4.4 Cultural Resources

4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

This chapter addresses historic buildings, features, and landscapes, and archaeological and paleontological resources in the study area for the 2020 LRDP and the Tien Center, and evaluates the potential effects of the components of the 2020 LRDP on these resources.

During the scoping period for this EIR, questions were received about the methodology for determining historic significance and cumulative impacts on cultural resources. Vari- ous methodologies were suggested and considered during the preparation of this chapter.

4.4.1 ANALYTICAL METHODS

HISTORICAL RESOURCES To establish baseline conditions, the listings of historical resources in this chapter were drawn from the National Register of Historic Places, the State Historic Resources In- ventory (State Inventory) compiled by the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University, the Physical and Environmental Planning unit in Facilities Services at UC Berkeley, and registers of the cities of Berkeley and Oakland. Federal, state and local land use plans and ordinances relevant to historic resources were reviewed and are summarized in Sections 4.4.2 and 4.4.3. 2020 LRDP program and specific Tien Center impacts were then evaluated, including the adequacy of existing programs and proposed 2020 LRDP policies intended to protect and enhance cultural resources.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES Data on archaeological and paleontological resources used in the preparation of this chapter were obtained from several sources, particularly the 1990 LRDP EIR, the Northwest Information Center and staff of the UC Museum of Paleontology. Previous EIRs prepared for UC Berkeley projects, the City of Berkeley General Plan EIR, and the Oakland Land Use and Transportation Element EIR were also reviewed. Federal, state and local land use plans and ordinances applicable to archaeological and paleontological resources were reviewed and are summarized in Sections 4.4.2 and 4.4.3.

4.4.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

FEDERAL

NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT OF 1966 The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) is the most influential federal law dealing with historic preservation. Numerous other federal statutes are also relevant to historic properties.

NATIONAL REGISTER. The NHPA authorized the Secretary of the Interior to maintain and expand a National Register of Historic Places. Districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects are eligible for listing in the Register. Nominations are listed if they are significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture at the national, state or local level. The National Register is administered by the National Park Service.

Listing in the National Register provides recognition of a significant property, consideration in the planning for federal or federally assisted projects, eligibility for federal tax benefits, and qualification for federal assistance. The National Register is influential be- yond its statutory role because it established uniform standards of documentation and

4.4-1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES evaluation. Projects involving properties listed in the National Register must be evaluated under CEQA.

SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION AND GUIDELINES FOR RE- HABILITATING HISTORIC BUILDINGS. To guide preservation efforts of federal agencies, the Secretary of the Interior has developed “Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings”. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards are codified in 36 CFR, part 67. “Rehabilitation” is defined as “the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient contem- porary use while preserving those portions and features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values.” The Secretary of the Interior's Standards have been widely used over the years to guide federal agencies in carrying out their historic preservation responsibilities, and by state and local officials in reviewing both federal and non-federal rehabilitation proposals. The State Historic Preservation Officer is responsible for reviewing and interpreting the Secretary of the Interior's Stan- dards for projects in California.

STATE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that project impacts to historical resources be analyzed. This EIR is being prepared to provide such analysis for the 2020 LRDP. CEQA consists of Sections 21000 through 21177 of the Public Re- sources Code Division 13. The Guidelines for CEQA consist of Sections 15000 through 15387 of the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3.

HISTORICAL RESOURCES. CEQA provisions codified in Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 define a “historical resource” as a resource listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Resources included in a local register, or deemed significant pursuant to criteria established in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(g), are also presumed historically or culturally significant, unless a preponderance of evidence supports a contrary finding. A lead agency may also make its own determination of significance for unlisted resources.

In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c), an historical resource may be eligible for inclusion in the CRHR if it: Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage, Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past, Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values, or Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES. CEQA distinguishes between two classes of archaeological resources: archaeological sites that meet the definition of a historical resource as described above, and “unique archaeological resources.” Section 21083.2(g) defines “unique archaeological resources” as “an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria:

4.4-2 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information, Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type, or Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person.”

PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines asks whether a project would “directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature.” CEQA does not define what is “a unique paleontological resource or site.”

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE, DIVISION 5: PARKS AND MONUMENTS; CHAPTER 1: STATE PARKS AND MONUMENTS, ARTICLE 2: HISTORICAL RESOURCES, SECTION 5024 Section 5024 of the California Public Resources Code (along with PRC 5027 and Execu- tive Orders B-64-80, W-26-92) is broadly similar to provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act. It requires state agencies “to preserve and maintain, when prudent and feasible” properties which are eligible for the National Register and to provide the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) with an inventory of such structures which are more than 50 years old. The SHPO is required to work with agencies to maintain a master list of state-owned historic structures. Agencies must submit documentation of projects which could affect these buildings to the SHPO for comment. The SHPO must also be made aware of any proposed actions that may transfer, relocate, or demolish an historic resource. Agencies are required to incorporate reasonable measures to eliminate or mitigate any adverse effects on historic resources.

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE, DIVISION 5: PARKS AND MONUMENTS, CHAPTER 1.7: ARCHAEOLOGICAL, PALEONTOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SITES, SECTION 5097 Public Resources Code 5097 specifies the procedures to be followed in the event of the unexpected discovery of human remains on nonfederal land. The disposition of Native American burials falls within the jurisdiction of the Native American Heritage Commission.

Section 5097.5 of the Code states the following:

“No person shall knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy, injure or deface any historic or prehistoric ruins, burial grounds, archaeological or verte- brate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints, inscriptions made by human agency, or any other archaeological, paleontological or historical feature, situated on public lands, except with the express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction over such lands. Violation of this section is a misdemeanor.”

As used in this section, “public lands” means lands owned by, or under the jurisdiction of, the state, or any city, county, district, authority, or public corporation, or any agency thereof. Consequently, the University of California is required to comply with PRC 5097.5 for its activities.1

4.4-3 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE, DIVISION 7: DEAD BODIES, CHAPTER 2: GENERAL PROVISIONS, SECTION 7052 AND 7050.5 Section 7052 of the Health and Safety Code states that the disturbance of Indian cemeteries is a felony. Section 7050.5 requires that construction or excavation be stopped in the vicinity of discovered human remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native American. If determined to be Native American, the coroner must contact the California Native American Heritage Commission.2

CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORICAL, CULTURAL AND SACRED SITES ACT The California Native American Historical, Cultural and Sacred Sites Act applies to both state and private lands. The Act requires that upon discovery of human remains, that activity cease and that the county coroner be notified. If the remains are of a Native American, the coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC then notifies the most likely descendants. The Act stipulates the procedures the descendants may follow for treating or disposing of the remains and associated grave goods.3

4.4.3 LOCAL PLANS AND POLICIES

Although the University is constitutionally exempt from local regulations when using its property in furtherance of its educational purposes, it is University policy to evaluate proposed projects for consistency with local plans and policies. Therefore, this section outlines the plans and policy goals of the cities of Berkeley and Oakland related to cultural resources.

CITY OF BERKELEY The City of Berkeley implements controls over the design and extent of local development through land use zoning, master plans, and city ordinances.

BERKELEY GENERAL PLAN The Berkeley General Plan provides a comprehensive and consistent set of policies designed to guide the development and preservation of the city. The General Plan includes an Urban Design and Preservation Element, the goal of which is to “protect and enhance Berkeley’s special built environment and cultural heritage by carefully conserving the numerous existing good buildings, areas, and other features and ensuring that new elements are so located and designed as to respect and strengthen the whole.”4

The element traces the history of Berkeley’s neighborhoods and architecture and discusses major preservation measures in previous plans and ordinances. The element states that “preservation and good design” offer two types of benefits: economic (including neighborhood and district stability, cost and time savings over new construction, conservation of resources, increased opportunities for small businesses, and attracting resi- dents and business activity) and community identity (beauty, continuity, and understand- ing of history).

The element calls for protecting existing resources, including historic buildings, districts, and landscapes, and it states that new construction should be designed so that it not only “complements and enhances the old, but that it also makes its own distinctive contribution to the built and natural environments.” The Urban Design and Preservation

4.4-4 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Element includes 39 policies and actions which spell out how the city should survey, inventory, regulate, and promote historic structures, sites, districts, and neighborhoods.

FINDINGS OF THE BERKELEY GENERAL PLAN EIR The Berkeley General Plan EIR found that implementation of the General Plan would not be expected to result in environmental impacts in the area of cultural resources, and that implementation of some policies would benefit this resource area. The EIR further found a “high potential for Native American cultural resources exists within the city limits.” An EIR mitigation measure requires the city to establish standard conditions of approval and criteria for determining which discretionary projects require further information about potential archaeological impacts.

The EIR also stated the General Plan provisions for increased residential development in the Downtown in association with the University and along transit corridors could have the potential to encourage demolition of historic resources in these areas, but due to city mechanisms for designating and protecting historic structures, and to the role of the Landmarks Commission in reviewing demolition permits for non-residential structures more than 40 years old, the increased development would not cause an impact which would require mitigation.5 The EIR concluded that implementation of the Gen- eral Plan would not result in any significant impacts to cultural and historic resources. It further stated that “Proposed new development would not contribute to any cumulative regional loss of historic resources”6 given state-mandated mitigations and policies.

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ORDINANCE Berkeley also has a Landmarks Preservation Ordinance, adopted in 1974, that requires the city to establish a list of potential buildings that should be considered for landmark, historic district, or structure of merit status. The ordinance outlines procedures for designating properties to landmark status and review procedures for physical changes to landmark buildings. A City Council-appointed Landmarks Preservation Commission and city staff administer the ordinance. Buildings designated as landmarks or as structures of merit must meet criteria for consideration set forth in the ordinance. The Landmark Preservation Ordinance codifies policies stipulated by the city General Plan to preserve and enhance historic buildings.

The criteria used in evaluation of buildings afford three levels of designation for historic buildings, including properties of exceptional significance (landmarks); structures of merit; and properties that do not meet landmark criteria but are worthy of preservation as part of a neighborhood, block, or street front. The lists in this chapter include specific properties on and off the UC Berkeley campus which have been listed as City of Berke- ley landmarks.

CITY OF OAKLAND The City of Oakland regulates the treatment of historic resources through its planning and zoning regulations. The Oakland General Plan, updated in 1998, lays out the goals and policies for development in the city, implemented through the planning and zoning regulations in the Oakland Planning Code. The planning and zoning regulations were under revision in November 2003.7

4.4-5 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Development in the City of Oakland is administered by the Community and Economic Development Agency under the direction of the City Planning Commission, the Mayor and the City Council. The Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board plays a special role in regulation of historic properties. The Landmarks Board, appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council, has seven members, including at least one architect, one landscape architect or city planner, one person with a background in Oakland history or architectural history, and one real estate expert.

OAKLAND GENERAL PLAN The Oakland General Plan includes an extensive Historic Preservation Element. The goals of the preservation element are to “use historic preservation to foster economic vitality and quality of life” and to “prevent unnecessary destruction of properties of special historical, cultural, and aesthetic value.”

The Historic Preservation Element includes provisions governing the treatment of two classes of resources: Designated Historic Properties and Potential Designated Historic Properties. There are about 130 officially designated individual city landmark properties and six districts, in addition to 40 individual properties and one district on the National Register. Local landmarks are designated after hearings by the Landmarks Board, the Planning Commission and the City Council.

A windshield survey of the city, completed in 1997, and the more detailed Oakland Cul- tural Heritage Survey, which covered fewer resources but in far greater detail, greatly augment the scope of the local and national landmark registers. Both surveys rate individual buildings (from A to F, with A to D having decreasing levels of historical significance and E and F having no established significance) and districts (with 1 indicating an area eligible to the National Register as a district, 2 indicating a zone of local significance, and 3 indicating no historic district exists). Buildings rated C or higher, and properties which contribute to districts rated 1 or 2, are considered Potential Designated His- toric Properties. Buildings rated A or B, and districts rated 1, are treated by the city as historic resources under CEQA.

The Historic Preservation Element includes a range of incentives for preserving Desig- nated Historic Properties, including a wider range of permitted uses than for other properties. It also requires design review by the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board for exterior changes, and restrictions on demolition or alterations. For Potential Designated Historic Properties, the Element provides review and possible postpone- ment for demolition, design review, and potential reclassification as Designated Historic Properties. There are also a variety of preservation incentives for potential historic properties.

