Summary of submissions: Proposed Plan Modifications 4, 33 and 119 Whole Plan Change Submission No. Name Decision 28/1 Sealink Travel Group NZ The proposed plan change be declined Limited 28/2 Sealink Travel Group NZ The proposed plan change amended to provide for ; Limited The integrated and sustainable management of the natural and physical resources of Wynyard Quarter, City (and the Auckland region as required). 43/1 Louise J Coburn Decline 56/1 Marc ter Beek 57/1 Arjen Visser 61/1 Cuan Forsyth-King 96/1 Marstel Terminals Limited a.That the Plan Change is withdrawn b.In the alternative, that the Plan Change is put on hold until such time as the Council has undertaken and completed urgent work in locating a commercially viable and unconditional site to enable the relocation of Marstel Terminals' business, including the completion of all consenting requirements for that relocation site on terms acceptable to Marstel c. Such other relief as would satisfy the points raised by Marstel in this submission 120/1 Melview Developments Plan Change 4 be cancelled Limited 121/1 Lighter Quay Residents Society Incorporated BC 3000 129/1 Cathleen M Haslett No decision requested. 590/3 Auckland Regional Public ARPHS recommends that best practice guidelines be followed, including the Urban Design protocol, Crime Health Services Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) and Injury Prevention. 32/5 Transit New Zealand That the following matters be clarified and new objectives, policies and methods (including, without limitation and where appropriate, assessment criteria) be incorporated into the text of the Plan Changes:

• Proposed provision for PT in The Wynyard Quarter precinct and the nature of any undertakings by any organisation in relation to the provision of PT • Assurance that development will only be allowed to continue if ongoing traffic effects are adequately mitigated • The importance of restrictions on the number of car parks to ensure that the adverse traffic effects of the Plan Changes are limited • Recognition of Transit's role as a key stakeholder in the surrounding roading network and the resultant need for Transit to be included in decisions affecting the surrounding roading network • Specific requirements for Transit to be involved in any further detailed analyses of the phasing of development and trigger points of future roading infrastructure upgrades or changes • Certainty that development will be controlled by the completion of key infrastructural upgrades • The proposed interaction between a three lane gyratory around Victoria Park and movements on the Fanshawe Street motorway on-ramp resulting from bus priority measures at the Fanshawe Street interchange already agreed between , ARTA and Transit • Relevance of the potential Waitemata Tunnel to avoiding the potential traffic effects of the Plan Changes • Management of traffic effects in the absence of the potential Waitemata Tunnel 37/1 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Westhaven Viaduct Tenants and Ratepayers Association Inc (WVTRA) oppose the Proposed Plan Change in total, and Ratepayers Association and as per the issues raised in this submission, because implementation of the Proposed Plan Change in its entirety, Incorporated (WVTRA) or implementation of the plan change sections pertaining to the issues raised in this submission, will: • Impact and disadvantage existing, legal and compliant industries attracted to the area by previous and current zoning • Limit growth of, or cause contraction of, existing and viable industries reliant on the Wynyard Quarter land-sea interface • Impact and disadvantage downstream industries reliant on existing Wynyard Quarter activities, thus negatively impacting local and regional businesses, economic activity, employment and growth. 39/6 Auckland Chamber of Auckland City and its stakeholder partners adopt a precautionary principle in confirming the various land use Commerce proposals. 6/1 Burtlea Investments No.98 Opposes the Proposed Plan Modifications in their entirety, and seeks that the Proposed Plan Modifications be Limited withdrawn. 9/1 Metro Parking (Daldy) Limited Holdings 123/1 Limited Viaduct Harbour Holdings 124/1 Limited Viaduct Harbour Holdings 608/1 Limited 171/1 Limited Council approve the Plan Modifications. (POAL) 172/1 Auckland Regional Holdings Council approve the Plan Modifications as notified, subject to the minor important amendments. 604/1 Onehunga Enhancement Decline Society 1/28 Marine Industry Association Withdraw the plan modifications in their entirety;

2/1 Electronic Navigation Limited The Submitter seeks that the Changes be deleted in their entirety.

Page 2 Anda Family Trust 11/1 Sonav Joint Venture 117/1 5/1 General Marine Services The submitter seeks that the Plan Changes be deleted in their entirety. Limited 12/1 E & D Limited, Trading as The Changes be deleted in their entirety. Topcatch Bait and Tackle

13/1 Alex Kerr 14/1 The Kampkes Family Trust 15/1 Steve Hudgell 16/1 Powell Family Trust 22/1 Southern Pacific Marine Limited 17/1 Charles R Goldie Decline 23/2 Equity Pacific Holdings The plan inadequately promotes the sustainable use of resources and further escalates inappropriate land use for Limited stormwater holding ponds in a very valuable location. 25/7 New Zealand Institute of We urge the Council to pursue the Urban Design Panel's vetting of development proposals. We urge architectural Architects competitions for buildings on key sites, and for the open-space, streetscape, public art and lighting design work. 26/1 Auckland Regional Holdings Council approve the Plan Modifications as notified, subject to the minor, but important amendments (addressed in Submission No 24 by Auckland Regional Holdings) 27/1 Mansons TCLM Limited a. A proper and complete consultation process involving all property and interest groups, rather than the selective 111/1 Prism Properties Limited information sharing undertaken prior to public notification; and b. Withdrawal of the Plan Modifications in their entirety and renotification once the consultation referred to above has been properly undertaken and responded to, with the inclusion of all appropriate modifications arising from the consultation; or, failing that: c. The withdrawal of the modifications. 29/1 Chevron New Zealand Decline Plan Change 4 and Proposed Plan Modification No.33. 30/21 Auckland Regional Council To make consequential amendments to the district plan change as appropriate to ensure integration between the coastal plan and district plan changes for Wynyard Quarter as they are amended through the hearing process Provisions of particular relevance include but are not limited to, the viewshafts and references to Comprehensive Area Structure Plans, Risk Sensitive Areas and carparking. 36/1 Ports of Auckland Limited The Council approve the Plan Modifications. (POAL) 139/1 Southern Spars Changes be deleted in their entirety. 567/1 Urban Auckland Accept with amendments

Page 3

14.9.1 and 14.9.2 Introduction and Resource Management Submission No. Name Decision 24/4 Auckland Regional Holdings Clause 14.9.1, page 7, item 2 be amended as follows, or in an alternative manner to give effect to ARH's concerns:

Upon completion of the necessary listed Travel Management measuresrequirements (14.9.11).... 32/1 Transit New Zealand Section 14.9.1 entitled 'Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing' be modified to read as follows (additions underlined):

"Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing

An additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing is an important future transport infrastructure project for the Auckland Region. Several options have been explored over a number of years including options for public transport (PT) or (PT plus vehicles, and both tunnel and bridge options. Wynyard Quarter is one of the possible locations considered as an option for the third harbour crossing. It is acknowledged that there is a need to future proof for provision of a third harbour crossing. The Daldy Street linear park link could provide an alignment of an appropriate width (40 metres including road and park space - see Annex 15, which shows an indicative alignment of a possible twin PT/vehicle tunnel) for a future underground tunnel, should Wynyard Quarter become the preferred location for a third harbour crossing. A joint study including consultation with key stakeholders is to be completed in 2008, which will identify a preferred option. Any notices of requirement for designation on whatever corridor is chosen will be issued thereafter. Auckland City Council is committed to working with Auckland Regional Council and Auckland Regional Transport Authority, Transit New Zealand and North Shore City Council through this process." 35/1 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Retain the following provisions without further modification: Limited and Mobil Oil NZ • 8th paragraph of the introduction 14.9.1; Limited • 14.9.2.3 (j); • 14.9.2.6 a), b), and c); • 14.9.2.9 a) and b) 35/3 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Amend 3rd bullet point (page 7) under the heading of "Approach to Redevelopment" as follows: Limited and Mobil Oil NZ Limited Management of risk and public safety associated with existing industry, while ensuring those industries can continue to operate. 35/9 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Introduce a new statement (e.g. in 14.9.1) that confirms that the transport of hazardous substances from the existing Limited and Mobil Oil NZ facilities is not considered to be a risk issue and which explains why this is no longer considered to be an issue and why it is Limited no longer necessary to ensure specific controls in place to protect sensitive activities 47/1 New Zealand Historic Places The NZHPT agrees that there is and 'overall industrial aesthetic' and supports the proposed 'maintenance and enhancement Trust Pouhere Taonga of the identified heritage characteristics of the area'. That these parts of the 14.9.1 Introduction - Context and Approach to Redevelopment be retained. 52/1 The National Trading Amend Resource Management Issue Clause 14.9.2.3 k) Social and Economic, as follows: Company of New Zealand k) Risk that commercial and non-marine retail development could conflict with the established role of the Queen Street Valley and

Page 4 Limited Karangahape Road Precincts as the primary retail core areas of the Central Area and other centres on the fringe of the Central Area. 52/2 The National Trading Insert new Resource Management Issue under Clause 14.9.2.3 Social and Economic. Insert following wording after Clause Company of New Zealand 14.9.2.3 k): Limited l) Risk that non-marine related retail development will service a wider catchments area than that within Wynyard Quarter. 52/3 The National Trading Insert new Resource Management Issue under Clause 14.9.2.3 Social and Economic. Insert following wording after Clause Company of New Zealand 14.9.2.3 k): Limited f) A retail function that is limited to servicing the residents, workers, and visitors of Wynyard Quarter only. In particular, A a complementary, rather than competing, role with the function of the Queen Street Valley and Karangahape Road Precincts as the primary retail core areas of the Central Area, and other centres on the fringe of the Central Area such as Parnell, Newmarket and Ponsonby beyond the Central Area. 52/4 The National Trading Insert new Resource Management Issue under Clause 14.9.2.3 Social and Economic. Insert following wording after Clause Company of New Zealand 14.9.2.3 k): Limited i) By encouraging activities which complement rather than compete with the function of the Queen Street Valley and Karangahape Road Precincts as the primary retail core areas of the Central Area, and other centres such as Parnell, Newmarket and Ponsonby beyond the Central Area; and which create a sense of community and place and service the needs of for the residents, workers and visitors of the Quarter. 52/5 The National Trading Insert new Resource Management Issue under Clause 14.9.2.3 Social and Economic. Insert following wording after Clause Company of New Zealand 14.9.2.3 k): Limited h) By strongly discouraging parking within buildings areas visible from existing and proposed public open space and streets. 122/1 Land Transport New Zealand Amend the wording of issue 14.9.2.7.a) as follows:

Opportunity to maintain and improve the functionality of the road network through optimising developer and financial contributions and by requiring and encouraging a change.... 35/10 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Delete 14.9.2.8 (d) and replace with the following: Limited and Mobil Oil NZ Limited opportunity to create a high quality environment through the remediation and/or management of contaminated land, including the integration of engineering controls into building and development design to ensure appropriate levels of protection to occupants/users from residual contamination 1/1 Marine Industry Association Under issue 14.9.2.3(h) the Plan should recognise that the marine and fishing industries are not just regionally significant, but nationally significant in economic terms. 6/2 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.2 Resource Management Issues be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute provision: Limited 123/2 Viaduct Harbour Holdings 14.9.2 Resource Management Issues Limited 14.9.2.1 Connection of Waterfront Precincts

Page 5 (l) Integration and connection of Wynyard Quarter with the waterfront precincts including the Viaduct Harbour and .

14.9.2.2 Continuous waterfront access (l) Integrated development of the quarter presents a unique opportunity to achieve enhanced and continuous waterfront access whilst showcasing Auckland City's coastal setting.

14.9.2.3 Establishment of diverse open spaces (l) Establishment of new and diverse open spaces within the quarter and connection of these with other key public open spaces in the Viaduct Harbour and Westhaven Marina.

14.9.2.4 An active working waterfront (I) A number of industrial, commercial and marine activities currently exist within the quarter. Continued viability and expansion of these industries, particularly the maritime industry is significant to national and regional economies.

14.9.2.5 Appropriate urban design and built form (l) Managing the building, height, scale and form of development within the quarter is necessary to ensure effective urban design outcomes.

14.9.2.6 Facilitating a mix of land use and activities Land Use Suitability (l) A mix of uses and activities is necessary to achieve vibrant people oriented spaces. (2) Reverse sensitivity issues are likely to arise if the effects of different land uses are not adequately managed. Constraints of Existing Land Tenure (3) Existing land tenure within the quarter is subject to complex layers of landholder and leaseholder interests. The existing lease arrangements on the Tank Farm portion of the quarter in particular, are not due to terminate until between 2016 and 2026. This necessitates a long term vision with completed development of the entire quarter therefore expected to occur (beyond the current Plan period) in stages over the next 25 years. (4) The provisions contained in the Plan (Change) are based on the more realistic 10 year planning horizon of the current Plan period (2004- 2014). (5) Ongoing monitoring of the actual development uptake (up to 500,000m2 GFA) and key external drivers is necessary to assess and determine the planning objectives for Wynyard Quarter beyond 2014. Environmental Risk Management (6) There are potential environmental risks associated with the historic use of the area for storage of dangerous goods. The potential effects of redevelopment within these areas must be carefully managed as development progresses. (7) The potential effects of climate change, and in particular sea level rise, must be evaluated in determining the long term location and suitability of land use activities throughout the quarter.

14.9.2.7 Sustainable transport and urbanism (l) Land use intensification in an uncoordinated manner, could result in traffic levels and patterns that exceed the capacity of the internal and wider roading network. 30/16 Auckland Regional Council Identifying the expansion of ferry operations in the Wynyard Quarter as an opportunity under Clauses 14.9.2.3 and 14.9.2.7 37/2 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.2.1.g Resource Management Issues/Built Form

Page 6 and Ratepayers Association Paragraph 14.9.2.1.g should be amended to read: Incorporated (WVTRA) Opportunity to encourage redevelopment which expresses the Quarter's marine, fishing and industrial operation in a contemporary manner. 37/3 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.2.3.h Social and Economic and Ratepayers Association the weighting given to the marine industry in the Proposed Plan Change should be increased significantly by providing Incorporated (WVTRA) more dedicated land area, better position and controls that encourage the industry, as opposed to discourage it. "....maintain and enhance the regionally 37/4 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.2.6.a Public Safety and Reverse Sensitivity and Ratepayers Association "Risk to public safety arising from people-generating activity being located in the vicinity of hazardous activities" Incorporated (WVTRA) Public risks is elevated by the Proposed Plan Change whereas it should be mitigated.

37/5 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.2.6.b Public Safety and Reverse Sensitivity significant economic function of and Ratepayers Association Non negotiable no-complaint covenants should apply to all new developments, whereby the no-complaint covenants Incorporated (WVTRA) should apply to all new developments, whereby the no-complaint covenant shall cover all existing industrial operations with grandfather rights, plus all new marine and fishing industry developments, so long as they are operating within the controls and limits set out in the current Operable District Plan (not the Proposed Districtthe Plan) marine and Resource and fishing Management industries." Act 1991.

14.9.3 Objectives and Policies Submission No. Name Decision 48/1 Art Deco Society Any policy should be guided by Salmond Reed's 2005 Wynyard Point Character Building Study, 113/1 Department of Conservation The objectives, policies and rules in new Part 14.9 Wynyard Quarter which provide for public open space generally as well as a continuous network of coastal edge public open space for the purposes of enabling pedestrian access to and along the coast be retained as proposed. 122/2 Land Transport New Zealand Insert new policies numbered 14.9.3.10 c), d) and e) respectively: By requiring ongoing monitoring of the traffic impacts of development both within Wynyard Quarter and on the wider road network. By requiring that the results of traffic monitoring are fed back into the decision making process when assessing applications for Comprehensive Area Structure Plans. By staging development within the Wynyard Quarter so that there is opportunity to address any traffic issues that have arisen from approved development(s).

Revised method 14.9.3.10.v) to read as follows: Ongoing collaboration with transport authorities to provide an appropriate level of passenger transport service as demand requires.

Insert new method numbered 14.9.3.10.vi) By monitoring trip generation figures from approved development(s) against the figures outlined in clause 14.9.11.1.1 and if necessary by reducing the trip generation telling outlined in clause 14.9.11.1.2 590/2 Auckland Regional Public Where there is like to be pedestrian and vehicular interaction ARPHS would like to see traffic calming measures installed

Page 7 Health Services where practical. 32/2 Transit New Zealand Objective 14.9.3.8 be modified to read as follows (additions underlined):

"14.9.3.8 Objective - Reverse Sensitivity and Amenity

Management of conflicts between different uses to ensure the efficient operation of marine and fishing industry and, industry and regionally significant transport infrastructure (including the State highway network) and enabling the marine events centre and public spaces to be used for a range of public events.

Policies f) By requiring new industry or changes to existing industry to protect and enhance amenity values at existing and future public interfaces. Implemented by Method 14.9.3.8i)

g) By ensuring that activities are not developed in such a way that will cause them to be significantly adversely affected by regionally significant infrastructure and, in particular, the ongoing operation of the State highway network. Implemented by Method 14.9.3.8ii)

Methods i) By requiring restricted controlled activity resource consent for industry located with Quarter Area 3 and restricted discretionary activity resource consent within Quarter Areas 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 to protect and enhance amenity values at existing and future public interfaces

ii) By requiring that where activities are sought to be established in areas where the amenity of the area is diminished by the adverse effects of regionally significant transport infrastructure (and, in particular, the State highway network) regard is had to the character of the receiving environment and activities are designed and located to avoid, remedy or mitigate reverse sensitivity between land uses.."

34/1 Auckland Regional Transport Approve Authority Amend the wording of 14.9.3.10 method v) to read: v) On-going consultation with public transport providers to establish an appropriate level of public transport service through Wynyard Quarter where demand requires. 35/2 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Retain the following provisions without further modification; Limited and Mobil Oil NZ • objective 14.9.3.4 (b); Limited • policy 14.9.3.4 (a); • methods 14.9.3.4 v) and viii); • all provisions in 14.9.3.7 35/4 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Retain policy 14.9.3.4 (e) without further modification except for the addition of the following text: Implemented by Limited and Mobil Oil NZ Method 14.9.3.4 (v) and (viii). Limited 35/5 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Amend policy a) and b) of 14.9.3.8 to read as follows:

Page 8 Limited and Mobil Oil NZ Limited a) By enabling and protecting the ongoing efficient operation of existing lawful industry during and after the development of Wynyard Quarter b) By controlling and/or avoiding the establishment of permanent or non permanent accommodation within or directly adjacent to area identified for marine and fishing industry and marine events or on sites subject to any overlay of individual fatality risk contours identified in Quarter Plan I 35/11 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Delete 14.9.3.9 and replace with a provision that enables remediation to occur prior to the development of a Limited and Mobil Oil NZ Comprehensive Area Structure Plan and that any remediation standard be based on ensuring no significant adverse effects. Limited This could be achieved by rewording as follows: Remediate and/or manage contaminated land so that there are no significant adverse effects. Policy:

a) By encouraging remediation and/or management of contaminated land prior to redevelopment to be: • "fit for purpose" and that any management requirements in terms of contamination management are appropriately identified, implemented and tracked • to a standard that either meets the relevant standards for the areas permitted activity land use; or is managed in a way that is suitable for the proposed development, through assessment of the Comprehensive Area Structure Plan process

b) By seeking that any contaminants on contaminated land remediated in advance of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan gives appropriate consideration to permitted future land use activities and likely pathways in relation to the relevant contaminant.

Methods i) Requiring as part of the approval of Comprehensive Area Structure Plans the consideration of likely effects of land any contamination on proposed development/uses ii) Application of the methods specified in Part 11 Hazardous Facilities iii) Liaising with ARC in respect of resource consents relating to investigation, management and remediation and in the approval process of Comprehensive Areas Structure Plans. 1/2 Marine Industry Association Objective 14.9.3.1 Built Form should include a policy that recognises that built form must be responsive to function, particularly marine related industrial, commercial and retail functions. 1/3 Marine Industry Association Policy (b) under Objective 14.9.3.2 Buildings should include a reference to the maritime attributes of the Quarter, particularly given its history and the fact that it is surrounded on 3 out of 4 sides by water. 1/4 Marine Industry Association Objective 14.9.3.2 should also include a reference to designing for reverse sensitivity issues (particularly noise) - perhaps through Policy (f) or through a new Policy, and ensuring that this policy is carried through into a Method 1/5 Marine Industry Association The policies and methods under Objective 14.9.3.3 should include a reference to relaxed provisions, standards and financial contributions as incentives or ‘rewards’ for the retention and re-use of identified character buildings 1/6 Marine Industry Association Objective 14.9.3.4 (b) should recognise that the economic function of the marine, fishing and other industries are not just regionally significant but are also nationally significant. The public open space and access referred to in Policies (g) and (h) under this Objective should be qualified by noting that

Page 9 such public access may be controlled where necessary to ensure the safe and efficient operation of marine and fishing industrial activities. 1/7 Marine Industry Association The policies under Objective 14.9.3.5 Public Open Space should similarly be qualified by reference to the need to control public access where necessary to ensure the safe and efficient operation of marine and fishing industrial activities. 1/8 Marine Industry Association The reference in Policy (d) to Objective 14.9.3.8 Reverse Sensitivity and Amenity to new industry or “changes to existing industry” to protect and enhance amenity values at existing and future public interfaces is vague and uncertain. The policy should not include “changes to existing industry” to “protect and enhance” amenity values, when those changes may be minor or irrelevant but seen by the consent authority or a third party as a means of forcing expensive and unnecessary requirements. 1/9 Marine Industry Association Objective 14.9.3.10 Transport and its policies should make specific reference to, and an exception for, marine and fishing industrial activities which are well-established in the Quarter, recognised under the plan modifications and supposedly to be encouraged and supported, particularly as sources of employment. 6/3 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.3 Resource Management Objectives and Policies be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following Limited substitute provision: 123/3 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 14.9.3 Resource Management Objectives and Policies 14.9.3.1 Connection of Waterfront Precincts Objective l) To enhance connections between Wynyard Quarter and adjoining waterfront precincts.

Policies (l) By having regard to the following when assessing resource consents: i) Public amenity; ii) Pedestrian permeability, accessibility and safety; iii) Location of streetscape planting, furniture and paving. (Refer also policies 14.3.9.7 Transport).

Explanation

These objectives and policies will be implemented through clause 14.9.8 Information Requirements and Assessment Criteria - Comprehensive Area Structure Plans. Comprehensive area structure plans are the principal technique for achieving good urban design outcomes and for linking the design and location of buildings not only internally but also to key precincts outside the Quarter.

14.9.3.2 Providing Continuous Waterfront Access Objective (l) To ensure the provision of a network of water edge promenades and pedestrian access-ways that facilitate continuous public access to and along waterfront areas throughout the Quarter. (2) To secure a continuous network of coastal edge public open space that enables public access to and along the coast and enjoyment of the coastal environment.

Page 10 Policies (1) By having regard to the following when assessing resource consents: 1) Proposed public linkages to waterfront access points; 2) Proximity to key public spaces and access points.

