DOCSLIB.ORG

Idaho Transportation Department Investment Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Idaho Transportation Department Investment Program FY2021 to FY2027 Draft for Public Comment - July 2020 Idaho Transportation Department Investment Program US 95, Northern Idaho TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Information and How to Submit Comments The Idaho Transportation Investment Program (ITIP) . .. .. 1 How to Submit Comments . .. .. .. 1 ITIP Development Calendar . .. .. .. 1 ITIP Development Participants . .. .. .. 2 Project Selection . .. .. .. .. 2 Program Priorities . .. .. .. 2 STIP Format. .. .. 3 Air Quality and Conformity ................................................ 4 Federal Funding, FAST Act ................................................ 4 Funding Assumptions/Forecasts ........................................... 4 References to MPO Transportation Improvement Programs . .. 5 Draft Program and Project List Idaho Transportation Investment Program, FY21 to FY27 . .. .. 7 Grouped Project FHWA Control Totals . .. .. 8 Program Name Abbreviations . .. .. .. 9 Fund Source Abbreviations ............................................... 10 District 1 Projects . .. .. .. 11 District 2 Projects . .. .. .. 27 District 3 Projects . .. .. .. 40 District 4 Projects . .. .. .. 54 District 5 Projects ....................................................... 71 District 6 Projects . .. .. .. 82 Statewide Projects ..... .. ..................................... 96 Indian Reservation Roads Program ....................................... 108 The Idaho Transportation Investment Program The Idaho Transportation Investment Program (ITIP)is a multi-modal program that includes highways, bridges, public transportation, railroads, aviation, and non-motorized transportation. Idaho’s state and local transportation systems are a network of cross-jurisdictional routes that require cooperation, coordination, and continuous planning to operate, maintain, and improve. The Idaho Transportation Department is providing this draft of the FY21 to FY27 ITIP to allow transportation agencies and the public to review and provide comments on the program. The ITIP’s federal document format meets the requirements of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST), the law that provides federal funding for transportation projects to move people and freight. In compliance with the FAST Act,this draft ITIP is fiscally constrained and includes at least four years of projects in compliance with 23CFR 450.218. How to Submit Comments To submit comments on the ITIP, please use one of the following methods: • On Line: Click on the map on the right side of the draft program web page. The following page will have a "Submit Comments" button at its upper left. itd.idaho.gov/funding/?target=draft-itip • Mail: Idaho Transportation Department ITIP Comments Attention Aubrie Spence Office of Communications P.O. Box 7129 Boise, ID 83707-1129 If you have questions regarding this document, please contact Aubrie Spence via email at [email protected] or call (208) 334-8119. FY 2021 to 2027 Draft Idaho Transportation Investment Program - July 2020 1 ITIP Development Participants Project Selection The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) ITD uses road and bridge management systems to refines federal and state funding estimates in select projects that: January, based on the annual revenue forecast published in August. In January, ITD also provides • Optimize current and projected funding levels the funding estimates to metropolitan planning organizations, the Local Highway Technical • Support federally funded local transportation Assistance Council (LHTAC), and ITD’s six agency plans and programs district offices. • Address system priorities In June, ITD submits a draft ITIP, including all state and local projects, to the Idaho Transportation • Achieve system-performance goals Board for review. Teams of experienced engineers and planners In July, ITD provides the draft ITIP to state and assist in the project-selection process by: local agencies, transportation stakeholders, and the public for comment. The department takes these • Analyzing road and bridge data provided by comments into consideration as it finalizes the management systems ITIP in August. The Idaho Transportation Board approves the final ITIP in September. • Determining specific program objectives In November, ITD submits the ITIP Federal • Establishing engineering requirements for Approval Document to the Federal Highway projects that achieve objectives Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for approval as Idaho’s • Making recommendations to management on FY2021-FY2027 Statewide Transportation funding levels required to meet objectives Improvement Program or STIP. • Balancing program budgets with available revenue The STIP includes references to the Transportation Improvement Programs for Idaho’s five Program Priorities