DOCSLIB.ORG

The Animal Biodiversity of Green Walls in the Urban Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Animal Biodiversity of Green Walls in the Urban Environment THE ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY OF GREEN WALLS IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT Caroline Chiquet July 2014 A thesis submitted to Staffordshire University in the subject of Ecology for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Supervised Research Caroline Chiquet. PhD Thesis. Urban animal biodiversity and green walls Caroline Chiquet. PhD Thesis. Urban animal biodiversity and green walls i “If you are not a little bit afraid every day, you are not trying hard enough.” (Anonymous) “Follow passion first and foremost. Do valuable things that have little or nothing to do with your PhD. Be utterly busy with everything awesome and worthwhile.” (Bradley L. Garrett) Caroline Chiquet. PhD Thesis. Urban animal biodiversity and green walls ii ABSTRACT Over the last few decades, a substantial body of literature has highlighted the importance of the natural environment for human well-being and health. In the urban environment where, space is particularly costly, the abundance of plants can be increased by growing them vertically as ‘green walls’, rather than horizontally. Although green walls ecology is a rapidly growing science, large gaps remain in our knowledge as only few studies have investigated their ecosystem services, focusing mainly on their thermal values. This doctoral research is one of the first attempts to establish the value of varying vertical greening systems for animal biodiversity. To identify the animal populations of green walls, surveys were carried out on bird, snail, spider and insect communities in green façades and living walls of Stoke- on-Trent, Birmingham and London, UK. The study then focused on the effects of varying characteristics of green walls (e.g. vegetation surface area, plant density and richness, botanical composition, type of foliage) on these communities and also investigated if the local environment (e.g. pedestrian and vehicle traffic volumes, abundance of nearby vegetation) influenced the use of green walls by animals. The results showed that animal groups respond differently to the characteristics of green walls and the surrounding features. Importantly, the design and the maintenance interventions of green walls influence their use by animals and, as such, it is possible to modify these environments to make them more attractive to certain animal communities. Whether growing on independent self-supporting structures, or directly on or in buildings, plants can use largely underexploited vertical space allowing an additional type of ecosystem to be incorporated into the urban environment. Caroline Chiquet. PhD Thesis. Urban animal biodiversity and green walls iii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to all those who helped me during my PhD study. Many people have made invaluable contributions, both directly and indirectly to my research. My deepest gratitude goes first and foremost to Professor John Dover, my supervisor, for his continuous encouragement and guidance. His enlightening instruction and constant patience stimulated me and taught me considerably during these years of research. I would also like to express my gratitude to Dr. Paul Mitchell, second supervisor, for the demanding identification of spiders and his valuable suggestions, and to Dr. Dave Skingsley for the crucial identification of snails. The whole project was made possible thanks to the funding received from the Research Excellence Framework. I am most grateful to the landowners, the manufacturers and installers, for the access to the walls, the help received, and for their enthusiasm for the study. I own my sincere gratitude to Dr Roger Dennis for his help on the multi-variate analysis of the data and the time he granted me for the explanations. I owe my sincere gratitude to Rosie Duncan, Dr. Sam Harrison and Charlotte Orphanou who have put up with me in the office, always available to answer my questions, to give valuable advices in the English writing and to help me with the English vocabulary and grammar. I also thank all my colleagues for their availability and their help. Christine Dover and Sam deserve thanks for proofreading the manuscript, sometimes within a quite short time scale :-). Rosie Duncan gave important support in the making of the maps in Appendix 6 to 8, thanks! My brother Vincent and my husband Cedric helped me with some of the fieldwork sessions, being enthusiastically the ‘pack horses’ and for that I am most grateful. I am also most grateful to the owners, who gave access to their property and land so that the green façades and living walls could be studied, and for their enthusiasm for the study. Assistance provided by the manufacturers was also greatly appreciated. I would not have followed the path of research without my parents’ enthusiasm and encouragement for continuously questioning things; I am immensely in debt towards them. Thanks for my constant support of my somewhat never ending education; I hope I made you proud. Last but not least, my thanks would go to Cedric, for his whole-hearted support, his love and his patience all through these years, since ‘Math sup/spé Bio’ to this PhD. Your turn now! . Caroline Chiquet. PhD Thesis. Urban animal biodiversity and green walls iv TABLE OF CONTENT Abstract................................................................................................................................iii Aknowledgements ...............................................................................................................iv Table of Content .................................................................................................................. v List of Figures......................................................................................................................xi List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... xiv List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ xvii List of Symbols ............................................................................................................. 