DOCSLIB.ORG

Champlain Hudson Power Express Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Champlain Hudson Power Express Project CHAMPLAIN HUDSON POWER EXPRESS PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH ROUTING PROPOSED IN JOINT PROPOSAL Submitted by: CHAMPLAIN HUDSON POWER EXPRESS INC. AND CHPE PROPERTIES INC. Pieter Schuyler Building, 600 Broadway Albany NY 12207 FEBRUARY 2012 Confidential Document for Settlement Discussions Pursuant to Commission's Settlement Guidelines Champlain Hudson Power Express Project Environmental Impacts Associated with Routing Proposed in Joint Proposal TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 1.0 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES........................................2 1.1 Construction Methods..............................................................................................2 1.1.1 Overland Installation Methodology ..........................................................2 1.1.1.1 Initial Clearing Operations and Stormwater and Erosion Control Installation .................................................................3 1.1.1.2 Trench Excavation ..................................................................4 1.1.1.3 Cable Installation ....................................................................5 1.1.1.4 Backfilling...............................................................................5 1.1.1.5 Restoration and Revegetation .................................................6 1.1.1.6 Upland Crossings....................................................................6 1.1.1.7 Environmental Training..........................................................6 1.1.2 Underwater Cable Installation Methodology............................................7 1.1.2.1 Jet Plow / Water Jetting ..........................................................8 1.1.2.2 Plowing .................................................................................10 1.1.2.3 Dredged Trench Excavation (Conventional Dredging) ........11 1.1.2.4 Non-Burial Installation .........................................................11 1.1.2.5 Infrastructure Crossing Installation Methodology................12 1.1.2.6 In-Water Support Vessels .....................................................14 1.1.3 Horizontal Directional Drilling...............................................................14 1.1.4 Cable Installation Methodologies Utilized Along the Route..................17 1.1.4.1 Canada / United States Border to Dresden, New York.........17 1.1.4.2 Dresden, New York to Catskill, New York ..........................18 1.1.4.3 Catskill, New York to Stony Point, New York.....................19 1.1.4.4 Stony Point, New York to Clarkstown, New York...............19 1.1.4.5 Clarkstown, New York to Astoria, Queens, New York City........................................................................................20 1.1.5 Convertor Station Construction ..............................................................20 1.1.6 Construction Support Work Areas..........................................................21 1.1.6.1 Overland Cable Installation Support Facilities.....................21 1.1.6.2 Underwater Cable Installation Support Facilities.................21 1.2 Operations..............................................................................................................21 1.2.1 Terrestrial Maintenance ..........................................................................22 1.2.2 Underwater Facility Maintenance...........................................................22 1.2.3 Converter Station Maintenance...............................................................23 1.2.4 Cable Repair Procedures.........................................................................23 2.0 LAND USE .......................................................................................................................24 2.1 Existing Land Use..................................................................................................24 2.1.1 Washington County ................................................................................25 2.1.1.1 Town of Dresden...................................................................26 2.1.1.2 Town/Village of Whitehall ...................................................26 2.1.1.3 Town/Village of Fort Ann ....................................................26 i Confidential Document for Settlement Discussions Pursuant to Commission's Settlement Guidelines Champlain Hudson Power Express Project Environmental Impacts Associated with Routing Proposed in Joint Proposal 2.1.1.4 Town Hartford ......................................................................27 2.1.1.5 Town of Kingsbury...............................................................27 2.1.1.6 Town/Village of Fort Edward...............................................27 