Whose Book Is It Anyway? EFFERIES a View from Elsewhere on Publishing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Public Lending Right Guidances
Public Lending Right A Briefing for Libraries This briefing, accompanying IFLA’s position on Public Lending Right, aims to provide further information about what Public Lending Right is and where it is applied, to explain IFLA’s own position, to address a number of questions that frequently arise, to explore other ways in which it is possible to support authors, and to set out some advocacy points for use by IFLA’s members. What is Public Lending Right? Public Lending Right (PLR) refers primarily to the idea that authors (or other rightholders) should have the exclusive right to lend (or to authorise lending of) copyrighted works. As a result, any lending of works should be subject to a form of compensation. PLR is also therefore synonymous with the payments made to authors for the lending of their works. It is worth noting that the idea of a lending right does not have the same status as other rights (such as reproduction, distribution, translation or communication to the public), and does not appear in the Berne Convention. Nonetheless, the European Union and a number of other countries (making over 50 in total) have introduced the idea that lending is an exclusive right. One primary argument for PLR is that lending harms sales. However, research has not demonstrated that this is the case. Of course, some will argue that any use of a work should lead to remuneration, but arguably, where there is no harm, then an exception can apply. How and Where is it applied? According to the PLR International website, 34 countries have operational PLR schemes (see the list here), and a further 27 have them in development (see the list here – although this assertion is often based only on the existence of a reference to exclusive lending rights in law). -
COMIC COMIC MUTT and JEFF by BUD FISHER
COMIC COMIC 5ECTIOM SECTION Woodbridge. New Jersey, Friday, December 12, 1930 ' - •.-•"••'%< • •; ?• it-v- i- •- • • He F«£QO€.MtLV SP T A»MT ASoAT,iTi TIMID? €LF, ; •-* .' is so«r< " is ' TINUt>! I*J // to* k MUTT AND JEFF Strategy Gets A Tough Break By BUD FISHER . IHO—by IL C Fiibtr. Tt.Jt Mltk Cnl Britain Ri|kt« Rori»».l DO6R AMb THAT'S X CALLS you CAUL AND A THAT IMC. GOT A Nice STAfeT oM ALSO A NMJTT 1 M*w TO rtU^liV TO A BRA»NLE:S£ FOOL: A (*\LUO<V> He HAD THE NEBBS Rudy's Top-Spinning Days Are Over By SOL HESS VUMATS TMAT KJO15G ^TMAT WHAT INJ -rv^e MOST 6& PLAVIM& "CMOPTME TV4AT CW»LQ WRECK TMtS H0U5& SO oo We'LL ALL HAVE TO <S»O SLEEP IM THE. uoose. i^> MO PLACE 7^1 USED *T6 Be SOME TOP-5PIMME.R I'LL PICK IT UP TO SPMSJ A TOP^VJMCCTS V VWME.M I WAS A KID _ I COULD DO AMD LET IT SPlM OKI ( M^TTEQ WiTM OUT-DOORS IMORG TRICKS- LET'S SE.6 >F I VTOO MUCH F«ESM \CAM DO AKJV OF TME.M ANJD THEKJ LET TOP AMD OOPS: TWE ^ 5TR1M& BACK: TV4E \r HOP5 SAC^ I'LL NOUR. DAD \5 OMLV STARTIM& SPI MM IMG ..SOME TRICK-6.V4,SOW £ \K1 TME WORLD VOU WAVE TO CON1B OUT VWWATS TMAT? S'MATTER POP? A Mixed-up Tale By C. M. PAYNE I TA»f£ A U»< ITTuffw£T) OUT CANV See tT XF YOU COULD BE AROUND WITH HIM THE WAV WE ARE,*fOU WOODEN ASK WHY WE CAUu 'HIM * STINKY*?'* TOONERVILLE FOLKS BV FONTAINE FOX TOONERVILLE FOLKS Stinky'Get* A Drenching Fontaine Fox NOBODY BUT *STINKY* VOU KIDS AINT GONNA WOULD DO A THING LIKE DO NOTHING TO, HIM THAT ! WE GOTTA AS LONG AS HE'S A GET HIM f •» PASSENGER ON MY CAR GOTTA GET UPON TOP **.•. -
English-Language Graphic Narratives in Canada
Drawing on the Margins of History: English-Language Graphic Narratives in Canada by Kevin Ziegler A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Kevin Ziegler 2013 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This study analyzes the techniques that Canadian comics life writers develop to construct personal histories. I examine a broad selection of texts including graphic autobiography, biography, memoir, and diary in order to argue that writers and readers can, through these graphic narratives, engage with an eclectic and eccentric understanding of Canadian historical subjects. Contemporary Canadian comics are important for Canadian literature and life writing because they acknowledge the importance of contemporary urban and marginal subcultures and function as representations of people who occasionally experience economic scarcity. I focus on stories of “ordinary” people because their stories have often been excluded from accounts of Canadian public life and cultural history. Following the example of Barbara Godard, Heather Murray, and Roxanne Rimstead, I re- evaluate Canadian literatures by considering the importance of marginal literary products. Canadian comics authors rarely construct narratives about representative figures standing in place of and speaking for a broad community; instead, they create what Murray calls “history with a human face . the face of the daily, the ordinary” (“Literary History as Microhistory” 411). -
