3-1 Modification of the Division of Archipelago Sea in the HELCOM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3-1 Modification of the Division of Archipelago Sea in the HELCOM Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Monitoring and Assessment Group (MONAS) MONAS 20-2014, 3-1 Oslo, Norway, 8-10 April 2014 Document title Modification of the division of Archipelago Sea in the HELCOM division of sub-basins and coastal areas Code 3-1 Category CMNT Agenda Item 3 – Information by the Contracting Parties and Observer Organizations Submission date 19.3.2014 Submitted by Finland Reference Background HELCOM Monitoring and Assessment Strategy describes (in its attachment 4) the HELCOM sub-divisions, which divide the Baltic Sea on four hierarchical scales to assessment units, allowing a nested approach for regional monitoring and assessment purposes. The Monitoring and Assessment Strategy was adopted by the Copenhagen Ministerial Meeting in 2013. According to the sub-division (see Figure 2 in Attachment 1 below), the Archipelago Sea coastal area (number 9) and the Northern Baltic Proper Finnish coastal area (number 10) are two separate coastal areas in two separate sub-basins (the former in Åland Sea and the latter in the Northern Baltic Proper). Both the coastal areas, however, belong to Finnish coastal waters under the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and are considered as same entity from the Finnish perspective in the monitoring, assessment and management purposes. Similarly, on the northern side of the Archipelago Sea, a part of the HELCOM coastal area ‘Bothnian Sea Finnish coastal area’ (number 5) belongs to the Åland coastal watersand Archipelago Sea coastal waters as defined in the WFD. Therefore, Finland proposes that: 1. the subdivision “Åland Sea” is modified to include also the “Northern Baltic Proper Finnish coastal area” (number 10) and this area is merged with the “Archipelago Sea coastal area”; 2. the border between the sub-basins ‘Åland Sea’ and ‘Bothnian Sea’ is delineated according to the WFD coastal water types. See attachment 1 (Figure 1) for illustration. In addition, Finland proposes that the sub-basin “Åland Sea” is renamed as “Åland Sea and Archipelago Sea”. Action required The Meeting is invited to agree on the modification of the sub-basin boundary. Page 1 of 4 MONAS 20-2014, 3-1 Attachment 1 Figure 1. Details of the proposed change. The proposed HELCOM sub-basin ‘Åland Sea and Archipelago Sea’ is coloured as pink. The current HELCOM sub-basin ‘Åland Sea’ is delineated by the black boundaries. This document proposes that the sub-basin area follows the coloured area instead of the black boundaries. Figure 2. Map of the Baltic Sea presenting the HELCOM sub- division into 17 open sub-basins and 42 coastal areas. The names of the open sea areas and coastal areas are provided in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. EEZs of the countries are shown with a grey dashed line. Page 2 of 4 MONAS 20-2014, 3-1 Table 1. Names of open sea sub-basins of the Baltic Sea Kattegat Great Belt The Sound Kiel Bay Bay of Mecklenburg Arkona Basin Bornholm Basin Gdansk Basin Eastern Gotland Basin Western Gotland Basin Gulf of Riga Northern Baltic Proper Gulf of Finland Åland Sea [changed to Åland Sea and Archipelago Sea] Bothnian Sea The Quark Bothnian Bay Table 2. Codes and names of the coastal water areas 1 Bothnian Bay Finnish Coastal waters 2 Bothnian Bay Swedish Coastal waters 3 The Quark Finnish Coastal waters 4 The Quark Swedish Coastal waters 5 Bothnian Sea Finnish Coastal waters 6 Bothnian Sea Swedish Coastal waters 7 Åland Sea Finnish Coastal waters 8 Åland Sea Swedish Coastal waters 9 Archipelago Sea Coastal waters 10 Northern Baltic Proper Finnish Coastal waters 11 Northern Baltic Proper Swedish Coastal waters 12 Northern Baltic Proper Estonian Coastal waters 13 Gulf of Finland Finnish Coastal waters 14 Gulf of Finland Estonian Coastal waters 15 Gulf of Finland Russian Coastal waters 16 Gulf of Riga Estonian Coastal waters 17 Gulf of Riga Latvian Coastal waters 18 Western Gotland Basin Swedish Coastal waters 19 Eastern Gotland Basin Estonian Coastal waters 20 Eastern Gotland Basin Latvian Coastal waters 21 Eastern Gotland Basin Lithuanian Coastal waters 22 Eastern Gotland Basin Swedish Coastal waters 23 Eastern Gotland Basin Russian Coastal waters 24 Eastern Gotland Basin Polish Coastal waters 25 Gdansk Basin Russian Coastal waters 26 Gdansk Basin Polish Coastal waters 27 Bornholm Basin Swedish Coastal waters 28 Bornholm Basin Polish Coastal waters 29 Bornholm Basin Danish Coastal waters 30 Bornholm Basin German Coastal waters 31 Arkona Basin Swedish Coastal waters Page 3 of 4 MONAS 20-2014, 3-1 32 Arkona Basin Danish Coastal waters 33 Arkona Basin German Coastal waters 34 Mecklenburg Bight German Coastal waters 35 Mecklenburg Bight Danish Coastal waters 36 Kiel Bight Danish Coastal waters 37 Kiel Bight German Coastal waters 38 Belts Danish Coastal waters 39 The Sound Swedish Coastal waters 40 The Sound Danish Coastal waters 41 Kattegat Swedish Coastal waters 42 Kattegat Danish Coastal waters, including Limfjorden Page 4 of 4 .
