Evidence of Superfluidity in a Dipolar Supersolid Through Non-Classical

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evidence of Superfluidity in a Dipolar Supersolid Through Non-Classical Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation Giulio Biagioni Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia and LENS, Università di Firenze, and CNR-INO, sezione di Pisa 106° SIF National Congress, 14-18 September 2020 Supersolid state of matter • Classical solid Crystalline order Macroscopic consequence: rigidity of the crystal • Superfluid Coherent wave function Macroscopic consequences: metastibility of supercurrents, reduced moment of inertia • Supersolid Both kinds of order Macroscopic consequences: ? Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 2 Our dipolar supersolid 휃 = 휋/2 162 푉푖푛푡(풓) = 푉푐표푛푡 풓 + 푉푑푖푝(풓) 퐷푖푝표푙푎푟 푎 Dy 휀 = = 푑푑 푑푑 퐶표푛푡푎푐푡 푎 휇 = 10휇 퐵 Isotropic and Repulsive repulsive 휃 = 0 Attractive Confinement Vertical trapping + anisotropy clustering effect ! Superfluid Normal solid (Bose-Einstein condensate) Supersolid (Droplet crystal) 휀푑푑 Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 3 Our dipolar supersolid 휀푑푑 lattice mode 8 10 Superfluid 1 5 0 0 9 3 k . y 5 k x Supersolid a ) 9 94 9 ( 7 a G 6 ( 2 0 . ) B 5 Droplet crystal 88 2 9 7 1 2 . 5 휀푑푑 5 8 28 48 100 t (ms) 1.25 superfluid mode Variance of ) 2 d 1.00 uniform random a r ( Evidence for double symmetry breaking e phase c 0.75 n a i r L. Tanzi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., a L. Tanzi et al., Nature, 574, 774 (2020) V 0.50 e 122, 130405 (2019) s a h P 0.25 Cluster supersolid with ~3 − 4 droplets and ~104 atoms per droplet 0.00 15 30 45 60 75 Time (ms) Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 4 Related works G. Natale et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050402 (2019) Innsbruck M. Guo et al., Nature 574, 386 (2019) Stuttgart Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 5 Superfluids under rotation 푖휑(푟) • Macroscopic wavefunction Ψ0 푟 = Ψ0(푟) 푒 ℏ 푣Ԧ = ∇휑 ⇒ ∇ ∧ 푣Ԧ=0 ⇒ ׯ 푣Ԧ ∙ 푑푙Ԧ = 0 ⇒ classical irrotational hydrodynamics • 푚 • Reduced moment of inertia ⇒ 퐼 = 1 − 푓푠 퐼푐 (in a cylindrical geometry) መ 푣Ԧ = 휔푅휃 • Normally, 푓푠 → 1 for 푇 → 0 ⇒ 퐼 = 0 z 휔 • No angular momentum is acquired < 퐿 >= 퐼휔 from the container when 휔 → 0 Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 6 Superfluids under rotation Helium-4 (1967) Hess-Fairbank Helium-3 (1982) related Meissner effect in superconductors BECs (2000) Giulio Biagioni Exploring the supersolid state of matter 7 Leggett’s argument: can a solid be superfluid? 