Road Casualty Review Stockton-On-Tees 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Road Casualty Review Stockton-On-Tees 2014 Road Casualty Review Stockton-on-Tees 2014 Economic Regeneration and Transport Big plans for an outstanding Borough Road Casualty Review 2014 Contact: Anthony Wilton, Tel No. (01642) 527311 Date: November 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. In May 2011 the Department for Transport (DfT) provided the Strategic Framework for Road Safety. The long term vision was to continue the downward trend in road casualties and also focus on reducing accidents in relatively high risk groups such as cyclists and children in deprived areas. 2. No targets or hard forecast has been set by Government, although performance will be monitored against key indicators. The main indicators are: • Number of fatalities • Number of serious injuries • Car occupants casualties • Motorcyclists casualties • Pedal Cyclists casualties • Pedestrians casualties • Child casualties 3. Since no specific targets have been set by Government, Stockton Borough Council accepted the targets agreed at Cleveland Casualty Reduction Group. These targets are: • *40% reduction in the number of people killed by 2020. • 40% reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured. (KSI) • 50% reduction in the number of children (0-15) killed or seriously injured. *Although due to small numbers this will be monitored rather than a specific target. 4. Alongside these targets a list of vulnerable road user groups will also be closely monitored, these are: • Powered Two Wheelers • Elderly Drivers • Young Drivers • Child casualties • Pedal Cycle casualties • Pedestrian casualties Pedestrians pedal cyclists and PTW casualties have seen a fall from the previous year. Young drivers have seen a marginal rise. Child casualties overall have seen a fall; however child passengers have seen a slight rise. 5. Regional comparison shows the North East Authorities have experienced a rise of 2.4% in Killed or Serious Injuries (KSIs). However Stockton’s figures have remained constant in 2014. Overall Totals 6. Overall there were 276 reported road traffic collisions in the Borough of Stockton, resulting in 393 casualties (1 fatal, 49 serious and 343 slight). This represents the lowest number of casualties and the second lowest number of KSI casualties since accidents were recorded by Stockton Borough Council. Road user groups Car Casualties 7. In 2014 there were 240 car casualties. The breakdown in severity of car occupants casualties were • 14 serious • 226 slight Pedestrian Casualties 8. In 2014 there were 49 pedestrian casualties. The breakdown in severity of pedestrian casualties were: • 1 fatal • 13 serious • 35 slight Pedal Cycle Casualties 9. In 2014 there were 51 Pedal cycle casualties. The breakdown in severity of pedal cycle casualties were: • 10 serious • 41 slight Motorcycle Casualties 10. In 2014 there were 24 Motorcycle casualties. The breakdown in severity of motorcycle casualties were: • 9 serious • 15 slight Location of collision Collisions at Junctions 11. Collisions are more likely to occur at points of greatest conflict, which usually means some form of junction. In 2014 63% of all collisions occurred at a junction within the Borough. Collisions by Road Classifications 12. The road network hierarchy within the Borough ranges from high standard Trunk Roads (which are the responsibility of the Highway England) to unclassified estate roads. The only rising collision trends are ‘A’ class Trunk and Principal on a dry road surface during the hours of darkness, which have seen a rise of 2 and 6 respectively on the previous year. Collisions by Road Type 13. It should be noted that there have been no rising trends year on year in the last three years for any of the road types. However roundabouts during the day on a dry road surface have seen an increase over the last three years. Collisions by Speed Limit 14. The majority of the road network is urban residential and in 2014, 41% of collisions occurred on a 30mph road, which accounted for 83% of all pedestrian collisions and 66% of all pedal cycle collisions. Collisions at crossing facilities 15. Collisions at crossing facilities include within 50 metres of a crossing facility. Collisions at Pedestrian Crossing Facilities accounted for 42 (15%) of all collisions in 2014, a decrease from the previous year. All crossing facilities have seen a fall from previous year, except Toucan crossings which remained constant. CONTENTS Executive Summary CONTEXT Targets Internal monitoring Regional