 2) 427 Transitway Class ‘A’ EA process ii) The Highway 427 EA will address the interim and ultimate transportation needs including consideration for added HOV and GPL lane(s). The key issues include tying into the planned widening south of Steeles Avenue and the planned 427 extension north of Highway 7; maintaining lane balance through the Highway 407 Interchange; and coordinating the interim and ultimate plans with the existing terminus at Highway 7 and/or the ultimate 427 extension. iii) The 427 Transitway EA will identify and protect the property required for a future transitway along the west side of Highway 427 including a carpool parking lot at Highway 7, and tie into the planned transitway north of Highway 7 and the planned 407 Transitway station south of Highway 407. The key issue will be connecting into the planned 407 transitway station in the southwest quadrant of the 407-427 Interchange. b) S. Saiyed asked about timing for construction of the Highway 427 Extension. N. Kandiah noted that MTO has received EA approval but there is no set

construction date for this project, as it is currently not on MTO’s 5-year program.

3. Project Schedule & Major Activities a) J. Dowell reviewed the project schedule noted that the first PIC will be on

June 21st from 4:00 to 8:00 p.m. b) M. Bricks noted that the project timeline to PIC 1 is condensed to ensure a June PIC. Early and ongoing municipal and transit agency input will be key to

the Transitway Study and the project team want to provide an opportunity for input prior to going out to the public.

4. Consultation / PIC 1 a) J. Dowell noted there will be a project website which will go live in the next couple of weeks and 2 rounds of PICs for this project. For the first PIC there

will be preview sessions for Agencies from 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. and a Property Owner session from 3:00 to 4:00 p.m. b) M. Bricks noted that one of project objectives is to protect property required for a future transitway, recognizing the development pressures on the west side of Highway 427. c) J. Dowell noted that the first PIC will present:

McCormick Rankin Corporation 2 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Minutes of Municipal Transit Meeting MT1 Preliminary Design and Class EA Date: 2011-05-31

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION:  Study Process  Existing Conditions  Transportation Problems and Opportunities  Evaluation of Alternatives to the Undertaking  Preliminary Highway and Transitway Alternatives  Proposed evaluation process and factors  Transitway Study Design Report

5. Alternatives a) H. Templeton provided an overview of the study area. It was noted that the study area includes the City of Vaughan, City of Toronto, City of Brampton, City of Mississauga as well as the Region of Peel and York Region. b) H. Templeton noted that the area is primarily industrial /employment lands and Highway 427 is a key goods movement corridor serving the CPR

Vaughan Intermodal (largest in CPR network) and CNR Intermodal Terminals, processing upwards of 4000 trucks per day. c) The existing traffic conditions indicate there is congestion southbound in the morning peak period from Highway 407 to Finch and both southbound and northbound in the morning and afternoon peak periods up near Highway 7,

which is primarily related to the terminus at Zenway Boulevard. The York Region Interim Arterial Extension up to Zenway Boulevard has alleviated some of the congestion at Highway 7. d) H. Templeton noted that the future 2031 traffic demand, based on MTO’s Greater Golden Horseshoe model, indicate a need for 10-lanes north and south of Highway 407, this consists of four general-purpose lanes plus an HOV

lane, and through the Highway 407 interchange (between the off-ramps and on-ramps), traffic demand is reduced by approximately 1-lane in each direction, reducing the need to 8-lanes. e) H. Templeton presented a summary of the existing and future transit plans in the study area, noting that the 427 Transitway study area is located at the interface between multiple transit providers and could provide a vital connection. R. Minnes noted that the plan is to protect for BRT with

flexibility to convert to LRT. Since the design standards for BRT and LRT are similar the additional costs are nominal compared to BRT only. It is likely BRT will be used in the near term and not preclude a long term vision of a LRT. f) B. Lakeman questioned if the transit plan is dependent on the Big Move implementation. H. Templeton noted that this plan illustrates existing and

proposed transit services in the study area, including Metrolinx’s Regional Transportation Plan. g) It was questioned if there are any intentions of making the 427 transitway an

earlier priority since this transitway is part of the 25-year plan. R. Minnes

McCormick Rankin Corporation 3 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Minutes of Municipal Transit Meeting MT1 Preliminary Design and Class EA Date: 2011-05-31

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION: noted that the objective of this EA is to protect property and ensure it is in place whenever construction commences. It is up to Metrolinx to establish priority of transit initiatives and proceed with implementation. M. McKay agreed with statement. h) D. Kuperman noted that the previous Highway 7 Corridor and Vaughan North-South Link Public Transit Improvements Environmental Assessment project did not protect for a Highway 7 station. H. Templeton confirmed that a potential carpool lot/transit station at Highway 7 is being protected for as part of this study. D. Kuperman questioned if all transit providers will be able to use this facility. R. Minnes noted that this station could be a transit service interface. i) It was questioned if there is a transitway connection to the south. H. Templeton noted that a previous GO BRT Study identified median BRT along Highway 427 with bus-only ramps to the 407 Transitway; however, MTO now has EA approval for HOV lanes south of Albion Road and GO buses will have the opportunity to use this facility. j) R. Minnes noted that approximately 360 parking spaces have been protected at the Highway 407 station on either side of Steeles Ave, but would prefer 500 spaces. k) D. Kuperman noted that access/egress to/from the proposed carpool lot/transit station at Highway 7 will be a challenge due to the close proximity to the Highway 7 Interchange ramp terminals. R. Minnes noted that intersection requirements will be carefully reviewed to ensure the traffic operations work accordingly. l) S. Saiyed questioned if there are plans for dedicated truck lanes on Highway 427 and noted it would be worthwhile to incorporate in this study. H. Templeton noted that it is not part of this study. MTO is conducting a MRC separate study and will look into the status of the project. R. Minnes noted that truck lanes must be considered on a network basis and not isolated to this study area. m) H. Templeton presented the Highway widening alternatives. J. Dowell noted that depending on the alternative chosen, the study limit may be extended to

Finch Ave to ensure lane balance is maintained at the Highway 407 Interchange. n) H. Templeton presented the Transitway alternatives and noted that the design standards used were developed as part of the 407 Transitway EA. Heather noted that the study purpose is to protect property on the west side of Highway 427 for the transitway and for a proposed carpool lot/station at Highway 7. It was noted that previously a 30 m right-of-way (ROW) was protected through the development application review process, but since then recent studies such as the 407 Transitway and the 407 East Extension have identified that a 60 m ROW is more desirable and was protected for north of Highway 7, as part of the Highway 427 Extension EA.

McCormick Rankin Corporation 4 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Minutes of Municipal Transit Meeting MT1 Preliminary Design and Class EA Date: 2011-05-31

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION: Alternatives 2 and 3 have an at-grade BRT connection with a future LRT station below. The station at Highway 407 will be a 2-level station with

parking. H. Templeton noted that there is a set property footprint for both the 407 and Highway 7 stations. H. Templeton noted that the 407 Transitway is below the elevation of the 427

Transitway. o) D. Stowe questioned if there will be a connection near the 427 and 407 transitway for Brampton’s Züm. R. Minnes confirmed that the 427/407 station will be a local transit service interface. p) R. Minnes requested the transit agencies to identify how many bus platforms YRT, Züm, would be required for their services at the Highway 7 and Highway 407 GO Transit stations. q) R. Beck questioned if TTC was invited to this meeting. M. Bricks noted that they are on the project contact list and have indicated they do not have a

strong interest in this study, but have requested that we continue to notify TTC of the study progress.

6. Next Steps a) MRC to circulate plans of the proposed transitway alternatives and stations to YRT, Züm, all the transit providers. M. Bricks requested input from the transit providers GO Transit on station integration and their future plans. b) J. Dowell noted that Transit Agency and Municipality input is integral to the planning of the Transitway and that smaller working meetings will be planned for later this summer and fall.

Meeting Adjourned 11:30 a.m. The foregoing represents the writer’s understanding of the major items of discussion and the decisions reached and/or future actions required. If the above does not accurately represent the understanding of all parties attending, please notify the undersigned within 48 hours of receiving these meeting minutes at 905-823-8500.

Minutes prepared by, McCormick Rankin Corporation Dana Lam Watt, EIT cc: Attendees; Aaron Janke (MTO); Pramod Kumar KC (MTO); Gillian Thompson (Ecoplans); Doug Rieger (Brampton Transit); Khurran Tunio (City of Brampton); Bobb Compton (City of Brampton); Henrik Zbogar (City of Brampton); Wendy Alexander (City of Mississauga); Gary Kocialek (Region of Peel); Damian Albanese (Region of Peel); Bill Dawson (TTC); Diana Birchall (City of Vaughan); Andrew Pearce ( City of Vaughan); Greg Brady (York Transit); Melanie Wright (York Transit);Loy Cheah (York Region); Richard Hui (York Region)

File: W:\2011\32\3211001-000 Hwy 427 Albion Road to Hwy 7\3211001-000.700-Planning+EA\3211001-000.705 Meetings\Municipal Transit MT1 110531\3211001 dlw Final MT1 Minutes 110531.doc

McCormick Rankin Corporation 5

2655 North Sheridan Way McCORMICK Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 RANKIN E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca CORPORATION MEMO TO FILE RE: GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Rd to Highway 7 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study OUR FILE: W.O. 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Lam Watt CC: Attendees; B. Stofko; L. Yu DATE: June 7, 2011 SUBJECT: 407 ETR Meeting 1

W:\2011\32\3211001-000 Hwy 427 Albion Road to Hwy 7\3211001-000.700-Planning+EA\3211001-000.705 Meetings\407ETR Meeting 110601\3211001 dlw Final 407 Meeting Notes 110607.doc A meeting with 407 ETR was held on June 7, 2011 at 1:30pm at the 407 ETR Office to introduce the above noted study and discuss the 407 ETR’s widening plans and timing.

The attendees included: Dave Bader 407 ETR Jeff Booker 407 ETR Paul Ruttan 407 ETR Craig White 407 ETR Frank Martins MTO SHMO Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Jim Dowell MRC Heather Templeton MRC Dana Lam Watt MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) J. Dowell and H. Templeton provided an overview of the project, noting PIC 1 is scheduled for June 21, 2011. b) MTO noted that the detailed design study to the south of this project, Highway 427 from Campus Road/Fasken Drive to Albion Road is completed but is currently not in the 5-year capital program. However, N. Kandiah noted that this program is reassessed annually. c) J. Dowell noted that a Feasibility Study is being carried out as part of the Highway EA Study to address the structural work on the 407 Overpasses: the Highway 427 Northbound & Southbound Overpasses at Highway 407 and at Highway 427 N – 407 E Ramp. P. Ruttan noted that 407 ETR is willing to work with MTO to find a solution. d) C. White questioned if the West Vaughan Transportation Improvements IEA is involved in this study. H. Templeton noted that it is not directly involved in this project, but was