Report on the Public Lending Right Scheme 1999-2000
REPORT ON THE PUBLIC LENDING RIGHT SCHEME 1999-2000 BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT INCORPORATING THE REGISTRAR'S ANNUAL REVIEW Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3(8) of the Public Lending Right Act 1979 December 2000 The Secretary of State's Report is © Crown Copyright, 2000. (Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to The Copyright Office, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ.) The Registrar's Annual Review is the copyright of the Registrar of Public Lending Right. (Permission is hereby given to reproduce pages or sentences of the Annual Review provided the source is acknowledged and the Registrar notified.) First published December 2000 ISBN 0-952-52916-5 ISSN 1461 5592 Published by: Registrar of Public Lending Right Richard House Sorbonne Close Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6DA Telephone: 01642-604699 Facsimile: 01642-615641 E-mail: [email protected] Copies of this Report are available from the Registrar at the above address at a cost of £2.80 including postage. CONTENTS Page REPORT BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT ON THE PUBLIC LENDING RIGHT SCHEME 1999-2000 1 REVIEW OF THE PUBLIC LENDING RIGHT SCHEME BY THE REGISTRAR 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE 1999-2000 5 Table 1 Five Year Comparisons 1995/96 - 1999/2000 8 3. SERVICE TO AUTHORS 9 (a) PAYMENT CALCULATION AND DISTRIBUTION (b) IMPROVING THE SERVICE Table 2 How authors learn of PLR’s existence 12 4. LOANS SAMPLING 14 (a) DATA COLLECTION Table 3 Sample Library Authorities July 1999 - June 2000 15 (b) SUPPORTING THE LIBRARY SERVICE Table 4 Loans of Registered Books by Category 20 5. -
Lorella Belli Literary Agency Ltd Lbf 2019
LORELLA BELLI LITERARY AGENCY LTD Translation Rights List LBF 2019 lbla lorella belli literary agency ltd 54 Hartford House 35 Tavistock Crescent Notting Hill London W11 1AY, UK Tel. 0044 20 7727 8547 [email protected] Lorella Belli Literary Agency Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. Company No. 11143767. Registered Office: 54 Hartford House, 35 Tavistock Crescent, Notting Hill, London W11 1AY, United Kingdom. 1 Fiction: New Titles/Authors Nisha Minhas Selected Backlist includes: Rick Mofina Taylor Adams Kirsty Moseley Renita D’Silva Ingrid Alexandra Owen Mullen Helen Durrant J A Baker Steve Parker Joy Ellis TJ Brearton Katie Stephens Charlie Gallagher Ruth Dugdall Mark Tilbury Sibel Hodge Ker Dukey Victoria Van Tiem Ana Johns Hannah Fielding Anita Waller Carol Mason Janice Frost Alex Walters Nicola May Sophie Jackson PP Wong Dreda Say Mitchell Maggie James Dylan H Jones Betsy Reavley Sharon Maas Alison J Waines Selected Bookouture authors (no new submissions, but handling existing deals/publishers only): Mandy Baggot Anna Mansell Rebecca Stonehill Robert Bryndza Angela Marsons Fiona Valpy Colleen, Coleman Helen Phifer Sue Watson Jenny Hale Helen Pollard Carol Wyer Arlene Hunt Kelly Rimmer Louise Jensen Claire Seeber Non-Fiction: New Titles Sally Corner Gerald Posner Marcus Ferrar Patricia Posner Hira Ali Tamsen Garrie Robert J Ray Nick Baldock/Bob Hayward Girl on the Net Tam Rodwell Christopher Lascelles Jonathan Sacks Selected Backlist Jeremy Leggett Grace Saunders -
Recommended Principles to Guide Academy-Industry Relationships
Recommended Principles to Guide Academy-Industry Relationships Purpose: To sustain and protect academic freedom, academic professionalism, research integrity, and public trust. Dedicated to the memory of Victor J. Stone (AAUP President, 1982–84), University of Illinois College of Law AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS Distributed by the University of Illinois Press To impart the results of their own and their fellow specialists’ investigations and reflection, both to students and to the general public, without fear or favor . requires (among other things) that the university teacher shall be exempt from any pecuniary motive or inducement to hold, or to express, any conclusion which is not the genuine and uncolored product of his own study or that of fellow specialists. Indeed, the proper fulfillment of the work of the professoriate requires that our universities shall be so free that no fair- minded person shall find any excuse for even a suspicion that the utterances of university teachers are shaped or restricted by the judgment, not of profes- sional scholars, but of inexpert and possibly not wholly disinterested persons outside of their own ranks. To the degree that professional scholars, in the formation and promulgation of their opinions, are, or by the character of their tenure appear to be, subject to any motive other than their own sci- entific conscience and a desire for the respect of their fellow experts, to that degree the university teaching profession is corrupted; its proper influence upon public opinion is diminished, and vitiated; and society at large fails to get from its scholars, in an unadulterated form, the peculiar and necessary service which it is the office of the professional scholar to furnish. -
