DOCSLIB.ORG

The Future of Sustainability Reporting Standards the Policy Evolution and the Actions Companies Can Take Today June 2021 Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Future of Sustainability Reporting Standards the Policy Evolution and the Actions Companies Can Take Today June 2021 Contents The future of sustainability reporting standards The policy evolution and the actions companies can take today June 2021 Contents Foreword 2 Introduction 3 State of play: sources of influence 6 Global variations in managing sustainability-related disclosures 8 Global standards outlook: through a macro lens 13 Recommendations for companies 18 Abbreviations 21 Lead authors 22 Contributors 23 Contacts 25 About this report 26 Endnotes 27 Foreword Foreword The shared global experience of the past year has illustrated the interconnectedness of our world, our vulnerability to the environment and the impact of global action. Public health, climate change, social inequality, diversity The most promising development is the expected launch Foundation, we recognize the need to instill and inclusiveness are challenges that need global of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) regional flexibility alongside a global standard. attention and innovative, collaborative solutions. We Foundation’s International Sustainability Standard Board The next 12–18 months are an opportunity for action also need a common language to measure and report (ISSB) at COP26 in November. As the body that sets and will likely result in developments that represent one on society’s progress and for the global economy accounting standards in much of the world, the IFRS of the most significant innovations in corporate to price externalities such as greenhouse gas emissions Foundation is well positioned to introduce the discipline accounting and reporting in decades. and environmental damage, allocate capital and make that exists in financial reporting into sustainability better decisions reporting, building on the linkage between the various Many businesses are preparing for future sustainability standards while respecting their different perspectives. disclosures and committing to transparency and Over the last 18 months, significant progress has been accountability before they are mandated. Now is the time made toward establishing global sustainability reporting We strongly support the IFRS Foundation’s proposed for companies and their leaders to work together with standards. The future of sustainability reporting creation of the ISSB and the development of robust, regulators and civil society to achieve consistent, global standards analyzes this progress across both developed globally consistent sustainability reporting standards. standards and contribute to this critical process that will and developing markets and recommends actions At the same time, we support efforts within the help define corporate reporting and accountability for companies can take now to navigate and prepare for European Union, United States and other jurisdictions to the next generation. emerging sustainability reporting mandates. develop regional standards that respond to local stakeholder needs and expectations. Like the IFRS Carmine Di Sibio Ruchi Bhowmik EY Global Chairman and CEO EY Global Vice Chair, Public Policy The future of sustainability reporting standards | 2 Section title Introduction The number of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) regulations and standards globally has nearly doubled in the last five years. Accompanying this rise are various reporting frameworks led by the “Group of Five” standard setting organizations.1 In addition, there are currently over 600 ESG reporting provisions globally, with many having differing interpretations of sustainability. The future of sustainability reporting standards | 3 Introduction The high number of guidelines about what ESG Figure 1: Voluntary and mandatory ESG reporting provisions information is required or recommended to be disclosed means companies face barriers and strained resource Number of ESG reporting provisions by region, 2020 capacities to focus on quality ESG disclosures. For Totals by year instance, publicly listed companies have to abide by Voluntary Mandatory mandatory financial and nonfinancial2 disclosure Europe 348 requirements issued by regulators and stock exchanges. Companies must also respond to varying requests for voluntary disclosures and assessment processes set by North America 104 141 266 ratings providers as the broader investment community 248 and shareholders are calling on companies to provide 16 31 greater transparency around sustainability risks. Africa and Middle East Asia-Pacific As a result of these different processes and requirements, 33 40 135 there are often significant variations in the information South America 75 99 disclosed about a company’s ESG performance. It is thus not surprising that there is a disconnect between the 38 37 increased focus on evaluating ESG performance from investors and the availability and efficacy of standardized nonfinancial data provided by companies. Source: Van der Lugt, C. T., P. P. van de Wijs, & D. Petrovics. (2020). Carrots & Sticks 2020 - Sustainability reporting policy: Global trends in disclosure as the ESG agenda goes mainstream. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the University of Stellenbosch Business School (USB). Available at: https://www.carrotsandsticks.net/media/ 2016 2020 zirbzabv/carrots-and-sticks-2020-interactive.pdf ESG areas of scope ESG standards generally encompass the following: Environmental, e.g., waste management, emissions Social, e.g., human rights, labor rights, working Governance, e.g., ownership and structural impact, energy efficiency, air and water pollution, conditions, health and safety, employee relations, transparency, shareholder rights, board of environmental protection, and biodiversity loss employment equity, gender diversity and pay gaps, directors’ independence and oversight, diversity, and restoration anti-corruption, and impact on local communities data transparency, business ethics, and executive compensation fairness. The aim is that these standards help companies to better measure and manage their exposures to ESG-related risks and to become better corporate citizens by measuring, disclosing and managing the environmental and social impacts they create. The future of sustainability reporting standards | 4 Introduction Growing momentum The bigger picture Given the lack of consensus over what reporting Initiatives by institutional bodies such as the IFRS information is required and the need for comparability Foundation to harmonize disclosure will have to confront across and within jurisdictions, there has been a a host of political and regulatory issues arising from growing momentum towards a global harmonization of national and regional divergences, influenced by an sustainability-related financial reporting standards in ecosystem of stakeholders with different interests. This the last 18 months. The most promising development report explores this broader political context, which is the IFRS Foundation’s ISSB, set to launch at COP26 encompasses a diverse set of actors — ranging from in November 2021. Building on existing frameworks individuals to public and private institutions — who play and endorsed by the Group of Five, the World Economic a salient role in shaping the sustainability reporting Forum International Business Council (WEF IBC) and the debate. Actors embedded in this ecosystem approach the International Organization of Securities Commissions conversation with varying degrees of influence and often (IOSCO), the ISSB will be tasked with developing and different objectives. Furthermore, each actor is operating maintaining global sustainability-related financial in a political context that will ultimately affect the future reporting standards that are relevant to enterprise direction of the global sustainability reporting discourse. value. The IFRS Foundation’s extensive consultation with The report concludes by outlining recommendations stakeholders has concluded that there is an urgent need for how companies can navigate this dynamic and to accelerate the establishment of a high-quality, global, evolving terrain. sustainability-related financial reporting framework.3 .In their 5 June communique, the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors expressed support for the ISSB and called for mandatory climate-related financial disclosures based on the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework. The IFRS Foundation has concluded that there is an urgent need to establish a global sustainability reporting framework. The future of sustainability reporting standards | 5 State of play: sources of influence State of play: sources of influence The sustainability reporting movement implement progressive changes in the E, S and G spheres. Figure 2: Sources of influence originated out of civil society and gained There are also top-down pressures from regulatory and standard setting actors that are promoting compliance The global sustainability prominence among a small number of socially and/or behavioral shifts through policy and best practices reporting ecosystem responsible, activist investors who aspired guidelines. Meanwhile, investors are directly influencing for companies to disclose their impact on companies to improve their ESG disclosures through Supervisory and broader stakeholders. ownership stakes and capital allocation.4 regulatory bodies The various players in this sustainability reporting Politics Standard setters In the past several years, the dynamics of the ecosystem can be broadly defined into three primary and policy Stock exchanges sustainability debate has dramatically shifted, with categories of stakeholder influence, with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards Better Embedding Sustainability Into Companies’