2.1.2 Saratoga County......................................................................................27 2.1.2.1 Town of Moreau ...................................................................27 2.1.2.2 Town of Northumberland .....................................................28 2.1.2.3 Town of Wilton.....................................................................28 2.1.2.4 Town of Greenfield...............................................................28 2.1.2.5 City of Saratoga Springs .......................................................29 2.1.2.6 Town of Milton.....................................................................29 2.1.2.7 Town of Ballston...................................................................30 2.1.2.8 Town of Clifton Park ............................................................30 2.1.3 Schenectady County................................................................................30 2.1.3.1 Town of Glenville.................................................................31 2.1.3.2 City of Schenectady ..............................................................31 2.1.3.3 Town of Rotterdam...............................................................31 2.1.4 Albany County........................................................................................32 2.1.4.1 Town of Guilderland.............................................................32 2.1.4.2 Town of New Scotland and Village of Voorheesville..........32 2.1.4.3 Town of Bethlehem...............................................................33 2.1.4.4 Town of Coeymans and Village of Ravena ..........................33 2.1.5 Greene County ........................................................................................33 2.1.5.1 Town of New Baltimore .......................................................33 2.1.5.2 Town and Village of Coxsackie............................................34 2.1.5.3 Town of Athens.....................................................................34 2.1.5.4 Town and Village of Catskill................................................34 2.1.6 Rockland County ....................................................................................35 2.1.6.1 Town of Stony Point .............................................................35 2.1.6.2 Town Haverstraw, Village of West Haverstraw, and Village of Haverstraw...........................................................35 2.1.6.3 Town of Clarkstown .............................................................36 2.1.7 New York County...................................................................................36 2.1.7.1 New York City......................................................................36 2.2 Consistency with State and Local Land Use Plans and Policies ...........................37 2.2.1 2009 New York State Open Space Conservation Plan ...........................38 2.2.2 Washington County ................................................................................41 2.2.2.1 Town of Dresden...................................................................41 2.2.2.2 Village of Whitehall..............................................................42 2.2.2.3 Town of Whitehall ................................................................42 2.2.2.4 Town of Fort Ann .................................................................42 2.2.2.5 Village of Fort Ann...............................................................43 2.2.2.6 Town of Hartford ..................................................................43 2.2.2.7 Town of Kingsbury...............................................................44 2.2.2.8 Town of Fort Edward............................................................44 2.2.2.9 Village of Fort Edward .........................................................45 ii Confidential Document for Settlement Discussions Pursuant to Commission's Settlement Guidelines Champlain Hudson Power Express Project Environmental Impacts Associated with Routing Proposed in Joint Proposal 2.2.3 Saratoga County......................................................................................45 2.2.3.1 Town of Moreau ...................................................................46 2.2.3.2 Town of Northumberland .....................................................47 2.2.3.3 Town of Wilton.....................................................................47 2.2.3.4 Town of Greenfield...............................................................48 2.2.3.5 City of Saratoga Springs .......................................................48 2.2.3.6 Town of Milton.....................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisa Wood Ruby
