DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Exhibit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Exhibit United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit NYS00131E Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. In the Matter of: (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) Submitted: December 14, 2011 u.... ~p..p. REG(J~)- ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 | 05000286 ~ 0 Exhibit #: NYS00131E-00-BD01 Identified: 10/15/2012 ~ ~ I./l I ' ~ Admitted: 10/15/2012 Withdrawn: ~ ~ !~~1-:~ 0-:" Rejected: Stricken: " ,- .* ..... Other: ALTERNATIVES to LICENSE RENEWAL the sites likely would be new. Wildlife (16 km) of the earth's crust. These habitat would be lost for terrestrial and resources exist in the form of hot vapor free-flowing aquatic biota, and additional (steam) or liquid (hydrothermal), habitat would be created for some aquatic geopressurized brines, or hot dry rock. species. Associated with the loss of land Hydrothermal is the only resource used by would be some erosion, sedimentation, current commercial technology. EIA dust, equipment exhaust, debris from land estimates that about 1.5 million quads per clearing, probable loss of cultural artifacts, year of geothermal resources exist in the and aesthetic impacts from land clearing United States; however, only about 22,800 and excavating. The construction work quads are accessible and, of these, only force would be fairly large, and approximately 250 quads per year can be socioeconomic impacts likely would be economically developed today substantial, especially if the dam were (DOE/EIA-0561). In 1990, geothermal constructed in a remote area where resources contributed 0.32 quad of primary inmigrating workers would burden local energy in the western United States. The public services. net geothermal generating capacity in the United States is projected to grow from 15 Operating impacts from hydroelectric dams billion kWh in 1990 to about 60 billion are associated predominantly with land and kWh in 2010. In comparison, one water resources. Land that once was lived 1000-MW(e) nuclear plant operating at on, farmed, ranched, forested, hunted, or 60 percent capacity generates 5.26 billion mined would be submerged under water kWh annually (DOE/EIA-0561). indefinitely. The original land uses would Geothermal has a high capacity factor of be replaced by electricity generation and approximately 90 percent and can be used recreation and, perhaps, residential and to provide reliable, baseload power. A business developments that take advantage geothermal electricity generating facility of the lake environment. Changes in water consists of a conversion well that brings the temperature, currents, and amount of geothermal resources to the surface, the sedimentation would produce a different conversion system that produces useful aquatic environment above and below the energy from the resource, and the injection dam. Alterations to terrestrial and aquatic well that recycles cooled brine back to the habitats could change the risks to underground reservoir threatened and endangered species. (SERI!fP-260-3674). Although the hydroelectric dam would create no air quality or solid waste impacts As shown in Figure 8.4, geothermal plants during operation and could serve as a may be located in the western United protector of property and lives in States, Alaska, and Hawaii where preventing floods, lake recreation would hydrothermal reservoirs are prevalent. The likely bring with it a number of drownings discrepancy between the vast amount of and cause water pollution during the resource projected to be available (1.5 facility's operation. million quads per year) and projected usage is due primarily to technological 8.3.5 Geothermal problems. Although geothermal plants offer alternative baseload capacity to Potentially recoverable geothermal conventional fossil fuel and nuclear plants, resources are located in the upper 10 miles widespread application of geothermal 8-25 NUREG-1437. Vol. 1 OAGI0001365_00593 z C ::0 tIl ~::c 9...... z .j>.. ~ ~ ;-I <: <: tIl ?2- CIl ...... ..., 0 t"'" ......n ztIl CIl tIl ::0 tIl Z tIl 8 ~ ... .'""~- . .• _I' .. \ ..<. ~:'~:'i;' ',,', .. '":':,,.' @ Temperature above 194°F @ Temperature below 194°F © Geopressured resources o » G) FIgure 8.4 U.S. known and potential geothermal energy resources. Source: Adapted from o DOE/EIA-0562. o o --" 0) (J) (J1 o o (J1 CD .j::>. ALTERNATIVES TO LICENSE RENEWAL energy is constrained by the geographic in constructing the geothermal facility. availability of the resource and the Some of the land originally cleared for maturity of the technology. The maximum construction of the geothermal facilities size of geothermal power plants, in their could probably be returned to previous present state of development, is about uses, since it would not all have 110 MW(e) per unit. Geothermal plants, geothermal facilities located on it. Much however, could be sited as modular units acreage would still be lost for the life of