푖휑(푟) Also supersolids are described by a macroscopic wavefunction Ψ0 푟 = Ψ0(푟) 푒 The density modulation appears in the form of the superfluid fraction: −1 (퐼 = 1 − 푓푠 퐼푐 with 푓푠 ≤ ׬푑푥/휌ҧ(푥 so that 0 < 퐼 < 퐼푐 at 푇 = 0 NCRI (Non Classical Rotational Inertia) 퐼 = 퐼푐 0 < 퐼 < 퐼푐 퐼 = 0 Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 8 The scissors mode How to probe the moment of inertia of our small and non-homogenous system? We employ a collective mode of the trapped condensate: the scissors mode In the small-angle limit: 휃 푡 = 휗0 sin(휔푠푐푡) Experiments with non-dipolar BECs: 푥 2 2 O.M. Maragò et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 휔푠푐 = 휔푥 + 휔푦 84, 2056-2019 (2000) 푦 푧 Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 9 The scissors mode Useful link with the moment of inertia 2 2 휔푥 + 휔푦 퐼 = 퐼푐훼 훽 2 휔푠푐 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ۄ Τ〈 푥 + 푦ۄ 훼 = 휔푦 − 휔푥 ൗ 휔푥 + 휔푦 훽 = 〈푥 − 푦 Trap deformation Cloud deformation D. Guéry-Odelin and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4452-4455 (1999) Analogy with torsional oscillators 퐾 퐼 = 2 휔표푠푐 Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 10 Scissors oscillation BEC 휃 휃′ 휃′ 휃′ Supersolid We excite the scissors mode .. then we extract the angle Single-frequency oscillation in both the changing temporary the at different times with a 2D BEC and the supersolid regime relative power between fit ODT2 and ODT3.. Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 11 Scissors frequencies and moment of inertia 2 2 휔푥 + 휔푦 퐼 = 퐼푐훼 훽 2 휔푠푐 퐼퐵퐸퐶 < 퐼푠푠 < 퐼푐 Reduced moment of inertia ⇒ proof of the superfluid behavior under rotation L. Tanzi et al., (2019) Preprint: arXiv:1912.01910. Accepted for publication in Science. Theory, including 훽, by the Trento group: S. M. Roccuzzo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:045702 (2020) Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 12 Superfluid fraction 2 2 2 Our definition of superfluid 1−훼훽 휔푥+휔푦 /휔푠푐 퐼 = 1 − 푓 퐼 + 푓 훽2퐼 ⇒ 푓 = fraction for an anisotropic system: 푠 푐 푠 푐 푠 1−훽2 numerical simulations 푓푠~1 (cluster supersolid) Comparison with the 1D Leggett’s −1 model: 푓푠 ≤ ׬푑 푥Τ휌ҧ (푥) (white droplets triangles, density profile from the superfluidity Trento group) 휇 휌 Our experiment: 0.88±0.14 Leggett formula Leggett: 0.25 Droplets superfluidity: 0.50 휀푑푑 = 1.50 휇 Helium experiments: ~0.01 −4 Leggett: 10 휀푑푑 = 1.42 15/09/2020 Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 13 Conclusions and outlook We have demonstrated the superfluid properties of the dipolar supersolid under rotation through a measurement of its moment of inertia. Next goals: • Realizing larger, 2D supersolids to detect a sub-unity superfluid fraction, study vortices and measure a finite shear modulus • Josephson effect without a barrier • Other types of supersolids with cold atoms (e.g. dipoles in 2D stabilized by 3-body forces, or lattice supersolids) Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 14 The team Current team: Luca Tanzi Giovanni Modugno Giulio Biagioni Nicolò Antolini Andrea Fioretti Carlo Gabbanini Former members: Eleonora Lucioni Francesca Famà Jacopo Catani Julian Maloberti Theory by: Russell Bisset, Luis Santos (Hannover); Alessio Recati, Sandro Stringari (Trento); Michele Modugno (Bilbao); Luca Pezzè, Augusto Smerzi (Firenze); Maria Luisa Chiofalo (Pisa), Adriano Angelone (Trieste) … Giulio Biagioni Evidence of superfluidity in a supersolid under rotation 15.
