Bawdy Brits West End Wit Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bawdy Brits West End Wit Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era Bawdy Brits West End Wit Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era & Bawdy Brits West End Wit Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era February 18 – April 16, 2011 Curated by: Emily Bastian Christy Gray Aimee Laubach Emily Maran Matthew Morowitz Allison Schell Carey Stadnick Margaret Staudter Laura Wilson Lauren Woodcock Grace Zell THE& TROUT GALLERY • Dickinson College • Carlisle, Pennsylvania Acknowledgements Bawdy Brits & West End Wit: Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era is a curatorial project by senior art history students participating in an exhibition seminar at Dickinson College. The annual seminar is designed to introduce students to the practice of preparing an exhibition and catalogue. Working with objects drawn from The Trout Gallery’s permanent collection, the curators selected the works for the exhibition, organized the material into major themes, and prepared the following essays. Bawdy Brits & West End Wit was developed in response to the promised gift of satirical prints to The Trout Gallery by the Brookes V Limited Partnership made in honor of Dr. and Mrs. Leon Ginsburg. This gift to The Trout Gallery was coordinated by Nancy Siegel, Associate Professor of Art History at Towson University. We thank the following individuals and institutions for generously providing essential documenta- tion and imagery for this catalogue: Tina Maresco, Specialist, Interlibrary Loan Services; James Gerenscer, Archivist, Special Collections; and Christine Bombaro, Research Librarian, Waidner-Spahr Library, Dickinson College. Special gratitude is due to Kimberley Nichols and Patricia Pohlman for their skillful design of this catalogue. We thank Andrew Bale for photographing the works for the catalogue. The Trout Gallery is served graciously by members of the Friends of The Trout Gallery and the Exhibition and Collections Committees. Special thanks is due to the staff members of The Trout Gallery who helped make this exhibition possible. Stephanie Keifer, the museum’s senior administrative associate, copy-edited the catalogue text and provided essential organizational services. James Bowman prepared the objects and worked with members of the seminar to design and install the exhibition and Wendy Pires, along with her student interns, organized and delivered the various outreach programs. Rosalie Lehman, Satsuki Swisher, and Catherine Sacco assisted with the outreach programs and provided essential visitor services. The Trout Gallery’s team of student interns assisted the museum staff in countless ways: Marianne Hutt ’11, Mauro David Lifschitz Arribio ’13, Azul Mertnoff ’11, Christina Neno ’11, Jennifer Rokoski ’12, Emily Rother ’12, and Emily Noss (Shippensburg University) ’11. Members of the Exhibition Seminar Phillip Earenfight, Associate Professor of Art History and Director, The Trout Gallery Cover: This publication was produced in part through the generous support of the George Cruikshank, Mixing a Recipe for Corns (detail), 1835. Etching, hand Helen Trout Memorial Fund and the Ruth Trout Endowment at Dickinson coloring. The Trout Gallery, Dickinson College (cat. 8). College. Published by The Trout Gallery, Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsyl- vania, 17013. James Gillray, The King of Brobdingnag and Gulliver (detail), 1804. Etching, engraving, aquatint, hand coloring. The Trout Gallery, Dickinson College Copyright © 2011 The Trout Gallery. All rights reserved. No part of this (cat. 33). publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or Back Cover: otherwise, without written permission from The Trout Gallery. James Gillray, Very Slippy-Weather (detail), 1808. Etching, engraving, hand coloring. The Trout Gallery, Dickinson College (cat. 37). Design: Kimberley Nichols and Patricia Pohlman Printing: Triangle Printing, Lancaster, Pennsylvania Frontispiece: James Gillray, Very Slippy-Weather, 1808. Etching, engraving, hand coloring. ISBN 978-0-9826156-1-4 The Trout Gallery, Dickinson College (cat. 37). Table of Contents Introduction: British Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era at The Trout Gallery 4 Phillip Earenfight Essays In With the Old Comedy: Satirical Prints in Georgian London and Connections to Ancient Greek Satire 9 Grace Zell Reading the Laughs: The Humor of Text in Prints of the Georgian