DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:Cond-Mat/9707301V1 29 Jul 1997 I Hoeia Aspects Theoretical III 1983 and 1951 Between Period the Survey: Historical Introduction II I Nrdcint Uesmer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:Cond-Mat/9707301V1 29 Jul 1997 I Hoeia Aspects Theoretical III 1983 and 1951 Between Period the Survey: Historical Introduction II I Nrdcint Uesmer Random Matrix Theories in Quantum Physics: Common Concepts Thomas Guhr, Axel M¨uller–Groeling, and Hans A. Weidenm¨uller Max–Planck–Institut f¨ur Kernphysik, Postfach 103980, 69029 Heidelberg, Germany (July 10, 1997) We review the development of random–matrix theory (RMT) during the last decade. We em- phasize both the theoretical aspects, and the application of the theory to a number of fields. These comprise chaotic and disordered systems, the localization problem, many–body quantum systems, the Calogero–Sutherland model, chiral symmetry breaking in QCD, and quantum gravity in two dimensions. The review is preceded by a brief historical survey of the developments of RMT and of lo- calization theory since their inception. We emphasize the concepts common to the above–mentioned fields as well as the great diversity of RMT. In view of the universality of RMT, we suggest that the current development signals the emergence of a new “statistical mechanics”: Stochasticity and general symmetry requirements lead to universal laws not based on dynamical principles. PACS numbers: 02.50.Ey, 05.45.+b, 21.10.-k, 24.60.Lz, 72.80.Ng Keywords: Random matrix theory, Chaos, Statistical many–body theory, Disordered solids MPI preprint H V27 1997, submitted to Physics Reports Contents I Introduction 4 II Historical survey: the period between 1951 and 1983 9 A RMT:theearlyperiod ................................ ........... 9 B From 1963 to 1982: consolidation and application . .................... 15 C Localizationtheory ................................ ............. 18 D Thesupersymmetrymethod .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............ 20 E RMTandclassicalchaos .............................. ............ 21 III Theoretical aspects 22 A ResultsofclassicalRandomMatrixTheory. .................. 22 arXiv:cond-mat/9707301v1 29 Jul 1997 1 Correlationfunctions .............................. ............ 23 2 Formoftheprobabilitydensity. .............. 24 3 Analytical results for the Gaussian ensembles . ................... 25 4 Analytical results for the rotation non–invariant case . ...................... 27 5 Two–levelcorrelationfunctions. ................ 28 B Analysisofdataandspectralobservables . ................... 30 1 Unfoldingprocedure................................ ........... 30 2 Nearestneighborspacingdistribution . ................. 32 3 Long–rangespectralobservables . ............... 33 4 Fouriertransforms................................. ........... 35 5 Superpositionofindependentspectra . ................ 36 6 GSEtestofGOEdata .................................. ....... 38 7 Ergodicity ........................................ ........ 38 C Introductiontosupersymmetry . ............... 39 1 Supersymmetric representation of the generating function...................... 40 2 Saddle–point approximation and non–linear σ model ........................ 42 D Scatteringsystems................................. ............. 43 1 1 Generalaspects .................................... ......... 43 2 ScatteringandRandomMatrixTheory . ............. 44 E Wavefunctionsandwidths . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............. 46 1 Results derived in the framework of classical RMT . .................. 46 2 Results derived in the framework of the supersymmetry method .................. 48 F Crossover transitions in spectral correlations . ....................... 50 1 Diffusioninthespaceofordinarymatrices . ................ 50 2 Diffusioninthespaceofsupermatrices . ............... 52 3 Numericalandanalyticalresults . ............... 54 G Crossovertransitions in other observables . ..................... 56 H Parametric level motion and parametric level correlations........................ 56 1 Levelmotionandcurvature. ............ 56 2 Parametriccorrelationfunctions . ................ 58 3 Gaussianrandomprocesses. ............ 61 IV Many–body systems 62 A Atomicnuclei ...................................... .......... 62 1 Basicfeaturesofnuclei ............................. ............ 63 2 Spectralfluctuations............................... ............ 64 3 Resonancesandscattering . ............ 66 4 Modelsystems...................................... ........ 68 5 Invariancesandsymmetries. ............. 69 B Atomsandmolecules ................................. ........... 71 1 Atoms ............................................. ..... 71 2 Molecules......................................... ........ 73 C Generalaspects .................................... ........... 