Explanation These objectives and policies will be implemented through clause 14.9.8 Information Requirements and Assessment Criteria - Comprehensive Area Structure Plans, clause 14.9.13 Financial Contributions - Public Open Space, and clause 14.9.14 Financial Contributions - Public Access to the Coastal Environment. Comprehensive area structure plans are the principal technique for achieving good urban design outcomes and for linking the design and location of buildings, where appropriate, to key waterfront access points. Financial contributions are a key tool used by the Council for the specific purposes of providing for the acquisition and development of public open space. A financial contribution may also be taken in the form of either a conservation covenant or land to be vested in Council for development on any site abutting or within 20 metres of the coastal marine area.

14.9.3.3 New and diverse public open spaces Objectives (1) To secure public open space to complement the Central Area and the public open space networks for the Quarter. (2) To ensure that, where appropriate, future development includes provision for pocket parks, linking spaces and plaza designed to complement the public open space network. (3) To ensure the connectivity of existing and future public open spaces within and outside the Quarter.

Policies (l) By having regard to the following matters when assessing resource consents: i) Convenient access for residents, workers and visitors; ii) Connectivity and accessibility to public open spaces; iii) Potential ground level wind and glare conditions;

(2) By treating the Wynyard Quarter internal street network as part of the public open space network, and providing, where appropriate, for the creation of internal canals, ponds and plazas as part of development within the quarter.

Explanation These objectives and policies will be implemented through clause 14.9.8 Information Requirements and Assessment Criteria - Comprehensive Area Structure Plans, and clause 14.9.9 Assessment Criteria for Buildings and Activities. Compliance with the assessment criteria is expected to result in high quality urban design outcomes.

14.9.3.4 Active working waterfront Objective (l) To ensure that sufficient and suitably located land is available to accommodate the continued operation and future growth of the marine and

Page 11 fishing industries.

Policies (1) The provision of sufficient and suitably located land available to accommodate existing and future operation and growth of the marine and fishing industries.

Explanation

These objectives and policies will be implemented through land use suitability zoning on the district plan maps and through the activity categories and resource consent thresholds in clause 14.9.6 Rules - Activities. The land use suitability zones will identify areas specifically suitable for marine and fishing activities and in doing so take into account reverse sensitivity issues.

14.9.3.5 Urban design and built form

Objective (l) To achieve high quality and integrated urban design and built form that: enhances the prominent waterfront location of Wynyard Quarter; complements the central area and wider city landform, skyline and views; preserves and enhances the unique maritime history and character of the area; and is integrated with the public open space network. (2) To achieve high quality individual buildings or collections of buildings that are of a form and scale appropriate to their location. (3) Construction of flexible and adaptable buildings designed to accommodate a range of activities and respond to changing demands.

Policies (l) By assessing redevelopment on a comprehensive land area basis rather than on an ad hoc building basis. (2) By having regard to the following matters when assessing building design: i) Proximity of building frontages to street boundaries; ii) Frontage typology and privacy; iii) Outlook amenity; iv) Adaptability of floor space height; v) Pedestrian safety and weather protection; vi) Enhanced permeability and legibility of the street pattern. (3) By having regard to the following matters pertaining to appropriate building heights: i) Buildings are of an appropriate scale in relation to the street network and the prominent waterfront location; ii) A transition is provided between the core of the quarter and the coastal edge and between the core SMA and the harbour; iii) Existing development within the Viaduct Harbour Precinct and Victoria Quarter is acknowledged; iv) Public view shafts and natural landscape features from public open spaces across, within and to Wynyard Quarter are not adversely affected; (4) By having regard to the preservation and enhancement of existing character buildings and structures when considering the effects of land and building development.

Page 12 (5) Transport and roading changes within and on the fringe of the Quarter including Fanshawe Street will only be acceptable if street quality and contribution to the amenity of the Quarter and adjacent areas is taken into account.

Explanation

These objectives and policies will be implemented specifically through clause 14.9.6 Information Requirements and Assessment Criteria for Comprehensive Area Structure Plans, clause 14.9.9 Assessment Criteria for Buildings and Activities, clause 14.9.12 Rules - Development Controls and in particular maximum permitted height (14.9.12.3), outlook space (14.9.12.4), street frontage and alignment (14.9.12.6), access to sites with multiple frontage (14.9.12.9) and lanes and view shafts (14.9.12.12). The purpose of these controls is to provide guidance as to the potential effects thresholds (permitted baseline) and minimum acceptable design standards. The maximum permitted building height and site intensity controls have been designed to not only achieve good urban design outcomes but also provide medium term development certainty. However, in developing these controls it is recognised that, where appropriate, base thresholds may be modified in a way that more appropriately achieves the objectives and policies of the plan and when considered in the context of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan. It is also anticipated that implementation of the development controls will be flexible and responsive and recognise that realistic development uptake (up to 500,000m2 GFA) will occur during the current Plan period (2004-2014). Detailed monitoring will then be required to determine the planning provisions for the period beyond 2014.

14.9.3.6 Mixed uses and activities

Objective - Land Use Suitability

(1) To enable continued operation of existing lawfully established industry within the Quarter. (2) To encourage the establishment of co-ordinated mixed use developments that include residential and non residential activities. (3) To manage the potential reverse sensitivity effects of potentially conflicting land uses. Objective - Constraints of Existing Land Tenure (4) To maximise the efficient use and development uptake of those land areas that are immediately available for development.

Objective - Environmental Risk Management

(5) To ensure that new development and activities are designed, located and managed to avoid unacceptable levels of risk presented by the storage and use of hazardous or dangerous activities and facilities. (6) To ensure the potential effects of climate change are considered in determining land use suitability.

Policies - Land Use Suitability

(1) Minimum acoustic attenuation standards and noise standards will be set to provide an acceptable level of internal amenity for residential occupants. (2) Flexible land use zoning and assessment criteria which recognises that market demands will ultimately determine the timing, uptake and end use of land within the quarter.

Page 13

Policies - Constraints of Existing land tenure

(3) By having regard to the staging and realistic uptake of development opportunities within the Quarter when assessing the effects of development proposals.

Policies - Environmental Risk Management (4) By having regard to the following when assessing the potential environmental risks associated with a proposed development or activity: i) Compatibility of the proposal with existing risk sensitive activities; ii) Public safety; iii) Contamination and remediation; iv) Effects of climate change; and v) Identified risk zones.

Explanation These objectives and policies will be implemented primarily through district plan zoning, clause 14.9.6 Rule - Activities, clause 14.9.8 Information Requirements and Comprehensive Area Structure Plans, and clause 14.9.12 Development Controls. Clause 14.9.11 Travel Demand Management also implements these objectives and policies, specifically as the effects of land use suitability will be measured by compliance with the permitted parking ratios and trip generation ratio targets in clause 14.9.12.1. The success of mixed use developments within the Quarter is seen to be dependent on the need for detailed baseline information on the suitability of the proposed land use for each particular quarter area followed by assessment of the ongoing effects and environmental risks. Having regard to potential future development beyond the Plan period (2004-2014) is appropriate for managing long term land use suitability and environmental risk, whilst recognising and not unreasonably limiting the development uptake (up to 500,000m2 GFA) that can occur within the Plan Period.

14.9.3.7 Sustainable transport and urbanism

Objectives

(l) To reduce and effectively manage future private vehicle travel to and from Wynyard Quarter, particularly during peak travel periods. (2) Increased use of alternative modes of transport to and from the Quarter. (3) A passenger transport service that is efficient, of an appropriate scale and compatible with the amenity and character of the Quarter.

Policies (l) By having regard to the following when assessing resource consent applications: i) Coordination of redevelopment north of Pakenham Street with passenger transport initiatives; ii) Trip generation and parking; iii) Traffic and people generation potential of the proposed activities; iv) Efficiency of the number, location and layout of proposed car parking areas; and

Page 14 v) Staging of development and realistic development uptake within the Quarter.

(2) By having regard to the following total vehicle trip generation ceilings for all activities within Wynyard Quarter: i) 3,500 (permitted) - 3,650 (restricted discretionary) vehicles per hour two way; ii) 2,500 vehicles per hour one way inbound or outbound during the weekday morning peak (7am-9am); iii) 2,500 vehicles per hour one way outbound or inbound during the weekday afternoon peak (4prn-6prn).

Explanation These objectives and policies are implemented primarily through clause 14.9.11 Travel Demand Management The success of the proposed mixed land use has been identified as dependant on appropriate trip generation levels and the implementation of travel reduction measures.

Such further, consequential, or alternative relief as may be required to give effect to this submission or which may be appropriate in the circumstances of the case. 24/5 Auckland Regional Holdings Clause 14.9.3.5 method (iii) be amended as follows, or in an alternative manner to give effect to ARH's concerns: Providing for declamationexcavation for the creation of new water space as a restricted controlled activity. 24/6 Auckland Regional Holdings Clause 14.9.3.7 method (iv) be amended as follows, or in an alternative manner to give effect to ARH's concerns: By requiring new hazardous industry or changes to existing hazardous industry to apply for resource consent (using the Hazardous Substances Screening Procedure as set out in Part 11) to ensure the appropriate management of risk and activity which may endanger the general public.

Delete 14.9.3.9 method (ii). 25/5 New Zealand Institute of We support the public transport objectives for the quarter. Architects 27/4 Mansons TCLM Limited The intention provisions be amended accordingly by acknowledging and promoting the difference of the sites at the 111/4 Prism Properties Limited southern end of the Quarter which have previously been earmarked for greater office development than is now provided for. It should be signalled in the intentions of the plan modification that these sites have different locational attributes, constraints and planning history and therefore should not be subject to the same stringency of controls on the extent of offices carparking and traffic. 27/6 Mansons TCLM Limited The intentions set out relating to built form (within street blocks as well as sites and heritage are generally supported, but 111/6 Prism Properties Limited need to express an intention that providing quality and sensitivity on these aspects will be especially favourably regarded by Council when balancing considerations on proposals which require development control modifications or activities not provided for as of right. 27/7 Mansons TCLM Limited The intention to provide public elements, such as pedestrian access and facilities and safety within developments should be 111/7 Prism Properties Limited emphasized. 30/10 Auckland Regional Council To clarify Objective 14.9.2.1 (g) and to achieve consistency with Objective 14.9.3.3 which refers to "the protection and enhancement" of character buildings within the precinct, by rewording it to: "Opportunity to encourage new development which expresses the Quarter's marine, fishing and industrial heritage in a contemporary manner." 30/14 Auckland Regional Council To add an additional policy at 14.9.3.3 (f), related to the need to retain and enhance a number of "character elements" that were identified in the Salmon-Reed study, including wharf capstans and other wharf edge elements, wrought iron eye bolts,

Page 15 and rail tracks; and to add related rules or assessment criteria at, for example, 14.9.8.2 (C), (E) and (K). 30/17 Auckland Regional Council Adding additional objectives and policies under 14.9.3.4 and 14.9.3.10 relating to the need to provide for ongoing car, freight and passenger ferry operations 111/8 Prism Properties Limited Consider greater rewards for special contributions to the public realm, using the bonus provisions of Part 6 of the District Plan as a guide as to the appropriate extent of reward, is also sought. 111/9 Prism Properties Limited It is sought that more attention is given to the particular circumstances of land ownership within street blocks to provide more practical and confined boundaries for the structure plans and/or providing flexibility to obtain the benefits of a structure plan in some circumstances. 602/1 Sanford Limited That the issues, objectives, policies and methods be amended so as to: a) Provide for the ongoing growth and development over the life of the District Plan and beyond of the fishing and marine related activities in both Quarter Areas 3 and 5. b) Give priority throughout the Wynyard Quarter to the fishing industry and related activities over other activities (including residential, office, marine events and entertainment) so that the fishing industry and related activities are not compromised by the presence of or provision for such activities and events. c) Recognise the need to require new development to occur in a manner that provides for the growth and development of the fishing and marine industries. d) Recognise the important role of the berthage along North Wharf (to the north of Jellicoe Street) and along the Halsey Street Extension Wharf and Western Viaduct Replacement Wharf for the fishing industry and the need to preserve access to those areas for the industry. 37/6 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.3.1a, b, ci, cii & civ Objective Built Form and Ratepayers Association All non-marine and non-fishing industry buildings in Area Quarter 3 should be limited to 18 metres height. However, to Incorporated (WVTRA) facilitate marine industry growth: • Marine refit/service/repair buildings to 31m should be allowed in Area Quarter 3 (e.g. world class refit hall) • Built Form policy must recognise that built form must be responsive to marine, commercial and industrial function 37/10 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.3.10 Transport and Ratepayers Association Transport related policies should exempt marine and fishing industries (refit, service, repairs, manufacturing, retail and Incorporated (WVTRA) wholesale functions) from travel demand strategies.

14.9.4 Resource Management Strategy Submission No. Name Decision 122/3 Land Transport New Zealand Insert new wording at the end of clause 14.9.4 - Travel Management to read as follows: While considerable work has been undertaken to establish the travel management approach, Council acknowledges the importance of ongoing monitoring of the traffic effects (both internal and external to the Wynyard Quarter), review of that information and its feedback into the decision making process. Monitoring, review and feedback of the traffic impacts into the decision making process is important in assessing the cumulative impact of development within the Wynyard Quarter. 35/6 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Delete 14.9.4.4, which states: "potential industry conflicts, including the management of risk associated with hazardous Limited and Mobil Oil NZ industry" and replace with the following wording: Limited The need to manage conflicts arising from land use changes with existing development and in particular minimising those conflicts and risks

Page 16 associated with introducing sensitive land uses near existing hazardous facilities, until such time as they relocate 35/7 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Reword provision 14.9.4 (iii) to read as follows: Limited and Mobil Oil NZ To provide a mechanism which allows development to be planned and phased in over time to account for the progressive departure of hazardous Limited and heavy industry from the Quarter while taking into account the presence of the existing hazardous and heavy industry as it progressively departs form the Quarter. 1/10 Marine Industry Association Under 14.9.4 Resource Management Strategy, which describes the various Quarter Areas - Quarter Area 2 (North Gaunt) should recognise the parcel of land bounded by Beaumont Street, Pakenham Street West, Daldy Street and Gaunt Street as being occupied by marine industries, whose presence should be recognised and protected until their relocation within the Wynyard Quarter has been achieved, by means of a deferred zoning, or other means. 1/11 Marine Industry Association Under 14.9.4 Resource Management Strategy - Quarter Area 3 (Marine) should: • Exclude any areas required for road widening or realignment - for example, for the Southern Motorway or Fanshawe Street. • Exclude any areas required for public access, which areas should be ‘made up’ elsewhere or, conversely, ensure public access is placed outside Quarter Area 3 land. • Be extended to make proper provision for the “efficient operation and growth of the marine and fishing industry sector” as noted in one of the key factors under 14.9.4 - for example, it should include part or all of the western parcel of land in Quarter Area 4 bounded by Beaumont Street, Madden Street and Pakenham Street West. This is particularly important given the description of Quarter Area 5 (Jellicoe) which, although recognised as including the marine and fishing sector, also notes its changing role as a pedestrian oriented environment and entertainment spine. Given this changing role, marine and fishing industrial activities are likely to come under increasing pressure to relocate or minimise their effects. • 14.9.5 Anticipated Environmental Results should include an environment in which the viability, efficient operation and growth of the marine and fishing industries is recognised and provided for 6/4 Burtlea Investments No.98 The description of Quarter Area 2 (North Gaunt) be amended to read as follows: Limited 123/4 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Area 2 (North Gaunt) is bounded to the south by Gaunt Street to the east by Halsey Street and to the north and west by Pakenham Street Limited West and Beaumont Street respectively. The Area is contained in two blocks and comprises a total land area of 3.36ha. It is in single freehold ownership which represents a significant opportunity for comprehensive redevelopment. Like Area 1, Area 2 is not adjacent to the coastline and is in relative proximity to Fanshawe Street. These factors combined with the synergies that can be gained from association with existing commercial activities (Area 1) means that Area 2 is also well disposed to commercial development. Commercial development within Area 2 will similarly assist to reduce the potential to draw traffic throughout the Quarter and will facilitate convenient utilisation of bus services operating along Fanshawe Street. 24/7 Auckland Regional Holdings Delete 14.9.5 K) 27/5 Mansons TCLM Limited Add a descriptive comment that provision for offices at the southern end of the area was made at the time of the Central 111/5 Prism Properties Limited Area Plan review in 1997. This should then flow through in the subsequent provisions to identify that the sites south of Gaunt Street are best suited to office development because the obstacle of Fanshawe Street limits suitability for most other uses in terms of traffic, noise and access constraints. 30/9 Auckland Regional Council Under the Vision Statement on page 6, reference the objective of the Vision 2040 to respect and

Page 17 celebrate places and buildings with local character and heritage value, which is given effect to through Objective 14.9.3.3 - Character. 37/11 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.4 Resource Management Strategy and Ratepayers Association The description of Quarter Area 2 should recognise a sub-sector within that Quarter that accommodates significant marine Incorporated (WVTRA) industries which as yet do not have options to relocate to within Quarter Area 3. The sub-sector bounded by Beaumont Street, Gaunt Street, Daldy Street and Pakenham Street West should recognise and protect these industries by means of deferring any change of zoning while existing marine companies are in residence. 37/17 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.10 Anticipated Environmental Result and Ratepayers Association Should include robust reference to the marine and fishing industries which provide natural theatre, diversity and Incorporated (WVTRA) employment opportunities within Wynyard Quarter.

14.9.6 Industry Submission No. Name Decision 95/1 Bulk Storage Terminals 1. Bulk Storage Terminals note the Council's desire to amend the District Plan in the Central area which encompasses the Limited Wynyard Quarter. 2. The company, while enjoying a lease until June 2023, desires to enter into meaningful discussions how the link to deep water at Wynyard Wharf and associated piping can be embraced beyond the end of the lease. 3. The company has no desire to be forcefully ejected from the site especially if the Council, or other suitable body, cannot find a suitable wharf-handy alternative. 4. If such a site is found then the company would expect a high degree of compensation for costs incurred to move to and build an appropriate structure(s) at such an Auckland based position. 5. BST wish to make it clear that they do not oppose the general desire to open up the Wynyard Quarter to the public of Auckland and visitors. Rather we just seek an amenable solution to enable the company to maintain an operation in Auckland and to continue to service the large degree of downstream socio-economic benefit that the region gains from BST's Auckland regional presence. 602/10 Sanford Limited Retail be provided for in Quarter Area 5 only if it: · Is Marine and Fishing Retail; · Is related to the Marine and/or Fishing Industry; or · Is ancillary to and associated with the provision and consumption of seafood. 37/28 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants The Proposed Plan Change should be reformulated to allow the retention of the bulk liquid industry on a viable commercial and Ratepayers Association basis. Incorporated (WVTRA) 1/13 Marine Industry Association Industry should be a RD or D Activity in the A3 quarter so that that quarter is clearly identified as being reserved for the Marine and Fishing Industry; 3/1 Australasian Solvents and Provide for better protection of existing bulk liquids facilities to enable uninterrupted supply. Chemicals Company 3/2 Australasian Solvents and Provide for efficient and cost effective relocation of bulk liquids facilities from Wynyard Wharf prior to any redevelopment Chemicals Company occurring.

Page 18 3/3 Australasian Solvents and That the plan change not be implemented and no redevelopment occurs until there is a commercially viable and Chemicals Company unconditional alternative site available for the bulk liquid industry.

14.9.6 Offices Submission No. Name Decision 59/3 Brian McClure Limit commercial and office space in mixed use as it gives rise to unregulated mixed use areas to the detriment of local apartments and increase traffic implications. 134/7 Peter E G Hosking Limiting commercial and office in mixed use areas. 137/3 Bowery Holdings Limited Limit commercial and other in mixed use areas. 334/2 Auckland City Council Amend 14.9.6 Rules-Activities Table as there are cross-referring errors . Replace references to 14.9.13.1c0 with 14.9.12.1c) and replace references to 14.9.13.1d) with 14.9.12d). 602/8 Sanford Limited In Quarter Area 5: Offices be provided for in Quarter Area 5 only if they are related to or associated with an activity that is otherwise provided for in Quarter Area 5. 133/3 Heart of The City We recommend the removal of either all of the commercial development on the headland north of Jellicoe and east of Hamer, or alternatively retaining only the development west of Daldy. 133/6 Heart of The City Recommend fewer general offices on the Jellicoe Street spine. 1/14 Marine Industry Association Offices related to Marine and Fishing Industry should be a RC activity in the A3 quarter (see submissions on Definitions below). 27/10 Mansons TCLM Limited Offices up to the current entitlement of 3:1 be permitted activities, with the abilities to provide offices up to 3.75:1 being 111/10 Prism Properties Limited restricted discretionary rather than non complying activities. As a consequence, specific restricted discretionary activity assessment criteria would need to be also inserted.

14.9.6 Marine and Fishing Industry Submission No. Name Decision 53/2 St Mary's Bay Association Protect marine industry against creeping rate/rental rises, in part through ensuring that residential and non marine-related Incorporated office uses are not permitted in the marine zone. 134/8 Peter E G Hosking Marine and fishing industries and ferry operations. Sufficient land needs to be made available for these industries. 602/3 Sanford Limited That the total amount of land allocated to Quarter Areas 3 and 5 be increased, at least to the extent that existing fishing and marine industry activities located on the Western Reclamation but outside those Quarter Areas are included within those Quarter Areas (e.g. Electronic Navigation Limited). 602/5 Sanford Limited In Quarter Area 5: Delete the limitation on the Sanford Land in Quarter Area 5 shown in cross hatching on Quarter Plan E which provides that the Sanford Land should be used for marine and fishing industry and marine and fishing retail only to the effect that the Sanford Land should have no additional encumbrances pursuant to Quarter Plan E. 602/7 Sanford Limited In Quarter Area 5: Marine and fishing industry be provided for as a Restricted Controlled activity within Quarter Area 5 37/12 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Marine and Fishing Industries should be permitted activities in A3.

Page 19 and Ratepayers Association Incorporated (WVTRA) 37/27 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants The Proposed Plan Change must be modified to provide additional waterfront areas suitable for core marine refit and and Ratepayers Association commissioning facilities (and the ARC Coastal Plan must be aligned and strengthened to prioritise working berths and Incorporated (WVTRA) working water front water space rights).

The Proposed Plan Change must be modified to provide more berthage for fishing vessels, workboats and barges, with appropriate commercially viable access to those berths.

The Proposed Plan Change must be modified to allow existing and complying businesses currently located in the marine zone but zoned out of the marine area by the Proposed Plan Change, to move to Quarter Area 3 as and when suitable new development takes place. Rezoning should be deferred until such marine industries have relocated, or Quarter area 3 must be expanded to capture them. 39/1 Auckland Chamber of Establish that sufficient land and deepwater access to meet the growth requirements of the marine industry long-term is Commerce provided for in the plan changes, even if it means trimming other aspects such as proposals to increase residential and other commercial areas. 39/3 Auckland Chamber of The proposed marine industry precinct (see fig 39: Area 3) is aligned and integrated with both Area 7 (America's Cup bases) Commerce and the marine industry activities currently and/or potentially located at Western Marina, which is being developed separately to Wynyard Quarter. 1/12 Marine Industry Association Marine and Fishing Industry should be a RC Activity in the A3, A4, A5 and A6 quarters and should not be limited to ground floors in any quarters; 1/16 Marine Industry Association In order to support Marine and Fishing Industry, any new Marine or Fishing Industry or change to an existing Marine or Fishing Industry which either provides 10 or more car parking spaces on-site or will result in an average daily traffic generation of 100 movements or more should be a RC activity 1/17 Marine Industry Association For transitional purposes, all activities except those Marine and Fishing Industry activities currently located in the block in Quarter Area 2 bounded by Beaumont, Gaunt and Daldy Streets and Pakenham Street West should be prohibited activities until such date as is appropriate for those activities to relocate to other locations on lease expiry.

