The Thermochemistry of Physical Change 6.9 Vaporization 6.10

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Thermochemistry of Physical Change 6.9 Vaporization 6.10 The Thermochemistry of Physical • Enthalpy of vaporization (DHvap) - the Change enthalpy change accompanying the conversion of one mole of a liquid into vapor – phase changes: DH = H – H solid « liquid liquid « gas solid « gas vap vapor liquid DH > 0 (endothermic) 6.9 Vaporization vap • Enthalpy of condensation (DH ) – vaporization (liquid ® gas) cond DH = H – H = – DH – condensation (gas ® liquid) cond liquid vapor vap • Vaporization is endothermic - the system DHcond < 0 (exothermic) absorbs energy needed to overcome the • The DH for the reverse of any process is the attractive forces between the molecules in the negative of the DH for the forward process liquid in order to spread them apart in the vapor (because H is a state function) Example: The vaporization of 23 g of ethanol 6.10 Melting and Sublimation at 78.5ºC and 1 atm requires 22 kJ of energy – melting, fusion (solid ® liquid) supplied as heat. Calculate the enthalpy of – freezing (liquid ® solid) vaporization of ethanol. • Enthalpy of fusion (DHfus) - the enthalpy P = constant Þ DH = q = 22 kJ change accompanying the conversion of one need DH per 1 mol of ethanol mole of a solid into liquid DH = H – H = – DH æ 1 mol ethanol ö fus liquid solid freez n = 23 g ethanol ´ ç ÷ = 0.50 mol ethanol • Melting is endothermic - energy is needed to è 46.1 g ethanolø overcome the forces holding the particles of a 22 kJ DH = = 44 kJ/mol solid in position and form the mobile liquid vap 0.50 mol ÞDHfus > 0 (endothermic); DHfreez < 0 (exothermic) – sublimation (solid ® gas) DHvap = Hvapor – Hliquid – deposition (gas ® solid) DHfus = Hliquid – Hsolid • Enthalpy of sublimation (DHsub) - the enthalpy change accompanying the conversion of one DHsub = Hvapor – Hsolid mole of a solid into vapor DHvap + DHfus = Hvapor – DHsub = Hvapor – Hsolid = – DHdepos Hliquid + Hliquid – Hsolid = • Sublimation is endothermic - energy is needed = H – H = DH to overcome the forces holding the particles of a vapor solid sub solid in position and form the gas phase Þ DHvap + DHfus = DHsub ÞDHsub > 0 (endothermic); DHdepos < 0 (exothermic) (true only at constant T) For H2O DHfus = 6.0 kJ/mol and DHsub = 50 kJ/mol Fig. 6.26 1 6.11 Heating and Cooling Curves • Heating (or cooling) curve - a graph of the temperature of a sample as a function of the heat added to (or removed from) it. • Regions in the heating (cooling) curves – sloped regions - correspond to temperature changes in the pure solid, liquid or gas phases (slope depends on the heat capacity of each phase) – flat regions - correspond to phase changes (temperature remains constant) Fig. 6.27 The Enthalpy of Chemical Change • Reaction enthalpy (DHr) - DH reported per one mol of a given reactant or product 6.12 Reaction Enthalpies • Properties of thermochemical equations • Thermochemical equations - chemical equation – multiplying an equation by a number multiplies the with physical states + enthalpy change (DH) DH value by the same number CH (g) + 2O (g) ® CO (g) + 2H O(l) – reversing the direction of a reaction changes the 4 2 2 2 sign of the DH value DH = – 890 kJ 2CH4(g) + 4O2(g) ® 2CO2(g) + 4H2O(l) the DH is for 1 mol CH and 2 mol of O 4 2 DH = – 2´890 kJ • The value of DH depends on the way the CO (g) + 2H O(l) ® CH (g) + 2O (g) chemical equation is written (stoichiometric 2 2 4 2 coefficients) DH = + 890 kJ • Example: When 2.31 g of solid P reacts with æ 1 mol P ö -2 gaseous Cl2 to form liquid PCl3 in a constant 2.31 g P ´ ç ÷ = 7.46 ´10 mol P pressure calorimeter with C = 2.16 kJ/ºC, the è 30.97 g Pø temperature rises by 11.06ºC. Write the - 23.9 kJ thermochemical equation. DH = = -320. kJ/mol P r 7.46 ´10-2 mol P qsurr = C´DT = 2.16 kJ/ºC´ 11.06ºC = 23.9 kJ P = constant - 320 kJ DH = ´ 2 mol P = -641 kJ Þ DH = qsys = – 23.9 kJ (for 2.31 g P) 1 mol P Chem. Eq. 2P(s) + 3Cl2(g) ® 2PCl3 (g) Þ need DH for 2 mol P 2P(s) + 3Cl2(g) ® 2PCl3 (g) DH = – 641 kJ 2 CH4(g) + 2O2(g) ® CO2(g) + 2H2O(g) 6.13 Standard Reaction Enthalpies DH = – 802 kJ (g) (g) (g) (l) • DHr depends on the physical states of reactants CH4 + 2O2 ® CO2 + 2H2O an products, P and T DHº = – 890 kJ • Standard state - the state of a substance in its pure form at 1 atm and a given temperature (usually 298 K). For substances in solutions, the standard state is at concentrations 1 mol/L • Standard reaction enthalpy (DHrº) - DHr for a reaction in which all reactants and products are in their standard states Fig. 6.29 3.
