DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Community Capacity: How Collaborative Planning Is Changing the Culture of Governance in Seattle Amber M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Community Capacity: How Collaborative Planning Is Changing the Culture of Governance in Seattle Amber M Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2009 Building community capacity: how collaborative planning is changing the culture of governance in Seattle Amber M. Kobler Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons Recommended Citation Kobler, Amber M., "Building community capacity: how collaborative planning is changing the culture of governance in Seattle" (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 10564. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10564 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Building community capacity: how collaborative planning is changing the culture of governance in Seattle by Amber M. Kobler A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING Major: Community and Regional Planning Program of Study Committee: Gerardo Sandoval, Major Professor Tara Lynne Clapp Betty Wells Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2009 Copyright © Amber M. Kobler, 2009. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... v Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1. Overview .............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Building Community Capacity through Collaborative Planning........................................................ 3 Problem Statement & Research Questions ......................................................................................... 6 Case Study Selection: Why Seattle? ................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Data Collection and Analysis ........................................................................................................... 10 Research Organization...................................................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Chapter 2. Literature Review ............................................................................................................... 14 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Shifting the planning paradigm: from scientific rationality to collaboration ................................... 14 The evolution of citizen participation and the neighborhood movement ......................................... 19 Government vs. Governance ............................................................................................................ 23 Defining capacity ............................................................................................................................. 27 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 32 Chapter 3: Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 34 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 34 Hypothesis and Purpose ................................................................................................................... 35 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 36 Conceptual Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 39 Operationalizing Variables ............................................................................................................... 40 Operational Framework .................................................................................................................... 41 Theoretical Framework .................................................................................................................... 42 Data Collection: Units of Analysis and Methods ............................................................................. 43 Interview Design, Methods, and Procedures .................................................................................... 46 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 48 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 48 Chapter 4: Establishing the Context ..................................................................................................... 50 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 50 The 1985 Downtown Land Use and Transportation Plan ................................................................ 51 The Citizens Alternative Plan (CAP) ............................................................................................... 54 Creating the Office of Neighborhoods ............................................................................................. 59 State Growth Management and the 1994 Comprehensive Plan ....................................................... 61 The Neighborhood-Planning Program (NPP) .................................................................................. 65 After the planning process: implementation and increased capacity ................................................ 72 iii Changing tides: The new administration .......................................................................................... 75 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 76 Chapter 5: Ripple Effects ..................................................................................................................... 79 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 79 Outreach: Engaging stakeholders ..................................................................................................... 79 Partnerships ...................................................................................................................................... 87 Learning............................................................................................................................................ 93 Empowerment and Signs of Governance Capacity .......................................................................... 98 The Neighborhood Matching Fund ................................................................................................ 103 How the Neighborhood Matching Fund Works ............................................................................. 105 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 110 Chapter 6: Lessons and Challenges .................................................................................................... 113 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 113 Research questions, hypothesis, and framework ............................................................................ 114 Summary of findings: Increased capacity and signs of governance ............................................... 117 Lessons, challenges and policy implications .................................................................................. 120 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 122 Appendix A. Research questions and subquestions ........................................................................... 124 Operationalizing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highline Community College Building 8, Student Union Building 2400 S
