Our Concerns for the Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(Iaps) and Other Small Waterbodies in Northern Ireland Quercus Project QU09-03
Natural Heritage Research Partnership Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) and other small waterbodies in Northern Ireland Quercus Project QU09-03 Bog pool at Montiaghs Moss Nature Reserve and ASSI Prepared for the Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) by Helen Keeble, Penny Williams, Jeremy Biggs, Pond Conservation & Neil Reid, Natural Heritage Research Partnership, Quercus This report should be cited as: Keeble, H. Williams, P. Biggs, J. & Reid, N. (2009) Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) and other small waterbodies in Northern Ireland. Report prepared by Pond Conservation and the Natural Heritage Research Partnership, Quercus for the Northern Ireland Environment Agency, Northern Ireland, UK. Pond Conservation c/o Oxford Brookes University Gipsy Lane, Headington Oxford, OX3 0BP www.pondconservation.org.uk Quercus project QU09-03 Quercus hosts the Natural Heritage Research Partnership between the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and Queen's University Belfast. http://www.quercus.ac.uk/ www.quercus.ac.uk Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who provided data, photos or other information for this assessment, and especially those who took time to visit sites with us in June 2009. In particular: Bob Davidson, Brian Nelson, Catherine McSorley, Jane Preston, John Early, Lynne Rendle, Marcus Malley, Mary Gallagher, Patrick Kelly, Richard Weyl, Seamus Burns and Tony Waterman. Report production: July 2009 Consultation: August 2009 SUMMARY Ponds are an important freshwater habitat that has been shown to play a key role in maintaining biodiversity at landscape level. However, ponds are also vulnerable to environmental degradation and there is evidence that, at a national level, pond quality is declining. In 2007, the biodiversity importance of ponds was recognised when high quality ponds (Priority Ponds) were added to the list of UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) Priority Habitats. -
Water Beetles
Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE ....................................................................................................................................................... -
Download Download
Journal Journal of Entomological of Entomological and Acarologicaland Acarological Research Research 2020; 2012; volume volume 52:9304 44:e INSECT ECOLOGY Update to the “Catalogue of Lepidoptera Tortricidae of the Italian Fauna” (2003-2020) P. Trematerra Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Italy List of taxa Tortricidae Abstract Subfamily Tortricinae In the paper are reported 37 species to add at the “Catalogue of Lepidoptera Tortricidae of the Italian fauna” published on 2003. Tribe Cochylini After this paper the list of tortricids found in Italy passed from 633 to 670 species. Phtheochroa reisseri Razowski, 1970 GEONEMY. Europe (France, Italy, ex-Yugoslavia, Crete). CHOROTYPE. S-European. DISTRIBUTION IN ITALY. Abruzzo: Rivoli and Aschi, L’Aquila Introduction (Pinzari et al., 2006) BIOLOGICAL NOTES. Adults were collected in May. The “Catalogue of Lepidoptera Tortricidae of the Italian fauna” IDENTIFICATION. Morphology of the adult and genital characters published on 2003 as supplement of the Bollettino di Zoologia are reported by Razowski (2009). agraria e di Bachicoltura, reported 633 species (Trematerra, 2003). In these last years tortricids from the Italian territory received atten- Cochylimorpha scalerciana Trematerra, 2019 tion by both local and foreign entomologists that also studied many GEONEMY. Europe (Italy: Calabria) collections deposited in various museums, increasing the faunistic CHOROTYPE. S-Appenninic. knowledge with the recording and description of new taxa. DISTRIBUTION IN ITALY. Calabria: various locations of the Monti In the present paper are reported 37 species to add at the della Sila, Cosenza (Trematerra, 2019a). “Catalogue”, after this paper the list of tortricids found in Italy BIOLOGICAL NOTES. Adults were found in May. -