Era 14 Carey Stadnick From Britannia to Bull: The Embodiment of Englishness 20 Emily Bastian Promis’d Horrors: Reactions to Napoleon in British Satirical Prints and Francisco Goya’s Los Desastres de la Guerra Series 26 Matthew Morowitz Quacks Among Quackery: Medicine and Satirical Prints in Georgian London 33 Christy Gray The Golden Age of Hairdressers: The Portrayal of Hair in Caricature of the Georgian Era 41 Lauren Woodcock Lustful Consumption: Prostitution in the Satirical Prints of Georgian London 46 Emily Maran Hannah Humphrey, Print Seller of Georgian London 51 Allison Schell “Honi soit qui mal y pense”: Censorship of British Satirical Prints in the Georgian Era 56 Laura Wilson Classical Themes and Motifs in the British Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era 60 Margaret Staudter High Art in Low Art: An Exploration of Fine Art References in British Satirical Prints 66 Aimee Laubach Illustrated Catalogue 73 3 Introduction: British Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era at The Trout Gallery Phillip Earenfight, Seminar Advisor Director, The Trout Gallery On February 10, 1808, Hannah Humphrey published James Gillray’s Very Slippy-Weather, a satirical print that shows a comical scene of a man slipping on the icy street outside her print shop at No. 27 St. James’s Street, London (Fig. 1).1 Behind the unfortunate man, who struggles to maintain his wig, coins, and snuff box, to say nothing of his composure, a crowd has gathered at Humphrey’s windows to view the prints on display. The prints—all by Gillray—feature a range of topics from contemporary politics, to health, personalities, leisure activities, and life in the city. This simple etching, which sold for little more than a shilling—or two if hand colored—provides a view into a popular aspect of eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century London and is a fitting introduction to Bawdy Brits & West End Wit, British Satirical Prints of the Georgian Era. Humphrey’s print shop was located on St. James’s Street, west of Piccadilly and between St. James’s Park and Mayfair—in the broader area known as the “West End” (Fig. 2).2 The West—or “Worst”—End of London was, during the century following Shakespeare’s death, the largely undevel- oped area between old center of London and the city of Westminster, along the northwest bend in the Thames. Save for key streets that paralleled the river and connected the two cities—The Strand and White Hall—much of the growth along this stretch was restricted to the areas near the wharf. Fig. 1. James Gillray, Very Slippy-Weather., 1808. Etching, engraving, hand However, during the seventeenth century, lack of space in the coloring. The Trout Gallery, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA (cat. 37). old city forced the development of the West End, pushing Fig. 2. Map of London. 4 new development in the areas north and northwest, well beyond Piccadilly, toward the fashionable neighborhoods of Mayfair, Soho, and Bloomsbury. Today this area houses many of the city’s major sites, including Charing Cross, the National Gallery, the Royal Academy, and Trafalgar Square. However, during the Georgian era, this highly desirable section was home to many of the city’s most prominent officials and royals, coffee houses, gin halls, art dealers, social clubs, taverns, print-sellers, and brothels. Regarding the latter, it is estimated that as much as 20 percent of the city’s female population was engaged in prostitution and many of them centered their activities at Covent Garden and the West End.3 Although the eastern edge of the West End merged with the area near Covent Garden, its western edge termi- nated in the ever fashionable St. James’s area, which abutted the royal palace and Westminster to the south. Thus, the West End housed a curious mix of the very wealthy, the ever fashionable, the politically powerful, the highly ambitious, the middling merchant, and the very poor, all with a range of distractions to fit every budget. Such an environment provided endless fodder for satirical printmakers and publishers, who made their neighborhoods and world of London the subject of their prints. Fig. 3. Richard Dighton, A London Nuisance. Ple 4th. A Pleasant way to Lose Such aspects of urban life and its challenges are well an Eye., 1821. Etching, hand coloring. The Trout Gallery, Dickinson represented in Very Slippy-Weather and in other light-hearted College, Carlisle, PA (cat. 13). scenes such as Richard Dighton’s A