RESOLUTION 20-30 Tab 1

Tab 1

RESOLUTION 20-30

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 17, 2020

Motion by ______; seconded by ______

BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of Keego Harbor accepts and authorizes the payment of bills for August 2020; and

BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of Keego Harbor accepts the Revenue and Expenditure Report; and

BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of Keego Harbor approves the following meeting minutes: • Study Session Virtual Meeting Minutes August 18, 2020 • City Council Virtual Meeting Minutes August 20, 2020

Roll Call Vote:

 Mayor Rob Kalman  Mayor Pro Tem Brian Lampl  Councilmember John Fletcher  Councilmember Karen Meabrod  Councilmember Theresa Shimansky

Mayor Robert Kalman declared this resolution adopted on September 17, 2020.

______Tammy Neeb City of Keego Harbor its City Clerk and Acting City Manager 08/10/2020 04:41 PM CHECK REGISTER FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 1/1 User: LGILMAN CHECK NUMBERS 60490 - 60515 DB: Keego Harbor TAB 2 Check Date Bank Check Vendor Vendor Name Description Amount Bank APCHS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

08/10/2020 APCHS 60490 ASPHALT SP ASPHALT SPECIALISTS INC BALANCE OF 2019 ROAD PRESERVATION PROJEC 12,147.15 08/10/2020 APCHS 60491 AUTO VALUE AUTO VALUEBUMPER TO BUMPER 19-4 WIPER BLADES 15.23 08/10/2020 APCHS 60492 BS&A BS&A SOFTWARE AUG 1 2020 - AUG 1 2021 ANNUAL SERVICE 430.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60493 CARDMEMBER CHASE CARD SERVICES COVID THERM,DISINF,PENS,BOOTIES - MONTHL 309.33 08/10/2020 APCHS 60494 CLEANING CLEANING AUTHORITY JULY CLEANING CITY HALL 500.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60495 CRWC CLINTON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL 2020-2021 STORMWATER EDUCATION 315.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60496 CONSUMERS CONSUMERS ENERGY JUNE 26 - JULY 27 DPW BUILDING UTILITIES 14.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60497 DELL DELL MARKETING LP 19-1,-4 LAPTOP,DOCK STAT AND SCRN SUPPRT 5,780.36 08/10/2020 APCHS 60498 FISH WINDO FISH WINDOW CLEANING 7/29 CITY HALL WINDOW CLEANING 100.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60499 GARBAGE GFL ENVIRONMENTAL USA AUG 955 RESIDENTAL TRASH PICKUP 13,488.25 08/10/2020 APCHS 60500 GRAPHX GRAPHX SHOP 500 BUSINESS CARDS (CHEIF FITZ) 30.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60501 HANECKOW T HANECKOW, TODD JULY 2 PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 130.00

08/10/2020 APCHS 60502 HRC HUBBELL, ROTH, & CLARK INC 1720 CLF (ESCROW) REVIEW AS BUILT 358.88 2019 STREET IMPROVEMENT - FINAL PAYMENT 99.96 1800 CLR (ESCROW) PLAN REVIEW, FOUNDATIO 449.01 1790 CLF (ESCROW) PLAN REVIEW AND FOUNDA 449.01 PRIDHAM SHOLE REPAIR, KLEIST SHOLE VISIT 717.75 JULY 2020 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 921.35 PASER SURVEY 51.04 1740 SLYVAN GLEN PLAN REVIEW, DRAIN ISSU 99.96 3,146.96 08/10/2020 APCHS 60503 I.T. RIGHT I.T. RIGHT SERVICE CONTRACT 9/1/20-11/30/20 2,500.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60504 MOTOWN DIG MOTOWN DIGITAL PC JULY 7, CC JULY 16 86.25 08/10/2020 APCHS 60505 OC TREASUR OAKLAND COUNTY JULY-SEPT CLEMIS 2,621.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60506 OAKLAND SC OAKLAND SCHOOLS STAX COPIES,DESIGN,POSTAGE, PROCESS FEE 731.31 08/10/2020 APCHS 60507 POLC POLICE OFFICERS LABOR COUNCIL AUGUST 2020 PD UNION DUES 201.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60508 RCOC ROAD COMMISSION FOR OAKLAND COUNTY MAY AND JUNE SIGNAL MAITENENCE 45.38 08/10/2020 APCHS 60509 RYAN TOM THOMAS J RYAN JULY 2020 LEGAL SERVICES 3,350.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60510 SHELTON RO SHELTON, RON JULY 11 ELECTRIC INSPEC, 22 RENTAL INSPE 2,145.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60511 SLADES SLADES PRINTING 2,500 WINDOW ENVELOPES 190.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60512 STOWE CURT C E STOWE INC JULY 21 INSPECTIONS AND 16.5 OFFICE HOUR 2,437.50 08/10/2020 APCHS 60513 SHIMANSKY THERESA SHIMANSKY MAY,JUNE,JULY COUNCIL PAY 25.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60514 WADE TRIM WADE TRIM JUNE MONTHLY SERVICES 3,850.00 08/10/2020 APCHS 60515 MISC WHOLESALE STORE FIXTURE 5 SIDE SNEEZE GUARDS 400.44

APCHS TOTALS: Total of 26 Checks: 54,989.16 Less 0 Void Checks: 0.00 Total of 26 Disbursements: 54,989.16 08/24/2020 02:31 PM CHECK REGISTER FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 1/1 User: LGILMAN CHECK NUMBERS 60516 - 60542 DB: Keego Harbor Check Date Bank Check Vendor Vendor Name Description Amount Bank APCHS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

08/24/2020 APCHS 60516 AJAX AJAX MATERIALS CORPORATION 3.03 TON COLD PATCH 348.45 08/24/2020 APCHS 60517 AUTO VALUE AUTO VALUEBUMPER TO BUMPER 19-1 BRAKE LIGHT BULB 7.99 08/24/2020 APCHS 60518 BCBSM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIED OF MICHIGAN SEPTEMBER HELATH INSURANCE 6,322.24 08/24/2020 APCHS 60519 COMCAST COMCAST 8/17-9/16 CITY HALL INTERNET 178.35 08/24/2020 APCHS 60520 COPS HEALT COPS HEALTH TRUST SEPTEMBER DENTAL INSURANCE 426.40 08/24/2020 APCHS 60521 MISC DALE WALDON ELECTION WORKER PLUS ADDITIONAL PAYMENT 227.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60522 DENISE DENISE HANLEY ADDITIONAL ELECTION WORKER PAYMENT OC 50.00

08/24/2020 APCHS 60523 DTE ENERGY DTE ENERGY 7/18-8/18 FRAN LEAF PARK UTILITIES 357.56 7/18-8/18 VETERANS MEMORIAL UTILITIES 16.98 7/18-8/18 1768 CLF UTILITIES 50.03 7/18-8/18 1765 CLF UTILITIES 95.62 SUNSET PARK UTILITIES 14.91 7/18-8/18 ROSE SORTER PARK UTILITIES 16.14 7/18-8/18 CITY HALL UTILITIES 666.29 7/18-8/18 DPW UTILITIES 218.77 1,436.30 08/24/2020 APCHS 60524 EDISON DTE ENERGY JULY 2020 STREETLIGHTS 4,627.49 08/24/2020 APCHS 60525 FORSTER FORSTER LYTLE SYLVAN LLC JULY - 10 PD CAR WASHES 50.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60526 GRAPHX GRAPHX SHOP BUSINESS CARDS TAMMY,DENISE,JENNIFER 50.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60527 HARTLEY MA MARY HARTLEY ELECTION (CHAIR) WORKER PLUS ADDITIONAL 274.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60528 HOME DEPOT HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES DPW TOOLS, MISC ITEMS 68.08 08/24/2020 APCHS 60529 I.T. RIGHT I.T. RIGHT 24 MICROSOFT 365 YRLY LICENSE 1,916.51 08/24/2020 APCHS 60530 JENNIFER JENNIFER GILMAN ELECTION WORKER ADDITIONAL PAYMENT OC 50.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60531 MISC JOHNATHON WEITHEIMER ELECTION WORKER PLUS ADDITIONAL PAYMENT 254.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60532 LAMPL LAMPL, BRIAN 2 WEBCAMS FOR TAMMY & CHIEF (COVID) 155.81 08/24/2020 APCHS 60533 MCGRAW MCGRAW MORRIS EMPLOYMENT ISSUE, COVID19 POLICY, PD ISS 542.50 08/24/2020 APCHS 60534 MML ANN AR MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL LEAGUE MML MEMBERSHIP DUES 7/1/20-6/30-21 1,936.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60535 MILLENIUM MILLENNIUM BUSINESS SYSTEMS $70 MONTHLY RATE PLUS 343 COLOR OVERAGE 104.31 08/24/2020 APCHS 60536 MISC OC TACTIAL TRAINING CONSORTIUM 2020 OAKTAC ANNUAL TRAINING FEE 250.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60537 SEMCOG SEMCOG FY 2021 MEMBERSHIP DUES 785.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60538 MISC SPECTRUM PRINTERS, INC 900 SECRECY ENVELOPE AND 1 TEST DECK 151.97 08/24/2020 APCHS 60539 SUPERFLEET SUPERFLEET MASTERCARD 7/16-8/15 DPW AND PD FUEL 1,215.93 08/24/2020 APCHS 60540 VERIZON VERIZON AUG CITY HALL PHONE 449.81 08/24/2020 APCHS 60541 WADE TRIM WADE TRIM JULY MONTHLY RETAINER 3,850.00 08/24/2020 APCHS 60542 WINNING WINNING IMPRINTS NAMEPLATE FOR JENNIFER 9.00

APCHS TOTALS: Total of 27 Checks: 25,737.14 Less 0 Void Checks: 0.00 Total of 27 Disbursements: 25,737.14

Tab 3 REVENUE AND ESPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR PERIOD ENDING 8/31/2020

2020-2021 Budget YTD Balance as of 8/2020 Activity for Month Available Balance % Budget Used TOTAL Fund 101 General Fund Revenue $ 1,924,896.00 $ 339,984.29 $ 203,048.67 $ 1,584,911.71 17.66 Expenditure $ 2,060,070.00 $ 155,485.88 $ 76,162.39 $ 1,904,584.12 7.55

TOTAL Fund 202 Major Streeet Fund Revenue $ 194,550.00 $ 25,697.54 $ 14,958.76 $ 168,852.46 13.21 Expenditure $ 182,985.00 $ 405.66 $ 141.06 $ 182,579.34 0.22

TOTAL Fund 203 Local Street Fund Revenue $ 119,500.00 $ 10,874.38 $ 6,330.34 $ 108,625.62 9.1 Expenditure $ 187,700.00 $ 12,517.12 $ 12,486.37 $ 175,182.90 6.67

TOTAL Fund 207 Police Fund Revenue $ 958,400.00 $ 60,816.45 $ 28,029.37 $ 897,583.55 6.35 Expenditure $ 993,400.00 $ 184,743.78 $ 64,454.64 $ 808,656.22 18.6

TOTAL Fund 247 TIFA Revenue $ 280,000.00 $ 24,640.91 $ 16,327.49 $ 255,359.09 8.80 Expenditure $ 210,730.00 $ 9,226.04 $ 4,627.49 $ 201,503.96 4.38

TOTAL Fund 271 Library Revenue $ 29,614.00 $ 4,620.48 $ 2,199.05 $ 24,993.52 15.60 Expenditure $ 29,614.00 $ - $ - $ 29,614.00 0.00

TOTAL Fund 353 TIFA DEBT $ 93,930.00 $ - $ - $ 93,930.00 $ - $ 93,930.00 $ - $ - $ 93,930.00 $ -

TOTAL Fund 401 Capital Improvements Revenue $ 127,950.00 $ - $ - $ 127,950.00 $ - Expenditure $ 127,950.00 $ 14,995.00 $ - $ 112,955.00 $ 11.72

TOTAL Fund 592 Water & Sewer Fund Revenue $ 19,400.00 $ 60.00 $ 60.00 $ 19,340.00 $ 0.31 Expenditure $ 5,100.00 $ - $ - $ 5,100.00 $ -

TOTAL Revenue $ 3,748,240.00 $ 4 66,694.05 $ 270,893.68 $ 3,281,545.95 $ 12.45 Expenditure $ 3,891,479.00 $ 377,373.46 $ 157,871.95 $ 3,514,105.54 $ 9.70 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 1/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 101-000-402.000 CURRENT TAXES 1,055,000.00 1,055,000.00 210,611.84 844,388.16 19.96 101-000-402.100 PUBLIC ACT 359 OF 1925 50,000.00 50,000.00 3,828.96 46,171.04 7.66 101-000-403.000 PRE DENIAL INT & PENALTY FR CO 1,250.00 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 0.00 101-000-404.000 NON CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 2,000.00 2,000.00 5.42 1,994.58 0.27 101-000-434.000 TRAILER TAX-CITY PORTION 500.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 101-000-445.000 PENALTIES AND INTEREST ON TAXES 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 101-000-446.000 PROPERTY TRANSFER PENALTY 5,275.00 5,275.00 200.00 5,075.00 3.79 101-000-447.000 PROPERTY TAX ADMIN FEE 45,000.00 45,000.00 3,891.04 41,108.96 8.65 101-000-447.100 ACH REVENUE/FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-448.000 REFUSE COLLECTION TAX 190,045.00 190,045.00 17,556.30 172,488.70 9.24 101-000-448.100 REFUSE COLLECTION ADMIN FEE 38,200.00 38,200.00 0.00 38,200.00 0.00 101-000-449.000 WEED CUTTING TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-451.100 CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION FEE 1,550.00 1,550.00 380.00 1,170.00 24.52 101-000-451.101 BUILDING PERMIT FEE 30,000.00 30,000.00 3,507.40 26,492.60 11.69 101-000-451.102 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEE 6,000.00 6,000.00 3,075.00 2,925.00 51.25 101-000-451.103 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEE 6,000.00 6,000.00 3,705.00 2,295.00 61.75 101-000-451.104 PLUMBING PERMIT FEE 4,500.00 4,500.00 1,410.00 3,090.00 31.33 101-000-451.105 EROSION CONTROL FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-451.106 WATERLINE/SEWER TRENCH FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-451.107 REINSPECTION FEE 500.00 500.00 65.00 435.00 13.00 101-000-451.108 DEMOLITION PERMIT FEE 250.00 250.00 290.00 (40.00) 116.00 101-000-451.109 FERTILIZER PERMIT FEE 325.00 325.00 0.00 325.00 0.00 101-000-452.000 RENTAL REGISTRATION FEE 10,000.00 10,000.00 3,045.00 6,955.00 30.45 101-000-452.001 RENTAL REINSPECTION FEE 1,300.00 1,300.00 325.00 975.00 25.00 101-000-453.000 BUSINESS LICENSE 7,850.00 7,850.00 875.00 6,975.00 11.15 101-000-454.000 NONBUSINESS LICENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-460.000 CABLE FRANCHISE FEE 45,000.00 45,000.00 10,972.06 34,027.94 24.38 101-000-460.100 VIDEO FRANCHISE FEE 8,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 101-000-477.000 PET LICENSE-CITY PORTION 200.00 200.00 6.50 193.50 3.25 101-000-529.000 CDBG REVENUE 14,250.00 14,250.00 0.00 14,250.00 0.00 101-000-530.000 MDNR GRANT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-541.000 SMART 2,064.00 2,064.00 0.00 2,064.00 0.00 101-000-543.000 ACT 302 REVENUES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-545.000 LIQUOR LICENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-573.000 LOCAL COMMUNITY STABILIZATION SHARE APPR 7,000.00 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 101-000-574.000 STATE REVENUE SHARING 225,000.00 225,000.00 44,421.00 180,579.00 19.74 101-000-576.000 STATE-ELECTION REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-581.000 COUNTY REVENUE SHARING 400.00 400.00 58.67 341.33 14.67 101-000-585.000 TREE GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-607.000 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 400.00 400.00 80.52 319.48 20.13 101-000-610.000 BUILDING DEPT REVIEW FEE 100.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 101-000-612.000 RECYCLING BINS 150.00 150.00 12.00 138.00 8.00 101-000-613.000 LAND DIVISION/CONSOLIDATION 250.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 101-000-614.000 PLANNER REVIEW FEES (NON-REFUNDABLE) 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,600.00 900.00 74.29 101-000-615.000 ZBA APPEAL FEE 1,500.00 1,500.00 800.00 700.00 53.33 101-000-625.000 NSF FEES 100.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 101-000-627.202 CONTRIBUTION/ADMIN FROM 202 MAJOR FUND 18,800.00 18,800.00 0.00 18,800.00 0.00 101-000-627.203 ADMIN CHARGES FROM 203 LOCAL STREET FUN 8,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 101-000-627.207 ADMIN CHARGES FROM 207 POLICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-627.247 ADMIN CHARGES FROM TIFA FUND 41,487.00 41,487.00 0.00 41,487.00 0.00 101-000-631.000 RESTITUTION-POLICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-632.000 COURT COST RECOVERY-OWI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-634.000 SOR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-639.100 WEED CUTTING - INVOICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-639.300 DEMOLOTION TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 2/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Revenues 101-000-643.900 BOAT KEY-PARKS PORTION 150.00 150.00 140.00 10.00 93.33 101-000-643.901 BOAT KEY-MARINE PORTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-655.000 DRUG FORFEITURE REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-656.000 DISTRICT COURT FINES 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 101-000-665.000 INTEREST 10,000.00 10,000.00 532.30 9,467.70 5.32 101-000-668.000 EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE RENTAL 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 101-000-669.000 ROOM RENTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-674.000 DONATIONS 1,000.00 1,000.00 25.00 975.00 2.50 101-000-674.002 TIGER GAME REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-674.003 EASTER DONATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-674.004 TREE LIGHTING DONATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-674.011 MISC DONATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-675.000 COST REC- MISC/REIMBURSEMENT 12,000.00 12,000.00 358.65 11,641.35 2.99 101-000-675.003 COST RECOVERY - MMRMA 15,000.00 15,000.00 26,724.00 (11,724.00) 178.16 101-000-675.008 COST RECOVERY- CIVIL INFRACTION 2,000.00 2,000.00 100.00 1,900.00 5.00 101-000-675.009 MARINE PATROL RESCUE/TOWING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-676.000 MISC REVENUE 0.00 0.00 382.63 (382.63) 100.00 101-000-694.000 CASH OVER (SHORT) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-697.000 LOAN PROCEEDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-697.890 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-698.999 APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 1,924,896.00 1,924,896.00 339,984.29 1,584,911.71 17.66

Dept 101 - CITY COUNCIL 101-101-675.000 COST REC- MISC/REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-101-698.999 APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 101 - CITY COUNCIL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL REVENUES 1,924,896.00 1,924,896.00 339,984.29 1,584,911.71 17.66

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 101-000-890.004 TREE LIGHTING EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-958.000 LITIGATION SETTLEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-999.000 TRANSFERS OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-000-999.405 TRANSFER OUT CITY HALL/PD PROJECT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 101 - CITY COUNCIL 101-101-711.007 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-101-802.000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-101-827.001 INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE-MMRMA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-101-901.000 PUBLICATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-101-955.001 MEMBERSHIP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-101-959.000 RECOGNITION DINNER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 101 - CITY COUNCIL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 3/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Expenditures Dept 191 - ADMINISTRATION 101-191-702.000 WAGES-FULL TIME 120,000.00 120,000.00 20,551.58 99,448.42 17.13 101-191-704.000 OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-191-707.000 WAGES- PART TIME 52,500.00 52,500.00 9,243.79 43,256.21 17.61 101-191-707.100 WAGES-PART TIME/CODE ENFORCEMENT 16,000.00 16,000.00 2,880.00 13,120.00 18.00 101-191-711.000 FICA 15,000.00 15,000.00 2,549.61 12,450.39 17.00 101-191-711.001 ICMA CITY MANAGER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101-191-711.004 HEALTH INSURANCE 6,800.00 6,800.00 2,113.91 4,686.09 31.09 101-191-711.005 RETIREMENT PLAN 137,076.00 137,076.00 12,295.02 124,780.98 8.97 101-191-711.006 LIFE INSURANCE 1,800.00 1,800.00 150.44 1,649.56 8.36 101-191-711.007 WORKERS COMP 1,400.00 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 101-191-711.008 UNEMPLOYMENT 10,000.00 10,000.00 3.00 9,997.00 0.03 101-191-711.014 HEALTH INSURANCE OPT OUT 4,000.00 4,000.00 769.25 3,230.75 19.23 101-191-711.015 RETIREMENT SUPPLEMENTAL 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 101-191-728.000 SUPPLIES 5,000.00 5,000.00 7,735.72 (2,735.72) 154.71 101-191-731.000 POSTAGE 3,000.00 3,000.00 293.93 2,706.07 9.80 101-191-800.001 BANK SERVICE CHARGE 1,500.00 1,500.00 200.00 1,300.00 13.33 101-191-800.101 LEGAL FEES-GENERAL PERSONNEL 5,000.00 5,000.00 542.50 4,457.50 10.85 101-191-800.265 LEGAL FEES CITY ATTORNEY 22,500.00 22,500.00 3,600.00 18,900.00 16.00 101-191-801.000 BOARD MEMBER/ELECTION WORKER PAY 2,000.00 2,000.00 986.25 1,013.75 49.31 101-191-802.000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 88,000.00 88,000.00 14,480.99 73,519.01 16.46 101-191-802.203 STORMWATER 5,000.00 5,000.00 2,715.50 2,284.50 54.31 101-191-802.257 PROPERTY TAX ASSESSING 24,000.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 101-191-803.000 COMPUTER SERVICES 18,000.00 18,000.00 4,773.21 13,226.79 26.52 101-191-805.000 COMPUTER SUPPORT-BS&A 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 101-191-805.001 COMPUTER SUPPORT-NON BS&A 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 101-191-806.211 AUDIT SERVICES 17,500.00 17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 0.00 101-191-827.000 INSURANCE-MMRMA 7,000.00 7,000.00 1,721.48 5,278.52 24.59 101-191-850.000 TELEPHONE 2,340.00 2,340.00 554.83 1,785.17 23.71 101-191-862.000 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 500.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 101-191-900.000 PRINTING AND BINDING 2,450.00 2,450.00 731.31 1,718.69 29.85 101-191-901.000 PUBLICATION 3,500.00 3,500.00 281.75 3,218.25 8.05 101-191-920.000 UTILITIES 7,500.00 7,500.00 1,508.57 5,991.43 20.11 101-191-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 101-191-944.001 COPIER & MAINTENANCE 1,800.00 1,800.00 255.34 1,544.66 14.19 101-191-955.000 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,100.00 1,100.00 50.00 1,050.00 4.55 101-191-955.001 MEMBERSHIP 8,000.00 8,000.00 1,215.00 6,785.00 15.19 101-191-956.000 COSTS, FEES, AND CHARGES 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 191 - ADMINISTRATION 610,766.00 610,766.00 92,202.98 518,563.02 15.10

Dept 215 - CITY CLERK 101-215-956.000 COSTS, FEES, AND CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 215 - CITY CLERK 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 336 - FIRE PROTECTION 101-336-814.000 FIRE DISPATCH 325,668.00 325,668.00 0.00 325,668.00 0.00

Total Dept 336 - FIRE PROTECTION 325,668.00 325,668.00 0.00 325,668.00 0.00

Dept 371 - INSPECTION SERVICES 101-371-802.101 BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTION 10,000.00 10,000.00 1,885.00 8,115.00 18.85 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 4/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Expenditures 101-371-802.102 MECHANICAL PERMIT INSPECTION 2,500.00 2,500.00 455.00 2,045.00 18.20 101-371-802.103 ELECTRICAL PERMIT INSPECTION 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,365.00 1,635.00 45.50 101-371-802.104 PLUMBING PERMIT INSPECTION 1,500.00 1,500.00 520.00 980.00 34.67 101-371-802.105 RENTAL INSPECTION 10,000.00 10,000.00 2,080.00 7,920.00 20.80 101-371-802.106 BLDG INSPECTION SERVICES 4,000.00 4,000.00 1,625.00 2,375.00 40.63

Total Dept 371 - INSPECTION SERVICES 31,000.00 31,000.00 7,930.00 23,070.00 25.58

Dept 441 - DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS 101-441-702.000 WAGES-FULL TIME 55,000.00 55,000.00 11,856.83 43,143.17 21.56 101-441-704.000 OVERTIME 1,350.00 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 0.00 101-441-707.000 WAGES- PART TIME/SEASONAL 25,000.00 25,000.00 900.00 24,100.00 3.60 101-441-708.000 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 500.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 101-441-711.000 FICA 6,120.00 6,120.00 945.14 5,174.86 15.44 101-441-711.004 HEALTH INSURANCE 9,000.00 9,000.00 1,645.84 7,354.16 18.29 101-441-711.006 LIFE INSURANCE 710.00 710.00 44.53 665.47 6.27 101-441-711.007 WORKERS COMP 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 101-441-711.008 UNEMPLOYMENT 5,000.00 5,000.00 2.47 4,997.53 0.05 101-441-725.000 FUEL 1,800.00 1,800.00 139.46 1,660.54 7.75 101-441-728.000 SUPPLIES 5,000.00 5,000.00 68.08 4,931.92 1.36 101-441-802.000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,936.00 (436.00) 129.07 101-441-804.000 DOLLAR LAKE BOAT RAMP KEYS 300.00 300.00 70.00 230.00 23.33 101-441-808.000 REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES 0.00 0.00 29,624.50 (29,624.50) 100.00 101-441-827.000 INSURANCE-MMRMA 13,347.00 13,347.00 6,885.90 6,461.10 51.59 101-441-850.002 24/7 COMMUNICATION 720.00 720.00 180.00 540.00 25.00 101-441-920.000 UTILITIES 13,000.00 13,000.00 1,054.15 11,945.85 8.11 101-441-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 7,500.00 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00 101-441-944.013 VEHICLE LEASE 12,200.00 12,200.00 0.00 12,200.00 0.00 101-441-955.000 TRAINING 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00

Total Dept 441 - DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS 164,247.00 164,247.00 55,352.90 108,894.10 33.70

Dept 445 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 101-445-803.000 DRAINS AT LARGE 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 35,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 445 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 35,000.00 0.00

Dept 528 - REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES 101-528-808.000 REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES 189,700.00 189,700.00 0.00 189,700.00 0.00

Total Dept 528 - REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES 189,700.00 189,700.00 0.00 189,700.00 0.00

Dept 694 - CITY HALL/DPW PROJECT 101-694-850.000 CDBG EXPENDITURES 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 0.00

Total Dept 694 - CITY HALL/DPW PROJECT 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 0.00

Dept 774 - RECREATION ACTIVITIES 101-774-728.000 SUPPLIES 850.00 850.00 0.00 850.00 0.00 101-774-802.000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 101-774-863.000 BUS TRANSPORTATION 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 5/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND Expenditures 101-774-882.000 SKATE NIGHT EVENT PROMOTION 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 101-774-890.003 EASTER EXPENDITURES 900.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 101-774-890.004 TREE LIGHTING EXPENDITURES 750.00 750.00 0.00 750.00 0.00 101-774-890.005 MEMORIAL DAY PARADE 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 101-774-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 101-774-959.000 RECOGNITION DINNER 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00

Total Dept 774 - RECREATION ACTIVITIES 17,500.00 17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 0.00

Dept 899 - TAX TRIBUNAL/OTHER REFUNDS ORDERED 101-899-956.000 COSTS, FEES, AND CHARGES 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 899 - TAX TRIBUNAL/OTHER REFUNDS ORDERED 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00

Dept 990 - DEBT SERVICE 101-990-991.000 OC BUILDING BOND 2010 PRINCIPAL 30,000.00 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 101-990-992.000 OC BUILDING BOND 2010 INTEREST 36,339.00 36,339.00 0.00 36,339.00 0.00 101-990-993.000 OC BUILDING BOND 2010 ANNUAL FEE 300.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00

Total Dept 990 - DEBT SERVICE 66,639.00 66,639.00 0.00 66,639.00 0.00

Dept 995 - OTHER FINANCING USES 101-995-999.207 TRANSFER OUT - POLICE FUND 578,300.00 578,300.00 0.00 578,300.00 0.00 101-995-999.401 TRANSFERS OUT CAPITAL PROJECTS 35,750.00 35,750.00 0.00 35,750.00 0.00

Total Dept 995 - OTHER FINANCING USES 614,050.00 614,050.00 0.00 614,050.00 0.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,060,070.00 2,060,070.00 155,485.88 1,904,584.12 7.55

Fund 101 - GENERAL FUND: TOTAL REVENUES 1,924,896.00 1,924,896.00 339,984.29 1,584,911.71 17.66 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,060,070.00 2,060,070.00 155,485.88 1,904,584.12 7.55 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES (135,174.00) (135,174.00) 184,498.41 (319,672.41) 136.49 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 6/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 202 - MAJOR STREET FUND Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 202-000-546.000 ACT 51 REVENUES 188,000.00 188,000.00 25,694.35 162,305.65 13.67 202-000-665.000 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 3.19 (3.19) 100.00 202-000-698.999 APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 188,000.00 188,000.00 25,697.54 162,302.46 13.67

