An Ultra High Throughput X-Ray Astronomy Observatory with a New Mission Architecture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Ultra High Throughput X-Ray Astronomy Observatory with a New Mission Architecture Final Report March 2002 An Ultra High Throughput X-ray Astronomy Observatory With a New Mission Architecture Grant-16717066 Prepared for NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts USRA Smithsonian Institution Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory is a ismember a member of the of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Abstract An Ultra-High Throughput X-Ray Telescope (UXT) Observatory With a New Mission Architecture Paul Gorenstein Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Over a two year period with the support of a grant from the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC/USRA Grant No. 7600-035) we addressed the question of how a space based X- ray astronomy observatory with an effective area of over 2 million square centimeters and an angular resolution of one arcsecond or better could be constructed and deployed in space. The Chandra X-Ray Observatory, XMM-Newton, and RXTE have reinforced the motivation for undertaking this enterprise by demonstrating its relevance to cosmology and fundamental physics. We considered three fundamentally different designs for the optics with several variations within each approach. All of them require “formation flying” or synchronized positioning of a large telescope aboard one spacecraft and detectors aboard others. One approach is an adaptation of the conventional filled aperture Wolter Type 1 X-ray telescope with a focal length of about 200 m. Another is a family of “sparse aperture” Kirkpatrick-Baez geometry telescopes with focal lengths up to 30 km. A third is a system based upon Fresnel zone plates and refractive lenses with focal lengths up to 3000km. All may require adaptive optics on some level to satisfy the angular resolution goal. The sparse aperture telescopes may be able to satisfy the angular resolution goal more easily but the very long focal length imposes limitations. The advantage of the Fresnel optics is two orders of magnitude lower mass but its extremely long focal length and severe chromatic aberration are important issues that limit their performance. The best site for all three designs is the Sun-Earth L2 region. We also considered a lunar-based observatory. The Moon is competitive with free space only if there already exists a lunar base with an infrastructure that can provide at no or very low cost transport services, materials, and construction services. 1. Introduction 1.1 Goal 1 1.2 Importance of X-ray Measurements in Astronomy 2 1.3 The Early Universe and Sources of X-ray Emission 4 2 The Ultimate High Throughput X-ray Telescope Observatory 2.1 X-ray Observatories 5 2.2 Astrophysics and Fundamental Physics 5 2.3 Effective Area of UXT 6 2.4 Relation of UXT to XEUS 9 3 The Observatory Architecture 3.1 Options 11 3.2 Telescope Architecture 12 3.4 Formation Flying-Pointing Accuracy and Stability 13 3.5 Detector Spacecraft:Traffic Management 14 3.6 Formation Flying Accuracy 15 3.6 Changing Pointing Direction 17 4 The X-ray Optics 4.1 Requirements of UXT 18 4.2 Filled Aperture Telescopes: Wolter Type 1 18 and Kirkpatrick-Baez Designs 4.3 Fabrication of KB and Wolter Optics 22 4.4 Sparse Aperture Telescopes 26 4.5 Fresnel Optics 29 4.6 Correcting Chromatic Aberration of Fresnel Optics 33 5. Adaptive Optics 5.1 Introduction 38 5.2 Effect of Telescope Geometry 39 6 Observatory Sites 6.1 Introduction 40 I 6.2 Low Earth Orbit 41 6.3 High Eccentricity Orbit 42 6.4 Heliocentric Orbit 43 6.5 Sun-Earth L1, L2 LaGrange Points 43 6.6 Halo Orbit about L2 44 7 A Lunar Based UXT 7.1 Introduction 46 7.2 The Architecture of a Lunar Based UXT 46 7.3 Components of a Lunar Based UXT 48 7.5 Construction of the Telescope 49 7.6 Construction of the Telescope on the Moon: Method 2 50 7.7 “Freezing” the Liquid 53 7.8 Uncertainty in the Assumptions 55 8 Launch and Propulsion 8.1 Requirements 57 8.2 The Journey from LEO to L2 57 9 Future Activities 9.1 Enabling technologies Required 60 9.2 Pathfinder Missions 60 9.3 Propulsion, End Note 61 10. References 62 Appendix A: Detecting Distant Quasars Appendix B: (Ion Engine Fuel Consumption and Power Levels in Station Keeping and Target Changes ) Appendix C: Lunar Glass Manufacturing and Mining References II 1. Introduction 1.1 Goal Reports of the NAS sponsored survey committees in astrophysics and physics have identified the most important questions of their disciplines. They are: what is the history of the early universe? In particular, when did the era of reionization begin and did it unfold rapidly or gradually? Were the first luminous objects, stars or AGN black holes? What is the distribution of mass in the universe and how did its structure evolve? How does matter behave in the strong gravitation