75 1 To what extent do the Gaussian ensembles model many–body systemsproperly?. 75 2 Aremany–bodysystemschaotic? . ............ 75 V Quantum chaos 76 A Historicaldevelopment ............................. .............. 76 B Dynamicallocalization ............................. .............. 77 C Billiards ......................................... .......... 78 D Demonstrativeexperiments. ............... 82 1 Microwavecavities................................. ........... 82 2 Acousticsandelastomechanics . .............. 84 E Quantumdots....................................... ......... 85 1 Magnetoconductanceand level correlations . .................. 87 2 Coulomb blockade regime and wave function statistics . .................... 90 F Hydrogenatominastrongmagneticfield. ................ 91 G Modelsystems...................................... .......... 93 1 Coupledoscillators ................................ ........... 93 2 AnisotropicKeplerproblem. ............. 95 H Classicalphasespaceandquantummechanics . .................. 95 I TowardsaproofoftheBohigasconjecture . ................. 96 1 Periodicorbittheory ............................... ........... 96 2 Supersymmetricfieldtheory . ............ 98 3 Structuralinvariance .............................. ............ 99 J Summary:quantumchaos .............................. ........... 100 VI Disordered mesoscopic systems 100 A Energyeigenvaluestatistics. ................. 102 1 Diffusive regime and Wigner–Dyson statistics . .................. 102 2 Ballisticandlocalizedregimes . ............... 106 3 Critical distribution at the metal insulator transition . ....................... 109 B Persistentcurrents................................ .............. 112 1 Earlytheory,andthethreeexperiments. ................ 113 2 Analytical theory for non–interacting electrons . ..................... 115 2 3 Theories with electron–electron interaction . .................... 118 C Transportinquasione–dimensionalwires . ................... 119 1 Universalconductancefluctuations. ................ 119 2 Dorokhov–Mello–Pereyra–Kumarequation . ................ 122 3 Non–linear σ modelforquasi1dwires............................... 125 4 Equivalence of non–linear σ modelandDMPKequation . 128 D Randombandmatrices ................................ ........... 130 E Transportinhigherdimensions . ............... 132 1 Scalingtheoryanddistributions . ............... 132 2 Renormalizationgroupanalysis . .............. 133 3 Supersymmetryapproaches. ............ 136 F Interaction–assistedcoherenttransport . ..................... 138 1 Ideaandscalingpicture............................. ............ 138 2 Microscopicapproachesandrefinements. ................ 140 3 Finiteparticledensity.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............. 142 G RMTincondensedmatterphysics—asummary . .............. 143 VII Field theory and statistical mechanics 144 A RMT and interacting Fermions in one dimension . .................. 144 1 Continuousmatrixmodel.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ........... 146 2 UseofDyson’sBrownianmotionmodel . ............. 147 3 Furtherresults.................................... .......... 148 B QCDandchiralRandomMatrixTheory . ............. 149 1 Evidenceforgenericfeatures . .............. 149 2 Chiralrandommatrixensembles . ............. 150 3 Thechiralphasetransition . ............. 151 4 Currentlinesofresearchandopenproblems . ................ 152 C Random matrices in field theory and quantum gravity . ................... 152 1 Preliminaryremarks................................ ........... 152 2 Planarapproximationtofieldtheory . .............. 153 3 RMT and two-dimensional quantum gravity . .............. 154 VIII Universality 156 IX Common concepts 160 A Synopsis .......................................... ......... 160 B Discussion ........................................ .......... 162 3 FIG. 1. Nearest neighbor spacing distribution for the “Nuclear Data Ensemble” comprising 1726 spacings (histogram) versus s = S/D with D the mean level spacing and S the actual spacing. For comparison, the RMT prediction labelled GOE and the result for a Poisson distribution are also shown as solid lines. Taken from Ref. 1. I. INTRODUCTION During the last ten years, Random Matrix Theory (RMT) underwent an unexpected and rapid development: RMT has been successfully applied to an ever increasing variety of physical problems. Originally, RMT was designed by Wigner to deal with the statistics of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of complex many–body quantum systems. In this domain, RMT has been successfully applied to the description of spectral fluctuation properties of atomic nuclei, of complex atoms, and of complex molecules. The statistical fluctuations of scattering processes on such systems were also investigated. We demonstrate these statements in Figs. 1, 2 and 3, using examples taken from nuclear physics. The histogram in Fig. 11 shows the distribution of spacings of nuclear levels versus the variable s, the actual spacing in units of the mean level spacing D. The data set
