Following This Cover Page Are Scanned Images of No-Opposition Summary Judgment Motions and Orders Filed on the Selected Date
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers. FILED SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK OCT 1 9 2015 COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL NEW YORK ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S.Part 50 (Moulton,P.) This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190402/14 ELIPETROVITCH and ANTOINETTE PETROVITCH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER WHEREFORE, defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: N v York ,2015 Jordan C. Fox, E CeighDeCotiis, Esq. Belluck & Fox I McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP 546 FifthAvenu Attorneys for Defendant A. O. Smith Water New York, NY Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York, New York 10005 SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H.Moulton __ 2625624 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X WILLIAM C. BODDY, and FRED C. BODDY INDEX NO. 190137/2015 JR. as Co-Executors for the Estate of FRED C. BODDY, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER -against- A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Defendants. X WHEREFORE, defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant Neles-Jamesbury, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. For purposes of this order, facsimile and PDF signatures shall be deemed binding as originals. Dated: New York, New York October , 2015 Adam Dreksler "SfcTT tmt.bu Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. ?oisv Drinker Bid'dle & Reath LLP 700 Broadway ÿ 1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st Floor W New York, NY 10003 New York, New York 10036 (212) 558-5500 ÿ 7%{212) 248-3140 Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Defendant William C. Boddy, andFredC. Boddy Jr. as Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. Co-Executorsfor the Estate ofFredC. Boddy SO ORDERED: F V 15 oil Peter H. Moulton SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -—X MARGARET---- F. DUFFY, Individually and as Index No. 107994/99 Executrix for the Estate of FRANK DUFFY, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY Plaintiff, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER -against- A. C. AND S., INC., et al., IncludingMAREMONT CORPORATION, Defendants. -X WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Maremont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Maremont Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. FILED Dated: New York, New York OCT 19 2015 August _,2015 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICÿ' NEW YORK Matthew Mclntyre, Esc Jordan D. Bcltz, Esq. Weitz and Luxenberg,P.C. Kasowitz/Benson,Torres & Friedman,LLP Attorneysfor Plaintiff Attorney/for Defendant Maremont 700 Broadway Corporation New York, NY 10003 1633 Broadway New York, New York 10019 SO ORDERED, (S D Hon. Peter H. Moulton SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 50 ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton, ft) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190034/2015 WALTER ANDREWS and GERALDINE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY ANDREWS JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER WHEREFORE, defendant Lennox Industries, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Lennox Industries, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Lennox Industries, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: New York, New York 0CT I0 2015 .w-uv Uf Jonat WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Lennox Industries, Inc. 700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016 (212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300 SO ORDERED, on. Peter H. Moulton "7 536 .13340/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION IAS PART 50 (Honorable Peter H. Moulton) This document relates to: Index No. : 120898/97 JACK KOGEN, Deceased, 105231/98 111071/98 Plaintiff , 100665/00 113687/02 -against- (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group) UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, et al . , NO OPPOSTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION Defendants . AND ORDER WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all afid clpops|jfej|ims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the same are hereby OCT lg dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ee«JNrvc,.i;RK,s DATED : / £ f // 5 East Hanover,JcNew Jersey .At. MATTHEW MACINTYRE, ÿSQ. STEPF WEITZ & LUXENBERG GARRITY, GF , MURPHY, GAROFALO Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936 SO ORDERED, norable Peter H. Moulton 536 .10045/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION IAS PART 50 (Honorable Peter H. Moulton) This document relates to: Index No.: 109782/00 ROBERT S. SABADASZ, Deceased, 122191/99 Plaintiff, (March 2014 FIFO Trial Group) -against- NO OPPOSTION UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION et al., AND ORDER Defendants . WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and thÿpsaÿe /pre ÿhereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. 0ii 1 -9 [ ?0]5 DATED : /I'/ci/l East Hanover, New Jersey Cou; ÿWVoflK°FF/cE L. MATTHEW MACINTYRE , STEPHI WEITZ & LUXENBERG GARRITY, GF , MURPHY, GAROFALO Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINN ' 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936 SO ORDERED, 7o/jsj/b Honorable Peter H. Moulton 536 .07933/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION IAS PART 50 (Honorable Peter H. Moulton) This document relates to: Index No.: 100029/99 HENRY MIKA, Plaintiff, (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group) -against - NO OPPOSTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, AND ORDER et al., Defendants . WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ÿ>L[ 9 m DATED : * East Hanover, New Jersey COuKj 'y Cj MATTHEW MACINTYRE, J3SQ STEPHEN F. BALSAMO,"HSSQ . CCb WEITZ & LUXENBERG GARRITY, GRAHAjtf, MURPHY, GAROFALO / Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936 SO ORDERED, Honorable Peter H. Moulton 536 .07 8 8 9/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION IAS PART 50 (Honorable Peter H. Moulton) This document relates to: Index No.: 121894/98 ROBERT BURNS KOBLER, Deceased, (May 2014 FIFO Trial Group) Plaintiff , NO OPPOSTION -against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, et al., Defendants . WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the game are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.