DOCSLIB.ORG

Floods in South-Central Oklahoma and North-Central Texas October 1981

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floods in South-Central Oklahoma and North-Central Texas October 1981 FLOODS IN SOUTH-CENTRAL OKLAHOMA AND NORTH-CENTRAL TEXAS OCTOBER 1981 By Harold D. Buckner and Joanne K. Kurklin U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 84-065 Austin, Texas 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information For sale by: write to: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch 649 Federal Building U.S. Geological Survey, MS 306 300 E. Eighth Street Box 25425, Denver Federal Center Austin, TX 78701 Denver, CO 80225 Telephone: (303) 234-5888 II CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction- 2 Meteorological setting and precipitation distribution 4 Description of floods- 7 Red River basin 20 Trinity River basin- 25 Brazos River basin 28 Flood damages 33 Oklahoma 33 Texas- 33 Explanation of station data 36 References cited- 37 Supplementary data 38 III ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing area of flooding in Oklahoma and Texas with location of flood-determination points 3 2. Map showing surface front, upper level trough line, and jet- stream on October 11, 1981 5 3. Map showing surface front, upper level trough line, outflow boundary, jetstream, and path of Hurricane Norrna- 6 4a-f. GOES enhanced infrared and visual imagery pictures showing track of Hurricane Norma across Mexico and Texas: a. 1:30 a.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 8 b. 5:00 a.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 9 c. 9:30 a.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 10 d. 1:30 p.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 11 e. 4:30 p.m. c.d.t., October 12, 1981 12 f. 1:30 a.m. c.d.t., October 13, 1981 13 5. Isohyetal map, storm of October 11-14, 1981, in south-central Oklahoma and north-central Texas 14 6. Discharge hydrographs at selected streamflow stations in the Red River basin- 26 7. Graphs showing contents at selected lakes in the Red River basin 27 8. Discharge hydrographs at selected streamflow stations in the Trinity River basin- 29 9. Graphs showing contents at selected lakes in the Trinity River basin 30 10. Flood inundation map for the city of Breckenridge for storm of October 11-13, 1981 32 11. Discharge hydrographs at selected streamflow stations in the Brazos River basin- 34 12. Graphs showing contents at selected lakes in the Brazos River basin 35 TABLES Table 1. National Weather Service rainfall data for storm of October 11-14, 1981, and total October rainfall in south-central Oklahoma 15 2. National Weather Service supplemental rainfall data for storm of October 11-14, 1981, in south-central Oklahoma 16 3. National Weather Service rainfall data for storm of October 12-14, 1981, and total October rainfall in north-central Texas-- ------- - -- -_-- ------ --_-_------_-_ 17 4. National Weather Service supplemental rainfall data for storm of October 11-13, 1981, in north-central Texas- 19 5. Summary of peak stages and discharges for Red, Trinity, and Brazos River basin floods of October 1981 21 IV METRIC CONVERSIONS For readers who prefer to use metric units, conversion factors for terms used in this report are listed below: Multiply B^ To obtain acre-foot (acre-ft) 0.001233 cubic hectometer (hm3 ) cubic foot per second (ft3 /s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second (m3 /s) cubic foot per second per 0.01093 cubic meter per second per square mile [(ft3 /s)mi 2 ] square kilometer [(m3 /s)/km2 ] degree Fahrenheit (°F) 5/9 (°F-32) degree Celsius (°C) foot (ft) 0.3048 rneter (m) inch (in.) 25.40 millimeter (mm) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (krn) square mile (mi 2 ) 2.590 square kilometer (km2 ) ton (short, 2,000 pounds) 0.9072 megagram (Mg) National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929): A geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called mean sea level. FLOODS IN SOUTH-CENTRAL OKLAHOMA AND NORTH-CENTRAL TEXAS OCTOBER 1981 By Harold D. Buckner and Joanne K. Kurklin Heavy rains fell over south-central Oklahoma and north-central Texas during October 11-14, 1981, causing record flooding in both States. Six lives were lost, many people were temporarily left homeless, and damages amounted to nearly $115 million. The maximum rainfall of 23 inches occurred 5 miles north of Clyde, Texas, in about 34 hours. Flood discharges along the East Fork Little Wichita River in Texas and along the Blue River, Clear Boggy Creek, and part of Muddy Boggy Creek in Oklahoma in the Red River basin exceeded those previously known. The Red River near Gaines- ville, Texas, had a record stage. Severe flooding also occurred along the West Fork and Elm Fork Trinity Rivers in Texas. The Brazos River experienced record flooding along tributaries in Abilene and Breckenridge, Texas, and the Brazos River near Glen Rose had a record stage that was almost 1.5 feet higher than any previous flood. Substantial reductions in peak stages and discharges on the West Fork Trin­ ity River downstream from Eagle Mountain Reservoir were attained as a result of reservoir storage. All floodwater on the Elm Fork Trinity River was contained by reservoir storage thus preventing a potentially devastating flood downstream on the Trinity River. Maximum stages and discharges and/or contents were recorded during and after this major flood at 83 gaging stations, crest-stage stations, reservoir stations, and a miscellaneous site. INTRODUCTION Outstanding floods occurred on rivers and streams in north-central Texas and south-central Oklahoma as a result of extreme rainfall that occurred in Oct­ ober 1981. These storms generally extended in a southwest to northeast direc­ tion from near Abilene, Texas, to near McAlester, Oklahoma. The affected region in Oklahoma and Texas along with gaging-station locations for the study area is shown in figure 1. The heaviest storms (rainfall) occurred during October 12-14, 1981, in north-central Texas and in south-central Oklahoma. Numerous National Weather Service reporting stations in Texas and Oklahoma indicated rainfall amounts in excess of 10 inches, but the maximum point rainfall reported during this storm was 23 inches at a gage 5 miles north of Clyde, Texas. The October 12-14, 1981, storm event covered an extremely large area. The 5-inch precipitation isohyetal encompassed an area in Texas and Oklahoma of about 21,600 square miles; the 10-inch isohyetal encompassed about 4,880 square miles; and rainfall amounting to 15 inches or more fell on about 1,730 square miles. The total rainfall volume within the 5-inch isohyetal was approximately 7.5 million acre-feet. Peak discharges were computed for many locations by indirect methods because of rapidly rising stages and because conditions did not facilitate direct measure­ ment. Peak discharges were computed indirectly using flood marks and channel geometry data obtained from detailed field surveys made after the flood and from extension of stage-discharge ratings. Six persons lost their lives and flood damages exceeded $115 million over the two-state area. Although economic losses were extensive throughout the storm area, the major economic damage occurred in Tarrant County, Texas, where flood damages exceeded $36 million. This report was prepared to compile selected data for the floods of October 1981 in a comprehensive and readily available form. The report includes a dis­ cussion of the meteorological setting and precipitation distribution, a descrip­ tion of the flooding by major river basins, damage report, and detailed station data on stages, discharge, and reservoir contents at selected stations in Okla­ homa and Texas. The