field of a black hole? Do quantum gravity models succeed in unifying the gravitational force with the standard model for the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces? Results from the Chandra X-Ray Observatory plus XMM-Newton and RXTE indicate that these questions can be addressed with considerable confidence of success in the X-ray band with telescopes that are two or three orders of magnitudes higher in throughput than the current missions or about 2 million square centimeters effective area and excellent angular resolution, about 1 second or arc. The objective of this two-year study is to develop conceptual models for what such an X- ray observatory would look like, plus how it can be developed and launched into space. We consider several options for the X-ray optics that differ radically from each other. Only one of these options is an extension or a scaled-up version of the current X-ray telescope geometry, the Wolter Type-1 optic. We have not limited ourselves to only those options allowed by current technology. Rather we identify what new technologies are needed in order for them to be feasible. This two-year study of an Ultra-High Throughput X-ray Observatory has occurred during a very eventful period in X-ray astronomy. During this time two major X-ray observatories have been operating in space, the Chandra X-Ray Observatory developed by NASA and the X-Ray Multi Mirror-Newton Observatory (XMM) of the European Space Agency. The two are complementary in that the Chandra telescope has very high angular resolution and the XMM telescope system has very high throughput. Each is the product of some fifteen years of effort and is considered among the greatest success in astrophysics for NASA and ESA. X-rays have been detected from virtually every type of astronomical object ranging from comets and planets in our solar system, clusters of galaxies, the largest known structures short of the universe itself, and active nuclei of galaxies out to very large distance, which are believed to be black holes. The Chandra deep surveys (Giacconi et al, 2001, Brandt et al, 2001) suggest that the first generation of luminous objects will carry X-ray signature that are not attenuated above 2 keV by the intergalactic medium or local dust shrouds as their visible light counterparts may be. They could be star formation regions, accreting black holes in nascent AGNs, or inverse Compton radiation from high energy particles scattering off the microwave background during a higher frequency epoch (Barkana and Loeb, 2001, Schwartz, 2001). X-rays are very specific indicators of gravitational lens effects and become increasingly effective at larger distance as probes of mass distribution (Munoz, Kochanek, and Falco, 1999). The X-ray band is optimum for testing models of quantum gravity. They predict distance dependent effects such as line broadening that are more pronounced at higher photon energies (Di Stefano et al, 2001). X-ray sources throughout a large range in z contain spectral lines as indicators. 1 Figure 1. Hubble Deep Field (left) and Chandra Deep Field (right), the HDF objects are mostly galaxies of finite size while the CDF objects are point sources, most likely black holes at the centers of distant galaxies. The level of detail that appears in the gallery of high resolution images obtained by Chandra http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/chronological.html) is particularly impressive not only in appearance but also for providing a physical insight that is often not seen in other wavelength bands. They clearly demonstrate that high angular resolution has to be an integral feature of a very high throughput X-ray Astronomy to merit receiving the considering funding it requires. This program is a study of what should be the scope and architecture of the ultimate X-ray telescope and how to develop it while satisfying the need for both high throughput and high angular resolution. 1.2 Importance of X-ray Measurements in Astronomy X-rays provide unique information about the structure and evolution of the universe. The most distant X-rays originate from the epoch when the first objects appear. The youngest objects that can be detected in any wavelength band are likely to be X-ray emitting infant black holes at the centers of young galaxies shrouded by light obscuring dust, or high redshift gamma ray bursts and their X-ray afterglows. X-rays from later epochs reveal the growth of structure, and the evolution of the abundance of chemical elements unambiguously. The absorption properties of elements in the foreground along the line of sight to distant sources are relatively insensitive to whether they are in the gaseous or sold and to their temperature. The growth of structure in the universe can be traced up to the present by imaging the extended X-ray emissions of clusters of galaxies and the high temperature halos of massive elliptical galaxies.