Recommended publications
  • Physical Model for Vaporization
    Physical model for vaporization Jozsef Garai Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Florida International University, University Park, VH 183, Miami, FL 33199 Abstract Based on two assumptions, the surface layer is flexible, and the internal energy of the latent heat of vaporization is completely utilized by the atoms for overcoming on the surface resistance of the liquid, the enthalpy of vaporization was calculated for 45 elements. The theoretical values were tested against experiments with positive result. 1. Introduction The enthalpy of vaporization is an extremely important physical process with many applications to physics, chemistry, and biology. Thermodynamic defines the enthalpy of vaporization ()∆ v H as the energy that has to be supplied to the system in order to complete the liquid-vapor phase transformation. The energy is absorbed at constant pressure and temperature. The absorbed energy not only increases the internal energy of the system (U) but also used for the external work of the expansion (w). The enthalpy of vaporization is then ∆ v H = ∆ v U + ∆ v w (1) The work of the expansion at vaporization is ∆ vw = P ()VV − VL (2) where p is the pressure, VV is the volume of the vapor, and VL is the volume of the liquid. Several empirical and semi-empirical relationships are known for calculating the enthalpy of vaporization [1-16]. Even though there is no consensus on the exact physics, there is a general agreement that the surface energy must be an important part of the enthalpy of vaporization. The vaporization diminishes the surface energy of the liquid; thus this energy must be supplied to the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Sublimation Enthalpy and Vapor Pressure for Inorganic and Metal-Organic Compounds by Thermogravimetric Analysis∗
    Connexions module: m33649 1 Determination of Sublimation Enthalpy and Vapor Pressure for Inorganic and Metal-Organic Compounds by Thermogravimetric Analysis∗ Andrew R. Barron This work is produced by The Connexions Project and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License y 1 Introduction Metal compounds and complexes are invaluable precursors for the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of metal and non-metal thin lms. In general, the precursor compounds are chosen on the basis of their relative volatility and their ability to decompose to the desired material under a suitable temperature regime. Unfortunately, many readily obtainable (commercially available) compounds are not of sucient volatility to make them suitable for CVD applications. Thus, a prediction of the volatility of a metal-organic compounds as a function of its ligand identity and molecular structure would be desirable in order to determine the suitability of such compounds as CVD precursors. Equally important would be a method to determine the vapor pressure of a potential CVD precursor as well as its optimum temperature of sublimation. It has been observed that for organic compounds it was determined that a rough proportionality exists between a compound's melting point and sublimation enthalpy; however, signicant deviation is observed for inorganic compounds. Enthalpies of sublimation for metal-organic compounds have been previously determined through a vari- ety of methods, most commonly from vapor pressure measurements using complex experimental systems such as Knudsen eusion, temperature drop microcalorimetry and, more recently, dierential scanning calorime- try (DSC). However, the measured values are highly dependent on the experimental procedure utilized. For example, the reported sublimation enthalpy of Al(acac)3 (Figure 1a, where M = Al, n = 3) varies from 47.3 to 126 kJ/mol.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Transformation in Supercooled Water Controls the Crystallization Rate of Ice