Copyright Transfer in Group-Authored Scientific Publications | Jaime A
Insights – 34, 2021 Copyright transfer in group-authored scientific publications | Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva and Aceil Al-Khatib Copyright transfer in group- authored scientific publications Academic publishers have different definitions of multiple authorship and ghost/guest authorship. When a scientific paper is submitted to a journal, the general assumption is that its ethics and authorship-related rules have been respected. Copyright transfer is a central issue in the flow of scientific information. To familiarize more academics with this topic, we examine the issue of copyright transfer from authors to a publisher. A key argument is the potential invalidation of a copyright transfer agreement if one or some of the co-authors do not authorize the transferring author to sign the agreement on their behalf. Keywords collaboration; copyright; ethics; guest; ghost and gift authorship; joint authorship JAIME A. TEIXEIRA DA SILVA Independent Academic authorship researcher Authorship is of great importance in science publishing and has multiple functions,1 including intellectual contribution for the research conducted,2 and responsibility and accountability for the published work,3 as a currency for the quality of the published research and as credit for the authors as they advance their scientific careers.4 Collaborative research projects involve the division of professional labour to achieve desired objectives and this has caused a global expansion in the number of multi-authored publications.5 In the face of increasing collaboration globally,6 even though multiple authorship became ACEIL AL-KHATIB common in the past decade or so,7 until quite recently, there were considerable differences Associate Professor and disparities in the definitions of authorship among leading publishers, ethical bodies, or Department of Oral 8 in the ethical guidelines of research institutes and universities. -
$ C^ 3$-Index: a Pagerank Based Multi-Faceted Metric for Authors
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) C3-index: A PageRank based multi-faceted metric for authors’ performance measurement Dinesh Pradhan · Partha Sarathi Paul · Umesh Maheswari · Subrata Nandi · Tanmoy Chakraborty∗ Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract Ranking scientific authors is an important but challenging task, mostly due to the dynamic nature of the evolving scientific publications. The basic indicators of an author’s productivity and impact are still the number of publications and the citation count (leading to the popular metrics such as h-index, g-index etc.). H-index and its popular variants are mostly effective in ranking highly-cited authors, thus fail to resolve ties while ranking medium- cited and low-cited authors who are majority in number. Therefore, these metrics are inefficient to predict the ability of promising young researchers at the beginning of their career. In this paper, we propose C3-index that combines the effect of citations and collaborations of an author in a systematic way using a weighted multi-layered network to rank authors. We conduct our experiments on a massive publication dataset of Computer Science and show that – (i) C3- index is consistent over time, which is one of the fundamental characteristics of a ranking metric, (ii) C3-index is as efficient as h-index and its variants to rank highly-cited authors, (iii) C3-index can act as a conflict resolution metric to break ties in the ranking of medium-cited and low-cited authors, (iv) C3- index can also be used to predict future achievers at the early stage of their career. -
Student Beliefs and Attitudes About Authorial Identity in Academic Writing
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UDORA - University of Derby Online Research Archive Authorial identity Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing Gail Pittam,a* James Elander,b Joanne Lusher,c Pauline Foxd & Nicola Paynee a. Faculty of Health & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, UK b. Centre for Psychological Research, University of Derby, UK c. Department of Psychology, London Metropolitan University, UK d. Department of Psychology, Thames Valley University, London, UK e. Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK Correspondence: [email protected] Cite as: Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2009). Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 153-170. Abstract Authorial identity is the sense a writer has of themselves as an author and the textual identity they construct in their writing. This paper describes two studies exploring psychology students’ authorial identity in academic writing. A qualitative focus group study with 19 students showed that authorial identity was largely unfamiliar to students, and highlighted the obstacles perceived by students to constructing authorial identities in university assignments. A questionnaire survey of 318 students explored the factor structure of an 18-item Student Authorship Questionnaire (SAQ). Three factors described aspects of student authorial identity (‘confidence in writing’, ‘understanding authorship’ and ‘knowledge to avoid plagiarism’), and three factors described approaches to writing (‘top-down’, ‘bottom-up’ and ‘pragmatic’). Confidence in writing and knowledge to avoid plagiarism were significantly higher among year two than year one students. Both studies could inform interventions to reduce unintentional plagiarism by improving students’ authorial identity. -