Recommended publications
  • GRIPS-Gamma-Ray Imaging, Polarimetry and Spectroscopy
    Experimental Astronomy manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) GRIPS - Gamma-Ray Imaging, Polarimetry and Spectroscopy www.grips-mission.eu? Jochen Greiner · Karl Mannheim · Felix Aharonian · Marco Ajello · Lajos G. Balasz · Guido Barbiellini · Ronaldo Bellazzini · Shawn Bishop · Gennady S. Bisnovatij-Kogan · Steven Boggs · Andrej Bykov · Guido DiCocco · Roland Diehl · Dominik Els¨asser · Suzanne Foley · Claes Fransson · Neil Gehrels · Lorraine Hanlon · Dieter Hartmann · Wim Hermsen · Wolfgang Hillebrandt · Rene Hudec · Anatoli Iyudin · Jordi Jose · Matthias Kadler · Gottfried Kanbach · Wlodek Klamra · J¨urgenKiener · Sylvio Klose · Ingo Kreykenbohm · Lucien M. Kuiper · Nikos Kylafis · Claudio Labanti · Karlheinz Langanke · Norbert Langer · Stefan Larsson · Bruno Leibundgut · Uwe Laux · Francesco Longo · Kei'ichi Maeda · Radoslaw Marcinkowski · Martino Marisaldi · Brian McBreen · Sheila McBreen · Attila Meszaros · Ken'ichi Nomoto · Mark Pearce · Asaf Peer · Elena Pian · Nikolas Prantzos · Georg Raffelt · Olaf Reimer · Wolfgang Rhode · Felix Ryde · Christian Schmidt · Joe Silk · Boris M. Shustov · Andrew Strong · Nial Tanvir · Friedrich-Karl Thielemann · Omar Tibolla · David Tierney · Joachim Tr¨umper · Dmitry A. Varshalovich · J¨orn Wilms · Grzegorz Wrochna · Andrzej Zdziarski · Andreas Zoglauer Received: 21 April 2011 / Accepted: 2011 ? See this Web-site for the author's affiliations. Jochen Greiner Karl Mannheim MPI f¨urextraterrestrische Physik Inst. f. Theor. Physik & Astrophysik, Univ. W¨urzburg arXiv:1105.1265v1 [astro-ph.HE] 6 May 2011 85740 Garching, Germany 97074 W¨urzburg,Germany Tel.: +49-89-30000-3847 Tel.: +49-931-318-500 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 2 Abstract We propose to perform a continuously scanning all-sky survey from 200 keV to 80 MeV achieving a sensitivity which is better by a factor of 40 or more compared to the previous missions in this energy range (COMPTEL, INTEGRAL; see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • ROSAT PSPC Observations of the Infrared Quasar IRAS 13349
    Mon Not R Astron So c Printed August ROSAT PSPC observations of the infrared quasar IRAS evidence for a warm absorb er with internal dust WN Brandt AC Fabian and KA Pounds Institute of Astronomy Madingley Road Cambridge CB HA Internet wnbastcamacuk acfastcamacuk Xray Astronomy Group Department of Physics Astronomy University of Leicester University Road Leicester LE RH Internet kapstarleacuk ABSTRACT We present spatial temp oral and sp ectral analyses of ROSAT Position Sensitive Pro p ortional Counter PSPC observations of the infrared loud quasar IRAS IRAS is the archetypal highlyp olarized radioquiet QSO and has an op ticalinfrared luminosity of erg s We detect variability in the ROSAT count rate by a factor of in ab out one year and there is also evidence for p er cent variability within one week We nd no evidence for large intrinsic cold absorption of soft Xrays These two facts have imp ortant consequences for the scatteringplus transmission mo del of this ob ject which was developed to explain its high wavelength dep endent p olarization and other prop erties The soft Xray variability makes electron scattering of most of the soft Xrays dicult without a very p eculiar scattering mirror The lack of signicant intrinsic cold Xray absorption together with the large observed E B V suggests either a very p eculiar system geometry or more probably absorp tion by warm ionized gas with internal dust There is evidence for an ionized oxygen edge in the Xray sp ectrum IRAS has many prop erties that are similar to those
    [Show full text]
  • Precollimator for X-Ray Telescope (Stray-Light Baffle) Mindrum Precision, Inc Kurt Ponsor Mirror Tech/SBIR Workshop Wednesday, Nov 2017