metropolitan planning areas rather than duplicating The ITIP’s priorities support the safety, mobility, those projects in the STIP. and economic opportunity goals identified in the department’s strategic plan. The department: Construction on new ITIP projects can begin following FHWA approval. The Environmental • Is committed to providing facilities that enable Protection Agency has a 30-day review and the safe movement of people and goods. Safety comment period that typically is concurrent with is considered in all transportation activities, the FHWA and FTA review. investments, and decision-making processes. FY 2021 to 2027 Draft Idaho Transportation Investment Program - July 2020 2 • Promotes accessible, affordable, and convenient STIP Format transportation choices for the movement of The department, the FHWA, and Idaho's people and goods. metropolitan planning organizations have agreed on the following improvements to make the STIP • Strives to keep the transportation infrastructure approval process more efficient. These in good repair and ensure uninterrupted service. improvements are authorized by 23 CFR450.218, Planning Assistance Standards. • Applies resources to maintain, improve, and expand routes and services that contribute to the • Routine highway projects are grouped by the year state’s economic vitality. of expenditure and by important types or geographic areas to highlight investment priorities. • Uses integrated management systems to ensure The grouped investment totals also serve as the transportation investments align with Idaho's basis for federal approval of the STIP, allowing transportation vision. the federal funding of future projects eligible for the investment groups. ITD strategically targets investments that improve safety, enhance mobility, and provide economic • For a complete list of projects including grouped opportunity. Idaho’s Safety & Capacity Program and MPO projects (includes projects sorted in contains these projects. They are funded with various ways for customer use), see the draft ITIP federal Highway Safety Improvement Program web page at the location below: funds. They are funded by the federal Highway itd.idaho.gov/funding/?target=draft-itip Safety Improvement Program, National Highway Performance Program, the Transportation • Highway projects are listed individually only if Expansion and Congestion Mitigation Program, they meet one or more of the following criteria: and state funds. - The project requires special reporting due to In March 2017, the Idaho Transportation Board the funding source. reviewed scenarios for pavement and bridge condition with various funding levels based on - The project requires an environmental their impact on the percent of pavement and clearance more in-depth than the minimal bridges that are in good or fair condition. categorical exclusion, such as projects with right-of-way needs. After reviewing the trade-offs between these funding levels and their effect on performance - The project may impact air quality and requires measures, the board approved for FY22 forward a additional analysis within certain metropolitan funding increase for safety and capacity (safety, planning areas. mobility, and economic opportunity) to $80 million annually, reduced pavement funding to - The department or an MPO believes the project $103 million, and reduced bridge funding to $80 warrants individual attention by local officials million annually. and stakeholders. FY 2021 to 2027 Draft Idaho Transportation Investment Program - July 2020 3 • Because investment groups have not yet been regional long-range transportation plans that take Idaho’s Transportation Alternatives Program established for public transportation and into consideration air quality conformity issues by is populated through FY21 with projects for aeronautics projects, they are listed individually. creating plans focusing on various transportation bike and pedestrian facilities, Safe Routes to corridors, pathways, public transportation systems, School projects, Americans with Disabilities Air Quality and Conformity and transportation system management elements. Act projects, and projects for the historic The Clean Air Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 7506(c))requires preservation or rehabilitation of transportation that all federally funded plans, programs, and projects Federal Funding, FAST Act facilities. Additionally, funding is reserved for in non-attainment or maintenance areas conform to the The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation FY24 through FY27 in this program. Plan for the Control of Air Pollution in the State of Act (FAST), Public Law No. 114-94, the current Idaho, commonly known as the State Implementation federal transportation authorization act,became Though no specific
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gardiner V. Boundary County Bd. of Com'rs Clerk's Record V. 1 Dckt