that would allow for larger generating the plant, however, and this loss could be capacities. complicated by subsidence caused by withdrawal of the geothermal fluid. Loss of Construction impacts of a geothermal habitat, impacts to threatened and facility would result primarily from endangered species, and visual impacts disturbance of land to support the large could be mitigated partially by returning number of geothermal wells and the power much of the land to, or even leaving it in, plant needed to produce electricity its original condition. Surface water and equivalent to that from a 1000-MW(e) groundwater quality could be impacted plant. Excluding new transmission adversely if waste fluids from wells escaped corridors, which would add to most into the ground water or surface streams impacts, an estimated 2800 ha (7000 acres) or ponds. In addition various toxic gases would be needed even though the such as ammonia, methane, and hydrogen generating facility or facilities would only sulfide and trace amounts of arsenic, borax, occupy around 25 ha (60 acres). This mercury, radon, and benzene would be amount of acreage having appropriate released to the atmosphere. Noise impacts geothermal resources would require a could be a problem for residents living on greenfield site or sites, which would imply the edge of a geothermal site. altering current land uses of farming, Socioeconomic impacts should be positive ranching, forest, or natural habitat. with substantial tax revenues and a Clearing this land would damage or destroy considerable number of jobs accruing to much of the existing habitat for wildlife, as local taxing jurisdictions from a geothermal well as pose potential adverse plant. consequences for cultural resources. Aesthetic impacts would include extensive 8.3.6 Wood Waste vegetation removal and earth moving. Soil erosion and stream sedimentation likely The 2.4 quads per year of waste wood would result in some degree from the early energy consumed in the United States clearing operations. Fugitive dust and generally is apportioned among the exhaust fumes from heavy equipment following sectors: industrial heat and would reduce air quality temporarily. The power-1.6 quads (66 percent), residential moderate-sized work force would create space heating-O.8 quads (33 percent), and some community impacts, particularly if electric utilities-O.01 quads (1 percent). affected communities were small and had Industrial wood energy is used in a variety little service infrastructure to accommodate of process heat and cogeneration workers who might move into a rural applications. Nearly half of that wood environment to build the plant. Operating energy is used in boilers, a little over impacts would involve those resources most 40 percent in cogeneration (steam and closely associated with the land disturbed electricity), and the remainder as process 8-27 NUREG·1437, Vol. 1 OAGI0001 :iRFi nnFiQ';; ALTERNATIVES TO LICENSE RENEWAL heat. Much of the electricity produced by and pulp/paper industries, and there is the industrial sector is sold to utilities. limited availability for energy uses. These nonutility generators, along with independent power producers, generated Nearly all of the wood-energy-using about 31 billion kWh in 1990 from 6 electricity generation facilities in the GW(e) of installed wood- and wood-waste­ United States use steam turbine conversion fired capacity. By 2010, installed capacity is technology. The technology is relatively expected to increase to over 8 G W (e) and simple to operate and it can accept a wide net generation to nearly 60 billion kWh variety of biomass fuels. However, at the (DOEIEIA-0561). scale appropriate for biomass, the technology is expensive and inefficient. Wood waste is a sub-category of biomass Therefore, the technology is relegated to energy. The category can include residues applications where there is a readily from forest clearcut and thinning available supply of low-, zero-, or negative­ operations, non-commercial tree species, cost delivered feedstocks. harvests of forests for energy purposes, and wastes from forest product milling The low efficiency of wood-fired power operations. The costs of these fuels are plants, relative to modern coal-fired plants, highly variable and very site-specific. Costs is due in part to the use of more moderate can be very low if the fuels are collected as steam conditions. Biomass steam-turbine part of commercial timber harvest plants use lower pressures and operations or as residues from milling temperatures because of the strong scale­ operations. Costs are higher if the biomass dependence of the unit capital cost (dollars
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Attendance Summary