    Journal of Cleaner Production 25 (2012) 14e26 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives Rodrigo Lozano* Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK article info abstract Article history: Corporate leaders and employees have been increasingly recognising their role in contributing to Received 12 November 2010 sustainability. In this context, different voluntary tools, approaches, and initiatives have been developed Received in revised form by and for corporations to engage with sustainability. However, there has been a lack of clarity in 1 November 2011 explaining how the initiatives address the different elements of the company system (operations and Accepted 20 November 2011 processes, management and strategy, organisational systems, procurement and marketing, and assess- Available online 9 December 2011 ment and communication), how they contribute to sustainability’s dimensions (economic, environ- mental, social, and time), how they are linked, or combined to help leaders better embed sustainability Keywords: ’ Corporations into their company s system. The paper provides an analysis of sixteen of the most widely used initiatives Sustainability (e.g. life cycle assessment, eco-design, cleaner production, corporate social responsibility, and sustain- Voluntary initiatives ability reporting). Each initiative was analysed on how it contributes or addresses the four dimensions of Company system sustainability, and the company system. It was found that each initiative has advantages with respect to Operations scope and focus for the sustainability dimensions and the company system’s elements, but it has certain Management disadvantages when it comes to dealing with the complexity and broadness of sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    In pursuit of progress since Annual report 2020 report Annual Annual report 2020 In pursuit of progress since Annual report 2020 report Annual Annual report 2020 CONTENTS ANNUAL REPORT STRATEGIC REPORT 2 Five-year summary 3 Group overview 4 From the chairman 6 From the chief executive 8 From the editor 9 Business review: the year in detail 13 The Economist Educational Foundation 15 The Economist Group and environmental sustainability 17 Corporate governance: the Wates Principles, our Section 172(1) statement and our guiding principles REPORT AND ACCOUNTS GOVERNANCE 22 Directors 23 Executive team 24 Trustees, board committees 25 Directors’ report 28 Directors’ report on remuneration 31 Financial review CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 35 Independent auditor’s report to the members of The Economist Newspaper Limited 38 Consolidated income statement 39 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 40 Consolidated balance sheet 41 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 42 Consolidated cashflow statement 44 Notes to the consolidated financial statements COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 94 Company balance sheet 95 Company statement of changes in equity 96 Notes to the company financial statements NOTICES 108 Notice of annual general meeting 1 STRATEGIC REPORT Five-year summary 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 £m £m £m £m £m Income statement—continuing business* Revenue 326 333 329 303 282 Operating profit 31 31 38 43 47 Profit after taxation 21 25 28 39 37 Profit on sale of CQ-Roll Call, Inc - 43 - - - Profit on sale of Economist Complex - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Assessment
    Title: Impact Assessment (IA) Sustainability criteria for biomass and bioliquids in the Renewables Obligation URN: 10D/761 Date: Lead department or agency: 16/07/2010 DECC Stage: Development/Options Other departments or agencies: Source of intervention: Domestic DfT Type of measure: Primary legislation Contact for enquiries: Ewa Kmietowicz Summary: Intervention and Options What is the problem under consideration? Why is government intervention necessary? Biomass is plant or animal matter of recent origin. It includes such materials as wood, food waste, manures, miscanthus grass, wheat and rapeseed oil. Biomass can be used to generate heat and electricity, or to produce transport fuel. GHG savings from the use of biomass only accrue if the material is replaced through replanting. As demand for woodfuel increases, there is the risk that biomass could be harvested by simply clearing large areas of tropical rainforest. The resulting land use change would deliver a large increase in greenhouse gas emissions, as well as destruction of a rare, highly biodiverse habitat. It could also spark damaging headlines impacting the credibility and confidence of the bioenergy industry. There are therefore important sustainability concerns to be addressed. What are the policy objectives and the intended effects? The policy objectives are four-fold. The introduction of sustainability criteria would - ensure that growth in bioenergy also delivers on the UK’s wider carbon and energy security ambitions, - reduce uncertainty to encourage investment in new UK generation and biomass feedstoc supplies, - promote good practice on sustainable feedstock sourcing and drive underperformers to improve, and - help secure the support of local government & public to proposed new bioenergy developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Steps to Good Sustainability Reporting a Practical Guide for Companies