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Holographic S–Matrix
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server On the Holographic S{matrix I.Ya.Aref’eva Steklov Mathematical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences Gubkin St.8, GSP-1, 117966, Moscow, Russia Centro Vito Volterra, Universita di Roma Tor Vergata, Italy [email protected] Abstract The recent proposal by Polchinski and Susskind for the holographic flat space S– matrix is discussed. By using Feynman diagrams we argue that in principle all the information about the S–matrix in the interacting field theory in the bulk of the anti- de Sitter space is encoded into the data on the timelike boundary. The problem of locality of interpolating field is discussed and it is suggested that the interpolating field lives in a quantum Boltzmannian Hilbert space. 1 According to the holographic principle [1, 2] one should describe a field theory on a manifold M which includes gravity by a theory which lives on the boundary of M.Two prominent examples of the holography are the Matrix theory [3] and the AdS/CFT corre- spondence [4, 5, 6]. The relation between quantum gravity in the anti-de Sitter space and the gauge theory on the boundary could be useful for better understanding of both theories. In principle CFT might teach us about quantum gravity in the bulk of AdS. Correlation functions in the Euclidean formulation are the subject of intensive study (see for example [7]-[21]). The AdS/CFT correspondence in the Lorentz formulation is considered in [22]-[29].
    [Show full text]
  • The Reality of Casimir Friction
    Review The Reality of Casimir Friction Kimball A. Milton 1,*, Johan S. Høye 2 and Iver Brevik 3 1 Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA 2 Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway; [email protected] 3 Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-405-325-3961 x 36325 Academic Editor: Sergei D. Odintsov Received: 17 March 2016; Accepted: 21 April 2016; Published: date Abstract: For more than 35 years theorists have studied quantum or Casimir friction, which occurs when two smooth bodies move transversely to each other, experiencing a frictional dissipative force due to quantum electromagnetic fluctuations, which break time-reversal symmetry. These forces are typically very small, unless the bodies are nearly touching, and consequently such effects have never been observed, although lateral Casimir forces have been seen for corrugated surfaces. Partly because of the lack of contact with observations, theoretical predictions for the frictional force between parallel plates, or between a polarizable atom and a metallic plate, have varied widely. Here, we review the history of these calculations, show that theoretical consensus is emerging, and offer some hope that it might be possible to experimentally confirm this phenomenon of dissipative quantum electrodynamics. Keywords: Casimir friction; dissipation; quantum fluctuations; fluctuation-dissipation theorem 1. Introduction The essence of quantum mechanics is fluctuations in sources (currents) and fields. This underlies the great successes of quantum electrodynamics such as explaining the Lamb shift [1] and the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Green-Kubo Formula for Open Systems
    Green-Kubo formula for open systems Abhishek Dhar Anupam Kundu (CEA, Grenoble) Onuttom Narayan (UC, Santa Cruz) Keiji Saito (Tokyo University) Raman Research Institute SNBose, Kolkata, India November 2010 (RRI) July 2010 1 / 31 Outline Introduction to the problem. Green-Kubo formula for thermal conductivity. Anomalous heat conduction in low-dimensional systems. Conductance for open systems: Landauer formula, Fluctuation theorem. Exact linear response formula for conductance. Frequency dependent conductance. Summary. Classical treatment. (RRI) July 2010 2 / 31 Response to small temperature difference J T TL R For small ∆T = TL − TR and system size L : ∆T Fourier0s law implies : j ∼ κ L The thermal conductivity κ is expected to be an intrinsic material property. (RRI) July 2010 3 / 31 Computing κ j L κ = ∆T Computing κ is difficult since this is a nonequilibrium problem. In equilibrium we know that e−βH(x,v) Prob[x, v] = P (x, v) = 0 Z Hence we can find the expectation value of any physical observable, say A(x, v). Thus Z Z hAi = dx dv A(x, v) P0(x, v) . For a system with one end at T and the other end at T + ∆T , in general, one does not know Prob(x, v) even in the nonequilibrium steady state. Hence difficult to find j = hj(x, v)i. (RRI) July 2010 4 / 31 Green-Kubo linear response theory For small deviations from equilibrium caused by small changes of Hamiltonian, one can do perturbation theory. Start with equilibrium phase space distribution P0(x, v) corresponding to Hamiltonian H. In this case hJi = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Noise and Quantum Measurement