comparisons The cost of collisions Page(s) CHAPTER 1 - OVERALL TOTALS, TARGETS AND TRENDS Casualties in Stockton - on -Tees 1-3 Collisions in Stockton - on -Tees 3 CHAPTER 2 - CASUALTIES Car occupants 4-5 Pedestrians 5-6 Pedal Cyclists 6-7 Motorcyclists 8-9 Bus occupants 9 CHAPTER 3 - LOCATION OF COLLISIONS Collisions at Junctions 10 Junction List 2012-14 11 Collisions by Road Type 12 Route Action Lists 2012-14 13-16 Collisions by Speed Limit 17 Casualties by Speed Limit 17 Collisions at Crossing Facilities 18 APPENDICES – Total Collision plot Appendix 1 Killed & Seriously injured Collision plot Appendix 2 Child Collision plot Appendix 3 Local Indicators - Casualties Appendix 4 Car Collision plot Appendix 5 Pedestrian Collision plot Appendix 6 Pedal Cycle Collision plot Appendix 7 Motorcycle Collision plot Appendix 8 Bus Collision plot Appendix 9 Local Safety Schemes Appendix 10 Vehicle Activated Signs & Speed Indication Devices plot Appendix 11 Total Collision plot – Northern area Appendix 12 Total Collision plot – Central area Appendix 13 Total Collision plot – Eastern area Appendix 14 Total Collision plot – Western area Appendix 15 CONTEXT This report is published annually and incorporates road collision and casualty statistics and trends in the Borough. It assists in providing the basis for many of the road safety studies/initiatives throughout the year. TARGETS In May 2011 the Department for Transport (DfT) provided the Strategic Framework for Road Safety. The long term vision was to continue the downward trend in road casualties and also to reduce relatively high risk groups such as cyclists and children in deprived areas more quickly. No targets or hard forecast has been set by Government, although performance will be monitored against key indicators. The main indicators are: . Number of fatalities . Number of serious injuries . Car occupants casualties . Motorcyclists casualties . Pedal Cyclists casualties . Pedestrians casualties . Child casualties Since no specific targets have been set by Government Stockton Borough Council accepted the targets agreed by the Cleveland Casualty Reduction Group. The targets are based on the 2005–2009 average as per the Strategic Framework for Road Safety. The aim is to achieve the following: - *40% reduction in the number of people killed by 2020. - 40% reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured. (KSI) - 50% reduction in the number of children (0-15) killed or seriously injured. (*due to small numbers involved this will be monitored rather than a specific target.) The table below shows the specific baseline for Stockton and the 2020 target figures. A three year moving average will “iron out” much of the statistical variation, giving a truer indication of longer term casualty trends. TARGET FIGURES 2011 – 2020 2005- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 2009 Target Baseline KSI (Actual) 62 69 50 50 46 KSI 76 (3 year 61 58 60 56 moving average) Child KSI (0-15) 10 8 7 8 6 Actual Child KSI 11 (0-15) (3 year 11 9 8 8 moving average) VULNERABLE ROAD USERS MONITORING CATEGORIES The table below shows the categories that Stockton has agreed to monitor. It should be noted that no specific reductions targets have been set for 2020 in each of these groups. INTERNAL MONITORING CATEGORIES Category 2005- 09 Base Actual Actual Change Line Figures Figures 2014 2013 Powered two wheelers 39 24 -4 Casualties 29 Elderly Casualties 17 12 9 -3 Drivers 33 (65+) Collisions 33 34 +1 Young Casualties 58 36 38 +2 Drivers Collisions 103 (17-24) 62 63 -2 All 70 49 45 -4 Pedal Child 10 9 -1 Casualties Cycle 15 (0-15) Pedestrian 23 26 18 -8 In car 25 12 15 +3 Pedal Cycle 62 51 40 -11 Casualties Pedestrian Casualties 54 72 49 -23 REGIONAL COMPARISONS 2013 2014 Baseline KSI KSI KSI STOCKTON - ON - TEES 50 50 76 MIDDLESBROUGH 40 36 51 HARTLEPOOL 19 25 35 REDCAR & CLEVELAND 34 48 54 DURHAM 201 182 216 DARLINGTON 41 26 43 GATESHEAD 61 57 83 NEWCASTLE 77 79 105 N.TYNESIDE 49 48 58 S.TYNESIDE 23 36 47 NORTHUMBERLAND 135 159 190 SUNDERLAND 70 75 102 NORTHERN REGION 800 821 --- Note: Local Authorities in the Cleveland Police area are using an average of 2005-09 for the baseline whilst other Local Authorities are using different years. THE COST OF COLLISIONS COLLISIONS * Cost (£) Number TOTAL COST (£) Fatal 1,953,783 1 1,953,783 Serious 223,870 46 10,298,020 Slight 23,544 229 5,391,576 The financial cost of collisions in Stockton during 2014 was over £17 million. 