The Explanation should include an appropriate reference to the Marine and Fishing Industry and the importance of that activity in the Wynyard Quarter in terms of its history, character, employment, amenity and impact on other development, particularly permanent and non-permanent accommodation. 1/18 Marine Industry Association 14.9.10 Anticipated Environmental Results should include a reference to the accommodation and growth of the Marine and Fishing Industry which provides diversity and employment opportunities within the Wynyard Quarter.

14.9.6 Marine and Fishing Retail and Retail Submission No. Name Decision 52/6 The National Trading 14.9.6.6 Activity Status Company of New Zealand

Page 20 Limited Activities A1, A2 A4,A3 A5, A6 A7 Retail other than Marine and Fishing Retail provided the gross floor area per site is (*2) <1,000m2 <200m2 GFA P# NC P# P# 1,000m2-5,000m2 200m2 - 999m2 GFA RD# NC RD# RD# 1,000m2 - 5,000m2 GFA D# NC D# D# >5,000m2 GFA D# NC NC D# NC D# NC Retail other than Marine and Fishing Retail located within the Transitional Overlay Precinct identified on Quarter Plan C2 provided the gross floor area per site is (*2) <1,000m2 <200m2 GFA n/a P# n/a n/a 1,000m2-5,000m2 200m2 - 999m2 GFA n/a RD# n/a n/a 1,000m2 - 5,000m2 GFA n/a D# n/a n/a >5,000m2 GFA n/a D# NC n/a n/a 133/1 Heart of The City Recommend stronger support for the differentiated fishing and marine industries (both manufacturing and retail), with any non-differentiated retail being limited to service retail (superette, chemist, butcher etc, in whatever form - the types of shops you would expect to find in a walkable liveable residential community). 27/12 Mansons TCLM Limited Floor area constraints imposed on some activities in particular are opposed. 111/12 Prism Properties Limited 27/15 Mansons TCLM Limited The thresholds for, in particular, retail and food and beverage, activities are too low for large sites. It is sought that they 111/15 Prism Properties Limited either be increased outright or related directly to site size.

14.9.6 Permanent or Non-Permanent Accomodation Submission No. Name Decision 54/2 Corinne M McLaren A general reduction in the number of apartments (buildings) being proposed to be built. 71/2 Peter B Smith Auckland has too many apartment blocks already. 110/2 Erwin van Asbeck Remove proposed apartments adjacent to Point Park. 112/1 Charlotte M Fisher The current proposed designations of apartment buildings must be re-thought. 112/3 Charlotte M Fisher Private residences beside public land do not work. 545/7 Edwin J W and Eila Ikin To prevent apartments being predominated by commercial and offices. 602/4 Sanford Limited That, with respect to Land Use Status: a) The transitional overlay precinct in Quarter Area 3 (see Quarter Plan C2) be deleted and permanent or non permanent accommodation, offices (apart from those ancillary to or which constitute marine or fishing related activities), services, entertainment / gathering be non-complying activities throughout Quarter Area 3. b) The areas identified in Quarter Plan E in which permanent accommodation is a non-complying activity be extended to include all of Quarter Areas 3, 4, 5 and 7. c) Non permanent accommodation be a non-complying activity throughout Quarter Areas 3, 4, 5 and 7.

Page 21 35/12 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Amend the Activities Table under 14.9.6 so that any permanent or non-permanent accommodation at ground level is a Limited and Mobil Oil NZ minimum a restricted discretionary activity in all Quarter areas, ensure that the introduction of accommodation only occurs Limited through an appropriately sanctioned Comprehensive Area Structure Plan. 37/15 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Permanent and non permanent accommodation should be non-complying in A3 at all stages of development and and Ratepayers Association completion Incorporated (WVTRA) 37/16 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Permanent accommodation subject to a no-complaint covenant where no such covenant has been entered into should be and Ratepayers Association non-complying throughout all stages of development and completion. Incorporated (WVTRA)

1/15 Marine Industry Association Any proposal for permanent or non-permanent accommodation in the A3 quarter and elsewhere through the Wynyard Quarter should be required to enter into a no complaints covenant in order to protect marine, fishing and other industries and businesses.

18/3 Goodman Nominee (NZ) Permanent and non-permanent accommodation are a non-complying activity in Quarter Area 1. Limited

14.9.6 Other Submission No. Name Decision 625/5 Sailors Corner Limited The council alter quarter plan C2 to increase the maximum permitted height for the area of land that Sailors Corner Ltd occupies on Lots 9 and 10 situated at 120 Beaumont Street to a new maximum permitted height and space. 33/1 Creative Functions Limited The provisions of the Plan Changes be amended to ensure that suitable provision be made for general activities (such as functions, concerts, etc already referred to in the Plan Changes) which derive a benefit from the amenity afforded by proximity to the CMA be provided for the Marine Events Precinct and the Port Management Area 2A. 132/2 Committee for Auckland • Visit destination reinforced by both visitor 'jewels', and activities and events - marine events centre, cultural facility Limited on Jellicoe, icon facility on Point Park • Mix of space favours residential - revisit potential for 'landmark' workplaces for mix of people, vitality, and a vibrant economy • Residential population unlikely to sustain retail uses needed to activate streets - so visit numbers essential - set visit numbers and mix for each stage • Working population is also needed to sustain activities through the day and to grow Auckland's CBD - set targets for working population 134/3 Peter E G Hosking The marine events centre should be situated on the existing America's Cup bases to retain the successful balance achieved in the Viaduct. 545/2 Edwin J W and Eila Ikin Do we need another waterside hotel? Reserve site for marine events centre with 360 public viewing points. 602/9 Sanford Limited Food and beverage be provided for in Quarter Area 5 only if it is fish and seafood oriented provided that in respect of a comprehensive development of food and beverage facilities on a single site up to 20% of the total area of those facilities

Page 22 need not be fish and seafood oriented. 602/11 Sanford Limited Entertainment / gathering be provided for in Quarter Area 5 only if it is related to or associated with an activity that is otherwise provided for in Quarter Area 5. 602/12 Sanford Limited Offices, food and beverage, retail and entertainment / gathering not otherwise provided for in Quarter Area 5 shall be a non complying activity in Quarter Area 5. 602/13 Sanford Limited The Changes be amended to recognise and provide for the continuation and expansion of fishing industry and related activities to the north of Jellicoe Street and on the adjacent land by preventing activities other than marine and fishing industry and marine and fishing retail on that part of Quarter Area 5 to the north of Jellicoe Street and to the east of Brigham Street (most appropriately by altering the notation on Quarter Plan E). 616/1 Damian D'Cruz Increase the amount of building on the site to around 70% of the overall site and include the following: • More buildings with public use such as shops, galleries, museums, restaurants • More buildings close to the edge of the wharf to have public use • Sheltered small (20-40m²) public squares with buildings on three sides but open to sea views • Small jetties enabling boats to tie up (short term) and access public spaces (e.g. during the day/evening) • Buildings that have public use and provide shelter from the sun, wind, rain (e.g. cafes with awnings) 625/2 Sailors Corner Limited That the council remove any reference to peak trip generation ratios per 100m² in the Wynyard Quarter and delete 14.9.11 completely as the ratios quoted are not practical and bear little resemblance to what is needed. 37/13 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Ferry operations (in terms of transport hubs and roll-on/roll-off bases servicing the Hauraki Gulf) should be non- and Ratepayers Association complying in A3. Incorporated (WVTRA) 37/14 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Entertainment activities should be non-complying in A3 and Ratepayers Association Incorporated (WVTRA) 39/2 Auckland Chamber of Protect sufficient space for hosting of international yacht events such as a future Americas Cup (see fig.39: Proposed Commerce Wynyard Quarter Precincts and Areas - Area 7, the existing America's Cup bases and adjacent Marine Events Precinct and Viaduct Harbour edge of Area 4). 6/5 Burtlea Investments No.98 That the Activities Table in clause 14.9.6 Rules - Activities be amended in relevant part and that the following activities be Limited categorised as permitted activities in Quarter Areas 1 and 2, namely: 123/5 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Prior to entry into of a joint development agreement (clause 14.9.11.2): Limited (a) Ancillary services for any of the activities listed for the relevant Quarter Area within Wynyard Quarter in the activities table;* (b) Car parking ancillary to permitted activities in Wynyard Quarter; (c) Demolition of buildings or creation of vacant space (except Character Buildings shown on Quarter Plan G: (d) Information centres; (e) Offices - up to 110,000m2 GFA (site ratio 3.5:l)

(Quarter Area 1 only); (f) Offices ancillary to permitted activities;*

Page 23 (g) Residential accommodation for people whose duties require living on site;* *These activities are ancillary to Marine and Fishing Industry, Marine and Fishing Retail, and other permitted activities listed in the Activities Table and may be located off-site in any Quarter Area notwithstanding the fact that the primary activity may not be provided for or located in the relevant Quarter Area.

From the date of entry into of a joint development agreement (clause 14.9.11.2): a) Accommodation; (b) Artworks; (c) Food and beverage; (d) Offices: (i) Quarter Area 1 - up to 110,000m2 GFA (site ratio 3.5:l); (ii) Quarter Area 2 - up to 69,300m2 GFA (site ratio 2.5:l); (e) Workrooms for light manufacturing service or repair activities with a gross floor area of less than 300m2. 6/6 Burtlea Investments No.98 The Activities Table in clause 14.9.6 Rules - Activities be amended in relevant part and that the following activities be Limited included in the table and categorised as controlled activities in Quarter Areas 1 and 2, namely: 123/6 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Prior to entry into of a joint development agreement (clause 14.9.11.2): Limited (a) Bonus Roof Height (Quarter Area 1 only); (b) Buildings and the external alteration or addition to existing buildings that comply with the relevant development controls for Wynyard Quarter, except cosmetic repairs which do not change the appearance of an existing building; (c) Comprehensive Area Structure Plan and any subsequent amendments subject to: (i) The subject land forming one contiguous land area (including as the case may be land in adjacent Quarter Areas); (ii) The subject land comprising a minimum land area of either: (l) One city block* where the subject land is included within a single Quarter Area; or (2) 2ha where the subject land area is included partly in one Quarter Area and partly in an adjacent Quarter Area;

*For example, the block bounded by Beaumont Street, Pakenham Street, Daldy Street, and Gaunt Street in Quarter Area 2; From the date of entry into of a joint development agreement (clause 14.9.11.2)#: (a) Bonus Roof Height (Quarter Areas 1 and 2); (b) Offices - up to 84,000m2 GFA (site ratio 3:1) (Quarter Area 2 only); (c) Retail where the gross floor area of any individual tenancy does not exceed 5,000m2. 6/7 Burtlea Investments No.98 The Activities Table in clause 14.9.6 Rules - Activities be amended in relevant part and that the following activities be re- Limited categorised as restricted discretionary activities: 123/7 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Quarter Area 2: Limited (a) Offices which exceed the maximum permitted office activity gross floor area control set out in clause 14.9.12.1c), subject to compliance with the maximum office activity gross floor area control set out in clause 14.9.12.1d);

Short term public visitor parking. 6/8 Burtlea Investments No.98 The following activities regarding Comprehensive Area Structure Plans included in the Activities Table in clause 14.9.6 Limited Rules - Activities be re- categorised and amended to read as follows:

Page 24 123/8 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited Restricted Discretionary Discretionary A Comprehensive Area Structure Plan and any A Comprehensive Area Structure Plan and any subsequent amendments subject to: (1) The subsequent amendments subject to; (1) The Comprehensive Area Structure Plan forming one Comprehensive Area Structure Plan forming one contiguous land area (including across adjacent contiguous land area (including across adjacent Quarter Areas; and (2) The Comprehensive Area Quarter Areas; and (2) The Comprehensive Area Structure Plan comprising a minimum land area of Structure Plan comprising a land area of 4,999m2 or less than: One city block (subject to a minimum less land area of 5,000m2) where the subject land is included in a single Quarter Area; or 1.99 ha (subject to a minimum land area of 5,000m2) where the subject land is included partly in one Quarter Area and partly in an adjacent Quarter Area. 6/9 Burtlea Investments No.98 The Activities Table in clause 14.9.6 Rules - Activities be amended in relevant part by deleting the following activities from Limited the table: 123/9 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited Discretionary Restricted Discretionary # Any new activity or change to an existing activity Any new activity or change to an existing activity which either: (1) Provides 10 or more car parking which either: (1) Provides 10 or more car parking spaces on site ; or (2) Will result in an average daily spaces on site; or (2) Will result in an average daily traffic generation of 100 movements or more traffic generation of 100 movements or more 6/10 Burtlea Investments No.98 Deleting sub-clauses 14.9.6.3.4 and 14.9.6.3.5 regarding non-complying activities and by including the following activity in Limited the Activities Table: 123/10 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited Discretionary Activity Any activity that does not comply with relevant Comprehensive Area Structure Plan provisions or Development Controls specified in Part 14.9 Wynyard Quarter: Standards and Terms When deciding resource consent applications for activities that do not comply with relevant Comprehensive Area Structure Plan provisions or Development Controls specified in Part 14.9 Wynyard Quarter regard shall be had to any relevant standards, terms and conditions specified in the Plan for permitted, controlled, or restricted discretionary activities 23/1 Equity Pacific Holdings The proposed plan provides for a number of areas of conflicting land use activities and inappropriately locates adjacent uses Limited within the Quarter. Further review of Activity Status as defined within 14.9.6 is required. 24/8 Auckland Regional Holdings Clause 14.9.6.6 be amended to specifically identify which item (i) above it is referring to, or in an alternative manner to give effect to ARH's concerns.

Page 25 27/11 Mansons TCLM Limited Greater flexibility is required in relation to activities for sites in Quarter area 1 if the diversity objectives and activation of 111/11 Prism Properties Limited ground level frontages is realistically to be achieved. 27/13 Mansons TCLM Limited The non-complying activity status proposed if activities marked with a # symbol on the activity table have not satisfied 111/13 Prism Properties Limited required travel management prerequisites is unduly onerous and unreasonable. 27/14 Mansons TCLM Limited The blanket statement that all activities not provided for in the activity list will be dealt with as a non-complying activity is 111/14 Prism Properties Limited unduly onerous and contrary to the Resource Management Act. Discretionary Activity status would be more appropriate. 27/16 Mansons TCLM Limited Ancillary carparking should be a permitted activity up to 100 spaces, as for elsewhere in the Central Area; all non-ancillary 111/16 Prism Properties Limited commuter carparking should be a non-complying activity, and all other forms of carparking should be a restricted discretionary activity.

Public Open Space and Quarter Plan D Submission No. Name Decision 37/9 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants The storm water pond function should be incorporated as a water feature within the park in Quarter Area 6 (or under- and Ratepayers Association grounded beneath the park), and the land area 'rezoned' to allow core marine and fishing functions. Incorporated (WVTRA) 42/2 Epsom Mothers Group Park to provide – • shade , wind shelters, toilets. • fenced playground • picnic tables • soundshell • sheltered childrens entertainment area. 59/2 Brian McClure Extent of park - increase in size to run from Jellicoe Street to Wynyard Point without residential or commercial buildings. 69/2 Klaus Buwert There should also be more land devoted to park land then buildings. 75/2 Christine Gildea Please lets have a decent sized park, an area we'd love to go to, not just a smattering of open space between buildings. 78/1 Alice L Bellerby Ensure the majority of land on the point is in park, for all to utilise. No buildings on the Tank Farm should be more than 20 metres high. 80/2 Geoffrey R Bonner Priority should also be given to maximising open space at the waters edge for public use. 94/1 Audrey van Ryn Give precedence to the provision of green open space and also to provide in the Wynyard Quarter an iconic building to house an adjunct to the current Auckland Art Gallery building. 101/2 Caroline and Michael We believe the tank farm would be best replaced by a park for all to enjoy the water front and access the harbour. Robinson 104/2 Paul A Nichols-Marcy No building out on the point. 110/1 Erwin van Asbeck Remove proposed mix-use buildings west of Bringham Street and east of Daldy Linear Park, from Jellicoe Plaza northwest to allow for appropriate cultural anchor. Particularly the block that is east/adjacent to Beaumont Plaza. Compromises the public space and locks out the city. 127/1 Joop Hollander Minimum of 8 ha park space. 134/6 Peter E G Hosking The size of the headland park should be increased to include the whole peninsula.

Page 26 137/2 Bowery Holdings Limited Increase park. 581/2 Gavin E White The point should be an ICONIC public facility (think convention centre and such like) or just left as park land. 602/2 Sanford Limited That all proposed public open space /stormwater features, lanes and viewshafts shown on Quarter Plan D be deleted at least insofar as they affect Quarter Area 5. 9/2 Metro Parking (Daldy) Limited The designations for: (i) Public open space - Daldy Street - Linear Park; (ii) Public open space - Central Park; (iii) Road and public open space - Te Wero link; be withdrawn either en bloc or individually 38/1 J Carapiet An alternative positioning for any apartment and commercial areas should be found to allow a park like square with the potential as a focus for Auckland citizens and visitors. The plan should be re-publicised with clearer visuals about the appearance of the site and views to/from it. 39/7 Auckland Chamber of Development partners maintain an open mind on the possibility that open space usage at Point Park may need to be re- Commerce appraised. 4/1 George R Mihaljevich In the area north of Jellicoe Street between Hamer Street and Brigham Street (Quarter Plan A., Quarter Area 6), this should be designated as parkland. Any exception should be an icon type building built for all Aucklanders to enjoy. (eg Sydney Opera House) 6/35 Burtlea Investments No.98 Quarter Plan D be amended to that: Limited Notations showing the Linear Park be amended so that the areas of land in Quarter Areas 1 and 2 to be acquired for public 123/35 Viaduct Harbour Holdings open space do not exceed 8m in width; Limited References to designations be deleted; The notations in Quarter Area 2 for the Linear Park and the Central Park be deleted and substituted by a land area commensurate with providing a combined land area in Quarter Area 2 not exceeding 5,000m2 for establishment of the Linear Park and the Central Park. 10/1 Elaine West Council investigates without delay-the notion of promoting Wynyard Wharf as a regional park. 19/1 Peter P Hollenstein • To decline development in the said area (of private nature) • To re-assign the said area to public open space and associated uses • To re-locate the private activity into the areas south of Jellicoe Street, in view of the "Central" park on the south corner Packenham Street and Daldy Liner Park, for instance 23/4 Equity Pacific Holdings The treatment of Wynyard Wharf will create a series of "no man's land" spaces in a critical locality and fails to capitalize on Limited the harbour edge opportunities. These spaces lack any connectivity back to the core activities and residents required to make such spaces vibrant and safe. 23/6 Equity Pacific Holdings A series of interconnected smaller, but active, spaces which relate to both adjacent activities and the water edge should be Limited considered. As part of this, consideration needs to be given to utilizing built form (building mass) to create protection from prevailing winds also. The east west Jellicoe Precinct should be further promoted as a direct link to the city of these spaces with careful consideration given as to pedestrian movement and marine vessel conflicts.

Page 27 24/16 Auckland Regional Holdings Quarter Plan D be amended to reflect Designation 379, particularly the limitation as to its extent spatially (10m wide x 5m high) 29/2 Chevron New Zealand Adjust the width of the proposed designation along Daldy Street to avoid adversely impacting on the safe and efficient operation of the service station. 37/24 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Quarter Plan D and Ratepayers Association Reference to the public open space and storm water feature should be deleted. In a situation where land is heavily over Incorporated (WVTRA) subscribed, and the marine and fishing industries require waterfront land and access to berths, it is a gross waste to utilize this site for a storm water function that can be achieved by more land-economic means

14.9.6 Character Buildings and Quarter Plan G Submission No. Name Decision 59/1 Brian McClure Increase of Heritage character building as per ARC submission to ACC. 545/5 Edwin J W and Eila Ikin Increase protection of Heritage character buildings (as per ARC submission). 625/1 Sailors Corner Limited That the council remove our buildings being situated on lots 9 and 10 at 120 Beaumont Street from the proposed character building as shown on quarter plan G 20/2 Art Deco Society (Auckland) 14.9.6.6 Activity Status should be amended to delete the words "except for demolition of internal walls, partitions and Incorporated pictures". The status of this activity should be changed from restricted discretionary to discretionary 27/17 Mansons TCLM Limited The demolition or removal of any building or part of a building on a site identified on Quarter Plan G - Character Overlay should be a Restricted Controlled Activity. 7/1 The Classic Yacht Association 1. Recognition of the heritage buildings and sites as per attachments. of New Zealand 2. Incorporation of these buildings/sites into the overall plan of Wynyard Quarter. 48/2 Art Deco Society Buildings and structures identified by Salmond Reed ( 2005) should be formally scheduled. 94/4 Audrey van Ryn Any heritage buildings and natural heritage sites in the Wynyard Quarter should be given the necessary protection. 134/5 Peter E G Hosking There should be increased protection of heritage character buildings (some of which are visible from The Point Apartments) and the character as per ARC submission to ACC on this issue. 137/1 Bowery Holdings Limited Support ARC submission on heritage character buildings. 6/38 Burtlea Investments No.98 Quarter Plan G be retained without amendment (particularly regarding Quarter Area 2). Limited 123/38 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 10/2 Elaine West ACC should protect our cultural and environmental heritage by preserving the 17 structures and objects recommended by Salmond Reed Architects Ltd. 20/1 Art Deco Society (Auckland) Quarter Plan G : Does not include all the "Character Buildings and Features". At least all those listed in the Salmond Reed Incorporated report "Wynyard Point Character Building Study", dated May 2006, pages 10-12, should be included. 30/12 Auckland Regional Council Including additional 'character buildings and features" on Quarter Plan G, as identified in the Salmon-Reed March 2006 study, as follows: • The former Bailey's shipyard and Devonport Ferry Co site and boat builders workshops, Beaumont Street

Page 28 • The former Chas Bailey Shipyard, on the footprint of a building present in 1913 Beaumont Street • The former oil company building (Trans Pacific Marine), Beaumont Street • The former oil company building (Mt Smart Marine), Beaumont Street • The former oil company building (Marine Electronics Warehouse & Belt & Tackle), Gaunt and Daldy Streets, • The Southern Spars building, Pakenham Street • The North Sails building, Pakenham Street • the Sanford's building, Hamer Street (noting its historic association with ship building)

Other Matters for Consideration Submission No. Name Decision 52/7 The National Trading Amend clause 14.9.7.2 Restricted Discretionary and Discretionary Activities as follows: Company of New Zealand Add the following wording to the last sentence of paragraph 2 of the Clause so that it reads: Limited "The criteria contained in Part 5 do not apply, unless otherwise listed in the table below for consideration as Specified Activities Criteria." 52/8 The National Trading 14.9.7.2 Restricted Discretionary and Discretionary Activities Company of New Zealand Limited Activity Assessment Criteria - Specified Activities Criteria Buildings and Activities Retail & Food and Beverage with a gross floor area 14.9.9.1.7 14.9.9.1.12 5.6.3.1a) 2 2 per site exceeding 100m 200m 14.9.9.1.13 52/9 The National Trading 14.9.7.2 Restricted Discretionary and Discretionary Activities Company of New Zealand Limited Activity Assessment Criteria - Buildings and Activities Any new activity or change to an existing activity 14.9.9.1.5c), and d) and f) 14.9.9.3.2Specified Activities Criteria which either: i) Provides 10 or more car parking 14.9.9.1.7 14.9.9.1.12 spaces on-site; or ii) Will result in an average daily traffic generation of 100 movements or more. 14.9.7.2 Restricted Discretionary and Discretionary Activities

Activity Assessment Criteria - Buildings and Activities Any new activity or change to an existing activity 14.9.9.1.5c), and d) and f) 14.9.9.3.2Specified Activities Criteria which either: i) Provides 10 or more car parking 14.9.9.1.7 14.9.9.1.12

Page 29 spaces on-site; or ii) Will result in an average daily traffic generation of 100 movements or more.