    Parks Attendance 8/29/2012 3:37:13 PM Summary Search Criteria: Region: -All- From Date: 1/1/2011 To Date: 8/28/2011 Group By: None Park Name: -All- IsStatistical: No Category: -All- Reg Costcenter Attendance -ALL- Allegany Quaker Area 423,970 Allegany Red House Area 500,778 Lake Erie St Pk 75,666 Long Point Marina 56,030 Midway State Park 82,880 Battle Isl Golf Course 22,209 Betty And Wilbur Davis State Park 12,756 Bowman Lake St Pk 40,515 Canadarago Boat Lnch 18,903 Chenango Valley St Pk 124,247 Chittenango Fls St Pk 30,551 Clark Reservation 34,530 Delta Lake St Pk 158,574 Fort Ontario 96,717 Gilbert Lake St Pk 79,082 Glimmerglass State Park 98,066 Green Lakes State Park 633,669 1 of 8 Herkimer Home 10,744 Lorenzo 25,265 Mexico Point Boat Launch 14,201 Old Erie Canal 16,916 Oquaga State Park 24,292 Oriskany Battlefield 3,446 Pixley Falls State Park 24,124 Sandy Island Beach 33,793 Selkirk Shores 53,235 Steuben Memorial 438 Verona Beach State Park 153,719 Allan Treman Marina 115,237 Buttermilk Falls St Pk 116,327 Canadaigua Btlau Ontrio 37,866 Cayuga Lake St Pk 93,276 Chimney Bluffs 86,443 Deans Cove Boat Launch 11,572 Fair Haven St Pk 230,052 Fillmore Glen St Pk 92,150 Ganondagan 22,339 H H Spencer 24,907 Honeoye Bt Lau 26,879 Indian Hills Golf Course 19,908 Keuka Lake St Pk 69,388 Lodi Point Marina/Boat 23,237 Long Point St Pk 33,257 Newtown Battlefield 17,427 Robert H Treman St Pk 158,724 Sampson St Pk 111,203 Seneca Lake St Pk 116,517 2 of 8 Soaring Eagles Golf Course 18,511 Stony Brook St Pk 118,064 Taughannock Falls St Pk 328,376 Watkins Glen St Pk 381,218 Braddock Bay 28,247 Conesus Lake Boat Launch 18,912 Darien Lakes State Park 52,750 Durand Eastman 18,704 Genesee Valley Greenway 21,022 Hamlin Beach State Park 221,996 Irondquoit Bay Boat Lnch 27,035 Lakeside Beach St Pk 50,228 Letchworth State Park 407,606 Oak Orchard Boat Launch 4,954 Rattlesnake Point 1,699 Silver Lake 17,790 Bayard C.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Section
    APPENDIX 1. A Selection of Biodiversity Conservation Agencies & Programs A variety of state agencies and programs, in addition to the NY Natural Heritage Program, partner with OPRHP on biodiversity conservation and planning. This appendix also describes a variety of statewide and regional biodiversity conservation efforts that complement OPRHP’s work. NYS BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The New York State Biodiversity Research Institute is a state-chartered organization based in the New York State Museum who promotes the understanding and conservation of New York’s biological diversity. They administer a broad range of research, education, and information transfer programs, and oversee a competitive grants program for projects that further biodiversity stewardship and research. In 1996, the Biodiversity Research Institute approved funding for the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to undertake an ambitious inventory of its lands for rare species, rare natural communities, and the state’s best examples of common communities. The majority of inventory in state parks occurred over a five-year period, beginning in 1998 and concluding in the spring of 2003. Funding was also approved for a sixth year, which included all newly acquired state parks and several state parks that required additional attention beyond the initial inventory. Telephone: (518) 486-4845 Website: www.nysm.nysed.gov/bri/ NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) biodiversity conservation efforts are handled by a variety of offices with the department. Of particular note for this project are the NY Natural Heritage Program, Endangered Species Unit, and Nongame Unit (all of which are in the Division of Fish, Wildlife, & Marine Resources), and the Division of Lands & Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • LONG ISLAND PINE BARRENS MARITIME RESERVE ACT Section 57-0101
    New York State Environmental Conservation Law Article 57 TITLE 1 LONG ISLAND PINE BARRENS MARITIME RESERVE ACT Section 57-0101. Short title. 57-0103. Legislative declaration. 57-0105. Legislative findings and intent. 57-0107. Definitions. 57-0109. Establishment of Long Island Pine Barrens maritime reserve; core preservation area and compatible growth area. 57-0111. Long Island Pine Barrens maritime reserve council. 57-0113. Duties of the council. 57-0115. Comprehensive management plan. 57-0117. Dedications to the Long Island Pine Barrens preserve; legislative protection. 57-0119. Central Pine Barrens joint planning and policy commission. 57-0121. Central Pine Barrens comprehensive land use plan; interim regulations. 57-0122. Carmans River watershed plan amendment. 57-0123. Implementation of the Central Pine Barrens comprehensive land use plan. 57-0125. Addition of towns. 57-0127. Cooperation of state and municipal agencies. 57-0129. Acceptance of monies. 57-0131. Limitations on regulation of hunting, fishing and recreation activities; nonregulation of federal conservation activities. 57-0133. Affect on other laws. 57-0135. Judicial review. 57-0136. Penalties and enforcement. 57-0137. Severability. Environmental Conservation § 57-0101. Short title. This title shall be known and may be cited as the "Long Island Pine Barrens maritime reserve act". § 57-0103. Legislative declaration. The legislature hereby declares it to be in the public interest to protect and manage the Pine Barrens-Peconic Bay system, in the county of Suffolk, by establishing a Long Island Pine Barrens maritime reserve. It is further in the public interest to establish a council made up of representatives of state and local governments and private citizens to prepare a comprehensive management plan and make recommendations to preserve, protect and enhance the natural, recreational, economic and educational values of the region, which the state and local governments may adopt.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources: Historic and Archaeological Page 1 of 22
