Milwaukee Road Segment Montana Inventory and Assesment: Phase I and II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Milwaukee Road Segment Montana Inventory and Assesment: Phase I and II Milwaukee Road Segment Montana Inventory and Assesment: Phase I and II PREPARED BY RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCY PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS Jeffrey Ciabotti Hugh Morris Darren Smith Rails-to-Trails Conservancy — creating a nationwide network of trails from former rail lines and connecting corridors to build healthier places for healthier people. The Great American Rail-Trail Milwaukee Road Segment — Montana Phase One and Two December 2004 TRAILDART TRAIL D EVELOPMENT A SSISTANCE R ESPONSE T EAM A Service of Rails-to-Trails Conservancy TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Project Goals andObjectives ..........................................................................................................2 Great American Rail-Trail ................................................................................................................2 The Value of Trails .........................................................................................................................2 Montana History............................................................................................................................3 Base Map .......................................................................................................................................5 Technical Methodology Inventory; Initial Public Outreach; Documentation; Assessment; and GIS Maps ............................7 Inventory — Corridor Identification and Research Proceedings Before the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) ...................................................7 Map/Map Legend ...................................................................................................................7 Primary Route .........................................................................................................................7 Spurs/Connectors....................................................................................................................7 Background Information Included in ICC Proceedings ...................................................................8 Segment Summary Information (mile posts, construction dates, right-of-way width, estimated acreage, land values as of 1979) ......................................................10 Land Use Corridor Descriptions ............................................................................................10 Montana Historical Sites ....................................................................................................... 13 List of Tunnels....................................................................................................................... 14 Possible Disposition Leads/Ownership Information ..................................................................... 15 Supplemental Information from Abandonment Filing (1979) on Interested Purchasers ........ 15 Heartland Partners Holdings ................................................................................................. 15 Federally Granted Right-of-Way Information ......................................................................... 15 Preliminary Assessment GIS Assessment Maps Milwaukee Road Corridor, Montana Segment — Overview Section Map ............................. 17 Milwaukee Road Corridor, Montana Segment — Base Maps Sections 1–8 ...........................18 Milwaukee Road Corridor, Montana Segment — Land Ownership Maps Sections 1–8 ....... 26 Implementation ........................................................................................................................... 34 Strategies for Successful Trails ............................................................................................. 34 Montana Trails and Greenways Funding ......................................................................................37 Montana Legal Review ............................................................................................................... 43 Appendix A. Photo Inventory ................................................................................................................. 46 B: Milwaukee Road Land Ownership Database ......................................................................... 61 C. State Rail-Trail Inventory — open/projects/highlight Milwaukee Rail Corridor projects ........ 88 D. Milwaukee Road Corridor Contacts ..................................................................................... 89 E. Rails-with-Trails Executive Summary.......................................................................................91 F. About Rails-to-Trails Conservancy ......................................................................................... 