14.9.8 Information Requirements and Assessment Criteria Comprehensive Area Structure Plans Submission No. Name Decision 122/4 Land Transport New Zealand Insert new assessment criteria numbered 14.9.8.2.G.2 The extent to which the actual trip generation figures from approved developments are consistent with those outlined in clause 14.9.11.1.1 602/6 Sanford Limited In Quarter Area 5: Development on the Sanford Land not be subject to the requirement to obtain an Approved Comprehensive Structure Plan or to comply with travel management pre-requisites. 35/13 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Delete 14.9.8.1(5) and replace with the following: Limited and Mobil Oil NZ • Identification of the level of any residual contaminants; Limited • A demonstration that any contaminated land is "fit for purpose" and/or identification of any necessary management or engineering controls to manage adverse effects from residual contamination along any likely pathways arising from the proposed use and/or; • Details in relation to any proposed additional remediation necessary in light of the proposed development 35/14 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Delete 14.9.8.2 B2. and the reference to "contamination" in the heading Limited and Mobil Oil NZ Limited 6/11 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.8 Information Requirements and Assessment Criteria - Comprehensive Area Structure Plans be deleted in its Limited entirety and replaced by the following substitute provision: 123/11 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 14.9.8 Information Requirements and Assessment Criteria - Comprehensive Area Structure Plans

14.9.8.1 Information Requirements

An application for approval of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan or any amendments to an Approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plan shall be accompanied by the following information:

l) Drawings showing: a) The urban context, including both existing, approved or Quarter Plan D-identified buildings, public open space, lanes, coastal margins, and/or approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plans (generally, and to the extent possible, the context shall consist of a minimum of two full city blocks surrounding all edges of the subject land area); (b) Proposed site contours, in relation to existing, approved or Quarter Plan D identified public open space, lanes, and/or coastal margins; (c) Proposed standard of site remediation, in relation to the likely future uses of land across the subject land area (where information is available). (d) Building footprints, in relation to all site boundaries with existing, approved or Quarter Plan D-identified public open space, lanes, and/or coastal margins;

Page 30 (e) Cross sections, through the site and both sides of the immediately surrounding existing, approved or Quarter Plan D- identified public open space, lanes, and/or coastal margins; (f) The hard and/or soft landscaping character and relationship to the public open space network shown on Quarter Plan D; (g) The general location of vehicle access, parking and loading areas; (h) The profile/outline of all elevations to existing, approved or Quarter Plan D-identified public open space, lanes, and/or coastal margins, illustrating indicative floor to floor heights and maximum overall building heights; (i) Proposed staging of the development (where relevant); (j)Three dimensional images of the proposed buildings with all existing or approved building forms on the opposite side of all immediately surrounding public open space, lanes, and/or coastal margins; (k) Where proposed buildings exceed the permitted maximum building height and permitted gross floor area, a shading study of the proposed buildings, in relation to public open space identified on Quarter Plan D.

14.9.8.2 Comprehensive Area Structure Plan Assessment Criteria

A General Considerations (l) The extent to which the structure plan integrates with any other Approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plan and the relevant conditions of consent granted.

B Ground Contours (l) The extent to which the proposed finished ground floor levels of future buildings are appropriate in relation to the levels of adjoining existing and proposed public spaces (where information is available).

C Contaminated Ground Soil Remediation (l) The extent to which the intended standard of ground soil remediation reflects likely future uses of land across the subject land area (where information is available).

D Public Open Space Network (l) The extent to which the proposed layout and design of public open space, and lanes on the subject land area will integrate with and complement the form and function of the existing and proposed public open space network shown on Quarter Plan D.

(2) The extent to which the proposed layout and design of public open space within the subject land area will ensure well connected, legible and safe vehicular and pedestrian routes with appropriate provision for footpaths, servicing, infrastructure services and landscape treatment.

(3) The extent to which development can be staged to correspond to the implementation of proposed public space network shown on Quarter Plan D, where such information in respect of programming is available.

E Buildings

Page 31 (l) The extent to which building footprints, profiles and heights (as opposed to detailed building design) establish an integrated and legible built form and spatial framework across the subject area while: (a) Where practicable and where their scale, form and height is appropriate in relation to existing or proposed scale, definition, containment and legibility of adjoining public open space, character buildings and structures shown on Quarter Plan G should be retained; (b) Enhancing the form and function of existing and proposed public open space shown on Quarter Plan D and other public open space provided as part of any Approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plan; (c) Enhancing the form and function of existing and proposed lanes shown on Quarter Plan D; (d) Ensuring variation in built form across the Wynyard Quarter when viewed from public open space. (2) The extent to which building location and orientation will provide sunlight access to the public open space identified on Quarter Plan D, where proposed built form exceeds maximum permitted height or maximum FAR.

F Activities (l) The extent to which the floor to floor heights of the ground floor levels of buildings enable them to accommodate a wide range of activities and to be adapted to accommodate differing uses in the future. (2) The extent to which the proposed ground floor level activities create an attractive and 'active' edge to the adjoining public realm. (3) The extent to which the design of buildings mitigates potential reverse sensitivity effects between activities within the subject land area and adjacent land areas.

G Services (l) The extent to which stormwater, wastewater, water supply, electricity and telecommunication infrastructure will be provided to adequately service the nature and staging of anticipated development within the subject land area. (2) The extent to which the proposed public open space network and the proposed stormwater management infrastructure provides for the establishment of future stormwater management features incorporating low impact storm water design principles and improved water quality systems.

H Traffic and Parking (l) The extent to which consideration has been given to integration of parking, loading and servicing areas within the subject land area taking into account the public open space network and the location and staging of anticipated activity types.

I Quarter Area 1 (Southern) Specific Considerations (l) The methods by which any prospective activities along the Beaumont Street that interface with Quarter Area 3 (Marine) can be managed to avoid or mitigate reverse sensitivity effects. (2) The extent to which non-complying building footprints, heights and profiles complement and enhance the function of Daldy Street as a major tree-lined boulevard linking Victoria Park to the public open space in Quarter Area 6 as shown on Quarter Plan D.

J Quarter Area 2 (North Gaunt) Specific Considerations (l) The specific considerations listed at 14.9.8.21.1 and 2 as they apply to the Beaumont Street and Daldy Street Frontages within Quarter Area 2 (North Gaunt).

Page 32 (2) The extent to which the proposed building footprints, heights and profiles and the public open space network will encourage an appropriate mix of commercial and other activities. 24/3 Auckland Regional Holdings Rules 14.9.8.4 and 14.9.8.2.C.2 be deleted CASP assessment Rule 14.9.8.2.A.1(i) be deleted 24/9 Auckland Regional Holdings Clause 14.9.8.2.J.2 be amended as follows, or in an alternative manner to give effect to ARH's concerns: ....(areas where permanent accommodation is subject to a no-complaint covenant a non-complying activity as identified on Quarter Plan E)... 24/10 Auckland Regional Holdings Delete Clause 14.9.8.2.M.1 27/9 Mansons TCLM Limited It is sought that more attention is given to the particular circumstances of land ownership within street blocks to provide more practical and confined boundaries for the structure plans and/or providing flexibility to obtain the benefits of a structure plan in some circumstances. 30/2 Auckland Regional Council Including an additional assessment criterion at 14.9.8.2 (I) (3) to encourage buildings facing "Central Park" to have active frontages and contain a mix of uses. 30/3 Auckland Regional Council Adding an additional assessment criterion at 14.9.8.2 (L) (3), to encourage active frontages and a mix of uses along Brigham Street and the section of Daldy Street between Jellicoe and Beaumont Plazas.

Adding an additional assessment criterion at 14.9.8.2 (L)(4), cross referencing assessment criterion 14.9.8.2 (H) (2), which seeks to enhance the function of Daldy Street as a major tree-lined boulevard. 30/5 Auckland Regional Council At Clause 14.9.8.1(7), to add an additional information requirement as a prerequisite to an application for the approval of a CASP, relating to street typologies where practicable. This would cross-reference Assessment Criterion 14.9.9.1 (1) (c) (i), and should: a. Articulate the proposed form and function of each street, or section of street contained within the CASP area, demonstrating in particular how major pedestrian routes (to be identified under 14.9.8.1 (1) (f) and proposed building profiles and heights) to be identified under 14.9.8.1 (2) relate to each other b. Set out indicative street cross-sections, including the widths of footpaths, cycle paths and traffic lanes, and the location of trees and street furniture; particularly along key pedestrian routes such as Jellicoe, Daldy and Brigham Streets. c. Demonstrate that the design of any street, or section of street (and associated building frontages) contained within the CASP area, does not preclude it from becoming pedestrian priority or traffic-free in the future 30/6 Auckland Regional Council To add additional Assessment Criteria at 14.9.8.2 (K) and (L), encouraging CASP applications within Quarter area 5 and 6 to indicate the form and use of proposed development on neighbouring wharves. 30/7 Auckland Regional Council To add additional Assessment Criteria at 14.9.8.2 (K) and (L), encouraging the design and built form of new buildings fronting the proposed "Point Park" and any water space to demonstrate design principles that ensure its built form is not overly dominant from ground level, such as building setbacks. 30/8 Auckland Regional Council To add additional Assessment Criteria at 14.9.8.2 (N), encouraging the design and built form of new buildings fronting the proposed stormwater pond to demonstrate design principles that ensure its built form is not overly dominant from ground level, such as building setbacks. 586/2 North Shore City Council That design briefs and master planning for the area take into account and enhance marine related industries, marine

Page 33 recreation and maritime history.

14.9.9 Buildings and Activities Assessment Criteria. Submission No. Name Decision 52/10 The National Trading Amend Assessment Criteria Clauses 14.9.9.1.1 and 14.9.9.1.5 to make reference to building design in relation to both public Company of New Zealand open space areas and streets, as follows: Limited 1. Public Open Space and Street Frontages

General Design Principles ------c) Buildings shall address and align to the boundary to a height appropriate to spatially define and enclose the public open space and/or street ----- f) Where site amalgamation occurs of large sites enable the development of an extensive building frontage to the public open space and/or street, that frontage should be visually broken up through building separation and/or variation in building height, from and/or design to avoid monotonous building facades as viewed from areas of public open space and/or streets...... h) Building frontages at street level and fronting onto public open spaces must contribute to pedestrian vitality, interest and public safety. This requires a variety of architectural detail and maximising doors, window openings and balconies fronting public open space and/or streets. ----- j) Building facades should provide richness, interest and depth. This includes architectural detail and balconies fronting public open space and/or streets. Blank walls are strongly discouraged on street and public open space frontages. ----- 5) Activity Relationship to Public Open Space and Streets

a) Internal space at all levels within the building should be designed to maximise outlook onto existing and proposed public open space and/or streets.

b) Activities which engage and activate existing and proposed public open space and/or streets at ground level are encouraged.

c) Parking areas that are located within buildings and which are visible from existing and proposed public open space and/or streets are strongly discouraged. It is expected that activated building space will be provided between car parking within buildings and existing and proposed street and public open space frontages. 52/11 The National Trading Insert new Assessment Criterion f in clause 19.9.9.1.5 as follows: Company of New Zealand Limited f. Parking and service areas not concealed within buildings are strongly discouraged from locating where visible from any public open space or street (other than service lanes).

Page 34 602/15 Sanford Limited Delete the criteria in Clause 14.9.9.1.13(a) regarding the qualities of the western edge of Quarter Area 3. 616/2 Damian D'Cruz Make the street levels of the buildings permeable. Have shops, restaurants, galleries, museums and other enterprises that the public will use at street level - especially ones that have front and back entrances. Put lanes between buildings. This means no slab sided buildings (at street level) housing things like car parks or supermarkets. 32/3 Transit New Zealand Inclusion of the following additional assessment criteria:

20. Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing

a) The extent to which the activity will impact on the capacity for an additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing to be constructed along the route provisionally indicated in Annex 15. 6/12 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.9.1 Design and Activity Assessment Criteria, be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute Limited provision: 123/12 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 14.9.9.1 Design and Activity Assessment Criteria (l) For applications for buildings or alterations and additions to buildings, including accessory buildings, the Council will need to be satisfied that the site design and building design are appropriate and responsive to the design-led aspirations for Wynyard Quarter in respect of:

(a) The desired hierarchy, scale, cross-section, and legible spatial definition and containment of adjoining public open space, lanes, and/or coastal margins; (b) Achieving a highly permeable, finely grained and highly pedestrian-hospitable public circulation network character and whether it is predominantly pedestrian, vehicular or service or any combination of these; (c) Building frontages aligning to the edges of the public realm, including streets, lanes, public open spaces and/or coastal margins; (d) Attractively scaled, composed, proportioned, articulated and modulated ground surfaces, building elevations and roofs; (e) The creation of "active edges" to the public realm frontages, particularly at ground and first floor levels; (fl The delivery of outlook space in compliance with the provisions of Figure 14.9.12.4 - Outlook Space; (g) Materials and details being of high quality, durable and low maintenance; (h) Pedestrian, vehicular and service access to and egress from the site; (i) The provision of pedestrian shelter over the footpaths identified on Appendix D; (j) High quality and well-designed signs; (k) Hard and soft landscape which is expressive of its inner city, urban, coastal and marine-related context; (I) Surface level car park planting which is appropriate to and consistent with the overall theme for the Quarter; (m) Compliance with all other relevant development controls (clause 14.9.12).

Note: Compliance with the Auckland City Design Guidelines - Wynyard Quarter (Annex 16) will be deemed to satisfy the above assessment.3

Explanation

Page 35 All building development in the Quarter is a restricted controlled activity. This is intended to provide a design-led planning framework which, while providing flexibility in building design, encourages well-defined, adaptable, characterful and "active"' edges to public spaces, a sense of enclosure, public and private interaction at the built edges of public space and a varied skyline which creates a transition in height of the built form extending from the water's edge to the Central Area core. 21/1 Peter P Hollenstein The inclusions of sustainability provisions is lacking and not sufficient. 21/3 Peter P Hollenstein The provisions (14.9.9.17) in the scheme are falling desperately short of what is required today and in future to cutting edge and sustainable building. 24/1 Auckland Regional Holdings An additional assessment criterion be added to 14.9.9.1.1c) as follows: ii In some circumstances, facade design incorporating colonnades at the street boundary may be appropriate. Consideration of this street frontage typology is encouraged on a street block basis through the Comprehensive Area Structure Plan process with the colonnade design on individual building frontages within a street block discouraged. 24/11 Auckland Regional Holdings Clause 14.9.9.1.8(a) be amended as follows, or in an alternative manner to give effect to ARH's concerns: The design of building frontages and elevations facing streets and/or other public open spaces should have regard to the setback, form and character of scheduled heritage building(s) character buildings abutting or adjacent to the site. This requires consideration of important heritage character elements and qualities through building design on frontages and elevations visible from streets and other public open spaces. 30/11 Auckland Regional Council Adding an additional Assessment Criterion at 14.9.9.1 (8) (d) relating to the need for new buildings abutting or in close proximity to identified character buildings to reflect, where appropriate, established building widths and floor areas to enhance vertical rhythm and streetscape value and interest.

14.9.9.2 Additional Criteria for Specified Controlled Activities Submission No. Name Decision 30/19 Auckland Regional Council Amend assessment criterion 14.9.9.2 (1) as follows: "Excavation works associated with the creation of new water space, including stormwater ponds and areas intended to become part of the coastal marine area", and to amend the associated entry in the Activity Table on page 25 to read "Excavation works associated with the creation of new stormwater ponds and water space, including areas intended to become part of the coastal marine area"

Add an additional assessment criterion at 14.9.9.2 (1) (f) to clarify the function of any proposed stormwater pond, including any relevant water management techniques, such as flushing, pumping from existing stormwater outfalls, and wetland plantings.

14.9.9.3 Additional Criteria for Specified Discretionary Activities Submission No. Name Decision 6/13 Burtlea Investments No.98 Private use of coastal access area vested in Council under clause 14.9.14, be amended to read as follows, namely: Limited 123/13 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Private use of esplanade reserve areas vested in Council under clause 14.9.14; Limited 6/14 Burtlea Investments No.98 Sub-clause 2 Any new activity or change to an existing activity which either provides 10 or more car parking spaces on-site Limited or results in a total average daily traffic generation of 100 movements of more, be deleted in its entirety;

Page 36 123/14 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 6/15 Burtlea Investments No.98 Sub-clause 4 Office activity which exceeds the maximum office activity gross floor area requirement set out in development Limited control 14.9.12.1c), subject to compliance with the maximum office activity gross floor area requirement set out in 123/15 Viaduct Harbour Holdings development control 14.9.12.1d), be amended to read as follows, namely: Limited Office activity which exceeds the maximum permitted office activity gross floor area control set out in development control 14.9.12.1c), subject to compliance with the maximum office activity gross floor area control set out in development control 14.9.12.1d)

(a) The extent to which the activity will adversely affect operational capacity and safety of the key intersections at Beaumont Street and Halsey Street, having regard to the following matters: (i) The extent to which it can be demonstrated that the proposed office activity is likely to achieve a maximum peak vehicle trip generation ratio of 0.76 per 100m2 GFA or less in the am (7am-9am) and pm (4pm-6pm) peak periods; (ii) Any publicly available information regarding implementation of travel demand measures in Wynyard Quarter; (iii) Any planned or constructed transport infrastructure beyond that shown on Quarter Plan K; (iv) That the maximum office activity GFA specified in development control 14.9.12.1d) is not exceeded; (v) The extent to which the additional office activity will give rise to the need for ancillary parking exceeding the maximum permitted parking ratio for offices specified in development control 14.9.12.1a); (vi) The proximity of the subject site to regular public transport services, including the availability and need for a new pedestrian and/or public transport bridge connecting Jellicoe Street with the Eastern Viaduct.

14.9.11 Travel Management Submission No. Name Decision 6/16 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.11 Travel Management be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute provision: Limited 123/16 Viaduct Harbour Holdings 14.9.11 Travel Demand Management Limited The measures set out in clause 14.9.11.2 are a prerequisite to the status of the activities marked # in rule 14.9.6.6.

14.9.11.1 Public authority obligations (l) The completion of a Wynyard Quarter Transport Plan to secure compliance with the objectives, policies, and methods for Wynyard Quarter pertaining to travel demand management will be led by Council with input from stakeholders.

(2) The establishment of the Wynyard Quarter Travel Demand Management body or similar management structure with responsibility to monitor and publicly report on the implementation of the Wynyard Quarter Transport Plan regarding, in particular but without limitation, the uptake of GFA on redevelopment of the Wynyard Quarter (up to 500,000m2 GFA) to determine the timing and required works for the Fanshawe Street upgrade.

Page 37 14.9.11.2 Freehold land owner or leaseholder obligations (l) The prior entry into of a joint development agreement between Council and the freehold land owner or leasehold owner (as the case may be) pertaining to the whole or part of any Quarter Area or Areas within Wynyard Quarter that includes a legally binding commitment:

(il To comply with the maximum permitted parking ratios set out in rule 14.9.12.1a); (ii) That any new buildings consented after the date of the agreement will be operated in a way that minimises the demand for private commuter trips to/from Wynyard Quarter during the morning (7am-9am) and afternoon 4pm-6pm) peak periods by providing or establishing appropriate travel demand measures, such as:

(a) Physical infrastructure provided by the freehold land owner or leasehold owner (as the case may be) on specific sites or in specific buildings within the relevant Quarter Area or any part thereof to support the use of alternative forms of transport, such as: - Adequate covered cycle parking facilities; - Showering Facilities for employees; - Dedicated carpool parking areas; - Travel reduction information boards; - Internet services to enhance employee awareness of alternative transport services;

(bl Using reasonable endeavours to establish operational measures (by the freehold land owner or leasehold owner as the case may be) on specific sites or In specific buildings within the relevant Quarter Area or any part thereof to encourage reduced vehicle trips to Wynyard Quarter by employees, such as:

- Car sharing schemes; - Public transport use incentives; - Flexitime - Staggered working hours;

(iii) Via any agreement for lease pertaining to the grant of a new lease or sublease (as the case may be) entered into after the date of the agreement to require the leasehold owner or subtenant (as the case may be) to comply with the requirements of the agreement.

* "Excludes any agreement for lease pertaining to the renewal of a lease.

(2) The activities marked # in rule 14.9.6 shall only apply to land that is subject to the requirements of a joint development agreement. (3) The requirement for a joint development agreement shall not apply where the leasehold owner or subtenant is bound to comply with the requirements of an agreement entered into between Council and the freehold land owner or the leasehold owner (as the case may be) in accordance with sub-clause 14.9.11.2 (l) (iii) above.

Page 38

Explanation The redevelopment of Wynyard Quarter will require the provision and establishment of appropriate travel demand management measures to support the objective of achieving a modal split of 30% of trips being by private car and 70% of trips being by other modes of transport 6/17 Burtlea Investments No.98 The vehicle trip generation ceilings be deleted from clause 14.9.11 and included in revised objectives and policies (clause Limited 14.9.3) as a guide for non-complying development to ensure that resource management strategy set out in the Proposed Plan 123/17 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Modifications and the Section 32 Report will be complied with. Limited 27/18 Mansons TCLM Limited Part 14.9.11.2 Freehold Landowner or Leaseholder Obligations should be deleted in its entirety. 39/4 Auckland Chamber of That all transport proposals for the development be reappraised from a business perspective. Commerce 39/5 Auckland Chamber of A creative and innovative approach be taken in addressing transport solutions for access to and within the precinct. For Commerce example, an idea for tourists and residents is to include a circular tram track and service that connects to the CBD and Queen Street. 53/5 St Mary's Bay Association Detail required on traffic management. Incorporated 111/17 Prism Properties Limited Part 14.9.11.2 Freehold Landowner or Leaseholder Obligations should be deleted in its entirety. 114/1 A Foster and Company It is ... essential that public transport and foot pedestrian movements are encouraged by the following modes. Limited 1. Water ferry services from the vicinity of Wynyard Wharf to Downtown ferry terminals connecting to Britomart rail and bus terminals 2. Pedestrian access to Downtown either around the perimeter of the Viaduct Harbour or across the yet to be built bridge/walkway from Te Whero Island across Viaduct Harbour to connect in the vicinity of Jellicoe Street. 3. The bridge connection with Jellicoe Street should be built to accommodate a tram way. 122/5 Land Transport New Zealand Insert new wording at the end of clause 14.9.11.1.2

Through monitoring of the traffic impacts of development within the Wynyard Quarter Council acknowledges that the vehicle trip generation ceilings may need to be altered. 358/1 Professional Public Relations A complete traffic management plan with an accent on private vehicle movements being adequate is a priority...The (NZ) Limited complete (Traffic Management) plan should be an integral part of the plan change. 630/4 Sailors Corner Limited The council take into account that car parks allocated solely for staff usage do not affect the ability of the roading network during the hours 8 am to 5.30 pm.

