SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 SECTION 6 MCRP ‘17 cted works e l irst & Last Name e 2017 F S

Contents

SECTION 1 Bike Share Expansion Studio 1 Public Engagement Photoshopped Reality

SECTION 2 Bike Share System Analysis 6 General Overview System Analysis

SECTION 3 Hazard Mitigation Studio 10 Project Management GIS Technical Work

SECTION 4 Professional Work 14 General Infographics Report and Plans TIGER VII Grant

SECTION 5 IAH Design Competition 19 Affordable Housing Site Plan Planning & Pro Forma

SECTION 1 Bike Share Expansion

The ever growing bike share stations in the inner-ring suburbs movement requires careful of Bexley, Grandview Heights, and monitoring to guarantee success. Upper Arlington. I co-lead the In December 2016, Columbus’ Columbus designated team and CoGo Bike Share system decided helped lead the graphics portion to expand even further in the of the studio effort, creating region with a grant award from infographics and images to the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning show our recommendations and Commission (MORPC). In the results. spring of 2017, I participated in a studio course working with , the private business that operates the CoGo Bike Share system, analyzing the current CoGo network and where to best site the 26 new stations that the region would be receiving.

The stations would be located in Columbus, as well as the first

1 SECTION 1 Station Location Siting and Designing

Photoshopped Reality

Our graphics committee created photoshopped images of the station locations we chose to help illustrate where the station can be sited and how it would look. The two images below are two of 15 total images I photoshopped to demonstrate where and how these new stations would look in a future reality. The photo on the left is at the intersection of Oak Street and South 18th Street and the photo on the right is at the intersection of Summit Street and East 17th Avenue, both in Columbus, OH.

2 SECTION 1 Clintonville (South) University District Neighborhood Area Commissions

Public Engagement Within the Columbus team, our public engagement efforts 5th by Northwest Milo-Grogan primarily included outreach to the local leaders at the Neighborhood Area Commissions. We corresponded and presented at commission meetings to all the neighborhoods located on the left and gathered valuable public input to inform our station location recommendations.

The following two pages show Near East Side Downtown the results of where our studio group decided to place the new stations. Rollout of the new CoGo stations is expected in the spring of 2018.

3 Primary Station Locations SECTION 1

Upper Arlington 1. Kingsdale Shopping Center 2. Tremont Road and Northam Road (Upper Arlington Public Library) 3. The Shops on Lane 4. Mallway Park 5. Northwest Boulevard and North Star Road

Grandview Heights 6. Grandview Library 7. Grandview Avenue and Second Avenue 8. Pierce Field 9. Grandview Yard

Columbus 10. 5th Avenue and Norton Avenue 11. 5th Avenue and Northwest Boulevard 12. Northwest Boulevard and Chambers Road 13. Kenny Road and Woody Hayes Drive 14. High Street and Kelso Road 15. Neil Avenue and Oakland Avenue 16. Summit Street and Maynard Avenue 17. Summit Street and 17th Avenue 18. Cleveland Avenue and 5th Avenue 19. North Bank Park 20. Oak Street and 18th Street 21. Long Street and Taylor Avenue 22. Franklin Park South and Morrison Avenue

Bexley 23. Jeffrey Mansion 24. East Broad Street and Merkle Road 25. Bexley City Hall 26. Main Street Gateway (East Main Street and Chelsea Avenue)

Stations suggested for Relocation (Columbus) 27. Bryden Road and Champion Avenue (moved from Main Street and Champion Avenue) 28. Confluence Park (moved from )

4 Primary Station Locations SECTION 1

N BROADWAY

KENNY

ZOLLINGER 1 Columbus ACKERMAN 14

Upper HUDSON Arlington HIGH 2

3 NORTHSTAR LANE 15 16 TREMONT 13 17TH 4 17 CLEVELAND KINNEAR 5 12 KING

JOYCE 11 10 18 5TH

1ST NEIL 7 3RD 6 Grandview Heights 8 MARYLAND GOODALE 9

23 24 21 BROAD 28 19 Bexley LEGEND 20 22

DREXEL BRYDEN 27 CASSADY BROAD STATIONS MAIN Current 25 26 Relocate COLLEGE

PROPOSED LIVINGSTON Grandview Heights

Upper Arlington WHITTIER Bexley MOUND Columbus

5 Bike Share System Analysis SECTION 2

As part of the research portion of the Bike Share Expansion Studio, each student was tasked with analyzing a different city’s bike share system and how it operates. These case studies were used to inform the studio’s decisions in where to place CoGo Bike Share stations. Metro

The case study system I chose Bike Share to analyze was the Los Angeles Downtown Los Angeles’ Bike Share Metro Bike Share system. This system, primarily located in Downtown Los Angeles, utilized numerous characteristics that influenced where the CoGo Bike Share stations should be sited.