Recommended publications
  • Application of the Josephson Effect to Voltage Metrology
    Application of the Josephson Effect to Voltage Metrology SAMUEL P. BENZ, SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE, AND CLARK A. HAMILTON, FELLOW, IEEE Invited Paper The unique ability of a Josephson junction to control the flow of worldwide set of units that is uniform and coherent. The am- magnetic flux quanta leads to a perfect relationship between fre- pere is the only electrical unit belonging to the seven base quency and voltage. Over the last 30 years, metrology laboratories units of the SI. The ampere is defined as “that constant cur- have used this effect to greatly improve the accuracy of dc voltage standards. More recent research is focused on combining the ideas rent which, if maintained in two parallel straight conduc- of digital signal processing with quantum voltage pulses to achieve tors of infinite length, of negligible circular cross section, similar gains in ac voltage metrology. The integrated circuits that and placed 1 meter apart in vacuum, would produce between implement these ideas are the only complex superconducting elec- these conductors a force equal to 2 10 newtons per meter tronic devices that have found wide commercial application. of length.” Keywords—Digital–analog conversion, Josephson arrays, quan- The volt, which is not a base unit, is defined through tization, standards. coherency of electrical power (current times voltage) and mechanical power (force times distance divided by time): I. INTRODUCTION “The volt is that electromotive force between two points on a conductor carrying a constant current of 1 ampere when In 1962, B. Josephson, a graduate student at Cambridge the power dissipated between the two points is 1 watt.” University, Cambridge, U.K., derived equations for the cur- Realization of the SI volt, therefore, depends on experiments rent and voltage across a junction consisting of two super- that relate the ampere and the volt to the mechanical units of conductors separated by a thin insulating barrier [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Science of Superconductivity and Superfluidity
    Universal Journal of Physics and Application 1(4): 392-407, 2013 DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2013.010405 http://www.hrpub.org Superconductivity and Superfluidity-Part I: The development of the science of superconductivity and superfluidity in the 20th century Boris V.Vasiliev ∗Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright ⃝c 2013 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved. Abstract Currently there is a common belief that the explanation of superconductivity phenomenon lies in understanding the mechanism of the formation of electron pairs. Paired electrons, however, cannot form a super- conducting condensate spontaneously. These paired electrons perform disorderly zero-point oscillations and there are no force of attraction in their ensemble. In order to create a unified ensemble of particles, the pairs must order their zero-point fluctuations so that an attraction between the particles appears. As a result of this ordering of zero-point oscillations in the electron gas, superconductivity arises. This model of condensation of zero-point oscillations creates the possibility of being able to obtain estimates for the critical parameters of elementary super- conductors, which are in satisfactory agreement with the measured data. On the another hand, the phenomenon of superfluidity in He-4 and He-3 can be similarly explained, due to the ordering of zero-point fluctuations. It is therefore established that both related phenomena are based on the same physical mechanism. Keywords superconductivity superfluidity zero-point oscillations 1 Introduction 1.1 Superconductivity and public Superconductivity is a beautiful and unique natural phenomenon that was discovered in the early 20th century. Its unique nature comes from the fact that superconductivity is the result of quantum laws that act on a macroscopic ensemble of particles as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Monte Carlo Simulation Study of 1D Josephson Junction Arrays
    Monte Carlo Simulation Study of 1D Josephson Junction Arrays OLIVER NIKOLIC Master Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2016 Typeset in LATEX TRITA-FYS 2016:78 ISSN 0280-316X ISRN KTH/FYS/-16:78-SE Scientific thesis for the degree of Master of Engineering in the subject of theoretical physics. © Oliver Nikolic, December 2016 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US AB iii Abstract The focus in this thesis is on small scale 1D Josephson junction arrays in the quantum regime where the charging energy is comparable to the Joseph- son energy. Starting from the general Bose-Hubbard model for interacting Cooper pairs on a 1D lattice the problem is mapped through a path integral transformation to a classical statistical mechanical (1+1)D model of diver- gence free