    Quantum noise and quantum measurement Aashish A. Clerk Department of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T8 1 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Quantum noise spectral densities: some essential features 2 2.1 Classical noise basics 2 2.2 Quantum noise spectral densities 3 2.3 Brief example: current noise of a quantum point contact 9 2.4 Heisenberg inequality on detector quantum noise 10 3 Quantum limit on QND qubit detection 16 3.1 Measurement rate and dephasing rate 16 3.2 Efficiency ratio 18 3.3 Example: QPC detector 20 3.4 Significance of the quantum limit on QND qubit detection 23 3.5 QND quantum limit beyond linear response 23 4 Quantum limit on linear amplification: the op-amp mode 24 4.1 Weak continuous position detection 24 4.2 A possible correlation-based loophole? 26 4.3 Power gain 27 4.4 Simplifications for a detector with ideal quantum noise and large power gain 30 4.5 Derivation of the quantum limit 30 4.6 Noise temperature 33 4.7 Quantum limit on an \op-amp" style voltage amplifier 33 5 Quantum limit on a linear-amplifier: scattering mode 38 5.1 Caves-Haus formulation of the scattering-mode quantum limit 38 5.2 Bosonic Scattering Description of a Two-Port Amplifier 41 References 50 1 Introduction The fact that quantum mechanics can place restrictions on our ability to make measurements is something we all encounter in our first quantum mechanics class. One is typically presented with the example of the Heisenberg microscope (Heisenberg, 1930), where the position of a particle is measured by scattering light off it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on Six-Dimensional Gauge Theories
    ILL-(TH)-97-09 hep-th/9712168 A Note on Six-Dimensional Gauge Theories Robert G. Leigh∗† and Moshe Rozali‡ Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL 61801 July 9, 2018 Abstract We study the new “gauge” theories in 5+1 dimensions, and their non- commutative generalizations. We argue that the θ-term and the non-commutative torus parameters appear on an equal footing in the non-critical string theories which define the gauge theories. The use of these theories as a Matrix descrip- tion of M-theory on T 5, as well as a closely related realization as 5-branes in type IIB string theory, proves useful in studying some of their properties. arXiv:hep-th/9712168v2 14 Apr 1998 ∗U.S. Department of Energy Outstanding Junior Investigator †e-mail: [email protected] ‡e-mail: [email protected] 0 1 Introduction Matrix theory[1] is an attempt at a non-perturbative formulation of M-theory in the lightcone frame. Compactifying it on a torus T d has been shown to be related to the large N limit of Super-Yang-Mills (SYM) theory in d + 1 dimensions[2]. This description is necessarily only partial for d > 3, since the SYM theory is then not renormalizable. The SYM theory is defined, for d = 4 by the (2,0) superconformal field theory in 5+1 dimensions [3, 4], and for d = 5 by a non-critical string theory in 5+1 dimensions [4, 5]. The situation of compactifications to lower dimensions is unclear for now (for recent reviews see [7, 8]).
    [Show full text]
  • Random Matrix Theory in Physics
    RANDOM MATRIX THEORY IN PHYSICS π π Thomas Guhr, Lunds Universitet, Lund, Sweden p(W)(s) = s exp s2 : (2) 2 − 4 As shown in Figure 2, the Wigner surmise excludes de- Introduction generacies, p(W)(0) = 0, the levels repel each other. This is only possible if they are correlated. Thus, the Poisson We wish to study energy correlations of quantum spec- law and the Wigner surmise reflect the absence or the tra. Suppose the spectrum of a quantum system has presence of energy correlations, respectively. been measured or calculated. All levels in the total spec- trum having the same quantum numbers form one par- ticular subspectrum. Its energy levels are at positions 1.0 xn; n = 1; 2; : : : ; N, say. We assume that N, the num- ber of levels in this subspectrum, is large. With a proper ) s smoothing procedure, we obtain the level density R1(x), ( 0.5 i.e. the probability density of finding a level at the energy p x. As indicated in the top part of Figure 1, the level density R1(x) increases with x for most physics systems. 0.0 In the present context, however, we are not so interested 0 1 2 3 in the level density. We want to measure the spectral cor- s relations independently of it. Hence, we have to remove FIG. 2. Wigner surmise (solid) and Poisson law (dashed). the level density from the subspectrum. This is referred to as unfolding. We introduce a new dimensionless en- Now, the question arises: If these correlation patterns ergy scale ξ such that dξ = R (x)dx.
