DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Assessment of the Potential Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts from Petroleum Operations in the Harper Basins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Assessment of the Potential Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts from Petroleum Operations in the Harper Basins Liberia Petroleum Regulatory Authority (LPRA) Strategic Assessment of the Potential Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts from Petroleum Operations in the Harper Basins May 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.0 Reasons for Bid Rounds .......................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 Description Tentative Schedule of Petroleum Activities ........................................................................ 7 4.0 PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT................................................................................................. 7 4.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2 Demand for Oil and Gas .................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Fiscal Regime ..................................................................................................................................... 10 4.4 Fiscal Instruments ............................................................................................................................. 11 4.5 Windfall Profits Taxes ....................................................................................................................... 12 4.6 Bonuses ............................................................................................................................................. 12 4.7 Royalties ............................................................................................................................................ 12 4.8 Surface Rental or land/acreage rental fees ...................................................................................... 12 Production Sharing .................................................................................................................................. 13 4.10 Ring-Fencing .................................................................................................................................... 13 4.11 Loss Carry-forwards ........................................................................................................................ 13 5.0 Bid Round .............................................................................................................................................. 13 5.1 Historical Perspectives on Bid Rounds .............................................................................................. 14 5.2 Joint Venture ..................................................................................................................................... 15 6.0 Economic Evaluation ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.1 Assumptions ...................................................................................................................................... 15 6.2 Results ............................................................................................................................................... 15 6.3 Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 16 6.4 Selling of Share (Privatization) .......................................................................................................... 19 7.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 19 7.1 Affected Environment ....................................................................................................................... 19 7.2 Potential Impacts and Alternatives ................................................................................................... 20 7.3 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 21 7.4 The ESIA Process ............................................................................................................................... 21 7.4.1 Introduction to the Process ....................................................................................................... 21 1 | P a g e 7.5 Mitigation and Monitoring Required ................................................................................................ 22 7.6 Regulatory Review ............................................................................................................................ 22 7.6.1 Legislative Framework ............................................................................................................... 22 7.6.2 Constitution of the Republic of Liberia ...................................................................................... 24 7.6.3 Environment Protection and Management Law of the Republic of Liberia .............................. 24 7.6.4 Effluent Discharge License ......................................................................................................... 25 7.6.5 Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal License ............................................................................ 25 7.6.6 Pollution Emission License ......................................................................................................... 25 7.6.7 National Environmental Policy ................................................................................................... 25 7.6.8 The Act Creating the Environmental Protection Agency ........................................................... 25 7.6.9 National Energy Policy ............................................................................................................... 26 7.6.10 Statements of Policy ................................................................................................................ 