Page 39

14.9.12 Development Control Modification

23/3 Equity Pacific Holdings Site development controls and designation of particular public open space in particular locations inappropriately responds to Limited the opportunity to create a vibrant mixed use locality with appropriate amenity levels for the city.

14.9.12.1 Parking and Peak Traffic Generation Submission No. Name Decision 6/18 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.1 be amended to read as follows: Limited 123/18 Viaduct Harbour Holdings 14.9.12.1 Parking and Peak Traffic Generation Limited (a) The following maximum permitted parking ratios shall apply to activities within the Quarter:

Activity Type Maximum Permitted Parking Ratio Office 1 space per 150m2 GFA Retail 1 space per 150m2 GFA Non-Permanent 1 space per 200m2 GFA Accommodation Permanent Accommodation 1 space per 80m2 GFA All other listed activities 1 space per 105m2 GFA

*For the purpose of calculating parking for accommodation account shall only be taken of actual gross floor area of accommodation units, excluding servicing and common areas within buildings.

(b) With the exception of clauses 9.6 (restricted controlled activity listed in the table), 9.6.1, and 9.7.1 the requirements of Part 9 Transportation apply.

(c) Within each Quarter Area the permitted gross floor area for office activity shall not exceed the following total gross floor area controls:

Quarter Area Maximum Permitted Office Activity GFA (and site ratios) 1 110,000m2 GFA (3.5:1)* 2 69,300m2 GFA (2.5:1)* 3 5,000m2 GFA 4 Future Development Area 5 3,700m2 GFA

Page 40 6 Future Development Area 7 0 Total 188,000m2 GFA

*Office activity GFA is allocated on a site basis within the relevant Quarter Area in accordance with the site ratios specified in the table, subject to the relevant specified maximum GFA for the Quarter Area not being exceeded. The subject land area of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan may be considered as one site for the purpose of development controls 14.9.12.1c) and d) so as to enable office activity GFA to be allocated on a different basis, subject to the relevant specified maximum GFA for the Quarter Area not being exceeded. (d) Subject to resource consent being granted for a restricted discretionary activity, the gross floor area within each Quarter Area for office activity shall not exceed the following total gross floor area controls:

Quarter Area Maximum Permitted Office Activity GFA (and site ratios) 1 110,000m2 GFA (3.5:1)* * 2 84,000m2 GFA (3:1)** 3 5,000m2 GFA 4 Future Development Area 5 30,500m2 GFA * 6 Future Development Area 7 0 Total 229,500m2 GFA

*Excludes land areas within Area 5 identified on Quarter Plan E as 'areas where all activity is limited to Marine and Fishing Industry and Marine and Fishing Retail only". No office activity is allowed within these areas. 30,500m2 GFA* Future Development Area Total **Office activity GFA is allocated on a site basis within the relevant Quarter Area in accordance with the site ratios specified in the table, subject to the relevant specified maximum GFA for the Quarter Area not being exceeded. The subject land area of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan may be considered as one site for the purpose of development controls 14.9.12.1c) and d)so as to enable office activity GFA to be allocated on a different basis, subject to the relevant specified maximum GFA for the Quarter Area (excluding any transferred gross floor area - see clause 14.9.12.1e) below) not being exceeded. Note: Resource consent is not required for office activity up to 110,000m2 GFA in Quarter Area 1 because this is allowed as a permitted activity under clause 14.9.12.1c). (e) Subject to resource consent being granted for a controlled activity, permitted office activity gross floor area may be transferred between Quarter Areas provided that: (i) The donor land and recipient land form part of the same Approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plan; and (ii) The total gross floor area for office activities allowed within Wynyard Quarter shall not, as a consequence of the transfer, exceed the controls specified above for controlled activities. Subject to resource consent being granted for: (i) A controlled activity, ancillary parking may exceed the relevant maximum permitted parking ratio where the following standards, terms, and conditions are complied with:

Page 41 Activity Peak Trip Generation Ratio per 100m2 GFA Activity GFA (and site ratios) Offices allowed under clause 0.96 4.9.12.1c Retail 0.73 Food & Beverage 0.25 Non-Permanent Accommodation 0.68 Permanent Accommodation 0.32

(ii) A restricted discretionary activity, ancillary parking may exceed the relevant maximum permitted parking ratio where the following standards, terms, and conditions and ail other relevant provisions in Part 14.9 Wynyard Quarter (e.g. clause 14.9.9.3.4) are complied with: Activity Peak Trip Generation Ratio per 100m2 GFA Offices allowed under clause 0.76 14.9.12.1d) Explanation The parking and peak traffic generation controls are designed to implement the total vehicle trip generation ceilings and vehicle peak trip generation ratios for Wynyard Quarter. They reflect the desire to encourage a modal shift away from private vehicles to alternative transport modes to ensure efficient operation of the key Beaumont Street and Halsey Street intersections.

Specific controls are imposed on the total gross floor area allowed for office activities within the Quarter, due to the potential for offices to generate traffic during the am and pm peak periods. Higher traffic generating activities (e.g. offices) are focused near Fanshawe Street to reduce the potential to draw traffic throughout the Quarter, and to provide convenient access to regular/high frequency bus services operating along Fanshawe Street.

Provision is made for additional gross floor area for office activities as a controlled activity to allow specific traffic conditions to be assessed based on available monitoring information to avoid adverse effects on the operation of the key intersections. 27/2 Mansons TCLM Limited The new proposed maximum office activity gross floor area requirements set out in proposed development control 14.9.12.1 111/2 Prism Properties Limited (c).Seeks that these provisions be removed or amended so that the existing office potential will be retained. 27/3 Mansons TCLM Limited Retain the existing entitlement, but offer incentives of additional development, say up to the 4:1 FAR (which with a structure 111/3 Prism Properties Limited plan is already offered), for the carparking ratio to be reduced. 27/19 Mansons TCLM Limited In Rule 14.9.12 a)(i), the non-complying activity status of an application to infringe the Parking and Peak Traffic Generation 111/18 Prism Properties Limited Rules is opposed. Discretionary Activity status is sought on the basis of it being a more consistent and appropriate District Plan approach. 27/20 Mansons TCLM Limited The Maximum Office Activity Ratio per site control set out in Rule 14.9.12.1(c) should either be deleted entirely or at least removed from applying to Quarter area 1. 29/3 Chevron New Zealand Remove the office space limitation from the Caltex service station site.

Page 42 30/18 Auckland Regional Council To consider whether the trip generation ratio targets identified under Clause 14.9.11.2 (1) (i) should exclude car, freight and passenger ferry operations, taking into account its status as a special activity 42/1 Epsom Mothers Group Two hours free parking of Victoria Park - free shuttle service. 94/2 Audrey van Ryn Wynyard Quarter could be designed to be as vehicle free as possible by the provision of underground parking accessed from the land end of the area. 111/19 Prism Properties Limited The Maximum Office Activity Ratio per site control set out in Rule 14.9.12.1(c) is onerous and unreasonable for the reasons elaborated earlier in these submissions. It should either be deleted entirely or at least removed from applying to Quarter Area 1. 602/19 Sanford Limited That the carparking and travel management provisions applying to Quarter Area 5 be no more restrictive than those currently applying to Quarter Area 5 under the operative District Plan provisions (including both the carparking ratios and the location and visibility of parking spaces when viewed from street and public open spaces). 625/3 Sailors Corner Limited The council retain the existing car parking ratio of 1 space per 50m² of GFA, for both marine and retail and offices. The Council adopt user friendly strategies that encourage more car parks in the immediate area that will allow greater use of the area for the public. 630/1 Sailors Corner Limited The council retain the existing car parking ratio of 1 space per 50 m2 of GFA, for both marine retail and offices. 630/2 Sailors Corner Limited The council adopt strategies that encourage more car parks in the immediate area to will allow greater use of the area for the public. 630/3 Sailors Corner Limited The council allow and encourage new car parking buildings to be built within the quarter.

14.9.12.2 Development Control Site Intensity and Quarter Plans B1 and B2 Submission No. Name Decision 1/22 Marine Industry Association The maximum floor area ratio in Area 3 should be increased following the approval of a CASP 6/19 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.2 Site Intensity be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute provision: Limited 14.9.12.2 Site Intensity 123/19 Viaduct Harbour Holdings (a) The maximum floor area ratios permitted in the Quarter prior to an Approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plan are shown on Quarter Limited Plan 81. (b) The maximum floor area ratios permitted in the Quarter with an Approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plan are shown on Quarter Plan B2 except as limited by development control 14.9.12.12.1c). (c) For the purposes of this clause, Gross Floor Area and Floor Area Ratio are defined in Part 16, except where the vertical distance between storey levels exceeds 6m the gross floor area of the building or part of the building so affected shall be calculated as floor area as opposed to the volume of that airspace.

Explanation The site intensity rule limits the building bulk and gross floor area achievable on a site. It is the prime control of the scale and intensity of development in the Central Area and Wynyard Quarter. Different site intensity ratios apply to land within the Quarter with the intention of working in conjunction with the maximum permitted height control to enable development that will achieve the Quarter-wide objectives and policies for built form. 21/2 Peter P Hollenstein The inclusion of development bonuses for those who make real sustainability provisions in their proposals.

Page 43 23/7 Equity Pacific Holdings The FAR and height controls result in inappropriate massing within the Quarter and should be further reviewed in the Limited context of the above comments. The Plan needs to introduce bonus elements such as those available in other Quarters i.e Victoria Quarter and the CBD. 27/8 Mansons TCLM Limited Consider greater rewards for special contributions to the public realm, using the bonus provisions of Part 6 of the District Plan as a guide as to the appropriate extent of reward, is also sought. 30/13 Auckland Regional Council Include provisions that facilitate the protection of all identified "character buildings and features, by enabling applications relating to character buildings and features to seek transferable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) development rights 37/18 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.12.2 Site Intensity and Ratepayers Association FAR controls should be further refined and defined in parallel with revised complying and non complying descriptions for Incorporated (WVTRA) A3, and a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan for A3, with the sole purpose of supporting and encouraging a variety of core marine and fishing industry developments, and marine retail development, while discouraging other activities that utilize medium and high density form. An FAR of 4.6:1 coupled with 31m and 52m height controls is entirely inappropriate within A3 if the intention is to allow, support and encourage marine activity in A3. 602/20 Sanford Limited a) The reduced maximum Floor Area Ratio of 2.5:1 applied to the western part of the Sanford Land by Quarter Plans B1 and B2 be increased so it is consistent with the Floor Area Ratio applied to the balance of the Sanford Land. b) The Sanford Land be allocated a Floor Area Ratio in Quarter Plan B2 no less than 4:1. 625/4 Sailors Corner Limited The council increase the floor area ratio on the area of land that Sailors Corner Ltd occupies to a level of 6:1 for our site of 1791m². 6/33 Burtlea Investments No.98 Quarter Plans B1 and B2 be amended as follows: Limited 123/33 Viaduct Harbour Holdings (a) References to and notations showing a 1.5:1 maximum floor area ratio for sites in Quarter Area 3 be deleted and substituted by a 2.5:1 Limited maximum floor area ratio: (b) Notations regarding the Special Amenity Yard (see Figure 14.12.13) which make no provision for any floor area ratio be deleted and substituted by a 2.5:1 maximum floor area ratio for that site;

Quarter Plan B2 be amended as follows:

(a) The plan title "Basic and Maximum Floor Area Ratio Following Approval of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan" be deleted and substituted by "Maximum Floor Area Ratio Following Approval of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan"; (b) The cross-reference to Quarter Plan B1 (regarding land to be acquired) be deleted and substituted by a cross-reference to Quarter Plan D; (c) Notations showing the Linear Park be amended so that the areas of land in Quarter Areas 1 and 2 to be acquired for public open space do not exceed 8m in width; (d) References to designations be deleted; (e) Notations showing a 2.75:1 maximum floor area ratio for sites in Quarter Area 2 fronting Beaumont Street be deleted and substituted by a 4:1 maximum floor area ratio; (f) Notations regarding sites in Quarter Areas 4 and 6 (except for notations regarding land to be acquired for road or public open space) be deleted and substituted by a notation zoning those sites as "Future Development Area". 18/1 Goodman Nominee (NZ) The maximum Floor Area Ratio for Quarter Area 1 as shown on Quarter Plan B2 is reduced to 3:1

Page 44 Limited 27/21 Mansons TCLM Limited The (basic) 3:1 site intensity or floor area ratio control and 24m heights set for the sites south of Gaunt Street should be 111/20 Prism Properties Limited increased to promote a better match with development potential on nearby Viaduct Harbour Precinct and other sites.

14.9.12.3 Maximum Permitted Height 1/24 Marine Industry Association The maximum height in QA3 should be increased following the approval of a CASP. 4/2 George R Mihaljevich Would support a mixture of low rise buildings (none at 52m), provided that the effects of wind, sun and shading were taken into account and minimized and with no buildings north of Jellicoe Street. 6/20 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause14.9.12.3 Maximum Permitted Height be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute provision: Limited 123/20 Viaduct Harbour Holdings 14.9.12.3 Maximum Permitted Height Limited (a) The height of any building or structure in the Quarter prior to an Approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plan shall not exceed specified permitted maximums shown on Quarter Plan C1. (b) The height of any building or structure in the Quarter with an Approved Comprehensive Area Structure Plan shall not exceed specified permitted maximums shown on Quarter Plan C2. (c) On sites with a maximum permitted height of 52m the maximum cumulative floor plate area per floor shall not exceed: (i) Quarter Area 2 - 1200m2 gross floor area and a maximum dimension of 45m X 45m along the Linear Park and Central Park building frontages for that part of the building exceeding a height of 31m; (ii) Quarter Area 5 at the corner of Halsey and Jellicoe Streets - 1200m2 gross floor area and a maximum dimension of 40m by 30m for that part of the building exceeding a height of 27m; (iii) Quarter Areas 3 and 5 (except for the site at the corner of Halsey and Jellicoe Streets) - 900m2 gross floor area and a maximum dimension of 30m by 30m for that part of the building exceeding a height of 31m.

Bonus Roof Height (d) This control applies to those sites in Wynyard Quarter to which the maximum permitted heights of 16.5~1, 25m and 31m shown on Quarter Plan C2 apply and allows the maximum permitted height to be exceeded for roofs, including roof top projections, where resource consent is granted pursuant to an application for a controlled activity. Consent will be granted where the form and design of the roof and rooftop projections comply with the following standards and assessment criteria: Standards The bonus roof height will apply where the roof, including any rooftop projections: (a) Exceeds the relevant maximum permitted height by no more than 2m; and (b) Does not result in the relevant maximum floor area ratio (shown on Quarter Plan B2) being exceeded.

Assessment Criteria (a) The roof profile design and composition should be considered as part of, and contribute to the overall architectural form of the building. Emphasis should be on avoiding any adverse effects on the design and appearance of the building when viewed from streets and other public spaces and from overlooking buildings. (b) Rooftop projections including towers, turrets, chimneys, lift towers, machinery rooms, water towers, or finials should be screened or incorporated in an architecturally attractive manner as part of the overall design of the building.

Page 45 Note: The bonus will be considered for separate parts of a roof where they extend above the maximum permitted height limits.

Explanation The maximum permitted height limits imposed on buildings in the Quarter seek to achieve an appropriate scale in relation to the proposed street network while also providing a transition to the coast, and between Wynyard Quarter an the Core SMA. Provision has been made for maximum permitted height of up to 52m on specific sites. These sites have been selected to add variety to building form and to provide "markers" for the Quarter. The site in Area 2 has been specifically selected to take advantage of the location adjacent to significant areas of public open space which will complement the building height and form. The maximum permitted height of 52m has been set to achieve a balance between providing for building variety while ensuring that built form will remain subservient to the Core SMA, and that any adverse effect will be mitigated through building design. The maximum permitted height requirement have been designed to allow scope to include roofing elements that make a positive contribution to the overall appearance of the building. 20/3 Art Deco Society (Auckland) The status of this activity should be changed from restricted discretionary to discretionary. Quarter Plan C2 : Maximum Incorporated Heights need to be reduced in many areas especially adjacent to "characters" or heritage buildings. 41/1 Claire Schoeller Building a maximum 5 storeys at the Fanshawe Street end of the Tank Farm, reducing to 3 storeys at Jellicoe Street. I support restricting the buildings on the Tank Farm to less than 20 metres high. 44/1 Christopher E Smith Building heights are too high and need to be reduced drastically. 45/1 Denis A Parkinson Buildings on the Tank Farm nearer the outer end of the peninsula should be a maximum of three stories, rising proportionately to a maximum of 5 stores at the Fanshawe. 51/1 Dawn R Gibson No buildings on the Tank Farm should be more than 20 metres high. The maximum building heights at the Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres/5 storeys and gradually reducing to 12 metres/3 storeys at Jellicoe Street and further out on the point. Tall buildings should be in the south of the development because of the sun and shadow effects and wind and views not on the north end of the tank farm. 53/3 St Mary's Bay Association Revise maximum heights. Incorporated 55/1 Saskia van der Geest and Buildings in the Tank Farm area should be no more than the surrounding buildings. (Vodafone, Westin, through to Air NZ Arjan Schenk building) i.e. 5 storeys at Fans awe Street end down to 3 storeys at Jellicoe Street and further out to the point. 58/1 Michael G Blamers Tank Farm buildings should have a maximum height of 20 metres at the inland end, reducing to no more than 12 metres at the point. 60/1 Philip R Nacelles The current plan is amended to constrain building height within the Tank Farm area less than 20 metres height at any one point with the height than reducing from the Fans awe Street end towards the sea. 64/1 Ji Hee Paek The proposed building height is excessive and need to be reduced realistically. 65/1 Kevin Pollock The maximum building heights at the Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres/5 storeys and gradually reducing to 12 metres/3 storeys at Jellicoe Street and further out on the point. 66/1 James Crossen Accept with amendments . The proposed building heights are too high 67/1 Mike Porteous The plan should be amended so that no buildings on the Tank Farm are more than 20 metres/5 storeys high. The maximum height at the Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres/5 storeys and this restriction should taper to a maximum of 12 metres/3 storeys at Jellicoe Street and beyond to the point. 68/1 Hannah M Jemmett The plan should be amended to reduce the height of the proposed building on the Tank Farm to no more than 20 metres/5

Page 46 storeys in height. Towards Jellicoe Street and out on the point the buildings should be no more than 12 metres/3 storeys in height. 49/1 Greg and Paulene Gordon No buildings on the Tank Farm should be more than 20 metres high. The maximum building heights at the Fanshawe Street 54/1 Corinne M McLaren end should be 20 metres /5 storeys and gradually reducing to 12 metres/3storeys at Jellicoe Street and further out on the 62/1 Peter A Mortimer point. 63/1 Tom Archibald 69/1 Klaus Buwert 76/1 Robin Seal 81/1 Gordon Brown 92/1 Jennifer J MacDonald 93/1 Penny Brock 100/1 Elizabeth M England-Teauraki 103/1 Shirley P Kent 104/1 Paul A Nichols-Marcy 106/1 Jennifer Ward 107/1 Linley Smith 108/1 Peter Neighbours 109/1 CD and MD Cotter 126/1 Katherine Bekesi 176/1 Hayley Edgell and Sean Thorburn 177/1 Rod Simpson 178/1 Lindsay E Foster 179/1 Mara Staffieri 180/1 Gaynor E Steel 181/1 James C M Devereaux 182/1 Allan and Carole Anderson 183/1 James McCarty 184/1 Eve de Castro-Robinson 185/1 Warwick G Lee 186/1 Raewyn F Kitching 187/1 Odette Mihaljevich 188/1 Roger Kingsley 189/1 Roger R Galvin 190/1 Ian K Attwood 191/1 David and Roz Tommas 192/1 Brenda and Maurice Mather 193/1 MRA Consulting

Page 47 194/1 Glenn Watt 195/1 Sandra Knight 196/1 Marilyn N Houison 197/1 Hilary J Le Mieux 198/1 David and Kelly Oxton 199/1 Claudia Wong She 200/1 Edward P Leary 201/1 Eva and Sonne Naera 203/1 Colin McKnight 204/1 Rosemary EK Reeves 205/1 Elaine Koller 206/1 Michael G Hughes 207/1 Jane F Hall 208/1 Dr.Annie Goldson 209/1 Jason Leong 210/1 Alison J Boon 211/1 Steven and Taryn Small 212/1 Grace McKnight 213/1 Sue McKnight 214/1 Vaulette Wylie 215/1 Margaret Watts 216/1 Debby Giness 217/1 Robin G McAndrew 218/1 John H Hall 219/1 Marcus William and Sylvia Shadforth 220/1 Nicola C Ward 221/1 Andrea Bruce 222/1 Peter H Van Nieuwkoop 223/1 South Head Trust 224/1 Jennifer A Davis 225/1 Sanne H Hansen 226/1 Mary and Lee Challis 227/1 Stuart Bode and Jan Hewitt 228/1 Julie Raddon 229/1 Mrs B E Spencer 230/1 Richard G Dockery 231/1 Sue Howard

Page 48 233/1 Lee A Baker 234/1 Lisa M O'Neill 235/1 Geoffrey D Jones-Prichard 236/1 Jenny R Hotham 237/1 Michael and Alison McKenzie 238/1 Sybil J MacDonald 239/1 Howard Smith 240/1 Paul Knight 241/1 James P Brown 242/1 Mark Green 243/1 Derek H Keene 244/1 Ken Beguely 245/1 Roger M Reynolds 246/1 James W Boult 247/1 Rachel Gardner 248/1 Rachel Wisbey 249/1 Great Southern TV 250/1 Claire Logan 251/1 Daniella Norling 252/1 Blair Slade-Jones 253/1 Warwick and Averil Norman 254/1 Rahul Ranchhodji 255/1 Stephen Delaney 256/1 Baden H Pascoe 257/1 Andrew P Fagan 258/1 Frason MacDonald 259/1 Ian A MacDonald 260/1 Greg Vincent 261/1 Paul Grubl 262/1 Mary Manion-Porter 263/1 Paula White 264/1 Raymond J Keenan 265/1 Susan L Gebbie 266/1 David G Gebbie 267/1 Neville M Thompson 268/1 Erika Whittome 269/1 Catherine A Tizard 270/1 Sarah K Guppy and Jonathan

