DOCSLIB.ORG

Berkeley County Draft Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Berkeley County Draft Hazard Mitigation Plan BERKELEY COUNTY DRAFT HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN October 8, 2019 Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments Update Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Hazard Mitigation Plan Background .......................................................................................... 2 Purpose of Hazard Mitigation Planning ...................................................................................... 3 Related Planning Efforts in the Region ...................................................................................... 5 Hazard Mitigation Plan Scope .................................................................................................... 6 Participants in the Planning Process ........................................................................................... 7 Public Participation ..................................................................................................................... 8 Planning Process ....................................................................................................................... 10 Step 1 .................................................................................................................................... 10 Step 2 .................................................................................................................................... 10 Step 3 .................................................................................................................................... 11 Step 4 .................................................................................................................................... 11 Step 5 .................................................................................................................................... 11 Project Timeline ........................................................................................................................ 12 Organize Resources .................................................................................................................. 12 Assess Risks and Develop a Mitigation Plan:........................................................................... 12 Community Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................ 13 Goal 1 .................................................................................................................................... 13 Goal 2 .................................................................................................................................... 14 Goal 3 .................................................................................................................................... 14 Goal 4 .................................................................................................................................... 14 Goal 5 .................................................................................................................................... 15 Goal 6 .................................................................................................................................... 15 Goal 7 .................................................................................................................................... 15 Goal 8 .................................................................................................................................... 16 Goal 9 .................................................................................................................................... 16 Goal 10 .................................................................................................................................. 16 Goal 11 .................................................................................................................................. 16 Mitigation Action Plans ............................................................................................................ 17 Types ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Action Plan for Berkeley County, SC ........................................................................................... 22 Action Plan for the Town of Bonneau, SC ................................................................................... 36 Action Plan for the City of Goose Creek, SC ............................................................................... 38 Action Plan for the City of Hanahan, SC ...................................................................................... 40 Action Plan for the Town of Jamestown, SC ................................................................................ 44 Action Plan for the Town of Moncks Corner, SC ........................................................................ 45 Action Plan for the Town of St. Stephen, SC ............................................................................... 49 IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................................... 50 Process ...................................................................................................................................... 50 Local Planning Mechanisms ..................................................................................................... 50 Funding Sources........................................................................................................................ 51 Local Funding Sources ............................................................................................................. 53 1 MONITORING, EVALUATION AND UPDATING .................................................................. 54 Timeframes ............................................................................................................................... 54 Three-Year Plan Review ....................................................................................................... 54 Five-Year Update .................................................................................................................. 54 Incorporation of Local Planning Mechanisms .......................................................................... 55 Continuing Public Participation ............................................................................................ 