The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin As a Refuge of the Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) Within the City
Acta Biologica 23/2016 | www.wnus.edu.pl/ab | DOI: 10.18276/ab.2016.23-02 | strony 15–34 The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin as a refuge of the moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) within the city Łukasz Dawidowicz,1 Halina Kucharczyk2 Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland 1 e-mail: [email protected] 2 e-mail: [email protected] Keywords biodiversity, urban fauna, faunistics, city, species composition, rare species, conservation Abstract In 2012 and 2013, 418 species of moths at total were recorded in the Botanical Garden of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. The list comprises 116 species of Noctuidae (26.4% of the Polish fauna), 116 species of Geometridae (28.4% of the Polish fauna) and 63 species of other Macrolepidoptera representatives (27.9% of the Polish fauna). The remaining 123 species were represented by Microlepidoptera. Nearly 10% of the species were associated with wetland habitats, what constitutes a surprisingly large proportion in such an urbanised area. Comparing the obtained data with previous studies concerning Polish urban fauna of Lepidoptera, the moths assemblages in the Botanical Garden were the most similar to the one from the Natolin Forest Reserve which protects the legacy of Mazovian forests. Several recorded moths appertain to locally and rarely encountered species, as Stegania cararia, Melanthia procellata, Pasiphila chloerata, Eupithecia haworthiata, Horisme corticata, Xylomoia graminea, Polychrysia moneta. In the light of the conducted studies, the Botanical Garden in Lublin stands out as quite high biodiversity and can be regarded as a refuge for moths within the urban limits of Lublin. -
Lepidoptera of North America 5
Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains, -
Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas: Review Paper for Saskatchewan
INDIGENOUS PROTECTED AND CONSERVED AREAS: REVIEW PAPER FOR SASKATCHEWAN (January 2021) Norman Henderson Adjunct Professor, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, U of R / U of S Sponsoring Partners: Ya'thi Néné Lands and Resources and Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment Project Managing Partner: Ya'thi Néné Lands and Resources DISCLAIMER: This Paper is for informational purposes only and was developed through collaboration between the Sponsoring Partners. This Paper is not a positional paper and is not a representation of the interests of either of the Sponsoring Partners. Where it includes views or opinions, these are the views and opinions of the author only, not the views or opinions of the Sponsoring Partners. Both Sponsoring Partners believe the information contained within this Paper could be useful for dialogue purposes moving forward and for any rights holders or stakeholders to consider when learning about Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..3 Purpose of an Indigenous Protected and Conserved Area…………………………….3 IPCA Diversity…..…………………………………………………………………….4 North American and European Conservation Thought Contrasted……………………4 Stakeholder and Athabasca Denesųłiné Objectives and Context………………………5 Saskatchewan-based IPCAs in the National Context………………………………..…6 Existing IPCA-Instructive Protected Area Designations…………………………………...8 British National Parks: All-Inclusive Protected Areas…………………….…………....8 Australian Indigenous Protected Areas: Autonomy, Conservation -
Lepidoptera) Bývalého Vojenského Prostoru U Oleška (Česká Republika, Ústecký Kraj)