Page 49 R Besser 271/1 Warren Prince 272/1 Franciscus J Slebos 273/1 Jason H Chong 274/1 Karyn J Van Den Nurk 275/1 Noel T Dalton 276/1 Cheryl and Peter Cornberg 277/1 John B Seagar 278/1 John and Deborah Garty 279/1 Virginia Browne and Bettina von Hassell 280/1 April Vaudrey 281/1 Michael Fitzpatrick 282/1 Brigitte J Klubien 283/1 Simon E K Reeves 284/1 Kerry Harrison 285/1 Marilyn O'Meara 286/1 Joan Witzman 287/1 Colin J Guldbrandsen 288/1 Michael J Bramley 289/1 Marilynn V Johnson 290/1 Leonie and John Hynds 291/1 Lee A Smith 292/1 Donald A Gifford 293/1 Anthony Krauth 294/1 Jan-Marie Ginnaie 295/1 Donald M Gibson 296/1 Elizabeth L Hardie 297/1 Annette C Isbey 298/1 Tom Lowe 299/1 Mr and Mrs Mason 300/1 Larissa and Brent Park 301/1 Bruce Copeland 302/1 Janine Copeland 303/1 Irene Chain 304/1 Judith H Trewartha 305/1 Ian M Trewartha 306/1 Chritine Babington

Page 50 307/1 Stewart Hunt 308/1 David Hofer 309/1 Margaret Whitch 310/1 M Addis Caliari 311/1 Antonio Caliari-Pearce 312/1 Francesca Caliari-Pearce 313/1 Roger S Pearce 314/1 Julie-Anne Caliari 315/1 Marianne O'Meara 316/1 Hamish M and Margaret L McKegg 317/1 John R Beck 318/1 John F Mathel 319/1 Dawn R Gibson 320/1 Patrick R Gibson 321/1 Catherine Heron 322/1 Kent Xie 323/1 Maxine Hefford 324/1 Kevin S Marshall 325/1 Ian D Walker 326/1 Michael D Andrews 327/1 Craig Housley 328/1 Diane Percy 329/1 Rupert Handy 330/1 Lesley M Kelly 331/1 Keith Morris 332/1 Stephen L Anderson 333/1 Peter and Linda Andrews 335/1 Timothy C Savage 336/1 Steve Frogley 337/1 Tana Fishman 338/1 H. Charles Fishman 339/1 Dee Wallace 340/1 Georgina M S Parkinson 341/1 Donald G McMillan 342/1 Denise and Rodney Wayne 343/1 Alison Shearer 344/1 Kenneth A Landeman

Page 51 345/1 Grant Davidson 346/1 Peter M Marler 347/1 Vance A Haywood 348/1 Jane C Stewart 349/1 Brett Hollander 350/1 John D Keane 351/1 Patricia N Baker 352/1 Scott Hazlewood 353/1 Fay Clark 354/1 Noni M Poland 355/1 Janet E Poland 356/1 Peter and Gae Howe 357/1 Catherine Mayo 360/1 Joop Hollander 361/1 Sandra Barclay-Graham 362/1 Lisa Tilley 363/1 Renie Walters 364/1 Andrew D Llyod 365/1 Chris Baker 366/1 Dorothy A Thomas 367/1 Helena Carroll 368/1 Angela Spain 369/1 Tracy A Mills 370/1 Professional Public Relations (NZ) Limited 371/1 Aleisha Van Veen 372/1 William Black 373/1 Maria A Lempriere 374/1 Helen Leahy 375/1 Rosalind Young 376/1 Gerard Murphy 377/1 Justine McSweeney 378/1 W D Paterson 379/1 Louise Fleming 380/1 John Ball 381/1 Carol Handin 382/1 Ethel Chieng 383/1 Katharine M Browne

Page 52 384/1 Judith R Simister 385/1 Barbara Smaill 386/1 Chris Morton 387/1 Roger and Sue Wall 388/1 Trevor J Hackett 389/1 Pamela G Ingram 390/1 Paul Snape and Pamela McLanchlan 391/1 Bridget Burnett 392/1 Catherine E Lawless 394/1 Nicola R Dentith 395/1 Mary L Castles 396/1 Eion M J Castles 397/1 Carol L Simkin 398/1 Ken and Julene Dorman 399/1 Ian J Reedy 400/1 Valerie Leech 401/1 Christine and Peter Fieldsend 403/1 Shayn Robertson 404/1 Tim and Jennifer Eddington 406/1 Paul S Rose 407/1 James Kellow 408/1 Felicity Matla 409/1 Robert and Tania Sweet 410/1 Rick Longdon 411/1 B R F McLeod 412/1 Beryl and Norman Jack 413/1 Dr.Raymond and Helen Miller 414/1 Bruce and Sheila Birnie 415/1 Francis J Mair 416/1 Gary Sparnon 417/1 Ronald W May 418/1 Timothy R Smith 419/1 Rachel and Anil Sharma 420/1 Kevin Martin 421/1 Ross and Anna Harvey 422/1 Michael J Harris 423/1 Barry R Cant

Page 53 424/1 Susan and Graham Burrett 425/1 J M McIntosh 426/1 John A Ormiston and Diana R Lennon 427/1 Jennifer Jury 428/1 Lillian J Chrystall 429/1 Ronald J Brittain 430/1 Murray Oliver 431/1 Petrina Madsen-Fisk 432/1 Peter Bovvell 433/1 David D Drake 434/1 Robert K Dryksen 435/1 Scott Jenkin 436/1 Dr.Ivanica M Vodanovich 437/1 John G Daube and Christian 438/1 Helen Blick 439/1 Anna Comrie-Thomson 440/1 Murray Gibson 441/1 Peter G Watts and Stephanie J Lees 442/1 Mark Duxbury 443/1 Loraine M Hartley 444/1 Ian G Baker 445/1 Work Design Solutions 446/1 Hughla Davidson 447/1 Jacqueline M Hudson 448/1 Rosemary A Gummer 449/1 John B Gummer 450/1 Maureen and Alan Tomlinson 451/1 Marion and David Regan 452/1 Richard S Woolley and Juanita Raimirez 453/1 John E Bellerby 454/1 Donna P MacMenigall 455/1 Rosanne J McKenzie 456/1 E R J and M W Martin 457/1 Antony W J McNeight 458/1 Robert Dagg

Page 54 459/1 Deanna Mihaljevich 460/1 Brenda J Thompson 461/1 Judith Ogilvy 462/1 Jocelyn Martin 463/1 Neil and Lynn Barker 464/1 Mary Eyre 465/1 Gregg and Pam Allnutt 466/1 Bruce J Cox 467/1 Martin Monk 468/1 Larissa Mihaljevich 469/1 Anthony M Borich 470/1 Joe Wade 471/1 Pamela A Roderick 472/1 Brian F Roderick 473/1 Elizabeth Mihaljevich 474/1 Josep Mihaljevich 475/1 Tony K Babarich 476/1 Bozidar Zutic 477/1 Diana and Stuart Fergusson 478/1 Maxine B Ridley 479/1 Denise Boyes 480/1 John and Ingrid Waugh 481/1 Carl Maitland 482/1 Stephen R Picard 483/1 Jocelyn G Calderwood 484/1 Anna E Buchly 485/1 Max Adams 486/1 Edward and Natalie Leng 487/1 Gregory B Martin 488/1 Alan and Victoria Clark 489/1 Philip Wright 490/1 Kathleen Clarke 491/1 Kiri Schumacher 492/1 John Collinge 493/1 Scott Wallace 494/1 Heather Waugh and Sandra 495/1 Steff 496/1 Maurice Kirkbride

Page 55 497/1 Graeme and Sue Cremer 498/1 Mr and Mrs. M Hartley 499/1 Peter J Murphy 500/1 Murray and June Tanner 501/1 Robert Everall 502/1 Christopher and Helen Cherry 503/1 John Darroch Matthew Goodson and 504/1 Dianna Perron 505/1 Jill Cory and Craig Brownie 506/1 Nick Williams 507/1 Richard J Rolfe Raymond and Rosemary 508/1 Malcolm 509/1 Christopher D Ridley 510/1 Graham R Smout 511/1 Evelyn B Foote 512/1 Olivia Woodroffe 513/1 Natalie Foote 514/1 Alla Woodroffe 515/1 Pamela E Lamon 516/1 Annemieke L Pritchard 517/1 Mervyn O Brennan 518/1 Josephine M Brennan 519/1 Marc C Lemson 520/1 Stephen B Fisher 521/1 Beverley J Morris 522/1 Thomas Blythen 523/1 Dr.Michael L Vidulich 524/1 Mr and Mrs F Blomfield 525/1 The Swaney Family 526/1 Thomas and Shane Conroy 527/1 Kathleen V Hogg 528/1 Edward J Jenner 529/1 Catherine Wenzel 530/1 Patrick J Noton 531/1 Barry W Smith 532/1 Anthony Urlich

Page 56 533/1 Reginald F Price 534/1 Roger and Corrine Wallis 535/1 Margaret A Malaghan Margaretha Sehnert and Allan 536/1 Cooper 537/1 John A McKenzie 538/1 Michael M Benjamin 539/1 Campbell Newman 540/1 Jeremy A P Aschcroft 541/1 Megan Fletcher 542/1 Nicole Antonelli 543/1 Kate McLiam 544/1 Tracey H Wotherspoon 545/1 Jason M Bailey 546/1 Edwin J W and Eila Ikin 547/1 D Moss-Mason 548/1 Gary R Breed 549/1 Mary M Meuli 550/1 Alma M Davis 551/1 Margaret L Dempsey 552/1 Andrew Mason 553/1 Jennifer R Bode 554/1 Body Corporate 117194 555/1 Robert Hart 556/1 Lesley K Pope 557/1 Diana Thomson 558/1 Dianne P Barron 559/1 Ondrey Ossyanin 560/1 Kate McHardy 561/1 Raymond and Maria Barker 562/1 John S Burrett 563/1 Richard G Brayne 564/1 Megan Robertson 565/1 Peter Scarlett 566/1 Russell Daniels 570/1 Elizabeth Greive 571/1 Lynette Mok 572/1 Claire Beams

Page 57 573/1 Isabel E Alison 574/1 Scott W Colebrook Tania L Hayden and Phillip 575/1 Monks 576/1 Philip V Hull 577/1 Jane E Ellingham 578/1 Karn L McIntosh 579/1 Margaret Surman 580/1 Nick Holroyd and Sarah Davis 583/1 Michael Coutts 584/1 Grahame and Raewyn Espie 585/1 Graham Wilson 587/1 Diane J Walton 588/1 Rosemary E Harris 589/1 David J Alison 591/1 Grant D Harris 592/1 City Rentals Trustees Limited 593/1 CTR 2 Limited 594/1 CTR 2 Limited 595/1 City Rentals Trustees Limited 596/1 CTR 1 Limited 597/1 City Rentals Trustees Limited 598/1 City Rentals Trustees Limited 599/1 City Property Investment 603/1 Group 605/1 CTR 2 Limited 606/1 CTR 2 Limited 609/1 Dona J White 610/1 Richard Carlyon 611/1 Miriam Dean 612/1 Janine Wallace 613/1 Martin Lempriere 614/1 Allan and Shona Armstrong 615/1 Andrea Milner 617/1 Elizabeth A Vesty 618/1 Gillian F Stobo 619/1 Athina Tsoulis and Barry Reay 620/1 Ray Knill

Page 58 621/1 A.J Hartstonge 623/1 Timothy J Erson 624/1 St Mary's College 626/1 Lucinda Welsh 628/1 Melissa Williams 631/1 Simon Sinclair 632/1 Kim M Newlove 633/1 Timothy J Jeffery 634/1 Bruce Blake 635/1 Peter D Wethey 637/1 Taina L Berrman 638/1 Patricia G Eastmond Andrew McCall Judith and John Sigley 70/1 Martin W Poulsen The height on Tank Farm buildings should be limited to 5 stories or approx 20 metres. Closer to the sea this limit should be 3 stories only. 71/1 Peter B Smith No buildings should be more than 10 metres high. 72/1 Ken Marsh No building should be more than 20 m in height. The maximum building height at the Fanshawe Street, end should be 5 storeys or 20 m. Reduce further to 12 m/3 storeys at Jellicoe Street. 73/1 Michael Graham-Stewart Maximum of 5 storeys or around 20 metres. Nothing bigger than the new Air NZ building should be permitted. 74/1 Kerry and Marilyn Jenkin No buildings on the Tank Farm should be more than 20 metres high. 402/1 Inga D Schader 405/1 Joy Oliver 582/1 Andrew Southcombe 75/1 Christine Gildea Please keep it lower. Maximum building height 3-5 stories. 77/1 Helen Burke That no buildings on the Tank Farm should be more than 4 storeys high. Fanshawe Street end of the tank Farm is maximum building height as is and that all other buildings should reduce in size. So that by Jellicoe Street they are no more than 3 storeys high or less. 78/2 Alice L Bellerby The maximum building height at the Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres/5 storeys, gradually reducing to heights of 12 metres/3 storeys or less at Jellicoe Street. Any further out on point (if they are necessary at all) should be 1 storey high only. 79/1 Andrea M Sutherland Tank Farm building limits should be set at no more than 20 metres, reducing to 12 metres further out on the point. More park space is required. 80/1 Geoffrey R Bonner No buildings on the Tank Farm should exceed 20 metres in height. The maximum height at the Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres and reduce to 12 metres at Jellicoe Street and further out on the point. 84/1 Dennis P Rakich Fewer but taller buildings that at least provided views between them. 85/1 Janmarie Thompson No buildings to be more than 20 metres high. The Fanshawe Street end should be no more than 20 metres/5 stories and the buildings should reduce in height to 3 stories at Jellicoe Street. Any buildings further out on the point should be no higher than 3 stories.

Page 59 86/1 Andrew Caldwell No buildings on the tank farm should be more than 20 metres high. The maximum heights at Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres/5 storeys and reduce to 12 metres/3 storeys at Jellicoe Street and so on out to the point. 88/1 Alistair K Baikie and Eamonn The proposed building heights are excessive and need to be drastically reduced. A O'Brien 89/1 Anthony W Smith The building height limits should maintain the present 15 m max height limit. 90/1 Mary Smith The maximum building heights should maintain the present 15 m maximum height. 91/1 Anthony D Skelton and Helen No buildings on the Tank Farm should be higher than 20 metres (5 stories). The tallest buildings of 20 metres should be at I Skelton Fanshaw Street and the height of buildings should reduce to be no more than 12 metres at the waters edge on Jellicoe Street and the point. 97/1 Lesley Christensen-Yule The proposed heights need to be significantly reduced so that the new development is not blocked off from , Ponsonby, Westhaven and inner city areas by a wall of buildings. 99/1 Willemina Donker No multi storey buildings should be erected on the Tank Farm. The maximum building height at Fanshawe Street end should be kept in line with the current height restriction of 5 storeys and the apartment buildings in Halsey Street, no further high rise beyond. 101/1 Caroline and Michael Building should be shorter ( no higher than 20 m). Robinson 105/1 Roger T King No buildings on the Tank Farm site should be higher than 20 metres. Maximum building height at Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres. Maximum height at Jellicoe Street and further out to the point should be 12 metres There should be a gradual reduction in height from the Fanshawe Street end to Jellicoe Street/point. 108/2 Peter Neighbours More consideration needs to be given to the linkage between existing public assets such as Viaduct Basin, Victoria Park, Westhaven Marina. We don't want to walk through a maze of high buildings to get to the open space. 110/3 Erwin van Asbeck Point Precinct - reduce proposed height limits to 12 metres for mix use Buildings. Jellicoe Precinct and Central Precinct current height allowances on all buildings over 20 meters must be reduced, particularly adjacent to public parks/spaces. 112/2 Charlotte M Fisher The current height allowances on all buildings over 20 metres must be reduced. 118/3 Ariadne Marinas Oceania Quarter Plans C1 and C2, and Clause 14.9.12.3 of the Plan Change in relation to maximum height should be amended to Proprietary Limited/Orams reflect the existing lawfully established bulk and scale of the buildings on the Orams' site. Marine Auckland 128/1 A R Lanning The Tank Farm development must be restricted to buildings and less than 20 m in height. Buildings and structures near the waterfront where people will be walking and hopefully enjoying a relaxing area should be even loss imposing i.e. higher than 12 m. 130/1 Cathleen M Haslett The blocks should be the maximum and 5 stories only. 134/4 Peter E G Hosking Proposed heights are mainly 31 metres/8 stories - reduce by 20%. Five towers of 52 metres/14 stories - reduce overall height. Specifically, 52 metre tower on corner of Halsey and Jellicoe Streets (close to water) should have height reduced and moved to centre of development. 135/1 Liz Westbrooke Height should scale down from the current 5 stories to open space. 136/1 Darryl V Dorrington Buildings beyond Jellicoe Street should be no more than 12 m. At the Fanshawe Street end the max height should be set at 20 m. The overall effect should be low rise and no tower structures .

Page 60 173/1 De S Anawdaraty and Rohini The proposed height will ruin the entire outlook of the harbour and ruin this beautiful outlook. The proposed heights are Anawdaraty excessive and must be drastically scaled down. 174/1 Rebecca Jones No more than four storeys back from the water and no more than 3 storeys on the water. These high buildings will cast a complete shadow on the waterfront even in the latter half of the afternoon in the summer when many Aucklanders will want to appreciate sunshine and sea front in public areas such as this. 175/1 Fenella Graham-Stewart No buildings on the Tank Farm should exceed 20 metres, a maximum of 5 storeys and reducing down to 12 metres and 3 storeys. 202/1 Dean R Klouwens No buildings on the Tank Farm should exceed 20 m in height (5 storeys). On the Fanshawe Street end, the maximum height should be 5 storeys, and gradually reduce down to 3 storeys (12 m) at Jellicoe Street and further out on the point should be reserved for open spaces. 232/1 Robyn Bartley No buildings in the Wynyard Quarter should be more than 20 metres (5 storeys) high in the Fanshawe Street end, and I would like to see that height reduced to a maximum of 12 metres/3storeys at Jellicoe Street and onto Tank Farm area. 331/2 Keith Morris Restricted development should be encouraged along the lines of 'The Point' and 'The Parc' 359/1 Professional Public Relations Proposed amendment: Maximum height of buildings to be five storeys or 20 metres, with a limit of three storeys or 12 (NZ) Limited metres from the water's edge back to 100 metres from the water's edge. 393/1 Bernard J O'Donnell The proposed building heights are appropriate. 403/2 Shayn Robertson It is not appropriate for the height controls to be any higher than the height permitted in the Viaduct Basin precinct, which range from 16.5.metres and 24 metres on Fanshawe Street. 410/2 Rick Longdon Other apartment blocks around Viaduct area are limited to 4-5 storeys . The farm should be no different. If anything lower for public safety and pleasure. 551/2 Andrew Mason High towers are inappropriate in this location. It should feel like the Viaduct Basin area with low buildings and a strong nautical feel. 568/1 Robert F Klouwens No multi storey buildings should be allowed on the point from Halsey Street down. 569/1 Willemina J Klouwens No buildings on the Tank Farm should be multiple storied. The maximum building heights at the Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres /5 storeys and gradually reducing to 12 metres/3storeys at Jellicoe Street and further out on the point. 581/1 Gavin E White Max height 20 metres reducing to 12 metres or 3 storeys at Jellicoe Street. 602/21 Sanford Limited That, with respect to Height: a) The reduced maximum Height of 15 metres applied to the western part of the Sanford Land by Quarter Plans C1 and C2 be increased so it is consistent with the Height applied to the balance of the Sanford Land. b) The Sanford Land be allocated a maximum Height in Quarter Plan C2 no less than 31 metres

627/1 Bronwen Innes and David The limit for buildings on the Tank Farm should be no more than 20m high and this should only be at the Fanshawe Street Abbott end. They should not be more than 5 storeys. Then should gradually get lower so that they are no more than 12 metres (i.e. 3 storeys) at Jellicoe Street and further out on the point. 629/1 Thomas Whyte No buildings on the Tank Farm should be more than 20 metres high, other than a magnificent public building. Auckland can be proud of that isn't a stadium and doesn't house council workers/employees. The maximum building heights at the Fanshawe Street end should be 20 metres/5 storeys and gradually reducing to 12 metres/3 storeys at Jellicoe Street and further out on the point.

Page 61

14.9.12.4 Outlook Space Submission No. Name Decision 6/21 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.4 Outlook Space be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute provision: Limited 14.9.12.4 Outlook Space 123/21 Viaduct Harbour Holdings (a) An outlook space shall be provided from each building containing windows to the principal living areas of any permanent accommodation unit. Limited Where windows to a principal living area are provided from two or more faces of a building, outlook space shall be provided to the face with the greatest window area of outlook. For the purpose of this rule "principal living area" means the main communal living space within an accommodation unit for entertainment, recreation, and relaxation. Refer to "Living" in Appendix 12 A Matrix of Minimum Gross Floor Areas (in m') for Components of Various Residential Apartment Types. (b) The dimensions of the outlook space, measured perpendicular to the exterior face of the building, shall be in accordance with Figure 14.9.12.4 for the relative height of the floor above average ground level along the face of the building from which the principal living area derives its outlook. (C) The outlook space may be over: (i) The site on which the building is located; (ii) A legal road or a lane complying with clause 14.9.12.12; (iii) Public open space (including land vested in Council for esplanade reserve purposes or subject to a conservation covenant for public access to the coastal marine environment); (iv) Another site provided that either: • Written approval of the owner of the adjoining site for the outlook space has been obtained before the grant of resource consent for the building; or • The outlook space shall be secured in perpetuity for the benefit of the building by a legal instrument put in place before commencement of construction. (d) More than one building may share an outlook space. (e) In the situation where an outlook space is provided over a legal road or a lane complying with clause 14.9.12.12 narrower than the width specified in Figure 14.9.12.4, the width of the road or lane shall be deemed to satisfy the outlook space requirement. Explanation The purpose of this control is to safeguard outlook, daylight, sunlight, and privacy for occupants of permanent accommodation units. It is not a view protection control. 23/8 Equity Pacific Holdings Review outlook and accommodation controls in line with those within the Victoria Quarter. Limited 24/12 Auckland Regional Holdings Text in figure 14.9.12.4 be amended as follows, or in an alternative manner to give effect to ARH's concerns: Outlook Court secured over either the Site, Legal Road, Public Open Space, Lane or Adjoining sites.

