DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biodiversity Impact Assessment APPENDIX F Biodiversity Impact Assessment REPORT Application for EA, AEL and GA for the proposed Lanele Oil Terminal 1 (Lot 1) Project at Ambrose Park, in Bayhead, Durban: Biodiversity Impact Assessment Lanele Group (Pty) Ltd Submitted to: Lanele Group (Pty) Ltd Submitted by: Golder Associates Africa (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 6001 Halfway House, 1685 Building 1, Maxwell Office Park Magwa Crescent West Waterfall City Midrand, 1685 South Africa +27 11 254 4800 1791874-324751-8 October 2019 October 2019 1791874-324751-8 Distribution List 1 x electronic copy Lanele Group (Pty) Ltd 1 x electronic copy Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions South Africa (Pty) Ltd 1 x electronic copy Golder project folder 1 x electronic copy e-projects library [email protected] i October 2019 1791874-324751-8 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Abbreviation/Acronym Explanation ADU Animal Demographic Unit BODATSA Botanical Database of Southern Africa CARA Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (Act No. 43 of 1983) CBA Critical Biodiversity Area CMS Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals C-Plan KwaZulu-Natal Conservation Plan DBSA Development Bank of Southern Africa D’MOSS Durban Metropolitan Open Space System ECO Environmental control officer EFZ Estuarine functional zone EHS Environmental, Health, and Safety EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIS Ecological importance and sensitivity ESS Environmental and Social Sustainability ESSS Environmental and Social Safeguard Standards Golder Golder Associates Africa (Pty) Ltd IFC International Finance Corporation IMO International Maritime Organisation JET A1 Jet Aviation Grade Kerosene Lanele Lanele Group (Pty) Ltd MFO Marine fuel oil MGO Marine gas oil MPP Multi Product Pipeline (previously known as the New Multi Product Pipeline) NEM: BA National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004) NFA National Forests Act (Act No. 84 of 1998) NOOA Terminal NOOA Fuel Storage and Handling Terminal ii October 2019 1791874-324751-8 Abbreviation/Acronym Explanation PES Present ecological status Project Lanele Oil Terminal 1 (Lot 1)” project SANBI South African National Biodiversity Institute SHEQ Safety, Health, Environmental and Quality Thyssenkrupp Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions South Africa (Pty) Ltd ULP 95 Unleaded Petrol 95 octane ULSD Ultra-Low Sulphur Diesel iii October 2019 1791874-324751-8 Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 3.1 Location .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3.2 Facility Details ................................................................................................................................ 4 4.0 BIODIVERSITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 5 4.1 Aim ................................................................................................................................................. 5 4.2 Approach and Structure of Report .................................................................................................. 5 4.3 Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework ..................................................................................5 5.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 6 5.1 Terrestrial Ecology (Flora and Fauna) ............................................................................................ 6 5.1.1 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................ 6 5.1.2 Field Survey ................................................................................................................................ 6 5.2 Wetland Ecology ............................................................................................................................. 7 5.3 Estuarine Ecology ........................................................................................................................... 7 5.4 Assessment of Biodiversity Value ................................................................................................... 8 5.4.1 Species of Conservation Concern ..............................................................................................8 5.4.2 Likelihood of Occurrence ............................................................................................................ 8 6.0 TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 9 6.1 KwaZulu-Natal Coastal Belt ............................................................................................................ 9 6.2 Statutory Conservation Considerations ......................................................................................... 12 6.3 Landscape Context and General Characteristics of the Site ......................................................... 15 6.4 Flora Assessment ......................................................................................................................... 17 6.4.1 On-Site Vegetation ................................................................................................................... 17 6.4.2 Species of Conservation Concern ............................................................................................ 18 6.4.3 Listed Alien Invasive Plant Species .......................................................................................... 20 6.4.3.1 Applicable Legislation ............................................................................................................... 20 6.4.3.2 Listed Alien Species Recorded On-Site .................................................................................... 21 6.5 Land Cover Classification ............................................................................................................. 22 iv October 2019 1791874-324751-8 6.6 Faunal Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 23 6.6.1 Mammals .................................................................................................................................. 23 6.6.2 Birds ......................................................................................................................................... 