92 INTRODUCTION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The overall vision of this project is to build The Great American Rail-Trail, a coast-to-coast, dedicated pathway along unused rail corridors celebrating America’s historical, natural and cultural richness. GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL The Great American Rail-Trail is an important component of Rails-to-Trails Conservancy’s vision of a national transportation network of rail-trails, canal towpaths, or dedicated greenways to commute to work or school, shop, or even bike or walk across the country. The trail will be a coast-to-coast, off- road, non-motorized trail accessible to bicyclists, hikers, wheelchair users, equestrians, in-line skaters and others. Extending from Washington, D.C., to Seattle, it will travel through Maryland, Pennsylva- nia, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Wyoming, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, and Washington. Currently, 33 percent of the proposed coast-to-coast route is open for use and another 37 percent is in the project stage. The largest gaps exist in Montana and Iowa. This report examines the Montana segment for trail development opportunities to link into the national network. THE VALUE OF TRAILS Trails and greenways positively impact individuals and improve communities by providing recreation and transportation opportunities, and encouraging economic and community development. Trails and greenways bring many benefits to the community they traverse. Recreation Opportunities. Most trail corridors in Florida are flat or have gentle grades, making them perfect for a variety of users, including walkers, inline skaters, bicyclists and people with disabilities. Trails are multimodal and versatile passageways. Increased Property Values. Studies have shown that properties on land near or adjacent to trails and greenways often increase in value. People are willing to pay more to have a multi-use trail in their neigh- borhood. Trails have become an important amenity that many look for when choosing where to live. Healthy Living. The U.S. Surgeon General estimates that 60 percent of American adults are not regu- larly active and 25 percent are not active at all. Additionally, childhood obesity is on the rise and Type II diabetes is increasingly affecting both adults and children. In many communities across the country, people do not have access to trails, parks or other recreation areas close to their homes. Trails and greenways provide safe, inexpensive avenues for regular exercise. Environmental and Open Space Protection. Trails and greenways help improve air and water quality. Communities with trails provide enjoyable and safe options for clean transportation, which reduces air pollution. By protecting land along canals and streams, greenways prevent soil erosion and filter pollu- tion caused by agricultural and road runoff. Connecting People and Communities. Trails serve as utilitarian transportation corridors linking neigh- borhoods, workplaces and additional community destinations such as schools, libraries and shopping centers. They connect congested urban areas with parks and open spaces. By bringing people together on greenways for their daily activities, trails unite people and their natural surroundings. 2 Regional Systems. As more and more trails are completed, we are beginning to see the emergence of regional systems of interconnected trails and other alternative transportation corridors such as onstreet bike lanes. Trails serve as the backbone for these systems, increasing the value of the whole by connecting the parts. Regional trail systems cross political, social and economic barriers, allowing trail users to form new connections with neighboring communities. These ribbons of green link schools, parks, commercial areas, neighborhoods and waterfronts, allowing trail users to traverse the region solely and safely on trails. Trail networks form a more cohesive transportation system, allowing people to travel to other communities and to combine trail use with other forms of transit. Regional trail systems draw more riders from outside the community, contributing to the economic growth of the region. Bringing trails together to form networks dramatically increases the positive effects that trails bring to their communities. MONTANA HISTORY Montana is a land of broad dimensions, generally low rainfall, and two sharply contrasting regions, the west forested and mountainous, the east a high, wide, barren prairie. Its 147,138 square miles make it as large as New England, with New York and half of Pennsylvania thrown in. It houses a low population density of 5.66 per square mile. Glacier Park, in the northwest corner of the state contains “Triple Divide Peak,” a high, water-origin peak, from which water flows into three drainage systems: the Saskatchewan, which flows into the Arctic Ocean; the Columbia,
Recommended publications
  • Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana
    Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana Joseph E. Worthington Idaho Geological Survey University of Idaho Technical Report 07-3 Moscow, Idaho ISBN 1-55765-515-4 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Molybdenum Vein Deposits ...................................................................... 2 Tertiary Molybdenum Deposits ................................................................. 2 Little Falls—1 ............................................................................. 3 CUMO—2 .................................................................................. 3 Red Mountain Prospect—45 ...................................................... 3 Rocky Bar District—43 .............................................................. 3 West Eight Mile—37 .................................................................. 3 Devil’s Creek Prospect—46 ....................................................... 3 Walton—8 .................................................................................. 4 Ima—3 ........................................................................................ 4 Liver Peak (a.k.a. Goat Creek)—4 ............................................. 4 Bald Butte—5 ............................................................................. 5 Big Ben—6 ................................................................................. 6 Emigrant Gulch—7 ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Billings Area Emergency Response Action Plan
