DOCSLIB.ORG

CITY of NEW HAVEN NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Revised and Adopted on June 15, 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CITY of NEW HAVEN NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Revised and Adopted on June 15, 2011 CITY OF NEW HAVEN NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Revised and Adopted on June 15, 2011 Prepared By New Haven City Plan Department 165 Church Street New Haven, Connecticut 06510 City of New Haven John De Stefano, Jr., Mayor CITY OF NEW HAVEN NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Revised and Adopted on June 15, 2011 Prepared By: New Haven City Plan Department 165 Church Street New Haven, Connecticut 06510 City of New Haven John DeStefano, Jr., Mayor TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Documentation of the Planning Process............................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Hazard Mitigation Goals .....................................................................................................1-5 1.4 Identification of Hazards and Document Overview................................................................ 1-6 2.0 COMMUNITY PROFILE ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Physical Setting................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Existing Land Use.............................................................................................................. 2-4 2.3 Geology............................................................................................................................ 2-7 2.4 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.5 Population and Demographic Setting................................................................................. 2-12 2.6 Development Trends ....................................................................................................... 2-13 2.7 Governmental Structure................................................................................................... 2-16 2.8 Critical Facilities and Sheltering Capacity ........................................................................... 2-17 3.0 INLAND FLOODING ........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Hazard Assessment ...........................................................................................................3-3 3.3 Historic Record ................................................................................................................. 3-4 3.4 Existing Programs, Policies and Mitigation Measures............................................................. 3-5 3.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment .................................................................................... 3-6 3.6 Potential Mitigation Measures, Strategies, and Alternatives ................................................. 3-14 3.6.1 Prevention ......................................................................................................... 3-14 3.6.2 Property Protection ............................................................................................. 3-17 3.6.3 Emergency Services ............................................................................................ 3-17 3.6.4 Public Education and Awareness .......................................................................... 3-18 3.6.5 Natural Resource Protection................................................................................. 3-18 3.6.6 Structural Projects .............................................................................................. 3-19 3.7 Recommended Actions .................................................................................................... 3-20 4.0 COASTAL FLOODING......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Hazard Assessment ...........................................................................................................4-3 4.3 Historic Record ................................................................................................................. 4-3 4.4 Existing Programs, Policies and Mitigation Measures............................................................. 4-4 4.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment .................................................................................... 4-4 4.6 Potential Mitigation Measures, Strategies, and Alternatives ................................................... 4-9 4.6.1 Prevention ...........................................................................................................4-9 4.6.2 Property Protection ............................................................................................. 4-11 4.6.3 Public Education and Awareness .......................................................................... 4-11 4.6.4 Natural Resource Protection................................................................................. 4-11 4.6.5 Emergency Services ............................................................................................ 4-12 City of New Haven Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Revised and Adopted on June 15, 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 4.6.6 Structural Projects .............................................................................................. 4-12 4.7 Recommended Actions .................................................................................................... 4-13 5.0 HURRICANES.................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Hazard Assessment ...........................................................................................................5-1 5.3 Historic Record ................................................................................................................. 5-4 5.4 Existing Programs, Policies, and Mitigation Measures............................................................ 