17xvii Thesis methodology and chapter organisation ................................................................ 1 1. Thesis Outline .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Aims and objectives of the doctoral research ............................................................... 3 1.2 Planning ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Justification of methods and pilot study ........................................................................ 4 1.4 Creation of a living wall on the University campus ........................................................ 4 2. Literature Review ......................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Green walls: a green infrastructure component ............................................................ 6 2.1.1 Green infrastructure definition and services ....................................................................... 6 2.1.2 The importance of green infrastructure ............................................................................... 8 2.2 The umbrella concept of green walls ...........................................................................10 2.2.1 Green walls, definitions and characteristics. Proposal for classification ........................... 10 2.2.2 Short history of green walls; ecology, research and utilisation ......................................... 14 2.2.3 Commercial systems in the Northern Hemisphere ........................................................... 16 2.3 The environmental values of green walls .....................................................................18 2.3.1 The specific use of hedges compared to other green walls ............................................. 18 2.3.2 Floral biodiversity of green walls ....................................................................................... 20 2.3.3 A building bioprotection cover or a biodeteriorative role? ................................................. 21 2.3.4 Urban heat island reduction, thermal mitigation and energy saving ................................. 22 2.3.5 Air quality improvement .................................................................................................... 25 2.3.6 Noise attenuation .............................................................................................................. 27 2.3.7 Stormwater management .................................................................................................. 28 2.3.8 Economic, social and health aspects ................................................................................ 29 2.4 Enhancing animal habitat in urban areas .....................................................................30 2.4.1 Theoretical context: different approaches for biodiversity conservation and landscape ecology .............................................................................................................................. 30 Caroline Chiquet. PhD Thesis. Urban animal biodiversity and green walls v 2.4.2 The importance of spatial context, heterogeneity and habitat concept in the study of green walls .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Following the Cold
    Systematic Entomology (2018), 43, 200–217 DOI: 10.1111/syen.12268 Following the cold: geographical differentiation between interglacial refugia and speciation in the arcto-alpine species complex Bombus monticola (Hymenoptera: Apidae) BAPTISTE MARTINET1 , THOMAS LECOCQ1,2, NICOLAS BRASERO1, PAOLO BIELLA3,4, KLÁRA URBANOVÁ5,6, IRENA VALTEROVÁ5, MAURIZIO CORNALBA7,JANOVE GJERSHAUG8, DENIS MICHEZ1 andPIERRE RASMONT1 1Laboratory of Zoology, Research Institute of Biosciences, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium, 2Research Unit Animal and Functionalities of Animal Products (URAFPA), University of Lorraine-INRA, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 3Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, University of South Bohemia, Ceskéˇ Budejovice,ˇ Czech Republic, 4Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Institute of Entomology, Ceskéˇ Budejovice,ˇ Czech Republic, 5Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Prague, Czech Republic, 6Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Department of Sustainable Technologies, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, 7Department of Mathematics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy and 8Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway Abstract. Cold-adapted species are expected to have reached their largest distribution range during a part of the Ice Ages whereas postglacial warming has led to their range contracting toward high-latitude and high-altitude areas. This has resulted in an extant allopatric distribution of populations and possibly to trait differentiations (selected or not) or even speciation. Assessing inter-refugium differentiation or speciation remains challenging for such organisms because of sampling difficulties (several allopatric populations) and disagreements on species concept. In the present study, we assessed postglacial inter-refugia differentiation and potential speciation among populations of one of the most common arcto-alpine bumblebee species in European mountains, Bombus monticola Smith, 1849.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    i procp:edings of uxited states national :\[uset7m. 359 23498 g. D. 13 5 A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; 0. 31 ; B. S. Leiigtli ICT millime- ters. GGGl. 17 specimeus. St. Michaels, Alaslai. II. M. Bannister. a. Length 210 millimeters. D. 13; A. 14; V. 3; P. 33; C— ; B. 8. h. Length 200 millimeters. D. 14: A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; C— ; B. 8. e. Length 135 millimeters. D. 12: A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; C. 30; B. 8. The remaining fourteen specimens vary in length from 110 to 180 mil- limeters. United States National Museum, WasJiingtoiij January 5, 1880. FOURTBI III\.STAI.:HEIVT OF ©R!VBTBIOI.O«ICAI. BIBI.IOCiRAPHV r BE:INC} a Jf.ffJ^T ©F FAUIVA!. I»l.TjBf.S«'ATI©.