56 Plan Amendments ..................................................................................................................... 57 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS ...................................................................... 58 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 58 Potential Hazards ...................................................................................................................... 58 Hazard Probability .................................................................................................................... 60 Flooding ................................................................................................................................ 61 Hurricanes and Tropical Storms ........................................................................................... 67 Tornadoes .............................................................................................................................. 74 Winter Storms ....................................................................................................................... 77 Thunderstorms ...................................................................................................................... 78 Hail ........................................................................................................................................ 78 Wildfires ............................................................................................................................... 80 Drought ................................................................................................................................. 82 Earthquake ............................................................................................................................ 84 Liquefaction .......................................................................................................................... 89 Landslides ............................................................................................................................. 91 Tsunamis ............................................................................................................................... 91 Dam Failure .......................................................................................................................... 92 Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................................. 94 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................ 99 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 03050201-010 (Lake Moultrie)
    03050201-010 (Lake Moultrie) General Description Watershed 03050201-010 is located in Berkeley County and consists primarily of Lake Moultrie and its tributaries. The watershed occupies 87,730 acres of the Lower Coastal Plain region of South Carolina. The predominant soil types consist of an association of the Yauhannah-Yemassee-Rains- Lynchburg series. The erodibility of the soil (K) averages 0.17 and the slope of the terrain averages 1%, with a range of 0-2%. Land use/land cover in the watershed includes: 64.4% water, 21.1% forested land, 5.4% forested wetland, 4.1% urban land, 3.1% scrub/shrub land, 1.4% agricultural land, and 0.5% barren land. Lake Moultrie was created by diverting the Santee River (Lake Marion) through a 7.5 mile Diversion Canal filling a levee-sided basin and impounding it with the Pinopolis Dam. South Carolina Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper) oversees the operation of Lake Moultrie, which is used for power generation, recreation, and water supply. The 4.5 mile Tail Race Canal connects Lake Moultrie with the Cooper River near the Town of Moncks Corner, and the Rediversion Canal connects Lake Moultrie with the lower Santee River. Duck Pond Creek enters the lake on its western shore. The Tail Race Canal accepts the drainage of California Branch and the Old Santee Canal. There are a total of 43.8 stream miles and 57,535.3 acres of lake waters in this watershed, all classified FW. Additional natural resources in the watershed include the Dennis Wildlife Center near the Town of Bonneau, Sandy Beach Water Fowl Area along the northern lakeshore, the Santee National Wildlife Refuge covering the lower half of the lake, and the Old Santee Canal State Park near Monks Corner.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1
    /o United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections______________ 1. Name Historic Resources of Pinopolis > "*> 1 ~* "> f- ^ ?-' . > historic (Partial Inventory: Historic and Architectural Properties) and/or common 2. Location street & number Communi ty 1 imi ts of Pi nopol i s not for publication city, town Pinopolis vicinity of state South Carolina code 045 county Berkeley code 015 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public x occupied agriculture museum building(s) x private x unoccupied commercial park structure both x work in progress educational _ X_ private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment _ X_ religious object N / " , i n process y yes: restricted government scientific X mul ti pi e^^- being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation resource no military _x_ other: vacant 4. Owner of Property name Multiple Ownership (See individual inventory forms) street & number city, town vicinity of state courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. See Continuation Sheet street & number city, town state 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Inventory of Historic Places title in South Carolina has this property been determined eligible? yes x no date 1981 . federal _X_ state county . local depository for survey records South Carolina Department of Archives and History city, town Columbia state South Carolina 29211 7. Description Condition Check one Check one deteriorated unaltered x original site ruins _X_ altered moved date X fair unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The multiple resources nomination for the Historic Resources of Pinopolis consists of two historic districts (twenty properties) and one individual property of local historic and architectural significance which are located WthiT'the community limits of Pinopolis, South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Santee Cooper®