5-4 5.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment .................................................................................... 5-5 5.6 Potential Mitigation Measures, Strategies, and Alternatives ................................................... 5-9 5.6.1 Prevention ........................................................................................................... 5-9 5.6.2 Property Protection ............................................................................................... 5-9 5.6.3 Public Education and Awareness ............................................................................ 5-9 5.6.4 Emergency Services ............................................................................................ 5-10 5.6.5 Structural Projects .............................................................................................. 5-10 5.7 Recommended Actions .................................................................................................... 5-10 6.0 SEA LEVEL RISE................................................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 Hazard Assessment ...........................................................................................................6-1 6.3 Historic Record ................................................................................................................. 6-2 6.4 Existing Programs, Policies, and Mitigation Measures............................................................ 6-2 6.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment .................................................................................... 6-2 6.6 Potential Mitigation Measures, Strategies, and Alternatives ................................................... 6-2 6.7 Recommended Actions ...................................................................................................... 6-4 7.0 SUMMER STORMS & TORNADOES ...................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................. 7-1 7.2 Hazard Assessment ...........................................................................................................7-1 7.3 Historic Record ................................................................................................................. 7-4 7.4 Existing Programs, Policies, and Mitigation Measures............................................................ 7-6 7.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment .................................................................................... 7-7 7.6 Potential Mitigation Measures, Strategies, and Alternatives ..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SSP SCHOOL TABLE 0607 1 District Code School Code District
    SSP_SCHOOL_TABLE_0607 1 Five Year Pct Eligible for District School Grade Total Enrollment Free Reduced Code Code District Name School Name School Type Range Enrollment Change Price Meals 1 1 Andover School District Andover Elementary School Traditional/Regular PK- 6 341 -1.7 7.0 2 3 Ansonia School District Mead School Traditional/Regular 3- 5 574 -17.4 50.3 2 8 Ansonia School District Prendergast School Traditional/Regular PK- 2 798 23.5 49.2 2 51 Ansonia School District Ansonia Middle School Traditional/Regular 6- 8 619 0.5 49.1 2 61 Ansonia School District Ansonia High School Traditional/Regular 9-12 735 15.4 42.7 3 1 Ashford School District Ashford School Traditional/Regular PK- 8 524 -12.1 15.6 4 3 Avon School District Roaring Brook School Traditional/Regular PK- 4 757 -5.8 1.7 4 4 Avon School District Pine Grove School Traditional/Regular K- 4 599 -13.9 4.0 4 5 Avon School District Thompson Brook School Traditional/Regular 5- 6 581 1.5 4 51 Avon School District Avon Middle School Traditional/Regular 7- 8 580 -19.6 2.8 4 61 Avon School District Avon High School Traditional/Regular 9-12 989 28.4 2.0 5 1 Barkhamsted School District Barkhamsted Elementary School Traditional/Regular K- 6 336 0.6 5.7 7 1 Berlin School District Richard D. Hubbard School Traditional/Regular K- 5 270 -13.7 4.8 7 4 Berlin School District Emma Hart Willard School Traditional/Regular PK- 5 588 3.0 8.0 7 5 Berlin School District Mary E.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Cassidy Dartmouth College Oral History Program the Dartmouth Vietnam Project February 13, 2020 Transcribed by Dominic Repucci ‘20
    Jack Cassidy Dartmouth College Oral History Program The Dartmouth Vietnam Project February 13, 2020 Transcribed by Dominic Repucci ‘20 REPUCCI: Alright, my name is Dominic Repucci. I am a senior History major here at Dartmouth College and I am here today on Baker Berry 406 [Dartmouth College Library, Hanover, NH] with a Mr. Jack Cassidy. I am interviewing today for the Dartmouth Vietnam Project and the date is 2/13/2020 [February 13, 2020]. Mr. Cassidy, would you mind stating and spelling your name just for the purpose of the archive? CASSIDY: Sure. Jack Cassidy, C A S S I D Y. REPUCCI: Perfect. Thank you for your participation in this interview Mr. Cassidy. And do you mind if I call you Mr. Cassidy or Jack? CASSIDY: No, just call me Jack. REPUCCI: All right, Jack. CASSIDY: My father was Mr. [laughter]. REPUCCI: Perfect. Jack, when and where were you born? CASSIDY: I was born June 18th, 1946 in New Haven, Connecticut. REPUCCI: What was New Haven like back then? What was your early life like? CASSIDY: Early life was, it was inner city. It was very ethnic, lots of Irish, lots of Polish, Italians, Jews, Blacks were all mingled in the same area. We all lived in the same, within two or three blocks. There was people who just came over from Poland and Europe, people who were again, all different ethnicities. And it was a great neighborhood. It was safe, it was fun. We played in the streets, we played football in the streets. We ran around in backyards and climbed fences and garages and got into trouble by breaking windows or--and, but it was a neighborhood where everybody knew you.
