Arxiv:2012.10962V1 [Math.FA]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Conditional positive definiteness as a bridge between k–hyponormality and n–contractivity Chafiq Benhida UFR de Math´ematiques, Universit´edes Sciences et Technologies de Lille, F-59655 Villeneuve-d’Ascq Cedex, France Ra´ul E. Curto Department of Mathematics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1419, USA George R. Exner Department of Mathematics, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 17837, USA Abstract For sequences α α of positive real numbers, called weights, we study ≡ { n}n∞=0 the weighted shift operators Wα having the property of moment infinite divisi- p bility ( ); that is, for any p > 0, the Schur power Wα is subnormal. We MID first prove that W is if and only if certain infinite matrices log M (0) α MID γ and log Mγ (1) are conditionally positive definite (CPD). Here γ is the sequence of moments associated with α, Mγ(0), Mγ (1) are the canonical Hankel matrices whose positive semi-definiteness determines the subnormality of Wα, and log is calculated entry-wise (i.e., in the sense of Schur or Hadamard). Next, we use con- ditional positive definiteness to establish a new bridge between k–hyponormality and n–contractivity, which sheds significant new light on how the two well known staircases from hyponormality to subnormality interact. As a consequence, we prove that a contractive weighted shift Wα is if and only if for all p > 0, arXiv:2012.10962v2 [math.FA] 26 Jul 2021 p p MID Mγ (0) and Mγ (1) are CPD. Keywords: Weighted shift, Subnormal, Moment infinitely divisible, Conditionally positive definite, Completely monotone 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification Primary 47B20, 47B37; Secondary 44A60. Email addresses: [email protected] (Chafiq Benhida), [email protected] (Ra´ul E. Curto), [email protected] (George R. Exner) URL: http://www.math.uiowa.edu/\protect \char 126\relax rcurto/ (Ra´ul E. Curto) Preprint submitted to Elsevier July 27, 2021 Contents 1 Introduction and Statement of Main Results 2 2 Notation and Preliminaries 5 2.1 Unilateral weighted shifts . 5 2.2 Aglershifts ............................... 6 2.3 shifts............................... 6 MID 2.4 k–hyponormality ............................ 7 2.5 n–contractivity ............................. 8 2.6 n–hypermonotone and n–hyperalternating weighted shifts . 9 2.7 Conditionally positive definite matrices . 12 3 A Bridge Between k–hyponormality and n–contractivity 15 3.1 Aunifyingcondition .......................... 17 3.2 A family of intermediate ladders . 19 3.3 Cutoffs for rank-one perturbations of the Agler shifts . ..... 20 1. Introduction and Statement of Main Results Let denote a separable, complex Hilbert space and ( ) be the algebra of H L H bounded linear operators on . Recall that an operator T is subnormal if it is the H restriction to a (closed) invariant subspace of a normal operator, and hyponormal if T ∗T T T ∗. A unilateral weighted shift Wα acting on the classical sequence 2≥ space ℓ (N0) is called moment infinitely divisible (in symbols, Wα ) if all p ∈ MID Schur powers Wα are subnormal. Thus, the class consists of all subnormal MID p weighted shifts Wα with moment sequence γ such that γ is interpolated by a positive Borel probability measure µ(p), for every p> 0; µ(p) is the so-called Berger p measure of the subnormal weighted shift Wα. This is equivalent to the (Schur) infinite divisibility of the two Hankel moment matrices Mγ (0) := (γi+j)i,j∞=0 and Mγ (1) := (γi+j+1)i,j∞=0, where γ is the sequence of moments associated with the weight sequence α. Since all entries in these two matrices are positive, and since the matrices are Hermitian, their infinite divisibility is equivalent to the conditional positive definiteness of their (Schur) logarithms log Mγ(0) and log Mγ (1). As a consequence, we can prove that W is if and only if both log M (0) α MID γ and log M (1) are CPD. This leads to a new characterization of W in γ α ∈ MID γnγn+2 terms of the sequence δn := log 2 (n 0). γn+1 ≥ 2 It is well known that subnormality is a much stronger condition than hyponor- mality. For a contractive weighted shift Wα, the former requires a Berger measure µ supported in [0, 1] that interpolates γ; the latter requires α α α . .. 