Written by Tyler Bender CRP 6950 - Transportation Studio

6 General Overview Station Map & Quick Facts

Carefully combing through Metro public files and meeting SECTION 2 minutes, I compiled general information to give the reader of the case study report an idea of how L.A.’s system is used. The meeting minutes also indicated future growth, which proved helpful to see how another city is tackling is expansion efforts.

The station map was created using a combination of online map data sources, ArcGIS QUICK FACTS online, and GIS coordinates for the existing Metro Bike Share Contract: $53,792,912 through July 30, 2017 stations. A careful analysis of Passes Sold: 3,724* the station distance and density Total Trips: 133,637* was later performed. Calories Burned: 9,290,091*

Emission Reduced: 318,327* lbs. of CO2

Expansions (station number): Pasadena (34) — Venice (15) — Port of Los Angeles (11)

* Data estimated using ridership data, trip duration, and origin/destination information from Metro as of 3/30/2017 https://bikeshare.metro.net/

7 Trip Origin Map System Analysis Ridership

The two maps to the left were generated using available public SECTION 2 data from Metro’s online portal, Excel data analysis, and ArcGIS online mapping systems. The results depict the popularity of each station for beginning and ending trips. This information was used to help inform why different stations were used more than others for origin and destination trips. Trip Destination Map Creating these maps later influenced the studio group to do the same for the existing CoGo stations and determine which ones were used more than others.

8 System Analysis FARE Pricing Fare Structure

STRUCTURE Walk-Up Likely the most critical A major component and selling point of Metro component of the Metro Bike Share that Metro stressed in the Regional All trips 30 minutes or less are $3.50 SECTION 2 Bike Share Implementation Plan was to integrate $3.50 per 30 minutes after Bike Share system was the fare structure of the system into the existing transit system. Metro achieved this goal and the its integration with the system is fully integrated with the TAP (Transit existing fare structure Access Pass) payment structure used by all Metro Monthly Pass transit services. Metro owns and operates all light for the local public rail, heavy rail, and bus rapid transit systems in $20/month the county, making it easy to incorporate bike transportation. This fare share use into a transit trip. Metro Bike Share was All trips 30 minutes or less are free actually the first large regional bike share program $1.75 per 30 minutes after integration became a in the country to integrate the fare structure like this. As seen in the image below, a customer can key takeaway from all of easily tap their TAP card on the bike dock and the city case studies and wait a few seconds and then take a bike out for Flex Pass a ride. For station financing, Metro stated in the our studio group then implementation plan that they will contribute up $40/year to 50% capital costs and up to 35% operating and All trips 30 minutes or less are $1.75 suggested policy change maintenance costs. The rest is covered by the City $1.75 per 30 minutes after of Los Angeles. to the CoGo Bike Share operator. The system offers three different ways to access the Metro Bike Share and includes a walk-up/ casual option, monthly pass option, and an annual option (titled flex pass). They can all be seen in the pricing graphic to the right with the prices involved with each.

Metro provides discounts to low-income riders that qualify for the Rider Relief Program ran by the transportation authority. Currently for the bike share program, Metro has distributed 40,000 annual pass coupons that waive the $40 fee for these qualified riders. The Rider Relief Program provides monthly coupons to Metro transit riders that meet annual income criteria in addition to the number of person in the household. An example for a qualifying household for a family of four would need to have an annual income of $43,400 or below. Discounts are also offered for Metro’s other transit services to seniors, students, and disabled riders. Outreach to lower-income communities is also performed through a grant provided by the national Better Bike Share Partnership for $100,000.

9 Hazard Mitigation Studio

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) SECTION 3 requires each county across the nation to have a hazard mitigation plan in place, in the event of a natural or man-made disaster hits the area. This plan is also required to be updated every five years.