4.4.4 EXISTING SETTING

HISTORICAL RESOURCES In this EIR, the numerous historical resources located within the geographic scope of the 2020 LRDP are divided into two separate categories: Primary Historical Resources and Secondary Historical Resources. Primary Historical Resources include those listed on the California Register of Historical Resources. Secondary Historical Resources include resources listed on local registers, as well as resources listed on the state Inventory.

4.4-6 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Secondary Historical Resources are presumed significant unless a preponderance of evidence demonstrates otherwise.8 Historic resources covered here include buildings, sites (which encompass landscapes), structures (such as bridges), and objects (such as Founders' Rock).

This section begins with an explanation of the different types of historical resources described in Section 5024.1 of the Public Resources Code. Then, for each 2020 LRDP land use zone, the resources in each of these categories are presented in a table. Brief histories of the Primary and Secondary Historical Resources owned by the University are included in Appendix D.

PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES: CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES The California Register of Historical Resources includes the following, in accordance with California Public Resource Code Section 5024.1(d):

Resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Resources that have a State Historical Landmark number of 770 or higher.

There are no resources in the 2020 LRDP area that are listed as California Points of Historical Interest: such properties would also qualify if they existed.

SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES: LOCAL REGISTER AND STATE INVENTORY RESOURCES Secondary Historical Resources include all the resources that may be listed in the Cali- fornia Register of Historical Resources in accordance with California Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, subsections (e), (f), and (g). All of these resources are presumed historically or culturally significant, unless a preponderance of evidence supports a contrary finding.9 California Public Resource Code Section 5024.1(e) states the California Register may include:

Individual historical resources. Historical resources contributing to the significance of an historic district under criteria adopted by the State Historical Resources Commission. Historical resources identified as significant in historical resources surveys, if the survey meets the criteria listed in subdivision (g). Historical resources and historic districts designated or listed as city or county landmarks or historic properties or districts pursuant to any city or county ordinance, if the criteria for designation or listing under the ordinance have been determined by the office to be consistent with California Register criteria adopted by the State Historical Resources Commission. Landmarks or historic properties designated under any municipal or county ordinance.

The first two types of resources, “individual resources” and “resources contributing to a historic district”, refer to those not yet listed on any official surveys or registers: these are not considered further in this EIR. The third type of resource, “resources identified as significant”, consists of resources listed in the State Inventory, and therefore listed in this EIR as Secondary Historical Resources. The last two types of resources, those designated by cities and counties, are as also listed as Secondary Historical Resources in this EIR.

4.4-7 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA. California Public Resource Code Section 5024.1(g) states that a resource identified as significant in an historical resource survey may be listed in the California Register if the survey meets all of the following criteria:

The survey has been or will be included in the State Historic Resources Inventory. The survey and the survey documentation were prepared in accordance with Office of Historic Preservation procedures and requirements. The resource is evaluated and determined by the Office of Historic Preservation to have a significance rating of Category 1 to 5 on DPR Form 523. If the survey is five or more years old at the time of its nomination for inclusion in the California Register, the survey is updated to identify historical resources which have become eligible or ineligible due to changed circumstances or further documentation and those which have been demolished or altered in a manner that sub- stantially diminishes the significance of the resource.

The first two criteria can essentially be combined since all surveys that were prepared in accordance with office procedures and requirements are included in the State Historic Resources Inventory (referred in this document as the State Inventory). The third crite- rion – Category 1 to 5 on DPR Form 523 – requires a brief explanation.

DPR Form 523 is the Department of Parks and Recreation Historic Resources Inven- tory Form, which is an application completed for an individual resource nomination to either a local or state register. If and when the resource is evaluated at the state level (by the Office of Historic Preservation), the resource is given a Category designation, which rates the likelihood of the resource becoming registered in the National Register of His- toric Places. This Category is listed under the heading NR (short for National Register) on the DPR Form 523 and is listed on the State Inventory under the heading National Register Status Code. (Please note that even though these ratings have different names, the codes/categories are exactly the same.)

Each code is alphanumeric, starting with a number, then a letter, and then another number. For the purposes of this EIR, only a brief explanation of the first number and select sub classifications (that are cited in this EIR) will be given because the entire list of designations consists of approximately 110 codes and sub-codes. For a more complete explanation of the designations, refer to “Appendix 2: National Register Status Codes” of the California Office of Historic Preservation Technical Assistance Series #8. 10

Code 1. Property is listed on the National Register Code 2. Determined eligible for National Register in a formal process Code 3. Appears eligible for National Register to person completing or reviewing form Code 3S. Appears eligible for National Register as a separate property Code 4. May become eligible for listing on the National Register Code 4S. May become eligible for National Register as a separate property Code 4X. May become eligible for National Register as contributing to a District not yet documented Code 5. Ineligible for the National Register but still of local interest Code 5S. Eligible for local listing only Code 6. Determined ineligible for National Register listing Code 7. Not evaluated

4.4-8 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Note that historical resources with a National Register Status Code of 1 or 2 are auto- matically listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and are therefore listed as Primary Historical Resources. Therefore, only historical resources that have Codes of 3, 4 or 5 are listed in this EIR as Secondary Historical Resources.

CAMPUS PARK The Campus Park contains 23 resources listed on the CRHR, as listed in Table 4.4-1. There are also 28 buildings that are Secondary Historical Resources, listed in Table 4.4-2.

In 1982, many buildings on the Campus Park were given National Register status under a Multiple Resource Area designation. The individual buildings or structures include Hearst Greek Theatre (which is in the Adjacent Blocks North), North Gate Hall, Hearst Memorial Mining Building, Sather Gate and Bridge and the Hearst Gymnasium for Women. The buildings that were designated with their landscaped settings were the Faculty Club and the Campanile Way and Esplanade. The Faculty Club designation includes the (Men’s) Faculty Club and Faculty Glade. The Campanile Way and Esplanade designation includes the following: Sather Tower (Campanile) and the Esplanade; South Hall; Wheeler Hall; Durant Hall; Doe Memorial Library; and California Hall. The Agri- cultural Complex and University House Buildings includes Wellman Hall, Hilgard Hall, Giannini Hall and the University House. Finally, Founders’ Rock was also a part of this Multiple Resource Area. The same group of buildings is listed as a State Landmark under the name “University of California, Berkeley Campus” with the record number 946 and recognition date of August 7, 1981.

ADJACENT BLOCKS The Adjacent Blocks North contain four listings on the CRHR, which are listed in Table 4.4-3. Table 4.4-4 further lists the seven Secondary Historical Resources in the Adjacent Blocks North. The Adjacent Blocks West land use zone contains three CRHR properties, which are listed in Table 4.4-5. Table 4.4-6 lists the 43 Secondary Historical Resources in the Adjacent Blocks West. The Adjacent Blocks South land use zone contains three resources listed on the CRHR, which are listed in Table 4.4-7. Table 4.4-8 lists the 18 Sec- ondary Historical Resources in the Adjacent Blocks South.

SOUTHSIDE The Southside land use zone contains four resources listed on the CRHR. These resources are listed in Table 4.41-10. Table 4.4-10 further lists the 70 Secondary Historical Resources in the Southside land use zone.

HILL CAMPUS The Hill Campus contains no CRHR properties and two Secondary Historical Resources. Table 4.4-11 lists the two Secondary Historical Resources in the Hill Campus.

LRDP HOUSING ZONE The portion of the Housing Zone within Berkeley contains 27 resources listed in the CRHR, which are listed in Table 4.4-12. Table 4.4-13 lists 165 Secondary Historical Re- sources located in the Berkeley portion of the Housing Zone. The portion of the Hous- ing Zone within Oakland contains two CRHR properties, which are listed in Table 4.4- 14. Table 4.4-13 lists six Secondary Historical Resources in the Oakland portion of the Housing Zone.

4.4-9 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-1 CAMPUS PARK, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES National State Construction Date Architect (s) Recognition Date Designation Code 1 Founders’ Rock Natural Landscape Feature 3/25/1982 N L 2 South Hall 1872-1903 David Farquharson 3/25/1982 N L 3 Faculty Club / Faculty Glade 1899-1903 Bernard Maybeck 3/25/1982 N L 4 California Hall 1903-1905 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 5 North Gate Hall 1906 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 6 Senior Hall 1906 John Galen Howard 11/5/1974 N R 7 Hearst Memorial Mining Building 1901-1909 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 8 Sather Gate and Bridge 1908-1910 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 9 Girton Hall (“Senior Women’s Hall”) 1911 Julia Morgan 9/26/1991 N R 10 University House 1911 Albert Pissis 3/25/1982 N L 11 Wellman Hall 1912 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 12 Durant Hall (Former Boalt Hall) 1908-1911 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 13 Naval Architecture / Drawing Bldg. 1914 John Galen Howard 11/18/1976 N R 14 Doe Memorial Library 1907-1917 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 15 Sather Tower & Esplanade 1913-1917 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 16 Wheeler Hall 1915-1917 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 17 Room 307, Gilman Hall 1917 John Galen Howard 10/15/1966 L R 18 Hilgard Hall 1916-1918 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L 19 Haviland Hall 1923 John Galen Howard 2/1/1982 N R 20 Hearst Gymnasium for Women 1927 Maybeck / Morgan 3/25/1982 N L 21 Giannini Hall 1930 William Charles Hays 3/25/1982 N L 22 George C. Edwards, Stadium 1932 Warren Perry / Stafford Jory 4/1/1993 N R 23 First Unitarian Church Dance Studio 1898 A.C. Schweinfurth of 11/16/1981 L R 2401 Bancroft Way A. Page Brown & Co Notes: National Designations: State Codes: N =National Register of Historic Places R = California Register of Historical Resources (National Resource Status Codes 1 or 2) L = National Historic Landmark L = State Historic Landmark D = National Register of Historic Places – District D = California Register of Historical Resources – District

4.4-10 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-2 CAMPUS PARK, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

Construction City Structure National Register Name Date Architect (s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code 1 Leuschner (Students’) Observatory, Observatory Hill 1885 Clinton Day 3S Warren Cheney House 2 1885 Warren Cheney 7/18/1990 3S 2241College Avenue Cupola from Giauque Lab 3 1889 Clinton Day 3S (remnant of old Chemistry building) 4 Tilden Football Statue 1899 Douglas Tilden 3S Warren Cheney House, 5 1902 Carl Ericson 7/18/1990 3S 2243 College Avenue 6 Old Power House (University Art Gallery) 1904 John Galen Howard 3S Charles E Bancroft House 7 1908 Fred D. Voorhees 3S 2222 Piedmont Prof Charles A Noble House 8 1908 William A. Knowles 3S 2224 Piedmont Walter Y Kellogg House 9 1908 Julia Morgan 3S 2232 Piedmont Dr. B.P. Wall House 10 1909 William C. Hayes 3S 2234 Piedmont Zeta Psi Fraternity 11 1910 Charles Peter Weeks 3S (Archaeological Research Facility) 2251 College John Bakewell, Jr., 12 Class of 1910 Bridge 1910 3S Arthur Brown, Jr. 13 Class of 1877 Sundial 1915 Clinton Day 3S

14 Lawson Adit 1916 College of Mining 3S

15 Stephens Memorial Union (Stephens Hall) 1922 John Galen Howard 3S Sigma Epsilon Fraternity 16 1923 Gwynn Officer 3S 2240 Piedmont

4.4-11 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-2 CAMPUS PARK, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

Construction City Structure National Register Name Date Architect (s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code 17 Women’s Faculty Club 1923 John Galen Howard 3S

18 Life Sciences Building 1928 George W. Kelham 3S

19 Harmon Gym - Haas Pavilion 1932 George Kelham 9/3/1996

20 Anthony Hall (“Pelican Bldg” ) 1956 Joseph Esherick 3S Hardison and DeMars 21 Sproul Plaza 1959 3S w/Lawrence Halprin DeMars, Esherick and 22 Wurster Hall 1964 3S Olsen Landscape Features

23 Willey Redwood N/A N/A 11/4/1996

24 Eucalyptus Grove N/A N/A 11/4/1996 3S

25 Dawn Redwoods adjacent to McCone Hall N/A N/A 11/4/1996

26 Campanile Esplanade (London Plane Trees) N/A N/A 11/4/1996

27 Melaleuca Copse adjacent to Esplanade N/A N/A 11/4/1996

28 California Buckeye Tree in Faculty Glade N/A N/A 11/4/1996

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

Note: National Register Status Codes are explained in Appendix D.