    CHAPTER ONE DUTCH ART AND THE HUDSON VALLEY PATROON PAINTERS Louisa Wood Ruby One of the earliest "schools" of American painting, the Hudson Valley patroon painters, has often been considered to have derived from seventeenth-century English portraiture. Portraits of English aristo- crats appealed to Dutch patroons as displays of the kind of social status they aspired to in their new country. British mezzotints after original paintings by Sir Godfrey Kneller and others provided the patroon painters with readily available models on which to base their portraits of wealthy Dutch Americans. Unfortunately, this convincing analysis vastly underestimates the influence of Dutch art and taste on the development of these paintings. Frequently overlooked in the discussion of the appeal of British portraiture to Dutch patroons is the fact that English portraiture of the seventeenth century was, in fact, a direct descendant of the Netherlandish portrait tradition. Kneller, the main source for the mez- zotints that flooded New York, was trained in Amsterdam. Sir Peter Lely was born in Holland, and of course Sir Anthony Van Dyck was from Antwerp. Wealthy Dutch families in New York would have been aware of the Netherlandish tradition through works of art they brought with them from their homeland. Indeed, the first paintings produced in New Amsterdam and early New York were essentially Dutch, since no other tradition existed here at the time. When British mezzotints finally arrived in 17 10, they did indeed appeal to the patroon families, most likely because they were works grounded in the Dutch tradition, then overlaid with elements of British culture and style.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bear Report Fall 2009 a MESSAGE from the EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JIM HALL 400 Years Ago Henry Hudson Passed Through Our Hudson Valley Noting Its Grandeur
    The Bear Report Fall 2009 A MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JIM HALL 400 years ago Henry Hudson passed through our Hudson Valley noting its grandeur. Efforts to protect and invest in that magnificence have continued to be a priority of the Palisades Interstate Park Commission since its inception. Our founding families, the Perkinses, the Harrimans, and the Rockefellers created the standard of excellence we resolve to provide each year to over nine million park visitors. There is no shortage of calls for a return to nature and to that end, the revitalization of our State Parks continues to be PIPC’s top priority. Many of our facilities were built by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the Works Progress Administration (WPA) generations ago. Their efforts remind us that when you invest in parks everyone feels better. Undeterred by budget cuts and financial uncertainty, we will continue to find creative ways to raise funds, awareness, and opportunities in order for the Palisades Interstate Parks system to flourish and remain the glorious resource it has been for a century. ~ Jim Hall ~ THE CONSERVANCY HONORS The Perkins Family On Thursday, June 4, 2009 the Palisades Parks Conservancy was privileged to honor the Perkins family, long considered the first family of the Commission. Longtime Hudson River Valley residents, they have blazed a path of philanthropy and action that has yielded dozens of parks, museums, cultural centers, farms, monuments, amusements, and the PIPC Group Camp concept that has served tens of thousands of children of all ages for nearly a century. Their belief in nature as the best medicine of all has had a ripple effect worldwide since George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockland County, NY
    41.338085N 41.331100N 74.283365W SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE MAP (2010 CENSUS): Rockland County, NY 73.827099W UNI Fort Montgomery 26902 6 UNI 04758 Philipstown UNI LEGEND 07380 UNI UNI UNI Blooming Grove town 07003 14430 West Point 80747 14430 11860town 57584 24000 West SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL LABEL STYLE Goose Pond Kiryas Joel 39853 293 Lake Mountain 6 Point West PUTNAM 079 Federal American Indian State Park 6 Mohegan Mil Res Point 119 Reservation L'ANSE RES 1880 32 ESTER 40689 Mil WESTCH Res Off-Reservation Trust 6 e 6 L t k T1880 A Highlands Land - M e Walton Park T o h k town 34550 e 17 L g 78063 17 a State American Indian Bear Mt n k Tama Res 4125 L State Park Reservation nd u Monroe o Cp Smith R 47988 UNI Alaska Native Regional NANA ANRC 52120 Harriman 16620 Corporation r k 32325 D L 7 S State (or statistically Lakes ev n en L NEW YORK 36 to ak equivalent entity) l es a Woodbury 82750 D r W Fo County (or statistically n r o ERIE 029 e D d C equivalent entity) u m s n R o t de e n r L r L be ai rg T l R k p R Monroe town 47999 Woodbury town 82755 ke UNI Shrub Oak 67279 Annsville Crk Minor Civil Division 22650 (MCD)1,2 Bristol town 07485 k y L rr be n Consolidated City Chester town 15308 a y r MILFORD 47500 w C k Crompond 19092 P w e t 9 a t y UNI Silver Mine Lk s w d Peekskill° 56979 1,3 er H