For this studio planning effort, I collaborated in updating the Perry County Hazard Mitigation Plan in the autumn of 2016. Our studio group worked with the Perry County Emergency Management Agency and the Ohio Emergency Management Agency (OEMA) to accomplish this federally-required plan 1 update.

10 Public Outreach/Meetings

Project Management SECTION 3

The project management team, which in remaining on schedule and on task I was a part of, lead the planning effort with required work elements that needed and designated different roles to different finished by certain times. I collaborated groups. I lead the GIS team effort while with OEMA in reviewing our work and they the three other managers lead document provided valuable guidance to keep our creation, editing, and public outreach. We hazard mitigation planning effort moving helped direct the other studio members forward.

11 Geographic Analysis

As mentioned before, I lead the GIS team effort in creating various maps to depict the hazards that may strike the county. We utilized data from many sources like FEMA, ODNR, Perry County Auditor, Perry County Engineer, and various federal agencies like NOAA. Our work also including using the federal software program HAZUS to analyze the flood potential in the county. After several attempts at running the program, our GIS team attained a Level 1 analysis for the county.

GIS Technical Work SECTION 3

The map above depicts the 100-year floodplains in Perry This map shows the basemap I developed to be used for County using the Flood Insurance Rate Map data. Buildings each hazard map basis. Different boundaries and assets and properties in these regions are highly susceptible to like jurisdictional boundaries, roads, railroads, and airports flood damage and flash floods. are displayed.

12 Federal & State Review

Project Management SECTION 3

Two public meetings were held to gather In the end, the plan was corrected and public input from community leaders improved as best possible and handed over on the hazards they believed were most to the Perry County EMA to finish up the important in their respective communities. remaining small details. The studio was The photo above shows the second of the awarded the Outstanding Studio Award for two while the page before shows the first. the City and Regional Planning section of the Knowlton School.

13 Professional Work

For three years, I interned at the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) in the Office of Statewide Planning & Research. I performed various tasks for the Office SECTION 4 including graphic design, database management, report creation, and federal program management.

I attained a great deal of knowledge on how government planning activities work and how local and regional entities are involved. I interfaced with different planning agencies, like the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), almost daily and assisted in several planning projects.

14 General Infographics Ohio Department of Transportation

One primary task of mine was to create visually pleasing and I compiled other reports like the annual Congestion Mitigatoin data-rich reports that showed the work the Office undertook. In and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program Obligations Report and the the example below, I updated the annual Regional Transportation MPO & Large City Capital Program Summary, both of which Planning Organization (RTPO) flyer to include a easy and are federally required and submitted to the Federal Highway organized narriative and visually pleasing graphics. Administration for review and approval.