\S REff,ATIIV« T© BRIT- I!§H RIRD!^. My BR. ELS^IOTT COUES, U. S. A. The zlppendix to the "Birds of the Colorado Yalley- (pp. 507 [lJ-784 [218]), which gives the titles of "Faunal Publications" relating to North American Birds, is to be considered as the first instalment of a "Uni- versal Bibliography of Ornithology''. The second instalment occupies pp. 230-330 of the " Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 'V Yol. Y, No. 2, Sept. G, 1879, and similarly gives the titles of "Faunal Publications" relating to the Birds of the rest of America.. The.third instalment, which occnpies the same "Bulletin", same Yol.,, No. 4 (in press), consists of an entirely different set of titles, being those belonging to the "systematic" department of the whole Bibliography^ in so far as America is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Host Specificity of Gonioctena
    BIOLOGY AND HOST SPECIFICITY OF GONIOCTENA TREDECIMMACULATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE): A POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT FOR KUDZU by Matthew J. Frye A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology and Applied Ecology Summer 2006 Copyright 2006 Matthew J. Frye All Rights Reserved UMI Number: 1435816 UMI Microform 1435816 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 BIOLOGY AND HOST SPECIFICITY OF GONIOCTENA TREDECIMMACULATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE): A POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT FOR KUDZU by Matthew J. Frye Approved:_____________________________________________________ Judith A. Hough-Goldstein, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: _____________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Chairperson of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: _____________________________________________________ Robin W. Morgan, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: _____________________________________________________ Conrado M. Gempesaw II, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Academic and International Programs ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study could not have been accomplished without the guidance, support, and input of Dr. Judy Hough-Goldstein. Dr. Hough-Goldstein provided insight at every step of the process, from experimental design to statistical analysis, and her efforts are greatly appreciated. I gratefully thank my advisory committee, Dr. Bruce Vasilas, Dr. Doug Tallamy, and Dr. Michael Smith for their suggestions and expertise. Dr. Cliff Keil was integral in the analysis of total phenolics and trichome density, and provided access to and training for necessary equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • General News
    Biocontrol News and Information 27(4), 63N–79N pestscience.com General News David Greathead hoods. Both broom and tagasaste pods can be a seasonally important food source for kererū (an As this issue went to press we received the sad news endemic pigeon, Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae), par- of the untimely death of Dr David Greathead at the ticularly in regions where its native food plants have age of 74. declined. A previous petition for the release of G. oli- vacea into New Zealand was rejected by the New Besides being a dedicated and popular Director of Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in CABI’s International Institute of Biological Control 1998 on the grounds that there was insufficient (IIBC), David was the driving force behind the estab- information to assess the relative beneficial and lishment and development of Biocontrol News and harmful effects of the proposed introduction. Information. He was an active member of its Edito- rial Board, providing advice and ideas right up to his As part of the submission to ERMA, Landcare death. Research quantified the expected costs and benefits associated with the introduction of additional biolog- We plan that the next issue will carry a full obituary. ical control agents for broom1. Due to uncertainties Please contact us if you would be willing to con- regarding the costs, a risk-averse approach was tribute information: commentary, personal adopted by assuming a worse-case scenario where memories or anecdotes on the contribution that tagasaste was planted to its maximum potential David made. extent in New Zealand (10,000 ha), levels of non- target damage to tagasaste were similar to those on Contact: Matthew Cock & Rebecca Murphy C.
    [Show full text]
  • Serie B 1995 Vo!. 42 No. 2 Norwegian Journal of Entomology
    Serie B 1995 Vo!. 42 No. 2 Norwegian Journal of Entomology Publ ished by Foundation for Nature Research and Cultural Heritage Research Trondheim Fauna norvegica Ser. B Organ for Norsk Entomologisk Forening Appears with one volume (two issues) annually. also welcome. Appropriate topics include general and 1Jtkommer med to hefter pr. ar. applied (e.g. conservation) ecology, morphology, Editor in chief (Ansvarlig redakt0r) behaviour, zoogeography as well as methodological development. All papers in Fauna norvegica are Dr. John O. Solem, University of Trondheim, The reviewed by at least two referees. Museum, N-7004 Trondheiln. Editorial committee (Redaksjonskomite) FAUNA NORVEGICA Ser. B publishes original new information generally relevant to Norwegian entomol­ Arne C. Nilssen, Department of Zoology, Troms0 ogy. The journal emphasizes papers which are mainly Museum, N-9006 Troms0, Ole A. Scether, Museum of faunal or zoogeographical in scope or content, includ­ Zoology, Musepl. 3, N-5007 Bergen. Reidar Mehl, ing check lists, faunal lists, type catalogues, regional National Institute of Public Health, Geitmyrsveien 75, keys, and fundalnental papers having a conservation N-0462 Oslo. aspect. Subnlissions must not have been previously Abonnement 1996 published or copyrighted and must not be published Medlemmer av Norsk Entomologisk Forening (NEF) subsequently except in abstract form or by written con­ far tidsskriftet fritt tilsendt. Medlemlner av Norsk sent of the Managing Editor. Ornitologisk Forening (NOF) mottar tidsskriftet ved a Subscription 1996 betale kr. 90. Andre ma betale kr. 120. Disse innbeta­ Members of the Norw. Ent. Soc. (NEF) will receive the lingene sendes Stiftelsen for naturforskning og kuItur­ journal free. The membership fee of NOK 150 should be minneforskning (NINA-NIKU), Tungasletta 2, N-7005 paid to the treasurer of NEF, Preben Ottesen, Gustav Trondheim.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Birds
