Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 And

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Project number: PHC-2020-0044

Report Type: Original Report Date: 02 December 2020

City of Brantford, Heritage Preservation Services

Proponents: : CSSA Properties Inc. Address: : c/o SRM Architects Inc. 279 King Street West, Suite 200, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1B1

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Content 1. Executive Summary ...... 1 2. Personnel ...... 2 3. Introduction ...... 3 3.1 Site Description and Context ...... 3 4. Legislative and Policy Framework ...... 6 4.1 Provincial Legislation and Policy ...... 6 4.1.1 Ontario Heritage Act ...... 6 4.1.2 Planning Act ...... 6 4.1.3 Provincial Policy Statement (2020) ...... 7 4.2 Municipal Policy Framework ...... 8 4.2.1 City of Brantford Official Plan (consolidated 2020) ...... 8 5. Historical Research and Analysis ...... 9 5.1 Regional Overview ...... 9 5.1.1 Town of Brantford ...... 9 5.2 Subject Property ...... 9 6. Assessment of Existing Conditions ...... 15 6.1 Architecture and Design ...... 15 6.1.1 Edwardian Classicism Residential Structure ...... 15 6.2 Current Condition 247 West Street ...... 37 6.2.1 Edwardian residence ...... 37 6.2.2 Surrounding Landscape ...... 37 7. Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Value and Interest ...... 41 7.1 Description of the Property ...... 41 7.2 Heritage Attributes ...... 41 7.3 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest ...... 41 7.3.1 Physical or Design Value ...... 43 7.3.2 Associative or Historical Value ...... 43 7.3.3 Contextual Value ...... 43 7.4 Statement of Significance ...... 43 8. Heritage Impact Assessment ...... 45 8.1 Description of Proposed Development ...... 45 8.2 Proposed Mitigation ...... 46 8.3 Conclusion ...... 46 9. Recommendations ...... 47 10. Bibliography and Reference Documents ...... 48

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

List of Tables, Figures, and Images

Table 1: Key land transactions related to Parts of Lots 17 and 18 of Plan 246 West Street Brantford Ontario ...... 10 Table 2 - The criteria for determining property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI) ...... 42

Figure 1: Location of the Property on a Topographic Map...... 4 Figure 2: Location of the Property on an Aerial Image...... 5 Figure 3: A portion of the 1852 Marcus Smith Map, red area denotes Subject Property ...... 11 Figure 4: Approximate location of 247 West Street on Tremaine’s Map of the County of Brant, red area denotes Subject Property ...... 12 Figure 5: Approximate location of 247 West Street on 1875 Historical Atlas of Brant County, red area denotes Subject Property ...... 12 Figure 6: Location of 247 West Street on 1875 Birds Eye View of Brantford, red area denotes Subject Property. Structure shown is not current structure at 247 West Street...... 13 Figure 7: 1915 Fire Insurance Map, red arrow indicates Subject Property ...... 13 Figure 8: 1927 Fire Insurance Map, red arrow indicates Subject Property ...... 14 Figure 9: 1950 Fire Insurance Map, red arrow indicates Subject Property ...... 14

Image 1: Front façade of 247 West Street, facing northeast...... 16 Image 2: Close up of front façade to highlight ghost outline of original veranda and associated second storey balcony, brick repair indicate former attachment points...... 16 Image 3: Close up of front gable and associated wooden mouldings, note peeling paint resulting in exposure of underlying wood...... 17 Image 4: Example of segmentally headed windows of rear of structure, note presence of vinyl sash windows in place of original wood...... 17 Image 5: Typical double hung wood sash window with aluminum outer storm. Note large cut stone lintel above structural opening and wooden lug sill and associated structural opening woodwork...... 18 Image 6: Rear of structure showing shed roof addition and large shed dormer with fire escape, facing south...... 19 Image 7: Typical example of original hip roofed dormer, facing east...... 19 Image 8: Non-original main entrance, note original cut stone lintel...... 20 Image 9: Tall, undecorated chimney on south side of structure, facing east...... 21 Image 10: Poured concrete foundation with applied ashlar finish, facing south...... 21 Image 11: Example of original wooden soffit, note staining indicative of rot resulting from water damage...... 22 Image 12: Non-original front veranda utilizing reconstructed half pillars set on brick pedestals. Brick used in pedestals does not match house brick, ghost outlines are visable where previous veranda was affixed to the home, facing south...... 23 Image 13: Typical floor construction as viewed from the basement ...... 24 Image 14: Basement stairs no longer assessable from first floor, and original wooden awning windows...... 25 Image 15: Utility room, note water staining on wall indicative of water infiltration due to a lack of external waterproofing ...... 25 Image 16: Original ledged baton door as found in basement...... 26 Image 17: Original staircase and balustrade, in common entrance running from first to second floor, note non- original slab door as main entrance to first floor apartment...... 27

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 18: Close up of original balustrade as seen at top of staircase on second floor, note buttressing of broken newel post with angle iron...... 28 Image 19: First floor apartment, note mix of original “cabinet head” millwork on windows and modern industrial trim surrounding modern bifold closet door...... 28 Image 20: Intact original fireplace surround and mantel including original green glazed tilework and beveled glass mirror...... 29 Image 21: Original two panel door and cabinet head trim ...... 29 Image 22: Living room of first floor apartment, note original narrow plank hardwood floors...... 30 Image 23: Second floor kitchen, note original door and hardware as well as associated trim, facing west, door opens to balcony of front veranda...... 31 Image 24: Second floor bedroom with original two panel door and cabinet head trim ...... 31 Image 25: Typical example of original baseboard and plinth block...... 32 Image 26: Remnant of rear staircase, note replacement vinyl window ...... 33 Image 27: Egress to attic apartment...... 34 Image 28: Attic apartment kitchen located in rear shed dormer...... 35 Image 29: Main living space of attic apartment ...... 35 Image 30: Trim typical of that used in attic, note electrical conduit duplicating the run of the door trim...... 36 Image 31: Space under main front gable used a bedroom...... 36 Image 32: Composite image of West Street streetscape as viewed from 253 West Street. 247 west street is depicted on the left of the image...... 38 Image 33: Looking south down West Street towards Subject Property, facing south. Red arrow indicates 247 West Street...... 39 Image 34: Looking north down West Street, facing west. Red arrow indicates 247 West Street ...... 39 Image 35: 247 West Street as viewed from Dundas Street East, facing north. Red arrow indicates 247 West Street. 40 Image 36: 247 West Street as viewed from 258 West Street, facing southeast. Red arrow indicates 247 West Street...... 40

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

1. Executive Summary Parslow Heritage Consultancy, Inc. (PHC) was retained by CSSA Properties Inc. (the Proponent) to prepare a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the property at 247 West Street, Brantford, Ontario. This HIA has been The Proponent is preparing an Official Plan and Zoning Amendment application as part of a Site Plan Approval to the City of Brantford for the redevelopment of the property located on part of Lots 18 and 19, Plan 246, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario. The extant structure at 247 West Street is currently identified as a listed structure on the City of Brantford’s Heritage Inventory.

This HIA has been prepared at the request of the City of Brantford’s Planning Department and is designed to meet the scope of work stipulated in the City of Brantford’s Official Plan (City of Brantford 2020).

The purpose of this assessment is to review relevant historical documents, evaluate the potential cultural heritage value or interest, identify cultural heritage resources and assess potential impacts, and recommend mitigation options, if necessary. To evaluate potential cultural heritage value or interest and recommend mitigation options, provisions in the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) under Regulation 9/06 and the Planning Act (1990) were applied.

A site visit was conducted on September 8, 2020 to document the property, structure, and surrounding landscape. After review of the proposed development plan, it is determined that the proposed re-development would require the demolition of the extant structure.

The two storey residence located at 247 West Street, Brantford, Ontario is characteristic of the 20th century development of the area. The residence at 247 West Street is constructed in the Edwardian Classicism architectural style typical of the early to mid-20th century. The property has undergone modifications since construction, resulting in the loss of original character-defining elements.

Currently the exterior of 247 West Street presents as a fair example of the Edwardian Classicism architectural style. The overall massing of the structure is intact; the red brick façade of the residence is constructed of smooth brick laid in a modified Flemish stretcher bond. The interior of the structure has been converted into apartment units, resulting in alteration to the original floorplan and damage to the interior millwork. The original veranda and main entrance have been lost and the current veranda and associated half pillars and brick pedestals are of recent construction. While the original main staircase and first floor fireplace remain, the overall composition of the structure has been lost.

When 247 West Street is evaluated against the criteria set forth to identify Cultural Heritage Value or Interest in Ontario Regulation 9/06 (Section 7.3), the property is found to not meet the criteria. The extant structure should be removed from the City of Brantford Heritage Inventory; it is recommended demolition be permitted to allow for the construction of the proposed apartment complex.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 1

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

2. Personnel Carla Parslow, Ph.D., CAHP Senior Cultural Resource Specialist

Christopher Lemon, B.Sc., Dip. Heritage Cultural Heritage Specialist

Renee Hendricks, M.A. Assistant Heritage Specialist

Acknowledgements

Steve Assel CSSA Properties Inc.

Nathan Ethrington Brant Museum & Archives

2 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

3. Introduction Parslow Heritage Consultancy, Inc. (PHC) was retained by CSSA Properties Inc. (the Proponent) to prepare a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the property at 247 West Street, Brantford, Ontario. This HIA has been The Proponent is preparing an Official Plan and Zoning Amendment application as part of a Site Plan Approval to the City of Brantford for the redevelopment of the property located on part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Township of Brantford East , now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario. The extant structure at 247 West Street is currently identified as a listed structure on the City of Brantford’s Heritage Inventory.

A site visit was conducted on September 8, 2020 to document the property, structure, and surrounding landscape.

3.1 Site Description and Context The subject property is situated on Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, in the former Town of Brantford, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario. The property is currently identified as 247 West Street and is located on the east side of West Street. The subject property is approximately 0.3 acre (ac.) in size and contains a single residential structure constructed in the Edwardian Classicism architectural style, popular in the early 20th century (circa 1900-1930).

247 West Street was constructed as a detached single-family residential unit but has been subdivided into four apartment units. This conversion has resulted in substantial alterations to both interior of the structure and moderate alterations to the exterior.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 3

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Figure 1: Location of the Property on a Topographic Map.

4 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Figure 2: Location of the Property on an Aerial Image.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 5

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

4. Legislative and Policy Framework The following assessment reviews Provincial and Municipal legislation and policies designed to protect cultural heritage resources that may be affected by development in the City of Brantford. This HIA has been prepared to meet the terms of reference set forth by the Official Plan of the City of Brantford, the Ontario Heritage Act, the Planning Act and the Provincial Policy Statement.

4.1 Provincial Legislation and Policy

4.1.1 Ontario Heritage Act The criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest are outlined in the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) under Regulation 9/06. (1) The criteria set out in subsection (2) are prescribed for the purposes of clause 29 (1) (a) of the Act. (2) A property may be designated under section 29 of the Act if it meets one or more of the following criteria for determining whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest:

1. The property has design value or physical value because it, i) is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method,

ii) displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit, or

iii) demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement.