    santee cooper ® INTHEZONE 2008 Annual Report o be sure, 2008 was a year of challenge, un- neers Environmental Impact Statement. Santee Cooper is certainty and, yes, opportunity. Energy issues out in front on new nuclear power development, too; we shared center stage with economic challenges filed an application at the Nuclear Regulatory Commis- at the national, state and local level. Talk of sion (NRC) to build two nuclear reactors, in partnership Tpotential energy and environmental legislation, customer with South Carolina Electric and Gas (SCE&G) Co. We growth, new generation, increased costs, and the economy also have an Engineering, Procurement and Construction dominated conversations from the halls of Congress to the (EPC) contract for those units. EXECUTIVE MESSAGE coffee shops on Main Street. Santee Cooper advanced our renewable generation initia- Indeed, leaders are weighing difficult issues at a pace not tives, opening a new biogas generating station in Anderson seen in many years. Santee Cooper continues to be influ- County and contracting with a proposed biomass plant in ential in these discussions that can shape the future of the Newberry County, among other key developments. energy industry and your state-owned electric and water utility. Our job is to do what is best for our customers and On the financial front, we held a successful retail bond sale our state, and our mission is to be the state’s leading re- that strategically positions Santee Cooper for continued source for improving the lives of all South Carolinians. It progress in 2009. Our October bond offering was signif- is a job we take seriously, by working tirelessly to provide icantly oversubscribed and that, combined with the vol- reliable, low-cost power that is environmentally responsi- ume of retail sales, was incredible because it came during ble, by providing excellent customer service, and by all the a period of extreme market turmoil.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Land, Water and Conservation Division 2221 Devine Street, Suite 222 Columbia, SC 29205
    SouthSouth CarolinaCarolina WaterWater PlanPlan SecondSecond EditionEdition SouthSouth CarolinaCarolina DepartmentDepartment ofof NaturalNatural ResourcesResources Land,Land, WaterWater andand ConservationConservation DivisionDivision On the cover: Water from the Columbia Canal falls over a spillway behind the old Columbia Water Works complex on the Congaree River in Columbia, South Carolina. The Columbia Canal, originally completed in 1824 to provide navigation past local rapids, was redesigned in 1891 to provide hydroelectric power to local industries. The red brick building in the center of the photograph was built in the 1890s and houses the pumps once used by the City of Columbia to supply water to its citizens. Although use of this pumping plant ended in the early 1970s, the canal still serves as a source of public-supply water and hydroelectric power for the City. Today, these buildings and the canal form part of Columbias Riverfront Park. (Photograph by Andrew Wachob, S.C. Department of Natural Resources.) SOUTH CAROLINA WATER PLAN Second Edition by A. W. Badr Andrew Wachob Joseph A. Gellici South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Land, Water and Conservation Division 2221 Devine Street, Suite 222 Columbia, SC 29205 January 2004 This document is available on the Department of Natural Resources web site at http://www.dnr.state.sc.us/ STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA The Honorable Mark H. Sanford, Governor South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Board Members Michael G. McShane, Chairman ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Santee Project: a Detour to Success
    The Santee Project: A Detour to Success Overview Students will be introduced to the Old Santee Canal and the Santee Cooper Project. They will become familiar with the two topics, map specific locations, and weigh the positive and negative aspects of the project. Connection to the Curriculum This lesson is related to geography, science, language arts, and South Carolina History. South Carolina Social Studies Academic Standards 8-2.5 Explain the economic and political tensions between the people of the Upcountry and the Lowcountry of South Carolina, including the economic struggles of both groups following the American Revolution, their disagreement over representation in the General Assembly and the location of the new capital city, and the transformation of the state’s economy that was caused by the production of cotton and convinced lowcountry men to share power with upcountry men. 8-6.5 Explain the effects of the Great Depression and the lasting impact of New Deal programs on South Carolina, including the Rural Electrification Act, the Civilian Conservation Corps, Works Progress Administration and Public Works Administration building projects, the Social Security Act, and the Santee Cooper electricity project. Social Studies Literacy Elements F. Ask geographic questions: Where is it located? Why is it there? What is significant about its location? How is its location related to that of other people, places, and environments? P. Locate, gather, and process information from a variety of primary and secondary sources including maps S. Interpret and synthesize information obtained from a variety of sources—graphs, charts, tables, diagrams, texts, photographs, documents, and interviews Time Two to three fifty-minute class periods Materials South Carolina: An Atlas (Optional) 27-minute video – “Santee Canal – America’s First Superhighway” South Carolina Interactive Geography (SCIG) disc Computer South Carolina Highway map Dry erase markers Objectives 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Santee Cooper Presentation