0 ≤ 1 ≤ 2 ≤ There are two well-known staircases connecting hyponormality and subnormality, and they correspond to two well-known tests for subnormality. The first test involves the Bram-Halmos criterion for subnormality, which requires that Wα be k–hyponormal for every k 1; the second test has to do with the Agler-Embry ap- ≥ proach to subnormality, which requires the n–contractivity of W for every n 1. α ≥ In this paper we consider the role of conditional positive definiteness in estab- lishing a bridge between the two above mentioned staircases. Concretely, as a first step we will see that k–hyponormality implies 2k–contractivity. In [20], G.R. Exner, I.B. Jung and S.S. Park proved for general operators that k–hyponormality implies 2k–contractivity. Implicit in their work was a significant identity, which we use as a point of departure. Given a moment sequence γ, a positive integer k, a nonnegative integer ℓ, and the (k + 1) (k + 1) (Hankel) com- k × pressed moment submatrix Mγ (ℓ, k) := (γℓ+i+j)i,j=0, we consider the expression Qγ (ℓ, k) := v∗Mγ (ℓ, k)v, (1.1) where v is the column vector of length k + 1 with i–th coordinate ( 1)i k ; that − i is, v := (1, k , k , k ,..., k , 1). Observe that k v = (1 1)k = 0. − 1 2 − 3 − k 1 i=0 i − Experimental calculations using Mathematica − [25] easily revealP that (1.1) becomes 2k 2k 2k Q (ℓ, k) = γ γ + γ γ + . γ ℓ − 1 ℓ+1 2 ℓ+2 − 3 ℓ+3 2k γℓ+2k 1 + γℓ+2k −2k 1 − − 2k 2k = ( 1)i γ . (1.2) − i ℓ+i Xi=0 Once the proposed form of Qγ(ℓ, k) is discovered, a proof of (1.2) by induction is straightforward. Positivity of the expression on the right-hand side of (1.2) for all ℓ is exactly what we need for 2k–contractivity of Wα. On the other hand, (1.1) is one of the expressions used in the determination of CPD for the matrix Mγ(ℓ, k). Concretely, if W is k–hyponormal, then M (ℓ, k) 0 for all ℓ 0. Then M (ℓ, k) is α γ ≥ ≥ γ CPD for all ℓ 0, and therefore Q (ℓ, k) 0 for all ℓ 0. It follows that ≥ γ ≥ ≥ 2k ( 1)i 2k γ 0 for all ℓ 0, and this means that W is 2k–contractive. i=0 − i ℓ+i ≥ ≥ α PThis is a special case of a more general result, involving (k, 2m)–CPD matrices, 3 which represents a very useful version of CPD, appropriately localized to keep track of the size of the matrix and the initial moment. The above calculation is part of a much broader theoretical setting, involving properties of sequences such as complete monotonicity and hypercontractivity, along with their log analogs, e.g., log complete monotonicity. We discuss aspects of this theory in Section 3. We are now ready to state the main results of this paper. The proofs will be given in Section 3. For notation and terminology, we refer the reader to Section 2, where we also briefly review some topics from unilateral weighted shifts and matrix theory that will be needed for Section 3. Theorem 1.1. Suppose Wα is a contractive weighted shift. Then the following statements are equivalent. (i) W is moment infinitely divisible ( ). α MID (ii) log Mγ (0) and log Mγ(1) are CPD. p p (iii) For every p> 0, Mγ (0) and Mγ (1) are positive definite. p p (iv) For every p> 0, Mγ (0) and Mγ (1) are CPD. (v) The moment sequence γ is log completely monotone. (vi) The weight sequence α is log completely alternating. Proposition 1.2. Let W be a unilateral weighted shift, k 1, and 0 m α ≥ ≤ ≤ k. Assume that Wα is (k, 2m)–CPD. Then Wα is 2m–contractive, (2m + 2)– contractive, . , 2k–contractive. Theorem 1.3. Let Wα be a contractive weighted shift whose weight sequence α has a limit (for example, if W is hyponormal), and fix m N. Assume that for α ∈ all k m, W is (k, 2m)–PD or (k, 2m)–CPD. Then W is subnormal. ≥ As a consequence, we obtain a result including what we believe is a new suffi- cient condition for subnormality. Proposition 1.4. Let Wα be a weighted shift with moment sequence γ = (γn)n∞=0. The following statements are equivalent. (i) W is . α MID γnγn+2 (ii) The sequence (δn)n∞=0 with δn = ln γ2 is a Stieltjes moment sequence. n+1 δn (iii) The weighted shift with moments δ is subnormal. 0 We now focus on rank-one perturbations of the Agler shifts (see Subsection 2.2 for the definition); our study reveals some remarkable cutoffs for (k, 2m)–positive 4 definiteness, and for the related weights-squared sequence to be m–alternating (for the terminology, see Definition 3.6, and page 9, resp.; in particular, (k, 0)–positive definiteness corresponds to k–hyponormality). Theorem 1.5. Let Aj(x) be the perturbation of the Agler shift Aj in which the (j) 1 (j) x N zeroth weight (α )0 := j is replaced by (α )0(x) := j , and let k and q ∈ m 0, 1,...,k .