2. The property has historical value or associative value because it, i) has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community,

ii) yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture, or

iii) demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community.

3. The property has contextual value because it, i) is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area,

ii) is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings, or

iii) is a landmark.

4.1.2 Planning Act The Planning Act (1990) provides the legislative framework for land use planning in Ontario. Part 1, Section 2 (d) and (r) of the Act identifies matters of provincial interest.

Part I, Section 2 The Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as,

6 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

(d) the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest;

(e) the promotion of built form that,

(i) is well-designed,

(ii) encourages a sense of place, and

(iii) provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant.

4.1.3 Provincial Policy Statement (2020) The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), issued under Section 3 of the Planning Act, came into effect on May 1, 2020. It applies to all planning decisions made on or after that date and replaced the PPS, 2014. The PPS provides direction for the appropriate regulation for land use and development while protecting resources of provincial interest, and the quality of the natural and built environment, which includes cultural heritage and archaeological resources. These policies are specifically addressed in Part V, Sections 1.7 and 2.6.

Section 1.7.1e of the PPS addresses long-term economic prosperity by “encouraging a sense of place, by promoting well-designed built form and cultural planning, and by conserving features that help define character, including built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes”.

Section 2.6 of the PPS addresses the protection and conservation cultural heritage and archaeological resources in land use planning and development and requires and requires the following:

2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.

2.6.2 Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on lands containing archaeological resources or areas of archaeological potential unless significant archaeological resources have been conserved.

2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.

2.6.4 Planning authorities should consider and promote archaeological management plans and cultural plans in conserving cultural heritage and archaeological resources.

2.6.5 Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and consider their interests when identifying, protecting and managing cultural heritage and archaeological resources.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 7

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

4.2 Municipal Policy Framework

4.2.1 City of Brantford Official Plan (consolidated 2020) Section 9 of the City of Brantford Official Plan describes policies relating to development on or adjacent to heritage properties, with its policies mirroring those of the Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06. Section 9.1.10 of the Brantford Official Plan addresses the requirements of an HIA:

Applications for development of a property designated under the terms and conditions of the Ontario Heritage Act will be required to include a Heritage Impact Statement prepared by a qualified heritage conservation professional. A Heritage Impact Statement may also be required on a property that is listed in the City’s Heritage Inventory or where development is proposed adjacent to a known heritage resource. The requirement may also apply to unknown or recorded heritage resources that are discovered during the development application stage or construction. A Heritage Impact Statement is a study to determine the impacts to known and potential heritage resources within a defined area. The study results in a report which identifies all known heritage resources, provides a detailed site history and physical description of the heritage resource, photo-documents the as-found interior and exterior of the resource; evaluates the significance of the resource(s); outlines the proposed development; assesses the impact of the proposal on the resources(s) and makes recommendations toward mitigative measures that would minimize negative impacts

8 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

5. Historical Research and Analysis 5.1 Regional Overview

5.1.1 Town of Brantford The area that is now within the city limits of Brantford was part the traditional lands of the Mississaugas, a sub-tribe of the Anishinaabe First Nations people and the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy.

The historic record pertaining to what is now the City of Brantford began in1784, when Joseph Brant led a group of primarily Mohawk, as well as other Indigenous persons loyal to the British Crown, to the tract of land on the Grand River that was granted to them in acknowledgement of their loyalty to the British Crown during the American Revolution. Joseph Brant and his followers settled at the banks of the Grand River at a point where conditions permitted the crossing of the wide river. These crossing points are known as fords, and where Brant settled became known as Brant’s Ford. Over the years the name evolved and became Brantford. The Town of Brantford historically grew from a small settlement, circa 1820s, as the road between Hamilton and London was continuously improved. According to the History of the County of Brant by F. Douglas Reville (1920), the first land survey of the Town of Brantford was conducted in 1829 by Lewis Burwell; Reville indicates that Burwell’s survey is not the first historic account of the lands that would become the City of Brantford. Burwell’s own records apparently references an earlier rendering of the area produced by a Joseph Reid dated 1824 (Reville 1920:87) Unfortunately it appears Reid’s original depiction has been lost and as such the first survey of the Town of Brantford is attributed to Lewis Burwell. In 1830 Burwell produced a second map of the area which depicted distinct blocks: Public Square, County Court House, Market, Kirk of Scotland, and Burying Ground. In 1840 Brantford was incorporated as a town. River navigation to Brantford began after 1848, increasing the population of the area; population of the area increased again with the arrival of the railway in 1854. Due to the proximity of the town to the Grand River, a major transportation route, as well as the construction of new roads, several major manufacturing companies started operations in Brantford in the 1860s and 1870s; these included Cockshutt and Harris, Britannia Foundry and Brantford Engine Works. The Subject Property is situated within the boundaries of the Burwell survey, originally located on the northern limits of the Town of Brantford. The Subject Property is now part of Ward 4 and is situated in the southwest corner of the Ward placing it at the junction of Wards 2, 3, 4 and 5.

5.2 Subject Property The Subject Property located on Lots 17 and 18 of Plan 246 first enters the historic record in 1859 when James Beel receives the Crown patent for a five acre property on the northwest limits of the Town of Brantford. The five-acre property acquired by Beel is initially recorded in the land records as Lot “C” west of the Wilkes Tract. In April of 1912 Robert L. Nelles severs three lots (Lots 17, 18 and 19) from his five acre property (Lot C). The newly created lots are sold to Carrie and Donald Throburn. Following a series of rapid transactions Lot 17 is acquired in June of 1913 by John Dyckman. Dyckman owns the property until May of 1933. Based on Dyckman’s tenure and available mapping it is likely that John Dyckman is who commissioned the home that currently

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 9

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

stands at 247 West Street. Land transactions associated with the Subject Property do not depict the property as being part of Lots 17 and 18 until 1986.

Table 1 lists key land transactions for Part of Lots 17 and 18 of Plan 246 West Street Brantford Ontario.

Table 1: Key land transactions related to Parts of Lots 17 and 18 of Plan 246 West Street Brantford Ontario

Instrument Date Grantor Grantee Area Patent Feb 25 1859 The Crown James Beel 5 ac "Lot C" Barter & Sale Dec 26 1868 James Beel wife William Shackell 5 ac "Lot C" Barter & Sale Feb 10 1874 William Shackell wife David B Dauskin 5 ac "Lot C" Grant June 7 1884 David B Dauskin David B Dauskin etal 5 ac "Lot C" Barter & Sale July 7 1885 Thomas Hunter wife Agnes wife of R.S Nelles 5 ac "Lot C" Grant Feb 15 1902 Agnes Nelles Robert Lottridge Nelles 5 ac "Lot C" and wife Barter and April 1 1912 Robert Lottridge Nelles Carrie Fowlers Thorburn Lot 17,18,19 Sale and wife and Donald Throburn Barter & Sale June 18 1912 Carrie F. Thorburn and George Benwell Lot 17 Donald Thorburn Barter & Sale Nov 20 1912 George Benwella and Sarah A. Faulkner Lot 17 Wife Barter & Sale June 24 1913 Sarah Anne Faulkner John M. Dyckman Lot 17 Barter & Sale May 13 1933 John M. Dyckman and Alexander Strokack and Pt Lt 17, not SW Wife Anne Strokack part Grant August 2 1985 Anne Strokack Alexander J Csomos Pt Lt 17 and 18 Grant Nov 28 1986 Alexander J Csomos James D and Gail L Pt Lt 17 and 18 Millin Transfer Nov 1 1992 Dale James Millian and Jennifer Hollice Millin Pt Lt 17 and 18 Linda Gail Millin and Harold Richard Riley Transfer June 27 2003 Jennifer Hollice Millin Kathleen Carrita Pt Lt 17 and 18 and Harold Richard Riley Transfer Nov 25 2004 Kathleen Carrita Jean Philippe Dupuis Pt Lt 17 and 18 Power of Sale Aug 10 2005 Home Trust Company 1667209 Ontario Inc. Pt Lt 17 and 18 Transfer Oct 31 2007 1667209 Ontario Inc. Peter Frank Pfenniger Pt Lt 17 and 18

10 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Records on file with the Brantford Historical Society indicate that 247 West Street has been used as a rental property for much of its existence. Starting in 1953 and ending in 1988, records indicate that in addition to the listed owners at least one other person declared 247 West Street as their place of residence. Brantford Historical Society records further indicate that the conversion to the current configuration of multiple rental units occurred in 1989, as beginning in that year up to five individuals list 247 West Street as their place of residence and none of the names correspond to the listed owners.

Figure 3: A portion of the 1852 Marcus Smith Map, red area denotes Subject Property

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 11

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Figure 4: Approximate location of 247 West Street on Tremaine’s Map of the County of Brant, red area denotes Subject Property

Figure 5: Approximate location of 247 West Street on 1875 Historical Atlas of Brant County, red area denotes Subject Property

12 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Figure 6: Location of 247 West Street on 1875 Birds Eye View of Brantford, red area denotes Subject Property. Structure shown is not current structure at 247 West Street.

Figure 7: 1915 Fire Insurance Map, red arrow indicates Subject Property

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 13

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Figure 8: 1927 Fire Insurance Map, red arrow indicates Subject Property

Figure 9: 1950 Fire Insurance Map, red arrow indicates Subject Property

14 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

6. Assessment of Existing Conditions 6.1 Architecture and Design

6.1.1 Edwardian Classicism Residential Structure Exterior 247 West Street is constructed in the Edwardian Classicism architectural style, a style that was popular in North America between c.1900 and c.1930 (Blumenson 1989). The residential structure is two storeys in height, constructed of smooth red brick laid in a modified Flemish stretcher bond pattern and set upon a poured concrete foundation with applied ashlar block finish (Image 1). The residence displays a hip roof with large, open front gable. The residence displays a rectangular plan with short façade presenting to West Street. The residence is identifiable as Edwardian Classicism architecture by way of the character-defining, monochromatic smooth brick exterior, tall undecorated chimney, use of multiple dormers, use of stone details (in this example oversized stone lintels are utilized at structural openings – Image 5, Image 8), use of half columns with brick pedestals, and simplified, yet formal overall massing (Blumenson 1989). The exterior of the home presents largely as built but has been subject to modification, the most notable being the truncation of the front veranda. The ghost outline of the original veranda and associated second floor balcony are clearly evident on the front façade (Image 2). The main entrance to the home has also been altered, resulting in the loss of the original front door (Image 8). The original wood windows have also been subject to revision with several having been replaced with modern vinyl replacements. The structure utilizes wooden lug sills, some of which have been caped in aluminum flashing. The rear of the structure exhibits several modifications including the addition of a large shed dormer and associated fire escape, the removal of two chimneys and the addition of a shed roofed rear wing (Image 6). While largely intact, the exterior of the structure displays signs of prolonged neglect resulting in indicators of degradation to the underlying structure. Exposed wood is visible across the exterior and discolouration of the surface finishes are indicative of water damage (Images 3, 11). The roof of the structure is clad in modern asphalt shingles that display signs of fatigue. The structural openings of the main façade and sides of the home display oversized cut stone lintels common to the Edwardian architectural style; these are in contrast to the rear of the structure where structural openings are segmentally headed and constructed of brick (Image 4)

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 15

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 1: Front façade of 247 West Street, facing northeast.

