DOCSLIB.ORG

125 © the Author(S) 2017 D.I. Campbell, P.M. Whittle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
125 © the Author(S) 2017 D.I. Campbell, P.M. Whittle INDEX1 NUMBERS AND SYMBOLS B 100% argument, 73 Back breeding, 31, 34 Backbreeding de-extinction, 15 Balance of nature, 99, 113 A Balance restoration argument, 99, 113 Alaskan red flat bark beetle, 66, 81 Beever, Jonathan, 69 American chestnut, 10, 72, 80 Biodiversity, 16 Animal welfare argument, 7, 115 Biodiversity restoration argument, 92, Anthropogenic de-extinction, 13 94, 96–98 Anthropogenic extinction, 6, 13 Black widow spider, 74 Anti-authenticist, 4, 50 Black-footed ferret, 9 Argument from coolness, 98 Blockstein, David, 6 Argument from the definition of Blue eyes in humans, 70 ‘extinction’, 74 Bucardo, 2, 3 Artificial womb, 40 Buller, Sir Walter, 23 Asian elephant, 10, 39, 72, 81, 83, 95 Assisted colonization, 16, 111 Auckland Island pigs, 71 C Aurochs, 35, 79, 106 Caesar, Julius, 35 Authentic de-extinction, 4, 13 Captive breeding, 104, 117 Authenticism, 4, 59, 84, 90, 113 Celia (the bucardo), 2, 3, 8, 11, 12, Authenticist, 4, 50 24, 82 Authenticity, 35, 84 Chimera, 16, 44, 108 Authenticity Question, 2, 7, 50, 84 Church, George, 39, 42 1 Notes: Page numbers followed by ‘n’ refers to notes. © The Author(s) 2017 125 D.I. Campbell, P.M. Whittle, Resurrecting Extinct Species, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69578-5 126 INDEX Clonal de-extinction, 15 F Cloning, 2, 3, 8, 15, 16, 39, 72, 75, Facilitated adaptation, 10, 72 83, 112 Freeze now and resurrect later, 102, Cohen, Shlomo, 119n2 105, 116 Conservation value, 20, 75, 77 Frozen zoo, 12, 107 Copying principle, 62, 63 Functional beauty, 18, 22, 84 CRISPR, 2, 34, 40 Functionally extinct, 11 Crist, Eileen, 102 Cryptobiosis, 14 Cryptobiotic de-extinction, 14, 66, 81 G Cuvier, Georges, 30 Gametic de-extinction, 14, 82 Gastric brooding frog, 12 Gene drive, 110 D Genesis argument, 64 Dawkins, Richard, 114, 119n1 Genetic determinism, 79 De-extinction, 2 Genetic drift, 104, 117 of gene, 9 Genetically depauperate, 9, 104 types of, 16 Genotype/phenotype theory (G/P Deferred de-extinction, 12, 100–103, theory), 84 105, 116 Gill, Jacquelyn, 36 Deleterious gene, 80 Göring, Herman, 31 Delmarva beggar’s tick, 20, 22 Grey wolf, 17 Discriminating de-extinction, 13, 80, 106, 118 DNA half-life, 36 H Dolly (the sheep), 1 Heck brothers, Lutz and Heinz, 32, 33, 35 Heck cattle, 32, 33 E Hennigian species concept, 65 Ecological beauty, 22, 24, 57, 62, 78, 84 Herridge, Teri, 36 Ecological proxy, 10, 40, 95 Holocene mass extinction, 6, 103, 111 Ecological restoration argument, 96 Hubris argument, 109, 112 Ecosystem de-extinction, 9, 11 Huia, 23, 81 Ecosystem engineering, 11, 17, 95 Hull, David, 65 Ehrenfeld, David, 22 Elliot, Robert, 57, 60 Embryonic de-extinction, 15 I Ethical Question, 8 Inbreeding depression, 9, 80, 104, Evolutionary potential, 9, 117 106, 117 Exacting de-extinction, 12, 22 Inexact de-extinction, 12 Extinction, 4, 66, 74 Interspecies gene de-extinction, 9, 10 of gene, 9 Interspecies primordial germ cell global, 16 transplantation (iPGCT), 16, 44, local, 16 75 INDEX 127 Intraspecies gene de-extinction, 9, 11 N iPGCT de-extinction, 16, 44 Naturalistic fallacy, 112 IUCN Red List, 4, 11, 91, 105 Nazis, 31, 33, 35 New Zealand, 110, 113 Ngati huia, 23 J Nominal de-extinction, 11, 104 Jurassic Park, 2, 36, 108 Non-anthropogenic de-extinction, 13 Justice argument, 94 Norton, Bryan, 21 Novak, Ben, 42, 45, 106 Numerical identity, 70 K Nussbaum, Martha, 114 Katipo spider, 74 Keystone species, 10, 17, 45, 95, 96, 117 O Oostvaardersplassen, 32 Outward beauty, 18, 22, 84 L Lascaux cave, 30 Least Concern de-extinction, 11, 104 P Leech project, 101 Pacific oyster, 72, 73, 82 Leopold, Aldo, 41, 45 Passenger pigeon, 53, 80, 92, 94, 106 Lévi-Strauss, Claude, 18 Phylogenetic argument, 68 Limbo, 5, 66, 67 Phylogenetic species concept, 68 Phylogenetic tree, 68 Picasso, 55 M Pleistocene Park, 36 Mammophant, 40, 81 Policing nature, 114 Mammoth steppe, 62 Population-boosting argument, 77 Managed de-extinction, 12 Precautionary Principle, 108 Managed extinction, 6 Precipitate de-extinction, 12, 105 Māori, 23 Primordial germ cell transplantation Martha (the passenger pigeon), 41 (PGCT), 16, 44 Matthiessen, Peter, 5 Pristineness, 20, 23 McKibben, Bill, 57 Pseudo de-extinction, 4, 13, 50 McMahan, Jeff, 114 Pyrenean ibex, see Bucardo Meine, Curt, 69 Mill, John Stuart, 114 Minteer, Ben, 6, 7, 58, 110, 112, 115 Q Mitochondria, 3, 13, 72, 82 Qualitative identity, 70 Moral hazard, 118 Moral hazard argument, 97, 108, 117 R Mouflon, 76 Reconstructive de-extinction, 15 Mutation load, 13, 80, 106 Red back spider, 74 128 INDEX Resource allocation argument, U 101–103, 117 Umbrella project, 101 Restoration thesis, 57 Undiscriminating de-extinction, 13 Resurrection thesis, 57, 58 Unmanaged de-extinction, 12 Rewilding, 32–35 Unnaturalness argument, 112–113 Rewilding argument, 106 Rewilding Europe, 33 Rolston, Holmes, 5, 20, 22 V R-selection, 114 Value