DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Mccloud Watershed Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Mccloud Watershed Analysis United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Lower McCloud Watershed Analysis December 2011 Shasta-McCloud Management Unit Shasta-Trinity National Forest For More Information Contact: Shasta-McCloud Management Unit PO Box 1620 McCloud, CA 96057 (530) 964-2184 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Shasta-Trinity National Forest Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 About This Analysis .................................................................................................................... 1 The Analysis Process ................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1: Characterization of the Watershed ................................................................................. 3 Location ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Analysis Area Setting .................................................................................................................. 3 Watershed Setting ........................................................................................................................ 4 Relationship to Larger Scale Setting ........................................................................................... 4 Physical Features ......................................................................................................................... 6 Biological Features .................................................................................................................... 10 Human Uses ............................................................................................................................... 18 Land Ownership, Allocations and Management Direction ....................................................... 20 McCloud-Pit Hydroelectric Project ........................................................................................... 26 Chapter 2: Issues and Key Questions ............................................................................................. 27 Issue: Fire and Fuels .................................................................................................................. 27 Issue: Habitat Quality ................................................................................................................ 28 Issue: Late-Successional Reserve .............................................................................................. 28 Chapter 3: Current Conditions ....................................................................................................... 31 Physical Features ....................................................................................................................... 31 Biological Features .................................................................................................................... 42 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 42 Human Uses ............................................................................................................................... 89 Chapter 4: Reference Conditions ................................................................................................... 97 Historical Overview ................................................................................................................... 97 Physical Features ..................................................................................................................... 101 Biological Features .................................................................................................................. 112 Human Uses ............................................................................................................................. 124 Chapter 5: Synthesis and Interpretation ....................................................................................... 129 Issue 1: Fire and Fuels ............................................................................................................. 130 Issue 2: Habitat Quality ........................................................................................................... 132 Issue 3: Late-Successional Reserve ......................................................................................... 136 Erosion Processes .................................................................................................................... 139 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................ 141 Stream Channel ....................................................................................................................... 143 Water Quality .......................................................................................................................... 146 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................ 148 Species and Habitat ................................................................................................................. 150 Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive (TES) Plants and Other Species of Concern ............. 150 Noxious Weeds ........................................................................................................................ 152 Terrestrial Wildlife Species and Habitat.................................................................................. 154 Aquatic and Riparian Species .................................................................................................. 157 Human Uses ............................................................................................................................. 160 Heritage Resources .................................................................................................................. 160 Recreation ................................................................................................................................ 161 Chapter 6: Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 163 Fire and Fuels .......................................................................................................................... 163 Habitat Quality ........................................................................................................................ 