    [Show full text]
  • New Haven School Construction Program Mayor John Destefano, Jr
    ,.- New Haven School Construction Program Mayor John DeStefano, Jr. Dr . Reginald R. Mayo , Superintendent of Schools ~~L - - Table of Contents Message From the Mayor I. Program Chronology, 1994 to 1996 II . Demographic Study Ill. Comprehensive Facility Report IV. Project Participants, Process & Management - V. The Projects VI. Project Schedule VII. Communications VIII. News Clippings - - - Message from - John DeStefano, Jr., Mayor As President Clinton and the federal - government begin to press for mas­ sive school construction programs s the country, the City of New - Haven has already initiated an aggres- -..ol!'"._._~-""!"'-~ sive school construction program. Today, the Citywide School Construction program stands as a national model for its massive scope, innovative financing and high degree of community involvement. - The School Construction program was launched in 1995 as a mechanism by which the City could repair its aging school ...... infrastructure while marginalizing the expense to taxpayers . To date, as a result of this innovative program and with no federal assistance, the City has commitments of $406.5 million toward the renovation or replacement of schools. An additional $295 million is planned to renovate an additional 21 schools over the next 10 years. The program includes both new and "gut-renovation" school projects. The General Accounting Office recently reported that one­ third of the nation's schools need extensive repair or replacement. In New Haven, a survey found that of the City's 42 city owned school buildings, 41 percent are at - least 50 years old . New Haven is moving aggressively to solve its problems while many municipalities are just com­ ing to grips with the extent of deterioration in neighborhood - schools built decades ago.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Kenner Emergency Operations Plan (COKEOP), Augmenting the Basic Plan (BP)
    CITY OF KENNER EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Annex “A” HURRICANE AND STORM PLAN (H&SP) Issued: June 1, 2007 Revised: November 1, 2011 City of Kenner, Louisiana Hurricane and Storm Plan June 1, 2007 I. PURPOSE The purpose of the City of Kenner Hurricane & Storm Plan (hereafter referred to as “Plan” or “H&SP”) is to describe the emergency response of City agencies in the event of a hurricane or severe storm. This document is intended to serve as a guide for the delivery and coordination of governmental services prior to, during, and following a storm incident. The guidelines set forth will facilitate the City’s Emergency Planning Advisory Group (EPAG) and executive’s decision-making regarding preparation, response and management of storm incidents. II. SCOPE This Plan is an administrative directive governing the operations of the City of Kenner, its subordinate agencies and departments. This document in no way purports to cover all aspects of storm related disaster/emergency or recovery management. Rather, it is intended to provide City personnel with an outline of those essential functions and duties to be performed in the event of a hurricane or storm event. - 1 - Revised: November 1, 2011 City of Kenner, Louisiana Hurricane and Storm Plan June 1, 2007 TITLE I. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION III. HURRICANE AND STORM PLAN IMPLEMENTATION The City of Kenner Hurricane and Storm Plan (H&SP) is a component of the City of Kenner Emergency Operations Plan (COKEOP), augmenting the Basic Plan (BP). Upon learning or receiving information from any source of a developing, pending, or actual hurricane or storm event, the Mayor or his/her designee may implement all or any portion of the COKEOP-BP or H&SP.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Strea