aesthetic, 18 amenity, 18 S anthropocentric, 17 Sandler, Ronald, 58 cultural, 18, 23 Self-funding project, 100 economic, 17, 22 Shapiro, Beth, 34, 73, 77 intrinsic, 17, 21, 24 Siipi, Helena, 74 option, 17, 22 Smart politics argument, 97–98 scientific, 18, 22 Smith, Ian, 65 service, 17, 22 Somatic cell nuclear transfer, 15 Vulnerable de-extinction, 11 Soulé, Michael, 22 Speciation, 65 Species de-extinction, 9, 11 W Species membership criterion, 51 Woolly mammoth, 10, 41, 50, 64, 71, Species problem, 51, 54 74, 81, 95, 98 Switek, Brian, 6 Wyndham, John, 19 T Y Tauros Programme, 34 Yellowstone National Park, 17 Teachable moment argument, 116 Terminal extinction, 5, 66 Tiger, 71 Z Translocation, 16, 108, 117 Zimov, Sergey A., 38, 40 Triaging, 6, 103 Triffid, 19 Tyrannosaurus rex, 36.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Draft Genome of Extinct European Aurochs and Its Implications for De-Extinction
    The Draft Genome of Extinct European Aurochs and its Implications for De-Extinction Gilbert, M Thomas P; Sinding, Mikkel Holger Strander Published in: Open Quaternary DOI: 10.5334/oq.25 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Gilbert, M. T. P., & Sinding, M. H. S. (2016). The Draft Genome of Extinct European Aurochs and its Implications for De-Extinction. Open Quaternary, 2, [7]. https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.25 Download date: 29. sep.. 2021 Sinding, M-H S and Gilbert, M T P 2016 The Draft Genome of Extinct European Aurochs and its Implications for De-Extinction. Open Quaternary, 2: 7, pp. 1–9, DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.5334/oq.25 ENGAGEMENT PAPER The Draft Genome of Extinct European Aurochs and its Implications for De-Extinction Mikkel-Holger S. Sinding*,† and M. Thomas P. Gilbert*,‡,§ Whether as a cave painting, a mounted skeleton in a museum, or as described in ancient texts, the extinct aurochs has long mesmerized humans. In the context of genetics, aurochs have been targeted since the early days of the establishment of ancient DNA techniques, and for two decades analyses of its mitochon- drial genome have considerably deepened our knowledge of this animal. These studies have produced major discoveries, such as how cattle were domesticated from aurochs through at least two separate events. However, answers to many other aspects of its evolutionary history require more than the sequence from a single non-recombining marker such as the mitochondrial genome.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Extinction, Dualisms, and Reframing Conservation
    Washington University Law Review VOLUME 92 NUMBER 4 2015 GOING THE WAY OF THE DODO: DE-EXTINCTION, DUALISMS, AND REFRAMING CONSERVATION ALEJANDRO E. CAMACHO ABSTRACT De-extinction, a suite of selective breeding or biotechnological processes for reviving and releasing into the environment members or facsimiles of an extinct species, has been the subject of a recent surge of analysis in popular, scientific, and legal literature. Yet de-extinction raises more fundamental questions about the relationship between humans and nature and about the more and less useful ways that the law serves to navigate that relationship. Unfortunately, the endangered species, invasive species, and public land management laws likely to govern the revival and introduction of de-extinct species largely remain premised on an understanding of nature as static and easily divisible from human activity. In these contexts, the law habitually privileges and even actively promotes what it identifies as natural and native over the unnatural and exotic. Through the example of de-extinction, this article illustrates the limitations of the law’s reliance on these crude dualisms. Currently, de- extinct species will often be obstructed as non-native and introduced (even Professor of Law and Director, Center for Land, Environment, and Natural Resources, University of California, Irvine School of Law; Member Scholar, Center for Progressive Reform. The author thanks the other participants in conferences, workshops, and meetings at the National Geographic Society, the Stanford Law School, and the National Academy of Sciences for their useful insights. I am indebted to Dan Burk, Michael Robinson-Dorn, and especially Andrew Torrance for helping me work through many of the issues explored in the paper, as well as Ava Azad, Andrew Contreiras, John Frank, and Andrea Ringer for their valuable research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Draft Genome of Extinct European Aurochs and Its Implications for De-Extinction