Memo To File: 407 ETR Meeting 1 Date: 2011-06-07 Page 2

considered in the Highway 427 Extension EA and is likely accounted for in MTO’s Greater Golden Horseshoe traffic model which was used for the traffic projections. e) H. Templeton reviewed the highway design alternatives. She noted that the 4 GPL+1 HOV alternative can fit within the existing MTO right-of-way (ROW) within the study limits. Through the Highway 407 Interchange Alternatives B, C and D include a 3GPL+1HOV cross-section which is supported by the forecasted 2031 traffic demand and is the maximum cross-section that will fit between the piers of the Highway 407 Interchange fly-over ramps. J. Dowell noted that the Highway 427 Extension EA was approved for 6-lanes with a 110 metre ROW which can accommodate additional lanes if warranted. f) H. Templeton reviewed the transitway alternatives. C. White noted that Alternative 1, near Highway 50 may impact the transponder reading gantry for the 407W – 427S Ramp. g) H. Templeton noted the following key challenges with the feasibility study: accommodating false work; the vertical clearance over Hwy 407; potential lane, shoulder, and ramp reductions; and the timing / coordination of design and construction. h) The Highway 427 Overpasses will require 3 GPL + 1 HOV + 1 Auxiliary lane in each direction. This could accommodate a minimal crown shift and leaves just less than 4.8m vertical clearance on the eastside with deck widening. 407 ETR’s preference is a minimum 5m vertical clearance. MRC will verify actual vertical clearances with field survey data. i) F. Martins noted that MRC is considering two construction approaches. Jacking approach could involve –building the structure formwork on jacks higher then lower it into place once the concrete is set. The other possible approach is to use 2 steel cross beam supports and pour the concrete. j) P. Ruttan noted that 407 ETR used 2 cast-in-place boxes for the 401-407 Interchange bridge widening. However, this was only a 3-lane span with substantial overhead clearance while the Highway 427 overpass is a 4-lane span with very tight overhead clearance. k) It was noted that along Highway 407 through the Highway 427 interchange the future 5th lane base is currently in place; under the existing shoulders, and the median drainage is in place. To put the lane into operation, will require installing a tall wall barrier and paving the lane and shoulders. P. Ruttan noted for 407 ETR to prepare the contract package typically takes 3 months and it will take less than 1 construction year to build. 407 ETR anticipate the 5th lane could be operational by August/September of 2013, with a Spring 2013 contract tender. It was noted that the construction of the Highway 427 Overpasses would be much easier and less costly with less disruption to 407 traffic if it was completed prior to opening the 5th lane. l) H. Templeton reviewed the plans for the 427N-407E Ramp and noted that the shoulders will be very narrow during construction. It was noted that for the construction of the Highway 427 Overpass, the Highway 27 ramp which is currently 2-lanes, could potentially be reduced to 1 lane during construction. m) A possible project schedule was discussed and the approximate dates were outlined:

 2012 – MTO complete bridge widening detail design and contract package

Memo To File: 407 ETR Meeting 1 Date: 2011-06-07 Page 3

 2013 – MTO Bridge widening construction

 2014 – 5th lane on Highway 407 ETR would open n) P. Ruttan indicated that 407 ETR was prepared to work with the Ministry to facilitate the proposed work and that they would work with this timetable. o) H. Templeton suggested a second meeting with 407 ETR once MRC has completed preliminary traffic staging plans and construction details to discuss detour, lane widths, and construction methods in more detail. 407 ETR noted that their minimum widths during construction are 3.5m lane width and 0.5m shoulder and possibly 0.3m shoulder if it is for short period. P. Ruttan noted to invite the same 407 ETR staff included at this meeting and to continue coordinating directly with D. Bader.

Meeting Adjourned 3:00 p.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way McCORMICK Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 RANKIN E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca CORPORATION MEMO TO FILE RE: GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Rd to Highway 7 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study OUR FILE: W.O. 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Lam Watt CC: Attendees; L. Yu DATE: October 19, 2011 SUBJECT: 407 ETR Meeting 2

W:\2011\32\3211001-000 Hwy 427 Albion Road to Hwy 7\3211001-000.700-Planning+EA\3211001-000.705 Meetings\407ETR Meeting 2 111019\3211001 dlw Final 407 Meeting Notes 111019.doc A meeting with 407 ETR was held on October 19, 2011 at 1:30 pm at the 407 ETR Office to provide an update to 407 ETR and get their comments on the bridge widening and staging plans.

The attendees included: Paul Ruttan 407 ETR Craig White 407 ETR Jeff Booker 407 ETR David Bader 407 ETR Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Frank Martins MTO SHMO Slawomir Demianczuk MTO SHMO Jim Dowell MRC Heather Templeton MRC Bob Stofko MRC Dana Lam Watt MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) H. Templeton provided an overview of the project, noting that the previous meeting was held on June 7, 2011. Since then, MRC has developed bridge widening and staging plans for the Highway 427 Northbound & Southbound Overpasses at Highway 407. a) H. Templeton noted two staging options were developed for the Highway 427 NB & SB Overpasses at Highway 407: 1. 4-Lane Staging – build with 407 ETR widening (currently planned for 2013/2014) 2. 5-Lane Staging – build after 407 ETR widening B. Stofko reviewed the Highway 427 Overpasses proposed widening, which will require 3 GPL + 1 HOV + 1 Auxiliary lane in each direction and widening on both sides of the existing bridges, reducing the vertical clearance to just less than 4.8 m on the eastside with deck widening, which meets the minimum standard. The existing structures can accommodate a minimal crown shift, if required. During construction the cross-section includes reduced lane widths of 3.5 m and 0.5 m shoulders along Highway 407 and Highway 427. Additionally, the Highway 27 ramp which is

Memo To File: 407 ETR Meeting 2 Date: 2011-10-19 Page 2 currently 2-lanes, will be reduced to 1 lane during construction. C. White noted that Long Combination Vehicles (LCVs) use this ramp. MRC to confirm LCV routes within the study area. C. White to review traffic volumes and confirm if the Highway 27 off-ramp can be reduced to 1 lane during construction. [Post Meeting Note: On November 2, 2011, C. White confirmed current volumes on the ramp 407W to Hwy 27 N/S (EB to 27 N/S) are such that 407 ETR could allow the ramp to be reduced to a single lane during your construction to widen the 427 structures over 407. Depending on the timing of this work this would have to confirmed against the traffic levels at the time the work actually goes ahead.] b) B. Stofko noted the following differences with the 5-lane scenario compared with the 4-lane scenario: work zones are narrower, access / egress points are more constrained, larger beams will be required and therefore the costs are higher. c) B. Stofko noted that the jacking approach is preferred for both the 4-lane and 5-lane scenario since there is insufficient space for false work. d) P. Ruttan suggested to further investigate the use of deep girders on either side of the widening for falsework instead of the jacking approach. MRC will review this option. e) H.Templeton noted that at the interchange on/off-ramp tie-in locations are impacted by the prposed widening. P. Ruttan noted that the radius of the existing two loop ramps is already tight. It was noted that there will be modifications required to all ramps since there is outside widening along Highway 427. MRC will further investigate the impacts to the existing ramps, and examine altneraves to maintain existing ramp geometry. f) It was noted that 407 ETR, like MTO prefer to not have construction staging in place over the winter, from November 15 to April 1 due to poor weather conditions. It is likely that this project could be completed in one construction season, or split over two seasons for the widening instead of cast-in place. g) C. White questioned if CPCI girders could be used. B. Stofko noted it is not recommended because there are different characteristics in the two materials and there is no vertical clearance to accommodate the deeper deck of the CPCI girders. h) It was noted that currently this project is not in the 5-year Ministry Program, therefore there is currently no commitment to commencing the Highway 427 Overpass widening work prior to the 407 ETR widening (C4 widening). i) H. Templeton noted that at a minimum, the median pier construction would take placed during the C4 widening. However, the pier work does not need to be completed before widening is completed because there is enough room to construct the false and pier work after the widening is completed, i.e. the 5-lane staging plan. j) P. Ruttan indicated that 407 ETR and MTO are in discussions regarding timing of the C4 widening. MTO / 407 ETR will confirm timing and inform MRC. k) MRC will develop cost estimates for the 4-lane and 5-lane staging plans.

Meeting Adjourned 2:30 p.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca

MINUTES OF MEETING

PROJECT: GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary Design and Class EA MEETING NO: Metrolinx Meeting MRC FILE NO.: 3211001 DATE: May 29, 2012 TIME: 10:00am PLACE: Compass Boardroom, 1st Floor, Building ‘D’, MTO Downsview PRESENT: Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Robb Minnes MTO Highway Engineering Chris Brown MTO Environmental Aaron Janke MTO Traffic Malcolm Mackay Metrolinx Josh Engel-Yan Metrolinx Heather Templeton MRC Gillian Thompson MRC Dana Lam Watt MRC PURPOSE: To report on the study progress.

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION: 1. Introduction All attendees introduced themselves and their role in the study. MRC circulated a sign-in sheet.

2. Overview a) H. Templeton provided an overview of the Municipal / Transit Meeting 1

which was held on May 31, 2011. b) H. Templeton provided an overview of the study, highlighting the key issues: i) The study is comprised of two components: 1) Highway 427 Group ‘B’ EA process; 2) 427 Transitway Group ‘A’ EA process. It was noted that the main focus for the Transitway is property protection.

McCormick Rankin 1 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Minutes of Metrolinx Meeting Preliminary Design and Class EA Date: 2012-05-29

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION: ii) The Highway 427 EA will address the interim and ultimate transportation needs including consideration for added HOV and GPL

lane(s). The Preferred Highway Alternative has a 3 GPL + 1 HOV configuration. iii) The 427 Transitway EA will identify and protect the property required for a future transitway along the west side of Highway 427 including a

Highway 7 Station and 427/407 Transitway Station. The preferred station alternatives under review are B1 and B3. c) It was noted that there are several transit services in the study area and the main goal is to build in flexibility at the stations to accommodate / integrate the

local and regional transit services, and create a fully accessible station for transit users. d) H. Templeton noted that the 427 and 407 Transitways are identified in the 25- year Regional Transportation Plan, with the 407 Transitway terminating at the 427 / 407 Transitway Station (Highway 50).

3. 427 / 407 Transitway Station a) The proposed 427 / 407 Transitway Station layout is proposed to be expanded

to include an additional 10 parcels of land along Codlin Crescent. b) H. Templeton noted that this station will likely serve as a transfer station

between local transit, 427 Transitway and 407 Transitway. c) J. Engel-Yan questioned what connections to the south are proposed. H. Templeton noted that there are ramp connections which were identified as part of a previous GO BRT Study from the 407 Transitway to Highway 427. d) H. Templeton noted that the revised station layout provides the ability to offer all station facilities identified in the Metrolinx Mobility Hub (PPUDO,

Accessible Parking etc) and to accommodate flexibility for implementation phasing and construction staging as expansion of services is needed. e) R. Minnes noted that the original station footprint was based on the 407

Parkway Belt Plan which do not include the 427 Transitway demand. f) H. Templeton noted that after reviewing similar recent studies, other facilities protect an average of 6 hectares. With the additional 10 properties the station will be 4.5 hectares. g) M. Mackay noted that an additional turn around for the eastbound buses may be required. J. Engel-Yen suggested to relocate the PPUDO to the north side of MRC Steeles Ave. h) It was noted that this station will likely provide public facilities such as washrooms, shelters, etc., however this will be designed in the subsequent design phases.

McCormick Rankin 2 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Minutes of Metrolinx Meeting Preliminary Design and Class EA Date: 2012-05-29

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION: i) H. Templeton noted that passengers from the north will likely park and ride or use Züm. Cycling facilities may be provided at the 407 Station, however it is mostly commercial and industrial in this area, since residential areas are further away. The station may also attract demand to / from nearby Humber College Campus. j) R. Minnes noted that these stations are more of network stations than

destination stations. k) M. Mackay noted that GO Transit services typically head further west to Bramalea, a primary node in the GO Bus network. R. Minnes noted that if the 407 Transitway terminates at this station, the GO Buses would use Steeles

Avenue to continue west until Airport Road to access Highway 407. It was noted that this may need to be reviewed further as part of a 407 Transitway Study to potentially terminate further west. l) H. Templeton questioned if Metrolinx has prioritized the 25 year plan. J. Engel-Yen noted that Metrolinx is focusing on the Top 15 projects within the 15 year plan. m) It was noted that the 427 Transitway EA report will identify the station lands and facility features more conceptually with less detail. The design report will include the detailed station layouts.