Image 2: Close up of front façade to highlight ghost outline of original veranda and associated second storey balcony, brick repair indicate former attachment points.

16 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 3: Close up of front gable and associated wooden mouldings, note peeling paint resulting in exposure of underlying wood.

Image 4: Example of segmentally headed windows of rear of structure, note presence of vinyl sash windows in place of original wood.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 17

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 5: Typical double hung wood sash window with aluminum outer storm. Note large cut stone lintel above structural opening and wooden lug sill and associated structural opening woodwork.

18 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 6: Rear of structure showing shed roof addition and large shed dormer with fire escape, facing south.

Image 7: Typical example of original hip roofed dormer, facing east.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 19

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 8: Non-original main entrance, note original cut stone lintel.

20 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 9: Tall, undecorated chimney on south side of structure, facing east.

Image 10: Poured concrete foundation with applied ashlar finish, facing south.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 21

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 11: Example of original wooden soffit, note staining indicative of rot resulting from water damage.

22 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 12: Non-original front veranda utilizing reconstructed half pillars set on brick pedestals. Brick used in pedestals does not match house brick, ghost outlines are visable where previous veranda was affixed to the home, facing south.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 23

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Interior The interior of 247 West Street has been extensively altered, transforming it from a single-family residence to a multi-unit apartment complex. The conversion to multi-unit apartment complex has result in extensive modification to the original floorplan and the loss of interior finishes. Basement The basement of the structure contains the communal laundry room, a storage area for the first floor apartment, a washroom and the utility room containing the structure’s hot water heater and furnace. The ceilings are six feet in height and where unfinished expose the construction for the first floor. Exposed floor joists are constructed of circular sawn 2”x 9 ½” material laid 16” on center. The subfloor is comprised of tongue and grove material that is 3 ½” in width and laid perpendicular to the joists (Image 13).

Image 13: Typical floor construction as viewed from the basement

24 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 14: Basement stairs no longer assessable from first floor, and original wooden awning windows.

Image 15: Utility room, note water staining on wall indicative of water infiltration due to a lack of external waterproofing

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 25

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 16: Original ledged baton door as found in basement.

26 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Main Floor The main floor is comprised of the main entrance with original staircase and a single apartment unit.

The main staircase is constructed of oak and reflects the craftsman style common to Edwardian residences (Image 17). The staircase exhibits an attention to detail indicative of the interior of Edwardian period homes. The craftsman style is evident in the remaining original window trim which are adorned with “cabinet head” style millwork indicative of the craftsman style and characteristic of Edwardian homes.

The main floor apartment unit contains portions of the home’s original trim and some original doors (Images 18 to 21). The most notable feature of the first-floor apartment is the presence of an original fireplace mantel complete with original glazed tile surround (Image 19). The fireplace is character-defining of the Edwardian architectural style. Original narrow plank wood floors are also visible in the first-floor apartment (Image 22).

Image 17: Original staircase and balustrade, in common entrance running from first to second floor, note non-original slab door as main entrance to first floor apartment.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 27

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 18: Close up of original balustrade as seen at top of staircase on second floor, note buttressing of broken newel post with angle iron.

Image 19: First floor apartment, note mix of original “cabinet head” millwork on windows and modern industrial trim surrounding modern bifold closet door.

28 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 20: Intact original fireplace surround and mantel including original green glazed tilework and beveled glass mirror.

Image 21: Original two panel door and cabinet head trim

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 29

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 22: Living room of first floor apartment, note original narrow plank hardwood floors.

Second Floor The second floor has been converted to a single apartment unit. The apartment makes use of much of the original floorplan. This is apparent by the presence of intact baseboard and window trim. Original panel doors also remain on the closets. The subdivision of the home has altered the original egress to the second floor. The remnants of a second rear staircase are present but is no longer functional as much of the staircase has been removed (Image 26).

The trim on the second floor is of the same cabinet head design as that found on the first floor (Image 23, Image 24). The remaining original doors are of a two-panel design and some retain their original doorknobs and hinges.

30 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 23: Second floor kitchen, note original door and hardware as well as associated trim, facing west, door opens to balcony of front veranda.

Image 24: Second floor bedroom with original two panel door and cabinet head trim

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 31

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 25: Typical example of original baseboard and plinth block.

32 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 26: Remnant of rear staircase, note replacement vinyl window

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 33

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Attic The attic of 247 West Street has been converted into an apartment unit. The conversion of the attic space necessitated the addition of the large shed dormer to the rear of the home. The dormer houses the kitchen unit and bathroom for the attic apartment. As the attic was never intended as living space the attic apartment does not display any elements original to the Edwardian residence.

Image 27: Egress to attic apartment.

34 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 28: Attic apartment kitchen located in rear shed dormer.

Image 29: Main living space of attic apartment

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 35

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 30: Trim typical of that used in attic, note electrical conduit duplicating the run of the door trim.

Image 31: Space under main front gable used a bedroom.

36 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

6.2 Current Condition 247 West Street

6.2.1 Edwardian residence 247 West Street is an example of a residential structure constructed in the Edwardian Classicism architectural style that was popular in the early 20th Century, circa 1900-1930 (Blumenson, 1989). Overall, the residence represents a fair example of the Edwardian Classicism architectural style. The physical massing of the residence remains, but the exterior of residence has been exposed to prolonged neglect resulting in visible degradation of the underlying wood. The very nature of the Edwardian Classicism style is minimalistic; as such, the loss of elements such as the front original veranda and entrance way detract from the overall style and intent of the building. This is in contrast to other architectural styles, where the lost of a few attributes is less detrimental to the overall character of the structure.

6.2.2 Surrounding Landscape 247 West Street is situated on a large city lot. The residence is situated well forward on the lot providing for an extensive back yard. The forward lot position coupled with the widening of West Street has impacted the overall aesthetic of the property. 247 West street is situated at the confluence of two thoroughfares of Brantford. The surrounding infrastructure is comprised of a mix of residential and commercial properties.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 37

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 32: Composite image of West Street streetscape as viewed from 253 West Street. 247 west street is depicted on the left of the image.

38 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 33: Looking south down West Street towards Subject Property, facing south. Red arrow indicates 247 West Street.

Image 34: Looking north down West Street, facing west. Red arrow indicates 247 West Street

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 39

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Image 35: 247 West Street as viewed from Dundas Street East, facing north. Red arrow indicates 247 West Street.

Image 36: 247 West Street as viewed from 258 West Street, facing southeast. Red arrow indicates 247 West Street.

40 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

7. Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Value and Interest 7.1 Description of the Property The Subject Property is situated on the east side of West Street, City of Brantford, Ontario. 247 West Street is located in a distinctive triangular segment of land bound by West Street to the West, Clarence Street to the East and Dundas Street East to the south. The Subject Property is located 1.2 kilometers north of downtown Brantford.

The property is municipality identified as part of Lot 17 and 18, Plan 246, Township of Brantford East, County of Brant, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario. (Ontario Land Registry 2020).

The Subject Property is 0.31 ac. in size and contains a single residential structure constructed in the Edwardian Classicism architectural style, popular in the early 20th century. The extant home is situated on the western edge of the property, providing for an ample back yard that slops quickly down to the east.

247 West Street is currently listed on the City of Brantford’s Heritage Inventory.

7.2 Heritage Attributes Heritage attributes observed during the site visit for the interior and exterior of the residence include the following features:

Exterior ► Massing of residential structure ► Oversized stone lintels ► Smooth brick façade ► Use of half columns with brick pillars Interior ► Intact original staircase ► Limited baseboard and door trim ► Some original doors Property as a Whole ► Massing of structure

7.3 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest Ontario Regulation 9/06 prescribes the criteria for determining the Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI) of a property in a municipality. The regulation requires that, to be designated, a property must meet “one or more” of the criteria grouped into the categories of Design/Physical Value, Historical/ Associative Value and Contextual Value (MHSTCI 2006a). Table 2 lists these criteria and identifies which criteria are met by 247 West Street.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 41

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Table 2 - The criteria for determining property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI) Criteria O.Reg.9/06 Criteria Met Justification (Y/N) The property has design value or physical value because it, I. is a rare, unique, representative The Edwardian Classicism architectural style was or early example of a style, type, popular in the early 20th century and one that is expression, material, or still well represented throughout southern N construction method, Ontario. This example was likely constructed c.1915, based on land registry records, indicating it is not an early example of the style. II. displays a high degree of The homes millwork exhibits craftsmanship craftsmanship or artistic merit, N typical of the era. or III. demonstrates a high degree of The residence does not display a high degree of technical or scientific N technical or scientific achievement. The home is achievement. typical of the era. The property has historical value or associative value because it, I. has direct associations with a N Historic research does not indicate a direct link theme, event, belief, person, between the property and any theme, event, activity, organization or believe, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a institution that is significant to the community. community, II. yields, or has the potential to N The property and associated structure do not yield, information that have the potential to yield information that could contributes to an understanding contribute to our understanding of a community of a community or culture, or or culture. The structure has been heavily modified and the grade of the property shows considerable modification. III. Demonstrates or reflects the N The property does not demonstrate or reflect the work or ideas of an architect, work or ideas of an architect artist, builder, artist, builder, designer or designer or theorist who is significant to the theorist who is significant to a community. No historical records were available community. to indicate an architect was involved in the construction. It is more likely the home was constructed using available pattern books typical of the era. The property has contextual value because it, I. is important in defining, The residence and property are not important in maintaining or supporting the N defining, maintaining, or supporting the character of an area, character of the area. II. is physically, functionally, Residence is not physically functionally or visually visually or historically linked to N linked to its surroundings and historic records do its surroundings, or not indicate any historical links III. is a landmark. N The residence does not serve as a local landmark.

42 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

7.3.1 Physical or Design Value The residence located at 247 West Street is a fair example of a common architectural style prevalent in the first half of the 20th century. The rectangular plan of the structure in association with the use of oversized stone lintels, smooth brick finish, multiple dormers, half columns with brick pedestals, type and placement of windows coupled with the large undecorated chimney are indicative of Edwardian Classicism architecture. The ghosted outline of the full width veranda and associated second floor balcony are conducive to the Edwardian Classicism style. Overall, the home is in fair condition and has been subject to modifications that has removed character defining attributes. The front veranda had been truncated and while the half pillars with brick pedestals are in keeping with the architectural style, they are non-original. The main entrance has also been replaced with a modern six panel steel door. The interior of the structure has been modified to accommodate the conversion of the structure from its as-built configuration as a single-family home to its current condition as a multi-unit apartment building. The modifications to accommodate its current use have impacted the original floorplan and resulted in the removal of much of the original millwork.

7.3.2 Associative or Historical Value 247 West Street is an example of urban growth and the use of popular architecture in the early 20th century. Given that the Edwardian Classicism style is attributed to circa 1900-1930, the structure’s likely construction date of c.1915 place the construction at the height of the style’s popularity and as such, 247 West Street represents one of many residential structures in the City of Brantford constructed in the Edwardian Classicism architectural style.