Published September 15, 2010 Klapalekiana, 46: 69–130, 2010 ISSN 1210-6100 Motýli (Lepidoptera) bývalého vojenského prostoru u Oleška (Česká republika, Ústecký kraj) Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) of the former military training area near Oleško (Czech Republic, Ústí Region) Jan ŠumpICH 582 61 Česká Bělá 212, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Lepidoptera, ecofaunistics, species diversity, sand habitats, Czech Republic, Central Europe Abstract. The lepidopteran fauna of the former military training area near Oleško (Czech Republic: Ústecký Region) was studied in the year 2008. This area is on sandy ground, the predominant habitats are dry Scots pine forests growing on sand. 700 species were recorded, many of them are markedly psammophilous. Some characteristic spe- cies are very abundant there, namely on open habitats Aroga velocella (Zeller, 1839), Teleiopsis diffinis (Haworth, 1828), Platytes alpinellus (Hübner, 1813), Pyrausta ostrinalis (Hübner, 1796), Paradrina selini (Boisduval, 1840), Agrotis vestigialis (Hufnagel, 1766), Eilema pygmaeolum (Doubleday, 1847)���������������������������������������, some other species were only recorded individually (Aristotelia brizella (Treitschke, 1833), Helcystogramma lineolellum (Zeller, 1839), Pediasia fasce- linella (Hübner, 1813), Lythria cruentaria (Hufnagel, 1767) and Hadena irregularis (Hufnagel, 1766)). Elatobia fuliginosella (Lienig et Zeller, 1846), Decantha borkhausenii (Zeller, 1839), Epinotia rubiginosana (Herrich- Schäffer, 1851), Cydia conicolana (Heylaerts, 1874) -
Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 11:18, Bamberg (2011), ISSN 1430-015X
Dieses PDF wird von der Arbeitsgemeinschaft bayerischer Entomologen e.V.für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Gebrauch zur Verfügung gestellt. Die kommerzielle Nutzung oder die Bereitstellung in einer öffentlichen Bibliothek oder auf einer website ist nicht gestattet. Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 11:18, Bamberg (2011), ISSN 1430-015X Neue Ergebnisse in der bayerischen Kleinschmetterlingsfaunistik 2. Beitrag (Insecta: Lepidoptera) aus der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Microlepidoptera in Bayern (mit Beiträgen von Georg Derra [GD], Gerald Fuchs [GF], Rudi Keller [RK], Peter Lichtmannecker [PL] und Werner Wolf [WW]) Abstract: 13 records of remarkable microlepidoptera from Bavaria are given, including the first german record of Gracillaria loriolella Frey, 1881 and the first bavarian record of Scrobipalpa ocellatella (Boyd, 1858). Zusammenfassung: Es werden Nachweise von 13 interessanten Kleinschmetterlingsarten aus Bayern besprochen, darunter der Erstnachweis von Gracillaria loriolella Frey, 1881 für Deutschland und der Erstnachweis der Rübenmotte Scrobipalpa ocella- tella (Boyd, 1858) für Bayern. Mit diesem neuen Beitrag möchten wir wieder einige für Bayern neue und interessante Kleinschmetter- lingsarten dokumentieren. Bezugnehmend auf die Rote Liste bayerischer Microlepidoptera (Pröse et al., [2004]) haben wir auch bemerkenswerte Neu- und Wiederfunde aus den 4 naturräumlich begründeten Re- gionen Bayerns, nach der die Rote Liste aufgegliedert wurde (Voith, [2004]), aufgenommen. Die Arbeitsgemeinschaft Microlepidoptera in Bayern versteht sich als loser, d. h. vereins- und organisa- tionsübergreifender Zusammenschluß und möchte insbesondere die faunistische Erfassung der bayerischen Kleinschmetterlinge bündeln. Sie steht allen an der Kleinfalterwelt Bayerns Interessierten offen. Adela associatella Zeller, 1839 (Abb. 1) Neu für das ostbayerische Grundgebirge! Von dieser prächtigen Langfühlermotte waren in der Roten Liste (Pröse et al., [2004]) in Bayern aktuelle Funde nur aus Alpen/Alpenvorland bekannt. -
LEPIDOPTERA), PART II, by M