4.4-12 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-3 ADJACENT BLOCKS NORTH, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES National State Name Construction Date Architect (s) Recognition Date Designation Code Gayley Road 1 Bowles Hall 1928 George Kelham 3/16/1989 N R Hearst Avenue 1 Phi Delta Theta Chapter House 1914 John Reid, Jr. 5/25/1982 N R 2717 Hearst Ave / 1822 Highland Place Le Roy Avenue 1 Cloyne Court 1904 John Galen Howard 11/15/1982 N 1875 Le Roy Ave / 2600 Ridge Road Stadium Rimway 1 Hearst Greek Theatre (Part of the 1982 MRA) 1903 John Galen Howard 3/25/1982 N L Notes: Resources in bold text are University-owned. National Designation: State Codes: N =National Register of Historic Places R = California Register of Historical Resources (National Register Status Codes 1 or 2) L = National Historic Landmark L = State Historic Landmark D = National Register of Historic Places – District D = California Register of Historical Resources – District

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-13 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-4 ADJACENT BLOCKS NORTH, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

Construction City Structure National Register Name Date Architect (s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Euclid Avenue 1 Proctor Apartments 1912 John Galen Howard 3S 1865 Euclid Avenue Hearst Avenue 1 Stern Hall Corbett & MacMurray 1941 4S Hearst Avenue and William Wurster 2 Smith House (Harris House) 1939 John B. Anthony 6/21/1976 3S 2301 Hearst Avenue/ 2300 Le Conte Avenue 3 Robert H Whetmore House 1923 3S 2323 Hearst Avenue 4 Benjamin Ide Wheeler House and Garden E.A. Mathews 1900 2325-2355 Hearst Avenue 1900 7/15/1985 L. Hobart 1911 1820 Scenic Avenue 5 Beta Theta Pi House (Goldman School of Public Policy) 1893 Ernest Coxhead 11/15/1982 3S 2601-2607 Hearst Avenue 1879 Le Roy Avenue Spruce Street 1 Normandy Village 1781-1851 Spruce Street 1928 William R. Yelland 12/19/1983 3S (except 1815 Spruce Street) Note: Resources in bold text are University-owned.

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-14 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-5 ADJACENT BLOCKS WEST, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

Construction National State Name Date Architect(s) Recognition Date Designation Code Addison Street 1 Studio Building 1905 F.H. Dakin 4/6/1978 N R 2107 Addison / 2037-45 Shattuck Avenue Bancroft Way 1 Masonic Temple/Crocker Bank (Berkeley Conference Center) 1905 William Wharff 7/15/1982 N 2105 Bancroft Way / 2295 Shattuck Avenue Shattuck Avenue 1 Tupper & Reed Building 1925 William R. Yelland 1/21/1982 N R 2271-75 Shattuck Avenue Notes: National Designation: State Codes: N =National Register of Historic Places R = California Register of Historical Resources (National Register Status Codes 1 or 2) L = National Historic Landmark L = State Historic Landmark D = National Register of Historic Places – District D = California Register of Historical Resources – District

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-15 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-6 ADJACENT BLOCKS WEST, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (S) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Addison Street 1 Mobilia Furniture Building (aka The Mason-McDuffie Company Building) 1928 Walter Ratcliff, Jr. 1/21/1985 3S 2104 Addison, 2101 Shattuck Avenue 2 Underwood Building 1905 F.E. Armstrong 11/01/93 3S 2110 -14 Addison 3 Terminal Place 1906 4S 2113 Addison Street 4 Heywood Apts 1906 3S 2119 Addison Street 5 Stadium Garage, Stadium Body Shop 1925 3S 3020 Addison Street Allston Way 1 Berkeley Farms Creamery, Red Cross (demolished) 1924 4S 2116 Allston Way 2 Lederer, Street, and Zeus Building 1938 4S 2121 Allston Way 3 YWCA 1938 Edwin Lewis Snyder 1/6/1992 3S 2134 Allston Way 4 William Such Building/ Oxford Hall 2175 -9 Allston Way 1906 George Mohr 8/17/1981 3S 2140-50 Oxford Street Bancroft Way 1 Waste & Clark Apts. 1913 Walter Ratcliff, Jr. 4/12/1993 3S 2126 Bancroft Way 2 Odd Fellows Temple 1926 James Plachek 1/20/1982 3S 2177-99 Bancroft Way, 2280-88 Fulton Street Berkeley Way 1 Richfield Oil Co. (University Garage) 1930 Walter Ratcliff, Jr. 12/21/1981 3S 2180-2198 Berkeley Way, 1952-1957 Oxford Street

4.4-16 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-6 ADJACENT BLOCKS WEST, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (S) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Center Street 1 Mikkelsen & Berry Building 1902 Stone & Smith 12/19/1983 2124-26 Center Street 2 Thomas Black Bldg, La Loma Apts 1904 3S 2132 Center Street 3 Enwor’s Restaurant, Act One/Act Two 1923 4S 2138 Center Street 4 Globe Stamp Store 1902 3S 2146 Center Street Durant Avenue 1 Bishop Photo Studio 1939 Carl Fox 7/21/1986 2125 Durant Avenue Fulton Street 1 3 Houses For Charles Finney 1899 3S 2142, 2144, 2146 Fulton Street Kittredge Street 1 Fox California, T & D Theatre (Currently Called The California Theater) 1914 3S 2113 Kittredge Street 2 A.H. Broad House And Storefronts 2117-2119 Kittredge Street (House – 1894; 1894 & 1928 A.H. Broad 10/1/01 3S Storefronts – 1928) 3 Robert Elder House, Morgan And Agost. 1895 3S 2125 Kittredge Street 4 John C Fitzpatrick House 1904 3S 2138 Kittredge Street Oxford Street 1 UC Printing Department 1939 3S 2120 Oxford

4.4-17 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-6 ADJACENT BLOCKS WEST, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (S) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Shattuck Avenue 1 MacFarlane Building/ U.S. Realty Co. 1925 Earle Bertz 9/15/1986 3S 1987-1979 Shattuck Avenue, 2101-2109 University 2 University and Shattuck Store Bldg 1909 3S 2001 Shattuck Avenue 3 Chase Building 1909 William Wharff 1/3/2000 2107-2111 Shattuck Avenue 4 Blums Flower Shop 1906 4S 2151 Shattuck Avenue 5 F W Foss Co., Martinos Restaurant 1895 3S 2177 Shattuck Avenue 6 Samson Market, Central Bank 1922 4S 2187 Shattuck Avenue 7 Hinkel Block, Havens Block 1895 3S 2201 Shattuck Avenue 8 Radstons Stationary, Alko Office 1913 3S 2225 Shattuck Avenue 9 Brooks Apts, Amherst Hotel 1906 3S 2231 Shattuck Avenue 10 Wanger Block, Blue & Gold Market 1903 4S 2257 Shattuck Avenue. 11 Capdevilles University 1904 4S 2281 Shattuck Avenue 12 Fidelity Savings Building 1925/ Walter Ratcliff, Jr./ 10/17/1983 3S 2323 Shattuck Avenue 1926 Walter Sorensen University Avenue 1 Acheson Physician's Building 1908 George Mohr 1/7/1983 3S 2125-2135 University Avenue 2 Sills, Berkeley Hardware Store 1915 3S 2139 University Avenue

4.4-18 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-6 ADJACENT BLOCKS WEST, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (S) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Walnut Street 1 Apartment House For William Heywood 1909 3S 1907 Walnut Street 2 1922 Walnut Street 1905 Unknown 3S 3 1925 Walnut Street 1905 Unknown 3S 4 1930 Walnut Street 1905 Unknown 3S Note: Resources in bold text are University-owned. Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-19 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-7 ADJACENT BLOCKS SOUTH, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

Construction National State Name Date Architect(s) Recognition Date Designation Code Bancroft Way 1 College Women's Club 1928 Walter Steilberg 1/21/1982 2680 Bancroft Way Durant Avenue 1 Berkeley Women’s City Club 10/28/1977 1929 Julia Morgan L 2315 Durant Avenue (City Only) Piedmont Avenue 1 Public-right-of-way between Gayley Road 1864 Frederick Law Olmstead 5/26/1989 L and Dwight Way, Piedmont Avenue Notes: National Designation: State Codes: N =National Register of Historic Places R = California Register of Historical Resources (National Register Status Codes 1 or 2) L = National Historic Landmark L = State Historic Landmark D = National Register of Historic Places – District D = California Register of Historical Resources – District

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-20 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-8 ADJACENT BLOCKS SOUTH, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect(s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Bancroft Way 1 St. Mark’s Episcopal Church 1901 William Curtlett 3S 2300 Bancroft Way 2 Gray Gables, Canterbury Foundation 1902 Unknown. 3S 2346 Bancroft Way 3 Stiles Hall 1949 4S 2400 Bancroft Way 4 Campus Theatre, Fox Campus Theatre 1925 4S 2434 Bancroft Way 5 Fred Turner Building 1940 Julia Morgan 12/21/1981 3S 2546-54 Bancroft Way 6 University Art Museum (Berkeley Art Museum) 1968 Mario J. Ciampi 3S 2626 Bancroft Way 7 Westminster House and Grounds 1926 Walter H. Ratcliff, Jr. 4/3/2000 3S 2700 Bancroft Way 8 Richard A. Clark House, Davis House 1913 Unknown. 3S 2833 Bancroft Way Bowditch Street 1 Christian Science Building 1933 Unknown. 3S 2315 Bowditch Street Durant Avenue 1 Cornelius Beach Bradley House 1895 Edgar A. Mathews 11/3/1997 3S 2639 Durant Avenue 2 P H Atkingon House 1908 Bernard Maybeck 3S 2735 Durant Avenue Piedmont Avenue 1 International House 1928 George W. Kelham 3S Piedmont Avenue 2 California Memorial Stadium 1923 John Galen Howard 3S Piedmont Avenue

4.4-21 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-8 ADJACENT BLOCKS SOUTH, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect(s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Telegraph Avenue 1 El Granada The Granada Apartments 1905 Myers and Ward 3S 2301 Telegraph Avenue 2 Hotel Carlton 1906 Unknown 3S 2328 Telegraph Avenue

Note: Resources in bold text are University-owned. Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-22 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-9 SOUTHSIDE, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

Construction National State Name Date Architect (s) Recognition Date Designation Code Bancroft Way 1 Thorsen, William R., House (Sigma Phi Fraternity) 1909 Greene & Greene 11/20/1978 N 2806 Bancroft Way / 2307 Piedmont Avenue Bowditch Street 1 Anna Head School for Girls 2410-20 Bowditch St / 2538 Channing Way, C Soule Edgar Fisher/ 1892-1927 8/11/1980 N 2538A Channing Way D/2536 Channing Way E Walter Ratcliff, Jr. 2536A Channing Way, F / 2527-47 Haste Street Dwight Way 1 First Church of Christ, Scientist 1910 Bernard Maybeck 12/22/1977 N R 2619 Dwight Way Piedmont Avenue 1 California Schools for the Deaf and Blind (State Asylum for the Deaf, Dumb and Blind) 1914-59 Office of the State Architect 10/14/1982 N (Clark-Kerr Campus) 2951-3001 Derby Street / 2601 Warring Street Notes: Resources in bold text are University-owned. National Designation: State Codes: N =National Register of Historic Places R = California Register of Historical Resources (National Register Status Codes 1 or 2) L = National Historic Landmark L = State Historic Landmark D = National Register of Historic Places – District D = California Register of Historical Resources – District

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-23 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-10 SOUTHSIDE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction DateArchitect(s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Bowditch Street 1 B Carrington House (relocated to 1029 Addison) 1893 Seth Babson 3S 2323 Bowditch Street 2 Rose Berteaux Cottage (“Fox Cottage”) 1930 Carl Fox 6/7/1999 3S 2350 Bowditch (relocated from Channing Way) 3 People's Park 2448 Bowditch Street, 2551 Dwight Way, 1969 11/19/1984 3S 2526 Haste Street Channing Way 1 J & C Luttrell House 1889 3S 2328 Channing Way 2 2515 Channing Way Walter H. Ratcliff 9/13/1999 3 Epworth Hall James L. Plachek 9/13/1999 2521 Channing Way 4 Samuel Davis House 1899 William Mooser and Son 2/27/1984 3S 2547 Channing Way 5 Channing House 1890 3S 2721 Channing Way 6 Dr. J. Knox House 1908 3S 2725 Channing Way 7 Dr. Sherrel W Hall House, Fraternity 1911 4S 2728 Channing Way 8 Hearst Hall Site, Gamma Phi Beta 1899 4S 2732 Channing Way 9 William E. Colby House 1905 Julia Morgan 7/15/1985 3S 2901 Channing Way