    Geographical Distribution and Potential for Adverse Biological Effects of Selected Trace Elements and Organic Compounds in Streambed Sediment in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins, 1992-94 By Robert F. Breault and Sandra L. Harris Abstract exceed sediment-quality guidelines over a wider geographical area, although usually by lower Streambed-sediment samples were collected ratios of contaminant concentration to sediment- in 1992-94 at selected sites in the Connecticut, quality guideline than the organic compounds. Housatonic, and Thames River Basins to determine the geographical distribution of trace elements and organic compounds and their INTRODUCTION potential for adverse biological effects on aquatic organisms. Chromium, copper, lead, mercury, The Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins study unit is one of 59 National Water-Quality nickel, zinc, chlordane, DDT, PAHs, and PCBs Assessment (NAWQA) study units nationwide. The were detected in samples from throughout the study unit drainage basin comprises an area of almost basins, but concentrations of these constituents 16,000 mi2 and extends through parts of the Province of generally were lowest in the northern forested Quebec, Canada, eastern Vermont, western New Hamp- drainage basins and highest in the southern shire, west-central Massachusetts, nearly all of Connect- urbanized drainage basins of Springfield, icut, and small parts of New York and Rhode Island. Massachusetts, and Hartford, New Haven and The study unit is entirely within the New Bridgeport, Connecticut. Possible anthropogenic England Physiographic Province (Fenneman, 1938), a sources of these contaminants include industrial plateau-like upland that rises gradually from the sea but effluent; municipal wastewater; runoff from includes numerous mountain ranges and individual agricultural, urban and forested areas; and peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • A FAILURE of INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina
    A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina U.S. House of Representatives 4 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Union Calendar No. 00 109th Congress Report 2nd Session 000-000 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Report by the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoacess.gov/congress/index.html February 15, 2006. — Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U. S. GOVERNMEN T PRINTING OFFICE Keeping America Informed I www.gpo.gov WASHINGTON 2 0 0 6 23950 PDF For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COVER PHOTO: FEMA, BACKGROUND PHOTO: NASA SELECT BIPARTISAN COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE PREPARATION FOR AND RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA TOM DAVIS, (VA) Chairman HAROLD ROGERS (KY) CHRISTOPHER SHAYS (CT) HENRY BONILLA (TX) STEVE BUYER (IN) SUE MYRICK (NC) MAC THORNBERRY (TX) KAY GRANGER (TX) CHARLES W. “CHIP” PICKERING (MS) BILL SHUSTER (PA) JEFF MILLER (FL) Members who participated at the invitation of the Select Committee CHARLIE MELANCON (LA) GENE TAYLOR (MS) WILLIAM J.
    [Show full text]
  • Protests and Expedients in Response to Failures in Urban Education : a Study of New Haven, 1950-1970
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1971 Protests and expedients in response to failures in urban education : a study of New Haven, 1950-1970. Cleo Abraham University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Abraham, Cleo, "Protests and expedients in response to failures in urban education : a study of New Haven, 1950-1970." (1971). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 2497. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/2497 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ) ) PROTESTS AND EXPEDIENTS IN RESPONSE TO FAILURES IN URBAN EDUCATION: A STUDY OF NEW HAVEN, 1950-1970 A Dissertation by CLEO ABRAHAM Submitted to Graduate Faculty Advisors of the School of Education of the University of Massachusetts in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May 1971 (Month lYear Major Subject - Urban Education PROTESTS AND EXPEDIENTS IN RESPONSE TO FAILURES IN URBAN EDUCATION: A STUDY OF NEW HAVEN, 1950-1970 A Dissertation by Cleo Abraham Approved as to style and content by: Dr. Ro^ce M. Phillips Committee Member Ma.v 1971 (Month (Year) ABSTRACT PROTESTS AND EXPEDIENTS IN RESPONSE TO FAILURES IN URBAN EDUCATION: A STUDY OF NEW HAVEN, 1950-1970 (May, 1971) Cleo Abraham, B.A. , Claflin University M.S., Southern Connecticut State College Directed by: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER NEW HAVEN Community Index 2016