7.3.3 Contextual Value 247 West Street presents as a fair example of a common residential architectural style popular in the early 20th century. Archival research has not produced any evidence that would indicate the structure was ever owned, occupied or involved in any historically significant events that are of cultural value to the City of Brantford or surrounding township.

7.4 Statement of Significance The property is currently listed on the City of Brantford’s Heritage Inventory and represents an example of the architectural style known as Edwardian Classicism. As stated in Blumenson, Edwardian Classicism was a response “to the highly colouristic, complicated and often eclectic composition of the late nineteenth century” (Blumenson, 1989: 166). The style is simplistic and elegant in comparison and aimed to exhibit a lighter and more open interior space than its predecessors.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 43

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

When compared to the criteria presented in Ontario Regulation 9/06 (Section 7.3) 247 West Street does not meet the criteria necessary to be identified as having cultural heritage value or interest and as such should be removed from the City of Brantford Heritage Inventory.

44 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

8. Heritage Impact Assessment The proposed development plan requires the demolition of 247 West Street, City of Brantford, Ontario. At the current time the property is not designated under the Ontario Heritage Act but is listed on the City of Brantford Heritage Inventory. A review of the City of Brantford Heritage Inventory indicates the property is not within or adjacent to a designated Heritage Conservation District (HCD) but is adjacent to another listed property located at 253 West Street.

8.1 Description of Proposed Development The Subject Property 0.31 ac. in size and currently contains a single, two storey residential structure that has been subdivided into rental units. The proposed development plan is to increase the residential density of the property by way of construction of a new multi-level apartment complex.

The proposed development plan calls for the construction of an eight storey apartment complex containing 70 residential units consisting of 21 one-bedroom units and 49 two-bedroom units (Appendix A). The proposed development would be similar in size and style to that currently located at 258 West Street. The proposed development would increase urban density in the area and aid the City of Brantford in meeting its 2014-2024 Housing Stability Plan (Brantford 2014).

As illustrated in Appendix A, the proposed development would require the demolition of 247 West street.

The MHSTCI Info Sheet #5 Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans were reviewed to further assess seven potential negative impacts on the property’s Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI) arising from the proposed site re-development (MHSTCI 2006b):

Destruction of any, or part of any, significant heritage attributes or features. • The proposed redevelopment would result in the demolition of the character defining attributes associated with 247 West Street as listed in section 7.2. But as the structure does not meet the requirements of Ontario Regulation 9/06, the demolition of the structure would not impact the CHVI of the property.

Alteration that is not sympathetic, or incompatible, with the historic fabric and appearance. • Not applicable, property does not meet the requirements of Ontario Regulation 9/06.

Shadows created that alter the viability of a heritage attribute or an associated natural feature or plantings, such as a garden. • Not applicable, property does not meet the requirements of Ontario Regulation 9/06.

Isolation of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context or a significant relationship. • Not applicable, property does not meet the requirements of Ontario Regulation 9/06.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 45

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

Direct or indirect obstruction of significant views or vistas within, from or of built and natural features. • Not applicable, property does not meet the requirements of Ontario Regulation 9/06.

A change in land use where the change in use may impact the property’s cultural heritage value or interest. • Any alterations that results in subsurface disturbance could result in impacts to yet unidentified subsurface features of cultural heritage value or interest.

Land disturbances such as a change in grade that alters soils and drainage patterns that may adversely affect archaeological or cultural heritage resources. • Land disturbances related to proposed alterations have the potential to adversely affect as yet unidentified subsurface resources that may be of cultural heritage value or interest.

8.2 Proposed Mitigation As 247 West Street does not meet the requirements for cultural heritage value or interest as outlined in Ontario Regulation 9/06 no mitigation is necessary.

8.3 Conclusion As 247 West Street does not meet the criteria for cultural heritage value or interest as outlined in Ontario Regulation 9/06 the extant structure should be removed from the City of Brantford Heritage Inventory; it is recommended demolition be permitted to allow for the construction of the proposed apartment complex.

46 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

9. Recommendations Further to Section 7, 247 West street does not meet the cultural heritage value or interest criteria set forth in Ontario Regulation 9/06. The extant structure should be removed from the City of Brantford Heritage Inventory; it is recommended demolition be permitted to allow for the construction of the proposed apartment complex.

It is recommended that any architectural elements able to be salvaged from 247 West street be salvaged and that these materials be made available to current owners of listed and designated homes in the City of Brantford. In doing so the City can aid and promote the retention of properties within the community that may need restoration or are undergoing adaptive re-use and require the installation of temporally correct millwork and hardware. Such a program could promote the retention of heritage structures and divert construction waste from landfill. Providing access to temporarily accurate construction materials from historic structures that are being demolished can save owners of heritage structures thousands of dollars and foster the larger City objective of retaining community heritage.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 47

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

10. Bibliography and Reference Documents Blumenson, John 1989 Ontario Architecture: A Guide to Styles and Building Terms 1784 to the Present. Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Canada.

Brant Historical Society n.d. Land Registry Abstracts, City Registries, Fire Insurance Plans, Burwell Survey.

Brosius, H. 1875 Bird’s Eye View of Brantford, Province Ontario, Canada.

City of Brantford 2014 Brantford Housing Sustainability plan 2014-2024 Electronic resource available at: https://www.homelesshub.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/FINAL%20-%20Master-Plan- 2013.pdf Last accessed Sept 2020.

2020 The Official Plan of the City of Brantford. Electronic resource available online: https://www.brantford.ca/en/business-and-development/resources/Documents/Official- Plan/Official-Plan-ALL.pdf. Last accessed 6 October 2020.

Environment Canada Parks Service 1980. The Buildings of Canada, A Guide to pre-20th Century Styles in Houses, Churches and Other Structures. The Reader’s Digest Association of Canada.

MHSTCI (Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries) 2006a Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, Heritage Property Evaluation. Electronic resource available online: http://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Standards_Conservation.pdf. Last accessed 21 June 2020.

MHSTCI (Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries) 2006b Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process. Electronic resource available online: http://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Heritage_Tool_Kit_ Heritage_PPS_infoSheet.pdf. Last accessed 13 July 2020.

Page and Smith 1875 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Brant, Ont.

Parks Canada 2010 Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. Queens Printer, Canada.

Province of Ontario 1990a Ontario Heritage Act. Electronic resource available online: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90o18. Last accessed 21 June 2020.

1990b Planning Act. Electronic resource available online: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90p13. Last accessed 21 June 2020.

48 02 December 2020 PHC-2020-0045 PHC Inc.

Heritage Impact Assessment, 247 West Street, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Plan 246, Town of Brantford, Township of Brantford East, now City of Brantford, County of Brant, Ontario

2020 Provincial Policy Statement. Electronic resource available online: https://www.ontario.ca/page/provincial-policy-statement-2020. Last accessed 4 July 2020.

Reville, F. Douglas 1920 History of the County of Brant. The Hurley Printing Company, Brantford.

Smith, Marcus 1852 Map of the Town of Brantford. Brant Historical Society.

Tremaine, G.R. 1858 Tremaine’s Map of the County of Brant, Canada West.

PHC Inc. PHC-2020-0045 02 December 2020 49

Appendix A

Development Plan Project North True North

GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS . WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS.

2. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE AND AMENDMENTS.

3. CONTRACTORS MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

4. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB -CONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.

5. ALL DOCUMENTS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. UNAUTHORIZED USE, MODIFICATION, AND/OR REPRODUCTION OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED BY THE CONSULTANT FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE OWNER.

6. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN REFLECTS THE

t Documents. CONSULTANTS BEST JUDGEMENT IN LIGHT OF THE 1 INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO HIM AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION. ANY USE WHICH A THIRD PARTY MAKES OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OR ANY RELIANCE ON/OR DECISIONS TO BE MADE BASED ON THEM ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCH THIRD PARTIES.

7. THE CONSULTANT ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES, IF ANY, SUFFERED BY ANY THIRD PARTY AS A RESULT OF DECISIONS MADE OR ACTIONS BASED ON THE 2 3 4 5 6 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. t of decisions made or actions based on the Contrac the on based actions or made decisions t of

A A the Consultant for the for Owner. Consultant the the of account UTILITY

ges, if any, suffered by any third party as a resul a as party third any by suffered any, if ges, 55.4 m²

70 3'x5' STORAGE UNITS ELEVATOR 14.7 m² rmission. The Contract Documents were prepared by by prepared were Documents Contract The rmission.

The Consultant accepts no responsibility for dama for responsibility no accepts Consultant The STORAGE 2933 SF B B

C C f these documents is prohibitted without written pe written without is prohibitted documents f these them are the responsibility of such third parties. parties. such third of responsibility the are them UTILITY STAIR 59.3 m² STAIR 15.1 m² 15.5 m² 1 2020-09-29 Consultant Coordination

UP UTILITY No. Date Revision 17.1 m² CORRIDOR 91.3 m²

nauthorized use, modification, and/or reproduction and/or o modification, use, nauthorized VESTIBULE VESTIBULE r any reliance on or decisions to be made based on on based made be to decisions or on reliance r any 17.2 m² 17 m²

D D

Project No 1 18038 l documents remain the property of the Architect. U Architect. the of property the remain documents l Project Date

ch a third party makes of the Contract Documents, o Documents, Contract the of makes party third ch a 2 3 4 5 6 2020-09-29 Drawn by Author

Checked by sr m MYV BASEMENT Plot Date / Time 1 1 : 100 ARCHITECTS INC. 2020-10-01 10:56:34 AM to the Architect before proceeding with the work. Al work. the with before Architect the to proceeding lable to him at the time of preparation Any use whi use Any preparation of time the at him to lable BRANTFORD

.Brantford Development V2_ljheetay.rvt Development .Brantford 253 & 247 WEST ST.

BASEMENT verify all dimensions and report any discrepancies discrepancies any report and dimensions all verify nts best judgement in light of the information avai information the of light in judgement nts best

Drawing Scale 1 : 100

Status

PRE-CONSULTATION

Drawing No. Revision No. RELIMINARY P C:\Users\ljheetay\Documents\20038 - 253&247 West St West 253&247 - C:\Users\ljheetay\Documents\20038 The material contained herein reflects the Consulta the reflects herein contained material The Do not scale drawings. Contractors must check and mustand check Contractors drawings. scale not Do A2.1 - r1 1 2 3 4 5 6

43643

8849 8601 8744 8601 8849

Project North True North

A GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS . WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS.

2. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE AND AMENDMENTS. LOBBY 41.7 m² 3. CONTRACTORS MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE

5600 PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

4. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB -CONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 8488 ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. ELEVATOR 5. ALL DOCUMENTS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE 14.7 m² ARCHITECT. UNAUTHORIZED USE, MODIFICATION, AND/OR REPRODUCTION OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED BY THE CONSULTANT FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE OWNER.

6. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN REFLECTS THE

t Documents. CONSULTANTS BEST JUDGEMENT IN LIGHT OF THE B INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO HIM AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION. ANY USE WHICH A THIRD PARTY MAKES OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OR ANY RELIANCE UNDERGROUND PARKING ON/OR DECISIONS TO BE MADE BASED ON THEM ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCH THIRD PARTIES. 1800 6839 6126 18775 22 STALLS 7. THE CONSULTANT ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR C DAMAGES, IF ANY, SUFFERED BY ANY THIRD PARTY AS A RESULT OF DECISIONS MADE OR ACTIONS BASED ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. t of decisions made or actions based on the Contrac the on based actions or made decisions t of STAIR STAIR 15.1 m² 15.1 m²

UP 8488 5600 the Consultant for the for Owner. Consultant the the of account SERVICES GARBAGE EXIT 17 m² 11.9 m² 5.1 m² ges, if any, suffered by any third party as a resul a as party third any by suffered any, if ges,

UNDERGROUND PARKING LEVEL 1 1 1 : 100 rmission. The Contract Documents were prepared by by prepared were Documents Contract The rmission.

The Consultant accepts no responsibility for dama for responsibility no accepts Consultant The 1 2 3 4 5 6

43643

8849 8601 8744 8601 8849 f these documents is prohibitted without written pe written without is prohibitted documents f these them are the responsibility of such third parties. parties. such third of responsibility the are them

2 2020-09-29 Consultant Coordination A 1 2020-03-06 Issued to Pre-Consultation No. Date Revision

LOBBY 41.7 m² nauthorized use, modification, and/or reproduction and/or o modification, use, nauthorized r any reliance on or decisions to be made based on on based made be to decisions or on reliance r any AREA DROP OFFDROP 8488 ELEVATOR 14.7 m²

Project No 18038

l documents remain the property of the Architect. U Architect. the of property the remain documents l Project Date

ch a third party makes of the Contract Documents, o Documents, Contract the of makes party third ch a B 2020-09-29 Drawn by OUTDOOR SPACE FKF 181.7 m² GROUND PARKING Checked by 1800 18344 18775 sr m MYV 23 STALLS Plot Date / Time ARCHITECTS INC. 2020-10-01 10:56:35 AM to the Architect before proceeding with the work. Al work. the with before Architect the to proceeding lable to him at the time of preparation Any use whi use Any preparation of time the at him to lable BRANTFORD STAIR STAIR .Brantford Development V2_ljheetay.rvt Development .Brantford 15.1 m² 15.1 m² 253 & 247 WEST ST. 8488

GARBAGE SERVICES EXIT P1 & LEVEL 1 11.3 m² 17 m² verify all dimensions and report any discrepancies discrepancies any report and dimensions all verify 5.7 m² nts best judgement in light of the information avai information the of light in judgement nts best

Drawing Scale 1 : 100

D Status

GROUND PARKING LEVEL 1 PRE-CONSULTATION 2 1 : 100 Drawing No. Revision No. RELIMINARY P C:\Users\ljheetay\Documents\20038 - 253&247 West St West 253&247 - C:\Users\ljheetay\Documents\20038 The material contained herein reflects the Consulta the reflects herein contained material The Do not scale drawings. Contractors must check and mustand check Contractors drawings. scale not Do A2.2 - r2 Do not scale drawings. Contractors must check andverify all dimensions and report any discrepanciesto the Architect before proceeding with the work. l Aldocuments remain the property of the Architect.nauthorized U use, modification, and/or reproductionf these o documents is prohibitted without written rmission.pe The Contract Documents were prepared bythe Consultant for the account of the Owner. The material contained herein reflects the Consultants best judgement in light of the information available to him at the time of preparation Any use which a third party makes of the Contract Documents,r anyo reliance on or decisions to be made based onthem are the responsibility of such third parties. The Consultant accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on the Contract Documents. C:\Users\ljheetay\Documents\20038 - 253&247 West St.Brantford Development V2_ljheetay.rvt D C B A

18775

8488 1800 8488 LEVEL 1 1 ROOF LEVEL 1 1 SUITE A SUITE A SUITE 82.8 m² 82.7 m² 8849

W/D W/D 2 2 STAIR 15.1 m² SUITE B SUITE UP 48.6 m² W/D ø 1 5 0 0 8601

ø BF SUITE GSUITE BF 1 W/D 5 0 0 54.9 m² ELEVATOR 14.7 m² ø 15 00 3 3 SHAFT

3.4 m² W/D ELEC. 5.6 m²

BF SUITE F SUITE BF W/D 73 m² 43643 8744 SUITE C SUITE 70.7 m²

ø 1 ø 5 1 0 5 0 0 0 4 4

W/D SUITE E SUITE 55.1 m² SUITE D SUITE 8601 74 m² STAIR 15.1 m²

W/D 5 5

W/D W/D SUITE A SUITE A SUITE 8849 82.7 m² 82.8 m² 1 6 6 TYPICAL2-5 FLOORLEVEL 1 : : 1100 D C B A o aeRevision Date No. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. GENERALNOTES s s m ARCHITECTSINC. 000-6Issued to Pre-Consultation 2020-03-06 Consultant Coordination 2020-09-29 1 2 P DOCUMENTS.CONTRACT ON THE BASED MADE ORACTIONS OF DECISIONS RESULT A BYANY THIRD PARTY AS IF SUFFERED ANY, DAMAGES, FOR NO RESPONSIBILITY ACCEPTS CONSULTANT THE OFTHIRD SUCH RESPONSIBILITY THE ONTHEM ARE BASED MADE TOON/ORBE DECISIONS OFCONTRACT THE ORDOCUMENTS, RELIANCE ANY THIRDPARTYMAKES A WHICH ANY USE PREPARATION. TO HIMTIME THE OF AT INFORMATION AVAILABLE JUDGEMENT OFLIGHT IN BEST THE CONSULTANTS THE REFLECTS CONTAINED HEREIN MATERIAL THE ACCOUNT FOR THE CONSULTANT OFOWNER. THE BY THE PREPARED DOCUMENTSCONTRACT WERE THE PERMISSION. WRITTEN WITHOUT PROHIBITED AND/OR MODIFICATION, USE, UNAUTHORIZED ARCHITECT. DOCUMENTS PROPERTY REMAIN OF THE THE ALL TIMES. ATALL ONSITE CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS OF APPROVED SET A HAVE SUB CONTRACTORSAND ALL THE WITH PROCEEDING BEFORE TOARCHITECT THE DISCREPANCIES ANY AND REPORT AND SPECIFICATIONS DIMENSIONS VERIFY ALL AND MUSTCONTRACTORS CHECK AMENDMENTS. CODE AND BUILDING ONTARIO 2012 THE COMPLYSHALL WITH WORK ALL SCALED OVER PRECEDENCE HAVE SCALE DO DRAWINGSNOT RELIMINARY 253 & 247 WEST & 247 253 ST. TYPICAL2 LEVEL rjc ot True North Project North r REPRODUCTION OF THESE DOCUMENTS REPRODUCTION OFIS THESE BRANTFORD PLAN WORK. . WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL SHALL DIMENSIONS WRITTEN . 23 r2 A2.3 - - CONTRACTORS SHALL SHALL CONTRACTORS DrawingNo. Status DrawingScale PlotDate Time/ Checkedby Drawnby ProjectDate ProjectNo 2020-10-0110:56:38 AM PARTIES. PRE-CONSULTATION DIMENSIONS. - 2020-09-29 5 RevisionNo. 1 : 100 180 38 MYV FKF Project North True North

GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS . WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS.

2. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE AND AMENDMENTS.

3. CONTRACTORS MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

4. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB -CONTRACTORS SHALL 1 2 3 4 5 6 HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.

6. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN REFLECTS THE

t Documents. CONSULTANTS BEST JUDGEMENT IN LIGHT OF THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO HIM AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION. ANY USE WHICH A THIRD PARTY MAKES OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OR ANY RELIANCE ON/OR DECISIONS TO BE MADE BASED ON THEM ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCH THIRD PARTIES.

7. THE CONSULTANT ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES, IF ANY, SUFFERED BY ANY THIRD PARTY AS A RESULT OF DECISIONS MADE OR ACTIONS BASED ON THE A A CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. SUITE 71.4 m²

t of decisions made or actions based on the Contrac the on based actions or made decisions t of W/D SUITE SUITE 49.4 m² SUITE 82.4 m² 82.8 m²

ELEVATOR W/D

14.8 m² W/D the Consultant for the for Owner. Consultant the the of account ges, if any, suffered by any third party as a resul a as party third any by suffered any, if ges,

W/D SUITE W/D 74 m² ELEC. B 5.1 m² B

C C rmission. The Contract Documents were prepared by by prepared were Documents Contract The rmission. SHAFT The Consultant accepts no responsibility for dama for responsibility no accepts Consultant The

W/D 0 0 3.4 m² 0 0 5 5 1 1 ø ø W/D W/D W/D W/D

00 STAIR ø 15 SUITE STAIR 15.1 m² 73 m² 15.1 m² 0 0 5 1 f these documents is prohibitted without written pe written without is prohibitted documents f these SUITE ø them are the responsibility of such third parties. parties. such third of responsibility the are them SUITE SUITE 55 m² 82.4 m² 82.3 m²

0 SUITE 0 15 55.1 m² 1 2020-09-29 Consultant Coordination ø No. Date Revision D D nauthorized use, modification, and/or reproduction and/or o modification, use, nauthorized r any reliance on or decisions to be made based on on based made be to decisions or on reliance r any

1 2 3 4 5 6 Project No 18038

l documents remain the property of the Architect. U Architect. the of property the remain documents l Project Date

ch a third party makes of the Contract Documents, o Documents, Contract the of makes party third ch a 2020-09-29 LEVEL 6 1 Drawn by 1 : 100 Author

Checked by sr m Checker Plot Date / Time ARCHITECTS INC. 2020-10-01 10:56:40 AM to the Architect before proceeding with the work. Al work. the with before Architect the to proceeding lable to him at the time of preparation Any use whi use Any preparation of time the at him to lable BRANTFORD

.Brantford Development V2_ljheetay.rvt Development .Brantford 253 & 247 WEST ST.

TYPICAL LEVEL 6 -8

verify all dimensions and report any discrepancies discrepancies any report and dimensions all verify PLAN nts best judgement in light of the information avai information the of light in judgement nts best

Drawing Scale 1 : 100

Status

PRE-CONSULTATION

MECH. MECH. 27.257 m 27.257 m 3 3 2857 2 2 2 2 2857 9 9 ROOF 9 ROOF GENERAL NOTES 24.400 m 24.400 m 2 1 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS . WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. 3 5 3000 2. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2012 ONTARIO 10 BUILDING CODE AND AMENDMENTS. LEVEL 8 8 LEVEL 8 3 21.400 m 21.400 m 6 7 3. CONTRACTORS MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE 3000 PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

LEVEL 7 LEVEL 7 4. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB -CONTRACTORS SHALL 18.400 m 18.400 m HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.

