Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

CITY OF TORONTO Technical Services Servicing Toronto Water, Solid Waste Management and Transportation Services

BIENNIAL DETAILED VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE BRIDGE AND CULVERT STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF TORONTO, REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Table of Contents NOTICE TO POTENTIAL PROPONENTS AND ADDRESS LABEL……………………………………..1 CITY OF TORONTO ...... 2

SECTION 1 - TERMINOLOGY ...... 4 1.1 REFERENCES TO LABELED PROVISIONS ...... 4 1.2 DEFINITIONS ...... 4 1.3 PROPOSAL PROCESS ...... 4 SECTION 2 - OVERVIEW ...... 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION ...... 6 2.2 CITY REFERENCE DOCUMENTS AND STANDARDSCOPY ...... 6 SECTION 3 - SCOPE OF WORK ...... 7 3.1 BACKGROUND ...... 7 3.2 SCOPE OF WORK OVERVIEW ...... 8 3.3 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ...... 16 3.4 SUMMARY OF PROJECT SUBMISSIONS ...... 17 3.5 CITY DEFINED ALTERNATIVES ...... SUBMIT 17 SECTION 4 - CITY OF TORONTO’S RESPONSIBILITIES ...... 17 4.1 GENERAL ...... 17 4.2 CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ...... 18 SECTION 5 - PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION ...... 19 5.1 SELECTION COMMITTEE ...... 19 5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA ...... 19 5.3 MANDATORY EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS ...... 19 5.4 SELECTION PROCESS ...... 20 5.5 CLARIFICATIONS ...... 21 5.6 INTERVIEW ...... NOT ...... 21 5.7 EVALUATION RESULTS ...... 21 5.8 NEGOTIATIONS AND AGREEMENT ...... 21 VIEWING5.9 CONSULTING AGREEMENTS/PURCHASE ORDERS ...... 22 5.10 NOTIFICATION ...... 22 SECTION 6 - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION ...... 23 6.1 SUBMISSION OVERVIEW ...... 23 6.2 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION AND DELIVERY ...... 23 6.3 TECHNICALDO PROPOSAL CONTENT ...... 24 SECTION 7 - COST OF SERVICES ...... 28 7.1 COST OF SERVICES DOCUMENTATION AND DELIVERY ...... 28

2 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

7.2 COST OF SERVICES SUBMISSION CONTENT - GENERAL ...... 28 7.3 BASE SCOPE OF WORK AND PROVISIONAL ITEMS ...... 29 UPSET LIMIT COST BREAKDOWN FOR: ...... 30

STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS BIENNIAL DETAILED VISUAL INSPECTION OF BRIDGE AND CULVERT STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF TORONTO...... 30 7.4 PAYMENTS FROM COST OF SERVICES PROPOSAL ...... 31 7.5 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE ...... 31 7.6 CURRENCY ...... 31 7.7 TAXES………………………………………………………………………………………………..31 APPENDIX A- TECHNICAL SERVICES: GUIDELINES FOR STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS PROJECTS ...... 33 APPENDIX B- RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS ...... 49 APPENDIX C- SUBMISSION FORMS ...... 59 APPENDIX D- SPECIMEN CONTRACT AGREEMENT, INCLUDING INSURANCE FORMS ...... 66 APPENDIX E - PROPOSAL EVALUATION TABLE ...... 93 APPENDIX F - BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (OBMS) INPUT SCREENS………………….94 APPENDIX G - QUALITY CONTROL (QC) PLAN ...... 114 APPENDIX H - SAMPLE OF STANTEC'S SOFTWARE LICENCE AGREEMENT ...... 115 APPENDIX I - SUMMARY ACTION REPORT, SAMPLE ...... 120 APPENDIX J - SAMPLE SCHEDULE ...... 122 APPENDIX K – LIST OF STRUCTURES……………………………………………………………...125COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

3 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SECTION 1 - TERMINOLOGY 1.1 REFERENCES TO LABELED PROVISIONS Each reference in this Request for Proposal to a numbered or lettered “section”, ”subsection“, “paragraph, “subparagraph”, “clause” or “subclause” shall, unless otherwise expressly indicated, be taken as a reference to the correspondingly labeled provision of this Request for Proposal (RFP). 1.2 DEFINITIONS Throughout this Request for Proposal, unless inconsistent with the subject matter or context, .1 “Agreement” means any written contract between the City and a Proponent, or any Purchase Order issued by the City to the Vendor, with respect to any Services contemplated by this RFP, and shall be deemed to include the terms and conditions for the provision of Services as set out in this RFP. .2 “City” means the City of Toronto. .3 “Council” means City Council. .4 “Must”, “shall” and “will” used in this RFP denote imperative (mandatory). .5 “May” and “should” used in this RFP denote permissive (not mandatory). .6 “MFIPPA” means the Municipal Freedom of InformationCOPY and Protection of Privacy Act. .7 “Preferred Proponent” means the Proponent whose Proposal, as determined by City staff through the evaluation analysis described in the RFP, provides the best overall value in meeting the City’s requirements, and may be recommended for award .8 “Project Manager” means main contact person at the City for all matters relating to the project. Manager of a team of City staff assigned to the project. SUBMIT .9 “Proponent” means a legal entity, being a person, partnership or firm that submits a Proposal in response to a formal Request for Proposal. .10 “Proposal” means a bid submitted by a Proponent in response to a formal Request for Proposals (RFP), which includes all of the documentation necessary to satisfy the submission requirements of the RFP. .11 “RFP” means this Request for Proposal package in its entirety, inclusive of all Appendices and any bulletins or Addenda that may be issued by the City. .12 “Services” means all services and deliverables to be provided by a Vendor as described in this RFP. NOT .13 “Solution” means a set of goods and services meeting the City’s requirements, as set out in this VIEWINGRFP. .14 “Vendor” means the successful Proponent with whom the City enters into an Agreement. .15 "Check Out" means creating a local working file and locking out the section of the master file to make changes. .16 "Check In"DO means writing local working files to master file and unlocking sections of the master file. 1.3 PROPOSAL PROCESS

4 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

.1 The process is governed by Appendix “B”.

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

5 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SECTION 2 - OVERVIEW 2.1 INTRODUCTION .1 To meet the requirements of Ontario Regulations the City of Toronto (City) requires the provision of engineering services to conduct Biennial Detail Visual Inspections of the City’s bridge & culvert structures and entering of collected data into the City's BMS program. This assignment is to encompass three (3) biennial inspection cycles and as such will span 6 years. The first cycle of bridge inspections is to begin in 2013. .2 The Award is subject to obtaining appropriate funding approval.

2.2 CITY REFERENCE DOCUMENTS AND STANDARDS The following documents are part of the RFP and will be presented in electronic format on DVD's accompanying the RFP document. The DVD's shall be picked up at 19st Floor West Tower City Hall from Ms. Joan Blake or Ms. Silvia Perera. .1 Digital copy of General Arrangement Drawing for each Bridge structure, as available. .2 List of Structures providing bridge details, such as construction date, rehabilitation date, ownership percentage, as well as drawings availability. .3 Toronto map showing the general location for eachCOPY bridge.

".PDF" files of all available bridge drawings will be supplied on a DVD's to the successful proponent. If the proponent requires viewing additional drawings to prepare their submission, they will be given access to one of the City's computer at 310 Front Street West, Suite 815. In order to arrange a viewing please contact Ms. Linda Bruno of the Technical Services, Design and Construction Linear Infrastructure – Structures & ExpresswaysSUBMIT at (416) 392-8313. Alternatively you may contact Chris Loader at (416) 392-8331.

NOT VIEWING

DO

6 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SECTION 3 - SCOPE OF WORK 3.1 BACKGROUND This assignment is to provide Engineering Services for inspection and data collection for bridge and culvert structures in each of the City's four (4) districts (Etobicoke York, Toronto & East York, North York, and Scarborough) as well as the elevated portion of the F.G. Gardiner Expressway and entry of inspection data into the City of Toronto's Bridge Management System (BMS). As part of an ongoing City assignment, detailed visual inspections were conducted for all bridge and culvert structures in 2012. Also through this existing assignment, the City's BMS database is being populated with the collected data, and is to be completed by spring 2013. To ensure compliance with Ontario Regulations the City will, through the assignment outlined in this RFP, inspect half of the bridge structures in 2013, and the remaining structures in 2014. The inspection cycle is to be repeated in 2015 & 2016, as well as in 2017 & 2018. The database compiled through the existing assignment will be provided to the successful proponent of this assignment.

The Bridge Management Software used by the City is BMS 2010, developed and distributed by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec). The City's BMS is based on the MTO's Ontario Bridge Management System (OBMS), which is also developedCOPY by Stantec. It has similar functionality and layout to the OBMS. Use of the new system will allow direct transfer of skills for anyone familiar with OBMS. This software will be used for the duration of the assignment. Stantec's involvement with this assignment and with the successful proponent is described below:

1. Stantec will provide the successful proponent with a limited web based version of the BMS 2010 software, compatible with Windows XP operating system, the appropriate subset of the City's bridge database, maintenance andSUBMIT support for the program, as well as a one day training session of the software at a City facility for the employees designated to work on this assignment. The proponent shall be responsible for procuring this software from Stantec. $5,000.00 shall be included in the cost table of the proposal to facilitate the consultant's purchase of the license and maintenance for the web based BMS program. Additional licenses can be purchased from Stantec at a cost of $2,500.00 for the 2nd license, and $2,000.00 each for the subsequent 3rd, 4th, or 5th licenses. 2. The proponent must execute a Software License agreement with Stantec (sample attached in Appendix H). 3. The proponent will be required to submit the first (10) ten completed inspections reports to the City for review. TheNOT City shall verify the ten submitted reports for accuracy of the data in accordance with the terms of this RFP. The purpose of this initial verification is to ensure that the proponent is populating the database correctly before proceeding with the VIEWINGremainder of the assignment. For the remainder of the assignment, the City will continue to verify the accuracy and consistency of the reports. It will be the proponent's responsibility to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the submitted data before being submitted to the City. Any reports not meeting the standards of the RFP will be returned to the proponent to adjust. The City maintains the right to, at its discretion, use Stantec'sDO services to review the submitted inspections to ensure uniformity of the data collected, and accuracy of the data entered into the program. Once the reports are accepted, they will be "checked in" to the City's BMS database by Stantec. 4. Stantec may or may not participate as a proponent for this assignment.

7 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

3.2 SCOPE OF WORK OVERVIEW .1 OVERVIEW The assignment for the Bridge Engineering Services of multiyear inspection and data collection of all rail, road and pedestrian bridges, culverts, and the entire elevated portion of the F.G. Gardiner, shall include the followings: a) Conduct Biennial visual inspections on each structure in accordance with OSIM 2008 b) Obtain permission to access areas within the right of way from all stakeholders including as TTC, CNR, CPR, TTR, etc. and secure the needed flag-person/watchman as required by each party. Due to scheduling constraints it is advised that the successful proponent request permission to access third party right of ways upon award of assignment. c) Compare and verify element and structure data from the BMS database with observations made in the field. In field measurement of elements may be required to verify data. d) Enter field observation and inspected condition quantities into the BMS. e) Develop and conduct a quality control/assurance system to ensure accuracy of inputted data. f) Provide standard typical photos of each COPYstructure and enter into the BMS Document Screen. This assignment is to encompass three (3) biennial inspection cycles and as such will span 6 years. Inspections to be completed in years 2013 shall form inspection Cycle A, and shall be repeated in 2015, & 2017. Inspections to be completed in years 2014shall form inspection Cycle B, and shall be repeated in 2016, & 2018. Each biennial inspection cycle shall include the inspection and entry of data for all bridge and culvert structures. A breakdown of structures to be inspected and the year in which they are to be inspected is includedSUBMIT in appendix K. For the purposes of reporting, the elevated portion of the F.G. Gardiner expressway has been sub-divided into 310 separate structures of one span each (with the exception of structure 280, and 281 which are three, and two spans respectively), 12 separate structures of on/off ramps, and 1 structure for each of the Lakeshore Blvd. over Spadina bridge, DVP on ramp to west bound Gardiner bridge, and Gardiner east bound ramp to Don Valley Parkway bridge. The inspection of the F.G. Gardiner shall be completed as part of inspection Cycle B. .2 DETAILS 1) The inspection procedure, including the amount and type of data to be collected and recorded, shall be in accordance with the requirements of the BMS and the OSIM 2008. All information gathered shall be entered intoNOT the BMS database. a. The successful proponent shall enter all the data into the appropriate BMS Input Screens VIEWINGfor each structure inspected. The assignment also includes the requirement to compare and verify the information existing in the database with observations in the field. The Successful Proponent shall note and record any discrepancies and update the BMS data accordingly. To adequately complete this task some field measuring may be required. b. The BMSDO database will be provided to the successful proponent by June 1, 2013. 2) A list of the structures to be inspected as part of this assignment and all available GA drawings for the structures are provided as reference documents for the RFP. A set of all available drawings, including rehabilitation drawings as applicable, for each structure will be provided to the successful proponent. The proponent is advised that the digital structural drawings which

8 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

will be provided may require some sorting efforts. Drawings under a specific site number may include drawings of other bridges/culverts or drawings that are obsolete. It is the proponent's responsibility to extract data from the correct drawings and to confirm information through field investigation. 3) For the bridge structures in the North York Districts and for culverts in all districts the BMS database provided to the successful proponent is not be populated. The successful proponent shall review the drawings provided extracting general structure data, identify the elements that make up the structure, and extract data on those elements. This includes identifying and recording the types of element(s), dimensions (length, width, height, and area) and other relevant information required by the BMS and described in the revised OSIM. Where drawings are not available as indicated in the table "List of Structures”, the Successful Proponent shall obtain quantities by conducting field measurements of the general structure and the specific elements and enter the data in BMS. The proponent shall enter all the data into each of the BMS Input Screens for each structure to be inspected. The assignment also includes the requirement to compare and verify the information obtained from drawings with observations in the field. The Successful Proponent shall note and record any discrepancies and update the BMS data accordingly. The Successful Proponent shall update the information in the Roadways, Watercourse, and Appraisal Indices Section of the BMS software (see Appendix F). The fields of the Appraisal Indices Section are to be populated for the Load Capacity, Barrier, Fatigue, Seismic, Scour and Flood tabs as indicated in Appendix F - BMS Input Screens of this RFP. Data for these fields shall be based on information found in the drawings provided and the judgment of the proponent's engineer. 4) For Etobicoke, Toronto & East York, Scarborough,COPY as well as the elevated portion of the F.G Gardiner expressway the database has previously been populated with element and appraisal data. The provided data for these structures need only be verified by the successful proponent through review of provided drawings, field observations, and measurement. 5) The assignment includes the requirement to compare and verify the information on the BMS forms with observations in the field. The proponent shall note and record any such discrepancies and update the BMS structure file accordingly. Where drawings are not available, the proponent shall conduct field measurementsSUBMIT of the general structure and the specific elements and enter the data in BMS 6) The Successful Proponent shall maintain timesheet logs for all field activities indicating bridge location, date, staff name, duration of work at each site, tasks completed, and equipment used. Logs shall be signed by the employees identified therein. 7) The Successful Proponent shall develop and adhered to a schedule outlining specific dates bridges are to be inspected. Dates for use of Bridgemaster, railway flagging, confined space entry, or traffic control as applicable shall also be provided in this schedule. The successful proponent is to provide weekly updates of the schedule to the City's Project Manager. Missed inspection dates shall be recorded in the schedule with explanation given and re-schedule dates provided. A sample scheduleNOT is provided in appendix J 8) The Successful Proponent is responsible to provide all necessary equipment, materials and labour to do the work. The Successful Proponent shall have available the inspection VIEWINGequipment specified in Part 2 Section 1.4 of OSIM. 9) Close-up visual assessments of elements, as defined in Part 1 section 1.3 of OSIM, shall be conducted for all bridge elements. The use of special equipment and devices may be required to reach and inspect structure elements with difficult access. For elements that cannot be accessed/inspected in a conventional manner the Proponent is to utilize, at their own expense, special DOaccess equipment (ladders, boat, scissor lifts, BridgeMaster, etc.). Inspectors must gain a view of the element as to be satisfied and confident in their assessment of the condition of the element. At a minimum all elements shall be inspected from a maximum distance as defined in the document, “Bridge Inspection Accessibility Guidelines, March 2010”.

9 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

10) The proponent shall include in their proposal a summary of all bridges they anticipate the use of specialized equipment will be needed, along with a synopsis of what specialized equipment is to be used and to inspect which elements. For sites where the proponent deems the use of specialized equipment necessary for inspection, the use of the equipment should be limited to areas that are inaccessible from the ground.

a. Further, the Successful Proponent shall make arrangements and schedule the use of the Bridge-master or equivalent as needed, for the bridges where this machine will be required for access. The Proponent shall make arrangements and schedule the necessary traffic protection for use of the access equipment. b. For the purpose of bidding on this assignment the bidder shall assume the use of enhanced access equipment/bridge master of 30 days/year. The upset limit cost shall be provided in item 4 of the upset limit cost breakdown table in section 7 – Cost of services. The quotation is to include the cost for the use of Bridge Master or other enhanced access equipment, as well any associated traffic controls (including flagging). Payment, including cost plus markup as outlined in section 7.4.3, shall be made based on the invoices submitted for use of enhanced access equipment/bridge master. The proponent shall indicate which structures they believe require the enhanced access equipment/bridge master in their proposal. Item 2 – "Traffic Control, Flagging" of the upset limit cost breakdown table in section 7 – Cost of services shall include all traffic control measures, including flagging, not associated with the use of a Bridge Master or other enhanced access equipment. 11) To inspect bearing elements of the elevated portionCOPY of the F.G Gardiner expressway the successful proponent shall utilize specialized access equipment (ladders, scissor lift, bucket truck, BridgeMaster) to attain a clear view of the element. 12) Every reasonable effort shall be made to adequately inspect all elements of the structure. Should, in the opinion of the proponent, an element be inaccessible for inspection, then the proponent shall notify the city prior to completing the inspection. 13) The Proponent shall make arrangements and schedule the necessary traffic controls as required for inspections. The Proponent shall include theSUBMIT costs of all traffic controls in a lump sum amount ("Upset Limit"), for this RFP. 14) At some sites, observations from the ground together with the use of visual enhancement equipment, such as binoculars, may be adequate for inspection of elements. Where defects and deterioration are suspected in inaccessible elements the information shall be recorded on the inspection forms, as well as on a separate list indicating the suspected defect and the description and location of the elements. This list shall be presented to the City in addition to the BMS data input. 15) Field inspections are to be carried out so as to minimize the impact on the flow of traffic. The proponent is to co-ordinate any lane closures through the City's Project Manger and Work Zone Coordinator. The proponentNOT shall comply with any requirements for separation from other construction contracts in the vicinity. The Proponent shall carry out the field inspections in a manner so as not to damage any utilities or property. Any damaged property shall be VIEWINGreported immediately to the City. 16) Scheduled closures of the F.G. Gardiner and Don Valley Parkway for maintenance and special repairs occur periodically throughout the year. Scheduled closure dates for expressways can be found at the following website (http://www.toronto.ca/transportation/road_info/index.htm). These closure dates are only tentative and is subject to change, or cancelation. The successfulDO proponent will be permitted to complete components of their assigned inspections during maintenance closures provided their work does not interfere with other scheduled tasks. The use of rolling lane closures to facilitate the inspection of the deck of the F.G. Gardiner and Don Valley Parkway will be entertained by the City

10 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

17) It is the Proponent's responsibility to schedule all activities and manage daily operations. Requests for information and direction of inspection staff must be made or provided directly by the Proponent's Project Manager. 18) Samples of the Data Entry forms are contained in OSIM, Section 7 of Part 2. Samples of the BMS Input Screens are shown in Appendix “F”. These screens are provided to illustrate the scope of inspections required. The actual input screen of the program may differ somewhat from what is provided in Appendix "F". Existing and new information must be checked for errors or omissions through the course of the inspection. c. The List of Bridge Elements to be inspected, and how they are to be quantified (i.e., by area, by length, or by each) shall be as per OSIM 2008, Section 2 of Part 2. The proponent is advised that BMS defines the concrete diaphragm by the quantity “each”, while OSIM requires the quantity to be recorded in square meters. The proponent shall calculate the quantities in m² and provide a note in OBMS indicating the quantity. Also, for this assignment the deck ends, the length of deck soffit ends and the length of girder ends shall be taken as 1m in length. 19) Procedures and methods for computing the surface area of elements are given in OSIM, Section 3 of Part 2. 20) The City’s Project Manager is to be kept informed of the progress of the work on a regular basis. To this end, the City’s Project Manager shall be copied on all pertinent correspondence. The City’s Project Manager shall be advised of significant problems and issues arising, including options considered and solutions adopted. The City’s Project Manager shall be consulted regarding major deviations from standards,COPY specifications, or procedures prior to their implementation, and shall be advised of any foreseeable issues. 21) The Successful Proponent is advised that designated hazardous substances are generally present at City bridge/culvert sites.

.3 SERVICES The Successful Proponent shall submit a Quality Control (QC)SUBMIT Plan specific to this project prior to commencing work. The Quality Control Plan shall include, but not limited to, the requirements set out in Appendix “G”. The Successful Proponent will be required to provide the following services: 1) Prior to the commencement of the field work, the Successful Proponent shall familiarize himself with all the reference documents provided, including the location of the structure sites and other relevant site conditions which may impact on the planning and carrying out of the inspection work in the field. The Successful Proponent shall also review existing data in the database and previous OSIM inspections to familiarize themselves with the structure and existing condition. NOT 2) As part of the field inspection the Successful Proponent shall;

VIEWINGa. Conduct a detailed visual inspection in accordance with the requirements of OSIM 2008 b. Compare and verify all element and structure data from the BMS data entry forms with observations made in the field. In field measurement of elements may be required to verify data.

c. NoteDO any discrepancies and make appropriate revisions on the data entry forms.

d. Subsequently enter corrected data into the BMS structure files accordingly.

11 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

e. The Successful Proponent shall take a sufficient number of photographs to clearly identify the structure and the condition of all elements of the structure. A digital camera with zoom and flash features shall be used to take all photographs. Digital photographs shall show the date (month-day-year) when they were taken.

3) Photographs shall be taken of the following:

For bridges a. One photograph shall be taken which clearly shows the deck cross-section and features such as number of traffic lanes, curbs and sidewalks, medians and railing system. Note: This photograph is normally taken from the approach roadway looking along the length of the bridge.

b. One photograph shall be taken of the elevation of the structure and which clearly shows the number of spans and superstructure type.

c. Photographs shall be taken of the underside (soffit) which shows the type and number of main superstructure element(s).

d. One photograph shall be taken of each expansion joint, taken along the length of the joint.

e. Photographs shall be taken to clearly show the substructure. COPY f. One photo shall be taken of all low clearance signs, and weight restriction signs.

g. One photo shall be taken of the bridge plaque.

h. Photographs will typically show every bridge element and the defects observed at the element.

i. All digital photographs shall be captioned to identifySUBMIT the element type and location.

For Culverts:

a. Features of the roadway, including road surface, guide rails, upstream and downstream views

b. Inlet and outlet of the culvert (elevations)

c. Views of the interior of the barrel NOT d. Significant or typical defects at construction joints VIEWING e. Two photos looking thru the culvert from the road centreline - one in each direction

f. Typical and significant deteriorated areas.

4) The SuccessfulDO Proponent shall immediately inform the City's Project Manager of any critical defects or deficiencies, such as fatigue cracks in steel girders, or loose concrete considered a hazard to traffic and/or pedestrians, as well as any unsafe conditions which are discovered in the field.

12 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

5) Enter the results of the inspections into the City’s BMS database. The Successful Proponent shall not destroy any original inspection forms completed in the field until instructed to do so by the City.

6) The successful proponent is responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the data collected and entered as part of this assignment. The proponent will be required to correct errors and omissions to the satisfaction of the City.

7) The Successful Proponent is responsible for the development and implementation of a Safety plan to ensure worker safety, and safety to the public. The requirements for the safety and protection of workers in the field, including protective clothing, traffic control and protection devices, and all other measures required to ensure safe operations, is the responsibility of the proponent.

8) The Successful Proponent shall provide traffic control and protection, as required for site work, in accordance with City of Toronto / Ministry of Transportation requirements as outlined of 3.2.4 Traffic Control. The associated costs of such traffic control are the responsibility of the proponent. All field inspections shall be carried out in accordance with the Occupational Health and Safety Plan to be developed by the proponent. All traffic signage shall be in accordance with City of Toronto / Ministry of Transportation requirements as outlined of 3.2.4 Traffic Control.

9) For box girder type bridges, of either steel or concreteCOPY construction, and of vertical depth of 1.2 meters or greater:

- The Successful Proponent shall include complete element and inspection data entry for all inside box girders as described in OSIM/OBMS.

- The Successful Proponent shall conduct a detailed visual inspection of the inside of the box girders including the concrete soffit. Special attention shall be given to fatigue prone details. The Successful Proponent shall submit a brief report for SUBMITeach box girder bridge outlining the condition and all observations such as fatigue cracks, deterioration, debris, drain blockage, evidence of deck leakage, soffit condition, etc.

- The Successful Proponent's shall advise the City’s Project Manager of the approximate dates for the inspection of the box girders. Access into the box girder hatches shall be the Successful Proponent responsibility and shall meet the requirements of OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT. The Successful Proponent shall notify the City's Project Manager upon completion of the inspection.

- The access hatch locations of the box girder bridges are shown on the drawings supplied by the City. It is the SuccessfulNOT Proponent responsibility to verify the locations and provide any required traffic control and protection to gain access to the hatch in accordance with City of Toronto / Ministry of Transportation requirements as outlined of 3.2.4 Traffic Control. VIEWING - The Successful Proponent shall provide digital photographs showing the inside condition of the box girders. Individual photographs shall be taken of all areas in poor condition state. The type, location and extent of the defects and deterioration shall be clearly depicted.

.4 DELIVERABLESDO Yearly, upon completion of each year's inspections and subsequent data entry, the successful proponent shall provide;

13 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

1) An electronic copy, on CD, of the database files containing all input inventory information (according to Section 3.2.1) and inspection information collected in the field. In addition the successful proponent shall provide a scanned copy of the finalized OSIM report for each bridge and culvert. 2) One (1) draft BMS generated inspection report and one draft excel format inspection report for each structure inspected for review. 3) Three (3) finalized BMS generated inspection reports including three hard copies in BMS excel format inspection report. The reports shall be printed double sided, on standard 8.5"x11” paper for the BMS generated report and 11”x17” paper for the excel format reports. Copies of all photographs, appropriately labeled, taken for the site shall be included in the BMS generated Inspection reports. All photographs must be printed using a color laser printer. There shall be a separate report produced, bound and stapled, for each structure site. The Inspection Report shall identify the condition states of the elements, performance deficiencies, required maintenance, and recommendations for repairs and rehabilitation. 4) The Successful Proponent shall produce a Summary Action Report, in Microsoft Excel format, which shall include recommendations for other inspections, investigations and surveys to be carried out. The Summary Action Report shall also identify the required maintenance to be carried out on the structure, its elements, and surrounding location. The Summary Action Report shall also include recommendations for repair and rehabilitation work required for each element and the time frame within which repairs and rehabilitation should be carried out, as well as a general statement on the overall condition of the structure. A sample of the required Summary Action Report can be found in Appendix I. The Successful Proponent shall provide three (3) hard copies and two electronic copies onCOPY CD of the Summary Action Report. 5) Seperately, a list with recommendations for maintenance for all the bridges inspected to the respective dates shall be provided. 6) The Successful Proponent shall provide one (1) colour digital copy of all photographs in “jpg” format (compatible with the viewing software in the BMS), resolution from 1024x768 to 1280x1024, so that the file size is less than 500 kb, DVD (’s) or USB. Digital photos for each structure shall be stored in sub-directories that are labeledSUBMIT by structure Site Number and date of inspection. Each digital photograph file shall be named to allow it to be easily identified with the element or part of the structure to which it applies. An Index file and Table of Contents for photographs, as specified in, shall be created on the DVD ('s)/USB and a hard copy of these provided with the DVD ('s)/USB. 7) The Successful Proponent shall provide three (3) copies of a report which details any problems and difficulties encountered in collecting the inventory and inspection data. The purpose of this report is to provide feedback to the City that can be used to improve the ease of collecting and recording the data and the quality of the data collected. Specifically, the Successful Proponent shall provide feedback as to the ease, or difficulty, of assessing the condition states for elements and quantifying areas, completing the inspection forms, and suggestions for improvements. NOT

VIEWING.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL The Successful Proponent shall be responsible for all traffic control (inclusive of appropriate flag persons), access and protection required to carry out the field inspection as follows: a) The Successful Proponent shall comply with the Ontario Traffic Manual Book 7 – Temporary Conditions (and the Temporary Conditions Field Edition) when carrying out fieldDO investigation and testing. All signing shall be in accordance with the Ontario Traffic Manual.

14 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

b) All traffic signage shall be in accordance with City of Toronto/Ministry of Transportation requirements, the requirements of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Construction Specification for Maintenance of Traffic TS1.00, and the Ontario Traffic Manual. c) Coordinate and pay for the services of flagmen as required. d) Ensure the safety of both the public and the staff involved in the investigation/testing. e) Protect utilities and property from damage. f) Restore the site as near to original conditions as practical. g) Comply with any requirements for separation from other construction contracts in the vicinity. h) Use a vehicle-mounted 360-degree operating amber light for all on-site vehicles The Successful Proponent is responsible for roadside safety when performing site work and shall adhere to the following operational constraints: g) Unless approved by the City's Transportation District Work Zone Coordinator, intersection closures, or double lane closures are not permitted on city streets.

h) Requested closures should conform to the above guidelines and first be discussed with the City’s Project Manager and the Transportation District Work Zone Co-coordinators. A RoDARS request for closure (Restriction Notice) must be submitted to Central Dispatch by fax at least ten (10) workingCOPY days prior to the commencement of work. Requestor is responsible for the development of a Traffic Management Plan, static signing, co-ordination of contractors/event organizers and liaison with Transportation Services – Road Operations staff for lane/ramp closure operations. Central Dispatch will forward the request to City’s RESCU for confirmation of the requested closure.