Dept 450 - WINTER MAINTENANCE 202-450-650.000 ROAD SALT 550.00 550.00 0.00 550.00 0.00

Total Dept 450 - WINTER MAINTENANCE 550.00 550.00 0.00 550.00 0.00

Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 202-460-675.002 COST RECOVERY - REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-675.003 COST RECOVERY - MMRMA 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00 202-460-675.004 COST RECOVERY - LIGHT POLE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00

Dept 466 - ROAD PRESERVATION 202-466-675.002 COST RECOVERY - REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 466 - ROAD PRESERVATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL REVENUES 194,550.00 194,550.00 25,697.54 168,852.46 13.21

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 202-000-812.101 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES-TO 101 18,800.00 18,800.00 0.00 18,800.00 0.00 202-000-812.203 CONTRIBUTION TO LOCAL STREET 30,000.00 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 48,800.00 48,800.00 0.00 48,800.00 0.00

Dept 446 - ROAD PRESERVATION 202-446-930.006 STREET PROJECT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 446 - ROAD PRESERVATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 450 - WINTER MAINTENANCE 202-450-702.000 WAGES-FULL TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-450-704.000 OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-450-707.000 WAGES- PART TIME/SEASONAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-450-711.000 FICA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-450-725.000 FUEL 500.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 202-450-728.000 SUPPLIES 9,000.00 9,000.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 202-450-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 500.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 202-450-935.000 STREET MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-450-944.000 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 5,500.00 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 7/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 202 - MAJOR STREET FUND Expenditures Total Dept 450 - WINTER MAINTENANCE 15,500.00 15,500.00 0.00 15,500.00 0.00

Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 202-460-702.000 WAGES-FULL TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-704.000 OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-707.000 WAGES- PART TIME/SEASONAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-711.000 FICA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-711.004 HEALTH INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-711.005 RETIREMENT PLAN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-711.006 LIFE INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-711.007 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-711.008 UNEMPLOYMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-711.014 HEALTH INSURANCE OPT OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-725.000 FUEL 345.00 345.00 27.69 317.31 8.03 202-460-728.000 SUPPLIES 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 202-460-728.001 METRO ACT- RIGHT OF WAY 8,500.00 8,500.00 0.00 8,500.00 0.00 202-460-800.001 BANK SERVICE CHARGE 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 202-460-802.000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 202-460-806.000 CONTRACTED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-827.000 INSURANCE-MMRMA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 202-460-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 202-460-930.004 MAINT & REPAIR-LIGHT POLE 7,500.00 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00 202-460-935.000 STREET MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 15,000.00 15,000.00 76.66 14,923.34 0.51 202-460-944.000 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 10,250.00 10,250.00 0.00 10,250.00 0.00

Total Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 51,645.00 51,645.00 104.35 51,540.65 0.20

Dept 462 - TRAFFIC SERVICES 202-462-806.000 CONTRACTED SERVICES 2,040.00 2,040.00 301.31 1,738.69 14.77

Total Dept 462 - TRAFFIC SERVICES 2,040.00 2,040.00 301.31 1,738.69 14.77

Dept 466 - ROAD PRESERVATION 202-466-930.006 STREET PROJECT 65,000.00 65,000.00 0.00 65,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 466 - ROAD PRESERVATION 65,000.00 65,000.00 0.00 65,000.00 0.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 182,985.00 182,985.00 405.66 182,579.34 0.22

Fund 202 - MAJOR STREET FUND: TOTAL REVENUES 194,550.00 194,550.00 25,697.54 168,852.46 13.21 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 182,985.00 182,985.00 405.66 182,579.34 0.22 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES 11,565.00 11,565.00 25,291.88 (13,726.88) 218.69 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 8/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 203 - LOCAL STREET FUND Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 203-000-546.000 ACT 51 REVENUES 80,000.00 80,000.00 10,874.38 69,125.62 13.59 203-000-574.100 METRO ACT FUNDING 7,000.00 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 203-000-627.101 CONTRIBUTION FROM 101 GENERAL FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-000-627.202 CONTRIBUTION/ADMIN FROM 202 MAJOR FUND 30,000.00 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 203-000-665.000 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-000-698.999 APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 117,000.00 117,000.00 10,874.38 106,125.62 9.29

Dept 450 - WINTER MAINTENANCE 203-450-650.000 ROAD SALT 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00

Total Dept 450 - WINTER MAINTENANCE 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00

Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 203-460-675.002 COST RECOVERY - REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 466 - ROAD PRESERVATION 203-466-675.002 COST RECOVERY - REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 466 - ROAD PRESERVATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL REVENUES 119,500.00 119,500.00 10,874.38 108,625.62 9.10

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 203-000-812.101 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES-TO 101 8,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 8,000.00 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00

Dept 450 - WINTER MAINTENANCE 203-450-702.000 WAGES-FULL TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-450-704.000 OVERTIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-450-707.000 WAGES- PART TIME/SEASONAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-450-711.000 FICA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-450-725.000 FUEL 1,250.00 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 0.00 203-450-728.000 SUPPLIES 9,000.00 9,000.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 203-450-802.000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 203-450-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 203-450-944.000 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 6,500.00 6,500.00 0.00 6,500.00 0.00

Total Dept 450 - WINTER MAINTENANCE 23,750.00 23,750.00 0.00 23,750.00 0.00

Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 203-460-702.000 WAGES-FULL TIME 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 203-460-704.000 OVERTIME 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 203-460-707.000 WAGES- PART TIME/SEASONAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 9/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 203 - LOCAL STREET FUND Expenditures 203-460-711.000 FICA 450.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 0.00 203-460-711.004 HEALTH INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-460-711.005 RETIREMENT PLAN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-460-711.006 LIFE INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-460-711.007 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-460-711.008 UNEMPLOYMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-460-711.014 HEALTH INSURANCE OPT OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-460-725.000 FUEL 500.00 500.00 98.16 401.84 19.63 203-460-728.000 SUPPLIES 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 203-460-728.001 METRO ACT- RIGHT OF WAY 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 203-460-800.001 BANK SERVICE CHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 203-460-802.107 BRIDGE INSPECTION 3,500.00 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 203-460-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 203-460-935.000 STREET MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 12,500.00 12,500.00 271.79 12,228.21 2.17 203-460-944.000 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 7,000.00 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 35,950.00 35,950.00 369.95 35,580.05 1.03

Dept 466 - ROAD PRESERVATION 203-466-930.006 STREET PROJECT 120,000.00 120,000.00 12,147.15 107,852.85 10.12

Total Dept 466 - ROAD PRESERVATION 120,000.00 120,000.00 12,147.15 107,852.85 10.12

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 187,700.00 187,700.00 12,517.10 175,182.90 6.67

Fund 203 - LOCAL STREET FUND: TOTAL REVENUES 119,500.00 119,500.00 10,874.38 108,625.62 9.10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 187,700.00 187,700.00 12,517.10 175,182.90 6.67 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES (68,200.00) (68,200.00) (1,642.72) (66,557.28) 2.41 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 10/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 207 - POLICE FUND Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 207-000-402.000 CURRENT TAXES 359,300.00 359,300.00 59,691.45 299,608.55 16.61 207-000-543.000 ACT 302 REVENUES 500.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 207-000-545.000 LIQUOR LICENSE 7,000.00 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 207-000-547.000 STATE GRANT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 207-000-631.000 RESTITUTION-POLICE 500.00 500.00 210.00 290.00 42.00 207-000-632.000 COURT COST RECOVERY-OWI 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 207-000-634.000 SOR 100.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 207-000-635.000 POLICE REPORTS 2,000.00 2,000.00 55.00 1,945.00 2.75 207-000-636.000 FINGERPRINT/BREATHALYZER 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 207-000-637.000 IMPOUND 4,500.00 4,500.00 330.00 4,170.00 7.33 207-000-643.901 BOAT KEY-MARINE PORTION 0.00 0.00 100.00 (100.00) 100.00 207-000-655.000 DRUG FORFEITURE REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 207-000-665.000 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 207-000-675.000 COST REC- MISC/REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 207-000-675.008 COST RECOVERY- CIVIL INFRACTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 207-000-675.009 MARINE PATROL RESCUE/TOWING 1,000.00 1,000.00 430.00 570.00 43.00 207-000-699.101 TRANSFERS-IN FR GENERAL 578,300.00 578,300.00 0.00 578,300.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 958,400.00 958,400.00 60,816.45 897,583.55 6.35

TOTAL REVENUES 958,400.00 958,400.00 60,816.45 897,583.55 6.35

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 207-000-702.000 WAGES-FULL TIME 352,218.00 352,218.00 66,723.87 285,494.13 18.94 207-000-704.000 OVERTIME 25,000.00 25,000.00 2,524.86 22,475.14 10.10 207-000-706.000 HOLIDAY PAY (PD) 20,000.00 20,000.00 3,624.00 16,376.00 18.12 207-000-707.000 WAGES- PART TIME/SEASONAL 73,000.00 73,000.00 12,564.00 60,436.00 17.21 207-000-708.000 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 8,700.00 8,700.00 3,050.00 5,650.00 35.06 207-000-710.000 MARINE PATROL 11,000.00 11,000.00 4,873.39 6,126.61 44.30 207-000-711.000 FICA 37,800.00 37,800.00 6,975.94 30,824.06 18.45 207-000-711.001 ICMA POLICE CHIEF 8,800.00 8,800.00 1,346.92 7,453.08 15.31 207-000-711.004 HEALTH INSURANCE 70,000.00 70,000.00 16,398.88 53,601.12 23.43 207-000-711.005 RETIREMENT PLAN 75,072.00 75,072.00 6,540.17 68,531.83 8.71 207-000-711.006 LIFE INSURANCE 3,500.00 3,500.00 264.34 3,235.66 7.55 207-000-711.007 WORKERS COMP 11,200.00 11,200.00 0.00 11,200.00 0.00 207-000-711.008 UNEMPLOYMENT 300.00 300.00 17.68 282.32 5.89 207-000-711.011 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 2,000.00 2,000.00 333.34 1,666.66 16.67 207-000-711.014 HEALTH INSURANCE OPT OUT 5,000.00 5,000.00 961.55 4,038.45 19.23 207-000-725.000 FUEL 18,000.00 18,000.00 2,191.03 15,808.97 12.17 207-000-728.000 SUPPLIES 8,500.00 8,500.00 783.01 7,716.99 9.21 207-000-800.101 LEGAL FEES-GENERAL PERSONNEL 21,000.00 21,000.00 3,350.00 17,650.00 15.95 207-000-812.101 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES-TO 101 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 207-000-813.000 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 65,000.00 65,000.00 15,581.98 49,418.02 23.97 207-000-827.000 INSURANCE-MMRMA 50,000.00 50,000.00 25,822.12 24,177.88 51.64 207-000-850.000 TELEPHONE 2,800.00 2,800.00 494.79 2,305.21 17.67 207-000-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 18,335.00 18,335.00 3,641.55 14,693.45 19.86 207-000-944.001 COPIER & MAINTENANCE 475.00 475.00 0.00 475.00 0.00 207-000-944.013 VEHICLE LEASE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 207-000-954.000 ACT 302 TRAINING 500.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 207-000-955.000 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 8,000.00 8,000.00 900.00 7,100.00 11.25 207-000-999.401 TRANSFERS OUT CAPITAL PROJECTS 97,200.00 97,200.00 5,780.36 91,419.64 5.95 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 11/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 207 - POLICE FUND Expenditures Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 993,400.00 993,400.00 184,743.78 808,656.22 18.60

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 993,400.00 993,400.00 184,743.78 808,656.22 18.60

Fund 207 - POLICE FUND: TOTAL REVENUES 958,400.00 958,400.00 60,816.45 897,583.55 6.35 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 993,400.00 993,400.00 184,743.78 808,656.22 18.60 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES (35,000.00) (35,000.00) (123,927.33) 88,927.33 354.08 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 12/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 247 - TAX INCREMENT FINANCE AUTHOR FUND Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 247-000-402.000 CURRENT TAXES 276,000.00 276,000.00 24,640.91 251,359.09 8.93 247-000-404.000 NON CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-000-573.000 LOCAL COMMUNITY STABILIZATION SHARE APPR 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 247-000-665.000 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-000-674.000-100000000 DONATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-000-698.999 APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-000-699.353 TRANSFER IN FROM TIFA 2013 REFUNDING BD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 280,000.00 280,000.00 24,640.91 255,359.09 8.80

TOTAL REVENUES 280,000.00 280,000.00 24,640.91 255,359.09 8.80

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 247-000-800.001 BANK SERVICE CHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-000-956.000 COSTS, FEES, AND CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-000-964.000 MISC EXPENSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 191 - ADMINISTRATION 247-191-802.000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 191 - ADMINISTRATION 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00

Dept 448 - STREET LIGHTING 247-448-920.000 STREET LIGHTING 50,400.00 50,400.00 9,226.04 41,173.96 18.31

Total Dept 448 - STREET LIGHTING 50,400.00 50,400.00 9,226.04 41,173.96 18.31

Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 247-460-702.000 WAGES-FULL TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-460-707.000 WAGES- PART TIME/SEASONAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-460-711.000 FICA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-460-711.004 HEALTH INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-460-711.005 RETIREMENT PLAN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-460-711.006 LIFE INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-460-711.007 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-460-711.008 UNEMPLOYMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 460 - ROUTINE STREET MAINTENANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 693 - CASS LAKE ROAD 247-693-728.000 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-693-802.000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-693-802.005 ANNUAL DISCLOSURE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-693-812.000 ADMINISTRATION CHARGES 41,400.00 41,400.00 0.00 41,400.00 0.00 247-693-920.000 UTILITIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-693-944.000 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 13/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 247 - TAX INCREMENT FINANCE AUTHOR FUND Expenditures 247-693-970.000 CAPITAL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 693 - CASS LAKE ROAD 41,400.00 41,400.00 0.00 41,400.00 0.00

Dept 899 - TAX TRIBUNAL/OTHER REFUNDS ORDERED 247-899-956.000 COSTS, FEES, AND CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 899 - TAX TRIBUNAL/OTHER REFUNDS ORDERED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 965 - APPROPRIATED TRANSFERS OUT 247-965-999.351 TRANSFERS OUT TO TIFA 2004 DEBT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247-965-999.353 TRANSFER OUT TO TIFA 2013 DEBT 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00

Total Dept 965 - APPROPRIATED TRANSFERS OUT 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 210,730.00 210,730.00 9,226.04 201,503.96 4.38

Fund 247 - TAX INCREMENT FINANCE AUTHOR FUND: TOTAL REVENUES 280,000.00 280,000.00 24,640.91 255,359.09 8.80 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 210,730.00 210,730.00 9,226.04 201,503.96 4.38 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES 69,270.00 69,270.00 15,414.87 53,855.13 22.25 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 14/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 271 - LIBRARY MILLAGE FUND Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 271-000-402.000 CURRENT TAXES 29,614.00 29,614.00 4,620.48 24,993.52 15.60 271-000-665.000 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 271-000-699.101 TRANSFERS-IN FR GENERAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 29,614.00 29,614.00 4,620.48 24,993.52 15.60

TOTAL REVENUES 29,614.00 29,614.00 4,620.48 24,993.52 15.60

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 271-000-956.000 COSTS, FEES, AND CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 790 - LIBRARY SERVICES 271-790-813.000 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 29,614.00 29,614.00 0.00 29,614.00 0.00

Total Dept 790 - LIBRARY SERVICES 29,614.00 29,614.00 0.00 29,614.00 0.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 29,614.00 29,614.00 0.00 29,614.00 0.00

Fund 271 - LIBRARY MILLAGE FUND: TOTAL REVENUES 29,614.00 29,614.00 4,620.48 24,993.52 15.60 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 29,614.00 29,614.00 0.00 29,614.00 0.00 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 4,620.48 (4,620.48) 100.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 15/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 353 - TIFA DEBT REFUNDING 2013 Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 353-000-665.000 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 353-000-699.013 TRANSFER IN FOR 2013 BOND 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00

TOTAL REVENUES 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 353-000-956.000 COSTS, FEES, AND CHARGES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 353-000-991.000 DEBT SERVICE PRINCIPAL 85,000.00 85,000.00 0.00 85,000.00 0.00 353-000-992.000 DEBT SERVICE FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 353-000-995.000 DEBT SERVICE INTEREST EXPENSE 8,930.00 8,930.00 0.00 8,930.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00

Dept 965 - APPROPRIATED TRANSFERS OUT 353-965-999.247 TRANSFER OUT TO TIFA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 965 - APPROPRIATED TRANSFERS OUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00

Fund 353 - TIFA DEBT REFUNDING 2013: TOTAL REVENUES 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 93,930.00 93,930.00 0.00 93,930.00 0.00 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 16/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 401 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 401-000-665.000 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-000-675.000 COST REC- MISC/REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-000-676.000 MISC REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-000-697.000 LOAN PROCEEDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-000-698.999 APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-000-699.101 TRANSFERS-IN FR GENERAL 35,750.00 35,750.00 0.00 35,750.00 0.00 401-000-699.207 TRANSFER IN FROM POLICE FUND 92,200.00 92,200.00 0.00 92,200.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 127,950.00 127,950.00 0.00 127,950.00 0.00

TOTAL REVENUES 127,950.00 127,950.00 0.00 127,950.00 0.00

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 401-000-802.000-110000000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 101 - CITY COUNCIL 401-101-980.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 101 - CITY COUNCIL 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00

Dept 191 - ADMINISTRATION 401-191-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 191 - ADMINISTRATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 207 - POLICE IN CAR COMPUTERS 401-207-981.000 POLICE VEHICLE 85,000.00 85,000.00 14,995.00 70,005.00 17.64 401-207-981.001 POLICE VEHICLE MODEMS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-207-981.002 POLICE IN CAR COMPUTERS 5,800.00 5,800.00 0.00 5,800.00 0.00 401-207-981.003 POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,400.00 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00

Total Dept 207 - POLICE IN CAR COMPUTERS 92,200.00 92,200.00 14,995.00 77,205.00 16.26

Dept 265 - CITY HALL FACILITIES 401-265-970.000 CAPITAL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 265 - CITY HALL FACILITIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 301 - POLICE 401-301-944.013 VEHICLE LEASE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-301-944.301 POLICE VEHICLE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-301-970.000 CAPITAL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-301-990.000 LOAN PAYMENT INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-301-990.100 LOAN PAYMENT PRINCIPAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 17/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 401 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Expenditures Total Dept 301 - POLICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 441 - DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS 401-441-944.013 VEHICLE LEASE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-441-944.301 DPW ASPHALT TRAILER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-441-970.000 CAPITAL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 401-441-977.000 DPW EQUIPMENT 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00

Total Dept 441 - DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00

Dept 445 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 401-445-924.000 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 445 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Dept 732 - CDBG PUBLIC SERVICE AID 401-732-736.301 CDBG- ROSE SORTOR PARK 10,750.00 10,750.00 0.00 10,750.00 0.00

Total Dept 732 - CDBG PUBLIC SERVICE AID 10,750.00 10,750.00 0.00 10,750.00 0.00

Dept 756 - PARK FACILITIES 401-756-745.000 GRANT MATCH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 756 - PARK FACILITIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 127,950.00 127,950.00 14,995.00 112,955.00 11.72

Fund 401 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND: TOTAL REVENUES 127,950.00 127,950.00 0.00 127,950.00 0.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 127,950.00 127,950.00 14,995.00 112,955.00 11.72 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES 0.00 0.00 (14,995.00) 14,995.00 100.00 09/10/2020 04:28 PM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR Page: 18/18 User: DENISE DB: Keego Harbor PERIOD ENDING 08/31/2020 2020-21 ORIGINAL 2020-21 YTD BALANCE AVAILABLE % BDGT GL NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUDGET AMENDED BUDGET 08/31/2020 BALANCE USED Fund 592 - WATER & SEWER FUND Revenues Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 592-000-451.120 MISC PERMIT 5,000.00 5,000.00 60.00 4,940.00 1.20 592-000-547.000 STATE GRANT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592-000-548.000 SAW GRANT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592-000-601.000 WATER AND SEWER FLAT FEE 14,400.00 14,400.00 0.00 14,400.00 0.00 592-000-604.000 TAB AND RECONNECT FEE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592-000-665.000 INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592-000-676.000 MISC REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 19,400.00 19,400.00 60.00 19,340.00 0.31

TOTAL REVENUES 19,400.00 19,400.00 60.00 19,340.00 0.31

Expenditures Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 592-000-800.001 BANK SERVICE CHARGE 100.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 592-000-802.000 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592-000-806.000 CONTRACTED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592-000-930.000 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 592-000-947.000 SAW GRANT PROJECT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 592-000-970.000 CAPITAL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Dept 000 - UNCLASSIFIED 5,100.00 5,100.00 0.00 5,100.00 0.00

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,100.00 5,100.00 0.00 5,100.00 0.00

Fund 592 - WATER & SEWER FUND: TOTAL REVENUES 19,400.00 19,400.00 60.00 19,340.00 0.31 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,100.00 5,100.00 0.00 5,100.00 0.00 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES 14,300.00 14,300.00 60.00 14,240.00 0.42

TOTAL REVENUES - ALL FUNDS 3,748,240.00 3,748,240.00 466,694.05 3,281,545.95 12.45 TOTAL EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS 3,891,479.00 3,891,479.00 377,373.46 3,514,105.54 9.70 NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES (143,239.00) (143,239.00) 89,320.59 (232,559.59) 62.36 Draft Tab 4 CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL STUDY SESSION MINUTES TUESDAY AUGUST 18, 2020

CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER: Mayor Kalman called the virtual meeting to order at 5:30pm

ROLL CALL: Mayor Rob Kalman, Mayor Pro Tem Brian Lampl, Council Member Karen Meabrod, Council Member John Fletcher, and Council Member Theresa Shimansky

STAFF PRESENT: Acting City Manager / City Clerk Tammy Neeb and Police Chief John Fitzgerald

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

PUBLIC COMMENT Ashley Attisha – Ms. Attisha introduced herself as a candidate running for City Council in November.

Taste of Keego 2.0 Kirsten Douglass presented the new vision for Taste of Keego, as the format will change this year.

Spring Rider Purchase Parks and Recreation would like to purchase 3 Spring Riders for Baxter Morgan Park. They budgeted and approved $5000.00 for this purchase with funds coming from the Taste of Keego account.

Gibbs Planning Group Council Members discussed the revised proposal from the Gibbs Planning Group. Mayor Kalman and Mayor Pro Tem Lampl will set up a call with Mr. Gibbs to discuss how to proceed.

Return to Work Policy Council Members discussed the COVID-19 policy that Acting Manager Neeb will present to all City staff.

AV Counting Board The AV counting board works on election days and only counts AV ballots. The members of the AV counting board get appointed by the Election Commission which consists of City Clerk, Mayor and City Attorney. Acting Manager Neeb is recommending having an AV Counting Board comprised of 2 people that would only process AV ballots at the General Election on November 3.

AV Ballot Machine Purchase Council Members discussed the purchase of the AV Ballot Machine vs. having Oakland County process the AV Ballots for the City. Having a machine to process AV Ballots at City Hall will be a great help to every election in the future. There is a grant from the State which will cover 50% of the purchase of the AV Ballot Machine, with the balance most likely being covered by CARES. Council members discussed the warranty for year 6-10 for $564.00 per year.

1 Draft

City Hall Camera System Chief Fitzgerald informed Council members he is still receiving quotes and will bring this item back to Council at a meeting later this year.

Rust Removal on Building Council Members discussed on how to best remove rust from the outside of building at City Hall.

City Hall Purchases Council Members discussed the purchase of sneeze guards and air scrubbers for City Hall. Acting Manager Neeb will confirm that the air scrubbers are ozone free, and that the City can purchase additional 2 bulbs. Council members also discussed some additional purchases the City should make and the submission for reimbursement process of the CARES Act.

Police Body Cameras Chief Fitzgerald discussed the possible purchase body cameras for Police Officers.

Police Vehicle Chief Fitzgerald discussed the purchase of a third vehicle as it was approved in the FY2021 Budget.

DPW Council members discussed the need for an equipment update from DPW Foreman Mills. Council Member Fletcher will assist in getting quotes for the repair / repaint of the light poles on Cass Lake Road. Council Members discussed the streets to include for Crack Seal this fall and the need for gates with locks next spring at the City owned beaches. Acting Manager Neeb will get quotes for a third party to assist in mowing our City parks.

Fran Leaf Park City Council members discussed issues at Fran Leaf park.

Items from Regular Agenda Council Members discussed items that appear on the City Council August 20 meeting agenda.

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT Mayor Kalman adjourned the virtual meeting at 7:53pm.

______Rob Kalman Lori Gilman City of Keego Harbor, its Mayor City of Keego Harbor, its Records Clerk

2 Tab 5 Draft

CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING MINUTES THURSDAY AUGUST 20, 2020

CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER: Mayor Kalman called the virtual meeting to order at 7:01pm

ROLL CALL: Mayor Rob Kalman, Mayor Pro Tem Brian Lampl, Council Member Karen Meabrod, Council Member John Fletcher, and Council Member Theresa Shimansky

STAFF PRESENT: Acting City Manager / City Clerk Tammy Neeb, Police Chief John Fitzgerald and City Attorney Tom Ryan

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

PUBLIC COMMENT No one addressed the Council Members, Closed to Public Comment

Announcements: • Mayor • Planning Commission • Parks and Recreation • Police Chief • City Attorney • Acting City Manager

CONSENT AGENDA: Resolution 20-29

Monthly Financial Report 1. Authorize Bill payments for July 2. Revenue and Expenditure Report Meeting Minutes 3. Study Session Virtual Meeting Minutes July 14, 2020 4. City Council Virtual Meeting Minutes July 16, 2020 5. City Council Special Virtual Meeting Minutes August 10, 2020 Miscellaneous 5. Road Local Matching Fund Program

Resolution to approve the Consent Agenda, Resolution 20-29, as presented by Council Member Shimansky; support by Council Member Fletcher Roll call: Lampl yes, Fletcher yes, Meabrod yes, Shimansky yes, Kalman yes - Motion Carried

1 Draft

REGULAR AGENDA: Return to Work Policy The City labor attorney prepared a COVID-19 policy. Acting Manager Neeb, as the Covid-19 City coordinator will administer and review with city staff, police officers and contractors who work inside of City Hall. Council discussed one change to the policy on Section 5 (b), DPW Foreman will deep clean City Hall on Monday mornings at 7:00am.

Motion to approve the COVID-19 Work Policy with one amendment by Mayor Pro Tem Lampl; support by Council Member Shimansky Roll call: Shimansky yes, Kalman yes, Lampl yes, Fletcher yes, Meabrod yes, - Motion Carried

Resolution to approve the Spring Rider purchase, as presented, by Council Member Meabrod; support by Council Member Fletcher Roll call: Meabrod yes, Fletcher yes, Shimansky yes, Kalman yes, Lampl yes, - Motion Carried

Amend Virtual Meeting Policy Motion to table this item until the September City Council meeting by Mayor Pro Tem Lampl; support by Council Member Shimansky Roll call: Kalman yes, Fletcher yes, Lampl yes, Meabrod yes, Shimansky yes - Motion Carried

City Hall Camera System Motion to table this item until Chief Fitzgerald has more information to present to City Council by Council Member Shimansky; support by Council Member Fletcher Roll call: Meabrod yes, Kalman yes, Shimansky yes, Fletcher yes, Lampl yes, - Motion Carried

Police Body Cameras Motion to table this item until Chief Fitzgerald has more information to present to City Council by Mayor Kalman; support by Council Member Meabrod Roll call: Fletcher yes, Kalman yes, Lampl yes, Shimansky yes, Meabrod yes, - Motion Carried

City Hall Purchases Council Members discussed the purchase of Sneeze Guards and Air Scrubbers for City Hall.

Resolution to approve the purchase of Sneeze Guards from Wholesale Fixture, not to exceed $7,610.00, by Mayor Pro Tem Lampl; support by Council Member Shimansky Roll call: Shimansky yes, Kalman yes, Fletcher yes, Lampl yes, Meabrod yes, - Motion Carried

Draft

Resolution to approve the purchase of an Air Scrubber with additional bulbs from Otto Trzos, not to exceed $2250.00 plus $300.00 for a total of $2,550.00, by Council Member Fletcher; support by Council Member Shimansky Roll call: Fletcher yes, Lampl yes, Shimansky yes, Meabrod yes, Kalman yes - Motion Carried

Resolution to approve the purchase of an AV Ballot Machine, not to exceed $5545.00 where remaining balance is covered by CARES with $564.00 to be budgeted for warranty in year 6-10 and allow Acting Manager Neeb to sign a contract with Hart to purchase, by Council Member Meabrod; support by Council Member Fletcher Roll call: Meabrod yes, Fletcher yes, Kalman yes, Lampl yes, Shimansky yes - Motion Carried

Agreement with Oakland County for Absentee Ballot Processing This is not necessary based on the approval to purchase the AV Ballot Machine.