    Structural transformation in supercooled water controls the crystallization rate of ice. Emily B. Moore and Valeria Molinero* Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0580, USA. Contact Information for the Corresponding Author: VALERIA MOLINERO Department of Chemistry, University of Utah 315 South 1400 East, Rm 2020 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0850 Phone: (801) 585-9618; fax (801)-581-4353 Email: [email protected] 1 One of water’s unsolved puzzles is the question of what determines the lowest temperature to which it can be cooled before freezing to ice. The supercooled liquid has been probed experimentally to near the homogeneous nucleation temperature T H≈232 K, yet the mechanism of ice crystallization—including the size and structure of critical nuclei—has not yet been resolved. The heat capacity and compressibility of liquid water anomalously increase upon moving into the supercooled region according to a power law that would diverge at T s≈225 K,1,2 so there may be a link between water’s thermodynamic anomalies and the crystallization rate of ice. But probing this link is challenging because fast crystallization prevents experimental studies of the liquid below T H. And while atomistic studies have captured water crystallization3, the computational costs involved have so far prevented an assessment of the rates and mechanism involved. Here we report coarse-grained molecular simulations with the mW water model4 in the supercooled regime around T H, which reveal that a sharp increase in the fraction of four-coordinated molecules in supercooled liquid water explains its anomalous thermodynamics and also controls the rate and mechanism of ice formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Corollary from the Exact Expression for Enthalpy of Vaporization
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Thermodynamics Volume 2011, Article ID 945047, 7 pages doi:10.1155/2011/945047 Research Article Corollary from the Exact Expression for Enthalpy of Vaporization A. A. Sobko Department of Physics and Chemistry of New Materials, A. M. Prokhorov Academy of Engineering Sciences, 19 Presnensky Val, Moscow 123557, Russia Correspondence should be addressed to A. A. Sobko, [email protected] Received 14 November 2010; Revised 9 March 2011; Accepted 16 March 2011 Academic Editor: K. A. Antonopoulos Copyright © 2011 A. A. Sobko. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A problem on determining effective volumes for atoms and molecules becomes actual due to rapidly developing nanotechnologies. In the present study an exact expression for enthalpy of vaporization is obtained, from which an exact expression is derived for effective volumes of atoms and molecules, and under certain assumptions on the form of an atom (molecule) it is possible to find their linear dimensions. The accuracy is only determined by the accuracy of measurements of thermodynamic parameters at the critical point. 1. Introduction 1938 [2] with the edition from 1976 [3], we may find them actually similar. we may come to the same conclusion if In the present study, the relationship is obtained that we compare [2] with recent monograph by Prigogine and combines the enthalpy of vaporization with other thermody- Kondepudi “Modern Thermodynamics” [4]. The chapters namic evaporation parameters from the general expression devoted to first-order phase transitions in both monographs for the heat of first-order phase transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics Guide Definitions, Guides, and Tips Definitions What Each Thermodynamic Value Means Enthalpy of Formation
    Thermodynamics Guide Definitions, guides, and tips Definitions What each thermodynamic value means Enthalpy of Formation Definition The enthalpy required or released during formation of a molecule from its elements. H2(g) + ½O2(g) → H2O(g) ∆Hºf(H2O) Sign: ∆Hºf can be positive or negative. Direction: From elements to product. Phase: The phase of the product being formed can be anything, but the elemental starting materials must be in their elemental standard phase. Notes: • RC&O Appendix 1 collects these values. • Limited by what values are experimentally available. • Knowing the elemental form of each atom is helpful. Ionization Enthalpy (IE) Definition The enthalpy required to remove one electron from an atom or ion. Li(g) → Li+(g) + e– IE(Li) Sign: IE is always positive — removing electrons from proximity of nucleus requires enthalpy input Direction: IE goes from atom to ion/electron pair. Phase: IE is a gas phase property. Reactants and products must be gas phase. Notes: • Phase descriptors are not generally given to an electron. • Ionization energy is taken to be identical to ionization enthalpy. • The first IE of Li(g) is shown above. A second, third, or higher IE can also be determined. Removing each additional electron costs even more enthalpy. Electron Affinity (EA) Definition How much enthalpy is gained when an electron is added to an atom or ion. (How much an atom “wants” an electron). Cl(g) + e– → Cl–(g) EA(Cl) Sign: EA is always positive, but the enthalpy is negative: ∆Hºrxn < 0. This is because of how we describe the property as an “affinity”.