26 7.6.11 New Petroleum Law of Liberia ................................................................................................. 26 7.7 Institutional Framework.................................................................................................................... 28 7.7.1 Environmental Protection Agency ............................................................................................. 28 7.7.2 Liberian Coast Guard .................................................................................................................. 29 7.7.3 Ministry of Mines and Energy .................................................................................................... 29 7.7.4 Ministry of Public Works ............................................................................................................ 29 7.7.5 Ministry of Health ...................................................................................................................... 30 7.7.6 Ministry of Internal Affairs ......................................................................................................... 30 7.7.7 Ministry of Agriculture ............................................................................................................... 30 7.7.9 National Fishery and Aquaculture Authority ............................................................................ 30 7.8 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Process .................................................................... 30 7.9 General Background of Liberia .......................................................................................................... 31 7.9.1 Coastal Plains ............................................................................................................................. 32 7.9.2 Rolling Hills ................................................................................................................................. 32 7.9.3 Plateau and Tablelands .............................................................................................................. 32 7.9.4 Northern Highlands .................................................................................................................... 33 7.9.5 Meteorological Setting ............................................................................................................... 33 7.9.6 Precipitation ............................................................................................................................... 33 7.9.7 Temperature and Sunshine ........................................................................................................ 33 7.9.8 Wind ........................................................................................................................................... 34 7.9.9 Relative Humidity ....................................................................................................................... 35 7.10 Geological Setting ........................................................................................................................... 36 2 | P a g e 7.10.1 Stratigraphy .............................................................................................................................. 37 7.10.2 Structure .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mangrove Reserves in Five West African Countries
    MANGROVE RESERVES IN FIVE WEST AFRICAN COUNTRIES BACKGROUND BRIEF Mangrove ecosystems are crucial for maintaining and sequestering carbon stocks, and preserving biodiversity. They can provide sustainable natural resources and protection from natural disasters to the people living in and around them. The Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities program is organizing a workshop on REDD+ and Mangroves in West Africa to be held in Ghana. This document provides background on protected areas containing significant mangrove stands within the five focal countries (Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone) for the workshop. These five countries lie contiguously on the coast of West Africa. There are mangrove stands in all five countries (figure 1), but these stands have declined since 1980 (table 1). Figure 1: Extent of Mangrove Forests in West Africa (Giri et al. 2011a) This document focuses on protected areas that contain significant mangroves stands, and are listed on the World Database on Protected Areas. This database includes designated UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserves, World Heritage Sites, Ramsar Sites, and IUCN Protected Areas. Other legal designations for the sites discussed are given in parentheses after the site name. All sites discussed are Ramsar Sites, that is, they are included on The Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance. This regularly updated list was originally compiled as a result of the Convention on Wetlands, signed in Ramsar, Iran in 1971, in which member countries committed to “stem the progressive encroachment on and loss of wetlands”(The Convention on Wetlands 1971). The list of areas described in this document is not exhaustive, but is intended to give readers an overview of existing mangrove reserves within the countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated List of Wetlands of International Importance Liberia