164 Late-Successional Reserve ...................................................................................................... 164 i Lower McCloud Watershed Analysis Other Resource Recommendations.......................................................................................... 165 Research, Survey, and Monitoring Needs ............................................................................... 168 Appendix A − Glossary ............................................................................................................... 169 Appendix B − References ............................................................................................................ 174 Appendix C – Map Listing .......................................................................................................... 190 Appendix D – Wildlife Habitat Descriptions ............................................................................... 192 Appendix E – Management Direction ......................................................................................... 196 Land Allocation ....................................................................................................................... 196 Management Prescriptions ...................................................................................................... 196 Management Areas .................................................................................................................. 198 Coordinated Resource Management Plan ................................................................................ 200 Appendix F – History of the Lower McCloud River Watershed ................................................. 202 Appendix H-Figures ..................................................................................................................... 206 List of Tables Table 1-1. Summary of land ownerships
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mccloud Area Recreation Guide
    McCloud Area Recreation Guide McCloud Station • Shasta-McCloud Management Unit • Shasta-Trinity National Forest SHASTA ajmwcV814 TRINITY This Recreation Opportunity Guide provides a brief overview of recreation facilities and opportunities available in the McCloud area of the Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Whether you are planning to go camping, fishing, hiking, boating, picnicking, snow­ mobiling, cross country skiing or sight seeing, the choices for recreation are almost unlimited. Recreation plus… During the late spring, summer and early fall, the McCloud River is the most popular attraction in this area, offering fishing, swimming, camping and spectacular scenery. During the winter months, snowmobiling, cross country skiing and downhill skiing are the top ranking outdoor opportunities. Developed campgrounds and facilities… Except for Harris Springs, Cattle Camp, Trout Creek Campgrounds and Lake McCloud Boat Ramp, all developed campgrounds and day use facilities are located along the McCloud River. All campgrounds are on a first come-first served basis and have a 14 day stay limit. River route… The McCloud River parallels Highway 89 from its source near Dead Horse Summit to Fowler’s Campground. There it turns south and continues through private property to Lake McCloud. At Lake McCloud, the river again flows through National Forest lands to a point several miles below Ah-Di-Na Campground, plus several other areas downstream to the McCloud Nature Preserve. From here, the river passes through mostly private property and public access is extremely limited until the river enters Shasta Lake. Dispersed camping… If the improved campgrounds around McCloud are too crowded and confining, you may want to try camping somewhere else.
    [Show full text]
  • CMS Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in California
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in California Serving American Indians and Alaska Natives Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) staff work with beneficiaries, health care providers, state government, CMS contractors, community groups and others to provide education and address questions in California. American Indians and Alaska Natives If you have questions about CMS programs in relation to American Indians or Alaska Natives: • email the CMS Division of Tribal Affairs at [email protected], or • contact a CMS Native American Contact (NAC). For a list of NAC and their information, visit https://go.cms.gov/NACTAGlist Why enroll in CMS programs? When you sign up for Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or Medicare, the Indian health hospitals and clinics can bill these programs for services provided. Enrolling in these programs brings money into the health care facility, which is then used to hire more staff, pay for new equipment and building renovations, and saves Purchased and Referred Care dollars for other patients. Patients who enroll in CMS programs are not only helping themselves and others, but they’re also supporting their Indian health care hospital and clinics. Assistance in California To contact Indian Health Service in California, contact the California Area at (916) 930–3927. Find information about coverage and Indian health facilities in California. These facilities are shown on the maps in the next pages. Medicare California Department of Insurance 1 (800) 927–4357 www.insurance.ca.gov/0150-seniors/0300healthplans/ Medicaid/Children’s Health Medi-Cal 1 (916) 552–9200 www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal Marketplace Coverage Covered California 1 (800) 300–1506 www.coveredca.com Northern Feather River Tribal Health— Oroville California 2145 5th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Pit River and Rock Creek 2012 Summary Report