    [Show full text]
  • Enthalpy of Sublimation in the Study of the Solid State of Organic Compounds
    J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 18055-18060 18055 Enthalpy of Sublimation in the Study of the Solid State of Organic Compounds. Application to Erythritol and Threitol A. J. Lopes Jesus, Luciana I. N. Tome´, M. Ermelinda Euse´bio,* and J. S. Redinha Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Coimbra, 3004-535, Coimbra, Portugal ReceiVed: March 30, 2005; In Final Form: July 5, 2005 The enthalpies of sublimation of erythritol and L-threitol have been determined at 298.15 K by calorimetry. The values obtained for the two diastereomers differ from one another by 17 kJ mol-1. An interpretation of these results is based on the decomposition of this thermodynamic property in a term coming from the intermolecular interactions of the molecules in the crystal (∆intH°) and another one related with the conformational change of the molecules on going from the crystal lattice to the most stable forms in the gas phase (∆confH°). This last term was calculated from the values of the enthalpy of the molecules in the gas state and of the enthalpy of the isolated molecules with the crystal conformation. Both quantities were obtained by density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP/6-311G++(d,p) level of theory. The results obtained in this study show that the most important contribution to the differences observed in the enthalpy of sublimation are the differences in the enthalpy of conformational change (13 kJ mol-1) rather than different intermolecular forces exhibited in the solid phase. This is explained by the lower enthalpy of threitol in the gas phase relative to erythritol, which is attributed to the higher strength of the intramolecular hydrogen bonds in the former.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION and BASIC CONCEPTS
    CLASS Third Units PURE SUBSTANCE • Pure substance: A substance that has a fixed chemical composition throughout. • Air is a mixture of several gases, but it is considered to be a pure substance. Nitrogen and gaseous air are pure substances. A mixture of liquid and gaseous water is a pure substance, but a mixture of liquid and gaseous air is not. 2 PHASES OF A PURE SUBSTANCE The molecules in a solid are kept at their positions by the large springlike inter-molecular forces. In a solid, the attractive and repulsive forces between the molecules tend to maintain them at relatively constant distances from each other. The arrangement of atoms in different phases: (a) molecules are at relatively fixed positions in a solid, (b) groups of molecules move about each other in the liquid phase, and (c) molecules move about at random in the gas phase. 3 PHASE-CHANGE PROCESSES OF PURE SUBSTANCES • Compressed liquid (subcooled liquid): A substance that it is not about to vaporize. • Saturated liquid: A liquid that is about to vaporize. At 1 atm and 20°C, water exists in the liquid phase (compressed liquid). At 1 atm pressure and 100°C, water exists as a liquid that is ready to vaporize (saturated liquid). 4 • Saturated vapor: A vapor that is about to condense. • Saturated liquid–vapor mixture: The state at which the liquid and vapor phases coexist in equilibrium. • Superheated vapor: A vapor that is not about to condense (i.e., not a saturated vapor). As more heat is transferred, At 1 atm pressure, the As more heat is part of the saturated liquid temperature remains transferred, the vaporizes (saturated liquid– constant at 100°C until the temperature of the vapor mixture).