.6 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY Occupational Health & Safety: The Successful ProponentSUBMIT is responsible for meeting the requirements of the Occupational Health & Safety Act and City Health & Safety Manual and the Successful Proponent is to review their safe work procedures with the City prior to undertaking any field work onsite. a) Staff on-site must be knowledgeable of the governing safety regulations including, but not limited to, the following: Industrial Regulations, Construction Regulations, and Regulation Respecting Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Building Repair Operations, Diving Operations, Designated Substances, WHMIS, Workplace Safety & Insurance Act, Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act, Technical Standards & Safety Act, and Highway Traffic Act. b) Staff on-site must possessNOT written proof of competency such as appropriate training and experience in health and safety related activities applicable to the project (i.e. confined space entry, fall arrest, First Aid & CPR, Ladder & scaffolding training VIEWINGdocumentation, WHMIS training documentation, traffic control, and any other appropriate certificate required to perform inspection work). c) The Successful Proponent is responsible for providing all safety equipment for the protection of their staff, including gas detection, safety retrieval devices, and any ancillaryDO equipment for confined space entries (CSEs) required for inspection purposes. .7 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICE REQUIREMENTS The general requirements for provision of engineering services to be provided by the Successful Proponent to the City of Toronto are as specified in the Appendices. It is the

15 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

responsibility of the proponent to familiarize themselves and comply with the project and contractual requirements of the City as specified in the Appendices, and to ascertain the full scope of work and the engineering services required for the project, prior to submission of the proposal, including: a) Technical Services Guidelines for Facilities and Structures Projects (refer to Appendix A – note where “Works & Emergency Services” or “WES” is identified, replace with the “City of Toronto”. Where “Commissioner” is identified, replace with the “Executive Director, Technical Services”); b) RFP Terms and Conditions (Appendix B); c) Submission Forms (Appendix C); d) Specimen Contract Agreement, including Insurance Forms and Statutory Declarations (Appendix D). e) Proposal evaluation Table (Appendix E) f) BMS Input screens (Appendix F) g) Quality control plan (Appendix G) and h) Sample of Stantec's Confidentiality Agreement (Appendix H) i) Summary action report (Appendix I) j) Sample Schedule (Appendix J) k) List of Structures (Appendix K) COPY l) a. Proponents are to confirm on-site, both the accuracy of the information provided in the City’s RFP and the current site conditions prior to submission of proposals. Record drawings are not to be solely relied upon. The requirement to meet regulatory codes is considered as being part of the base assignment. b. Within the proposal, the proponent is responsible for identifyingSUBMIT a timeline that they are committed to accomplishing, taking into consideration the City defined milestones. A breakdown of structures to be inspected and the year in which they are to be inspected is included in appendix J. 3.3 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS .1 The City’s general project requirements are included in Appendix A.1. General requirements include project management and administration procedures, approvals, and standards. The proponent is responsible for reviewing this information and familiarizing themselves with the City’s requirements, and shall comply in its entirety. The following clauses provide additional, project specific requirements, and are to be read in conjunction with the Appendices. Where there is a conflict, the provisionsNOT in this section shall take precedence. .2 At the beginning of the project, the proponent is to provide a baseline work-plan for review and VIEWINGapproval by the City. The work-plan will be a refinement of the proposal, which will define in detail the scope of work and schedule for the project. The schedule is to be updated monthly and reviewed at progress meetings. Changes to the project schedule require a written explanation and must be approved, in writing, from the City. .3 Review and confirm the existing field conditions. The Successful Proponent shall carry out sufficientDO representative investigation or surveying as needed to determine the cost of services .4 In addition to the project meetings required in accordance with Appendix A.1. include for two additional (2) annual meetings (for each year of the project) with the project team. The focus of

16 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

these meetings will be to address project management issues (scope, schedule, and fees), issues resolution, and proactive project planning. .5 Note City requirements with respect to Health & Safety and Designated Substances Management (including mandatory qualifications for (sub) consultants undertaking DSL Reports and associated activities). .6 Specific exceptions/modification to Appendix A.1 includes: a. Section A.1.15.1.9: Safety equipment is to be provided by the Successful Proponent, but paid for in accordance with Section 7.3. 3.4 SUMMARY OF PROJECT SUBMISSIONS .1 The following table summarizes the major project submissions for the entire 6 year duration of this assignement. The proponent should note that other deliverables are also required, as specified within this document. Table 1: Biennial Detail Visual Inspections, City of Toronto

Assignment Work Plan Complete Report Final Awarded Submitted Field Work Submission Acceptance March 11, April 1, September November 11, December 9, Year 1 2013 2013 30, 2013 2013 2013 March 10, September October 20, November Year 2 2014 8, 2014COPY 2014 17, 2014 March 9, September October 19, November Year 3 2015 7, 2015 2015 16, 2015 March 7, September October 17, November Year 4 2016 5, 2016 2016 14, 2016 March 6, September October 16, November Year 5 2017 4, 2017 2017 13, 2017 March 12, September October 22, November Year 6 2018 10, 2018 SUBMIT2018 19, 2018

3.5 CITY DEFINED ALTERNATIVES

The City has not considered alternatives to this work.

SECTION 4 - CITY OF TORONTO’S RESPONSIBILITIES NOT 4.1 GENERAL VIEWING.1 The City staff will provide assistance to the successful proponent by reviewing all submitted documents within approximately two to three weeks of receipt, depending on the magnitude of the submission. .2 The City will designate a Project Manager to this project upon completion of the evaluation of the RFP and award of the project. This Project Manager will have the responsibility for ensuring that the DOOperating Division’s position, as client, on all matters relevant to this project is represented to the Successful Proponent.

17 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

.3 Best efforts will be made by the City to provide a summary on the scope and current status of active design and construction projects as well as the current timeline for completion. Available details on the existing capital works program, listing the project names, general details on scope, and timeline, will be provided. .4 As required, the City will provide available operational data to support the inspection. .5 The City will provide a copy of the City’s Health & Safety Manual as required. .6 The City will pay for all approvals applications. .7 The City will pay for all utility locates. 4.2 CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION .1 The Technical Services Consultant Performance Evaluation Template (CPET) will be used to assess the performance of the successful proponent through a set of performance indicators and evaluation templates. Once completed, the CPET will be forwarded to the appropriate Directors, in the Operating Division and Technical Services, for information and/or appropriate action. COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

18 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SECTION 5 - PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION 5.1 SELECTION COMMITTEE .1 All Proposals will be evaluated through a comprehensive review and analysis by a Selection Committee, which will include members from the City's Technical Services, Structures & Expressways and other relevant City staff and stakeholders as required. .2 The Selection Committee may at its sole discretion retain additional committee members or advisors. .3 The aim of the Selection Committee will be to select one Proposal which in its opinion meet the City's requirements under this RFP and provides a satisfactory overall value to the City, but the Proposal selected, if any, will not necessarily be the one offering the lowest fees. Pricing is one of the components in determining the total score or ranking. .4 By responding to this RFP, Proponents will be deemed to have agreed that the decision of the Selection Committee will be final and binding. 5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA Evaluation criteria will include but not necessarily be limited to completeness, conciseness and general suitability of proposals demonstrating the following:

Proposal content Selection CriteriaCOPY Experience & Performance of the Project Demonstrated successful experience of staff and relevant Team qualifications Corporate Experience & Performance Successful past experience on similar projects and appropriate staffing on previous projects Past Performance on Bridge Projects Demonstrated effectiveness in identifying scope of work and preparing reporting package with appropriate staffing levels Project Organization & Work Program Each phase of the projectSUBMIT identified and properly planned, completeness and suitability of work plan and methodology. Appropriate and adequate site investigation. Qualifications and experience of proposed staff and staffing levels and staff availability including sufficient effort for the items as identified in 6.3.9 including sufficient staff levels for overall project management, design effort, head office administration during investigation, site inspection services, design staff support during evaluation. These activities should be identified separately in the time/task breakdown. Required Elements NOTDocument review, initial data input in OBMS, field inspection, input of the inspection findings into OBMS and QC, reporting and recommendations phases described. VIEWINGTechnical Issues Potential issues identified and attention given to specific areas of various bridge elements prone to certain defects during their service life. Method and Schedule of addressing Addressing concerns regarding affected agencies, concerns and securing permits authorities, utilities, communities, etc. Project ManagementDO and Controls Records, Scheduling and Quality Control Core pricing Cost 5.3 MANDATORY EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS Proponents must have the following experience within the past five (5) years in order to be

19 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

considered for award. In order to prove the experience listed below, Proponents must list the projects fulfilling the mandatory requirements. Proponents are to provide details of the project, including a description, dates, value of the project, owner and staff representatives along with contact numbers. The City may contact the staff representatives to confirm details of the projects.

A. Proponents must have a minimum experience of successfully completing the following: 1. 2 bridge detailed inspection programme, in accordance with OBMS and OSIM for MTO or other Ontario municipalities, in the last 5 years; WITH 2. each programme consisting of a minimum of 30 bridges including data input in the OBMS.

B. For the project experience in A. above, all the following terms must also be met: 1. Ministry of Transportation Ontario OSIM bridge inspection workshop training successfully taken within the last three (3) years, please provide reference. 2. One of the team members must be a qualified engineer as defined by Professional Engineers of Ontario. Lead Inspectors and inspectors must be professional engineers or technicians with a minimum of 3 years of bridge inspection experience in their designated role.

5.4 SELECTION PROCESS .1 The Selection Committee will utilize the best format/criteria for the evaluation and selection process to establish a Total Score for each ProposalCOPY as noted in the sample evaluation table below. .2 A Mandatory Submission Requirements (Section 6) Pass/Fail Mandatory Experience Requirements (Section 5.3) Pass/Fail B. Technical Proposal Submission SUBMIT80 pts. C. Cost of Services 20 pts. Formula: [(lowest cost proposal divided by Proponent’s proposal cost) x 20] Total Score 100 pts.

.3 If the submission fails the Mandatory Submission Requirements or the Mandatory Experience Requirements, the proposal will be rejected. The Technical Proposal and Cost of Services will not be reviewed. .4 The Technical Proposal must score a minimum 60 points of the possible 80 points to have the Cost of Services Envelope opened and evaluated. Purchasing and Materials Management Division may open the Cost of NOTServices envelope to ensure compliance with the requirements of the RFP, however the Evaluation Team will not have any knowledge of any information contained in the Cost of Services envelopes until such time that the technical evaluations are VIEWINGcomplete and Proponents are short listed. .5 The Total Score shall be the sum of the Cost of Services score and Technical Proposal score. .6 The Proposal that achieves the highest overall Total Score will be ranked first. .7 In the eventDO of a tie Total Score (Total Score rounded to one decimal point), the Proponent achieving the highest score for its Technical Proposal will be ranked first overall.

20 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

5.5 CLARIFICATIONS .1 As part of the evaluation process the Selection Committee may make requests for further information with respect to the content of any Proposal and/or to ascertain the understanding and responsiveness of the Proponent of and to any of the project information and requirements. .2 The Selection Committee may request further information from one or more Proponents and not from others. 5.6 INTERVIEW .1 A Proponent whose Proposal has received a high ranking may be invited to an interview with the Selection Committee, the results of which will be used by the Committee as a mechanism to revisit, revise and finalize the technical score as necessary. .2 The representatives designated by the Selection Committee in its invitation to the Proponent must attend any interview scheduled as part of this evaluation process. .3 The representative of a Proponent at any interview scheduled is expected to be thoroughly versed and knowledgeable with respect to the requirements of this RFP and the contents of its Proposal, and must have the authority to make decisions and commitments with respect to matters discussed at the interview, which may be included in any resulting Agreement. .4 No Proponent will be entitled to be present during, or otherwise receive, any information regarding any interview with any other Proponent. COPY .5 The Selection Committee may interview any Proponent(s) without interviewing others, and the City will be under no obligation to advise those not receiving an invitation until completion of the evaluation and selection process. 5.7 EVALUATION RESULTS .1 Upon conclusion of the evaluation process, a final recommendation will be made by the Committee to the Executive Director of Technical Services and/orSUBMIT City Council. .2 Proposal evaluation results shall be the property of the City and are subject to the MFIPPA. Evaluation results may be made available to public release pursuant to the MFIPPA. .3 Proponents should be aware that Council and individual Councilors have the right to view the responses provided that their requests have been made in accordance with the City’s procedure. 5.8 NEGOTIATIONS AND AGREEMENT .1 Any award of an Agreement to a Proponent will be at the absolute discretion of the City. The selection of a recommended Proponent will not oblige the City to negotiate or execute an Agreement with that recommendedNOT Proponent. .2 Any execution of an Agreement resulting from this RFP will be in accordance with the bylaws, VIEWINGpolicies, and procedures of the City and in accordance with Appendix D. .3 The City shall have the right to negotiate on such matter(s) as it chooses with any Proponent to which it has awarded an Agreement without obligation to communicate, negotiate, or review similar modifications with other Proponents. The City shall incur no liability to any other ProponentDO as a result of such negotiation or alternative arrangements. .4 During negotiations, the scope of the services may be refined, issues may be prioritized, responsibilities among the Proponent, all staff and subconsultants provided by it and the City may be settled and the issues concerning implementation may be clarified.

21 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

.5 Any Agreement must contain terms and conditions in the interest of the City, and be in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. If the Agreement required City Council approval, the final Agreement must contain terms and conditions substantially as set out in the Council report authorizing the Agreement. Any Agreement will incorporate as schedules of appendices such part of the RFP (including addenda) and the Proposal submitted in response thereto as are relevant to the provision of the goods and/or services. .6 If negotiations between the City and a successful Proponent do not result in an Agreement within one hundred-twenty (120) Days of receipt by the Proponent of notification of award, the City may at its sole discretion terminate such negotiations and either enter into negotiations with one or more other Proponents or terminate the RFP process. .7 The City shall be under no obligation to accept a Proposal without amendment, alteration, counter-offer, or any change that may result from negotiations with the Proponent submitting the proposal. .8 The City reserves the right to award a contract in whole or in part. 5.9 CONSULTING AGREEMENTS/PURCHASE ORDERS .1 For reference, a specimen contract agreement is included in the Appendices to provide the proponent with the details that will be contained in the executed agreement. The agreement may be required for all projects regardless of dollar value, at the City’s sole discretion. If an engineering agreement is not executed, the provisions contained within the agreement will apply. COPY .2 The insurance requirements are as follows: a. Professional Liability (errors and omissions coverage) for the performance of Services by the Consultant in the amount of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00); b. Commercial General Liability in the amount of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00), per occurrence; c. Automobile Insurance coverage for all licensed motorized vehicles owned and/or leased by the Consultant that will be used in the performance of service,SUBMIT if applicable, in the amount of NOT LESS THAN ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence. .3 Prior to undertaking work onsite, the consultant or sub-consultant preparing DSL Reports, DSL abatement specifications, DSL abatement monitoring and provision of Clearance Certificates must provide the City with proof that their Professional Liability Insurance policy includes pollution coverage, specifically and especially mould and asbestos. Also refer to the general insurance requirements described in the specimen agreement. .4 The cost proposal should identify all costs associated with the work as defined above. The total cost will be taken into account in the overall evaluation of the proposal. 5.10 NOTIFICATION NOT Once the City and the selected Proponent execute an Agreement, all other Proponents will be VIEWINGnotified accordingly.

DO

22 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SECTION 6 - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

6.1 SUBMISSION OVERVIEW .1 The City has formulated the procedures set out in the following provisions in this section to ensure that it receives Proposals through an open, competitive process, and that Proponents receive fair and equitable treatment in the solicitation, receipt and evaluation of their Proposals. The City may reject the Proposal of any Proponent who fails to comply with any of such procedures. .2 Proposals shall address the proposal content requirements as outlined herein, must be well ordered, detailed and comprehensive. Clarity of language, adherence to suggested structuring, and adequate accessible documentation is essential to the City’s ability to conduct a thorough evaluation. .3 The Cost of Services proposal to be submitted separately, as part of the two-envelope process. Refer to Section 7 for details on the Cost of Services proposal. Inclusion of pricing information in the Technical proposal will render the proposal submission as informal. 6.2 PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION AND DELIVERY The documentation for each Proposal: COPY .1 Must be submitted in a sealed envelope or container (submissions made by fax, telephone, electronic message or telegram will not be accepted) displaying a full and correct return address; .2 Section 1 through 8 should be limited to 18 pages (revise to suit), minimum 11 point font, single sided (or preferably printed on 9 pages double sided), with unlimited appendices; .3 Must consist of One (1) original (clearly marked as such on its first page) and three (3) full copies of: SUBMIT a) A Main Proposal Document as described in article 6.3 below, including all attachments; b) Form 1 (Proposal Submission Form) completed and signed by an authorized official of the Proponent; c) Form 2 (Policy to Exclude Bids from External Parties Involved in the Preparation or Development of a Specific Call/Request) completed as indicated; .4 Should include if applicable One (1) original (clearly marked as such on its first page) and Three (3) full photocopies of: NOT a) Form 3 (Restrictions on the Hiring and Use of Former City of Toronto Management VIEWINGEmployees for City Contracts) completed if applicable; b) Form 4 (Environmentally Responsible Procurement Statement) completed as indicated;

.5 Must be deliveredDO no later than the Deadline to: Chief Purchasing Official Purchasing and Materials Management Division 18th Floor, West Tower, City Hall

23 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

TORONTO, ON, M5H 2N2

.6 Delays caused by any delivery service (including Canada Post and courier) shall not be grounds for an extension of the Deadline, and Proposals that arrive after the Deadline will not be accepted. 6.3 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL CONTENT The Technical Proposal should contain the following items. .1 Submit all mandatory requirements. .2 Title Page: Showing RFP number, closing date and time, proponent name, the address, telephone and fax numbers of the Proponent firm, and a contact person who will act as the proponent’s representative for post-submission communications. .3 Letter of Introduction: Introducing the Proponent and signed by the person(s) authorized to sign on behalf of and to bind the Proponent to statements made in response to this RFP. This should contain the same signature as the person signing the submission forms. .4 Table of Contents: Include page numbers, identifying all included materials. .5 Section 1 – Executive Summary: Summary of the key features of the proposal. .6 Section 2 – Proponent Profile: Overview of the Proponent firm(s), its history, and its future plans. Include a list of present or pending assignmentsCOPY with the City of Toronto, if any. a. Proponents should have staff, organization, and an installed base adequate to ensure their ongoing ability to deliver and support the project over the period of the contract. b. To permit the Proponent to be evaluated fully as a viable and sound enterprise, include the following information with respect to the Proponent, and if the submission is a joint Proposal, for each consortium member. Please note that Proposals being presented by consortiums that do not include the information requested for each consortium member, will not be awarded full marks during evaluations. SUBMIT i) A profile and summary of corporate history including: ii) Date Company started; iii) Products and/or services offered; iv) Total number of employees; v) Major clients; vi) A profile and summary of corporate history of any parents or subsidiaries and affiliates and the nature of the Proponent’s relationship to them (i.e., research, financing and so on). vii) If the proposal is being presented by a consortium, provide a description of the relationships between consortium members. NOT .7 Section 3 – Proponent’s Qualifications: VIEWINGi) Clearly show your firm(s)’s recent experience on projects meeting the mandatory requirements, with details as to dates, project value, location, owner and owner’s representative, including contact information, and the name of the proponent’s staff that managed these projects. Provide specific experience references in past performance on bridge projects to confirm the mandatory experience requirements listed in section 5.3 above. DO ii) Demonstrated successful experience of staff and corporation in the areas of qualification, including a table cross-referencing areas of experience & performance

24 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

with specific assignments should be described in this section, with any project profile documentation included as an Appendix.

iii) In providing references, Proponents agree that the City can contact the individuals provided as part of the evaluation process. The City will make its own arrangements in contacting the references. Substitution of references will not be permitted after the close of the RFP.

.8 Section 4 – Understanding of the Assignment: i) A statement of understanding with respect to the scope of work involved and the methodology proposed to complete the assignment. Provide a short discussion on the approach to undertaking the assignment, the project initiation and evolution, planning objectives and associated timelines, and the essential concepts and their methodology. Proposals should be clearly structured towards achieving results as opposed to identifying the assignment process.

ii) The proponent should include the proposed methodology and rationale or justification for the representative site investigation/survey/inspection work in the proposal, and should also include the method of quantity estimation.

.9 Section 5 – Work Plan and Deliverables:

i) Detailed work plan indicating the projectCOPY method, schedule, Gantt chart, tasks, and deliverables. (Note: It is expected that the schedule will be adhered to unless a written explanation is received from the proponent and approved, in writing, from the City).

ii) The work plan should detail your project-specific approach to each phase of the project including review of available material, initial quantities calculation, inspection program and inspection report. The workplan should be structured to match the categories in the table in Section 7 – Cost of Services, but expandedSUBMIT on to include activities under each phase. The workplan should clearly identify the base scope items and provisional items separately.

iii) The workplan should detail your quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) plan for key deliverable and for all phases of the project. Provide an estimated overall timeline of the project, including an indication of the date of commencement.

iv) Key dates for major deliverables should be clearly defined in the proponent's detailed work plan and highlighted in the Gantt chart. Include 2-week time periods for all City reviews. NOT v) For each deliverable provide sufficient detail for the reviewers to evaluate the value of the effort expended. VIEWING vi) Please provide a discussion of the underlying assumptions associated with the proposed project schedule.

.10 Section 6 – Resources: i) ADO list of key staff proposed for this project. Provide their professional qualifications, related project experience and an indication of their roles and responsibilities on this project.

25 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

ii) Each proposed inspection team shall be outlined in the proposal. Names of Lead inspector, inspectors, and supervising engineer shall be clearly shown as part of the organizational chart.

iii) To demonstrate staff availability, based on the list of key staff proposed for the project, provide a table cross-referencing key staff proposed for this project with other present or pending assignments. Include in this table, the proposed staff name, their role on the project (include Project Manager, Design Lead(s), and site inspection staff as a minimum); the status of the project (i.e. design, construction) and estimated milestone completion timelines.

Project status Project A Project A Project B Project C Project D & timeline for City of City of Ministry of Region of Y County of completion Toronto Toronto X Z Staff name Construction Design – Inspection Construction Inspection (proposed – present to present to – Fall ’14 to – Present to – present PM) Winter ‘14 Fall ‘15 Fall ‘16 Spring ‘14 to Spring ‘13 Staff name PM PM (proposed lead inspector) COPY Staff name Inspector (proposed inspector)

.11 Include a project organization chart with clearly defined rolesSUBMIT and responsibilities. .12 Include a time/task breakdown with estimated person-hours for members of the project team required to complete the various components of the assignment. The time/task breakdown must at a minimum match the categories provided in the table in Section 7 – Cost of Services. These categories should be expanded based on your workplan described in Section 5 of your proposal. The time/task breakdown should be sufficiently detailed so that the level of effort of each staff member is identified for the various tasks in each separate phase of the project. The time/task breakdown should include, as a minimum: a. Review of available documents b. Project Management & Meetings c. Traffic control plan (if necessary) d. OSIM Report NOT e. Recommended Actions VIEWINGf. QA/QC

.13 Note that the time/task breakdown is to be included in the Technical Proposal not the Cost of Services Submission. .14 ResumesDO for proposed individuals are to be included as an Appendix to the proposal. It is important that key project individuals (i.e. major areas of responsibility) be named, with accompanying indication of guaranteed availability. Continuity of key personnel will be required, with a contractual obligation for substitutions only with full written approval of the client. The

26 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

resumes should clearly identify the individual’s specific qualifications and experience as it relates to their role in this project and their role in the referenced projects. .15 State assumptions regarding roles and involvement of client staff. This is important so clarifications of any incorrect assumptions are apparent to the Selection Committee during the proposal review, and/or Presentation/Interview meeting, if applicable. .16 Note: The Proponent should submit signed consent forms authorizing the disclosure of personal information to the City, or its designated agent(s), for any resumes that are submitted, however, the Proponent will accept all liability if not disclosed to the City. .17 Section 7 – Technical Issues: Identify technical issues together with potential solutions

.18 Section 8 – Method and Schedule of Addressing Stakeholder Concerns and Securing Permits: i) Identify stakeholders and all permits required during execution of the project’s phases.

ii) Clearly outline the anticipated lead times and permit costs to address stakeholder concerns and permit application. .19 Section 9 – Project Management and Controls Clearly outline the cost control measures that will be implemented in order to ensure that the upset limit for the engineering fees will not be exceeded.COPY .20 Section 10 – Clarifications: Confirm in this section that the proposal meets all requirements of the RFP. If there is a need to highlight scope clarifications based on the interpretation of the RFP document, all limitations on the extent of work that could be inferred must be identified in this section of the proposal. If exceptions or scope clarifications are not provided in this section, then the City will consider that the terms of reference are met in its entirety, and all costsSUBMIT to meet the terms of reference is included, regardless of the text in the body of the proposal. Note that substantial exceptions to the base scope could render the proposal non-compliant and the proposal rejected, at the City’s sole discretion. .21 Appendices – Including: a. Mandatory Proposal Submission Forms b. Corporate Information c. Resumes of Proposed Project Participants d. Project Profile Documents NOT VIEWING DO

27 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SECTION 7 - COST OF SERVICES

7.1 COST OF SERVICES DOCUMENTATION AND DELIVERY .1 The documentation for each Cost of Services: .2 Must be PACKAGED AND SEALED IN A SEPARATE ENVELOPE labeled Cost of Services (submissions made by fax, telephone, electronic message or telegram will not be accepted) displaying a full and correct return address; .3 Must consist of One (1) original, clearly marked as such on its first page, and Five (5) copies. (Revise the number of copies as required for each project, Purchasing retains the original); .4 Any pricing shown in the Technical Proposal shall render the submission non-compliant and the Proposal will not be considered for award. 7.2 COST OF SERVICES SUBMISSION CONTENT - GENERAL .1 Identify an upset limit for the project, inclusive of all taxes. .2 Identify a specific cost per deliverable, including all taxes, as indicated in the project cost breakdown. The deliverable level costs shall be organized according to project costs breakdown listed below, and the time/task breakdown as shown by the Proponent in their Technical Proposal Submission. COPY .3 Submit a schedule of proposed hourly rates (excluding HST) for all project personnel by classification. All key personnel and any other specified individuals should be cross-referenced in Proposal Section 6 to these rated classifications. These rates, once approved, will be used for any part of the work to be paid for on a time basis as indicated elsewhere herein. These rates will be fixed for the duration of the assignment up to the completion date as identified in the proponent’s project schedule. The City will consider requests for rate adjustment, should the duration of the project extend beyond the proposed schedule due to delays beyond the Consultant’s control. The rate adjustment shall not exceedSUBMIT the current consumer price index plus two percent. Rate adjustment will not be considered for delays caused by the Consultant or its sub-consultant. .4 Provide a Lump Sum Limit for any and all anticipated disbursements required in connection with the work, on a per deliverable basis. Disbursements relate to daily expenses properly and truly incurred in the performance of services required for this assignment. Payments for disbursements will be pro-rated on the value of work performed during a billable period; .5 The Lump Sum Limit for disbursements associated with the services is not to exceed a maximum value of 5% of the fees identified by the proponent; .6 Disbursements shall comprise NOTthe following general expenses that may or can occur on a daily basis: VIEWING.7 Telephone calls inclusive of long distance charges and telegraphs .8 Photocopying .9 Printing .10 FacsimilesDO .11 Public transit fares .12 Parking

28 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

.13 Delivery and expense charges .14 Computer, word processing .15 Computer aided drafting design (CADD) services .16 Travel expenses for office and resident field personnel for job-related travel .17 Notarization of invoices and/or statutory declarations .18 Disbursements should not include, and the City will not pay for roadway tolls, meal allowances, or use of personal computers (laptops). .19 Disbursements that are considered “specialty services” or “specialized expenses” are to be identified separately. .20 In the event that the value of the disbursements exceeds the percentage (%) stipulated in the City’s RFP, the value of the disbursements shall be corrected, by the City, not to exceed the maximum % value identified for disbursements associated with that phase of work. Any such corrections resulting in an adjustment to the disbursement lump sum will be similarly applied as an adjustment to the Total Upset Limit Price identified for the assignment. .21 For specialized expenses, such as specialized equipment for investigation or sub-consultants, provide a lump sum cost for these expenses. 7.3 BASE SCOPE OF WORK AND PROVISIONAL ITEMSCOPY .1 The Total Upset Limit as provided in the table will be summed up for each of the first through sixth year of inspection and their sum will establish the Cost of Services score for the proposal evaluation and selection as outlined in Section 5 of the RFP. .2 In accordance with the terms and conditions of the RFP (appendix B) the City may reject a bid if it determines, in its sole discretion, that the bid is materially imbalanced. .3 The quoted yearly price shall include any adjustments pertainingSUBMIT to cost inflation, including but not limited to the increase in wages. Rate adjustments shall not be considered for the duration of the project. .4 To complete the data entry component of this assignment a BMS license must be purchased by the proponent at a cost of $5000. Additional licenses may be purchased by the proponent at the cost of $2500.00 for the 2nd license, $2000.00 for the 3rd license, $2000.00 for the 4th license, and $2000.00 for the 5th license. The proponent shall include the price for all additional license intended to be purchased under item 7 of the pricing form. NOT VIEWING

DO

29 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

Upset Limit Cost Breakdown for: Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of bridge and culvert structures in the City of Toronto Item Description 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Cycle A Cycle B Cycle A Cycle B Cycle A Cycle B

1 Fees for Inspection, BMS data entry and Reporting (Upset Limit)

2 Traffic Controls, Flagging (Upset Limit)

3 Sub-consultants (Upset Limit)

4 Access and specialized equipment (30 days use/year) (Upset Limit) COPY

5 Disbursements (Upset Limit)

$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 6 Initial BMS License

7 Additional BMS Licenses SUBMIT 1) 8 Provisional Work $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00

9 Fee (item 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8) (Upset Limit)

10 Contingency 2) (15% of item 9)

11 Total Fee (item 9+10) NOT

12 HST (13% of item 11)VIEWING

13 Subtotal -Yearly Budget (item 11+12) 14 Total Budget (sum of row 13) DO 1) The amount of $100,000.00 is reserved as an allowance for Provisional Items, where authorized by the Division Head. 2) Contingency is for additional work as requested and authorized in writing by the City of Toronto.

30 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

7.4 PAYMENTS FROM COST OF SERVICES PROPOSAL .1 For labour costs, payment will be on a time basis at approved hourly or per diem rates to an Upset Limit for each deliverable to be provided by the successful proponent. .2 Payments for disbursements will be pro-rated based on the value of the work performed during a billable period. .3 Payment for specialized expenses such as sub-surface investigations and specialized investigation equipment, etc., will be paid at cost plus a mark-up of a maximum of 5%, if provided for in the cost of services proposal. Receipts must be submitted with invoices for payment. .4 Fees for sub-consultants will be paid at cost plus a mark-up of a maximum of 5%, if provided for in the cost of services proposal. Invoices must be submitted for payment. .5 The Construction Lien Act requirements shall be applied to all phases of the assignment. Refer to Section 5.8 of the RFP. .6 The 10% holdback for the given year on the Purchase Order will be released upon final acceptance of reports for each year and upon satisfying the Construction Lien Act requirements. a. Prices and staff rates submitted in a Proposal are to be firm for the duration of the RFP pro- cess and the term of any resulting Agreement. b. The City shall not be responsible for any unauthorized additional costs. c. The Proponent must be solely responsible for anyCOPY and all payments and/or deductions required to be made including those required for the Canada Pension Plan, Employment Insurance, Workplace Safety and Insurance, and Income Tax. d. All invoices must clearly show HST as a separate value and HST "registrant" number. e. Without restricting the generality of the foregoing, the Proponent acknowledges that, if it is a non-resident person, payments to the Proponent, as a non-resident person, may be subject to withholding taxes under the Income Tax Act (Canada). Further, unless the Proponent, as a non-resident person, provides the City with an official SUBMITletter from Canadian Customs and Revenue Agency waiving the withholding requirements, the City will withhold the taxes it determines are required under the Income Tax Act (Canada). f. In the event of mathematical errors found in the pricing pages, the unit prices quoted shall prevail. Extensions and totals will be corrected accordingly by City staff and adjustments resulting from the correction will be applied to the Total Lump Sum Price quoted. 7.5 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE .1 In seeking authority to engage consulting services, City Technical Services will include a contingency amount to cover potential changes in the scope of services where warranted. Payments from the ContingencyNOT Allowance will not be permitted without prior approval of the Executive Director. 7.6VIEWING CURRENCY .1 All dollar amounts, fee statements, and invoicing shall be in Canadian dollars. The proponent shall assume all currency risk. 7.7 TAXES HarmonizedDO Sale Tax (HST) is to be applied to the prices submitted as specified in the relevant sections of the call document or in the Price Schedule provided in the call.

31 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

HST for the supply and delivery of materials/goods is to be shown as additional/separate line items on the Price Schedule and any subsequent invoices. Taxes for construction services and real property improvements/services where the applicable Provincial Sales Tax was previously embedded in the price quoted (GST extra) are now bound by the following: Effective on July 1, 2010, the Ontario Retail Sales Tax (ORST) will be replaced with a value- added tax and combined with the Federal Goods and Services Tax (GST) to create a federally administered HST. The HST will have a combined rate of 13%. The proposed price for the goods and/or services shall not contain any HST. The vendor will add the HST as a separate line item to all their monthly invoices as of July 1, 2010. Proponents shall govern themselves accordingly when estimating the costs of materials previously subject to ORST, and should not include the 8% ORST in the proposed prices.

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

32 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDICES APPENDIX A- TECHNICAL SERVICES: GUIDELINES FOR STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS PROJECTS

A.1 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS – STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS – DECEMBER 2011 A.3 ENGINEERING STUDIES – STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS – APRIL 2008

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

33 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

A.1 GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS

A.1.1 General

The requirements for engineering services to be provided by the Consultant to the City of Toronto for projects are as specified in the Request for Proposal and in the Appendices A.1 to A.6, inclusive. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to ascertain the full scope of the engineering services required for the project as they will be required to perform the work as specified. The Consultant shall become fully familiar and comply with the City’s project management requirements.

Wherever it is stated in the RFP, “engineering services” , it is intended that these services are inclusive of any and all professional services required in fulfillment of the project requirements.