    Five Steps to Good Sustainability Reporting A Practical Guide for Companies Five Steps to Good Sustainability Reporting 1 Five Steps to Good Sustainability Reporting A Practical Guide for Companies NOVEMBER 2020 ABOUT THIS REPORT The report is based on BSR’s long experience working on sustainability reporting with companies, a literature review, and interviews with member companies. Any errors are those of the authors. Please direct comments or questions to [email protected]. This report was researched and written by Nina Hatch and Adam Fishman, with input from Dunstan Allison-Hope. The authors wish to thank the companies featured in case studies for sharing their perspectives and for participating in this exercise. DISCLAIMER BSR publishes occasional papers as a contribution to the understanding of the role of business in society and the trends related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) and responsible business practices. BSR maintains a policy of not acting as a representative of its membership, nor does it endorse specific policies or standards. The views expressed in this publication are those of its authors and do not reflect those of BSR members. Five Steps to Good Sustainability Reporting 2 Contents Introduction 4 Step 1: Set Priorities and Develop Strategy 7 1.1 Materiality: Conduct/Review 8 1.2 Set Strategy, Pillars, Ambition, and Goals 11 1.3 Benchmark: What Are Peers Doing 14 Step 2: Build the Structure and Gather Data 15 2.1 Identify Key Audiences for The Report 16 2.2 Assess Gaps against Standards and Frameworks 18 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • REPORTING on the Sdgs an Action Platform to Accelerate Corporate Reporting on the Global Goals
    REPORTING ON THE SDGs An Action Platform to accelerate corporate reporting on the Global Goals We are at a key moment in the evolution of sustainability; transparency is fast becoming the new paradigm for conducting business. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have ushered in a new era of global development objectives, aimed at addressing the world’s most pressing problems. The active participation of business is a principle driver in achieving these goals but best practice for corporate reporting on the SDGs has yet to be established. The UN Global Compact, the world’s largest corporate sustainability initiative, and GRI, the world’s leading organization for sustainability reporting, have formed a ground-breaking action platform to tackle this challenge. Reporting on the SDGs will complement GRI Standards and the UN Global Compact Communication on Progress, and enable business reporting on the SDGs. There is growing recognition of the value of corporate non-financial reporting. The Action Platform will leverage the GRI Standards – the world’s most widely used sustainability reporting standards – and the Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact to help businesses incorporate SDG reporting into their existing processes. This will empower corporate action that can make the achievements of the SDGs a reality. The members of the Action Platform will work to increase the value of corporate sustainability disclosures for other stakeholder groups, including members of the financial community as well as governments and policy makers. GRI and the UN Global Compact will also facilitate SDG-reporting by small and medium-size enterprises, as they represent around 90% of global economic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Sustainability Reporting in the Present Institutional Context: the Case of Seaport Authorities Geerts Magali1*, Dooms Michaël1 and Stas Lara1
    IAME 2020 CONFERENCE | HONG KONG Paper ID 105 Determinants of sustainability reporting in the present institutional context: the case of seaport authorities Geerts Magali1*, Dooms Michaël1 and Stas Lara1 1Vrije Universiteit Brussel * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Research on the practice oF sustainability reporting speciFically Focused on the approach applied by port authorities (or port managing bodies – PMB) and based on surveys as a data collection method is very limited. Most research consists of single case studies, only covers in part the different dimensions related to the implementation of sustainability reporting or are based on content analysis. This chapter ofFers a multidimensional approach of the concept of sustainability reporting based on a global survey yielding 97 complete and valid answers of PMBs. A binomial logistic regression has been conducted to identify those internal determinants (organizational characteristics) that have the largest explanatory power when it comes to the adoption of the practice of sustainability reporting. The research results identify new internal variables compared to the results of previous studies, such as the proximity to a city, the history of data gathering and the presence of environmental/social certiFications. Furthermore, the chapter also investigates how these organizational characteristics are interlinked with external, contextual Forces by making use of the institutional theory. By combining organizational characteristics with information of the institutional environment in which the PMB operates, a more complete image is obtained. The results of this analysis show that all different institutional pressures are in play when it comes to having influence on the decision-making oF PMBs with regard to the adoption of sustainability reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Reporting Priorities – a Study Exploring Accounting Majors’ Perceptions