3000 5. ALL DOCUMENTS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. UNAUTHORIZED USE, MODIFICATION, LEVEL 6 LEVEL 6 AND/OR REPRODUCTION OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS 15.400 m 15.400 m 6 PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. THE 7 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED BY THE 5 4 CONSULTANT FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE OWNER. 3000 8 6. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN REFLECTS THE

t Documents. LEVEL 5 LEVEL 5 CONSULTANTS BEST JUDGEMENT IN LIGHT OF THE 12.400 m 12.400 m INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO HIM AT THE TIME OF 24200 PREPARATION. ANY USE WHICH A THIRD PARTY MAKES OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OR ANY RELIANCE

3000 ON/OR DECISIONS TO BE MADE BASED ON THEM ARE THE 27400 RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCH THIRD PARTIES. LEVEL 4 LEVEL 4 9.400 m 9.400 m 7. THE CONSULTANT ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR 3 DAMAGES, IF ANY, SUFFERED BY ANY THIRD PARTY AS A 2 2 RESULT OF DECISIONS MADE OR ACTIONS BASED ON THE 3 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3 3000 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 3 6.400 m 6.400 m

t of decisions made or actions based on the Contrac the on based actions or made decisions t of 1 PRE-CAST CONCRETE - RED RUNNING BOND BRICK

3 3000

LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2 2 PRE-CAST CONCRETE - BEIGE STACKED BOND BRICK 3.400 m 3.400 m 11 3 3 PRE-CAST CONCRETE 5 3 1 11 3200 3 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 4 PRE-CAST CONCRETE - DARK GREY 11 0.200 m 0.200 m the Consultant for the for Owner. Consultant the the of account 1 8 5 SEALED GLAZING 12 ges, if any, suffered by any third party as a resul a as party third any by suffered any, if ges, 3200 3200 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 5 3200 6 SPANDREL PANEL P1 P1 -3.000 m -3.000 m 7 METAL LOUVRE

8 METAL MULLIONS 1 North Elevation 3 East Elevation 1 : 150 1 : 150 9 PRE-CAST CONCRETE ROOF CORNICE rmission. The Contract Documents were prepared by by prepared were Documents Contract The rmission. 10 TEMPERED GLASS RAILING The Consultant accepts no responsibility for dama for responsibility no accepts Consultant The

11 TIMBER COLUMN

12 METAL GARAGE DOOR

1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D f these documents is prohibitted without written pe written without is prohibitted documents f these them are the responsibility of such third parties. parties. such third of responsibility the are them

MECH. MECH. 2 27.257 m 3 3 27.257 m 2 2020-09-29 Consultant Coordination 1 2020-03-06 Issued to Pre-Consultation 9 3

2857 2 2857 No. Date Revision 9 9 9 ROOF ROOF 2 24.400 m 1 24.400 m 2 5 4 3000 3000 nauthorized use, modification, and/or reproduction and/or o modification, use, nauthorized 10

r any reliance on or decisions to be made based on on based made be to decisions or on reliance r any LEVEL 8 LEVEL 8 21.400 m 21.400 m 3 3 3000 3000

LEVEL 7 LEVEL 7 18.400 m 3 18.400 m 3 3 3000 3000 Project No LEVEL 6 LEVEL 6 18038 15.400 m 15.400 m l documents remain the property of the Architect. U Architect. the of property the remain documents l Project Date

ch a third party makes of the Contract Documents, o Documents, Contract the of makes party third ch a 2020-09-29 3000 3000 Drawn by

LEVEL 5 24200 LEVEL 5 FKF 12.400 m 12.400 m Checked by MYV 24200 sr m 2 5

3000 3000 Plot Date / Time 10 ARCHITECTS INC. 2020-10-01 10:54:52 AM LEVEL 4 LEVEL 4 6 9.400 m 9.400 m 7 2 8

5 3000 3000 to the Architect before proceeding with the work. Al work. the with before Architect the to proceeding 3

lable to him at the time of preparation Any use whi use Any preparation of time the at him to lable 3 LEVEL 3 3 LEVEL 3 6.400 m 6.400 m BRANTFORD 3

.Brantford Development V2_ljheetay.rvt Development .Brantford 1 253 & 247 WEST ST. 3 1 3000 3000 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2 3.400 m 3.400 m

5 11 3200 3200 11 ELEVATIONS

verify all dimensions and report any discrepancies discrepancies any report and dimensions all verify LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1

nts best judgement in light of the information avai information the of light in judgement nts best 0.200 m 0.200 m 3

Drawing Scale 3200 As indicated P1 Status -3.000 m

PRE-CONSULTATION

Drawing No. Revision No. RELIMINARY 2 South Elevation 4 West Elevation P C:\Users\ljheetay\Documents\20038 - 253&247 West St West 253&247 - C:\Users\ljheetay\Documents\20038 A3.1 - r2 The material contained herein reflects the Consulta the reflects herein contained material The Do not scale drawings. Contractors must check and mustand check Contractors drawings. scale not Do 1 : 150 1 : 150 Project North True North

GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS . WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS.

2. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE AND AMENDMENTS.

3. CONTRACTORS MUST CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

8.67 m 4. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB -CONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE A SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

I ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. D 0.

E 06

°10'55"W A m 5. ALL DOCUMENTS REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE N68 R 65.664m D ARCHITECT. UNAUTHORIZED USE, MODIFICATION, 0 m D AND/OR REPRODUCTION OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS 7.5 R YA PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. THE AR 9.00 m 4.00 m 1.63 m 4.50 m ASPHALT RE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED BY THE CONSULTANT FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE OWNER.

6. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN REFLECTS THE

t Documents. CONSULTANTS BEST JUDGEMENT IN LIGHT OF THE 0 m INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO HIM AT THE TIME OF 1.5 0.85 m 3.65 m 0.10 m 5.60 m m 2.75 PREPARATION. ANY USE WHICH A THIRD PARTY MAKES OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OR ANY RELIANCE ON/OR DECISIONS TO BE MADE BASED ON THEM ARE THE OUTDOOR 0 m SOD RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCH THIRD PARTIES. SITE DATA SOD DROP CURB 5.6 AMENITY m 1.50 7.65 m 7.65 7. THE CONSULTANT ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR

Project Address, City, Province 9.

46 VISITOR DAMAGES, IF ANY, SUFFERED BY ANY THIRD PARTY AS A

DATA REQUIRED PROVIDED 16 RACKS BIKE RESULT OF DECISIONS MADE OR ACTIONS BASED ON THE OR IT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ZONING ZONING - RC MAIN ENTRY IS 6.00 m m 3.40 V m 0 m .00 .0 LOT AREA (m²) XX (m²) 3251.31 (m²) FRONT YARD 20 6 FRONT YARD (m) 6.0 (m) 8.0 (m) CONC. SIDEWALK OR t of decisions made or actions based on the Contrac the on based actions or made decisions t of INTERIOR SIDE YARD (m) 0.6 (m) 8.6 (m) IT SOD IS EXTERIOR SIDE YARD (m) 0.6 (m) 9.6 (m) V BALC. ABOVE BALC. ABOVE BALC. ABOVE BALC. ABOVE BALC. ABOVE m 1.91 N SETBACKS REAR YARD (m) 7.5 (m) 20.0 (m) 5 1.50 m 1.50 m 1.50 m 7.20 ° 3 4 9 9 R . O 9 '5 IT 3 0 IS 9 " V m W BUILDING DATA

DATA REQUIRED PROVIDED OR 5.50 m 5.50 IT IS TOTAL DENSITY (# of units) XX (units) 70 (units) DROP OFF V AREA

the Consultant for the for Owner. Consultant the the of account 0 BUILDING AREA (m²) XX (m²) 819.41 (m²) 40

3 m 0.10 GROSS FLOOR AREA (m²) XX (m²) 5857.46 (m²) ASPHALT R TO ges, if any, suffered by any third party as a resul a as party third any by suffered any, if ges, I NUMBER OF STOREYS --- 8 IS CONC. SIDEWALK V LOBBY LOBBY BUILDING HEIGHT (m) XX (m) MAX. 27.06 (m) m 1.80 1.54 m 1.54 ENTRANCE COMMERCIAL/RETAIL AREA (m²) XX (m²) XX (m²) R TO AMENITY AREA (m²) XX (m²) 926.86 (m²) SI 0.10 m 0.10 PROPOSED 8 STOREYS VI ACCESSIBLE SUITES 70 x 20% = 14 (units) 14 (units) MULTI -RESIDENTIAL GROUND LEVEL BUILDING ENTRANCE TO MIDRISE APARTMENT UNDERGROUND R TO OVERHEAD PARKING SI PARKING GROUND LEVEL m 6.00 I 6.27 m 6.27 70 UNITS V LANDSCAPING DATA ACCESS PARKING ACCESS DROP DROP CURB DATA REQUIRED PROVIDED rmission. The Contract Documents were prepared by by prepared were Documents Contract The rmission. OR LANDSCAPE AREA (percentage) XX (%) 26.4 (%) IT IS

The Consultant accepts no responsibility for dama for responsibility no accepts Consultant The V LANDSCAPE AREA (m²) XX (m²) 857.7 (m²) ASPHALT

HARDSCAPE AREA (percentage) XX (%) 49.1 (%) WEST STREET

2 R HARDSCAPE AREA (m²) XX (m²) 1597.9 (m²) 8 2 O m 9 82 IT 53 9 S . 5 VI 1

SOD 36.271m

5.75 m 5.75 SURFACE N27°40'45"E 0 m VEHICLE PARKING DATA m 6.19 PARKING 5.6 6.00 m DATA REQUIRED PROVIDED 25 STALLS

RESIDENTIAL PARKING 0.X / units 58 SIDEWALK CONC. f these documents is prohibitted without written pe written without is prohibitted documents f these 6 BARRIER FREE PARKING 0.0X / units 3 .0 0 them are the responsibility of such third parties. parties. such third of responsibility the are them m 5.00% CONC. SIDEWALK 5.00% m 07 VISITOR PARKING 0.X / units 10 UP 6. 2.24 m 2.24 0 EXIT DROP CURB 1.52 m 1.52 0 BALC. ABOVE BALC. ABOVE BALC. ABOVE EXIT BALC. ABOVE COMMERCIAL PARKING 0.X / units XX 0 2 1 TOTAL 71 0.10 m 5.50 m 2.26 m 2 2020-09-29 Consultant Coordination G 5 m 1 2020-03-06 Issued to Pre-Consultation PARKING GARAGE / IN 2.5 AD STAIRWELL ENTRY LO 3 .5 No. Date Revision BICYCLE PARKING DATA 200 0 14.31% m -3000

DATA REQUIRED PROVIDED m 6.00 ASPHALT ASPHALT m RESIDENTIAL BICYCLE PARKING 0.X / units 16 00 1 9. .5 E 0 5" 4 COMMERCIAL BICYCLE PARKING 0.X / units XX m 2' W 5 m 4° 00 nauthorized use, modification, and/or reproduction and/or o modification, use, nauthorized TOTAL XX A 8 .2 S N 1

S 4

r any reliance on or decisions to be made based on on based made be to decisions or on reliance r any T

D E 0

SOD 0

N62°29'45"W D 32.004m

22.36 m 3.20 m m 19.25 m 2.75 m

TYP. S 0 ID .0 E 6

Y m A R D 2 Project No .6 4 m 18038 9.449m l documents remain the property of the Architect. U Architect. the of property the remain documents l

N27°40'45"E Project Date

ch a third party makes of the Contract Documents, o Documents, Contract the of makes party third ch a 2020-09-29

. 6 SOD

m Drawn by FKF

Checked by sr m MYV N62°29'45"W Plot Date / Time 18.525m ARCHITECTS INC. 2020-10-01 11:01:35 AM to the Architect before proceeding with the work. Al work. the with before Architect the to proceeding lable to him at the time of preparation Any use whi use Any preparation of time the at him to lable BRANTFORD

.Brantford Development V2_ljheetay.rvt Development .Brantford 253 & 247 WEST ST.