flood information was collected from a network of stream and reservoir gages operated as part of a continuing cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey with the States of Texas and Oklahoma, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and cities, counties, and river authorities in Texas and Oklahoma. The National Weather Service in Fort Worth and Lubbock provided the sur­ face air and upper air analyses along with supplementary precipitation data and the isohyetal map for the storm of October 11-14, 1981. The satellite pictures were provided by the National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Flood damage estimates were provided by the Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, and by the Governor's office, State of Oklahoma. -2- EXPLANATION A STREAMFLOW-QAQINQ STATION T WATER-QUALITY SAMPLING STATION A CREST-STAQE PARTIAL-RECORD STATION A LOW-FLOW PARTIAL-RECORD STATION 0 MISCELLANEOUS STATION RESERVOIR (LAKE) STATION C3 PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT SITE , 5 NUMBERS CORRESPOND TO THOSE ' IN TABLE 6 IT /COTLIN :; Vi L-«- N 5M - *NNA»,.. ^A CELINA IJ 6 I l^f^T. U~\ 74 FI JACKSBORI a L 'C. ,. I THROCKMORTON I HASKELL yi^ ______ I _______ c?/*/ i"Sr^ jxP vrs WOODSON fall NEWARlTV -_ J_,___,__ .2L. C.»b_B. * " I I III I H III I I I STAMFORD" /! I I JONES' J SH 40 WHH.IS 0 10 «> W 40 MKN.OMCTMI Flgur* 1.-Ar*c ! flooding In Oklohom* and Toxa* with loottlon ol llood-dotorinliicllon point* METEOROLOGICAL SETTING AND PRECIPITATION DISTRIBUTION The weather pattern that began on October 10 produced the extreme rainfall over north-central Texas and south-central Oklahoma, October 11-14, 1981 (fig. 2). On October 10, a weak stationary front was established along a Del Rio-Austin- Beaumont line. Moisture at low levels was abundant on both sides of the front. At the 850-mb (millibar) level, or 5,000 feet, an area of high pressure was sit­ uated over the central Gulf of Mexico, providing a clockwise flow of moist Gulf air into Texas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sewage Data for Digital
    BODY OF WATER GALLONS OF SEWAGE IN 2018 *Unknown 35,445,373 Lake Ray Hubbard 14,002,405 Trinity River 10,217,500 Red Oak Creek 7,677,000 Sycamore Creek 7,237,800 Mauk Branch Creek 7,119,765 Elm Fork Trinity River 6,590,450 Horne Branch Creek 4,361,850 Ten Mile Creek 3,474,332 White Rock Creek 2,201,195 Clear Fork Trinity River 2,150,015 Bull Creek 1,770,900 Big Fossil Creek 1,326,602 Bear Creek 1,213,943 Little Creek to Mustang Creek 1,143,000 Ticky Creek to Lavon Lake 1,050,000 Marine Creek 1,045,240 White Rock Creek Basin 1,042,655 Post Oak Creek 787,300 West Fork Trinity River 749,910 Waxahachie Creek 680,100 Delaware Creek 662,000 Mustang Creek 520,200 Spring Creek Basin 365,970 White Rock Lake 364,400 Village Creek 360,080 Lake Lavon 317,214 Valleyview Branch 309,036 Rowlett Creek basin 296,830 Deer Creek 282,325 White Rock Creek Drainge Basin 271,000 Lake Arlington 259,350 Tenmile Creek 214,549 Segment 0821 Sister Grove Creek to Lake Lavon 205,000 Clear Fork Trinity 200,243 Sister Grove Creek 200,000 Cottonwood branch 192,600 Prairie Creek 169,834 Praire Branch, Big Cottonwood Creek, Kings Creek into Cedar Creek Reservoir 159,000 East Bank 155,666 Hutton Branch 151,200 Cooks Creek 133,500 Kings Creek to Cedar Creek Reservoir 88,000 Eagle Mountain Reservoir 86,000 White Rock Branch 80,000 Rowlett Creek 79,600 Spring Creek 79,224 Turtle Creek 78,660 Town Creek 78,600 Choctaw Creek 74,800 Coombs Creek 71,838 Beck Branch Creek 67,500 !1 Post oak creek to Choctaw Creek 64,000 Rowlett Creek Draiage Basin 62,350 Spring Creek Drainage Basin
    [Show full text]
  • Bryan County, Ok Bryan County Bryan County
    BRYAN COUNTY, OK BRYAN COUNTY BRYAN COUNTY REGIONAL CONTEXT* LABOR MARKET OVERVIEW, 2017 OKLAHOMA Civilian Labor Force 1,834,312 Employed 1,755,604 Unemployed 78,708 Unemployment Rate 4.3% CHOCTAW 11-COUNTY AREA Civilian Labor Force 102,418 Employed 96,655 Unemployed 5,763 Unemployment Rate 5.6% BRYAN COUNTY Civilian Labor Force 19,839 Employed 19,053 Unemployed 786 Unemployment Rate 4.0% FAST FACTS BY THE NUMBERS • Major employers include: Choctaw Nation, Southeastern Oklahoma State University, Big Lots Distribution Center, Alorica, Alliance Health, Webstaurant, and Indian Nation Wholesale Co. • Major manufacturers include: Commercial Metals Co., Cardinal Glass, Eagle Suspensions, Stahl, Gamco • Headquarters of Choctaw Nation 46,319 18,755 2017 Population 2017 Jobs • Located along US Highways 70 & 75/69 and along both Union Pacific and Kiamichi railroads • From Durant: • 98 miles to DFW airport • 150 miles to Will Rogers airport (Oklahoma City) • Durant Regional Airport (KDUA) with 2 runways, fuel, hangars, tie downs, and a terminal 89.8 $14.53 • Lake Texoma, one of the largest reservoirs in the US Cost of Living Index Median Hourly Wage • Foreign Trade Zone #227 includes the 30-acre (US median=$17.81) (US average=100) International Business Park in Durant Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (state and county labor market data, wages). Data for 2017 is an annual average calculated by TIP; EMSI 2017.4 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, and Self-Employed (wage and cost of living data); Morrison hall sosu by Urbanative via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0) (header image).
    [Show full text]
  • CDBG Rural Economic Action Plan (REAP)
    CDBG Rural Economic Action Plan FY 2019 Application Guidelines Oklahoma Department of Commerce Community Development 1 State of Oklahoma Table of Contents SECTION ONE: APPLICATION GUIDANCE ................................................................ 2 National Objective-CDBG Funds ..................................................................................................................... 3 Eligible Entities .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Application Submission Requirements ......................................................................................................... 3 Proper Sponsors .................................................................................................................................................. 4 CDBG REAP Projects – Use of Funds ............................................................................................................ 4 CDBG REAP Projects – Project Descriptions .............................................................................................. 6 State Appropriated Rural Economic Action Plan (REAP) Funds ............................................................ 6 Project Definition ................................................................................................................................................. 7 CDBG Project Eligibility Policy .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Mapside-PDF.Ai 1 1/7/2013 11:40:46 AM
    2013_OK_State_Mapside-PDF.ai 1 1/7/2013 11:40:46 AM AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP108 MILES 385 Wichita STATE 287 KANSAS Baxter St. Louis COLORADO 56 48 miles 166 Chetopa Springs LINE TO Joplin 111111111111 2222222222222333333333333344444444444445555555555555566666666666677777777777778888888 166 Coffeyville 280 miles 111111111111 2222222222222333333333333344444444444445555555555555566666666666677777777777778888888 Elkhart 281 166 44 BLACK MESA Liberal KANSAS KANSASKANSAS Caney 69 2 HISTORIC TREASURES Elev. 4973 Englewood Caldwell 81 4 4 SPRING Arkansas City Picher 8 11 Highest Elevation GrandNeosho 4 66 69 RIVER 4 6 Cimarron Hardtner Kiowa 63 MILES Cardin ROUTE ALT 1 in Oklahoma Lake Owen South Coffeyville 59 2 3 TRAIL 59 BNSF 56 83 8 STATE LINE Verdigris Commerce QQuapawuapaw 71 River 136 Tyrone Cimarron Chikaskia 110 MILES Chilocco Hulah 6 9 456 Surrey Hills Fork Manchester Hardy 18 TO TULSA North Miami 17 Peoria 7 23 Salt 58 81 177 4 STATE LINE TO COLEMAN THEATRE 1 River 7 (private) Hulah Copan 10 Elliott 2 69 34 231 OKLAHOMA CITY 77 4 5 Kenton Sturgis 95 15 270 7 Lookout 6 10 Lake Miami A 60 281 7 6 75 10 River BBLACKLACK MESAMESA 385 54 283 183 of ALFALFA 8 Hollow Elev. 801
    [Show full text]
  • Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan April2006 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND Wll...DLIFE SERVICE P.O. Box 1306 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 In Reply Refer To: R2/NWRS-PLN JUN 0 5 2006 Dear Reader: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is proud to present to you the enclosed Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for the Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). This CCP and its supporting documents outline a vision for the future of the Refuge and specifies how this unique area can be maintained to conserve indigenous wildlife and their habitats for the enjoyment of the public for generations to come. Active community participation is vitally important to manage the Refuge successfully. By reviewing this CCP and visiting the Refuge, you will have opportunities to learn more about its purpose and prospects. We invite you to become involved in its future. The Service would like to thank all the people who participated in the planning and public involvement process. Comments you submitted helped us prepare a better CCP for the future of this unique place. Sincerely, Tom Baca Chief, Division of Planning Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Sherman, Texas Prepared by: United States Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Planning Region 2 500 Gold SW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 Comprehensive conservation plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Draft Basin Highlights Report an Overview of Water Quality Issues Throughout the Canadian and Red River Basins
    2020 DRAFT BASIN HIGHLIGHTS REPORT AN OVERVIEW OF WATER QUALITY ISSUES THROUGHOUT THE CANADIAN AND RED RIVER BASINS The preparation of this report was financed through and in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality North Fork Red River at FM 2473 2020 Canadian and Red River Basins Highlights Report ~ Page 2020 Canadian and Red River Basins Highlights Report ~ Page 2 Lake Texoma at US 377 Bridge TABLE OF CONTENTS CANADIAN AND RED RIVER BASIN VICINITY MAP 4 INTRODUCTION 5 Public Involvement Basin Advisory Committee Meeting 6 Coordinated Monitoring Meeting 7 Zebra Mussels Origin, Transportation, Impact, Texas Bound, Current Populations, and Studies 8 Texas Legislation Action 9 CANADIAN AND RED RIVER BASINS WATER QUALITY OVERVIEW AND HIGHLIGHTS Canadian and Red River Basins Water Quality Overview, 2018 Texas IR Overview 10 TABLES Canadian River Basin 2018 Texas IR Impairment Listing 11 Red River Basin 2018 Texas IR Impairment Listing 12 Water Quality Monitoring Field Parameters, Conventional Laboratory Parameters Red River Authority Environmental Services Laboratory Environmental Services Division 15 2020 Canadian and Red River Basins Highlights Report ~ Page 3 2020 Canadian and Red River Basins Highlights Report ~ Page 4 INTRODUCTION In 1991, the Texas Legislature enacted the Texas Clean Rivers Act (Senate Bill 818) in order to assess water quality for each river basin in the state. From this, the Clean Rivers Program (CRP) was created and has become one of the most successful cooperative efforts between federal, state, and local agen- cies and the citizens of the State of Texas. It is implemented by the Texas Commission on Environ- mental Quality (TCEQ) through local partner agencies to achieve the CRP’s primary goal of maintain- ing and improving the water quality in each river basin.
    [Show full text]
  • OK FUNDING for at a Guide to Solving the Funding Puzzle and Receiving Assistive Technology in Oklahoma
    OK FUNDING FOR AT A Guide to Solving the Funding Puzzle and Receiving Assistive Technology in Oklahoma FOURTH EDITION, JANUARY 2005 Developed by OKLAHOMA ABLE TECH Oklahoma's Assistive Technology Program Oklahoma State University Seretean Wellness Center 2 Acknowledgments We are especially grateful to the staff members of all the Oklahoma and Federal public agencies along with private organizations listed within this document for their collaboration and cooperation in: • Sharing information about their programs and services; • Reviewing the information in this document for accuracy; • Disseminating information in this document for broader use. A special word of appreciation is extended to Joy Kniskern, a former staff member of the Georgia Assistive Technology Project, Tools for Life, whose funding guide provided the basis for much of the information contained in this guide. Thanks! Duplication: There are no copyrights on this document. Agencies, organizations, companies, individuals, and others are welcome to copy this document in whole or in part. Oklahoma ABLE Tech does ask that we are credited appropriately. “OK FUNDING for AT” is a publication of Oklahoma ABLE Tech. ABLE Tech is funded by U. S. Department of Education (USDOE). This publication does not necessarily reflect the position or policy of USDOE and no official endorsement of the material should be inferred. Information about the Oklahoma ABLE Tech program is available upon request as a public service. Oklahoma State University administers and conducts all program and activities in accordance with the U.S. Civil Rights Acts which provide that no person shall, on grounds of race, color, national origin, sex or disability be excluded benefits or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • South Central Oklahoma Workforce Area Briefing May 2017
    South Central Oklahoma Workforce Area Briefing May 2017 Overview The South Central Oklahoma Workforce Development Area is composed of eight Oklahoma counties: Caddo, Comanche, Cotton, Grady, Jefferson, McClain, Stephens, and Tillman. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, this combined region of Oklahoma covers 7,246 square miles, making it the third largest of the state’s workforce areas in land mass. Over 312,000 Oklahoma citizens live in the eight‐county area – approximately 8% of the state’s total population. Three cities in the area boast populations of 10,000 residents or more, including Lawton, Duncan, and Chickasha. Note that for simplicity, the South Central Oklahoma Workforce Development Area will generally be referenced throughout this report as the “Area.” Sources for all data are cited. The most common data source utilized is EMSI, data release 2017.2. Population Breakdown by County The city of Lawton, the county seat of Comanche 2016 Area Percentage of Population by County, is the largest city in County the Area with an estimated population of 97,589. Comanche County, the Stephens, 14% most populous County in the Area, is home to a total McClain, 13% of 125,003 individuals, representing 40.1% of the Grady, 18% Caddo, 9% population of the Area. Tillman, 2% Cotton County, the second smallest county Jefferson, 2% geographically with only Cotton, 2% 642 square miles, is the Comanche, 40% least populous county in the Area and home to 5,991 residents or 1.9% of the Area population. Source: EMSI 2017.2 Between 2010 and 2016, the Area experienced a nominal growth rate of 1.35%, a net increase of 4,169 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Classified Stream Segments and Assessments Units Covered by Hb 4146
    CLASSIFIED STREAM SEGMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS UNITS COVERED BY HB 4146 SEG ID River Basin Description Met criteria 0216 Red Wichita River Below Lake Kemp Dam 96.43% 0222 Red Salt Fork Red River 95.24% 0224 Red North Fork Red River 90.91% 1250 Brazos South Fork San Gabriel River 93.75% 1251 Brazos North Fork San Gabriel River 93.55% 1257 Brazos Brazos River Below Lake Whitney 90.63% 1415 Colorado Llano River 94.39% 1424 Colorado Middle Concho/South Concho River 95.24% 1427 Colorado Onion Creek 93.43% 1430 Colorado Barton Creek 98.25% 1806 Guadalupe Guadalupe River Above Canyon Lake 96.37% 1809 Guadalupe Lower Blanco River 95.83% 1811 Guadalupe Comal River 98.90% 1812 Guadalupe Guadalupe River Below Canyon Dam 96.98% 1813 Guadalupe Upper Blanco River 95.45% 1815 Guadalupe Cypress Creek 99.19% 1816 Guadalupe Johnson Creek 97.30% AU ID River Basin Description Met criteria 1817 Guadalupe North Fork Guadalupe River 100.00% 1414_01 Colorado Pedernales River 93.10% 1818 Guadalupe South Fork Guadalupe River 97.30% 1414_03 Colorado Pedernales River 91.38% 1905 San Antonio Medina River Above Medina Lake 100.00% 1416_05 Colorado San Saba River 100.00% 2111 Nueces Upper Sabinal River 100.00% Colorado River Below Lady Bird Lake 2112 Nueces Upper Nueces River 95.96% 1428_03 Colorado (formally Town Lake) 91.67% 2113 Nueces Upper Frio River 100.00% Medina River Below Medina 1903_04 San Antonio Diversion Lake 90.00% 2114 Nueces Hondo Creek 93.48% Medina River Below Medina 2115 Nueces Seco Creek 95.65% 1903_05 San Antonio Diversion Lake 96.84% 2309 Rio Grande Devils River 96.67% 1908_02 San Antonio Upper Cibolo Creek 97.67% 2310 Rio Grande Lower Pecos River 93.88% 2304_10 Rio Grande Rio Grande Below Amistad Reservoir 95.95% 2313 Rio Grande San Felipe Creek 95.45% 2311_01 Rio Grande Upper Pecos River 92.86% A detailed map of covered segments and assessment units can be found on the TCEQ website https://www.tceq.texas.gov/gis/nonpoint-source-project-viewer .
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • Blind. You Can Do This by Calling the • This
    ) Where to Get More Information If you have questions not answered in this handbook, you may want to contact a member of the Heartland Council of the Blind or Oklahoma Council of the Blind. You can do this by calling the information provided below. We have listed possible sources for ) additional information below in two sections. • The first section includes agencies and organizations focusing on people with vision loss. • The second section lists some suppliers of equipment and technology that may be helpful. • This information is provided for your consideration and is not an 72 endorsement by the Heartland ) Council or Oklahoma Council of the Blind. People with Vision Loss Agencies. Organizations. Services • Division of Visual Services ) Oklahoma Department of Rehabilitation Services 3535 NW 58*^ Street, Suite 500 Oklahoma City, OK 73112-4815 (405) 951-3400 Voice and TTY (800) 845-8476 Voice and TTY Website: www.okdrs.gov To locate the office nearest to you, please phone (800) 487-4042, press ) 73 "1" for Visual Services and enter your five-digit zip code when requested. • Vocational rehabilitation services (help to prepare for, get or keep a job). • Instructional services to help individuals with low vision or blindness to learn skills, techniques and resources for living independently and working. • Oklahoma Librarv for the Blind and Phvsicailv Handicapped (OLBPhh. • Business Enterprise Program (vending facility management). • Older Blind Program for age 55 and over provides help in adjusting to vision loss, learning new skills for 74 living independently, and finding ) resources in the community. • Older Blind Support Groups. • S e r v i c e s f o r i n d i v i d u a l s w i t h b o t h vision and hearing loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Plan
    COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY PLAN FY 2017 - 2019 I. INTRODUCTION A. Legal Authority and Structure of the Association SODA is the Southern Oklahoma Development Association and serves a ten county area in Southern Oklahoma. This council or government is a sub-state planning district; a voluntary association of local governments representing 62 incorporated cities, ten counties and ten soil conservation districts. SODA was created in 1966 in order to perform regional planning functions. To provide technical assistance, planning and coordination of economic development activities and perform other tasks as required in support of member entities. The legal authority of SODA is the Oklahoma Inter-Local Cooperation Act (74 0.S. Supp. 1981. Section 101 et. seq.). In February of 1967 SODA was formally designated by the U.S. Economic Development Administration, as an economic development district, thereby becoming the first Economic Development District in the nation funded by E.D.A. SODA receives funds through the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture to coordinate a district-wide Rural Fire Defense program. Other programs and services provided to members are community planning, 911 Coordination, analytical research and mapping with the Geographic Information System, SODA is also designated as the Area Agency on Aging, which provides senior citizens in the ten county region with services such as nutrition, transportation, legal counsel, outreach, etc. 1. Non- profit status: SODA is a certified U.S. Internal Revenue Service non-profit organization under Section 50 1 © of the I.R.S Regulation. 2. Governing board: The governing board of SODA is made up of directors appointed or elected from the membership which includes Boards of County Commissioners of the ten counties, Directors of the member Soil and Water Conservation Districts, for the cities and town in each county, and four members at large representing minority populations.
    [Show full text]