Norman Levine Fonds Inventory #345
page 1 Norman Levine fonds Inventory #345 File: Title: Date(s): Note: Call Number: 1983-004/001 Manuscripts: Prose Fiction (1) Anarchists in Ontario 1975-1976 (2) The Angled Road - jacket notes (3) Because of the War (4) Because of the War (5) Because of the War March 1980 (6) Because of the War April 1980 (7) Because of the War May 1980 (8) Because of the War Summer 1980 (9) Because of the War July 5, 1980 (10) Because of the War July 12-16, 1980 (11) Because of the War July 20, 1980 (12) Because of the War July 21, 1980 (13) Because of the War July 31, 1980 (14) Because of the War early August, 1980 (15) Because of the War August 14, 1980 (16) Because of the War September 3, 1980 (17) Because of the War January 26, 1981 (18) Because of the War January 29, 1981 (19) Because of the War February 2, 1981 (20) Because of the War February 5, 1981 (21) Because of the War February 9, 1981 (22) Because of the War February 16- 24, 1981 (23) Because of the War March 29, 1981 (24) Because of the War April 21, 1981 (25) Because of the War May 30, 1981 (26) Because of the War [ca. October 1981] (27) Because of the War, "version before the final one..." (28) Because of the War, "final version", [ca. October 1981] (29) The Big Time - children's story (30) Boiled Chicken (31) By a Frozen River (32) By a Frozen River 1974 (33) By a Frozen River 1976 (34) By a Frozen River, edited and abridged for CBC March 1983 Booktime, in St. -
E-Lending and a Public Lending Right: Is It Really a Time for an Update?
E-lending and a public lending right: is it really a time for an update? By Rita Matulionyte, Dr., LL.M. (Munich); lecturer at University of Newcastle (Australia); associated research fellow at Law Institute of Lithuania (This paper was accepted for publication in European Intellectual Property Review) Abstract This article examines the current status of e-lending in the EU and the potential impacts of the extension of the PLR scheme on e-publishing markets, libraries, and authors. It concludes that a legislative intervention in the area would be premature and, in a medium term, calls for a stronger dialog and cooperation between the stakeholders. Introduction E-book lending in public libraries (e-lending) and the need to extend public lending right (PLR)1 to these practices has been recently discussed on several occasions. Following the Siehart report on e-lending in 20132, the UK government has extended the PLR to e-book downloads occurring in the premises of the UK libraries3. In 2013-2014 the Commission carried out a consultation on the Review of EU Copyright rules, with e-lending being one of the issues4. In 2015 the Dutch court has referred a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) asking a number of questions related to e- lending, including the application of the PLR exception for e-books5. A number of studies on e-lending has also been increasing6. 1 See art 3, Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (codified version) OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. -
MUNDANE INTIMACIES and EVERYDAY VIOLENCE in CONTEMPORARY CANADIAN COMICS by Kaarina Louise Mikalson Submitted in Partial Fulfilm
MUNDANE INTIMACIES AND EVERYDAY VIOLENCE IN CONTEMPORARY CANADIAN COMICS by Kaarina Louise Mikalson Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia April 2020 © Copyright by Kaarina Louise Mikalson, 2020 Table of Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... v Abstract ............................................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Comics in Canada: A Brief History ................................................................................. 7 For Better or For Worse................................................................................................. 17 The Mundane and the Everyday .................................................................................... 24 Chapter outlines ............................................................................................................. 30 Chapter 2: .......................................................................................................................... 37 Mundane Intimacy and Slow Violence: ...........................................................................