A.1.2 Stamped Reports & Drawings

All engineering reports are to be signed and stamped by a Professional Engineer, licensed in the Province of Ontario. The bridge drawings are to be signed and stamped according to the Ontario Ministry of Transportation Structural Manual. COPY A.1.3 Project Manager (PM)

A.1.3.1. Role of Project Manager

The City will assign a Project Manager for the project. The City's Project Manager will provide direction to the Consultants providing engineering services to the City throughout their contracted service period. The Project Manager will transmit instructions to and receive information from the Consultants. SUBMIT

A.1.3.1. Correspondence

Identify all correspondence to the City with the project number provided by the City. All correspondence either written or electronic should be addressed to the City’s Project Manager, except where agreed upon or otherwise specified by the Project Manager.

A.1.4 Co-ordination with Other Sections

The Consultant’s contact with the City is the assigned Project Manager. The Project Manager will liaise with NOTand coordinate work with other City sections and/or departments. The Project Manager may direct the Consultant when appropriate to work directly with other City section or department staff. VIEWING

A.1.5 Project Meetings

A.1.5.1 Studies/EA/Design

DO The consultant shall schedule a project commencement meeting and monthly progress meetings. The Consultant shall schedule additional meetings as required for the review of

Page 1 of 12 34 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

draft documents, milestone design reviews, and other events as defined in the RFP.

A.1.5.2 Contract Administration

When providing site administration and engineering services during project construction, the Consultant shall conduct bi-weekly site meetings.

A.1.5.3 Agendas and Notes of Meeting

For each project meeting, unless otherwise directed, the Consultant shall prepare and distribute an agenda and conduct the meeting in an efficient manner. The Consultant shall take notes or minutes of the meeting, and the minutes of meeting are to be distributed no later than five (5) working days after the meeting.

A.1.6 City’s Reviews

1. Where reference is made to submission of documents, designs, plans, etc., unless specified otherwise, they shall first be submitted in draft form to the City. A minimum of two weeks is required for City review and comment. 2. The Consultant shall provide a response to the City’s comments indicating concurrence or non-concurrence, and if comments are not to be incorporated the Consultant shall indicate the reason for such. COPY 3. Draft documents submitted for review shall be essentially complete, so as to allow for proper evaluation of material submitted. Any unfinished or missing sections or elements shall be clearly identified in the draft, and a brief description of the intended material is to be provided.

A.1.7 Project Schedules

A.1.7.1 General SUBMIT The Consultant shall produce a Project Schedule once the assignment has been awarded and the Project Manager has issued the notice of award of the project, and a purchase order has been issued.

A.1.7.2 Baseline (Gantt Chart)

The baseline schedule shall include deliverables and other major milestones. It shall show the sequence of work, any interdependencies and the project critical path.

A.1.7.3 Tasks

Scheduling of tasks shallNOT allow for document review time where appropriate. Task bars should show percent complete.

VIEWINGA.1.7.4 The schedule shall be updated monthly and reviewed at progress meetings.

A.1.8 Document Management

A.1.8.1 General

DOA letter of transmittal shall be submitted with all deliverables submitted to the City, both electronic and hard copy. The letter of transmittal shall list the various documents, and

Page 2 of 12 35 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

number of copies.

A.1.8.2 Electronic Document Management

1. When submitting draft or final reports, design documents, and other deliverables, the consultant shall also provide one electronic copy on CD for input to the City’s electronic document management system. This must be provided at the same time as the paper copy. In order to be compatible with the City’s technology platform, all electronic information must be provided such that it is compatible with one of the following platforms: (a) Microsoft Office 2002 SP3 (b) Microsoft Project 2007 (c) MicroStation V8 (Bentley) 2. Prior to finalizing each submission, the consultant is to confirm the City’s preferred software package and version, for that submission. All CD/DVD’s are to be properly labelled on the CD/DVD itself. 3. All files produced as a result of this project become the property of the City.

A.1.8.3 Record or As built Drawings

Submit electronic copy on CD/DVD of final Drawings and Specifications. The City will verify that the CADD files meet City standards. All drawingsCOPY not meeting City standards will not be accepted, and must be re-issued at no additional cost to the City. Paper print versions of documents shall be submitted to the City. Final record drawings shall be supplied to the City on mylar.

A.1.9 Invoicing Requirements

A.1.9.1 General

Invoices throughout the project must be submitted in a formatSUBMIT acceptable to the City. Invoices for Engineering services shall be submitted monthly, unless otherwise stipulated. Each invoice is to include, as a minimum, the following information.

A.1.9.2 Standard Format

1. All invoices shall include the City’s Purchase Order number, and the project number. Invoices shall be addressed to the City’s Project Manager, unless otherwise stipulated. 2. The invoice summary sheet must be broken down into tasks, including sub-consultants, and associated disbursements per the Fee Proposal. In addition, the summary sheet shall also show the following for each task: the task value, the amount billed for the billing period, the amount billed previously, the total to date, the per cent complete and the balance of the feesNOT remaining. The individual task information must be summarized for the entire project. The Approved Change Order Amount, Total Invoice Amount, Amount Previous Payment, Holdbacks, HST and Total Amount Payable are to be VIEWINGidentified separately. Charges against the contingency allowance provided for by the City will not be permitted without prior written approval.

A.1.9.3 Supporting Documentation

1. For tasks billed on time based services to an Upset Limit, the invoice must include back DOup information identifying the hours charged to each task by each staff, and the corresponding hourly rate and classification. Billing rates for staff or classifications must

Page 3 of 12 36 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

be consistent with those provided in the Fee Proposal. 2. Billing rates for staff or classifications other than those identified in the Fee Proposal shall be submitted in writing for review and shall be subject to approval prior to the utilization of the personnel on the assignment.

A.1.9.4 Disbursements

1. Unless stated otherwise in the RFP, disbursements will be paid pro-rated based on the value of the work performed during the billable period, as indicated in the Fee Proposal Submission Requirements, therefore back-up receipts are not required to be provided with the invoice. 2. Where indicated in the RFP, certain disbursements shall be paid at cost. Allowable disbursements will be paid at cost subject to detailed expense sheets, copies of receipts, vehicle travel records, and all such documentation and materials needed in respect to such valid expenses to be provided as back up to the invoice.

A.1.9.5 Work Status Report Requirements

With each invoice, the Consultant shall provide a status report for the work completed for the billing period. The status report shall identify the overall project status, as well as a brief description of the work completed for each task, percent complete, project alerts, and the work planned for the next billable period. COPY

A.1.9.6 Statutory Declaration

With the request for final payment, the Consultant shall submit an original of the Statutory Declaration Schedule SD-FINAL, certifying that the services performed and the disbursements claimed for the project were properly incurred in accordance with the provisions of the Consulting Services Agreement, and that no further invoices or claims will be made against the project. Note that the Statutory Declarations are required whether or not an engineering agreement is executed for the project.SUBMIT The Statutory Declaration is to be signed and sealed by a Commissioner of Oaths.

A.1.9.7 Audits

The proponent shall submit an accounting audit at the end of each phase of an assignment. If the assignment extends beyond a period of two years, audit reports are required at the end of the second year and at the end of each subsequent year in which services are performed. For more detailed information, refer to the attached template agreement, Section 3.

A.1.10 Project Cost Control NOT A.1.10.1 General

VIEWING 1. The Consultant is required to maintain effective project cost control when providing engineering services to the City. Project cost control means the monitoring and control of engineering fees and construction cost throughout the life of the project. The Consultant shall provide timely notice for recommended scope changes to the Project Manager to ensure that action can be taken to mitigate cost and/or other such action so that additional funding can be obtained for the project. DO 2. Timely notice is defined as a reasonable period for which it will permit the Project

Page 4 of 12 37 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

manager to report to Committee and Council PRIOR to the expected overrun in fees or costs. Where the Consultant does not exercise proper cost control and has incurred additional cost, the City of Toronto is not obligated to honour payment for such services.

A.1.10.2 Upset Limits

1. Consultants must not exceed the approved Upset Limit without first obtaining written approval from the Project Manager. 2. Where the Consultant has exceeded the Upset Limit without the prior written approval of the Project Manager, it shall assume full responsibility for the cost of such services. 3. It is to be clearly understood that the City accepts no responsibility for costs incurred by the Consultant for fees or additions to the contract cost where approval has not been granted for the inclusion of such work and fees to the project. If the Consultant is requested to provide engineering services which it believes to be outside the approved scope of work, it must identify the cost of the extra work and seek written approval from the Project Manager prior to commencement of the work.

A.1.10.3 Engineering Change Orders

1. All changes in engineering services provided by Consultants must be confirmed by Change Orders and authorized by the Executive Director. 2. The request for a Change Order must identifyCOPY the following: (a) Description of scope change complete with rationale and time/task breakdown to undertake the work (b) Impact on Engineering Fees inclusive of disbursements (c) Impact on Schedule (d) Impact on Construction Cost (if applicable)

A.1.10.4 Contingency & Provisional Items

The contingency allowance is for potential extra work thatSUBMIT may be required beyond the scope of the project, and is subject to the approval of the City. Provisional allowances are for specific items as identified in the RFP. Payments from the contingency or provisional allowance will only be made following issuance of a Change Order approved by the City.

A.1.11 Approvals

A.1.11.1 General

1. The Consultant will be required to liase with the City and the approving agencies; obtain all the required application forms; complete the forms and prepare any documentation requested by the approval agency, and present them to the City for execution, where necessary. NOT 2. The City will pay for the cost of the application fees of all required approvals. 3. Where agreements must be executed between the City and the approving agencies, the VIEWINGConsultant shall advise the City in writing in a timely manner so that all such agreements can be executed by the City to avoid impact on project schedules. 4. The following is a list of the approvals that may be required. The City expects that the Consultant will determine and confirm for itself the specific approvals that are required for the project. 5. The requirement to seek additional approval(s) may be considered as an addition to the DOscope of work provided that the Consultant can demonstrate that it cannot be reasonably expected to know of the existence of these additional approval(s) at the time of submission.

Page 5 of 12 38 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

A.1.11.2 Federal Approvals

1. Fisheries & Oceans Canada (a) Department of Fisheries and Oceans Act (b) Fisheries Act 2. Transport Canada (a) Department of Transport Act and Regulations (b) Government Property Traffic Act and Regulations (c) Navigable Waters Protection Act

A.1.11.3 Provincial Approvals/Permits

1. Ministry of Environment (MOE) – Certificate of Approval (Water, Sewage, Air) 2. Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) - Permit 3. Ministry of Transport - Permit 4. Environmental Protection Act 5. Ministry of Labour

A.1.11.4 Municipal Approvals

1. Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)COPY - Permit 4. Right of Way Permit 5. Toronto Transportation

A.1.11.5 Utility/Authority Approvals/Permits

1. Toronto Hydro 2. Hydro One 3. Gas 4. Cable SUBMIT 5. Bell 6. ESA 7. TSSA

A.1.12 Standards

A.1.12.1 City of Toronto Standards

1. When fulfilling the project requirements, the Consultant is to ensure compliance with the following City of Toronto standards, unless specifically directed otherwise by the Project Manager: NOT

(a) Latest version of “Design and Construction – Linear Infrastructure CADD VIEWINGSpecification manual”. The Consultant shall note that topographic mapping, field edit, compiled area plan, and surveys are collections of data from various sources and may require verification in the field.

(b) Latest version of the City of Toronto’s “Standard Construction Specifications & Drawings for Sewers, Watermains and Roads”. DO A.1.12.2 City of Toronto Requirements for Highway and Pedestrian Bridges, Retaining Walls, Barriers

Page 6 of 12 39 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

and Highway Accessory Supports of a Structural Nature.

1. Design highway structures in accordance with the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code and Ontario Ministry of Transportation “Structural Manual”. 2. Design highway structures in accordance Ministry of Transportation “Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways” and Transportation Association of Canada “Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads”.

A.1.12.3 Drawing Standards

1. All drawing documentation shall be as set forth in the City of Toronto, Digital Graphics Standards Manual or as otherwise directed or approved by the City of Toronto. 2. Drawings with colours shall be reproducible by all printing or duplication media in black and white. 3. Except as may be modified or specified herein, or otherwise approved by the City of Toronto, the collection and depiction of subsurface utility information shall conform to the applicable provisions of CI/ASCE 38-02, “Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data”. 4. Drafting and lettering shall be of proper density and legibility for a 50% reduction during reproduction. 5. The depiction of attributes such as line type, material type, age, condition, ownership, status (e.g. in-service, out-of-service, active,COPY abandoned), number of conduits or direct buried cables, or other required information, shall not be eliminated, obliterated, or obscured by the manner of reproduction of by 50% reduction in size. 6. Final drawings for reproduction shall have all drafting work and image on one side of the sheet. 7. The Consultant shall replace, at no cost to the City of Toronto, plan sheets that do not comply with the above criteria.

A.1.12.4 Other Guidelines & Standards SUBMIT

1. The Consultant shall use recognized industry design standards, guidelines, and best practices to establish the basic design data and design criteria. The design must meet the requirements of relevant codes and applicable legislation. The following list of selected statutes and codes is provided for guidance only: (a) Ontario Provincial Standards for Roads and Public Works (b) Navigable Water Act (c) Environmental Protection Act, (d) Ontario Health and Safety Act

A.1.13 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

A.1.13.1 General NOT

1. The City requires the Consultant to exercise internal Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality VIEWINGControl (QC) for the projects it executes for the City. This is to ensure that the project will be executed to the City's requirements and expectations. 2. Preference will be given to Consultants having QA/QC programs in place at the time of Consultant selection.

A.1.13.2 QA Program DO 1. The Quality Assurance (QA) program that the City expects from the Consultant includes all

Page 7 of 12 40 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

those planned and systematic actions required to ensure that the works that are to be constructed, will be designed in accordance with applicable codes, guidelines, standards and specifications. 2. Perform the following minimum standard in QA for the project to ensure that the design work when completed has been reviewed and checked by senior staff from within the firm to ensure it has been performed in accordance with: (a) Good engineering practice (b) Constructability (c) Practical layout of equipment from an operation and maintenance perspective (d) Relevant code(s) and standard(s) that the project must comply with. (e) The City's requirements as specified herein and in the Request for Proposal (f) Other specific requirements to the project

A.1.13.3 QC Program

1. The Quality Control, which the City requires the Consultant to provide for projects, is the examination of the services provided and work done, together with management and documentation necessary to demonstrate that these services and works meet contractual and regulatory requirements. 2. The City requires engineering drawings producedCOPY by the Consultant have been checked: (a) For design errors (b) For drafting errors (c) To ensure proper co-ordination has been exercised between the various engineering disciplines within the firm and those performed by sub-consultant(s) (d) To ensure constructability 3. That specifications produced by the Consultant have been checked for completeness to ensure: (a) The City's legal and construction requirementsSUBMIT are met (b) To ensure the City's standards for Tender Form, General Conditions, Special Provisions etc. have been used (c) That all the required approvals and permits have been specified (d) That all codes and/or standards have been specified (e) That the Specifications are clear and concise

A.1.14 Designated Substances (including asbestos) Management

A.1.14.1 Designated Substances & Asbestos Surveys – General 4. The City requires investigations and recommendations on the management of designated substances as definedNOT under the Ontario Occupational Health & Safety Act. This includes the following Designated Substances that may be located at some City facilities: VIEWINGa) Asbestos - RRO 278/05; b) Isocyanates - RRO 842/90 amended to 108/04; c) Lead - RRO 843/90 amended to 109/04;

2. In addition to the designated substances listed above the following materials are also to be DOincluded:

Page 8 of 12 41 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

a) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); 3. Where the scope of work refers to “Designated Substances”, this includes all of the items noted above. 4. Unless specifically instructed in the Request for Proposal that a Designated Substances and Asbestos Survey Report (DSL Report, “the Report”) is not required, complete the Report in accordance with the requirements of the latest Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) and Regulations. The asbestos report shall identify the cost for asbestos removal and shall include the requirements to meet OHSA, including without limitation, the following: a) Inspect and sample area indicated and related equipment and services that are suspected of containing asbestos to establish whether any friable material that is likely to be disturbed, handled or removed during the demolition work, contains asbestos. Destructive testing shall be performed only on equipment that is to be demolished and is not currently in service. Obtain approval from the City prior to any destructive testing b) Carry out laboratory analysis of samples to determine type and percentage of asbestos. c) All sampled locations are to be labelled as to whether they contain asbestos or not. They shall be labelled as containing asbestos or not, through the use of durable, high visibility labels at least three inchesCOPY by one and a half inches in size and which properly and fully adhere to the surface (Spray painting of asbestos and asbestos free material is acceptable, and may be substituted for adhesive labels. High visibility paint in a distinctive colour is to be used). d) Prepare drawings and photographic documentation for all testing performed indicating type, location and extent of asbestos. e) A report shall be prepared that states whether friable material that is likely to be disturbed, handled or removed during construction.SUBMIT If it does contain asbestos, the report shall state the type of asbestos, the approximate quantity present, and the recommended removal type. The report shall be in full compliance with the requirements of Section 10 of Regulation 278/05. f) The “Report” must include recommendations regarding remediation prior to tendering of the contract. g) Ten (10) copies of the report shall be provided to the City, and one CD in the native electronic and pdf format.

A.1.14.2 Asbestos Management Work Scope Activities 1. Pre-Design Phase NOT a) Prepare survey in accordance with A.1.14.1 including a site survey, sampling and analysis, labelling onsite, and report generation. Note that if the consultant undertaking VIEWINGthe asbestos survey is not the prime consultant, the prime consultant responsible for design who is fully conversant with the scope of work must walk the site with the consultant undertaking the Report. Furthermore, the specialty consultant must be provided with a detailed site plan and work scope description prior to initiating the Report. DO2. Detailed Design Phase a) At completion of detailed design, re-confirm, in writing, that the scope of work

Page 9 of 12 42 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

matches the designated substances and asbestos survey conducted in pre-design and/or update the survey if required. Confirmation must be signed and stamped by a Professional Engineer who is knowledgeable as to the scope of work, and who is licensed in the Province of Ontario. Prepare a draft Owner’s Report for inclusion in the Tender Documents b) Include in the design specification a detailed protocol for: a) removal of asbestos required under the contract (if any); b) a strategy for dealing with any suspected (i.e. could not be tested for during design stage) or unanticipated designated substances and/or asbestos found during construction, and/or c) management in-place, as appropriate. c) If remediation prior to tendering is feasible, provide a detailed scope of work for: a) asbestos abatement; and/or b) to manage asbestos in-place. The City will provide services for abatement and/or management. Include for monitoring of asbestos abatement/management by qualified personnel, and provide a clearance certificate, if applicable 3. Construction Phase a) Include for monitoring of asbestos removal and/or management by qualified consultants, and provide a clearance certificate, if applicable b) Update the DSL Report and prepare a draft Asbestos Owner’s Report as scope changes to the contract necessitate

A.1.14.2 Mandatory Qualifications for ConsultantsCOPY Undertaking Designated Substances & Asbestos Surveys 1. Consultants or sub-consultants completing designated substances and asbestos surveys for projects at Toronto Water facilities must fulfill the following mandatory requirements. Proof that the requirements are met must be provided to the City’s Project Manager, prior to any associated work proceeding:

a) The firm must have a minimum five years experience working on similar projects, and experience within the municipal governmentSUBMIT environment. b) The project manager must have a minimum five years experience working on similar projects, and experience within the municipal government environment. c) Principal or Senior Environmental Consultant must be a certified Industrial Hygienist with mandatory of five years related experience, and preferably ten years experience. d) Each inspector shall possess the following minimum qualifications to be eligible for consideration under this contract: e) Be full time employee with the successful firm prior to commencement of work. During the period of employment, the employee must be engaged in designated substance and hazardous waste survey work and hazardous abatement/project management on a full time basis. f) Have a minimumNOT of three year’s experience carrying out designated substance and hazardous waste facility surveys and supervising of abatement contractors/ projects management. VIEWINGg) Have attended asbestos facility survey and abatement courses (minimum three (3) days duration). The City recognizes that there are currently no mandatory accreditation courses. Therefore provide details on the courses completed, including the date(s) of training. h) Have been trained in the use and care of respirators.

A.1.14.2 DOMandatory Qualifications for Laboratories being used for Designated Substances &

Page 10 of 12 43 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

Asbestos Surveys 1. The proposed laboratory must meet the following criteria: a) Performing the analyses must be accredited under the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). Submit sample lab report with the proposal. Submit the name and NVLAP number of the accredited Bulk Analysis Laboratory that is to be used for sample analysis. All samples must be analyzed in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of Labour Code. b) For asbestos note the following: a. Individuals performing analysis should be personnel registered in Asbestos Analyst Registry (AAR) of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and the local Ministry of Labour Code as appropriate. b. Samples must be analyzed using appropriate method for determination

A.1.15 Health & Safety

A.1.15.1 General Requirements 1. The successful proponent is responsible for meeting the requirements of the Occupational Health & Safety Act and City Health & Safety Manual and the consultant is to review their safe work procedures with the City prior to undertaking any field work onsite. 2. The consultant’s staff on-site during any phaseCOPY of the project must be knowledgeable of the governing safety regulations including, but not limited to, Industrial Regulations, Construction Regulations, Regulation Respecting Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Building Repair Operations, Diving Operations, Designated Substances, WHMIS, Workplace Safety & Insurance Act, Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act, Technical Standards & Safety Act, Highway Traffic Act, Fire Protection & Promotions Act, X-Ray Safety. 3. The consultant’s staff on-site during any phase of theSUBMIT project must possess written proof of competency such as appropriate training and experience in health and safety related activities applicable to the project (i.e. confined space entry, fall arrest, First Aid & CPR, Ladder & scaffolding training documentation, WHMIS training documentation, asbestos awareness and any other appropriate certificate required to be onsite). 4. WHMIS training, confined space awareness training, and 4-hour asbestos awareness training, is mandatory for all consultant’s staff present on-site during any phase of the project. The City may request proof of training at any time. 5. For facilities where specific site orientation and security protocol exist, the consultant’s staff onsite during any phase of the project must attend a mandatory 2-hour health and safety orientation specific to the treatment plant site before undertaking any work onsite. Staff must adhere to site securityNOT and emergency procedures at all times. 6. The successful proponent is responsible for providing all safety equipment for the protection of their staff, including gas detection, safety retrieval devices, and any ancillary VIEWINGequipment for confined space entries (CSEs) required for inspection purposes. Certification in CSE is a pre-requisite and experience in the use of self-contained breathing apparatus is also a requirement. 7. A standard entry permit must be completed before any CSE's take place. City staff will be available to allow access to the facilities only. DO A.1.15.2 1. Prior to initiating any work onsite, the consultant must submit a letter on company

Page 11 of 12 44 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.1 – GENERAL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS –DECEMBER 2011 ______

letterhead, identifying that all personnel engaged in the assignment have had appropriate training in accordance with Section 1.15.1.4 and 1.15.1.5. The letter must be signed and signed by personnel who have the authority to bind the corporation.

END OF APPENDIX A1

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

Page 12 of 12 45 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.3 – ENGINEERING STUDIES STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS APRIL 2008 ______

A.3 ENGINEERING STUDIES

A.3.1 Meetings

Refer to Appendix A.1 for details regarding project meetings.

A.3.2 Data Collection

A.3.2.1. General

The Consultant shall review all available pertinent documentation and conduct all necessary field inspections, testing, studies, and surveys to suit the study scope.

A.3.2.2. Existing Data Collection

1. Existing Documents, Record Drawings and Existing Conditions The City will provide copies of available record drawings, reports studies and other documents pertaining to the study. Visit the site as required to determine existing conditions, services, features, routes, access,COPY interference, etc., related to the study. The Consultant shall note that changes may have been made over time without updating the documents or record drawings. Prior to commencement of the engineering study, the Consultant shall review the existing background information, as well as conduct a site review of the structure to confirm changes or omissions, if any, in the record drawings. The expected level of the site review includes at a minimum, a walk- through of the structure and visual observations. The Consultant shall record its findings and advise the PM of any significant changes or omissions in the existing documents and record drawings. SUBMIT Any additional work required due to the Consultant’s failure to review documents or record drawings will be at the Consultant’s own cost.

2. Current Projects

Review scope of current City projects and identify potential impacts on this study. Ensure that any potential impacts/conflicts are identified and discussed with the City’s Project Team, for resolution by the City.

3. Existing Structure

Perform a field reviewNOT of the existing structure relevant to the study. Verify existing structure capacities, conditions and layout.

VIEWING A.3.2.3. New Data Collection

1. Following the collection of all existing data, the consultant shall prepare a Technical Memorandum summarizing the collected information, identifying where data gaps exist, and outline a recommended Study Plan so that sufficient new data can be collected to DOadequately complete the study. 2. Study Plan

Page 1 of 3 46 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.3 – ENGINEERING STUDIES STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS APRIL 2008 ______

The consultant shall prepare a Study Plan tailored to the scope and goals of this study outlining the following: - materials to be sampled and rationale - inspection equipment and methodology - parameters to be monitored or tested and rationale - comparative criteria (i.e. applicable Codes, Standards, Regulations, Guidelines, etc.) - schedule

A.3.3 Standards

Refer to the RFP Section 2.3 for the City’s standards.

The Consultant shall note that topographic mapping, field edit, compiled area plan, and property surveys are collections of data from various sources. This information requires proper editing and formatting by the Consultant in accordance with the City’s drafting standard before being used as a base plan.

A.3.4 Conceptual Design Alternatives COPY A.3.4.1 The Consultant shall develop several conceptual design alternatives and summarize in a Technical Memo, which will provide the foundation for the study. Where possible, a minimum of three viable alternatives are to be identified for comparison purposes. In general, these should represent a range of alternatives with respect to life cycle, complexity and cost.

A.3.4.2 Submit a Technical Memo outlining the alternative conceptual designs for consideration in the study to the City for approval prior to commencement of the review. SUBMIT A.3.5 Study Report

A.3.5.1 The final study report shall outline the pertinent pre-existing data collected, summarise the results of the study plan, detail the conceptual design alternatives developed, provide an analysis and comparison of these alternatives, and include a recommendation on the preferred alternative. The analysis shall be based on the technical information, prepared by the Consultant. The analysis and comparison of the alternatives shall include, but not be limited to the following:

1. Cost of ownership (i.e. lifecycle costs) 2. Capacity, performance and efficiency 3. Operational issues andNOT concerns 4. Site constraints 5. Design and construction schedule VIEWING6. Constructability challenges A.3.5.2 The review shall document the process with sufficient level of detail to support the City’s decision on proceeding with the selected alternative.

A.3.5.3 In general, the report shall include technical memoranda, the results of the study plan, and any modelling, notes of meetings, and copies of relevant correspondence with the study DOstakeholders.

Page 2 of 3 47 of 138 ______

APPENDIX A.3 – ENGINEERING STUDIES STRUCTURES & EXPRESSWAYS APRIL 2008 ______

A.3.6 Deliverables

A.3.6.1 The following provides a list of deliverables upon completion of the study. The Consultant shall note that the RFP may contain additional project specific deliverables. 1. Draft and final study plan 2. Technical Memo on Design Alternatives 3. First draft Study Report 4. Second draft Pre-design Study Report 5. Final Study Report

END OF APPENDIX A.3 COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

Page 3 of 3 48 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX B- RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

49 of 138

APPENDIX B RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1 PROPONENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES ...... B -2 2 PRIME PROPONENT ...... B -2 3 SUBCONSULTANTS ...... B-2 4 QUESTIONS ...... B-2 5 ADDENDA...... B-3 6 EXCEPTIONS ...... B-3 7 OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES AND INTERPRETATIONS ...... B-3 8 INCURRED COSTS ...... B -4 9 POST-SUBMISSION ADJUSTMENTS ...... B-4 10 NO COLLUSION ...... B-4 11 PROHIBITION AGAINST GRATUITIES ...... B-4 12 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSALS ...... B -5 13 VERIFICATION ...... B-5 14 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ...... B -5 15 OWNERSHIP AND CONFIDENTIALITY OF CITY-PROVIDED DATA ...... B-6 COPY B 16 OWNERSHIP AND DISCLOSURE OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION ...... -6 17 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ...... B-7 18 FAILURE OR DEFAULT OF A PROPONENT ...... B-7 19 PUBLICITY...... B-7 20 AGREEMENT ...... B-7 21 COPYRIGHT ...... B-8 22 DISCLAIMER ...... B-8 23 GOVERNING LAW ...... SUBMITB -8 24 UNBALANCED BIDS ...... B -8

NOT VIEWING DO

50 of 138 B-1

1 PROPONENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES

.1 It shall be the responsibility of each Proponent

(a) to examine all the components of this RFP, including all Appendices, Forms and Ad- denda; (b) to acquire a clear and comprehensive knowledge of the required services before sub- mitting a Proposal; (c) to become familiar, and (if it becomes a successful Proponent) comply, with all of the City’s Policies and Legislation set out on the City of Toronto website at www.toronto.ca/tenders/index.htm

.2 The failure of any Proponent to receive or examine any document, form, addendum, agreement, policy shall not relieve the Proponent of any obligation with respect to its Proposal, executed Agreement or Purchase Order.

2 PRIME PROPONENT COPY .1 A joint Proposal by a consortium of two or more Proponents having no formal corporate links may be submitted, but one person or company must be shown as the Prime Proponent and be prepared to represent the consortium to the City by executing the Agree- ment, acting as the primary contact, and taking overall responsibility for performance of the Agreement. .2 Where a proposal is made by a Prime Proponent with associate firms working with or under the Prime Proponent in either a sub-contracting or consortium relationship, it is required that those associate firms be named in the proposal.SUBMIT

3 SUBCONSULTANTS

.1 Utilizing a subconsultant to augment and enhance the Proponent’s service is acceptable. The successful Proponent shall be solely responsible for the payment of every subconsultant employed, engaged, or retained by it for the purpose of assisting it in the performance of its obligations under the Agreement. The successful Proponent shall coordinate the services of its subconsultant in a manner acceptable to the City, and ensure that they comply with all theNOT relevant requirements of the Agreement. .2 The successful Proponent shall be liable to the City for all costs or damages arising from VIEWINGacts, omissions, negligence or willful misconduct of its subconsultant. 4 QUESTIONS

.1 All questions concerning this RFP should be directed in writing to the City employee(s) designatedDO as “City Contacts” in the Notice to Potential Proponents.

51 of 138 B-2

.2 No City representative, whether an official, agent or employee, other than those identified “City Contracts” are authorized to speak for the City with respect to this RFP, and any Proponent who uses any information, clarification or interpretation from any other repre- sentative does so entirely at the Proponent’s own risk.

.3 Not only shall the City not be bound by any representation made by an unauthorized per- son, but any attempt by a Proponent to bypass the RFP process may be grounds for rejection of its Proposal.

5 ADDENDA

.1 If it becomes necessary to revise any part of this RFP, the revisions will be by Addendum posted electronically in Adobe PDF format on the City’s website at www.toronto.ca/calldocuments. Proponents and prospective Proponents SHOULD MONITOR THAT SITE as frequently as they deem appropriate until the day of the Deadline. Only answers to issues of substance will be posted. The City reserves the right to revise this RFP up to the Closing Deadline. When an Addendum is issued the date for submitting Proposals may be revised by the City if, in its opinion, determines more time is necessary to enable Proponents to revise their Proposals. COPY .2 All Proponents must acknowledge receipt of all Addenda in the space provided on the Proposal Submission Form. .3 The City’s Purchasing and Materials Management Division will make reasonable efforts to issue the final Addendum (if any) no later than two (2) DaysSUBMIT prior to the Deadline. 6 EXCEPTIONS

If a Proponent wishes to suggest a change to any mandatory term or condition set forth in any part of this RFP, it should notify the City in writing not later than three days before the Closing Deadline. The Proponent must clearly identify any such term or condition, the proposed change and the reason for it. If the City wishes to accept the proposed change, the City will issue an Addendum as described in the article above titled Addenda. The decision of the City shall be final and binding, from which there is no appeal. Changes to mandatory terms and conditions that have not been accepted by the City by the issuance of an Addendum are not permitted and any Proposal that takes exception to or does not comply with the mandatoryNOT terms and conditions of this RFP will be rejected. 7VIEWING OMISSIONS, DISCREPANCIES AND INTERPRETATIONS

.1 A Proponent who finds omissions, discrepancies, ambiguities or conflicts in any of the RFP documentation or who is in doubt as to the meaning or has a dispute respecting any part of the RFP should notify the City in writing not later than three days before the Closing Deadline.DO If the City considers that a correction, explanation or interpretation is necessary or desirable, the City will issue an Addendum as described in the article above titled Addenda. The decision and interpretation of the City respecting any such disputes shall

52 of 138 B-3

be final and binding, from which there is no appeal. No oral explanation or interpretation shall modify any of the requirements or provisions of the RFP documents.