1 OVERALL TOTALS, TARGETS AND TRENDS CASUALTIES IN STOCKTON - ON - TEES 1.1 In 2014 there were 1 fatal, 49 serious and 343 slight casualties. Overall there were 276 reported road traffic collisions, in the Borough of Stockton - on - Tees, resulting in 393 casualties. The table below shows the casualty trends over the last 10 years. This is the second year in a row where Stockton has seen the lowest number of casualties ever recorded. When collisions are recorded by the police a consistent set of data is collated known as Stats 19. Local Authorities make use of this data by identifying trends that assist in prioritising sites for remedial measures if required or for education or road safety campaigns. Injuries are categorised into three groups which are: Fatal injury is where death occurs in less than 30 days as a result of the collision. Natural causes or suicide are not included. Serious injury are fracture, internal injury, severe cuts, crushing, burns, concussion, severe shock requiring hospital treatment and detention in hospital.
Recommended publications
  • Middlesbrough College 3
    Map and Directions h t A19 u A689 o M s Greatham e e Tees Bay A689 Graythorp T Wynyard r e v Village Newton Bewley i R A178 NORTH SEA Thorpe Larches A1185 Wolviston Coatham REDCAR Foxton A177 A19 Cowpen Bewley Elstob BILLINGHAM Dormanstown Stillington Thorpe Thewles Marske-by- Haverton Hill 5 Whitton Norton 8 the-Sea Saltburn- Port Clarence A10 Carlton Kirkleatham by-the-Sea South A17 Bishopton 4 Roseworth Bank Yearby Redmarshall New Marske A1 A66 Grangetown 7 Little Stainton 4 F Brotton Lazenby B12 North Ormesby Wilton Upleatham 4 6 A17 9 Skelton STOCKTON-ON-TEES MIDDLESBROUGH Dunsdale Eston Hartburn Normanby 73 North Park End A1 Skelton Thornaby- A172 A66 Acklam Sadberge Elton on-Tees Ormesby Boosbeck Lingdale A66 Guisborough Longnewton A19 Marton Margrove Park A171 Stanghow A135 A174 Hutton Gate Charltons A67 Coulby Newham Moorsholm Ingleby Barwick Nunthorpe 3 A171 Stainton Licence number PU100029016 7 Hutton Village . A67 1 Hemlington A Thornton Middleton Maltby St George A1044 Newton under Roseberry Durham Tees B A172 High Leven 1 Valley Airport Newby 3 6 Middleton Aislaby Yarm 5 All rights reserved One Row Hilton . Great Ayton 4 A A19 6 6 Tanton Commondale B12 7 Seamer New Row Low Worsall 3 Little Ayton Maltby 17 Kirklevington A Kildale © Crown Copyright Stokesley Easby Girsby 0 5 10 KM A 8 1 0 7 4 1 6 Port Clarence A P D P A R O O i R R R T N I v W O V C E T E e R L R L A R S r A C O I D R N H D O W R E T E N AT P A e C SE R e E K s D R R A O O O A A R D D TH D OR A RTF O STA R S A E 1 W 7 O 8 LL B D IGNE E BR P O RD T Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT
    Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: 7/2010/0236 Installation of 3 No. 2 megawatt wind turbines and foundations and associated underground cables, FULL APPLICATION anemometer mast, crane, hard standings, access tracks, DESCRIPTION : temporary construction compound, switchgear house and ancillary infrastructure NAME OF APPLICANT : Wind Prospect ADDRESS : Land east of Spring Lane / Foxton Lane, Sedgefield ELECTORAL DIVISION : David Walker, Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER : 03000 261054, [email protected] DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS Purpose of the report 1. This report concerns a detailed planning application, reference 7/2010/0236/DM for 3 wind turbines and associated works at land east of Spring Lane / Foxton Lane. 2. The applicant has lodged an appeal with the Planning Inspectorate because the Local Planning Authority has not determined the application within the statutory 16 week period. Once such an appeal is lodged, it is no longer possible for the application to be determined locally. The decision can only be made by an Inspector on behalf of the Secretary of State. 3. In order to defend the Local Planning Authority’s position at appeal, this report sets out the planning issues and asks that the County Planning Committee indicates what decision it would have been minded to make had it been able to do so. The Site 4. The application site is located on an area of agricultural land which stands to the east of spring lane / Foxton Lane approximately 1.7km to the south of Sedgefield and 0.8 km north of Foxton. 5. The proposed site is located in an area of undulating farmland adjacent to Shotton Beck The area consists of a number small farmsteads and clusters of residential properties with the settlements of Sedgefield to the north, Mordon to the west, Great Stainton and Elstob to the south west, Foxton, Bishopton and Stillington to the south and Thorpe Thewles and Thorpe Larches to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Routes Our Bus Routes Operate Monday to Friday, College Term Time Only