    Ramsar Sites Information Service Annotated List of Wetlands of International Importance Liberia 5 Ramsar Site(s) covering 95,879 ha Gbedin Wetlands Site number: 1,628 | Country: Liberia | Administrative region: Nimba county Area: 25 ha | Coordinates: 07°16'N 08°48'W | Designation dates: 24-08-2006 View Site details in RSIS Gbedin Wetlands. 24/08/06; Nimba; 25 ha; 07°16'N 008°48'W. Situated in the north of Liberia, the area is largely a swamp, also including a man-made wetland with irrigation system that includes channels, ditches, dams and drainages. The paddy fields provide a good feeding ground for many bird species including Palaearctic and Nearctic migrants as well as resident breeders such as the Plover Charadrius dubius, Bar-Godwit Limosa lapponica and the Forbes' Plover C. forbesi. The endemic otter shrew Micropotamogale lamottei also occurs in the area. The suitability of the swamp for rice cultivation prompted the government in 1960 to solicit technical assistance to introduce modern agricultural methods to local rice farmers in order to discourage shifting cultivation. The project, the Gbedin Swamp Rice Project, has employed a large number of local people, especially up to the onset of the civil war in 1990. The site is currently used for subsistence farming (rice), hunting and fishing, while the surroundings are used for logging and mining, as well as multiple crop farming. The use of fertilizers and pesticides are potential threats. In November 2005 elementary students were asked by the Ramsar CEPA focal point to depict the wise use concept through arts. Ramsar site no.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Lake Piso RIS 2007 E
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2006-2008 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2 nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3 rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . Cecelia-Smith Kollie DD MM YY Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 4th Street Sinkor Monrovia, Liberia Cell #02316-832666 Designation date Site Reference Number Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: FFebruary 13, 2007 3. Country: Liberia 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Environmental Threats and Opportunities Assessment (Etoa)
    LIBERIA ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES ASSESSMENT (ETOA) FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2008 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by DAI. LIBERIA ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES ASSESSMENT (ETOA) FINAL REPORT Submitted to: USAID/Liberia, Office of Economic Growth Task Order EPP-I-02-06-00021-00 Submitted by: Development Alternatives Inc. 7600 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 200 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: (301) 771 7600 Fax: (301) 771 7777 Cover Photo: +/- 100ha section of forest cleared for cassava production at the proposed Lake Piso National Park site. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................................................................................. XIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................ XIX BACKGROUND ....................................................................... XXXVII PART 1: STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................ 1 SECTION 1: THREATS TO ECOSYSTEMS, INCLUDING TERRESTRIAL, COASTAL, WETLANDS AND MARINE AREAS .... 2 1.0 FOREST ECOSYSTEMS .................................................. 2 1.1 THREATS TO FOREST ECOSYSTEMS .............................. 4 1.1.1 Illegal and quasi-legal logging .......................... 4 1.1.2 Shifting cultivation ............................................ 5 1.1.3 The
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Conservation Actions for Coastal Wetlands of the Gulf of Guinea Results from an Ecoregional Workshop, Pointe-Noire, Congo, 19-22 April 2005
    Priority conservation actions for coastal wetlands of the Gulf of Guinea Results from an Ecoregional Workshop, Pointe-Noire, Congo, 19-22 April 2005 Tim Dodman, Mame Dagou Diop, Jérôme Mokoko Ikonga & Abdoulaye Ndiaye Priority conservation actions for coastal wetlands of the Gulf of Guinea Results from an Ecoregional Workshop, Pointe-Noire, Congo, 19-22 April 2005 Tim Dodman¹, Mame Dagou Diop², Jérôme Mokoko Ikonga³ & Abdoulaye Ndiaye² 1. Hundland, Papa Westray, Orkney KW17 2BU, UK 2. Wetlands International, BP 8060, Dakar, Sénégal 3. WCS-Congo, BP 14537 / 2522 Brazzaville, République du Congo Wetlands International 2006 © Wetlands International 2006. ISBN 9058820335 and 978-9058820335 This publication should be cited as follows: Dodman, T., Diop, M.D., Mokoko Ikonga, J. & Ndiaye, A. (eds.) 2006. Priority conservation actions for coastal wetlands of the Gulf of Guinea: Results from an Ecoregional Workshop, Pointe-Noire, Congo, 19-22 April 2005. Wetlands International, Dakar, Senegal. Published by: Wetlands International, www.wetlands.org Available from: Wetlands International BP 8060, Dakar, Yoff-Diamalaye, Senegal, www.wetlands.org Cover illustration: Pulling in fishing net, Songolo, Congo; crossing Conkouati Lagoon, Congo; Ecoregional Workshop participants at the Gorges de Diosso, Congo. Photos by Tim Dodman. Photographs by: Tim Dodman, Placide Kaya, Jacques Adjakpa, Environment Plus & Wetlands International. Layout by: Charles Bèye & Tim Dodman. Translations (English – French) by: Wency Gatabariwa. Priority conservation actions for coastal wetlands of the Gulf of Guinea Results from an Ecoregional Workshop, Pointe-Noire, Congo, 19-22 April 2005 The Ecoregional Workshop in Pointe-Noire, Congo was hosted and supported by the Ministry of Forest Economy and the Environment of the Govermnent of the Republic of Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review for the Participatory Regional Assessment of the Shellfisheries in 11 Countries from Senegal to Nigeria