    BILLINGS AREA EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTION PLAN PHMSA Sequence Number 2988 Owner/Operator: Phillips 66 3010 Briarpark Drive Houston, Texas 77024 24-Hour Number: (800) 231-2551 or (877) 267-2290 Page A7-1 Confidentiality Notice: This document is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information that is considered to be proprietary to Phillips 66. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. Billings Area Appendix 7: Response Zone Appendix ERAP Appendix 7: ERAP Table of Contents 7.1 Area Information .......................................................................................................... 1 7.1.1 Tank Table ....................................................................................................... 2 7.2 Communication Equipment ......................................................................................... 2 7.3 Notification Sequence ................................................................................................. 2 7.4 Emergency Notification Contact List ........................................................................... 5 7.5 Emergency Response Equipment, Testing & Deployment ......................................... 9 7.6 Immediate Actions ..................................................................................................... 10 7.7 Maps and Diagrams .................................................................................................. 12 7.8 Response Forms ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parks & Recreation Board Agenda Headwaters
    PARKS & RECREATION BOARD AGENDA HEADWATERS CONFERENCE ROOM 600 Cregg Ln. Missoula, Montana July 9, 2019, 12:00 PM I. Administrative Business A Roll Call-- History Members Present: Dale Harris, Sonja Verlanic, Wendy Ninteman, John O’Connor, Johnna Eisenman Members Absent: Chris Ryan, Ross Mollenhauer Guests: Madison Doner; NBC Montana Staff Present: Donna Gaukler, Ryan Applegate, Cassy Gladwin B Approval of minutes - June 11, 2019 Meeting-- History Wendy Ninteman moved to approve the minutes. Sonja Verlanic seconded the motion. Minutes were approved as posted C Announcements-- History Montana Rail Link Park ribbon cutting ceremony is planned for Thursday, July 11, 2019 D Public/Guest comments-- none History II. Action Items A Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Requests and Prioritizations--Ryan History Applegate Ryan Applegate gave a presentation on the departments fiscal year 2020 budget requests and prioritizations. Ryan outlined the department’s mission, strategic goals, and funding priorities. The main operating budgets from fiscal year 2017 to 2019 were also reviewed. The committee made discussed the presentation and discussed the ranking of priorities. Dale Harris – how much was funded in the previous fiscal year? Ryan Applegate – around $100,000 in budget enhancement requests. Park District allow any savings to be retained which is a benefit in budgeting. Sonja Verlanic – can the department ask for a budget when taking on new maintenance of parks, boulevards, etc.? Donna Gaukler –cost to maintain is provided by department upfront; won’t receive operational funding new park/boulevard, etc. is up and running, Dale Harris – Park District increase contribution to Aquatics Ryan Applegate - contribution from Park District was included in FY2019 requests but not funded.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 State Rail Planning
    2010 Montana State Rail Plan 3.0 State Rail Planning 3.1 MONTANA RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY In 2006, eight freight railroads operated 3,238 rail miles in Montana (excluding trackage rights).26 These eight carriers include: BNSF Railway (BNSF); Union Pacific (UP); Dakota, Missouri Valley, and Western (DMVW); Montana Rail Link (MRL); Central Montana Rail (CMR); Mission Mountain Railroad (MMR); Yellowstone Valley Railroad (YVR); and Rarus/Butte, Anaconda, and Pacific Railway (BAP). Table 3.1 summarizes the rail miles contributed by each carrier and Figure 3.1 illustrates the State’s freight railroad network. Table 3.1 Montana Railroad Statistics Miles of Railroad Operated in Montana 2000 2005 2006 BNSF Railway 2,135 1,983 1,942 Union Pacific 125 125 125 Class I Railroads Total 2,260 2,108 2,067 Dakota, Missouri Valley, and Western 57 58 58 Montana Rail Link 812 807 807 Regional Railroads Total 869 865 865 Central Montana Rail 87 88 88 Mission Mountain Railroad N/A 39 39 Yellowstone Valley Railroad N/A 186 186 Montana Western Railway 59 N/A N/A Butte, Anaconda and Pacific Railway 69 25 25 Local Railroads Total 215 338 338 Network Total 3,344 3,311 3,270 Source: 2005 and 2006 data from the Association of American Railroads, 2000 data from the 2000 Montana State Rail Plan Update. Note: Miles operated includes trackage rights. One mile of single track is counted the same as one mile of double track. 26 Rail miles, synonymous with route miles, represents the total miles of road in freight service operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Butte-Silver Bow: Recreation Destination