space-time currents which is suitable for numerical simulations. This model is studied using periodic boundary conditions, in the absence of external current sources and in a statistical canonical ensemble. It is explained how Monte Carlo simulations of this model can be constructed based on the worm algorithm with efficiency comparable to the best cluster algorithms. A description of how the effective energy Ek, voltage Vk and inverse capacitance −1 Ck associated with an externally imposed charge displacement k can be ex- tracted from simulations is presented. Furthermore, the effect of inducing charge by connecting an external voltage source to one island in the chain via the ground capacitance is investigated. Simulation results display periodic −1 response functions Ek, Vk and Ck as the charge displacement is varied. The shape of these functions are largely influenced by the system parameters and evolves from sinusoidal with exponentially small amplitude deep inside the superconducting regime towards more intriguing shapes closer to the insulat- ing regime where interactions among quantum phase slips are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition from Phase Slips to the Josephson Effect in a Superfluid 4He Weak Link
    1 Transition from phase slips to the Josephson effect in a superfluid 4He weak link E. Hoskinson1, Y. Sato1, I. Hahn2 and R. E. Packard1 1Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA The rich dynamics of flow between two weakly coupled macroscopic quantum reservoirs has led to a range of important technologies. Practical development has so far been limited to superconducting systems, for which the basic building block is the so-called superconducting Josephson weak link1. With the recent observation of quantum oscillations2 in superfluid 4He near 2K, we can now envision analogous practical superfluid helium devices. The characteristic function which determines the dynamics of such systems is the current-phase relation I s (ϕ) , which gives the relationship between the superfluid current I s flowing through a weak link and the quantum phase difference ϕ across it. Here we report the measurement of the current-phase relation of a superfluid 4He weak link formed by an array of nano- apertures separating two reservoirs of superfluid 4He. As we vary the coupling strength between the two reservoirs, we observe a transition from a strongly coupled regime in which I s (ϕ) is linear and flow is limited by 2π phase slips, to a weak coupling regime where I s (ϕ) becomes the sinusoidal signature of a Josephson weak link. The dynamics of flow between two weakly coupled macroscopic quantum reservoirs can be highly counterintuitive. In both superconductors and superfluids, 2 currents will oscillate through a constriction (weak link) between two reservoirs in response to a static driving force which, in a classical system, would simply yield flow in one direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounds of a Supersolid A
    NEWS & VIEWS RESEARCH hypothesis came from extensive population humans, implying possible mosquito exposure long-distance spread of insecticide-resistant time-series analysis from that earlier study5, to malaria parasites and the potential to spread mosquitoes, worsening an already dire situ- which showed beyond reasonable doubt that infection over great distances. ation, given the current spread of insecticide a mosquito vector species called Anopheles However, the authors failed to detect resistance in mosquito populations. This would coluzzii persists locally in the dry season in parasite infections in their aerially sampled be a matter of great concern because insecticides as-yet-undiscovered places. However, the malaria vectors, a result that they assert is to be are the best means of malaria control currently data were not consistent with this outcome for expected given the small sample size and the low available8. However, long-distance migration other malaria vectors in the study area — the parasite-infection rates typical of populations of could facilitate the desirable spread of mosqui- species Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles ara- malaria vectors. A problem with this argument toes for gene-based methods of malaria-vector biensis — leaving wind-powered long-distance is that the typical infection rates they mention control. One thing is certain, Huestis and col- migration as the only remaining possibility to are based on one specific mosquito body part leagues have permanently transformed our explain the data5. (salivary glands), rather than the unknown but understanding of African malaria vectors and Both modelling6 and genetic studies7 undoubtedly much higher infection rates that what it will take to conquer malaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephson Tunneling at the Atomic Scale: the Josephson EEct As a Local Probe