4. Highway 7 Station a) H. Templeton presented the proposed Highway 7 Station layout and noted that this facility will include a carpool lot, park and ride as well as local transit services. The Highway 7 Corridor Transit Improvement EA noted the need for 200 parking spaces at the Highway 50 station and 300 at the Highway 27 station; however, no station footprint(s) was identified/protected in the EA. Additionally, D. Lam Watt noted that the MTO Central Region Carpool Lots Opportunity Study also indicated a need for 100 carpool spaces at this location. Therefore, approximately 400-500 spaces will be provided to 427 Transitway users. b) R. Minnes noted that drainage facilities will also be identified for the

transitway and stations. c) M. Mackay suggested if the 427 Transitway is not built, to have the local bus loop parallel to Highway 7, which would be similar to the Trafalgar Rd and Highway 407 layout. d) M. Mackay suggest to meet with Züm and YRT to discuss proposed 427 Transitway plans. C. Brown confirmed that in the coming months MTO will MTO/MRC meet with all Transit Agencies in advance of PIC 2.

5. Highway 427 a) H. Templeton provided a brief overview of the Highway 427 Improvements:

McCormick Rankin 3 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Minutes of Metrolinx Meeting Preliminary Design and Class EA Date: 2012-05-29

PROCEEDINGS: ACTION: i) To the north, the 427 Transportation Corridor Environmental Assessment has recommended the extension of Highway 427 from its existing terminus at Highway 7 to Major Mackenzie Drive, with protection for a dedicated transitway along the west side. ii) Further north, will be the GTA West corridor which will be a combined transportation corridor and Highway 427 will connect into, with a possible Transitway connection as well. iii) To the south, the detail design study, from Campus/Fasken Drive to Steeles Avenue has been completed to widen Highway 427 to three general purpose lanes (GPL) plus one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, in each direction. b) The preferred plan for the ‘gap’ is a 3 GPL + 1 HOV lane cross-section.

6. Next Steps a) J. Engel-Yen requested to review the planning justification for the 427 Transitway. H. Templeton noted that the Study Design Report is available on MRC the study website and will also circulate digital copy to Metrolinx. b) H. Templeton noted that the second round of consultation is planned for this

Fall and filing of the TESRs in early 2013. c) It was noted that property acquisition will be completed by MTO. M. Mackay noted that most of GO Transit carpool lots are owned by MTO. GO Transit only owns rail corridors, rail stations and a few bus stations.

Meeting Adjourned 12:00 p.m.

The foregoing represents the writer’s understanding of the major items of discussion and the decisions reached and/or future actions required. If the above does not accurately represent the understanding of all parties attending, please notify the undersigned within 48 hours of receiving these minutes at 905-823-8500.

Minutes prepared by, McCormick Rankin, a member of MMM Group Limited

Dana Lam Watt, EIT

cc: Attendees; Project Team

McCormick Rankin 4

2655 North Sheridan Way McCORMICK Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 RANKIN E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca CORPORATION MEMO TO FILE RE: GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Rd to Highway 7 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study OUR FILE: W.O. 3211001 PREPARED BY: Jim Dowell CC: Attendees DATE: July 5, 2012 SUBJECT: 407 ETR Meeting 3

W:\2011\32\3211001-000 Hwy 427 Albion Road to Hwy 7\3211001-000.700-Planning+EA\3211001-000.705 Meetings\407ETR Meeting 2 111019\3211001 dlw Final 407 Meeting Notes 111019.doc A meeting with 407 ETR was held on July 5, 2012 at 10:00 am at the 407 ETR Offices to provide a study update.

The attendees included: Paul Ruttan 407 ETR Craig White 407 ETR Jeff Booker 407 ETR David Bader 407 ETR Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Frank Martins MTO SHMO Slawomir Demianczuk MTO SHMO Jim Dowell MRC Heather Templeton MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) Paul Ruttan noted that the 407 ETR widening between Hwy 427 and Hwy 400 will commence in 2013 with an opening scheduled in 2014. b) H. Templeton provided an overview of the project status, noting that the project team has confirmed the bridge widening and staging plans for the Highway 427 Northbound & Southbound Overpasses at Highway 407; and confirmed the preferred widening plans for Highway 427 from Albion Road to Highway 7, including the recommended modifications to the existing Highway 407 interchange on/off ramps. c) MRC presented the recommended design plans for modifying the N-E and W-N inner loop ramps to accommodate the Highway 427 widening, noting that various design alternatives were reviewed while recognizing that these two existing inner loop ramps are already at a minimum radius. Part of this discussion included a review of 4 potential treatments for the gore area at the N-E ramp on Highway 427. Following this discussion, it was agreed that Option 3A was preferred. See Memo to File, 427N-407E Interchange Ramp Impacts.

Memo To File: 407 ETR Meeting 3 Date: 2012-07-05 Page 2 d) It was noted that this project is currently not in the 5-year Ministry Program, therefore there is currently no commitment to commencing the Highway 427 Overpass widening work prior to the 407 ETR widening (C4 widening). e) P. Ruttan asked about the retaining wall along the outside of the inner loop ramp. It was noted that this wall will not be disturbed. f) 407ETR requested a copy of the preliminary design plan for Highway 427 widening. g) P. Ruttan asked about the 5-lane widening. The Team noted it is doable. The project team noted that both the 4-lane and 5-lane staging options are feasible with the jacking approach. h) There was a discussion regarding the Hwy 427N-Hwy 407W ramp. It was noted that this ramp would have to be two lanes through to its connection with Highway 407. It currently tapers down to a single lane as it merges with the Hwy 427S-Hwy 407W ramp. It was noted that the toll gantry is located just downstream of this merge point and that the Hwy 50 structure is just downstream of the gantry. The gantry and the Hwy 50 structure may make it difficult to extend the second Hwy 427N-Hwy 407W ramp lane through this area. Further review will be required. i) P. Ruttan asked about the planned widening of Highway 427 to the south. The Team noted that a contract had been prepared and shelved. It was further noted that the Highway 427 widening south of Finch Ave needs to be completed before this project can proceed.

Meeting Adjourned 11:30 p.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca

MEMO TO FILE GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary RE: Design and Class EA OUR FILE: 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Glofcheskie CC: Attendees DATE: July 24, 2012 SUBJECT: City of Toronto Meeting https://www.ecollaboration.mmm.ca/livelinkdav/nodes/1532154/3211001 dg City of Toronto Meeting Notes 120724.doc The City of Toronto meeting was held on July 24, 2012 at MTO Downsview 4th Floor Boardroom to provide a study update as well as discuss the ongoing City of Toronto Claireville Land Use Study.

The attendees included: Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Chris Brown MTO Environmental Shelley Miller MTO Property Aaron Janke MTO Traffic Waseem Sookin MTO Traffic Bill Kiru City of Toronto Planning Richard Beck City of Toronto Planning Sabrina Salatino City of Toronto Planning Jack Kribnik City of Toronto Justin Hare City of Toronto Joe Mariconda City of Toronto Counc. Vincent Crisanti Councillor, Ward 1 – Etobicoke North Jim Dowell MRC Gillian Thompson MRC Dana Glofcheskie MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) B. Kiru provided a study overview of the Claireville Land Use Study and noted the following:

 The Claireville Study includes a review of existing land uses, urban design and gateway features for the lands bounded by Steeles Avenue, Albion Road and Highway 427.

Memo To File: City of Toronto Meeting Date: 2012-07-24 Page 2

 The land use study will culminate in the preparation of land use guideline for the area, which will identify a long term vision for the lands in the context of the surrounding area and the land use policy environment.

 There are multiple properties with land use violations (MLS issues). The City has been working with local land owners to resolve these issues, with some success.

 The properties on Codlin Crescent are isolated and they are poorly integrated with other properties in the area.

 The City held a public meeting on March 9, 2012 and there were 85 people in attendance. The meeting was held to obtain community input from the owners of the subject lands to assist in identifying a future vision for this area. Topics discussed at this meeting included zoning information, previous violations from Municipal Licensing and Standards, Urban Design Guidelines, and ideas from the property owners of what they would like to see happen in Claireville. Overall the majority of the public were satisfied with the City of Toronto’s plan to revitalize this community.

 The City has committed to a follow up meeting with the public to present the proposed land use plan. b) D. Glofcheskie provided a study overview of the 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 EA Study and noted the following:

 There are 2 studies under this project: Highway 427 widening and 427 Transitway functional planning

 The preferred alternative for Highway 427 improvements is proposed to consist of highway widening to 1 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane and 3 General Purpose Lanes

 The 427 Transitway is proposed to run along the west side of the Highway and connect into the future 407 Transitway at the south. It will also connect into the proposed 427 Transitway north of Highway 7. Two Stations are proposed, one at Highway 7 and one at the 407 Transitway.

 After reviewing similar stations along the 407 Transitway, additional station facilities were added to the original 407 Transitway preliminary concept (Pick up and drop off area, local bus interface, etc.). In order to accommodate staging and implementation phases, the need for 9 additional parcels along Codlin Crescent was identified. c) J. Dowell noted that the second and final PIC will be held in the Fall and EA documents will be filed in Spring 2013. d) J. Krubnik noted that the land use study will be producing a short study report which will include proposed streetscaping and gateway features. e) C. Brown noted that as part of the EA documentation, MTO will include an EA commitment that will ensure that the Province will work with the City to mesh the Transitway Station Design with the urban design guidelines the City is developing for the Claireville area.

Memo To File: City of Toronto Meeting Date: 2012-07-24 Page 3 f) There was a discussion regarding the timing of the property purchase and implementation. MTO noted that no decision or timing has been made on when these 9 properties would be purchased. The EA needs to be completed before the designation of the lands is approved.

The City of Toronto noted that they are not looking at acquiring any of the properties as part of the Claireville Land Use Study. It was noted that MTO’s approach and timing may influence the timing of completion of the new Zoning by-law and the overall transition of the area. MTO will confirm their approach to designating and purchasing property and the City will need to determine if this will impact the implementation of this land use study. g) B. Kiru noted that they were hoping to have an approved plan by this Fall and will have to review and assess both study timelines and hopes the project teams can work together.

Meeting Adjourned 2:45 p.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca

MEMO TO FILE GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary RE: Design and Class EA OUR FILE: 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Glofcheskie CC: Attendees DATE: July 26, 2012 SUBJECT: Zzen Group Meeting https://www.ecollaboration.mmm.ca/livelinkdav/nodes/1532154/3211001 dg Zzen Group Meeting 120726.doc The Zzen Group meeting was held on July 26, 2012 at MTO Downsview 4th Floor Boardroom to provide a study update and discuss the preliminary preferred Transitway Plan.

The attendees included: Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Chris Brown MTO Environmental Margaret Mikolajczak MTO Corridor Management Rosario Sacco Urban Ecosystems Limited Sam Speranza Zzen Group Joseph Sgro Zzen Group Jim Dowell MRC Gillian Thompson MRC Dana Glofcheskie MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) J. Dowell provided a study overview of the 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 EA Study and noted the following:

 There are 2 studies under this project: Highway 427 widening and 427 Transitway

 The Highway 427 widening will consist of 1 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane and 3 General Purpose Lanes that can be accommodated within the existing MTO highway ROW.

 The 427 Transitway will run along the west side of the Highway, connecting into the 407 Transitway at the south end and the proposed 427 Transitway north of Highway 7 (which has a 60 m right-of-way).