    Butte-Silver Bow: A World-Class Recreation Destination MAY 2015 Recreation Guide ENDORPHINS NOW. BREW PUBS LATER. What IPA goes best with a full suspension? What stout best compliments a hard tail? These are the kind of questions you’ll find the answers to after you conquer the nearby uncrowded Continental Divide Trail in Butte, Montana. After you saddle up, mosey up to a chair at one of our popular brewpubs and restaurants. Start your adventure at buttecvb.com. Letter from the Director/ Staff/ Board…Page 2 Policies…Page 4 Parks and Facility Reservations…Page 6 We’re on the web! Festivals and Special Events…Page 13 co.silverbow.mt.us/192/Parks-Recreation Find us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram! Bike Routes and Safe Biking…Page 18 Bike Route Map…Page 19 @ButteParks @ButteSilverBow @ButteParksandRec Programs…Page 21 On the cover: The 2014 Montana Folk Festival at the Original Mine Yard. Trails…Page 23 All photos by Derek Pruitt unless otherwise noted. Urban Trail Map…Page 24 Thompson Park Map…Page27 Partners…Page 31 Camps…Page 42 BUTTE RECREATION GUIDE 2015 1 A note from the director Dear citizens and visitors, Please join with me in celebrating how recreation creates a great quality of life in Butte-Silver Bow. Each of us are touched daily by recreational e appreciate the pursuits for ourselves, our children, our grandchildren, and our friends. As we walk for exercise, play sports, spectate at an event, or just W socialize with friends, these activities become a vital part of our days. opportunity to serve you Recreational activities become part of who we are and also how we celebrate community.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2007 to 12/31/2007 Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Aerial Application of Fire - Fuels management In Progress: Expected:10/2007 10/2007 Christopher Wehrli Retardant 215 Comment Period Legal 202-205-1332 EA Notice 07/28/2006 [email protected] Description: The Forest Service proposes to continue the aerial application of fire retardant to fight fires on National Forest System lands. An environmental analysis will be conducted to prepare an Environmental Assessment on the proposed action. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/retardant/index.html Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. Nation Wide. National Forest System Land - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:01/2008 02/2008 Kevin Lawrence Management Planning - Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-205-2613 Proposed Rule 08/31/2007 [email protected] EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal *NEW LISTING* Register 12/2007 Description: The Agency proposes to publish a rule at 36 CFR part 219 to finish rulemaking on the land management planning rule issued on January 5, 2005 (2005 rule). The 2005 rule guides development, revision, and amendment of land management plans. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/nfma/2007_planning_rule.html Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - All units of the National Forest System.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Tariff MRL 8000-F (Cancels Freight Tariff MRL 8000-E)
    Freight Tariff MRL 8000-F (Cancels Freight Tariff MRL 8000-E) Naming Local Rates and Distances and Miscellaneous Rules and Charges Applying at and between Stations on Montana Rail Link, Inc. Local Tariff This tariff is also applicable on intrastate traffic, except where expressly stated otherwise provided to the contrary in connection with particular rates and provisions contained herein. Issued: December 1, 2018 Effective: January 1, 2019 Issued By: Montana Rail Link, Inc. P.O. Box 16390 101 International Drive Missoula, MT 59808 1 Contents ITEM 450 CALCULATION OF DISTANCES PART 1 RULES AND OTHER GOVERNING ON MRL ...................................................... 9 PROVISIONS ....................................................... 5 PART 2 LOCAL RATES AND DISTANCES ............ 10 SECTION 1 – GENERAL.................................... 5 SECTION 1 – SPECIFIC COMMODITY RATES . 10 ITEM 1 CANCELLATION NOTICE ................ 5 ITEM 500 CARLOAD FUEL SURCHARGE... 10 ITEM 2 EXEMPT FROM REGULATION ........ 5 ITEM 510 COMMODITY: ......................... 10 ITEM 4 CAPACITIES, LENGTHS, AND SECTION 2 – DISTANCE COMMODITY RATES DIMENSIONS OF CARS ................................ 5 ..................................................................... 10 ITEM 5 DESCRIPTION OF GOVERNING ITEM 600 COMMODITY: ......................... 10 CLASSIFICATION ......................................... 5 ITEM 610 COMMODITY: ......................... 11 ITEM 8 APPLICATION OF INCREASES ......... 5 ITEM 620 COMMODITY: ......................... 11 ITEM 9 DISPOSITION
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation for Community Health 2013-2015 Annual Report
    2013-2015 ANNUAL REPORT A NEW CHAPTER 1 2 Strong History & New Opportunities Looking back on the changes in the life of our Foundation, the The last 12-18 months have brought significant change to ever-constant presence is you, our donors and volunteers. our Foundation with the sale of Community Medical Center. Your support for the health and well-being of our greater The transition to our new purpose to provide philanthropic community was the reason Community Medical Center support for the advancement of healthy lives in Western Foundation came into being in 1988. You made gifts. You Montana along with our new name, Foundation for served on our committees and Board. You invited others Community Health, has provided the Board with new and to join with you. Working together, we provided more than exciting philanthropic opportunities. $11 million for hospital programs and care initiatives like the Women’s and Newborn Center, healthcare scholarships As we look to the future, the Board and Staff are dedicated and public health presentations. One can only imagine the to advancing the need for “healthy lives” and we extend our numbers of lives impacted, but each of us can readily picture invitation to all to partner with us in that effort. It is a worthy some of the faces of those we have served, young and old Dorcie Dvarishkis Barry Kenfield cause. alike. Thank you for creating such a strong Foundation. On behalf of the Board and Staff of the Foundation for When Community Medical Center sold to a for-profit Community Health, we thank you for your past and future entity in January 2015, a new chapter began for us.