    Highline Community College Building 8, Student Union Building 2400 S. 240th Street Des Moines, WA 98198 Schedule 2:15 pm Welcome and Introduction, SeaTac Municipal Court Judge Elizabeth Bejarano; 2:20 pm Mia Gregerson, House Representative and Mayor, City of SeaTac; Dave Kaplan, Mayor, City of Des Moines; Des Moines Municipal Court Judge Veronica Alicea- Galvan 2:45 pm Comedian John Keister 3:15 pm Judge James Docter, City of Bremerton 3:30 pm Recording Artist Wanz 3:40 pm Dan Satterberg, King County Prosecuting Attorney 4:00 pm Katie Whittier, King County Director for Senator Patty Murray, on behalf of Patty Murray 4:15 pm Comedian Ty Barnett 4:45 pm Norm Rice, President and CEO of the Seattle Foundation, and Former Seattle Mayor 5:00 pm Closing remarks (Schedule subject to change as entertainers are added) Speaker and Entertainer Information Speakers Mia Gregerson http://housedemocrats.wa.gov/roster/rep-mia-gregerson/ http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/index.aspx?page=90 Before being appointed to the House of Representatives in 2013, and selected as Mayor of the City of SeaTac in 2014, Mia served as a council member and deputy mayor for the City of SeaTac. While on the council she served on the executive board of the Puget Sound Regional Council, on the board of directors for Sound Cities Association and on other regional committees. Mia has been a surgical assistant and business manager in the dental field for more than 16 years. She has degrees from Highline Community college and the University of Washington. Dan Satterberg http://www.kingcounty.gov/Prosecutor.aspx A Seattle area native, Dan is a graduate of Highline High school, the University of Washington, and the University of Washington Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Central Area
    History of the Central Area Thomas Veith Seattle Historic Preservation Program City of Seattle Department of Neighborhoods 2009 Contents The Central Area Defined p. 3 Preliminaries p. 5 Territorial Period: 1853 – 1889 p. 12 Early Urbanization: 1890 – 1918 p. 25 Between the Wars: 1918 – 1940 p. 49 The Years of Transition: 1940 – 1960 p. 53 Period of Turmoil: 1960 - 1980 p. 63 The Central Area Today p. 85 Bibliography p. 89 Appendix A: Landmarks p. 93 The Central Area Defined Unlike some Seattle neighborhoods, the Central Area has never existed as a political entity separate from the City of Seattle. In addition the Central Area‟s development was not part of a unified real state scheme with coordinated public improvements (such as the Mount Baker community). For these reasons, it has never had official boundaries and various writers describe its extent in various ways. Almost all attempts to describe the neighborhood include a core area bounded by Madison Street on the north, Jackson Street on the south, 15th Avenue on the west, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Way (formerly Empire Way) on the east. In 1975, Nyberg and Steinbrueck identified the eastern boundary of the Central Area as 30th Avenue (more or less), and also included extensions to the north and south of the core area. The extension to the south of Jackson Street was bounded by 30th Avenue (approximately) on the east, Interstate 90 on the south, and the mid-block alley just east of Rainier Avenue South on the west. The extension to the north of Madison Street was bounded on the west by 23rd Avenue, on the east by the Washington Park Arboretum, and extended north to a line just north of East Helen Street marking the boundary between the plats known as the Madison Park Addition and the Hazelwood Addition Supplemental.1 Walt Crowley describes the neighborhood as a “sprawling residential district .
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations from the Structure Subcommittee
    FINAL REPORT January 29, 2008 Judge Terrence A. Carroll, ret., Chair Bob Boruchowitz, Vice Chair Jenny A. Durkan M. Lorena González Pramila Jayapal Gary Locke Hubert G. Locke Judith Krebs Mike McKay Norman B. Rice Jennifer Shaw Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................i Background ..............................................................1 General Bases of Recommendations ....................4 Recommendations Accountability & Public Confidence ....................5 Independence ...................................................10 Professional Conduct .......................................11 Transparency ....................................................12 Conclusion .............................................................14 Appendices 2007 Police Accountability Review Panel Biographies ................................15 Materials Provided to the Police Accountability Review Panel ..................19 Executive Summary Public safety is paramount to the effective functioning of a civil society. Seattle is fortunate that its neighborhoods and communities enjoy a relatively high degree of safety and stability. The Panel recognizes that this is due, in large part, to the dedication of Seattle police officers. The majority of these officers work day in and day out, forging bonds with residents and successfully improving communities in which they serve. Most are rarely subject to any form of disciplinary complaint. Similarly, the Panel recognizes the work of the current and former Office
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Transcript
    VOTERS-2018/11/01 1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION FALK AUDITORIUM THE ROLE OF MINORITY VOTERS IN THE 2018 MIDTERM ELECTIONS Washington, D.C. Thursday, November 1, 2018 Introduction: NICOL TURNER LEE Fellow, Center for Technology Innovation The Brookings Institution Panel Discussion: FREDRICK HARRIS, Moderator Nonresident Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, The Brookings Institution Dean of Social Science and Professor of Political Science, Columbia University KIMBERLY ATKINS Washington Bureau Chief The Boston Herald CHRISTINE CHEN Executive Director APIAVote MICHAEL FAUNTROY Associate Professor, Political Science Howard University * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 500 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 VOTERS-2018/11/01 2 P R O C E E D I N G S DR. LEE: Good afternoon. We want to welcome everybody here who is here at the Brookings Institution with us this afternoon, as well as those of you who are watching us in C-SPAN, who is kindly covering this event this afternoon. I have the pleasure of, for those of you who know me, not sitting on this panel, but actually being someone who is interested in the topic. My name is Dr. Nicol Turner Lee. I am a fellow in the Center for Technology Innovation which sits in our Governance Studies department here at Brookings. But I have this great honor to introduce the moderator for today's event, which is going to address the role of minority voters in the midterms, which cannot be much more of a timely topic today than ever before. Dr. Fred Harris is a nonresident fellow here at Brookings, but he is also most importantly the dean of social science and professor of political science at Columbia University.