 2 Transitway Stations are proposed: Highway 7 and 407.

Memo To File: Zzen Group Meeting Date: 2012-07-26 Page 2

 Drainage design/stormwater management plan for the Highway and Transitway still needs to be completed by MRC. Pending the results, MTO may require additional property, beyond that which has been previously designated/protected for the Transitway.

 J. Dowell noted that the second and final PIC will be held in Fall 2012 and EA documents will be filed in Spring 2013. Post meeting note, the date for PIC 2 is tentatively scheduled for October 24, 2012. b) M. Mikolajczak indicated once the EA is approved it typically takes 2-6 months to designate the land. Given the current project schedule and intent to file the EA by March, the designation could be completed by the end of 2013. c) In response to the previous request by Zzen Group, the Project Team undertook a review of the feasibility of locating the Highway 7 Transitway station to MTO property north of Highway 7. The Project Team concluded that this station option is not feasible for the following reasons:

 Very poor accessibility for pedestrians transferring from local transit services along Highway 7 Lengthy out-of-way travel, no direct access to Highway 7 to / from Highway 7 and Highway 427 for carpool parking and to pick-up / drop-off area

 The station/carpool lot is located mid-block between Highway 7 and Zenway Blvd

 No interchange at Zenway Blvd, therefore the access to Highway 427 is at the Highway 7 interchange via Zenway Blvd to Highway 50 or Zenway Blvd to Highway 27

 Inability to provide direct passenger connection between the 427 Transitway and the Highway 7 Transitway

 Lengthy out-of-way travel for local transit services including Brampton Züm 501 and 501A, YRT 77 and 28

 No direct transfer capability from the 427 Transitway to the Highway 7 Transitway

 Limited area to provide sufficient parking for both the 427 Transitway station and carpool lot – can only provide 427 spaces. Additionally, the Highway 7 Corridor EA recommended 500 spaces and the carpool lot study recommended 100 spaces. This does not include the 427 Transitway demand.

 Does not support staged implementation of Highway 427 Transitway since Highway 427 Extension and 427 Transitway would have to be in place north of Highway 7

All agreed this was not a viable option for the Highway 7 Station. d) The proposed Highway 7 Station plan was reviewed. Zzen Group requested MRC provide a concept design of an alternative station orientation that is based on the future east-west road being located along the south property limit. MRC to prepare and circulate.

Memo To File: Zzen Group Meeting Date: 2012-07-26 Page 3 e) MRC noted the property impacts due to grading and drainage along the 30 m protected transitway right-of-way. Pending further investigation, these impacts may extend beyond 30 metres, specifically in the south-east corner of the development f) R. Sacco noted that the sanitary and storm sewer crossings have been completed under Highway 427 and grading of the lands of the former golf course, to Highway 407, is ongoing. MRC requested the most recent engineering drawings of the development plan and sewer crossings. R. Sacco to provide. g) Zzen Group noted that the owners of the parcels north of Highway 7 would like to commence construction next year. h) It was agreed to meet prior to PIC 2 in the Fall, to review the preferred plan.

Meeting Adjourned 12:20 p.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO FILE GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary RE: Design and Class EA OUR FILE: 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Glofcheskie CC: Attendees DATE: August 21, 2012 SUBJECT: City of Brampton Meeting https://www.ecollaboration.mmm.ca/livelinkdav/nodes/1532154/3211001 dg City of Brampton Meeting Notes 122112.doc The City of Brampton meeting was held on August 21, 2012 at MTO Downsview 6th Floor Boardroom to provide a study update and discuss the preferred 427 Transitway alternative.

The attendees included: Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Chris Brown MTO Environmental David Kuperman City of Brampton Chris Lafleur Brampton Transit Jim Dowell MRC Dana Glofcheskie MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) D. Glofcheskie provided a study overview of the 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 EA Study and noted the following:

 There are 2 studies under this project: Highway 427 widening and 427 Transitway functional planning

 The preferred alternative for Highway 427 improvements is proposed to consist of highway widening to 1 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane and 3 General Purpose Lanes

 The 427 Transitway is proposed to run along the west side of the Highway and connect into the future 407 Transitway at the south. It will also connect into the proposed 427 Transitway north of Highway 7. Two 427 Transitway Stations are proposed, one at Highway 7 and one at the 407 Transitway.

 After reviewing similar stations along the 407 Transitway, additional station facilities were added to the original 407 Transitway preliminary concept (Pick up and drop off

Memo To File: City of Brampton Meeting Date: 2012-08-21 Page 2

area, local bus interface, etc.). In order to accommodate staging and implementation phases, the need for 9 additional parcels along Codlin Crescent was identified. b) J. Dowell noted that the second and final PIC will be held in the Fall and EA documents will be filed in Spring 2013. c) C. Lafleur noted that Route 1 currently terminates at Highway 50 which is part of Brampton’s local network and the Züm buses run to York University on Highway 7 and on Highway 407. d) It was noted that there is a potential to use the 427 station at Highway 7 as the terminus for Route 1, provided that YRT also terminates at this location e) MTO noted that there is a potential opportunity to use the 427 station at Highway 7 in the interim before the 427 Transitway is built as a carpool lot with a bus loop. The City of Brampton noted that they will review this opportunity to use the bus loop in the interim. f) There was a discussion regarding the 427 / 407 Transitway Station. It was noted that currently Route 11 is anticipated to extend its serve further east on Steeles Ave and there is an opportunity to use the 427/407 Transitway Station. g) MRC to provide the Draft Preferred Transitway and Station Plans.

Meeting Adjourned 9:45 a.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO FILE GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary RE: Design and Class EA OUR FILE: 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Glofcheskie CC: Attendees DATE: August 21, 2012 SUBJECT: York Region Meeting https://www.ecollaboration.mmm.ca/livelinkdav/nodes/1532154/3211001 dg York Region Meeting Notes 122112.doc The York Region meeting was held on August 21, 2012 at MTO Downsview 6th Floor Boardroom to provide a study update and discuss the preferred 427 Transitway alternative.

The attendees included: Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Chris Brown MTO Environmental Aaron Janke MTO Traffic Paul May YRRTC Steve Mota York Region Winnie Lai York Region William Choi York Region Transit Greg Brady York Region Transit Jim Dowell MRC Dana Glofcheskie MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) D. Glofcheskie provided a study overview of the 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 EA Study and noted the following:

 There are 2 studies under this project: Highway 427 widening and 427 Transitway functional planning

 The preferred alternative for Highway 427 improvements is proposed to consist of highway widening to 1 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane and 3 General Purpose Lanes

 The 427 Transitway is proposed to run along the west side of the Highway and connect into the future 407 Transitway at the south. It will also connect into the proposed 427 Transitway north of Highway 7. Two 427 Transitway Stations are proposed, one at Highway 7 and one at the 407 Transitway.

Memo To File: York Region Meeting Date: 2012-08-21 Page 2

 After reviewing similar stations along the 407 Transitway, additional station facilities were added to the original 407 Transitway preliminary concept (Pick up and drop off area, local bus interface, etc.). In order to accommodate staging and implementation phases, the need for 9 additional parcels along Codlin Crescent was identified. b) J. Dowell noted that the second and final PIC will be held in the Fall and EA documents will be filed in Spring 2013. c) It was noted that currently MTO is the proponent for the 427 Transitway and will protect the lands for the project. However, it is possible that Metrolinx will oversee the next design and implementation phases of this project. d) MTO noted that there is an opportunity to use the 427 Transitway station at Highway 7 in the interim before the 427 Transitway is built as a carpool lot with a bus loop. e) G. Brady noted that currently the YRT service ends at Martingrove Rd, since Züm extends to York University. It was noted that YRT has been in discussions on possibly extending the service to Highway 50 f) It was noted that there is a potential to use the 427 Transitway Station at Highway 7 as the terminus instead of Highway 50. This would allow for interconnections between York, Brampton and GO services. YRT noted that this would be of interest to them. However, YRT noted that there are no plans or funding for the Highway 7 transitway in this area. g) There was a discussion regarding the 427 Transitway connection south of Highway 407. It was noted that the buses will likely run along the proposed HOV lanes south of Highway 407 due to the narrow right-of-way. P. May noted that a narrower Highway right-of-way should be considered south of the study area to possibly provide a separate transitway. C. Brown noted that this was not part of this study. h) S. Mota requested for York Region to review the TESRs before they are filed. MTO noted that they may have an opportunity to review, however depending on the timing of the review period and filing date a meeting to discuss the final plans may be a more effective option. i) MRC to provide the Draft Preferred Transitway and Station Plans.

Meeting Adjourned 2:10 p.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca

MEMO TO FILE GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary RE: Design and Class EA OUR FILE: 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Glofcheskie CC: Attendees; P. Ruttan DATE: February 5, 2013 SUBJECT: 407 ETR Meeting 4

I:\3211001 dg 407ETR Meeting 4 130205.doc The 407 ETR Meeting 4 was held on February 5, 2013 at the 407ETR office to review the Technically Preferred Highway and Transitway Alternatives.

The attendees included: Craig White 407 ETR Jeff Booker 407 ETR Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Sarah Merriam MTO Environmental Frank Martins MTO SHMO Jim Dowell MRC Gillian Thompson MRC Dana Glofcheskie MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) D. Glofcheskie provided a study overview of the 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 EA Study and noted the following:

 There are 2 studies under this project: Highway 427 widening and 427 Transitway

 The Highway 427 widening will consist of 1 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane and 3 General Purpose Lanes that can be accommodated within the existing MTO highway ROW.

 The 427 Transitway will run along the west side of the Highway, connecting into the 407 Transitway at the south end and the proposed 427 Transitway north of Highway 7 (which has a 60 m right-of-way).

 2 Transitway Stations are proposed: Highway 7 and 407.

Memo To File: 407 ETR Meeting 4 Date: 2013-02-05 Page 2

 The second and final PIC will be held on February 28, 2013 and EA documents will be filed in Spring 2013. b) D. Glofcheskie reviewed the proposed modifications to the 427-407 Interchange ramps and noted the following:

 The 427N-407E loop ramp will have minor modifications to the gore area. It was confirmed that the existing radius of 45 m will be maintained and there will be no impact to the existing retaining wall.

 The project traffic volume for 2031 indicates a need for additional capacity along the 427N-407W ramp. Therefore, this ramp will be modified from a single lane to a 2- lane ramp.

 To avoid impacts to the 407 toll gantry and Highway 50 structure, the 427S-407W ramp will be modified to a single lane ramp. Along the Highway 427 mainline one lane will be dropped from 6 to 5 lanes, 500m north of Finch E-427N ramp. A traffic assessment was completed for several ramp alternatives. It was confirmed that the proposed ramp configuration alleviates the congestion related to the N-W ramp along Highway 427.

 MRC to provide traffic memo related to the 427S/N-407W Ramp. [Post Meeting Note: Provided on February 27, 2013.] c) N. Kandiah indicated that there is no current funding or scheduling commitment to proceed with construction of the Campus/Fasken Drive to Steeles Avenue project. d) D. Glofcheskie indicated that MRC completed additional analysis to determine if a directional ramp for the 427N-407E movement is warranted with the future with the GTA- West connection north of Major Mackenzie Drive. It was determined that the volumes do not exceed the capacity of the existing loop ramp. Therefore a fly-over ramp is not recommended. e) D. Glofcheskie reviewed the proposed Stormwater Management Plan for Highway 427. The following key items were noted:

 Two wet ponds are proposed – in the NE quadrant of the 427-407 Interchange and within the Interchange east of the 407W-427N loop ramp

 A linear dry pond is proposed on the west side of Highway 427 south of CN Rail corridor f) 407 ETR does not have an issue with the proposed Stormwater Management Plan. It was noted that MTO would be responsible for cleaning / maintenance of the proposed ponds. g) D. Glofcheskie reviewed the Preferred Transitway Plan, indicating that it will be a 2-stage implementation (BRT and LRT alignments). This will provide the most flexibility and protects the maximum property envelope. This portion of the 407 and 427 Transitway are part of the Metrolinx 25-year plan.