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic and Kinetic Supercooling of Liquid in a Wedge
    THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 129, 154509 ͑2008͒ 7KHUPRG\QDPLF DQG NLQHWLF VXSHUFRROLQJ RI OLTXLG LQ D ZHGJH SRUH ͒ Dominika Nowak,1 Manfred Heuberger,2,3 Michael Zäch,2,4 and Hugo K. Christenson1,a 1School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom 2Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology, Department of Materials, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland 3Empa Advanced Fibers, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, CH-9014 St. Gallen, Switzerland 4Department of Applied Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden ͑Received 1 July 2008; accepted 15 September 2008; published online 21 October 2008͒ Cyclohexane allowed to capillary condense from vapor in an annular wedge pore of mica in a ͑ ͒ surface force apparatus SFA remains liquid down to at least 14 K below the bulk melting-point Tm. This is an example of supercooling of a liquid due to confinement, like melting-point depression in porous media. In the wedge pore, however, the supercooled liquid is in equilibrium with vapor, and the amount of liquid ͑and thereby the radius of curvature r of the liquid-vapor interface͒ depends on ␥ the surface tension LV of the liquid, not the interfacial tension between the solid and liquid. At ⌬ coexistence r is inversely proportional to the temperature depression T below Tm, in accordance with a recently proposed model ͓P. Barber, T. Asakawa, and H. K. Christenson, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 2141 ͑2007͔͒. We have now extended this model to include effects due to the temperature dependence of both the surface tension and the enthalpy of melting.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theoretical Analysis on Enthalpy of Vaporization: Temperature- Dependence and Singularity at the Critical State
    Fluid Phase Equilibria 516 (2020) 112611 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fluid Phase Equilibria journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fluid A theoretical analysis on enthalpy of vaporization: Temperature- dependence and singularity at the critical state * Dehai Yu , Zheng Chen BIC-ESAT, SKLTCS, CAPT, Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China article info abstract Article history: Accurate evaluation of enthalpy of vaporization and its dependence upon temperature is crucial in Received 4 November 2019 studying phase transition and liquid fuel combustion. The theoretical calculation of enthalpy of vapor- Received in revised form ization based on Clapeyron equation involves the vapor-pressure-temperature correlation and the 14 April 2020 equation of state, and hence an explicit formula is unavailable. The formula for enthalpy of vaporization Accepted 14 April 2020 derived from the corresponding state principle, although in explicit form, is not valid over the entire Available online 19 April 2020 temperature range. The fitting formulas for enthalpy of vaporization involves various fluid-dependent coefficients and hence are lack of theoretical generality. In this study, the formulas for enthalpy of Keywords: Enthalpy of vaporization vaporization are rigorously derived at both the reference and critical states. By appropriate weighing, we Temperature dependence propose a composite formula for enthalpy of vaporization that has an elegant and compact form and is Critical exponent free of fitting parameters. Compared to the calculation based on equation of state, the composite formula Heat capacity predicts the evaluation of enthalpy with comparable or improved accuracy. The composite formula Coordination number implies a unified relationship between normalized enthalpy of vaporization and normalized tempera- ture, which substantiates the appropriateness of the function form of the composite formula.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Enthalpies of Sublimation by Drop Method in a Calvet Type Calorimeter: Design and Test of a New System