Crack Seal on City Streets Council Members discussed the City will not be paving any roads this year, instead roads will be crack sealed. Crack seal will help to extend the life of the road. A list of streets was compiled, and Council would like to add other streets to that list that were paved in 2017. Mayor Kalman, Council Member Fletcher and DPW Foreman Mills will walk the City to confirm before the project begins. The City will use a grant for $5,000.00 and funds from ACT 51 will be used to pay the balance of this project.

Resolution to approve the Michigan Joint Sealing Inc. to complete the crack sealing project with additional money from the grant, not to exceed $17160.000 plus $5000.00 for a total of $22,160.00, by Council Member Fletcher; support by Council Member Shimansky Roll call: Kalman yes, Fletcher yes, Lampl yes, Meabrod yes, Shimansky yes - Motion Carried

Boards and Commissions Greater West Bloomfield Community Cable Commission (GWBCCC) had an applicant, Barbara Kline, who had a phone interview with Council Member Fletcher. Council Members discussed the fact that the applicant had litigation against the City.

Motion to appoint Barbara Kline to GWBCCC by Council Member Fletcher; support by Council Member Meabrod Roll call: Fletcher yes, Kalman no, Lampl no, Shimansky no, Meabrod yes, - Motion Failed

Draft

COUNCIL COMMENTS

ADJOURNMENT Mayor Kalman adjourned the virtual meeting at 8:28pm.

______Rob Kalman Lori Gilman City of Keego Harbor, its Mayor City of Keego Harbor, its Records Clerk

Tab 6

From: KEVIN REISING To: [email protected] Cc: Lori Gilman Subject: Re: Planning Commission Virtual Meeting Sept 1 Packet Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 2:51:35 PM

Hi Joel, Per our conversation earlier this afternoon, I would like to make a brief announcement at the beginning of the meeting. I will advise the Commission that due to business demands, I do not have time to continue on the Commission at this time. Of course, if circumstances change and I can volunteer more time then I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Keego Harbor in this or another capacity.

The time spent with you and the other Commissioners has been a great pleasure. I would also like to wish the Commission well as we enter important years for the City – I am confident we will do well. I also have some people in mind that could serve the Commission well – I will discuss with them.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve, Kevin

From: Lori Gilman Date: Friday, August 28, 2020 at 1:11 PM To: Lori Gilman Subject: Planning Commission Virtual Meeting Sept 1 Packet

Attached please find the packet for the virtual meeting next Tuesday September 1.

If you would like a hard copy printed for pick-up at City Hall on Monday or Tuesday, please let me know.

Have a nice weekend,

Lori Gilman Record’s Clerk City of Keego Harbor (248) 682-1930 MEMORANDUM TAB 7 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Michigan Joint Seal Contact

BACKGROUND: A Resolution to approve the Michigan Joint Sealing Inc. to complete the crack sealing project with a total of $22,160.00. Consent was not given for Acting City Manager to enter a contract.

RECOMMENDAITON: Motion to approve or (deny) to ratify the Michigan Joint Seal Inc. contract. MEMORANDUM TAB 8 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Reprogramming Request

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the City allocated $9,533.00 of CDBG funds to Parks, Recreational Facilities; only $5,799.00 was used. The balance, $3,734.00, must be reprogrammed to other accounts allocated by the City to use CDBG funds. The other account where CDBG funds have been allocated is Remove Architectural Barriers.

RECOMMENDATION: Resolution to approve (or deny) the reprogramming of 2018 funds in the amount of $3,734.00 from Parks, Recreational Facilities to Remove Architectural Barriers Public Notice Posted on Website

Notice is hereby given that in accordance with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) requirements a Virtual Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 7:00 p.m., to receive written and verbal comment regarding the reprogramming of federal CDBG funds as follows:

Existing - 2018 Program Year Activity Number 731332 Activity Description Parks, Recreational Facilities - Remove obsolete wooden play scape and replace with new play scape at Fran leaf Park. Amount $3,734.00

Proposed - 2018 Program Year Activity Number 731619 Activity Description Remove Architectural Barriers – Retro fit existing sidewalks, ramp, gazebo, and parking lot at Rose Sortor Park to ADA standards Amount $3,734.00

Arrangements to reasonably accommodate special needs, including handicap accessibility or interpreter, will be made upon receiving 72-hour advance notice. Contact City Clerk Tammy Neeb at (248) 682-1930 for special services.

Published on City Website on Thursday September 3, 2020 Letter and Map to be Sent if Reprogramming is approved City of Keego Harbor 2025 Beechmont Keego Harbor, Michigan 48320 "Heart of the Lakes"

September 17, 2020

Mike Pucher, Supervisor Contract Compliance Unit Oakland County Community & Home Improvement Oakland Pointe Suite 1900 250 Elizabeth Lake Rd Pontiac, Ml 48341-0414

RE: REPROGRAMMING REQUEST

The City of Keego Harbor requests the following reprogramming of PY 2018 funds.

Existing (FROM): Account Number Activity Description Amount 731332 Parks, Recreational Facilities $3,734.00

Account Number Proposed (TO): Amount 731619 Activity Description $3,734.00 Remove Architectural Barriers

Description: Retro fit existing sidewalks, ramp, gazebo, and parking lot at Rose Sortor Park to ADA standards.

I have attached the required backup including a copy of the public hearing advertisement, copy of certified meeting minutes, project description and updated environmental review record as needed. If you have questions or require further information, please contact my office at (248) 682-1930.

Sincerely,

Lori Gilman CDBG Contact

Attachments

City Administration (248) 682-1930 • Fax (248) 682-2008 Police Administration/Non-Emergency (248) 682-3030 • Fax (248) 682-1635 • Police/Fire Emergency 911

MEMORANDUM TAB 9 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER

TO: City Council FROM: Tammy Neeb - Acting City Manager/City Clerk DATE: September 17, 2020 SUBJECT: Police Vehicle Purchase

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Request to purchase a white 2020 Ford Police Interceptor Sport Utility Vehicle.

At this time, I would recommend purchasing the vehicle without financing with funds available in the Capital Projects Fund (401), budgeted for FY20-21.

RECOMMENDATION (MOTION): Resolution to approve or (deny) up to $50,000 for white 2020 Police Interceptor Sport Utility Vehicle

MEMORANDUM TAB 10 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Amend Virtual Meeting Policy

BACKGROUND: Mayor Pro Tem Lampl is working with City Attorney Ryan on revisions to the policy. He will give an update at the City Council meeting.

MEMORANDUM TAB 11 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Planning Commission Revised By-Laws

BACKGROUND: At the request of the Planning Commission a proposed amendment to the City of Keego Harbor Planning Commission Bylaws was proposed. The Planning Department amended the language as shown in the enclosed Bylaws. The proposed language is shown within Article V: Meetings, Section 5.

In accordance with the existing Planning Commission Bylaws, the August 5, 2020 Planning Commission meeting served as the first reading of the proposed amendment. At the September 1, 2020 Planning Commission meeting the amendment was approved for adoption.

RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve (or deny) the revised Planning Commission By-Laws as presented

DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2020

PLANNING COMMISSION BY-LAWS

Article I

The name of this Commission shall be the City of Keego Harbor Planning Commission.

Article II

The General purpose of the Keego Harbor Planning Commission shall be to guide and promote the efficient, coordinated development of this City in a manner which will best promote the health, safety and general welfare of its people.

Article III: Creation and Duties

The planning Commission was created pursuant to Ordinance #64 of the City of Keego Harbor as authorized by Act 110, Michigan Public Act of 2006, as amended.

The Commission shall consist of seven (7) members representing insofar as it is possible, different professions or occupations who shall be appointed by the City Council, including one (1) ex-officio member as the City Council liaison.

The term of each member shall be three years. Vacancies that occur will be filled by the City Council.

Article IV: Officers

Section 1. The Commission shall have a Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and Secretary.

Section 2. The Chairperson shall preside at all meetings, appoint such committees as shall from time to time be deemed necessary; and perform such duties as may be delegated by the Commission. The Chairperson shall have a vote on all resolutions of the Commission.

Section 3. The Vice—Chairperson shall preside in the absence of the Chairperson.

Section 4. If the Chairperson and Vice—Chairperson are absent and if a quorum is otherwise present, the longest serving Commission Member will serve as a Temporary Acting Chairman “Pro Tem” for the purpose of conducting said meeting.

DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2020

Section 5. The Secretary shall keep a record of the minutes of all meetings; a record all transcripts, records, plans, etc., brought before the Commission.

Section 6. The Commission may create and fill such other offices or Committees as it may deem necessary.

Article V: Meetings

Section 1. Regular meeting shall be held monthly on the weekday and at the time determined at the convenience of the Commission.

Section 2. Special meetings may be called by the Chairperson or by two (2) or more members of the Commission at such time and place as deemed necessary, with 48 hours prior notification, and including purpose of the special meetings.

Section 3. Regular meetings shall be open to the public. The public shall not be excluded from any Planning Commission Meeting.

Section 4. In the event a regular meeting falls upon a holiday, such meeting shall be cancelled, and items of that agenda carried forward to the designated day of the next week.

Section 5. Any Commission member absent from three (3) consecutive two (2) regular meetings in a calendar year for any reason may be reported to the City Council for replacement, at the discretion of the Commission, according to provisions of Ordinance #64 of the City of Keego Harbor.

Article VI: Election of Officers

Section 1. Election of Officers of the Commission shall be held at the regular March meeting of each year.

Section 2. The term of office shall be one (1) year beginning immediately upon election. A member of the Commission may be elected to the same office for more than three (3) successive years.

Section 3. The Secretary may be elected from within the Commission or be appointed by the Commission.

Section 4. The ex-officio member of the Planning Commission cannot be elected to Chairperson, pursuant to Public Act 110 of 2006, as amended.

DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2020

Article VII: Rules

Section 1. A Quorum consists of four (4) members, and an affirmative majority vote of members present shall be necessary to pass any motion.

Section 2. When a quorum is not present, no official action may take place. Those present may, however, discuss matters of interest, but take no action until the next regular or special meeting.

Section 3. Voting shall ordinarily be voice vote; provided, however, that a roll call vote shall be required if requested by any Commission Member.

Section 4. Any member may be excused from voting only if that person has a conflict of interest as recognized by the majority of the remaining members of the Commission.

Section 5. Expenditures shall be approved by the majority of the Planning Commission.

Section 6. Conduct a regular meeting shall require the following order of business:

1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 4. Review and/or approval of Agenda 5. Public comments concerning items not on the Agenda 6. Public Hearings (If Appropriate) 7. New Business 8. Unfinished Business 9. Communications 10. Adjournment

Section 7. All inquiries, applications or matters requiring official action by the Commission shall be submitted to the Commission at a regular meeting. Such request for scheduling must be submitted at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting.

Section 8. All proceedings, decisions and resolutions of the Commission shall be initiated by motion. The vote upon motions and resolutions shall be recorded.

Section 9. The Planning Commission shall require such information necessary to accurately describe such matters as are brought before it for its

DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2020 consideration, such as surveys, plans, property descriptions, as well as legal information.

In the event that sufficient data has not been furnished, the Commission shall postpone the matter until such a time as the required information has been submitted. Such time shall not exceed sixty (60) days from the original request. At the expiration of this time limit, if such information has not been submitted, the matter shall be removed from the agenda.

Section 10. “Robert’s Rules of Order” shall govern all Commission meetings, except as noted herein.

Article VIII

These by—laws may be amended at any regular meeting by a majority vote of the members of the Commission, providing the proposed changes have been read at a preceding regular meeting.

Commissioners:

Joel Yoder, Chairperson Kevin Reising

Gino Santia, Vice-Chairperson Lisa McCarthy

William Dillon Corine Streng

John Fletcher, Councilman

DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2020

Approved by the Planning Commission at their Regular Meeting of:

______Linda Voll, City Clerk City Clerk

MEMORANDUM TAB 12 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Boards and Commissions

BACKGROUND: Planning Commission Partial Term ending 03/2021 – Kevin Douglass

Mr. Douglass was interviewed by Mayor Pro Tem Brian Lampl, Planning Commission Chairman Joel Yoder and Planning Commission Vice-Chairman Gino Santia.

RECOMMENDATION: Motion to (or not to) appoint Kevin Douglass for a partial term on the Planning Commission ending March 2021 [email protected] MEMORANDUM TAB 13 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Dump Truck Repair

BACKGROUND: DPW foreman Corey Mills took the City’s dump truck to Bostick Truck Center to receive a quote for needed repairs: 1) Engine oil leak 2) Hydraulic leak 3) Batteries will not hold a charge 4) DOT inspection 5) Oil change and filter

Attached you will find the Quote not sales tax will be charged. The overall quote to repair the dump truck $3,350.00.

RECOMMENDAITON: Resolution to approve or (deny) the repairs at Bostick Truck Center in the amount of $3,350.00

MEMORANDUM TAB 14 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Gibbs Planning Group Revised Proposal

BACKGROUND: On January 6, 2020 Gibbs Planning Group provided the City with a $85,000.00 proposal for Urban Planning Consulting Services for the Downtown Development Authority Area. After a meeting with Mayor Kalman and Mayor Pro Tem Lampl and hearing the City’s thoughts and priorities, Mr. Gibbs provided a revised proposal for $45,000.00. Attached is the revised proposal.

Gi bbs Planning Group

06 January 2020 Revised 08 September 2020

Tammy Neeb City Clerk, Acting City Manager City of Keego Harbor 2025 Beechmont Street Keego Harbor, Michigan 48320

Dear Ms. Neeb: On behalf of Gibbs Planning Group (GPG), I am pleased to respond to your request to provide urban planning consulting services for the City of Keego Harbor’s Downtown Development Authority area. GPG’s expertise allows us to formulate and refine a proven and focused approach to accomplish innovative market-based planning services.

GPG has a broad range of both private and public-sector experience across North America including: Birmingham, Charleston, Grand Rapids, Houston, Howell, Kalamazoo, Palm Beach, Portland, Naples, Troy and Walloon Lake Village.

Above: GPG’s Master Plan proposal for Wixom and Marquette Michigan.

Project Understanding Based on our recent discussions, it is my understanding that the City is seeking to explore its potential to create a walkable village center along Cass Lake Road with residential, commercial and community land uses. The City is also interested in reviewing its existing zoning code and building development standards to study opportunities to upgrade new development to the best practices of urban planning and the real estate industry.

Proposed Professional Services Please find below GPG’s proposed approach, scope and fees based upon our experience with other communities and my understanding of the City’s objectives:

240 Martin Street · Birmingham, Michigan · 48009 TRADITIONAL TOWN PLANNING + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + MARKET RESEARCH Tel. 248.642.4800 Fax. 248.642-5758

PHASE 1: PROJECT INITIATION & PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT ($15,000 $5,000) Public engagement is a critical stage in Keego Harbor’s master planning process. We understand the City wants residents and business owners to be comfortable with the project and most importantly, to be excited about the new opportunities of the neighborhoods, waterfront, Cass Lake and Orchard Lake Roads. GPG will provide the following as a part of Phase 1: • Staff meetings to confirm scope, study area, goals and process • Steering committee kick-off meeting • Test the community norms and expectations to ensure that the course set for the plan is consistent with community values • Provide meaningful opportunities for people to engage in the planning process • Work with the City’s leadership team to develop a communications plan for the project • All meetings shall be conducted in person or via video conferences.

View of GPG’s Westland plan (above left) and view of proposed Interlochen Village, Green Lake Township, Michigan.

PHASE 2: PRE-PLANNING RESEARCH ($5,000 $3,000) GPG shall complete the following background inventory and research collection prior to the public charrette outlined in Phase 4 below: • Map and classify existing key land uses and development for the study areas • Prepare scaled maps of the DDA study areas • Map and inventory existing infrastructure and utilities conditions and challenges

PHASE 3: PUBLIC PLANNING WORKSHOP ($15,000 $5,000) GPG shall coordinate and lead a three-day public workshop to master plan the Cass Lake study area. This workshop shall be completed in a public location in Keego Harbor. During this workshop GPG shall complete the following: • Give three (3) one (1) public presentations on new trends in urban planning and placemaking • Work with the City and stakeholder’s group to outline desired development and land use programs for the DDA study area • Prepare two (2) conceptual master plans and supporting illustrative sketches for the DDA study area

Keego Harbor Master Plan Proposal 2. Gibbs Planning Group, Inc. 06 January 2020 08 August 2020

• Lead a three-day one-day public charrette to review alternatives and to generate community input, land uses, master plan and design ideas for the study area in person or via video conference • Issue press releases and launch a web site and social media campaign of the charrette activities and findings • Prepare and present a consensus master plan for the study area and the two (2) detailed study areas

View of GPG master planning public workshop for the City of Birmingham.

PHASE 4: MASTER PLAN ($25,000 $15,000) Based on the input from the above planning workshop, the stakeholder’s group and the City, GPG shall prepare a long-range master plan for the Cass Lake Road DDA study area. This plan shall illustrate proposed land uses, building foot-prints, parking, vehicular circulation, public space, parks and pedestrian walkways. The master plan shall include: • Illustrative scaled master plan showing all proposed improvements and potential redevelopment for the study area • Two (2) birds-eye computer generated isometric views of the study area • One (1) birds-eye computer generated isometric view of each detailed study area • One (1) master plan for each of the two (2) detailed study areas along Cass Lake Road • One watercolor painting of the proposed plan’s representative character • Outline of proposed zoning codes to implement the proposed master plan

PHASE 5: CODE UPDATES ($20,000 $15,000) Based on the findings of the above planning process, GPG shall review the City’s zoning and site planning codes and make specific recommendations to update its urban planning and real estate development standards. GPG’s review shall include the code’s land use, site planning, parking, streetscape, signage, materials, design, landscape and other relevant standards and requirements.

Keego Harbor Master Plan Proposal 3. Gibbs Planning Group, Inc. 06 January 2020 08 August 2020

View of The Village of Rochester, master planned by GPG in 2004 and Westwood Common in Beverly Hills, Michigan planned by GPG in 1995.

GPG will prepare written and graphic exhibits to illustrate the recommended planning updates. Note, GPG’s review will focus on general urban planning issues and will not review the code for architectural, engineering, environmental, mechanical building, health, safety and design standards.

PHASE 6: ADOPTION ($5,000 $2,000) GPG will assist the City in shepherding the plan through its desired adoption process. We will attend up to 10 5 adoption meetings to present the results of the work completed, and to answer questions or present the results at public hearings in person or via video conference.

Proposed Schedule GPG is prepared to begin the above planning services immediately. We propose completing Phases 1-6 within 6-months or as desired by the City.

Proposed Professional Fees: GPG proposes completing the above planning services for a lump sum fee of $85,000 $45,000 plus direct printing including all expenses.

Limits of Scope of Services The services described in this agreement are for conceptual urban planning design services and should not be used as the sole basis of development, financing or leasing. Actual site, building, parking, utility, environmental, grading, civil engineering and architectural plans, cost projects, real estate leasing, brokerage services and construction documents are not included within the scope of work of this proposal and are to be completed by others.

Conditions of Agreement a. GPG is an independent contractor and shall be responsible for all of its overhead, insurance, payroll and taxes. b. All invoices will be paid by the City within 40 days of receipt. c. This agreement will not be enforced by either party until each party has in its possession a copy of this agreement signed by the other.

Keego Harbor Master Plan Proposal 4. Gibbs Planning Group, Inc. 06 January 2020 08 August 2020

GPG’s Master plan sketch for Walloon Village, Michigan.

d. In the event of termination or suspension due to the fault of others than GPG, GPG will be paid compensation for all completed work, plus other fees which may have been authorized by the City of Keego Harbor.

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and we are looking forward to working with you and the Keego Harbor community in the near future.

Sincerely, GIBBS PLANNING GROUP, INC.

Robert J. Gibbs, FASLA, AICP President [email protected]

Keego Harbor Master Plan Proposal 5. Gibbs Planning Group, Inc. 06 January 2020 08 August 2020 MEMORANDUM TAB 15 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: COVID-19 Related Purchases

BACKGROUND: CARES Act $ 66,785.20

Submitted for Reimbursement Aug 28 $ 8,687.23

To be Submitted for Reimbursement Sept 14 $ 12,934.07

Supplies to Order $ 9,014.01*

Touchless Faucets / Toilets $ 6,795.00

Balance to Spend $ 29,354.89

*Please keep in mind, prices on most of these items change daily

Attached please see the list of supplies we would like to order as well as the quotes from Service Pro and S & B Plumbing for 7 touchless faucets and 6 touchless toilets.

RECOMMENDATION: Resolution to approve (or deny) the purchase of supplies, not to exceed $9,500.00

Resolution to approve (or deny) Acting City Manager Neeb to sign contract with Service Pro to install touchless faucets and toilets as presented for $6,795.00

Quotes are from Amazon, Quill and Home Depot Pro. The red highlighted dollar amounts show where we would like to purchase from.

Product Comments Quantity Amazon Quill Home Depot Pro Total

Color Printer, Scanner, Fax, Extra Ink PD 1 $ 423.45 $ 694.00 $ 423.45 Admin 3 $ 1,270.35 $ 3,811.05

Touchless Sanitizer Dispenser Desktop PD 3 $ 45.00 $ 135.00 Admin 6 $ 270.00

Touchless Soap Wall mount Bathrooms 6 $ 22.00 $ 45.99 $ 132.00 Kitchen 1 $ 22.00

AA Batteries For Touchless Soap & Sanitizer 48 / $15.49 $ 15.49

Touchless Sanitizer Station Lobby 1 $ 199.95 $ 129.99 $ 212.94 C Batteries For Touchless Sanitizer Station 12 / $12.99 Sanitizer 2400ml refillable $ 53.99

Hand Sanitizer Gallons 4 $ 72.00 $ 99.00 $ 159.96 $ 72.00

Sanitizing Wipes 50 Wipes per Pack 40 $ 300.00 $ 119.60 $ 119.60

Masks 3 Layer, 50 per Box 56 $ 1,120.00 $ 1,399.44 $ 1,259.44 $ 1,120.00

Masks N95 200 $ 520.00 $ 699.80 $ 520.00

Disinfectant Spray On Back Order 12 $ 77.40 $ 77.40

Electrostatic Sprayer Cleaner 5 Gallon 1 $ 109.99 $ 109.99

Gloves 100 per Box 2000 $ 560.00 $ 440.00 $ 480.00 $ 440.00

Hand Soap Refill Gallons 4 $ 80.00 $ 79.28 $ 79.28

Hands Free Door Opener 10 - Pack 1 $ 279.50 $ 279.50

C-Fold Towels 2400 3 $ 26.12 $ 35.99 $ 78.36

Wall Thermometer For Front Entryway 1 $ 99.95 $ 99.95

Fans For Air Circulation at DPW 2 $ 498.00 $ 996.00

Total $ 9,014.01 Description $ Notes Authorization Submitted for Reimbursement in August $ 8,687.23 Supplies, Countertop Sneeze Guards, E. Sprayer and Backpack

2 Disinfectant for Electrostatic Sprayer $ 82.50 Purchased in August Lori Gilman time processing, entering, submitting CARES ($18.31/hr x 10) $ 183.10 3 Webcams $ 494.97 Purchased in August McGraw Morris August Invoice $ 1,813.50 Covid Work Policy Sneeze Guards (Full Counter and Cubicles) $ 7,610.00 Wholesale Fixture Co. AV Ballot Machine $ 2,750.00 Half not covered by the State Touchless Faucet, Toilets in each Bathroom and Kitchen $ 6,795.00 Quote from Service Pro Approval Required Supplies to be Ordered $ 9,014.01 Provided on Other Page Approval Required Subtotal $ 37,430.31 Oakland County CARES - Keego Harbor Allocation $ 66,785.20 Balance Remaining $ 29,354.89

Future Items 5 Programable Thermostats UVC Light Bulbs for HVAC (Air Scrubbers) Lori Gilman time From PowerVac of Michigan | ServicePro 44300 Grand River Avenue Novi MI 48375 248 912 9973 https://yourworkorder.com/

Quote No. 1321762 Quote For Keego Harbor City Office Type Repair 2025 Beechmont Street Prepared By Mike Schneider Keego Harbor MI 48320 Created On 08/27/2020

Description of Work

Quote to update existing faucets and flush handles on toilets sinks and urinals to touch less faucets and censor flushes

Services to be completed [Commercial Plumbing] Location - Building ATTN: Tammy Neeb [email protected] Phone: 1-248-682-1930

Tammy, Service Pro will furnish the material and labor to remove existing faucets and flush handles on toilets sinks and urinals and install touch less faucets and censor flushes in the following locations:

Price: $6,795.00 total

Men’s front restroom 2 faucets 1 urinal 1 toilet

Women’s front restroom 2 faucets 2 toilets

Women’s back restroom 1 toilet 1 faucet

Men’s back restroom 1 toilet 1 faucet

Break room 1 kitchen sink faucet

We will also shut the water off to the drinking fountains but make sure the bottle filler stays on

All work done during normal business hours based on an 8 hour day. Any unforeseen issues will be addressed onsite with management Sloan faucets and flush valves All sinks and toilet handles are 4 days out Kitchen sink faucet is 3 weeks out

GRAND TOTAL $6795.00

Terms and Conditions

AUTHORIZATION

I have the authority to order the work described above; and I hereby authorize Service Pro (SP) and/or PowerVac of Michigan (PV) to complete the work. I recognize that the system may be deteriorated thus rendering it non-serviceable; and I agree to hold SP and/or PV blameless for any and all damages resulting from these conventional repairs. There is a 30 day labor warranty on all repairs, except electrical. You must provide written notice of any defect or complaint; and allow SP and/or PV thirty days to cure.

I agree that SP and/or PV will retain title to any equipment or material; furnished until final and complete payment is made. I understand that any credit granted shall be paid promptly in accordance with the terms, and the credit grantor may add one and half percent (1.5%) per month to any balance owed. The creditor will pay reasonable collection charges and/or attorney fees in the event of default.

By my signature below, I authorize work to begin and agree to pay the Grand Total according to the terms and conditions of this agreement.

Name: Date:

Signature:

MEMORANDUM TAB 16 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Light Poles TIFA District

BACKGROUND: At City Council request Council Member John Fletcher reached out to Sherwin Williams to inquire about painting of the 99 light poles in the TIFA District. Below are the names of the 3 painting companies. Attached is also a pdf from Sherwin Williams regarding the specifications for type of paint and materials required for preparing surfaces. There is a section for proper preparation of galvanized metal, excerpt:

These are the painters that Sherwin Williams Rep (Dave Boyk) recommended: Jimmy Os painting (Jimmy) 1-248-425-1566 Lewandowski Bro’s Painting (Tom) 1-248-762-1842 Four Seasons Painting (Pat) 1-248-882-9911

TIFA formed a subcommittee, Sue Williams, David Emerling and Leslie Clark. They will go around the city to assess the bases of the light poles and note the height of the concrete elevations of each pole. (just relaying TIFA’s decision, they want to see if the corrosion of the bases correlates to how much off the ground they are)

RECOMMENDAITON: Obtain quotes for the light poles, with all the specific needed. Obtain quotes on the resin/composite bases from three companies.

Product Submittal

Project: Light Poles Keego Harbor

Dear NATIONAL RESTORATION INC:

Thank you for considering Sherwin-Williams products for the Light Poles Keego Harbor project. Included in this package is the Sherwin-Williams submittal for the above referenced project.

Should you require assistance or have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (248) 830-1280 or e-mail me at [email protected].

David Boik Sales Representative

(248) 830-1280 [email protected]

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 2362 FRANKLIN RD, BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302 0332 NATIONAL RESTORATION INC Light Poles Keego Harbor September 02, 2020

Exterior Finishes

Galvanized Metal Primer: B66W00310 - Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl® Universal Acrylic Primer Off White - Secondary Location: Spot Prime Primer: B66W00310 - Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl® Universal Acrylic Primer Off White - Secondary Location: Spot Prime 2 Coats: B66W00311 - Sher-Cryl HPA High Performance Acrylic Gloss Coating Extra White

Basic Surface Preparation

Coating performance is directly affected by surface preparation. Coating integrity and service life will be reduced because of improperly prepared surfaces. As high as 80% of all coating failures can be directly attributed to inadequate surface preparation that affects coating adhesion. Proper product selection, surface preparation, and application affect coating performance. Coating integrity and service life will be reduced because of improperly prepared surfaces. Selection and implementation of proper surface preparation ensures coating adhesion to the substrate and prolongs the service life of the coating system.

The majority of paintable surfaces are concrete, ferrous metal, galvanizing, wood and aluminum. They all require protection to keep them from deteriorating in aggressive environments. Selection of the proper method for surface preparation depends on the substrate, the environment, the coating selected, and the expected service life of the coating system. Economics, surface contamination, and the effect on the substrate will also influence the selection of surface preparation methods. Recognize that any surface preparation short of total removal of the old coating may compromise the service length of the system.