23 6.6.3 Herpetofauna (Reptiles and Amphibians) ................................................................................. 23 6.6.4 Arthropods ................................................................................................................................ 23 7.0 WETLAND ECOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 29 7.1 Historical Wetland Context............................................................................................................ 29 7.2 Wetland Verification and Delineation ............................................................................................ 30 7.2.1 Terrain Unit Indicator ................................................................................................................ 30 7.2.2 Vegetation Indicator .................................................................................................................. 32 7.2.3 Soil Wetness Indictor ................................................................................................................ 33 7.3 Wetland Classification .................................................................................................................. 35 7.4 Wetland Present Ecological State (PES) and Ecological Importance and Sensitivity (EIS) ........... 36 8.0 ESTUARINE ECOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 38 8.1 Estuaries – An Introduction ........................................................................................................... 38 8.2 Durban Bay Estuary ...................................................................................................................... 39 8.2.1 General Characterisation .......................................................................................................... 39 8.2.2 Physical Attributes .................................................................................................................... 40 8.2.3 Biological Communities ............................................................................................................ 40 8.2.4 Existing Threats to Durban Bay Estuary ................................................................................... 41 8.3 Durban Bay Estuary in Relation to the Project Site ....................................................................... 41 9.0 SCREENING OF IMPORTANT BIODIVERSITY FEATURES ...............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Herpetofaunal Survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the Foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 717-730 (2020) (published online on 25 August 2020) Herpetofaunal survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa Werner Conradie1,2,* Brian Reeves3, Sandile Mdoko3, Lwandiso Pamla3, and Oyama Gxabhu3 Abstract. The results of a herpetofaunal survey of Ongeluksnek Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa are presented here. Combination of visual encounter survey methods and standard Y-shape trap arrays were used to conduct the survey. A total of 26 species (eight amphibians and 18 reptiles) were recorded, representing 29 quarter-degree grid cell records, of which 62% represented the first records for these units. Furthermore, we document the presence of three species of snakes (Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia, Hemachatus haemachatus and Homoroselaps lacteus) for the first time for the whole degree square of 3028 (approx. 100 km2). This study highlights the need to survey poorly known regions to enable us to understand and document the full distributional extent of species. We also discuss the impact of uncontrolled fires on the absence of grassland specialised species during our survey. Keywords. Amphibia, Reptilia, karroid, conservation, biodiversity, fire Introduction has been done in the southern and western regions (e.g. Branch and Braack, 1987), while the northern and The herpetofaunal richness of South Africa is central areas associated with the former homelands of considered to be amongst the highest in the world the Ciskei and Transkei remained poorly surveyed. In (Branch, 1998; Bates et al., 2014; Du Preez and recent years a series of rapid biodiversity studies has Carruthers, 2017; Tolley et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment for the Hlabisa Landfill Site
    Ecological Assessment for the Hlabisa landfill site Compiled by: Ina Venter Pr.Sci.Nat Botanical Science (400048/08) M.Sc. Botany trading as Kyllinga Consulting 53 Oakley Street, Rayton, 1001 [email protected] In association with Lukas Niemand Pr.Sci.Nat (400095/06) M.Sc. Restoration Ecology / Zoology Pachnoda Consulting 88 Rubida Street, Murryfield x1, Pretoria [email protected] i Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Uncertainties and limitations .................................................................................................. 1 2. Site .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.1. Location ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. Site description ....................................................................................................................... 1 3. Background information ................................................................................................................. 4 3.1. Vegetation ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Centres of floristic endemism ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Preprint
    Does evolution of plumage patterns and of migratory behaviour in Apodini swifts (Aves: Apodiformes) follow distributional range shifts? Dieter Thomas Tietze, Martin Päckert, Michael Wink The Apodini swifts in the Old World serve as an example for a recent radiation on an intercontinental scale on the one hand. On the other hand they provide a model for the interplay of trait and distributional range evolution with speciation, extinction and trait s t transition rates on a low taxonomic level (23 extant taxa). Swifts are well adapted to a life n i mostly in the air and to long-distance movements. Their overall colouration is dull, but r P lighter feather patches of chin and rump stand out as visual signals. Only few Apodini taxa e r breed outside the tropics; they are the only species in the study group that migrate long P distances to wintering grounds in the tropics and subtropics. We reconstructed a dated molecular phylogeny including all species, numerous outgroups and fossil constraints. Several methods were used for historical biogeography and two models for the study of trait evolution. We finally correlated trait expression with geographic status. The differentiation of the Apodini took place in less than 9 Ma. Their ancestral range most likely comprised large parts of the Old-World tropics, although the majority of extant taxa breed in the Afrotropic and the closest relatives occur in the Indomalayan. The expression of all three investigated traits increased speciation rates and the traits were more likely lost than gained. Chin patches are found in almost all species, so that no association with phylogeny or range could be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Notas Breves FOOD HABITS of the ALPINE SWIFT on TWO