Recommended publications
  • A 1500-Year Multiproxy Record of Coastal Hypoxia from the Northern Baltic Sea Indicates Unprecedented Deoxygenation Over the 20Th Century
    Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-25 Manuscript under review for journal Biogeosciences Discussion started: 16 January 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. A 1500-year multiproxy record of coastal hypoxia from the northern Baltic Sea indicates unprecedented deoxygenation over the 20th century Sami A. Jokinen1, Joonas J. Virtasalo2, Tom Jilbert3, Jérôme Kaiser4, Olaf Dellwig4, Helge W. Arz4, Jari 5 Hänninen5, Laura Arppe6, Miia Collander7, Timo Saarinen1 10 15 20 25 30 1Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland 2Marine Geology, Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), P.O. Box 96, 02151 Espoo, Finland 3Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014 Helsinki, Finland 4Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde (IOW), Seestrasse 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany 35 5Archipelago Research Institute, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland 6Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland 7Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland Correspondence to: Sami A. Jokinen ([email protected]) 1 Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-25 Manuscript under review for journal Biogeosciences Discussion started: 16 January 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. Abstract. The anthropogenically forced expansion of coastal hypoxia is a major environmental problem affecting coastal ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles throughout the world. The Baltic Sea is a semi-enclosed shelf sea whose central deep basins have been highly prone to deoxygenation during its Holocene history, as shown previously by numerous paleoenvironmental studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy, Wealth and Governance in the Caucasus and Central Asia
    Energy, Wealth and Governance in the Caucasus and Central Asia In 1991 the eight countries of the Caucasus and Central Asia (CCA) became independent from the former Soviet Union. Although a region rich in natural resources, the transition toward a market economy has not gone smoothly for the CCA countries. Drawing upon recent progress in development economics and political science, the book provides fresh analysis of the CCA countries’ transition by tracing the impact of the natural resource endowment. The book examines the synergies between energy-rich and energy-poor states and highlights the practical consequences of both well-managed and poorly-managed energy revenue deployment. The region has been a relatively slow reformer, its governments have become more authoritarian, and the contributors argue that despite recent growth spurts, further reform is required to sustain rapid GDP growth and nurture democracy. They suggest that unless CCA elites change the way in which they deploy natural resource revenues, regional development will fall short of its potential with possibly disastrous consequences. The contributors apply the experience of the developing market economies to demonstrate that the region still holds considerable potential to become an important stable supplier of raw materials and a source of industrial demand to the global economy. However, the CCA could become a threat to the global economy as a consequence of the misuse of energy revenues in promoting the interests of predatory political elites. With contributions from prominent specialists on resource-driven econ- omies Energy, Wealth and Governance in the Caucasus and Central Asia pro- vides a systematic and integrated analysis of the political economy of resource-driven growth in the CCA region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Effective Water Protection in the Gulf of Finland