8 INCURRED COSTS

.1 The City will not be liable for, nor reimburse, any potential Proponent or Proponent, as the case may be, for costs incurred in the preparation, submission or presentation of any Proposal, for interviews or any other activity that may be requested as part of the evaluation process or the process for the negotiation or execution of an Agreement with the City, as the case may be. .2 The rejection or non-acceptance of any or all Proposals shall not render the City liable for any costs or damages to any firm that submits a Proposal.

9 POST-SUBMISSION ADJUSTMENTS

.1 No unilateral adjustments by Proponents to submitted Proposals will be permitted. .2 A Proponent may withdraw its Proposal prior to the Deadline any time by notifying the City Buyer designated in this RFP in writing. COPY .3 A Proponent who has withdrawn a Proposal may submit a new Proposal, but only in ac- cordance with the terms of this RFP. .4 After the Deadline each submitted Proposal shall be binding on Proponents for a period of 120 Days. .5 If the City makes a request to a Proponent for clarification of its Proposal, the Proponent will provide a written response accordingly, which shallSUBMIT then form part of the Proposal. 10 NO COLLUSION

.1 No Proponent may discuss or communicate about, directly or indirectly, the preparation or content of its Proposal with any other Proponent or the agent or representative of any other Proponent or prospective Proponent. If the City discovers there has been a breach at any time, the City reserves the right to disqualify the Proposal or terminate any ensuing Agreement.

11 PROHIBITION AGAINST GRATUITIESNOT

VIEWING.1 No Proponent and no employee, agent or representative of the Proponent, may offer or give any gratuity in the form of entertainment, participation in social events, gifts or otherwise to any officer, director, agent, appointee or employee of the City in connection with or arising from this RFP, whether for the purpose of securing an Agreement or seeking favourable treatment in respect to the award or amendment of the Agreement or influencing the performance of the Agreement, including without restriction enforcement of performanceDO standards, or expressing appreciation, or providing compensation, for the

53 of 138 B-4

award of an Agreement or for performance of the City's obligations thereunder or for con- ferring favours or being lenient, or in any other manner whatsoever. .2 If the City determines that this article has been breached by or with respect to a Proponent, the City may exclude its Proposal from consideration, or if an Agreement has already been entered into, may terminate it without incurring any liability.

12 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSALS

.1 The City shall not be obliged to accept any Proposal in response to this RFP. .2 The City may, without incurring any liability or cost to any Proponent: (a) accept or reject any or all Proposal(s) at any time; (b) waive immaterial defects and minor irregularities in any Proposal; (c) modify and/or cancel this RFP prior to accepting any Proposal; (d) award a contract in whole or in part.

.3 The City is relying on the experience and expertise of the Proponent. The City reserves the right to disqualify any Proponent who has given inaccurate, incomplete, false or misleading information in the sole opinion of the City. COPY

13 VERIFICATION

.1 The City reserves the right to verify with any Proponent or with any other person any information provided in its Proposal but shall be under no obligation to receive further information. SUBMIT .2 If, in the opinion of the City, any Proponent has clearly misinterpreted the services or underestimated the hours or value of the services to be performed as reflected in its Proposal content and submitted price/fees, or all or any or any combination of them, then the City may reject its Proposal as unbalanced (i.e., not representative of the scope of the services).

14 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

.1 In its Proposal, the Proponent must disclose to the City any potential conflict of interest that might compromise the performanceNOT of the Work. If such a conflict of interest does exist, the City may, at its discretion, refuse to consider the Proposal. VIEWING.2 The Proponent must also disclose whether it is aware of any City employee, Council member or member of a City agency, board or commission or employee thereof having a financial interest in the Proponent and the nature of that interest. If such an interest exists or arises during the evaluation process or the negotiation of the Agreement, the City may, at its discretion, refuse to consider the Proposal or withhold the awarding of any Agreement to theDO Proponent until the matter is resolved to the City’s sole satisfaction. .3 If, during the Proposal evaluation process or the negotiation of the Agreement, the Proponent is retained by another client giving rise to a potential conflict of interest, then the

54 of 138 B-5

Proponent will so inform the City. If the City requests, then the Proponent will refuse the new assignment or will take such steps as are necessary to remove the conflict of interest concerned. .4 Proponents are cautioned that the acceptance of their Proposal may preclude them from participating as a Proponent in subsequent projects where a conflict of interest may arise. The successful Proponent for this project may participate in subsequent/other City projects provided the successful Proponent has satisfied pre-qualification requirements of the City, if any, and in the opinion of the City, no conflict of interest would adversely affect the performance and successful completion of an Agreement by the successful Proponent.

15 OWNERSHIP AND CONFIDENTIALITY OF CITY-PROVIDED DATA

.1 All correspondence, documentation and information provided by City staff to any Proponent or prospective Proponent in connection with, or arising out of this RFP, the Services or the acceptance of any Proposal

(a) is and shall remain the property of the City; (b) must be treated by Proponents and prospective Proponents as confidential; (c) must not be used for any purpose other than for replying to this RFP, and for fulfillment of any related subsequent agreement.COPY

16 OWNERSHIP AND DISCLOSURE OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION

.1 The documentation comprising any Proposal submitted in response to this RFP, along with all correspondence, documentation and information provided to the City by any Proponent in connection with, or arising out of this RFP, once receivedSUBMIT by the City:

(a) shall become the property of the City and may be appended to the Agreement and/or Purchase Order with the successful Proponent; (b) shall become subject to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act ("MFIPPA"), and may be released, pursuant to that Act.

.2 Because of MFIPPA, prospective Proponents are advised to identify in their Proposal material any scientific, technical, commercial, proprietary or similar confidential information, the disclosure of which couldNOT cause them injury. .3 Each Proponent’s name at a minimum shall be made public on request. Proposals will be made available to members of City Council provided their requests have been made in VIEWINGaccordance with the City’s procedure and may be released to members of the public pursuant to MFIPPA. DO

55 of 138 B-6

17 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

.1 Each Proponent warrants that the information contained in its Proposal does not infringe any intellectual property right of any third party and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its staff and its consultants, if any, against all claims, actions, suits and proceedings, including all costs incurred by the City brought by any person in respect of the infringement or alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trademark, or other intellectual property right in connection with their Proposal.

18 FAILURE OR DEFAULT OF A PROPONENT

.1 If the Proponent, for any reason, fails or defaults in respect of any matter or thing which is an obligation of the Proponent under the terms of the RFP, the City may disqualify the Proponent from the RFP and/or from competing for future tenders or RFP issued by the City for a period of one year. In addition, the City may at its option either: a) Consider that the Proponent has withdrawn any offer made, or abandoned the Agreement if the offer has been accepted,COPY whereupon the acceptance, if any, of the City shall be null and void; or b) Require the Proponent to pay the City the difference between its Proposal and any other Proposal which the City accepts, if the latter is for a greater amount and, in addition, to pay the City any cost which the City may incur by reason of the Proponent’s failure or default, and further the Proponent will indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents from all loss, damage, liability, cost, charge and expense whatever which it, theySUBMIT or any of them may suffer, incur or be put to by reason of such default or failure of the Proponent.

19 PUBLICITY

.1 The Proponent and its affiliates, associates, third-party service providers, and subcontractors shall not release for publication any information in connection with this RFP or any Agreement without prior written permission of the City.

20 AGREEMENT NOT

VIEWING1 The successful Proponent(s), if any, may be required to enter into a written Agreement with the City of the type included in the Appendices of this RFP ("Consulting Services Agree- ment") subject to such additions and other modifications consistent with the other parts of this RFP, the Proponent's Proposal and the results of any negotiations as described in the Proposal Evaluation and Selection section of this RFP. .2 The DOAgreement may include a provision for Construction Lien Act requirements that will be applied on this assignment.

56 of 138 B-7

.3 In the event that the City elects to forego a formal Agreement and issue a Purchase Order only for the required services, the provisions contained within the specimen Consulting Services Agreement including the insurance requirements will apply. .4 Prior to contract execution or issuance of a Purchase Order, the successful Proponent shall supply: (a) Occupational Health and Safety Statutory Declarations (as set forth in the Appendices of this RFP); (b) Insurance Certificates (as set forth in the specimen Consulting Services Agreement).

21 COPYRIGHT

.1 The City is the copyright owner of the content of this RFP and other Information/documentation provided in connection with it. The City hereby authorizes each prospective Proponent to make copies of this RFP and such other documentation in whole or in part for the purpose of preparing and submitting a Proposal, but all other uses are strictly prohibited.

22 DISCLAIMER COPY

.1 While the City has made considerable effort to ensure that accurate information is contained in this RFP, the information contained in this RFP is supplied solely as a guideline for Proponents. The City, its directors, officers, servants, employees, agents and consultants expressly disclaim any and all liability for representations, warranties expressed or implied or contained in, or for omissions from this RFP or any written or oral information transmitted or made available at any time toSUBMIT a Proponent by or on behalf of the City of Toronto.

23 GOVERNING LAW

.1 This RFP and any Proposal submitted in response to it and the process contemplated by this RFP including any ensuing Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario. Any dispute arising out of this RFP or this RFP process will be determined by a court of competent jurisdictionNOT in the Province of Ontario. 24 UNBALANCED BIDS VIEWING The City may reject a bid if it determines, in its sole discretion, that the bid is materially imbalanced. A bid is materially imbalanced when: (1) it is basedDO on prices which are significantly less than cost for some items of work and prices which are significantly overstated in relation to cost for other items of work; and

57 of 138 B-8

(2) the City had determined that the proposal may not result in the lowest overall cost to the City even though it may be the lowest submitted bid; or (3) it is so unbalanced as to be tantamount to allowing an advance payment.

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

58 of 138 B-9 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX C- SUBMISSION FORMS

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

59 of 138

APPENDIX C - SUBMISSION FORMS

FORM 1: Proposal Submission Form – (Mandatory)

FORM 2: Policy to Exclude Bids from External Parties Involved in the Preparation or Development of a Specific Call/Request – (Mandatory)

FORM 3: Restrictions on the Hiring and Use of Former City of Toronto Management Employees for City Contracts – If Applicable

FORM 4: Environmentally Responsible Procurement – If Applicable

FORM 5: Notice of No Submission – If Applicable

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

60 of 138

FORM 2

POLICY TO EXCLUDE BIDS FROM EXTERNAL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE PREPARATION OR DEVELOPMENT OF A SPECIFIC CALL/REQUEST.

To ensure Fair and Equal Treatment in its competitive procurements, the City of Toronto will undertake to:  disallow bidders/proponent from submitting a bid to any Tender, Quotation, or Proposal call in which the bidders/proponent has participated in the preparation of the call document; and  a bidder/proponent who fails to comply will result in disqualification of their response to the call/request.

Did you, the proponent, assist the City of Toronto in the preparation of this Request for Proposal call?

Specify: Yes ______No ______

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

62 of 138

FORM 3

RESTRICTIONS ON THE HIRING AND USE OF FORMER CITY OF TORONTO MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES FOR CITY CONTRACTS

The purpose of this Policy to ensure that former City of Toronto management employees who took part in a separation program or received a retirement package, are prohibited from participating in contracts directly or indirectly related to the City of Toronto or its special purpose bodies for a period of two years starting from an employee's separation date. Former employees covered by this policy are prohibited from participating in contracts directly or indirectly related to the City of Toronto or its special purpose bodies for a period of two years starting from the employee’s separation date. This would include, but not be limited to, for example, the following roles:  As an independent contractor/consultant;  As a contractor/consultant on City project work for a company/firm (but, the firm may compete); or  As a contractor/consultant on City project work for a company/firm that has been sub-contracted by another company/firm. Former City of Toronto management employees who took part in a separation program or received a retirement incentive are prohibited from participating in contracts directly or indirectly related to the City of Toronto and its special purpose bodies for a period of two years starting from anCOPY employee’s termination date. Notes: (1) Adopted by Council at its meeting of February 4, 5, & 6, 1998, Report No. 2, Clause No. 2 of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and (2) Revised by City Council at its meeting of November 26, 27, 28, 2002, Report No. 14, Clause No. 6, Administration Committee. Respondents are to state the name(s) of any former City of Toronto management employee(s) hired/used by your firm, if any, who have left the employ of the City or its special purpose bodiesSUBMIT within the last two years. Specify: . This policy will be considered in the evaluation of all submissions received by the City of Toronto. For further information contact: Manager, Corporate Purchasing, Policy & Quality Assurance 18th Floor, West Tower, City Hall, (416) 392-0387 NOT VIEWING DO

63 of 138

FORM 4

Environmentally Responsible Procurement Statement

The City of Toronto Environmentally Responsible Procurement Policy encourages bidders to also offer products/services that are environmentally preferred.

Environmentally preferred products/services offered must be competitive in cost, conform to specifications, performance requirements and, be suitable for the intended application as determined by the using department(s)

Environmentally preferred products/services are those such as durable products, reusable products, energy efficient products, low pollution products/services, products (including those used in services) containing maximum levels of post-consumer waste and/or recyclable content, and products which provide minimal impact to the environment.

An environmentally preferred product is one that is less harmful to the environment than the next best alternative having characteristics including, but not limited to the following:

1. Reduce waste and make efficient use of resources: An Environmentally Preferred Product would be a product that is more energy, fuel, or water efficient, or that uses less paper, ink, or other resources. For example, energy-efficient lighting, and photocopiers capable of double-sided photocopying.

2. Are reusable or contain reusable parts: These products COPYsuch as rechargeable batteries, reusable building partitions, and laser printers with refillable toner cartridges.

3. Are recyclable: A product will be considered to be an Environmentally Preferred Product if local facilities exist capable of recycling the product at the end of its useful life.

4. Contain recycled materials: An Environmentally Preferred Product contains post-consumer recycled content. An example is paper products made from recycled post-consumer fibre.

5. Produce fewer polluting by-products and/or safety hazards during manufacture,SUBMIT use or disposal: An EPP product would be a non-hazardous product that replaces a hazardous product.

6. Have a long service-life and/or can be economically and effectively repaired to upgraded.

Bidders shall if requested, provide written verification of any environmental claims made in their bid/proposal satisfactory to the City of Toronto within five (5) working days of request at no cost to the City. Verification may include, but not be limited to, certification to recognized environmental program (e.g., Environmental Choice Program [ECP]), independent laboratory tests or manufacturer's certified tests, Only proven environmentally preferred products/services shall be offered. Experimental or prototype products/services will not be considered.

For a copy of the City of Toronto EnvironmentallyNOT Responsible Procurement Policy, visit the website at http://www.toronto.ca/calldocuments/pdf/environment_procurement.pdf

StateVIEWING if environmentally preferred products/service is being offered: YES______NO______

State briefly the environmental benefit of the product/service offered:

______

______DO

64 of 138

FORM 5

NOTICE OF “NO SUBMISSION”

RFP # : 9117-13-5001 JB

CLOSING DATE: February 8, 2013

IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ THIS

It is important to the City of Toronto to receive a reply from all invited Proponents. There is no obligation to submit a Proposal; however, should you choose not to submit, completion of this form will assist the City in determining the type of services you are interested in submitting a Proposal in the future.

INSTRUCTIONS:

If you are unable, or do not wish to submit a Proposal on this Request for Proposals, please complete the following portions of this form. State your reason for not submitting a Proposal by checking applicable box(es) or by explaining briefly in the space provided. It is not necessary to return any other Request for Proposals documents. Just return the completed form in the enclosed Proposal Submission Envelope prior to the official closing date.

COPY 1. We do not offer this service. Other reasons or additional comments.

2. We do not offer services to these requirements.

3. Unable to offer services competitively.

4. Cannot handle due to present commitments. SUBMIT 5. Quantity/project too large.

6. Cannot meet delivery/completion requirements.

7. Licensing restrictions.

Do you wish to participate in Request for Proposals for services in the future? YES ____ NO ____

For City’s use only - Do not write in this space. Company Name:

Address: NOT

VIEWING Signature of Company Representative:

Position:

DO Date: Tel. No.:

Fax No.:

65 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX D- SPECIMEN CONTRACT AGREEMENT, INCLUDING INSURANCE FORMS

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

66 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

THIS AGREEMENT made in quadruplicate this ______day of ______, 200__

BETWEEN: CITY OF TORONTO (the “City”) Of The First Part - and -

[ENTER Consultant’s Full Legal Name] (the “Consultant”) Of The Second Part

WHEREAS the City issued the RFP in connection with obtaining professional consulting services for the Project and the Consultant submitted a Proposal in response to the RFP; and

WHEREAS the Consultant has agreed to perform Services in connection with the Project, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and

INSERT 1 of the following clauses: [Approval Clause - by GM] WHEREAS the Consultant was selected in accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code Chapters 71 and 195 to provide the Services in connection with the Project in accordance with all the terms and conditions of the RFP and the ProposalCOPY at a total cost not in excess of $[ENTER AMOUNT] inclusive of contingency and applicable taxes, being within the delegated authority and financial authority of the Division Head; OR [Approval Clause - by Bid Committee] WHEREAS at its meeting held on [ENTER DATE], the Bid Committee adopted the recommendations in the Staff Report from the Director of Purchasing and Materials Management dated [ENTER DATE], and authorized the retention of the ConsultantSUBMIT to provide the Services in connection with the Project; OR [Approval Clause - by Council] WHEREAS at its meeting held on [ENTER DATE], City Council adopted Item No. __ of Report No. ___ of the [ENTER appropriate committee name] Committee, thereby authorizing the retention of the Consultant to provide the Services in connection with the Project;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: 1. INTERPRETATION NOT (1) The Interpretation provisions of and definitions contained in the RFP are incorporated into and VIEWINGform part of this Agreement. (2) Definitions In addition to the foregoing, the following terms shall have the meanings as specified in this section unless the context otherwise specifies or requires:

(a) “Additional Services” are those services which are not contemplated or provided for in the scope ofDO Services set out in the RFP and which are expressly authorized by the Division Head in writing and in advance in accordance with this Agreement. (b) “Addendum” and “Addenda” means a written addendum or written addenda issued by the City which modify the RFP and include(s) the following:

67 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

[INSERT “None.” where no Addenda and DELETE box below]

 Addendum No. 1 dated [ENTER DATE]  Addendum No. 2 dated [ENTER DATE]  Addendum No. 3 dated [ENTER DATE]

(c) “Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a statutory or civic holiday in the Province of Ontario. (d) “Claims” or “Claim” means any demands, claims, actions, causes of action, suits, proceedings, executions, liens or otherwise for, without limitation, compensation, liabilities, damages or loss of any kind and any nature whatsoever and howsoever caused including property damage or loss, bodily injury or death, loss of reputation, loss of opportunity, economic loss, royalties, judgments, fines, penalties, interest, charges, expenses and costs (including legal costs on a substantial indemnity basis). (e) “City” means the City of Toronto and where an authority or discretion is conferred upon the City under this Agreement, means the appropriate official or representative of the City as designated or appointed under its governing by-laws, resolutions or policies from time to time or under this Agreement. (f) “Clarification Letter(s)” means a written document issued by the Consultant clarifying its Proposal.

The Consultant's Proposal has been clarified by the following letter(s) of the Consultant:

 Letter(s) of the Consultant dated [ENTER DATE]COPY (the “Clarification Letter(s)”). Each reference in this Agreement to the Consultant’s Proposal (or individually to the Consultant’s Technical Proposal or Cost of Services Proposal) shall be taken as a reference to the respective Proposal as modified by the foregoing Clarification Letter(s).

[INSERT “There has been no clarification made of the Consultant’s Proposal.” where no Clarification Letters and DELETE box above] SUBMIT (g) “Confidential Information” means, with respect to the City, all documents, information and material which are identified by the City to the Consultant as confidential or containing confidential information; or which ought by their nature to be considered as confidential or as containing confidential information of the City, which the Consultant and/or its subcontractors receive or are exposed to by reason of this Agreement or performing the Services including: (i) any personal information; (ii) any software code and associated documentation owned or licensed by the City; and (iii) any administrative, commercial, financial, proprietary, technical, commercial labour relations, statistical or regulatory information of the City, or of any third party which may be contained in records of the City and was supplied in confidence to the City and identified as such to the Consultant.NOT Notwithstanding the foregoing, Confidential Information shall not include any document, information or material that is or becomes publicly available through no act or failure of the Consultant from a source other than the Consultant prior to VIEWINGreceipt from the City; or becomes independently available to the Consultant as a matter of right. (h) “Construction Lien Act” means the Construction Lien Act, R.S.O. c. C.30 and regulations thereunder, as amended from time to time. (i) “Division Head” means the [General Manager, Toronto Water][Executive Director of Technical Services]DO [ENTER appropriate Division Head for Project] and includes such person’s designate. (j) “including” means “including but not limited to”.

68 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

(k) “Indemnitees” means the City, its elected officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, successors and assigns. (l) “Optional Item” means an item which has not been set out in the scope of work of the RFP but has been proposed by the Consultant in its Proposal as an enhancement or additional service which may benefit the Project. (m) “Personnel” means the Consultant’s personnel and includes: (i) the Consultant’s officers, directors, partners, employees, agents and subcontractors; (ii) any person employed or engaged by or under the control of the Consultant or its subcontractors to perform or supply any part of the Services including goods related thereto; and (iii) any other person for whom the Consultant is responsible at law. (n) “Project” means [ENTER brief Project description]. (o) “Proposal” means the Consultant’s Technical Proposal dated [ENTER DATE] and Cost of Services Proposal dated [ENTER DATE], including all appendices, exhibits and attachments thereto, submitted in response to the RFP (individually the “Technical Proposal” and the “Cost of Services Proposal”, respectively). Each reference to the Proposal in this Agreement shall be taken as a reference to the Proposal as modified by the Clarification Letter(s), if any. (p) “Provisional Item” means a Service identified in Schedule A which shall only be undertaken by the Consultant at the request and upon the prior written authorization of the Division Head. (q) “RFP” means the Request for Proposal No. [ENTER RFP # ], issued by the City on [ENTER DATE], in connection with obtaining professionalCOPY consulting services for the Project. Each reference to the RFP in this Agreement shall be taken as a reference to the RFP as modified by the Addenda, if any. (r) “Services” means those services, and goods related thereto, and obligations detailed in this Agreement, including Schedule A, to be provided and undertaken by the Consultant for the City and shall include Provisional Items and Additional Services, unless the context requires otherwise, authorized by the Division Head in accordance with this Agreement. (s) “Working Day” shall have the same meaning as set out orSUBMIT described in the RFP and, where there is no meaning or description of Working Day set out in the RFP, it shall have the same meaning as Business Day. (3) Interpretation (a) For the purposes of this Agreement, any reference to a “subcontractor” of the Consultant shall include a sub-consultant of the Consultant. (b) Any reference to the Division Head or other officer or representative of the City shall be construed to mean the person holding that office from time to time, and the designate or deputy of that person, and shall be deemed to include a reference to any person holding a successor office or the designateNOT or deputy of that person. (c) Without restricting or limiting the rights and privileges of the City to any broader interpretation, any breach or default of or in respect of a term, covenant, warranty, condition or provision of the VIEWINGAgreement, or a liability caused, by any of the Consultant’s Personnel shall constitute a breach or default or liability caused by the Consultant. (d) A reference to any Act, bylaw, rule, policy or regulation or to a provision thereof shall be deemed to include a reference to any Act, bylaw, rule, policy or regulation or provision enacted in substitutionDO thereof or amendment thereof. (e) This Agreement shall not be construed as or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit of any third parties, and no third party shall have any right of action arising in any way under this Agreement for any cause whatsoever.

69 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

(f) Any services, goods or incidentals not explicitly specified in this Agreement but which are necessary to conform to professional or safety standards or codes governing such Services, or which may be fairly implied as “included”, shall be done or supplied by the Consultant as if such services, goods or incidentals had been explicitly specified. (g) Any words and abbreviations, which have well-known professional, technical or trade meanings, are used in this Agreement in accordance with such recognized meanings, unless expressly provided otherwise. (h) All amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars and are to be payable in Canadian dollars and all references to time shall be deemed to be references to current time in the City.

(4) Priority of Documents In the event of any conflict or disagreement between the various documents or any omissions contained in the documents making up this Agreement, the documents shall govern in the following order of precedence: (a) A written amendment to this Agreement in accordance with the terms hereof, the amendment bearing the later date having priority (if any); (b) This Agreement including Schedules “A” and “B”; (c) Addenda, the addendum bearing the later date having priority (if any); (d) RFP; (e) Statutory Declaration by the Consultant (Schedule “SD-Final”); (f) Clarification Letter(s) of the Consultant (if any), the Clarification Letter bearing the later date having priority; and (g) Consultant’s Proposal (including the Technical Proposal and Cost of Services Proposal). The foregoing documents are incorporated into and COPYform part of this Agreement, even if said documents are not physically attached hereto. The Consultant acknowledges receipt of all such documents.

2. PERFORMANCE (1) The Consultant agrees and covenants, and represents and warrants, to the City and acknowledges that the City is relying on such representations, warranties and covenants in entering into this Agreement, as follows: SUBMIT (a) to supply and perform the Services, more particularly set forth in Schedule "A" attached hereto, and undertake, perform and complete its undertakings and obligations provided for in this Agreement to the satisfaction of the Division Head in accordance with all the terms and conditions of this Agreement; (b) to supply and provide, at its sole cost, save as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, all necessary equipment, goods, materials, analysis, transportation, accommodation, labour, personnel, technical assistance and incidentals required in performing or supplying the Services, and all overhead expenses in connection therewith; (c) to supply, perform and provide the Services in a careful, professional, skilful, diligent, timely and workmanlike manner accordingNOT to the best standards of practice, care, skill and diligence to be expected of professionals and contractors in the performance of services similar to those called for under this Agreement including the use of materials and methods as are properly VIEWINGsuited to the function and performance intended; (d) to make available and employ for the purposes of this Agreement only such persons as are professionally qualified, careful, skilled and experienced in the duties required of them to perform the Services properly and in a competent and professional manner and ensure that every such person is properly and thoroughly trained and instructed; (e) to ensureDO that its Personnel, when using any buildings, premises, equipment, hardware or software owned, leased or licensed by the City shall comply with all security policies, regulations or directives relating to those buildings, premises, equipment, hardware or software of which the Consultant has received oral or written notice;

70 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

(f) to use, in the performance of the Services, those Personnel specifically named in its Proposal and to not add to or substitute any such Personnel or engage any other subcontractor without the prior written approval of the Division Head. The City reserves the right to require the Consultant to immediately replace any of its Personnel supplying or performing the Services, upon written notice by the Division Head, where such person in the reasonable opinion of the Division Head has performed unsatisfactorily or breached an obligation of the Consultant under this Agreement or has otherwise acted improperly. The City shall not pay any fee or compensation whatsoever in respect of the time required by the replacement for any such Personnel to gain familiarity with the Project. (g) to be solely responsible for the payment of all its Personnel employed or engaged for the purpose of assisting in or undertaking any of its obligations under this Agreement; (h) to adhere to the Project time schedule and any amendments thereto approved in writing by the Division Head; and (i) to comply with and conform to all statutes, laws, by-laws, regulations, requirements, ordinances, notices, rulings, orders, directives and policies (including the City policies referenced in the RFP) of the municipal, provincial and federal governments and any other lawful authority and all court orders, judgments and declarations of a court of competent jurisdiction (collectively referred to as the “Laws”), applicable to the Services to be provided by, and the undertakings and obligations of, the Consultant under this Agreement. (2) The Consultant represents and warrants that its Personnel and, where applicable, the respective workforce of each are fully qualified to perform the Services and the obligations under this Agreement and hold all requisite licences, rights and other authorizations required by any Laws with respect thereto and all powers, capacities andCOPY authorities under its governing legislation. Where required by any Laws, the Personnel shall be duly licensed in performing the Services to the satisfaction of the Division Head. (3) The Consultant shall ensure that all its Personnel comply with the terms of this Agreement and, in particular without limiting the foregoing, the responsibilities of the Consultant with respect to matters concerning safety, compliance with all Laws and the conduct of the Services. (4) The Consultant shall co-ordinate the services of all its Personnel in a manner acceptable to the Division Head. The Consultant shall ensure that its PersonnelSUBMIT at all times work in a professional, co-operative and collegial manner with City staff and the City’s other consultants. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to control and check the Services of all of its Personnel and to ascertain that all Services are performed in accordance with this Agreement. (5) The Consultant, in providing the Services, shall and is deemed to be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of the City. (6) No subcontracting of any part of the Services or this Agreement by the Consultant shall relieve the Consultant of any responsibility for the full performance of all of its obligations under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the approval of any of its Personnel by the City, the Consultant shall be fully responsible for every such Personnel’s activities, works, Services and acts or omissions. Without limiting the generality of any other provision of this Agreement, the Consultant shall be solely responsible and liable to theNOT City for all its costs, losses or damages arising from errors or omissions or non-compliance with this Agreement of or by the Consultant’s Personnel or any of them. The Consultant’s responsibility and liability as set out in this Agreement shall survive the VIEWINGtermination or expiry of this Agreement. 3. PAYMENT (1) The City will pay the Consultant for the Services performed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, in the amounts and manner, and at the times, set forth in Schedule "B" Fees and Expenses heretoDO attached. (2) The Consultant shall, even if the rate of payment set forth in Schedule "B" hereto attached is based on an hourly, daily or other time-based rate, perform all of the Services notwithstanding that the value of the time spent by the Consultant in performance thereof exceeds the maximum amount

71 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

specified in the Schedule, on the basis that neither such rate nor any provision of this Agreement shall relieve the Consultant from performing all the Services or all its undertakings and obligations under this Agreement. (3) The Consultant agrees to keep and maintain accurate and complete records and accounts related to any costs payable by the City under this Agreement. All such records, including timesheets, correspondence, receipts and memoranda pertaining to the Services shall be available for inspection by any authorized employee or agent of the City at all reasonable times for the purpose of auditing the Consultant's costs and the Consultant shall provide every reasonable assistance for that purpose. Such records shall be kept for a period of 12 months after completion of all of the Consultant’s services in respect to the Project or termination of this Agreement, whichever occurs last. (4) At the request of the Division Head, the Consultant shall submit to the City, when claiming reimbursement of expenses, except where the RFP does not require disbursements to be itemized and claimed on an individual basis, detailed expense sheets, copies of receipts, and/or per diem documentation, invoices, vehicle travel records and all such documents and materials in respect of such expenses. (5) Upon completion of all Services pursuant to this Agreement, the Consultant shall submit to the Division Head a statutory declaration attached as Schedule SD-FINAL (Final Payment) to this Agreement, completed by a senior professional engineer (or, where professional engineering services are not performed, a senior professional regulated by a professional body in respect to the Services performed), who is a fully authorized representative of the Consultant, detailing the Services, or part thereof, for which payment is being claimed, itemizing all disbursements claimed at the time of such submission and certifying that such Services have been performed and disbursements claimed in accordance with the provisionsCOPY of this Agreement. The details of the performance of the Services, or part thereof, to be contained in the statutory declaration shall be satisfactory to the Division Head. (6) At the time of submission of the final statement or within a reasonable time thereafter, the Consultant shall submit to the Division Head the certificate of an auditor duly licensed under the Public Accounting Act, 2004 to the effect that in his/her opinion the charges set forth in such final statement (exclusive of any Services to be paid on a fixed fee basis) are properly chargeable under this Agreement. Audit reports must be in the format prescribed bySUBMIT The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). Reports which are not in accordance with current CICA guidelines will not be accepted. The City reserves the right to conduct an audit of the records of the Consultant at the option of the Division Head. In the event that the Services are scheduled to extend or, while not scheduled to do so, do extend beyond a period of two years, audit reports satisfactory to the Division Head shall be required at the end of the second year of Services and on the last day in each subsequent year in which Services are performed; provided, however, that in the final year of Services, the audit report shall be provided within 60 days of the last day of performance of the Services.

4. CONSTRUCTION LIEN ACT (1) For the purposes of this section, “supply of services”, “improvement” and “holdback” shall have the same meaning, respectively, as definedNOT by the Construction Lien Act. (2) Where any part of the Services constitutes a supply of services upon or in respect to an VIEWINGimprovement, the City shall retain a holdback as required by the Construction Lien Act from each sum otherwise payable to the Consultant under this Agreement with respect to those Services. The holdback shall be retained, held and released by the City in accordance with the Construction Lien Act.

5. RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP/CONFIDENTIALDO INFORMATION (1) Any item, including tangible and intangible property, created, prepared or purchased by the Consultant or any person on its behalf in connection with the Services or this Agreement and charged to the City’s account, including all original written materials, programs, card decks, tapes,

72 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

disks, listings, books, reports, drawings, maps plans, and all other documents, items, materials and information, (a) is and shall be deemed and shall remain the sole and absolute property of the City, including all copyright therein and rights of use and reproduction, without the payment of any additional compensation by the City to the Consultant; and (b) shall be delivered to the Division Head upon completion of the Services or other termination of this Agreement, whichever occurs first, or as otherwise directed by the Division Head. (2) All proprietary rights in, connected with or arising out of, the ideas, concepts, know-how, techniques, computer data or programming developed by the Consultant or the Consultant’s Personnel, or by the Consultant or the Consultant’s Personnel and the City and its personnel jointly, during the course of this Agreement relating to the Services provided under this Agreement shall be the sole and absolute property of the City and shall be treated as trade secrets to which the City alone is entitled, with the concomitant duty of confidentiality and non-disclosure. The Consultant shall obtain all necessary assignments of copyright and waivers of moral rights in all Services and related goods to be delivered to the City in accordance with this Agreement and shall provide satisfactory proof thereof to the Division Head upon request. (3) The Consultant acknowledges that any item, document or other matter which is the property of the City, or in which the City has proprietary rights, pursuant to subsections (1), (2) and (3) of this section and the information contained therein are the property of the City having been developed in confidence for the City for its own and sole use. (4) Any documents, data or other information obtained from the City or prepared by the Consultant for the City shall be disclosed only to those of the Consultant's employees, agents or subcontractors who have a "need to know" for purposes of assistingCOPY the Consultant in the performance of the Services. (5) The Consultant shall not use, disclose, disseminate or reproduce or in any way making known to third parties or to the public any Confidential Information of the City communicated to or acquired by the Consultant in the course of carrying out the Services, except: (a) as may be strictly required for the purposes of carrying out the Services, or (b) as expressly permitted in advance by the City in writing, or SUBMIT (c) as may be required by law to be disclosed pursuant to a court or tribunal order or other legal compulsion and, if so compelled, the Consultant shall only furnish the portion of the City Confidential Information that it is legally required to furnish. Where the Consultant is required by law to disclose any such documents, data or information, the Consultant shall promptly notify the Division Head upon such legal requirement being imposed to permit the City an opportunity to seek an order or other remedy to prohibit or restrict such disclosure. (6) The Consultant shall deliver to the Division Head, upon completion of the Services, any computer data or program used by the Consultant in performing the Services and paid for by the City, subject to any third party proprietary rights with respect to any computer data or program used by the Consultant but which was developed by a third party with resources unrelated to this Agreement which may be purchased or licensedNOT directly by the City, at the City’s option. (7) The Consultant shall return forthwith and without demand all Confidential Information of the City as VIEWINGmay be in documentary form or recorded electronically or otherwise upon the termination of its Services. (8) Any reports or other documentation delivered to the City by the Consultant shall become the property of the City and may be subject to disclosure under the terms of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.M.56 (the “MFIPPA”). While the City is not responsible for the interpretation of any of the provisions of MFIPPA, if the Consultant believes that any part ofDO the reports or other documentation delivered to the City reveals any trade secret, intellectual property right or any scientific, technical, commercial, financial or other similar information belonging to the Consultant and the Consultant wishes the City to attempt to preserve the

73 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

confidentiality of the trade secret, intellectual property right or information, the trade secret, intellectual property right or information must be clearly and specifically designated as confidential.

6. INSURANCE [Note: Specimen Certificate & Policy Coverages to be set out in RFP] (1) The Consultant agrees to purchase and maintain in force, at its own expense, the policies of insurance and coverage set out in the RFP for the duration of this Agreement, except in the case of professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance which shall be maintained for a period ending no sooner than two (2) years after the termination of this Agreement or the completion of the Project, whichever occurs last. Such insurance shall be in accordance with the requirements of the RFP and be provided by an insurer licensed to carry on the business of an insurer in Ontario and acceptable to the City. The Consultant shall provide the City with certificates of insurance as proof of such coverage, in a form acceptable to the City in accordance with the RFP, originally signed by the insurer or its authorized agent and delivered to the City prior to the execution of this Agreement and the commencement of the Consultant’s Services. (2) Prior to the execution of this Agreement and the commencement of the Consultant’s Services, the Consultant shall also provide the City with proof of professional liability insurance maintained by any subcontractor engaged by the Consultant in relation to the Services, where such subcontractor is under a professional obligation to maintain the same, in a form and with an insurer acceptable to the City. (3) The City reserves the right to require the Consultant to purchase additional insurance coverage or alter existing insurance coverage as the City’s Manager of Insurance & Risk Management may reasonably require. The City agrees to pay the reasonable incremental cost to the Consultant of such additional insurance or any increase in existingCOPY coverages, where applicable. Provided, however, the City’s obligation to pay any incremental cost shall not include any costs attributable to risk factors unrelated to the increase of coverage requested by the City, including the Consultant’s claims history, or any costs that exceed generally available market prices for such coverages available to consultants providing like services. The Consultant shall obtain the prices for such coverage changes and provide same to the City. (4) Any premiums due on any insurance policy under this section but not paid by the Consultant may be paid directly to the insurer(s) or broker(s) by the City, which shallSUBMIT be entitled to deduct the amount of same along with its reasonable costs in so doing from any monies otherwise due to the Consultant by the City either under this Agreement or otherwise. (5) To ensure there is no gap in coverage, the Consultant shall provide original signed Certificates evidencing renewals or replacements to the City prior to the expiration date of the original policies, without notice or request by the City. (6) The Consultant agrees that insurance policies may be subject to reasonable deductible amounts, which deductible amounts shall be borne by the Consultant. The certificates of insurance must include details of the insurance coverage, exclusions, deductibles and any conditions of coverage. (7) The Consultant shall bear all costs, expenses, losses and damages of its own and those of the City which may arise as a result of theNOT Consultant failing to or delaying in promptly complying with this VIEWINGsection. 7. WORKERS’ RIGHTS (1) The Consultant shall provide to the City, prior to the commencement of the Services, proof of coverage (registration and payment of premiums) under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 and the regulations thereunder for itself and its Personnel, which coverage shall be maintained for the duration of the Agreement. At the request of the Division Head, the Consultant shall provideDO proof of the maintenance of such coverage for the duration of the Agreement. (2) The Consultant shall at all times pay or cause to be paid any assessments or compensation required to be paid by the Consultant or its subcontractors pursuant to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 and the regulations thereunder and any other applicable workers' compensation

74 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

legislation, and upon failure to do so, the City may pay such assessments or compensation to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board and may deduct such assessments or compensation from monies due to the Consultant. The Consultant shall comply with all Laws relating to workers' compensation. (3) Without limiting the generality of any other indemnification provision of this Agreement, the Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Indemnitees from and against all Claims which may arise as a consequence of or result of the Consultant or any of its subcontractors failing or delaying in fully complying with the provisions of this section or which may arise as a consequence of any illness, injury or death of any employee of the Consultant or any such subcontractor.

8. INDEMNITIES (1) The Consultant shall indemnify and save harmless the Indemnitees from and against any and all Claims resulting from: (a) any breach, violation or non-performance by or on behalf of the Consultant of any covenant, obligation or agreement of the Consultant contained in this Agreement, including any express or implied warranty; (b) any negligent acts, errors or omissions or wilful misconduct by or on behalf of the Consultant relating to the Services to be provided under this Agreement; (c) any acts performed by or on behalf of the Consultant beyond the authority of the Consultant hereby conferred, whether negligent or otherwise; (d) any inaccuracy in or breach of any of the representationsCOPY or warranties of the Consultant contained in this Agreement; (e) any preserved or perfected lien under the Construction Lien Act filed or made on account of the Services performed under this Agreement, provided that such liens are not the direct result of the default in payment by the City to the Consultant of amounts properly due under this Agreement. The Consultant shall cause any such lien or claim which may be filed or made to be released, vacated or otherwise discharged within 5 days of obtaining notice of the lien or claim or from receipt by the Consultant of written notice from the City. If theSUBMIT Consultant fails to release, vacate or discharge any such lien or claim, then the City may, but is not obligated to, obtain a discharge or release of the lien or claim or otherwise deal with the lien or claim, and the Consultant shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses, including reasonable legal fees, incurred by the City in so doing; (f) any infringement or alleged infringement of any patent, trade secret, service mark, trade name, copyright, official mark, moral right, trademark, industrial design or other proprietary rights conferred by contract, common law, statute or otherwise in respect to the Services or any matter provided to the City or performed by the Consultant, or anyone else for whom at law it is responsible. (2) The Consultant shall pay all reasonableNOT costs, expenses and legal fees that may be incurred or paid by the Indemnitees in connection with any Claim with respect to a matter for which the Consultant is obligated to indemnify the Indemnitees pursuant to this section, provided that the indemnity VIEWINGobligations of the Consultant under this section shall not extend to loss or damage attributable to the negligence or wilful misconduct of any Indemnitee to the extent that such Indemnitee’s negligence or wilful misconduct caused the loss or damage. (3) In the event any Claim is asserted in respect to which an Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this section, and without prejudice to any other right or remedy the City may have, the City shall be entitledDO to deduct or withhold a reasonable sum on account of such Claim, including reasonable legal costs, from monies owed or payable by the City to the Consultant under this Agreement pending the final determination or settlement of any such Claim. In the event (i) the Consultant is, becomes, or is deemed to be bankrupt or an insolvent person pursuant to the

75 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada); (ii) the Consultant makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or (iii) a receiver or interim-receiver is appointed with respect to some or all of the Consultant’s business, assets, or property, then the City shall be entitled, without prejudice to any other right or remedy the City may have, to further deduct or withhold a reasonable sum on account of such Claim, including reasonable legal costs, from any monies owed or payable by the City to the Consultant under the Project or any other agreement or account. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply in the event that such Claim is otherwise fully provided for under any insurance provided by the Consultant to or for the benefit of the City. (4) This section shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

9. DEFAULT & TERMINATION (1) The following shall constitute, without limitation, Acts or Events of Default (“Default”) by the Consultant: (a) where the Consultant fails or neglects to commence the Services within ten (10) Working Days of a formal direction by the Division Head to commence; (b) where the Consultant fails or neglects to proceed, once commenced, with the provision of Services diligently and at a rate of progress that, in the reasonable opinion of the Division Head, will ensure entire completion of the Services within the time provided for in the Agreement or where the City reasonably determines that the Consultant has abandoned its duties with respect to this Agreement; (c) where the Consultant fails or neglects to complete the Services within the time limit(s) under this Agreement; COPY (d) where the Consultant has made any material misrepresentation in respect to this Agreement or any part thereof; (e) where the Consultant fails to comply with and maintain in good standing any insurance policies and coverages, securities, professional certificates, permits, licences or approvals required by this Agreement or commits any acts or omissions that, in the opinion of the Division Head, jeopardizes or may jeopardize these policies, securities, certificates, permits, licences or approvals; SUBMIT (f) where the Consultant fails or refuses to correct, rectify or remedy any unsatisfactory or defective Services, when so ordered by the City in writing, or fails to prosecute the Services with the required skill and diligence; (g) where the Consultant fails to comply with any Law applicable to the Services; (h) where the Consultant subcontracts the whole or any part of this Agreement or the Services or makes an assignment of this Agreement or the Services thereunder or any part thereof, without the prior written consent of the City; (i) where a lien arises with respect to the Services undertaken by the Consultant under the Agreement and remains unpaid by the Consultant after demand to pay therefore, unless vacated or discharged and released by payment into a court of competent jurisdiction or otherwise, within Five (5) WorkingNOT Days of such demand, save and except a valid and proper lien of the Consultant registered against the property affected by the Agreement; VIEWING(j) where any of the goods, chattels or effects of the Consultant shall at any time during the Term be seized or taken in execution of attachment; or if a writ of execution shall be issued against the goods, chattels or effects of the Consultant; or if the Consultant shall make any assignment for the benefit of creditors; or if the Consultant shall be adjudged bankrupt or insolvent, commit any act of bankruptcy or insolvency or make any proposal under or take advantage of any of the provisions of any act or statutes whatsoever that may be in force regarding bankrupt or insolventDO debtors or debtors who are not able to or do not pay their debts promptly and in full; or if a receiving order or winding up order shall be made against or in respect of the Consultant; or if any actions or proceedings shall be taken to wind up, dissolve or liquidate the Consultant or its assets by, against or in respect of the Consultant; or where a resolution is

76 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

passed or any other act undertaken for the winding up of the Consultant; or a receiver, manager or trustee is appointed in respect of the business or assets of the Consultant, or any part of thereof, by a court of competent jurisdiction, or under an agreement; (k) where the Consultant ceases or threatens to cease to carry on its business, or where the Consultant makes or agrees to make a bulk sale of its assets; or defaults in payment of any indebtedness or liability to a chartered bank or other lending institution, whether secured or not; and (l) where the Consultant fails to comply with or observe or perform, or breaches or violates, any material provision, term, covenant, warranty, condition and/or obligation of the Agreement. (2) In the event that the Consultant has committed a Default or a Default has occurred, the Division Head may provide written notice (“Default Notice”) to the Consultant to the effect that if the Consultant does not completely remedy the Default to the satisfaction of the Division Head within Five (5) Working Days of delivery of the Default Notice or otherwise expressly granted in writing by the Division Head in his or her absolute discretion, then the Division Head may, in his/her sole discretion, on the behalf of the City: (a) suspend the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant and either perform the Services on a temporary basis itself or engage another consultant to perform the Services on a temporary basis; (b) terminate the Agreement and/or the Services of the Consultant immediately by giving notice to that effect to the Consultant; (c) cease all payments to the Consultant, save for the payment of those Services, if any, that have been furnished by the Consultant to the satisfaction of the Division Head up to the time of such termination and that have not yet been paid by theCOPY City (the Consultant shall have no claim of any kind otherwise against the City), subject to any rights or remedies the City may have against the Consultant; (d) enforce any performance security provided by the Consultant or deduct or set-off from funds retained under such performance security or otherwise held, but such enforcement shall not preclude the City from recovering any further amounts or damages incurred by the City as a result of the Default by the Consultant; (e) engage another consultant to complete the Project or may itself complete the Project, without further liability to the Consultant, SUBMIT (f) where the City performs or engages another consultant to perform the Services, either on a temporary basis or otherwise, the City may employ such means as the Division Head may deem necessary or advisable to complete the Services to his satisfaction with such changes therein as in the Division Head's opinion are necessary or advisable by reason of the Consultant's Default, or any combination of the foregoing. (3) Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section and without prejudice to or foregoing any other right, privilege or remedy of the City, in the event that any emergency services are necessitated as a result of the Default of the Consultant, such services may be undertaken immediately, without notice, by the City and all reasonableNOT costs incurred by the City arising from such emergency or as a result of such emergency services shall be borne by the Consultant and payable forthwith upon written demand by the City, with particulars of the emergency and services necessitated thereby, VIEWINGand the City shall have no liability to the Consultant for any loss or damage or compensation whatsoever resulting from such action by the City. (4) In addition to the rights and remedies in subsection (2) and (3) of this section, if the City terminates the Consultant’s Services in whole or part, as a result of a Default by the Consultant, the City may but is not obliged to: (a) take possessionDO of and utilize any items, goods, material and equipment of the Consultant devoted to that part of the Services terminated, within the Project site, which is intended to be utilized in the Services, subject to the secured rights of third parties; (b) withhold further payments to the Consultant with respect to the Services or the portion of the Services withdrawn from the Consultant until the Services or portion thereof withdrawn are completed to the

77 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

satisfaction of the Division Head; (c) charge the Consultant the additional cost over the Consultant’s Proposal price for completing the Services or portion thereof withdrawn from the Consultant; (d) charge the Consultant a reasonable allowance, as determined by the Division Head, to cover correction to the Services performed by the Consultant that may be required; (e) charge the Consultant for any costs and damages the City may have sustained as a result of the Default; and (f) charge the Consultant the amount by which the cost of corrections to the Services exceeds the allowance provided for such corrections, or any combination of the foregoing. (5) The Consultant's obligation under this Agreement as to quality, correction and warranty of the Services, performed prior to the time of termination of this Agreement or termination of the Consultant's right to continue with the Services in whole or in part, shall continue to be in force after such termination. (6) In addition to the foregoing rights of the City, the Division Head may, at his or her sole option and upon providing not less than ten (10) Working Days’ prior written notice to the Consultant, elect to suspend the Services for up to ninety (90) calendar days or discontinue the Services and terminate this Agreement for any reason. In such an event, the Consultant shall have no claim, including for any loss or damages, against the City except for payment for such of the Services as have been satisfactorily performed by the Consultant to the satisfaction of the Division Head to the date of notice of the suspension or discontinuance of Services, subject to any rights or remedies the City may have against the Consultant. The Consultant shall immediately suspend or discontinue the Services, as the case may be, on theCOPY date and to the extent specified in the notice and place no further orders for materials or services for the terminated portion of the Services. In the event of a discontinuance of Services, termination shall become effective on such date as shall be stated in the City's notice. (7) The rights and remedies provided in this section given to the City are distinct, separate and cumulative, may be exercised at any time and from time to time independently or in combination, are in addition to all other legal, equitable or statutory rights, privileges and remedies to which the City is otherwise entitled, as well as any other rights and remedies stipulated in this Agreement, and the exercising or taking of any one right or remedy shall notSUBMIT preclude the exercising or taking of any other rights or remedies.

10. NON-WAIVER No condoning, excusing or overlooking by the City or any of its representatives of any Default by the Consultant at any time or times in respect of any provision contained in this Agreement shall operate as a waiver of the City's rights under this Agreement in respect of any continuing or subsequent Default or so as to defeat or affect in any way the rights of the City under this Agreement in respect of any such continuing or subsequent Default. No waiver shall be inferred from or implied by anything done or omitted by the City or any of its representatives and no waiver of any rights of the City shall be effective unless expressly provided inNOT writing by an authorized representative of the City. 11. SET-OFF InVIEWING addition to any other remedies the City may have under this Agreement, the City shall have the right to set-off, withhold, retain or deduct from amounts due or owing by the City to the Consultant under the Project an amount sufficient to cover any monetary Claims or other amount due or owing from time to time, or portions thereof, by the Consultant to the City, including any amount owing to the City pursuant to the Consultant’sDO indemnification of the City under this Agreement. 12. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY ACT (1) The Consultant shall comply with the Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O., 1990 c.0.1 and all regulations thereunder, as amended from time to time, (collectively the "OHSA") including, without

78 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

restricting the generality of the foregoing, any obligations of the Consultant as an "employer" under Sections 25 and 26 thereof. (2) The Consultant: (a) must, immediately upon the execution of this Agreement and prior to commencement of the Services, forward to the Division Head a copy of the Material Safety Data Sheets (the “MSDS”) for each hazardous material (as defined in the OHSA) to be used in the performance of the Services; 8) shall not bring onto the work site any hazardous material, as defined in the OHSA, without first obtaining the prior written authorization of the Division Head and maintaining at the Project site a copy of the relevant MSDS readily accessible to all workers, Consultant’s Personnel and City personnel; (b) shall not remove or interfere with any "designated substance" as defined by the OHSA, except in full compliance with the OHSA and after notifying the Division Head; and (c) shall, following discovery that any designated substance has been removed or interfered with other than in compliance with subsection (c) of this section, forthwith report same to the Division Head and ensure that no further non-compliant removal or interference occurs. (3) The Consultant shall report to the Division Head any non-compliance with the OHSA by the contractor in the construction of the Project if and when brought to the attention of the Consultant. (4) Authorized representatives of the City shall at all times have access to the work site to monitor the Services to whatever extent they deem appropriate to determine compliance by the Consultant with the requirements of this Agreement including all health and safety requirements under the OHSA and applicable Laws, and the Consultant acknowledgesCOPY that: (a) Compliance with the OHSA is material to this Agreement and the lack of such compliance may result in the Consultant's performance of the Services being suspended or this Agreement being terminated by the City for cause; and (b) violations are intended to be documented and kept on file. (5) The Consultant shall cease the Services, or any part thereof, if an authorized representative of the City so requires orally or in writing on the grounds that there has been any violation of this Agreement with respect to health and safety requirements SUBMITincluding those under OHSA, and thereafter the Services or affected part thereof shall not resume until any such violation has been rectified to the satisfaction of the Division Head. (6) The Consultant shall be responsible for any delay caused by the Consultant or any of its Personnel in the progress of the Services as a result of any violation of provincial or municipal health and safety requirements by the Consultant, it being understood that no such delay shall be a force majeure for the purposes of extending the time for performance of the Services or entitling the Consultant to additional compensation, and the Consultant shall take all necessary steps to avoid delay in the final completion of the Services without additional cost to the City, which shall not be responsible for any additional costs or liability resulting from any such delay. (7) Without limiting the generality ofNOT any other indemnification provision of this Agreement, the Consultant will indemnify the Indemnitees and hold them harmless from and against all liability resulting from any and all failures to meet the responsibilities referred to in this section, including, VIEWINGwithout restricting the generality of the foregoing, (i) any expenses incurred by the City as a result of stoppage of the Services on account of failure by the Consultant to meet its obligations under and/or with respect to the OHSA; and (ii) any fine(s) levied against the City as a result of any breach of the responsibilities of the employer for the Project, to the extent attributable to the Consultant's failure to fulfil its obligations as describedDO in this section. (8) Nothing in this section shall be taken as making the City the "employer" (as defined in the OHSA) of any workers employed or engaged by the Consultant for the Services, either instead of or jointly with the Consultant.

79 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

13. SCHEDULES The following Schedules attached to this Agreement shall constitute an integral part of this Agreement and all expressions defined in this Agreement shall have the same meanings in such Schedules, unless expressly provided otherwise in such Schedules:

Schedule "A": Professional Consulting Services Schedule "B": Fees and Expenses Schedule “SD-FINAL”: Statutory Declaration Schedule “C”: Consultant’s Cost of Services Proposal Schedule “D”: Clarification Letter(s) of the Consultant (if any) The RFP, the Addenda (where applicable) and the Consultant’s Proposal are incorporated by reference into this Agreement as if they were set out in this Agreement in their entirety and form part of this Agreement, even if said documents are not physically attached hereto. The Consultant acknowledges receipt of such documents.

14. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS (1) This Agreement and all terms, covenants, conditions and provisions herein shall be binding upon and shall enure to the benefit of the City and the Consultant and their respective permitted assigns, successors and legal representatives. COPY (2) Except as expressly permitted in this Agreement, the Consultant shall not: (a) assign, transfer or encumber in any manner or part this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City; or (b) subcontract any Services under this Agreement or any part thereof to a third party or change any approved subcontractor without the prior written consent of the Division Head. (3) No assignment or subcontracting shall, in any circumstances,SUBMIT relieve the Consultant of its responsibilities, obligations and liabilities under this Agreement.

15. AGREEMENT IN WRITING No verbal arrangement or agreement relating to the Services will be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by duly authorized representative(s) of the City. The City shall not be bound by any oral communication or representation whatsoever, including but not limited to any instruction, amendment or clarification of this Agreement or any of the documents comprising this Agreement, or any representation, information, advice, inference or suggestion, from any person (including but not limited to an elected official, employee, agent, independent consultant or any other person acting on the behalf of or at the direction of the City or other representative of the City) concerning this Agreement, any of the documents comprisingNOT this Agreement, or any other matter concerning this Agreement. Where in this Agreement a reference is made to the express written agreement, approval or consent of the City or the Division Head, it shall be understood that the City or Division Head shall notVIEWING be deemed or construed to have agreed to any stipulation, specification, exclusion, limitation or other term or condition that deviates from a provision set out in this Agreement, unless that deviation is expressly confirmed in a written and express amendment to this Agreement. No officer, employee, representative or agent of the City is authorized to orally alter any portion of this Agreement. The City shall not be bound by any written representation whatsoever concerning this Agreement unlessDO executed by the person designated and authorized in accordance with this Agreement or in accordance with a direction or authorization of City Council. The Consultant releases and waives all claims whatsoever in negligence, in equity or otherwise with respect to any oral or unauthorized representations or communications.

80 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT The documents comprising this Agreement are complementary and what is required by any part thereof shall be considered as being required by the whole. This Agreement, as may be amended from time to time by the written agreement of the parties in accordance with the terms herein, contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matters hereof. It is agreed that there is no representation, warranty, collateral contract or condition affecting this Agreement except as expressed in it. No amendment, modification or supplement to this Agreement shall be valid or binding unless set out in writing and executed by the parties hereto.

17. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by, subject to and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada, as applicable to the matters herein. Any action or other legal proceeding arising under or with respect to this Agreement (including any motion or other interlocutory proceeding) shall be brought in a Court or a tribunal, whichever may be applicable, sitting in Toronto, Ontario. In the event that there is no applicable Court or tribunal sitting in Toronto, the proceeding shall be brought in the court (or other forum) of competent jurisdiction nearest to the City of Toronto within the Province of Ontario. The Consultant and the City each irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario in accordance with the foregoing.

18. SURVIVAL In addition to any obligations set forth in this Agreement that by their nature survive the completion of the Services or termination of this Agreement, those obligations set out in ss. 2(1)(g) and 2(6) [liability for and payment of Consultant’s Personnel], ss. 3(3) [retention of records], s. 5 [Rights of Ownership/Confidential Information], s. 6 [Insurance], ss.COPY 7(2) [Workers’ Compensation Claims], s. 8 [Indemnities], s. 9 [Default/Termination], s. 11 [Set-Off], ss. 12(7) [OHSA indemnity], s. 14 [Successors and Assigns], s. 15 [Agreement in Writing] and s. 17 [Governing Law] or otherwise expressly intended to survive shall continue to bind the Consultant notwithstanding the completion of all or part of the Services and payment therefore in accordance with this Agreement or the termination of this Agreement.

19. SEVERANCE WHERE PROVISION ILLEGAL, ETC. If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to anySUBMIT person or circumstances is found to be invalid, unenforceable or void by any court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed severable and all other provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be separate and independent therefrom and continue in full force and effect unless and until similarly found invalid, void or unenforceable. The remaining provisions of this Agreement and its application to any person or circumstances shall not be affected thereby, but this severance provision shall apply only insofar as the effect of that severance is not to change the fundamental nature of the obligations assumed respectively by the City and Consultant.

20. FURTHER ASSURANCES The Consultant agrees that it will do all such acts and execute all such further documents, conveyances, deeds, assignments, transfersNOT and the like, and will cause the doing of all such acts and the execution of all such further documents (including waivers of moral rights) as are within its power toVIEWING cause the doing or execution of, as the City may from time to time reasonably request, in writing, and as may be necessary or desirable to give full effect to this Agreement.

21. NOTICES Any demand orDO notice to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be duly and properly made and given if made in writing and delivered to the party for whom it is intended at the address as set out below, either personally, by facsimile or by means of prepaid registered mail addressed to such party as follows:

81 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

(1) in the case of the City:

City of Toronto [ENTER Division Head] [ENTER Division Head’s Address]

Attention: [ENTER contact person]

(2) in the case of the Consultant:

[ENTER Consultant’s name and address]

Attention: [ENTER contact person] or to such other addresses as one party may from time to time notify the other party in writing, and any demand or notice so made or given shall be deemed to have been duly and properly given and received on the day on which it was personally delivered or, if delivered by facsimile, shall be deemed to be delivered as of the next Business Day following the date of transmission (provided a confirmation of transmission receipt is issued) or, if mailed, then, in the absence of any interruption in postal service in the City of Toronto affecting the delivery or handling thereof, on the day following three (3) full Business Days following the date of mailing.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the City and the Consultant have hereunto affixed their respective corporate seals attested to by the hands of their proper officers in thatCOPY behalf duly authorized.

SUBMIT

IN ACCORDANCE WITH LEGAL SERVICES APPROVED FORM

………………………………………… Confirmed by Division Head: ------Alternate Wording #1 ----- Authorized by Division Head pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 71 and 195. ------Alternate Wording # 2 ------NOT SIGNED,Authorized by SEALEDMeeting No. [ENTER AND #] DELIVERED of the Bid ) CITY OF TORONTO Committee on ) inVIEWING thethe ______presence day of ______. of: ) ------Alternate Wording # 3 ------) Authorized by name of standing Committee, Item No. [ENTER #], as adopted by City of Toronto Council on )

the ______day of ______. ) City Clerk [delete where not required] ) (c/s) DO ) ) ______) [ENTER - Division Head’s Title] )

82 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

) ) [enter Consultant’s Full Legal Name] ) ) ) ______) Name: ) Title: ) (c/s) ) ) ______) Name: ) Title: ) ) I/We have authority to bind the Corporation.

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

83 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SCHEDULE “A”

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES

Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide the Services more particularly described in this Schedule for the Project, ensuring that the project approach, staffing, organization, methodology and schedule are in accordance with the RFP and the Consultant's Proposal.

Services:

[USE where Services all in one Agreement] The Consultant shall provide and undertake the following Services for the Project:

[insert Brief Description of Services to be performed under this Agreement – See following examples:]

 Preliminary Design and Detailed Design for the Project [DELETE if not applicable]  Services during construction including office and site supervision services, testing and commissioning [DELETE if not applicable]  Post-Construction Services for the Project [DELETE if not applicable] including those Services identified in: COPY  Sections 2 and 3, Appendix A.1, Appendix A.4 and Appendix A.5 of the RFP; and [INSERT applicable Appendices for the Services]  the Consultant’s Technical Proposal. For further clarity, Optional Items included in the Consultant’s Proposal shall not be included in the Services unless identified as a Provisional Item in this Schedule. and, without limiting the foregoing, those related professional services and responsibilities otherwise detailed in the RFP and this Agreement in the nature of a generalSUBMIT or specific responsibility of the Consultant related to the Project.

[USE for Preliminary and Detailed Design Services Agreement] The Consultant shall provide and undertake the following Services for the Project:  Preliminary Design and Detailed Design for the Project including those Services identified in:

 Sections 2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.8, Appendix A.1, Appendix A.4 and Appendix A.5 of the RFP; and [INSERT correct SectionNOT & Appendix references from RFP]  the Consultant’s Technical Proposal. For further clarity, Optional Items included in the VIEWINGConsultant’s Proposal shall not be included in the Services unless identified as a Provisional Item in this Schedule. and, without limiting the foregoing, those related professional services and responsibilities otherwise detailed in the RFP and this Agreement in the nature of a general or specific responsibility of the Consultant related to the Project, save and except services during construction (including site supervision services, testing and commissioning)DO and post-construction service set out in sections 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 and Appendix A.6 and Appendix A.7, of the RFP which are subject to two further separate agreements (which may include a purchase order for post-construction services). [INSERT correct Section & Appendix references from RFP]

84 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

[USE for Services during Construction Agreement] The Consultant shall provide and undertake the following Services for the Project:  Services during construction including site supervision services, testing and commissioning including those Services identified in:

 Sections 2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.8, Appendix A.1, Appendix A.6 and Appendix A.7 of the RFP; and [INSERT correct Section & Appendix references from RFP]  the Consultant’s Technical Proposal. For further clarity, Optional Items included in the Consultant’s Proposal shall not be included in the Services unless identified as a Provisional Item in this Schedule. and, without limiting the foregoing, those related professional services and responsibilities otherwise detailed in the RFP and this Agreement in the nature of a general or specific responsibility of the Consultant related to the Project, save and except preliminary design and detailed design services and post-construction services set out in sections 3.3, 3.4 and 3.7 and Appendix A.4 and Appendix A.5 of the RFP which are subject to two separate agreements (which may include a purchase order for post-construction services). [INSERT correct Section & Appendix references from RFP]

[Provisional Items clause - DELETE where inapplicable] COPY Provisional Items: In addition to the foregoing, the Consultant shall provide the following Provisional Items set out in the Consultant’s Proposal, if and when required by the Division Head:

 [INSERT, as applicable]

 [INSERT, as applicable]  [INSERT, as applicable] SUBMIT

Throughout the Project, the Consultant shall work collaboratively with the City staff. The Consultant shall ensure that sufficient time and resources are allocated to allow for City’s input into decision- making processes, that the City’s concerns are adequately addressed and that all Services are coordinated with the other active associated projects as required.