27/22 Mansons TCLM Limited 14.9.12.4, the application of an Outlook Space control is opposed. 111/21 Prism Properties Limited

Page 62 14.9.12.5 Street Frontage Alignment and Height. Submission No. Name Decision 6/22 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.5 Street Frontage Alignment and Height be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute Limited provision: 123/22 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 14.9.12.5 Street Frontage Alignment and Height (a) Except as required by rule 14.9.12.5e) and f) the frontage of new buildings and additions to buildings on a site identified on Quarter Plan F must abut the street or public open space boundary for its entire length and shall not be less than 13m above mean street level (MSL). (b) For the purpose of this rule "frontage" means that part of the external wall of a building that occupies the length of the public open space boundary to a height of no less than the minimum required under a) of this rule, but excludes vehicle entrances, public open space, loading bays, structurally required columns and walls, pedestrian entrances and lobbies, window and balcony recesses and similar architectural modulations. "Frontage height" excludes any railing or other similar form of safety barrier that is not more than 50% solid and not higher than 1.4m above its point of attachment. (c) Where the maximum building height is less than the minimum frontage height requirement in a), rule 14.9.12.5 shall not apply. (d) Where an application is made to modify this development control rule, the criteria listed in clause 14.9.9.1.8b) and 14.9.9.1.1c) shall be considered in addition to the criteria set out in rule 15.3.1.2b). (e) Any building within Quarter Area 7 shall comply with the requirements of rule 14.9.12.5a) except that at ground floor along the eastern boundary it shall be set back from the public open space identified on Quarter Plan I by a minimum width of 2.5m measured perpendicular from the public open space for a minimum height of 4m. (f) Any building within building platform areas identified on Quarter Plan H as '3 storeys above mean street level" shall comply with the requirement of rule 14.9.12.5a) except that it shall be set back from the northern site boundary at ground floor by a minimum of 2.5m for a minimum height of 4m.

Explanation The Street Frontage Alignment and Height control is applied to ensure that new buildings achieve an appropriate scale and alignment in relation to the street and one that achieves a sense of intimacy and enclosure of the street environment. Rather than set a single fixed frontage height, the control sets a minimum base height. This provides for some flexibility in design and avoids potential visual monotony of a regimented frontage height. Redevelopment is not restricted to perimeter block style development, and other design solutions will be allowed. Rule 14.9.12.5e) reflect the relatively narrow width of public open space required along the coastal edge and the risk that accommodation and similar activity has potential to privatise such spaces. Rule 14.9.12.5f.l is designed to ensure sufficient space is available for north facing outdoor seating fronting North Wharf. 24/2 Auckland Regional Holdings Rule 14.9.12.5 d) be amended to include reference to additional assessment criteria, and in particular amend the rule to read:

'Where an application is made to modify this development control rule, the criteria listed in clause 14.9.9.1.8 (b), and 14.9.8.2C, 14.9.9.1.1(c), 14.9.9.1.1 j), and 14.9.9.1.5b) shall be considered in addition to the criteria set out in rule 15.3.1.2(b)'

The explanation to Rule 14.9.12.5 be amended by inserting a new paragraph between the second and third existing paragraphs, as follows:

Page 63 Rule 14.9.12.5d) acknowledges that it is appropriate to provide the opportunity to achieve integration between the built form and the streetscape by alternate methods, while still achieving a sense of intimacy and enclosure. 25/3 New Zealand Institute of Support the minimum frontage heights required in Section 14.9.12.5. Architects 27/23 Mansons TCLM Limited The Street Frontage Alignment and Height control is generally supported but exceptions for irregular shaped sites, and the 111/22 Prism Properties Limited ability to incorporate a plaza or public entrance opening is sought within the control.

14.9.12.6 Street Frontage Storey Height, Floor Level and Transparency Control Submission No. Name Decision 545/3 Edwin J W and Eila Ikin Object to special character frontage on all four sides of Team NZ building. 6/23 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.6 Street Frontage Storey Height, Floor Level and Transparency Control be deleted in its entirety and replaced Limited by the following substitute provision: 123/23 Viaduct Harbour Holdings 14.9.12.6 Street Frontage Storey Height, Floor Level and Transparency Control Limited (a) Ground floor space in all new buildings abutting any existing or proposed street or public open space shall be designed to provide a minimum floor to floor height of 4m for a minimum depth of 6m. (b) The ground floor within all new buildings fronting any Special Character Frontage identified in Quarter Plan E shall: (i) Be at mean street level; and (ii) Shall have clear glazing for at least 75% of its height for at least 50% of the ground floor building frontage (other than vehicle entrances and loading bays and pedestrian entrances and lobbies). (c) For any building on a site having a Special Character Frontage identified on Quarter Plan E the gross floor area of any individual ground floor tenancy shall not exceed 400m2.

Explanation The purpose of this control is to provide a built environment that will encourage active street and public frontages throughout the Quarter and in particular within Special Character Frontage areas. The provision of safe and attractive public places often depends upon the nature of activities and buildings adjoining those public places. The character frontage control is designed to provide a defined edge to streets and public places and to provide activities that complement activities on the associated public open space. The scale of buildings adjoining public open spaces is also an important component in the quality of those spaces. While it is expected that the building should be designed to address the adjoining street or public open space, strict alignment of the building frontage with the boundary will not be required where active amenities such as outdoor food and beverage areas are incorporated in the design (e.g. to allow the setting back of dining/drinking areas). 27/24 Mansons TCLM Limited In 14.9.12.6 the rule is unduly prescriptive and is opposed as being unnecessary and unreasonable in this location. 111/23 Prism Properties Limited 30/1 Auckland Regional Council Identifying an additional "Special Character Frontage" around the northern, southern and eastern perimeter of the proposed "Central Park" on Quarter Plan E. 30/4 Auckland Regional Council Adding an additional development control at 14.9.12.6 (d), requiring the ground floor of all new buildings fronting Daldy and Brigham Streets (north of Jellicoe Street) to be at mean street level, thereby ensuring their future ability to provide an active street frontage; and identifying this requirement on Quarter Plan E

Page 64 14.9.12.8 Noise and Quarter Plan J Submission No. Name Decision 545/4 Edwin J W and Eila Ikin Object to noise (external) and operating hours proposed for Jellicoe Street entertainment hub, especially Team NZ site (Quarter Area 7) 602/14 Sanford Limited That the noise controls applying to the Sanford Land (including Quarter Plan J and clause 14.9.12.8) be amended to the extent required to ensure that they are no stricter than those currently applying to the Sanford Land under the operative District Plan provisions. 1/19 Marine Industry Association In 14.9.12.8 Noise, the daytime L10 in Noise Area 3 should be increased to 70dBA, received in all Noise Areas, and the night time L10 levels should be increased to those in Noise Areas 1 and 4, received in all Noise Areas. 1/24 Marine Industry Association In Quarter Plan E, all areas where permanent or non-permanent accommodation is contemplated as an activity should be subject to a non-complaint covenant. 6/24 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.8 Noise be deleted. 123/24 Limited Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 27/25 Mansons TCLM Limited The external noise levels are opposed as they seem unduly restrictive. It is sought that these provisions be liberalized. 111/24 Prism Properties Limited 37/19 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.12.8.2 External Noise and Ratepayers Association Quarter Plan J should be modified so that Noise Area 3 aligns with and replicates Quarter Area 3. The daytime L10 in the Incorporated (WVTRA) redefined Noise Area 3 should be increased to 70 dBA, received in all noise areas. Nighttime L10 levels should also be increased by a similar percentage.

14.9.12.9 Access to Sites With Multiple Frontages Submission No. Name Decision 6/25 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.9 Access to Sites with Multiple Frontage be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute Limited provision: 123/25 Viaduct Harbour Holdings 14.9.12.9 Access to Sites with Multiple Frontage Limited The provisions under clause 9.7.3.2 apply to the Quarter except that: (a) No vehicular entry or exit shall be established directly from Fanshawe Street (where alternative access via another street is legally available), Beaumont Street (eastern side only south of Jellicoe Street), western side of Halsey Street (north of Gaunt Street), Daldy Street (north of Gaunt Street) or Jellicoe Street. (b) No vehicular entry or exit shall be established through any Special Character Frontage area shown on Quarter Plan E.

Explanation The purpose of this control is to avoid potential adverse traffic safety and efficiency effects on arterial functions of Fanshawe Street, as well as protecting traffic capacity and pedestrian amenity along Beaumont Street, Halsey Street, Daldy Street and Jellicoe Street, and to promote the pedestrian function of Special Character Frontage areas.

Page 65

14.9.12.10 Vehicular Access Over Footpaths Submission No. Name Decision 6/26 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.10 Vehicular Access over Footpaths be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute Limited provision: 123/26 Viaduct Harbour Holdings 14.9.12.10 Vehicular Access over Footpaths The provisions under clause 9.7.3.3 apply to the Quarter except that: Limited (a) No vehicular entry or exit shall be established directly from Fanshawe Street where alternative access via another street is legally available. (b) Where alternative access is available via another street, accessway or lane no vehicular entry or exit shall be established directly from Beaumont Street (eastern side south of Jellicoe Street), western side of Halsey Street (north of Gaunt Street) (except as provided for in c) below), Daldy Street (north of Gaunt Street) or Jellicoe Street. (c) Except for Quarter Area 7, no vehicular entry or exit shall be established through any Special Character Frontage area shown on Quarter Plan E. (d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing clauses, the total crossing width for any front or corner site shall not exceed 50% of the frontage to any road which it abuts) shall not apply to any site within the Quarter.

Explanation The purpose of the rule is to prevent the aggregation of vehicular accesses, which can have an adverse effect by breaking frontage continuity, particularly on frontages to streets that are significant pedestrian routes. Due to the arterial function of Fanshawe Street and the need to maintain traffic efficiency on Beaumont Street and Halsey Street, direct vehicle access is strongly discouraged for safety reasons. A similar restriction is required on Jellicoe Street and Daldy Street to enhance pedestrian amenity and safety. 24/13 Auckland Regional Holdings Clause 14.9.12.10(d) be amended as follows, or in an alternative manner to give effect to ARH's concerns:

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing clauses, the total crossing width for any front or corner site shall not exceed 50% of the frontage to any road in which it is place shall not apply to any site within the quarter. 27/26 Mansons TCLM Limited Greater flexibility is also sought within the development controls relating to vehicular access over footpaths and access to 111/25 Prism Properties Limited sites with multiple frontage and lanes to enable efficient solutions and incentives.

14.9.12.11 Risk Sensitive Activities Submission No. Name Decision 1/20 Marine Industry Association In 14.9.12.11 Risk Sensitive Activities, the approach in the plan modifications is exaggerated and applied inconsistently, particularly with regard to Marine and Fishing Retail. The provision should be amended to address this. 35/8 Shell NZ Limited, BP Oil NZ Delete 14.9.12.11 b) and the explanation. reword the explanation to read as follows: Limited and Mobil Oil NZ The purpose of this control is to protect the existing hazardous substance facilities from potentially sensitive activities generating reverse sensitivity Limited effects and to control the pace of land use change at a rate that will allow the industry to continue to operate efficiently and effectively until such time as they decommission or relocate. 602/18 Sanford Limited That the provisions regarding risk and public safety including those concerned with the effects of installations on the Western Reclamation of potentially hazardous substances be deleted and replaced with provisions that:

Page 66 (a) Are based on sound scientifically based research and analysis; (b) Apply a sound, realistic and workable methodology to the circumstances present on the Western Reclamation; (c) Adopt a recognised and conservative approach to the calculation and management of risk; and

Implement suitably conservative provisions with respect to the establishment of sensitive activities in the Western Reclamation.

14.9.12.12 Lanes and View Shafts Submission No. Name Decision 6/27 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.12 Lanes and View Shafts be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute provision: Limited 123/27 Viaduct Harbour Holdings 14.9.12.12 Lanes and View Shafts Limited (a) Lanes shall be provided at ground level, generally in the indicative locations shown on Quarter Plan D and shall comprise: (i) A minimum width of 10m where provided for pedestrians, cyclists, and service vehicles; or (ii) 6m where provided for pedestrians and cyclists only. (b) Where the lanes shown on Quarter Plan D are also shown as view shafts the minimum width shall be 10m. (c) Where a view shaft is indicated alone, it shall have a minimum width of 10m. (d) The minimum widths specified in (a), (b), and (c) above shall be clear and unobstructed by buildings or structures from ground level upwards, except that verandas may be provided where they meet the following standards: (i) A minimum height of 3rn and a maximum height of 4rn above the footpath, road, lane, or ground immediately below; (ii) A minimum width of 3rn or setback no closer than 0.6m from the edge of any vehicle carriageway, whichever is the lesser. (e) The lane shall be available for public use at ail times between the hours of 7am-llpm. (fl The registration of an access easement on the title(s) subject to the lane is required to ensure public access and ongoing maintenance of the lane by the land owner(s).

Explanation The purpose of this control is to build upon the existing grid pattern of streets that characterise the Quarter by establishing additional lane connections to provide a finer urban grain. The minimum widths provide the opportunity for some lanes to be used as service lanes while contributing to pedestrian permeability within city blocks. The widths also provide the opportunity to include landscaping features, furniture and artworks. The viewshafts identified along required lanes combined with those obtained along the existing street structure and from proposed waterfront public open spaces retain and enhance the visual connections of the Quarter with the harbour, other features of the surrounding landscape, the CBD and the wider city.

14.9.12.13 Special Amenity Yard Submission No. Name Decision 6/28 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.12.13 Special Amenity Yard (including Figure 14.12.13) be deleted in its entirety. Limited Clause 14.9.12.13 Special Amenity Yard (including Figure 14.12.13) be deleted in its entirety.

Page 67 123/28 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited

14.9.13 Financial contributions: Public Open Space Submission No. Name Decision 334/3 Auckland City Council Amend 14.9.13b) roman numerals as there is an error; Replace ii) with i) and iii) with ii)

6/29 Burtlea Investments No.98 The following provision be inserted into the Proposed Plan Modifications, namely: Limited 14.9.13 Contributions 123/29 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Contributions will be levied in respect of development in Wynyard Quarter in accordance with Council's policy on development contributions under Limited the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) as set out in the long term plan and annual plan, and in accordance with S 108 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) as provided in Part 14.9 Wynyard Quarter. The policy on development contributions allows Council to enter into private developer agreements with land owners regarding payment of contributions under the LGA and RMA.

Council confirms that subject to entering into a private developer agreement the contributions regime applicable to Wynyard Quarter will be as follows: (1) Development contributions for community amenities and storm water will be consistent with charges made by Council for other development within the Auckland City Isthmus; (2) No development contributions for storm water will be required in respect of development within Wynyard Quarter for non-residential activities; (3) Development contributions for open space will be consistent with charges made by Council for other development within the Auckland City Central Area; (4) Development contributions for transport will be capped at the rate of $7,760 per HUE, and indexed in relation to the relevant construction index to reflect any variation over time regarding the cost of capital works; (5) No further development contributions will be imposed regarding transport, traffic, and parking effects arising from development in Wynyard Quarter; (6) Development contributions applying to retail activities in Wynyard Quarter will be charged at the reduced rate of 30% of the contribution charged for retail activities in the Auckland City Isthmus; (7) Development contributions will be charged for development in Wynyard Quarter at the same point in time that similar contributions are charged for works of a similar nature in the Auckland Central Area; (8) Financial contributions for public open space acquisition and development within Wynyard Quarter will be charged at the rate of 1% of the value of development work, and will be payable before commencement of any consented non-residential development approved after the date of the agreement; (9) Provision will be made for bonding of contributions; (l0) Provision will be made for refund or return of contributions in whole or in part if: (a) The relevant building consent lapses; (b) The development does not proceed;

Page 68 (c) Council does not provide the network infrastructure or community infrastructure for which the contribution was required before 31 December 2014.

Explanation Private developer agreements provide certainty for land owners regarding future liabillity to pay contributions, and provide Council with certainty that the contributions agreed to will not be challenged on appeal or by judicial review. 6/30 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.13 Financial Contributions - Public Open Space be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following substitute Limited provision: 123/30 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 14.9.13 Financial Contributions - Public Open Space (a) A financial contribution may be taken for development on any site for the specific purposes of providing for the acquisition and development of public open space in the Quarter, and enhancing public pedestrian facilities. For the purpose of this rule "development" includes site works, building construction and alterations. Financial contributions shall not be levied for subdivisions. (b) The financial contribution requirements as set out in Part 8.7.1 shall apply, with the exception that: financial contributions shall not be levied for refurbishments. For the purpose of this rule "refurbishment" means the cosmetic alteration, restoration or redecoration to the interior or exterior of a building or site and includes replacement services such as lifts or air conditioning. "Refurbishment" excludes increases to the gross floor area of a building and changes in activity such as conversion of office premises to retail premises and conversion of offices to residential apartments. (i) Clauses 8.7.1.3e) and 8.7.1.30 do not apply. (ii) In clause 8.7.1.5 the references to the "Central Area" shall be read as references to "Wynyard Quarter". 23/9 Equity Pacific Holdings Greater flexibility to encourage developments to be able to achieve bonus offsets to be set against any required contributions Limited should be incorporated within the Plan. Such bonus provisions should reward inclusion of elements such as thru site links, public open space, (both hard and soft landscaped environments), public works of art and the like. 27/27 Mansons TCLM Limited The Financial Contributions proposed are opposed. 111/26 Prism Properties Limited 37/20 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.13 Financial Contributions - Public Open Space and Ratepayers Association Paragraphs A and B should be amended so that refurbishment, reconstruction and alteration of existing buildings and site Incorporated (WVTRA) layouts in Quarter Area 3 and dedicated marine and fishing areas as described in Quarter Plan E, where the activity undertaken in the revised state is similar to the activity undertaken in the original state, is permitted without incurring financial contribution to public space provisions.

14.9.14 Financial contributions: Public Access to The Coastal Environment Submission No. Name Decision 602/16 Sanford Limited Delete Clause 14.9.14 regarding Financial Contributions for Public Access to the Coastal Environment. 6/31 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.14 Financial Contributions - Public Access to the Coastal Environment be deleted in its entirety and replaced by Limited the following substitute provision: 123/31 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 14.9.14 Financial Contributions - Public Access to the Coastal Environment (a) A financial contribution may be taken in the form of either:

Page 69 (i) A conservation covenant in the case of private land;* or (ii) Land to be vested in Council as esplanade reserve in the case of land owned by a public authority; For development of any site abutting the coastal marine area or any site within 20m of the coastal marine area for the specific purpose of enabling public access to and enjoyment of the coastal environment. This rule does not apply to any site where an esplanade reserve or conservation covenant of 20m or greater in width (or such lesser width as provided by clause b), d) or e) below) has been created prior to 13 July 2007. * Provision shall be made in any conservation covenant: • For buildings to extend over the conservation covenant are for a width of 3m, 5m above MSL; • Precluding any restriction on the rights of existing tenants, under the terms of their leases, to use the conservation covenant area for marine related activities; • For variation of the conservation covenant area, provided that there will be no quantitative reduction in the land area subject to the covenant. (b) Within Quarter Area 3 the total width of land to be subject to a conservation covenant or vested in Council (as the case may be) shall be of a minimum width of 10m measured perpendicular from the coastal mean high water springs mark, except that along the northern edge of Lot 1 DP 85893 the maximum width of the conservation covenant area shall be 5m. (c) Within Quarter Areas 5 and 6 where the site abuts the coastal marine area, the land to be vested in Council or otherwise secured shall be of a minimum width of 20m and shall not exceed 30m in width measured perpendicular from the coastal mean high water springs mark, except where specified by rule 14.9.14d). (d) The total width of land to be vested in Council for Lots 34 and 35 DP 131567 within Quarter Area 5 (Jellicoe) is limited to the land area identified as 'public open space" on Quarter Plan H. (e) The total width of land over which public access is secured within Quarter Area 7 is limited to the area identified as "public open space" on Quarter Plan I. (f) For the purpose of this rule "development" means site works and building construction and alterations. Financial contributions will not be levied for refurbishments. For the purpose of this rule "refurbishment" means the cosmetic alteration, restoration or redecoration to the interior or exterior of a building or site and includes replacement of services such as lifts or air conditioning. Refurbishment excludes increases to the gross floor area of a building and changes in activity such as conversion of office premise to retail premises and conversion of offices to residential apartments. 31/2 Pier 21 Limited It is not practical to have public access walkway around the foreshore where there is boatyards, slipways and drystacks. 37/21 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.14 Financial Contributions - Public Access to the Coastal Environment and Ratepayers Association Paragraphs A and C should be amended to remove the requirement for a conservation covenant in Quarter Area 3. Failing Incorporated (WVTRA) that, the land vested in Council should be no more than 5m measured perpendicular to the coastal mean high water spring. Paragraph F should be amended to read: For the purposes of this rule 'development’ means significant site works and construction other than reconstruction and alteration of existing buildings and site layouts where the activity undertaken in the revised state is similar to the activity undertaken in the original state.

14.9.15 Definitions Submission No. Name Decision 33/2 Creative Functions Limited Insert the definition of "Marine Event" as follows :

Page 70 (a) Water-based cultural, entertainment or recreational event, including boat races, regattas, boat or exhibitions, swimming event, triathlons; or

(b) and e Events on wharves or pontoons or barges such as public performances, concerts, festivals, exhibitions, functions and entertainment/hospitality and activities of a similar character; or

(c) Other events which derive a benefit from a locality adjacent to or within the CMA 1/21 Marine Industry Association Under 14.9.15 Definitions it is accepted that Marine and Fishing Industry includes “industry primarily associated with marine, fishing and port activities”, and that it “includes fish processing and coolstores, boat building, storage and repair, drydocks, slipways and ancillary offices.”

However, marine and fishing activities are far more extensive than “industry” and those activities listed. Under the NZ Marine Industry website the following industries are listed: • Boat building - commercial work boats, cruising yachts, day sailers, inflatable boats, kayaks and canoes, launches, motoryachts, multihulls, race yachts, sportsfishers, superyachts, trailerable power boats, wooden boats; • Construction materials - fibreglass/carbon fibre/ resins, metals, paints/coatings, supplies, tools and accessories, wood and timber • Designers - electrical/electronic, engineering, interior, naval architects/designers; • Dockage and berthage - commercial, recreational/foreign yachts, superyachts; • Engines - accessories, diesel, generators, outboards, petrol/gasoline, propulsion systems; • Fishing and diving - charters, commercial, dive services, equipment; • Hardware and accessories - chandlers, clothing and accessories, electrical, electronics, fender, hardware, hydraulics, interior manufacture and fitout, refrigeration, safety equipment; • Other services - banks and finance, boat transport/delivery, charter companies, crew placement, legal services, marine insurance, project development and management, superyacht agents, valuers/surveyors; • Publications and marketing - journalists/photographers, marketing services, publications/books, software; • Recreational refit and repair - haulout facilities, project managers, refit design/engineering, refit services; • Commercial ship builders, refit and repair - ship builders, ship haulout facilities, ship refit services; • Spars, rigging and sails - canvas, cordage, engineering/design, furling systems, new sails, new spar construction, rigging repairs, sail repairs; • Trailer manufacturers - trailer components, trailers complete; • Yacht brokers and dealers - boat dealers, commercial and recreational brokers; • Ship and work boat - component suppliers, design services, new builds, other services, ship and vessel repair and maintenance, shipbuilders, slip, lift or haul facilities.

The definition should be wide enough to encompass these activities and to include industrial, professional, commercial, administrative and service activities - in fact all activities associated with the marine and fishing sectors except retail which

Page 71 has its own definition.

It follows that the inclusion of “offices” as ancillary and the limitation of those offices to 10% of the total gross floor area on any site is inappropriate and should be deleted.