    Chapter 7: Cultural Resources: Historic and Archaeological Page 1 of 22 •,>• 7. Cultural Resources: Historic and Archaeological 7.1 Definitions of Terms Before one can develop a more complete understanding of cultural resources, it is important to understand the nature of these resources and the terms used in pertinent sections of the Central Pine Barrens Plan. Accordingly, the following terms used in this section are defined as follows: Aboriginal - Pertaining to native inhabitants (i.e., the original Native American inhabitants of Long Island). Adaptive Reuse - The retrofitting and preservation, as opposed to destruction, of an historic structure for a new purpose, (e.g., the use of an historic residence or for an office.). rchaeological Resources - Material remains of past habitations or activities which may be below or ove ground. Cultural resource - As defined by the National Park Service in its "Cultural Resources Management Guidelines," cultural resources are: Those tangible and intangible aspects of cultural systems, both living and dead, that are valued by or representative of a given culture or that contain information about a culture . .. and [they] include but are not limited to sites, structures, districts, objects and artifacts, and historic documents associated with or representative of peoples, cultures, and human activities and events, either in the present or in the past. Cultural resources also can include the primary written and verbal data for interpreting and understanding those tangible resources. As commonly defined, these may be archaeological (that is, found beneath the surface) or above-ground resources. hese may include, but are not limited to: * 1. Components of structures and features (houses, mills, piers, fortifications, earthworks, ditches and mounds, roads, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 436 344 SE 061 230 TITLE The Long Island Pine Barrens: A Curriculum & Resource Guide. INSTITUTION Long Island Pine Barrens Society, NY. SPONS AGENCY Western Suffolk BOCES, Northport, NY.; New York State Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of New York and Long Island, Albany. PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 63p. CONTRACT NE992275-95-0 AVAILABLE FROM Long Island Pine Barrens Society, P.O. Box 429, Manorville, NY 11949. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academic Standards; Conservation Education; Curriculuin Development; *Ecology; Environmental Education; Evaluation; *Hands on Science; Learning Activities; Plants (Botany); *Resource Materials; Science Education; Teaching Methods; Wildlife IDENTIFIERS *New York (Long Island) ABSTRACT The Long Island Pine Barrens is Long Island's premier ecosystem. It overlies the greatest quantity of the purest drinking water remaining on Long Island and boasts the greatest diversity of plants and animals in New York State. This curriculum guide provides background and suggested inquiry-based in-class and field trip experiences to use with students in grades 3-8 when teaching environmental science. The environmental significance of the ecological system is discussed and suggested classroom and out-of-classroom activities are also presented to assist in developing hands-on environmental science lessons for students. These suggested activities are presented as lesson plans and are designed to be easily adaptable to the Frameworks for Mathematics, Science, and Technology program currently being promulgated by the New York State Education Department. They can also serve as the starting point for student-produced workpresented in portfolios or incorporated into performance-based/authentic assessment activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Plan for Grassland Birds in New York