Ohio Regional Transportation LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE Planning Organization (RTPO) Program A focus for the RTPO transportation planning programs At the request of the City of Defiance,MVPO is to provide value added products and services for RTPO conducted an origin and destination study member local governments. Examples of some services to assess truck traffic through Downtown OVERVIEW RTPOs are providing their members are as follow: Defiance. The study findings determined that many semi-trucks are entering the City’s Downtown In July 2013, Ohio initiated a Regional Transportation OMEGA staff assisted the Muskingum area from the southeast and travelling north, rather than Planning Organization (RTPO) transportation planning County Engineers Office (MCEO) in northwest as was previously thought. Approximately 55% of program with five existing Ohio planning agencies, covering conducting a Road Safety Audit (RSA) those truck trips are ‘through’ and 45% are ‘destination’. Data 33 nonmetropolitan Ohio counties. Federal transportation for three county roads. OMEGA from the study will provide for a more focused transportation guidance encourages RTPOs to enhance nonmetropolitan coordinated multidisciplinary team of local government study in 2017. (rural) area local governments’ participation in “the officials to review crash data and locations and to identify planning, coordination, and implementation of statewide countermeasures to address roadway safety conditions. Many OVRDC is serving as a the “public sponsor” for strategic long-range transportation plans and transportation low-cost countermeasure improvements were identified, a $728,535 Diesel Emission Reduction Grant improvement programs.” such as signage upgrade (retro-reflectivity and curve (DERG) Program project to repower two Superior warning signs), pavement markings and guardrail. OMEGA The initial focus of the RTPO planning programs was to Marine Ways tug boats operating on the Ohio then worked with the MCEO and ODOT on preparation of River out of South Point, Ohio. The repowered SECTION 4 establish the first ever long range multi-modal transportation the sign order. Upgraded signage was received at no cost to plans for their regions, develop transportation databases, tug boats will have significantly lower operating costs and the MCEO. Guardrail and pavement markings are still being reduced pollutant emissions. and to become knowledgeable about local government coordinated between MCEO and ODOT. transportation funding programs. OMEGA facilitated the development of a school travel plan On January 27, 2016, Ohio Governor John Kasich to enhance bicycle and pedestrian safety for a new school in formally designated each of the five agencies as Regional the Brown Local Schools. After the completion of the plan, Transportation Planning Organizations. OMEGA, with the sponsorship of the Village of Malvern, secured a Safe Routes to School grant for $312,352 which allowed for the addition of sidewalks, signage, and pavement PROGRAM GOALS RTPO 2018-2021 TIPs markings near the school. Beginning in December 2016, Ohio’s RTPOs will be growing Planning conduct transportation planning OMEGA also assisted the City of New Philadelphia in programs in Ohio’s rural regions their transportation planning programs by initiating securing $237,000 in ODOT Safety funding to finance Example of a Safe DERG Superior Marine project on the Ohio River development of SFY 2018 – 2021 Regional Transportation intersection and corridor improvements along High Avenue Routes to School position rural communities to compete Funding Improvement Programs (RTIPs) for their regions. The (SR 39) in the city. sidewalk project for transportation funding opportunities RTIPs will record all federal and state funded transportation provide a forum for rural local improvement projects scheduled for implementation in TIMELINE Collaboration elected officials to engage in ODOT the SFYs 2018 – 2021 time period. The RTPOs will engage statewide planning processes their local government members and the general public in a proactive review of the program of projects scheduled for December 2016 July 1, 2013 RTPOs initiate development PROGRAM EXPANSION implementation. A key component of the review process ODOT established January 27, 2016 will be to compare the projects’ consistency with the RTPO of SFY 2018–2021 Regional RTPO Pilot Program Governor Kasich Transportation Improvement transportation plans. Recognizing the value and potential of the RTPO planning creating transportation formally designated Programs (RTIPs) process, the Central Ohio region established Ohio’s sixth planning organizations five agencies as RTPOs RTPO governing committees will have a formal approval RTPO. The Central Ohio Rural Planning Organization in Ohio’s rural regions. March 27–April 7, 2017 action on the RTIPs in 2017. The resulting projects will (CORPO) will be housed and staffed through the Mid-Ohio RTIP public involvment be incorporated directly into the SFY 2018 – 2021 State Regional Planning Commission (MORPC). See the map Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The STIP above for CORPO’s planning geograpy. will be effective July 1, 2017. 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 MORPC Executive Director, William Murdock, conveyed his excitement about establishing Ohio’s newest RTPO as follows: RTPO PROGRAM CONTACT “As you know, CORPO is a groundbreaking transportation Summer 2015 October 1, 2016 July 1, 2017 (STIP Effective) partnership that brings new transportation planning resources Dave Moore RTPOs completed CORPO established RTPO governing committees to these seven Central Ohio counties and engages MORPC 614-466-0754 first long-range as first expansion of formally approve the RTIPs and staff support and expertise to move it forward.” [email protected] transportation plans the RTPO program projects incorporated directly for respective regions into the SFY 2018–2021 STIP

15 Ohio’s Freight Plan Infographic

Other graphic work I Map Infographic created includes the infographic to the left OHIO TURNPIKE used to market the Ohio This 241-mile toll road offers one of the safest, heaviest travelled and efficient routes for OHIO’S FREIGHT NETWORK Freight Plan. This plan, freight traffic to reach destinations in TRANSPORT Ohio’s Freight Network is made up of Ohio’s most utilized and valuable freight transportation Northern Ohio. The turnpike also OHIO provides a connection from Chicago to assets, supporting Ohio’s economic growth and stability. Lake Erie recently completed eastern U.S. ports. Port of Toledo Ohio Turnpike M-90 20 90 PORT OF CLEVELAND Port of Cleveland by ODOT, outlines the 11 The Port of Cleveland plays a key role in U.S. shipping to Europe 90 TOLEDO2 with scheduled container ship service along the Great Lakes/St. CLEVELAND Lawrence Seaway system. In 2013, The port handled 3.4 million tons of cargo and services major automakers like Ford and GM. current state of freight