    Ardeola 56(2), 2009, 259-269 Notas Breves FOOD HABITS OF THE ALPINE SWIFT ON TWO CONTINENTS: INTRA- AND INTERSPECIFIC COMPARISONS DIETA DEL VENCEJO REAL EN DOS CONTINENTES: ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO INTRA E INTERESPECÍFICO Charles T. COLLINS* 1, José L. TELLA** and Brian D. COLAHAN*** SUMMARY.—The prey brought by alpine swifts Tachymarptis melba to their chicks in Switzerland, Spain and South Africa included a wide variety of arthropods, principally insects but also spiders. Insects com- prised 10 orders and 79 families, the Homoptera, Diptera and Hymenoptera being the most often con- sumed. The assessment of geographical variation in the diet was complicated by the great variability among the individual supplies of prey. Prey size varied between 1.3 and 29.6 mm, differing significantly in the median prey size of the three populations (5.12 - 8.81 mm) according to the intraspecific variation in size of alpine swifts. In an interspecific comparison, prey size correlated positively with body size in seven species of swifts. RESUMEN.—Las presas aportadas por vencejos reales Tachymarptis melba a sus pollos en Suiza, Es- paña y Sudáfrica incluyeron una amplia variedad de artrópodos, principalmente insectos pero también arañas. Entre los insectos, fueron identificados 10 órdenes y 79 familias, siendo Homoptera, Diptera e Hymenoptera los más consumidos. Las variaciones geográficas en la dieta se vieron ensombrecidas por una gran variabilidad entre los aportes individuales de presas. El tamaño de presa varió entre 1.3 y 29.6 mm, oscilando las medianas para cada población entre 5,12 y 8,81 mm. Los vencejos reales mostraron di- ferencias significativas en el tamaño de sus presas correspondiendo con su variación intraespecífica en tamaño.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Diversity and Community-Based Ecotourism in Ndumo Game Reserve, South Africa
    Amphibian diversity and Community-Based Ecotourism in Ndumo Game Reserve, South Africa FM Phaka orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-3156 Previous qualification (not compuLsory) Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Masters degree in Environmental Science at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof LH du Preez Co-supervisor: Dr DJD Kruger Assistant Supervisor: Mr EC Netherlands Graduation May 2018 25985469 Declaration I, Fortunate Mafeta Phaka, declare that this work is my own, that all sources used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references, and that this thesis was not previously submitted by me or any other person for degree purposes at this or any other university. Signature Date 18/11/2017 i i AcknowLedgements A great debt of gratitude is owed to my study supervisor L.H. Du Preez, co-supervisor D.J.D. Kruger, and assistant supervisor E.N. Netherlands for guidance and encouragement to focus on my strengths. To my mentors, D. Kotze and L. De Jager, and the Phaka clan, your faith in me has kept me going through all these years. Thank you to African Amphibian Conservation Research Group and Youth 4 African Wildlife for accepting me as part of your family. Members of the Zululand community are thanked for their enthusiasm and assistance towards this study. Fieldwork and running expenses for this research were funded by the South African National Biodiversity Institute’s (SANBI) Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme (Grant UID 98144). Financial assistance for studying towards this degree was provided by SANBI’s Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme (National Research Foundation Grant- Holder Linked Bursary for Grant UID 98144), and the North-West University (NWU Masters Progress Bursary, and NWU Masters Bursary).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the East Africa Natural History Society and National Museum
    JOURNAL OF THE EAST AFRICA NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY AND NATIONAL MUSEUM 15 October, 1978 Vol. 31 No. 167 A CHECKLIST OF mE SNAKES OF KENYA Stephen Spawls 35 WQodland Rise, Muswell Hill, London NIO, England ABSTRACT Loveridge (1957) lists 161 species and subspecies of snake from East Mrica. Eighty-nine of these belonging to some 41 genera were recorded from Kenya. The new list contains some 106 forms of 46 genera. - Three full species have been deleted from Loveridge's original checklist. Typhlops b. blanfordii has been synonymised with Typhlops I. lineolatus, Typhlops kaimosae has been synonymised with Typhlops angolensis (Roux-Esteve 1974) and Co/uber citeroii has been synonymised with Meizodon semiornatus (Lanza 1963). Of the 20 forms added to the list, 12 are forms collected for the first time in Kenya but occurring outside its political boundaries and one, Atheris desaixi is a new species, the holotype and paratypes being collected within Kenya. There has also been a large number of changes amongst the 89 original species as a result of revisionary systematic studies. This accounts for the other additions to the list. INTRODUCTION The most recent checklist dealing with the snakes of Kenya is Loveridge (1957). Since that date there has been a significant number of developments in the Kenyan herpetological field. This paper intends to update the nomenclature in the part of the checklist that concerns the snakes of Kenya and to extend the list to include all the species now known to occur within the political boundaries of Kenya. It also provides the range of each species within Kenya with specific locality records .