    Bus Routes Our Bus Routes operate Monday to Friday, college term time only. Please note that buses will depart 30 minutes earlier on a Friday evening. All passengers are required to arrive at their designated stop 5 minutes prior to the arrival time. Please give a clear signal to the driver to stop the vehicle in good time. Seatbelts must be worn at all times. SSF01 - Route One From Marton Road From SSFC - Sainsbury’s side of the road Marton Road / Stamford Street (dep) 07:42 Stockton Sixth Form College (dep) 15:45 James Cook Hospital 07:49 Lord Westbury - Westbury Street 15:47 The Blue Bell - Acklam 07:55 Thontree Rd 15:49 Coronation Hotel / Mandale Road 07:58 Thornaby Centre - Water Board 16:04 Mandale Rd / Heythrop Rd 08:00 Bassleton Lane 16:05 Trenchard Avenue / Spitfire Roundabout 08:06 Trenchard Avenue / Spitfire Roundabout 16:07 Bassleton Lane 08:07 Mandale Rd / Heythrop Rd 16:17 Thornaby Centre - Water Board 08:08 Coronation Hotel / Mandale Road 16:25 Thontree Rd 08:11 The Blue Bell - Acklam 16:33 Lord Westbury - Westbury Street 08:15 James Cook Hospital 16:40 Stockton Sixth Form College (arr) 08:40 Marton Road / Stamford Street (arr) 16:46 SSF02 - Route Two From Billingham From SSFC - The college side of the road Billingham – The Swan Hotel (dep) 08:05 Stockton Sixth Form College (dep) 15:45 Whitehouse Road/Skripka Drive 08:08 Junction Rd/William Newton Centre 15:55 High Grange 08:10 Norton High Street/Leven Road 15:57 Marsh House Ave 08:14 Billingham Green 15:59 Billingham – Town Centre (std 2) 08:16 Billingham – Town Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Water Hardness
    Water hardness Northumbrian Water is responsible for supplying a reliable source of safe, clean, drinking water. The majority of the company supply area is soft to slightly hard. Why some water is hard If your water comes from underground limestone or chalk rocks, or contains a proportion of groundwater, then the chances are that it is hard. The hardness is caused by the presence of minerals dissolved from the ground and rocks by the water. Northumbrian Water is compliant with the appropriate regulations and has no plans to introduce softening to hard water areas. Please find below a PDF document of the water hardness for the Northumbrian Water area, along with the measurement of hardness in degrees Clarke, for use with dishwashers and washing machines. You can check out how hard the water is in your area here by viewing the harness zones. What does this mean for my appliances? If your water is hard you will notice that your kettle and other water heating appliances become furred up with a white scale. You may also find this scale in your bath, sink and shower. It isn't harmful but can be a bit of a nuisance. Hard water can also affect appliances like washing machines, dishwashers and steam irons. If you are installing a new dishwasher, your plumber may ask you for the hardness of your water. If the manufacturer’s instructions show hardness using a different factor, you can convert the values as follows: x 2.5 = calcium carbonate (CaCO3) mg/l x 0.174 = Degrees Clarke Total hardness (as mg/l Ca) x 0.25 = French Degrees x 0.142 = German Degrees We do not change the natural hardness of the region’s water through treatment, it is left to the customer, either domestic or commercial, to decide whether artificial softening is the right choice for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Proceedings of the SEPTEMBER
    SEDGEFIELD TOWN COUNCIL Minutes of the proceedings of the SEPTEMBER SPECIAL Meeting of the Council held at 6.15 p.m. in the Council Offices, Sedgefield, on Monday 10th September 2018. MINUTES Present Cllr. Mel Carr (Chairman) Cllr. Gloria Wills (Vice-Chairman) and Cllrs. Allan Blakemore, Mark Cant, Ann Carr, Alda Hummelinck, Chris Lines, Julie Towler, Alf Walton, Fiona Warrand and Mavis Wayman Officer Dr Jane Ayre (Town Clerk) 1. Apologies: Cllrs. Vanessa Carmichael, David Brown and Leo McCormack. 