    [Show full text]
  • JT Gravity and Random Matrix Ensembles
    JT Gravity And Random Matrix Ensembles Edward Witten Strings 2019, Brussels I will describe an extension of this work (Stanford and EW, \JT Gravity And The Ensembles of Random Matrix Theory," arXiv:1907:xxxxx). We generalized the story to include * time-reversal symmetry * fermions * N = 1 supersymmetry This morning Steve Shenker reported on random matrices and JT gravity (Saad, Shenker, and Stanford, \JT Gravity as a Matrix Integral" arXiv:1903.11115 ). * time-reversal symmetry * fermions * N = 1 supersymmetry This morning Steve Shenker reported on random matrices and JT gravity (Saad, Shenker, and Stanford, \JT Gravity as a Matrix Integral" arXiv:1903.11115 ). I will describe an extension of this work (Stanford and EW, \JT Gravity And The Ensembles of Random Matrix Theory," arXiv:1907:xxxxx). We generalized the story to include * fermions * N = 1 supersymmetry This morning Steve Shenker reported on random matrices and JT gravity (Saad, Shenker, and Stanford, \JT Gravity as a Matrix Integral" arXiv:1903.11115 ). I will describe an extension of this work (Stanford and EW, \JT Gravity And The Ensembles of Random Matrix Theory," arXiv:1907:xxxxx). We generalized the story to include * time-reversal symmetry * N = 1 supersymmetry This morning Steve Shenker reported on random matrices and JT gravity (Saad, Shenker, and Stanford, \JT Gravity as a Matrix Integral" arXiv:1903.11115 ). I will describe an extension of this work (Stanford and EW, \JT Gravity And The Ensembles of Random Matrix Theory," arXiv:1907:xxxxx). We generalized the story to include * time-reversal symmetry * fermions This morning Steve Shenker reported on random matrices and JT gravity (Saad, Shenker, and Stanford, \JT Gravity as a Matrix Integral" arXiv:1903.11115 ).
    [Show full text]
  • Giuseppe Gaeta – List of Publications∗
    Giuseppe Gaeta { List of publications∗ Books [B1 ] G. Gaeta: \Nonlinear symmetries and nonlinear equations" (series: Math- ematics and Its Application, vol. 299); Kluwer Academic Publishers (Dor- drecht) 1994; ISBN 0-7923-3048-X [B2 ] G. Gaeta and G. Cicogna: \Symmetry and perturbation theory in non- linear dynamics" (series: Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. M57); Springer (Berlin) 1999; ISBN 3-540-65904 Monographs [M1 ] G. Gaeta: \Bifurcation and symmetry breaking"; Physics Reports 189 (1990), n. 1, 1-87 [M2 ] G. Gaeta, C. Reiss, M. Peyrard and T. Dauxois: \Simple models of DNA nonlinear dynamics"; Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 17 (1994), n.4, 1-48 Edited volumes [E1 ] D. Bambusi and G. Gaeta (eds.): \Symmetry and Perturbation Theory" (Proceedings of Torino Workshop, I.S.I., December 1996); G.N.F.M. { C.N.R. (Gruppo Nazionale di Fisica Matematica { Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche), Roma, 1997 [E2 ] A. Degasperis and G. Gaeta (eds.): \Symmetry and Perturbation Theory II { SPT98" (Proceedings of Roma Workshop, Universit´a\La Sapienza", December 1998); World Scientific, Singapore, 1999; ISBN 981-02-4166-6 ∗Only research and review papers and monographs are listed; in particular, this list does not include contributions to conferences or schools proceedings (as these reproduce results obtained in research papers). Note that books and monographs (not edited volumes nor textbook) also appear in the list of published research works. Last modified 5/12/2015. 1 [E3 ] D. Bambusi, G. Gaeta and M. Cadoni (eds.): \Symmetry and Pertur- bation Theory { SPT2001" (Proceedings of the international conference SPT2001, Cala Gonone, Sardinia, Italy, 6-13 May 2001); World Scientific, Singapore, 2001; ISBN 981-02-4793-1 [E4 ] G.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Dissipation and Decoherence of Collective Telefon 08 21/598-32 34 Prof