    Global Journal of Accounting and Finance Volume 1, Number 2, 2017 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING PRIORITIES – A STUDY EXPLORING ACCOUNTING MAJORS’ PERCEPTIONS Marianne L. James, California State University, Los Angeles ABSTRACT Sustainability reporting continues to gain global significance. Diverse stakeholders expect that entities of all types and sizes behave responsiblyand add value while minimizing their negative impact on scarce resources. Increasingly, stakeholders also expect that entities report information about their comprehensive effect on the environment, employees, the community, and other stakeholders. Accounting professionals’ involvement with the selection, derivation, and reporting of sustainability related information is expanding and presents significant opportunities for current and future accounting professionals. Accounting professionals’ perceptions regarding sustainability reporting may influence the nature and extent of reporting; hence, their perceptions are important. This study investigates the perceptions of accounting majors regarding broad aswell as specific aspects of sustainability reporting by business entities. The study finds thataccounting majors tend to support sustainability reporting by public companies, perceive that entities should report information about failures as well as achievements, and that the information should be audited. In response to openended- queries, accountingmajors specified several typesof information with high reporting priority for each major sustainability area - environment, labor,
    [Show full text]
  • Gri 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016
    GRI 414: SUPPLIER SOCIAL ASSESSMENT 2016 GRI 414 Contents Introduction 3 GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 5 1. Management approach disclosures 5 2. Topic-specific disclosures 7 Disclosure 414-1 New suppliers that were screened using social criteria 7 Disclosure 414-2 Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken 8 Glossary 9 References 11 About this Standard Responsibility This Standard is issued by the Global Sustainability Standards Board (GSSB). Any feedback on the GRI Standards can be submitted to [email protected] for the consideration of the GSSB. Scope GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment sets out reporting requirements on the topic of supplier social assessment. This Standard can be used by an organization of any size, type, sector or geographic location that wants to report on its impacts related to this topic. Normative This Standard is to be used together with the most recent versions of the following references documents. GRI 101: Foundation GRI 103: Management Approach GRI Standards Glossary In the text of this Standard, terms defined in the Glossary are underlined. Effective date This Standard is effective for reports or other materials published on or after 1 July 2018. Earlier adoption is encouraged. Note: This document includes hyperlinks to other Standards. In most browsers, using ‘ctrl’ + click will open external links in a new browser window. After clicking on a link, use ‘alt’ + left arrow to return to the previous view. 2 GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016 Introduction A. Overview An organization then selects from the set of topic- specific GRI Standards for reporting on its material This Standard is part of the set of GRI Sustainability topics.
    [Show full text]
  • SDG Compass Guide for Business Action on the Sdgs
    The guide for business action on the SDGs Developed by: TM Our planet faces massive economic, social and environmental challenges. To combat these, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) define global priorities and aspirations for 2030. They represent an unprecedented opportunity to eliminate extreme poverty and put the world on a sustainable path. Governments worldwide have already agreed to these goals. Now it is time for business to take action. The SDG Compass explains how the SDGs affect your business – offering you the tools and knowledge to put sustainability at the heart of your strategy. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) What’s inside? Page Executive Why do the SDGs matter for business? 4 summary What is the SDG Compass? 5 Step 01 6 Understanding What are the SDGs? 7 the SDGs Understanding the business case 8 The baseline responsibilities for business 10 Step 02 11 Defining Map the value chain to identify impact areas 12 Select indicators and collect data 14 priorities Define priorities 15 Step 03 16 Setting Define scope of goals and select KPIs 17 Define baseline and select goal type 18 goals Set level of ambition 18 Announce commitment to SDGs 20 Step 04 21 Anchoring sustainability goals Integrating within the business 22 Embed sustainability across all functions 23 Engage in partnerships 24 Step 05 25 Reporting and Effective reporting and communication 27 Communicating on SDG performance 28 communicating SDG Compass www.sdgcompass.org 3 Executive summary Why do the SDGs matter for business? The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Covering a wide spectrum of sustainable development define global sustainable development priorities topics relevant to companies – such as poverty, and aspirations for 2030 and seek to mobilize health, education, climate change and environmental global efforts around a common set of goals degradation – the SDGs can help to connect business and targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Reporting Trends: Get Ready for 2021