    Mindrum.com Precollimator for X-Ray Telescope (stray-light baffle) Mindrum Precision, Inc Kurt Ponsor Mirror Tech/SBIR Workshop Wednesday, Nov 2017 1 Overview Mindrum.com Precollimator •Past •Present •Future 2 Past Mindrum.com • Space X-Ray Telescopes (XRT) • Basic Structure • Effectiveness • Past Construction 3 Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • XMM-Newton 1999 • Chandra 1999 • HETE-2 2000-07 • INTEGRAL 2002 4 ESA/NASA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • Swift 2004 • Suzaku 2005-2015 • AGILE 2007 • NuSTAR 2012 5 NASA/JPL/ASI/JAXA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com • Astrosat 2015 • Hitomi (ASTRO-H) 2016-2016 • NICER (ISS) 2017 • HXMT/Insight 慧眼 2017 6 NASA/JPL/CNSA Space X-Ray Telescopes Mindrum.com NASA/JPL-Caltech Harrison, F.A. et al. (2013; ApJ, 770, 103) 7 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103 Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com Grazing Incidence 8 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure: NuSTAR Mirrors Mindrum.com 9 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • XMM Newton XRT 10 ESA Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • XMM-Newton mirrors D. de Chambure, XMM Project (ESTEC)/ESA 11 Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • Thermal Precollimator on ROSAT 12 http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/ Basic Structure XRT Mindrum.com • AGILE Precollimator 13 http://agile.asdc.asi.it Basic Structure Mindrum.com • Spektr-RG 2018 14 MPE Basic Structure: Stray X-Rays Mindrum.com 15 NASA/JPL-Caltech Basic Structure: Grazing Mindrum.com 16 NASA X-Ray Effectiveness: Straylight Mindrum.com • Correct Reflection • Secondary Only • Backside Reflection • Primary Only 17 X-Ray Effectiveness Mindrum.com • The Crab Nebula by: ROSAT (1990) Chandra 18 S.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center Laboratory for High Energy
    1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 @S0002-7537~99!00301-7# This report covers the period from July 1, 1997 to June 30, Toshiaki Takeshima, Jane Turner, Ken Watanabe, Laura 1998. Whitlock, and Tahir Yaqoob. This Laboratory’s scientific research is directed toward The following investigators are University of Maryland experimental and theoretical research in the areas of X-ray, Scientists: Drs. Keith Arnaud, Manuel Bautista, Wan Chen, gamma-ray, and cosmic-ray astrophysics. The range of inter- Fred Finkbeiner, Keith Gendreau, Una Hwang, Michael Loe- ests of the scientists includes the Sun and the solar system, wenstein, Greg Madejski, F. Scott Porter, Ian Richardson, stellar objects, binary systems, neutron stars, black holes, the Caleb Scharf, Michael Stark, and Azita Valinia. interstellar medium, normal and active galaxies, galaxy clus- Visiting scientists from other institutions: Drs. Vadim ters, cosmic-ray particles, and the extragalactic background Arefiev ~IKI!, Hilary Cane ~U. Tasmania!, Peter Gonthier radiation. Scientists and engineers in the Laboratory also ~Hope College!, Thomas Hams ~U. Seigen!, Donald Kniffen serve the scientific community, including project support ~Hampden-Sydney College!, Benzion Kozlovsky ~U. Tel such as acting as project scientists and providing technical Aviv!, Richard Kroeger ~NRL!, Hideyo Kunieda ~Nagoya assistance to various space missions. Also at any one time, U.!, Eugene Loh ~U. Utah!, Masaki Mori ~Miyagi U.!, Rob- there are typically between twelve and eighteen graduate stu- ert Nemiroff ~Mich. Tech. U.!, Hagai Netzer ~U. Tel Aviv!, dents involved in Ph.D. research work in this Laboratory. Yasushi Ogasaka ~JSPS!, Lev Titarchuk ~George Mason U.!, Currently these are graduate students from Catholic U., Stan- Alan Tylka ~NRL!, Robert Warwick ~U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic X-Ray Background
    The Cosmic X-Ray Background Steven M. Kahn Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology Stanford University 1 Outline of Lectures Lecture I: * Historical Introduction and General Characteristics of the CXB. * Contributions from Discrete Source Classes * Spectral Paradoxes Lecture II: * The CXB and Large Scale Structure * The Galactic Contributions to the CXB * The CXB and the Cosmic Web 2 I. Historical Introduction and General Characteristics of the CXB. 3 Historical Introduction * The “birth” of the field of X-ray astronomy is usually associated with the flight of a particular rocket experiment in 1962 that yielded the detection of the first non-solar cosmic X-ray source: Scorpius X-1. (Giacconi et al. 1962) * That same rocket experiment also yielded the discovery of an apparent diffuse component of X-radiation, the Cosmic X-ray Background (CXB). (N.B. This was well in advance of the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background by Pensias and Wilson!) * In the ensuing 40 some odd years, our understanding of the X-ray Universe has progressed considerably. X-rays have now been detected from virtually all classes of astronomical systems, ranging from normal stars to the most distant galaxies. * Nevertheless, the precise origin of the CXB remains puzzling. This has been one of the great mysteries of high energy astrophysics! 