    A Plan for Conserving Grassland Birds in New York: Final Report to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation under contract #C005137 Michael Morgan and Michael Burger Audubon New York 10 June 2008 Audubon New York 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd. Ithaca, NY 14850 (607) 254-2487 or [email protected] 1 Support The funding for the planning process and the creation of this document, which describes the foundation for grassland bird conservation in New York and provides direction for future efforts, has been provided by a contract from the Department of Environmental Conservation (C005137). Funds for the contract originated as a Tier 1 grant from the USFWS State Wildlife Grants Program. Many partnering agencies are contributing to the coordinated grassland bird conservation effort in New York, and are listed as partners in this plan. The following individuals have either contributed to the development of various components of the plan, or supported its development through review of draft materials or participation in discussions, and this support is greatly appreciated. Thanks to Jeff Bolsinger, Chris Dobony, Peter Gibbs, Mitch Hartley, Paul Hess, Sheila Hess, Tom Jasikoff, Heidi Kennedy, Chris Lajewski, Mike Murphy, Paul Novak, Dave Odell, Ray Perry, Tim Post, Marcelo del Puerto, Chris Reidy, Ron Rohrbaugh, Ken Rosenberg, Paul Salon, Carl Schwartz, Shanna Shaw, Gerry Smith, Bryan Swift, Mike Townsend, and Maiken Winter, among others. Our apologies to anyone that we’ve failed to mention. 2 Executive Summary • Grassland birds have been declining faster than any other habitat-species suite in the northeastern United States. The primary cause of these declines is abandonment of agricultural lands, causing habitat loss due to reversion to later successional stages or due to sprawl development.
    [Show full text]
  • Below Is the List of Planned Park Closures in the New York-New Jersey Trail Conference Region
    Below is the list of planned park closures in the New York-New Jersey Trail Conference region. See the full list of proposed closures at http://readme.readmedia.com/Statements- from-Governor-David-A-Paterson-and-Commissioner-Carol-Ash/1166601 February 19, 2010 Statement by Governor Patterson and State Parks Commissioner Carol Ash: The Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) today put forward a list of closures and service reductions in order to achieve its proposed 2010-11 agency savings target and help address the State's historic fiscal difficulties. As part of a comprehensive plan to close an $8.2 billion deficit, the 2010-11 Executive Budget included necessary cost reductions to each executive State agency, as well as cuts to education, health care, social services, and every other area of State spending. OPRHP's plan includes the closure of 41 parks and 14 historic sites, and service reductions at 23 parks and 1 historic site. The plan also assumes $4 million in park and historic site fee increases that will be identified at a later date, and the use of $5 million in funds from the Environmental Protection Fund (EPF) to finance OPRHP operations. These two actions were part of the 21-day amendments to the Executive Budget and are intended to reduce the number of parks and historic sites subject to closures and service reductions. Long Island Brookhaven State Park Suffolk Close Park Eliminate Winter Sports; Bethpage State Park Suffolk Reduce picnic area and polo field Caleb Smith State Park Preserve Suffolk Close
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H: 2007 HMP Hazard Events
    Appendix H: 2007 HMP Hazard Events This appendix includes the hazard event tables that were found in the 2007 Suffolk County HMP. These tables include events that occurred in the County through 2007. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Suffolk County, New York H-1 April 2014 Appendix H: 2007 HMP Hazard Events Table H-1. Coastal Erosion Events FEMA Declaration Suffolk County Dates of Event Event Type Number Designated? Losses / Impacts September 22- 23, 1815 Severe Storm N/A N/A Many structures damaged including Montauk Lighthouse, major erosion October 29, 1893 Severe Storm N/A N/A During “The Great Storm of 1893”, Fire Island Cut broken through October 24, 1897 Nor’easter N/A N/A Separated Orient Village from the North Fork March 4, 1931 Nor’Easter N/A N/A Created Moriches Inlet, severe beach erosion and structural damage September 21, 1938 Hurricane N/A N/A “Long Island Express” or “Great Hurricane of ‘38” caused approximately $6.2 M, multiple deaths, Shinnecock Inlet created, Moriches Inlet widened by over 4,000 feet. More then 200 homes had been perched on dunes 20-feet high, destroyed fishing industry, created 12 new inlets. The storm produced winds that reached 200 miles per hour (mph), generated 5-meter-high breakers, overwashed 1/3 to 1/2 of Long Island, and created approximately 12 new inlets. altered natural coastline erosion responses from future storms (Mandia, 1992). September 14, 1944 Hurricane N/A N/A The “Great Atlantic Hurricane” storm center crossed the eastern portion of Long Island during a falling tide.