4.4-24 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-10 SOUTHSIDE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction DateArchitect(s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code College Avenue 1 Yummers, Espresso Experience (Café Strada) 1969 3S 2300 College Avenue 2 Alma A Smith House 1905 3S 2310 College Avenue 3 Channing Apartments 1913 3S 2409 College Avenue Dana Street 1 James A Squire House 1892 3S 2400 Dana Street 2 Seneca Gale House 1895 3S 2446 Dana Street 3 Town & Gown Club 2447 Dana Street 1899 Bernard Maybeck 12/15/1979 2401 Dwight Way Durant Avenue 1 Mary A Helphinstine House (Chief Justice 1891 3S William Waste), 2222 Durant Avenue 2 H J Merritt Apartments 1914 3S 2236 Durant Avenue 3 Marsh House Charles F. Mau & 1891 8/18/1986 3S 2308-10 Durant Avenue James Toohig 4 McCreary-Greer House 1901-02 Unknown 8/18/1986 3S 2318 Durant Avenue 5 Cambridge Apts 1914 3S 2500 Durant Avenue 7 The Brasfield (Beau Sky Hotel) 1911 Shea & Lofquist 9/13/1999 3S 2520 Durant Avenue 8 Blood House 1891 R. Gray Frise 9-13-99 3S 2526 Durant Avenue 4.4-25 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-10 SOUTHSIDE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction DateArchitect(s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code 9 The Albra 1921 Walter H. Ratcliff 9-13-99 2530-34 Durant Avenue 10 Durant Hotel 1928 William Weekes 2-01-93 3S 2600 Durant Avenue 11 U.C. Berkeley Unit 1 (partly demolished) John Carl Warnecke, 2650 Durant Avenue 1957-1959 Lawrence Halprin & 9-11-00 William Wilson Wurster 12 Parsons House, Student Residence 1905 4S 2732 Durant Avenue Dwight Way 1 Nelson S Trowbridge House 1892 3S 2239 Dwight Way 2 James L Barker House 1895 3S 2247 Dwight Way 3 McKinley Elms c. 1903 3S 2419 Dwight Way 4 James Edgar House 1869 Unknown 11-16-81 2437-41 Dwight Way 5 2441 Dwight Way 1880 3S 6 Bishop Berkeley Apts 1928 3S 2709 Dwight Way 7 Paget-Gorrill House, Gorrill House 1891 3S 2727 Dwight Way Fulton Street 1 3 Houses For Charles Finney 1899 3S 2142, 2144, 2146 Fulton Street 2 Federal Land Bank (UC Extension) James Plachek, 1922, 1949 4S 2233 Fulton Street Michael Goodman 3 Odd Fellows Temple 1926 James Plachek 3S 2288 Fulton Street 4.4-26 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-10 SOUTHSIDE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction DateArchitect(s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Haste Street 1 Haste Street Building/McKinley School 1906 A.H. Broad 2-5-96 3S 2419 Haste Street 2 George D Hutchinson Apt 1904 3S 2436 Haste Street 3 Sequoia Apts, Studio Guild Theatre 1916 3S 2441 Haste Street 4 People's Bicentennial Mural 2500 Haste Street 1976 Osha Newman et al. 2/22/1990 2455 Telegraph Avenue 5 The Wooley House 1876 Unknown 10/16/1989 3S 2509 Haste Street 6 Casa Bonita Apartments 1928 John A. Marshall 11/1/1999 3S 2605 Haste Street 7 U.C. Berkeley Unit 2 (partly demolished) John Carl Warnecke; 2650 Haste Street 1957-1960 Lawrence Halprin & 9/11/00 William Wilson Wurster Hillside Avenue 1 Shepard House 1911 3S 2422 Hillside Avenue 2 Ford House, Crocker Hall 1895 3S 2425 Hillside Avenue 3 Prof Geo. M. Stratton House 1901 3S 2434 Hillside Avenue 4 2444 Hillside Avenue 1905 3S

4.4-27 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-10 SOUTHSIDE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction DateArchitect(s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Hillside Court 1 Joseph N. LeConte House 1908 3S 19 Hillside Court Orchard Lane 1 Steilberg Family Home 1922 3S 1 Orchard Lane Panoramic Way 1 Steilburg Cottage 1921 Walter T Steilburg 3S 1 Panoramic Way 2 Clifton Price Apartments 1912 3S 9 Panoramic Way 3 Boke House 1902 Bernard Maybeck 3S 23 Panoramic Way 4 Walter T. Steilburg House 1917 3S 38 Panoramic Way 5 Howard Maise House 1929 3S 69 Panoramic Way 6 Price Apts. 1909 3S 73 Panoramic Way Piedmont Avenue 1 The Lewis Hicks House, Chi Psi Fraternity 1906 3S 2311 Piedmont Avenue 2 George Tasheira House, Fuente House 1914 3S 2336 Piedmont Avenue 3 Gayley House 1905 3S 2378 Piedmont Avenue 4 Phi Gamma Delta House 1928 Frederick Reimers 5/21/1990 3S 2395 Piedmont Avenue

4.4-28 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-10 SOUTHSIDE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City Structure National Register Name Construction DateArchitect(s) City Landmark of Merit Status Code Prospect Street 1 John F. Sims House, Alpha Delta Phi 1893 3S 2422 Prospect Street Telegraph Avenue 1 Public Food Store 1932 3S 2369 Telegraph Avenue 2 Sprouse-Reitz Store, Sunset Theatre 1941 4S 2411 Telegraph Avenue 3 Berkeley Food Center 1933 3S 2455 Telegraph Avenue Warring Street 1 Charles Washington Merrill House 1911 3S 2307 Warring Street 2 The Thomas Olney House, Sigma Pi House 1911 3S 2434 Warring Street Note: Resources in Bold text are owned by the University of California. Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-29 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-11 HILL CAMPUS, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES National Register Name Construction Date Architect(s) City Landmark City Structure of Merit Status Code 1 Charter Hill and the Big C 1905 Classes of 1907 and 1908 3S John W. Gregg, Landscape 2 Botanical Garden 1920-1926 Architect with Thomas 3S Harper Goodspeed

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-30 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-12 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES National Construction Recognition Designa- State Name Date Architect (s) Date tion Codes Addison Street 1 Berkeley Day Nursery – West Berkeley Children's Center / Health Center 1927 Walter H. Ratcliff, Jr. 9/15/1977 N R 829 Addison Street, 2031 6th Street 2 Golden Sheaf Bakery (Annex) 1905 Clinton Day 3/31/1978 N R 2069 -2071 Addison Street Allston Way 1 Old City Hall Annex 1835 Allston Way 1926 James Plachek 11/21/1988 D D (part of the Berkeley Historic Civic Center District) 2 Berkeley High School Community Center William Corlett Sr./ Henry 1930 Allston Way Gutterson (part of the Berkeley Historic Civic Center District) 1937 12/3/98 D D (Jacques Schnier and Robert (also known as the Grove Street Buildings because Martin Howard, Sculptors) Luther King Jr. Way was originally known as Grove Street) 3 Civic Center Park, now called the Martin Luther King Junior Civic Center Park. Henry Gutterson, John Boundaries: Allston Way, Martin Luther King Jr. Way, 1940-42 12/3/1998 D D Gregg Milvia Street, Center Street (part of the Berkeley Historic Civic Center District) 4 Downtown YMCA 2001 Allston Way 1910 Benjamin McDougall 2/20/1990 D D (part of the Berkeley Historic Civic Center District) 5 Berkeley Main Post Office 2004 Allston 1914 Oscar Wenderoth 6/16/1980 D D (part of the Berkeley Historic Civic Center District)

4.4-31 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-12 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES National Construction Recognition Designa- State Name Date Architect (s) Date tion Codes Bancroft Way 1 Corder Bldg./Shattuck Apts. 2048 Bancroft Way 1921 James Plachek 1/11/1982 N R 2300-50 Shattuck Avenue 2047 Durant Avenue Berkeley Square 1 Chamber of Commerce, Kaldor’s Knit 1940 08/19/85 N R 100 Berkeley Square Center Street 1 Veterans Memorial Building 12/03/98 1931 Center Street (National) 1928 Henry H. Meyers D R (part of the Berkeley Historic Civic Center District) 4/15/1988 (City) 2 State Farm Insurance Co Building 12/03/98 1947 Center Street 1947 James Plachek D R (National) (part of the Berkeley Historic Civic Center District) 3 American Trust Building, Wells Fargo 2081 Center Street 1925 Walter Ratcliff, Jr. 08/25/85 N R 2140 Shattuck College Avenue 1 Mercantile Trust Co./Wells Fargo Bank, Elmwood 3/15/1982 1925 Walter Ratcliff, Jr. R 2959 College Avenue (City) Delaware Street 1 802 Delaware Street 12-17-79 Alphonso House (City) 1878 Joseph Alphonso R (originally at 1731-33 Fifth Street) 10/28/77 (State Reg.) Durant Avenue 1 Boone's University School 1880 Unknown 11/1/1982 N R 2029 Durant Avenue

4.4-32 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-12 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES National Construction Recognition Designa- State Name Date Architect (s) Date tion Codes Fifth Street 1 Heywood House, Estrada House 01/01/78 1878 Unknown R 1808 Fifth Street (State Reg.) Fourth Street 1 Heywood Ghego House 6/21/1982 1809 -11 Fourth Street (City) 1877 William Heywood R 10/27/77 (State Reg.) Haste Street 1 Morrill Apts. 5/21/1984 2101 Haste Street (City) 1911 George F. King R 2484-2494 Shattuck Avenue 2/2/96 (State Reg.) Hearst Avenue 1 Davis Harmes House 9/15/1986 1890 C.W. Davis 733 Hearst Avenue (City Only) Hillegass Street 1 Hillegass Site American Baptist Seminary (Smith House and Smith Cottage) 1902-27 Henry Gutterson et al. 1/21/1980 N R (Smith House demolished) 2527-29 Hillegass Kittredge Street 1 Berkeley Public Library 1930 James Plachek 3/19/1982 N R 2090 Kittredge Street

4.4-33 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-12 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES National Construction Recognition Designa- State Name Date Architect (s) Date tion Codes Martin Luther King Jr. Way 1 Civic Center Fountain 2100 Martin Luther King Jr. Way 1938 12/03/98 D D (Part Of The Berkeley Historic Civic Center District) 2 Old City Hall 9/11/1981 2134 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way 1908 Bakewell & Brown 12/03/98 D D (part of the Berkeley Historic Civic Center District) (District) Sixth Street 1 Andrews House 6/15/1992 1812 Sixth Street (City) 1880 Unknown R 3/19/86 (State Reg.) University Avenue 1 Fox Court 1928-30 Fox Brothers 2/4/1982 N R 1472-78 University Avenue 2 UC Theater 5/6/2002 1916 James Plachek 2018-2036 University Avenue (City Only) 3 2054 University Avenue 2/2/01 (State – – R Only) Notes: National Designation: State Codes: N =National Register of Historic Places R = California Register of Historical Resources (National Register Status Codes 1 or 2) L = National Historic Landmark L = State Historic Landmark D = National Register of Historic Places – District D = California Register of Historical Resources – District

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-34 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code Addison Street 1 Manuel Silva House 1886 3S 743 Addison Street 2 Joseph Mcvey House, Hoppe/Glosser 1892 3S 814 Addison Street 3 Edward Mcvey House, Bay House 1890 3S 816 Addison Street 4 Charles Foster House 1878 3S 828 Addison Street 5 Carrington House 1893 Seth Babson & R. Wenk 3/15/82 1029 Addison Street (Moved From 2323 Bowditch Street) 6 Framat Lodge Sanford G. Jackson/ 1927 4/7/1997 1900 Addison Street Sommarstrom Bros. 7 National Guard Armory, Barney’s Gen. 1915 3S 1950 Addison Street 8 American Railway Express, Swedberg 1895 3S 2070 Addison Street Adeline Street 1 Frederick H. Dakin Warehouse 1906 3S 2750 Adeline Street 2 Hull & Durgin Funeral Chapel 1922 3S 3031 Adeline Street 3 T. M. Lukes Nicklelodeon 1909 4S 3192 Adeline Street 4 Carlson's Block 1903 William Wharff/ C. Eckman 7/19/1982 3S 3228 -3230 Adeline Street 5 India Block 3250 -52 Adeline 1903 A.W. Smith 7/19/1982 3S 1820-22 Harmon Street 6 Wells Fargo Bank, South Berkeley Bank John Galen Howard/ John Debo 1906 7/19/1982 3S 3286 -90 Adeline Street Galloway