4 Historical Introduction 5 Historical Introduction * “The diffuse character of the observed background radiation does not permit a positive determination of its nature and origin. However, the apparent absorption coefficient in mica and the altitude dependence is consistent with radiation of about the same wavelength responsible for the peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Chandra Was Launched Aboard Space Shuttle Columbia on July 23, 1999!!! Crew Lost During Re-Entry Modern X-Ray Telescopes and Detectors
    Chandra was launched aboard Space Shuttle Columbia on July 23, 1999!!! Crew Lost During Re-Entry Modern X-ray Telescopes and Detectors •X-ray Telescopes •X-ray Instruments •Some early highlights •Observations •Data characteristics •Calibration •Analysis X-ray Telescope: The advantages • Achieve 2-D imaging – Separate sources – Study morphology of extended sources – Simultaneously measure both source and local background • Reduce the background Æ increase the source 1/2 detection sensitivity: S/N ~ Fs t/(Fst+ ASbt) –t –exposure time –Fs – source count flux –A –source detection area –Sb – background surface brightness: Detector + sky background • Facilitate high-resolution dispersive spectrometers X-ray Telescope: Focusing mechanism External reflection at small grazing angles - an analogy of skipping stones on water •Snell’s law: sinφr=sinφi/n, where the index of refraction n=1-δ+iβ • External reflection occurs with sinφr > 1 Æ 1/2 The critical grazing angle θ = π/2- φi ~ (2δ) 1/2 (δ ∝ ne /E << 1) Focusing mechanism (cont.) • The critical angle (effective collecting area) decreases with increasing photon energy • High Z materials allow for reflecting high energy photon with the same grazing angle X-ray Telescope: Hans Wolter Configuraions • A Paraboloid gives a perfect image for on-axis rays. But it gives a coma blur of equivalent image size proportional to the off-axis angle. • Wolter showed that two reflections were needed to eliminate the coma. • A Paraboloid-Hyperboloid combination proves to be the most useful in X-ray astronomy. X-ray Telescopes • First used to observe the Solar corona • Then transferred to general astronomy with HEAO-2 (Einstein Observatory), launched in 1978: – imaged X-rays in 0.5-4.0 keV.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryogenics in Space
    — 37 — Cryogenics in space Nicola RandoI Abstract Cryogenics plays a key role on board space-science missions, with a range of applications, mainly in the domain of astrophysics. Indeed a tremendous progress has been achieved over the last 20 years in cryogenics, with enhanced reliability and simpler operations, thus matching the needs of advanced focal-plane detectors and complex science instrumentation. In this article we provide an overview of recent applications of cryogenics in space, with specific emphasis on science missions. The overview includes an analysis of the impact of cryogenics on the spacecraft system design and of the main technical solutions presently adopted. Critical technology developments and programmatic aspects are also addressed, including specific needs of future science missions and lessons learnt from recent programmes. Introduction H. Kamerlingh-Onnes liquefied 4He for the first time in 1908 and discovered superconductivity in 1911. About 100 years after such achievements (Pobell 1996), cryogenics plays a key role on board space-science missions, providing the environ- ment required to perform highly sensitive measurements by suppressing the thermal background radiation and allowing advantage to be taken of the performance of cryogenic detectors. In the last 20 years several spacecraft have been equipped with cryogenic in- strumentation. Among such missions we should mention IRAS (launched in 1983), ESA’s ISO (launched in 1995) (Kessler et al 1996) and, more recently, NASA’s Spitzer (formerly SIRTF, launched in 2006) (Werner 2005) and the Japanese mis- sion Akari (IR astronomy mission launched in 2006) (Shibai 2007). New missions involving cryogenics are the ESA missions Planck (dedicated to the mapping of the cosmic background radiation) and Herschel (far infrared and sub-millimetre observatory), carrying instruments operating at temperatures of 0.1 K and 0.3 K, respectively (Crone et al 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Nustar Observatory Guide