Memo To File: 407 ETR Meeting 4 Date: 2013-02-05 Page 3 h) C. White noted that the BRT alignment which crosses the Highway 407 near Highway 50 may create an issue with the toll gantry reading the transponders. Anything within 50-100 m of the cameras may impact the readings. The gantry may require relocation; this will be addressed during the Detail Design phase. i) MRC to provide hard copies of the Preferred Highway and Transitway Plans to 407 ETR [Post Meeting Note: These were provided on February 27, 2013.]

Meeting Adjourned 11:40 a.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca

MEMO TO FILE GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary RE: Design and Class EA OUR FILE: 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Glofcheskie CC: Attendees; Sarah Merriam DATE: February 5, 2013 SUBJECT: CN Rail Meeting 1 https://www.ecollaboration.mmm.ca/livelinkdav/nodes/1532154/3211001 dg CN Rail Meeting 1 130205.doc The CN Rail Meeting 1 was held on February 5, 2013 at the CN Rail office to review the Technically Preferred Highway and Transitway Alternatives and discuss the property impacts.

The attendees included: Stefan Linder CN Rail Derek Basso CN Rail Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York/Simcoe Jim Dowell MRC Gillian Thompson MRC Dana Glofcheskie MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) D. Glofcheskie provided a study overview of the 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 EA Study and noted the following:

 There are 2 studies under this project: Highway 427 widening and 427 Transitway

 The Highway 427 widening will consist of 1 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane and 3 General Purpose Lanes that can be accommodated within the existing MTO highway ROW.

 The 427 Transitway will run along the west side of the Highway, connecting into the 407 Transitway at the south end and the proposed 427 Transitway north of Highway 7 (which has a 60 m right-of-way).

 2 Transitway Stations are proposed: Highway 7 and 407.

 The second and final PIC will be held on February 28, 2013 and EA documents will be filed in Spring 2013.

Memo To File: CN Rail Meeting 1 Date: 2013-02-05 Page 2 b) D. Glofcheskie reviewed the proposed Highway alignment and noted the following:

 The proposed improvements largely stay within the existing MTO right-of-way but will require a small portion of CN Rail lands adjacent to the spur line, south the CN Rail corridor.

 The 427 structure over the CN Rail corridor will be widened to accommodate the proposed highway widening. c) S. Linder noted that the spur line provides limited service but is still in use and CN intends to keep the line. d) There was a discussion regarding the ownership of the lands required. CN Rail to follow-up with legal department. CN Rail to provide record of property line (electronic version, if available). e) CN Rail to confirm the number of rail lines being protected for at the main crossing under Highway 427 The new 427 structure should span the entire CN Rail right-of-way to ensure future CN expansion is not precluded. S. Linder indicated that several new structures along this corridor are being built to accommodate 4 rail lines, if the structure spans the full right- of-way there shouldn’t be an issue. MRC to provide proposed General Arrangement drawing for CN review. f) D. Glofcheskie indicated MTO will require a written agreement in-principle from CN Rail for the property and widening of the 427 structure over the CN Rail corridor. CN did not anticipate issues with providing agreement in principle. g) N. Kandiah noted that after the EA has been finalized, subject to funding availability and priorities, the Ministry may start the detail design component, which will typically last 2-3 years before construction commences. Construction time for this project has not been determined. To the south of this study area, the detail design study, from Campus/Fasken Drive (south of Highway 407) to Steeles Avenue has been completed and proposes to widen Highway 427 to three general purpose lanes (GPL) plus one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, in each direction. There is no current funding or scheduling commitment to proceed with construction of the Campus/Fasken Drive to Steeles Avenue project.

Meeting Adjourned 1: 50 p.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca

MEMO TO FILE GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary RE: Design and Class EA OUR FILE: 3211001 PREPARED BY: Dana Glofcheskie CC: Attendees; J. Dowell; N. Kandiah; J. Sgro DATE: February 13, 2013 SUBJECT: Zzen Group Meeting 2 http://localhost:3579/aHJycDovL2NvbnRlbnRfc2VydmVyL0ZPTERFUi8vYi1hY3Rpb24lM2FfYV9hZmluZGl0ZW1pbmZvYWN0aW9uX2FpdGVtX2NfYTE1MzIxNTQ/3211001 dg Zzen Group Meeting 2 130213.doc The Zzen Group Meeting 2 was held on February 13, 2013 at MTO Downsview 6th Floor Boardroom to provide a study update and discuss the Technically Preferred 427 Transitway Plan.

The attendees included: Sarah Merriam MTO Environmental Margaret Mikolajczak MTO Corridor Management Rosario Sacco Urban Ecosystems Limited Sam Speranza Zzen Group Gillian Thompson MRC Dana Glofcheskie MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) D. Glofcheskie provided a study overview of the 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 EA Study and noted the following:

 There are 2 studies under this project: Highway 427 widening and 427 Transitway

 Drainage design/stormwater management plan for the Highway and Transitway has been completed

 D. Glofcheskie noted that the second and final PIC will be held on February 28, 2013 and EA documents will be filed in late Spring 2013 b) The proposed Highway 7 Station plan was reviewed. MRC noted the following:

 The proposed 427 Transitway is aligned to match the alignment of the 427 Transitway north of Highway 7. Additionally, the Hwy 7 W-427S ramp has been modified to a smaller radius which shifts the ramp alignment further east than the

Memo To File: Zzen Group Meeting 2 Date: 2013-03-13 Page 2

existing ramp while still meeting current standards. This ramp cannot be modified any further. Therefore the 427 Transitway alignment cannot be shifted further east.

 The Province will maintain their own SWM facility therefore we need to identify a station footprint that accommodates the proposed SWM block. Our objective during the EA Study is to identify an overall footprint for the transitway, based on a concept design, that demonstrates all requirements can be met (e.g. parking, SWM, transitway geometric design). This is a conservative approach and will be subject to subsequent preliminary and detail design phases. MTO to provide formal letter.

 While we are able to assess basic station orientation alternatives, a more detailed assessment of internal station layout and minor reshaping of the station footprint are beyond the current scope of work and will be subject to subsequent design phases. c) Zzen Group requested for the SWM Pond to be located further east and to add additional parking area to the south, to create a more rectangular shape. d) Zzen Group noted that the proposed road at the south end of the parcel, may be shifted. R. Sacco to provided revised road network to MRC in CAD format. e) MRC noted the property impacts due to grading and drainage along the 30 m protected transitway right-of-way. Specifically in the southeast corner of the development land. f) M. Mikolajczak indicated once the EA is approved it typically takes 2-6 months to designate the land. It was noted that the EA is anticipated to be filed at the end of Spring 2013. g) Zzen Group noted that the owners of the parcels north of Highway 7 will likely to commence construction this year. This includes sanitary connection and the construction of New Huntington Road north of Highway 7. h) Zzen Group to provide letter agreeing in principle the orientation of the 427 Transitway Station at Highway 7.

Meeting Adjourned 11:15 a.m.

2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905) 823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mrc.ca

MEETING NOTES GWP 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary RE: Design and Class EA OUR FILE: 3211001 PREPARED BY: Jay Goldberg CC: Attendees DATE: October 1, 2014 SUBJECT: Hwy 7 Transitway Station Layout and Local Road Network https://www.ecollaboration.mmm.ca/livelinkdav/nodes/24342072/3211001 jg Hwy 7 Station City of Vaughan and Zzen Group_Glen-50 Meeting Minutes 140324.doc The ZZEN Group was held on October 1, 2014 at MTO Downsview to describe the current preferred 427 Transitway Station Plan.

The attendees included: Nanda Kandiah MTO Highway Engineering – York and Simcoe Olga Garces MTO Highway Engineering Area 1 Iram Bukhari MTO Traffic Engineering Area 1 Rita Venneri MTO Corridor Management Office Margaret Mikolajczak MTO Corridor Management Office Sam Speranza ZZEN Group Joseph Sgro ZZEN Group Rosario Sacco Urban Ecosystems Limited Jim Dowell MRC Jay Goldberg MRC

The key meeting notes are as follows: a) J. Dowell provided an overview for the Highway 7 Transitway Station and noted the following:

 The purpose of the 427 Transitway EA is to confirm property protection requirements for the 427 Transitway and two stations. This EA study will confirm the property envelope so that MTO can appropriately protect/designate the lands for the future transitway. A functional level of design has been undertaken to ensure that all required components of the transitway station can be accommodated within the identified property envelope with appropriate access and egress.

Page 1

Highway 427 Improvements October 1, 2014 ZZEN Group

 The MTO Technically Preferred Plan includes the ‘square’ station plan concept, a right-in/right-out access from Highway 7, and an access from the east-west local road.

 Upon previous discussions with the City of Vaughan and ZZEN Group, in was noted that shifting the east-west road south could provide benefits such as additional storage length on New Huntington Road, and create a more rectangular concept plan. MTO noted however, that the EA recommended plan needs to be based on the approved road network, as illustrated in the Technically Preferred Plan.

 MTO recognizes that the developer may submit an amendment to the approved plan in order to shift the east-west road to the south. Therefore, the Transitway TESR will include a contingency plan for that scenario, illustrated as Option B Revised (attached). This contingency keeps the ‘square’ concept, but includes an access driveway adjacent to the Transitway. b) ZZEN Group inquired regarding the stormwater management pond and if MTO will share the existing pond which has been designed for the whole block. MTO noted that at this time, it is preferred that the Transitway Station have a separate SWM pond located on MTO property. c) ZZEN Group inquired regarding the timing of the Transitway Station. MMM noted that there is no specific timing for the Transitway as there is currently insufficient data from Metrolinx. However, the Station is planned to be phased, and the first phase is a carpool lot which could be included in the Highway 427 widening which is in the MTO 5 year program. d) ZZEN Group inquired if the ‘rectangular’ concept would be considered, if the east-west road is shifted south. The ‘rectangular’ concept is desirable as it would provide ZZEN Group with more frontage on Highway 7. MMM noted that the Highway 7 access is required in either scenario (‘square’ or ‘rectangular’) to reduce traffic on the local road network, improve operations, and as a safety measure as an alternative access to the parking area, in case one is blocked. MMM also noted that the location of the RIRO access is the minimum distance required from the ramp terminal intersection (i.e., it cannot be located any further east).

MMM noted that a ‘rectangular’ concept, which kept the access to Highway 7, was reviewed. However this would require additional property for the access to Highway 7, and would have the same frontage to Highway 7. e) ZZEN Group inquired what the setback requirements are around the Transitway Station. MTO to confirm. f) ZZEN Group inquired if MTO would agree to a cost sharing agreement for the local road network, noting that the traffic generated as a result of the Transitway Station may require additional lanes on the roads. MTO to provide response. g) ZZEN Group to review the Technically Preferred Plan, and Option B Revised and provide comments to MTO.

Meeting Adjourned 5:00 p.m.

Page 2 Highway 427 Improvements October 1, 2014 ZZEN Group

The foregoing represents the writer’s understanding of the major items of discussion and the decisions reached and/or future actions required. If the above does not accurately represent the understanding of all parties attending, please notify the undersigned within 48 hours of receiving these minutes at 905-823-8500.