4.4-35 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code Allston Way 1 Elks Club 1913 Walter H. Ratcliff, Jr. 10/7/1991 3S 2018 Allston Way 2 Shattuck Hotel/Hink's 2068 -2070 Allston Way 1909-13 Benjamin McDougall 5/16/1983 2060 Kittredge 2200-2240 Shattuck Avenue Ashby Avenue 1 Webb Bldg., Hudson Antiques 1905 3S 1985 Ashby Avenue Ashby Place 1 Mrs. C.L. Goddard House 1908 3S 2733 Ashby Place Bancroft Way 1 Pasand Hotel/Donogh Arms/Morse Block 2037-43 Bancroft Way 1906 Dickey & Reed 6/18/1979 3S 2276-86 Shattuck Avenue Benvenue 1 Ayers House 1899 Unknown/ pos. Arthur Ayers 6/18/1990 3S 2528 Benvenue Avenue 2 Charles John Dickman House 1894 3S 2555 Benvenue 3 Woodsum House 1907 3S 2933 Benvenue Avenue Berkeley Square 1 124 Berkeley Square 1938 3S 2 Southern Pacific Office 1938 4S 134 Berkeley Square

4.4-36 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code Berkeley Way 1 George Morgan 1904 3S 2053 Berkeley Way Blake Street 1 Haney Ice Co. 1910 4S 2015 Blake Street Bonita Avenue 1 Anton A. Fink House 1891 3S 1901 Bonita Avenue Center Street 1 Chamber Of Commerce Bldg., Wells Fargo 1925 3S 2081 Center Street Channing Way 1 Avansino House 1893 3S 1940 Channing Way Claremont Avenue 1 John Muir School 1915 James Plachek 7/18/1983 3S 2955 Claremont Avenue College Avenue 1 O. J. Bettis House 1890 3S 2530 College Avenue 2 Strand Theater/Elmwood Theater 1914 Albert Cornelius 5/24/1982 3S 2966 College Avenue Durant Avenue 1 Howard Automobile Co./Maggini Chevrolet Building 2136-40 Durant Avenue 1930 Frederick H. Reimers 10/17/1983 3S 2236 Fulton Street

4.4-37 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code Dwight Way 1 Barker Building 2033-49 Dwight Way 1905 A. W. Smith 1/16/1978 2484-94 Shattuck Avenue 2 Williamson Building 1905 George L. Mohr 2/25/1991 3S 2120-24 Dwight Way 3 Williams Building 1902 George L. Mohr 2/24/1991 2126-28 Dwight Way 4 Davis-Byrne Building 1895 Remodeled by George L. Mohr 2/25/1991 2134-40 Dwight Way 5 Hutton House, Woolsey House 1885 3S 2244 Dwight Way 6 Alta Bates/Benjamin Ferris House 1880 Unknown 1/26/1987 3S 2314 Dwight Way 7 Stuart House 1891 Pissis and Moore 9/13/1999 3S 2524 Dwight Way 8 George Edwards House (relocated to adjacent lot) 1886 A.H. Broad 4/6/1998 2530 Dwight Way 9 Baptist Divinity School/Hobart Hall 1918-21 Julia Morgan 9/8/1998 3S 2600-06 Dwight Way 10 Charles Wilkinson House 1876 Clinton Day 2/6/1995 3S 2730 Dwight Way Eighth Street 1 1940 Eighth Street 1875 Unknown 11/18/1985 915-921 University Avenue 2 W Berkeley College Settlement 1895 3S 2015 Eighth Street 3 George Durrell House 1890 3S 2028 Eighth Street

4.4-38 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code 4 Kawneer Manufacturing Co. 2547 Eighth Street 1913 C.H. Miller, Alben Frober 7/21/1988 927 Parker Street Etna Street 1 Albert Derge House 1908 3S 2514 Etna Street 2 Cedric Wright House 1921 3S 2515 Etna Street 3 Reverend Holmes Cottage 1906 3S 2525 Etna Street 4 2531 Etna Street 1908 3S Fifth Street 1 Haller/Dowd House, Stephens House 1886 3S 2105 Fifth Street 2 W Berkeley News, Manning House 1886 3S 2107 Fifth Street 3 Velasca House, Kennedy House 1878 3S 2109 Fifth Street 4 Mrs. Sanchez House 1895 3S 2117 Fifth Street 5 Charles Spear House 1888 3S 2212 Fifth Street Fulton Street 1 Northern Bertha Bosse Cottage 1884 Vietch & Knowles 6/2/2003 3S 2424 Fulton Street 2 Southern Bertha Bosse Cottage 1884 Vietch & Knowles 6/2/2003 3S 2424 Fulton Street 3 Kueffer House 1891 Unknown 5/5/2003 2340 Fulton Street

4.4-39 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code Harold Way 1 Armstrong College 1923 Walter Ratcliff, Jr. 9/6/94 2222 Harold Way Haste Street 1 Monroe C Hamlin House 1892 3S 1920 Haste Street

Hazel Road 1 W E Chamberlin House 1923 3S 8 Hazel Rd. Hearst Avenue 1 Davis Harmes House 1890 C.W. Davis 9/15/1986 3S 733 Hearst Avenue 2 Albert Ferreira House, Mr. Kahns House 1880 3S 809 Hearst Avenue 3 Antonio Brown House 1875 4S 815 Hearst Avenue Hillegass Avenue 1 2501-21 Hillegass 1919-21 Julia Morgan, et al. 2/1/1999 2 Miss Eleanor M. Smith House 1927 Henry Higby Gutterson 3S 2527 Hillegass Avenue Lincoln Street 1 Whittier School 2022 Lincoln Street Dragon, Officer, Hardman, 6/25/1984 1939 2015 Virginia Schmidts 1645 Milvia Street Le Conte Avenue 1 Harris House 1939 John B. Anthony 3S 2300 Le Conte Street 2 Delta Zeta Sorority 1923 4S 2311 Le Conte Street

4.4-40 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code 3 Warren T Clarke House 1912 3S 2317 Le Conte Street 4 Phoebe Hearst House 1900 3S 2368 Le Conte Street Milvia Street 1 Wheeler Manufacturing Co. (demolished) 1926 3S 2115 Milvia Street 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center Building 4/15/1985 1938 James Plachek (Formerly Federal Land Bank) 2180 Milvia Street Newbury Street 1 Mary Keon House 1891 3S 2905 Newbury Street 2 Mathew Lee House 3S 1889 2911 Newbury Street Ninth Street 1 Lodovico Rosano House And Store 1890 3S 2028 Ninth Street Ridge Road 1 Adolf Miller House, Ridge House 1906 4S 2420 Ridge Road 2 Treehaven 1910 3S 2523 Ridge Road Russell Street 1 Claremont Ct. Gates 1907 3S Russell Street 2 Lois W. Walcott House 1909 3S 2638 Russell Street San Pablo Avenue 1 Rivoli Theatre, 1926 4S 1931 San Pablo Avenue 4.4-41 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code 2 Weisbrod Building (Guys Drugs) 2001 San Pablo Avenue 1930 Spiveck & Spiveck 7-15-85 1102-06 University Avenue 3 Varsity Theatre, Waynes Donut Shop 1911 3S 2072 San Pablo Avenue 4 Petersons Saloon 1891 3S 2400 San Pablo Avenue Shattuck Avenue 1 Lucky Store (Long’s Drugs) 1947 3S 1451 Shattuck Avenue 2 Swink House, Cottage And Garden 1903 & 1905 James L. Swink 5-1-00 1525-29 Shattuck Avenue 3 Plachek Building (Also Known as The Heywood Building) 1917 James Plachek 4/12/1993 3S 2014 Shattuck Avenue 4 Kress Store 1933 Edward F. Sibbert 4/20/1981 3S 2036-2040 Shattuck Avenue 5 Francis K. Shattuck 1901 Louis Stone/ Henry Smith 2/6/1995 3S 2100 Shattuck Avenue 6 Roy O Long Co Morse –Brock Bldg 1927 3S 2122 Shattuck Avenue 7 1st Savings Bldg Great Western Bldg 1969 3S 2150 Shattuck Avenue 8 Havens Block, Constitution Square 1906 4S 2168 Shattuck Avenue 9 Homestead Loan Association Building 1905 3S 2270 Shattuck Avenue 10 United Artists Theatre 1932 3S 2274 Shattuck Avenue

4.4-42 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code 11 John K Stewart Bldg Yellow House 1890 3S 2377 Shattuck Avenue 12 Fujikawa & Chun Optometry 1946 4S 2414 Shattuck Avenue 13 Berkeley Theatre 1911 3S 2425 Shattuck Avenue 14 Barker Bldg 1905 A. W. Smith 3S 2486 Shattuck Avenue 15 The Halls or Washing Well 1894 3S 2528 Shattuck Avenue 16 Berkeley Bowl 1940 4S 2777 Shattuck Avenue Shattuck Square 1 14,22,24,37,38,39,40,4143,44,48 Shattuck Square Timothy Pflueger & 1926 2/27/198 3S (48 Shattuck Square, Palmers is on the State Inventory) James Miller 2 63, 64 Shattuck Square, Roos Bros. Building Timothy Pflueger & 1926 10/20/80 3S (64 Shattuck Square is on the State Inventory) James Miller 3 1,17,11,15,81,82,85,87,98 Shattuck Square 2/27/198 3S (82 Shattuck Square, Watkins Shoe is on the State Inventory) Seventh Street 1 Library Hall / 7th Street School 1879 3S 2016 Seventh Street Telegraph Avenue 1 Mrs. E P King House 1901 3S 2501 Telegraph Avenue 2 British Motor Car Sales And Service 1950 3S 2539 Telegraph Avenue 3 Gorman's Furniture Store 12/4/2000 2597-2599 Telegraph Avenue 4 John Albert Marshall House #3 1900 C M Cook 3S 2740 Telegraph Avenue 4.4-43 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code 5 John Albert Marshall House #4 1905 John Marshall 3S 2744 Telegraph Avenue 6 Concrete Grid Forms Co, Scandinavia 1938 3S 3075 Telegraph Avenue 7 Edlington Court 1910 3S 3120 Telegraph Avenue Tenth Street 1 West Berkeley YWCA 1939 Walter H. Ratcliff, Jr. 1/6/92 2009 Tenth Street 2 August Peterson House 1882 3S 2010 10th Street University Avenue 1 Southern Pacific Railroad Station Southern Pacific RR 1913 3/5/2001 3S 700 University Avenue architectural bureau 2 Semerias Dry Goods 1878 3S 982 University Avenue 3 West University Branch Library 1923 Roy O. Long 5/5/2003 1125 University Avenue 4 Santa Fe Railway Station 1904 Charles Frederick Whittlesey 9/10/2001 3S 1310 University Avenue 5 Fox Commons 1670: 1931 1670-1676 University Avenue 1672: 1940 Fox Brothers 12/7/1998 1674-6: 1983 6 Elizabeth M Kenney Cottage (relocated) 1887 William H. Wrigley 2/5/2001 1719-1725 University Avenue 7 Bonita Apartments 1905 George Mohr 1/15/1979 3S 1940-44 University Avenue 8 Bertin Properties 1922 John Bartlett 6/2/2003 1952 University Avenue 9 Bertin Properties 1923 Harry C. Smith 6/2/2003 1960 University Avenue

4.4-44 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-13 LRDP HOUSING ZONE, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES

City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect (s) Landmark of Merit Status Code 10 UC Theater 1916 James Plachek 5/6/2002 3S 2018-2036 University Avenue 11 Nash Hotel 1923 3S 2041 University Avenue 12 Joseph Davis Bldg (The Victoria) 1905 3S 2044 University Avenue 13 Koerber Bldg, State Farm Bldg 1923 3S 2050 University Avenue Vine Street 1 Squires Block 1895 3S 2100 Vine Street 2 EBMUD Vine Street Pumping Plant 1930 A.J. Calleri/Arthur Johnson 7/18/1983 2113 Vine Street Walnut Street 1 Hanscom House 1875 3S 1525 Walnut Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-45 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-14 OAKLAND, PRIMARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES Recognition National State Name Construction Date Architect(s) Date Codes Codes Martin Luther King Jr Way

University High School 1 7/19/94 N R 5714 Martin Luther King Jr Way

Telegraph Avenue

Carnegie Library: Temescal Branch 1 1918 Donavan and Dickey 11/4/80 N R 5205 Telegraph Ave

Notes: National Codes: State Codes: N =National Register of Historic Places R = California Register of Historical Resources (National Register Status Codes 1 or 2) L = National Historic Landmark L = State Historic Landmark D = National Register of Historic Places – District D = California Register of Historical Resources – District

Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-46 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TABLE 4.4-15 OAKLAND, SECONDARY HISTORICAL RESOURCES City City Structure National Register Name Construction Date Architect(s) Landmark of Merit Status Code 49th Street 1 Mouser House 1892 3S 449 49th Street Martin Luther King Jr. Way 1 Sacred Heart Church - 4X 4001 Martin Luther King Jr. Way Ocean View Avenue 1 5605 Ocean View Avenue 5609 Ocean View Avenue - 3D 5613 Ocean View Avenue 5617 Ocean View Avenue Telegraph Avenue 1 Bank of Italy 5S 4881 Telegraph Avenue 2 Gunnings Saloon Building, Hotel Ald 1889 3S 4904 Telegraph Avenue 3 Cattaneo Block Buon Gusto Bakery - 9/6/1983 3S 5006-5010 Telegraph Avenue Source: Page and Turnbull, 2003.