Verify the existence of lead based paints on the project. Buildings constructed after 1978 are less likely to contain lead based paints. If lead based paints are suspected on the project, all removal must be done in accordance with the EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting and all applicable state and local regulations. State and local regulations may be more strict than those set under the federal regulations. Verify that Owner has completed a Hazardous Material Assessment Report for the project prior to issuing of Drawings. Concluding that no lead based paints were found on project site, delete paragraph regarding lead based paints.

WARNING! Removal of old paint by sanding, scraping or other means may generate dust or fumes that contain lead. Exposure to lead dust or fumes may cause brain damage or other adverse health effects, especially in children or pregnant women. Controlling exposure to lead or other hazardous substances requires the use of proper protective equipment, such as a properly fitted respirator (NIOSH approved) and proper containment and cleanup. For more information, call the National Lead Information Center at 1-800-424-LEAD (in US) or contact your local health authority. Removal must be done in accordance with EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule and all related state and local regulations. Care should be taken to follow all state and local regulations which may be more strict than those set under the federal RRP Rule.

No exterior painting should be done immediately after a rain, during foggy weather, when rain is predicted, or when the temperature is below 50°F, unless the products to be used are designed to be used in those environments. ______

Aluminum – S-W 1: Remove all oil, grease, dirt, oxide and other foreign material by cleaning per SSPC-SP1, Solvent Cleaning.

Block (Cinder and Concrete) – S-W 3: Remove all loose mortar and foreign material. Surface must be free of laitance, concrete dust, dirt, form release agents, moisture curing membranes, loose cement, and hardeners. Concrete and mortar must be cured at least 28 days at 75°F. The pH of the surface should be between 6 and 9. On tilt-up and poured-in-place concrete, commercial detergents and abrasive blasting may be necessary to prepare the surface. Fill bug holes, air pockets, and other voids with a cement patching compound (per ASTMD4261).

Brick – S-W 4: Must be free of dirt, loose and excess mortar, and foreign material. All brick should be allowed to weather for at least one year followed by wire brushing to remove efflorescence. Treat the bare brick with one coat of Loxon Conditioner.

Concrete and Masonry – Concrete, Poured – Exterior or Interior– S-W 5: The preparation of new concrete surfaces is as important as the surface preparation of steel. The following precautions will help assure maximum performance of the coating system and satisfactory coating adhesion: 1. Cure – Concrete must be cured prior to coating. Cured is generally defined as concrete poured and aged at a material temperature of at least 75°F for at least 28 days unless specified products are designed for earlier application. 2. Moisture – Reference ASTM F1869-98 Moisture Test by use of Calcium Chloride or ASTM D4263 Plastic Sheet Method Concrete must be free from moisture as much as possible (it seldom falls below 15%). Vapor pressures, temperature, humidity, differentials, and hydrostatic pressures can cause coatings to prematurely fail. The source of moisture, if present, must be located, and the cause corrected prior to coating. 3. Temperature – Air, surface and material temperatures must be in keeping with requirements for the selected product during and after coating application, until coating is cured. 4. Contamination – Remove all grease, dirt, paint, oil, laitance, efflorescence, loose mortar, and cement by the recommendations listed in the surface preparation section.

5. Surface Condition – Hollow areas, bug holes, voids, honeycombs, fin form marks, and all protrusions or rough edges are to be ground or stoned to provide a continuous surface of suitable texture for proper adhesion of the coating. Imperfections may require filling, as specified, with a recommended Sherwin-Williams product.

6. Concrete Treatment – Hardeners, sealers, form release agents, curing compounds, and other concrete treatments should be removed to ensure adequate coating adhesion and performance.

Methods of Surface Preparation on Concrete per SSPC-SP13/NACE 6 or ICRI 03732 Surface Cleaning Methods: Vacuum cleaning, air blast cleaning, and water cleaning per ASTM D4258. Used to remove dirt, loose material, and/or dust from concrete. Detergent water cleaning and steam cleaning per ASTM D4258. Used to remove oils and grease from concrete. Prior to abrasive cleaning, and after abrasive cleaning, surfaces should be cleaned by one of the methods described above.

Mechanical Surface Preparation Methods: Dry abrasive blasting, wet abrasive blasting, vacuum assisted abrasive blasting, and centrifugal shot abrasive blasting per ASTM D4259. Used to remove contaminants, laitance, and weak concrete, to expose subsurface voids, and to produce a sound concrete surface with adequate profile and surface porosity. High-pressure water cleaning or water jetting per SSPC-SP12-NACE5. Used to remove contaminants, laitance, and weak concrete, to expose subsurface voids, and to produce a sound concrete surface with adequate profile and surface porosity. Impact tool methods per ASTM D4259. Used to remove existing coatings, laitance, and weak concrete. Methods include scarifying, planing, scabbling, and rotary peening. Impact tools may fracture concrete surfaces or cause microcracking requiring surface repair. Power tool methods per ASTM D4259. Used to remove existing coatings, laitance, weak concrete, and protrusions in concrete. Methods include circular grinding, sanding, and wire brushing. These methods may not produce the required surface profile to ensure adequate adhesion of subsequent coatings.

Chemical Surface Preparation Methods: Acid etching per ASTM D4260. Use to remove some surface contaminants, laitance, and weak concrete, and to provide a surface profile on horizontal concrete surfaces. This method requires complete removal of all reaction products and pH testing to ensure neutralization of the acid. Not recommended for vertical surfaces. Etching with hydrochloric acid shall not be used where corrosion of metal in the concrete is likely to occur. Adequate ventilation and safety equipment required. 1. Clean surface per ASTM D4268 2. Wet surface with clean water 3. Etch with 10-15% muriatic acid solution at the rate of 1 gallon per 75 square feet 4. Scrub with stiff brush 5. Allow sufficient time for scrubbing and until bubbling stops 6. If no bubbling occurs, surface is contaminated. Refer to ASTM D4258 or ASTM D4259 7. Rinse surface two or three times. Remove acid/water each time. 8. Surface should a texture similar to medium grit sandpaper. 9. Neutralize surface with a 3% solution of tri-sodium phosphate and flush with clean water. 10. Allow to dry and check for excess moisture.

Cement Composition Siding/Panels – S-W 6: Remove all surface contamination by washing with an appropriate cleaner, rinse thoroughly and allow to dry. Existing peeled or checked paint should be scraped and sanded to a sound surface. Glossy surfaces should be sanded dull. Pressure clean, if needed, with a minimum of 2100 psi pressure to remove all dirt, dust, grease, oil, loose particles, laitance, foreign material, and peeling or defective coatings. Allow the surface to dry thoroughly. If the surface is new, test it for pH, many times the pH may be 10 or higher.

Composition Board (Hardboard) – S-W 9: Some composition boards may exude a waxy material that must be removed with a solvent prior to coating. Whether factory primed or unprimed, exterior composition board siding (hardboard) must be cleaned thoroughly and primed with an alkyd primer.

Copper – S-W 7: Remove all oil, grease, dirt, oxide and other foreign material by cleaning per SSPC-SP2, Hand Tool Cleaning.

Drywall—Interior and Exterior – S-W 8: Must be clean and dry. All nail heads must be set and spackled. Joints must be taped and covered with a joint compound. Spackled nail heads and tape joints must be sanded smooth and all dust removed prior to painting. Exterior surfaces must be spackled with exterior grade compounds.

Galvanized Metal – S-W 10: Allow to weather a minimum of 6 months prior to coating. Clean per SSPC-SP1 using detergent and water or a degreasing cleaner, then prime as required. When weathering is not possible or the surface has been treated with chromates or silicates, first Solvent Clean per SSPC-SP1 and apply a test area, priming as required. Allow the coating to dry at least one week before testing. If adhesion is poor, Brush Blast per SSPC-SP16 is necessary to remove these treatments.

Plaster – S-W 11: Must be allowed to dry thoroughly for at least 30 days before painting. Room must be ventilated while drying; in cold, damp weather, rooms must be heated. Damaged areas must be repaired with an appropriate patching material. Bare plaster must be cured and hard. Textured, soft, porous, or powdery plaster should be treated with a solution of 1 pint household vinegar to 1 gallon of water. Repeat until the surface is hard, rinse with clear water and allow to dry.

Steel/Ferrous Metal Substrates

SSPC-SP1- Solvent Cleaning: Solvent cleaning is a method for removing all visible oil, grease, soil, drawing and cutting compounds, and other soluble contaminants. Solvent cleaning does not remove rust or mill scale. Change rags and cleaning solution frequently so that deposits of oil and grease are not spread over additional areas in the cleaning process. Be sure to allow adequate ventilation. Follow manufacturer's safety recommendations when using solvents. For complete instructions, refer to Steel Structures Paint Council Surface Preparation Specification No.1. (Refer to each products cleaning instructions. Many acrylic coatings will state; When cleaning the surface per SSPC-SP1, use only an emulsifying industrial detergent, followed by a water rinse. Do not use hydrocarbon solvents for cleaning.)

SSPC-SP2 - Hand Tool Cleaning: Hand Tool Cleaning removes all loose mill scale, loose rust, and other detrimental foreign matter. It is not intended that adherent mill scale, rust, and paint be removed by this process. Mil scale, rust, and paint are considered adherent if they cannot be removed by lifting with a dull putty knife. Before hand tool cleaning, remove visible oil, grease, soluble welding residues, and salts by the methods outlined in SSPC-SP1. For complete instructions, refer to Steel Structures Paint Council Surface Preparation Specification No.2.

SSPC-SP3 - Power Tool Cleaning: Power Tool Cleaning removes all loose mill scale, loose rust, and other detrimental foreign matter. It is not intended that adherent mill scale, rust, and paint be removed by this process. Mil scale, rust, and paint are considered adherent if they cannot be removed by lifting with a dull putty knife. Before power tool cleaning, remove visible oil, grease, soluble welding residues, and salts by the methods outlined in SSPC-SP1. For complete instructions, refer to Steel Structures Paint Council Surface Preparation Specification No.3.

SSPC-SP5 / NACE 1 - White Metal Blast Cleaning: A White Metal Blast Cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, mill scale, rust, paint, oxides, corrosion products, and other foreign matter. Before blast cleaning, visible deposits of oil or grease shall be removed by any of the methods specified in SSPC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods. For complete instructions, refer to Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPC-SP5/ NACE No.1.

SSPC-SP6 / NACE 3 - Commercial Blast Cleaning: A Commercial Blast Cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, mill scale, rust, paint, oxides, corrosion products, and other foreign matter, except for staining. Staining shall be limited to no more than 33 percent of each square inch of surface area and may consist of light shadows, slight streaks, or minor discoloration caused by stains of rust, stains of mill scale, or stains of previously applied paint. Before blast cleaning, visible deposits of oil or grease shall be removed by any of the methods specified in SSPC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods. For complete instructions, refer to Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPC-SP6/NACE No.3.

SSPC-SP7 / NACE 4 - Brush-Off Blast Cleaning: A Brush-Off Blast Cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, loose mill scale, loose rust, and loose paint. Tightly adherent mill scale, rust, and paint may remain on the surface. Mil scale, rust, and coating are considered adherent if they cannot be removed by lifting with a dull putty knife. Before blast cleaning, visible deposits of oil or grease shall be removed by any of the methods specified in SSPC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods. For complete instructions, refer to Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPC-SP7/NACE No.4. SSPC-SP10 / NACE 2 - Near-White Blast Cleaning: A Near White Blast Cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, mill scale, rust, paint, oxides, corrosion products, and other foreign matter, except for staining. Staining shall be limited to no more than 5 percent of each square inch of surface area and may consist of light shadows, slight streaks, or minor discoloration caused by stains of rust, stains of mill scale, or stains of previously applied paint. Before blast cleaning, visible deposits of oil or grease shall be removed by any of the methods specified in SSPC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods. For complete instructions, refer to Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPCSP10/ NACE No.2.

SSPC-SP11 - Power Tool Cleaning to Bare Metal: Metallic surfaces that are prepared according to this specification, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, mill scale, rust, paint, oxide corrosion products, and other foreign matter. Slight residues of rust and paint may be left in the lower portions of pits if the original surface is pitted. Prior to power tool surface preparation, remove visible deposits of oil or grease by any of the methods specified in SSPC -SP 1, Solvent Cleaning, or other agreed upon methods. For complete instructions, refer to Steel Structures Paint Council Surface Preparation Specification No.11.

SSPC-SP12 / NACE 5 - Surface Preparation and Cleaning of Metals by Waterjetting Prior to Recoating: High- and Ultra -High Pressure Water Jetting for Steel and Other Hard Materials This standard provides requirements for the use of high- and ultra-high pressure water jetting to achieve various degrees of surface cleanliness. This standard is limited in scope to the use of water only, without the addition of solid particles in the stream. For complete instructions, refer to Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPC-SP12/NACE No.5.

SSPC-SP13 / NACE 6 or ICRI 03732 - Surface Preparation of Concrete: This standard gives requirements for surface preparation of concrete by mechanical, chemical, or thermal methods prior to the application of bonded protective coating or lining systems. The requirements of this standard are applicable to all types of cementitious surfaces including cast-in-place concrete floors and walls, precast slabs, masonry walls and shotcrete surfaces. An acceptable prepared concrete surface should be free of contaminants, laitance, loosely adhering concrete, and dust, and should provide a dry, sound, uniform substrate suitable for the application of protective coating or lining systems. Depending upon the desired finish and system, a block filler may be required. For complete instructions, refer to Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPC-SP13/NACE No.6 or ICRI 03732

SSPC-SP14 / NACE 8 – Industrial Blast Cleaning: This standard gives requirements for industrial blast cleaning of unpainted or painted steel surfaces by the use of abrasives. This joint standard allows defined quantities of mill scale and/or old coating to remain on the surface. An industrial blast cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dust, and dirt. Traces of tightly adherent mill scale, rust, and coating residue are permitted to remain on 10% of each unit area of the surface. The traces of mill scale, rust, and coating shall be considered tightly adherent if they cannot be lifted with a dull putty knife. Shadows, streaks, and discolorations caused by stains of rust, stains of mill scale, and stains of previously applied coating may be present on the remainder of the surface.

SSPC-SP16 Brush-Off Blast Cleaning of Coated and Uncoated Galvanized Steel, Stainless Steels, and Non-Ferrous Metals: This standard covers the requirements for brush-off blast cleaning of uncoated or coated metal surfaces other than carbon steel by the use of abrasives. These requirements include visual verification of the end condition of the surface and materials and procedures necessary to achieve and verify the end condition. A brush-off blast cleaned non-ferrous metal surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all visible oil, grease, dirt, dust, metal oxides (corrosion products), and other foreign matter. Intact, tightly adherent coating is permitted to remain. A coating is considered tightly adherent if it cannot be removed by lifting with a dull putty knife.

High- and Ultra-High Pressure Water Jetting for Steel and Other Hard Materials: SSPC-SP WJ-1/NACE WJ-1: Clean to Bare Substrate (WJ-1) is intended to be similar to the degree of surface cleanliness of SSPC-SP 5/NACE 1, except that stains are permitted to remain on the surface. This standard is used when the objective is to remove every trace of rust and other corrosion products, coating and mill scale. SSPC-SP WJ-2/NACE WJ-2: Very Thorough Cleaning (WJ-2) is intended to be similar to the degree of surface cleanliness of SSPC-SP 10/NACE 2, except that tightly adherent material, rather than only stains, is permitted to remain on the surface. This standard is used when the objective is to remove almost all rust and other corrosion products, coating, and mill scale. SSPC-SP WJ-3/NACE WJ-3: Thorough Cleaning (WJ-3) is intended to be similar to the degree of surface cleanliness of SSPC-SP 10/NACE 2, except that tightly adherent material, rather than only stains, is permitted to remain on the surface. This standard is used when the objective is to remove much of the rust and other corrosion products, coating, and mil scale, leaving tightly adherent thin films. SSPC-SP WJ-4/NACE WJ-4: Light Cleaning (WJ-4) is intended to be similar to the degree of surface cleanliness of SSPC- SP 10/NACE 2, except that tightly adherent material, rather than only stains, is permitted to remain on the surface. This standard is used when the objective is to allow as much of the tightly adherent rust and other corrosion products, coating, and mill scale to remain as possible, Discoloration of the surface may be present.

Water Blasting NACE Standard RP-01-72: Removal of oil grease dirt, loose rust, loose mill scale, and loose paint by water at pressures of 2,000 to 2,500 psi at a flow of 4 to 14 gallons per minute.

Stucco S-W 22 :Must be clean and free of any loose stucco. If recommended procedures for applying stucco are followed, and normal drying conditions prevail, the surface may be painted in 30 days. The pH of the surface should be between 6 and 9.

Wood—Exterior – S-W 23: Must be clean and dry. Prime and paint as soon as possible. Knots and pitch streaks must be scraped, sanded, and spot primed before a full priming coat is applied. Patch all nail holes and imperfections with a wood filler or putty and sand smooth. Caulk should be applied after priming.

Wood—Interior – S-W 24: All finishing lumber and flooring must be stored in dry, warm rooms to prevent absorption of moisture, shrinkage, and roughening of the wood. All surfaces must be sanded smooth, with the grain, never across it. Surface blemishes must be corrected and the area cleaned of dust before coating.

Vinyl Siding, Architectural Plastics, PVC & Fiberglass: – S-W 24: Clean the surface thoroughly by scrubbing with warm, soapy water. Rinse thoroughly, prime with appropriate white primer. Do not paint vinyl with any color darker than the original color. Do not paint vinyl with a color having a Light Reflective Value (LRV) of less than 56 unless VinylSafe® Colors are used. If VinylSafe® Colors are not used and darker colors lower than an LRV of 56 are, the vinyl may warp. Follow all painting guidelines of the vinyl manufacturer when painting. Only paint properly installed vinyl siding. Deviating from the manufacturer's painting guidelines may cause the warranty to be voided.

Previously Coated Surfaces – S-W 12: Maintenance painting will frequently not permit or require complete removal of all old coatings prior to repainting. However, all surface contamination such as oil, grease, loose paint, mill scale dirt, foreign matter, rust, mold, mildew, mortar, efflorescence, and sealers must be removed to assure sound bonding to the tightly adhering old paint. Glossy surfaces of old paint films must be clean and dull before repainting. Thorough washing with an abrasive cleanser will clean and dull in one operation, or, wash thoroughly and dull by sanding. Spot prime any bare areas with an appropriate primer. Recognize that any surface preparation short of total removal of the old coating may compromise the service length of the system. Check for compatibility by applying a test patch of the recommended coating system, covering at least 2 to 3 square feet. Allow to dry one week before testing adhesion per ASTM D3359. If the coating system is incompatible, complete removal is required per ASTM D4259.

Touch-Up, Maintenance and Repair For a protective coating system to provide maximum long-term protection, regularly scheduled maintenance is required. Maintenance includes inspection of painted areas, cleaning of surfaces to remove oils, chemicals, and other contaminants, and touch-up of areas where the coatings have been damaged. Highly corrosive areas, such as those subjected to frequent chemical spillage, corrosive fumes, and/or high abrasion or temperature areas should be inspected frequently – every six months, for example. Areas exposed to less severe conditions, such as interiors and exteriors of potable water tanks, may be inspected annually to assess the condition of the coating system.

The SSPC-VIS 2, Standard Method for Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces, can be used as a guide to determine appropriate touch-up and repairs maintenance schedules. Touch-up would be suggested when the surface resembles Rust Grade 5-S (Spot Rusting), 6-G (General Rusting), or 6-P (Pinpoint Rusting). Surface preparation would generally consist of SSPC-SP2, SP3, SP11, or SP12. Overcoating a well protected, but aged steel surface showing no evidence of rusting, may be achieved by Low Pressure Water Cleaning per SSPC-SP12/WJ4, and applying an appropriate coating system.

Full removal of the existing coating system by abrasive blasting would be recommended when the surface resembles Rust Grade 3-S (Spot Rusting), 4-G (General Rusting), or 4-P (Pinpoint Rusting). When the coating system has deteriorated to encompass approximately 33% of the surface area, it is always more economical to consider full removal and reapplication of the appropriate protective coating system.

Mildew –Prior to attempting to remove mildew, it is always recommended to test any cleaner on a small, inconspicuous area prior to use. Bleach and bleaching type cleaners may damage or discolor existing paint films. Bleach alternative cleaning solutions may be advised. Mildew may be removed before painting by washing with a solution of 1 part liquid bleach and 3 parts water. Apply the solution and scrub the mildewed area. Allow the solution to remain on the surface for 10 minutes. Rinse thoroughly with water and allow the surface to dry before painting. Wear protective eyewear, waterproof gloves, and protective clothing. Quickly wash off any of the mixture that comes in contact with your skin. Do not add detergents or ammonia to the bleach/water solution. Specification Light Poles Keego Harbor

Reference Pages

Data Pages

113.05

PRO-CRYL® PRO UNIVERSAL PRIMER ™ INDUSTRIAL B66W00310 OFF WHITE As of 09/11/2015, Complies with: B66A00310 GRAY OTC Yes LEED® 09 CI Yes SCAQMD Yes LEED® 09 NC Yes B66N00310 RED OXIDE CARB Yes LEED® 09 CS Yes CARB SCM 2007 Yes LEED® 09 S Yes MPI 107,134 NGBS Yes CHARACTERISTICS RECOMMENDED SYSTEMS

Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Waterborne topcoat: Primer is an advanced technology, self 1-2 cts. Pro Industrial Acrylic cross-linking acrylic primer. It is rust or Pro Industrial DTM Acrlyic inhibitive and designed for commercial, or Pro Industrial Multi-Surface Acrylic new construction and maintenance or Pro Industrial Pre-Catalyzed Waterbased Epoxy applications. It can be used as a primer or Pro Industrial Waterbased Acrolon 100 under water-based or solvent-based high or Pro Industrial Waterbased Catalyzed Epoxy performance topcoats.

 Rust inhibitive Solventborne topcoat:  Single component 1-2 cts. Pro Industrial High Performance Epoxy  Early moisture resistant or Pro Industrial Urethane Alkyd  Fast dry  Low temperature application 40°F  Interior and exterior use  Suitable for use in USDA inspected facilities Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer B66W310 Off White is GREENGUARD GOLD certified for low Color: Off White, Gray, Red Oxide chemical emissions into indoor air during product usage. For more information, visit ul.com/gg. Recommended Spread Rate per coat: Wet mils: 5.0 - 10.0 System Tested: (unless otherwise indicated) Dry mils: 1.8 - 3.6 Substrate: Steel ~Coverage: 160 - 320 sq ft/gal Surface Preparation: SSPC-SP10 Approximate 1 ct. Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Universal Primer Theoretical coverage sq ft/gal 1 ct. Pro Industrial Acrylic (m2/L) @ 1 mil / 25 microns dft 577sq ft NOTE: Brush or roll application may require multiple Adhesion: Moisture Condensation Resistance: coats to achieve maximum film thickness and Method: ASTM D4541 Method: ASTM D4585, 100°F, 1250 uniformity of appearance. Result: 500 psi hours Result: Passes Drying Time @ 6.0 mils wet 50% RH: Corrosion Weathering: 40°F 77°F 120°F Method: ASTM D5894, 10 cycles, Pencil Hardness: To touch: 2 hrs 40 min 20 min 3360 hours Method: ASTM D3363 Tack free: 8 hrs 2 hrs 1 hr Result: Passes Result: H To recoat: 16 hrs 4 hrs 2 hrs To cure: 45 days 30 days 14 days Direct Impact Resistance: Salt Fog Resistance: Drying time is temperature, humidity, and film Method: ASTM D2794 Method: ASTM B117, 1250 hours thickness dependent. Finish: Low sheen Result: >140 in. lbs. Result: Passes Flash Point: N/A Shelf Life: 36 months, unopened Dry Heat Resistance*: Provides performance comparable to Store indoors at 40°F to 100°F. Method: ASTM D2485 products formulated In Lieu of Federal Tinting: Do not tint Result: 200°F Specification: AA50557 and Paint B66W310 (may vary by color) Specification: SSPC-Paint 23. Flexibility: VOC (less exempt solvents): Method: ASTM D522, 180° bend, 96 g/L; 0.80 lb/gal As per 40 CFR 59.406 and SOR/2009-264, s.12 1/4" mandrel Volume Solids: 36% ± 2% Result: Passes Weight Solids: 49% ± 2% Weight per Gallon: 10.23 lb *Suitable for intermittent dry heat resistance up to 300°F when used as a system with Sher-Cryl HPA

9/2015 www.sherwin-williams.com continued on back PRO INDUSTRIAL™ PRO-CRYL® UNIVERSAL PRIMER SURFACE PREPARATION APPLICATION

WARNING! Removal of old paint by sanding, scraping or other means may generate Refer to the SDS before using dust or fumes that contain lead. Exposure to lead dust or fumes may cause brain Temperature: 40°F minimum damage or other adverse health effects, especially in children or pregnant women. 120°F maximum Controlling exposure to lead or other hazardous substances requires the use of (air, surface, and material) proper protective equipment, such as a properly fitted respirator (NIOSH approved) At least 5°F above dew point and proper containment and cleanup. For more information, call the National Lead Relative humidity: 85% maximum Information Center at 1-800-424-LEAD (in US) or contact your local health authority. The following is a guide. Changes in pressures and tip sizes may be needed for proper spray Do not use hydrocarbon solvents for cleaning. characteristics. Always purge spray equipment before use with listed reducer. Any reduction must be Iron & Steel - Minimum surface preparation is Hand Tool Cleaning per SSPC-SP2. compatible with the existing environmental and Remove all oil and grease from the surface per SSPC-SP1. For better performance, application conditions. use Commercial Blast Cleaning per SSPC-SP6. Reducer: Water Aluminum - Remove all oil, grease, dirt, oxide and other foreign material per SSPC- SP1.Prime the area the same day as cleaned. Airless Spray Pressure ...... 2000 psi Galvanizing - Allow to weather a minimum of six months prior to coating. Solvent Hose ...... 1/4" ID Clean per SSPC-SP1. When weathering is not possible, or the surface has been Tip ...... 015" - .019" treated with chromates or silicates, first Solvent Clean per SSPC-SP1 and apply a Filter ...... 60 mesh test patch. Allow paint to dry at least one week before testing adhesion. If adhesion is Reduction ...... Not recommended poor, brush blasting per SSPC-SP16 is necessary to remove these treatments. Rusty galvanizing requires a minimum of Hand Tool Cleaning per SSPC-SP2, prime the Conventional Spray area the same day as cleaned. Gun ...... Binks 95 Fluid Nozzle ...... 66 Previously Painted Surfaces - If in sound condition, clean the surface of all foreign Air Nozzle ...... 63PB material. Smooth, hard or glossy coatings and surfaces should be dulled by abrading Atomization Pressure ...... 60 psi the surface. Apply a test area, allowing paint to dry one week before testing Fluid Pressure ...... 25 psi adhesion. If adhesion is poor, additional abrasion of the surface and/or removal of ReductionAs needed up to 5% by volume the previous coating may be necessary. Retest surface for adhesion. If paint is peeling or badly weathered, clean surface to sound substrate and treat as a new Brush ...... Nylon/Polyester surface as above. Recognize that any surface preparation short of total removal of Reduction ...... Not recommended the old coating may compromise the service length of the system. Roller ...... 3/8" woven APPLICATION PROCEDURES ReductionAs needed up to 5% by volume

Apply paint at the recommended film thickness and spreading rate as indicated on If specific application equipment is listed above, front page. Application of coating below minimum recommended spreading rate will equivalent equipment may be substituted. adversely affect coating performance. CLEANUP INFORMATION SAFETY PRECAUTIONS Refer to the SDS sheets before use. FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY Clean spills and spatters immediately with Published technical data and instructions are subject to change without notice. soap and warm water. Clean hands and tools Contact your Sherwin-Williams representative for additional technical data and immediately after use with soap and warm instructions. water. After cleaning, flush spray equipment with compliant cleanup solvent to prevent rusting of the equipment. Follow PERFORMANCE TIPS manufacturer's safety recommendations when No painting should be done immediately after a rain or during foggy weather. using solvents. When using spray application, use a 50% overlap with each pass of the gun to avoid HOTW 09/11/2015 B66W00310 32 96 holidays, bare areas, and pinholes. Apply coating evenly while maintaining a wet edge to prevent lapping. KOR, FRC, SP

The information and recommendations set forth in this Product Data Sheet are based upon tests conducted by or on behalf of The Sherwin-Williams Company. Such information and recommendations set forth herein are subject to change and pertain to the product offered at the time of publication. Consult your Sherwin-Williams representative or visit www.paintdocs.com to obtain the most current version of the PDS and/or an SDS. 124.01