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Technology Upgrade and Conducting Accessibility Assessments at 400 State‐Operated Recreation Sites Inclusive Recreation Resource Center December 2013 to November 2015 PROJECT SUMMARY Since its inception in 2007, the Inclusive Recreation Resource Center has actively promoted and helped sustain inclusive recreation for ALL people. Through the development of the Inclusivity Assessment Tool, the day‐long Inclusion U training, and the ever‐ growing online recreation database, the IRRC has been instrumental in helping all people play wherever they choose. This project focused on making the IRRC’s work even more accessible to even more people with even more relevant recreation data. How? Through the migration of the Inclusion U training to an online format, Inclusion U Online The redesign of the website The redesign of the online recreation database to a more streamlined and mobile platform The streamlining of the Inclusivity Assessment Tool (IAT) to allow data to be entered into the database more efficiently and by more people The development of an app for mobile use The development of a trail assessment checklist Working with two partners, NYS DEC and NYS OPRHP to assessing state‐administered recreation sites throughout the state of New York Our project rolled out according to plans. This report shares the outcomes of this work and future steps. 2 OUTCOMES Inclusion U Online Target Outcome: 1 Inclusion U Online Actual Outcome: 1 Inclusion U Online Inclusion U Online is a 9‐module training that can be completed in 10 hours. Working with Gorges, Inc., based in Ithaca, NY, we developed and implemented a learning management system that is responsive in design, allowing users to complete the training on any device.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 New York State Open Space Plan
    David A. Paterson, Governor Lead Agencies: The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Alexander B. Grannis, Commissioner The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) Carol Ash, Commissioner Partnering Agencies: The Department of Agriculture & Markets The Department of Transportation The Department of State DEFINITION OF OPEN SPACE Open space is defined as land which is not intensively developed for residential, commercial, industrial or institutional use. Open space can be publicly or privately owned. It includes agricultural and forest land, undeveloped coastal and estuarine lands, undeveloped scenic lands, public parks and preserves. It also includes water bodies such as lakes and bays. What land is defined as open space depends in part on its surroundings. A vacant lot or a small marsh can be open space in a big city. A narrow corridor or pathway for walking or bicycling is open space even though it is surrounded by developed areas. And while not strictly open space, this Plan also discusses cultural and historic resources which, along with open space, are part of the heritage of New York State. June 8, 2009 Dear Fellow New Yorker: I am very pleased to approve the 2009 Final New York State Open Space Conservation Plan, which serves as the blueprint for continuing the State of New York’s great open space conservation legacy. This Plan maintains New York’s longstanding tradition of open space conservation that makes our State a wonderful place to live and attractive to businesses, and it is one of the key elements of our economic competitiveness. The Plan has been developed, pursuant to 1990 legislation, through a grassroots process involving local government officials and citizens as members of Regional Advisory Committees, and an extensive public comment process.
    [Show full text]
  • State Park Highlights by Region
    STATE PARK HIGHLIGHTS BY REGION The 359 imperiled animal species, rare plant species, and significant natural community types known in the state park system are distributed across the state according to the availability of habitat, so boreal species, for example, are typically restricted to northerly regions while Midwestern species are mostly in western New York. Despite this patchy distribution, however, the numbers of rare species and natural community types in each region consistently range between about five and 20 (Figure 3). The Long Island and Palisades Regions, however, are dramatically more diverse. While exploring the reasons for the variation in the Long Island and Palisades Regions was beyond the scope of this project, we surmise that several factors may be behind it. First, many of New York’s rare species and unusual natural community types are maritime, and these species and communities are restricted to Long Island. Second, the Long Island and Palisades Regions may capture species and natural community types (such as tiger salamanders – Ambystoma tigrinum) that are reaching the northern extent of their ranges. Third, these regions include several geologically unusual areas, particularly the Long Island moraine and the Shawangunk Ridge, which create uncommon habitats. Finally, the Palisades Region includes several of the state’s largest parks – Harriman, Sterling Forest®, and Minnewaska – and greater area increases the likelihood of having a rare species or significant natural community present. A final factor that may or may not hold up under analysis is that the Long Island and Palisades Regions have undergone some of the most intensive development in the state, which may have given them a disproportionate number of species that were once common but are now rare.
    [Show full text]