Hb3231 Jcr.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hb3231 Jcr.Pdf HB3231,1220,F,JOINT OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE REPORT 5/24/2016 7:20:08 PM JOINT COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET HB3231 By: Sears et al of the House Jolley et al of the Senate Title: Public finance; Oklahoma Public Finance Act of 2016; effective date; emergency. Coauthored By: Recommendation: DO PASS AS AMENDED BY CS Amendments: 1. Committee Substitute Attached ______________________________________ Chr. Representative Earl Sears YEAS: 17 Billy, Casey, Coody (A), Cox, Johnson, Martin, McCall, McCullough, Nelson, Ortega, Osborn, Ownbey, Peterson, Russ, Sanders, Sears, Wright NAYS: 7 Brown, Hoskin, Inman, Morrissette, Rousselot, Sherrer, Wesselhoft CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVILEGE: 0 O K L A H O M A S T A T E S E N A T E JOINT COMMITTEE REPORT May 24, 2016 JOINT COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET HB 3231 By: Sears of the House and Jolley and Treat of the Senate Title: Public finance; Oklahoma Public Finance Act of 2016; effective date; emergency. Recommendation: DO PASS AS AMENDED Aye: Allen, Barrington, Bice, Boggs, Crain, David, Fields, Ford, Fry, Griffin, Halligan, Holt, Jech, Justice, Loveless, Quinn, Sharp, Simpson, Standridge, Stanislawski, Thompson, Yen, Treat, Jolley Nay: Anderson, Brecheen, Brooks, Brown, Dahm, Dossett, Floyd, Mazzei, Newberry, Paddack, Shaw, Silk, Smalley, Sparks Pass: Senator Clark Jolley, Chair Committee Substitute, motion by Senator JOLLEY - Adopted (Request No: 10126) 1 STATE OF OKLAHOMA 2 2nd Session of the 55th Legislature (2016) 3 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR 4 HOUSE BILL NO. 3231 By: Sears and Casey of the House 5 and 6 Jolley and Treat of the 7 Senate 8 9 10 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE 11 An Act relating to transportation finance; authorizing issuance of certain obligations by the 12 Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority; stating amount of net proceeds; imposing certain restrictions 13 related to timing of issuance; providing for use of net proceeds; specifying authorized use of proceeds; 14 incorporating content of Department of Transportation Construction Work Plan by reference; providing for 15 priority of expenditures; providing for disposition of earnings; authorizing agreements between the 16 Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority and the Department of Transportation; specifying content of 17 agreements; providing for effect of redemption; authorizing borrowing of monies and issuance of 18 negotiable obligations; stating legislative intent with respect to appropriations to the Department of 19 Transportation; authorizing payment of certain fees and costs; authorizing issuance in series; requiring 20 repayment from certain revenue sources; providing obligations not general obligations of the State of 21 Oklahoma; providing full faith and credit not pledged to repayment; prescribing procedures for sale of 22 obligations; authorizing liquidity agreements; providing for disposition of interest earnings; 23 providing exemption from taxation; providing for investment of proceeds; providing for applicability 24 of certain statutory provisions; authorizing Oklahoma Req. No. 10126 Page 1 1 Capitol Improvement Authority to initiate certain judicial proceedings; providing for codification; 2 providing an effective date; and declaring an emergency. 3 4 5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: 6 SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified 7 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 342 of Title 73, unless there is 8 created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 9 A. Subject to the limitations with respect to the authorized 10 date of issuance provided by this subsection, the Oklahoma Capitol 11 Improvement Authority is authorized to issue notes, bonds or other 12 evidences of obligation in an amount necessary to generate net 13 proceeds of Two Hundred Million Dollars ($200,000,000.00), no 14 earlier than July 1, 2016, after providing for costs of issuance, 15 credit enhancement, reserves and other associated expenses related 16 to the financing. 17 B. Net proceeds of the financing will be deposited into a 18 construction fund to provide for the financing of acquisition of 19 real property, together with improvements located thereon, and 20 personal property, to construct, maintain and improve those state 21 highway and state bridge assets identified in the Oklahoma 22 Transportation Commission Construction Work Plan for the federal 23 fiscal years 2016 through 2023 (FFY-2016 through FFY-2023) as 24 Req. No. 10126 Page 2 1 specifically identified in the Appendix of this act and which is 2 incorporated by reference as if fully set out herein. 3 C. The Transportation Commission or the Department of 4 Transportation shall use the proceeds identified in subsection B of 5 this section according to the priority of the enumerated project as 6 it appears for the applicable federal fiscal year in the 7 Construction Work Plan described in subsection B of this section in 8 order to facilitate the completion of the enumerated projects, 9 giving consideration to the ability to match federal funding and 10 such other factors as the Transportation Commission or the 11 Department of Transportation shall deem fiscally prudent. 