Sher-Cryl™ HPA High Performance Acrylic B66-300/350 Series

CHARACTERISTICS COMPLIANCE SPECIFICATIONS SHER-CRYL HPA is a higher performing As of 02/19/2020, Complies with: Steel: ambient cured, one component acrylic coating OTC Yes 1 coat Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Primer with excellent performance properties. OTC Phase II Yes or Pro Industrial DTM Primer/Finish SCAQMD No Features: CARB Yes or Kem Bonds HS • Chemical Resistant CARB SCM 2007 Yes or Zinc Clad XI • Outstanding humidity resistance Canada Yes 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA • Outstanding application characteristics LEED® v4 & v4.1 Emissions No • Flash rust-early rust resistant LEED® v4 & v4.1 V.O.C. No Aluminum: • Corrosion resistant EPD-NSF® Certified No 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA • Fast dry MIR-Product Lens Certified No • Suitable for use in USDA inspected facilities MPI-(Gloss) Yes Aluminum: Recommended for use in: 1 coat Pro Industrial Pro-Cryl Primer • Buildings & Warehouses APPLICATION 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA • Equipment & Machinery Temperature: • Storage Tanks & Piping & Structural Steel minimum 50°F / 10°C Concrete Block (CMU): • Manufacturing Facilities & New Construction maximum 120°F / 49°C 1 coat Pro Industrial Heavy Duty Blockfiller • Interior or Exterior air, surface, and material or Loxon Acrylic Block Surfacer For use on properly prepared: At least 5°F above dew point 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA Steel, Galvanized & Aluminum, Concrete and Relative humidity: 85% maximum Masonry, Wood, Previously Painted & Zinc rich The following is a guide. Changes in pressures and tip Concrete-Masonry: primers sizes may be needed for proper spray characteristics. 1 coat Loxon Concrete & Masonry Primer Finish: 80°+@60° Gloss Always purge spray equipment before use with listed or Loxon Conditioner reducer. Any reduction must be compatible with the 35-45°@60° Semi-Gloss existing environmental and application conditions. 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA Color: Most colors Reducer: Water Drywall: Recommended Spreading Rate per coat: R8K10 - WB Hot Weather Reducer up to 10% 1 coat ProMar 200 Zero V.O.C. Primer Extra White B66W00311 (may vary by base) Airless Spray: 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA Wet mils: 6.0-10.0 Pressure 1500 p.s.i. Hose 1/4 inch I.D. Dry mils: 2.0-3.3 Galvanizing: Tip .017 - .021 inch 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA Coverage: 160-264 sq.ft. per gallon Filter 60 mesh Theoretical Coverage: 529 sq. ft. per gallon Conventional Spray: Pre-Finished Siding: (Baked-on finishes) @ 1 mil dry Gun Binks 95 1 coat DTM Bonding Primer Fluid Nozzle 66 Approximate spreading rates are calculated on volume Air Nozzle 63 PB 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA solids and do not include any application loss. Atomization Pressure 50 p.s.i. Previously Painted: Note: Brush or roll application may require multiple coats Fluid Pressure 15-20 p.s.i. to achieve maximum film thickness and uniformity of Reduction: As needed up to 12.5% by volume 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA appearance. Brush Nylon-polyester Wood, exterior: 3/8 inch woven Drying Schedule @ 7.0 mils wet, @ 50% RH: Roller Cover If specific application equipment is listed above, equivalent 1 coat Exterior Wood Primer Drying, and recoat times are temperature, humidity, and film equipment may be substituted. 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA thickness dependent. Apply paint at the recommended film thickness Wood, interior: @50°F @77°F @110°F and spreading rate as indicated on front page. Application of coating above maximum or below 1 coat Premium Wall & Wood Primer To touch 1 hour 30 minutes 5 minutes minimum recommended spreading rate may 2 coats Sher-Cryl HPA To handle 8 hours 5 hour 15 minutes adversely affect coating performance. Spreading To recoat 8 hours 5 hour 15 minutes rates are calculated on volume solids and do not The systems listed above are representative of include an application loss factor due to surface To cure 30 days 30 days 30 days profile, roughness, or porosity of the surface, the product’s use, other systems may be appropriate. skill, and technique of the applicator, method of Other primers may be appropriate. Tinting with CCE only: application, various surface irregularities, material Base oz. per gallon Strength lost during mixing, spillage, over thinning, climatic conditions, and excessive film build. Extra White 0-4 SherColor Application temperature above 95°F (35°C) may Ultradeep base 10-12 SherColor cause dry spray, uneven sheen, and poor adhesion. Application temperature below 50°F (10°C) may cause poor adhesion and lengthen the drying and Extra White B66W00311 curing time. (may vary by color) V.O.C. (less exempt solvents): As mixed Mix paint thoroughly to a uniform consistency with 239 grams per litre; 1.99 lbs. per gallon slow speed power agitation prior to use. As per 40 CFR 59.406 Stripe coat crevices, welds, and sharp angles to Volume Solids: 33 ± 2% prevent early failure in these areas. Weight Solids: 42 ± 2% When using spray application, use a 50% overlap with each pass of the gun to avoid holidays, bare Weight per Gallon: 9.44 lb areas, and pinholes. If necessary, cross spray at a Flash Point: N/A right angle. Vehicle Type: Acrylic During the early stages of drying, the coating is Shelf Life: 36 months, unopened sensitive to rain, dew, high humidity and moisture condensation. Plan painting schedules to avoid these influences during the first 16-24 hours of curing.

02/2020 www.sherwin-williams.com continued on back Sher-Cryl™ High Performance Acrylic

SURFACE PREPARATION SURFACE PREPARATION SAFETY PRECAUTIONS WARNING! Removal of old paint by sanding, Prefinished Siding (baked-on finishes)- Remove Before using, carefully read CAUTIONS on label. scraping or other means may generate dust or fumes oil, grease, dirt, oxides, and other contaminants from Refer to the Safety Data Sheets (SDS) before use. that contain lead. Exposure to lead dust or fumes may the surface by cleaning per SSPC-SP1 or water cause brain damage or other adverse health effects, blasting per NACE Standard RP-01-72. Always especially in children or pregnant women. Controlling checks for compatibility of the previously painted FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY. exposure to lead or other hazardous substances surface with the new coating by applying a test patch requires the use of proper protective equipment, of 2 - 3 square feet. Allow to dry thoroughly for 1 week Published technical data and instructions are such as a properly fitted respirator NIOSH( approved) before checking adhesion. DTM Bonding Primer is subject to change without notice. Contact your and proper containment and cleanup. For more required. Sherwin-Williams representative for additional information, call the National Lead Information Center Previously Painted Surfaces - If in sound condition, technical data and instructions. at 1-800-424-LEAD (in US) or contact your local clean the surface of all foreign material. Smooth, hard health authority. or glossy coatings and surfaces should be dulled by When cleaning the surface per SSPC-SP1, use only abrading the surface. Apply a test area, allowing paint an emulsifying industrial detergent, followed by a to dry one week before testing adhesion. If adhesion CLEANUP INFORMATION water rinse. is poor, additional abrasion of the surface and/or Do not use hydrocarbon solvents for Clean spills, spatters, hands and tools cleaning. removal of the previous coating may be necessary. Retest surface for adhesion. If paint is peeling or immediately after use with soap and warm Remove all surface contamination by washing with an badly weathered, clean surface to sound substrate water. After cleaning, flush spray equipment appropriate cleaner, rinse thoroughly and allow to dry. and treat as a new surface as above. Recognize that with compliant cleanup solvent to prevent Existing peeled or checked paint should be scraped any surface preparation short of total removal of the rusting of the equipment. Follow manufacturer’s and sanded to a sound surface. Glossy surfaces old coating may compromise the service length of the safety recommendations when using solvents. should be sanded dull. Stains from water, smoke, system. ink, pencil, grease, etc. should be sealed with the HOTW 02/19/2020 B66W00311 23 239 appropriate primer/sealer. Recognize that any surface Mildew- Prior to attempting to remove mildew, it is HOTW 02/19/2020 B66T00304 21 224 preparation short of total removal of the old coating always recommended to test any cleaner on a small, HOTW 02/19/2020 B66W00351 23 235 may compromise the service length of the system. inconspicuous area prior to use. Bleach and bleaching HOTW 02/19/2020 B66T00354 24 241 type cleaners may damage or discolor existing paint FRC Iron & Steel - Minimum surface preparation is Hand films. Bleach alternative cleaning solutions may be Tool Clean per SSPC-SP2. Remove all oil and grease advised. from surface per SSPC-SP1. For better performance, use Commercial Blast Cleaning per SSPC-SP6. Mildew may be removed before painting by washing Primer recommended for best performance. Prime with a solution of 1 part liquid bleach and 3 parts water. any bare steel within 8 hours or before flash rusting Apply the solution and scrub the mildewed area. Allow occurs. the solution to remain on the surface for 10 minutes. Rinse thoroughly with water and allow the surface Remove all oil, grease, dirt, oxide and Aluminum - to dry before painting. Wear protective eyewear, other foreign material per SSPC-SP1. waterproof gloves, and protective clothing. Quickly Galvanizing - Allow to weather a minimum of six wash off any of the mixture that comes in contact with months prior to coating. Solvent Clean per SSPC- your skin. Do not add detergents or ammonia to the SP1. When weathering is not possible, or the surface bleach/water solution. has been treated with chromates or silicates, first Solvent Clean per SSPC-SP1 and apply a test PERFORMANCE patch. Allow paint to dry at least one week before Sher-Cryl HPA Gloss– 2 coats @ 3.0 mils D.F.T per coat testing adhesion. If adhesion is poor, brush blasting (unless otherwise noted) per SSPC-SP16 is necessary to remove these Abrasion Resistance: treatments. Rusty galvanizing requires a minimum of Method: ASTM D4060, CS17 Hand Tool Cleaning per SSPC-SP2, prime the area Wheel, 1000 cycles, 1 the same day as cleaned. kg load Concrete Block - Surface should be thoroughly Results: 59.1 mg loss clean and dry. Air, material and surface temperatures Adhesion: must be at least 50°F (10°C) before filling. Use Pro Method: ASTM D4541 industrial Heavy Duty Block Filler or Loxon Acrylic Results: 947 psi Block Surfacer. The filler must be thoroughly dry Corrosion Weathering1: before topcoating. Method: ASTM D5894, 7 cycles Masonry - All masonry must be free of dirt, oil, Results: Corrosion 8, Blistering 10 grease, loose paint, mortar, masonry dust, etc. Clean per SSPC-SP13-Nace 6-ICRI No. 310.2R, CSP 1-3. Direct Impact Resistance: Poured, troweled, or tilt-up concrete, plaster, mortar, Method: ASTM D2794 etc. must be thoroughly cured at least 30 days at 75°F. Results: greater than 176 in. lb Form release compounds and curing membranes Dry Heat Resistance: must be removed by brush blasting. Brick must Method: ASTM D2485 Method A be allowed to weather for one year prior to surface Results: 300°F/149°C preparation and painting. Prime the area the same day Flexibility: as cleaned. Weathered masonry and soft or porous Method: ASTM D522, 180° bend, cement board must be brush blasted or power tool 1/8” mandrel cleaned to remove loosely adhering contamination Results: Pass and to get to a hard, firm surface. Apply one coat 1 Loxon Conditioner, following label recommendations. Humidty Resistance : Primer required. Method: ASTM D4585, 2186 hours Results: Corrosion 10, Blistering 10 Wood - Surface must be clean, dry, and sound. Prime with recommended primer. No painting should be Pencil Hardness: done immediately after a rain or during foggy weather. Method: ASTM D3363 Knots and pitch streaks must be scraped, sanded and Result: 4B spot primed before full coat of primer is applied. All nail holes or small openings must be properly caulked. 1 1 coat Sher-Cryl HPA over 1 coat Pro Industrial Pro- Sand to remove any loose or deteriorated surface Cryl Universal Primer wood and to obtain a proper surface profile. Provides performance comparable to products in lieu of the Federal Specification: AA50570, and Paint Specification: SSPC-Paint 24.

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Saw Purchase

BACKGROUND: See attached quote from Weingartz for a water saw for $1,363.83.

RECOMMENDATION: Resolution to approve (or deny) purchase of water saw not to exceed $1,363.83

MEMORANDUM TAB 18 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Fran Leaf Park Wetland

BACKGROUND:

City Council has had discussion as to the potential is for Fran Leaf Park Wetland. Attached you will find written plans submitted: • Natural Community Services • Cardon, Inc.

Plan Wise submitted a letter as a proposal to complete a management plan.

The information submitted will help guide City Council with the plan to move forward.

RECOMMENDAITON: City Council discussion QUOTE 1 Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT & PLANNING PROPOSAL For: City of Keego Harbor At: Fran Leaf Park

Contents Overview and Cover Letter ...... 0 Site Conditions and Project Understanding ...... 1 Proposed Plan ...... 2 1. Ecological Consulting and Planning – BACKGROUND DATA & ECOLOGICAL SURVEY ...... 2 2. Work Plan and Task Description- DATA ANALYSIS & CONCEPT PLANS ...... 3 3. Work Plan and Task Description- REPORT & PRESENTATION TO CITY ...... 3 4. Qualifications ...... 5 Staff Resumes ...... 6 6. References ...... 14 7. Natural Resources Overlay Maps & Concept Planning ...... 15 8. Price Proposal...... 17

Overview and Cover Letter NCS is an ecological restoration firm from West Bloomfield, MI. Natural Community Services is an equal opportunity employer (EEO) and a woman-owned small business (WBE). Our environmental assessment, planning, design, and ecological restoration philosophy approaches land manager concerns by: • Innovative biological assessments and geospatial analysis and plan integration with sense of place and recreation • Acknowledging the intrinsic value of biodiversity by strategizing cost-efficient restoration actions • Native plant experts, selecting species for maximum biodiversity; preventing spread of invasive species • Unparalleled and local habitat restoration experience - maximizing wildlife, recreational, and visual appeal • Natural Shoreline Professionals, Landscape Architects and Certified Ecological Restoration Practitioners

NCS proposes to assist Keego Harbor in planning habitat restoration of Fran Leaf Park through biological survey which will prepare vernal pond, woodland and wetland ecosystems for enhancements for wildlife and environmental recreation around the wetland habitat, and potential hydrologic improvements to main park parcels. Keego Harbor will have Mr. John DeLisle, Principal Ecologist and lead conservation planner at NCS and other key staff members at its disposal. Our very local team is uniquely qualified to address the requirements of the project and to implement natural areas woody invasive plant stewardship as the first part of ecological restoration establishment work that restores wildlife habitat, prairie and forest- savanna areas, establishing methods for maintenance and site sustainability. Our team has been involved in the evaluation, planning, site design and implementation of natural areas for over 75 years of combined ecosystem restoration experience. Biological assessments, restoration design and natural areas management are NCS signature services. Our Consulting- Contracting structure enables us to provide comprehensive services, including master planning, development of detailed ecological restoration and management plans, construction documents, implementation, construction oversight, and ecological monitoring and management. We partner frequently with other experts to provide the best team for a given project. We work within our clients’ schedules and resources to identify the best value solutions, enhancing site’s unique features.

0 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle

Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Site Conditions and Project Understanding NCS visited the site on 8-20-20, and consulted with city representative on Fran Leaf Park history, conditions, assumptions, and hypothetical end goals. Our understanding of the park’s habitat centers around the vernal pool, its rare and conservative plant and animal species - threatened and vernal pool indicator species pumpkin ash was seen near and over the private property line, and fox sedge, hollow Joe-Pye and other wet meadow indicator plants were observed in the (raised/historically filled flood zone) along the Schmidt Drain channel through the wetland.

NCS observed and discussed some project area parameters with the city. It was noted, as at present, the pool dries out in late summer, and is under water in late winter into spring. Some years ago, the city installed a 4" PVC pipe running under the path footbridge. It was installed to help drain the swamp into the canal in the spring, since the addition of sidewalks interferes with natural drainage. But the swamp, pool, and part of the wet meadow are lower than the canal so it does not drain it completely, fortunately. However, when there are heavy summer rain events, the lake level might rise an inch or more above the legal summer level, and Cass Lake flows into the wetland. Starting two years ago, the city put a cap on the canal end of the pipe for the summer to prevent backflow. It is not thought to be advantageous nursery fish habitat, and the current hydroperiod and soil types are likely better making it more optimal breeding habitat for more diverse herpetofauna – toad populations are already excellent here. Deer bedding and tracks were noted, and managing for resistant vegetation, while preserving and enhancing wildlife watching opportunities. On the canal shoreline, undercutting was observed which contributes colloids for algal growth. Coir log and rush/milkweed toe restoration could significantly reduce blooms and chemical inputs.

The park, like many in the area, has an excess of unused lawn, and opportunities for pollinator prairies and stormwater management using green infrastructure technologies could be considered as part of a well-rounded habitat, environmental interpretive and recreation grant feasibility study – water, park land, environmental and interactive resident use can and should be integrated toward multifunctional goals. Development of the vacant lot on Cass Lake Rd to the east of the park ran into trouble last year because it would be required to include a retention pond before the park parking lot, to clean runoff before flowing to a drain under the road into the canal, and there just isn't room or elevation to do that. The row of town houses on the north side of the parking lot has drainage problems due possibly due to the segmentation of the wetland with sidewalks, and wetland conversion (filling) of the park historically. Bioretention practices could be implemented inside the park boundaries using simple surface swales pitched gently to convey water to a segmented wetland treatment train system. While hydrology is a real problem in that area, it can also be seen as a community asset that a diversity of wildlife can use, and increased native plant cover better filters runoff to improve water quality – if configured in the right way.

Vernal wetland

Pipe outfall

1 | P a g e

Liz & John DeLisle

Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Proposed Plan NCS proposes to assess biological and physical conditions, analyze data, compose basis of conceptual design, and report to city staff the benefits, costs, and plan for moving Fran Leaf Park and habitat improvements toward grant submission. NCS will perform site biological surveys, and conceptualize possible design approaches and draft plans and specifications for the habitat restoration, following the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration; composed to recruit the species categorized by the community abstracts of vernal pool, swamp, and wet-meadow – as described by MNFI. The spring and fall assessments will reveal native and exotic species diversity and spatial distribution within the study area and provide recommendations to restore and enhance habitat, while conceptual plan report and presentation will frame budgets and basis of design for grant writing (grant-specific submittals work such as NFWF SE MI Fund, and/or DNR Trust Fund, can be an additional item TBD).

1. Ecological Consulting and Planning – BACKGROUND DATA & ECOLOGICAL SURVEY (Fall 2020, Spring 21) NCS proposes to compile historical information, perform ecological surveys in aquatic fringe, wetland, swamp forest, and shoreline habitats to determine flora, fauna, soil and water conditions to support feasibility study of vernal pool habitat restoration. The data collected in the survey will be characterized in species presence, abundance and implication to natural processes, potential habitat improvements, and value to the city and park users. NCS will collect data relevant for feasibility study considering park use, wildlife, native landscape design and ecological restoration plans for reaching aesthetic, low- maintenance and wildlife conservation goals of this project, similar to other successful prairie and habitat restoration design experience we’ve conducted for governments and NGOs across Michigan. NCS proposes biological survey. NCS proposed scope of work includes evaluating existing and proposed woodlands, wetland- upland gradient buffers, butterfly-pollinators, bioswale/rain garden strip interpretive opportunities, for wildlife such as wading birds, frogs, turtles, deer and macroinvertebrates, comparing plants of wet-meadow versus swamp forest, organizing data according to Michigan Natural Features Inventory systems. NCS will also characterize soil textures, organic matter, EC, and water levels during sampling events in spring and fall to quantify existing edaphic conditions in support of pool, wet-meadow, and shoreline restoration approaches. Steps for the scope of work are according to the city’s RFQ, below:

Scope of work • Compile baseline historical and archived park spatial and natural resources data • Visit the site this summer, fall, and again in the spring to understand the hydrology, flora and fauna of the site • Rapid assessments with photographic, audio, borings and GPS data about soil, hydrology, habitats and species • Document sampled macroinvertebrates, mammals herptiles, plants, soils, and water levels • Outline the ecological services provided by such a site

Deliverables • Biological Survey Spreadsheet and Geospatial data • Vegetation and wildlife management plan • Maps • Basis of Conceptual Design draft

NCS will base vernal pool, wetland and shoreline restoration plans on the MNFI natural communities of southeast MI, with abstracts referenced here: https://mnfi.anr.msu.edu/communities While more extensive that this RFP, we are including our recent plans for Royal Oak’s Normandy Oaks Park Savanna and Vernal Pool, Detroit’s Eliza Howell Wetland and Savanna Restoration and the city should review our example specifications for disturbed remnant and conversion habitats, here: Specification with Appendix.docx Wetland Buffers and Green Infrastructure Site Maintenance Plan Clinton Township DPW.docx

2 | P a g e

Liz & John DeLisle

Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

2. Work Plan and Task Description- DATA ANALYSIS & CONCEPT PLANS (Winter/Spring 2021) NCS will analyze collected flora, fauna, soil data with spatial inventory and maps, and conduct statistical and spatial analysis. This will guide site planning will be further detailed in concert with Keego Harbor. Since project goals include both studying feasibility of restoration of existing vernal wetlands, and up to an acre of lawn to native prairie habitat, NCS will be analyzing flora, fauna, and soil-water data regarding the wetland resources as well as organizing information about potential transition and upland prairie habitats. We estimate a typical 1-year storm event rushes 2 million gallons of stormwater annually through the park, so possible green infrastructure using swaled, formal native plantings tolerant of saline pollutants using Fresh Coast Guardians software – catered to visually pleasing native flower buffers and/or rain gardens, recreational access, lawn inputs reduction by naturalizing mowed area. Enhanced natural areas may expand wildlife shelter and protect rare species. NCS will provide scientific analysis of biota to prepare ideas for habitat restoration design for upland and wetland wildlife restoration as well as invasive species and green infrastructure project integration. Because herpetofauna and macroinvertebrates can respond quickly to restoration and will quickly occupy restored areas, are excellent baseline target species - data will be saved as a future comparative metric of restoration success. Full vegetation assessment in 2020 to clarify spatial and conservation areas, along with initial hydrology and fauna sampling. 2021 vernal edaphic survey will have data analyzed to support goals.

Scope of work • Analyze probability of species recorded as indicators of restoration potential, soil textures, hydrologic resilience • Comparative analysis of vernal pool vs. wet-meadow – species, habitats, seed banks and options • Map distribution and abundance of observed species, propose restoration targets • Draw conclusions about stormwater, species diversity, opportunities for restoration • Incorporate results in basis of conceptual design report, maps, and schedule plans

Deliverables • Spreadsheet analysis of variance between wet-meadow and vernal pool/forested wetland • GIS shapefiles for Concept Plan • Example section views of restored wet-meadow, rain garden and vernal pool/forests • Possible construction cost estimates for habitat restoration, green infrastructure, and access improvements • 2 Conceptual Design Plan options for features such as: o Naturalized shoreline toe o Grass path, boardwalk, and ADA trail-pool o Vernal pool/forested wetland interface enhancement areas o Lawn-to-pollinator prairie o Rain gardens/GI/hydrologic restoration

3. Work Plan and Task Description- REPORT & PRESENTATION TO CITY (Spring 2021) In order to properly solicit and manage grant efforts, and engage the public and city support for the habitat restoration, NCS proposes meeting with, and presenting findings to city representatives, with estimation and schedules of proposed grants. We will summarize geospatial and ecological information in easily interpreted forms in preparation for meetings. NCS will produce a final report with any needed edits to clarify future project steps, goals, schedule and budget; summarize existing information; and identify data gaps before the city progresses to grant-writing. Scope of work • Identify and prioritize problems that the city should address in the near term. • Recommend basic management practices during this holding period, active and passive. • Broadly identify the extent of possible human uses for this area. • Estimate the level of effort and cost to execute habitat restoration and improvements • Information will be categorized to help guide grant applications in the future.

Deliverables • Provide a written report of findings and advice, grant-type work budget and a conceptual restoration plan • Present an overview of findings and concept plan at a City Council meeting.

3 | P a g e

Liz & John DeLisle

Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

4. Qualifications

Company Resume Natural Community Services (NCS), LLC – Owned by Elizabeth and John DeLisle. We are an interdisciplinary ecological design, consulting and restoration firm with expertise in biological assessment, green infrastructure, ecological restoration, and native landscape design throughout Michigan, and are headquartered in West Bloomfield. We have intensive municipal and NGO prairie restoration experience, as well as design planning and management experience. We understand the scientific process of strategizing methods for proper assessment, design and restoration of natural areas in a timely fashion and can present findings effectively orally and in writing. NCS is a diversified ecological restoration firm with demonstrated experience in working effectively with communities to resolve issues and habitat restoration programs. • Woman-owned small business (WBE, • Measuring and improving values of certified by SBA and Wayne Co), equal opportunity biodiversity and enhancing natural system integrity employer (EEO) by designing, restoring, and monitoring natural areas • Has multi-disciplinary professionals and improving their functionality, aesthetics, and specializing in biological assessment, site prep, connectivity, using community appropriate native restoration ecology, invasive species management, species habitat design-build & establishment • Equipment & staff capacity • Local knowledge of ecosystems • Natural features assessment & interpretation Staff and Experience NCS strives to provide the best possible assessment, design, restoration, Relevant Highlights monitoring and native landscape services for our clients. We perform ecological ✓Habitat Restoration Design services for municipal, state, and federal government agencies, non-profits, private ✓Assessment, design and residences/HOAs, corporations, and schools. All staff is educated in ecological and construction of wetlands environmental sciences. NCS has demonstrated capability to perform the work ✓Biological surveys for plants specified- please see the reference sheets, and employees dedicated to this and animals project. ✓Fish, herptile, and bird specialists Description of BMPs we use ✓Shoreline assessment and ● Assess biological, ecological, soil, hydrology bioengineering design ● Mapping and planning habitat restoration projects experience ● Complete forest management plans & plan prescribed burns; Years of Experience: 45 ● Manage remnant or created natural areas; invasive plant removal projects; ● Design and install landscapes using native plant species; combined ● Conduct plant and animal inventories; Education ● Map existing ecosystems and natural communities; All degreed professionals in ● Coordinate volunteer groups for planting or restoration work; environmental fields ● Conduct training for all aspects of natural area restoration; Registrations/ ● Develop brochures and signage to help people understand and appreciate the natural Certifications/Training features around them. • Natural Shoreline ● Restore native landscapes with a variety of equipment Professional ● Monitor and Maintain native landscapes • Certified Ecological ● Integrated permaculture, wildlife, forest and invasive species management practices development and implementation Restoration Practitioners ● Forest and wetland mensuration, natural resources inventory and delineation • DNR Forest Division and USDA NRCS Certified TSP

5 | P a g e

Liz & John DeLisle

Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Staff Resumes

Liz DeLisle CEO & Owner

Liz is the CEO and owner of NCS, which is an SBA certified woman-owned small business. She takes charge of finance, bidding, grants, government contracting, client communications, materials costing, procurement, human resources, and is our problem-solver. She has a master’s in management from Davenport University.

Project Experience • Composes plans and schedules • Schedules and supervises staff • Communicates with clients and cooperators • Procures materials and equipment

Experience Consultant to property owners, construction managers/general contractors, architects, and engineers. Provides a supportive role to projects requiring special care and detail, manages human resources, project development and related insight for project and design considerations, coordination between stakeholders, achieving local review approval, and construction phase support.

Registrations/ Education Certifications/Training M.S. in Management • WBENC • Concentration in Project Management • Foster Closet of MI Davenport University, MI • QuickBooks ProSeries

6 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

John DeLisle Principal Ecologist, CERP Relevant Highlights • Sustainable landscape Restoration Mr. DeLisle is a botanist, entomologist and ecologist Design with over 20 years of experience in ecology, soil • Assessment, design and construction of science, sustainable landscape/habitat restoration wetland design, bioretention, invasive species management, and permitting projects for • Biological surveys for plants and various residential, commercial, agricultural, and government clients. John is animals dedicated to restoring the diversity, vitality, integrity, and beauty of our clients' • 20 years of experience land and water resources. John manages a staff educated and experienced in • 10 years with NCS planning, installing and maintaining native ecosystems, and well-versed in the range of native plants suitable to these natural sustainable landscapes. Natural Community Services accomplishes restoration, consulting, and native plant Registrations/ movement scientific and sociological goals using survey, design and management Certifications/Training methods proven to ameliorate disturbed soils, hydrology, wildlife, and • Natural Shoreline Professional vegetation, while establishing locally indigenous plants adapted to restoring • Professional Wetlands Scientist these pre-settlement conditions. • DNR Forest Division & USDA NRCS Education Certified TSP • M.S. University of Michigan; • Certified Ecological Restoration Environmental Science Professional • B.S. Michigan State University, Natural Resources

Project Experience Mr. John DeLisle, principal ecologist of NCS, supervised habitat-driven landscape design and field biology research programs for 10 years for governmental agencies before starting NCS. John has participated in many ecological survey, design and GIS projects, including over 10 GLRI-funded projects for governments and NGOs in southeast Michigan. He served as the team leader for DNR ecological survey for on Belle Isle, for Sterling and almost 10 other State Parks, led the implementation of SEMCOG and Macomb County (MI) green infrastructure program and similar initiatives for Wayne County and Southfield. John was the biological survey and ecological design lead for Detroit’s Maheras-Gentry Park Coastal Habitat Feasibility study, and served as the biological assessment lead for Chesterfield Township’s Brandenburg Park Coastal Habitat Restoration, as well as restoration practice lead for Stony and Celeron Islands in the Detroit River.