01 D1 SITE PLAN 1 1 : 150 Site Plan verify all dimensions and report any discrepancies discrepancies any report and dimensions all verify nts best judgement in light of the information avai information the of light in judgement nts best

Drawing Scale As indicated

Status

PRE-CONSULTATION

Resumes 38 Somerset Ave, Suite 200 Toronto, ON M6H 2R4 647-348-4887 | www.phcgroup.ca [email protected]

CARLA PARSLOW PRINCIPAL ARCHAEOLOGIST

Bio Dr. Carla Parslow has over 20 years of experience in the field of archaeology and 15 years of experience in the cultural science consulting industry in both Manitoba and Ontario. As the Principal Archaeologist at PHC Inc., Carla is responsible for the for the management of medium to large scale projects, as well as the technical review and quality assurance of all archaeological and cultural heritage projects. As a consultant archaeologist, Carla has lead/managed teams of 50+ archaeologists in both the field and office in multiple offices throughout the province of Ontario. As a professionally licensed archaeologist in Ontario (P243), Carla has been the principal archaeologist/licensee on over 385 archaeological assessments. Dr. Parslow is comfortable and experienced in leading teams on small scale projects (< $20,000) as well as large complex linear infrastructure archaeology/heritage projects (> $10,000,000).

Employment History PARSLOW HERITAGE CONSULTANCY INC. 2018-Present, Principal Archaeologist Key Responsibilities: Archaeological program design, quality assurance and control, business development GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD. 2009-2018, Associate, Senior Archaeologist Key Responsibilities: Responsible for the coordination, technical review and quality assurance of archaeological and cultural heritage projects. ONTATIO MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION 2007-2009, Regional Archaeologist Key Responsibilities: Develop archaeological/heritage policy development and procedures, manage archaeological and cultural heritage consultants working on class environmental assessments on behalf of the ministry, Indigenous consultation on behalf of the Ministry (Crown). ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. 2006-2007, Assistant Manager, Environmental Assessment Division Key Responsibilities: Management and coordination of archaeological and cultural heritage assessments within an environmental assessment context (municipal, provincial and national).

Education and Ph.D. Anthropology, specialization in Archaeology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, 2006 qualifications M.A. Anthropology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, 1999 B.A. Anthropology, Honours, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, 1996

Ontario Professional Archaeological License – P243 Member of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP)

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

CULTURAL HERITAGE

Public Works and Project Manager and writing assistant for a Heritage Impact Assessment of the Michipicoten Island Government Services Light Tower at the east end of Lake Superior. The purpose of the survey was to observe the Canada condition of the structure’s exterior parging, door and windows and to recommend materials that are sympathetic to the visual aesthetics of the Lighthouse and will not have a negative impact on Michipicoten Island the heritage property. PWGSC requires this HIA as a component of a lead abatement program that is being proposed for the Light Tower. (2018)

NextBridge East-West Senior writer for the CEAA effects assessment and senior technical reviewer/advisor for a Stage 1 Tie Transmission Project archaeological assessment and heritage impact assessment of East-West Tie access roads, laydown Thunder Bay, ON yards, worker camps, Loon Lake reroute on behalf of NextBridge for the proposed new East-West Tie Transmission Project. The Preferred Route primarily parallels the existing East-West Tie and is approximately 450 km long and will consist of the installation of a double-circuit 230 kV transmission line generally paralleling the existing double-circuit 230 kV transmission corridor (the existing East- West Tie) connecting the Wawa TS to the Lakehead TS near Thunder Bay, with a connection approximately mid-way at the Marathon TS. (2016-2018)

Cultural Resource Study Cultural Lead (archaeology and cultural heritage) on behalf of the City of Brampton to complete a desktop-level cultural resource (archaeological and heritage) survey for the Queen Brampton ON Street Rapid Transit Corridor Master Plan (RTCMP) for the City of Brampton, Ontario. The study area comprises 200m on either side (a 400m corridor) of the 14.4 km stretch of Queen Street East and West, between McLaughlin Road and Highway 50. Duties include the research and production of an information document detailing known archaeological and heritage resources within a 100m radius of Lakeshore Road and provide mapping and recommendations for culturally sensitive areas within the Study Area. (2016)

Cultural Resource Study Cultural Lead (archaeology and cultural heritage) on behalf of the City of Mississauga for the Transportation Management Plan (TMP) Class EA for future planning of Lakeshore Road. Study Mississauga ON Area encompassed the entire length of Lakeshore Road, within the City of Mississauga limits. Duties include the research and production of an information document detailing known archaeological and heritage resources within a 100m radius of Lakeshore Road and provide mapping and recommendations for culturally sensitive areas within the Study Area. (2016)

Cultural Value and Project Director and Senior Reviewer and main point of contact for a cultural heritage impact Heritage Impact assessment for the TRCA as part of the East Don Trail Project. In February 2015 the Toronto and Assessment Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) completed the East Don Trail. Environmental Assessment (East Don EA) for a proposed “East Don Trail” extension to link the existing East Don Trail with Toronto, ON the Don Trail network located south of the Forks of the Don. Based on the findings of a TRCA Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment (2013), the Environmental Assessment recommended that a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) be undertaken of the proposed trail extension. (2015)

Page | 2 Carla Parslow Principal Archaeologist

Cultural Heritage Project Director and Senior Reviewer for a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the North Kent Impact Wind 1 Project. The project is being proposed by North Kent Wind 1 LP, by its general partner, North Kent Wind 1 GP Inc. The HIA is a required component of the client’s application for a Assessment Municipality Renewable Energy Approval, as outlined in Ontario Regulation 359/09 of the Environmental of Chatham Kent, ON Protection Act. A total of 14 potential built heritage resources 40 years of age or older and six potential cultural heritage landscapes were documented and evaluated according to Ontario Regulation 09/06. (2015)

Heritage Impact Senior Reviewer for a Heritage Impact Statement (HIS) of the McCormicks Building at 1156 Statement Dundas Street in the City of London at the request of The City of London. The McCormicks Building is designated by the City of London under the Ontario Heritage Act as a property of London, ON cultural heritage value or interest under By-law No. L.S.P.-3441-366. The City required this HIS to assist in preparing a Preliminary Design Concept for the property. (2015)

Heritage Impact TransCanada PipeLines Limited (TransCanada) is planning the construction and operation of the Assessment King’s North Connection Pipeline Project (the Project) to be located in the Cities of Brampton, Toronto, and Vaughan, Ontario. TransCanada retained Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder) to Vaughan, ON prepare the environmental and socio-economic assessment report and other approval applications, including a Heritage Impact Assessment, for the Project. (2014 - 2015)

Cultural Resource Project manager and lead researcher for to undertake a study to determine if and how select Vulnerability Study cultural resources (archaeological and cultural heritage), on the Rainy River are being affected by the 2000 Rule Curves for the Rainy River International Dam. (2014 – 2015) District of Thunder Bay, ON

Heritage Impact Project Director and senior reviewer for a heritage impact assessments and Stage 1-2 Assessment and archaeological assessments for the proposed Lakeshore–Royal Windsor Hydro Corridor multi- Archaeological use trail from North Service Road to Westfield Drive in the City of Mississauga, Ontario as part of a larger Class Environmental Assessment process. Served as reviewer for all documentation Assessment and data submitted to the client or the regulatory body, client contact, and senior advisor to Mississauga, ON the Golder team. (2013 - 2015)

Cultural Resource Senior Technical Reviewer/Advisor for background cultural heritage and archaeological study Assessments for the New Transmission Line to Pickle Lake Project (the Project), as part of a larger environmental assessment Retained by Wataynikaneyap Power, a partnership between District of Kenora, ON Central Corridor Energy Group which represents 13 First Nation communities, and Goldcorp Canada Ltd. The Project includes the construction of a proposed 230 kilovolt (kV) High

Voltage alternating current (HVac) electricity transmission system in a corridor extending approximately 300 km. (2012 – 2014)

Feasibility Study Cultural Heritage/Archaeology lead for a cultural heritage and archaeological review of the Yonge Street – Highway 401 Interchange Functional Planning Study (PT11-796) study area as City of Toronto, ON part of a larger planning assessment study designed to inform planning decisions affecting the preferred configuration and alignment of the proposed interchange. (2013)

Page | 3 Carla Parslow Principal Archaeologist

Cultural Resource Project Manager for six major Wind Energy projects managing a combined budget of over $3 Assessments million. Project Management involved delivery of Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments and an archaeological program for various Stage 1 through 4 assessments. Duties include Welland, East Durham, scheduling and budgeting of projects; providing senior review for archaeological reports; Huron, and Bruce client communications; liaison with MTCS. (2012-2013) County, ON

Cultural Resource Golder was retained by AECOM through the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) to Assessments undertake the cultural heritage and archaeological work for the Detail Design Study for rehabilitation of the Highway 401 Bloor Street underpass bridge in the City of Oshawa (GWP Oshawa, ON 2186-08-00). This will include repaving of Bloor Street over the structure. Duties include senior oversight of the heritage and archaeological component, client communications, and liaison with MTCS (2012) Cultural Resource Lead for the Cultural Heritage and archaeological component as contracted by HDR to Assessments provided cultural heritage and archaeology reports for eight intersections in MTO’s Central Region 2009-E-0078 (WO# 10- 20001). Responsibilities include senior oversight of heritage and Various Locations, archaeological component, primary contact for prime consultant and MTO, and management Central Region, ON of scope and budgets. (2011)

Feasibility Study Cultural Heritage/Archaeological senior reviewer for a cultural heritage and archaeological review in support of the Downtown Rapid Transit Study (TTC Contract No. G85-275) study area City of Toronto, ON as part of a larger planning assessment study (2012).

Heritage and Project Coordinator and main point of contact to Metrolinx for the Georgetown South Heritage Archaeological Feature and Archaeological Features Assessment. Heritage Impact Assessments were completed for Assessment 17 bridges, two residences as well as two cultural heritage landscapes. Duties include scheduling and budgeting of the project; client communications; and liaison with MTCS. (2010- City of Toronto, ON 2011)

Page | 4 Carla Parslow Principal Archaeologist

38 Somerset Ave, Suite 200 Toronto, ON M6H 2R4 647-348-4887 | www.phcgroup.ca [email protected]

CHRIS LEMON, B.Sc., Dip. BUILT HERITAGE SPECIALIST

Chris Lemon is a Cultural Heritage Specialist and Licensed Archaeologist (R289) with 15 years experience. He received an Honours B.Sc. in Anthropology from the University of Toronto and has completed course work towards an M.A. from the University of Western Ontario. Mr. Lemon has a Diploma in Heritage Carpentry and Joinery and a Certificate in Heritage Planning from Algonquin College. During his career Mr. Lemon has participated in cultural heritage assessments across Ontario as both a Senior Field Director in archaeology and as a Built Heritage Practitioner. He has managed field teams and projects ranging in value from <$5,000.00 to in excess of $1,000,000.00. Mr. Lemon is a member of the Ontario Archaeological Society and the Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology. Chris’s previous experience includes representation on Joint Health and Safety Committees; he is dedicated to maintaining a safety-first focus on all job sites.