    [Show full text]
  • MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS of MINES and PROSPECTS in the DILLON Lox 2° QUADRANGLE, IDAHO and MONTANA
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS OF MINES AND PROSPECTS IN THE DILLON lox 2° QUADRANGLE, IDAHO AND MONTANA By JeffreyS. Loen and Robert C. Pearson Pamphlet to accompany Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1803-C Table !.--Recorded and estimated production of base and precious metals in mining districts and areas in the Dillon 1°x2° guadrangle, Idaho and Montana [Production of other commodities are listed in footnotes. All monetary values are given in dollars at time of production. Dashes indicate no information available. Numbers in parentheses are estimates by the authors or by those cited as sources of data in list that follows table 2. <,less than; s.t., short tons] District/area Years Ore Gold Silver Copper Lead Zinc Value Sources name (s. t.) (oz) (oz) (lb) (lb) (lb) (dollars) of data Idaho Carmen Creek 18 70's-190 1 (50,000) 141, 226 district 1902-1980 (unknown) Total (50,000) Eldorado 1870's-1911 17,500 (350 ,000) 123, 226 district 1912-1954 (13,000) (8,000) (300,000) Total (650,000) Eureka district 1880's-1956 (13 ,500) 12,366 (2,680,000) 57,994 (4,000) ( 4,000 ,000) 173 Total (4,000,000) Gibbonsville 1877-1893 (unknown) district 1894-1907 (83,500) (1,670,000) 123, 226 1908-1980 ( <10 ,000) 123 Total (2,000,000) Kirtley Creek 1870's-1890 2,000 40,500 173 district 1890's-1909 (<10,000) 1910-1918 24,300 (500 ,000) 123 1919-1931 (unknown) 1932-1947 2,146 (75 ,000) 173 Total (620,000) McDevitt district 1800's.-1980 (80,000) Total (80,000) North Fork area 1800's-1980 (unknown) Total ( <10 ,000) Pratt Creek 1870's-1900 (50 ,000) district Total (50,000) Sandy Creek 1800 's-1900 (unknown) district 1901-1954 19,613 4,055 4,433 71,359 166,179 (310,000) 17 3, 200 Total (310 ,000) Montana Anaconda Range 1880's-1980 (<100,000) area Total (<100,000) Argenta district 1864-1901 (1 ,500 ,000) 1902-1965 311,796 72,241 562,159 604,135 18,189,939 2,009,366 5,522,962 88 Total (7,000,000) Baldy Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Kaimin, November 3, 1987 Associated Students of the University of Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Associated Students of the University of Montana Montana Kaimin, 1898-present (ASUM) 11-3-1987 Montana Kaimin, November 3, 1987 Associated Students of the University of Montana Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper Recommended Citation Associated Students of the University of Montana, "Montana Kaimin, November 3, 1987" (1987). Montana Kaimin, 1898-present. 7960. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper/7960 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (ASUM) at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Kaimin, 1898-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Montana Kaimin University of Montana Tuesday/November 3, 1987 Missoula, Montana Schwinden: my criticisms meant to help By Rebecca Manna sentative Harry Fritz said he Kaimin Reporter thought it was unfortunate Gov. Ted Schwinden said that Schwinden publicly spoke Monday he believes it’s the out against the university sys­ responsibility of your best tem. friend to tell you what your Fritz criticized Schwinden problems are. for accusing university-system It was in this context, he officials of misrepresenting said, that he tried to offer the their financial need: “That’s university system constructive not true, it’s the worst critique criticism during a controver­ you could make,” he said. sial speech last Thursday at Fritz said, “He (Schwinden) the Board of Regents meeting and Ray Peck (Rep.-D, Havre) in Bozeman.