R t r Incorporated Place In S e Davis 18100 29970 U iv es R d a s li a UNI P UNI Census Designated Place Incline Village 35100 Monroe 19650 Csx RR (CDP) 3 Reservoir 14010 UNI Stony Point town 71674 31980 Unified School District UNI Dr 03370 ok erlo r v D O r D y t r p o e t SEC b e i g Yorktown Secondary School District L id R N town 84077 99965 Buchanan r ELM D 10341 Elementary School District re M o 02220 ot h t Farm Rd S Tiorati W d Lk R y g w Dr r k en e P ah b e k k t S c a u DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL t s B r e t n I n L s ri e Interstate 3 Water Body Pleasant Lake u d l a o s Verplanck s i l S n i Vw Island a l P e C d m v Pond e o A 77211 d R T a t Rd m U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nyack Beach State Park
    Nyack Beach State park Hook Mountain State Park is perfect for a great day outside. Hook Mountain and Nyack Beach State Parks are located at the very end of North Broadway in Nyack , NY. The combined areas offer hiking and biking trails, fishing and picnicking along the Hudson River. The riverside path is about two miles long and is fairly level so it’s a relatively easy walk. The Hook Mountain trail continues for another four miles to the Haverstraw Beach State Park for a longer, more intensive hike. There’s plenty of wildlife that call this park home. Hawks nest in the cliffs and glide overhead. There are also fossils and dinosaur footprints in the rocks along the pathway. The views along the bike path are inspiring, not just of the river but the mountain side as well. With every season and every storm the landscape evolves. Rock slides along the cliffs create remarkable formations. Sometimes you can actually look up at the cliffs and pick out where a specific pile of boulders has fallen as if from a jigsaw puzzle. Some of these boulders seem to form familiar shapes of faces and animals, silent sentinels watching over the seasons, sunrises, the ebbs and flows of the tides and dual currants of the historic and mysterious Hudson River. There are many places along this path that make it special. Trails lead up the mountain and intersect and weave through the woods along the river, some continue to the upper level of the park and beyond, some just end abruptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Champlain Hudson CHPE Properties, Inc. Pieter Schuyler Building Albany
    State of New York Department of State One Commerce Plaza 99 Washington Avenue Andrew M. Cuomo Cesar A. Perales Governor Albany, NY 12231-0001 Secretary of State June 8, 2011 Mr. Donald Jessome, President/CEO Champlain Hudson Power Express Inc. and CHPE Properties, Inc. Pieter Schuyler Building 600 Broadway Albany, NY 12207-2283 Re: F-2010-1162 U.S. Dept. ofEnergy #: PP-362 U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers Application #: 2009- 01089-EHA NYS Public Service Commission Application #: 10- T-0139 Champlain-Hudson Power Express 1,000 megawatt HVDC electric transmission system from Canada to New York City Conditional Concurrence with Consistency Certification Dear Mr. Jessome: The Department ofState (DOS) has completed its review ofthe consistency certification and data and information for the above referenced project in accordance with the federal Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA). Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.4 and 930.62, DOS conditionally concurs with the consistency certification for the project under the enforceable policies ofthe New York State Coastal Management Program (CMP). This transmission project promises to deliver a tremendous supply ofclean, renewable hydropower from Canada to the New York City Metropolitan Area, one ofthe nation's largest energy markets. Ifconstructed as proposed and conditioned, the project can provide several important energy benefits. The electricity will serve the New York Independent Systems Operator (NYISO) load center in Zone J and adjacent zones, a high need area. Hydro-power, a renewable energy source, diversifies the State's energy portfolio. Because the electricity is predominantly generated by hydropower, it will improve air quality by displacing less clean generators and will not contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost City of Tryon Trail Is an Approved Historic Trail Of