London Nuisance. Ple 4th. A Pleasant Way To Lose An Eye. (1821) or George Cruikshank’s Symptoms of Life in London—or—Love, Law, & Physic. (1821) (Figs. 3, 4).4 While A London Nuisance shares in the same slapstick humor as Very Slippy-Weather, Cruikshank’s Symptoms of Life in London points to the biting satire one frequently associates with this genre of prints. In this example, we see in the left scene a drunk dandy flanked by prostitutes who stand outside a tavern; in the middle a bailiff and dandy appear on the street; and on the right, a doctor and nurse tend to a patient. Although each scene represents an aspect of London society, read together they suggest a progression from unchecked lust to its potential legal and health consequences. As we see in this last scene, as Fig. 4. George Cruikshank, Symptoms of Life in London—or Love, Law, & well as in the prints featured in the windows of Very Slippy- Physic., 1821 Etching, hand coloring. The Trout Gallery, Dickinson College, Weather, health and health care was a prominent subject Carlisle, PA (cat. 5). among the printmakers of this period. Indeed, Thomas Rowlandson’s Palatable Physic (c. 1810) comments on the lewd subject matter, as we see in Thomas Rowlandson’s The role of spirits in health, as a parson, a woman, and a gout- Wooden Leg—or Careful Landlady (1809) (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction: the Royal Character in the Public Imagination 1
    Notes Introduction: The Royal Character in the Public Imagination 1. I use the words “royal” and “monarch” (and their variants, “royalty,” “monarchy,” “monarchical,” etc.) interchangeably. By the late eigh- teenth century both terms in common usage referred equally to kings and to those who ruled (queens, regents). “Royal” also referred, and still does, to near relatives of the monarch, as in “royal family,” and I use it in this sense also. 2. Austen’s conservatism is famously unstable. Feminist critics espe- cially have suggested that a feminist subtext undercuts or at least tempers the conservative trajectories of her novels. In Equivocal Beings, Claudia Johnson provides a comprehensive discussion of the conservative reading of Emma as well as its implicit feminist critique (192–96). 3. Unlike Pride and Prejudice, in which she was revising an earlier draft, Austen wrote Mansfield Park, Emma, and Persuasion after 1810. She began writing Mansfield Park in February 1811, the same month in which the Regency began (Sturrock 30; see also Tomalin 223–24). 4. Clara Tuite suggests that Mansfield Park can be read as “a provincial deflection of the wider national issues of responsible hereditary gov- ernment” (Romantic Austen 132). 5. The phrase “Queen Caroline affair” historically refers to the events of 1820 and 1821, when the uncrowned King attempted to divorce his wife by Act of Parliament. Although Caroline was technically Queen, supporters of the new King used a variety of means, some political, some rhetorical, to contest her legitimacy. Similarities as well as an evident continuity between this episode and the Prince’s first attempt to obtain a divorce, some fifteen years earlier, have often led scholars to refer to their marital disputes before, during, and after the Regency as the Queen Caroline affair.
    [Show full text]
  • Caricature in the Novel, 1740-1840 a Dissertation Submitted in Part
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Sentiment and Laughter: Caricature in the Novel, 1740-1840 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in English by Leigh-Michil George 2016 © Copyright by Leigh-Michil George 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Sentiment and Laughter: Caricature in the Novel, 1740-1840 by Leigh-Michil George Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Jonathan Hamilton Grossman, Co-Chair Professor Felicity A. Nussbaum, Co-Chair This dissertation examines how late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century British novelists—major authors, Laurence Sterne and Jane Austen, and lesser-known writers, Pierce Egan, Charles Jenner, and Alexander Bicknell—challenged Henry Fielding’s mid-eighteenth-century critique of caricature as unrealistic and un-novelistic. In this study, I argue that Sterne, Austen, Egan, and others translated visual tropes of caricature into literary form in order to make their comic writings appear more “realistic.” In doing so, these authors not only bridged the character-caricature divide, but a visual- verbal divide as well. As