    Pit River and Rock Creek 2012 summary report October 9, 2012 State of California Department of Fish and Wildlife Heritage and Wild Trout Program Prepared by Stephanie Mehalick and Cameron Zuber Introduction Rock Creek, located in northeastern California, is tributary to the Pit River approximately 3.5 miles downstream from Lake Britton (Shasta County; Figure 1). The native fish fauna of the Pit River is similar to the Sacramento River and includes rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss sp.), sculpin (Cottus spp.), hardhead (Mylopharadon conocephalus), Sacramento sucker (Catostomus occidentalis), speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus) and Sacramento pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus grandis; Moyle 2002). In addition, the Pit River supports a wild population of non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta). It is unknown whether the ancestral origins of rainbow trout in the Pit River are redband trout (O. m. stonei) or coastal rainbow trout (O. m. irideus) and for the purposes of this report, we refer to them as rainbow trout. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife Heritage and Wild Trout Program (HWTP) has evaluated the Pit River as a candidate for Wild Trout Water designation since 2008. Wild Trout Waters are those that support self-sustaining wild trout populations, are aesthetically pleasing and environmentally productive, provide adequate catch rates in terms of numbers or size of trout, and are open to public angling (Bloom and Weaver 2008). The HWTP utilizes a phased approach to evaluate designation potential. In 2008, the HWTP conducted Phase 1 initial resource assessments in the Pit River to gather information on species composition, size class structure, habitat types, and catch rates (Weaver and Mehalick 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Crags State Park Brochure
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is Castle Crags to provide for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping he lofty spires and to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological T State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and granite dome of Castle Crags cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. rise to more than 6,500 feet. The grandeur of the crags has been revered as California State Parks supports equal access. an extraordinary place Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park for millennia. at (530) 235-2684. This publication can be made available in alternate formats. Contact [email protected] or call (916) 654-2249. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Discover the many states of California.™ Castle Crags State Park 20022 Castle Creek Road Castella, CA 96017 (530) 235-2684 © 2014 California State Parks M ajestic Castle Crags have inspired The Okwanuchu Shasta territory covered A malaria epidemic brought by European fur enduring myths and legends since about 700 square miles of forested mountains trappers wiped out much of the Okwanuchu prehistoric times. More than 170 million from the headwaters of the Sacramento River Shasta populace by 1833. years old, these granite formations in to the McCloud River and from Mount Shasta With the 1848 gold discoveries at the the Castle Crags Wilderness border the to Pollard Flat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wintu and Their Neighbors: a Very Small World-System
    THE WINTU AND THEIR NEIGHBORS: A VERY SMALL WORLD-SYSTEM Christopher Chase-Dunn Department of Sociology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, ND 21218 ABSTRACT The world-systems perspective analyzes the modern international system. This approach can be applied to long range social evolution by studying smaller regional intersocietal systems such as the late pre-contact Wintu and their neighbors. Three questions: 1. What was the nature of integration among wintu groups and between them and neighboring groups? 2. What are the spatial characteristics of this network regarding fall­ off of the impact of events? 3. Was there regional soc~ally­ structured inequality in this system? Archaeological data may allow estimation of extent and rate of Wintu expansion, obsidian trade patterns, settlement sizes, and other features of this little world-system. INTRODUCTION This paper describes a theoretical approach for the comparative study of world-systems and a preliminary consideration of a small regional intersocietal system composed of the Wintu people and their neighbors in Northern California. I am currently engaged in the study of two "cases" of relatively small intersocietal networks -- the Wintu-centered system and late prehistoric Hawaii (Chase-Dunn 1991). This paper describes my preliminary hypotheses and examines possibilities for using archaeological, ethnographic, and documentary evidence for answering questions raised by the world-systems perspective. The world-systems perspective is a theoretical approach which has been developed to analyze the dynamics of the Europe­ centered, and now-global, political economy composed of national societies (cf. Wallerstein 1974, 1979; Chase-Dunn 1989; and a very readable introduction in Shannon 1989). One important structure in this modern world-system is the core/periphery hierarchy -- a stratified system of relations among dominant "advanced" core states and dependent and "underdeveloped" peripheral areas.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Mt. Shasta 70305 N
    C ITY OF MT . S HASTA F REEZE M INI -S TORAGE AND C AR W ASH P ROJECT REVISED AND RECIRCULATED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2017072042 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA 70305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CA 96067 Prepared by: 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 JUNE 2019 C ITY OF MT . S HASTA F REEZE M INI -S TORAGE AND C AR W ASH P ROJECT REVISED AND RECIRCULATED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2017072042 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA 305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CA 96067 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 JUNE 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Regulatory Guidance ................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.2 Lead Agency .................................................................................................................................. 1.0-1 1.3 Purpose and Document Organization ...................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................ 1.0-2 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................. 3.0-1 3.2 Existing Use and Conditions ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shasta Lake Unit