24 23 422 75 operations in Ohio and North Baltimore Ohio Turnpike 80 Intermodal SECTION 4 20 8 YOUNGSTOWN 250 how to properly manage 76 PORT OF TOLEDO AKRON 71 The Port of Toledo is a multi-modal transportation hub playing Interstate 75 15 its growth. a major role in economic development in Northwest Ohio. One 68 21 62 of the largest ports on the Great Lakes, it handles over 12 million 30 tons of cargo and 700 vessel calls each year. 30 Marion 250 CANTON 33 Intermodal WELLSVILLE Wellsville Port The Wellsville Intermodal Facility along the Ohio Another office at 23 7 River includes highway, rail and maritime access with a 60-ton bridge crane to help facilitate freight 31 77 movement through Eastern Ohio. The port serves ODOT saw the value in the shale gas and oil industry predominately. 33 250 127 36 infographics liks this and 68 16 75 NORTH BALTIMORE 42 49 tasked myself to alter it The North Baltimore Intermodal Facility is one of the premier freight facilities in the Midwest. Employing nearly 300 people, 70 the facility manages more than 30 unit trains a day and moves to show the state’s bike approximately 2 million containers and trailers per year. 70 DAYTON COLUMBUS 71 route system and bike 35 Rickenbacker 77 MARION Intermodal 33

M-70 facilities. The Bike Ohio INTERMODAL 4 Interstate 75 The Marion Intermodal facility is one of Ohio’s critical links to the western U.S. with daily service to infographic has been Kansas City. The 183 acre facility provides valuable 50 distributing and warehousing services. 74 23 RICKENBACKER AIRPORT AND INTERMODAL used to market the effort INTERSTATE 75 Rickenbacker features a dedicated cargo airport with direct flights Brent 32 Known as “auto alley”, I-75 is a vital north-south roadway in the Spence CINCINNATI to Asia. Direct rail connection from Chicago to Norfolk, Virginia, to officially designate eastern U.S., and plays a key role in the transport of automotive Bridge one of the busiest deep water ports in the US, via the Heartland commodities. The interstate carries 12,000+ trucks a day with 35 LEGEND Corridor passes through this crucial intermodal facility. sections of the road carrying up to 16,000+ trucks a day. M-70 the U.S. and State Bike Routes. The Brent Spence Bridge carries South Point Interstates 71 and 75 between SOUTH POINT Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky. BRENT The Port of South Point recently opened for business Labeled as a nationally significant and now boasts road, rail, and river access for shipping bridge, it is one of the busiest truck SPENCE goods through southern Ohio and the nation. routes in the country, carrying over $400 billion in freight each year. BRIDGE

16 ODOT’s Planning Program Entertaining + Public Involvement Process Enlightening.

Reports and Plans

Various plans and process the Statewide Transporation documents needed updating in Improvement Program (STIP) and my time at ODOT, so I tasked Access Ohio. myselft to create an organized and easy to digest layout The plans have gone forward

for these documents. Using to be used by the Office for SECTION 4 pictures from the Office of promotional use. Communications and narrative collaboratively edited by the The Ohio Department of Transportation Statewide Planning staff, I Rural Consultation Process updated the documents to the left and made them available online.

These documents have been used to inform the RTPOs and

other concerned citizens about The Ohio Department of Transportation the pubic input process for Rural Consultation Process ODOT planning products like

September 2014

17 Grant Writing & Design USDOT TIGER VII Grant

In the seventh round of the U.S. The highly competitve grant Department of Transportation program required stringent & (USDOT) discretionary grant narrative guidelines to follow and program, Transportation the application I designed worked Innovation Generating Economic within these guidelines to create a Recover (TIGER), ODOT submitted winning application. three applications. On the one I collaborated on, I designed the application and assisted in editing TIGER VII Discretionary the final narrative. Grant Application A few months after submission, Transit Tech Ohio was selected to receive $6.8 million in TIGER VII funding. Transit Tech Ohio SECTION 4 T 2O

18 IAH Design Competition

The need for affordable housing in American cities is more important now than ever. Designing housing that is both appealing, affordable, and innovative can often be a tough objective. Through the Innovation in Affordable Housing (IAH) student design and planning competition, graduate student teams get to display their talents SECTION 5 at accomplishing this task.

In the 2017 edition of the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) competition, the site selected for real world problem solving was in Cleveland, OH.