Minutes prepared by,

MMM Group Limited

Jay Goldberg

cc: Attendees; Project Team File: 3211001 jg Hwy 7 Station City of Vaughan and Zzen Group_Glen-50 Meeting Minutes 140324

Page 3 PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE NOTICES Notice of Study Commencement and Public Information Centre #1 Highway 427 Class Environmental Assessment Study From Albion Road to Highway 7 City of Toronto, City of Vaughan

THE STUDY The Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) has retained McCormick Rankin Corporation to initiate two environmental assessment processes to address the planning gap on Highway 427 between Albion Road and Highway 7 by determining a long-term strategy to address the needs in the transportation corridor. The study limits extend 2.5 km from south of Albion Road to Highway 7. THE PROCESS The first study will address the interim and ultimate needs of Highway 427. The highway improvements will follow the approved environmental planning process for Group 'B' projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). The second study will address the planning and corridor protection for a proposed transitway on the west side of Highway 427 from Highway 407 to Highway 7 and is currently following the approved environmental planning process for Group 'A' projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). Opportunities for public input will be provided throughout each study. Upon completion of each study, a Transportation Environmental Study Report (TESR) will be completed and made available for a 30-day public review period. The TESR public review period will be announced in local newspapers. PUBLIC CONSULTATION A Public Information Centre (PIC) has been arranged to allow the public and interest groups an opportunity to review and comment on the project details with members of the Project Team. Brief presentations will be held at 5:30 p.m. and again at 7:30 p.m. to introduce the Project Team and provide a study overview. Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 Place: Embassy Grand Convention Centre, Hall 5 8800 The Gore Road brampton, Ontario Time: 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. brief presentation at 5:30 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. The first PIC will be a drop-in style open house session to allow members of the public and residents an opportunity to review the study process, existing conditions, need and justification, generation of preliminary alternatives, and the next steps in the study. Members of the public, residents, and local business representatives are encouraged to attend. A second PIC will be held in early 2012. COMMENTS Comments and information regarding both studies will be collected to assist the Project Team. This material will be maintained on file for use during both studies and may be included in study documentation. Comment forms and study information are available on the study website: www.427albiontohwy7ea.ca. Information collected will be used in accordance with the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and the Access to Information Act. With the exception of personal information, all comments will become part of the public record. For further information, or to be added to the study mailing list, please visit the study website or contact: Mr. Nanda Kandiah, P.Eng. Mr. Jim Dowell, P.Eng. Project Manager Consultant Project Manager Ontario Ministry of Transportation McCormick Rankin Corporation 1201 Wilson Avenue, Building D, 4th Floor 2655 North Sheridan Way Downsview, ON M3M 1J8 Mississauga, ON L5K 2P8 tel: (416) 235-5397 tel: (905) 823-8500 fax: (416) 235-3576 fax: (905) 823-8503 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Des renseignements sont disponibles en français en composant (905) 823-8500 poste 1471 (Yannick Garnier).

BLEED Avis de début d’étude et première séance d’information publique Évaluation environnementale de portée générale de l’autoroute 427 De la route Albion jusqu’à la route 7 Ville de Toronto et Ville de Vaughan

L’ÉTUDE Le ministère des Transports de l’Ontario a retenu les services de la société McCormick Rankin Corporation afin d’entreprendre deux processus d’évaluation environnementale visant à remédier aux lacunes en matière de planification constatées sur l’autoroute 427, entre la route Albion et la route 7, en définissant une stratégie à long terme pour répondre aux besoins afférents au couloir de transport. La zone d’étude s’étend à partir de 2,5 km au sud de la route Albion jusqu’à la route 7. LE PROCESSUS La première étude portera sur les besoins provisoires et absolus relatifs à l’autoroute 427. Les améliorations apportées à l’autoroute suivront le processus de planification environnementale approuvé applicable aux projets de « groupe B » en vertu des Normes d'évaluation environnementale de portée générale pour les installations provinciales de transport (2000) du MTO. La seconde étude portera sur la planification et la protection d’un corridor pour Transitway qui sera située du côté ouest de l’autoroute 427, entre l’autoroute 407 et la route 7. L’étude suit actuellement le processus de planification environnementale approuvé applicable aux projets de « groupe A » en vertu des Normes d'évaluation environnementale de portée générale pour les installations provinciales de transport (2000) du MTO. Les membres du public auront l’occasion de formuler des observations tout au long de chaque étude. Une fois chaque étude achevée, on rédigera un rapport d'étude environnementale pour les transports. Le public pourra consulter ce rapport pendant 30 jours. Un avis annonçant la période de consultation publique sera publié dans les journaux locaux. CONSULTATION PUBLIQUE Une séance d’information (SIP) publique aura lieu afin de permettre au public et aux groupes d'intérêt d’examiner les divers éléments du projet et de faire part de leurs commentaires aux membres de l’équipe de projet. De courtes présentations seront données à 17 h 30, puis à 19 h 30, dans le but de dresser un survol de l’étude et de présenter les membres de l’équipe de projet. Date : Le mardi 21 juin 2011 Lieu : Embassy Grand Convention Centre, Hall 5 8800 The Gore Road brampton (Ontario) Heure : 16 h à 20 h courtes présentations à 17 h 30, puis à 19 h 30 La première séance d’information publique (SIP) se déroulera sous forme de portes ouvertes libres et permettra au public et aux résidants d’examiner le processus d’étude, les conditions actuelles, la nécessité et le bien- fondé du projet, les solutions de rechange préliminaires et les prochaines étapes de l'étude. Les membres du public, les résidants et les représentants de commerces locaux sont invités à participer. Une seconde séance d’information publique se tiendra au début de 2012. COMMENTAIRES On recueillera les commentaires et les renseignements relatifs aux deux études afin d’orienter l’équipe de projet dans son travail. Ces renseignements seront consignés aux dossiers aux fins de consultation lors des deux études et pourraient faire partie de la documentation des études. Les personnes intéressées peuvent obtenir des fiches de commentaires et des renseignements sur les études en consultant le site Web des études, à l’adresse suivante : www.427albiontohwy7ea.ca. Les renseignements recueillis seront utilisés conformément à la Loi sur l'accès à l'information et la protection de la vie privée et la Loi sur l'accès à l’information. Tous les commentaires, à l’exception des renseignements personnels, seront versés au domaine public. Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements ou pour faire partie de la liste de diffusion des études, veuillez consulter le site Web des études ou communiquer avec les personnes suivantes : M. Nanda Kandiah, ing. M. Jim Dowell, ing. Chef de projet Chargé de projet de firme de conseils Ministère des Transports de l’Ontario McCormick Rankin Corporation Édifice D, 4e étage 2655 North Sheridan Way 1201, avenue Wilson Mississauga (Ontario) L5K 2P8 Downsview (Ontario) M3M 1J8 Téléphone : 905 823-8500 Téléphone : 416 235-5397 Téléc. : 905 823-8503 Téléc. : 416 235-3576 Courriel : [email protected] Courriel : [email protected] Des renseignements sont disponibles en français en composant le 905 823-8500, poste 1471 (Yannick Garnier).

BLEED Notice of Public Information Centre #2 Highway 427 Class Environmental Assessment Study From Albion Road to Highway 7 City of Toronto, City of Vaughan

THE STUDY The Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) has retained McCormick Rankin, a member of MMM Group, to carry out two environmental assessment processes to determine a long-term strategy which will address the needs of Highway 427 between Albion Road and Highway 7. The study limits extend 2.5 km from south of Albion Road to Highway 7. THE PROCESS The first study was initiated to address the interim and ultimate needs of Highway 427 and is following the approved environmental planning process for Group ‘B’ projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). The second study was initiated to address the planning and corridor protection for a proposed transitway on the west side of Highway 427 from Highway 407 to Highway 7 and is currently following the approved environmental planning process for Group ‘A’ projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000). Opportunities for public input will be provided throughout each study. Upon completion of the study, a Transportation Environmental Study Report (TESR) will be completed and made available for a 30-day public review period. The TESR public review period will be announced in this newspaper. The notices will explain the review process and identify the locations where the TESR is available for review. PUBLIC CONSULTATION The first Public Information Centre (PIC) was held on June 21, 2011. The purpose of the first PIC was to provide the public the opportunity to review and comment on the alternatives under consideration and the proposed evaluation criteria. A second and final PIC has been arranged to allow the public and interest groups an opportunity to review and comment on the results of the assessment and evaluation process, and to present the Preferred Alternative for the highway and the transitway. Date: Thursday, February 28, 2013 Place: Embassy Grand Convention Centre, Hall 5 8800 The Gore Road brampton, Ontario Time: 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The PIC will be a drop-in style open house session to allow affected landowners, members of the public and other stakeholders the opportunity to review and comment on display material and discuss the study with members of the Project Team. We encourage you to attend this PIC to provide us with your views and comments. COMMENTS Comments and information regarding both studies will be collected to assist the Project Team. This material will be maintained on file for use during both studies and may be included in study documentation. Comment forms and study information are available on the study website: www.427albiontohwy7ea.ca. Information collected will be used in accordance with the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and the Access to Information Act. With the exception of personal information, all comments will become part of the public record. For further information or to be added to the study mailing list, please visit the study website or contact: Mr. Nanda Kandiah, P.Eng. Mr. Jim Dowell, P.Eng. Project Manager Consultant Project Manager Ontario Ministry of Transportation McCormick Rankin 1201 Wilson Avenue A member of MMM Group Building D, 4th Floor 2655 North Sheridan Way Downsview, ON M3M 1J8 Mississauga, ON L5K 2P8 tel: 416-235-5397 tel: 905-823-8500 fax: 416-235-3576 fax: 905-823-8503 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Des renseignements sont disponibles en français en composant (905) 823-8500 poste 1471 (Yannick Garnier).

BLEED

Ministry of Transportation Public Information Centre PN-4127-MCRA Brampton Guardian, Etobicoke Guardian, Vaughan Citizen 5C (5.145) x 140ag Avis de deuxième séance d'information publique Étude d'évaluation environnementale de portée générale pour l'autoroute 427 Entre Albion Road et la route 7 Villes de Toronto et Vaughan