    Fishing The waters of Shasta Lake provide often congested on summer weekends. Packers Bay, Coee Creek excellent shing opportunities. Popular spots Antlers, and Hirz Bay are recommended alternatives during United States Department of Vicinity Map are located where the major rivers and periods of heavy use. Low water ramps are located at Agriculture Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Area streams empty into the lake. Fishing is Jones Valley, Sugarloaf, and Centimudi. Additional prohibited at boat ramps. launching facilities may be available at commercial Trinity Center marinas. Fees are required at all boat launching facilities. Scale: in miles Shasta Unit 0 5 10 Campground and Camping 3 Shasta Caverns Tour The caverns began forming over 250 8GO Information Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity 12 million years ago in the massive limestone of the Gray Rocks Trinity Unit There is a broad spectrum of camping facilities, ranging Trinity Gilman Road visible from Interstate 5. Shasta Caverns are located o the National Recreation Area Lake Lakehead Fenders from the primitive to the luxurious. At the upper end of Ferry Road Shasta Caverns / O’Brien exit #695. The caverns are privately the scale, there are 9 marinas and a number of resorts owned and tours are oered year round. For schedules and oering rental cabins, motel accommodations, and RV Shasta Unit information call (530) 238-2341. I-5 parks and campgrounds with electric hook-ups, swimming 106 pools, and showers. Additional information on Forest 105 O Highway Vehicles The Chappie-Shasta O Highway Vehicle Area is located just below the west side of Shasta Dam and is Service facilities and services oered at private resorts is Shasta Lake available at the Shasta Lake Ranger Station or on the web managed by the Bureau of Land Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation
    Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Contents Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 1-1 Project Background ........................................................................................ 1-3 Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan ............................. 1-4 2009 NMFS Biological Opinion .............................................................. 1-5 Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation ...................................................... 1-6 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................... 1-7 Objectives ...................................................................................................... 1-7 Study Area ..................................................................................................... 1-8 River Selection Process............................................................................ 1-9 Shasta Lake ............................................................................................ 1-10 Upper Sacramento River Watershed .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LAND-USE CONFLICT at SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA a Thesis
    THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Geography by Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco, California January, 2010 Copyright by Anne Kathryn McTavish 2010 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Role of Critical Cartography in Environmental Justice: Land-use Conflict at Shasta Dam, California by Anne Kathryn McTavish, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Arts in Geography at San Francisco State University. ____________________________________________________ Nancy Lee Wilkinson Professor of Geography ____________________________________________________ Jerry Davis Professor of Geography THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco State University 2010 The United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is conducting a feasibility study to increase the height of Shasta Dam. The Winnemem Wintu Indian Tribe contend that any increase in the storage capacity of Shasta Lake would inundate their remaining cultural and historic sites, tribal lands, and current homestead, an act they describe as “cultural genocide.” Critical Cartography plays a valuable role evaluating the Winnemem Wintu claim, revealing how the tribe’s claim to land was mapped, then unmapped, over the past two-hundred years. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. ___________________________________________ ________________ Chair, Thesis Committee Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been amazed, delighted, appalled, and humbled as I learned about the rights, issues, and status of the Winnemem Wintu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenians
    THE ARMENIANS By C.F. DIXON-JOHNSON “Whosoever does wrong to a Christian or a Jew shall find me his accuser on the day of judgment.” (EL KORAN) Printed and Published by GEO TOULMIN & SONS, LTD. Northgate, Blackburn. 1916 Preface The following pages were first read as a paper before the “Société d’Etudes Ethnographiques.” They have since been amplified and are now being published at the request of a number of friends, who believe that the public should have an opportunity of judging whether or not “the Armenian Question” has another side than that which has been recently so assiduously promulgated throughout the Western World. Though the championship of Greek, Bulgarian and other similar “Christian, civilized methods of fighting,” as contrasted with “Moslem atrocities” in the Balkans and Asia Minor, has been so strenuously undertaken by Lord Bryce and others, the more recent developments in the Near East may perhaps already have opened the eyes of a great many thinking people to the realization that, in sacrificing the traditional friendship of the Turk to all this more or less sectarian clamor, British diplomacy has really done nothing better than to exchange the solid and advantageous reality for a most elusive and unreliable, if not positively dangerous, set of shadows. It seems illogical that the same party which recalled the officials (and among them our present War Minister) appointed by Lord Beaconsfield to assist the Turkish Government in reforming their administration and collecting the revenue in Asia Minor, and which on the advent of the Young Turks refused to lend British Administrators to whom ample and plenary powers were assured, should now, in its eagerness to vilify the Turk, lose sight of their own mistakes which have led in the main to the conditions of which it complains, and should so utterly condemn its own former policy.