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 48(1 ), 1994, 74-76 BOOK REVIEWS KEYS TO THE INSECTS OF THE EUROPEAN PART OF THE USSR (G. S. Medvedev, chief editor). VOLUME IV (LEPIDOPTERA), PART II, by M. I. Falkovit'lh (ed.) et al. 1990. E. J. Brill, Leiden. (translation of: OPREDELITEL NASEKOMYKH EVEOPEISKOI CHASTI SSSR, TOM IV, CHESHUEKRYLYE, VTORAIA CHAST. Nauka Publishers, Leningrad, 1981-trans lator: B. R. Sharma). x + 1092 pp., 675 figs. Hard cover, 16 x 24 cm, ISBN 90-04-08926- 8. $160.00 U.S. Available from E. J. Brill (U.S.A.) Inc., 24 Huclson Street, Kinderhook, New York 12106. This remarkable, bulky handbook is the second part of a work devoted to the Lepi doptera of western Russia. The English version of Part One was issued in 1987 (Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi-edition supervised by the U.S.D.A. , Washington, D.C.), and it covered the non-ditrysian families (with only a superficial treatment of the Nepticulidae), and eight families among the lower Ditrysia, namely the Psychidae and dll members of the Zygaenoidea, Cossoidea, Sesioidea and Tortricoidea. Part Two deals with a larger number of families (29 if one accepts the classification that I proposed in 1991: see Entomol. Seand. 22:90-91). These are the Eriocottidae and Tineidae (including the "Euplocamidae" and "Hieroxestidae" ), all members of the Gracillarioidea, Ypono meutoidea, Choreutoidea, Urodoidea (Woekia Heinemann: p. 508, as a "plutellid" genus), Schreckensteinioidea, and Epermenioidea, and all the gelechioid families with the ex ception of most Coleophoridae (only the Amphisbatinae being treated: pp. -
Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Zhang, A. H.; Li, H. H. A systematic study on Gibberifera Obraztsov, 1946 from China1 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 32, núm. 128, diciembre, 2004, pp. 289-295 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45512808 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 289 Zhang 3/1/77 18:25 Página 289 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 32 (128), 2004: 289-295 SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 A systematic study on Gibberifera Obraztsov, 1946 from China1 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) A. H. Zhang & H. H. Li Abstract This paper deals with eight species of the genus Gibberifera Obraztsov from China. One new species, G. cla- vata Zhang & Li, sp. n., is described. The female of G. monticola Kuznetsov is described for the first time in scien- ce. A key to the Chinese species is given. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, Gibberifera, new species, China Un estudio sistemático sobre Gibberifera Obraztsov, 1946 de China (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, Olethreutinae) Resumen Este trabajo trata ocho especies del género Gibberifera Obraztsov de China. Se describe una nueva especie G. clavata Zhang & Li, sp. n. Se describe por primera vez para la ciencia la hembra de G. monticola Kuznetsov. Se da una clave de las especies chinas. -
Lepidopterous Fauna Lancashire and Cheshire
LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE LEPIDOPTERA, THE LEPIDOPTEROUS FAUNA OF LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE COMPILED BY WM. MANSBRIDGE, F.E.S., Hon. Sec. La11c:1 shire and Cheshire Entomological Society. BEING A NEW EDITION OF Dr. ELLIS'S LIST brought up to date with the a~s istance of the Lepidoptcrists whose names nppcnr below. Ark le, J., Chester A. Baxter, T., Min-y-don, St. Annes-on-Sea T.B. Bell, Dr. Wm., J.P., Rutland House, New Brighton W.B. Boyd, A. W., M.A., F.E.S., The Alton, Altrincham ... A.W.B Brockholes, J. F. The late J.F.B. Capper, S. J. The late .. S.J.C. Chappell, Jos. The late .. J C. Collins, Joseph, The University Museum, Oxford J. Coll. Cooke, N. The late N.C. Corbett, H. H., Doncaster H.H.C. Cotton, J., M.R.C.S., etc., Simonswood, Prescot Rd., St. Helens ... ]. Cot. Crabtree, B. H., F. E.S., Cringle Lodge, Leve nshulme, Manchester ... B.H.C. Day, G. 0 ., F.E.S. late of Knutsforcl ... D. Wolley-Dod, F. H, Edge, near Malpas F.H.W.D. Ellis, John W ., M.B. (Vic), F.E.S., etc., 18, Rodney Street, Liverpool J.W.E. Forsythe, Claude F., The County Asylum, Lancaster C.H F. Frewin, Colonel, Tarvin Sands ... F. Greening, Noah, The late N.G. Gregson, Chas. S., The late C.S.G. Gregson, W., The late ... W.G. Harrison, Albert, F.E.S., The lalt1 A.H. 2 LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE LEPIDOPTERA. LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE LEPIDOPTERA. 3 Harrison, W. W.H. Higgins, Rev: H. -
Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................