L'ÉTUDE Le ministère des Transports a chargé McCormick Rankin, membre du Groupe MMM, d'effectuer deux processus d'évaluation environnementale afin d'élaborer une stratégie à long terme qui répondra aux besoins de l'autoroute 427, entre Albion Road et la route 7. L'étude porte sur une distance de 2,5 km, du sud d'Albion Road à la route 7. LE PROCESSUS La première étude a été lancée pour répondre aux besoins à court et long termes de l'autoroute 427 et se déroule suivant le processus approuvé de planification environnementale pour les projets du groupe « B », conformément à l'Évaluation environnementale de portée générale pour les installations provinciales de transport (2000). La deuxième étude a été lancée pour la planification et la protection d'un corridor réservé aux transports en commun qu'il est proposé d'aménager sur le côté ouest de l'autoroute 427, entre l'autoroute 407 et la route 7. Cette étude se déroule suivant le processus approuvé de planification environnementale pour les projets du groupe « A », conformément à l'Évaluation environnementale de portée générale pour les installations provinciales de transport (2000). Le public sera consulté dans le cadre de chacune de ces deux études. Une fois l'étude achevée, un rapport d’étude environnementale pour les transports (RÉET) sera préparé et mis à la disposition du public pour examen pendant 30 jours. La période d'examen public sur le RÉET sera annoncée dans ce journal. Les avis expliqueront le processus d'examen et indiqueront les endroits où le RÉET peut être examiné. CONSULTATION PUBLIQUE La première séance d'information publique a eu lieu le 21 juin 2011. Cette première séance d'information visait à offrir au public la possibilité d'examiner et de commenter les diverses solutions envisagées et les critères d'évaluation proposés. Une deuxième et dernière séance d'information est organisée pour donner au public et aux groupes d'intérêt la possibilité d'examiner et de commenter les résultats du processus et de l'évaluation, et pour présenter la solution préférée pour l'autoroute et le corridor de transport en commun. Date : Jeudi 28 février 2013 Lieu : Embassy Grand Convention Centre, Hall 5 8800 The Gore Road brampton (Ontario) Heure : de 16 h à 19 h Cette séance se déroulera sous la forme d’un centre d'information informel pour permettre aux propriétaires fonciers concernés, au public et aux autres personnes intéressées d'examiner et de commenter les renseignements qui seront présentés et de discuter de l'étude avec les membres de l'équipe du projet. Nous vous encourageons à assister à cette séance d'information et à nous communiquer vos avis et commentaires COMMENTAIRES Les commentaires et renseignements concernant ces deux études seront recueillis afin d'aider l'équipe chargée du projet. Ces renseignements seront conservés au dossier pour les besoins des deux études et pourront être inclus dans la documentation du projet. Des formulaires de commentaires et des renseignements sur ces études sont disponibles sur le site Web correspondant : www.427albiontohwy7ea.ca (en anglais seulement). L'information recueillie sera utilisée conformément à la Loi sur l’accès à l’information et la protection de la vie privée (Ontario) et à la Loi sur l'accès à l'information (Canada). À l'exception des renseignements personnels, tous les commentaires seront versés au dossier public. Pour obtenir des renseignements additionnels ou vous faire inscrire sur la liste de diffusion de l'étude, veuillez visiter le site Web de l'étude ou contacter : M. Nanda Kandiah, ing. M. Jim Dowell, ing. Chef de projet Chef de projet (expert-conseil) Ministère des Transports de l'Ontario McCormick Rankin, A member of MMM Group 1201, avenue Wilson, bâtiment D, 4e étage 2655 North Sheridan Way Downsview (Ontario) M3M 1J8 Mississauga (Ontario) L5K 2P8 Téléphone : 416 235-5397 Téléphone : 905 823-8500 Télécopieur : 416 235-3576 Télécopieur : 905 823-8503 Courriel : [email protected] Courriel : [email protected] Des renseignements sont disponibles en français en composant le 905 823-8500 poste 1471 (Yannick Garnier).

BLEED

Ministry of Transportation Public Information Centre PN-4127-MCRA_FRE L'Express de Toronto 3C (6.25) x 140ag PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE COMMENTS

427 Albion to Hwy 7 EA

From: 427 Albion to Hwy 7 EA Sent: January-23-13 3:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Highway 427 | Albion Road to Highway 7 - Website Comments

QQR:` V`JQQJ `8 1R.%5  .:J@7Q%`Q`7Q%`1J_%1`78.11$.1:7 1:V1J$1$.1:711RVJ1J$:C V`J: 10V``QICG1QJ#R Q1$.1:7 8  .V1$.1:7 CG1QJ#Q:R Q1$.1:7  %R711CCGV`1CVR1JC: V ]`1J$8` V` .V.:GVVJ`1J:C1

Vijay Sidhu [email protected] 40 College Street Toronto Ontario M5G2J3 When can we realistically see the 427 widening north of the 409 completed by?

1

May 8, 2013

Thank you for circulating Infrastructure Ontario (formerly the Ontario Realty Corporation) on your Notice. Infrastructure Ontario (IO) is the strategic manager of the provincial government's real estate property with a mandate of maintaining and optimizing value of the portfolio, while ensuring real estate decisions reflect public policy objectives of the government.

As you may be aware, IO is responsible for managing real estate property that is owned by Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure (MOI). There is a potential that IO manages lands that fall within your study area. As a result, your proposal may impact IO managed properties and/or the activities of tenants present on IO- managed lands. In order to determine if IO property is within your study area, IO requires that the proponent of the project conduct a title search by reviewing parcel register(s) for adjoining lands, to determine the extent of ownership by MOI or it’s predecessors (listed below) ownership. Please contact IO if any ownership of provincial government lands are known to occur within your study area and are proposed to be impacted. IO is obligated to complete due diligence for any realty activity on IO managed lands and this should be incorporated into all project timelines. IO managed lands can include within the title but is not limited to variations of the following: Her Majesty the Queen/King, OLC, ORC, Public Works, Hydro One, PIR, MGS, MBS, MOI, MTO, MNR and MEI*. Please ensure that a copy of your notice is also sent to the ministry/agency on title. As an example, if the study area includes a Provincial Park, then MNR is to also to be circulated notices related to your project.

Potential Negative Impacts to IO Tenants and Lands

General Impacts Negative environmental impacts associated with the project design and construction, such as the potential for dewatering, dust, noise and vibration impacts, and impacts to natural heritage features/habitat and functions, should be avoided and/or appropriately mitigated in accordance with applicable regulations best practices and Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and Ministry of the Environment (MOE) standards. Avoidance and mitigation options that characterize baseline conditions and quantify the potential impacts should be present as part of the EA project file. Details of appropriate mitigation, contingency plans and triggers for implementing contingency plans should also be present.

Impacts to Land holdings Negative impacts to land holdings, such as the taking of developable parcels of IO managed land or fragmentation of utility or transportation corridors, should be avoided. If the potential for such impacts is present as part of this undertaking, you should contact the undersigned to discuss these issues at the earliest possible stage of your study.

If takings are suggested as part of any alternative these should be appropriately mapped and quantified within EA report documentation. In addition, details of appropriate mitigation and or next steps related to compensation for any required takings should be present. IO requests circulation of the draft EA report prior to finalization if potential impacts to IO-managed lands are present as part of this study. Heritage Management Process & Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Process

Should the proposed activities impact cultural heritage features on IO managed lands, a request to examine cultural heritage issues which can include the cultural landscape, archaeology and places of sacred and secular value could be required. The IO (formerly Ontario Realty Corporation) Heritage Management Process should be used for identifying and conserving heritage properties in the provincial portfolio (this document can be downloaded from the Heritage section of our website: http://www.ontariorealty.ca/What-We-Do/Heritage.htm). Through this process, IO identifies, communicates and conserves the values of its heritage places. In addition, the Class EA ensures that IO considers the potential effects of proposed undertakings on the environment, including cultural heritage.

Potential Triggers Related to MOI’s Class EA

IO is required to follow the MOI Class Environmental Assessment Process for Realty Activities Not Related to Electricity Projects (MOI Class EA). The MOI Class EA applies to a wide range of realty and planning activities including leasing or letting, planning approvals, dispostion, granting of easements, demolition and property maintenance/repair. For details on the MOI Class EA please visit the Environment and Heritage page of our website found at http://www.infrastructureontario.ca/What-We-Do/Buildings/Realty-Services/Environmental- Management/Class-EAs/ Please note that completion of any EA process does not necessarily provide an approval for IO’s EA process unless the alternative EA incorporates IO’s applicable Class EA requirements.

If the MOI Class EA is triggered, and deferral to another ministry’s or agency’s Class EA or individual EA is requested, the alternative EA will be subject to a critical review prior to approval for any signoff of a deferral by the proponent. The alternative EA needs to fulfill the minimum criteria of the MOI Class EA. When evaluating an alternative EA there must be explicit reference to the corresponding undertaking in the MOI Class EA (e.g., if the proponent identifies the need to acquire land owned by MOI, then “acquisition of MOI-owned land”, or similar statement, must be referenced in the EA document). Furthermore, sufficient levels of consultation with MOI’s/IO’s specific stakeholders, such as the MNR, must be documented with the relevant information corresponding to MOI’s/IO’s undertaking and the associated maps. In addition to archaeological and heritage reports, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), on IO lands should also be incorporated into the alternative EA study. Deficiencies in any of these requirements could result in an inability to defer to the alternative EA study and require completing MOI’s Class EA prior to commencement of the proposed undertaking.

In summary, the purchase of MOI-owned/IO-managed lands or disposal of rights and responsibilities (e.g. easement) for IO-managed lands triggers the application of the MOI Class EA. If any of these realty activities affecting IO-managed lands are being proposed as part of any alternative, please contact the Sales and Marketing Group through IO’s main line (Phone: 416- 327-3937, Toll Free: 1-877-863-9672), and contact the undersigned at your earliest convenience to discuss next steps. Specific Comments

If an EA for this project is currently being undertaken and only if the undertaking directly affects all or in part any IO-managed property, please send the undersigned a copy of the DRAFT EA report and allow sufficient time (minimum of 30 calendar days) for comments and discussion prior to finalizing the report to ensure that all MOI Class EA requirements can be met through the EA study.

Please remove IO from your circulation list, with respect to this project, if there are no IO managed lands in the study area. In addition, in the future, please send only electronic copies of notices for any projects impacting IO managed lands to: [email protected]

Thank you for the opportunity to provide initial comments on this undertaking. If you have any questions on the above I can be reached at the contacts below.

Sincerely,

Lisa Myslicki Environmental Advisor, Environmental Management Infrastructure Ontario 1 Dundas Street West, Suite 2000, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2L5 (416) 212-3768 [email protected]

* Below are the acronyms for agencies/ministries listed in the above letter OLC: Ontario Lands Corporation ORC: Ontario Realty Corporation PIR: Public Infrastructure and Renewal MGS: Ministry of Government Services MBS: Management Board and Secretariat MOI: Ministry of Infrastructure MTO: Ministry of Transportation MNR: Ministry of Natural Resources MEI: Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure IO LETTER

PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE DISPLAY PANELS G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1

Welcome to the

Highway 427 Albion Road to Highway 7 Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment Study

Public Information Centre 1

June 21, 2011 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 WELCOME

Welcome to the first Public Information Centre (PIC) for two Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Studies on Highway 427.

? The first study will address the interim and ultimate needs of Highway 427.

? The second study will address the planning and corridor protection for a proposed transitway on the west side of Highway 427 from Highway 407 to Highway 7.

The purpose of this PIC is to discuss the project with members of the local community and interested stakeholders and obtain input on:

? The study process;

? Existing conditions;

? Transportation Problems and Opportunities;

? The alternatives to the undertaking for the transitway and highway;

? The process to identify and evaluate the design alternatives;

? The preliminary highway and transitway alternatives;

? The Transitway Study Design Report, and;

? The next steps.

Representatives from the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) and their consultants are available to discuss the project with you.

Please ask questions and make your opinions known to us. We also encourage you to complete a comment sheet before leaving.

THANK YOU FOR SIGNING IN AT THE FRONT DESK

Information presented today is also available online at the project website: www.427albiontohwy7ea.ca

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 STUDY AREA

CITY OF

YORK VVAUGHANAUGHAN

REGION OF PEEL PEEL OF OF REGION REGION REGION OF REGION REGION OF YORK REGION Future 427 N Extension Zenway Blvd

York Region 427 Interim Arterial Extension (To be removed when Highway

427 extended)

Hwy 50 50 Hwy Hwy

Huntington Rd

Hwy 7

STUDY LIMITS The Gore Rd

Glenview 427 Memorial

Hwy 27 Gardens

Hydro One

Hydro One Queen of Claireville Heaven Catholic Hwy 50 Cemetery Conservation

Area 407ETR CITY OF BRAMPTON 407ETR REGION OF YORKYORK TORONTO Steeles Ave W.

407ETR CN Rail Albion Rd Claireville

Conservation CITY OF TORONTTORONTOO Area 427

Indian Line

Campground O

TORONTO TORONT

REGION OF PEEL PEEL OF OF REGION REGION

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Finch Ave

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 BACKGROUND AND STUDY PURPOSE

Background

Highway 427, one of the busiest freeways in Ontario, is uniquely positioned within the GTA and is a critical element in the provincial highway network. It is one of Ontario's most important transportation facilities in terms of moving people and goods as it provides key links to all the GTA's east-west freeways and Pearson International Airport.