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork Ranch 2,822 Acres Tehama County, CA
    North Fork Ranch 2,822 acres Tehama County, CA BILL WRIGHT SHASTA LAND SERVICES, INC. 358 Hartnell Avenue, Suite C Redding, CA 96002 cell (530) 941-8100 www.ranch-lands.com North Fork Ranch 2,822 acres West of Red Bluff & Cottonwood, CA LOCATION: The North Fork Ranch is located just about 30 minute drive east of Red Bluff and Cottonwood, CA which is about halfway between Portland, OR and San Francisco, CA. DESCRIPTION: The ranch consists of about 2,822 acres. Good quality winter range ranch with rolling to some steep oak and covered hills, open more level areas, and some steeper rangeland areas – this is a pretty good winter range. Stock ponds and seasonal drainages provide livestock and wildlife habitat. Elevations range from about 800 feet to 1,000 feet. Winter temperatures are cool but not high elevation cold. Interior access is provided by a gated entrance off of CA State Highway 36 West and then a private graveled road into to the ranch. Pretty good system of roads and trails that provide good access through the interior of the ranch. ACRES: Approximately 2,822 acres; 8 Tehama County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 003-040-06, 003-040-07, 003-070-06, 003-080-01, 003-080-02, 003-080-003, 003-080-06, and 003-120-01 IMPROVEMENTS: None. Plenty of room to build your own with a perfect view! ZONING: The ranch is in the “Williamson Act” with 160 acre minimum parcel sizes. The “Williamson Act” results in lower real estate taxes - taxes are computed based upon a properties agricultural income rather than assessed on current market value.
    [Show full text]
  • Winnemem Wintu Tribe 14840 Bear Mountain Rd Redding, CA 96003
    Winnemem Wintu Tribe 14840 Bear Mountain Rd Redding, CA 96003 =<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>=<>= Shasta Dam Raise Project January 14, 2019 c/o: Stantec 3301 C Street, Suite 1900 Sacramento, CA 95816 Introduction: On November 30, 2018 Westlands Water District (Westlands or WWD) issued an Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP) stating that it was the lead agency for a Shasta Dam Raise Project (SDRP or Project) [formerly known as the Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation (SLWRI), and began soliciting scoping comments to prepare a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) draft environmental impact report (EIR) for the Project. This Project would increase the existing height of Shasta Dam by 18.5 feet and purportedly expand the capacity of Shasta Lake by up to 634,000- acre feet. In response to this solicitation, the Winnemem Wintu Tribe (WWT) issues the following comments, assertions, and raises questions about the project’s legality. From reading the IS/NOP WWD does not define who is actually the proponent of the project. A lay person reading the IS/NOP would get the impression that it is WWD who will carry out this project, yet WWD makes no distinction. No proponent is identified. This omission renders the project description as deficient. The Project proponent must also be identified in order that transparency is maintained by WWD. Who is funding this EIR effort? If the EIR finds that the Project must be amended to avoid, lessen or mitigate environmental effects, who will amend the Project? Also, from reading the IS/NOP it appears that WWD has made no initial findings of its own, but relies heavily if not entirely on Reclamation’s SWLRI Final EIS released in 2014, and Reclamation’s SWLRI Final Feasibility Report released in 2015.
    [Show full text]