    [Show full text]
  • Résumé, Winter, 1986, Volume 17, Issue 02 Alumni Association, WWU
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Western Reports and Résumé Western Publications Winter 1986 Résumé, Winter, 1986, Volume 17, Issue 02 Alumni Association, WWU Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/alumni_reports Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Alumni Association, WWU, "Résumé, Winter, 1986, Volume 17, Issue 02" (1986). Western Reports and Résumé. 202. https://cedar.wwu.edu/alumni_reports/202 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Publications at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Reports and Résumé by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Report to Alumni and Other Friends of Western Washington University Western s women’s basketball team goes to nationals! See story on page 6. Winter 1986 VOL. 17, NO. 1 A Report to Alumni and Other Friends of Western Washington University Rare books on Jefferson donated to Wilson Library rare set of books on the writings of Thomas Jefferson has been given Ato ther Western’s Wilson Library by Mr. and Mrs. Tim Block of Seattle and Bainbridge Island. The Works of Thomas Jefferson, set number 41 of a limited and signed version of 1,000, was edited by Paul Leicester Ford and published as the Federal Edition by G.P. Putnam’s Sons in 1904 and 1905. This particular edition of Jefferson’s works is noted as being extremely accurate In an age when editorial accuracy was not always prized. The gift was given in the memory of Anne Stewart Kelley, a journalism graduate of the University of Washington, who wrote for The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Atlantic and The New York Times Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the State of Washington Yes For
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON YES FOR EARLY SUCCESS, a non-profit cotporation, LAURA CHANDLER,~dBARBARAFLYE Petitioners, vs. CITY OF SEATTLE ~d KING COUNTY, Respondents. PETITION FOR REVIEW SMITH & LOWNEY, PLLC By: Knoll D. Lowney WSBA No. 23457 Claire Tonry WSBA No. 44497 2317 East John Street Seattle WA 98112-5412 (206) 860-2883 Attorneys for Petitioners Barbara Flye ~d Laura Chandler TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... ! II. IDENTITY OF PETITIONERS ........................................... .4 III. COURT OF APPEALS' PUBLISHED DECISION .............. .4 IV. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ................................... 5 V. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ............................................... 6 VI. ARGUMENT WHY REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED .... 9 1. This Court should accept review under RAP 13.4(b)(3) and (4) because the published opinion invalidates the initiative right in the City of Seattle and jeopardizes that right for 1.5 million residents of first-class cities ......................................... 9 a. First-class cities operating under charter are entitled to the same rights of direct democracy as other cities ..................................... .11 b. The recodification of a ballot title statute cannot justifY stripping voters of their rights and invalidating a City Charter................... 13 c. By invalidating the Charter's initiative process, but providing no replacement, the published opinion will lead to unending litigation .................. 16 2. Review is necessary under RAP 13.4(b)(3) to protect fundamental rights under the United States Constitution ............................................. 17 11 3. Review is necessary to protect the charters of first-class cities from unintentional preemption ..................................................... 19 4. Review is necessary to restore the right to bring an independent cause of action under the Open Public Meetings Act.