The Consultant shall provide any Additional Services, if and as may be required by the City, upon the prior written authorization to proceed with such Additional Services from the Division Head. The fees and expenses for any such Additional Services are subject to the approval of the Division Head, in his/her sole discretion, and, if approved, shall be paid under the contingency allowance (where applicable) provided for in Schedule "B"NOT - Fees and Expenses to this Agreement. VIEWING DO

85 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SCHEDULE “B”

FEES AND EXPENSES

1. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the total fees and disbursements (including overhead and all taxes) for all Services to be provided by the Consultant under this Agreement, including any authorized Provisional Items and Additional Services, shall not exceed a maximum price of $000,000.00 (the “Maximum Agreement Price”).

2. The Consultant’s fees and disbursements are set out in its Cost of Services Proposal attached as Schedule C, as modified by any Clarification Letter(s).

[where the Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement are not separately set out in the Consultant’s Cost of Services Proposal (i.e. separately for design/construction/post-construction) OR where CLARIFICATIONS have altered the amounts in the Consultant’s Cost of Services Proposal or Mathematical ERRORS need to be corrected  INSERT revised Cost of Services table below and DELETE above sentence]

2. The Consultant’s fees and disbursements are comprised of the following: Service Deliverables Cost

A. BASE SERVICE DELIVERABLES FOR EVEN YEAR INSPECTION :

Fees for Inspection, BMS data entry and Reports (Upset Limit) $000,000.00 Trafick control, Sub- consultants, Access and Specialized equipment $000,000.00 Disbursements (Upset Limit) COPY$000,000.00

BASE DELIVERABLES SUB-TOTAL: $000,000.00

B. CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES: (WHERE APPLICABLE AND AUTHORIZED) $000,000.00

Maximum Agreement Price for Services (exclusive of HST) $000,000.00 HST @ 13% $00,000.00

Maximum Price for Services IN FIRST YEAR INSPECTION (inclusive of HST)SUBMIT $000,000.00

A. BASE SERVICE DELIVERABLES FOR EVEN YEAR INSPECTION :

Fees for Inspection, BMS data entry and Reports (Upset Limit) $000,000.00 Trafick control, Sub- consultants, Access and Specialized equipment $000,000.00 Disbursements (Upset Limit) $000,000.00

BASE DELIVERABLES SUB-TOTAL: $000,000.00

B. CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES: (WHERE APPLICABLE AND AUTHORIZED) $000,000.00

Maximum Agreement Price for Services NOT(exclusive of HST) $000,000.00 HST @ 13% $00,000.00

VIEWINGMaximum Price for Services IN THE SECOND YEAR INSPECTION (inclusive of HST) $000,000.00

Maximum Agreement Price for Services INSPECTION (inclusive of HST) $000,000.00

3. An amount of $50,000.00 (inclusive of all fees, disbursements and taxes) is reserved as an allowance for Provisional Items, where authorized by the Division Head. [DELETE where not applicable] DO 4. An amount of $00,000.00 (inclusive of all fees, disbursements and taxes) is reserved as a contingency allowance for Additional Services which may arise during the course of the Project, where authorized by the Division Head. [DELETE where not applicable]

86 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

5. The initial estimated cost of Service deliverables or tasks may be adjusted during the Agreement by mutual agreement between the City and the Consultant, provided that the total cost of Services under this Agreement is not greater than the Maximum Agreement Price.

6. Provisional Items and Additional Services shall only be provided on an “as and when requested” basis. The City shall not be responsible for the payment of any Provisional Item or Additional Services unless those services have been authorized and assigned to the Consultant by prior written approval of the Division Head. If and upon being authorized, the Consultant shall proceed forthwith to supply the Provisional Item(s) or Additional Service(s), as the case may be, in accordance with: (i) the provisions of this Agreement; (ii) the terms of such authorization; and (iii) in the case of Provisional Items, the price set out in the Consultant’s Proposal; or in the case of Additional Services, the applicable unit rates or prices or lump sum amount set out in the Consultant’s Proposal or otherwise agreed to in writing by the Consultant and the Division Head, as the case may be.

7. If any Services under this Agreement are included by the Consultant in a progress claim as partially or fully completed, but are not completed in accordance with this Agreement, the City may withhold from payment the total amount payable, or a part thereof, for those Services until they are completed or corrected to the full satisfaction of the Division Head, and the Division Head shall notify the Consultant in writing of its action and the reason for same.

8. The City shall pay the Consultant on a monthly basis, within forty-five (45) days of the City’s receipt of the Consultant's invoice properly prepared to show details of the portion of the Services accomplished and the hours expended by the Consultant's Personnel to carry out the Services covered by the said invoice. COPY

9. All or part of the aforementioned amounts are to be paid by the Consultant on a timely basis to any other firm and/or personnel which assists the Consultant in performing part or all of the Services, and the Consultant shall advise the Division Head when such payments by the Consultant have all occurred. It is agreed and understood that the City will not pay any firm and/or personnel other than the Consultant for the Services and that it is the Consultant's responsibility to pay all the other firms and personnel. SUBMIT 10. The Consultant's fees and disbursements shall be in accordance with the Consultant's Cost of Services Proposal [REPLACE “the Consultant’s Cost of Services Proposal” with “section 2 of this Schedule” where replacement has been made in section 2] and shall not exceed the specified Maximum Agreement Price with respect to the Services under this Agreement. Subject to section 7 [Confirm correct section reference] (Cost of Services) of the RFP, the payment for Services and authorized Additional Services shall be paid in accordance with the following:

(a) Time of Principals, For time-based services, Personnel specifically identified in Senior Officers, the Consultant’s Proposal attached hereto shall be billed at Specialists the all-inclusive hourly or per diem flat rates indicated NOTtherein or this Schedule “B”, as the case may be; otherwise billing rates for this class of personnel shall be submitted for review and shall be subject to prior approval of the Division VIEWINGHead. (b) Time of other Staff For time-based services, staff or personnel classifications specifically identified in the Proposal attached hereto shall be billed at the hourly or per diem flat rates indicated DO therein. Billing rates for staff or classifications other than those identified in the Proposal shall be submitted for review and

87 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

shall be subject to prior approval of the Division Head.

(c) Disbursements A lump sum limit for any and all anticipated disbursements required in connection with any part of the Services shall be provided as identified in the RFP.

Payments for disbursements will be pro-rated based on the value of the Services performed during a billable period.

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

88 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SCHEDULE “SD-FINAL”

STATUTORY DECLARATION BY THE CONSULTANT RE: FINAL PAYMENT

PROVINCE OF ONTARIO ) IN THE MATTER OF ) the consulting agreement entered into ) between the City of Toronto ) and ______) dated ______(the “Agreement”) ) and an Invoice dated ______(the “Invoice”) )

To Wit:

I, ______of the ______(Name) (City, Town, etc.) in the ______(Regional Municipality, City, etc.) do solemnly declare that: [modify to appropriate professional type, where no engineering servicesCOPY are being provided under agreement] 1. I am a senior professional engineer employed by ______(Consultant’s full legal name) (the “Consultant”). I have personal knowledge of the facts herein set forth and, as a duly authorized representative of the Consultant, have the authority to certify as follows.

2. Attached hereto and marked as Exhibit A to this my declaration are true copies of statements of the Consultant as part of the Invoice addressed to the City of Toronto setting forth in detail the services performed and the disbursements incurred by the Consultant during the period from the ____ day of ______, 200___ to the ____ day of ______, 200___, and for which payment is requested. I SUBMITdo hereby certify that such services were performed and such disbursements were properly incurred by the Consultant pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement.

3. The Consultant has completed all Services (as defined in the Agreement) to be performed by the Consultant.

AND I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing it to be true and knowing that it is of the same force and effect as if made under oath and by virtue of the Canada Evidence Act.

DECLARED before me at the ) ) ______of ______,NOT ) ) in the Province of Ontario, ) VIEWING ) this day of ______, 200___. ) ______) ) ) ______) A Commissioner, etc.DO

89 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SCHEDULE “C”

CONSULTANT’S COST OF SERVICES PROPOSAL

[ATTACH Cost of Services Proposal for the Services applicable to this Agreement - e.g. Cost of Services Proposal for Design Services/ Cost of Services Proposal for Construction Services - where Services are not all within 1 agreement]

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

90 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

SCHEDULE “D”

CONSULTANT’S CLARIFICATION LETTER(S)

[REMOVE Schedule “D” where there are no clarifications]

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

91 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

To be completed only by the Insurer or its representative

City of Toronto Contact Name: Address:

1. Name of Insured 2. Address and Telephone # of Insured

3. Operations of Named Insured for which certificate is issued:

(NOTE: Provide specific project information including the Toronto contract number) 4. Commercial General Liability Please state amount of deductible or self retained portion of coverage: Policy Limit(s) Insuring Company Policy Number Effective Date Expiry Date (per occurrence) Primary Insurer:

Umbrella/Excess Insurer:

5. Policy Provisions/Amendments/Endorsements 9) Commercial General Liability is extended to include Cross-Liability and Severability of Interest, Broad Form Contractual Liability, Owner’s and Contractor’s Protective Liability, Contingent Employers Liability, Employer’s Liability, Non-OwnedCOPY Automobile Liability, Products/Completed Operations, Personal Injury Liability and, if applicable to the insured operations as detailed in Item 3, coverage for Blasting, Pile Driving and Collapse. A. The CITY OF TORONTO, ITS BOARDS, AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS OR SUBSIDIARY OPERATIONS, AS APPLICABLE, are included as Additional Insureds but only with respect to liability arising out of the operation of the Insured for which a Contract is issued by the City of Toronto. B. The Commercial General Liability Policy(ies) identified above shall protect each insured in the same manner and to the same extent as though a separate policy has been issued to each, but nothing shall operate to increase the Limits of Liability as identified above beyond the amount or amounts for which the Company would be liable if there had been onlySUBMIT one Insured. C. The Commercial General Liability Policy(ies) identified above shall apply as primary insurance and not excess to any other insurance available to the Additional Insureds as set out in Item 5B. D. If cancelled or materially changed to reduce the coverage outlined on this Certificate during the period of coverage as stated herein, thirty (30) days, (fifteen (15) days if cancellation is due to non-payment of premium), prior written notice by registered mail will be given by the Insurer(s) to the CITY OF TORONTO at the address provided on this Certificate.

6. Automobile Liability (if applicable): Please note Sections 5A to 5D do not apply to this policy. Insuring Company Policy Number Policy Limit(s) Effective Date Expiry Date

NOTCERTIFICATION I certify that the insurance is in effect as stated in this Certificate and that I have authorization to issue this Certificate for and on behalf of the Insurer(s). This Certificate is valid until the expiration date(s) shown in Item 4 (and Item 6 if applicable) unless notice is given in writing in accordanceVIEWING with Item 5E.

Date Broker’s or Insurer’s Name and Address Signature and Stamp of Certifying Official

DO

92 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX E - PROPOSAL EVALUATION TABLE

Name of Proponent: ______Name of Project: Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures In the City of Toronto. Evaluated By: ______

CRITERIA Max. Score

MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS PASS_____ FAIL____

Part A – EXPERIENCE AND COMPANY RESOURCES 45 (Experience and Performance of the Project Team)

 Demonstrated successful experience of key staff on projects of similar scope and size for each component listed in the terms of reference and project description;  Demonstrated effectiveness in addressing the concerns and working co- operatively with a variety of agencies, authorities, utilities, community, public, and special interest groups;  Demonstrated experience in Project Management including service delivery, time and cost control; COPY  Corporate Experience and Performance (Reference checks may be performed);  Past corporate experience on similar types of projects;  Additional corporate resources;  Presentation of proposal; and

 Experience on previous bridge projects.

Part B – PROJECT SPECIFIC TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT 35 SUBMIT  Project organization and detailed workplan for each phase of the project;  Identified elements of the traffic control plan, inspection, and reporting phases of the project;  Technical issues clearly identified with potential solutions, addressing the economics, impact on parties, and project as a whole.

 Method and schedule of addressing concerns from the affected agencies, authorities, utilities, community, public and special interest groups.

Technical Proposal 80 NOT Part C - Cost of Services $______20 . Total Price VIEWING. The lowest cost Proposal receives 20 points; and the remaining Proposals are assigned points based on the following formula (Lowest priced Proposal divided by the price of Proponent’s Proposal) x 20

Total PointsDO 100

93 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX F - BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (OBMS) INPUT SCREENS The consultant will need to sign a confidentiality agreement with Stantec, the owner of the OBMS and will receive a limited version of the latest Toronto version of the OBMS. A sample of this Agreement is attached in Appendix "H". The City will not be part of any such permission/agreement and will not be responsible legally or financially for any claims and liabilities arising from such permission/agreement. The data collected from drawings and in the field will be entered into the consultant's limited version of the OBMS which shall be used for data entry report creation, testing and printing. The assignment will be considered completed only when the bridge inspections are verified by the City and installed error free on City’s network.

Screen captures of the Toronto OBMS input screens which will be required for data entry are given in the following pages. The screens shown in this Appendix are required for the entry of initial inventory and appraisal information. All inventory, structure, roadway, elements, and appraisal information must be entered. Where data is present in the database, it must be checked and corrected for major errors and omissions.

The data which must be entered is highlighted by the block arrows ( ➨) shownCOPY on each screen. To assist in data entry, many of the fields have pick lists which give acceptable input for the field. These pick lists are indicated by a down arrow icon (
) in the data entry window beside each field. A sample pick list is shown below:

SUBMIT

The screens shown in the following pages are as of the date of release of this assignment. It is anticipated that there may be minor changes in some of the screens in the actual version of the OBMS made available to the Consultant. The sample BMS screens provided are from the City's BMS which is based on MTO's OBMS developed by Stantec. The City is moving to a new, updated BMS from the same vendor which providesNOT the same functionality as the current one with screen layouts very similar to attached screens. Use of the new system will allow direct transfer of skills for anyone familiar with OBMS.

All data shown inVIEWING attached screens have an identical corresponding location in the new system. The new system is accessed via web connection to a web hosted database. Inspection data will be entered into the BMS over the web. For security reasons, the consultant should assume all data will be entered in the office using a direct web connection and not in the field using wireless connection. DO 94 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge INITIAL and Culvert INVENTORY Structures DATA in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE ON NOT DRAWINGS VIEWING

.1 DO 95 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 96 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY

PROVIDE AS SUBMITAPPLICABLE

NOT VIEWING DO 97 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE ON SUBMITDRAWINGS

NOT VIEWING DO 98 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 99 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 100 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE ON NOT DRAWINGS VIEWING DO 101 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

All Field For Each NOT Element VIEWING DO 102 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

Vertical Geometry Deck Membrane Type Flat Unknown Grade 1% - 3% Built-Up Grade < 1% Epoxy Grade > 3% N/A

Deck Structure Type None

Aluminum Other Closed Grating Preformed Fabric Concrete Cast-in- Place Deck Top Reinforcing Concrete Precast COPY Panels Cathodic Protection Corrugated Steel CFRP Reinforcing

Not applicable Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Open Grating FRP Reinforcing Other Galvanized Steel plate (includes Reinforcing orthotropic) GFRP Reinforcing SUBMITWood or Timber Internally Sealed

Deck Surface Type MMFX Reinforcing

Bituminous N/A

Epoxy Overlay None

Gravel Other

Integral Concrete Other Coated Reinforcing Latex Concrete / Similar Polymer Impregnated Low Slump Concrete Stainless Reinforcing NOT MonolithicConcrete Steel Reinforcing Horizontal Geometry N/A Uncoated Compound None VIEWING Reinforcing Steel Record these 6 data items. Curved Other Unknown Straight Wood or Timber DO 103 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING .2 DO 104 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto For Culverts RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 105 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001 For Culverts

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 106 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001 For Culverts

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 107 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and CulvertFor StructuresCulverts in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 108 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

Photo Document Entry

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 109 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

For Each Roadway NOT VIEWING DO 110 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 111 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO 112 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

COPY SUBMIT

NOT

VIEWING DO 113 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX G - QUALITY CONTROL (QC) PLAN

The Quality Control Plan shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the following;

1) breakdown of the work, set out in Section 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK, into tasks 2) names and positions of the individuals assigned to complete the tasks and names and positions of the individuals assigned to perform QC measures of those tasks 3) schedules on a work flow diagram form for the tasks and its QC measures 4) standards, specifications, policies, and procedures that will be used for the proper performance of the tasks 5) methodology or approach to doing the work for the task; and that to doing independent check, independent quality audit, and documentation to support the work for the task. 6) Independent Check 7) The Consultant shall use competent and trained staff to carry out independent checks of the critical tasks. The Consultant shall ensure its staff is not checking their own work when independent checks are required. The checks shall provide traceable documentation in: 8) methodology or approach to doing the work 9) standards, specifications, policies and procedures 10) accuracy and completeness of data, reports, measurements and calculations 11) Independent Quality Audit 12) The Consultant shall carry out a minimum of 2 independent audits of the quality assurance process at appropriate milestones. The auditCOPY team members shall be competent and trained staff; and shall not be directly responsible for, nor involved in the project. The Consultant shall provide the names and positions of the audit team members. The audit shall be based on, but is not necessarily limited to, the following; 13) the QC Plan 14) City of Toronto standards, specifications, policies, and procedures 15) The Consultant shall prepare an audit report for each audit 16) Completion of assignment SUBMIT 17) The Consultant shall provide the City of Toronto at the completion of the assignment, a 18) certification from a senior partner of the firm, that the QC Plan has been duly delivered. 19) City of Toronto Audits 20) At appropriate milestones in the projects development, or at any time after the Completion of the project, the City, or its delegate, reserves the right to visit the Consultants office to conduct an independent audit of the work completed to date. The Consultant shall ensure that the documents and quality assurance records are maintained and available for review at the time of the audit. NOT VIEWING DO

114 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX H - SAMPLE OF STANTEC'S SOFTWARE LICENCE AGREEMENT

COPY

SUBMIT

NOT

VIEWING

DO

115 of 138

SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

Agreement Number:

This License Agreement, made and entered into by and,

BETWEEN:

Hereinafter called ‘USER’

- and -

STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. 49 Frederick Street Kitchener, Ontario, Canada N2H 6M7

Hereinafter called ‘STANTEC’

IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: COPY

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. SCOPE

This License Agreement (hereinafter referred to as ‘AGREEMENT’) shall apply to the rental, lease and/or license of the proprietary computer software product(s) specified in Paragraph 1 herein. For purposes of this Agreement, the term ‘PRODUCT’SUBMIT shall mean that specific proprietary computer software product (including programs, documentation and any subsequent updates) specified as follows:

Bridge Management System (OBMS, City of Toronto) (One (1) User)

2. LICENSE

The PRODUCT is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties, as well as other intellectual property laws andNOT treaties. The PRODUCT is licensed, not sold.

VIEWINGSTANTEC hereby grants to, and the USER hereby accepts, subject to the terms and conditions specified herein, a nontransferable and nonexclusive license to use the PRODUCT exclusively in the USER’s business, for the USER’s benefit and on USER operated computing equipment. The USER expressly agrees to use the PRODUCT for its own internal operations only and not to allow the PRODUCT to be re-marketed, shared, assigned or used in any manner whatsoever by any other party. DO The PRODUCT shall be used by the USER only at the following location:

USER laptop computer

116 of 138 1 of 4

This license and the PRODUCT may not be shared or used concurrently on different computers unless authorized to do so herein. The PRODUCT is licensed as a single product for specific project for limited period specified under Agreement with City of Toronto. Its component parts may not be separated for use on more than one computer.

The USER assumes full responsibility for the condition and effectiveness of the operating environment in which the PRODUCT is to function.

The USER shall use the PRODUCT for internal purposes only. The USER shall not copy or duplicate the PRODUCT without the prior written consent of STANTEC. The USER shall not provide, transfer, assign, rent, lease, lend or otherwise make available the PRODUCT or any part or copies in any form to any third party, except as may be permitted in writing by STANTEC. The USER may not copy the printed materials accompanying the PRODUCT.

3. TITLE

Title to the PRODUCT and any reproduction thereof, all property rights therein, and all materials supplied to the USER under this Agreement shall remain the sole property of STANTEC and her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario. All copyright, patent, trade secret and other intellectual and proprietary rights in the PRODUCT are and remain the valuable property of STANTEC and her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario.

4. NON-DISCLOSURE COPY The USER understands and agrees that the PRODUCT constitutes proprietary information and trade secrets of STANTEC. The USER agrees to keep confidential and to exercise its best efforts to prevent and protect the PRODUCT, or any part thereof, from disclosure to any person other than the USER’s employees having need for disclosure incident to the USER’s use of the PRODUCT. In order to prevent unauthorized use, STANTEC may install such security devices as they deem necessary.

5. LIMITATIONS ON REVERSE ENGINEERING, DECOMPILATIONSUBMIT AND DISASSEMBLY

Reverse engineering, decompilation or disassembly of the PRODUCT is prohibited.

6. YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE

Stantec warrants that the currently supported releases of the PRODUCT will:

a) correctly handle date information before, during and after 1 January 2000, accept date input, provide date output and perform calculations on dates, including leap year calculations; b) function according to the documentation,NOT during and after 1 January 2000, without changes in operation associated with the advent of the new century; and

VIEWINGc) store and provide output of date information in ways that are unambiguous as to century

when configured and used according to the documented instructions, provided that the hardware, software, firmware, and other computing facilities used in combination with the PRODUCT properly exchange date and other data with the PRODUCT. DO

117 of 138 2 of 4

7. LIMITS OF LIABILITY

No other warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, shall apply unless such warranty is in writing and signed by both parties. STANTEC and her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario shall have no liability or responsibility to the USER or any third party with respect to any loss or damage caused by the PRODUCT including but not limited to any interruption of service, loss of business, or anticipatory profits, special, indirect or consequential damages resulting from the use of operation of the PRODUCT. In the event of a breach of any warranty STANTEC’s entire liability and the USER’s exclusive remedy shall be the right to terminate this Agreement by returning the PRODUCT and obtaining a refund of monies paid to STANTEC for the PRODUCT.

8. RESTRICTED USE

The PRODUCT will be used by the USER to process or analyze data collected within the jurisdiction of the USER for the USER’s internal purposes and no other. Under no circumstances shall the USER use the PRODUCTS to provide services, to any third party, related to infrastructure data, needs or evaluation analysis.

9. TERM

This AGREEMENT is effective from the date of its acceptance by STANTEC and shall remain in force until terminated by either party as provided herein. However, the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT under Paragraphs 3, 4, and 8 shallCOPY continue in full force and effect and shall survive the termination of this AGREEMENT and any Schedule(s) that become a part of this AGREEMENT.

10. TERMINATION

(a) If either party shall be in default of its obligations under this AGREEMENT and such default continues for thirty (30) days after written notice thereof by the other party, this AGREEMENT may thereupon be terminated by such other party.SUBMIT

(b) Upon any termination of this AGREEMENT, the USER shall deliver to STANTEC forthwith all the PRODUCT, copies, materials, reproductions and modifications held by the USER and shall warrant in writing to STANTEC that all copies thereof have been returned to STANTEC or destroyed.

11. GENERAL PROVISIONS

(a) Neither party shall be held responsible for any delay in performance hereunder arising out of causes beyond its control and without its fault or negligence. Such causes may include, but are not limited to, fires, strikes,NOT embargoes, acts of God, inability to secure transportation facilities or other causes beyond the control of either party.

VIEWING(b) The failure of STANTEC in any one or more instances to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms or provisions of this contract shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment, to any extent, of the right to assert or rely upon any such terms or provisions on any future occasions. If any term, provision or condition of this AGREEMENT is held to be invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the AGREEMENTDO shall remain in full force and effect and in no way shall be affected, impaired or invalidated.

118 of 138 3 of 4

(c) This AGREEMENT, constitutes the entire AGREEMENT between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede all previous negotiations, commitments, and writings and no representation or statement not contained in this AGREEMENT shall be binding upon STANTEC as a warranty or otherwise.

(d) The USER agrees that because of the unique nature of the PRODUCT, irreparable harm will be caused by a breach by the USER of its obligations hereunder, that monetary damages will be inadequate to compensate for such harm, and that injunctive relief will be an appropriate remedy to enforce this AGREEMENT.

(e) This AGREEMENT may not be released, discharged, modified or assigned, sublicensed or otherwise transferred or attached in any way except by a written instrument ratified by a duly authorized representative of each of the parties. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario. Each of the parties hereto irrevocably attorns to jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario and further agrees to commence any litigation which may arise hereunder in the courts located in the Province of Ontario. The terms and conditions contained herein shall prevail notwithstanding any variance with the terms and conditions of any other submitted by the USER.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on this ______day of ______, ______.

Name of USER (and company name) COPY ______PER: ______WITNESS

(Typed Name of Person Signing)

STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. SUBMIT

______PER: ______WITNESS

NOT VIEWING DO

119 of 138 4 of 4 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX I - SUMMARY ACTION REPORT, SAMPLE

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

120 of 138

Appendix “D” APPENDIX " D "

SAMPLE - SUMMARY ACTION REPORT

Additional Investigations

Site Inspection Date Investigations, Inspections, Surveys Recommended Priority Number 12-123 May 01 2000 Deck Condition Survey Normal (< 2 yrs) Fatigue Investigation Urgent

Structure Evaluation Normal (< 2 yrs) Underwater Investigation Normal (< 2 yrs)

Maintenance COPY

Site Inspection Date Element Maintenance Required Comments Number 12-123 May 01 2000 Embankment Erosion control at bridge

Pier Cap Repair bridge concrete Repair east end of pier.

Deck top Rout and seal asphalt Eastbound lane only. SUBMIT Expansion Joint repair Replace seal. joint seal

Repair and Rehabilitation Work

Site Inspection Date Element Rehabilitation Required Priority Number (years)

12-123 May 01 2000 Barrier system Remove and replace with concrete barrier wall 1 to 5

GirderNOT Repair fatigue crack Urgent

Deck top Deck rehabilitation 1 to 5 VIEWING Expansion Remove and replace expansion joint assembly 1 to 5 joint assembly

Site Inspection Date Remarks Number (Overall condition of structure) 12-123 DO May 01 2000 • Fair to good condition with deterioration of east curb face and handrail system • Severe erosion of east embankment

121 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX J - SAMPLE SCHEDULE

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

122 of 138 Scheduled Actual OSIM Scheduled Revised No D Name Type OU Type Name Location Inspector Railway Flagging Traffic Control Bridge Master Confined Space Completed Inspection Comment Created Inspection Date Inspection Date Inspection Date 6 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. RD u RD Lake Shore Blvd at Jameson 7 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. RD u RD Dowling Avenue 8 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. RD u RD Jameson Avenue 9 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. RD u RD Lake Shore Blvd at Dunn 10 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. RD u RD Dufferin Street 11 H Bathurst Street RD o RWY TTR s of Front 12 H Dundas Street RD o RWY CNCP s of Bloor 13 H Spadina Avenue RD o RWY TTR s of Front 17 R Don Valley Parkway RD u RWY CN Rail n of Lake Shore 18 H Lake Shore Blvd RD o WAT Don River 19 H Lake Shore Blvd RD o OTH Outfall conduit e of Woodbine 20 H Dundas Street RD o RWY CN Rail w of Dufferin 35 H Queensway RD o RD Parkside Drive 37 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. RD o RD Parkside Drive 40 H Queens Park RD o RD Wellesley Street 41 P Don Valley Parkway RD u PED pedestrian at Riverdale 42 H Dundas Street RD o WRR DVP,Don R & CNR at DVP 43 R Dundas Street RD u RWY CN Rail e of DVP 45 R Woodbine Avenue RD u RWY CN Rail s of Danforth 61 R Bloor Street RD u RWY CNCP e of Keele 63 R Bloor Street RD u RWY CN Rail (File 340 & 718) e of Keele 64 R Dufferin Street RD u RWY CP Rail n of Bloor 65 R Bathurst Street RD u RWY CP Rail n of Bloor 66 H Spadina Avenue RD o OTH Churchill Reservoir s of St. Clair 67 R Spadina Avenue RD u RWY CP Rail n of Bloor 68 R Avenue Road RD u RWY CP Rail n of Bloor 69 R Yonge Street RD u RWY CP Rail s of St Clair 71 H Aylmer Avenue RD o RWY TTC e of Yonge 72 R Mt. Pleasant Road RD u RWY CP Rail s of St Clair COPY 73 H Mt. Pleasant Road RD u RD Crescent Road n of Bloor 74 H Mt. Pleasant Road RD o OTH Rosedale Ravine n of Bloor 75 H Bloor Street RD o RD Mt Pleasant Road e of Yonge 76 H Bloor Street RD o RD Rosedale Valley Rd 77 H Bloor Street RD o WRR DVP, Don R, CN at DVP 78 H Don Valley Parkway RD o RD Bayview Ave Ext Bloor ramp 79 H Don Valley Parkway RD o RWY CN Rail Bloor ramp 80 H Don Valley Parkway RD o WAT Don River Bloor ramp 82 H Don Valley Parkway RD o RD Bloor Street Ramp at Chesterhill 83 H Pottery Road RD o WAT Don River 84 H Don Valley Parkway RD o RD Pottery Road 85 H Don Valley Parkway RD o RD Beechwood Avenue 86 H O'Connor Drive RD o WAT Taylor Creek e of Woodbine 97 H Bathurst Street RD o OTH Nordheimer Ravine n of St Clair 99 P Yonge Street RD u PED Belt Line n of St. Clair 100 H St. Clair Avenue RD o OTH ravine e of Yonge SUBMIT 101 H Mt. Pleasant Road RD o R/R Cemetery Road at cemetery 102 R Bayview Ave. Ext. RD u RWY CP Rail n of Pottery 103 H Bayview Ave. Ext. RD o RWY CP Rail n of Pottery 104 R Millwood Road RD u RWY CP Rail w of Overlea 105 H Millwood Road RD o WRR DVP,Don R & CNR n of O'Connor 107 H Don Mills Road RD o WAT Don River s of Overlea 108 H Old Don Mills Road RD o WAT Don River 109 H Don Mills Road RD o RD Don Valley Parkway 110 H Don Valley Parkway RD o WAT Taylor Creek n of Don Mills 111 H Don Valley Parkway RD o RWY CN Rail s of Eglinton 120 H Bathurst Street RD u RD Old Forest Hill Rd (File 554 & 669) n of Eglinton 121 H Eglinton Avenue RD o OTH Belt Line e of Bathurst 175 P F.G.Gardiner Exp. RD u PED pedestrian at Sunnyside 189 P Don Valley Parkway RD u PED pedestrian ramp s of Bloor 244 H Gerrard Street RD o WRR Gerrard Street at DVP, Don River, CN 245 H Queen Street RD o WRR Don Valley Parkway at DVP, Don River, CN 246 H Richmond Street RD o RD King Street 249 P Glen Road RD o PED Rosedale Valley Rd n of Bloor 250 H Sherbourne Street RD o RD Rosedale Valley Rd n of Bloor 253 H Allen Road RD u RD Ridelle Avenue 263 H DVP offramp to Richmond Adelaide RD o WAT Don Channel 264 H Richmond Adelaide RD o RD DVP, Don River, CN & Bayview Ext. at ped bridge 266 H Adelaide Street RD o RD King Street at Front NOT 282 H Allen Road RD u RD Elmridge Drive 351 H Allen Road RD u RD Aldburn Road 372 P Lake Shore Blvd RD u PED pedestrian at Jameson 501 H Chaplin Crescent RD o RWY TTC w of Yonge 503 H Crescent Road RD o RWY TTC e of Yonge 504 R Brock Avenue RD u RWY VIEWINGCNCP n of Queen West 505 H Cherry Street RD o WAT Keating Channel s of Lakeshore 507 H Dowling Avenue RD o RWY CN Rail s of Springhurst 509 H Dufferin Street RD o RWY CN Rail s of Springhurst DO 123 of 138 510 R Christie Street RD u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 511 H Dunn Avenue RD o CN Rail s of Springhurst 513 H Garrison Road RD o RWY CP Rail n of Fleet 514 R Coxwell Avenue RD u RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 517 H Glen Road RD o OTH Ravine s of Summerhill 518 R Davenport Road RD u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 520 R Dovercourt Road RD u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 521 H Governor's Road RD o OTH Moore Park Ravine n of Summerhill 522 R Dupont Street RD u RWY CNCP e of Dundas West 523 P Heath Street PED o OTH Moore Park Ravine e of Hudson 524 R Dupont Street RD u RWY CN Rail w of Lansdowne 525 H Hillsdale Avenue RD o RWY TTC w of Yonge St 527 H Imperial Street RD o RWY TTC w of Yonge 530 Gerrard Street RW o RWY Railway 531 H Jackes Avenue RD o RWY TTC e of Yonge 533 H Jameson Avenue RD o RWY CN Rail s of Springhurst 534 R Greenwood Avenue RD u RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 536 R Howland Avenue RD u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 537 H Lola Road RD o RWY TTC w of Yonge 539 P MacLennan Avenue PED o R/R CP Rail over Summerhill 540 R Jones Avenue RD u RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 541 H Main Street RD o RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 542 R King Street RD u RWY CNCP e of Atlantic 543 P Manor Road PED o RWY TTC w of Yonge 545 P Pape Avenue PED o RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 546 R Lansdowne Avenue RD u RWY CNCP Rail s of Dundas West 549 H Rosehill Avenue RD o RWY TTC e of Yonge 550 H Ossington Avenue RD u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 551 H Rowanwood Ave RD o RWY TTC e of Yonge 553 H Roxborough Street RD o RWY TTC e of Yonge 554 P Paton Road PED u RWY CN Rail e of Symington 558 R Queen Street West RD u RWY CNCP e of Dufferin 559 H Strachan Avenue RD o RWY CN Rail n of Fleet, north structure 561 H Strachan Avenue RD o RWY CP Rail n of Fleet, south structure 562 R Shaw Street RD u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 563 H Summerhill Avenue RD o RWY TTC e of Yonge 565 H Unwin Avenue RD o WAT Harbour at Outer Harbour 566 R Symington Avenue RD u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont COPY 567 P Wallace Street PED o RWY CNCP e of Dundas 569 H Algonquin Road RD o WAT Toronto Bay on Algonquin Island 570 P Woodfield Road PED u RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 571 H Woodlawn Avenue RD o RWY TTC subway e of Yonge 575 H Peter Street Slip RD o WAT Harbour e of Spadina 577 P John Street PED o RWY TTR s of Front 579 H Blue Jay Way (Peter Street) RD o RWY TTR s of Front 580 H Governor's Bridge Estates RD o RWY CP Rail w of Bayview Ave Ext 582 H Dawes Rd RD o WAT Massey Creek n of Danforth 711 P Glen Cedar Pedestrian Path PED o OTH Ravine .03 km s of Strathearn Rd 125 Structures SUBMITTotal Structures Inspected: 0