    [Show full text]
  • Snakes of the Everglades Agricultural Area1 Michelle L
    CIR1462 Snakes of the Everglades Agricultural Area1 Michelle L. Casler, Elise V. Pearlstine, Frank J. Mazzotti, and Kenneth L. Krysko2 Background snakes are often escapees or are released deliberately and illegally by owners who can no longer care for them. Snakes are members of the vertebrate order Squamata However, there has been no documentation of these snakes (suborder Serpentes) and are most closely related to lizards breeding in the EAA (Tennant 1997). (suborder Sauria). All snakes are legless and have elongated trunks. They can be found in a variety of habitats and are able to climb trees; swim through streams, lakes, or oceans; Benefits of Snakes and move across sand or through leaf litter in a forest. Snakes are an important part of the environment and play Often secretive, they rely on scent rather than vision for a role in keeping the balance of nature. They aid in the social and predatory behaviors. A snake’s skull is highly control of rodents and invertebrates. Also, some snakes modified and has a great degree of flexibility, called cranial prey on other snakes. The Florida kingsnake (Lampropeltis kinesis, that allows it to swallow prey much larger than its getula floridana), for example, prefers snakes as prey and head. will even eat venomous species. Snakes also provide a food source for other animals such as birds and alligators. Of the 45 snake species (70 subspecies) that occur through- out Florida, 23 may be found in the Everglades Agricultural Snake Conservation Area (EAA). Of the 23, only four are venomous. The venomous species that may occur in the EAA are the coral Loss of habitat is the most significant problem facing many snake (Micrurus fulvius fulvius), Florida cottonmouth wildlife species in Florida, snakes included.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Zululand District Municipality, Kwazulu-Natal
    EZEMVELO KZN WILDLIFE Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Zululand District Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal Technical Report February 2010 The Project Team Thorn-Ex cc (Environmental Services) PO Box 800, Hilton, 3245 Pietermaritzbur South Africa Tel: (033) 3431814 Fax: (033) 3431819 Mobile: 084 5014665 [email protected] Marita Thornhill (Project Management & Coordination) AFZELIA Environmental Consultants cc KwaZulu-Natal Western Cape PO Box 95 PO Box 3397 Hilton 3245 Cape Town 8000 Tel: 033 3432931/32 Tel: 072 3900686 Fax: 033 3432033 or Fax: 086 5132112 086 5170900 Mobile: 084 6756052 [email protected] [email protected] Wolfgang Kanz (Biodiversity Specialist Coordinator) John Richardson (GIS) Monde Nembula (Social Facilitation) Tim O’Connor & Associates P.O.Box 379 Hilton 3245 South Africa Tel/ Fax: 27-(0)33-3433491 [email protected] Tim O’Connor (Biodiversity Expert Advice) Zululand Biodiversity Sector Plan (February 2010) 1 Executive Summary The Biodiversity Act introduced several legislated planning tools to assist with the management and conservation of South Africa’s biological diversity. These include the declaration of “Bioregions” and the publication of “Bioregional Plans”. Bioregional plans are usually an output of a systematic spatial conservation assessment of a region. They identify areas of conservation priority, and constraints and opportunities for implementation of the plan. The precursor to a Bioregional Plan is a Biodiversity Sector Plan (BSP), which is the official reference for biodiversity priorities to be taken into account in land-use planning and decision-making by all sectors within the District Municipality. The overall aim is to avoid the loss of natural habitat in Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) and prevent the degradation of Ecological Support Areas (ESAs), while encouraging sustainable development in Other Natural Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • P0249-P0262.Pdf
    THE CONDOR VOLUME 57 SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER. 19.55 NUMBER 5 A SYSTEMATIC REVISION AND NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SHINING SUNBIRD OF AFRICA By JOHN G. WILLIAMS The ,Shining Sunbird (Cinnyris habessinicus Hemprich and Ehrenberg) has a com- paratively restricted distribution in the northeastern part of the Ethiopian region. It occurs sporadically from the northern districts of Kenya Colony and northeastern Uganda northward to Saudi Arabia, but it apparently is absent from the highlands of Ethiopia (Abyssinia) above 5000 feet. The adult male is one of the most brightly col- ored African sunbirds, the upper parts and throat being brilliant metallic green, often with a golden sheen on the mantle, and the crown violet or blue. Across the breast is a bright red band, varying in width, depth of color, and brilliance in the various races, bordered on each side by yellow pectoral tufts; the abdomen is black. The female is drab gray or brown and exhibits a