    NuSTAR Guest Observer Program NuSTAR Observatory Guide Version 3.2 (June 2016) NuSTAR Science Operations Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center, Greenbelt, MD nustar.caltech.edu heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/nustar/index.html i Revision History Revision Date Editor Comments D1,2,3 2014-08-01 NuSTAR SOC Initial draft 1.0 2014-08-15 NuSTAR GOF Release for AO-1 Addition of more information about CZT 2.0 2014-10-30 NuSTAR SOC detectors in section 3. 3.0 2015-09-24 NuSTAR SOC Update to section 4 for release of AO-2 Update for NuSTARDAS v1.6.0 release 3.1 2016-05-10 NuSTAR SOC (nusplitsc, Section 5) 3.2 2016-06-15 NuSTAR SOC Adjustment to section 9 ii Table of Contents Revision History ......................................................................................................................................................... ii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 NuSTAR Program Organization ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. The NuSTAR observatory .................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 NuSTAR Performance ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NASA HQ Update on IXO
    NASA HQ Update on IXO IXO Facility Science Team Meeting GSFC, 20 August 2008 Michael Salamon Astrophysics Division, NASA HQ Recent History of IXO • Stern and Southwood at NASA/ESA bilateral informally agree that Con-X and XEUS must find a path forward to a single, merged mission (Paris, Sept 2007). • Southwood letter to Stern (Jan 2008) invites NASA to participate in XEUS study as a starting point leading to possible interagency partnership. • Morse/Favata letter (May 2008): • Con-X is highest priority large-class mission following JWST (2000 Decadal), to be revisited in 2010 Decadal. • XEUS selected as one of three CV L-class competing missions (Outer Planets, XEUS, LISA) with downselection in 2009 and 2011. • Limited resources in both agencies and considerable overlap in science goals argue for finding a joint mission approach. • Agreement for a joint mission study (not the mission itself). • Formation of coordination group (CG) composed of ESA, NASA, and JAXA representatives. • First task of CG is to determine the existence of possible joint mission scenarios. • Once found, study the joint mission scenario to the level required by the selection process milestones of the agencies involved. • No consideration to be given by the CG of which agency might lead the merged mission. IXO Coordination Group • IXO-CG initially charged to find a joint mission scenario for further joint study by the agencies (ESA, NASA, JAXA). • IXO-CG now charged with definition of science requirements for the IXO concept, scientific supervision of study activities, reporting to Agencies. • IXO-CG jointly chaired by the ESA and NASA study scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights and Discoveries from the Chandra X-Ray Observatory1
    Highlights and Discoveries from the Chandra X-ray Observatory1 H Tananbaum1, M C Weisskopf2, W Tucker1, B Wilkes1 and P Edmonds1 1Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138. 2 NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, ZP12, 320 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35805. Abstract. Within 40 years of the detection of the first extrasolar X-ray source in 1962, NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory has achieved an increase in sensitivity of 10 orders of magnitude, comparable to the gain in going from naked-eye observations to the most powerful optical telescopes over the past 400 years. Chandra is unique in its capabilities for producing sub-arcsecond X-ray images with 100-200 eV energy resolution for energies in the range 0.08<E<10 keV, locating X-ray sources to high precision, detecting extremely faint sources, and obtaining high resolution spectra of selected cosmic phenomena. The extended Chandra mission provides a long observing baseline with