NOT VIEWING

DO 124 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

APPENDIX K - LIST OF STRUCTURES

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

125 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 1 H Lake Shore Blvd Y RD/ o WAT Etobicoke Creek 1935 50 2 2 0 Cycle A 2 H Browns Line Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail n of Lake Shore 1957 50 2 1 24 Cycle A 3 R Kipling Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of Lake Shore 1938 50 2 2 Cycle A 5 H Lake Shore Blvd Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 1979 77 2 2 64 Cycle A 21 H Kipling Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail s of Dundas 1961 100 2 7 108 Cycle A 22 H Queensway Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 1955 100 2 1 14 Cycle A 23 H Queensway N RD/ o RWY TTC w of Humber 1955 100 2 1 14 Cycle A 24 H Queensway Y RD/ o WAT Humber River 1955 77 2 11 363 Cycle A 25 H Lake Shore Blvd WB Y RD/ o WAT Humber River Humber Bridge #5 1999 100 2 3 8 Cycle A 26 H Lake Shore Blvd EB Y RD/ o WAT Humber River Humber Bridge #1 1995 100 2 Cycle A 27 H South Kingsway Y RD/ o RD/ Queensway 1955 100 2 2 Cycle A 29 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. WB Y RD/ o W/R Humber River, Kingsway Humber Bridge #3 1996 100 2 Cycle A 30 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. EB Y RD/ o W/R Humber River, Kingsway Humber Bridge #2 1996 100 2 Cycle A 31 R South Kingsway Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of F.G.G. (off ramp from F. G. G.) 1958 100 2 1 Cycle A 32 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o RD/ Windermere Avenue 1957 100 2 1 Cycle A 33 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o RD/ Ellis Avenue 1957 100 2 1 Cycle A 34 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o RD/ Howard Avenue at Colbourne Lodge Drive 1957 100 2 1 Cycle A 44 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Etobicoke Creek 1977 50 2 3 72 Cycle A 47 H Dundas Street EB Y RD/ o RD/ Kipling Avenue at Six Points 1962 100 2 1 Cycle A 48 H Dundas Street WB Y RD/ o RD/ Kipling Avenue at Six Points 1962 100 2 1 Cycle A 49 H Bloor Street Y RD/ o RD/ Dundas Street at Six Points 1962 100 2 1 16 Cycle A 50 H Kipling Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek n of BurnhamthorpeCOPY 1957 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 51 R Bloor Street Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail w of Islington 1957 75 2 2 48 Cycle A 52 H Dundas Street Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek at Islington 1962 100 2 3 Cycle A 53 H Bloor Street Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek e of Islington 1957 100 2 3 32 Cycle A 54 H Dundas Street Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail at Royal York 1956 100 2 15 145 Cycle A 55 H Dundas Street Y RD/ o WAT Humber River 1923 100 2 11 68 Cycle A 56 H Bloor Street Y RD/ o WAT Humber River w of Jane 1924 100 2 6 Cycle A 58 R Keele Street Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Dundas 1891 35 2 Cycle A 60 P Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ u PED Pedestrian w of Scarlet 1999 100 2 1 4 Cycle A 91 C Jane Street Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek n of St Clair 1948 100 2 Cycle A 92 H Weston Road Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek s of Eglinton 1981 100 2 1 Cycle A 93 H Rogers Road Y RD/ o RWY CNCP e of Weston SUBMIT1954 40 2 5 Cycle A 95 R St. Clair Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CNCP e of Keele 1931 45 2 Cycle A 96 R St. Clair Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail e of Keele 1931 45 2 2 Cycle A 114 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 1970 100 2 1 Cycle A 115 H Jane Street Y RD/ o RWY CNCP n of Eglinton 1961 100 2 16 Cycle A 117 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek w of Keele 1966 100 2 1 28 Cycle A 118 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail e of Keele 1930 100 2 1 6 Cycle A 131 H Dixon Road Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 1962 100 2 3 Cycle A 133 H Islington Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail s of Hwy 401 1961 100 2 3 52 Cycle A 134 H Weston Road Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail s of Hwy 401 1929 25 2 Cycle A 135 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Humber River 1955 100 2 2 Cycle A 138 H Jane Street Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek s of Hwy 401 1960 100 2 1 Cycle A 140 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek e of Jane 1960 100 2 1 Cycle A 145 H Sheppard Avenue N RD/ o RD/ Bartor Road e of Weston 1970 100 2 1 26 Cycle A 157 H Islington Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Humber River NOTs of Albion 1959 100 2 2 18 Cycle A 158 H Albion Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber River e of Islington 1948 100 2 2 Cycle A 159 H Albion Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber River w of Weston 1950 100 2 3 20 Cycle A 172 H Finch Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Humber River at Islington 1971 100 2 2 12 Cycle A 176 H Islington Avenue YVIEWING RD/ o WAT Humber Creek s of Dixon 1959 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 179 H Finch Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Humber R e of Hwy 427 1982 100 2 3 60 Cycle A 186 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o RWY TTC e of Park Lawn 1956 100 2 1 0 Cycle A

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 126 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 216 R Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ u RD/ Kodak Access w of Black Creek 1966 100 2 2 15 Cycle A 229 H Kipling Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ F.G.Gardiner Exp. 1966 100 2 3 16 Cycle A 231 C Dixon Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber Creek w of Islington 1976 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 234 H Steeles Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail at Martingrove 1985 100 2 Cycle A 255 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o RD/ Lake Shore Boulevard w of Humber 1972 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 257 H Dixon Road Y RD/ o RD/ Highway 27 1957 100 2 1 Cycle A 267 C Albion Road Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek w of Islington 1964 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 269 H Queensway Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail w of Kipling 1972 100 2 7 34 Cycle A 272 H Islington Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ F.G.Gardiner Exp. 1967 100 2 4 28 Cycle A 274 C Islington Avenue Y RD/ o WAT stream n of Rexdale 1956 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 293 H Jane Street Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek n of Wilson 1960 100 2 1 26 Cycle A 298 R Finch Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail e of Weston 1970 45 2 2 48 Cycle A 300 H St Phillips Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber River n of Dixon 1968 100 2 5 Cycle A 304 H Albion Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber River w of Weston 1972 100 2 3 22 Cycle A 305 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Humber River 1970 100 2 5 34 Cycle A 306 H Wilson Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ Weston Road 1972 100 2 3 40 Cycle A 316 H Queensway Y RD/ o WAT Etobicoke Creek 1970 50 2 1 20 Cycle A 317 H Bloor Street Y RD/ o WAT Etobicoke Creek 1971 50 2 3 Cycle A 318 C Bloor Street N RD/ o PED pedestrian w of Hwy 427 0 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 319 C Bloor Street Y RD/ o WAT Renforth Creek w of Hwy 427 1961 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 324 H Rexdale Boulevard Y RD/ o RD/ Jockey Club Road 1973 100 2 1 Cycle A 325 H Kipling Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Humber River s of Albion 1959 100 2 3 32 Cycle A 344 H Burnhamthorpe Ave. Y RD/ o WAT creek w of Hwy 427COPY 1967 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 345 H Burnhamthorpe Ave. Y RD/ o WAT Etobicoke Creek 1975 50 2 1 36 Cycle A 352 R Steeles Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail e of Islington 1973 40 2 2 24 Cycle A 354 R Weston Road Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Finch 1960 34 2 2 96 Cycle A 360 H Scarlett Road Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek s of Eglinton 1983 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 361 H Steeles Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Humber River 1978 100 2 5 110 Cycle A 364 H Scarlett Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber River s of Eglinton 1930 100 2 3 Cycle A 367 R Black Creek Drive Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Weston 1981 100 2 4 10 Cycle A 368 H Dundas Street Y RD/ o RD/ East Mall 1968 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 371 H Islington Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail s of FGG SUBMIT1978 100 2 7 48 Cycle A 373 H Black Creek Drive Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek s of Lawrence 1978 100 2 1 40 Cycle A 374 H Black Creek Drive Y RD/ u RD/ Queens Drive n of Lawrence 1979 100 2 2 24 Cycle A 375 H Dundas Street Y RD/ o WAT Etobicoke Creek 1968 100 2 3 48 Cycle A 376 H Black Creek Drive Y RD/ u RD/ Maple Leaf Drive n of Lawrence 1979 100 2 2 24 Cycle A 377 R Black Creek Drive Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of Weston 1980 100 2 4 10 Cycle A 379 C Dixon Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber Creek e of Kipling 1976 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 380 P Finch Avenue Y RD/ u PED Pedestrian e of Kipling 1989 100 2 Cycle A 391 C Kipling Avenue N RD/ o WAT Berry Creek n of Rexdale 1960 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 392 C Kipling Avenue Y RD/ o WAT stream s of Albion 1960 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 393 H Kipling Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek n of Albion 1960 100 2 Cycle A 394 C Kipling Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream n of Finch 1960 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 395 C Kipling Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream n of Finch 1960 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 396 C Scarlett Road RD/ o WAT stream n of Eglinton 2 100 Cycle A 412 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o RD/ East Mall 1966 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 413 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o R/R CP Rail NOTat Wickman 1966 100 2 2 0 Cycle A 414 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ u RD/ Royal York Road 1971 100 2 3 16 Cycle A 415 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ u RD/ Grand Avenue 1971 100 2 3 8 Cycle A 416 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 1972 100 2 3 120 Cycle A 417 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. YVIEWING RD/ o RD/ Park Lawn Road 1971 100 2 1 38 Cycle A 418 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail e of Park Lawn 1970 100 2 2 181 Cycle A 419 H Lake Shore WB Ramp to FGG N RD/ o WAT Humber River Humber Bridge #4 1998 100 2 3 8 Cycle A H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 127 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 420 H FGG WB Ramp to Lake Shore N RD/ o W/R Humber River, Kingsway Humber Bridge #6 2000 100 2 5 12 Cycle A 421 H Browns Line Y RD/ u RD/ Evans Avenue s of FGG 1968 100 2 3 20 Cycle A 422 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Ramp N RD/ o RD/ East Mall ramp 1966 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 423 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. WB ramp Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek wb on-ramp 1972 100 2 3 30 Cycle A 424 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. EB ramp Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek eb off-ramp 1972 100 2 3 36 Cycle A 425 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. EB ramp Y RD/ o RD/ Lake Shore Boulevard EB ramp to Lake Shore 1970 100 2 2 9 Cycle A 426 H Highway 27 Y RD/ u RD/ Woodbine Avenue Jockey Club 1955 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 427 H Highway 27 Y RD/ o WAT Humber River s of Finch 1971 100 2 3 44 Cycle A 430 C Highway 27 N RD/ o WAT stream 0 1960 100 2 100 Cycle A 431 H Highway 27 Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek n of Hwy 401 1968 100 2 1 0 Cycle A 516 R Davenport Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail w of Caledonia 1957 75 2 1 8 Cycle A 529 P Innes Avenue Y PED o RWY CN Rail w of Caledonia 1956 100 2 1 Cycle A 544 R Lansdowne Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 1931 45 2 Cycle A 605 P Va Dusen Y PED o WAT Mimico Creek w of Thompson Ave 1956 100 2 1 Cycle A 615 H Rathburn Road Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 0.24 km e of Martin Grove Rd. 1963 100 2 3 Cycle A 616 H Martin Grove Road Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 0.12 km n of Rathburn Rd. 1961 100 2 1 Cycle A 620 H Edenbridge Drive Y RD/ o WAT Silver Creek 0.76 km e of Royal York 1965 100 2 1 Cycle A 621 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Silver Creek w of Royal York Rd 1959 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 623 H Royal York Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber Creek n of the Westway 1954 100 2 1 Cycle A 624 H Skyway Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 0.12 km w of Hwy27 1982 100 2 3 Cycle A 627 H Carlingview Drive Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 0.09 km n of Hwy 409 1962 100 2 1 Cycle A 628 P Brydon Drive N PED o WAT Berry Creek North of N end of Brydon Drive 1969 100 2 1 Cycle A 629 H Martin Grove Road Y RD/ o WAT Humber R. w. branch 1.74 km n ofCOPY Rexdale Blvd 1963 100 2 3 Cycle A 630 H Humberwood Y RD/ o WAT Humber R. w. branch .5 km s of Finch Ave. 1990 100 2 3 Cycle A 631 H Amaron Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek 0.37 km e of Kipling Ave 100 2 Cycle A 632 H Taysham Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek 0.06 km e of Kipling Ave 1959 100 2 Cycle A 633 H Martin Grove Road Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek 0.60 km n of Albion Rd 1965 100 2 Cycle A 634 H Old Mill Road N RD/ o WAT Humber River 0.7 km e of Bloor St. 1916 100 2 3 Cycle A 635 H Royal York Road Y RD/ o WAT Mimico Creek 0.8 km s of Bloor St. 1937 100 2 1 Cycle A 636 H at Mill Race N RD/ o PED Old Mill Road 0.5 km e of Bloor St. 1916 100 2 1 Cycle A 639 H Indian Line Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail 0.24 Km w of HWY 27 1963 100 2 Cycle A 641 H Cordova Avnue Y RD/ o RD/ Islington Ave 0.60 km s of Dundas 1961 100 2 1 Cycle A 642 R Montgomery Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail 0.52 km e of Islington Ave.SUBMIT1981 100 2 Cycle A 643 H Cloverdale Mall Road Y RD/ o RD/ The East Mall 0.43 km e of Hwy 427 1969 100 2 1 Cycle A 644 H East Mall N RD/ u RD/ Vickers Rd. (A&P access) s of Dundas 1970 100 2 1 Cycle A 646 R East Mall Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail 0.61 km n of North Queen Street 1970 100 2 Cycle A 653 R Royal York Road Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail 0.10 n of Dundas St 1956 75 2 Cycle A 654 H Matheson Avenue N RD/ o RD/ Renforth Ave. w of Eglinton Ave 1994 100 2 20 Cycle A 661 C Toledo Road Y RD/ o WAT Renforth Creek .24 km w of Renforth Drive 1960 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 662 H Old Burnhamthorpe Road Y RD/ o WAT Renforth Creek 0.24 km n of Burnhamthorpe 1960 1 2 1 1 Cycle A 663 C Elmcrest Road Y RD/ o WAT Elmcrest Creek .12 km s of Rathburn Rd 1964 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 664 C Rathburn Road Y RD/ o WAT Renforth Creek 0.52 km w of Renforth Dr 1964 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 665 C Royal York Road Y RD/ o WAT Silver Creek .70 km s of Eglinton Ave 1955 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 666 H Brittany Court Y RD/ o WAT Humber Creek e of Royal York 1972 100 2 1 Cycle A 667 C Holberg Y RD/ o WAT Berry Creek .52 km e of Islington Ave. 1964 100 2 100 Cycle A 668 H Redwater N RD/ o WAT Berry Creek .12 km w of Islington Ave. 1950 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 669 H Drumheller N RD/ o WAT Berry Creek NOT.37 km w of Islington Ave. 1950 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 670 H Berry Creek Drive N RD/ o WAT Berry Creek 0.18 km e of Kipling Ave 1950 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 671 C Martin Grove Road N RD/ o WAT Berry Creek 0.53 km n of Rexdale Blvd 1960 100 2 100 Cycle A 672 C Stevenson Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek .50 km e of Martin Grove Rd. 1964 100 2 100 Cycle A 673 H Garfella YVIEWING RD/ o WAT Albion Creek .37 km e of Martin Grove Rd. 1962 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 674 C Silverstone Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek 0.61 km n of Albion Rd 1965 100 2 100 Cycle A 675 C Baywood Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek s of Royalcrest Rd 1965 100 2 100 Cycle A

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 128 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 676 C Royalcrest Road Y RD/ o WAT Albion Creek 0.12 km e of Hwy 27 1965 100 2 1 100 Cycle A 677 C The Westway Y RD/ o WAT Humber Creek .12 km w of Royal York 1956 100 2 100 Cycle A 678 C Wincott Drive N RD/ o WAT Humber Creek s of Dixon Rd 1960 100 2 100 Cycle A 679 C Acme Cres, at Wincott Dr Y RD/ o WAT s of Dixon Rd 1960 100 2 100 Cycle A 680 C Carlingview Drive Y RD/ o WAT 0 s of Dixon Rd 1960 100 2 100 Cycle A 681 C Carlingview Drive Y RD/ o WAT 0 s of Dixon Rd 1960 100 2 100 Cycle A 682 C Shaft Road Y RD/ o WAT at Ronson Drive w of Kipling Ave 0 100 2 100 Cycle A 683 C Belfield Road N RD/ o WAT 0 w of Kipling Ave 0 100 2 100 Cycle A 684 C College Street Y RD/ o WAT 0 e of Islington 0 100 2 100 Cycle A 701 H Trethewey Drive Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek e of Black Creek Dr. 1971 100 2 1 30 Cycle A 702 H Rockcliffe Blvd. Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek .18 km s of Alliance Ave 1970 100 2 Cycle A 703 H Humber Blvd S. N RD/ o WAT Black Creek .1km n of Alliance Ave 1975 100 2 1 Cycle A 704 H Humber Blvd N RD/ o WAT Black Creek .03 km n of Alliance Ave 1975 100 2 1 Cycle A 705 P Humber Blvd & Louvarin N PED o WAT Black Creek 0.3 Km w of Weston Road 1975 100 2 Cycle A 706 R Ray Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail .2 km e of Weston Rd. 1928 100 2 2 Cycle A 707 R Ray Avenue N RD/ u RWY CP Rail .23 km e of Weston Rd. 1928 100 2 2 Cycle A 708 H Symes Road Y RD/ o WAT Symes Rd Creek .01 km w of Symes Rd. 1930 100 2 1 Cycle A 709 H Symes Road Y RD/ o WAT Symes Rd Creek .01 km n of Orman Ave. 1930 100 2 1 Cycle A 710 R Rogers Road N RD/ u RWY CN Rail .03km e of Blackthhorn Ave 1952 100 2 1 Cycle A 759 H Queens Drive Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek 0.4 km e of Jane Street 1962 100 2 1 14 Cycle A 760 H Maple Leaf Drive Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek 0.4 km e of Jane Street 1963 100 2 1 14 Cycle A 761 H Gordon MacKay Drive N RD/ o WAT Black Creek 1962 100 2 Cycle A 766 R Ormont Drive Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail w of Femar COPYDr. 1983 100 2 1 Cycle A 46 R Victoria Park Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail s of Danforth 1938 66 4 2 Cycle A 87 C Victoria Park Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Massey Creek n of Danforth 1962 100 4 Cycle A 88 C St. Clair Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Massey Creek w of Warden 1967 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 89 R Bloor Street Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail e of Warden 1924 70 4 2 20 Cycle A 90 H Danforth Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ Kingston Road 1938 100 4 1 0 Cycle A 94 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail e of Kennedy 1980 100 4 6 32 Cycle A 98 H Ellesmere Road Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail e of Kennedy 1981 100 4 5 28 Cycle A 116 C Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT stream e of Markham 1966 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 127 C Danforth Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream n of Eglinton 1960 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 128 H Markham Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek n of Eglinton SUBMIT1949 100 4 1 5 Cycle A 129 H Markham Road Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail n of Eglinton 1961 100 4 3 Cycle A 152 R Victoria Park Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail n of Lawrence 1959 100 4 3 44 Cycle A 153 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of McCowan 1955 100 4 3 48 Cycle A 154 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek w of Galloway Rd. 1966 100 4 5 100 Cycle A 155 H Kingston Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Morningside 1978 100 4 5 30 Cycle A 156 H Kingston Road Y RD/ u RD/ Lawson Road e of Morningside 1947 100 4 2 16 Cycle A 168 H Markham Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek (file 521 & 269) n of Ellesmere 1966 100 4 1 0 Cycle A 177 H Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Kennedy 1966 100 4 1 Cycle A 178 C Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ o WAT creek e of Morningside 1980 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 180 H Kingston Road Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail e of Markham 1979 100 4 5 150 Cycle A 181 C Warden Avenue N RD/ o WAT Massey Creek n of St Clair 1970 100 4 0 100 Cycle A 200 R Warden Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail s of Ellesmere 1963 100 4 2 28 Cycle A 202 R Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail w of Brimley 1963 30 4 Cycle A 203 H Markham Road Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail NOTn of Sheppard 1963 100 4 5 96 Cycle A 204 H Markham Road Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail n of Finch 1963 100 4 3 0 Cycle A 211 H Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ Yorkdale Access 1974 100 4 Cycle A 212 H Kennedy Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek n of Sheppard 1962 100 4 1 0 Cycle A 223 C Finch Avenue NVIEWING RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Vic Park 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 230 H Finch Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail w of Markham 1979 100 4 3 56 Cycle A 239 R Victoria Park Avenue N RD/ u RWY TTC 67 4 Cycle A

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 129 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 240 R St. Clair Avenue Y RD/ u RWY TTC w of Warden 1970 50 4 Cycle A 265 H Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of McCowan 1969 100 4 1 0 Cycle A 270 C Warden Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream n of Sheppard 1961 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 276 C Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Massey Creek w of Kennedy 1951 100 4 100 Cycle A 277 C Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT stream e of Warden 1953 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 278 C Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Dorset Creek (Also File P1066-69) e of Kennedy 1961 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 279 C Warden Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream s of Ellesmere 1959 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 281 C Markham Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek s of Finch 1976 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 283 C Kennedy Road Y RD/ o WAT Dorset Creek n of Lawrence 1963 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 289 C Ellesmere Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek w of Brimley 1961 100 4 100 Cycle A 290 R Ellesmere Road Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail at Warden 1963 100 4 2 28 Cycle A 291 C Ellesmere Road N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Vic Park 1959 100 4 100 Cycle A 301 P Victoria Park Avenue Y RD/ u PED pedestrian at TTC 1970 100 4 5 20 Cycle A 310 H McCowan Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek n of Lawrence 1957 100 4 1 14 Cycle A 312 H McCowan Road Y RD/ u RD/ Progress Avenue s of Hwy 401 R-45-83 100 4 2 16 Cycle A 323 H McCowan Road N RD/ o PED pedestrian s of Hwy 401 1983 100 4 Cycle A 334 C Steeles Avenue Y RD/ o WAT creek e of Littles 1975 100 4 100 Cycle A 335 C Steeles Avenue N RD/ o WAT creek w of Neilson 1970 100 4 100 Cycle A 336 H Steeles Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River e of Staines 1957 100 4 Cycle A 338 H Steeles Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River e of Reesor 1957 100 4 Cycle A 339 C Steeles Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream e of Beare 1970 100 4 100 Cycle A 346 C McCowan Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek n of SheppardCOPY 1971 100 4 100 Cycle A 347 H Meadowvale Road Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River n of Sheppard 1973 100 4 3 48 Cycle A 348 H Meadowvale Road Y RD/ u RD/ Zoo Access n of Sheppard 1974 100 4 1 Cycle A 349 C McCowan Road N RD/ o WAT stream s of Finch 1970 100 4 100 Cycle A 355 H Ellesmere Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Orton Park 1966 100 4 3 48 Cycle A 357 H Morningside Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek s of Ellesmere 1964 100 4 5 72 Cycle A 358 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek w of Meadowvale 1972 100 4 5 36 Cycle A 362 C Finch Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Warden 1971 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 363 C Finch Avenue N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Warden 1971 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 365 C Finch Avenue N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Kennedy 1960 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 366 C Finch Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Brimley 1973 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 370 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail e of Kennedy SUBMIT1977 100 4 9 40 Cycle A 381 C Finch Avenue N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek w of Markham 1976 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 384 C Brimley Road N RD/ o WAT stream n of Eglinton 1970 100 4 100 Cycle A 385 C Brimley Road N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek n of Lawrence 1970 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 388 C Brimley Road N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek n of Sheppard 1970 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 389 C Brimley Road N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek n of Finch 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 406 C Danforth Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream n of Eglinton 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 407 C Ellesmere Road N RD/ o WAT creek w of Morningside 1980 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 408 C Kingston Road N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek e of Morningside 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 409 C Steeles Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream w of Markham 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 410 C Markham Road N RD/ o WAT creek n of Sheppard 1970 100 4 100 Cycle A 411 C Markham Road N RD/ o WAT stream n of Finch 1970 100 4 100 Cycle A 429 H Kingston Road Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River e of Sheppard 1965 100 4 6 28 Cycle A 801 P Tara Avenue Y PED o RWY CN Rail .36 km west of Midland Ave 1960 100 4 Cycle A 802 H Twyn Rivers Drive Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River NOT.46 km west of Pickering Town Line (Maxwell's Bridge) 1927 100 4 1 4 Cycle A 803 H Twyn Rivers Drive Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River .61km east of Sheppard Ave (Stott's Bridge) 1915 100 4 1 4 Cycle A 806 H Meadowvale Road Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River .37 km north of Finch Ave (Hillside Bridge) 1917 100 4 1 4 Cycle A 808 H Old Kingston Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek .24 km west of Military Trail 1979 100 4 3 Cycle A 812 H Sewells Road YVIEWING RD/ o WAT Rouge River .27 km north of Old Finch Ave 1912 100 4 3 8 Cycle A 813 H Old Finch Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River .1 km east of Sewells Rd 1988 100 4 2 Cycle A 817 H Neilson Road Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail .67 km south of Finch Ave 1975 100 4 4 28 Cycle A