    UIdaho Law Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs 6-18-2008 Gardiner v. Boundary County Bd. Of Com'rs Clerk's Record v. 1 Dckt. 35007 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/ idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs Recommended Citation "Gardiner v. Boundary County Bd. Of Com'rs Clerk's Record v. 1 Dckt. 35007" (2008). Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs. 2011. https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/2011 This Court Document is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ UIdaho Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO PATRICK GARDINER AND ADA ) SUPREME COURT NO. 35007 GARDINER, husband and wife ) ) PlaintiffsIRespondents, ) District Court No. CV 2006 339 vs. ) 1 BOUNDARY COUNTY BOARD ) OF COMMISSIONERS, 1 ) DefendantsIAppellants. ) CLERK'S RECORD ON APPEAL Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District of the State of ldaho, in and for the County of Boundary. HON. JAMES R. MICHAUD Senior District Judge Paul William Vogel Philip H. Robinson PO Box 1828 PO Box 1405 Sandpoint, ldaho 83864 Sandpoint, ldaho 83864 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT CLERK'S RECORD ON APPEAL I TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER OF ACTIONS PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW Filed September Ilth, 2006 ORDER GOVERNING JUDICAL REVIEW Filed September
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Inventory of Existing Conditions
    2014 Airport Master Plan Narrative Report 2.0 INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 INTRODUCTION AND PLANNING CONTEXT 2.1.1 GENERAL The purpose of the inventory is to summarize existing conditions of all the facilities at the Priest River Municipal Airport (1S6) as well as summarize other pertinent information relating to the community and the airport background, airport role, surrounding environment and various operational and other significant characteristics. The information in this chapter describes the current status of the Priest River Municipal Airport and provides the baseline for determining future facility needs. Information was obtained through various justifiable mediums including: consultant research, review of existing documents, interviews and conversations with airport stakeholders including the airport sponsor (Bonner County), City of Priest River, airport tenants, Idaho Transportation Department - Division of Aeronautics (ITD) and other knowledgeable sources. 2.1.2 FAA NATIONAL PLAN OF INTEGRATED AIRPORT SYSTEMS (NPIAS) AND ASSET STUDY The United States has developed a national airport system. Known as the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), this system identifies public-use airports considered by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), state aviation agencies, and local planning organizations to be in the national interest and essential for the U.S air transportation system. Per the 2013- 2017 NPIAS Report to Congress, guiding principles of the NPIAS include: The NPIAS will provide a safe, efficient and integrated system of airports; The NPIAS will ensure an airport system that is in a state of good repair, remains safe and is extensive, providing as many people as possible with convenient access to air transportation The NPIAS will support a variety of critical national objectives such as defense, emergency readiness, law enforcement, and postal delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case for Always Flying the Aircraft…Even When It Won't
    AE S RONAUTIC Winter 2011 Serving Idaho’s Aviation Community for over 60 Years Vol 57, Issue 1 A Case for Always Flying the Aircraft…Even When It Won’t By: Dennis Scifres I began a Early one October morning in 2008, slow left turn eager to put in a day of deer hunting to remain up on the Middle Fork of the Salmon, within the I headed out to the Caldwell Airport canyon and felt and my trusty Cessna 185. Although I a very slight was very anxious to get airborne, it had bump in the just come out of maintenance, and I control yoke as wanted to be especially meticulous with I moved the the preflight and every checklist item. ailerons. I tried In spite of my caution, I lifted off of to increase the runway 12 by 7:15. It was just bank, but beginning to get light in the east as I nothing headed toward the Middle Fork. happened. The control yoke As I climbed out, I heard Boise went well Approach talking to an airliner, asking beyond its The cockpit shortly after landing. Photo by Dennis Scifres about any icing conditions they may normal stop without a corresponding returned to a nearly level position and have encountered. Other than light rime increase in turn. I then reversed the then began to increase bank again, icing between 14,500 and 16,500, they yoke, moving it all the way to the right, stopping at about 25 degrees, all without reported nothing else. Icing would not still with no corresponding change.