    The Lost City of Tryon Trail is an approved Historic Trail of the Boy Scouts of America and is administered by the Seneca Waterways Council Scouting Historical Society. It offers hikers a fantastic opportunity to experience a geographic location of enduring historic significance in Upstate New York. 2018 EDITION Seneca Waterways Council Scouting Historical Society 2320 Brighton-Henrietta Town Line Road, Rochester, NY 14623 version 2.0 rdc 10/2018 A Nice Hike For Any Season Introduction The Irondequoit Bay area was once at the crossroads of travel and commerce for Native Americans. It was the home of the Algonquin and later the Seneca, visited by a plethora of famous explorers, soldiers, missionaries and pioneers. This guidebook provides only a small glimpse of the wonders of this remote wilderness prior to 1830. The Lost City of Tryon Trail takes you through a historic section of Brighton, New York, in Monroe County’s Ellison Park. The trail highlights some of the remnants of the former City of Tryon (portions of which were located within the present park) as well as other historic sites. It was also the location of the southernmost navigable terminus of Irondequoit Creek via Irondequoit Bay, more commonly known as “The Landing.” The starting and ending points are at the parking lot on North Landing Road, opposite the house at #225. Use of the Trail The Lost City of Tryon Trail is located within Ellison Park and is open for use in accordance with park rules and regulations. Seasonal recreation facilities, water, and comfort stations are available. See the park’s page on the Monroe County, NY website for additional information.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Land Trust Grants - New York State Conservation Partnership Program
    2018 Land Trust Grants - New York State Conservation Partnership Program Detailed Roster of 2018 Conservation Partnership Program Grant Awards Capacity & Excellence Grants Organization Office Location Project Summary Grant Award *Accredited Land Trusts are in Bold Strategic and Succession Planning for Greater Sustainability - Grant will enable the accredited ASA to undertake a comprehensive planning Greenwich, Agricultural Stewardship Association process that will include development of a new five-year strategic plan, a multi-year revenue plan, a succession plan and coaching to $27,000 Washington County support implemention. A Financial Foundation for the Catskill Center’s Next 50 Years - Grant will enable the Catskill Center to increase unrestricted revenues by Arkville, Delaware Catskill Center engaging fundraising consultants, improving its donor database, expanding development activities, and preparing for a new member $14,700 County campaign. Catskill Center is currently registered for accreditation. Update Strategic Plan with Attention to Constituent Engagement and Development - Grant will enable CPF to complete a five-year Cazenovia, Madison Cazenovia Preservation Foundation Strategic Plan update using a constituency and community engagement process and with benchmarks aligned with fundraising tasks to $18,000 County support successful implementation. Cazenovia Preservation Foundation is a current applicant for accreditation. Westport, Essex CATS Outreach and Growth Project - Grant will enable the accredited Champlain Area Trails
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Communities of New York State
    Ecological Communities of New York State by Carol Reschke New York Natural Heritage Program N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation 700 Troy-Schenectady Road Latham, NY 12110-2400 March 1990 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The New York Natural Heritage Program is supported by funds from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. Within DEC, funding comes from the Division of Fish and Wildlife and the Division of Lands and Forests. The Heritage Program is partly supported by funds contributed by state taxpayers through the voluntary Return a Gift to Wildlife program. The Heritage Program has received funding for community inventory work from the Adirondack Council, the Hudson River Foundation, the Sussman Foundation, U.S. National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service (Finger Lakes National Forest), and each of the seven New York chapters of The Nature Conservancy (Adirondack Nature Conservancy, Eastern New York Chapter, Central New York Chapter, Long Island Chapter, Lower Hudson Chapter, South Fork/Shelter Island Chapter, and WesternNew YorJ< Chapter) This classification has been developed in part from data collected by numerous field biologists. Some of these contributors have worked under contract to the Natural Heritage Program, including Caryl DeVries, Brian Fitzgerald, Jerry Jenkins, Al Scholz, Edith Schrot, Paul Sherwood, Nancy Slack, Dan Smith, Gordon Tucker, and F. Robert Wesley. Present and former Heritage staff who have contributed a significant portion of field data include Peter Zika, Robert E. Zaremba, Lauren Lyons-Swift, Steven Clemants, and the author. Chris Nadareski helped compile long species lists for many communities by entering data from field survey forms into computer files.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2016 New York–North Jersey Chapter