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE The Finnish Environmentprovided by Helsingin yliopiston632 digitaalinen arkisto ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Mikko Kiirikki, Pirjo Rantanen, Riku Varjopuro, Anne Leppänen, Marjukka Hiltunen, Heikki Pitkänen, Petri Ekholm, Elvira Moukhametshina, Arto Inkala, Harri Kuosa and Juha Sarkkula Cost effective water protection in the Gulf of Finland Focus on St. Petersburg . .......................... FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE The Finnish Environment 632 Mikko Kiirikki, Pirjo Rantanen, Riku Varjopuro, Anne Leppänen, Marjukka Hiltunen, Heikki Pitkänen, Petri Ekholm, Elvira Moukhametshina, Arto Inkala, Harri Kuosa and Juha Sarkkula Cost effective water protection in the Gulf of Finland Focus on St. Petersburg HELSINKI 2003 . .......................... FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE The publication is also available in the Internet www.environment.fi/publications ISBN 952-11-1426-6 ISBN 952-11-1427-4 (PDF) ISSN 1238-7312 Cover photo: Karri Eloheimo/ Water sampling in the Central Waste Water Treatment Plant in St. Petersburg. Graphics: Paula Väänänen & Mikko Kiirikki Layout: Ritva Koskinen Printing: Dark Ltd Helsinki 2003 2 ..........................................................The Finnish Environment 632 Contents Summary ..........................................................................................5 1 Introduction ..................................................................................7 2 Nutrient load ..............................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • From Small Scales to Large Scales –The Gulf of Finland Science Days
    Gulf of Finland Co-operation From small scales to large scales –The Gulf of Finland Science Days 2017 9th-10th October 2017 Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tallinn Photo: Riku Lumiaro Photo: Gulf of Finland Contents Co-operation ORAL PRESENTATIONS V. Andreeva, E. Voyakina* Phytoplankton structure in eastern part of Gulf of Finland A. Antsulevich*, S. Titov Development of the program for combined restoration of European pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) and salmonid fishes local populations in two rivers inflowing to the Gulf of Finland in nature protected areas of Leningrad Oblast. R. Aps*, M. Fetissov, F. Goerlandt, P. Kujala, A. Piel, J. Thomas Systems approach based maritime traffic safety management in the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea) J. Kotta*, R. Aps, M. Futter, K. Herkül Assessing the environmental impacts and nutrient removal potential of mussel farms in the northeastern Baltic Sea J. Björkqvist*, O. Vähä-Piikkiö, L. Tuomi, V. Alari A spatially extensive validation of three different wave models in the Helsinki coastal archipelago A. Ivanchenko, D. Burkov* The state and environmental consequences of pollution air pool of the Gulf of Finland transport emissions K. Rubtsova, T. Mironenko, E. Daev* Preliminary assessment of water and sediment pollutions in littoral zone of the Kotlin Island. P. Ekholm*, M. Ollikainen, E. Punttila, S. Puroila, A. Kosenius Reducing agricultural phosphorus load by gypsum: results from the first year after amendment M. Fetissov*, R. Aps, P. Heinla, J. Kinnunen, O. Korneev, L. Lees, R. Varjopuro Ecosystem-based Maritime Spatial Planning – impact on navigational safety from offshore renewable energy developments V. Fleming-Lehtinen*, H. Parner, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic and Dynamic Ice Thickness Contributions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago in NEMO-LIM2 Numerical Simulations
    The Cryosphere, 12, 1233–1247, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1233-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Thermodynamic and dynamic ice thickness contributions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago in NEMO-LIM2 numerical simulations Xianmin Hu1,a, Jingfan Sun1,b, Ting On Chan1,c, and Paul G. Myers1 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2E3, Canada anow at: Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada bnow at: School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA cnow at: Skytech Solutions Ltd., Canada Correspondence: Xianmin Hu ([email protected]) Received: 6 September 2017 – Discussion started: 10 October 2017 Revised: 16 March 2018 – Accepted: 19 March 2018 – Published: 10 April 2018 Abstract. Sea ice thickness evolution within the Canadian is found in the northern CAA and Baffin Bay while a de- Arctic Archipelago (CAA) is of great interest to science, as cline (r2 ≈ 0:6, p < 0:01) is simulated in Parry Channel re- well as local communities and their economy. In this study, gion. The two main contributors (thermodynamic growth and based on the NEMO numerical framework including the lateral transport) have high interannual variabilities which LIM2 sea ice module, simulations at both 1=4 and 1=12◦ hor- largely balance each other, so that maximum ice volume can izontal resolution were conducted from 2002 to 2016. The vary interannually by ±12 % in the northern CAA, ±15 % in model captures well the general spatial distribution of ice Parry Channel, and ±9 % in Baffin Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ordovician Reef and Mound Evolution: the Baltoscandian
    Ordovician reef and mound evolution: The Baltoscandian picture Björn Kröger1, Linda Hints2, Oliver Lehnert2, 3,4 1. Finnish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 44, Fi-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland, [email protected] 2. Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086, Tallinn, Estonia 3. Geo-Center of Northern Bavaria , Lithosphere Dynamics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg , Schlossgarten 5, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany 4. Department of Geology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden Original Article Corresponding author: Björn Kröger, [email protected] Short title: Baltic reefs 1 Abstract: Widespread growth of reefs formed by a framework of biogenic constructors and of frame-lacking carbonate mounds started on Baltica during the Ordovician. Previously, Ordovician reef and mound development on Baltica was considered to be sporadic and local. A review of all known bioherm localities across the Baltic Basin reveals a more consistent pattern. Ordovician bioherms grew in a wide E/W stretching belt across the Baltic Basin and occur in several places in Norway. Substantial reef development began simultaneously across the region during the late Sandbian / early Katian boundary interval and climaxed during the late Katian Pirgu Stage. The current spatiotemporal distribution of bioherms is a result of interdependent factors that involve original drivers of reef development, such as relative sea level, climate during the time of deposition, and effects of post-depositional erosion. Oceanographic conditions were likely more favorable during times of cooler global climates, low sea level and glacial episodes. At the same time, the likelihood that bioherms are preserved from long time erosion is higher when deposited during low sea level in deeper parts of the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Gulf of Finland-1
    Template for Submission of Information, including Traditional Knowledge, to Describe Areas Meeting Scientific Criteria for Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas EASTERN GULF OF FINLAND Abstract The area is a shallow (mean 24 m, max 95 m deep) archipelago area in the northeastern Baltic Sea. It is characterized by hundreds of small islands and skerries, coastal lagoons and boreal narrow inlets, as well as a specific geomorphology, with clear signs from the last glaciation. Due to the low salinity (0- 5 permille), the species composition is a mixture of freshwater and marine organisms, and especially diversity of aquatic plants is high, Many marine species, including habitat forming key species such as bladderwrack (Fucus vesiculosus) and blue mussel (Mytilus trossulus), live on the edge of their geographical distribution limits, which makes them vulnerable to human disturbance and effects of climate change. The area has a rich birdlife and supports one of the most important populations of the ringed seal (Pusa hispida botnica), an endangered species. Introduction to the area The proposed area (Fig. 1 & 2) is situated on the north-eastern part of the Gulf of Finland, in the Baltic Sea, which is the largest brackish water area in the World. The proposed area is an archipelago with hundreds of small islands and skerries, coastal lagoons and boreal narrow inlets, as well as a specific geomorphology, with clear signs from the last glaciation (ca. 18.000 – 9.000 BP). Coastal areas freeze over still freeze over every winter for at least a few weeks. The scenery in the area ranges from sheltered inner archipelago with lagoons, shallow bays and boreal inlets, through middle archipelago, with few larger islands, to wave exposed outer archipelago with open sea, small islands and skerries.