    WOMEN SHELLFISHERS AND FOOD SECURITY PROJECT Literature Review for Activity 1: Participatory Regional Assessment of the Shellfisheries in 11 Countries from Senegal to Nigeria December 2020 This publication is available electronically in the following locations: The Coastal Resources Center https://www.crc.uri.edu/projects_page/the-usaid-women-shellfishers-and-food-security- project/ USAID Development Clearing House https://dec.usaid.gov/dec/content/search.aspx For more information on the Women Shellfishers and Food Security Project, contact: USAID Women Shellfishers and Food Security Coastal Resources Center Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island 220 South Ferry Rd. Narragansett, RI 02882 USA Tel: 401-874-6224 Fax: 401-874-6920 Email: [email protected] Citation: Chuku, E. O., Abrokwah, S., Adotey, J., Effah, E., Okyere, I., Aheto D. W., Duguma, L., Oaks, B., Adu-Afarwuah, S. (2020). Literature Review for the Participatory Regional Assessment of the Shellfisheries in 11 Countries from Senegal to Nigeria. USAID Women Shellfishers and Food Security Project. Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island. Narragansett, RI, USA. WSFS2020_05_CRC. 102 pp. Authority/Disclaimer: Prepared for USAID under the BAA-AFR-SD-2020 Addendum 01, (FAA No. 7200AA20FA00031) awarded on August 12, 2020 to the University of Rhode Island and entitled “Women Shellfishers and Food Security.” This document is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the Project team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the cooperating organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ci-Gef Project Agency
    CI-GEF PROJECT AGENCY Project Document Improve sustainability of mangrove forests and coastal mangrove areas in Liberia through protection, planning and livelihood creation – building blocks towards Liberia’s marine and coastal protected areas LIBERIA March 11, 2016 (resubmitted) i PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE: Improve sustainability of mangrove forests and coastal mangrove areas in Liberia through protection, planning and livelihood creation – as a building block towards Liberia’s marine and coastal protected areas PROJECT OBJECTIVE: To strengthen the conservation and sustainable use of globally important mangrove forests through effective participatory land-use planning and establishment of marine and coastal protected areas in at least 35% of Liberia’s mangroves PROJECT OUTCOMES: 20% of priority mangrove areas have been identified, delineated, and management plans to safeguard them completed Priority mangrove forest land-use planning integrated and mainstreamed in wider landscape and subjected to 5-year monitoring and evaluation program for adaptive management 15% of priority mangroves are protected in buffer areas by addressing drivers of deforestation and improving people’s livelihoods, Capacity and awareness of key government agencies and local communities on mangrove forest conservation and sustainable use substantially improved COUNTRY(IES): Liberia GEF ID: 5712 GEF AGENCY(IES): Conservation International (CI) CI CONTRACT ID: OTHER EXECUTING Environmental Protection DURATION IN MONTHS: 36 PARTNERS: Agency, Liberia; CI-Liberia
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Biodiversity Conservation to the Proposed Lake Piso Nature
    Report prepared for the project “Taking Biodiversity Conservation to the Proposed Lake Piso Nature Reserve in Liberia” an initiative of Farmers Associated to Conserve the Environment funded by Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund Biodiversity and environmental Impacts of Human Activities on the proposed Lake Piso Nature Reserve February 5, 2007 By Richard Siaffa Sambolah 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Abbreviations 3 Acknowledgement 4 Foreword 5 Summary 6 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Background to Lake Piso Conservation Efforts 7 1.2 Background to the CEPF Grant 8 1.3 Implementation of the Project 8 1.4 Methodological issues 8 2 Description of the proposed Lake Piso Nature Reserve 9 3 Results of the Surveys 11 3.1 Biodiversity inventory 11 3.1.1 Ecosystems 11 3.1.2 Fauna 13 3.1.3 Flora 15 3.1..4 Threats 15 3.2 Socio-economic surveys 16 3.2.1 Administration 17 3.2.2 Demography 17 3.2.3 Livelihoods 17 3.2.4 Dependence of local people on biodiversity resources 18 4 Discussions 18 4.1 Ecosystems and habitats 18 4.2 Fauna 19 4.3 Flora 20 4.4 Threats 21 4.5 Socio-economic parameters 21 5 Other achievements of the project 22 6 Lessons learned 22 7 Conclusion and Recommendations 22 8 References cited. 24 Appendix 27 2 Abbreviations 3 Cs the three objectives of forest management in Liberia: Community, Commercial, and Conservation CEPF Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund CI Conservation International EIA Environmental Impact Assessment FACE Farmers Associated to Conserve the Environment FDA Forestry Development Authority FFI Fauna & Flora International
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Adequacy of Reporting to the Ramsar Convention on Change in the Ecological Character of Wetlands
    Marine and Freshwater Research, 2020, 71, 117–126 © CSIRO 2020 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18328 Supplementary material A review of the adequacy of reporting to the Ramsar Convention on change in the ecological character of wetlands N. C. DavidsonA,B,J, L. DinesenC, S. FennessyD, C. M. FinlaysonB,E, P. GrillasF, A. GrobickiG, R. J. McInnesB,H and D.A. StroudI ANick Davidson Environmental, Queens House, Ford Street, Wigmore, HR6 9UN, UK. BInstitute for Land, Water & Society, Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Mitchell Drive, PO Box 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia. CNatural History Museum of Denmark, Section of Biodiversity, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Building 3, 3rd floor, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. DKenyon College, Biology Department, 202 North College Road, Gambier, OH 43022, USA. EIHE Delft, Institute for Water Education, PO Box 3015, NL-2601 DA Delft, Netherlands. FTour du Valat, Research Institute for Mediterranean wetlands, Le Sambuc, F-13200 Arles, France. GGreen Climate Fund, Songdo Business District, 175 Art Center-daero Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22004, South Korea. HRM Wetlands & Environment Ltd, 6 Ladman Villas, Littleworth, Oxfordshire, SN7 8EQ, UK. IJoint Nature Conservation Committee, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough, PE1 1JY, UK. JCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] This Supplementary material provides the following: 1. a list of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites) subject to an Article 3.2 report to the Ramsar Convention Secretariat, and their status, as reported by the Secretariat to Ramsar Conferences of the Contracting Parties (COPs) since 2002; 2. numbers of Article 3.2 reports made to the Ramsar Secretariat by Contracting Parties and by third parties between 2002 and 2018; and 3.