19 Affordable Housing Site Plan

Teams were tasked with redesigning a portion of the Woodhill Homes affordable Visioning housing complex, specifically Village C, in south-central Village C Cleveland. I contributed to my 5 team by providing planning and site design skills. In the 6 Sustainability Holistic Connectivity 1 end, the image to the right Health displays our proposal for 1

Stair improving the layout and 875 SF2 BD

875 SF2 BD 1111 SF3 BD design of Village C. 3 1 875 SF2/3 BD 982 SF3 BD 2

675 SF1/2 BD

825 SF2/3 BD

The development included 875 SF2/3 BD 1 Townhouses with 7 825 SF2/3 BD two-story townhouses, Solar Panels 1 Stair Apartments with three-story apartments, 2 875 SF2/3 BD Rooftop Gardens 1 Stair

825 SF2/3 BD green space, rooftop gardens 875 SF2/3 BD 3 Bioswale Park 2 825 SF2/3 BD and a playground all meant Stair 1000 SF3 BD 4 Playground 4 to improve the lives of the SECTION 5 7 875 SF2/3 BD Stair

675 SF1/2 BD 825 SF2/3 BD tenants in Woodhill Homes. 5 Pedestrian Bridge 875 SF2/3 BD

Stair Housing structures were also 1000 SF3 BD 2 825 SF2/3 BD

6 Car Share Parking 1000 SF3 BD designed to face south in 7 Community Space/ order to take full advantage of Bike Racks natrual light and heating from the sun.

20 Woodhill Homes‐‐Village C Financials Team 22

Project Information Proposed Uses Project Utilities Address: 10810 Mt. Carmel Rd. (center of site) Townhome Units: 36 units Water: Owner City, State, Zip: Cleveland, OH 44104 Apartments: 63 Units Trash: Owner Census Track: 1193.00 Parking Spaces: 86 spaces Heat & Hot Water: Owner (apartments)/Tenant (townhouses) Site Area: 3.48 Acres; 151,939 sf Total Developed Sf: 130,992 Electric: Tenant Construction Type: New Construction Building Count (BIN's): 8 Buildings Population: Family Total Paved Area: 46,525 sf Total Green Space: 7,200 sf

Rents Receivable and Cashflow Affordable to Total Acheivable Rent Minimum Tenant Rent Tenanant Utility Gross Monthly Units Bedrooms Bathrooms Square Footage Rental Subsidy what AMI? (FMR) (TTP) Allowance Receivable Rents 3 1 1 675 30% $614 $116 $30 $498 $1,580 3 1 1 675 40% $614 $220 $30 $394 $1,372 5 2 1 825 30% $773 $133 $41 $640 $3,292 18 2 1 875 50% $773 $220 $41 $553 $10,133 19 2 1 875 60% $773 $331 $41 $442 $8,688 Cash‐Flow Assumptions 3 3 2 1000 30% $1,017 $167 $51 $850 $2,666 First Year Vacancy: 15.00% 6 3 2 1000 40% $1,017 $220 $51 $797 $4,951 Avg. Vacancy: 7.00% 3 3 2 1111 50% $1,017 $248 $51 $769 $2,504 Vacancy Expense: $9,672.75 3 3 2 1111 60% $1,017 $331 $51 $686 $2,338 Compliance Period: Minimum of 15 years 2 3 2 1821 30% $1,017 $167 $109 $850 $1,758 10 3 2 1821 50% $1,017 $248 $109 $769 $7,829 20 3 2 1821 60% $1,017 $331 $109 $686 $13,942 2 4 2 1821 50% $1,073 $275 $127 $798 $1,744 2 4 2 1821 60% $1,073 $331 $127 $742 $1,688 Totals: 99 247 $64,485.00

Planning & Pro Forma Financial Analysis A major component of the displays a portion of the final pro the proposal include defining competition included making forma my team developed and assumptions, allocating funding SECTION 5 sure the development was different design decisions we to needed development sections, financially feasible. My team made in regards to the housing and identifying new sources for utilized data from various unit layout. funding our team’s proposal. sources including nonprofits and our team advisor, a professor in My team made the top ten the Knowlton School City and semi-final selection before Regional Planning program. being knocked out in the final four selection. Contributions I The spreadsheet seen above made in the financial portion of

21 First & Last Name Master of City and Regional Planning The Ohio State University Class of 2017