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 130 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 818 H Military Trail Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek .27 km west of Highcastle Rd 1978 100 4 1 12 Cycle A 819 H Scar Golf Club Rd Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek .35 km s of Confederation Dr 1978 100 4 1 14 Cycle A 821 H Bellamy Road Y RD/ o WAT Highland Creek .15 km north of Cederbrae Blvd 1963 100 4 1 16 Cycle A 825 H Birchmount Road Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail .12 km north of Highview Ave 1959 25 4 3 12 Cycle A 826 H Pharmacy Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .18 km north of Teesdale Place 1963 100 4 3 54 Cycle A 827 R Midland Avenue N RD/ u RWY CP Rail .18 km south of Sheppard Ave 1969 17.5 4 2 152 Cycle A 828 H Pharmacy Ave Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail .85 km north of Lawrence Ave 1976 100 4 5 Cycle A 829 C Emblem Court N RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .2 km west of Midland Avenue 1968 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 830 H Midland Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .09 km south of Cosintino Dr 1981 100 4 1 0 Cycle A 831 C Birchmount Road N RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .02 km n of Ashtonbee Rd 1965 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 834 C Milner Avenue N RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .75 km east of McCowan Rd 1969 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 835 C Progress Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .3 km west of Bellamy Rd 1966 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 836 H Invergordon Avenue N RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .09 km east of Tineta Cres 1970 100 4 2 Cycle A 838 C Milner Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .61 km east of Dailing Gate 1973 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 839 C Birchmount Road Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .91 km north of Sheppard Ave 1966 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 840 C Huntingwood Drive Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .09 km east of Dunmurray Blvd 1968 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 841 C Burrows Hall Blvd. Y RD/ o WAT Malvern, Highland Creek .06 km east of Purvis Cres 1973 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 842 H Progress Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .3 km west of Midland 1982 100 4 3 Cycle A 843 C Bellamy Road Y RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .3 km north of Ellesmere Rd 1966 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 844 H Kirkhams Road Y RD/ o WAT Rouge River .37 km north of Meadowvale Rd 1956 100 4 2 12 Cycle A 845 C McLevin Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Malvern, Highland Creek .1 km east of Malvern St 1975 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 846 H Birchmount Road Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail .30 km south of Hwy 401 1978 100 4 5 270 Cycle A 847 C Clemes Road Y RD/ o WAT Centennial, Highland Creek .15 km westCOPY of Centennial Rd 1977 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 849 C Nugget Avenue RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .02 km east of McCowan Rd 4 100 Cycle A 851 H Kennedy Road Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail .12 km north of Aylesworth Ave 1981 100 4 6 Cycle A 856 H Tapscott Road Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail .3 km south of Crow Trail 1981 100 4 3 9 Cycle A 857 C Bertrand Avenue N RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .9 km east of Thermos Rd 1956 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 901 C Lawson Road Y RD/ o WAT Centennial, Highland Creek .04 km east of Irvine Rd 1976 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 902 C Centennial Road N RD/ o WAT watercourse .4 km n of Lawson Rd 1960 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 904 H Pickering Townline N RD/ o WAT Rouge River .20 km north of Finch Ave 1970 100 4 1 Cycle A 905 H Sewells Road N RD/ o WAT Rouge Tributary .15 km north of Passmore Rd 1988 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 906 C Middlefield Road N RD/ o WAT Malvern, Highland Creek .2 km north of Finch Ave 1980 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 907 C Chartland Blvd N RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .3 km west of Sandhurst SUBMITCir 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 909 C Brimwood Blvd Y RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .15 km east of Brimley Rd 1972 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 910 C Midland Avenue N RD/ o WAT Dorset Park Interceptor .1 km south of Marcos Blvd 1963 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 911 C Timberbank Blvd Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .06 km west of Fluellen Dr 1969 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 912 C Garrybrook Drive Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .03 km south of Timberbank Blvd 1968 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 913 C Baylawn Drive Y RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .17 km west of Midland Ave 1975 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 914 C Beechgrove Drive Y RD/ o WAT West Hill watercourse .18 km N of Coronation Dr 1976 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 915 C L'Amoreaux Drive Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .08 km E of Bridletowne Cir 1971 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 916 C Cardwell Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .06 km east of Kennedy Rd 1983 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 918 H Dewey Drive Y RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .15 km south of Ellesmere Rd 1950 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 919 H Penworth Road Y RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .03 km east of Crossland Dr 1957 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 921 C Foxbridge Drive N RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .06 km W of Kennedy Rd 1960 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 922 C Middlefield Road N RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .1 km east of McCowan 1978 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 923 C Midland Avenue N RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .01 km N of Huntingwood Dr 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 924 C Nashdene Road N RD/ o WAT Malvern, Highland CreekNOT.21 km W of Dynamic Dr 1980 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 925 C Collingsbrook Blvd Y RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .04 km W of Bridletowne Cir 1974 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 926 C Canlish Road Y RD/ o WAT Dorset Park Interceptor .07 km S of Shropshire Dr 1971 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 927 C Wye Valley Road Y RD/ o WAT Dorset Park Interceptor .07 km S of Shropshire Dr 1979 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 928 C Japonica Road YVIEWING RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .61 km east of White Abbey Park 1957 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 929 C East Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Adams Park Creek .06 km S of Baronial Court 1984 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 930 C Scar Golf Club Rd N RD/ o WAT Subtrunk A .12 km N of Densgrove Rd 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 131 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 931 H McNicoll Avenue Y RD/ o WAT East Bendale, Highland Creek .48 km west of Kennedy Rd 1988 100 4 3 42 Cycle A 932 H Tapscott Road Y RD/ o PED pedestrian walkway .4 km west of Neilsen Rd 1971 100 4 1 0 Cycle A 933 H McCowan Road N RD/ u RD/ Landmark Blvd .28 km south of Eglinton Ave 1988 100 4 1 Cycle A 934 H McCowan Road N RD/ o RD/ Corporate Drive .01 km south of Consilium Place 1986 100 4 1 Cycle A 935 P Bushby Dr Ramp Y RD/ u PED TTC Walkway .01 km east of McCowan Rd 1985 100 4 1 Cycle A 937 H Consilium Place N RD/ o RD/ 401 On-Ramp .01 km east of McCowan Rd 1985 100 4 1 Cycle A 942 C Mammoth Hall Trail Y RD/ o WAT Malvern, Highland Creek .06 km east of Gateforth Dr 1985 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 943 C Old Finch Avenue N RD/ o WAT Rouge River .23 km E of Morningside Ave 1980 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 944 C Reesor Road N RD/ o WAT Rouge Tributary 1.2 km north of Finch Ave 1960 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 945 H Plug Hat Rd Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail 0.3km W of Beare Rd 1960 50 4 3 Cycle A 946 C Pine Meadow Blvd N RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .03 km W of Bridletowne Cir 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 947 C Birchmount Road N RD/ o WAT Bendale, Highland Creek .01 km S of Silver Spring Blvd 1974 100 4 2 100 Cycle A 948 C Tiffield Road N RD/ o WAT Malvern, Highland Creek .2 km north of Finch Ave 1979 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 949 C Corporate Drive N RD/ o WAT Markham, Highland Creek .35 km west of Bellamy Rd 1980 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 950 C Prudential Drive N RD/ o WAT Dorset Park Interceptor .15 km west of Midland Ave 1970 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 951 C Tower Drive N RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .09 km east of Warden Ave 1960 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 952 C Birchmount Road N RD/ o WAT Massey Creek .03 km north of St.Clair Ave 1962 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 954 C Nantucket Blvd N RD/ o WAT Dorset Park Interceptor .01 km N of Wickware Gate 1979 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 955 C Banmoor Blvd N RD/ o WAT Subtrunk B .25 km east of Bellamy Rd 1960 100 4 3 100 Cycle A 956 C Chestermere Blvd N RD/ o WAT Subtrunk B .07 km east of Farmbrook Rd 1950 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 957 C Blake Manor Blvd N RD/ o WAT Subtrunk B .2 km north of Nelson St 1950 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 958 P Timberbank Blvd N PED o WAT watercourse 1970 100 4 1 4 Cycle A 959 P Stubbswood Sq N PED o WAT watercourse COPY 1970 100 4 Cycle A 960 P Silverstead Drive N PED o WAT watercourse 1970 100 4 4 Cycle A 961 P Sandhurst Circle N PED o WAT watercourse 1970 100 4 2 Cycle A 962 P Prairie Drive Y PED o RWY TTC subway n of Danforth 1968 100 4 0 Cycle A 963 P McCowan Rd N of Providence St N PED o WAT watercourse 1977 100 4 2 Cycle A 964 P Kennedy Rd N of Hopecrest Dr N PED o WAT watercourse to Maywood Pk 1970 100 4 1 8 Cycle A 965 P Littleleaf Dr N PED o WAT watercourse to school 1976 100 4 2 Cycle A 966 C Ellesmere Rd N RD/ o WAT Dorset Creek Interceptor .02 km west of Birchmount Ave 0 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 967 C Birchmount Ave N RD/ o WAT Dorset Creek Interceptor .02 km south of Ellesmere Rd. 0 100 4 1 100 Cycle A 968 P Lupin Drive N PED o WAT watercourse Crocus Dr 1970 100 4 1 4 Cycle A 969 H Woodrow Avenue N RD/ o RWY CN Rail SUBMIT100 4 Cycle A 970 H Morningside Avenue Y RD/ u RD/ Street A n of 401 2004 100 4 1 Cycle A 972 R Morningside Avenue N RD/ u RWY CPRail Finch & Morningside 2010 100 4 1 Cycle A 973 R Finch Avenue N RD/ u RWY CPRail Finch & Morningside 2010 100 4 1 Cycle A 974 C Lawerance Ave N RD/ o WAT Lake Ontario Trib e of East ave 4 1 100 Cycle A 975 C Lawerance Ave N RD/ o WAT Highland Creek Trib w of Centenial Rd 4 1 100 Cycle A 976 C Piperbrook cres N RD/ o WAT West Hill watercourse 4 1 100 Cycle A 977 C Beechgrove Drive N RD/ o WAT West Hill watercourse 4 1 100 Cycle A 6 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ u RD/ Lake Shore Blvd at Jameson 1958 100 1 4 25 Cycle B 7 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ u RD/ Dowling Avenue 1958 100 1 2 18 Cycle B 8 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ u RD/ Jameson Avenue 1958 100 1 2 20 Cycle B 9 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ u RD/ Lake Shore Blvd at Dunn 1958 100 1 2 Cycle B 10 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ u RD/ Dufferin Street 1959 100 1 2 Cycle B 11 H Bathurst Street Y RD/ o RWY TTR s of Front 1931 77 1 8 12 Cycle B 12 H Dundas Street Y RD/ o RWY CNCP NOTs of Bloor 1984 77 1 Cycle B 13 H Spadina Avenue Y RD/ o RWY TTR s of Front 1990 100 1 4 38 Cycle B 17 R Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of Lake Shore 1949 70 1 Cycle B 18 H Lake Shore Blvd Y RD/ o WAT Don River 1959 100 1 2 Cycle B 19 H Lake Shore Blvd YVIEWING RD/ o OTH Outfall conduit e of Woodbine 1960 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 20 H Dundas Street Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail w of Dufferin 1937 77 1 2 Cycle B 35 H Queensway Y RD/ o RD/ Parkside Drive 1956 100 1 1 Cycle B

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 132 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 37 H F.G.Gardiner Exp. Y RD/ o RD/ Parkside Drive 1956 100 1 1 Cycle B 40 H Queens Park Y RD/ o RD/ Wellesley Street 1949 100 1 Cycle B 41 P Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ u PED pedestrian at Riverdale 1958 100 1 7 Cycle B 42 H Dundas Street Y RD/ o WRR DVP,Don R & CNR at DVP 1911 100 1 4 Cycle B 43 R Dundas Street Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail e of DVP 1953 100 1 2 Cycle B 45 R Woodbine Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail s of Danforth 1954 75 1 Cycle B 61 R Bloor Street Y RD/ u RWY CNCP e of Keele 1925 45 1 4 28 Cycle B 63 R Bloor Street Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail (File 340 & 718) e of Keele 1924 45 1 4 Cycle B 64 R Dufferin Street N RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Bloor 1953 75 1 2 24 Cycle B 65 R Bathurst Street Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Bloor 1913 20 1 4 64 Cycle B 66 H Spadina Avenue Y RD/ o OTH Churchill Reservoir s of St. Clair 1930 100 1 3 16 Cycle B 67 R Spadina Avenue N RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Bloor 1913 22 1 4 48 Cycle B 68 R Avenue Road Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Bloor 1923 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 69 R Yonge Street Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail s of St Clair 1914 22 1 5 50 Cycle B 71 H Aylmer Avenue Y RD/ o RWY TTC e of Yonge 1952 100 1 1 Cycle B 72 R Mt. Pleasant Road N RD/ u RWY CP Rail s of St Clair 1948 50 1 2 24 Cycle B 73 H Mt. Pleasant Road Y RD/ u RD/ Crescent Road n of Bloor 1987 100 1 1 12 Cycle B 74 H Mt. Pleasant Road Y RD/ o OTH Rosedale Ravine n of Bloor 1948 100 1 5 Cycle B 75 H Bloor Street Y RD/ o RD/ Mt Pleasant Road e of Yonge 1949 100 1 2 51 Cycle B 76 H Bloor Street Y RD/ o RD/ Rosedale Valley Rd 1918 100 1 3 Cycle B 77 H Bloor Street N RD/ o WRR DVP, Don R, CN at DVP 1918 67 1 6 Cycle B 78 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RD/ Bayview Ave Ext Bloor ramp 1958 100 1 3 28 Cycle B 79 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail Bloor ramp COPY 1958 100 1 3 28 Cycle B 80 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o WAT Don River Bloor ramp 1958 100 1 3 16 Cycle B 82 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RD/ Bloor Street Ramp at Chesterhill 1959 100 1 3 96 Cycle B 83 H Pottery Road Y RD/ o WAT Don River 1928 100 1 1 24 Cycle B 84 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RD/ Pottery Road 1960 100 1 3 84 Cycle B 85 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RD/ Beechwood Avenue 1960 100 1 3 96 Cycle B 86 H O'Connor Drive Y RD/ o WAT Taylor Creek e of Woodbine 1930 100 1 13 40 Cycle B 97 H Bathurst Street Y RD/ o OTH Nordheimer Ravine n of St Clair 1975 100 1 4 84 Cycle B 99 P Yonge Street Y RD/ u PED Belt Line n of St. Clair 1922 100 1 8 40 Cycle B 100 H St. Clair Avenue Y RD/ o OTH ravine e of Yonge 1924 100 1 5 Cycle B 101 H Mt. Pleasant Road Y RD/ o R/R Cemetery Road at cemetery SUBMIT1976 100 1 2 64 Cycle B 102 R Bayview Ave. Ext. Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Pottery 1957 75 1 2 56 Cycle B 103 H Bayview Ave. Ext. Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail n of Pottery 1957 100 1 3 60 Cycle B 104 R Millwood Road Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail w of Overlea 1927 100 1 Cycle B 105 H Millwood Road Y RD/ o WRR DVP,Don R & CNR n of O'Connor 1969 100 1 11 44 Cycle B 107 H Don Mills Road Y RD/ o WAT Don River s of Overlea 1961 100 1 1 18 Cycle B 108 H Old Don Mills Road Y RD/ o WAT Don River 1921 100 1 1 4 Cycle B 109 H Don Mills Road Y RD/ o RD/ Don Valley Parkway 1959 100 1 2 27 Cycle B 110 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o WAT Taylor Creek n of Don Mills 1959 100 1 3 60 Cycle B 111 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail s of Eglinton 1959 100 1 3 32 Cycle B 120 H Bathurst Street Y RD/ u RD/ Old Forest Hill Rd (File 554 & 669) n of Eglinton 1984 100 1 1 8 Cycle B 121 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o OTH Belt Line e of Bathurst 1948 50 1 1 0 Cycle B 175 P F.G.Gardiner Exp. N RD/ u PED pedestrian at Sunnyside 1958 33 1 8 26 Cycle B 189 P Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ u PED pedestrian ramp s of Bloor 1963 100 1 7 4 Cycle B 244 H Gerrard Street Y RD/ o WRR Gerrard Street NOTat DVP, Don River, CN 1923 100 1 3 64 Cycle B 245 H Queen Street Y RD/ o WRR Don Valley Parkway at DVP, Don River, CN 1911 70 1 15 Cycle B 246 H Richmond Street N RD/ o RD/ King Street 1962 100 1 8 75 Cycle B 249 P Glen Road Y RD/ o PED Rosedale Valley Rd n of Bloor 1974 100 1 3 8 Cycle B 250 H Sherbourne Street YVIEWING RD/ o RD/ Rosedale Valley Rd n of Bloor 1972 100 1 4 20 Cycle B 253 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Ridelle Avenue 1970 100 1 5 24 Cycle B 263H DVP offramp to Richmond Adelaide Y RD/ o WAT Don Channel 1962 100 1 8 52 Cycle B

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 133 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 264 H Richmond Adelaide Y RD/ o RD/ DVP, Don River, CN & Bayview Ext. at ped bridge 1962 100 1 17 519 Cycle B 266 H Adelaide Street Y RD/ o RD/ King Street at Front 1962 100 1 20 175 Cycle B 282 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Elmridge Drive 1970 100 1 5 24 Cycle B 288 C Bloor Street N RD/ o PED pedestrian walkway at Glen Road 1964 100 1 1 100 Cycle B 351 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Aldburn Road 1970 100 1 5 24 Cycle B 372 P Lake Shore Blvd Y RD/ u PED pedestrian at Jameson 1972 100 1 3 8 Cycle B 501 H Chaplin Crescent Y RD/ o RWY TTC w of Yonge 1974 100 1 4 44 Cycle B 503 H Crescent Road Y RD/ o RWY TTC e of Yonge 1952 100 1 2 0 Cycle B 504 R Brock Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CNCP n of Queen West 1914 20 1 4 110 Cycle B 505 H Cherry Street Y RD/ o WAT Keating Channel s of Lakeshore 1968 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 507 H Dowling Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail s of Springhurst 191133.3 1 1 2 Cycle B 509 H Dufferin Street Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail s of Springhurst 191133.3 1 1 6 Cycle B 510 R Christie Street Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 1914 22 1 4 50 Cycle B 511 H Dunn Avenue Y RD/ o CN Rail s of Springhurst 191133.3 1 1 2 Cycle B 512 R Colbourne Lodge Dr N RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of Lakeshore 1911 0 1 2 15 Cycle B 513 H Garrison Road N RD/ o RWY CP Rail n of Fleet 1960 36 1 3 20 Cycle B 514 R Coxwell Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 1913 100 1 4 135 Cycle B 517 H Glen Road Y RD/ o OTH Ravine s of Summerhill 1928 100 1 7 48 Cycle B 518 R Davenport Road Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 1914 22 1 4 40 Cycle B 520 R Dovercourt Road Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 1914 20 1 4 42 Cycle B 521 H Governor's Road Y RD/ o OTH Moore Park Ravine n of Summerhill 1923 100 1 3 0 Cycle B 522 R Dupont Street Y RD/ u RWY CNCP e of DundasCOPY West 1925 45 1 4 49 Cycle B 523 P Heath Street Y PED o OTH Moore Park Ravine e of Hudson 1999 100 1 3 4 Cycle B 524 R Dupont Street Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail w of Lansdowne 1951 75 1 2 21 Cycle B 525 H Hillsdale Avenue Y RD/ o RWY TTC w of Yonge St 1952 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 527 H Imperial Street Y RD/ o RWY TTC w of Yonge 1952 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 531 H Jackes Avenue Y RD/ o RWY TTC e of Yonge 1952 100 1 3 20 Cycle B 533 H Jameson Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail s of Springhurst 1963 100 1 1 4 Cycle B 534 R Greenwood Avenue N RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 1959 50 1 1 0 Cycle B 536 R Howland Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 1913 22 1 4 40 Cycle B 537 H Lola Road Y RD/ o RWY TTC w of Yonge 1953 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 539 P MacLennan Avenue Y PED o R/R CP Rail over Summerhill SUBMIT1974 100 1 12 6 Cycle B 540 R Jones Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 1951 75 1 2 24 Cycle B 541 H Main Street Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 1979 30 1 1 24 Cycle B 542 R King Street Y RD/ u RWY CNCP e of Atlantic 1888 50 1 2 480 Cycle B 543 P Manor Road Y PED o RWY TTC w of Yonge 1977 100 1 3 12 Cycle B 545 P Pape Avenue Y PED o RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 1981 100 1 11 4 Cycle B 546 R Lansdowne Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CNCP Rail s of Dundas West 20 1 Cycle B 549 H Rosehill Avenue Y RD/ o RWY TTC e of Yonge 1953 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 550 H Ossington Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 1914 22 1 Cycle B 551 H Rowanwood Ave Y RD/ o RWY TTC e of Yonge 1953 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 553 H Roxborough Street Y RD/ o RWY TTC e of Yonge 1953 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 554 P Paton Road Y PED u RWY CN Rail e of Symington 1981 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 558 R Queen Street West Y RD/ u RWY CNCP e of Dufferin 1978 36 1 1 14 Cycle B 559 H Strachan Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail n of Fleet, north structure 1917 100 1 1 6 Cycle B 561 H Strachan Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail n of Fleet, south structure 1981 100 1 1 30 Cycle B 562 R Shaw Street Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail NOTn of Dupont 1914 22 1 4 20 Cycle B 563 H Summerhill Avenue Y RD/ o RWY TTC e of Yonge 1953 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 565 H Unwin Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Harbour at Outer Harbour 1945 100 1 2 6 Cycle B 566 R Symington Avenue N RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Dupont 1968 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 567 P Wallace Street YVIEWING PED o RWY CNCP e of Dundas 1908 100 1 7 24 Cycle B 569 H Algonquin Road Y RD/ o WAT Toronto Bay on Algonquin Island 1914 100 1 10 0 Cycle B 570 P Woodfield Road Y PED u RWY CN Rail n of Gerrard 1924 100 1 1 0 Cycle B

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 134 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 571 H Woodlawn Avenue Y RD/ o RWY TTC subway e of Yonge 1953 100 1 1 0 Cycle B 575 H Peter Street Slip Y RD/ o WAT Harbour e of Spadina 1984 100 1 12 2 Cycle B 577 P John Street Y PED o RWY TTR s of Front 1988 100 1 1 6 Cycle B 579 H Blue Jay Way (Peter Street) Y RD/ o RWY TTR s of Front 1988 100 1 2 76 Cycle B 580 H Governor's Bridge Estates Y RD/ o RWY CP Rail w of Bayview Ave Ext 1998 100 1 1 16 Cycle B 582 H Dawes Rd N RD/ o WAT Massey Creek n of Danforth 1968 100 1 1 28 Cycle B 711 P Glen Cedar Pedestrian Path Y PED o OTH Ravine .03 km s of Strathearn Rd 1912 100 1 5 36 Cycle B 4 H Dufferin Street Y RD/ o RD/ Yorkdale Access s of Cartwright 1963 100 3 1 Cycle B 62 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Wilson Heights Blvd 1966 100 3 3 66 Cycle B 70 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Glencairn Avenue 1970 100 3 5 80 Cycle B 106 H Don Mills Road Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail s of Overlea 1959 100 3 3 54 Cycle B 112 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ u RD/ Grenoble Drive s of Eglinton 1961 100 3 4 56 Cycle B 113 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RD/ St Dennis Drive s of Eglinton 1961 100 3 1 Cycle B 119 P Dufferin Street N RD/ u RWY CN Rail n of Eglinton 1959 100 3 4 Cycle B 122 H Mt. Pleasant Road Y RD/ o RD/ Strathgowan Ave s of Lawrence 1935 100 3 8 Cycle B 123 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River w of Leslie 1955 100 3 5 16 Cycle B 124 R Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail e of Leslie 1956 100 3 1 8 Cycle B 125 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RD/ Eglinton Avenue 1961 100 3 1 50 Cycle B 126 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o W/R CNR & Don R e of DVP 1954 100 3 4 20 Cycle B 144 H Yonge Street Y RD/ o WAT Don River s of York Mills 1955 100 3 1 26 Cycle B 146 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ Bayview Avenue 1962 100 3 1 Cycle B 147 H Don Mills Road Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail n of Lawrence 1966 100 3 3 108 Cycle B 148 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail w of DVP COPY 1959 100 3 3 Cycle B 149 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ Don Valley Parkway 1960 100 3 2 Cycle B 150 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River e of DVP 1960 100 3 3 44 Cycle B 151 R Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail w of Vic Park 1960 100 3 2 24 Cycle B 161 H Wilson Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek e of Jane 1960 100 3 1 24 Cycle B 166 H York Mills Road Y RD/ o WAT Don River e of Don Mills 1964 100 3 3 48 Cycle B 170 C Bathurst Street Y RD/ o WAT Don River n of Sheppard 1956 100 3 3 100 Cycle B 171 H Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River at Leslie 1968 100 3 1 0 Cycle B 173 H Finch Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River e of Dufferin 1950 100 3 1 0 Cycle B 174 H Bayview Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River s of Steeles 1957 100 3 1 20 Cycle B 188 H Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River e of Bathurst SUBMIT1961 100 3 11 150 Cycle B 191 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ u RD/ Wynford Drive 1961 100 3 4 80 Cycle B 192 C Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n Eglinton 1961 100 3 3 100 Cycle B 193 C Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o PED pedestrian (file 402 & 314) n Eglinton 1961 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 194 R Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail s of Lawrence 1961 100 3 2 Cycle B 197 H Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ Allen Road 1963 100 3 3 Cycle B 198 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o WAT Don River n of Lawrence 1961 100 3 3 64 Cycle B 201 H Don Mills Road Y RD/ o WAT Don River n of York Mills 1964 100 3 4 72 Cycle B 205 C pedestrian N PED u RWY CN Rail e of DVP 1961 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 207 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Flemington Road 1964 100 3 3 48 Cycle B 208 H Allen Road Y RD/ o RD/ Ranee Avenue 1964 100 3 3 156 Cycle B 209 H Allen Road Y RD/ o RD/ Yorkdale Road 1964 100 3 4 196 Cycle B 213 H Don Mills Road Y RD/ o RD/ Highway 401 1963 100 3 4 112 Cycle B 214 R Don Mills Road Y RD/ u RWY CP Rail n of Eglinton 1966 22 3 4 16 Cycle B 217 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ IBM Access NOTw of Don Mills 1965 100 3 3 62 Cycle B 233 H Allen Road Y RD/ o RD/ Wilson Avenue three structures 1966 100 3 4 Cycle B 238 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RD/ York Mills Road 1966 100 3 4 176 Cycle B 248 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Viewmount Avenue 1969 100 3 5 60 Cycle B 254 H Don Valley Parkway YVIEWING RD/ o RD/ Brookbanks Drive s of York Mills 1966 100 3 1 120 Cycle B 256 H Don Valley Parkway Y RD/ o RD/ Underpass Gate n of York Mills 1966 100 3 1 0 Cycle B 259 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Glengrove Avenue 1968 100 3 5 70 Cycle B

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 135 of 138 RD=road RWY=rail PED=pedestrian R/R=road,rail WAT=water WRR=water,road,rail OTH=ravine,other o=over u=under ID D Name1 DWG Type1 ou Type2 Name2 Location Built Own District Spans Brgs Inspection Cycle 260 H Leslie Street Y RD/ u RD/ Hospital s of Sheppard 1967 100 3 4 56 Cycle B 262 C Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Bobbocks Creek e of Yonge 1960 100 3 100 Cycle B 271 H Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ u RD/ Old Leslie Street w of Leslie 1968 100 3 2 28 Cycle B 273 H Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o RD/ Wynford Drive e of DVP 1968 100 3 3 64 Cycle B 275 C Eglinton Avenue Y RD/ o WAT stream w of Vic Park 1954 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 280 H Allen Road Y RD/ u RD/ Dell Park Avenue 1968 100 3 5 48 Cycle B 284 C Lawrence Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Wilket Creek e of Leslie 1956 100 3 100 Cycle B 285 H Bayview Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River (dwgs in 220 and 354) n of Lawrence 1928 100 3 9 105 Cycle B 286 C Dufferin Street Y RD/ o WAT stream s of Finch 1976 100 3 2 100 Cycle B 294 C Jane Street Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek s of Sheppard 1960 100 3 2 100 Cycle B 295 C Finch Avenue N RD/ o WAT Black Creek e of Jane 1960 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 296 H Jane Street Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek at Steeles 1965 100 3 1 86 Cycle B 307 C Bayview Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River at Finch 1960 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 308 C Finch Avenue Y RD/ o WAT stream e of Dufferin 1960 100 3 0 100 Cycle B 313 H Wilson Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River w of Yonge 1972 100 3 3 18 Cycle B 315 H Overlea Boulevard Y RD/ o WAT Don River 1960 100 3 5 42 Cycle B 321 R Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail e of Keele 1966 100 3 Cycle B 328 H Steeles Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River e of Dufferin 1959 100 3 1 0 Cycle B 329 H Steeles Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River w of Bayview 1965 100 3 1 30 Cycle B 331 H Steeles Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River e of Leslie 1969 100 3 1 26 Cycle B 332 H Leslie Street Y RD/ o WAT Don River s of Steeles 1964 100 3 1 28 Cycle B 333 C York Mills Road N RD/ o WAT creek e of Bayview 1969 100 3 2 100 Cycle B 340 C Sheppard Avenue N RD/ o WAT Black Creek w of Keele COPY 1960 100 3 2 100 Cycle B 341 H Finch Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don River w of Leslie 1960 100 3 3 18 Cycle B 343 H York Mills Road Y RD/ o RWY CN Rail e of Leslie 1969 100 3 13 116 Cycle B 350 R Finch Avenue Y RD/ u RWY CN Rail e of Keele 1974 36 3 2 Cycle B 382 C Bayview Avenue Y RD/ o WAT stream n of Eglinton 1960 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 397 C Weston Road N RD/ o WAT stream n of Sheppard 1960 100 3 100 Cycle B 398 C Weston Road N RD/ o WAT stream n of Sheppard 1960 100 3 100 Cycle B 399 C Finch Avenue N RD/ o WAT Black Creek e of Jane 1960 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 400 C Bayview Avenue N RD/ o WAT stream n of Sheppard 1960 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 402 C Sheppard Avenue Y RD/ o WAT creek e of Leslie 1998 100 3 100 Cycle B 405 C Leslie Street N RD/ o WAT stream n of Eglinton SUBMIT1960 100 3 1 100 Cycle B 733 C Maxome Rd N RD/ o WAT Revcoe Ravine n of Finch 3 1 100 Cycle B 751 H Plymbridge Road Y RD/ o WAT Don R w branch 1 km e of Yonge Street 1955 100 3 3 4 Cycle B 752 H Donino Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don R w branch 0.6km e of Yonge Street 1959 100 3 1 12 Cycle B 753 H Mill Street Y RD/ o WAT Don R w branch 0.1 km e of Yonge Street 1964 100 3 1 14 Cycle B 754 H Duncan Mill Road Y RD/ o WAT Don R e branch 0.22 km w of Don Mills Road 1968 100 3 3 54 Cycle B 755 H Cummer Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Don R e branch 0.22 km w of Craigmont 1968 100 3 3 240 Cycle B 757 H Addington Avenue Y RD/ o OTH Ravine .188 km n of Sheppard Ave. 1965 100 3 5 Cycle B 758 H Don River Blvd. N PED o WAT Don R w branch .02 km n of Sheppard Ave. 1962 100 3 1 14 Cycle B 762 H Downsview Avenue N RD/ o WAT Black Creek 0.11 e of Jane Street 1954 100 3 Cycle B 763 H Douglas Avenue Y RD/ o WAT Bedford Creek 0.25 km e of Avenue Road 1978 100 3 1 40 Cycle B 764 P Pedestrian N RD/ o RD/ Shoreham Drive West of Columbia Dr. 1968 100 3 4 14 Cycle B 765 H Garnier Court Y RD/ o WAT Don R e branch .12km east of Bayview Ave. 1977 100 3 3 Cycle B 767 P Chipping Road N RD/ o WAT Don R e branch 1960 ? 3 1 4 Cycle B 768 P Pineway Blvd. Y PED o WAT German Mills Creek NOTnw of Leslie and Cummer 1973 100 3 6 14 Cycle B 771 P Pedestrian N PED o RD/ Driftwood Avenue 1968 100 3 3 8 Cycle B 772 H Shoreham Drive Y RD/ o WAT Black Creek 0.5km e of Jane Street 1969 100 3 5 110 Cycle B 979 C Forrest Groove N RD/ o WAT Revoce Ravine n of Finch 3 1 100 Cycle B 980 C Grandview NVIEWING RD/ o WAT Black Creek e of Driftwood 3 1 100 Cycle B

H=highway bridge R=rail bridge P=pedestrian bridge C=culvert 1/10/2013 DO 136 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

LIST OF FREDERICK G. GARDINER EXPRESSWAY STRUCTURES The elevated portion of the F.G. Gardiner bridge structures is composed of the main FG Gardiner (Bridge # 436 of 310 spans and two abutments) and of 12 on and off ramps as well as the bridges Lake Shore over Spadina (Bridge # 292) that connects with on and off FG Gardiner ramps, FG Gardiner off ramp to Don Valley Parkway (Bridge #258) and the Don Valley Parkway on ramp to FG Gardiner (Bridge # 247). The elevated portion of the F.G. Gardiner shall be inspected as part of Cycle B inspections (years 2014, 2016, & 2018) Below is the description of the F.G. Gardiner breakdown starting with the first structure 436-1 and up to 436-367 with numbers between 436-62 & 436-79, as well as between 436-204 & 436-227 omitted. The inspection of the elevated portion of the F.G. Gardiner, as listed below, shall be inspected as part of Inspection Cycle B For the structures describing the main Gardiner the bearing element shall be associated to the pier belonging to that particular structure (i.e. All bearings located on Pier 2 are associated to Bridge 436-2) 436 − 1 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure West abutment, Span 1 and Pier1 436 − 2 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span2 and Pier 2 ------FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure and so on (Span 3 and Pier 3 to Span 60 and Pier 60) 436 − 61 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span 61 and Pier 61 436 − 80 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure SpanCOPY 80 and Pier 80 ------FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure and so on (Span 81 and Pier 81 to Span 180 and Pier 180) 436 − 180 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span 180 and Pier 180 436 − 181 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span 181 and Pier 181 436 − 252 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span 252 and Pier 252 436 − 253 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span 253 and Pier 253 ------FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure and so on (Span 254 and Pier 254 to Span 277 and Pier 277) 436 − 278 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span 278 and Pier 278 436 − 280 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Spans 280E, 279,SUBMIT 280W and Piers 279, 280E, 280W 436 − 281 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Spans 281E, 281W and Piers 281E, 281W 436 − 282 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span 282 and Pier 282 ------FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure and so on (Span 283 and Pier 283 to Span 345 and Pier 345) 436 − 346 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span 346 and Pier 346 436 − 347 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span R1 and Pier R1 436 − 348 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span R2 and Pier R2 436 − 349 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span R3 and Pier R3 436 − 350 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span R4 and Pier R4 436 − 351 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span R5 and Pier R5 436 − 352 FG Gardiner - Elevated Structure Span R and East Abutment R 436 − 353 Spadina on ramp to FGGNOT WB 118, Bs11-Bs3,Bc2,BC1 436 − 354 FGG EB off ramp to Spadina 114-116,As10-As1 436 − 355 FGG WB off ramp to Spadina E-De2-De7, 145-148 VIEWING436 − 356 Lakeshore Blvd. over Spadina Br. # 292 Fa, Fb, Fc, Fd, F1-F18 + Fc, Cs4, Cs3, Bc2 + F11, D1, De2 436 − 357 FGG EB off ramps to York and Bay 160, By1-By28,By30-By38 436 − 358 Rees on ramp to FGG EB Gs, Gs1-Gs6, 169,171 436 − 359 York on ramp to FGG WB 168, Ay1-Ay7, Ay 436 − 360 FGG EB off ramp to Jarvis 192, Dj21-Dj1 436 − 361 Bay & Yonge on ramp to FGG EB Ab9-Ab1, 232 436 − 362 JarvisDO on ramp to FGG WB 235, Bj1-Bj12 436 − 363 FGG EB off ramp to Yonge Cb10-Cb2, 252 436 − 364 Jarvis on ramp to FGG EB Aj14-Aj1, 271

137 of 138 Structures & Expressways Biennial Detailed Visual Inspection of Bridge and Culvert Structures in the City of Toronto RFP No. 9117-13-5001

436 − 365 FGG WB off ramp to Sherbourne Cj10-Cj1, 279 436 − 366 DVP on ramp to FGG WB Br. # 247 325, Ps1-Ps13, Ps 436 − 367 FGG EB off ramp to DVP Br. # 258 328-330, Pn1-Pn9,Pn

COPY SUBMIT

NOT VIEWING DO

138 of 138