    SB 30(2) COV 27/5/10 10:55 Page 1 The pair of Ptarmigan were roosting either side of a PhotoSP T boulder, and observing them for a while, they didn’t Plate 155. On a wintery day© in March 2010 I drove move. I decided to move a little bit closer to try and to the Cairngorms to record any birds I might see. capture a picture and I did this every five minutes or SCOTTISH There was snow at 1000 feet, and the mountain I so until I got to a decent distance for the 400 mm decided to climb was not far from thousands of lens. The picture I believe gives a real feeling to the skiers. I encountered Red Grouse at 1500 feet and extreme habitat in which Ptarmigan exist. I backed just a little bit higher at c. 2000 feet I came across off and left them to roost in peace. my first Ptarmigan. There was also a pair slightly BIRDS higher at c. 2900 feet. For people who are interested in camera gear, I used a Canon 40D, 400 mm lens and a Bushawk On my climb I also found foot prints of Mountain shoulder mount. Volume 30 (2) 30 (2) Volume Hare and more grouse. I’m sure the Ptarmigan had been forced lower down the hill to feed, as there John Chapman was so much snow cover and on the tops it must (www.johnchapmanphotographer.co.uk) have been -15°C the night before. Scottish Birds June 2010 published by the SCOTTISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ CLUB Featuring the best images posted on the SOC website each quarter, PhotoSpot will present stunning portraits as well as record shots of something unique, accompanied by the story behind the photograph and the equipment used.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae: Dysderidae)
    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4419 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4419 Taxonomic Paper A new species of Harpactea Bristowe, 1939 from Turkey (Araneae: Dysderidae) Recep Sulhi Özkütük‡, Mert Elverici §,|, Yuri M. Marusik¶, Kadir Boğaç Kunt‡ ‡ Anadolu University, Science Faculty, Biology Department, Eskişehir, Turkey § Middle East Technical University, Biology Department, Ankara, Turkey | Erzincan University, Science and Arts Faculty, Biology Department, Erzincan, Turkey ¶ IBPN RAS, Magadan, Russia Corresponding author: Recep Sulhi Özkütük ([email protected]), Kadir Boğaç Kunt ([email protected]) Academic editor: Jason Bond Received: 27 Dec 2014 | Accepted: 06 Sep 2015 | Published: 07 Sep 2015 Citation: Özkütük R, Elverici M, Marusik Y, Kunt K (2015) A new species of Harpactea Bristowe, 1939 from Turkey (Araneae: Dysderidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4419. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4419 ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DE2CC6E0-FA8F-4C26-8D03-55ED686D5E96 Abstract A new species of Harpactea Bristowe, 1939, H. alanyana sp. n. is described from southern Turkey. The new species appears closely related to H. osellai Brignoli, 1978. Detailed description and illustrations of the new and related species are provided. The relationships of the two species are discussed. Keywords Alanya, Antalya, Mediterranean, spider, woodlouse hunters Introduction Harpactea Bristowe, 1939 is large genus of dysderid spiders that includes 172 species distributed in the Mediterranean region from the Iberian Peninsula to Turkmenistan (World Spider Catalog 2014). In spite of this wide distribution range and high species richness, © Özkütük R et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Conservation of Threatened Bird Species at Laojunshan, Sichuan, China
    CLP Report Assessment and conservation of threatened bird species at Laojunshan, Sichuan, China Submitted by Jie Wang Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R.China E-mail:[email protected] To Conservation Leadership Programme, UK Contents 1. Summary 2. Study area 3. Avian fauna and conservation status of threatened bird species 4. Habitat analysis 5. Ecological assessment and community education 6. Outputs 7. Main references 8. Acknowledgements 1. Summary Laojunshan Nature Reserve is located at Yibin city, Sichuan province, south China. It belongs to eastern part of Liangshan mountains and is among the twenty-five hotspots of global biodiversity conservation. The local virgin alpine subtropical deciduous forests are abundant, which are actually rare at the same latitudes and harbor a tremendous diversity of plant and animal species. It is listed as a Global 200 ecoregion (WWF), an Important Bird Area (No. CN205), and an Endemic Bird Area (No. D14) (Stattersfield, et al . 1998). However, as a nature reserve newly built in 1999, it is only county-level and has no financial support from the central government. Especially, it is quite lack of scientific research, for example, the avifauna still remains unexplored except for some observations from bird watchers. Furthermore, the local community is extremely poor and facing modern development pressures, unmanaged human activities might seriously disturb the local ecosystem. We conducted our project from April to June 2007, funded by Conservation Leadership Programme. Two fieldwork strategies were used: “En bloc-Assessment” to produce an avifauna census and ecological assessments; "Special Survey" to assess the conservation status of some threatened endemic bird species.
    [Show full text]