    N§ MAI %NRAISONDU -OBILITÏ DÏMÏNAGEMENT E DU3ERVICEDELA RENCONTREDÏTUDIANTS !UPROGRAMMERENCONTREDÏTU TAIRE ÌL5,0!JOUTERÌ COMMUNICATION DIANTSETDENSEIGNANTS CHERCHEURS LACOMPÏTENCEDISCIPLINAIREETLIN ETDENSEIGNANTS LEPROCHAIN CHERCHEURSDANSLE VISITEDUCAMPUS INFORMATIONSSUR GUISTIQUE UNE EXPÏRIENCE BINATIO LES ÏCHANGES %RASMUS3OCRATES NALEETBICULTURELLE TELESTLOBJECTIF BULLETIN DOMAINEDESSCIENCESDE ENTRELES&ACULTÏSDEBIOLOGIEDES DECETTECOLLABORATIONNOVATRICEEN DINFORMATIONS LAVIE5,0 5NIVERSITËT DEUX UNIVERSITÏS PRÏSENTATION DE BIOLOGIEBIOCHIMIE PARAÔTRA DES3AARLANDES PROJETS DE RECHERCHE EN PHARMA LEMAI COLOGIE VIROLOGIE IMMUNOLOGIE ET #ONTACTS 5NE PREMIÒRE RENCONTRE AVAIT EU GÏNÏTIQUEHUMAINEDU:(-" &ACULTÏDESSCIENCESDELAVIE LIEU Ì 3AARBRàCKEN EN MAI $R*OERN0àTZ #ETTERENCONTRE ORGANISÏEÌLINI JPUETZ IBMCU STRASBGFR SUIVIEENFÏVRIERPARLAVENUE TIATIVEDU$R*0àTZETDU#ENTRE #ENTREDELANGUES)," Ì 3TRASBOURG DUN GROUPE DÏTU DELANGUESDEL)NSTITUT,E"ELCÙTÏ #ATHERINE#HOUISSA DIANTS ET DENSEIGNANTS DE LUNI STRASBOURGEOIS DU 0R - 3CHMITT BUREAU( VERSITÏ DE LA 3ARRE ,A E ÏDITION CÙTÏ SARROIS SINSCRIT DANS LE CATHERINECHOUISSA LABLANG ULPU STRASBGFR LE MAI PERMETTRA CETTE CADREDESÏCHANGESENTRELESDEUX FOISAUXSTRASBOURGEOISDEDÏCOU FACULTÏS VISANT Ì LA MISE SUR PIED ;SOMMAIRE VRIR LES LABORATOIRES DU :ENTRUM DUN CURSUS FRANCO ALLEMAND EN FàR(UMANUND-OLEKULARBIOLOGIE 3CIENCES DE LA VIE 5NE ÏTUDIANTE !CTUALITÏS :(-" DEL5NIVERSITÏDELA3ARRE DE L5,0 TERMINE ACTUELLEMENT SA IMPLANTÏS SUR LE SITE DU #(5 DE LICENCE, ÌL5D3 DEUXÏTUDIANTS /RGANISATION 3AARBRàCKEN
    [Show full text]
  • D-Brane Actions and N = 2 Supergravity Solutions
    D-Brane Actions and N =2Supergravity Solutions Thesis by Calin Ciocarlie In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2004 (Submitted May 20 , 2004) ii c 2004 Calin Ciocarlie All Rights Reserved iii Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to the people who have taught me Physics throughout my education. My thesis advisor John Schwarz has given me insightful guidance and invaluable advice. I benefited a lot by collaborating with outstanding colleagues: Iosif Bena, Iouri Chepelev, Peter Lee, Jongwon Park. I have also bene- fited from interesting discussions with Vadim Borokhov, Jaume Gomis, Prof. Anton Kapustin, Tristan McLoughlin, Yuji Okawa, and Arkadas Ozakin. I am also thankful to my Physics teacher Violeta Grigorie who’s enthusiasm for Physics is contagious and to my family for constant support and encouragement in my academic pursuits. iv Abstract Among the most remarkable recent developments in string theory are the AdS/CFT duality, as proposed by Maldacena, and the emergence of noncommutative geometry. It has been known for some time that for a system of almost coincident D-branes the transverse displacements that represent the collective coordinates of the system become matrix-valued transforming in the adjoint representation of U(N). From a geometrical point of view this is rather surprising but, as we will see in Chapter 2, it is closely related to the noncommutative descriptions of D-branes. A consequence of the collective coordinates becoming matrix-valued is the ap- pearance of a “dielectric” effect in which D-branes can become polarized into higher- dimensional fuzzy D-branes.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Approaches to M-Theory