    [Show full text]
  • 93-103 in the SUPREME COURT of the STATE of MONTANA 1993 MONTANA RAIL LINK Petitioner/Respondent, M. JANE BYARD and the MONTANA
    NO. 93-103 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1993 MONTANA RAIL LINK Petitioner/Respondent, -v- M. JANE BYARD and the MONTANA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, Respondents/Appellants. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, In and for the County of Missoula, The Honorable Edward P. McLean, Judge presiding. COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Edward A. Murphy, Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind, Missoula, Montana For Respondents: David Rusoff, Human Rights Commission, Helena, Montana: Joan Jonkel, Missoula, Montana Submitted on Briefs: July 20, 1993 Decided: September 16, 1993 Filed: Justice James C. Nelson delivered the Opinion of the Court. Before the Court is Petitioner's appeal from a Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, order affirming the Montana Human Rights Commission determination that Montana Rail Link (MRL) discriminated against the Respondent M. Jane Byard (Byard) in violation of the Montana Human Rights Act, based on her sex. We affirm. We restate the issues on appeal: I. Did the hearing examiner err in allowing Byard to amend her complaint? II. Did the hearing examiner err in allowing the testimony of Dr. Hacker? III. Did the hearing examiner err in prohibiting the testimony of Ron Dean? IV. Did the hearing examiner err in concluding that MRL subjected Byard to discriminatory treatment? V. Did the hearing examiner err in concluding that MRL's hiring practices had a disparate impact on women? BACKGROUND Byard was hired by Burlington Northern Railroad (BN) in 1977. She received a promotion in November of 1978 when she became an engineer. Byard is currently employed as a BN engineer in Havre, Montana, although she is on a leave of absence.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest MONTANA
    visitvisit SouthWest MONTANA 2017 OFFICIAL REGIONAL TRAVEL GUIDE SOUTHWESTMT.COM • 800-879-1159 Powwow (Lisa Wareham) Sawtooth Lake (Chuck Haney) Horses (Michael Flaherty) Bannack State Park (Donnie Sexton) SouthWest MONTANABetween Yellowstone National Park and Glacier National Park lies a landscape that encapsulates the best of what Montana’s about. Here, breathtaking crags pierce the bluest sky you’ve ever seen. Vast flocks of trumpeter swans splash down on the emerald waters of high mountain lakes. Quiet ghost towns beckon you back into history. Lively communities buzz with the welcoming vibe and creative energy of today’s frontier. Whether your passion is snowboarding or golfing, microbrews or monster trout, you’ll find endless riches in Southwest Montana. You’ll also find gems of places to enjoy a hearty meal or rest your head — from friendly roadside diners to lavish Western resorts. We look forward to sharing this Rexford Yaak Eureka Westby GLACIER Whitetail Babb Sweetgrass Four Flaxville NATIONAL Opheim Buttes Fortine Polebridge Sunburst Turner remarkable place with you. Trego St. Mary PARK Loring Whitewater Peerless Scobey Plentywood Lake Cut Bank Troy Apgar McDonald Browning Chinook Medicine Lake Libby West Glacier Columbia Shelby Falls Coram Rudyard Martin City Chester Froid Whitefish East Glacier Galata Havre Fort Hinsdale Saint Hungry Saco Lustre Horse Park Valier Box Belknap Marie Elder Dodson Vandalia Kalispell Essex Agency Heart Butte Malta Culbertson Kila Dupuyer Wolf Marion Bigfork Flathead River Glasgow Nashua Poplar Heron Big Sandy Point Somers Conrad Bainville Noxon Lakeside Rollins Bynum Brady Proctor Swan Lake Fort Fairview Trout Dayton Virgelle Peck Creek Elmo Fort Benton Loma Thompson Big Arm Choteau Landusky Zortman Sidney Falls Hot Springs Polson Lambert Crane Condon Fairfield Great Ronan Vaughn Haugan Falls Savage De Borgia Plains Charlo Augusta CONTENTS Paradise Winifred Bloomfield St.
    [Show full text]