    GREATER NEW HAVEN Community Index 2016 Understanding Well-Being, Economic Opportunity, and Change in Greater New Haven Neighborhoods A CORE PROGRAM OF In collaboration with The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven and other community partners and a Community Health Needs Assessment for the towns served by Yale-New Haven Hospital and Milford Hospital. Greater New Haven Community Index 2016 Understanding well-being, economic opportunity, and change in Greater New Haven neighborhoods MAJOR FUNDERS Other Funders The Greater New Haven Community Index makes extensive use of the 2015 DataHaven Community Wellbeing Survey, which completed in-depth interviews with 16,219 randomly-selected adults in Connecticut last year. In addition to the major funders listed above, supporters of the survey’s interviews with 1,810 adults in Greater New Haven as well as related data dissemination activities included the City of New Haven Health Department, United Way of Greater New Haven, Workforce Alliance, NewAlliance Foundation, Yale Medical Group, Connecticut Health Foundation, Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, and the Community Alliance for Research and Engagement at the Yale School of Public Health among others. Please see ctdatahaven.org for a complete list of statewide partners and funders. Lead Authors Mark Abraham, Executive Director, DataHaven Mary Buchanan, Project Manager, DataHaven Co-authors and contributors Ari Anisfeld, Aparna Nathan, Camille Seaberry, and Emma Zehner, DataHaven Amanda Durante and Fawatih Mohamed, University of Connecticut
    [Show full text]
  • Yale University 2021 Long-Service Recognition from the President
    yale university 2021 Long-Service Recognition From the President Dear Honorees, It is my privilege to continue the tradition of Yale’s annual Long-Service Recognition, now in its twenty-ffh year, as we honor the talented and devoted employees who are celebrating milestone anniversaries at Yale. We are proud to recognize the eforts of 270 Yale staf members who have made the university a welcoming and excellent community. Over the years, you have demonstrated collegiality, dedication, generosity, and innovative thinking. Collectively, you have contributed 8,325 years to the university. This includes 106 of you who are marking twenty-fve years of service and seventy- three who are celebrating thirty-year milestones. Fify-two of our colleagues have been here for thirty-fve years, and twenty-six of you have devoted four decades to Yale. Nine of you have reached forty-fve-year career milestones, and one colleague has been at Yale for half Design Fritz Hansen a century. Print Production Carmen Cusmano, Yale Printing and Publishing Services Writers Ashley Blackwell, Linda Clarke, Lisa Maloney This year, we honor two individuals who are marking ffy-fve years at Yale. One very special colleague is celebrating an extraordinary Photographers Tony Fiorini, Robert Lisak, Michael Marsland, Beatrix Roeller, Joanne Wilcox sixty years of service to the university. I commend you all on your remarkable tenures. Cover and chapter-head paintings Asher Lifin ’21 Each day, I am reminded of the incredible commitment and expertise of our staf, who are the lifeblood of Yale. In your diferent roles— assistants, chefs, coaches, custodians, directors, groundskeepers, librarians, managers, police officers, researchers, and more—you help us The annual Yale University Long-Service Recognition commemorative book is an Internal Communications presentation led by Lalani Perry, achieve Yale’s mission, “improving the world today and for future generations through outstanding research and scholarship, education, assistant vice president, and Katie Pomes, events manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Bookletchart™ New Haven Harbor NOAA Chart 12371
    BookletChart™ New Haven Harbor NOAA Chart 12371 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Published by the vessels are on the west side of the channel north of Sandy Point. Waterborne commerce in the harbor consists of petroleum products, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scrap metal, lumber, automobiles, gypsum, paper and pulp products, National Ocean Service steel products, chemicals, rock salt, and general cargo. Office of Coast Survey West River, on the west side of the main channel about 3 miles above Southwest Ledge Light, has a dredged channel marked by buoys to just www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov above the first highway bridge (Kimberly Avenue Bridge), about 1.2 888-990-NOAA miles above the channel entrance. In April 1996-February 1997, the midchannel controlling depth was 10 feet from the channel entrance to What are Nautical Charts? Buoy 18, thence in February 1997, 5 feet at midchannel to just above the first highway bridge, the head of navigation. Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show Mill River, on the west side of Fair Haven about 4 miles above water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much Southwest Ledge Light, is entered from the main channel through a more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and dredged entrance channel that branches into an east and west fork to efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial the Grand Avenue Bridge, 0.6 mile above the mouth. In June 1982, the ships that carry America’s commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Preparedness Guide 2021
    Hillsborough County Disaster Preparedness Guide 2021 INSIDE Three Steps to Disaster Preparedness Prepping for All Disasters Hurricane Season (June 1 – November 30) Hurricane Maps Important Contact Information Hillsborough County Hillsborough County Emergency Management A Great Place to Live, Work, and Play Located in the thriving center of West-Central Florida, Hillsborough County is the Tampa Bay Disaster Preparedness region’s largest county, and a major part of the Florida High-Tech Corridor along Interstate 4. Situated between Orlando and the Gulf of Mexico, Hillsborough County features stunning natural treasures, a plethora of entertainment options, Guide 2021 major employers, and the University of South Florida, a premiere research institution, all in a year-round temperate climate. Hillsborough County Contents is a great place to live, work, and play. Emergency Management is Hillsborough County Emergency Management 1 Prepared for You Three Steps to Disaster Preparedness 1 The Office of Emergency Management is responsible for planning and coordinating actions 1. Pack a Disaster Kit 2 to prepare, respond, and recover from natural or man-made disasters in Hillsborough County. The 2. Make a Plan 3 Office manages the County Emergency Operations Center, conducts emergency training, provides public education, helps coordinate the Community Emergency Response Teams, and many other tasks. 3. Stay Informed 6 Three Steps to Disaster Preparedness Prepping for All Disasters 7 Hurricane Season in Hillsborough County (June 1 – November 30) 8 1. Pack a Disaster Kit Being prepared starts by having a disaster supply kit. Take a moment every year to review the items Hillsborough County Hurricane Maps 12 in your disaster kit and restock it with anything you may be missing or that needs to be replaced.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches
    to boating in Connecticut! TheWelcome map with local ordinances, state boat launches, pumpout facilities, and Boating Infrastructure Grant funded transient facilities is back again. New this year is an alphabetical list of state boat launches located on Connecticut lakes, ponds, and rivers listed by the waterbody name. If you’re exploring a familiar waterbody or starting a new adventure, be sure to have the proper safety equipment by checking the list on page 32 or requesting a Vessel Safety Check by boating staff (see page 14 for additional information). Reference Reference Reference Name Town Number Name Town Number Name Town Number Amos Lake Preston P12 Dog Pond Goshen G2 Lake Zoar Southbury S9 Anderson Pond North Stonington N23 Dooley Pond Middletown M11 Lantern Hill Ledyard L2 Avery Pond Preston P13 Eagleville Lake Coventry C23 Leonard Pond Kent K3 Babcock Pond Colchester C13 East River Guilford G26 Lieutenant River Old Lyme O3 Baldwin Bridge Old Saybrook O6 Four Mile River Old Lyme O1 Lighthouse Point New Haven N7 Ball Pond New Fairfield N4 Gardner Lake Salem S1 Little Pond Thompson T1 Bantam Lake Morris M19 Glasgo Pond Griswold G11 Long Pond North Stonington N27 Barn Island Stonington S17 Gorton Pond East Lyme E9 Mamanasco Lake Ridgefield R2 Bashan Lake East Haddam E1 Grand Street East Lyme E13 Mansfield Hollow Lake Mansfield M3 Batterson Park Pond New Britain N2 Great Island Old Lyme O2 Mashapaug Lake Union U3 Bayberry Lane Groton G14 Green Falls Reservoir Voluntown V5 Messerschmidt Pond Westbrook W10 Beach Pond Voluntown V3 Guilford
    [Show full text]