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    United States US Senator Education: Warren received a Navy scholarship to and graduated from Oregon State University in Chemical Engineering. Before college he was a national guards- man and after graduation served eighteen years as a commissioned naval officer and received training in nuclear - biological - chemical defense and deep sea diving. Occupation: Warren commercially fished for salmon in Washington and Alaska for forty plus years and currently is working as a casual longshoreman at the Tacoma and Seattle ports. Professional Qualifications: Warren’s military service, mental and physical strengths, life experiences, hard work. Plus willingness to accept difficult tasks qualifies him to meet the challenges of this office. Personal Information: Warren is a single man of excellent health with an active Warren E. Hanson mind, spirit and body. He is the father of three healthy daughters with two excellent Democratic sons-in-laws, three grandchildren and one additional young lady, a mother of four, PMB 444 who is like a fourth daughter. 4320 196th St SW Community Involvement: Warren has served in many church capacities, as a Red Cross Board Member and is a frequent blood donor. Lynnwood, WA 98036 Personal Views: Warren will work forcefully to secure our boarders, to drastically (425) 418-2736 reduce illegals, to be more selective in legal entries and to solve the many problems that interfere with a good life for all citizen Americans. Education: Occupation: Professional Qualifications: Personal Information: Community Involvement: Personal Views: Washington state is a great place to live and raise a family. We must preserve and build on the things that make us strong.
    [Show full text]
  • 145 Million Seattle Housing Levy on November Ballot
    A PUBLICATION OF THE LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE J U LY 2 0 0 9 INSIDE $145 Million Seattle Housing Seattle 3 Housing Levy Levy on November Ballot 2009 Legislative 4 Update By Sharon Lee or homelessness because of economic condi- On June 15 the Seattle City Council voted tions would also be able to access temporary Congress Passes unanimously to place a $145 million housing and short-term rental assistance. 5 HEARTH Act levy on the November ballot with the goal of Mayor Nickels proposed his levy package producing 1,670 rental units and 180 home to City Council after receiving recommenda- HUD FY ownership units for low-income families and tions from a citizen’s advisory committee 6 2010 Budget individuals. The city’s current $86 million co-chaired by former mayors Norm Rice and property-tax levy for housing, passed in 2002, Charles Royer. The advisory committee had Housing Renovation expires at the end of this year. originally recommended a larger levy at $167 7 & Green Jobs Program In May, Mayor Greg Nickels announced million, but this was cut back by the mayor. his proposal to renew Seattle’s housing levy. During testimony before City Council, Adams Square Family He proposed a seven-year, $145 million housing advocates including the Seattle/ Center in Tacoma 8 package that would go toward building and King County Coalition for the Homeless preserving affordable housing in the city for (SKCCH), Displacement Coalition, Low City Club of Seattle Income Housing Institute, Real Change and Hosts Forum renters and first-time home buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • S-Tt77 DRUGS and the CITIES: the FEDERAL 2ESPONSE
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. 1L/-s-tt77 DRUGS AND THE CITIES: THE FEDERAL 2ESPONSE HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMIT'rEE ON NARCOTICS ABUSE AND CONTROL HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 30, 1992 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control SCNAC-102-2-9 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 58-586 WASHINGTON: 1992 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing .office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Ornee, Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-039449-X Ii .- • SELECT COMMITrEE ON NARCOTICS ABUSE AND CONTROL (102d Congress) CHARLES B: RANGEL, New York, Chairman JACK BROOKS, Texas LAWRENCE COUGHLIN, Pennsylvania FORTNEY H. (PETE) STARK, California BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York JAMES H. SCHEUER, New York MICHAEL G. OXLEY, Ohio CARDISS COLLmS, llIinois F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., FRANK J. GUARINI, New Jersey Wisconsin DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida ROBERT K. DORNAN, California WILLIAM J. HUGHES, New Jersey TOM LEWIS, Florida MEL LEVINE, California JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma SOWMON P. ORTIZ, Texas WALLY HERGER, California LAWRENCE J. SMITH, Florida CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut • EDOLPHUS "ED" TOWNS, New York BILL PAXON, New York JAMES A. TRAFICANT, JR., Ohio WILLIAM F. CLINGER, JR., Pennsylvania KWEISI MFUME, Maryland HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina NITA M. WWEY, New York PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey JIM RAMSTAD, Minnesota ROMANO L. MAZZOLI, Kentucky RON DE LUGO, Virgin Islands GEORGE J. HOCHBRUECKNER, New York CRAIG A. WASHINGTON, Texas ROBERT E. ANDREWS, New Jersey COMMITl'EE STAFF EDWARD H. JURlTH, Staff Director PETER J.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Blue Ribbon Commission on the Delivery of Services to Children and Families