    Josephson Tunneling at the Atomic Scale: The Josephson Eect as a Local Probe THIS IS A TEMPORARY TITLE PAGE It will be replaced for the nal print by a version provided by the service academique. Thèse n. 6750 2015 présentée le 22 juillet 2015 à la Faculté des Sciences des Bases Laboratoire á l'Echelle Nanométrique Programme Doctoral en Physique École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne pour l'obtention du grade de Docteur des Sciences par Berthold Jäck acceptée sur proposition du jury: Prof. Andreas Pautz, président du jury Prof. Klaus Kern, directeur de thèse Prof. Davor Pavuna, rapporteur Prof. Hermann Suderow, rapporteur Dr. Fabien Portier, rapporteur Lausanne, EPFL, 2015 Non est ad astra mollis e terris via — Lucius Annaeus Seneca Acknowledgements It took me about three and a half years, with many ups and downs, to complete this thesis. At this point, I want to say thank you to all the people that supported me on my way by any means. First of all, I am grateful to Prof. Klaus Kern for giving me the opportunity to perform my doctoral studies under his supervision at the Max-Planck-Institute for Solid State Research in Stuttgart, Germany. For the entire time of my studies, I enjoyed a significant scientific freedom, such that I had the great possibility to pursue and realize my own ideas. In particular, I want to acknowledge his personal support, which allowed me to attend conferences, workshops and schools, have interesting scientific discussions as well as a wonderful time in the whole of Europe and across the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes for Quantum Matter
    Lecture Notes for Quantum Matter MMathPhys c Professor Steven H. Simon Oxford University July 24, 2019 Contents 1 What we will study 1 1.1 Bose Superfluids (BECs, Superfluid He, Superconductors) . .1 1.2 Theory of Fermi Liquids . .2 1.3 BCS theory of superconductivity . .2 1.4 Special topics . .2 2 Introduction to Superfluids 3 2.1 Some History and Basics of Superfluid Phenomena . .3 2.2 Landau and the Two Fluid Model . .6 2.2.1 More History and a bit of Physics . .6 2.2.2 Landau's Two Fluid Model . .7 2.2.3 More Physical Effects and Their Two Fluid Pictures . .9 2.2.4 Second Sound . 12 2.2.5 Big Questions Remaining . 13 2.3 Curl Free Constraint: Introducing the Superfluid Order Parameter . 14 2.3.1 Vorticity Quantization . 15 2.4 Landau Criterion for Superflow . 17 2.5 Superfluid Density . 20 2.5.1 The Andronikoshvili Experiment . 20 2.5.2 Landau's Calculation of Superfluid Density . 22 3 Charged Superfluid ≈ Superconductor 25 3.1 London Theory . 25 3.1.1 Meissner-Ochsenfeld Effect . 27 3 3.1.2 Quantum Input and Superfluid Order Parameter . 29 3.1.3 Superconducting Vortices . 30 3.1.4 Type I and Type II superconductors . 32 3.1.5 How big is Hc ............................... 33 4 Microscopic Theory of Bosons 37 4.1 Mathematical Preliminaries . 37 4.1.1 Second quantization . 37 4.1.2 Coherent States . 38 4.1.3 Multiple orbitals . 40 4.2 BECs and the Gross-Pitaevskii Equation . 41 4.2.1 Noninteracting BECs as Coherent States .
    [Show full text]
  • Colloidal Crystal: Emergence of Long Range Order from Colloidal Fluid
    Colloidal Crystal: emergence of long range order from colloidal fluid Lanfang Li December 19, 2008 Abstract Although emergence, or spontaneous symmetry breaking, has been a topic of discussion in physics for decades, they have not entered the set of terminologies for materials scientists, although many phenomena in materials science are of the nature of emergence, especially soft materials. In a typical soft material, colloidal suspension system, a long range order can emerge due to the interaction of a large number of particles. This essay will first introduce interparticle interactions in colloidal systems, and then proceed to discuss the emergence of order, colloidal crystals, and finally provide an example of applications of colloidal crystals in light of conventional molecular crystals. 1 1 Background and Introduction Although emergence, or spontaneous symmetry breaking, and the resultant collective behav- ior of the systems constituents, have manifested in many systems, such as superconductivity, superfluidity, ferromagnetism, etc, and are well accepted, maybe even trivial crystallinity. All of these phenonema, though they may look very different, share the same fundamental signature: that the property of the system can not be predicted from the microscopic rules but are, \in a real sense, independent of them. [1] Besides these emergent phenonema in hard condensed matter physics, in which the interaction is at atomic level, interactions at mesoscale, soft will also lead to emergent phenemena. Colloidal systems is such a mesoscale and soft system. This size scale is especially interesting: it is close to biogical system so it is extremely informative for understanding life related phenomena, where emergence is origin of life itself; it is within visible light wavelength, so that it provides a model system for atomic system with similar physics but probable by optical microscope.
