The Canadian Senate As a Political Symbol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1992 Symbolic Action as Politics: The Canadian Senate as a Political Symbol Jay Marsh Price College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Price, Jay Marsh, "Symbolic Action as Politics: The Canadian Senate as a Political Symbol" (1992). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625753. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-pf1m-mf47 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYMBOLIC ACTION AS POLITICS THE CANADIAN SENATE AS A POLITICAL SYMBOL A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Government The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfilment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Jay Marsh Price 1992 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, August 1992 Roger W. Smith James Mi clot DEDICATION Ad Glorae Dei ii TABLE OF CONTENTS page APPROVAL SHEET ............................................................................... i DEDICATION............................................................................................................ ii TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................. iv ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. v INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 2 CHAPTER I. THE SYMBOLISM OF POLITICS . ................................................10 CHAPTER II. BICAMERALISM AND THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE . 21 CHAPTER III. FEDERAL MYTHAND SYMBOLIC REALITY .... 55 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................80 APPENDIX........................................................................................................................82 BIBLIOGRAPHY.......................................................................................................85 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his appreciation to a number of individuals and groups. I would particularly like to thank the Library of Canadian Embassy in Washington, the Senate of Canada Information Service, the Government of Alberta, and the Canada West Foundation for supplying me with a considerable amount of useful information which would have been difficult to obtain otherwise. I would also like to thank Dr. Donald J. Baxter, for first suggesting that I study upper chambers, and Dr. Katherine Rahman, for recommending the Canadian Senate as a thesis topic. Finally, I would like to thank those on my thesis committee: Dr. James Miclot, for his humor and encouragement, Dr. Roger W. Smith, for being a sympathetic sounding board during the writing process, and Dr. Alan J. Ward, for his patience, guidance, and sense of humor, all of which were needed in guiding the intellectual wanderings of a bewildered graduate student. ABSTRACT This thesis tests the ideas of Walter Bagehot and Murray Edelman, who suggest that symbols are very important to a political system, by using the Canadian Senate as a case study. Though this study is primarily concerned with the Senate which was created in 1867, the implications of a future reformed chamber are also included. The hypothesis is that the Canadian Senate, in spite of its concrete weaknesses, has impacted the politics of Canada by serving as a symbol for highly valued Canadian ideals, in particular the need to protect Quebec and the smaller provinces from the federal government. The role of the Senate in the discussions of Canadian Confederation (1864-1867) and the Constitutional reform issue (ca. 1980-1992) illustrate the degree to which the Canadians respond to the symbols of their country. The case of the Canadian Senate suggests that symbols can play an effective role in a political system in two ways. First, a symbol can be a focal point onto which individuals and groups can attach their aspirations. Second, a political symbol can be a tool by which participants in the political process can understand the happenings around them. v SYMBOLIC ACTION AS POLITICS: THE CANADIAN SENATE AS POLITICAL SYMBOL INTRODUCTION The political symbols of a government are often evident to both outsiders and citizens. To the vast majority of a nation’s people, the images of politics provide an important way of relating to the complicated process of government. Symbols serve a real function by motivating and placating the forces which occur within a country. One example of a useful political symbol is the Canadian Senate. The chamber has been a source of controversy for over a century, particularly since much of the literature surrounding the institution has focused on its purely practical aspects, where the Senate does indeed fall short. However, the Senate is a worthwhile institution because of its ability to represent important ideals. The Red Chamber1 is valuable as a political symbol. Even though its impact does not come from concrete actions, like the alteration of legislation, the Senate has been constructive in Canadian po1i t ics. 1. The Canadian Senate’s nickname is "the Red Chamber," a name derived from the red furnishings of the Senate chamber, itself. Chapter IV explains why the color red is significant to the Senate’s image. 2 3 Upper chambers2 have been a popular subject of study for over two centuries. The usefulness of the British House of Lords has been debated since the 18th century by several theorists, including Edmund Burke, Montesquieu, Jeremy Bentham, and John Stuart Mill. The emergence of the United States of America produced one of the first great systematic analyses of bicameralism, the Federalist Papers. A short time later, the French revolution helped encourage thinkers to write against the aristocratic second house as something outdated. Jeremy Bentham, whose opinions are outlined in Lewis Rockow’s article, "Bentham on the Theory of Second Chambers," was one of the earliest critics of the bicameral system. Even John Stuart Mill, who thought that the issue of upper chambers received far more attention than it was worth, wrote on the merits and costs of an upper house in Representative Government. At the turn of the century, bicameral ism became the focus of early social scientists as well as philosophers. By that time, enough bicameral systems had been established to allow scholars to compare the upper chambers of several states. Among these early works are Senates and Upper Chambers, by W. V. Temperley, Second Chambers in Practice, by the Rainbow Circle, Second Chambers, by J. A. R. Marriott, and Second 2 For this essay, the terms "upper chamber," "second chamber," "second house," "upper house," "senate," and "legislative council" are treated as synonomous. Unless directly quoted as such these terms will not be capitalized. 4 Chambers in Theory and Practice, by H. B. Lees-Smith. After the 1930\s, interest specifically in the nature of upper chambers declined in favor two different modes of study. In one type of literature, such as K. C. Wheare, Legis latures, and Alexander Brady, Democracy in the Dominions. the discussion of bicameralism was simply a component of a larger s tudy. The other type of literature focused on the upper chambers of specific nations rather than on second houses in general. Often, the discussion of a particular country’s second house was just a section of a more general analysis of that nations political system as a whole. In reference to Canada, such works include C.E.S. Frank, The Parliament of Canada, Robert Jackson and Michael Atkinson, The Canadian Legislative System:_____ Politicians and Policymaking, J.R. Mallory, The Structure of Canadian Government, and Dawson’s The Government of Canada, by Norman Ward, which all provide useful insights into the workings of the Canadian Senate by placing the institution in its context in Canadian politics. The Canadian Senate has long been a topic of controversy and has generated a considerable amount of research. The seminal work on the Red Chamber is Robert A. Mackay, The Unreformed Senate of Canada. Published in 1926 and updated in 1963, this work remains the backbone of scholarship on the Canadian upper house. Also of major significance is F. A. Kunz , The Modern Senate of Canada 1925-1963: A Re-appraisal, 5 a book written partly in response to Mackay, which argues that the Senate has taken on new roles in addition to those which it has traditionally performed since 1867. In 1988, the Centre for Constitutional Studies at the University of Alberta hosted a conference of journalists, academians, and politicians for the purpose of comparing the different Senate reform plans. The Centre published the proceedings of this conference in a work entitled, The Canadian Senate: What Is To Be Done? Other scholarly works include Senator John Connolly’s