The definition should be amended to encompass these points - for example:

Marine and Fishing Activities means activities primarily associated with marine, fishing and port activities and includes industrial, professional, commercial, administrative and service activities such as (berthage, commissioning, haulout and launching, refit, servicing and maintenance of boats of all types, yacht broking, marine insurance, etc etc) but excludes retail … 6/32 Burtlea Investments No.98 Clause 14.9.15 be deleted in relevant part and replaced by the following substitute provisions: Limited Public Open Space 123/32 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Public Open Space means streets, boulevards, squares, plazas, parks and esplanade reserves vested in a local authority or the Crown. Marine and Limited Fishing Industry Marine and Fishing Industry means industry primarily associated with marine, fishing and port activities. It includes: (1)Fish processing and cool-stores, boat building, storage and repair, dry-docks, and slipways; (2) Offices ancillary to permitted activities; (3) Ancillary services; (4) Residential accommodation for people whose duties require living on site; For the purpose of this definition "ancillary offices", 'ancillary services", and "residential accommodation" may be located on site or offsite elsewhere within Wynyard Quarter. 37/22 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants 14.9.15 Definitions and Ratepayers Association Marine and Fishing descriptions should be expanded to reflect the activities covered by the Marine Industry Association of Incorporated (WVTRA) New Zealand. Marine and Fishing description should be expanded to reflect modern installations such as large travel lifts, shiplifts and syncrolifts, refit halls for superyachts, and industries associated with those activities. Marine and Fishing descriptions should be expanded to include industrial, professional, commercial, administrative and consulting services servicing the expanded marine and fishing definitions.

Quarter Plan A Submission No. Name Decision 37/23 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Quarter Plan A and Ratepayers Association Quarter Area 3 (The ‘Marine Zone’) should be expanded to the north to compensate for: Incorporated (WVTRA) • The land area lost to new roads and road widening • Small area, non viable blocks created by road acquisitions • The land area lost to the storm water pond • The land lost to office, hotel and apartments encouraged by to 4.6:1 FAR and 31m/52m building heights • Any land lost to roll-on roll-off ferry terminals

Page 72 • Land area lost to conservation covenants (esplanade reserves)

Quarter Area 3 (The ‘Marine Zone’) should be expanded to the east to include the sub-sector block bounded by Beaumont Street, Gaunt Street, Daldy Street and Pakenham Street West, if the description of Quarter Area 2 is not amended to recognize this sub-sector accommodates significant marine industries that must be allowed for by means of deferring the change of zoning while these companies are in residence 37/29 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants The description of Quarter Area 3 should not allow the extension of the 'waterfront' axis along Jellicoe Street into Quarter and Ratepayers Association Area 3, especially as per the description in Quarter Area 5. Residential and hotel activities should be non-complying activities Incorporated (WVTRA) within Quarter Area 3. 545/6 Edwin J W and Eila Ikin Support or propose increase in size of headland park and improve accessibility from Jellicoe Street with wide boulevard linking to Victoria Park.

Quarter Plans C1 and C2 Submission No. Name Decision 6/34 Burtlea Investments No.98 Quarter Plans C1 and C2 be amended as follows: 123/34 Limited Viaduct Harbour Holdings (a) Notations regarding the Special Amenity Yard (see Figure 14.12.13) which make no provision for any maximum Limited permitted height be deleted and substituted by a 5m maximum permitted height; (b) The plan titles be deleted and substituted by: (i) Quarter Plan C1 - "Maximum Permitted Height Prior to the Approval of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan"; (ii) Quarter Plan C2 - "Maximum Permitted Height Following the Approval of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan";

Quarter Plan C2 be amended as follows:

(a) The measured north-south dimension of the Central Park (75m) be deleted and substituted by a dimension commensurate with providing a combined land area in Quarter Area 2 not exceeding 5,000m2 for establishment of the Linear Park and the Central Park; (b) Notations showing the Linear Park be amended so that the areas of land in Quarter Areas 1 and 2 to be acquired for public open space do not exceed 8m in width; (c) References to designations be deleted; (d) Notation showing a 31m maximum permitted height extends along the frontage of Gaunt Street west for the same distance as the notation showing a 31m maximum permitted height for the site in Quarter Area 2 fronting the north side of Gaunt Street west (i.e. the transition between 25m and 31m maximum permitted height zones should follow the indicative mid-line of the required north-south lanes); (e) Notations regarding sites in Quarter Areas 4 and 6 (except for notations regarding land to be acquired for road or public open space) be deleted and substituted by a notation zoning those sites as "Future Development Area".

18/2 Goodman Nominee (NZ) The maximum Height for Quarter Area 1 as shown on Quarter Plan C2 is reduced to 25 metres. Limited 24/17 Auckland Regional Holdings Quarter Plan C2 be amended to reflect the permitted height above the Designation 379 of 25m, consistent with adjacent

Page 73 land to the east. 25/4 New Zealand Institute of It would be unacceptable to propose buildings further north then shown on Plan C2. Architects

Consequential Amendments Submission No. Name Decision 32/4 Transit New Zealand Explanatory note be added to Annex 15 that reads (or to like effect) as follows:

The alignment shown in this Annex is indicative only and does not necessarily represent the final form, nature, alignment or other characteristics of any potential future Additional Waitemata harbour Crossing. 590/1 Auckland Regional Public ARPHS requests amendment of 3.4.2 to read: "... access to good air quality through a consistent monitoring programme" ARPHS Health Services supports the objectives in 3.8.1, but seek clarification on how 3.8.1(c) and 3.8.1(g) will be achieved and maintained. 6/41 Burtlea Investments Annex 15: Potential alignment for Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing Underground Tunnel be deleted in its entirety. 9/3 Metro Parking (Daldy) Limited 123/41 No.98 Limited Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited 23/5 Equity Pacific Holdings The imposition (it would appear late in the process) of a potential designation or development of an underground tunnel Limited outlet at the beginning of the Gaunt Street boulevard needs complete review. 586/3 North Shore City Council Wishes to ensure that possible entry/exit points for a third harbour crossing are taken into consideration and incorporated in the overall planning for the area, in consultation with Transit and North Shore City Council. 334/1 Auckland City Council Replace Annex 15 with attachment 1 of the submission. This is because the alignment shown in the notified plan doesn't reflect the most recent discussions between Auckland City Council and Transit NZ with respect to the potential alignment for possible additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing underground tunnel.

Miscellaneous Submission No. Name Decision 28/3 Sealink Travel Group NZ The proposed plan change amended to provide for ; Limited Passenger, vehicle and freight ferry services and operations in the Wynyard Quarter in close proximity to the CBD e.g on North Wharf, or the southern end of Wynyard Wharf

8/1 Classic Yacht Association of No decision sought New Zealand and The Classic Yacht Charitable Trust 40/1 Carol Sanders That a world-wide competition is sponsored by the Councils. No changes of plan should be made until the result from such a competition are known. 40/2 Carol Sanders That no resource consents be issued until a masterplan is established.

Page 74 46/1 Richard B Somerville-Ryan The current Wynyard Wharf terminal be retained and enhanced under any revised plan, or that an equivalent which fully meets the needs of the island community be incorporated into the city's plans for the waterfront. 48/3 Art Deco Society An international competition to provide a template for the Wynyard Quarter. 53/1 St Mary's Bay Association Harbour tunnel decision to be made ahead of plan modification decisions. Infrastructure issues to be considered and notified Incorporated in detail. 54/3 Corinne M McLaren Less human activity in the area will help towards the sustainability of the environment. 82/1 That Great Barrier Island Wynyard Wharf ferry terminal and services be maintained and provided for at its current site in Community Board this plan change. 94/3 Audrey van Ryn Well-designed, publicly-approved art works that are not overly expensive and are well-maintained would be an asset. 102/2 Iris Neighbours More consideration needs to be given to the linkage between existing public assets such Viaduct Basin, Victoria park, West Haven Marina. 116/1 A Foster and Company Extend submission date Limited 120/2 Melview Developments The Masterplan process be recommenced and pursued in a manner which enables the involvement of the very best national 121/2 Limited and international urban design expertise. Lighter Quay Residents Society Incorporated BC 3000 131/1 Elizabeth K Carroll A concealed and line underground highway through the city could include a rail line, and green spaces etc. above. 132/3 Committee for Auckland • Establish benchmark for quality early on in the Te Wero precinct - consider benefit of site specific freeholding Limited • Establish return on investment to mitigate capital constraints of ARC/ACC- recoup costs of Te Wero bridge and apply this approach to catalyst projects • Implement smaller stages to focus on doing the early projects very well and avoid spreading quality too thin e.g Jellicoe stage 1a and 1b 135/2 Liz Westbrooke • Find another way to finance Auckland's transport system (get the whole of the Auckland regions petrol (and wine) tax back from Central Government. 135/3 Liz Westbrooke • Please underground Fanshawe Street to get "flow" for people. 622/1 Betty and Frederick R Daniels • The end of Wynyard Point there must be a great point of interest not just grass and trees. A building well designed to house a theatre, art gallery maybe a sailing boat building. A spectacular and beautiful building, viewed from the North Shore, white curved a landmark. A 15 storey hotel will take away views and sun. The Te Wero bridge will interfere with boats, why not have a monorail around Victoria Park and around the Wynyard Point area. 39/8 Auckland Chamber of The plan modification be supported by a schedule setting out information on numbers of additional Commerce residents/business/visitors that the area can support under existing utilities. 39/9 Auckland Chamber of Before land use changes for Wynyard Point and CBD wharves are locked down, an international design contest to come up Commerce with ideas for transforming both areas and which also embraces Viaduct Basin should be undertaken. 124/2 Viaduct Harbour Holdings VHHL seeks that the closing date for submissions be extended until 3 September 2007 for the reasons given in paragraph Limited 12.8(i)(ii) (of the submission). 81/2 Gordon Brown Should be no apartment buildings on the Tank farm area.

Page 75 24/14 Auckland Regional Holdings Quarter Plans B1, D, E ,F & I be amended to correctly correlate with each other in respect of the extent of the designation at the southern end of Area 7. 24/15 Auckland Regional Holdings Quarter Plans B2, C2, D, E & F be amended to correlate with each other in respect of the extent of Designation 378 for the "Stormwater feature", and the adjacent lanes. 27/28 Mansons TCLM Limited The provisions relating to the proposed Daldy Street park, the motorway connection and the undergrounding of Fanshawe 111/27 Prism Properties Limited Street have not been properly considered or described including dimensions and urban design considerations. In the absence of such proper consideration, they should be deleted. 608/2 Viaduct Harbour Holdings In the alternative, and without prejudice to or derogating from the general submission made above VHHL makes the Limited specific submissions on the Proposed Plan Modifications contained in Parts 4 and 5 of the submissions lodged on 20 August 2007. 608/3 Viaduct Harbour Holdings VHHL seeks that the closing date for submissions be extended until 3 September 2007 for the reasons given in paragraph Limited 12.5(d)(ii) (of this submission). 608/4 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Pursuant to the undertaking given in the letter dated 15 August 2007, Council officers recommend to the Hearings Limited Commissioners that this late submission be received. 608/5 Viaduct Harbour Holdings The Hearings Commissioners receive this late submission as a submission about the Proposed Plan Modifications because: Limited (1) As requested by Council, the submission has been lodged before 5 pm on 27 August 2007

(ii) Council failed to ensure that its letter dated 16 August 2007 was sent to VHHL in a manner that would result in it actually being received by VHHL before the close of submissions on 20 August 2007, thereby depriving VHHL of the opportunity to make the submission concerning maximum permitted height and/or bonus roof height and the procedure by which Council has purported to decide these matters as set out in this submission.

608/6 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Such further, consequential, or alternative relief as may be required to give effect to these submissions or which may be Limited appropriate in the circumstances of the case.

•

Page 76

•

Quarter Plan E Submission No. Name Decision 118/1 Ariadne Marinas Oceania Quarter Plan E should be amended to include a blanket 'no-complaint' covenant across all proposed zones to ensure reverse Proprietary Limited/Orams sensitivity issues do not arise against the existing marine industry in the Wynyard Quarter. Marine Auckland 134/9 Peter E G Hosking The existing "special character frontages" around the Central Park, Daldy Street, Brigham and Jellicoe Streets need enhancing, especially to improve accessibility to the Point Park. 334/4 Auckland City Council Amend Quarter Plan E key title 'Activities' to read 'Additional activity restrictions' to provide greater clarity as the purpose of this plan. 37/8 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Quarter Plan E fails to cater for the growth of the marine and fishing industry, given that the Sanford site in Quarter area 5 and Ratepayers Association is the only site where activity is dedicated to marine and fishing activity. In addition, the plan change proposes to reduce Incorporated (WVTRA) Sanford's site in terms of land area and financial viability by taking land for road widening. Quarter area 3, the area promoted by the plan change as 'marine', will in fact support a multitude of competing uses within the proposed Plan Change; the misleading marine designation offers no exclusivity or protection to the marine industry. The marine industry will have to compete with a range of activities vying for space within the 'marine zone'. The Proposed Plan Change should be modified to: • Implement controls that encourage marine industry and marine related activities as of right (Permitted Activity)

Page 77 • Greatly reduce the range and type of non-marine and non-fishing activities that comply in Quarter area 3 • Make all permanent accommodation and temporary accommodation non complying activities in Quarter Area 3 37/25 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Quarter Plan E and Ratepayers Association The area identified as “areas where all activity is limited to marine and fishing industry and marine and fishing retail only, Incorporated (WVTRA) should be expanded to include all of Quarter Area 3.

1/25 Marine Industry Association In Quarter Plan E, Area 3 should be identified as an area where Marine and Fishing Industry and Marine and Fishing Industry Retail are preferred activities. 1/26 Marine Industry Association In Quarter Plan E, in the areas identified as limiting ground level activity to Marine + Fishing Industry and Marine and Fishing Retail only should be extended to provide for Marine and Fishing Industry and Marine and Fishing Retail without a limitation to ground level. 6/36 Burtlea Investments No.98 Quarter Plan E be amended as follows: Limited • Notations showing the Linear Park be amended so that the areas of land in Quarter Areas 1 and 2 to be acquired for 123/36 Viaduct Harbour Holdings public open space do not exceed 8m in width; Limited • The notations in Quarter Area 2 for the Linear Park and the Central Park be deleted and substituted by a land area commensurate with providing a combined land area in Area 2 not exceeding 5,000m2 for establishment of the Linear Park and the Central Park; • The measured east-west dimension (40m) for the land in Quarter Area 2 zoned as an area where ground level activity is limited to marine and fishing industry and marine and fishing retail activities only be deleted and substituted by a measured east-west dimension not exceeding 28m in width (i.e. following the indicative mid- line of required north-south lanes); • Notations showing the sites in Quarter Area 1 zoned as a areas where ground level activity is limited to marine and fishing industry and marine and fishing retail activities only be deleted and substituted by notations showing those sites zoned as areas where office activity is permitted prior to the approval of a Comprehensive Area Structure Plan; • Notations showing the sites in Quarter Areas 1 and 2 zoned as a areas where permanent accommodation is subject to a no-complaint covenant (see clause 14.9.6) be deleted; • Notations regarding sites in Quarter Areas 4 and 6 (except for notations regarding land to be acquired for road or public open space) be deleted and substituted by a notation zoning those sites as "Future Development Area"; The land areas within Quarter Area 5 identified on Quarter Plan E as 'areas where all activity is limited to Marine Fishing Industry and Marine and Fishing Retail only" should be extended to include the entire city block east of Daldy Street (excluding land required for the Linear Park), and the limitation on activities should be amended to allow residential and entertainment activities as per the description of Quarter Area 5 in the Resource Management Strategy in clause 14.9.4.

Quarter Plan F 6/37 Burtlea Investments No.98 Quarter Plan F be amended as follows: 123/37 Limited Viaduct Harbour Holdings • Notations showing the Linear Park be amended so that the areas of land in Quarter Areas 1 and 2 to be acquired for

Page 78 Limited public open space do not exceed 8m in width; • The notations in Quarter Area 2 for the Linear Park and the Central Park be deleted and substituted by a land area commensurate with providing a combined land area in Quarter Area 2 not exceeding 5,000m2 for establishment of the Linear Park and the Central Park; • References to designations be deleted; • Notations regarding sites in Quarter Areas 4 and 6 (except for notations regarding land to be designated or other wise acquired for road or public open space) be deleted and substituted by a notation zoning those sites as "Future Development Area".

Quarter Plan I Number Submitter Decision 115/1 A Foster and Company That the planners think long term and don't allow or provide for a hotel site on the existing reclaimed land adjacent to Limited Halsey Street. 125/1 John S Burrett To maintain existing building heights and existing marine usage. When we win the A/C back, this area is vital for keeping the Viaduct as the hub of these activities. 125/2 John S Burrett The bridge should not go ahead. 6/39 Burtlea Investments No.98 Quarter Plan I be amended by inserting immediately after the reference to '18.5m above mean street level" the following Limited reference '(inclusive of 2m bonus roof height)". 123/39 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited

Quarter Plan K Number Submitter Decision 50/1 Graham W A Bush 1. That the east-west passenger transport priority route (Jellicoe Street- proposed Te Wero bridge) be confirmed. 2. That the north-south passenger priority route (Daldy Street Linear Park) be confirmed. 3. That all of the above roads be assigned a status in the plan modification that will provide the capacity to allow for the construction of a tourist/heritage tramway. 106/2 Jennifer Ward Pedestrian overbridge to connect St Mary's Bay and Ponsonby to the Tank Farm so pedestrians do not need to negotiate motorway entering or exiting traffic. 118/2 Ariadne Marinas Oceania Quarter Plan K should be amended to remove the proposed pedestrian walking route on the eastern boundary of the Proprietary Limited/Orams Wynyard Quarter at the seaward boundary of the Orams' site. Marine Auckland 134/2 Peter E G Hosking If there is to be a bridge, it should be pedestrian cyclists only - would have smaller imprint, opening times not dependent on bus timetables etc. If the bridge is to accommodate buses as well, should these be limited solely to those travelling to and from the tank farm, with no through access to or from other suburbs. 602/17 Sanford Limited Delete the walking routes shown on Quarter Plan K (including, for clarity, those applying to Quarter Area 3, Wynyard

Page 79 Wharf, the berthage immediately to the north of Jellicoe Street, the Halsey Street Reclamation, the Halsey Street Extension Wharf and the Western Viaduct Replacement Wharf). 37/26 Westhaven Viaduct Tenants Quarter Plan K and Ratepayers Association The waterfront walking route through Area 3 should be deleted, and failing that, subject to controlled status whereby the Incorporated (WVTRA) hierarchy defers to, and gives priority to, commercial marine and fishing industries processes, and control to close the walking route is extended to industry as part of the Proposed Plan Change. 133/5 Heart of The City We recommend that all regional bus services remain on Fanshawe Street (this also has implications) for Daldy and Jellicoe Streets). 133/7 Heart of The City Recommend that the connection to Victoria Park is designed for cyclists as well as pedestrians 1/27 Marine Industry Association In Quarter Plan K, the walking route through Area 3 should be shown as a controlled walking route, subject to closure as necessary due to the safety requirements of the marine and fishing industry or other activities taking place (such as boat launching) 6/40 Burtlea Investments No.98 Quarter Plan K be amended as follows: Limited • Delete references and notations regarding public transport route shown along Daldy Street, Jellicoe Street, part of 123/40 Viaduct Harbour Holdings the coastal marine area in the Viaduct Harbour, and Te Wero Island and substitute by an alternative public transport Limited route through Wynyard Quarter that is not dependant on construction of the Te Wero link and proposed bridge; • Delete references and notations regarding pedestrian bridges.; • Delete references and notations regarding traffic underpass option. 24/18 Auckland Regional Holdings Quarter Plan K be amended to show where "sections" are taken. Figure 14.2 be amended to properly correlate to the Quarter Plans in terms of Lanes, extent of designations etc.

25/6 New Zealand Institute of The actual use of the public transport route shown on Quarter Plan K needs further explanation. Architects

Wynyard Quarter Urban Design Framework Number Submitter Decision 132/1 Committee for Auckland Urban design framework is robust, including marker buildings for height. Limited 134/1 Peter E G Hosking Should be broadened to include Victoria Park to which the wide promenade so-called Daldy Street Linear Park should connect across an undergrounded Fanshawe Street and undergrounding the motorway through Victoria Park (in both directions) thus enabling the flyover to be removed. 133/2 Heart of The City To lift the vision of the Wynyard Quarter to heights aspired to by both politicians and the public buildings, that expresses Auckland's history art and culture (example by Chicago's Millennium Park). 133/4 Heart of The City (para 1.4). The final bullet notes that use of the UDF "may also be appropriate" when considering discretionary and non- complying applications. HOTC recommends changing the "may" to "will" to this bullet, to remove any doubt that the UDF should be used, and also add that its is to be used also for "complying activities on both private and public land." 6/42 Burtlea Investments No.98 UDF be amended in relevant part by:

Page 80 Limited • Establishing a clearer link in section of the UDF between the key concepts and principles found in sections 2 and 3 123/42 Viaduct Harbour Holdings of the UDF with the issues, objectives and policies in the Proposed Plan Modifications; Limited • Establishing a more precise link between relevant sections of the UDF and the information requirements and assessment criteria for Comprehensive Area Structure Plans (clause 14.9.8) in the Proposed Plan Modifications; • Amending Figure 33 (and related text) to delete references to the provision of community/cultural facilities in Quarter Area 2; • Deleting Figure 77 and substituting it with a more accurate representation of the concept for the 52m building in in Quarter Area 2; • Consequential amendments to sections 4.1 to 4.5 of the UDF to correspond with the decisions version of the Proposed Plan Modifications; • Deleting sections 4.6 to 4.26 of the UDF and substituting those provisions with either: (a) More comprehensive design guidelines incorporated in the UDF based on revision and update of the Viaduct Harbour Design Guidelines; or (b) A revision and update of the Viaduct Harbour Urban Design Guidelines as a separate non-statutory document which should be incorporated by reference into the Proposed Plan Modifications to provide detailed guidance (and assessment criteria) regarding building design. 25/1 New Zealand Institute of Congratulate the Council on the quality of the Urban Design Framework associated with the notified Plan Change, and on Architects the methodical way this has been incorporated in the Plan Change document. 30/15 Auckland Regional Council To add a section relating to public realm design to the Wynyard Quarter urban Design Framework. This should: a. Set out existing character elements to be retained and enhanced b. Reference heritage components such as the slipway/seawall in the vicinity of the former Bailey's shipyard, and the several hulks (Chelmsford and Kaniere) that are buried under the Western Reclamation in the vicinity of Hamer Street c. Set out a palette of materials and general street design concepts that promote pedestrian priority and facilitate cycling d. Ensure that public art is incorporated into the streetscape e. Ensure the involvement of local artists in the public realm design process 30/20 Auckland Regional Council To amend maps and plans contained in the Urban Design Framework to exclude any structures that lie within the Coastal Marine Area. 586/1 North Shore City Council Suggests that in making its decisions on the plan change Auckland City Council gives consideration to making the Master Plan design of the area the subject of an international design competition to elicit the best possible design outcomes for this significant location.

Page 81