12 D. Earnings that result from the investment of the construction 13 fund may be used for the projects authorized in this section or for 14 other legal purposes approved by the Authority. 15 E. The Authority and the Transportation Commission and the 16 Department of Transportation are authorized to enter into such 17 agreements as may be necessary to authorize the Authority to hold 18 title to the real and personal property and improvements until such 19 time as any obligations issued for the purpose set forth in 20 subsection B of this section are retired or defeased and the 21 Authority may lease the real property and improvements to the 22 Transportation Commission or the Department of Transportation for 23 the purposes authorized by this section. Upon final redemption or 24 defeasance of the obligations created pursuant to this section, Req. No. 10126 Page 3 1 title to the real and personal property and improvements shall be 2 transferred from the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority to the 3 Transportation Commission or the Department of Transportation. 4 F. For the purpose of paying the costs for acquisition and 5 construction of the real property and improvements and personal 6 property and making the repairs, refurbishments and improvements to 7 real and personal property, and providing funding for the project 8 authorized in this section, and for the purpose authorized in 9 subsection H of this section, the Authority is hereby authorized to 10 borrow monies on the credit of the income and revenues to be derived 11 from the leasing of such real and personal property and improvements 12 and, in anticipation of the collection of such income and revenues, 13 to issue negotiable obligations in one or more series. 14 G. It is the intent of the Legislature to appropriate to the 15 Department of Transportation sufficient monies to make rental 16 payments for the purposes of retiring the obligations created 17 pursuant to this section. 18 H. To the extent funds are available from the proceeds of the 19 borrowing authorized by subsection A of this section, the Oklahoma 20 Capitol Improvement Authority shall provide for the payment of 21 professional fees and associated costs related to the projects 22 authorized in this section. 23 I. The Authority may issue obligations in one or more series 24 and in conjunction with other issues of the Authority. The Req. No. 10126 Page 4 1 Authority is authorized to hire bond counsel, financial consultants 2 and such other professionals as it may deem necessary to provide for 3 the efficient sale of the obligations and may utilize a portion of 4 the proceeds of any borrowing to create such reserves as may be 5 deemed necessary and to pay costs associated with the issuance and 6 administration of such obligations. 7 J. The bond indenture or other instrument pursuant to which the 8 Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority becomes obligated for the 9 repayment of principal and interest of the proceeds from the sale of 10 obligations authorized in subsection A of this section shall provide 11 that all obligations are to be repaid from the source of revenue 12 specified in this section. 13 K. The bonds or other obligations issued pursuant to this 14 section shall not at any time be deemed to constitute a debt of the 15 state or of any political subdivision thereof or a pledge of the 16 faith and credit of the state or of any such political subdivision. 17 L. Such bonds or other obligations shall contain on the face 18 thereof a statement that neither the faith and credit nor the taxing 19 power of the state or any political subdivision thereof is pledged, 20 or may hereafter be pledged, to the payment of the principal of or 21 the interest on such bonds. 22 M. The obligations authorized under this section may be sold at 23 either competitive or negotiated sale, as determined by the 24 Authority, and in such form and at such prices as may be authorized Req. No. 10126 Page 5 1 by the Authority. The Authority may enter into agreements with such 2 credit enhancers and liquidity providers as may be determined 3 necessary to efficiently market the obligations. The obligations 4 may mature and have such provisions for redemption as shall be 5 determined by the Authority, but in no event shall the final 6 maturity of such obligations occur later than fifteen (15) years 7 from the first principal maturity date. 8 N. Any interest earnings on funds or accounts created for the 9 purposes of this section may be utilized as partial payment of the 10 annual debt service or for the purposes directed by the Authority. 11 O. The obligations issued under this section, the transfer 12 thereof and the interest earned on such obligations, including any 13 profit derived from the sale thereof, shall not be subject to 14 taxation of any kind by the State of Oklahoma, or by any county, 15 municipality or political subdivision therein.