    [Show full text]
  • Despite the Devastating Tragedy of the 9/11 Terrorist Attack on This
    General Aviation Airports Pose a Threat to National Security Nearly eleven years have elapsed since that fateful September day when Mohammed Atta commandeered American Airlines Flight 11 and crashed it into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.1 A few minutes later fellow terrorist Marwan al Shehhi steered United Airlines Flight 175 into the South Tower.2 Both Atta and Shehhi obtained pilot's licenses and received large jet flight simulator instruction at Huffman Aviation in Venice Florida. They also trained at Jones Aviation in Sarasota, Florida.3 Hani Hanjour, who piloted American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon, was rejected from a flight school in his home country before receiving pilot training in the U.S. After being turned away by the flight school in Saudi Arabia he was accepted at Arizona Aviation. From there he went on to obtain both a private and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued commercial pilot certification. Hanjour then returned to Saudi Arabia where he was denied admission to a civil aviation school. Upon returning to the U.S. Hanjour trained on a Boeing 737 simulator at the Pan Am International Flight Academy in Mesa, Arizona.4 He also trained and practiced at Air Fleet Training Systems in Teterboro, New Jersey, and Caldwell Flight Academy in Fairfield, New Jersey.5 United Airlines Flight 93, which crashed short of its presumed Washington DC target, came down in a field in Pennsylvania. This aircraft was piloted by Ziad Jarrah6 who received his private pilot training at the Florida Flight Training Center in Venice, Florida.7 In addition he trained at the Hortman Aviation,8 a training school which serves the Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware region.9 Within the space of seventy-seven minutes, terrorists transformed four commercial aircraft into weapons of mass destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2011 Serving Idaho’S Aviation Community for Over 60 Years Vol 57, Issue 2 the Amazing Rescue of Fango 45
    AE S RONAUTIC Spring 2011 Serving Idaho’s Aviation Community for over 60 Years Vol 57, Issue 2 The Amazing Rescue of Fango 45 By: William C. Miller, with Frederic M. Wilson and Michael P. McGrath On 8 April 1982, the following crew conversation takes place inside FANGO 43, an Idaho Air National Guard (ANG) RF-4C flying a twilight low-level radar mission over eastern Oregon: 43 PILOT: “Ground speed set at 480.” 43 Weapons Systems Officer (WSO): “Okay, turn right to two- zero-three.” 43 PILOT: “Steady two-zero-three.” 43 WSO: “Okay, come one-half left and hold that.” 43 PILOT: “Rawj.” 43 WSO: “Clear your clock. After we Idaho Air National Guard RF-4Cs. Photo courtesy of Bill Miller. hack, turn left two-zero-three and hold that ‘till we cross the target. 43 PILOT: “Mike, that’s Fred, and over there to join up? He really Ready, ready—Hack!” he’s in big trouble! We’re needs our help.” 43 PILOT: “My clock’s runnin’; I’m abandoning this low-level, and I’m SLC: “FANGO 43, squawk ident. turning to two-zero-three…okay; headin’ over that way right now; Radar contact, 105 west of Boise.” steady on!” coming to a two-two-zero heading.” 43: “Roger. He’s probably heading 43 WSO: “We’ll cross the target at toward Boise; should be around fifty-two seconds. Then climb FANGO 43 was about 20 miles east 250 knots.” straight ahead to 7,300 feet, switch of FANGO 45, and their new SLC: “Okay FANGO 43, I’ve got a to TAO, make a 45-degree-bank southwesterly heading would quickly 4300 squawk in that vicinity, left turn to one-eight-five.” put them close to FANGO 45, who bearing two-zero-zero for 21.” 43 PILOT: “Okay ….