    GET READY FOR 2021 WITH OUR LATEST Sustainability Reporting Trends AND BEST PRACTICES FRAMEWORKS STORYTELLING SMART REPORTING COVID-19 The latest on established Sustainability takes See how top reporters We look at how companies and emerging frameworks – centre stage with are targeting the right are managing to address from SASB to the TCFD. influencers, experiential audiences with the right one of today’s most marketing and more. information in new ways. complex issues. THIS REPORT IS FOR YOU The reporting landscape is always changing. We know that you don’t always have the time to stay on top of it – but we do. We love it, we live it, and in this summary we have identified what you need to know as you build your reporting program for 2021. 9 265+ 10 5 YEARS OF DATA POINTS SECTORS CONTINENTS TRENDS RESEARCH ANALYZED RESEARCHED ASSESSED SEVEN CORE RESEARCH TOPICS LEADERSHIP WHAT MATTERS STORYTELLING SMART AND STRATEGY MOST REPORTING DIGITAL FRAMEWORKS PERFORMANCE STRATEGIES ABOUT OUR METHODOLOGY IN FULL TRANSPARENCY Our team reviews primary sustainability publications (including Our primary goal is to identify and highlight the very best integrated reports) along with supporting materials. These practices. Consequently, we highlight reports we did not include financial disclosures, summary reports and ESG data design. It is not our intention to take credit for the work of tables. We also review sustainability-focused content available on others; rather, we seek to draw attention to excellence on the each company’s corporate website and how companies promote part of reporting companies (and their suppliers, when that sustainability on social media channels – which occasionally applies).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2O18
    ANNUAL REPORT 2O18 202.660.0900 councilka.org 1875 K Street NW, Suite 400 [email protected] Washington, DC 20006 Dear Supporter, The Council of Korean Americans (CKA) is a national Korean American organization with nearly 250 community leaders, pioneers, and trailblazers. Our members, board of directors, and staff have worked tirelessly to advance the national voice, interest, and influence of the Korean American community. 2018 was a pivotal year for CKA. First, we embarked on a leadership change and an important transition to strengthen CKA’s management team. Dr. Abraham Kim was installed as the new executive director in December 2018 and has since launched an ambitious, multi-year plan for the organization to become the premier national voice for Korean Americans. Second, under the effective interim leadership of Jessica Lee, CKA expanded its active programming and outreach across the country throughout 2018. CKA gathered community leaders in Los Angeles and Washington, DC for two high-profile galas that drew over 1,000 people combined to celebrate the extraordinary contributions of the Korean American community. CKA also forged groundbreaking partnerships with African American and Jewish American communities to discuss race relations and the future of U.S.-North Korea engagement, ensuring that Korean American voices are heard on issues of national consequence. Third, we continued our critical investment in the next generation of Korean American leaders. 2018 marked the third year of the CKA-KALCA Public Service Internship Program, which funded and placed nearly 30 college students with summer internships in government offices and nonprofit organizations throughout Washington, DC and New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Chen
    COMPUTER SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND shell JONATHAN CHEN A Year of Growth From Undergrad to CTO Dear Friends, With mixed emotions, we said thank you and farewell to three of our faculty Editor in Chief As scientists, we work towards certainty. B.K. Adams in 2014. Professor Dianne O’Leary But we love surprises. announced her retirement and was named TABLE OF CONTENTS Managing Editor I can think of no better surprise than both an Emerita and a Distinguished Todd Holden the day Brendan Iribe, CEO of Oculus University Professor. Professor Bonnie Update on Building Dorr also retired and was named an Designer VR declared that he wanted to help our Learn more about The Brendan Iribe Center for department construct a new building. Emerita. Associate Professor Chau-Wen 4 Computer Science and Innovation, and learn 4 Paige Nelson ‘15 This was during a visit to the department Tseng announced his retirement as well. about commitments made to the project. Photographer as our students invited him to be the We are delighted to welcome several new Chester Lam ’15 Grace Hopper keynote speaker at Bitcamp 2014. Less faculty hires. Eytan Ruppin joined us than six months later, he formalized his The conference that brings women computer Staff Writers as Professor and Director of the Center 6 scientists together. Alex BenDebba ‘16 commitment to help with a record-setting for BioInformatics and Computational Kelly Bilodeau ‘17 $31 million donation that establishes Biology (CBCB). Andrew Childs joined 10 Marcus Fedarko ‘18 the Brendan Iribe Center for Computer us an Associate Professor and co-Director CS Welcomes New Faculty Rebecca He ‘17 Science and Innovation.
    [Show full text]