Employment History PARSLOW HERITAGE CONSULTANCY INC. 2020-Present, Built Heritage Specialist Key Responsibilities: Built Heritage Assessments, Health and Safety protocols GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD. 2008-2018, Project Archaeologist Key Responsibilities: Senior archaeological field director GTA, crew training, report production, coordination and quality control of archaeological field work, cultural heritage assessments and report production ARCHAEOLOGIX INC. 2006-2008, Field Director/Field technician Key Responsibilities: Oversaw the day-to-day operation of site field work, maintained a safety- focused workspace, conducted background research and prepared report sections

Education and Dip. Heritage Carpentry and Joinery – Algonquin College (2020) qualifications Certificate in Heritage Planning – Algonquin College (2019) M.A. course work – University of Western Ontario (2012-2014) Honors B.Sc. (Anthropology) – University of Toronto (2006) Ontario Research Archaeological License – R289

PROJECT EXPERIENCE CULTURAL HERITAGE

Cultural Heritage Assessment Field documentation and reporting of an early 20th century Edwardian residential Report, 1326 Bronte Road structure for a cultural heritage impact assessment as part of a proposed Oakville, Ontario redevelopment of the Bronte Road West Lands in the Town of Oakville. The report 2020 involved research into the history of the property, an evaluation of the cultural landscape and an evaluation of the potential cultural heritage value or interest for the property.

Cultural Heritage Impact Field documentation and reporting of a late 19th century Gothic Revival residential Assessment, 13735 Highway structure for a cultural heritage impact assessment as part of a proposed 27 redevelopment. The report involved research into the history of the property, and an Nobleton, Ontario evaluation of the potential cultural heritage value or interest for the property. 2020 Recommendations were also developed to mitigate cultural heritage impacts to the property.

Cultural Heritage Field documentation and reporting of a late 20th century concrete bridge. The report Evaluation Report, Old Fort involved research into the history of the structure and surrounding landscape, an Overhead Bridge evaluation of the cultural landscape and an evaluation of the potential cultural heritage Midland, Ontario value or interest for the property. 2020

Cultural Heritage Principal investigator and author of a Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report on a mid-18th Evaluation Report, 450 century stone neo-classical storey and a half residential structure. The documentation Finch Street and report included producing measured drawings of the property and exterior and Pickering, Ontario interior of the structure, and evaluation of the property against Ontario Regulation 2020 9/06.

Perth, Ontario Façade Part of a two-person team responsible for the production of accessible heritage Recovery Project documentation of culturally significant structures located within the Town of Perth’s Perth, Ontario Heritage Conservation District. Project was undertaken as a joint venture between 2019 Algonquin College and the Town of Perth. Coordinated workflow with Perth’s heritage planner and development officer.

Cultural Heritage Secondary investigator and report writer for a cultural heritage evaluation of an early to Evaluation Report, 400 mid-20th century residential structure. Field investigations included production of Mary Street East measured drawings of the interior and exterior, and determining the structural Whitby, Ontario sequence. An evaluation of the potential cultural heritage value or interest for the 2018 property was necessary to recommend next steps.

Page | 2 Chris Lemon, B.Sc., Dip. Built Heritage Specialist

Heritage Impact Primary field investigator and contributing author for the heritage impact assessment Assessment, 400 Maple of the remaining annex of a 19th century Victorian school complex. Field investigations Street included production of measured drawings of the interior and exterior, and Collingwood, Ontario determining the structural sequence of interior alterations. 2018

Cultural Heritage Primary field investigator and archival researcher for a mid-20th century residential Evaluation Report, 276 St. structure. Evaluation was conducted in advance of a proposed adaptive reuse of the Marie Street property. Field investigations included production of measured drawings of the interior Collingwood, Ontario and exterior. Archival research involved consultation with the local archivist. 2018

Cultural Heritage Secondary field investigator and researcher for a cultural heritage evaluation of a late Evaluation Report, 18924 19th century residential structure. Field investigations included production of 2nd Concession measured drawings of the interior and exterior, detailed photography and determining East Gwillimbury, Ontario the structural sequence. An evaluation of the potential cultural heritage value or 2017 interest for the property was undertaken to recommend next steps.

Cultural Heritage Primary field investigator for proposed infrastructure upgrades as part of a Class Evaluation Report, County environmental assessment (EA). Project involved the investigation of three listed Road 53 properties and four other properties adjacent to proposed impacts. Field work Springwater Township, involved photographic documentation and collection of heritage data utilizing an Ontario electronic database. 2017

Heritage Impact Field documentation and historic research of “Treble Hall” and associated Assessment, 12 John Street additions. Treble Hall dates to 1879 and is one of the last surviving examples of North Renaissance Revival architecture in Hamilton. Field investigations involved the Hamilton, Ontario production of measured drawings of the interior and exterior, detailed 2017 photography of the structure. Research involved evaluation of available mapping and written accounts of the structure and associated additions including the “Pegoda Building” located at 85 King Street East.

Cultural Heritage Field documentation and collection of pertinent data resulting from interview with Assessment, 262 MacNab current owner. The residential structure is the work of noted architect James Street North Balfour. Field work involved the recording of structural details and extensive photo Hamilton, Ontario documentation of the interior and exterior of the structure. Further research was 2017 conducted at a local restaurant know to maintain information pertinent to the property. The objective of the project was to have the structure included on the City of Hamilton’s cultural heritage register.

Heritage Documentation Field investigator and contributing author of a heritage documentation report for an Report, 347 Charlton early 20th century dwelling in downtown Hamilton. Reporting included producing Avenue West measured drawings of the property and exterior and interior of the house, archival Hamilton, Ontario research and reporting, and drafting recommendations for the salvage and reuse of 2017 millwork.

Page | 3 Chris Lemon, B.Sc., Dip. Built Heritage Specialist

Cultural Heritage Field investigation of mid-19th century commercial building. Investigation involved Assessment, 48 John Street the documentation of the exterior of the structure in advance of a proposed infill that South would obscure the currently exposed north wall. Documentation involved the Hamilton, Ontario creation of measured drawings of all exposed brick surfaces and photo documentation 2017 of the exterior of the property.

Cultural Heritage Field investigation of mid-19th century commercial building. Investigation involved Evaluation, 522 Kingston the documentation of the exterior of the structure in advance of a proposed infill. Road West Documentation involved visual examination of the interior and exterior of the Ajax, Ontario building as well as extensive photographic documentation. Measured drawings of 2017 the interior and exterior of the structure were also undertaken.

Heritage Impact Primary field investigator of an octagonal residential structure. Project involved the Assessment, 8280 Heritage recording of structural details as well as the production of measured drawings and Road extensive photographic record. The study was undertaken in advance of proposed Mississauga, Ontario redevelopment that would necessitate the relocation of the structure. 2017

Cultural Heritage Primary field investigator and report contributor for a mid-19th century red brick Evaluation Report, 3059 storey and a half residential structure. Study was undertaken as a fact-finding Burnhamthorp Road West investigation at the request of a developer prior to draft submission of development Milton, Ontario plan. Investigation included the production of scaled drawings of the interior and 2017 exterior of the structure as well as photo documentation of the structure and surrounding landscape.

Heritage Assessment, Secondary investigator and report writer for a heritage evaluation of the Barton Barton & Kenilworth Reservoir and associated features, built between 1856 and 1860 as part of the Reservoirs Hamilton Waterworks National Historic Site of Canada, and the Kenilworth Reservoir (built 1958). Field investigations included landscape survey and mapping, Hamilton, Ontario determining the structural sequence, application of City of Hamilton heritage 2016 evaluation criteria to a large industrial site, and undertaking archival research.

Heritage Impact Field documentation and contributing author of a heritage impact assessment and Assessment & subsequent documentation report prior to commercial development of 244 Brock Documentation Report, The Street South in downtown Whitby. The heritage impact assessment required Sawdon Building evaluation of a former early 20th century coal shed and an assessment of potential Whitby, ON impact on two proposed heritage conservation districts. The documentation report included producing measured drawings of the property and exterior and interior of 2016 the structure, and contributing to a proposed interpretive panel documenting the past history of the property.

Page | 4 Chris Lemon, B.Sc., Dip. Built Heritage Specialist

Heritage Impact Secondary investigator and report production of a heritage impact assessment for Assessment, The Anglican the c. 1870 Anglican Parsonage at 18 West Avenue South. Reporting included Church of St. Thomas photogrammetry, floor plan and interior documentation, archival research and Parsonage reporting. Required assessment of potential impact on the adjacent municipally Hamilton, ON designated Church of St. Thomas 2016

Heritage Impact Assessment, Field investigation and contributing author of a heritage impact assessment for a The Meaford Mews proposed condominium on five properties in the Meaford Downtown Heritage Meaford, ON Conservation District. The four existing structures on the properties dated between 1870 and 1950. Reporting included field investigations, determining the structural 2016 sequence, and application of Ontario heritage evaluation criteria to several vernacular buildings.

Heritage Impact Field investigator and contributing author of a heritage impact assessment for a Assessment, 12259 municipally listed 19th century log farmhouse and twelve associated outbuildings Chinguacousy Road on a large rural property. Reporting included producing measured drawings, Caledon, ON determining the farm’s evolution sequence, archival research, reporting and developing a mitigation strategy prior to development of the property for 2016 residential housing.

Heritage Impact Assessment, Field investigations for a heritage impact assessment for residential development 2057 Major Mackenzie Drive on a property with an early stone Picturesque/Regency cottage. The assessment Vaughan, ON required evaluating the structure and its later wings and outbuildings, and the production of measured drawings. 2016

Heritage Impact Field documentation, for a heritage impact assessment for a high-rise development Assessment, 310 Kingston adjacent to a 19th century Quaker cemetery. Assessment involved the photographic Street documentation of the property and the production of measured drawings of the Ajax, ON property and surrounding area. 2015

Heritage Impact Field investigation, building documentation and reporting for a heritage impact Assessment,TCPL Vaughan assessment of a 12-km long pipeline project west of Kleinburg. Reporting included Mainline Extension field investigations of 13 heritage properties, and application of Ontario heritage Vaughan, ON evaluation criteria. 2015

Union Station Cultural Undertook the documentation of heritage attributes associated with the mechanical Heritage Evaluation systems as well as the heating and ventilation controls. Was responsible for photo Toronto, Ontario documentation and the post-processing of collected data into information forms detailing each identified component. 2009

Page | 5 Chris Lemon, B.Sc., Dip. Built Heritage Specialist