    Three Approaches to M-theory Luca Carlevaro PhD. thesis submitted to obtain the degree of \docteur `es sciences de l'Universit´e de Neuch^atel" on monday, the 25th of september 2006 PhD. advisors: Prof. Jean-Pierre Derendinger Prof. Adel Bilal Thesis comittee: Prof. Matthias Blau Prof. Matthias R. Gaberdiel Universit´e de Neuch^atel Facult´e des Sciences Institut de Physique Rue A.-L. Breguet 1 CH-2001 Neuch^atel Suisse This thesis is based on researches supported the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Commission of the European Communities under contract MRTN-CT-2004-005104. i Mots-cl´es: Th´eorie des cordes, Th´eorie de M(atrice) , condensation de gaugino, brisure de supersym´etrie en th´eorie M effective, effets d'instantons de membrane, sym´etries cach´ees de la supergravit´e, conjecture sur E10 Keywords: String theory, M(atrix) theory, gaugino condensation, supersymmetry breaking in effective M-theory, membrane instanton effects, hidden symmetries in supergravity, E10 con- jecture ii Summary: Since the early days of its discovery, when the term was used to characterise the quantum com- pletion of eleven-dimensional supergravity and to determine the strong-coupling limit of type IIA superstring theory, the idea of M-theory has developed with time into a unifying framework for all known superstring the- ories. This evolution in conception has followed the progressive discovery of a large web of dualities relating seemingly dissimilar string theories, such as theories of closed and oriented strings (type II theories), of closed and open unoriented strings (type I theory), and theories with built in gauge groups (heterotic theories).
    [Show full text]
  • Conductance of Single Electron Devices from Imaginary–Time Path Integrals
    Conductance of Single Electron Devices from Imaginary–Time Path Integrals Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakult¨at f¨ur Mathematik und Physik der Albert–Ludwigs–Universit¨at, Freiburg im Breisgau vorgelegt von Christoph Theis aus Bernkastel-Kues Freiburg, April 2004 Dekan : Prof. Dr. R. Schneider Leiter der Arbeit : Prof. Dr. H. Grabert Referent : Prof. Dr. H. Grabert Koreferent : Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 26. Mai 2004 Contents 1 Introduction and Overview 1 2 Concepts of Transport in Nanoscopic Structures 5 2.1 Resonant Tunneling through Discrete Levels . ........... 5 2.2 CoulombBlockadeofTransport. ...... 8 2.3 KondoEffectinQuantumDots . 11 I Transport Properties from Imaginary-Time Path Integrals 15 3 Path Integrals for Fermions 17 3.1 Introduction: The Feynman Path Integral . ......... 17 3.2 SecondQuantization .............................. 19 3.3 GrassmannAlgebra ................................ 20 3.3.1 Motivation and Definition of the Grassmann Algebra . ........ 21 3.3.2 Calculus for Grassmann Variables . ..... 22 3.3.3 Important Integration Formulas . ...... 23 3.4 FermionCoherentStates. ..... 25 3.4.1 Definition of Fermion Coherent States . ..... 25 3.4.2 PropertiesofFermionCoherentStates . ....... 26 3.5 CoherentStatePathIntegral . ...... 28 3.6 Example: Non–Interacting Fermions . ........ 29 3.6.1 ThePartitionFunction . 29 3.6.2 TheThermalGreen’sFunction . 30 4 Path Integral Monte Carlo 33 4.1 BasicsofMonteCarloIntegration. ........ 33 4.2 Importance Sampling and Markov Processes . ......... 34 4.2.1 Reduction of Statistical Errors by Importance Sampling.......... 34 4.2.2 Markov Processes and the Metropolis Algorithm . ........ 35 4.3 Statistical Analysis of Monte Carlo Data . .......... 37 4.3.1 Estimates for Uncorrelated Measurements . ........ 37 4.3.2 Correlated Measurements and Autocorrelation Time . .......... 38 4.3.3 Binning Analysis of the Monte Carlo Error .
    [Show full text]