At Maheras-Gentry, John led extensive aquatic, wetlands, uplands, and natural history studies, having performed and reported on data collection, analysis, and basis of wildlife habitat design, shoreline, waterway, soil investigation, and floristic quality inventories for the park oxbow backwater marsh, Detroit River frontage, and remaining natural swales and buffer in the southwest margins. John categorized and prioritized plant and animal species and habitats for conservation and restoration. He directed NCS biologists for specific taxa-based studies and interfaced with the city and OHM in coordinating public engagement, key stakeholder reviews, and analysis of site-scale, AOC-BUI based watershed analysis.

He is currently leading planning, design, and implementation services for savanna and wetlands restoration at City of Detroit Eliza Howell Park and Royal Oak’s Normandy Oaks Parks, oversight of contractor restoration of Belle Isle’s Flatwoods, prairie restoration projects at Heritage Park in Farmington Hills, Beverly Park in Beverly Hills, and several parks for the cities of Southfield. John personally leads biological assessments, and map data products, basis of design, client interaction, design and implementation quality control, and overall leadership as part of this project, involving and enriching value for city staff, compiling data analysis summaries and reports, and performing field evaluation QA/QC.

7 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle

Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Mike Sobieski General Manager Relevant Highlights • CISMA manager Mr. Sobieski is an invasive species management • Master rain gardener planner, macroinvertebrate entomologist, forester • Tree inventory and mapping and team leader with 20 years of experience in ecology, ecological survey, • Forest management planning forestry, soil science, GIS and management. Mike leads forestry • Machine operator, sawyer operations in addition to general project management. Establishes Key • 20 years of experience Performance Indicators and QA/QC deliverables for work planners. Communicates and negotiates management strategies with cooperators and internal managers through organizational and cultural processes. Coalesces cross-functional teams by streamlining information distribution and analysis.

Registrations/ Education Certifications/Training • B.S. Oakland University; Environmental • MNSP CNSP Science. • MDARD applicator • Master Rain Gardener

Project Experience Mr. Sobieski led the Oakland and Lake St. Clair CISMA’s as their director from 2015-2018. Here, he coordinated invasive plant and animal surveys, composed project specifications, performed oversight of control operations and managed cooperative staff. He led assessment services for invasive species contracts within over the course of the last 10 years, serving Macomb, Oakland and St. Clair counties, working alongside ecological contractors, environmental consultants, NGO and government staff. In doing so, he developed an auditing process for assessing contractor efficiency and their budgetary efficiency. He has led restoration operations, including scheduling, planning, and field implementation for greater than 20 projects in the Southeast Michigan region. He has in-depth experience in forest and restoration methodology, implementation, and statistical analysis. Additionally, he is certified natural shoreline professional, and Master Rain Gardener, having worked with CRWC WaterTowns. Mike will manage scheduling and implementation for this project.

8 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Relevant Highlights Renaud Habert, MLA • Habitat Restoration Design Ecological Designer • Assessment, design and construction of wetlands Renaud is a designer and ecologist responsible for promotion • Bioengineering and development of NCS’ stream and aquatic restoration • Biological surveys practice, green infrastructure and wildlife habitat design, and • Habitat structures for target animals invasive species planning. Renaud holds a B.S. in conservation • Design team manager ecology from U-M’s SNRE program, along with education in • 5 years of experience landscape architecture. His project experience is varied, but • 3 years with NCS focused on assessment, design, management, and restoration of natural resources including permitting, wildlife biology, and invasive plants, including GIS, concept drawings, client care, EDRR species prioritization and plan writing.

Education Registrations/ B.S.; Environmental Planning Certifications/Training M.S Landscape Architecture. • Natural Shoreline Professional • Certified Permaculture Designer • MDARD applicator

Project Experience

Renaud has led management plan surveys, composition, GIS and implementation for bioengineering, green infrastructure and wildlife management projects and restorations in interlobate and lakeplain communities for Cities of Novi, Royal Oak, Wayne County, Oakland County, and 6 Rivers Land Conservancy. Renaud also has designed wildlife habitat structures, conservation seed mixes, and composed CAD planting layouts for numerous private clients. Renaud was an ecological design contributor for Detroit’s Maheras-Gentry Park Coastal Habitat Feasibility Study and served as the lead designer for Normandy Oaks Savanna, City of Taylor Senior Center Pond Restoration, and Eliza Howell Park Habitat Restoration. Renaud has worked internationally in both landscape architecture and environmental planning.

9 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Steve Turner Forester, ISA Arborist

Mr. Turner has been an Arborist for 27 years and has been involved with all aspects of tree care from Climbing to Plant Health Care and everything in between Including, Hazard tree evaluation, Diagnostics, Identification, Construction preservation and planning, Expert witness, Appraisals and Tree inventories, Project management, and Training. Steve has been an Adjunct professor at O.C.C .teaching Arboriculture and has been a columnist for Michigan Gardener writing the Tree tips column for 20 years. In 2001, he created the Relevant Highlights Belle isle tree hug in which he brought together and help organized the pro bono • Tree root expert work of 20 local tree care companies to perform a day of service and provided • Assessment, treatment of Oak over $100,000 worth of work on the trees of Belle Isle each year for 2 years, Wilt Again in 2004 Steve was called on by national trade association TCI to help plan • Biological control and facilitate the work to be done on a National day of service on Belle Isle, this • Intimate personal experience with includes an effort to help preserve the rare Pumpkin Ash from EAB, he Identified Belle Isle, including the wet- all the trees and organized all the treatments to be done. Steve has been the mesic flatwoods Arborist for the Belle Isle conservatory since 2002, and has been responsible for • 28 years of experience all trimming and removals of the trees as well as some plant health care, and • CWD woody fish habitat expert using an air spade to decompact and amend the soil. • 9 Years with NCS

Registrations/ Certifications/Training Education • ISA Certified Arborist B.S.; Michigan State University, Natural • DNR Forest Division and USDA NRCS Resources; 1990 Certified TSP • Professional Wetlands Scientist • MDARD applicator

Project Experience Steve Turner has over 25 years of experience managing trees, including performing Oak Wilt Management in 2017 on Belle Isle in Detroit, holding ongoing pruning contracts, leading the Belle Isle tree hug since 2002, Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) diagnosis and treatment during the initial outbreak in 2005, and designing rootwell and other tree protection devices. Steve has extensive forest habitat conservation experience, including NCS’ USACE Rootwads for Habitat project in 2017.

10 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Addison Gaines Lead Biologist Relevant Highlights Ms. Gaines is an ecologist with over 5 • Habitat Restoration Design years of experience in ecology habitat • Assessment, design and construction of wetlands restoration design, site restoration, bioretention, bioengineering • Bioengineering design, fish and herpetofauna studies, land GIS mapping. • Biological surveys Addison is dedicated to educating clients about biodiversity, • Native plant expert vitality, integrity, and beauty of our clients' land and water • Design team manager resources. She is educated and experienced in planning, • 9 years of experience installing and maintaining native ecosystems, and well-versed in • 4 years with NCS the range of native plants hosting and provisioning butterflies, birds, identifying them, and specializing in herpetology as well.

Education B.S.; University of Michigan; Environmental Registrations/ Science; 2009 Certifications/Training A.S.; Henry Ford College Landscape • Natural Shoreline Professional Architecture; 2007 • Certified Permaculture Designer • MDARD applicator

Project Experience Addison has worked on several GLRI projects with NCS, including fish, wildlife, invasive species, water quality, vegetation and other biota for QAPP-development, site survey, and habitat restoration on many government, NGO and private lands and waters in southern Michigan. Addison was the biological survey and ecological design specification staff training and materials lead for Detroit’s Maheras-Gentry Park Coastal Habitat Feasibility study, and served as the biological assessment data collector, GIS map contributor, and summary report author for Chesterfield Township’s Brandenburg Park Coastal Habitat Restoration, Normandy Oaks Savanna, Stony and Celeron Islands, and Eliza Howell Park Habitat Restorations. She is highly skilled in avian survey design, and using innovative, non-intrusive technologies for sampling bird, herpetofauna, fish, and benthic insects.

11 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle

Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Bob Muller Fish Biologist Relevant Highlights Bob Muller has been studying non-game • 30 years’ experience native fishes for over 30 years, with a • Assessment, design and monitoring of spawning and foraging habitats special interest in darters and other • Great Lakes, rivers, inland lakes and stream benthic fishes. Sampling a Round Goby experiences in a local river in 2008 began an interest in the effect they would • Renowned minnow expert have on the benthic fish community. He has been working in • Fish data and populations analyses partnership with Friends of the Rouge and Dr. Larissa Sano since • Past-president of Michigan Native Fish Assoc. 2013 under a grant from the Graham Water Center at the • Biological surveys for birds, plants, herpetofauna University of Michigan to collect data on the goby and fish community of the Lower Rouge. Beyond the grant, he has also been investigating other local river fish communities and the impact of the Round Goby

Registrations/ Education Certifications/Training B.S.; University of Michigan; Environmental Science • Natural Shoreline Professional

• Certified DNR protected species permit-

holder

• NANFA

Project Experience Bob has worked on several GLRI projects with NCS, including fish and other QAPP-development, site survey, and habitat restoration monitoring on DNR, Chesterfield Twp., Detroit, Farmington Hills, MNA, and Royal Oak lands and waters. Bob’s 40 years of experience as a biological survey and ecological design specification writer for NCS, Friends of the Rouge and others includes work at Detroit’s Maheras-Gentry Park Coastal Habitat Feasibility study, field biologist for Chesterfield Township’s Brandenburg Park Coastal Habitat Restoration, multiple City of Royal Oak projects, Stony and Celeron Islands, and Eliza Howell Park Habitat Restoration. Bob has sampled fish in all of southeast Michigan’s watersheds, including the Detroit River and Ecorse Creek.

12 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Jeff Klein, LLA, ASLA Landscape Architect Relevant Highlights • Concept and Design Development Jeff Klein is a Detroit based • Site Planning landscape architect with over 20 • Park and Public Space Planning years of design, construction and • Green Stormwater Infrastructure project management experience. • Urban Agriculture Jeff’s diverse portfolio of work demonstrates his ability to • Project Management thoughtfully engage and collaborate with a broad range of clients • Proposal and Contract Development and community stakeholders in projects ranging from: residential • Estimating and Scheduling design/build, community open space and vacant land development, • Construction Documentation and Administration urban agriculture, water harvesting and re-use, green stormwater • Project Implementation and Oversight infrastructure, public space and park development. His combined work experiences exemplify his interdisciplinary approach to project development from concept through construction administration. Furthermore, his work underscores a personal belief that the landscape is a powerful tool for change that can support social and environmental cohesion while transforming and healing, land, people, and communities. Registrations/ Certifications/Training Education • Licensed Landscape Architect State of B.L.A. Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, Michigan Michigan State University • Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI) 2016 • American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)

Project Experience Jeff recently designed and overaw NCS construction of Scotia Park in Huntington Woods. It received an MPARKS Landscape Design Award in 2019. The modestly budgeted re-development effectively combines essential community programmatic elements alongside practical GSI applications. The park practice manages the spaces internal storm water while additionally accepting adjacent roadway runoff. Native plant species provide beauty while adding additional layers of ecological continuity. Additional work includes implementation of one of Detroit’s earliest GSI project, the “Green Alley” located in midtown next to the Green Garage, design and construction of the Detroit Garden Centers, native garden and education space along Detroit’s Dequindre Cut and design and construction of solar powered stormwater harvesting and re-use systems used in sustainable urban agriculture practices. More details about Jeff’s work can be found at: https://classicjeff.wixsite.com/mysite

13 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

6. References NCS has performed biological assessments, written and led NFWF grants, designed, built, maintained and monitored habitat restoration projects for many municipal clients in Southeast Michigan, including Farmington Hills, Southfield, Royal Oak, Detroit, Wayne and Macomb County. • Chesterfield Township, MI Brandenburg Park Natural Shoreline & Aquatic Habitat Restoration Assessments, Design, Biological Monitoring Contact: John Deslippe: (248) 979-3543 [email protected]

• Macomb County Department of Planning and Economic Development Metro Parkway Green Infrastructure Wetlands Planning and Restoration Contact: Gerry Santoro (586)469-6443 [email protected]

• City of Lathrup Village Lathrup Preserve Vegetation Survey, Landscape Design, Maintenance Plan, Invasive Species Control Contact: Sandra Johnson [email protected]

• Van Buren Township French Landing Park Forest & Shoreline Consulting, Native Landscape Design-Build-Maintain Contact: Matt Best, Director [email protected] 734-699-8913

• Village of Beverly Hills Beverly Park Forest and Pond Ecological Restoration Contact: Kristin Rutkowski, Director [email protected]

• Sidewalk Detroit Biological assessments, Ecological Restoration Design, Savanna habitat restoration and native landscape design-build Contact: Sophie Stockum : 313-815-2345, [email protected]

• Clinton Township Shoreline, wetland & prairie site assessment, design-build, monitoring, planning Contact: Mary Bednar, Director [email protected] 586-286-9465

• City of Royal Oak Natural Areas Assessments, Savanna, Bioswale designs, Ecological planning & Restoration for Pond, Forest, and Arboretum Contact: Aaron Filipski, [email protected] 248.246.3300

• City of Taylor Pond Ecosystem Restoration & Butterfly Garden Design-build Contact: Guido Ulin, [email protected] 248-336-4361

• City of Farmington Hills Native Landscape Design, Heritage Park Planning, and Management Contact: Ashlie Smith, 248.477.1135, [email protected]

• City of Southfield Park and green infrastructure planning, design, invasive species assessment/mapping and control Contact: Brandy Siedalczek, Stormwater Manager: [email protected]

• City of Detroit Maheras-Gentry Park Aquatic and Wetland Habitat Restoration Contact: Arianna Zannetti, Landscape Designer (313) 628-4307 [email protected]

14 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

7. Natural Resources Overlay Maps & Concept Planning NCS specializes in analyzing GIS map data in support of field survey and conceptual plan development. Site soils reference map and example plans from area habitat restoration assessment and design projects are below.

Detroit Eliza Howell Park Habitat Restoration 15 | P a g e Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

Left: Normandy Oaks Vernal Pool and Savanna habitat restoration design Right: Heritage Pk. before, during, and after design-build-maintain services

16 | P a g e QUOTE 2 Liz & John DeLisle Owners & Principal Ecologist Natural Community Services Cell: 248.672.7611

http://naturalcommunityservices.com/ Email: [email protected]

8. Price Proposal NCS proposes the table of prices below according to the absolute best rapid ecological survey and conceptual planning practices for Fran Leaf Park Wetland Habitat, including assessment, maps and data analysis/summary report, an OPTIONAL grant writing (another 5k + amount for engineering review) item, with total sum of $5985.00 at bottom. KEEGO HARBOR FRAN LEAF PARK TASK FEE PROPOSED SCOPE DESCRIPTION Task 1 – Site Background, Compile historical information, Biological Assessments environmental/ecological research, perform and Physical Inventory $ 2,570.00 ecological and physical surveys

Task 2 – Data analysis, Compose feasibility maps; scientific analysis of Basis of Design, flora, fauna, and soil-water data regarding the Estimates,Conceptual Plan $ 2,875.00 wetland resources, concept design park features

Task 3– Plan Summary Summary pool/habitat restoration design & Report, Schedules, implementation schedules, estimating, suggest Meeting & Presentation $ 540.00 grants, presentation & report

Task 4+– OPTIONAL Compose technical plans, section drawings, design & grant writing compose grant documents, budgeting - assistance $ - OPTIONAL COST TBD TOTAL $ 5,985.00

ACCEPTANCE AND NOTICE TO PROCEED Natural Community Services, LLC is pleased to be given the opportunity to submit our proposal for ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT & PLANNING to City of Keego Harbor. Please sign and date two (2) copies of the agreement in the space provided below. Keep one for your files and return the other signed to NCS. Should you prefer to issue a purchase order, or attach additional agreement forms, please reference or attach to this proposal and its contents.

NCS will not be held responsible for alterations to the proposed schedule due to events beyond our direct control. Delays caused by the owner, other consultants/contractors, inclement weather, or other alterations not attributed to NCS shall not constitute default by NCS.

This signature page and the preceding terms and conditions are the only instruments within this agreement. Any change or alterations must be written, signed and dated by both parties to constitute a change to this agreement.

AUTHORIZATION AND NOTICE TO PROCEED:

______Authorized Signature Please Print Name and Title

______Witness Date

17 | P a g e Proposal for Fran Leaf Park

Prepared for City of Keego Harbor 2025 Beechmont St. Keego Harbor, MI 48320

Prepared by Cardno, Inc. 8000 Kensington Ct. Brighton, MI 48116 517 862 6897 www.cardno.com

August 26, 2020

Table of Contents

Company’s Experience and Qualifications ...... 1 Relevant Project Experience ...... 2 Key Personnel ...... 6 Work Plan and Schedule...... 8 Project Schedule ...... 12 Assumptions ...... 13 Cost ………………………………………………………………………………..14

FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Company’s Experience and Qualifications

Cardno provides a wide range of infrastructure consulting, design, engineering, and construction services over a broad regional area. We have provided innovative and sustainable solutions to challenging environmental issues in the Midwest for decades. Cardno began working in Michigan as early as 1989. Our multidisciplinary teams of professionals provide a full range of ecological consulting and restoration services, with expertise in watershed planning, stream and ecosystem restoration, mitigation design, full wetland services, endangered species consulting, designing natural systems for stormwater/ wastewater, archaeology, and green infrastructure, regulatory permitting and compliance, and geographic information system (GIS) analysis and database management. Our Brighton Office is similarly qualified, performing whole-scope restoration services on varying scales, from individual landowner sites to federally owned parcels. Cardno has successfully completed hundreds of ecological restoration projects across the Midwest. Cardno field staff members are trained and experienced in all aspects of restoration. Cardno’s restoration field team is are certified by the Michigan Department of Agriculture & Rural Development in commercial pesticide applicator in aquatics, forestry, and right-of-way categories. With regard to invasive species management, we currently have more than a dozen staff members licensed by the state of Michigan. Extensive training and experience in identification and mapping of invasive species enables the team to work in a highly efficient manner. Our methods may include restoration mowing, spot and boom spray type herbicide application, and woody species removal. Woody species removal may include cut and treat, boom spray type foliar herbicide (where conditions allow), spot foliar application, basal bark herbicide application, mechanical removal, and potentially prescribed fire where conditions allow. Herbaceous species may be removed through spot and/or boom spray herbicide application, strategic mowing, and other various restoration minded methods.

Page 1

FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Relevant Project Experience

Clinton River Invasive Species Control – Mount Clemens, Macomb County, Michigan Client Reference Personnel / Role Project Cost Project Dates Clinton River Spillway Intercounty Shawn Duke / PM, Robin Burke $457,525 October 2015 – Drain Drainage Board, Derek /Field Supervisor, Frank Sass / June 2019 Stratelak, 248-454-6870-direct Field Technician, Lauren 248-535-3347, Meyers / Field Technician [email protected] Summary The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (NOAA-GLRI) awarded a grant to the Clinton River Spillway Intercounty Drain Drainage Board for habitat improvement planning and design on the Clinton River Spillway in Macomb County. Phase I included enhancing the riparian area through vegetation management on approximately 65 acres along 2.5 miles of the river, which is located in the Clinton River AOC. Cardno implemented the Invasive Species Control Plan, which includes herbicide treatments of exotic/invasive species from 2015 through 2019. Field crews applied herbicide via boat, ATV, backpack and direct hand application. Common Reed (Phragmites australis), reed Canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and purple loosestrife (Lythrum Salicaria) are the three target herbaceous species. Eleven tree/shrub species were treated using the cut-stump and treat method. The cut material was then be disposed off-site. Foliar treatments were administered in the spring/summer to combat re- sprouts. Selective treatments were used over Broadcast to reduce non-target damage. Cardno continued seasonal maintenance through year 2019 to achieve the desired goals of 98 percent removal of invasive species and 95 percent coverage of native plants within the treatment zones. Removing these species gave the native flora a chance to thrive and provide natural habitat for the local fauna. The native flora will improve the water quality through proper filtration and provide aesthetic value to the community and recreational activities, giving the public enhanced fishing access.

Oakland County Parks Ecological Services – Oakland County, Michigan Client Reference Personnel / Role Project Cost Project Dates Oakland County Parks and Shawn Duke / PM, Robin Burke / $585,000 8/2013-Present Recreation, Sarah Maylen, 248- Field Technician, Patrick Duffy / 343-1353, [email protected] Field Technician, Becky Norris / GIS Summary Cardno was contracted to perform selective herbicide treatments on populations of oriental bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus), swallowwort (Vincetoxicum spp.), common reed (Phragmites australis), autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Invasives were controlled within prairie, forest, and wetland ecosystems, covering several hundred acres across nine county parks. Several treatment sites provide habitat for the federally threatened eastern massasauga rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus) and an abundance of other native species. Cardno obtained Aquatic Nuisance Control permits for all herbicide work and created maps for future client usage. Field crews used a combination of backpack and ATV-mounted sprayers as well as hand-wicking and cut-stump methods to treat invasive species, while avoiding damage to desirable native plants. Specific treatment methods and action plans for various land cover types at varying densities were tailored to successfully treat invasive plants found at each site. Due to restricted park access, plant phenology, weather and budget considerations, a detailed project timeline, and daily contingency plans were created and maintained to mitigate against each scheduling concern.

Page 2

FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Jamian Drain Streambank Restoration – West Bloomfield Township, Michigan Client Reference Personnel / Role Project Cost Project Dates West Bloomfield Township, Shawn Duke / PM, Robin Burke / $201,500 2013-Present Marshall Labadie, 248-451-4833, Field Supervisor, Patrick Duffy / [email protected] Field Supervisor, Becky Norris / GIS Summary Cardno restored 1500’ of streambank to create an aesthetically pleasing natural buffer that promotes water conservation and habitat for native organisms. Past restoration attempts of the area, which was previously maintained as turf grass, resulted in high densities of invasive plant species. Cardno designed the project using natural shoreline engineering methods and installed bioengineered erosion control blankets, geotextile and stone to restrict invasive species growth and provide slope stabilization. Cardo installed more than 10,000 native plant plugs and 100 native shrubs. Cardno has been retained for a multi-year maintenance period to insure the project is on track to become a self-sustaining natural area.

Michigan CISMA Invasive Species Control – Multiple Counties, Michigan Client Reference Personnel / Role Project Cost Project Dates Oakland County, Mid-Michigan, Shawn Duke / PM, Robin Burke $146,640.25 6/2016–Present and Lake St. Clair CISMAs, Erica / Field Supervisor / PM, Patrick Clites , 248-660-0716 Duffy / Field Supervisor, Becky Norris / GIS Summary Cardno was contracted by partners of the Oakland County, Mid- Michigan and Lake St. Clair Cooperative Invasive Species Management Areas to perform selective herbicide treatments, mechanical cutting and surveying of priority invasive species populations including swallowwort (Cynanchum spp.), Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum) and common reed (Phragmites australis). Invasives were controlled within prairie, forest, and wetland ecosystems on both public and private properties including Right-of-Ways (ROWs). ArcGIS handheld units were used to locate and record populations. Project specific data collection methods allowed for increased accuracy and efficiency during implementation and reporting phases. Cardno also acquired and fulfilled all reporting requirements for Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Aquatic Nuisance Control (ANC) permits. Field crews used a combination of backpack and vehicle-mounted sprayers as well as hand-wicking methods to treat invasive species. Specific treatment methods and action plans for various land cover types at varying densities were tailored to successfully treat invasive plants found at each site. Due to restricted access, phenology, weather and budget considerations, Cardno created and maintained a detailed project timeline and daily contingency plans to mitigate against potential decreases in treatment efficacy. Post-treatment cutting/mowing was conducted on multiple sites to enhance follow up treatment efficacy and promote native habitat. Cardno met the challenges of working within property boundaries, including ROWs and private parcels at multiple sites by utilizing local ArcGIS layers to determine boundaries and then planning routes to maximize efficiency. Teams also followed stringent safety protocols and timed treatments appropriately in the highly traffic ROW areas. In addition, Cardno identified and implemented GIS-based methods to report the large quantity of treatment sites under one MDEQ ANC permit accurately and efficiently.

Page 3

FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Oakland Township Native Prairie Seeding – Oakland Township, Oakland County, Michigan Client Reference Personnel / Role Project Cost Project Dates Oakland Township, Benjamin Shawn Duke / PM $ 30,000 2016-2018 VanderWeide, 248-651-7810, [email protected] Summary Cardno provided and installed six custom native seed mixes within local genotypic restrictions in southeast Michigan. Seed was installed in five community types across 31 acres using a combination of no-till drilling and broadcast methods. Seeding best management practices were used during the dormant season to maximize native community establishment.

City of Birmingham Invasive Species Control – Birmingham, Oakland County, Michigan Client Reference Personnel / Role Project Cost Project Dates City of Birmingham, Michigan, Shawn Duke / PM, Robin Burke / $ 69,968 2015-Present Carrie A Laird, 248-530-1714 Field Technician, Patrick Duffy / Field Technician, Becky Norris / GIS Summary Since 2015, Cardno has provided invasive species management and native restoration services across forest and wetland ecosystems at locations within suburban public parks. Field crews removed a wide variety of herbaceous and woody invasive species to meet the 95% removal goal for each park, including invasive common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), box elder (Acer negundo), tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica), common privet (Ligustrum vulgare), honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and oriental bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculata). To meet this goal, field crews carefully located and identified individuals of each species, using field guides when necessary. The project required Cardno to conduct extensive planning to ensure public safety and to maintain access due to work site locations within suburban public parks. This included posing signage and caution tape, engaging the public, limiting work hours, and ensuring all public areas were clean and safe at all times.

Page 4

FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Krispin Drain Habitat Restoration – St. Clair River AOC, Harsens Island, Algonac County, Michigan Client Reference Personnel / Role Project Cost Project Dates J F Brennan Company, Inc., Tyler Shawn Duke / Field Supervisor, $244,250 May 2015 – Lee, 608-519-5360 office, 608- Becky Norris / GIS, Tony St. September 2018 792-0815 mobile, Aubin / Project Manager [email protected] Summary The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Great Lakes National Program Office Construction Services awarded a Task Order to the Great Lakes Sediment Remediation, LLC joint venture for habitat restoration along Krispin Drain in Harsens Island, Michigan. The four-mile-long drain, which cuts through the middle of Harsens Island from the North Channel to Muscamoot Bay in Algonac County, is located in the St. Clair River AOC. The project’s objectives included removing invasive species and plant native vegetation, re-establishing flow and restoring tributary habitat, reshaping the drain to promote sediment transport, benthic habitat, and flow restoration, and restoring the substrate within the drain. This included controlling invasive common reed, promoting vegetation diversity, composition and stem density, and fish, macroinvertebrate, herpetofauna, and avian diversity/populations. As a subcontractor to J F Brennan Company, Cardno performed ecological restoration activities, including: > Provided and installed approximately 42,000 yards of various seed mixes; > Provided and installed more than 1,150 trees and shrubs; and > Provided two years of maintenance and monitoring and additional control in the planted areas. The broader goals of the Krispin Drain project included restoring the drain to habitat conditions similar to those found there historically, as described by stakeholders and landowners during the 1960s, when the drain was last maintained.

Kuipers Drain Restoration Services – Laketown Township, Allegan County, Michigan Client Reference Personnel / Role Project Cost Project Dates Connan LTD, Chris Thomas N/A $123,817 August 2017- 646-772-5454, December 2018 [email protected] Summary The goal of this project was to create a large wetland basin to capture runoff from large rain events and slowly release the water into the Kuipers drain in order to reduce flooding downstream. Working as a subcontractor to the excavation company, Connan LTD, Cardno installed approximately 8.5 acres of native upland seed mix, 2 acres of wetland basin seed mix and 4 acres of wet-to-mesic wetland seed mix and 150 native live stakes. Cardno also installed 1,800 square yards of reinforced grass spillways and nearly 1 acre of erosion control material. The project was a collaboration between the Allegan County Drain Commissioner and a local nonprofit, the Outdoor Discovery Center (property owner).

Page 5 FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Key Personnel

Cardno has a team of experienced professionals ready to meet the needs of the City of Keego Harbor. To provide the highest quality of service and communication, Mr. Patrick Duffy will serve as the Cardno’s project manager, serving as the primary point of contact. With over five years of experience in developing and implementing ecological restoration plans and consulting with clients to meet their environmental needs, Mr. Duke is highly qualified to meet to meet the City’s expectation to manage this contract. He is located and currently manages operations and projects for the Brighton office, which is located approximately 45 minutes from the project location, therefore he will be easily accessible to you on a regular and as-needed basis.