Highway 427 at its widest segment, south of the 401, is a fourteen-lane core-collector freeway. North of Highway 409, it reduces to a six-lane freeway with an open median. At the 407 interchange, Highway 427 continues with four-lanes up to the current terminus located at Highway 7. In 2008 York Region opened a four-lane arterial road connection to Zenway Boulevard to alleviate congestion at the existing Highway 7 interchange.

To the north of the study area, the 427 Transportation Corridor Environmental Assessment has recommended the extension of Highway 427 from its existing terminus at Highway 7 to Major Mackenzie Drive, with protection for a dedicated transitway along the west side. Additionally, to the south, the detail design study, from Campus Road/Fasken Drive to Steeles Avenue has been completed to widen Highway 427 to three general purpose lanes (GPL) plus one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, in each direction.

Purpose

The purpose of the Class EA studies are to address the following within the study limits: ? Identify the interim and ultimate transportation needs, including HOV lanes on Highway 427 within the study limit; and ? Protect for a transitway connection from Highway 7 to the 407 Transitway.

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS

The highway improvements will follow the approved environmental planning process for Group “B” projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000), with the opportunity for public input throughout the study.

The protection for a new transitway is currently being planned in accordance to Group “A” projects under the Class Environmental Assessment for Provincial Transportation Facilities (2000).

Public consultation is key to both Group 'A' and Group 'B' projects and the public is encouraged to provide input at any point during this project.

The overall Environmental Assessment planning process approach and key tasks are illustrated in the diagram below. This process will consist of two major phases: Functional Planning and Preliminary / Concept Design.

Transportation Purpose of Alternatives to the Study Area the Study Generate Refine EA Process Undertaking Environmental (Problems and Alternative Methods Alternative Functional Planning (Alternative Conditions and Opportunities) Methods Solutions) Constraints

?Travel Demand ?Field Investigations Key Study Forecasting ?Environmental PIC #1 ?Transportation Needs Constraints (June 2011) Activities Assessment ?Fisheries Investigations

Final Transitway Study Design Report (SDR) ?Do Nothing ?TDM/TSM ?Transit ?Added Lanes ?Widen in median ?Widen outside ?Provincial Policy Highway 427 Widening ?Combination of ?Area Plans / Network inside and outside ?HOV, GPL

CONTINUOUS CONSULTATION

Examine Concept Identify Preferred Prepare & File two EA Process Evaluate & Design Alternatives Highway Preliminary Design / Transportation Select Preferred and Complete Preliminary / Preferred Transitway Concept Environmental Alternative Methods Preliminary Design / Design and Impacts and Proposed Reports Concept Design Concept Design Mitigation Measures

Key Study PIC #2 Activities (Spring 2012)

?Route Alternatives ?Station Locations Transitway ?407 Crossing ?Grade-separation alternatives Public Review of TESRs ?Widen in median ?Widen outside Highway 427 Widening ?Combination of inside and outside ?HOV, GPL

CONTINUOUS CONSULTATION

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 STUDY PROCESS AND SCHEDULE

2011 2012

Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall

Project Initiation

Purpose of the Study (Problems & Opportunities)

Alternatives to the Undertaking (Alternative Solutions)

Existing Conditions

Prepare Transitway SDR

Public Information Centre 1 WE ARE HERE

Design Alternatives

Transitway Concept Design

Highway Preliminary Design

Public Information Centre 2

Prepare TESRs

File TESRs

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS - NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS - SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT µ

Huntington Road Langstaff Road

Highway 50

Highway 27

The Gore Road Zenway Boulevard

Highway 7

Memorial Gorewood Drive Garden

Hydro Corridor

Highway 27 Highway 427

Queen of Martin Grove Road Heaven Cemetery Highway 407 Claireville Conservation Area Steeles Avenue West

Highway 407

Legend Albion Road Glendale Finch Avenue Wild Residential - Low Density Water Memorial Residential - Medium Density Kingdom Gardens Estate Residential

Mixed Use Areas

Natural Areas

Parks / Open Spaces Areas Indian

Other Open Spaces Line

Commercial Mixed-Use Campground

Employment Areas

Business Corridor

Infrastructure and Utilities

Provincial Highways Finch Avenue

Municipal Boundaries

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

Over 60,000 vehicles travel this section of Highway 427 each day. Approximately 15% of these vehicles are trucks. The following graphs illustrate the speeds on Highway 427 during the morning and afternoon peak periods.

100+ km/h 90 - 100 km/h 80 - 90 km/h 70 - 80 km/h 60 - 70 km/h 50 - 60 km/h 40 - 50 km/h 30 - 40 km/h 20 - 30 km/h 10 - 20 km/h 0 - 10 km/h KEY TO SPEEDS

Southbound AM Northbound AM Survey Date 8-Sep-10 9-Sep-10 17-Sep-10 Survey Date 8-Sep-10 9-Sep-10 17-Sep-10 Survey Start Time 6:03 7:46 8:43 7:07 8:07 8:48 6:31 7:08 7:47 8:30 Survey Start Time 6:23 7:04 8:19 6:42 7:59 8:40 6:57 7:39 8:17 ZENWAY ZENWAY

HWY 7 HWY 7

HWY 407 HWY 407

STEELES STEELES

ALBION ALBION Direction of Travel Direction of Travel

FINCH FINCH

DERRY/REXDALE DERRY/REXDALE

Southbound PM Northbound PM Survey Date 8-Sep-10 9-Sep-10 13-Sep-10 Survey Date 8-Sep-10 9-Sep-10 13-Sep-10 Survey Start Time 16:12 17:05 15:13 15:26 16:05 16:19 17:00 Survey Start Time 15:53 16:57 15:57 17:05 15:43 16:53 17:36 ZENWAY ZENWAY

HWY 7 HWY 7

HWY 407 HWY 407

STEELES STEELES

ALBION ALBION Direction of Travel Direction of Travel

FINCH FINCH

DERRY/REXDALE DERRY/REXDALE

? The southbound traffic during the morning peak period is congested, resulting in stop and go conditions between Highway 407 and Finch Avenue. ? The congestion between Highway 7 and Zenway Boulevard is primarily related to the terminus.

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 FUTURE TRAFFIC DEMAND

The following illustrates forecasted future peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes for 2031. These volumes are based on MTO’s Greater Golden Horseshoe Model (GGHM).

LEGEND Existing Traffic Volumes Forecast 2031 Traffic Volume Desired Operating Range

Highway 7 to Highway 407 Highway 7 to Highway 407 southbound - AM peak hour Highway 7 northbound - PM peak hour 10000 10000

9000 8470 9000 Desired operating range 8000 8000 7000 7000 7000 6000 6000 NORTH 5000 5000 4000 4000

vehicles/hour 3870 vehicles/hour 3000 3000 3210 2000 2000 1000 CITY OF 1000 0 VAUGHAN 0 2011 2021 2031 2011 2021 2031

within Highway 407 interchange within Highway 407 interchange southbound - AM peak hour northbound - PM peak hour 10000 10000 9000 407ETR 9000 8000 8000 7000 7000 Steeles Avenue 6000 5350 6000 4990 5000 West 5000 4000 4000

vehicles/hour

vehicles/hour 3000 3000 3280 2000 2000 2670 1000 1000 0 0 2011 2021 2031 2011 2021 2031

Highway 407 to Finch Avenue Highway 407 to Finch Avenue southbound - AM peak hour northbound - PM peak hour 10000 CITY OF 10000 9000 TORONTO 9000 7910 8000 8000 7010 7000 Highway 427 7000 6000 6000 5000 5800 5000

4000 4000 4490

vehicles/hour vehicles/hour 3000 3000 2000 2000 1000 1000 0 0 2011 2021 2031 2011 2021 2031

? The desired operating range for Highway 427 is between 1,600 to 1,800 vehicles per lane per hour. ? Based on this, future 2031 traffic demand volumes indicate a need for: - 10-lanes north and south of Highway 407 (Four general purpose lanes and one HOV lane in each direction); and - 8-lanes through the 407 Interchange (Three general purpose lanes and one HOV lane in each direction).

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 EXISTING TRANSIT NETWORK

Potential future connection to proposed GTA-West transportation corridor and GO Bolton Station 50 N

Future Hwy 427 Hwy 50 / 24 / 50 Hwy Hwy 50 / 24 / 50 Hwy Extension The Gore Rd 38

Huntington Rd 38 Protected Future CITY OF 427 TransitwayTransitway VAUGHAN

Zenway Blvd 77

To York University, Finch GO Bus Terminal with connection ZÜM to Yonge TTC Subway Hwy 7 ZÜM 77A 77 501A 501 77 501 To Brampton Transit Centre, Downtown Brampton Terminal Proposed Highway 7 BRT & GO Georgetown Line

Proposed Highway 7 Transitway Station / Carpool Lot. 27

YORK 501A ZÜM

CITY OF 50 Hwy 27 REGION OF PEEL OF REGION

REGION OF PEEL OF REGION 77A

REGION OF OF YORK REGION REGION

BRAMPTON Proposed Martin Grove Road Future 427 STUDY Claireville Transitway LIMITS

Conservation Hwy 427

Area Potential 427 38 To York University, Transitway Crossing Vaughan Corporate Centre of Highway 407. at Keele Street and Hwy 7 27 ZÜM 407ETR 77A 501A 47 48 32 40 45 46

Planned 407 Transitway

Steeles Ave W. REGIONREGION OF YORKYORK 60D 27 407ETR TORONTOTORONTO CN Rail

To Brampton Transit Centre, Hurontario & 407 GO Park & Ride 11 38 48 47 Planned 407

Transitway

Hwy 27 Hwy 46 27 Hwy 45 Station. 32 Wildwater Planned 407 Transitway CITY OF Kingdom Possible 427 GO 40 Bus links into 407 Albion Rd Rexdale Blvd Transitway. TORONTO

Rexdale Blvd 11 N Woodbine

Racetrack 50

TORONTO TORONTO

REGION OF PEEL PEEL OF OF REGION REGION

Planned GeorgetownG Expansion and Hwy 27 Hwy Hwy 27 Hwy 11 eorgetow n Expansion and Air Rail Link 73C

Proposed 427 GO BRT Airport Rd CN Rail 11 50 Hwy 409

Goreway Drive Legend: Dixon Rd 40 38 Existing Transit Routes

Toronto Pearson 40 Also served by all 50 11 GO Transit International Airport local & regional transit providers.

O TTC Transit RONT

Hwy 427

TORONTO TO REGION OF PEEL OF REGION Proposed PEEL OF REGION Brampton Transit / ZÜM Renforth Gateway Hwy 401 CITY OF Humber College York Region Transit / VIVA Hwy 401 MISSISSAUGA 38 To Toronto Pearson International Airport, Insert 1 Renforth Gateway & connection to Mississauga BRT (See Insert 1)

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION G.W.P. 2229-09-00 Highway 427 Preliminary Design and Class EA Study Albion Road to Highway 7 PIC No. 1 FUTURE TRANSIT NETWORK

Metrolinx has developed a Regional Transportation Plan, called “The Big Move” which is a strategic long-term vision for an integrated multi-modal regional transportation system for the entire Greater Toronto and Hamilton area.

15-Year Regional Transportation Plan (The Big Move, 2008, Metrolinx)

GO Bolton Service

Highway 427 Extension

Union-Pearson Airport Service STUDY VIVA Highway 7 AREA Queen Street Acceleride

Highway 407 Transitway

25-Year Regional Transportation Plan (The Big Move, 2008, Metrolinx)

GTA West Corridor

Highway 427 Transitway

STUDY AREA

McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION