DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Water and Waste Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2018/110720/07 INTEGRATED WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR A WATER USE LICENCE IN TERMS OF SECTION 40 FOR A WATER USE IN TERMS OF SECTION 21(G) OF THE NATIONAL WATER ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 36 OF 1998): THE REHABILITATION OF THE HISTORICALLY MINED PIT ON PORTION 15 OF THE FARM JAGERSFONTEIN 14 IS IN THE FREE STATE THROUGH BACKFILLING OCTOBER 2019 Report prepared by: REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2018/110720/07 Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) : Louis De Villiers Assistant : Morné van Wyk : Suite 221 Private Bag X01 Postal Address Brandhof 9324 : 21 Dromedaris Street Dan Pienaar Physical Address Bloemfontein 9301 Tel : 072 967 7962 : [email protected] E-mail [email protected] Page | ii Applicant: Applicant Contact Person : Mr. P. N. Meyer Postal Address : P.O. Box 24 Jagersfontein 9974 Physical Address : Jagersfontein Tailings Operation Jagersfontein Tel : 073 463 1747 E-mail : [email protected] Site Information: Property (i.e. farm) name : Jagersfontein Farm Number : 14 Farm Portion : 15 21 Digit Surveyors Code(s) : F01100000000001400015 Magisterial District : Fauresmith District Municipality : Xhariep District Municipality Local Municipality : Kopanong Local Municipality : Lat: -29.771783° Site coordinates (Centre of site) : Long: 25.418445° Page | i Page | ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS iii 1. INTRODUCTION 27 1.1 Activity Background ............................................................................................................................ 27 1.2 Contact Details .................................................................................................................................... 27 1.2.1 Contact details of the Applicant ...................................................................................................... 27 1.2.2 Contact details of the Environmental Consultant ........................................................................... 28 1.3 Location of project .............................................................................................................................. 28 1.3.1 Regional locality .................................................................................................................................. 28 1.3.2 Water management area.................................................................................................................. 28 1.4 Property description ............................................................................................................................ 29 1.4.1 Landowner ........................................................................................................................................... 29 1.4.2 Land tenure and use of immediately adjacent land ..................................................................... 29 1.4.3 Surface infrastructure and presence of servitudes ......................................................................... 30 1.5 Purpose of the IWWMP ....................................................................................................................... 31 2. CONTEXTUALISATION OF ACTIVITY 33 2.1 Description of Activity ......................................................................................................................... 33 2.2 Extent of activity .................................................................................................................................. 35 2.3 Key activity related processes and products .................................................................................. 35 2.4 Activity life description ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.5 Activity infrastructure description ...................................................................................................... 36 2.6 Key water uses and waste streams ................................................................................................... 36 2.6.1 Water use activities ............................................................................................................................. 36 2.6.2 Key waste streams ............................................................................................................................... 36 2.7 Organisational structure of activity/organisation ............................................................................ 36 2.8 Jagersfontein Developments (Pty) Ltd Environmental Policy ........................................................ 39 3. REGULATORY WATER AND WASTE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK 40 3.1 Summary of all water uses .................................................................................................................. 40 3.2 Existing lawful water uses .................................................................................................................... 40 3.3 Relevant exemptions .......................................................................................................................... 40 Page | iii 3.4 Generally authorised water uses ....................................................................................................... 41 3.5 New water uses to be licensed ......................................................................................................... 41 3.6 Waste management activities (NEMWAA) ...................................................................................... 42 3.7 Other authorisations and regulations (EIAs, EMPs RoDs) ................................................................ 42 4. PRESENT ENVIRONMENTAL SITUATION 44 4.1 Climate ................................................................................................................................................. 44 4.1.1 Regional Climate ................................................................................................................................. 44 4.1.2 Rainfall .................................................................................................................................................. 44 4.1.3 Evaporation .......................................................................................................................................... 45 4.2 Surface water....................................................................................................................................... 46 4.2.1 Water Management Area ................................................................................................................. 46 4.2.2 Surface water hydrology .................................................................................................................... 47 4.2.3 Surface water quality .......................................................................................................................... 49 4.2.4 Mean Annual Runoff (MAR) ............................................................................................................... 49 4.2.5 Resource class and river health ......................................................................................................... 50 4.2.6 Receiving water quality objectives and the reserve ...................................................................... 50 4.2.7 Surface water user survey .................................................................................................................. 50 4.2.8 Sensitive areas survey ......................................................................................................................... 50 4.3 Groundwater ....................................................................................................................................... 51 4.3.1 Aquifer characterisation ..................................................................................................................... 51 4.3.2 Groundwater quality ........................................................................................................................... 51 4.3.3 Hydrocensus ......................................................................................................................................... 55 4.3.4 Potential pollution source identification ........................................................................................... 55 4.3.5 Groundwater Model ........................................................................................................................... 55 4.4 Socio-economic Environment ........................................................................................................... 55 4.4.1 Population density, growth and location ......................................................................................... 56 4.4.2 Employment data in Kopanong Local Municipality ....................................................................... 57 4.4.3 Income per individual in the Kopanong Local Municipality .......................................................... 57 5. ANALYSES AND CHARACTERISATION OF ACTIVITY 59 5.1 Site delineation for characterisation ................................................................................................. 59 5.2 Water and Waste Management ....................................................................................................... 59 5.2.1 Process water ......................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment

    Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment

    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
  • South Africa)

    South Africa)

    FREE STATE PROFILE (South Africa) Lochner Marais University of the Free State Bloemfontein, SA OECD Roundtable on Higher Education in Regional and City Development, 16 September 2010 [email protected] 1 Map 4.7: Areas with development potential in the Free State, 2006 Mining SASOLBURG Location PARYS DENEYSVILLE ORANJEVILLE VREDEFORT VILLIERS FREE STATE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT VILJOENSKROON KOPPIES CORNELIA HEILBRON FRANKFORT BOTHAVILLE Legend VREDE Towns EDENVILLE TWEELING Limited Combined Potential KROONSTAD Int PETRUS STEYN MEMEL ALLANRIDGE REITZ Below Average Combined Potential HOOPSTAD WESSELSBRON WARDEN ODENDAALSRUS Agric LINDLEY STEYNSRUST Above Average Combined Potential WELKOM HENNENMAN ARLINGTON VENTERSBURG HERTZOGVILLE VIRGINIA High Combined Potential BETHLEHEM Local municipality BULTFONTEIN HARRISMITH THEUNISSEN PAUL ROUX KESTELL SENEKAL PovertyLimited Combined Potential WINBURG ROSENDAL CLARENS PHUTHADITJHABA BOSHOF Below Average Combined Potential FOURIESBURG DEALESVILLE BRANDFORT MARQUARD nodeAbove Average Combined Potential SOUTPAN VERKEERDEVLEI FICKSBURG High Combined Potential CLOCOLAN EXCELSIOR JACOBSDAL PETRUSBURG BLOEMFONTEIN THABA NCHU LADYBRAND LOCALITY PLAN TWEESPRUIT Economic BOTSHABELO THABA PATSHOA KOFFIEFONTEIN OPPERMANSDORP Power HOBHOUSE DEWETSDORP REDDERSBURG EDENBURG WEPENER LUCKHOFF FAURESMITH houses JAGERSFONTEIN VAN STADENSRUST TROMPSBURG SMITHFIELD DEPARTMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT & HOUSING PHILIPPOLIS SPRINGFONTEIN Arid SPATIAL PLANNING DIRECTORATE ZASTRON SPATIAL INFORMATION SERVICES ROUXVILLE BETHULIE
  • Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District Socio�Economic Profile 2007 — NO 1 and Development Plans

    Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District SocioEconomic Profile 2007 — NO 1 and Development Plans

    Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District socio-economic profile 2007 NO 1 and development plans Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District socio-economic profile and development plans Centre for Development Support (IB 100) University of the Free State PO Box 339 Bloemfontein 9300 South Africa www.ufs.ac.za/cds Please reference as: Centre for Development Support (CDS). 2007. Arid Areas Report, Volume 1: District socio-economic profile and development plans. CDS Research Report, Arid Areas, 2007(1). Bloemfontein: University of the Free State (UFS). CONTENTS I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 II. Geographic overview ........................................................................................................ 2 1. Namaqualand and Richtersveld ................................................................................................... 3 2. The Karoo................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Gordonia, the Kalahari and Bushmanland .................................................................................... 4 4. General characteristics of the arid areas ....................................................................................... 5 III. The Western Zone (Succulent Karoo) .............................................................................. 8 1. Namakwa District Municipality ..................................................................................................
  • The Impact of a Nutrition Education Programme on the Anthropometric Nutritional Status of Low-Income Children in South Africa

    The Impact of a Nutrition Education Programme on the Anthropometric Nutritional Status of Low-Income Children in South Africa

    Public Health Nutrition: 5(1), 3±9 DOI: 10.1079/PHN2001204 The impact of a nutrition education programme on the anthropometric nutritional status of low-income children in South Africa CM Walsh1,*, A Dannhauser2 and G Joubert3 1School of Tourism, Hospitality and Sport, Technikon Free State, Private Bag X20539, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa: 2Department of Human Nutrition, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa: 3Department of Biostatistics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa Submitted 10 December 1998: Accepted 30 May 2001 Abstract Objective: The study determined the impact of a community-based nutrition education programme, using trained community nutrition advisors, on the anthropometric nutritional status of mixed-race children aged between 2 and 5 years. Design and setting: The programme was implemented over two years in four study areas in the Free State and Northern Cape Provinces. Two control areas were included to differentiate between the effect of the education programme and a food aid programme that were implemented simultaneously. Weight-for-age, height-for- age and weight-for-height were summarised using standard deviations from the NCHS reference median. For each of the indicators, the difference in the percentage of children below minus two standard deviations from the reference NCHS median in the initial and follow-up surveys was determined. Subjects: Initially 536 children were measured and, after two years of intervention, 815. Results: Weight-for-age improved in all areas, but only significantly in boys and girls in the urban study area, and in boys in one rural study area. No significant improvement in height-for-age occurred in any area.
  • FREE STATE DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION Address List: ABET Centres District: XHARIEP

    FREE STATE DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION Address List: ABET Centres District: XHARIEP

    FREE STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Address List: ABET Centres District: XHARIEP Name of centre EMIS Category Hosting School Postal address Physical address Telephone Telephone number code number BA-AGI FS035000 PALC IKANYEGENG PO BOX 40 JACOBSDAL 8710 123 SEDITI STRE RATANANG JACOBSDAL 8710 053 5910112 GOLDEN FOUNTAIN FS018001 PALC ORANGE KRAG PRIMARY PO BOX 29 XHARIEP DAM 9922 ORANJEKRAG HYDROPARK LOCAT XHARIEP 9922 051-754 DAM IPOPENG FS029000 PALC BOARAMELO PO BOX 31 JAGERSFONTEIN 9974 965 ITUMELENG L JAGERSFORNTEIN 9974 051 7240304 KGOTHALLETSO FS026000 PALC ZASTRON PUBLIC PO BOX 115 ZASTRON 9950 447 MATLAKENG S MATLAKENG ZASTRPM 9950 051 6731394 LESEDI LA SETJABA FS020000 PALC EDENBURG PO BOX 54 EDENBURG 9908 1044 VELEKO STR HARASEBEI 9908 051 7431394 LETSHA LA FS112000 PALC TSHWARAGANANG PO BOX 56 FAURESMITH 9978 142 IPOPENG FAURESMITH 9978 051 7230197 TSHWARAGANANG MADIKGETLA FS023000 PALC MADIKGETLA PO BOX 85 TROMPSBURG 9913 392 BOYSEN STRE MADIKGETLA TROMPSBU 9913 051 7130300 RG MASIFUNDE FS128000 PALC P/BAG X1007 MASIFUNDE 9750 GOEDEMOED CORRE ALIWAL NORTH 9750 0 MATOPORONG FS024000 PALC ITEMELENG PO BOX 93 REDDERSBURG 9904 821 LESEDI STRE MATOPORONG 9904 051 5530726 MOFULATSHEPE FS021000 PALC MOFULATSHEPE PO BOX 237 SMITHFIELD 9966 474 JOHNS STREE MOFULATHEPE 9966 051 6831140 MPUMALANGA FS018000 PALC PHILIPPOLIS PO BOX 87 PHILIPPOLIS 9970 184 SCHOOL STRE PODING TSE ROLO PHILIPPOLIS 9970 051 7730220 REPHOLOHILE FS019000 PALC WONGALETHU PO BOX 211 BETHULIE 9992 JIM FOUCHE STR LEPHOI BETHULIE 9992 051 7630685 RETSWELELENG FS033000 PALC INOSENG PO BOX 216 PETRUSBURG 9932 NO 2 BOIKETLO BOIKETLO PETRUSBUR 9932 053 5740334 G THUTONG FS115000 PALC LUCKHOFF PO BOX 141 LUCKHOFF 9982 PHIL SAUNDERS A TEISVILLE LUCKHOFF 9982 053 2060115 TSIBOGANG FS030000 PALC LERETLHABETSE PO BOX 13 KOFFIEFONTEIN 9986 831 LEFAFA STRE DITLHAKE 9986 053 2050173 UBUNTU FS035001 PALS SAUNDERSHOOGTE P.O.
  • Upper Orange

    Upper Orange

    South Africa UPPER ORANGE WMA Position Purification works name Capacity (Mℓ/d) Owner/operator Raw water source Latitude Longitude Bethulie 30° 31’ 21” 26° 03’ 39” 4.00 D Municipality Orange River, boreholes Botshabelo 29° 13’ 58” 26° 43’ 59” 100.00 D Bloem Water Rustfontein Dam Brandford Unknown Unknown Unknown Municipality Sand–Vet Government Water Scheme Clarens 28° 30’ 60” 28° 24’ 60” 1.00 % Municipality Clarens and Gryp dams Clocolan 28° 54’ 00” 27° 34’ 01” 3.46 D Municipality Moperri Dam Fauresmith 29° 45’ 23” 25° 18’ 48” Unknown Municipality Jagersfontein, boreholes Ficksburg 28° 52’ 21” 27° 52’ 42” Unknown Municipality Meulspruit Dam Gariep Dam 30° 37’ 23” 25° 30’ 24” Unknown Bloem Water Gariep Dam Hobhouse 29° 31’ 53” 29° 09’ 37” Unknown Municipality Armenia Dam Jacobsdal 29° 07’ 42” 24° 46’ 22” 960.00 D Municipality Kalkfontein Dam, boreholes Jagersfontein 29° 46’ 21” 25° 26’ 33” Unknown Municipality Boreholes Koffiefontein 29° 24’ 37” 25° 00’ 07” Unknown Municipality Riet River Government Water Scheme Ladybrand (Genoe WTW) 29° 11’ 38” 27° 27’ 38” 0.60 D Municipality Caledon River, Cathcart Drift Dam Luckoff 34° 20’ 36” 19° 00’ 43” 0.44 D Municipality Orange–Riet Canal Oppermans 29° 24’ 11” 24° 44’ 25” 0.03 % Municipality Boreholes Reddersburg 29° 39’ 10” 26° 10’ 11” 0.47 D Bloem Water Welbedacht Dam Rosendal 28° 29’ 59” 27° 54’ 61” Unknown Municipality Rosendal Dam Rouxville 30° 24’ 56” 26° 49’ 60” Unknown Municipality Kalkoenkrans Dam, boreholes Smithfield 30° 12’ 44” 26° 31’ 54” 1.40 D Municipality Smith Dam, boreholes Thaba Nchu (Moutloatsi) 29° 11’ 59” 26° 49’ 60” 18.0 D Bloem Water Moutloatsi Dam, Rustfontein Dam, boreholes Note: Thaba Patchoa 29° 19’ 21” 27° 06’ 53” Unknown SA Dept of Water Affairs Armenia Dam, boreholes D Design Trompsburg 30° 01’ 60” 25° 46’ 50” Unknown Bloem Water Gariep Dam % Operational capacity Tweespruit 29° 11’ 15” 27° 01’ 61” 1.00 % Municipality Lovedale Dam Unknown The data was not available in the existing Vanstadensrus 29° 59’ 13” 27° 00’ 11” Unknown Municipality Boreholes reports used to obtain information.
  • A Regional Analysis of Agricultural Price Risk in South Africa

    A Regional Analysis of Agricultural Price Risk in South Africa

    Agrekon, Vol 33, No 3 (September 1994) Van Schalkwyk and Groenewald A REGIONAL ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL PRICE RISK IN SOUTH AFRICA HD van Schalkwyk and JA Groenewald Lecturer and Professor, Department ofAgricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, University ofPretoria, Pretoria Regional output/input price differentials and variations were calculated to evaluate price risk in South Africa. It was found that price unstable regions are not necessarily also risky regions as regions with higher output/input price ratios can handle higher price variations better. The average value of the price index for the top ten regions is over 3 times larger than the average for the ten lowest regions. The higher the prices of inputs relative to output prices (the lower the price ratio), the smaller their application to each hectare of land, and the lower the land productivity. The regional prices appears to be a function of the interaction between differential natural and economic factors in different regions. 'n Streeksanalise van landbou prysrisiko in Suid-Afrika Regionale uitset/inset prysverskille en variasies is bereken om prys risiko in Suid-Afrika te evalueer. Daar is gevind dat prys onstabiele streke the noodwendig ook hoe risiko streke is nie, want streke met hoer uitset/inset prys verhoudings kan hoer prys variasies beter verwerk. Die gemiddelde waarde van die prys indeks vir die tien top streke is nicer as 3 keer groter as die gemiddeld vir die tien laagste streke. Hoe hoer die pryse van insette relatief tot uiset pryse(hoe lac- die prys verhouding), hoe minder is hulle aanwending per hektaar, en hoe laer die grond produktiwiteit.
  • The Historic Built Environment and a Sense of Place Jagersfontein