Table 1. Key Staff Qualifications Overview Staff / Role / Education / Qualifications Years of Experience Shawn Duke As a restoration consultant and field operations lead, Mr. Shawn Duke is primarily Project Manager responsible for developing and implementing ecological restoration plans. Restoration work includes invasive species control, native plantings, natural . MS, Biology, Eastern shorelines, erosion control, and prescribed fire. Mr. Duke also assists with wetland Michigan University; delineations, habitat and botanical surveys, soil studies, wetland delineations, BS, Fisheries and mitigation projects, environmental monitoring, and endangered species reviews. Wildlife, Michigan State University Certifications: Michigan Commercial Pesticide Applicator Certification, Categories 2, 5 and 6 (#C006140194); Certified Ecological Restoration Practioner, CERP #0204, . 8 years of professional Society of Ecological Restoration; Certified Michigan Natural Shoreline Professional; experience NWCG Wildland Firefighter Certification: S-130, S-190, I-100, IS-700; 40-hour OSHA HAZWOPER Certification; Level 2 Equipment Operator. Robin Burke Ms. Robin Burke is responsible for implementing restoration plans in the field. . MLA, Landscape Restoration work includes invasive species control, native plant installation, and Architecture; BA, erosion control. She is also experienced in GIS and the use of handheld GPS units, Environmental Studies, maps and compasses to navigate to plot locations. Prior to joining Cardno, Ms. Burke Beloit College served as Conservation Planner and Land Protection Manger for Legacy Land Conservancy. . 9 years of professional experience Certifications: Michigan Commercial Pesticide Applicator Certification, Categories 5 and 6 (#C003181217)

Patrick Duffy Mr. Patrick Duffy manages restoration plans in the field. He designs, implements, and Project Manager manages ecological restoration projects that involve invasive species control, native plant establishment, wetland mitigation, stream stabilization, and project monitoring. . MS, Forestry, Purdue Mr. Patrick Duffy is both an analytical scientist and hands-on practitioner, having led University; BS, over 50 natural resource projects per year in the Greater Detroit area and Environmental Science, Washtenaw County, with scope of service including cost estimation, design, University of Michigan stakeholder consulting, proposal writing, and implementation. He has 10 years of . 7 years of professional experience in leadership and teaching, and 5 years of experience in restoration experience project management. He has mentored, trained, and supervised more than 24 employees and interns. Certifications: Michigan Commercial Pesticide Applicator Certification, Categories 5 and 6; Certified Arborist, ISA; TSP Forest Management, MDARD; S-130, S-190, S- 290 Fire Certifications (National Wildfire Coordinating Group)

Page 6

FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Staff / Role / Education / Qualifications Years of Experience Tony St. Aubin Mr. Anthony (Tony) St. Aubin provides oversight and project management to Quality Control Specialist ecological restoration projects across the company and serves as Principal-in-Charge for the most complicated and detailed natural resource restoration projects. With . BS, Biological more than 16 years of natural resource experience, he is an integral part to the Research, Loras growth and success in developing Cardno’s remediation and emergency response College services area. His role includes oversight and personnel management, proposal and . 17 years of contract review/generation, project estimating, planning, and management, and is professional experience responsible for profitability, performance, safety, and client satisfaction. Mr. St. Aubin has served on several professional organizations and has given numerous presentations and workshops on the use of native vegetation in the landscape, habitat restoration, and restoration design/ planning. Certifications: 40-hour OSHA HAZWOPER Certification; 8-hour OSHA HAZWOPER Refresher Certification; 10-hour OSHA Safety and Health Training; Wildland Firefighter Certified Training: S-130, S-190, S290; Registered United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Technical Service Provider (TSP); U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Certified Construction Quality Management Becky Norris Ms. Rebecca (Becky) Norris is a staff scientist mainly responsible for GIS analysis, GIS Analyst while also providing technical support for fieldwork. With three years of experience in spatial data analysis, she is responsible for the acquisition/creation, management . MS, Biology, Grand and analysis of large datasets for both small and large multi-year projects, as well as Valley State University; the creation of maps and figures for many of Cardno's GIS projects. Ms. Norris also BS, Natural Resource assists in field botany efforts for wetland delineations, threatened and endangered Management, Grand species surveys, botanical inventories, habitat management as well as aiding in the Valley State University preparation of reports. . 7 year of professional experience

Page 7 FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Work Plan and Schedule Assessment Cardno proposes first to visit the site in fall of 2020 and again in spring of 2021 in order to assess vegetation health and general condition, apparent population of fauna, hydrological, soil, and light conditions, and other potential factors in management. This will be done in coordination with available volunteer leadership in order to facilitate community development and outreach pertinent to environmental stewardship. Cardno will then provide a concise report detailing:

• Ecological services provided by such a site. • Problems that the city should address in the near term. • Basic management practices during this holding period, active and passive. • The extent of possible human uses for this area. • The level of effort and ballpark cost to execute management recommendations. Cardno would also propose to present this information to the appropriate municipal group.

Invasive Species Management Upon initial inspection, it is clear that the restoration of this wetland area will require the removal of the following weedy and invasive species among others: . Common buckthorn . Glossy buckthorn . Phragmites . Reed canary grass . Purple loosestrife . Canada thistle . Catnip . Dock species

This should be done with a combination of treatments. Cardno proposes to treat these species with a wetland safe Glyphosate (Rodeo) or wetland safe Triclopyr (Garlon 3A) herbicide, tracking dye, and Cygnet surfactant via tank sprayers after the initial inspection in the fall of 2020 or spring of 2021. The should be done via two visits, one in Spring/Summer, and another in late fall to best capture the ideal treatment window for each species. During the fall or winter, Cardno proposes to handle woody invasive species like buckthorn and multi-flora rose via cutting at the base, leaving biomass where they fall, and treating the stumps with concentrated Triclopyr herbicide. This will leave a more ecologically valuable wetland area. However, since this bottomland woods is heavily wooded, planting endeavors should be focused on the open basin area to the Southwest. During this time, one of two treatments is advisable. Either Cardno proposes to mow the open basin area to cut back vegetation, allow for better future germination, and for aesthetic reasons, or leave the area with standing dead biomass and provide a prescribed burn during that fall or subsequent spring. Burning is a natural part of the historical disturbance regime that stimulates soil and fosters the growth of native species that are well adapted to it and is highly recommended.

Page 8 FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Planting and Seeding After chemical and mechanical treatments and a second assessment period, Cardno will then propose a seed and plant mix as well as any pertinent Bioengineered erosion controls. The implementation of this portion of the restoration can be negotiated to include volunteers in order to lower cost and better include the public. Public outreach endeavors should be discussed during this time as they could also include a field day, other educational event, signage, and/or sitting, observation area.

Page 9 FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Table 2. Example Seed Mix Composition by per Acre Rate Scientific Name Common Nam Quantity

PLS Botanical Name Common Name Ounces/Acre

Permanent Grasses/Sedges/Rushes: Juncus effusus Common Rush 1.00 Leersia oryzoides Rice Cut Grass 3.00 Hard-Stemmed Schoenoplectus acutus Bulrush 2.50 Total 26.00

Temporary Cover: Avena sativa Common Oat 360.00 Lolium multiflorum Annual Rye 100.00 Total 460.00

Forbs: Acorus americanus Sweet Flag 1.00 Common Water Alisma subcordatum Plantain 2.00 Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed 1.00 Swamp Decodon verticillatus Loosestrife 0.50 Spotted Joe-Pye Eutrochium maculatum Weed 0.50 Rose Mallow Hibiscus spp. Species 4.00 Iris virginica v. shrevei Blue Flag 6.00 Lobelia cardinalis Cardinal Flower 0.25 Lobelia siphilitica Great Blue Lobelia 0.25 Common Water Lycopus americanus Horehound 1.00 Penthorum sedoides Ditch Stonecrop 0.50 Persicaria spp. Pinkweed Species 2.00 Verbena hastata Blue Vervain 1.00 Total 20.00

Page 10 FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Cardinal Flower Hardy Hibiscus Swamp Milkweed Swamp Rose

Butterfly Weed Cup Plant Obedient Plant

Figure 1 Example planting species

Page 11 FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Project Schedule Table 3 below shows Cardno’s anticipated project schedule for 2020 and 2021. Cardno will work with the City to revise schedule as needed for 2021.

Table 3. Project Schedule

Task Description Winter Spring Summer Fall Write & Cardno submits work plan. submit work plan draft Inspection Up to 2 visits to inspect soils, light environment, and hydrological factors to inform management Seeding and Install seed mix and bioengineered planting erosion control as needed per inspection, plant potted plants Herbicide Foliar herbicide application for all Treatment listed weedy or invasive species Mowing and Mow back areas as needed, and cutting provide cutting and stump treatment for woody shrubs Prescribed Burn basin on periodic basis to Fire stimulate growth. Outreach Plan event in coordination with volunteers, or install signage, sitting space.

Page 12 FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Assumptions

Cardno has developed custom seed mixes to match site conditions across many sites within Oakland County. Cardno will further customize the mix and plant selection prior to seeding for other specific conditions as observed during monitoring. If the number of species in the mix increases or a given substitute species that is more expensive than the original is used Cardno will propose a revised cost to the City. The pricing will adjust based on observed conditions during periodic site visits in order that recommendations for planting, seeding, and bioengineering match hydrological and other ground conditions.

Page 13 FRAN LEAF PARK – CITY OF KEEGO HARBOR

Cost

Table 4 contains a breakdown of our cost proposal as requested in the RFQ. These costs represent the likely cost of initial treatment. Follow up treatment may vary in cost.

Table 4. Cost Proposal Matrix

Work Item Description Cost Two visits to the site per year to assess biotic and abiotic conditions pertinent to Inspection management. Communication with the City $800 Applying a customized seed mix for the area and potential bioengineered erosion Seeding control $800 - $1,200 Planting containerized plants specific for the ecosystem. Potential is here for utilizing volunteers in order to engage the Planting community $800 - $2,500 Providing two foliar herbicide treatment visits on all species listed in description Herbicide Treatments above $950 Late season cutting at 12” or above to stimulate following year’s growth and for aesthetic purpose. Cut stump treatment of invasive buckthorn and others within the Mowing and cut stump treatment wooded wetland $1,500 Spring or Fall prescribed burn to manage weedy species and stimulate the growth of Prescribed burn native plants $1,500 This may include a field day, volunteer day, signage, a bench, or other options pending Outreach consultation. $200 - $1,000

Page 14 QUOTE 3

ABOUT CARDNO Cardno is an ASX-200 professional infrastructure and environmental services company, with expertise in the development and improvement of physical and social infrastructure for communities around the world. Cardno’s team includes leading professionals who plan, design, manage, and deliver sustainable projects and community programs. Cardno is an international company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange [ASX:CDD]. For additional information, visit www.cardno.com.

At Cardno, our primary concern is to develop and maintain safe and healthy conditions for anyone involved at our project worksites. We require full compliance with our Health and Safety Policy Manual and established work procedures and expect the same protocol from our subcontractors. We are committed to achieving our Zero Harm goal by continually improving our safety systems, education, and vigilance at the workplace and in the field. Safety is a Cardno core value and through strong leadership and active employee participation, we seek to implement and reinforce these leading actions on every job, every day.

www.cardno.com

August 31, 2020

Tammy Neeb City of Keego Harbor 2025 Beechmont St Keego Harbor, MI 48320

Dear Tammy:

Please accept this letter as a proposal to complete a management plan and presentation to city council regarding the seasonal wetland located at Fran Leaf Park in Keego Harbor. Specific elements of the proposal are as follows:

➢ Our written management plan would be completed by October 31st, and would be based on a site visit to view the landscape and identify many of the plant species growing there, and would include: o An outline of the ecological services provided by the site; o Identifying and prioritizing the problems (such as erosion, invasive species, neighbor dumping, etc) the city should address; o Recommendations for management practices; o Identifying human uses for the area; o An estimate of the effort and associated costs to execute management efforts; and o An optional presentation of findings at a City Council meeting.

Schedule: Following approval by Council, we will assess the site and speak with knowledgeable locals to better understand the site in late September. A report would be submitted in October.

Cost: Management Plan: $1025 Presentation to council: $350

At PlantWise, we are experts at walking sites to assess existing species and conditions. From such assessments, we have developed management plans for thousands of acres of natural areas. Two of our most recent management plans were provided to Heartland Township (Settler’s Park) and Albion College (Whitehouse Nature Center). Our consulting work is the foundation of what

we do. It reflects and supports our mission to provide the best possible restoration services for our clients while doing the most ecological and aesthetic good for the sites in which we work. We also have 25 years of experience in managing natural areas. Our extensive management efforts means that our recommendations are based on real-world, proven results and outcomes.

References

Jason Raddatz, Director of Whitehouse Nature Center at Albion College 517-629-0582 [email protected]

Bob West, Public Works Director, Hartland Township 810-632-7498 [email protected]

Ben Vanderweide, Natural Areas Stewardship Manager, Oakland Township Parks and Recreation 248-651-7810 [email protected]

Bob Clancy, Ecological Restoration Specialist, Michigan Department of Natural Resources 517-284-6088 [email protected]

If you have questions regarding this proposal feel free to contact me by phone or e-mail. We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this estimate.

Sincerely,

David Mindell

MEMORANDUM TAB 19 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals Training

BACKGROUND: The Michigan Planning Association offers a Planning and Zoning Essentials training class. Traditionally, our training for officials is held in March at several locations throughout the state. However, the Michigan Planning Association will be revising that model for 2021 as they may do virtual workshops at that time.

It was suggested by the Michigan Planning Association that Keego Harbor could schedule a virtual workshop of our own. We can coordinate with other communities to share costs. Costs start at $1000 plus costs for materials for participants. MEMORANDUM TAB 20 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: Handbook for Board Members and Commissioners

BACKGROUND: Mayor Pro Tem Lampl would like to propose giving each Board Member and Commissioner a handbook. City staff can work on this handbook which will include a cover sheet, Oath of Service, Overview of the Open Meetings Act, Directory, Meeting Dates and Duties & Responsibilities. In addition, Planning Commissioners and ZBA Board Members will receive a Supplemental handbook from MML.

Boards and Commissions Handbook

130 N. Nottawa Sturgis, Michigan 49091

As Approved, March 2010

Table of Contents

Boards and Commissions Information ...... 1 Types of Boards and Commissions ...... 1 Roles and Responsibilities of Boards and Commissions ...... 1 Commission Recommendations ...... 2 Keys to Becoming an Effective Commission or Board Member ...... 3 The Value of Service ...... 3

Policies and Procedure ...... 4 Application and Appointment Process ...... 4 Applying to a Board or Commission ...... 4 Appointment Process ...... 4 Term of Service ...... 4 Reappointment ...... 4 Resignation ...... 4 Board and Committee Organization ...... 5 Board / Commission Chairperson ...... 5 City Staff Liaison ...... 5 Commission / Board Meetings ...... 6 Attendance ...... 6 Decorum and Rules of Order ...... 6 Meeting Agenda ...... 7 Public Comment ...... 7 Voting and Quorum ...... 7 Meeting Minutes ...... 7 Open Meetings Act ...... 7

Other Issues and Considerations ...... 8 Training and Orientation ...... 8 Public Disclosure / Conflict of Interest ...... 8 Access to Legal Council ...... 9 Conflict Resolution and Dealing with the Public ...... 9 Conflict Between Individuals ...... 9 Conflict Between Entities ...... 9 Handling Citizen Concerns or Complaints ...... 9

BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS INFORMATION

Municipal boards and commissions serve an important function within the City of Sturgis. As advisory bodies responsible for assisting the City Commission with areas or issues of importance, boards and commissions provide valuable insight to both City policy makers and administrators.

The primary policy-making body of the City of Sturgis is the City Commission. As the legislative body, they are responsible for the passage of municipal ordinances and the overall direction of the City, comparable to the board of directors of a private corporation. The City Commission, with limited exceptions, authorizes all boards and commissions and appoints all members of both new and standing boards.

The City of Sturgis, by City Charter, operates under the Council-Manager form of government. Under this form of government, the City Manager serves as the chief administrative officer of the City, equivalent to the CEO of a private corporation. The City Manager is responsible for the day-to- day operation of the City, as well as the overview and assignment of City staff. It is the job of the City Manager to carry out the policies adopted by the City Commission. As administration, the City Manager, and by extension City staff members, provide assistance and expertise to boards and commissions. While board and commission members can expect to work closely with City staff, it is important to note that they do not have any authority over staff members or the City Manager; City staff is responsible to the City Manager and the City Manager is responsible to the City Commission.

Types of Boards and Commissions Two major types of boards and commissions exist in Sturgis. The first and more formal of these types is the standing board or commission. These groups are created and authorized by either the City Charter or municipal ordinance to provide the City Commission with in-depth advice on a variety of topics and/or to research particular issues and gather public input. These standing boards serve the City long-term and rotate membership based on terms of service outlined in their authorizing legislation and bylaws.

The majority of these standing boards are comprised of citizens appointed to serve by the City Commission. Often these groups will also have a City Commission member appointed to serve in either a non-voting or voting role, providing a link between the board or commission and the City Commission. Occasionally, a City staff liaison will be assigned to work with a board. A few standing boards are comprised solely of either City Commission members or a mixture of staff and Commissioners.

The second form of boards or commissions employed by the City are temporary or ad-hoc. These boards will often serve similar advisory or information-gathering roles as the standing boards, but on issues or areas less permanent in nature. While these boards and commissions have authorizing legislation to guide their purpose, they rarely will have formal bylaws.

Roles and Responsibilities of Boards and Commissions Boards and commissions, by virtue of their authorizing statutes, will typically take on one of two roles, each of which has its own level of authority and responsibility.

Regulatory/Adjudicatory boards, such as the Planning Commission or the Zoning Board of Appeals, are granted direct authority over narrow policy areas or the authority to make binding

determinations on questions brought before them. While appointed by the City Commission, they have authority to make decisions independent of the Commission. These boards may also provide an advisory role to the City Commission on certain issues.

Advisory boards, the second type of board/commission role, serve the City Commission by providing them with the input and insight of their members, holding meetings and gathering input from the general public, providing evaluation of programs, and giving other assistance and information as requested by the Commission. As advisory bodies, these boards and commissions cannot unilaterally make policy decisions or direct City staff. It is important for both Regulatory/Adjudicatory as well as Advisory boards and commissions to remember that while they have an important role in the governmental system, they are limited in duty, scope, and authority. The scope of a board or commission’s responsibilities is tied to the authorizing statute under which they were created. This amounts to a mission statement handed down from the City Commission and care should be taken to stay within its scope. Boards and commissions may only discuss and make recommendations or decisions on topics within this area.

Commission Recommendations One critical role of boards or commissions is to make recommendations to the City Commission. In making these recommendations, several factors need to be considered:

▪ While commission or board members may be appointed to represent a particular group of people or may have ties to a particular interest group, the goal of the group is to make recommendations that reflect what is best for the entire City. ▪ Commission and board members should take care that deliberations include thorough research and review of all alternatives on an issue prior to making a recommendation. ▪ Recommendations to the City Commission should reflect the consensus or majority position of the entire board or commission and not the position of a single member or minority. ▪ Recommendations should reflect a consensus position not only based on the deliberations of the board, but also reflecting any public input received. ▪ Any written report that accompanies a board or committee recommendation should be formally typed and delivered to City staff prior to the Commission meeting for which they are on the agenda; staff will provide the information to the City Commission. ▪ A representative of the board or commission should attend the City Commission meeting at which the recommendations are presented in order to answer questions. ▪ Any representative should take care not to give personal opinions or recommendations before the City Commission without clarifying them as such.

Board and commission members should note that staff may present recommendations contrary to that of the board or commission; this is to be respected as a different viewpoint. Also, understand the City Commission is under no obligation to follow the recommendation of the board or City staff, and may choose for a variety of reasons to implement a policy different than the recommended one. In this case, board and commission members should respect this decision and remember they serve the City Commission; their decisions are policy and once made the board or commission should move on to the next area of discussion or find ways to best assist implementation of the new policy.

Boards and Commissions Information 2

Keys to Becoming an Effective Commission or Board Member Like any endeavor, serving as a board or commission member requires you to put in time and effort. Several key behaviors can help make you a more effective part of these groups:

▪ Be familiar with the operating statute, bylaws, and other critical documents of your particular board or commission. These documents provide information on the mission and scope of your group as well as how it should operate. ▪ Review the Open Meetings Act. This legislation will guide how your group can meet and several steps it will need to take to comply with State law. ▪ Attend meetings and come prepared. Most of the City’s boards prepare an agenda prior to each meeting and many provide related materials. Each board member is expected to come to each meeting prepared to discuss the relevant issues, having reviewed any provided documentation. It is beneficial to arrive at meetings on time, in an alert condition, and with an open mind so that meeting will be conducted in an efficient and fair manner. ▪ Understand the role of your board and commission and constraints on the City. By understanding what you can do and how you affect policy, you can reduce frustration with the process and outcomes. In turn, it helps to remember that your area is only one small part of the operations of the City and that limited resources are available to address all needs. Thus recommendations and the policies ultimately adopted should both be viewed with the idea not of the perfect solution, but the best solution given available resources. ▪ Remember you are one member of a committee. The authority of the board or commission comes from the entire group, not just one member; therefore, the decisions made must be of a consensus or majority nature. There may be a time at which your individual view is not that of the commission or board as a whole. In these cases, remember to work as a member of the group and represent your personal views only when it is clear that they are personal and not reflective of the board or City Commission.

The Value of Service While service on a board or commission involves real work, it is also tremendously important and rewarding. As a member of a board or commission, you will have a chance to influence public policy through your recommendations to the City Commission and gain a better understanding of the issues facing the City. As a commission or board member, you will also have the chance to interact with other citizens on meaningful issues, participate in and gain new insights into the public policy process, and give back to the community by using your time and talent to make Sturgis a better place.

Boards and Commissions Information 3

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Application and Appointment Process Applying to a Board or Commission Individuals interested in serving on a City board or commission must complete the “City of Sturgis Appointed Boards/Commissions Application”, indicating which board or commission they are applying for. This application can be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office and returned there upon completion. The application will be held on file by the Clerk for one year and will be considered by the City Commission if an opening in the applicable board or commission becomes available.

Eligibility to apply and serve on a board or commission varies based on their bylaws and authorizing legislation. Several boards and commissions require residency within the City of Sturgis; see the Boards and Commissions list in the appendix for the eligibility requirements of a particular board or commission.

Appointment Process Upon notification of a board or commission opening or board resignation, applicants for the position will be advertised by City staff in the local newspaper. The City Clerk’s Office gathers new applications and contacts all applicants previously on file to confirm whether they are still interested in serving on that board. After gathering and verifying applications, the City Clerk will forward them to the City Commission. The City Commission will review all applications and then make an appointment at the next Commission meeting.

With some exceptions, representatives to all boards and commissions are regularly appointed in May; special appointments are made following a resignation. The City Clerk’s Office will send a letter of appreciation to the outgoing board member and a notice to the newly appointed board member.

Term of Service Each board and commission has different terms of service based on their bylaws and authorizing legislation. Typically boards and commissions will have either one or three year terms; see the Boards and Commissions list in the appendix for the term of service for a particular board or commission.

Reappointment Each year before May, all members of commissions or boards whose terms are set to expire must complete a “City of Sturgis Reappointment Application.” The application will confirm the board or commission member’s interest to continue or discontinue service. Reappointments are not automatic. The City Commission will review all applications from new applicants and the existing board/commission member and then make an appointment or reappointment.

Resignation Any board member that intends to resign must forward a letter to their board or commission chair, who will then forward that letter to the City Clerk. The resignation letter will then be forwarded to the City Commission for their acceptance. If a board or commission member resigns before their term expires, a replacement member will be appointed via the process listed above to serve the remainder of the term.

Board and Committee Organization All boards and committees are organized to include a chairperson and a staff liaison. Some boards may also use sub-committees to handle special topics.

Once a year, typically coinciding with the appointment or reappointment of members in May, a board or commission will elect its officers. For all boards this will include the election of a chairperson, while some boards will elect secretaries and other officers as outlined in their bylaws.

Board / Commission Chairperson The Chair of a board or committee maintains his or her status as a voting member and takes on additional duties. These include but are not limited to:

▪ Assisting staff in preparing meeting agendas ▪ Running board/commission meetings ▪ Serving as contact person for staff liaison to the board/commission ▪ Keeping board/commission discussions on topic ▪ Ensuring all points of discussion are clear and understood ▪ Ensuring all individuals (board/commission members and citizens) are given a chance to speak ▪ Minimizing conflict and developing board/commission consensus ▪ Summarizing discussion and clarifying what decisions were made

The Chair of a board or commission is also usually the representative at the City Commission meeting when a recommendation or report is made. This is not a formal duty of the Chair, but he or she will typically fulfill it.

City Staff Liaison Assigned by the City Manager, most boards and commissions will have a City staff liaison who, in either a formal or informal capacity, will serve as the staff contact for the board or commission. The role of the staff liaison is to aid the board or commission in fulfilling their duties by providing assistance through their training and experience in local government operation and their functional area. Duties may include:

▪ Attending meetings of the board/commission ▪ Assisting in the preparation of meeting agendas and/or minutes ▪ Arranging times and locations for board/commission meetings (if necessary) ▪ Researching issues and preparing reports for the board or commission ▪ Disseminating information to board/commission members ▪ Ensuring compliance with Open Meetings Act ▪ Serving as point of contact between board/commission and City staff ▪ Ensuring reports to the City Commission are reflective of board/commission consensus ▪ When necessary providing alternate reports to City Commission as a staff recommendation.

While boards and commissions are expected to work closely with the staff liaison, they have no authority to direct the work of staff or assign staff to a task; this authority lies with the City Manager. If a board feels they are receiving insufficient staff support, they should contact the City Manager.

Policies and Procedures 5

Commission / Board Meetings The work of a commission or board is typically accomplished within the scope of a meeting. Several boards and commissions have regularly scheduled meetings established by statute or board/commission bylaws, while others meet as needed. These boards and commissions meet in a variety of locations; some will meet in a particular place according to bylaws or custom, while others will meet at locations based on availability. Please see the Boards and Commissions list in the appendix for the meeting time and location of a particular board or commission.

In addition to regular meetings, there may be occasions where a board or commission will need to cancel or postpone a meeting, reschedule an issue for consideration to another meeting, or hold a special meeting to address a pressing issue. In all such cases, the Chair and staff liaison should take care to ensure requirements of the Open Meetings Act are upheld and critically affected parties are notified.

Attendance Because so much of the work of commissions and boards is completed at meetings, attendance is a critical component of successful boards and commissions. High rates of attendance ensure full discussion of issues and the broadest range of perspectives; these factors lead to more comprehensive and collective recommendations.

Therefore, members of citizen boards or commissions are expected to attend meetings on a regular basis. If a board member is unable to attend a meeting, they should inform the Chair or the City staff liaison. On a quarterly basis, the chair or secretary of each board forwards the attendance record of all members to the City Clerk, who records and reviews these records.

In cases where absenteeism is a chronic issue for a particular board member, the City Clerk may take steps to contact the individual or board Chair to determine if action to remove or replace the member is warranted. If necessary, the City Clerk may then forward this information with a recommendation to the City Commission for their review and possible action. Three absences in a twelve month period may constitute sufficient reason for removal by the City Commission of a member with such an attendance record.

Decorum and Rules of Order Members of a board or commission, by nature of their appointment are representatives of the City of Sturgis and the City Commission. As such, members are expected to act with respectability and courtesy toward each other, City staff, and members of the public appearing at board or commission meetings. In the same manner, members of the staff and public are also expected to follow rules of decorum and order at board and commission meetings. City staff is expected at all times to act in a professional manner towards members of commissions and boards and members of the public.

In cases where the behavior at a meeting is outside proper decorum, it is the responsibility of the Chair of the board or commission to control the situation and resolve any issues. If the problem is persistent, it is suggested to follow the tips in the “Conflict Resolution and Dealing with the Public” section of this handbook.

Depending on the board or commission, rules regarding meeting order may vary from very formal to less formal. The bylaws of the particular board or commission should be followed at all times; where the bylaws are not specific or do not exist, guidelines from the Modern Rules of Order should

Policies and Procedures 6

be followed, to be supplemented as necessary with board/commission custom or common sense rules of operation. For members of the public or other guests attending a board or commission meeting, rules of order may not be known or understood; in these cases it is appropriate for the Chair to explain how the meeting will proceed.

Meeting Agenda An agenda lays out the order of a meeting and which issues will be discussed. Development of the agenda is handled by the staff liaison with assistance from the board/commission chair and is prepared in advance of the meeting date. In general, the meeting agendas of boards and commissions should follow the format of the City Commission agenda.

Once complete, the agenda should be disseminated to the members of the board/commission and posted and made available to the public in compliance with the Open Meeting Act. All members of the board or commission and the staff liaison may add items to the meeting agenda prior to any formal posting by contacting the Chair or staff liaison. After formal posting, the agenda should be considered set, with any changes made adhering to the rules of the Open Meeting Act and board/commission bylaws.

Public Comment In cases where members of the public have attended to speak on a particular issue, comment should be made during the time that agenda item is discussed. If citizens have attended to make general comments in relation to an issue not on the agenda, time should be set aside at the beginning of the meeting for this purpose. Reasonable time limits may be set for public comments.