I demonstrate, the desire to connect caricature with character, and the visual with the verbal, grew out of larger ethical and aesthetic concerns regarding the relationship between laughter, sensibility, and novelistic form. ii This study begins with Fielding’s Joseph Andrews (1742) and its antagonistic stance towards caricature and the laughter it evokes, a laughter that both Fielding and William Hogarth portray as detrimental to the knowledge of character and sensibility. My second chapter looks at how, increasingly, in the late eighteenth century tears and laughter were integrated into the sentimental experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The King Falls Into the Hands Ofcaricature
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Kremers, Anorthe ; Reich, Elisabeth (Hrsgg.): Loyal subversion? Caricatures from the Personal Union between England and Hanover (1714-1837), Göttingen 2014, S. 11-34 Werner Busch The King Falls into the Hands of Caricature. Hanoverians in England Durch die Hinrichtung Karls I. auf Veranlassung Cromwells im Jahr 1649 wurde das Gottesgnadentum des Konigs ein erstes Mai in Frage gestellt. Als nach dem Tod von Queen Anne 1714 die Hannoveraner auf den englischen Thron kamen, galten diese den Englandern als Fremdlinge. 1760 wurde mit Georg III. zudem ein psychisch labiler, spater geisteskranker Konig Regent. Als 1792 der franzdsische Konig Ludwig XVI. inhaftiert und spater hingerichtet wurde, musste das Konigtum generell um seinen Fortbestand fiirchten. In dieser Situation bemdchtigte sich die englische Karikatur endgilltig auch der koniglichen Person. Wie es schrittweise dazu kam und welche Rolle diesfilr das konig- liche Portrat gespielt hat, wird in diesem Beitragzu zeigen sein. If I were to ask you how you would define the genre of caricature, then you would perhaps answer, after brief reflection that Caricature is basically a drawing reproduced in newspapers or magazines that comments ironically on political or social events in narrative form and both satirises the protagonists shown there by exaggerating their features and body shapes on the one hand and by reducing them at the same time to a few typical characteristics on the other hand characterising them unmistakably. Perhaps you would then add that the few typical characteristics of well-known peo­ ple become binding stereotypes in the course of time and as such are sufficient to let the person become instantly recognisable.
    [Show full text]
  • Yahr2013 Pdf (1.194Mb)
    The University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire An Exploration in Representation and Reality: The Divide in Women’s Portrayals During the French Revolution of 1789 Department of History By Becca Yahr Supervising Professor: Joseph Orser Cooperating Professor: Louisa Rice Eau Claire, Wisconsin December 2013 Copyright of this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, with the consent of the author. Yahr 2 CONTENTS Abstract……………..……………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction: Representation and History………………………………………………………....4 Historiography...…………………………………………………………………………………..6 Historical Background...…………………………………………………………………………..8 Analysis of Creative Texts……………………………………………………………………….10 Conclusion: The Power of Representation………………………………………………………31 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..34 Yahr 3 Abstract: This essay examines artistic representations of French women in the period contemporaneous to the French Revolution of 1789. Through the analysis of literary texts and visual art, a better understanding of the social perception of women in this time period can be achieved. Sources like novels, narratives, newspaper accounts, prints, etchings, and sculptures are used to show a distinct dichotomy in the portrayals of French women. In the artistic work from Britain, Ireland, Germany, and France, women who were active participants in the revolutionary proceedings were disparaged for being violent and ruthless, while women who were limited to the private sphere where glorified as mothers and moral anchors. Additionally, this essay argues that the inclusion of creative texts, such as these, is important for developing a more complete view of social ideas in historical periods. Yahr 4 Introduction: Representation and History When discussing the French Revolution of 1789, it is safe to say that with the advent of the revolution the entirety of French society was forced into a period of drastic social change.