    The Historic Built Environment and a Sense of Place Jagersfontein

    THE HISTORIC BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND A SENSE OF PLACE JAGERSFONTEIN: A MINING TOWN IN THE FREE STATE, SOUTH AFRICA Jagersfontein A 60 credit research project submitted In partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Philosophy in Conservation of the Built Environment By University of Cape Town Loudine Philip School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment University of Cape Town January 2014 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my supervisor and course convener, Professor Stephen Townsend, for his expert, sincere and valuable guidance and encouragement extended to me. Thank you for an absolute amazing journey! To my employer, the National Museum, my sincere appreciation for providing the means to do this research; without your support this would not have been possible. I am most grateful for the people of Jagersfontein, for their patience in answering endless questions, for providing me with information and photographs, allowing me to take photographs of their homes and town, and returning over and over to do more of the same. You are the true diamonds of Jagersfontein. I sincerely thank my colleague, Lloyd Rossouw, for giving me the space and time when needed to meet a deadline, and I would also like to thank Gerda Coetzee for moral support.
  • Livestock Farming Livestock Farming

    Livestock Farming Livestock Farming

    Guidelines for LivestockLivestock FarmingFarming Third edition Guidelines for LivestockLivestock FarmingFarming Published by Plaas Publishing Guidelines for livestock farming A project of: The National Wool Growers’ Association Tel 041 365 5030 / Fax 041 365 5035 PO Box 34291, Newton Park, Port Elizabeth, 6055 www.nwkv.co.za Red Meat Producers’ Organisation Tel +27 12 348 1933 / Fax +27 12 361 4430 PO Box 36802, Menlo Park, 0102 www.rpo.co.za Published by: Plaas Publishing Private Bag X2010 Lyttelton 0063 217 Clifton Avenue, Centurion Tel: +27 12 664 4793 Third edition, first print: 2014 ISBN: 978-0-620-55465-7 Copyright: National Wool Growers’ Association & Red Meat Producers’ Organisation © All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, whether it be through photocopying, disk or recording, or through any other system aimed at the preservation or development of information, without the written consent of the compiler, publisher or copyright holders Project team Compiler: Bom Louw, NWGA, [email protected] Editor: Lynette Louw, Plaas Publishing, [email protected] Cover design and page layout: Karien van Wyk, Plaas Publishing, [email protected] Proofreader/sub-editor: Elizabeth Botha, Plaas Publishing, [email protected] Advertising sales: Plaas Publishing Sponsor co-ordinator: Patti Myburgh, NWKV, [email protected] SA Studbook advisor: Pierre van Rooyen Bound and printed by: Interpak Books, Pietermaritzburg CHAPTER 1: Personnel and management
  • Free State Province

    Free State Province

    Agri-Hubs Identified by the Province FREE STATE PROVINCE 27 PRIORITY DISTRICTS PROVINCE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROPOSED AGRI-HUB Free State Xhariep Springfontein 17 Districts PROVINCE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROPOSED AGRI-HUB Free State Thabo Mofutsanyane Tshiame (Harrismith) Lejweleputswa Wesselsbron Fezile Dabi Parys Mangaung Thaba Nchu 1 SECTION 1: 27 PRIORITY DISTRICTS FREE STATE PROVINCE Xhariep District Municipality Proposed Agri-Hub: Springfontein District Context Demographics The XDM covers the largest area in the FSP, yet has the lowest Xhariep has an estimated population of approximately 146 259 people. population, making it the least densely populated district in the Its population size has grown with a lesser average of 2.21% per province. It borders Motheo District Municipality (Mangaung and annum since 1996, compared to that of province (2.6%). The district Naledi Local Municipalities) and Lejweleputswa District Municipality has a fairly even population distribution with most people (41%) (Tokologo) to the north, Letsotho to the east and the Eastern Cape residing in Kopanong whilst Letsemeng and Mohokare accommodate and Northern Cape to the south and west respectively. The DM only 32% and 27% of the total population, respectively. The majority comprises three LMs: Letsemeng, Kopanong and Mohokare. Total of people living in Xhariep (almost 69%) are young and not many Area: 37 674km². Xhariep District Municipality is a Category C changes have been experienced in the age distribution of the region municipality situated in the southern part of the Free State. It is since 1996. Only 5% of the total population is elderly people. The currently made up of four local municipalities: Letsemeng, Kopanong, gender composition has also shown very little change since 1996, with Mohokare and Naledi, which include 21 towns.
  • Free State Province Facility, Sub-District and District