    Sinding, M-H S and Gilbert, M T P 2016 The Draft Genome of Extinct European Aurochs and its Implications for De-Extinction. Open Quaternary, 2: 7, pp. 1–9, DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.5334/oq.25 ENGAGEMENT PAPER The Draft Genome of Extinct European Aurochs and its Implications for De-Extinction This article has been corrected here: Mikkel-Holger S. Sinding*,† and M. Thomas P. Gilbert*,‡,§ Whether as a cave painting, a mounted skeleton in a museum, or as described in ancient texts, the extinct aurochs has long mesmerized humans. In the context of genetics, aurochs have been targeted since the early days of the establishment of ancient DNA techniques, and for two decades analyses of its mitochon- drial genome have considerably deepened our knowledge of this animal. These studies have produced major discoveries, such as how cattle were domesticated from aurochs through at least two separate events. However, answers to many other aspects of its evolutionary history require more than the sequence from a single non-recombining marker such as the mitochondrial genome. Of these questions, perhaps one of the most fascinating is whether domestic cattle and wild aurochs continued to cross-breed following the initial domestication event, and if so, to what extent? Resolving this question would provide valuable new insights into how our ancestors domesticated cattle and subsequently manipulated their gene pool. In addition, it will become increasingly relevant as we enter the de-extinction debate. Are we witnessing the recovery of information that might, in the not too distant future, allow the re-creation of aurochs through selective back breeding of carefully chosen modern cattle lineages? Keywords: De-extinction; back breeding; ancient genomics; aurochs-cattle hybridization Introduction – aurochs genetics in the pre- heavily biased towards the European population.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Zoo Design: Alternative Futures in the Anthropocene
    Post-Zoo Design: Alternative Futures in the Anthropocene by Rua Alshaheen A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2019 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Renata Hejduk, Chair Braden Allenby Ed Finn Darren Petrucci ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2019 ©2019 Rua Alshaheen All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Public awareness of nature and environmental issues has grown in the last decades and zoos have successfully followed suit by re-branding themselves as key representatives for conservation. However, considering the fast rate of environmental degradation, in the near future, zoos may become the only place left for wildlife. Some scholars argue that we have entered a new epoch titled the “Anthropocene” that postulates the idea that untouched pristine nature is almost nowhere to be found.1 Many scientists and scholars argue that it is time that we embraced this environmental situation and anticipated the change. 2 Clearly, the impact of urbanization is reaching into the wild, so how can we design for animals in our artificializing world? Using the Manoa School method that argues that every future includes these four, generic, alternatives: growth, discipline, collapse, and transformation3, this dissertation explores possible future animal archetypes by considering multiple possibilities of post zoo design. Keywords: Nature, Environment, Anthropocene, Zoo, Animal Design, Future, Scenario 1 Paul J. Crutzen, “Geology of Mankind,” Nature 415, no. 6867 (January 3, 2002): 23. 2 Jamie Lorimer, Wildlife in the Anthropocene (Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2015); Frank Oldfield et al., “The Anthropocene Review: Its Significance, Implications and the Rationale for a New Transdisciplinary Journal,” The Anthropocene Review 1, no.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Extinction, Dualisms, and Reframing Conservation
    Washington University Law Review Volume 92 Issue 4 2015 Going the Way of the Dodo: De-Extinction, Dualisms, and Reframing Conservation Alejandro E. Camacho University of California, Irvine School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Animal Law Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Population Biology Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Alejandro E. Camacho, Going the Way of the Dodo: De-Extinction, Dualisms, and Reframing Conservation, 92 WASH. U. L. REV. 849 (2015). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol92/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Review VOLUME 92 NUMBER 4 2015 GOING THE WAY OF THE DODO: DE-EXTINCTION, DUALISMS, AND REFRAMING CONSERVATION ALEJANDRO E. CAMACHO ABSTRACT De-extinction, a suite of selective breeding or biotechnological processes for reviving and releasing into the environment members or facsimiles of an extinct species, has been the subject of a recent surge of analysis in popular, scientific, and legal literature. Yet de-extinction raises more fundamental questions about the relationship between humans and nature and about the more and less useful ways that the law serves to navigate that relationship. Unfortunately, the endangered species, invasive species, and public land management laws likely to govern the revival and introduction of de-extinct species largely remain premised on an understanding of nature as static and easily divisible from human activity.
    [Show full text]