    Thermochimica Acta 415 (2004) 15–20 Measurement of enthalpies of sublimation by drop method in a Calvet type calorimeter: design and test of a new system Luis M.N.B.F. Santos, Bernd Schröder, Oscar O.P. Fernandes, Manuel A.V. Ribeiro da Silva∗ Centro de Investigação em Qu´ımica, Departamento de Qu´ımica, Faculdade de Ciˆencias, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, P-4169-007 Porto, Portugal Received 12 May 2003; received in revised form 7 July 2003; accepted 8 July 2003 Available online 22 January 2004 Abstract A new system to measure enthalpies of sublimation by the drop method was designed, constructed and tested. The performance of the apparatus was checked by measuring the enthalpy of sublimation of ferrocene, benzoic acid and anthracene at different temperatures. The measurement of enthalpies of sublimation by the drop method is described in detail. g H ◦ . −1 Compound Texp (K) cr m at 298 15 K (kJ mol ) Benzoic acid 417 92.1 ± 2.6 Benzoic acid 453 93.9 ± 3.1 Ferrocene 373 74.9 ± 1.7 Anthracene 453 100.8 ± 1.7 © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Enthalpies of sublimation; Drop method; Calvet microcalorimetry 1. Introduction The technique described in this paper belongs to the di- rect methods. Tian–Calvet type heat-flux calorimeters that The enthalpy of sublimation, which is a measure of in- measure integral heats are suitable to determine enthalpies termolecular forces in the crystalline phase [1], is an impor- of sublimation. Tian [7] was one of the first scientists taking tant thermodynamic property, which is necessary to derive advantage of the heat conduction principle while construct- the standard enthalpy of formation of a compound in the ing calorimeters.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,935,450 B2 Preidel Et Al
    US00793545OB2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,935,450 B2 Preidel et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 3, 2011 (54) METHOD FOR OPERATION OF AN ENERGY (56) References Cited SYSTEM, ASWELLAS AN ENERGY SYSTEM U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventors: Walter Preidel, Erlangen (DE); Bernd Wacker, Herzogenaurach (DE); Peter 4,617,801 A 10/1986 Clark, Jr. Van Hasselt, Erlangen (DE) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS DE 36 34.936 C1 5, 1988 (73) Assignee: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, Munich DE 39 08573 C2 3, 1992 (DE) WO WO O2, 14736 * 2/2OO2 WO WO O2, 1473.6 A1 2, 2002 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WOO2,24523 A2 3, 2002 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 * cited by examiner U.S.C. 154(b) by 1079 days. Primary Examiner — Ula C. Ruddock (21) Appl. No.: 11/723,268 Assistant Examiner — Thomas H. Parsons (22) Filed: Mar 19, 2007 (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. (65) Prior Publication Data US 2007/O248849 A1 Oct. 25, 2007 (57) ABSTRACT An energy system, in at least one embodiment, includes an (30) Foreign Application Priority Data energy production device for production of energy for the Mar. 20, 2006 (DE) ......................... 10 2006 O12 679 energy system with the aid of an working medium, a Super conductor for low-loss conduction of electrical energy in the (51) Int. Cl. energy system, and a cooling device for cooling of the Super HOLM 8/04 (2006.01) conductor with the aid of a liquid phase of a cooling medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Enthalpy of Mixing and Heat of Vaporization of Ethyl Acetate with Benzene and Toluene at 298.15 K and 308.15 K
    Brazilian Journal of Chemical ISSN 0104-6632 Printed in Brazil Engineering www.abeq.org.br/bjche Vol. 25, No. 01, pp. 167 - 174, January - March, 2008 ENTHALPY OF MIXING AND HEAT OF VAPORIZATION OF ETHYL ACETATE WITH BENZENE AND TOLUENE AT 298.15 K AND 308.15 K K. L. Shivabasappa1*, P. Nirguna Babu1 and Y. Jagannadha Rao2 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Siddaganga Institute of Technology, Phone: (91) 984-5768784, Fax: (91) 816-2282994, Tumkur, 572103, India. 2Department of Chemical Engineering, MVJ College of Engineering, Bangalore - 560067, India E-mail: [email protected] (Received: June 4, 2007 ; Accepted: November 5, 2007) Abstract - The present work was carried out in two phases. First, enthalpy of mixing was measured and then the heat of vaporization for the same mixtures was obtained. The data are useful in the design of separation equipments. From the various designs available for the experimental determination of enthalpy of mixing, and heat of vaporization, the apparatus was selected, modified and constructed. The apparatus of enthalpy of mixing was tested with a known system Benzene – i-Butyl Alcohol and the data obtained was in very good agreement with literature values. Experiments were then conducted for mixtures of Ethyl Acetate with Benzene and Toluene. The experimental data was fitted to the standard correlations and the constants were evaluated. Heat of vaporization data were obtained from a static apparatus and tested for accuracy by conducting experiments with a known system Benzene – n-Hexane and the data obtained were found to be in agreement with literature values. Experiments were then conducted to measure heat of vaporization for the mixtures of Ethyl Acetate with Benzene and Toluene.
    [Show full text]