    South Carolina Public Service Authority Presentation to: Public Service Authority Evaluation and Recommendation Committee September 5, 2018 ® Agenda Cost and Rate Development Santee Cooper Hydroelectric Project Parks, Conference Centers & Economic Development Water Systems Nuclear Other September 5, 2018 – 44000 – Pres No. 2 – 2 ® Cost and Rate Development September 5, 2018 – 44000 – Pres No. 2 – 3 What do we mean when we ® say “Cost of Service Rates”? Cost-of-service may be defined as the amount of revenue a company must collect from rates charged consumers to recover the cost of doing business. September 5, 2018 – 44000 – Pres No. 2 – 4 ® Uniform System of Accounts Santee Cooper uses the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Uniform System of Accounts to maintain the books and records for the Electric System • This is the system of accounts used by most electric utilities • Allows utilities to report consistently (FERC and Energy Information Administration reports) • Provides detailed descriptions of what assets, liabilities, expenses and income should be charged to each account • Utilities frequently use this system of accounts to categorize costs when developing rates There is a similar uniform system of accounts typically used by water utilities prescribed by the National Association of Regulatory Commissioners (NARUC). Santee Cooper uses NARUC for the two Water Systems. September 5, 2018 – 44000 – Pres No. 2 – 5 Santee Cooper Electric System: ® Overview of Cost Components 2017 Cost Components COST OF SERVICE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS (millions) Fuel & Purchased Power CIF, PTS, SIL, + Non-Fuel O&M WC + Debt Service $170, 10% + Payment to State & Sums in Lieu (PTS, SIL) + Working Capital (WC) Fuel Subtotal $563, 32% + Capital Improvement Fund (CIF) Debt Service $399, 23% Total Revenue Requirement (“Cost”) 2017 Total Revenue Requirement (millions) $1,737 Purchased Power $198, 11% Non-Fuel O&M $407, 24% September 5, 2018 – 44000 – Pres No.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Fy2020-2021 Annual South Carolina Aquatic Plant Management Plan
    DRAFT FY2020-2021 ANNUAL SOUTH CAROLINA AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by the Aquatic Nuisance Species Program South Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Approved by the South Carolina Aquatic Plant Management Council 2020 2020 SOUTH CAROLINA AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL Chris Page - Council Chairman S.C. Department of Natural Resources, Land, Water, and Conservation Division Chad Altman - S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control, Environmental Quality Control, Bu- reau of Water Willie Simmons - S.C. Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Division William Marshall - S.C. Department of Natural Resources, Land, Water, and Conservation Division Adam Leaphart - S.C. Department of Agriculture, Director of Consumer Protection Laboratories Chris Stout - S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean and Coastal Re- source Management Casey Moorer - S.C. Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper) Matthew Lawson S.C. Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Tammy Lognion - Clemson University, Department of Pesticide Regulation Appointment Pending- Governor’s Office i SOUTH CAROLINA AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents PART II – FY2020-21 ANNUAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 AQUATIC PLANT PROBLEM AREAS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Santee National Wildlife Refuge Fishing Regulations Brochure
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Santee National Wildlife Refuge Areas open to fishing include the waters of Lake Marion Clarendon County, SC and several freshwater ponds and canals. Access for many Santee National Wildlife Refuge is one of 568 National of these areas is limited to foot or bicycle travel only. Please Wildlife Refuges in the U.S. and its territories. The mission refer to the map on the reverse for these designations. of the National Wildlife Refuge System is to administer a Santee national network of lands and waters for the conservation, Littering, camping and/or overnight parking, open fires, management, and where appropriate restoration of the fish, swimming or wading, collection-searching for or taking of National Wildlife wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the any items of antiquity, and overnight mooring of boats are U.S. for the benefit of present and future generations of prohibited. Pets are only allowed in designated areas and Refuge Fishing Americans. Santee National Wildlife Refuge was originally must remain on a leash or in your vehicle/vessel. established in 1941 as a migratory bird sanctuary. Formed We prohibit fishing or boating within 100 feet (30 meters) Regulations and by the confluence of the Congaree and Wateree rivers, of any nesting birds or bird rookeries within refuge Lake Marion is a man-made lake and part of the Santee- boundaries. Permit Cooper reservoir network that also includes Lake Moultrie. We prohibit commercial fishing, air-thrust boats, Lake Marion drains into the Santee River and Lake Moultrie drains into the Santee and Cooper rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • South Caroolina State Water Assessment, 2Nd Ed., Chapter 7
    WATERSHED CONDITIONS: ACE BASIN Broad Upper Savannah Lynches SANTEE Pee Dee Catawba- Saluda Wateree Little SA Pee Dee V ANN Congaree PEE DEE Waccamaw Black AH Santee Lower Edisto Savannah ACE Ashley- VIRGINI A Cooper Combahee- Coosawhatchie NO RT H C A R OLI NA Pee Dee Santee basin basin SOUTH Savannah CA RO LI NA basin ACE GEORGIA basin South Carolina Water Assessment 7-1 ASHLEY-COOPER RIVER SUBBASIN The major population centers in 2000 were Charleston (96,650), North Charleston, including Charleston Heights (79,641), Mount Pleasant (47,609), Summerville (27,752), St. Andrews (21,814), and Hanahan (12,937). The year 2005 per capita income in the subbasin ranged from $26,207 in Dorchester County, which ranked 17th in the State, to $34,158 in Charleston County, which ranked second. In 1999, median household income in the subbasin ranged from $37,810 in Charleston County to $43,316 in Dorchester County. Median household income in the three counties ranked between tenth and fourth in the State, well above the South Carolina average of $37,082 (South Carolina Budget and Control Board, 2005). During 2000, the counties of the subbasin had combined annual average employment of nonagricultural wage and salary workers of about 248,000. Labor distribution in the subbasin counties included management, professional, and technical services, 33 percent; sales and office, 26 percent; service, 16 percent; production, transportation, and materials moving, 13 percent; construction, extraction, and maintenance, 11 percent; and farming, fishing, and forestry, 1 percent. Management, professional, and technical employment was about 10 percent above the State average, and production, transportation, and ASHLEY-COOPER RIVER SUBBASIN materials moving employment was about 30 percent The Ashley-Cooper River subbasin is in the central below the State average.