2. Declaration of interest: None. 3. Presentation by Mr Gavin Cordwell-Smith and Ms Katie Rumble of Hellens Group detailing their interest in land on the North side of Beacon Lane, Sedgefield: The Chair, Cllr Mel Carr, welcomed Mr Gavin Cordwell-Smith and Ms Katie Rumble of Hellen Group and reminded all that this meeting has been requested by Hellens Group in order to explain to the Town Council their interest in land to the North side of Beacon Lane. Mr Cordwell-Smith and Ms Rumble would present their information and then there would be an opportunity for Cllrs to as questions. Hellens Group representatives had earlier confirmed that when appropriate they would be hosting public consultation events for members of the community to attend. Mr Cordwell-Smith introduced himself and colleague and circulated to all a map showing with a red boundary the land, approximately 30 acres, purchased by Hellens Group earlier in the year on the North side of Beacon Lane. The purpose of this meeting was a courtesy to inform the Town Council of this purchase and to be open with communications so as to avoid inaccurate rumours.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications and Decisions: North East of England: 6 December 2017
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 6268 PUBLICATION DATE: 06/12/2017 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 27/12/2017 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 248 8521 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 13/12/2017 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede each section, where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners Copies of Applications and Decisions can be inspected free of charge at the
    [Show full text]
  • 9 October 2013
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 6132 PUBLICATION DATE: 09 October 2013 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 30 October 2013 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 248 8521 Website: www.gov.uk The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 23/10/2013 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede each section, where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk Copies of Applications and Decisions can be inspected free of charge at the Office of the Traffic Commissioner in
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE Friday, 12 September 2008 10.00 a.m. Council Chamber, Council Offices, Spennymoor AGENDA AND REPORTS Printed on Recycled Paper DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE Friday, 12 September 2008 AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST To notify the Chairman of any items that appear later in the agenda in which you may have an interest. (Pages 1 - 4) 3. MINUTES To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 15 th August 2008. (Pages 5 - 8) 4. APPLICATIONS - BOROUGH MATTERS To consider the attached schedule of applications, which are to be determined by this Council. (Pages 9 - 30) 5. DEVELOPMENT CONTROL - ADDITIONAL APPLICATIONS To consider any applications which need to be determined as a matter of urgency. 6. DEVELOPMENT BY SEDGEFIELD BOROUGH COUNCIL To consider the attached schedule of applications for consent to develop, which are to be determined by this Council. (Pages 31 - 34) 7. CONSULTATIONS FROM DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL To consider the attached schedule detailing an application which is to be determined by Durham County Council. The view and observations of this Council have been requested. (Pages 35 - 46) Members are reminded that the applications to be considered under Items 4,5,6 and 7 together with the plans submitted and all representations on the applications are available for reference in the relevant files in the Council Chamber, 30 minutes before the meeting or before that in the Development Control Section. 8. COUNTY DECISIONS A schedule of applications, which have been determined by Durham County Council is attached for information. (Pages 47 - 48) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications and Decisions 2 July 2014
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 6151 PUBLICATION DATE: 02 July 2014 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 23 July 2014 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 248 8521 Website: www.gov.uk The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 16/07/2014 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede each section, where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk Copies of Applications and Decisions can be inspected free of charge at the Office of the Traffic Commissioner in Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham County Council LA 100019779