    [Show full text]
  • Surprising New States of Matter Called Time Crystals Show the Same Symmetry Properties in Time That Ordinary Crystals Do in Space by Frank Wilczek
    PHYSICS CRYSTAL S IN TIME Surprising new states of matter called time crystals show the same symmetry properties in time that ordinary crystals do in space By Frank Wilczek Illustration by Mark Ross Studio 28 Scientific American, November 2019 © 2019 Scientific American November 2019, ScientificAmerican.com 29 © 2019 Scientific American Frank Wilczek is a theoretical physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He won the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on the theory of the strong force, and in 2012 he proposed the concept of time crystals. CRYSTAL S are nature’s most orderly suBstances. InsIde them, atoms and molecules are arranged in regular, repeating structures, giving rise to solids that are stable and rigid—and often beautiful to behold. People have found crystals fascinating and attractive since before the dawn of modern science, often prizing them as jewels. In the 19th century scientists’ quest to classify forms of crystals and understand their effect on light catalyzed important progress in mathematics and physics. Then, in the 20th century, study of the fundamental quantum mechanics of elec- trons in crystals led directly to modern semiconductor electronics and eventually to smart- phones and the Internet. The next step in our understanding of crystals is oc- These examples show that the mathematical concept IN BRIEF curring now, thanks to a principle that arose from Al- of symmetry captures an essential aspect of its com- bert Einstein’s relativity theory: space and time are in- mon meaning while adding the virtue of precision. Crystals are orderly timately connected and ultimately on the same footing.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid 4He: Search for Superfluidity
    Solid 4He : search for superfluidity G. Bonfait, H. Godfrin, B. Castaing To cite this version: G. Bonfait, H. Godfrin, B. Castaing. Solid 4He : search for superfluidity. Journal de Physique, 1989, 50 (15), pp.1997-2002. 10.1051/jphys:0198900500150199700. jpa-00211043 HAL Id: jpa-00211043 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00211043 Submitted on 1 Jan 1989 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1bme 50 N° 15 1er AOUT 1989 LE JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE J. Phys. France 50 (1989) 1997-2002 1er AOUT 1989, 1997 Classification Physics Abstracts 67.80 Short Communication Solid 4He : search for superfluidity G. Bonfait (1)(*), H. Godfrin (1,2) and B. Castaing (1) (1) CRTBT.-C.N.R.S., Laboratoire associé à l’Université Joseph Fourier, B.P. 166 X, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France (2) ILL, B.P. 156 X, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France (Reçu le 17 avril 1989, accepté sous forme définitive le 30 mai 1989) Résumé. 2014 L’existence d’une superfluidité pour un solide de bosons a été proposée par plusieurs théoriciens. Aucune expérience ne l’a jusqu’à présent révélée. Nous présentons un argument qui nous a incités à explorer la gamme de température 1 mK-20 mK.
    [Show full text]
  • Eltsov, VB AC Josephson Effect Between Two
    This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Autti, S.; Heikkinen, P. J.; Mäkinen, J. T.; Volovik, G. E.; Zavjalov, V. V.; Eltsov, V. B. AC Josephson effect between two superfluid time crystals Published in: Nature Materials DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-0780-y Published: 01/02/2021 Document Version Peer reviewed version Please cite the original version: Autti, S., Heikkinen, P. J., Mäkinen, J. T., Volovik, G. E., Zavjalov, V. V., & Eltsov, V. B. (2021). AC Josephson effect between two superfluid time crystals. Nature Materials, 20(2), 171-174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563- 020-0780-y This material is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorised user. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) AC Josephson effect between two superfluid time crystals S. Autti1;2∗, P.J. Heikkinen1;3, J.T. M¨akinen1;4;5, G.E. Volovik1;6, V.V. Zavjalov1;2, and V.B. Eltsov1y 1Low Temperature Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, Aalto University, POB 15100, FI-00076 AALTO, Finland. yvladimir.eltsov@aalto.fi 2Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, UK. *[email protected] 3Department of Physics, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersolid State of Matter Nikolai Prokof 'Ev University of Massachusetts - Amherst, [email protected]
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Physics Department Faculty Publication Series Physics 2005 Supersolid State of Matter Nikolai Prokof 'ev University of Massachusetts - Amherst, [email protected] Boris Svistunov University of Massachusetts - Amherst, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/physics_faculty_pubs Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Prokof'ev, Nikolai and Svistunov, Boris, "Supersolid State of Matter" (2005). Physics Review Letters. 1175. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/physics_faculty_pubs/1175 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Department Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. On the Supersolid State of Matter Nikolay Prokof’ev and Boris Svistunov Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 and Russian Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, 123182 Moscow We prove that the necessary condition for a solid to be also a superfluid is to have zero-point vacancies, or interstitial atoms, or both, as an integral part of the ground state. As a consequence, superfluidity is not possible in commensurate solids which break continuous translation symmetry. We discuss recent experiment by Kim and Chan [Nature, 427, 225 (2004)] in the context of this theorem, question its bulk supersolid interpretation, and offer an alternative explanation in terms of superfluid helium interfaces. PACS numbers: 67.40.-w, 67.80.-s, 05.30.-d Recent discovery by Kim and Chan [1, 2] that solid 4He theorem.
    [Show full text]