Recommended publications
  • Notropis Girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis Tetranema)
    Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Species Status Assessment Report for the Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) Arkansas River shiner (bottom left) and peppered chub (top right - two fish) (Photo credit U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Version 1.0a October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Angela Anders, Jennifer Smith-Castro, Peter Burck (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Southwest Regional Office) Robert Allen, Debra Bills, Omar Bocanegra, Sean Edwards, Valerie Morgan (USFWS –Arlington, Texas Field Office), Ken Collins, Patricia Echo-Hawk, Daniel Fenner, Jonathan Fisher, Laurence Levesque, Jonna Polk (USFWS – Oklahoma Field Office), Stephen Davenport (USFWS – New Mexico Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Mark Horner, Susan Millsap (USFWS – New Mexico Field Office), Jonathan JaKa (USFWS – Headquarters), Jason Luginbill, and Vernon Tabor (Kansas Field Office). Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema), version 1.0, with appendices. October 2018. Albuquerque, NM. 172 pp. Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) are restricted primarily to the contiguous river segments of the South Canadian River basin spanning eastern New Mexico downstream to eastern Oklahoma (although the peppered chub is less widespread). Both species have experienced substantial declines in distribution and abundance due to habitat destruction and modification from stream dewatering or depletion from diversion of surface water and groundwater pumping, construction of impoundments, and water quality degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryan County, Ok Bryan County Bryan County
    BRYAN COUNTY, OK BRYAN COUNTY BRYAN COUNTY REGIONAL CONTEXT* LABOR MARKET OVERVIEW, 2017 OKLAHOMA Civilian Labor Force 1,834,312 Employed 1,755,604 Unemployed 78,708 Unemployment Rate 4.3% CHOCTAW 11-COUNTY AREA Civilian Labor Force 102,418 Employed 96,655 Unemployed 5,763 Unemployment Rate 5.6% BRYAN COUNTY Civilian Labor Force 19,839 Employed 19,053 Unemployed 786 Unemployment Rate 4.0% FAST FACTS BY THE NUMBERS • Major employers include: Choctaw Nation, Southeastern Oklahoma State University, Big Lots Distribution Center, Alorica, Alliance Health, Webstaurant, and Indian Nation Wholesale Co. • Major manufacturers include: Commercial Metals Co., Cardinal Glass, Eagle Suspensions, Stahl, Gamco • Headquarters of Choctaw Nation 46,319 18,755 2017 Population 2017 Jobs • Located along US Highways 70 & 75/69 and along both Union Pacific and Kiamichi railroads • From Durant: • 98 miles to DFW airport • 150 miles to Will Rogers airport (Oklahoma City) • Durant Regional Airport (KDUA) with 2 runways, fuel, hangars, tie downs, and a terminal 89.8 $14.53 • Lake Texoma, one of the largest reservoirs in the US Cost of Living Index Median Hourly Wage • Foreign Trade Zone #227 includes the 30-acre (US median=$17.81) (US average=100) International Business Park in Durant Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (state and county labor market data, wages). Data for 2017 is an annual average calculated by TIP; EMSI 2017.4 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, and Self-Employed (wage and cost of living data); Morrison hall sosu by Urbanative via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0) (header image).
    [Show full text]
  • State Mapside-PDF.Ai 1 1/7/2013 11:40:46 AM
    2013_OK_State_Mapside-PDF.ai 1 1/7/2013 11:40:46 AM AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP108 MILES 385 Wichita STATE 287 KANSAS Baxter St. Louis COLORADO 56 48 miles 166 Chetopa Springs LINE TO Joplin 111111111111 2222222222222333333333333344444444444445555555555555566666666666677777777777778888888 166 Coffeyville 280 miles 111111111111 2222222222222333333333333344444444444445555555555555566666666666677777777777778888888 Elkhart 281 166 44 BLACK MESA Liberal KANSAS KANSASKANSAS Caney 69 2 HISTORIC TREASURES Elev. 4973 Englewood Caldwell 81 4 4 SPRING Arkansas City Picher 8 11 Highest Elevation GrandNeosho 4 66 69 RIVER 4 6 Cimarron Hardtner Kiowa 63 MILES Cardin ROUTE ALT 1 in Oklahoma Lake Owen South Coffeyville 59 2 3 TRAIL 59 BNSF 56 83 8 STATE LINE Verdigris Commerce QQuapawuapaw 71 River 136 Tyrone Cimarron Chikaskia 110 MILES Chilocco Hulah 6 9 456 Surrey Hills Fork Manchester Hardy 18 TO TULSA North Miami 17 Peoria 7 23 Salt 58 81 177 4 STATE LINE TO COLEMAN THEATRE 1 River 7 (private) Hulah Copan 10 Elliott 2 69 34 231 OKLAHOMA CITY 77 4 5 Kenton Sturgis 95 15 270 7 Lookout 6 10 Lake Miami A 60 281 7 6 75 10 River BBLACKLACK MESAMESA 385 54 283 183 of ALFALFA 8 Hollow Elev. 801
    [Show full text]
  • Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan April2006 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND Wll...DLIFE SERVICE P.O. Box 1306 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 In Reply Refer To: R2/NWRS-PLN JUN 0 5 2006 Dear Reader: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is proud to present to you the enclosed Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for the Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). This CCP and its supporting documents outline a vision for the future of the Refuge and specifies how this unique area can be maintained to conserve indigenous wildlife and their habitats for the enjoyment of the public for generations to come. Active community participation is vitally important to manage the Refuge successfully. By reviewing this CCP and visiting the Refuge, you will have opportunities to learn more about its purpose and prospects. We invite you to become involved in its future. The Service would like to thank all the people who participated in the planning and public involvement process. Comments you submitted helped us prepare a better CCP for the future of this unique place. Sincerely, Tom Baca Chief, Division of Planning Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Sherman, Texas Prepared by: United States Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Planning Region 2 500 Gold SW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 Comprehensive conservation plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000
    Volume 2000 Article 26 8-2000 Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000 Ross C. Fields Prewitt and Associates, Inc., [email protected] E. Frances Gadus Prewitt and Associates, Inc. Karl W. Kibler Cross Timbers Geoarcheological Services, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Lee P C.ar tNor of thedt American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Prewitt and Associates, Inc. Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Fields, Ross C.; Gadus, E. Frances; Kibler, Karl W.; and Nordt, Lee C. (2000) "Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2000, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2000.1.26 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2000/iss1/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2002 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm
    Time Path Path Number of Estimated October 2002 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm OKLAHOMA, Western, Central and Southeast Alfalfa County 2 S Cherokee02 1135CST 0 0 Thunderstorm Wind (G52) Grant County Pond Creek02 1730CST 0 0 Hail(0.75) Garfield County 1 W Kremlin02 1745CST 0 0 20K Thunderstorm Wind Severe straight-line winds downed several large tree limbs and blew a boat and trailer about 100 yards. In addition, several house windows were broken; a cattle feeder was blown onto a nearby road; numerous wooden fences were blown over, and the westward-facing wall of a storage shed was pushed in three to five inches. Kay County Ponca City02 1835CST 0 0 Hail(0.88) Hail was reported on the northwest side of the city. Alfalfa County 1 N Cherokee03 0000CST 0 0 60K Flash Flood Four homes received minor damage from high water. Two vehicles were pulled out of high water, and State Highway 8 was closed due to high water. Woodward County 2 SW Mutual03 0200CST 0 0 20K Flash Flood 0800CST A paved road was washed away. Alfalfa County 2 SE Helena03 0300CST 0 0 0 Flash Flood State Highway 45 was closed due to high water. OKZ005-007>008- Woods - Grant - Kay - Woodward - Major - Dewey - Blaine - Kingfisher 010>011-015-017>018 03 0700CST 0 0 25K Flood 06 1430CST Two days of periodic heavy rain fell across much of northwest Oklahoma with some areas receiving nearly seven inches. Large amounts of runoff caused many rivers to rise above flood stage, including the Salt Fork Arkansas River at Tonkawa, the Chikaskia River near Braman and Blackwell, the Cimarron River near Waynoka, Okeene, and Dover, and the North Canadian River near Seiling.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridgeview Resort and Marina 139-Acre Lease Expansion Project Marshall County, Oklahoma Bridgeview Resort and Marina 13947 Reel