4.4-47 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

TIEN CENTER The Chang-Lin Tien Center for East Asian Studies is a two-phased project for which only the first phase is currently designed and scheduled for Regents’ approval. Phase 1 would be located at the south base of Observatory Hill, directly across Memorial Glade from Doe Library, between Haviland Hall and McCone Hall. Phase 2 would be located at the west base of Observatory Hill, adjacent to Haviland Hall. Three National Register buildings are located in the Tien Center vicinity: Haviland Hall, Doe Memorial Library, and North Gate Hall. The site of the Leuschner (or Students’) Observatory on Observa- tory Hill, and the Dawn Redwoods adjacent to McCone Hall, are Secondary Historical Resources.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL & PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section describes archaeological and paleontological resources in the 2020 LRDP planning area. It begins with an explanation of the difference between archeological and paleontological resources and then discusses the presence of these resources in each of the 2020 LRDP land use zones.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Archeological resources are the physical evidence of past human activity, including evidence of the effects of that activity on the environment. Archeological resources repre- sent both prehistoric and historic time periods. They are found above and below ground and under water. Examples of prehistoric archeological resources include cliff dwellings, petroglyphs, surface scatters of pottery fragments and chipped stone, and campsites. Examples of historic archeological resources include archeological components of historic structures, battlefields, mining camps, forts and shipwrecks.11

Standard definitions of historic significance are found in the California Register of His- torical Resources and the National Register of Historic Places. The California Register generally addresses historic resources that are over 50 years old, but also notes that “a resource less than fifty years old may be considered for listing in the California Register if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance.” Listing on the National Register can be achieved for “a property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance.”12

All human development can produce culturally valued art, artifacts and architecture that represents the current era in human development. Archaeological value cannot easily be defined by age -- a significant building may have been built, then demolished or acciden- tally destroyed after only ten years -- yet its remains and footprint may have archaeological meaning to future generations.

PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES Paleontological resources (fossils/fossilized footprints) are the remains or traces of prehistoric plants and animals. Fossils are important scientific and educational resources because they furnish information about the kinds of animals and plants that existed, when they appeared and vanished, where and how they lived, and the type of environments they preferred. Fossils help us learn how species evolved, how some descended from others, and how groups of organisms are related.13

4.4-48 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

CAMPUS PARK Two prehistoric archaeological resources have been identified within the Campus Park planning area near the south fork of Strawberry Creek. These consist of a burial and habitation site found during trenching operations for the Faculty Club in 1907. Addi- tional prehistoric archaeological sites are most likely to be found along the north and south forks of Strawberry Creek, and along the previous course of Mining Circle Creek which once traversed the Campus Park area.

Historic-era (post 1860s) artifacts have also been discovered in the Campus Park, including buried foundations of early University buildings and private residences on sites now part of the campus, utility and landscape structures, and a variety of household and workplace objects. These discoveries have typically occurred at sites where previous buildings and facilities were demolished prior to the middle of the 20th century and have not been built on since.14

Eight historic archaeological sites are known to exist in the Campus Park, and, based upon historic maps, nine additional sites may exist. The known sites include remnants of 19th Century campus buildings including East Hall, Birge Hall, and the 1890s Philosophy Building; and an area scattered with chipped stone where UC students and faculty prac- ticed stone tool making, apparently over a long time period. Additional remnants of historic buildings and features could exist at the following locations within the Campus Park Planning Area: the previous site of 19th century greenhouses, a site used previously for artillery equipment storage by the Cadet Corps in the early 19th century, the previous location of late 19th century residences and 1870s student residences, the previous location of World War I and World War II temporary buildings, and at the previous site of an old mining building. Further, any campus structure 50 years or older may have associated archaeological deposits.

No paleontological resources are known to exist in the Campus Park. However, it is possible that excavations within previously undisturbed areas that contain Quaternary alluvium could encounter limited fossils. An exception is in the northeast corner of the planning area, between the Earth Sciences Building and Hearst Mining Circle, and between Hearst Mining Circle and the Hayward Fault, which is underlain by unfossiliferous geologic units.15

ADJACENT BLOCKS Prehistoric archaeological sites have been recorded in the Adjacent Blocks areas. One of these sites consists of a human burial recovered from the Adjacent Blocks West area in the 1950s during ground clearing activities near Strawberry Creek. The other site also consisted of a human burial that was encountered in the Adjacent Blocks North area during construction of Memorial Stadium in 1925. Given the long development history of the adjacent blocks, the likelihood of any significant prehistoric archaeological resources remaining intact is slim, except in areas close to Strawberry Creek. The most likely locations for such resources are in the Northside area and the central portion of the Westside area, adjacent to Strawberry and Mining Circle Creeks.

There are no known historic archaeological resources in the adjacent blocks area. How- ever, historic-era (post 1860s) resources may remain at some sites, given the area's nearly 150 years of continuous use for urban settlement and habitation. When buildings and

4.4-49 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES facilities were demolished prior to the mid-20th century, it appears to have been com- mon practice for building foundations and other traces of use to be buried and covered over, rather than removed from a site. Such historic-era archaeological remnants may still remain if they are not on sites that have since been deeply excavated or otherwise disturbed in more recent decades.16

In the Northside area, the remnants of a late 19th century Roman Catholic student center could exist. In the Westside there is a low to moderate potential for the presence of intact remnants of private residences and associated features. The South Shattuck area is considered to have a moderate potential for the existence of such resources.

No paleontological resources are known to exist within the adjacent area; however, based upon local geology, it is possible that excavations within previously undisturbed areas that contain Quaternary alluvium could encounter limited fossils.

SOUTHSIDE There are no known prehistoric archaeological resources in the Southside.17 The most likely locations for such resources is along the previous course of Derby Creek, which traversed the extreme eastern portion of the Southside area.

The Southside neighborhood encompasses east Berkeley's earliest historic-era settlements, including neighborhoods platted for development in the 1860s by the private College of California, and numerous sites where 19th century homes, commercial and institutional buildings, and associated structures and facilities stood. Where such buildings were demolished prior to the mid-20th century, buried remnants--including foundations, basements, trash pits, wells, and other artifacts--may remain.18

No historic archaeological resources are known to exist in the Southside area, but based upon historic maps, at least seven potential resource locations have been identified. These consist of the locations of the grounds of a 19th century private estate, the site of private residences that were demolished in the 1950s and 1960s, the Anna Head property where a school was situated, the location of the old McKinley School, and the previous locations of buildings and associated features of the School for the Deaf and Blind on the current site of the Clark Kerr Campus.

No paleontological resources are known to exist within the adjacent area, however, based upon local geology, it is possible that excavations within previously undisturbed areas that contain Quaternary alluvium could encounter limited fossils.

HILL CAMPUS The Hill Campus encompasses a large part of the Strawberry Creek watershed. As a majority of prehistoric sites in the hill areas of Alameda County have been found along seasonal and perennial watercourses, the banks of Strawberry and Claremont creeks, and the previous course of Mining Circle Creek are considered the most likely locations for prehistoric archaeological resources.

In the early decades of the historic era, the Hill Campus was used for grazing, dairying, and other agricultural and research activities as well as recreation. 19th century water systems were constructed to supply the campus. Scattered structures were erected and

4.4-50 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES sites developed. In some cases physical remnants of these facilities and uses may remain.19 Two historic petroglyph sites have been identified in the canyons of the Hill Campus, and remnants of a barbed wire fence and a cadastral or property line marker have been recorded in this area. Three potential resource locations have been identified in the southwest portion of the area. These are the previous location of the campus poultry husbandry facilities, and the previous location of an early 20th century corporation yard, and at the location of a 1920s dumping site.

No known paleontological resources exist in the Hill Area, and there is a low potential for the occurrence of such resources in the majority of the area, which is underlain by Cretaceous age sandstones and siltstones. An exception is in the northcentral portion of this area where the Orinda Formation could yield scientifically important Miocene aged fossil mammals.

LRDP HOUSING ZONE Archaeological sites have been discovered within one-half mile of the Campus Park.20 Paleontological resources, such as mastodon teeth and fossilized shellfish and plants, have been located in the East Bay Hills. Native American remains have been found in several places in Oakland.21 Evidence suggests that the East Bay was populated by Na- tive American tribes as long ago as 3,500 BC, and that they mainly lived in settlements along shorelines and creeks.22 Thus, the greatest potential for subsurface prehistoric archaeological resources in the LRDP Housing Zone exists near seasonal and perennial watercourses.

During the historic era, from the 1850s onward, many of the sites within the LRDP Housing Zone were initially developed with farms, residences and early commercial or industrial structures. Private rail transit systems served many of these areas. As urbaniza- tion intensified, most original structures were later demolished or obscured by succes- sive eras of development, primarily auto-oriented commercial facilities along major transportation corridors. However, remnants of the original facilities and other early historic-era activities--such as trash burials from the period prior to centralized refuse collection services--may remain.23

TIEN CENTER Based upon a review of historic maps of the Tien Center project site, it was determined that a high potential existed for the presence of subsurface architectural remnants of the campus’ astronomical observatory complex that was constructed in the 1880s and demolished in the early 1970s, and a conservatory building constructed in the 1890s for use by the Agriculture Department and demolished in 1925-26.

To determine the presence and potential significance of any historic archaeological remains that might exist at the site, a test excavation was conducted by faculty and staff of the Campus Archaeological Research Facility in June 2003 as a field course in archaeology field methods. Only sparse remnants of the Student’s Observatory foundation were found. Test excavations revealed the front extent of the conservatory foundation, and intact associated materials were located. Initial testing indicates that the accessible portion of this site is well preserved. The remnants of the Conservatory may qualify for listing on the CRHR.

4.4-51 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

The site of the proposed Tien Center is not located in an area considered to have a high potential for the presence of prehistoric archaeological resources, and such resources were not encountered during recent archaeological test excavations conducted at the site. It is therefore concluded that prehistoric archaeological resources are not present at the site.

The site of the proposed Tien Center is underlain by Cretaceous age sandstone and silt- stones24, which have a low potential to yield paleontological resources. Therefore, it is unlikely that paleontological resources are present at the site.

4.4.5 STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE

The significance of the potential impacts of the 2020 LRDP and Tien Center on cultural resources was determined based on the following standards:

Standard: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CCR Section 15064.5?

Standard: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CCR Section 15064.5?

Standard: Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource, or site, or unique geologic feature?

Standard: Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?

4.4.6 POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GUIDING FUTURE PROJECTS

This section describes existing policies and procedures that would help to minimize cultural resource impacts of development under the 2020 LRDP. It discusses both the policies in the 2020 LRDP itself and other University agreements affecting cultural resources.