stable and well-calibrated instruments, enabling temporal studies over time-scales from milliseconds to years. In this report we present a selection of highlights that illustrate how observations using Chandra, sometimes alone, but often in conjunction with other telescopes, have deepened, and in some instances revolutionized, our understanding of topics as diverse as protoplanetary nebulae; massive stars; supernova explosions; pulsar wind nebulae; the superfluid interior of neutron stars; accretion flows around black holes; the growth of supermassive black holes and their role in the regulation of star formation and growth of galaxies; impacts of collisions, mergers, and feedback on growth and evolution of groups and clusters of galaxies; and properties of dark matter and dark energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Messenger-No117.Pdf
    ESO WELCOMES FINLANDINLAND AS ELEVENTH MEMBER STAATE CATHERINE CESARSKY, ESO DIRECTOR GENERAL n early July, Finland joined ESO as Education and Science, and exchanged which started in June 2002, and were con- the eleventh member state, following preliminary information. I was then invit- ducted satisfactorily through 2003, mak- II the completion of the formal acces- ed to Helsinki and, with Massimo ing possible a visit to Garching on 9 sion procedure. Before this event, howev- Tarenghi, we presented ESO and its scien- February 2004 by the Finnish Minister of er, Finland and ESO had been in contact tific and technological programmes and Education and Science, Ms. Tuula for a long time. Under an agreement with had a meeting with Finnish authorities, Haatainen, to sign the membership agree- Sweden, Finnish astronomers had for setting up the process towards formal ment together with myself. quite a while enjoyed access to the SEST membership. In March 2000, an interna- Before that, in early November 2003, at La Silla. Finland had also been a very tional evaluation panel, established by the ESO participated in the Helsinki Space active participant in ESO’s educational Academy of Finland, recommended Exhibition at the Kaapelitehdas Cultural activities since they began in 1993. It Finland to join ESO “anticipating further Centre with approx. 24,000 visitors. became clear, that science and technology, increase in the world-standing of ESO warmly welcomes the new mem- as well as education, were priority areas Astronomy in Finland”. In February 2002, ber country and its scientific community for the Finnish government. we were invited to hold an information that is renowned for its expertise in many Meanwhile, the optical astronomers in seminar on ESO in Helsinki as a prelude frontline areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Error Doomed Japanese Hitomi Spacecraft!
    Software error doomed Japanese Hitomi spacecraft! ! Space agency declares the astronomy satellite a loss.! ! Japan’s flagship Hitomi astronomical satellite, which launched successfully on 17 February but tumbled out of control five weeks later, may have been doomed by a basic engineering error. Confused about how it was oriented in space and trying to stop itself from spinning, Hitomi's software apparently fired a thruster jet in the wrong direction — accelerating rather than slowing the craft's rotation.! ! http://www.nature.com/news/software-error-doomed-japanese-hitomi- spacecraft-1.19835! 1! Gamma-Ray Bursts- Longair 22.7! • Are bright flashes of γ-rays- for a short period of time (<100 sec )! • fluxes of ~0.1-100 photon/cm2/sec/keV emitted primarily in the 20-500 keV band.! – Distribution is isotropic on the sky! • Because of these properties it took ~30 years from their discovery (1967) to their identification! – They are at very large distances (z up to 8 (!)) with apparent luminosities of 3x1054 erg/sec! – Rate is ~10-7/yr/galaxy ! • What are they??- short timescales imply compact object ; what could the 2 33 energy reservoir be- Mc implies M~10 gms~ Msun if total conversion of mass into energy How does all this energy end up as γ-rays ?! – Location of long γRBs is in and near star forming regions in smallish galaxies- associated with star formation! – a few γRBs have been associated with a type Ic supernova! 2! 3! Gamma-Ray Bursts ! • Cosmic γ-ray bursts (GRBs) were first reported in 1973 by Klebesadel et al (l973) but were first seen
    [Show full text]