    [Show full text]
  • ASMFC River Herring Sustainable Fishing Plan for South Carolina
    ASMFC River Herring Sustainable Fishing Plan for South Carolina Introduction: The purpose of this sustainable fisheries management plan is to allow existing river herring fisheries that are productive and cause no threat to future stock production and recruitment to remain in place and close all others. Some excerpts from the stock status review for SC’s river herring were used in this document (ASMFC 2008). The review, which was prepared and submitted to the ASMFC shad and river herring board by SCDNR and the Stock Assessment Subcommittee (SASC), summarizes SC’s fisheries for river herring. Historically, river herring (blueback herring Alosa aestivalis) occurred in most of South Carolina’s major rivers (Figure 1). Commercial fisheries for blueback herring in South Carolina occur to a limited extent in open rivers such as Winyah Bay tributaries, but the majority of river fishing activity occurs in hydro-electric tailraces of the Santee-Cooper River system (Figure 2). It remains the most important and the most closely monitored fishery in the state. A brief history of the Santee-Cooper Complex is detailed in Appendix 1. Recreational fisheries for blueback herring exist, but only as a bycatch to the American shad fishery. Management of blueback herring in South Carolina is shared between the Marine Resources and Freshwater Divisions of the Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR). Management units are defined by stock and the complex of river(s) utilized. Management units include all rivers and tributaries within each area complex: Winyah Bay (Sampit, Lynches, Pee Dee, Bull Creek, Black, and Waccamaw Rivers) and the Santee-Cooper Rivers complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to the Santee and Cooper Rivers Anadromous
    Anadromous FISH use to guide them on these homecoming Diversion the damming of the river also blocked journeys is not fully understood. It is CHANGES TO THE hundreds of miles of migration routes The most significant change to the Anadromous fish are fish that spend believed that the young fish actually SANTEE AND COOPER for anadromous fish returning to the Santee and Cooper rivers occurred in most of their lives in the saltwater memorize a particular “smell” or taste system. However, while commercial use RIVERS 1941 when Santee River was dammed, environment of oceans and bays, but of the river and they use this smell to of the lock never developed, operation and Lakes Moultrie and Marion were return to the freshwater environment of guide them to their natal river as they The Santee Canal of the lock in conjunction with high created. The water from Santee River, rivers and streams to spawn. Some of the get closer to it’s mouth when they return The water of the Santee and Cooper springtime discharges of water from the one of the largest drainages on the best known anadromous fish to spawn. rivers has been manipulated by man Cooper River dam allowed fish to pass East Coast, was diverted to the small are salmon and trout, As the fish leave for several uses. When Europeans first into the lake system. tidal Cooper River. The project was which are often saltwater and ascend settled this region, low marshy areas Each spring anadromous fish constructed by the South Carolina shown to freshwater streams, along the rivers were diked and flooded concentrated at the base of the dam Public Service Authority, now known as jumping various physiological to produce rice fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Pintail Island Project Leland G
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Research Manuscript Series Institute of 11-1973 Pintail Island Project Leland G. Ferguson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Ferguson, Leland G., "Pintail Island Project" (1973). Research Manuscript Series. 43. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/43 This Book is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Manuscript Series by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pintail Island Project Keywords Excavations, Berkeley County, South Carolina, Archeology Disciplines Anthropology Publisher The outhS Carolina Institute of Archeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Comments In USC online Library catalog at: http://www.sc.edu/library/ This book is available at Scholar Commons: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/43 PINTAIL ISLAND PROJECT by Leland G. Ferguson Research Manuscript Series, No. 51 Prepared by the INSTITUTE OF ARCHEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA November, 1973 INTRODUCTION The Pintail Island Project is a plan for residential development of an island formerly known as Butler's Island in Lake Marion. This 74 acre island is located immediately south of the western end of the Lake Marion-Lake Moultrie Diversion Canal. Planned development will in­ clude the construction of homes, a road system, recreation areas, a bridge to the mainland and dredging to facilitate boat traffic near the island. Development plans for this island were brought to the attention of the Institute of Archeology and Anthropology of the University of South Carolina by the South Carolina Department of Archives and History.
    [Show full text]