    [Show full text]
  • International Council for the Exploration of the Sea FINLAND J. Lassig Institute of Marine Research C. H. 1982/L: L/Corr. Admini
    \ International Council for C. H. 1982/L: l/Corr. the Exploration of the Sea Administrative Report Addendum 'BiologicalOceanography Committee FINLAND 6/0 J. Lassig Institute of Marine Research Phytoplankton, primary production, chlorophyll a and related parameters were studied every second week (twice during the ice period) at one station in the western part of the Gulf of Finland and at 15 stations in the entire Baltic Sea as stipula­ ted in theBaltic Monitoring Programme (Helsinki:Commission). Zooplankton was sampled (Hensen net) three times a month (once during the ice period) at two coastal stations in the Gulf of Finland, one station in the Archipelago Sea and one in the Bothnian Bay. Zooplankton was sampled (WP-2 net) at 26 stations in the entire Baltic Sea according to the Baltic Monitoring Programme·, I Benthic macrofauna communities were studied in the deep areas of the Baltic Sea. The stations of the Baltic Monitoring Pr~gramme were included in the survey. The produciton and decomposition of organie matter in the pela­ gial were studied in the Gulf of Finland in eooperation with Tvärminne Zoologieal Station of the University of Helsinki. Institute of Radiation Proteetion, Helsinki Benthos studies were carried out in the vieinity of two nuclear power plants, one in the Gulf of Finland and one in the Bothnian Bay. SampIes have been taken twiee at 9 stations at each plant. Phytoplankton, .ehlorophyll a and primary produetion studies were performed onee or twiee a month during the ice-free period around both plants. National Board of Waters, Water Research Office, Helsinki The influence of industrial pollution on the composition of th~ benthic macrofauna was studied in 4 areas in the Gulf of Finland, in 4 areas in~ the Bothnian Sea and in 3 areas in the Bothnian Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Report Card 2018 Effects of Persistent Arctic Warming Continue to Mount
    Arctic Report Card 2018 Effects of persistent Arctic warming continue to mount 2018 Headlines 2018 Headlines Video Executive Summary Effects of persistent Arctic warming continue Contacts to mount Vital Signs Surface Air Temperature Continued warming of the Arctic atmosphere Terrestrial Snow Cover and ocean are driving broad change in the Greenland Ice Sheet environmental system in predicted and, also, Sea Ice unexpected ways. New emerging threats Sea Surface Temperature are taking form and highlighting the level of Arctic Ocean Primary uncertainty in the breadth of environmental Productivity change that is to come. Tundra Greenness Other Indicators River Discharge Highlights Lake Ice • Surface air temperatures in the Arctic continued to warm at twice the rate relative to the rest of the globe. Arc- Migratory Tundra Caribou tic air temperatures for the past five years (2014-18) have exceeded all previous records since 1900. and Wild Reindeer • In the terrestrial system, atmospheric warming continued to drive broad, long-term trends in declining Frostbites terrestrial snow cover, melting of theGreenland Ice Sheet and lake ice, increasing summertime Arcticriver discharge, and the expansion and greening of Arctic tundravegetation . Clarity and Clouds • Despite increase of vegetation available for grazing, herd populations of caribou and wild reindeer across the Harmful Algal Blooms in the Arctic tundra have declined by nearly 50% over the last two decades. Arctic • In 2018 Arcticsea ice remained younger, thinner, and covered less area than in the past. The 12 lowest extents in Microplastics in the Marine the satellite record have occurred in the last 12 years. Realms of the Arctic • Pan-Arctic observations suggest a long-term decline in coastal landfast sea ice since measurements began in the Landfast Sea Ice in a 1970s, affecting this important platform for hunting, traveling, and coastal protection for local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Arctic Energy Summit Final Report