    & Trails Waves News from the Appalachian Mountain Club Volume 38, Issue 2 • Summer 2016 New York–North Jersey Chapter OPEN FOR BUSINESS: the new Harriman Outdoor AMC TRAILS & WAVES SUMMER 2016 NEW YORK - NORTH JERSEY CHAPTER 1 Center IN THIS ISSUE Chapter Picnic 3 The Woods Around Us 4 Our Public Lands 7 Leadership Workshop 13 Membership Chair 14 Thanks! 16 Letter to the Editor 18 Harriman FAQs 19 Fuel it Up 21 Book Review 24 Photo Contest 29 An Easy Access Wilderness? 30 Harriman Activities 34 Dunderberg Mountain 37 Message from the Chair ummer started early and outdoor This year we have also been working on a activities are going strong. We are solid Path to Leadership Program and S very excited about the opening of the Leadership Workshop. Excellence in Harriman Outdoor Center. For those of you outdoor leadership is part of the AMC who have not seen, we encourage you to join Vision 2020 and we are working with a work crew or take a tour. The camp opening Boston staff for the Workshop to be held is scheduled for July 2nd. Cabins are available September 23rd through September 25th. Our for rent, so get a group together and go! leaders are what set us apart from the many Contact [email protected] for more other groups in the area. Leaders have been information. The chapter has planned 19 polled and an agenda pulled together to offer weekend activities with programs for both advanced training and training for paddlers, hikers, cycling, trail maintainers, potential leaders. We hope many of you will leader training and much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Correspondence of Maria Van Rensselaer (1669-1689)
    CORRESPONDENCE OF MARIA VAN RENSSELAER 1669-1689 Translated and edited by A. J. F. VAN LAER Archivist, Archives and History Division ALBANY THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK I 935 PREFACE In the preface to the Correspondence of Jeremias van Rens­ selaer, which was piiblished in 1932, attention was called to the fact that after the death of Jeremias van Rensselaer his widow carried on a regular correspondence with her husband's youngest brother, Richard van Rensselaer, in regard to the administration of the colony of Rensselaerswyck, and the plan was announced to publish this correspondence in another volume. This plan has been carried into effect in the present volume, which contains translations of all that has been preserved of the correspondence of Maria van Rensselaer, including besides the correspondence with her brother-in-law many letters which passed between her and her brother Stephanus van Cortlandt and other members of the Van Cortlandt family. Maria van Rensselaer was born at New York on July 20, 1645, and was the third child of Oloff Stevensen van Cortlandt and his wife Anna Loockermans. She married on July 12, 1662, when not quite 17 years of age, Jeremias van Rensselaer, who in 1658 had succeeded his brother Jan Baptist van Rensse­ laer as director of the colony of Rensselaerswyck. By him she had four sons and two daughters, her youngest son, Jeremias, being born shortly after her husband's death, which occurred on October 12, 1674. As at the time there was no one available who could succeed Jeremias van Rensselaer as director of the colony, the burden of its administration fell temporarily upon his widow, who in this emergency sought the advice of her brother Stephanus van Cortlandt.
    [Show full text]
  • Outings for Scouting Bookfold
    Outings for Scouting: A Resource Guide to Long Island and Beyond Wood Badge NE-VII-16 2009 Buffalo Patrol John Benson, Lance Cheney, Robert B. Purdy, Sue McGuire, Tom O’Donnell, and Robert Wall 1 Fellow Scout Leaders, Scouting provides an ideal setting for boys and girls to Philmont Scout Ranch explore the world through diverse activities. Day and 17 Deer Run Road weekend trips, as well as summer camp, may provide Cimarron, NM 87714 enrichment in the Scout’s areas of interest, study, or (575) 376-2281 Email: [email protected] rank advancement. Extended trips to cities such as Boston, Philadelphia, and Washington D.C. provide unique Philmont Scout Ranch provides an unforgettable adventure along its opportunities for Scouts to experience their nation’s hundreds of miles of rugged, rocky trails. Program features combine history and government. Lastly, high adventure trips the best of the Old West—horseback riding, burro packing, gold build upon the older Scout’s self-confidence and panning, chuckwagon dinners, and interpretive history—with exciting challenges for today—rock climbing, burro racing, mountain biking, leadership skills under exciting yet often physically and and rifle shooting—in an unbeatable recipe for fast-moving outdoor mentally challenging conditions. fun. www.scouting.org/scoutsource/HighAdventure/Philmont.aspx As Leaders recognizing the importance of these experiences, we often want to expand on our knowledge base of tried and true activities but are not quite sure Mt. Washington where to turn. This activity guide was designed to meet Mount Washington, the highest peak in the northeastern U.S., that need: to return the “outing” back to Scouting.
    [Show full text]