    Free State Province Facility, Sub-District and District

    FREE STATE PROVINCE FACILITY, SUB-DISTRICT AND DISTRICT Facility Posts Period Field of Study Province District Sub-District Facility 2017 Audiologist fs Free State Province fs Thabo Mofutsanyana District Municipality fs Maluti a Phofung Local Municipality fs Mofumahadi Manapo Mopeli Hospital 1 fs Maluti a Phofung Local Municipality Total 1 fs Thabo Mofutsanyana District Municipality Total 1 fs Free State Province Total 1 Audiologist Total 1 Clinical Psychologist fs Free State Province fs Correctional Services ICSP fs Correctional Services Health Units fs Grootvlei Management Area 2 fs Kroonstad Management Area 3 fs Correctional Services Health Units Total 5 fs Correctional Services ICSP Total 5 fs Fezile Dabi District Municipality fs Moqhaka Local Municipality fs Boitumelo Hospital 2 fs Moqhaka Local Municipality Total 2 fs Fezile Dabi District Municipality Total 2 fs Lejweleputswa District Municipality fs Matjhabeng Local Municipality fs Bongani Hospital 1 fs Matjhabeng Local Municipality Total 1 fs Lejweleputswa District Municipality Total 1 fs Thabo Mofutsanyana District Municipality fs Maluti a Phofung Local Municipality fs Mofumahadi Manapo Mopeli Hospital 2 fs Maluti a Phofung Local Municipality Total 2 fs Thabo Mofutsanyana District Municipality Total 2 fs Xhariep District Municipality fs Kopanong Local Municipality fs Diamond (Diamant) Hospital 1 fs Goedemoed Correctional Centre 2 fs Kopanong Local Municipality Total 3 fs Xhariep District Municipality Total 3 fs Free State Province Total 13 Clinical Psychologist Total 13 Dentist
  • I Ndian Ocean a T L a N T Ic O C E

    I Ndian Ocean a T L a N T Ic O C E

    A B C D E F G H J K L 16°E 18°E 20°E 22°E 24°E 26°E 28°E 30°E 32°E S h a s h e M otloutse Tuli Z I M B A B W E Th EASTERN CAPE FREE STATE LIMPOPO NORTH WEST WESTERN CAPE u ne Dam Index Latitude Longitude Dam Index Latitude Longitude Dam Index Latitude Longitude Dam Index Latitude Longitude Dam Index Latitude Longitude 22°S Limpopo Binfield Park Dam.........G8 S32°41'56.8" E26°54'46.6" Allemanskraal Dam.........H5 S28°17'15.9" E27°08'49.4" Albasini Dam..............K2 S23°06'26.0" E30°07'29.0" Bloemhof Dam..............G4 S27°39'52.1" E25°37'11.7" Beaufort West Dam.........E8 S32°20'39.5" E22°35'07.7" Beitbridge 22°S Bushmans Krantz Dam.......G8 S32°21'26.3" E26°40'38.4" Armenia Dam...............H6 S29°21'52.3" E27°07'40.9" Damani Groot Dam..........K1 S22°51'05.2" E30°30'55.9" Boskop Dam................H4 S26°33'41.0" E27°06'41.6" Berg River Dam............C9 S33°54'21.1" E19°03'19.0" Cata Dam..................H8 S32°37'52.9" E27°07'02.8" Erfenis Dam...............G5 S28°30'35.7" E26°46'40.9" Doorndraai Dam............J2 S24°16'48.6" E28°46'37.1" Bospoort Dam..............H3 S25°33'45.4" E27°19'35.5" Buffeljags Dam............D9 S34°01'07.2" E20°32'03.0" 1 Darlington Dam............F8 S33°12'20.3" E25°08'54.4" Fika Patsu Dam............J5 S28°40'21.1" E28°51'24.1" Ebenezer Dam..............J2 S23°56'27.3" E29°59'05.9" Buffelspoort Dam..........H3 S25°46'49.3" E27°29'12.9" Bulshoek Dam..............C7 S31°59'45.8" E18°47'13.7" Musina 1 d De Mistkraal Weir.........G8 S32°57'28.9" E25°40'27.8" Gariep Dam................G6 S30°37'22.1" E25°30'23.7"