    [Show full text]
  • ACDBE Program Policy Statement 2017
    FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL AIRPORT HAILEY, IDAHO AIRPORT CONCESSION DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM (ACDBE) 2017 Friedman Memorial Airport Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Hailey, Idaho Friedman Memorial Airport Authority Friedman Memorial Airport Hailey. Idaho ACDBE PROGRAM POLICY STATEMENT Section 23.1, 23.23 Objectives / Policy Statement The Friedman Memorial Airport Authority has established an Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) program in accordance with regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), 49 CFR Part 23. The Friedman Memorial Airport is a primary airport and has received federal funds authorized for airport development after January 1988 (authorized under Title 49 of the United States Code), The Friedman Memorial Airport Sponsors have signed airport grant assurances that it will comply with 49 CFR Part 23. It is the policy of the Friedman Memorial Airport Authority to ensure that ACDBEs as defined in Part 23, have an equal opportunity to receive and participate in concession opportunities. It is also our policy: 1. To ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of opportunities for concessions by airports receiving DOT financial assistance; 2. To create a level playing field on which ACDBEs can compete fairly for opportunities for concessions; 3. To ensure that our ACDBE program is narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable law; 4. To ensure that only firms that fully meet this part's eligibility standards are permitted to participate as ACDBEs at our airport(s); 5. To help remove barriers to the participation of ACDBEs in opportunities for concessions at our airport(s); and 6. To provide appropriate flexibility to our airport in establishing and providing opportunities for ACDBEs.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertisement for Bids Boundary County Airport
    ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS BOUNDARY COUNTY AIRPORT ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS BOUNDARY COUNTY AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS BONNERS FERRY, BOUNDARY COUNTY, IDAHO AIP 3-16-0004-013-2015 Separate sealed bids will be received by Boundary County, Idaho until 1:30 p.m., local time, May 26, 2015. All bids will be received, publicly opened, and read aloud at the commissioner's office, Boundary County Courthouse, 6452 Kootenai Street, Room 28, Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 for the Boundary County Airport Improvements Project to include the following: Crack Seal, Seal Coat, and Remark Pavements; Coal Tar Emulsion Application; Soil Sterilant Application; Install Guidance Signs and Lights; and Install Runway "2" PAPI. This work is to include all tools, equipment, materials, and labor to complete this project. Boundary County, Idaho, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. \u00DF\u00DF 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award. Notice to Prospective Federally Assisted Construction Contractors: 1.) A Certification of Non-segregated Facilities shall be submitted prior to the award of a federally-assisted construction contract exceeding $10,000 which is not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity Clause. 2.) Contractors receiving federally-assisted construction contract awards exceeding $10,000 which are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity Clause will be required to provide for the forwarding of the following notice to prospective subcontractors for supplies and construction contracts where the subcontracts exceed $10,000 and are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity Clause.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon. Richard A. Jones UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    1 The Hon. Richard A. Jones 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 ) 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. CR10-336-RAJ ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT 13 v. ) ) 14 COLTON HARRIS-MOORE, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 17 18 The United States of America, by and through Jenny A. Durkan, United States 19 Attorney for the Western District of Washington, and Darwin P. Roberts and Michael 20 Dion, Assistant United States Attorneys for said District, and Defendant, COLTON 21 HARRIS-MOORE, and his attorneys, John Henry Browne and Emma Scanlan, enter into 22 the following Agreement, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c): 23 1. Waiver of Indictment. Defendant, having been advised of the right to be 24 charged by Indictment, agrees to waive that right and enter a plea of guilty to the charges 25 brought by the United States Attorney in a Superseding Information. 26 2. Waiver of Venue. Defendant, having been advised of the fact that venue 27 for the Interstate Transportation of Stolen Aircraft offense charged in Count 7 normally 28 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY PLEA AGREEMENT/HARRIS-MOORE 700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 Seattle, W ashington 98101-1271 Case No. CR10-336-RAJ - 1 (206) 553-7970 1 would lie in the Southern District of Indiana, agrees to waive venue with respect to that 2 charge and to be prosecuted for the charge in the Western District of Washington. 3 3. The Charge(s). Defendant, having been advised of the right to have this 4 matter tried before a jury, agrees to waive that right and enter his pleas of guilty to the 5 following charges contained in the Superseding Information: 6 a.
    [Show full text]