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    February 15 , 2019 Acknowledgement The Board of Directors, the National Biodiversity Steering Committee, the Office of the Executive Director of the EPA, Hon. Nathaniel T. Blama, and the Management of the Environmental Protection Agency of Liberia, the Biodiversity Coordination Unit of the MEAs Department, extend thanks and appreciation to the United Nations Environment Programme, Global Environmental Facility and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, for the financial and technical assistance during the preparation of this report. Special thanks and appreciation go to the consulting team including, Dr. Samuel N. Koffa, Asst. Prof. Jerome Nyenka, Mr. Richard S Sambolah, Mr. Forkpa Dennis, Mr. Phoree Lawor, Miss Sando Ross, and Mr. Berexford Jallah Geo-spatial reference focal point at the EPA whose role was critical in telling the story of biodiversity in our country through words and figures. The Agency and the Biodiversity Coordinating Unit remain grateful to line ministries and agencies, Non- governmental Organizations (both national & international), academic and research institutions, local communities’ leaders and civil society organizations for their strong cooperation during the preparation of the report. Your assistance helped to improve the quality of the report and we will always remain thankful to you all. J.S. Datuama Cammue Project Coordinator National Focal Point Convention on Biological Diversity 1 Executive Summary This Sixth National Report of Liberia to the CBD is organized into 7 sections, excluding the introduction. Section I presents and discusses the 20 National Targets that are being pursued, as embodied in the Revised National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP 2017). It also defines the rationale for each National Target, matches each National Target with its most relevant Aichi Biodiversity Target, and lists pertinent websites, web links and files, as among the key deliverables.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Liberia's OP6 Country Programme Strategy SGP COUNTRY
    SGP COUNTRY PROGRAMME STRATEGY FOR OP6 LIBERIA OP6 RESOURCES ( 1.26 MILLION US$) Core funds = US$ 400 ,000 STAR funds : = US$ 500 ,000 Requested Other Funds to be mobilized: = US$ 250 ,000 In - kind = US$ 11 0 ,000 1.0 S GP country programme - summary background 1.1 Liberia’s Country Programme Strategy (CPS) for Operational Phrase Six ( OP 6 ) is prepared to support non - governmental organizations and Community - Based Organizations (CBOs) to build their capacities and provi de funds for management of natural resources both within the protected areas and the ir buffer zone s ; conservation of environment in productive landscapes ; productive uses of renewable energy that are environmentally sound; support innovative demonstration s and capacity building work in sustainable land management practices and other innovative capacity building in cost effective technologies which may lead to the reduction and eliminati on of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP) . In addition, the OP - 6 strate gic programme will seek to reconcile global environmental goals with Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) and work towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals ( SDGs ) to improve the income generating capacity of the vulnerable population there by co ntrib uting to the PRS and Agenda for Economic Transformation ( AEF 2012 - 2017 ) efforts of Liberia and u tilization of community protected areas within the biological hot - spots outside the gazette forest reserves. As indicated in the OP6 project document, the progra mme will develop strategy for social inclusion as well . The programme will further develop indicators to measure progress or success in projects implementation that supports the GEF’s strategic goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Assessment of the Potential Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts from Petroleum Operations in the Harper Basins
    Liberia Petroleum Regulatory Authority (LPRA) Strategic Assessment of the Potential Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts from Petroleum Operations in the Harper Basins May 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 Reasons for Bid Rounds ........................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 Description Tentative Schedule of Petroleum Activities ......................................................................... 7 4.0 PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................. 7 4.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2 Demand for Oil and Gas ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Fiscal Regime ..................................................................................................................................... 10 4.4 Fiscal Instruments .............................................................................................................................. 11 4.5 Windfall Profits Taxes ........................................................................................................................ 12 4.6 Bonuses
    [Show full text]