    FINAL REPORT AND TECHNICAL PROCEEDINGS AES Final Report & Technical Proceedings | Executive Summary 1 Arctic council • u.S. DEpArtmEnt of StAtE • inStitutE of tHE nortH The Arctic Energy Summit: The Arctic as an Emerging Energy Province international polar Year project #299 prepared by: James r. Hemsath pE, pmp Senior fellow the institute of the north Anchorage, Alaska february 2010 conference photos by clark James mishler contents 3 IPY LETTER 5 FoREwoRd 6 CHAPTER 1: Executive Summary An introduction to the international polar Year the Arctic as an Energy province the Arctic Energy Summit recommendations from the Summit organization of this report conclusions 14 CHAPTER 2: Arctic Energy Summit Technology Conference plenary Sessions panel Sessions policy Human resources rural Energy in the Arctic Shipping and transportation options Environmental concerns infrastructure and the impact of climate change impacts of Energy Development on the people of the north Energy Security Arctic Energy technology conference themes rural and renewable Energy in the Arctic Extractive Energy in the Arctic Sustainability of Energy in the Arctic presentations and papers 30 CHAPTER 3: The Arctic Energy Action Team results and recommendations Extractive Energy: the Development of Arctic coal renewable Energy: the Development of tidal Generation rural Energy: the Development of Alternative transportation fuels 34 CHAPTER 4: The Arctic Energy Education and outreach Program the Arctic Energy Summit Website the Arctic Synergy Education and Youth 36 APPENdICES:
    [Show full text]
  • South of the Åland Islands
    2014 3 ECT J RO P EA S C I T L A B Oceana proposal for a Marine Protected Area South of the Åland Islands INTRODUCTION TO THE AREA The autonomous region of the Åland Islands, which is made up of more than 6,500 islands, forms part of the Archipelago Sea. It is situated between Finland and Sweden at the entrance to the Gulf of Bothnia (Figure 1). The coastal area has a complex topography, with many small islands and skerries, and experiences up to 90 ice days during the winter1. The seabed in the region is characterized mainly by hard bottoms, including boulders and stones, but patches of sand occur as well. In deeper waters, mud dominates the seabed. Physical factors, like water temperature, dissolved oxygen saturation and the organic content of sediment, control benthic life in the area. Some marine protected areas, including Natura 2000 areas and a Ramsar (The Convention on Wetlands) site called Signilsär‑Märket Archipelago2, exist in the Åland region, but the offshore waters in particular, lack protection. 1 3 South of the Åland Islands Oceana conducted underwater surveys with an underwater robot (ROV) and scuba dives, at different depths from the coast to offshore waters in the area south of the Åland Islands in 2011, 2012 and 2013. DESCRipTION OF THE AREA The area south of the Åland Islands hosts a unique biodiversity consisting of marine, brackish and freshwater species. The inner coastal waters of the archipelago have a relatively high organic content, and thus suffer from occasional oxygen depletion, while the offshore waters have a lower organic content and generally high oxygen saturation3.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercalibration of Sediment Data from the Archipelago Sea
    Title BALANCE Interim Report No.14 Intercalibration of sediment data from the Archipelago Sea Authors Date Reijonen, A. May 2007 Kotilainen, A.T. Approved by Geological Survey of Finland Johnny Reker Revisi Description By Checked Approved Date 1 Final report AK JYR JYR 19/8-06 0 Draft report AK AR JYR 19/5-06 Front page illustration Box corer sample from the Archipelago Sea, Image: GTK, 2005 Key words Classification BALANCE; sediment classification & harmonization, Open Archipelago Sea Internal Proprietary Distribution No of copies BALANCE Secretariat 3 + pdf BALANCE partnership 20 + pdf BSR INTERREG IIB Joint Secretariat 1 Archive 1 BALANCE Interim Report No. 14 i CONTENTS 0 PREFACE .......................................................................................................................3 1 STUDY AREA.................................................................................................................4 2 METHODS ......................................................................................................................6 2.1 Local scale......................................................................................................................7 2.2 Detailed scale..................................................................................................................8 3 RESULTS......................................................................................................................10 4 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]