    [Show full text]
  • Cat Estambul.Pdf
    2 3 GOYA ZAMANININ TANIĞI Gravürler ve Resimler GOYA WITNESS OF HIS TIME Engravings and Paintings Sergi Kataloğu Exhibition Catalogue Pera Müzesi Yayını Pera Museum Publication 55 İstanbul, Nisan April 2012 ISBN:........................... Küratörler Curators: Marisa Oropesa Maria Toral Yayına Hazırlayanlar Editors: Witness of Teşekkürler Acknowledgements: Zamanının Tanığı Begüm Akkoyunlu Ersöz Tania Bahar Museo de Bellas Artes de Bilbao His Time Soprintendenza Speciale per il Polo Museale Fiorentino, Gravürler ve Resimler Yayın Koordinatörü Publication Coordinator: Galleria degli Uffizi Zeynep Ögel Fundación de Santamarca y de San Ramón y San Antonio Engravings Fundación Zuloaga Proje Asistanı Project Assistant: Colección Joaquín Rivero Selin Turam and Paintings Miriam Alzuri Çeviriler Translations: Placido Arango Lucia Cabezón İspanyolca-Türkçe Spanish-Turkish Valentina Conticelli Roza Hakmen Teresa García Iban Çiğdem Öztürk Anna Gamazo Adolfo Lafuente Guantes İspanyolca-İngilizce Spanish-English Vanessa Mérida Alphabet Traducciones Fernando Molina López Antonio Natali İtalyanca-Türkçe Italian-Turkish Ignacio Olmos Kemal Atakay Marilyn Orozco José Remington İtalyanca-İngilizce Italian-English Helena Rivero Spaziolingue Milan Margarita Ruyra Ana Sánchez Lassa Türkçe Düzelti Turkish Proofreading: Ignacio Suarez-Zuloaga Müge Karalom Laura Trevijano Grafik Tasarım Graphic Design: Instituto Cervantes, Madrid TUT Ajans, www.tutajans.com Víctor García de la Concha, Montserrat Iglesias Santos, Juana Escudero Méndez, Ernesto Pérez Zúñiga, María
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism, Liberation and a New Way of Seeing
    Diploma Lecture Series 2013 Revolution to Romanticism: European Art and Culture 1750-1850 Goya Michael Hill 20/21 February 2013 Lecture summary: Francisco de Goya y Lucientes (1746-1828) was the quintessentially ambitious artist, competing with the greats of the past and mastering every genre of painting. He became deaf mid-way through his career, plunging him into a silent world of visual narrative. This perhaps accounts for something of the intense emotionalism of his storytelling, which culminates in the so-called ‘Black paintings’ of his last years. Slide list: 1. Francisco de Goya y Lucientes (1746-1828), I am still learning, 1824-28 2. Goya, The Parasol, 1777, Prado 3. Goya, Spring, or The Flowergirls, Prado, 1787 4. * Goya, Grape Harvest,1787, Prado 5. Goya, San Bernardino of Siena Preaching before Alfonso V of Aragon, San Francesco Madrid, 1780 6. Goya, Carlos IV in Red, 1789, Prado 7. Goya, The Duchess of Alba, 1797, Hispanic Society of America 8. * Goya, Dona Isabel Cabos de Porcel, 1805, London NG 9. Goya, Family of Charles IV, 1800, Prado 10. Goya, Yard with Lunatics, oil on tin, 1794, Meadows Mus, Dallas. 11. Goya, Prison Interior, 1810-14, Prado 12. Goya, Clothed Maja,1800, Prado 13. Goya, Los Caprichos, Aquatint, 1799 14. Goya, The Sleep of Reason produces Monsters, from Los Caprichos, 1797-99, Acquatint 15. * Goya, This is Worse, from The Disasters of War, Acquatint, 1812-15 16. Goya, For Being Born Somewhere Else, from Album C (Images of the Inquisition), Sepia Wash, 1814-23 17. Goya, 2nd May 1808, 1814, Prado 18.