    Washington State Blue Ribbon Commission on the Delivery of Services to Children and Families Judge Anne Levinson (Ret.) – Co-Chair (Governor’s Representative) With experience drawn from more than two decades in public service, Judge Levinson serves as an advisor for government, non-profits and foundations. Among her roles in state and local government, she was the founding judge for Seattle’s Mental Health Court, one of the first therapeutic diversion courts in the country, the Chair of the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission, where she led efforts to stop energy deregulation and to improve service for consumers, and Deputy Mayor, Chief of Staff and Legal Counsel for Seattle Mayor Norm Rice, where she led many system reform initiatives, including the City’s first families & education levy. Judge Levinson served for ten years on the MacArthur Foundation’s Research Network on Mandated Community Mental Health Treatment, studying the effectiveness and policy implications of community mandated mental health treatment. In 2002, she served as Special Counsel to Washington State’s Select Committee on Adolescents in Need of Long Term Placement, developing policy and organizational recommendations for DSHS’ systems for foster care youth with complex needs. Judge Levinson provides independent oversight on issues related to police accountability for the City of Seattle, consults with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration on establishing therapeutic courts, and is helping improve the effective implementation of laws designed to reduce risk of violence due to firearms. She helped establish and continues to serve as a board member for the Center for Children & Youth Justice, a non-profit created to help lead reforms in Washington’s juvenile justice & child welfare systems, and is currently Vice-Chair of the State Public Disclosure Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Documents
    Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Monday, January 29, 1996 Volume 32ÐNumber 4 Pages 83±118 1 VerDate 28-OCT-97 08:13 Jan 12, 1998 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 W:\DISC\P04JA4.000 p04ja4 Contents Addresses to the Nation Interviews With the News Media State of the UnionÐ90 Exchange with reporters in the Oval OfficeÐ 87 Addresses and Remarks Letters and Messages Kentucky Ramadan, messageÐ83 Community in LouisvilleÐ102 Community policing, roundtable discussion Meetings With Foreign Leaders in LouisvilleÐ99 Israel, Foreign Minister BarakÐ87 Radio addressÐ83 Texas Resignations and Retirements Barbara Jordan, funeral service in General Services Administration, HoustonÐ85 Administrator, statementÐ114 Space Shuttle Endeavour astronauts, arrival Statements by the President in HoustonÐ86 U.S. Conference of MayorsÐ108 See also Resignations and Retirements George Burns, 100th birthdayÐ87 Communications to Congress Northern Ireland peace processÐ98 Space Shuttle Challenger, 10th anniversaryÐ Department of Transportation, message 115 transmitting reportÐ115 Libya, message reporting on U.S. national Supplementary Materials emergencyÐ88 Acts approved by the PresidentÐ118 Checklist of White House press releasesÐ117 Communications to Federal Agencies Digest of other White House Food assistance to developing countries, announcementsÐ115 memorandumÐ89 Nominations submitted to the SenateÐ116 WEEKLY COMPILATION OF regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (37 FR 23607;
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNING Magazine May 2015
    THE STATES AND LOCALITIES Mayy 2015 Caught on Camera Police departments are rushing to outfi t offi cers with body cameras. But it’s far more complicated than just pressing ‘record.’ GOV05_cover1.indd 1 4/10/15 2:22 PM Be the leader in public safety. When your success comes Are body cameras right for down to securing public safety, your organization? Insight understands there’s no Read our whitepaper: room for error. Our partnerships www.insight.com/bodycameras and experience make us the premier provider of public safety solutions, from infrastructure to ruggedized devices. __________Designer __________Creative Dir. 100 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630 916-932-1300 __________Editorial __________Prepress www.erepublic.com CMY grey T1 T2 T3 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 Page # __________Other ____________OK to go BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN VOL. 28, NO. 8 05.2015 FEATURES 24 VIDEO CAPTURE Police across the country are being outfi tted with body cameras. But it’s a lot more complicated than just hitting “record.” By Mike Maciag 32 THE NEXT CREDIT CRISIS? Governments confront predatory small business loans. By Liz Farmer 36 SECOND CHANCE CITY In Jersey City, N.J., ex-off enders are getting an opportunity to start their lives over again—and so is the familiar public fi gure trying to help them. By J.B. Wogan 44 THE SMARTEST TRAIN ON THE TRACK Commuter trains in Los Angeles used to be known mostly for being dangerous. Now the city is implementing the most advanced safety systems in the country.
    [Show full text]