    Bridgeview Resort and Marina 139-acre Lease Expansion Project Marshall County, Oklahoma Prepared for: Bridgeview Resort and Marina 13947 Reel Lane Madill, Oklahoma 73446 Prepared by: Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 335 P.O. Box 5446 Vinita, Oklahoma 74301 Fort Smith, Arkansas 72913 918-272-7656 918-697-3936 June 2017 Update April 2018 Steven R. Votaw President ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED AND SCOPE ......................................................1 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................................................4 2.1 Action Alternative A ..............................................................................................7 2.2 Action Alternative B ..............................................................................................8 2.3 Alternative Comparison ........................................................................................9 2.4 Action Alternative C: No-Action .......................................................................10 3.0 THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................10 3.1 Land Use ...............................................................................................................10 3.2 Social and Economic Resources ..........................................................................11 3.2.1 Environmental Justice .........................................................................................12 3.2.2 Protection
    [Show full text]
  • East Central Plains (Post Oak Savanna)
    TEXAS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN East Central Texas Plains (Post Oak Savanna) ECOREGION HANDBOOK August 2012 Citing this document: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2012. Texas Conservation Action Plan 2012 – 2016: East Central Texas Plains Handbook. Editor, Wendy Connally, Texas Conservation Action Plan Coordinator. Austin, Texas. Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 HOW TO GET INVOLVED ............................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 RARE SPECIES and COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................. 13 PRIORITY HABITATS ..................................................................................................................................... 13 ISSUES ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 CONSERVATION ACTIONS ........................................................................................................................... 28 ECOREGION HANDBOOK FIGURES Figure 1. ECPL Ecoregion with County Boundaries ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Spawning Times of Alligator Gar (Atractosteus Spatula) in Lake Texoma, Oklahoma
    46 Estimating Spawning Times of Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) in Lake Texoma, Oklahoma Richard A. Snow Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Oklahoma Fishery Research Laboratory, Norman, OK 73072 James M. Long U.S. Geological Survey Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 Abstract: In 2013, juvenile Alligator Gar were sampled in the reservoir-river interface of the Red River arm of Lake Texoma. The Red River, which flows 860 km along Oklahoma’s border with Texas, is the primary in-flow source of Lake Texoma, and is impounded by Denison Dam. Mini- fyke nets were deployed using an adaptive random cluster sampling design, which has been used to effectively sample rare species. Lapilli otoliths (one of the three pair of ear stones found within the inner ear of fish) were removed from juvenile Alligator Gar collected in July of 2013. Daily ages were estimated by counting the number of rings present, and spawn dates were back-calculated from date of capture and subtracting 8 days (3 days from spawn to hatch and 5 days from hatch to swim- up when the first ring forms). Alligator Gar daily age estimation ranged from 50 to 63 days old since swim-up. Spawn dates corresponded to rising pool elevations of Lake Texoma and water pulses of tributaries. ©2015 Oklahoma Academy of Science Introduction In its native range, Alligator Gar spawns from early April through the middle of June The Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) is in conjunction with seasonal flooding events the largest freshwater fish species in Oklahoma (Etnier and Starnes 1993, Ferrara 2001, Inebnit and the third largest in North America (Page and 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Floods in South-Central Oklahoma and North-Central Texas October 1981