    [Show full text]
  • UC GAIA Wagner CS5.5-Text.Indd
    Pathological Bodies The Berkeley SerieS in BriTiSh STudieS Mark Bevir and James Vernon, University of California, Berkeley, editors 1. The Peculiarities of Liberal Modernity in Imperial Britain, edited by Simon Gunn and James Vernon 2. Dilemmas of Decline: British Intellectuals and World Politics, 1945– 1975, by Ian Hall 3. The Savage Visit: New World People and Popular Imperial Culture in Britain, 1710– 1795, by Kate Fullagar 4. The Afterlife of Empire, by Jordanna Bailkin 5. Smyrna’s Ashes: Humanitarianism, Genocide, and the Birth of the Middle East, by Michelle Tusan 6. Pathological Bodies: Medicine and Political Culture, by Corinna Wagner Pathological Bodies Medicine and Political Culture Corinna Wagner Global, Area, and International Archive University of California Press Berkeley loS angeleS london The Global, Area, and International Archive (GAIA) is an initiative of the Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley, in partnership with the University of California Press, the California Digital Library, and international research programs across the University of California system. University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress iSBn: 978-1938169-08-3 Manufactured in the United States of America 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of anSi/niSo z39.48– 1992 (r 1997) (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • CRUIKSHANK, GEORGE, 1792-1878. George Cruikshank Collection, 1835-1852
    CRUIKSHANK, GEORGE, 1792-1878. George Cruikshank collection, 1835-1852 Emory University Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library Atlanta, GA 30322 404-727-6887 [email protected] Descriptive Summary Creator: Cruikshank, George, 1792-1878. Title: George Cruikshank collection, 1835-1852 Call Number: Manuscript Collection No. 1314 Extent: .25 linear foot (1 box) and 1 oversized papers box (OP) Abstract: Collection of etchings by British caricaturist George Cruikshank published in The Comic Almanack from 1835 to 1852. Language: Materials entirely in English. Administrative Information Restrictions on Access Unrestricted access. Terms Governing Use and Reproduction All requests subject to limitations noted in departmental policies on reproduction. Source Unknown Citation [after identification of item(s)], George Cruikshank collection, Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library, Emory University. Processing Processed by Michael Camp, September 2014. This finding aid may include language that is offensive or harmful. Please refer to the Rose Library's harmful language statement for more information about why such language may appear and ongoing efforts to remediate racist, ableist, sexist, homophobic, euphemistic and other oppressive language. If you are concerned about language used in this finding aid, please contact us at [email protected]. Emory Libraries provides copies of its finding aids for use only in research and private study. Copies supplied may not be copied for others or otherwise distributed without prior consent of the holding repository. George Cruikshank collection, 1835-1852 Manuscript Collection No. 1314 Collection Description Biographical Note George Cruikshank, British caricaturist and illustrator, was born on September 27, 1792, in London, England.
    [Show full text]
  • Defaming the Dead
    Defaming the Dead Defaming the Dead DON HERZOG New Haven and London Published with assistance from the foundation established in memory of Calvin Chapin of the Class of 1788, Yale College. Copyright © 2017 by Don Herzog. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. An online version of this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License through Michigan Publishing, the digital publishing arm of the University of Michigan Library. It can be accessed at http://hdl .handle.net/2027.42/118195. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] (U.S. office) or [email protected] (U.K. office). Set in Minion type by Integrated Publishing Solutions. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Control Number: 2016947904 ISBN: 978-0-300-22154-1 (hardcover : alk. paper) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The Woody Guthrie lyrics in chapter 5 are from “Plane Wreck at Los Gatos” (“Deportee”); words by Woody Guthrie, music by Martin Hoffman; WGP/TRO-© Copyright 1961 (renewed), 1963 (renewed), Woody Guthrie Publications, Inc. & Ludlow Music, Inc., New York, NY; administered by Ludlow Music, Inc. Used by Permission. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Ukiyo-E in Chicago • Chagoya's Goyas • a Critique of Art Since 1900 • 1913 Armory Show at IPCNY • Artists & Poets