2020 LRDP In recognition of the fact that more than a third of UC Berkeley buildings are over 50 years old and thus potentially eligible for the National Register, the 2020 LRDP includes several objectives that seek to protect potential historic resources for future generations. These include the following:

Plan every new project as a model of resource conservation and environmental stewardship. Maintain and enhance the image and experience of the campus, and preserve our historic legacy of landscape and architecture. Plan every new project to respect and enhance the character, livability, and cultural vitality of our city environs.

The 2020 LRDP would support these objectives by ensuring future Campus Park projects conform to the Campus Park Guidelines, which include special provisions to protect significant landscape and open space features, and to preserve and enhance the in-

4.4-52 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES tegrity of the classical core. For projects in the City Environs, the 2020 LRDP would con- tinue the existing UC Berkeley practice of presenting all major City Environs projects to the relevant city planning commission and landmarks commission for information and comment, prior to schematic design review by the UC Berkeley Design Review Committee.

CAMPUS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SITE ANALYSIS For major landscape alterations, building alterations and new buildings, UC Berkeley staff undertake a detailed site analysis before conceptual design begins. This analysis includes consideration of historic buildings and landscapes, including at a minimum all resources listed on the National Register or determined eligible for it, and a determination as to the physical characteristics of each resource that convey its historical significance.

PROJECT DESIGN GUIDELINES Project-specific design guidelines prepared for each project include measures to preserve and enhance the integrity of the significant features of historic buildings and landscapes. The project-specific guidelines inform the review of each project by the UC Berkeley Design Review Committee, as described below.

CONSULTATION WITH SHPO UC Berkeley staff consult regularly with the California State Office of Historic Preserva- tion about projects which could affect historic resources. This includes sending draw- ings and project descriptions to the SHPO for review, as well as meeting at UC Berkeley to observe project sites and assess project options.

INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW University policy requires independent architectural design review and independent cost estimates of projects with a total project cost over $5 million.25 The policy requires design reviews to be performed early in the preparation of design, at suitable intervals during design, and at the time of completion of design. Selection of the reviewer, or panel of reviewers, and the format for the design review are left to the discretion of the Chan- cellor, subject to the following:

The reviewers shall be licensed architects or other design professionals. The reviewers shall have no current connection with the firm or firms acting as executive architect or as consultants on the project being reviewed. The reviewers shall not be employed by the University, except for qualified faculty. The review shall focus on, but need not be limited to, the compatibility of the design with its setting and the suitability of the design to its functional program and project budget.

At UC Berkeley, independent design review of projects is conducted by the UC Berkeley Design Review Committee, with staff support from Facilities Services. The 2020 LRDP stipulates the UC Berkeley Design Review Committee would include at least one architectural historian or other person with equivalent experience and knowledge in historic preservation. As part of project review, the DRC evaluates potential adverse impacts on cultural resources and recommends measures to avoid or minimize such impacts.

4.4-53 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

4.4.7 2020 LRDP IMPACTS

This section describes the potential cultural resource impacts of the 2020 LRDP based on the Standards of Significance, whether they are significant or less than significant, and whether any significant impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS

LRDP Impact CUL-1: Construction activities under the 2020 LRDP could have the potential to destroy a unique paleontological resource, or site, or unique geologic feature, but campus best practices would ensure this impact is less than significant.

There are no known paleontological resources or unique geologic features in the geographic scope of the 2020 LRDP, and the overall paleontologic potential of the planning area is low, with some areas of moderate potential. It is therefore possible that major excavations of previously-undisturbed areas could encounter limited fossil finds. Excep- tions are in the northeast corner of the Campus Park and in most of the Hill Area, which are generally underlain by unfossiliferous units, and unlikely to produce fossils. Within the Hill Area, the only location that may contain fossils is in a limited area within the northcentral portion, where exposures or the Orinda Formation area present. Im- pacts to a paleontological resource, site, or geological feature would be significant if the resource is determined to be “a unique resource” by a qualified paleontologist or geologist. Implementation of the following best practice would ensure any impact on a unique resource would be limited to a less than significant level.

Continuing Best Practice CUL-1: In the event that paleontological resource evidence or a unique geological feature is identified during project planning or construction, the work would stop immediately and the find would be protected until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist or geologist. If the resource is determined to be a “unique resource,” a mitigation plan would be formulated and implemented to ap- propriately protect the significance of the resource by preservation, documentation, and/or removal, prior to recommencing activities.

SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

LRDP Impact CUL-2: Projects developed under the 2020 LRDP could cause adverse changes in the significance of historical resources. However, in general the provisions of the 2020 LRDP and the best practices described below would ensure this impact is less than significant.

Projects implementing the 2020 LRDP could materially alter, in an adverse manner, those physical characteristics that convey the historic significance of a campus site or structure. This would constitute a substantial adverse change in the significance of a resource, and would potentially pose a significant impact under CEQA.

Continuing Best Practice CUL-2-a: If a project could cause a substantial adverse change in features that convey the significance of a primary or secondary resource, an Historic Structures Assessment (HSA) would be pre-

4.4-54 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

pared. Recommendations of the HSA made in accordance with the Secre- tary of the Interior’s Standards would be implemented, in consultation with the UC Berkeley Design Review Committee and the State Historic Preservation Office, such that the integrity of the significant resource is preserved and protected. Copies of all reports would be filed in the Uni- versity Archives/Bancroft Library.

Continuing Best Practice CUL-2-b: UC Berkeley would make informa- tional presentations of all major projects in the City Environs in Berkeley to the Berkeley Planning Commission and, if relevant, the Berkeley Land- marks Commission for comment prior to schematic design review by the UC Berkeley Design Review Committee. Major projects in the City Environs in Oakland would similarly be presented to the Oakland Planning Commission and, if relevant, to the Oakland Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board.

LRDP Impact CUL-3: Under certain circumstances warranted by public benefits in furtherance of the University’s educational mission, projects developed under the 2020 LRDP could cause substantial adverse changes in the significance of historical resources. Under these circumstances, the University would follow the mitigation measure described below, but the impact would remain significant and unavoidable.

LRDP Mitigation Measure CUL-3: If, in furtherance of the educational mission of the University, a project would require the demolition of a primary or secondary resource, or the alteration of such a resource in a manner not in conformance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, the resource would be recorded to archival standards prior to its demolition or alteration.26

LRDP Impact CUL-4: Projects developed under the 2020 LRDP could destroy significant prehistoric or historic archaeological resources. The mitigations described below would reduce this impact to less than significant.

Projects developed under the 2020 LRDP could materially alter in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that make archaeological resources significant. This would constitute a substantial adverse change, and a potential significant impact under CEQA. With implementation of the measures described below, development under the 2020 LRDP would limit impacts on archaeological resources to a less than significant level.

LRDP Mitigation Measure CUL-4-a: UC Berkeley will create an inter- nal document: a UCB Campus Archaeological Resources Sensitivity Map. The map will identify only the general locations of known and potential archaeological resources within the 2020 LRDP planning area. For the Hill Campus, the map will indicate the areas along drainages as being areas of high potential for the presence of archaeological resources. If any project would affect a resource, then either the project will be sited to avoid the location or, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist, UC Berkeley will determine the level of archaeological investigation that is appropriate for the project site and activity, prior to any construction or demolition activities.

4.4-55 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Continuing Best Practice CUL-4-a: In the event resources are determined to be present at a project site, the following actions would be implemented as appropriate to the resource and the proposed disturbance: UC Berkeley shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct a subsurface investigation of the project site, to ascertain the extent of the deposit of any buried archaeological materials relative to the project’s area of potential effects. The archaeologist would prepare a site record and file it with the California Historical Resource Information System. If the resource extends into the project’s area of potential effects, the resource would be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. UC Berkeley as lead agency would consider this evaluation in determining whether the resource qualifies as a historical resource or a unique archaeological resource under the criteria of CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5. If the resource does not qualify, or if no resource is present within the project area of potential effects, this would be noted in the environmental document and no further mitigation is required unless there is a discovery during construction (see below). If a resource within the project area of potential effect is determined to qualify as an historical resource or a unique archaeological resource in accordance with CEQA, UC Berkeley shall consult with a qualified archaeologist to mitigate the effect through data recovery if appropriate to the resource, or to consider means of avoiding or reducing ground disturbance within the site boundaries, including minor modi- fications of building footprint, landscape modification, the placement of protective fill, the establishment of a preservation easement, or other means that would permit avoidance or substantial preservation in place of the resource. If further data recovery, avoidance or substantial preservation in place is not feasible, UC Berkeley shall implement LRDP Mitigation Measure CUL-5, outlined below. A written report of the results of investigations would be prepared by a qualified archaeologist and filed with the University Archives/ Ban- croft Library and the Northwest Information Center.

LRDP Mitigation Measure CUL-4-b: If a resource is discovered during construction (whether or not an archaeologist is present), all soil disturbing work within 35 feet of the find shall cease. UC Berkeley shall contact a qualified archaeologist to provide and implement a plan for survey, subsurface investigation as needed to define the deposit, and assessment of the remainder of the site within the project area to determine whether the resource is significant and would be affected by the project, as outlined in Continuing Best Practice CUL-3-a, above. UC Berkeley would implement the recommendations of the archaeologist.

Continuing Best Practice CUL-4-b: In the event human or suspected human remains are discovered, UC Berkeley would notify the County Coroner who would determine whether the remains are subject to his or her authority. The Coroner would notify the Native American Heritage Commission if the remains are Native American. UC Berkeley would comply with the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and

4.4-56 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(d) regarding identification and in- volvement of the Native American Most Likely Descendant and with the provisions of the California Native American Graves Protection and Repa- triation Act to ensure that the remains and any associated artifacts recovered are repatriated to the appropriate group, if requested.

Continuing Best Practice CUL-4-c: Prior to disturbing the soil, contrac- tors shall be notified that they are required to watch for potential archaeological sites and artifacts and to notify UC Berkeley if any are found. In the event of a find, UC Berkeley shall implement LRDP Mitigation Measure CUL-4-b, above.

LRDP Impact CUL-5: Under certain circumstances warranted by public benefits in furtherance of the University’s educational mission, projects developed under the 2020 LRDP could cause substantial adverse changes in the significance of archaeological resources. Under these circumstances, the University would follow the mitigation measure described below, but the impact would remain significant and unavoidable.

LRDP Mitigation Measure CUL-5: If, in furtherance of the educational mission of the University, a project would require damage to or demolition of a significant archaeological resource, a qualified archaeologist shall, in consultation with UC Berkeley: Prepare a research design and archaeological data recovery plan that would attempt to capture those categories of data for which the site is significant, and implement the data recovery plan prior to or during development of the site. Perform appropriate technical analyses, prepare a full written report and file it with the appropriate information center and provide for the permanent curation of recovered materials.

4.4.8 TIEN CENTER IMPACTS

This section describes the potential cultural resource impacts of the Chang-Lin Tien Center for East Asian Studies based on the Standards of Significance, whether they are significant or less than significant, and whether any significant impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels.

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS

HISTORIC RESOURCES

Tien Center Impact CUL-1: The proposed Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildings have the potential to cause adverse changes in the significance of historical resources, but no such changes are anticipated.

The Chang-Lin Tien Center for East Asian Studies is a two-phased project for which only the first phase is currently designed and scheduled for construction. Phase 1 would be located at the south base of Observatory Hill, directly across Memorial Glade from Doe Library. Phase 2 would be located at the west base of Observatory Hill, adjacent to

4.4-57 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES the east of Haviland Hall. Three National Register buildings are located in the Tien Cen- ter vicinity: Haviland Hall, Doe Memorial Library, and North Gate Hall. The sites of the Leuschner and Students’ Observatories on Observatory Hill, and the Dawn Redwoods adjacent to McCone Hall, are Secondary Historical Resources.

The significant resource in closest proximity to the Tien Center is Haviland Hall. Phase 2 of the Tien Center, as currently envisioned in concept, could lie as close as 40 feet to the east, or rear, façade of Haviland Hall. Conceptual studies for the Phase 2 building show the building set into the western base of Observatory Hill to minimize the visual impact of the structure. The design of the exposed west façade of the building would respect and complement the classical forms and composition of Haviland Hall. Detailed building plans would be developed when funding becomes available.