well-marked color cline, the most southerly birds being pale and those to the northward becoming gradually darker and terminating with the blackish-brown female of the most northerly subspecies. In the present study I am retaining, with some reluctance, the genus Cinnyris for the speciesunder review. I agree in the main with Delacour’s treatment of the group in his paper ( 1944) “A Review of the Family Nectariniidae (Sunbirds) ” and admit that the genus Nectarinia, in its old, restricted sense, based upon the length of the central pair of rectrices in the adult male, is derived from a number of different stocks and is ur+ sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Frugivore Interactions in a Heterogeneous Forest Landscape of South Africa
    Plant-frugivore interactions in a heterogeneous forest landscape of South Africa Dissertation In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of a Doctorate Degree in Natural Sciences (Dr. rer. nat) The Faculty of Biology, Philipps-University of Marburg Lackson Chama, MSc Sinazongwe (Zambia) June 2012, Marburg From the Faculty of Biology, Philipps-University Marburg als Dissertation am angenommen. Dekan: Prof. Dr. Paul Galland Erstgutachterin: Prof. Dr. N. Farwig Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. R. Brandl Tag der Disputation: 25th June 2012 Dedicated to my son, Mishila, who’s first two years on earth I was hardly part of, due to my commitment towards this work. Contents CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 EFFECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ON FOREST BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................................ 4 PLANT-FRUGIVORE INTERACTIONS IN CHANGING LANDSCAPES .................................................................................................. 5 THE ROLE OF FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY IN FRUGIVORE COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................... 5 EFFECTS OF SEED INGESTION BY FRUGIVOROUS BIRDS ON GERMINATION SUCCESS ........................................................................ 6 AIMS OF THE THESIS .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification of Muroid Rodents Driven by the Late Miocene Global Cooling Nelish Pradhan University of Vermont
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2018 Diversification Of Muroid Rodents Driven By The Late Miocene Global Cooling Nelish Pradhan University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Pradhan, Nelish, "Diversification Of Muroid Rodents Driven By The Late Miocene Global Cooling" (2018). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 907. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/907 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIVERSIFICATION OF MUROID RODENTS DRIVEN BY THE LATE MIOCENE GLOBAL COOLING A Dissertation Presented by Nelish Pradhan to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Specializing in Biology May, 2018 Defense Date: January 8, 2018 Dissertation Examination Committee: C. William Kilpatrick, Ph.D., Advisor David S. Barrington, Ph.D., Chairperson Ingi Agnarsson, Ph.D. Lori Stevens, Ph.D. Sara I. Helms Cahan, Ph.D. Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College ABSTRACT Late Miocene, 8 to 6 million years ago (Ma), climatic changes brought about dramatic floral and faunal changes. Cooler and drier climates that prevailed in the Late Miocene led to expansion of grasslands and retreat of forests at a global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Effects of Biogeography and Fragmentation on The
    Evaluating the effects of biogeography and fragmentation on the taxonomic, functional, and genetic diversity of forest-utilising bats in a South African biodiversity hotspot by Monika Ilka Moir Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisors: Dr. Ramugondo V. Rambau Prof. Michael I. Cherry Dr. Leigh R. Richards December 2020 i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights, and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. This dissertation includes one original paper published in a peer-reviewed journal with me as lead author, and three articles submitted and under peer-review. The development and writing of the papers (published and unpublished) were the principal responsibility of myself. Monika Ilka Moir August 2020 Copyright © 2020 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Bats are a highly diverse mammalian order and are some of the most economically important non-domesticated vertebrates, providing many ecosystem services that contribute to the global economy. Yet, they remain a largely understudied taxon, particularly in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa, in which basic surveys of bat assemblages utilising indigenous forests are lacking. Indigenous forests constitute South Africa’s smallest and most fragmented biome yet support disproportionally high biodiversity.
    [Show full text]