    FLOODS IN SOUTH-CENTRAL OKLAHOMA AND NORTH-CENTRAL TEXAS OCTOBER 1981 By Harold D. Buckner and Joanne K. Kurklin U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 84-065 Austin, Texas 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information For sale by: write to: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 649 Federal Building U.S. Geological Survey, MS 306 300 E. Eighth Street Box 25425, Denver Federal Center Austin, TX 78701 Denver, CO 80225 Telephone: (303) 234-5888 II CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction- 2 Meteorological setting and precipitation distribution 4 Description of floods- 7 Red River basin 20 Trinity River basin- 25 Brazos River basin 28 Flood damages 33 Oklahoma 33 Texas- 33 Explanation of station data 36 References cited- 37 Supplementary data 38 III ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing area of flooding in Oklahoma and Texas with location of flood-determination points 3 2. Map showing surface front, upper level trough line, and jet- stream on October 11, 1981 5 3. Map showing surface front, upper level trough line, outflow boundary, jetstream, and path of Hurricane Norrna- 6 4a-f. GOES enhanced infrared and visual imagery pictures showing track of Hurricane Norma across Mexico and Texas: a. 1:30 a.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 8 b. 5:00 a.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 9 c. 9:30 a.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 10 d. 1:30 p.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 11 e.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought of Water Year 2006 Compared with Four Major Drought Periods of the 20Th Century in Oklahoma
    Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Hydrologic Drought of Water Year 2006 Compared with Four Major Drought Periods of the 20th Century in Oklahoma • .... Canadian River near Norman February 1952 -,. Canadian River downstream from State Highway. 99" or' near Ada August 16, 2006.. Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5199 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front Cover: Picture One shows wind ripples and river silts, Canadian River near Norman, Cleveland County, Okla- homa, taken February 1952. Photographer: W.B. Hamilton, from U.S. Geological Survey Photographic Library. Picture Two shows the dry Canadian River near Ada, Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, downstream from State High- way 99, taken August 16, 2006. Photographer: Daniel Fenner, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Hydrologic Drought of Water Year 2006 Compared with Four Major Drought Periods Of the 20th Century in Oklahoma By Robert L. Tortorelli Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5199 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 This and other USGS information products are available at: http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions About Southwestern's Vegetation
    One West Third Street Tulsa, OK 74103-3502 918-595-6600 www.swpa.gov Frequently Asked Questions – Lake Texoma Hydropower Generation April 3, 2014 Question. Why is Southwestern generating at Lake Texoma when the lake is so low? Answer. Southwestern is generating only a minimal amount to meet short-term peaking and critical power needs. The year 2013 marked the lowest generation year in the 70 year history of Lake Texoma and Denison Dam. The year 2011 was the second lowest. In fact, SWPA has been operating in drought mode since January 2011, generating only 25% of average. Since May 2012, generation has been even less, about 19% of average. Question. What gives Southwestern the right to generate at all? Answer. Southwestern is one of two project users which pay into the U.S. Treasury for water storage in Lake Texoma. The other is Municipal & Industrial (M&I) water supply. As an authorized user of the project with designated water storage, Southwestern has the right to use the water storage for which it has paid. That said, however, Southwestern and its customers have voluntarily reduced generation to save storage during the drought responsible for the low Lake Texoma elevations. Question. Who are Southwestern's customers at Denison? Answer. The entire output of the project is marketed to Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative and Tex-La Electric Cooperative, both of which are not-for-profit rural electric cooperatives serving electrical load mainly in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region. Question. What is ERCOT? Answer. ERCOT is one of nine Independent System Operators (ISO) in the United States.
    [Show full text]