As currently envisioned, however, neither Phase 1 nor Phase 2 of the Tien Center would have the potential to cause adverse changes to the significance of Haviland Hall. As noted in its nomination to the National Register:

“The major significance of Haviland, however, is its role in John Galen Howard’s Beaux Arts plan of the University. It is important to the plan by virtue of both its placement and its design qualities. Haviland is also important because it was built during Howard’s last year as supervising architect, and differs from its predecessors in that it is built of concrete rather than the more expensive granite …. The building is important because it helps to define both the actual structure of Howard’s plan and the principles on which his plan is based. The values of symmetry, harmony, and classicism which the founders and Regents of the University, as well as Howard himself, hoped to see embodied in their future campus are exemplified by Howard’s work on Haviland.”27

The Phase 1 building has been sited and designed to both respect and complement the same principles of symmetry, harmony and classicism referenced in the Haviland nomination, and strengthen rather than compromise the integrity of the ensemble of neoclas- sical buildings at the heart of the Campus Park. While the Phase 1 building will not attempt to replicate the ornamental style of details featured on Haviland, it will utilize the same vocabulary of architectural forms and materials used in historic neighboring buildings such as Haviland and Doe Library, including a pitched tile roof and granite exterior walls, and will be sited to reinforce the orthogonal relationships of buildings in the classical core ensemble.

Phase 2 as currently envisioned would neither compete with nor adversely affect the significance of Haviland Hall or other nearby historic resources. However, as the design develops, the 2020 LRDP Campus Park Guidelines and CBPs CUL-2-a and CUL-2-b would serve to preclude any such impacts.

4.4-58 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES

Tien Center Impact CUL-2: Excavation and site development for the Phase I building would result in the loss of historic archaeological resources, but the best practices described below would reduce this impact to less than significant.

Based upon a review of historic maps of the Tien Center project site, it was determined that a high potential existed for the presence of subsurface architectural remnants of the campus’ astronomical observatory, constructed in the 1880s and demolished in the early 1970s, and a conservatory building constructed in the 1890s for use by the campus Ag- riculture Department and demolished in 1925-26.

To determine the presence and potential significance of any historic archaeological remains that might exist at the site, a test excavation was conducted by faculty and students of the Campus Archaeological Research Facility in June 2003 as a field course in archaeology field methods. Test excavations revealed sparse remnants of the Student’s Observatory foundation and related buildings: demolition of the buildings, and possible subsequent use of the site as a staging area for the construction of McCone Hall, con- tributed to the eradication of evidence of the earlier site uses.28 The observatory remnants lack integrity and are not a significant cultural resource warranting further study.

The remnants of the conservatory may be a unique historic archaeological resource. The conservatory structure’s foundation and intact associated materials were located, and initial testing indicates that the accessible portion of this site is well preserved. The field report states, “Excavations covering 62 square meters were completed at this locus, re- vealing the front extent of the building and recovering an abundance of architectural and artifactual data associated with the conservatory and its occupation.”

Ceramics, flower pots, building materials, glassware, faunal data, small personal items, coal and slag deposits were found. “The site is a rare example of a 19th century structure and its associated archaeology preserved on the University of California campus, the first public university in California.” In order to recover the scientifically consequential information from and about the archaeological resource, limited additional excavation would be conducted in accordance with recommendations of the archaeologist.

In accordance with Continuing Best Practice CUL-4-a above, the campus would implement a further data recovery plan in consultation with a qualified archaeologist, prior to the start of construction for the Phase 1 Tien Center building. Portions of the asphalt parking lot would be removed to conduct systematic archaeological excavations. The purpose would be to ensure that some materials are recovered from each of the five original plant houses, the two additional houses added to the rear of the structure around 1912, and the boiler room. The recovery plan would require the excavation of no less than 55 square meters of the site, and no more than 65 square meters, bringing the total excavated area at the conservatory to 115-125 square meters. This would repre- sent a significant archaeological sample from the structure and would mitigate for any archaeological impacts brought about by the construction of the Tien Center.29

4.4-59 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

4.4.9 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

This section evaluates whether the 2020 LRDP, in combination with other University and non-University projects which are reasonably foreseeable, would result in significant cumulative impacts in regard to cultural resources.

This analysis considers cumulative growth as represented by the implementation of municipal general plans, implementation of the proposed Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2004 LRDP, the draft Southside Plan, the AC Transit Major Investment Study, the proposed redevelopment of University Village Albany, and implementation of the 2020 LRDP, as described in 4.0.5. The analysis also includes growth anticipated by the City of Berkeley General Plan EIR and by previously certified UC Berkeley EIRs, including the Northeast Quadrant Science and Safety Projects (SCH 2001022038), Seis- mic Replacement Building 1 (SCH 99122065), and the Underhill Area Projects (SCH 99042051).

The geographic context for the analysis of cumulative impacts on cultural resources includes the City of Berkeley and the areas of the City of Oakland within the scope of the 2020 LRDP. All the projects implemented under the 2020 LRDP or the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2004 LRDP would be located within this area. Given the localized nature of impacts under the Standards of Cumulative Significance, below, any potential cumulative impacts to cultural resources would occur within this geographic context.

The only effects that may occur outside these cities would be residential or other projects indirectly induced by the aforementioned projects: for example, housing to ac- commodate new employees at UC Berkeley or Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. However, any such projects would be governed by local codes and ordinances, which are presumed to preclude significant adverse impacts.

The proposed redevelopment of University Village Albany includes one significant and unavoidable impact: the demolition of the Experiment Station buildings, which may be eligible for listing on the CRHR as an historic district. However, no other project or cumulative impacts were identified for cultural resources.30

The significance of the potential cumulative impacts was determined based on the following standards:

Standard: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CCR Section 15064.5.

Standard: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CCR Section 15064.5.

The other two standards listed in 4.4.5 are determined to be adequately mitigated by project-specific measures to avoid cumulatively considerable impacts, and are not considered further in this section.

The question posed in this section is twofold:

4.4-60 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Is the potential cumulative impact of the 2020 LRDP and other reasonably foreseeable projects under these standards significant? Is the contribution of the 2020 LRDP to these impacts cumulatively considerable?

Cumulative Impact CUL-1: The 2020 LRDP, in combination with other reasonably foreseeable projects, could contribute to cumulative reduction and/or degradation of the resource base of historical or archaeological resources. The contribution of UC Berkeley projects to this impact would be minimized through the best practices and mitigations described above, but the impact would remain significant and unavoidable.

Both Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and UC Berkeley have missions that may, under certain infrequent circumstances as noted in LRDP Impacts CUL-3 and CUL-5, require the alteration or demolition of historical, archaeological, or paleontological resources that result in substantial adverse changes to their significance. While the effects on individual resources would be discrete, the combined effects of the two programs, along other projects permitted by local jurisdictions, could have an adverse cumulative impact on the resource base as a whole.

As described in 4.4.3, the cities of Oakland and Berkeley both have extensive policies and procedures to address the identification and preservation of cultural resources. While there may be specific instances where such resources must be altered or destroyed in order to achieve other public benefits, the policies and the past practices of both cities suggest such instances would be rare exceptions.

The provisions of the 2020 LRDP, and the best practices and mitigation measures cited in 4.4.7, would minimize the contribution of 2020 LRDP projects to this cumulative impact to the maximum extent feasible. When and if such impacts occur as the result of 2020 LRDP projects, LRDP Mitigation Measures CUL-3 and CUL-5 would be implemented.

4.4.10 REFERENCES

1 State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), http://www.dot.ca.gov/ser/vol1/sec3/physical/ Ch08Paleo/chap08paleo.htm#statelaws, retrieved on January 27 2004. All California laws can be accessed at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html. 2 State of California, State Preservation Laws, http://ceres.ca.gov/nahc/statepres.html, retrieved on Janu- ary 27, 2004. 3 Arrowheads Dot Com, http://www.arrowheads.com/burials.htm#CALIFORNIA, retrieved on January 27, 2004. 4 City of Berkeley, Planning Commission General Plan, April 2002, Urban Design and Preservation Ele- ment, page UD-11, http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/planning/landuse/plans/generalPlan /gppdfs.html, retrieved January 27, 2004. 5 City of Berkeley Draft General Plan EIR, February 2001, pages 180-181. 6 City of Berkeley Draft General Plan EIR, February 2001, page 312. 7 The regulations are not complete as of November 17, 2003 as per personal communication from Oakland Planning Department to Constance Lai, Page & Turnbull. 8 California Public Resources Code §21084.1, http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=prc, retrieved March 5, 2004. 9 California Public Resources Code §21084.1, http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=prc, retrieved March 5, 2004.

4.4-61 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 2020 LRDP DRAFT EIR 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES

10 Office of Historic Preservation, Department of Parks and Recreation, State of California, California Office of Historic Preservation Technical Assistance Series #8: How to Read an Historic Properties Directory, May 23, 2001, page 1. 11 National Park Service Archaeology and Ethnography Program, http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/afori/wharre_intr.htm, retrieved on January 27, 2004. 12 California Office of Historic Preservation Technical Assistance Series #6, “California Register and National Register: A Comparison”, May 23, 2001, http://www.ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1069/files/06%20cal%20reg_and_%20nat%20reg.pdf, retrieved on January 27, 2004. 13 California Geological Survey, Note 51, “Fossils”, 2002, http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/information/publications/cgs_notes/note_51/note_51.pdf, retrieved on January 27, 2004. 14 Finacom, Steve, Planning Analyst, UCB Facilities Services. Personal communication with Jennifer Lawrence, Principal Planner, UCB Facilities Services, October 17, 2003. 15 Holroyd, Patricia, UCB Museum Scientist. Personal communication with Carol Kielusiak, UCB Fa- cilities Services, December 4, 2003. 16 Finacom, Steve, Planning Analyst, UCB Facilities Services. Personal communication with Jennifer Lawrence, Principal Planner, UCB Facilities Services, October 17, 2003. 17 UC Berkeley, Long Range Development Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, January 1990, page 4.3-8. 18 Finacom, Steve, Planning Analyst, UCB Facilities Services. Personal communication with Jennifer Lawrence, Principal Planner, UCB Facilities Services, October 17, 2003. 19 Finacom, Steve, Planning Analyst, UCB Facilities Services. Personal communication with Jennifer Lawrence, Principal Planner, UCB Facilities Services, October 17, 2003. 20 UC Berkeley, Long Range Development Plan DEIR, January 1990, page 4.3-15. 21 City of Oakland, Oakland General Plan, Land Use and Transportation Element, Draft EIR, page III.G-1. 22 City of Oakland, Oakland General Plan, Land Use and Transportation Element, Draft EIR, page III.G-2. 23 Finacom, Steve, Planning Analyst, UCB Facilities Services. Personal communication with Jennifer Lawrence, Principal Planner, UCB Facilities Services, October 17, 2003. 24 US Geological Survey (USGS), Miscellaneous Field Study MF-2342, “Geologic map and Map Data- base of the Oakland Metropolitan Area, Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Francisco Counties, Cali- fornia”, http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/map-mf/mf2342/, overlain with GIS data from UC Berkeley’s GIS Center, December 5, 2003. 25 University of California, Facilities Manual, Vol 3, Part 1, Chapter 5, Section 5.1, http://www.ucop.edu/facil/fmc/facilman/volume3/part1/ch5.html, retrieved February 19, 2004. 26 The Historic American Building Survey (HABS), developed by the National Park Service, outlines standards for formally documenting / recording historic structures and sites. HABS standards help insure that documentation is clear and accurate, long-lasting, and of use to future researchers. The Berkeley campus uses an approach similar to that outlined in HABS for photo-documenting historic structures. Key elements include: black and white photography, processed through true black and white development methods; large format (5x7 or similar) prints; contact prints on archival fiber- based paper; labeling and indexing of photographs to accurately document dates and locations of photographs. Photographic sets would be deposited in the permanent collection of the University Archives (Bancroft Library) to ensure their long-term preservation and access to researchers. 27 Entries in the National Register, State of California, Haviland Hall, Section 8-Significance, February 1 1982. 28 Wilkie and Kozakavich , 2003 Archaeological Field Research Report, page 40 29 Wilkie, Proposed Recovery Plan for Locus A, January 19 2004. 30 UC Berkeley, Subsequent Focused Draft EIR for the University Village & Albany/Northwest Berkeley Proper- ties Master Plan Amendments , January 30, 2004, pages 99-101.

4.4-62