    US $25 The Global Journal of Prints and Ideas July – August 2013 Volume 3, Number 2 Ukiyo-e in Chicago • Chagoya’s Goyas • A Critique of Art Since 1900 • 1913 Armory Show at IPCNY • Artists & Poets Keigo Takahashi • The Impressionist Line from the Clark • Jim Dine • Treasures from the Vault • Under 100 • News July – August 2013 In This Issue Volume 3, Number 2 Editor-in-Chief Susan Tallman 2 Susan Tallman On Broadcasting Associate Publisher Ellen E. Roberts 3 Julie Bernatz Ukiyo-e in Chicago: Frank Lloyd Wright, Marion Mahony Griffin and the Managing Editor Prairie School Annkathrin Murray Sarah Kirk Hanley 11 Associate Editor The Recurrence of Caprice: Amelia Ishmael Chagoya’s Goyas Manuscript Editor Treasures from the Vault Prudence Crowther Christine Giviskos 20 Design Director Exposition Henri-Gabriel Ibels Skip Langer à La Bodinière Commentary Robert Palter 23 The Print in Modern Art: A Critique of Art Since 1900 Reviews Sarah Andress 26 1913 Armory Show Revisited: the Artists and their Prints Susan Tallman / Julie Bernatz 29 Artists & Poets Britany Salsbury 33 The Impressionist Line Elleree Erdos 36 Keigo Takahashi: Creases 4 Mel Becker 37 A Printmaker’s Document by Jim Dine <100 40 News of the Print World 41 Contributors 52 Membership Subscription Form 53 On the Cover: Camille Pissarro, detail of Peasant Women Weeding the Grass (ca. Guide to Back Issues 54 1894), etching printed in blue, red, yellow, and black on cream laid paper, The Clark, 1962.91. This Page: Carla Scott Fullerton, detail of Paneled Forms (2013), etching with chine collé. Art in Print’s new series “Treasures from the Vault” Art in Print was made possible with the generous 3500 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Graphic Satire and the Rise and Fall of the First British Empire: Political Prints from the Seven Years' War to the Treaty of Paris, C
    Karhapää, Henna Veera (2016) Graphic satire and the rise and fall of the First British Empire: political prints from the Seven Years' War to the Treaty of Paris, c. 1756-1783. PhD thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/7509/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Graphic Satire and the Rise and Fall of the First British Empire: Political Prints from the Seven Years' War to the Treaty of Paris, c. 1756- 1783 Henna Veera Karhapää M.A., MLitt Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD History of Art School of Culture and Creative Arts College of Arts University of Glasgow December 2015 © Henna Veera Karhapää 2015 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the early stages of the transformation of emblematic political prints into political caricature from the beginning of the Seven Years' War (1756) to the Treaty of Paris, which ended the American Revolutionary War (1783). Both contextual and iconographical issues are investigated in relation to the debates occasioned by Britain's imperial project, which marked a period of dramatic expansion during the Seven Years' War, and ended with the loss of the American colonies, consequently framing this thesis as a study of political prints during the rise and fall of the so-called 'First British Empire'.
    [Show full text]
  • Gillray, Cruickshank and the Thelwallian Grotesque
    Gillray, Cruikshank & Thelwall: visual satire, physiognomy and the Jacobin body Steve Poole, University of the West of England, Bristol This essay examines the role of loyalist visual satire in the making and shaping of political notoriety during the period 1795-1825. Its subject is John Thelwall, the first non-elite English radical to be caricatured with reference to a recognisable physiognomy in the 1790s and, by contemporary reputation at least, the most influential and politically dangerous of the English Jacobins. It will be argued that Thelwall presented loyalist caricature with a particular set of problems. First, Thelwall enjoyed a particularly high public profile as a platform orator and lecturer in the 1790s, which meant that his face was well enough known to justify representation in more precise terms than those customarily used to depict the anonymous ‘Jacobin beast’. Even those that had never seen him might still recognise an accurate caricature because at least two engraved portraits and one condor token bust of Thelwall were in circulation by the time of the 1794 Treason trials and these likenesses share many physiognomical features in common. Second, much of Thelwall’s notoriety derived from his animated manner and volatility on the platform, which, taken together with his relatively small physical stature, offered caricaturists a vehicle for attitudinal, rather than simply facial, representation; but if Thelwall’s energetic manner was a subject for derogatory satire, it was also, conversely, the very thing that made him attractive to audiences. Third, Thelwall’s physiognomy was not remotely bestial. As contemporary biographers like John Aiken well understood, the heavy facial characteristics of a famously swarthy target like Fox, or Pitt, a man who ‘possessed no advantages of person or physiognomy, the first of which was ungraceful, the second repulsive’1, were far more easily exaggerated and lampooned by caricaturists.
    [Show full text]