    C D E F G H J K Index of places served Index of places of interest South Shields West Jesmond Howden Barnard Castle .................................................... D7 Killhope Lead Mining Centre ............................ A4 Newcastle Hadrian Percy South Shields Road Main County Durham A L Eldon Square 20 50 50A Beamish Museum ................................................ F2 Low Force ............................................................ B5 Wallsend Annfield Plain ................................................ F3 Lanchester .................................................... E3 Binchester Roman Fort .................................... 6 6A 21 25 28 28A F5 Lumley Castle........................................................ G3 Jesmond Arnison Centre ............................................ G3 Lanehead ........................................................ A4 Bowes Museum, The............................................ D7 Net Park ................................................................ H5 45 X9 X10 X12 X21 X30 Chichester Aycliffe ............................................................ G6 Langdon Beck................................................ B5 Public Transport Map Causey Arch ........................................................ F2 Pow Hill Country Park ........................................ D3 X31 X32 X45 X46 X70 X71 Aycliffe Industrial Estate ........................ G6 Langley Moor ................................................ G4 Walkergate De Vere Staley Hall Hotel ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.551
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.551 Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties COUN~Y OF CLEVELAND AND ITS BOUNDARY WIT DURHAM LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION POII ENGLAND REPORT NO 551 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRIGS FSVA Members Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Professor G E Cherry BA FRTPI FRIGS Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT. HON. NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF CLEVELAND AND ITS BOUNDARY WITH DURHAM COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 2 September 1986 we wrote to the County Councils of Cleveland and Durham announcing our intention to undertake reviews of the counties under section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of these letters were sent to all the principal local authorities and parishes in Cleveland and Durham and in the surrounding counties of Cumbria, Northumberland and North Yorkshire. Copies were also sent to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests, the headquarters of the main political parties, and government departments with an interest, as well as to the Northern Regional Health Authority, British Telecom, the North Eastern Electricity Board, the Northern Gas Board, the Northumbrian Water Authority, the English Tourist Board, Port Authorities in the Counties, the Editors of the Municipal Journal and Local Government Chronicle, local television and radio stations serving the area, and the National and County Associations of Local Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Gommission for England Report No.416 LOCAL Coveefflmetcv BOUKDARY" COMMISSION "FOR ESGLAHD
    Local Government Boundary Gommission For England Report No.416 LOCAL COVEEfflMETCV BOUKDARY" COMMISSION "FOR ESGLAHD CHAIHld&lT . -Sir Nicholas Morrison KCB MEMBERS '• Lady.Bowden Mr J T Brockbank DL .'••". .'-... Mr: R R Thornton CBE DL - . .^. .,.:."•". ':;;..':. • ' Mr D P Harrison :.-."::; ' ,..,'"-• - . Professor G: E Cherry THE RT. EON MICHAEL HESELTINE MP SECRETARY OP STATE FOR THE ERYIRONTiffiNT 1. In a letter dated 30 July 1980, Sedgefield District Council requested us to review the "boundary between the district of Sedgefield in the County of Durham and the borough of Stockton-on-Tees, in the County of Cleveland. The request arose out of Sedgefield District Council's parish boundary review. Two changes were proposed as follows: 1) the transfer of part of Stillington Parish in Sedgefield District to Whitton Parish in Stockton-on-Tees Borough in the County of Cleveland. 2) The transfer of part of the hamlet known as Thorpe Larches, part of Grindon Parish in Stockton-on-Tees Borough, to Sedgefield Parish in Sedgefield District. 2. The first change was proposed because the village of Stillington is divided between the two counties, with the major part in the borough of Stockton-on-Tees. Following a public meeting of the residents of both parishes there was unanimous agreement that the village should be united as a whole with a majority view that it be included in the County of Cleveland. The second change was proposed because the hamlet of Thorpe Larches is split, by the county boundary and the majority of residents appear to want the hamlet to be united in Sedgefield District,in County Durham.
    [Show full text]