Voting and Quorum In cases where a board or commission must vote or where a critical issue is being decided, a majority of the board/commission members (a quorum) must be present. For official actions, a majority of the quorum must vote in favor.

Meeting Minutes Meeting minutes for a board or commission describe the action and discussion that took place at a given meeting. Minutes are typically taken by a board or commission secretary, other member, or the staff liaison. In general the minutes should include a brief summary of a discussion and should contain mainly a record of the legislative actions from the meeting. Board or commission bylaws may provide more specific procedures regarding meeting minutes. Typically minutes will be approved at the next meeting of the board or commission, and any changes should be made in open session with approval of a majority of members. From there minutes will be handled by the staff liaison, who will see that they are appropriately archived with the City and made available to citizens in compliance with the Open Meetings Act.

Open Meetings Act The Open Meetings Act of Michigan, Public Act 267 of 1976, requires that meetings of a public body, including boards, commissions, committees, or subcommittees authorized to “perform a governmental or proprietary function,” make all decisions and hold all deliberations that include a quorum at a meeting open to the public, with limited exceptions. The Act also allows members of the public to address the public body, requires public notice of meeting times and places as well as changes to the same, and calls for the keeping of meeting minutes and the ability for the public to access these minutes. A full version of the Open Meetings Act is available for review online at http://www.legislature.mi.gov.

Policies and Procedures 7

OTHER ISSUES AND CONSIDERATIONS

Training and Orientation For all new citizen board or commission members, City staff will provide an orientation session that includes a review of enabling legislation for that board or commission, Modern Rules of Order, historical perspectives on work of the board or commission, and any other material appropriate to the work of the particular board or commission such as bylaws, traditional practices, etc.

Beyond this initial orientation, board and committee members are strongly encouraged and may be required to attend training that enhances their ability to effectively serve. The increasing complexity of municipal operations and the potential for legal challenges to recommendations and decisions made by appointed and elected officials makes it increasingly important for members to receive proper training in order to carry out their roles and responsibilities.

The Planning Commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals are required to attend appropriate training in their particular specialty within one year of appointment. Thereafter, these boards shall continue to attend a minimum of one workshop, training seminar, etc. per year. The continuing education efforts of all board or commission members will be a consideration for reappointment.

Public Disclosure / Conflict of Interest1 Conflict of interest questions arise periodically at all levels of government and can become very complex. Generally, a conflict of interest occurs when you, as a member of a board or commission, are slated to vote on a matter:

1. Involving you or a member of your family by blood or marriage. 2. Involving a business owned in whole or part by you or a member of your family by blood or marriage. 3. When the outcome would be economically advantageous to you or a member of your family or to a business owned in whole or in part by you or a member of your family.

In any such case, there is no question that you have a responsibility to disclose this information to the rest of the commission and to abstain from any discussion or vote on the matter.

All members of boards and commissions must also be aware of situations in which there is an appearance of conflict of interest. In some cases, a matter may be pending before the board or commission which will not benefit you or a member of your family in any way, but the general public may perceive that a conflict exists. In some cases, an individual’s alliance or allegiance to an organization, group, or institution may leave doubt in the public’s mind as to that member’s ability to make an objective determination. Although there may not be any legal preemption from voting under such circumstances, prudence should prevail.

Openness is generally the best policy. When these issues arise, discuss them openly with the board. If you are in doubt, the safest course of action is to abstain from participating in any discussions on that particular issue. Abstention from an issue should include your physically leaving the room when the board or commission is meeting during the period the matter is discussed or acted upon.

1 Public Disclosure / Conflict of Interest section taken and adapted from City of Rosenburg Board and Commission Guidelines, p. 4-5, January 1997 and obtained from ICMA.org

Access to Legal Council If legal questions arise that the board or commission needs clarification on, the City Attorney is available to provide legal opinion. Contact with the City Attorney should be arranged through the City Manager or staff liaison and not independently by the board or commission. Typically and with very few exceptions, the City Attorney will not attend board and commission meetings, so if an issue arises during a meeting that requires a legal opinion, decisions on the issue should be held until the next meeting so consultation with the City Attorney can take place.

Conflict Resolution and Dealing with the Public At various times individuals or the board or commission as a whole may come into conflict over a particularly difficult or impassioned issue or other problem. The following rules will assist in reaching a positive conclusion to the issue.

Conflict Between Individuals Step 1: When two individuals have a conflict, they will try to resolve it between themselves. Step 2: If unable to resolve the conflict, the two parties will invite a mutually agreed-upon third party to assist in resolving the conflict. Step 3: If step two does not work, the parties shall go to the Chair, Staff liaison, or City Manager. Step 4: If the conflict still cannot be resolved, an outside neutral facilitator may be brought in to help.

Conflict Between Entities Step 1: When there is a conflict between the bodies, there will be a meeting of the Chairs. Step 2: If they are unable to resolve the conflict, there will be a meeting scheduled ASAP to bring the bodies together to resolve the conflict. Step 3: If the conflict is still unresolved, an outside neutral facilitator may be brought in to help.

Handling Citizen Concerns or Complaints If a board or commission member receives a complaint or concern from a citizen, they should first ask if the complaint has been submitted to the appropriate City department. The City has processes in place to handle complaints, therefore residents should be encouraged to use the processes established to ensure a timely response that is consistent with policies. Also, making sure that complaints are directed through the appropriate staff person ensures that supervisors are aware of ongoing issues or trends that may need attention.

Board or commission members should take care not to represent promises or assurances to resolve a complaint. Remember that a board or commission member has limited authority to take action. While individual board members and the board as a whole may take actions appropriate within the scope and power of their mandate, they do not necessarily have the authority to address the citizen’s issue or complaint. Initially not all citizens will understand this, and may need to be provided information of the member or board’s role. As a rule, all complaints should be referred to the staff liaison who can either handle the complaint or refer it to the City Manager for proper staff assignment.

Other Issues and Considerations 9

Appendix A: List of Boards and Commissions

Airport Advisory Committee ...... A-1 Auditorium Board ...... A-1 Board of Review ...... A-1 Construction Board of Appeals ...... A-2 Downtown Development Authority Board of Directors ...... A-2 Doyle and Recreation Advisory Board ...... A-2 EDC and Brownfield Redevelopment Board ...... A-3 Elected Officials Compensation Commission ...... A-3 Election Commission ...... A-3 Employee’s Retirement System ...... A-4 Health Facilities and Hospital Finance Authority ...... A-4 Parks and Cemetery Board ...... A-4 Planning Commission ...... A-5 Sister City Committee ...... A-5 Sturgis Building Authority ...... A-5 Sturgis Housing Commission ...... A-6 Zoning Board of Appeals ...... A-6

A-1

Airport Advisory Committee The Airport Advisory Committee provides input to the City Commission on matters that deal with the Kirsch Municipal Airport. The Committee primarily considers airport-related policy and helps to prioritize capital improvements, providing recommendations to the City Commission in these areas. Members 7 members of the community, 1 appointment by City Manager Residency Required? No Term 1 year When Appointed May Meeting Date 3rd Tuesday of the month Meeting Place 6:30 pm, Kirsch Municipal Airport

Auditorium Board The Auditorium Board is responsible for guiding the policy of the Sturges-Young Auditorium and for promoting its use. The board aids the Auditorium manager and staff by outlining policies for the operation of the Auditorium, including providing input on the yearly programing for the facility and prioritizing capital improvements. Members 8 members of the community, 1 City Commissioner (voting) Residency Required? No Term 3 years When Appointed May Meeting Date 3rd Thursday of the month Meeting Place 5:30 pm, Sturges-Young Auditorium

Board of Review State statute allows cities to establish a Board of Review, a hearing body which resolves conflicts on the assessed tax value of properties within the City. As per the statute, appeals are heard for as long as necessary, but for a minimum of two days, during the second full week of March. Board members are paid for their service. Decision are made by the Board are not subject to appeal to the City Commission. Members 3 members of the community, City Assessor (non-voting) Residency Required? Yes Term 2 years Meeting Date At least two consecutive days in the Month of March; else as needed Meeting Place Site as available

A-1

Construction Board of Appeals The Construction Board of Appeals hears all appeals of the building code interpretations made by the City of Sturgis Building Inspector. The decisions of the board are not subject to appeal to the City Commission. Members 3 members of the community Residency Required? No Term 3 years Meeting Date As needed (whenever appeals are made) Meeting Place Site as available

Downtown Development Authority Board of Directors The Downtown Development Authority Board of Directors supervises the Sturgis Downtown Development Authority (DDA). The Authority was created in 1982 in accordance with Michigan law to promote the economic growth of the downtown area. It collects revenue from all local jurisdictions that levy a tax in the DDA district. The DDA also has the power to assess a tax on the downtown property owners. The Authority works closely with downtown business owners to promote the downtown community. Members 12 members of the community, 1 appointment by the City Manager Residency Required? No Term 4 years Meeting Date 1st Wednesday of each month Meeting Place 7:30 am, City Hall conference room

Doyle and Recreation Advisory Board The Doyle and Recreation Advisory Board is responsible for guiding the policy of the Doyle Community Center and the City’s recreation programs. The board aids the director and staff by recommending policies regarding programming at the Doyle Center and through the recreation department, as well as recommendations on fees for service and prioritization of capital improvements. Members 11 members of the community (7 appointed by the City Commission, 4 appointed by the Sturgis Area Community Foundation), 1 City Commissioner, Director of the Doyle Community Center (non-voting) Residency Required? No Term 3 years Meeting Date 1st Monday of each month Meeting Place 4:00 pm, Doyle Community Center & Brownfield Redevelopment Board

A-2

EDC and Brownfield Redevelopment Board The Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and Brownfield Redevelopment Board were established by the City Commission in accordance with Public Act 338 of 1974. The corporations exist to encourage employment in Sturgis through the redevelopment of industrial areas and can sell bonds as well as buy and sell land. The corporations can also levy taxes on the community with the approval of the City Commission. Members 9 members of the community Residency Required? No Term 6 years Meeting Date 1st Tuesday of each month Meeting Place 4:00 pm, City Hall Conference Room

Election Commission The Election Commission supervises the operation of elections within the City. The commission’s responsibilities include hiring election workers, scheduling elections, reviewing results, and performing recounts when required. The commission is answerable to the St. Joseph County Election Commission. Members 3 members of the community Residency Required? Yes Term 1 year Meeting Date As needed Meeting Place Site as available

Elected Officials Compensation Commission In accordance with section 117.5c of The Home Rule City Act 279 of 1909 the Elected Officials Compensation Commission meets annually to review and recommend revisions to the compensation of the City Commission, Mayor, and other elected officials. Members 5 members of the community Residency Required? Yes Term 5 years Meeting Date Bi-annually Meeting Place Site as available

A-3

Employee’s Retirement System The role of the Employee’s Retirement System is to make decisions on matters concerning the Employee Retirement System. The Fund is responsible for establishing the amount of benefits to be paid and how to invest and reinvest the assets and monies of the Retirement System. Members 1 member of the community, 2 City employees, 1 City Commissioner, the Mayor Residency Required? No Term 3 years Meeting Date Quarterly Meeting Place Site as available

Health Facilities and Hospital Finance Authority The HFHFA’s purpose is to lend money to a hospital to construct, acquire, improve, own, or lease hospital facilities. In addition, the HFHFA may also engage in all actions allowed under Act 38 of Public Acts of 1969 (as amended). Members 5 members of the community Residency Required? No Term 3 years Meeting Date As needed Meeting Place Site as available

Parks and Cemetery Board The Parks and Cemetery Board is responsible for guiding the policy of the City’s parks and providing governance and control over the City’s cemeteries. The board aids the director and staff by recommending policies regarding operation and use of the City parks and cemetery facilities, including recommendations on fees and prioritization of capital improvements. Members 5 members of the community, 1 City Commissioner (non-voting) Residency Required? Yes Term 5 years Meeting Date Quarterly (March, June, September, December) 2nd Tuesday Meeting Place 9:00 am, City Hall Conference Room

A-4

Planning Commission The role of the Planning Commission is to advise the City Commission in matters dealing with land use policy in the City. The Commission also consults and cooperates with governmental units outside the boundaries of the city as well as with other boards and commissions within the City to deal with matters concerning the use of land. The Planning Commission also prepares and recommends a master plan (every 5 years) and zoning code (as needed) to the City Commission. Members 9 members of the community, 1 City Commissioner Residency Required? No Term 3 years Meeting Date 3rd Tuesday of each month Meeting Place 5:30 pm, City Hall Wiesloch Raum

Sister City Committee The Sister City Committee is responsible for coordinating and promoting activities and citizen exchanges with Sturgis’ sister city, Wiesloch, Germany. The Committee is also responsible for building cultural ties with Wiesloch. Members 6 members of the community, 1 representative of the schools, 1 representative of the Chamber of Commerce, 1 representative of industry, 1 representative of commerce, 1 representative of the City Staff, 1 City Commissioner (voting) Residency Required? No Term 3 years When Appointed May Meeting Date Bi-monthly Meeting Place 7:00 pm, City Hall Wiesloch Raum

Sturgis Building Authority The Sturgis Building Authority’s purpose is to aid the City in acquiring, owning, improving, operating or maintaining buildings and other structures of public purpose. In addition the Building Authority can undertake all actions allowed under Act 31 of Public Acts of 1948. Members 5 members of the community (cannot be a City Commissioner) Residency Required? No Term 1 year Meeting Date As needed Meeting Place Site as available

A-5

Sturgis Housing Commission The Sturgis Housing Commission is responsible for setting the policy of the Maple Towers Senior Citizen’s Complex. The commission aids the Maple Towers’ Director and Staff by outlining the policies for the efficient operation and use of the complex. The Commission, with the assistance of the director, develops the complex’s annual funding request, budgets the complex’s funds, and authorizes and oversees all major expenses. Members 5 members of the community (City Commission appoints 1) Residency Required? No Term 5 years Meeting Date 4th Tuesday of each month Meeting Place 9:00 am, Maple Towers

Zoning Board of Appeals The Zoning Board of Appeals hears appeals on the City’s zoning code and decisions related thereto. It also decides on zoning variances and non-conforming land uses. Decisions of the board are subject to appeal to the St. Joseph County Circuit Court. Members At least 5 members of the community Residency Required? No Term 3 years Meeting Date 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month Meeting Place 4:00 pm, City Hall Wiesloch Raum

A-6

Board or Commission Member

Acceptance and Oath of Office

I have read in their entirety the Board or Commission Member Privileges and Duties Statement provided to me and pledge to carry out the responsibilities of my position in a trustworthy and diligent manner in accordance with the Statement. I hereby accept the position of member for the (name) Board/Commission, in the City of Grand Rapids, to which I was appointed on (date).

______Signature

CONSTITUTIONAL OATH

STATE OF MICHIGAN) ) SS COUNTY OF KENT )

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Michigan, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of a member of the (name) Board/Commission, for a term ending (date), in the City of Grand Rapids, according to the best of my ability.

______Signature

Subscribed & sworn to before me on This _____ day of ______, 20__.

______Notary Public Kent County My Commission expires: ______

MEMBER'S OATH

CITY CLERK'S COPY

5 MEMORANDUM TAB 21 OFFICE OF THE ACTING CITY MANGER / CITY CLERK

To: City Council From: Tammy Neeb, Acting City Manager / City Clerk Date: September 17, 2020 Subject: WRC Chapter 20 Drains

BACKGROUND:

City Council requested additional backup documentation in May 2020 from WRC (Geoffrey Wilson) for the Chapter 20 Drains.

WRC has provided additional documentation, if the documentation is sufficient, he would like to set up at meeting that would include WRC attorney John Basch.

RECOMMENDAITON: City Council decision on moving forward with a meeting. The meeting suggestion would be Tom Ryan, Acting City Manager, Geoffrey Wilson and John Basch. Run by: 17820 Scope: 82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 As of Date: 2020-03-10 Oakland County Revenue and Expenditures - 8 year Comparison Fund: 82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Revenues 655077 Accrued Interest Adjustments (1.26) (1.33) 1.25 (8.20) (31.70) (23.44) (97.47) 36.67 655385 Income from Investments 14.74 (23.62) (59.58) (103.96) (191.96) (382.30) (645.56) (465.43) Total Revenues 13.48 (24.95) (58.33) (112.16) (223.66) (405.74) (743.03) (428.76)

Expenditures 702110 Per Diem 4.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 730037 Adj Prior Years Exp 0.00 0.00 447.59 2,334.60 (2,334.60) 0.00 0.00 0.00 730058 Administration 936.63 1,127.50 1,180.12 1,164.34 1,210.66 1,531.34 1,401.63 56.25 730562 Electrical Service 311.68 298.13 270.58 239.34 328.33 362.67 397.17 182.31 730940 Insurance 464.00 462.41 483.81 351.18 315.28 501.75 641.57 0.00 731213 Membership Dues 2.81 6.76 3.67 3.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750294 Material and Supplies 0.00 0.00 0.00 689.50 250.01 196.05 0.00 0.00 771638 Drain Equip Labor 1,782.01 2,045.37 2,838.90 3,188.31 6,344.44 1,609.92 3,179.23 260.86 771639 Drain Equipment 319.74 380.25 676.27 1,578.68 660.64 548.33 729.35 78.70 Total Expenditures 3,821.04 4,320.42 5,900.94 9,549.49 6,774.76 4,750.06 6,348.95 578.12

Fiscal Year End Fund Balance (846.01) (5,191.38) (11,150.65) (20,812.30) (27,810.72) (32,966.52) (40,058.50) Run by: 17820 Scope: 82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20 As of Date: 2020-03-10 Oakland County Revenue and Expenditures - 8 year Comparison Fund: 82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Revenues 630966 Inspection Fees 0.00 514.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 655077 Accrued Interest Adjustments (1.66) 15.59 0.20 (2.23) (7.79) (6.55) (26.69) 11.03 655385 Income from Investments 24.02 (86.76) (18.66) (25.61) (52.30) (100.72) (179.21) (155.15) Total Revenues 22.36 443.65 (18.46) (27.84) (60.09) (107.27) (205.90) (144.12)

Expenditures 702110 Per Diem 6.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 730037 Adj Prior Years Exp 0.00 0.00 3,303.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 730058 Administration 876.40 995.35 780.75 771.08 820.75 1,107.06 1,246.20 33.85 730940 Insurance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 731213 Membership Dues 4.02 3.18 1.73 1.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 731563 Recording Fees 0.00 0.00 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750294 Material and Supplies 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166.88 0.00 771637 Drain Equip Materials 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.48 0.00 771638 Drain Equip Labor 839.49 1,513.99 4.78 0.00 1,707.12 103.70 1,911.84 135.56 771639 Drain Equipment 466.48 524.75 21.16 0.04 457.04 92.31 355.61 28.66 Total Expenditures 2,193.32 3,037.27 4,134.28 772.78 2,984.91 1,303.07 3,884.01 198.07

Fiscal Year End Fund Balance 664.59 (1,929.03) (6,081.77) (6,882.39) (9,927.39) (11,337.73) (15,427.64) Run by: 17820 Scope: 82722 Schmid Drain Maintenance Fund As of Date: 2020-03-10 Oakland County Revenue and Expenditures - 8 year Comparison Fund: 82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Revenues 630966 Inspection Fees 0.00 500.00 250.00 342.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 655077 Accrued Interest Adjustments 2.71 (6.96) 4.11 (20.84) (83.87) (46.20) (180.49) 70.09 655385 Income from Investments (74.26) (222.81) (194.87) (252.79) (486.35) (776.88) (1,228.46) (867.98) Total Revenues (71.55) 270.23 59.24 68.57 (570.22) (823.08) (1,408.95) (797.89)

Expenditures 730037 Adj Prior Years Exp 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,225.60 (6,225.60) 0.00 0.00 0.00 730058 Administration 1,140.67 1,436.09 1,513.50 1,514.05 1,664.94 1,483.66 1,552.67 69.90 730373 Contracted Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,725.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 730562 Electrical Service 1,067.38 958.42 915.87 914.05 1,071.94 999.37 1,062.97 496.42 730940 Insurance 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,151.57 1,033.85 1,645.39 1,448.06 0.00 731115 Licenses and Permits 0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 731213 Membership Dues 6.53 9.54 5.18 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750294 Material and Supplies 60.95 243.80 535.62 166.05 3,177.50 0.00 616.37 50.43 771637 Drain Equip Materials 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.70 0.00 0.00 11.80 0.00 771638 Drain Equip Labor 2,514.46 3,686.22 4,798.22 9,686.26 4,909.06 3,259.57 3,946.18 669.72 771639 Drain Equipment 753.30 599.49 947.16 4,440.65 (963.75) 920.02 877.22 152.86 Total Expenditures 5,543.29 7,183.56 8,715.55 35,848.97 4,667.94 8,308.01 9,515.27 1,439.33

Fiscal Year End Fund Balance (14,136.01) (21,049.34) (29,705.65) (65,486.05) (70,724.21) (79,855.30) (90,779.52)

Summary of Drain Maintenance: Keego Harbor

10/1/2012 - 3/10/2020

FY 2013 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

CH 20 & 21 Drains

82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 Maintenance - PM - - 1 1 2 Maintenance - PM - Beechmont Dr 2 - - - 2 Power Outage - Beechmont Dr - - - 4 4 Site Inspection - PM - Beechmont Dr 6 7 - 3 16

Total Work Orders 8 7 1 8 24

82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20 Storm - Field Change 1 - - - 1

Total Work Orders 1 0 0 0 1

82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20 Drain Plan Review - - - 1 1 Electrical Maintenance 1 - - - 1 General Drain Maintenance Work 1 - - 1 2 Maintenance - PM - - 1 1 2 Maintenance - PM - Schmid Dr 4 1 - - 5 Repair - Schmid - - - 3 3 Site Inspection - PM - Schmid Dr 12 14 - 6 32 Special Project - Map Request 1 - - - 1

Total Work Orders 19 15 1 12 47

FY 2014 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

CH 20 & 21 Drains

82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 Electrical Maintenance - Beechmont Dr - - 1 2 3 Maintenance - PM - Beechmont Dr - - 1 - 1 Power Outage - Beechmont Dr - - - 2 2 Site Inspection - PM - Beechmont Dr 4 5 2 3 14

Total Work Orders 4 5 4 7 20

82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20 Inspect - Keego Harbor - 56 - - 56 Prepare Triennial Inspection - 1 - - 1

Total Work Orders 0 57 0 0 57

82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20 Drain Plan Review 1 1 1 1 4 Electrical Maintenance 4 - 1 1 6 Emergency Alarm - PM - Schmid Dr 1 - - - 1 Maintenance - PM - Schmid Dr - - 2 - 2 Site Inspection - PM - Schmid Dr 7 12 4 6 29 Storm - Draw Project Polygon 1 - - - 1

Total Work Orders 14 13 8 8 43

6/10/2020 Page 1 of 4 Keego Harbor: Completed Drain Maintenance Work 10/1/2012 - 3/10/2020

FY 2015 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

CH 20 & 21 Drains

82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 Electrical Maintenance - Beechmont Dr - 1 1 - 2 Emergency Alarm - PM - Beechmont Dr - 2 - 1 3 Inspect - Beechmont 16 - - - 16 Maintenance - PM - 1 - - 1 Maintenance - PM - Beechmont Dr - - 1 - 1 Power Outage - Beechmont Dr - 3 - - 3 Prepare Triennial Inspection 1 - - - 1 Site Inspection - PM - Beechmont Dr 2 3 2 2 9

Total Work Orders 19 10 4 3 36

82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20 Storm - Field Change - - 1 - 1

Total Work Orders 0 0 1 0 1

82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20 CDM - Inspect - Schmid - 2 - - 2 Drain Permit Final - - - 1 1 Drain Permit Inspection - 1 - 1 2 Drain Plan Review 1 1 - - 2 Electrical Maintenance 2 1 1 - 4 Emergency Alarm - PM - Schmid Dr 1 - - - 1 Inspect - Schmid - 28 - - 28 Maintenance - PM - Schmid Dr - 1 - - 1 Power Outage - Schmid Dr - 1 - - 1 Repair - Schmid - - - 10 10 Site Inspection - PM - Schmid Dr 4 7 4 4 19

Total Work Orders 8 42 5 16 71

FY 2016 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

CH 20 & 21 Drains

82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 Electrical Maintenance - Beechmont Dr 2 1 1 - 4 Emergency Alarm - PM - Beechmont Dr 3 3 - - 6 Power Outage - Beechmont Dr - - - 1 1 Site Inspection - PM - Beechmont Dr 3 2 3 2 10

Total Work Orders 8 6 4 3 21

82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20 Dry Weather Screening 1 - - - 1 Electrical Maintenance - 2 2 1 5 Emergency Alarm - PM - Schmid Dr - 2 1 1 4 Maintenance - PM - Schmid Dr 2 - 1 2 5 Repair - Schmid 10 - - - 10 Site Inspection - PM - Schmid Dr 6 6 6 5 23 WLN - General Lab Work 1 - - - 1

Total Work Orders 20 10 10 9 49

FY 2017 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

6/10/2020 Page 2 of 4 Keego Harbor: Completed Drain Maintenance Work 10/1/2012 - 3/10/2020

FY 2017 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

CH 20 & 21 Drains

82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 Electrical Maintenance - Beechmont Dr - 1 2 1 4 Inspect - Beechmont - - - 16 16 Maintenance - PM - - 1 1 2 Maintenance - PM - Beechmont Dr - 1 - 1 2 Site Inspection - PM - Beechmont Dr 3 2 3 3 11

Total Work Orders 3 4 6 22 35

82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20 Inspect - Keego Harbor - 56 - - 56

Total Work Orders 0 56 0 0 56

82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20 Electrical Maintenance 2 1 1 1 5 Emergency Alarm - PM - Schmid Dr - - - 1 1 Maintenance - PM - - 1 - 1 Maintenance - PM - Schmid Dr 2 - - 1 3 Power Outage - Schmid Dr - - 2 - 2 Site Inspection - PM - Schmid Dr 6 5 6 6 23

Total Work Orders 10 6 10 9 35

FY 2018 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

CH 20 & 21 Drains

82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 Emergency Alarm - PM - Beechmont Dr 1 - - - 1 Maintenance - PM - Beechmont Dr - 1 1 1 3 Power Outage - Beechmont Dr - - - 2 2 Site Inspection - PM - Beechmont Dr 3 4 3 3 13

Total Work Orders 4 5 4 6 19

82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20 Repair - Keego Harbor - 17 - - 17

Total Work Orders 0 17 0 0 17

82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20 CDM - Inspect - Schmid - 2 - - 2 Electrical Maintenance 2 - - 1 3 Emergency Alarm - PM - Schmid Dr - - 2 - 2 General Survey Work - - 1 - 1 Inspect - Schmid - 28 - - 28 Maintenance - PM - Schmid Dr - - 1 1 2 Repair - Schmid - - - 11 11 Site Inspection - PM - Schmid Dr 6 8 6 6 26

Total Work Orders 8 38 10 19 75

FY 2019 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

CH 20 & 21 Drains

6/10/2020 Page 3 of 4 Keego Harbor: Completed Drain Maintenance Work 10/1/2012 - 3/10/2020

FY 2019 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 Electrical Maintenance - Beechmont Dr - - - 1 1 Emergency Alarm - PM - Beechmont Dr 1 - - 1 2 Illicit Discharge Investigation 1 - - - 1 Investigate Complaint 1 - - - 1 Maintenance - PM - Beechmont Dr 1 - - - 1 Power Outage - Beechmont Dr 1 - 1 - 2 Site Inspection - PM - Beechmont Dr 3 4 3 3 13

Total Work Orders 8 4 4 5 21

82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20 Operation - - 1 1 2 Repair - Keego Harbor - 15 2 - 17 ROW Activities - - - 1 1 TV Inspect - Investigate - KH - 1 1 - 2

Total Work Orders 0 16 4 2 22

82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20 Corrective Maintenance 1 1 - - 2 Electrical Maintenance - - - 2 2 Emergency Alarm - PM - Schmid Dr - 1 - - 1 Investigate Complaint 1 1 - - 2 Maintenance - PM - Schmid Dr - - 1 - 1 Power Outage - Schmid Dr - 1 1 - 2 Preventive Maintenance - - - 1 1 Repair - Schmid - 10 1 - 11 ROW Activities - - - 1 1 Site Inspection - PM - Schmid Dr 6 8 6 6 26

Total Work Orders 8 22 9 10 49

FY 2020 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Total

CH 20 & 21 Drains

82663 Beechmont Drain Ch20 Electrical Maintenance - Beechmont Dr 1 - - - 1 Site Inspection - PM - Beechmont Dr 4 2 - - 6

Total Work Orders 5 2 0 0 7

82662 Keego Harbor Drain Ch20 Operation 1 - - - 1

Total Work Orders 1 0 0 0 1

82722 Schmid Drain Ch 20 Electrical Maintenance 1 1 - - 2 Site Inspection - PM - Schmid Dr 8 4 - - 12

Total Work Orders 9 5 0 0 14

6/10/2020 Page 4 of 4