Development of Intranasal Nalmefene to Treat Synthetic Opioid Overdose

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development of Intranasal Nalmefene to Treat Synthetic Opioid Overdose 1521-0103/371/2/409–415$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.118.256115 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS J Pharmacol Exp Ther 371:409–415, November 2019 U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright Special Section on The Opioid Crisis Fighting Fire with Fire: Development of Intranasal Nalmefene to Treat Synthetic Opioid Overdose Philip Krieter, Shwe Gyaw, Roger Crystal, and Phil Skolnick National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (P.K., S.G.) and Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Santa Monica, California (R.C., P.S.) Downloaded from Received January 2, 2019; accepted March 27, 2019 ABSTRACT The dramatic rise in overdose deaths linked to synthetic opioids Encinitas, CA) reduced Tmax to 0.25 hour and increased Cmax by (e.g., fentanyl, carfentanil) may require more potent, longer- ∼2.2-fold. The pharmacokinetic properties of IN nalmefene duration opiate antagonists than naloxone. Both the high affinity (3 mg) formulated with dodecyl maltoside has characteristics jpet.aspetjournals.org of nalmefene at m opiate receptors and its long half-life led us to consistent with an effective rescue medication: its onset of examine the feasibility of developing an intranasal (IN) formula- action is comparable to an i.m. injection of nalmefene (1.5 mg) tion as a rescue medication that could be especially useful in previously approved to treat opioid overdose. Furthermore, treating synthetic opioid overdose. In this study, the pharmaco- the Cmax following IN administration was ∼3-fold higher than kinetic properties of IN nalmefene were compared with an following i.m. dosing, comparable to previously reported plasma intramuscular (i.m.) injection in a cohort of healthy volunteers. concentrations of nalmefene observed 5 minutes following a Nalmefene was absorbed slowly following IN administration, 1-mg i.v. dose. The high affinity, very rapid onset, and long half-life at ASPET Journals on October 18, 2019 with a median time to reach Cmax (Tmax) of 2 hours. Addition of the (.7 hours) of IN nalmefene present distinct advantages as a rescue absorption enhancer dodecyl maltoside (Intravail, Neurelis, Inc., medication, particularly against longer-lived synthetic opioids. Introduction and prescription opioids [reviewed by Skolnick (2018)]. Fur- thermore, the piperidine-based structure of fentanyl is highly A Government Accountability Office report released in mutable. More than 1400 fentanyl analogs have been de- October 2018 declared the opioid crisis a public health scribed in the patent and scientific literature, and a dozen or emergency (https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-685R). more are available on the illicit market (Misailidi et al., 2018), The most visible manifestation of this crisis is the rising adding another layer of complexity for both detection and number of opioid overdose deaths and the dramatic spike in interdiction by law enforcement. fatalities linked to fentanyl and related synthetic opioids. Naloxone is currently the only Food and Drug Administra- Thus, based on 2017 estimates (https://www.drugabuse.gov/ tion (FDA)–approved treatment for suspected or confirmed related-topics/trends-statistics/overdose-death-rates), syn- opioid overdose. The efficacy of naloxone at reversing the thetic opioids (“synthetics”) were linked to more than half of pharmacological actions of opioids, including synthetics such the estimated 49,000 opioid-related deaths, far surpassing as fentanyl, has been well established in both the emergency fatalities attributed to either heroin or prescription opioids. department and operating room [Glass et al., 1994; Kaplan et al., There are multiple factors responsible for the dangers posed 1999; reviewed by Boyer (2012)]. There are two FDA-approved by synthetics, including very high potencies, rapid onset of naloxone products (an autoinjector and a nasal spray) that are action, long half-lives, and ease of synthesis; this latter primarily used by first responders (e.g., police, emergency property translates to a low cost of goods relative to heroin medical service technicians, bystanders) to treat overdose victims (Skolnick, 2018). However, both anecdotal reports (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-16/heroin- P.S. and R.C. are employees of Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. P.K. and S.G. are employees of the National Institutes of Health. era-antidotes-can-t-handle-overdoses-in-age-of-synthetics; The work was conducted under a Clinical Trial Agreement supported in part https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/post-nation/ by Opiant Pharmaceuticals and National Institute on Drug Abuse contracts N01DA-12-8905, N01DA-13-8920, and N01DA-14-8914. wp/2018/04/10/study-despite-decline-in-prescriptions-opioid- https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.118.256115. deaths-skyrocketing-due-to-heroin-and-synthetic-drugs/) and ABBREVIATIONS: AE, adverse event; AUC0–t, area under the concentration time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration; CI, confidence interval; DDM, dodecyl maltoside; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; IN, intranasal; LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; Tmax, time to reach Cmax;t1/2, elimination phase half-life. 409 410 Krieter et al. clinical case studies (Sutter et al., 2017; Uddayasankar, et al., alcohol from admission to the end of the last blood draw of the study, 2018) indicate overdose with synthetics such as fentanyl and from nicotine and from caffeine-containing products and food for at least carfentanil often requires more naloxone than the standard 1 hour prior to and 2 hours after dose administration, and from caffeine- unit doses [2 mg i.m./4 mg intranasal (IN)] generally available containing products and food from midnight the day prior to and 4 hours ’ to first responders. Some authors (Li et al., 2018) have recom- after nalmefene dosing. On days of dosing, a subject s vital signs were required to be within the normal range before receiving nalmefene mended parenteral naloxone doses of up to 12–15 mg to (systolic blood pressure .90 and #140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure .55 successfully reverse a synthetic overdose. While each overdose and #90 mm Hg, resting heart rate .40 and #100 beats per minute, situation is unique (Skolnick, 2018), the current National and respiratory rate .8 and #20 respirations per minute). Institute on Drug Abuse position states that “Overdoses of Study Design. The study was an inpatient, double-blind (for fentanyl should be treated immediately with naloxone and IN administration), randomized, four-period, four-treatment, six- may require higher doses to successfully reverse the overdose” sequence crossover. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of six (https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/fentanyl). sequences to ensure at least two subjects in each sequence. On the day Moreover, the short half-life of naloxone (t1/2 1.3–2.4 hours) after clinic admission, participants were administered the study drug (Ryan and Dunne, 2018) can complicate the management of in randomized order with a 4-day washout period between doses. overdose with long-lived synthetics, including fentanyl (Ahonen Subjects remained at the clinic for 17 days until all four treatments – et al., 2000; Kharasch, 2015). were administered. They were contacted 3 5 days after discharge by a follow-up telephone call. Subjects fasted overnight before each dosing In response to the increasing number of overdose deaths day and received one of the following four treatments: linked to synthetics, National Institutes of Health leadership Downloaded from recently called for the development of “…stronger, longer- Treatment A: 3 mg IN (one 0.1-ml spray of a 30-mg/ml acting formulations of antagonists” (Volkow and Collins, nalmefene solution in one nostril). 2017). At face value, the opiate antagonist nalmefene fulfills Treatment B: 3 mg plus 0.25% dodecyl maltoside (DDM; Intravail) IN (one 0.1-ml spray of a 30-mg/ml nalmefene these criteria. Thus, multiple studies (Emmerson et al., 1994; solution containing 0.25% DDM in one nostril). Toll et al., 1998; Cassel et al., 2005) have demonstrated that Treatment C: 1.5 mg IN (one 0.1-ml spray of a 15-mg/ml ∼ Â the affinity of nalmefene is 5 higher than naloxone at both nalmefene solution in one nostril). jpet.aspetjournals.org native and recombinant m opioid receptors. The half-life (t1/2) Treatment D: 1.5 mg i.m. (1.5 ml of a 1.0-mg/ml nalmefene solution). of parenterally administered nalmefene is ∼8.2–8.9 hours The IN treatments were randomized while the intramuscular dose (Dixon et al., 1986), comparable to the half-lives of synthetics was the last treatment of all subjects. The high dose (3 mg) of – such as fentanyl (7 to 8 hours) and sufentanil (6 9 hours) nalmefene was selected based on the relative bioavailability (∼50%) (Ahonen et al., 2000; Kharasch, 2015). In addition, the efficacy of the structurally related molecule, naloxone (Krieter et al., 2016), of nalmefene in treating opioid overdose has been established. and the FDA guidance on parenteral dosing of nalmefene that Thus, parenteral nalmefene was FDA approved (1995) to treat produces a maximum reversal of a suspected opioid overdose (https:// at ASPET Journals on October 18, 2019 opioid overdose was but withdrawn from the market in 2008 www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2006/020459s006lbl.pdf). due to low sales, with no significant safety issues (https:// In phase I studies, intravenous doses of up to 24 mg have been well www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/11/03/2017-23952/ tolerated in normal volunteers (Dixon et al., 1986). determination-that-revex-nalmefene-hydrochloride-injection-01- Study Details. IN devices were coded so neither the staff nor the milligram-basemilliliter-and-10). Here, we describe a pilot study subjects knew the treatment administered. IN nalmefene was admin- istered in the supine position, and subjects remained in this position in healthy volunteers demonstrating the feasibility of developing for approximately 1 hour after dosing.
Recommended publications
  • BMC Pharmacology Biomed Central
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Springer - Publisher Connector BMC Pharmacology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Pharmacological Properties of DOV 315,090, an ocinaplon metabolite Dmytro Berezhnoy†1, Maria C Gravielle†1, Scott Downing1, Emmanuel Kostakis1, Anthony S Basile2, Phil Skolnick2, Terrell T Gibbs1 and David H Farb*1 Address: 1Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118, USA and 2DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc, 150 Pierce St., Somerset, NJ 08873-4185, USA Email: Dmytro Berezhnoy - [email protected]; Maria C Gravielle - [email protected]; Scott Downing - [email protected]; Emmanuel Kostakis - [email protected]; Anthony S Basile - [email protected]; Phil Skolnick - [email protected]; Terrell T Gibbs - [email protected]; David H Farb* - [email protected] * Corresponding author †Equal contributors Published: 13 June 2008 Received: 20 December 2007 Accepted: 13 June 2008 BMC Pharmacology 2008, 8:11 doi:10.1186/1471-2210-8-11 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2210/8/11 © 2008 Berezhnoy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background: Compounds targeting the benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA-R are widely prescribed for the treatment of anxiety disorders, epilepsy, and insomnia as well as for pre- anesthetic sedation and muscle relaxation. It has been hypothesized that these various pharmacological effects are mediated by different GABAA-R subtypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report
    Research Report Revised Junio 2018 Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Table of Contents Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Overview How do medications to treat opioid use disorder work? How effective are medications to treat opioid use disorder? What are misconceptions about maintenance treatment? What is the treatment need versus the diversion risk for opioid use disorder treatment? What is the impact of medication for opioid use disorder treatment on HIV/HCV outcomes? How is opioid use disorder treated in the criminal justice system? Is medication to treat opioid use disorder available in the military? What treatment is available for pregnant mothers and their babies? How much does opioid treatment cost? Is naloxone accessible? References Page 1 Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder Research Report Discusses effective medications used to treat opioid use disorders: methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone. Overview An estimated 1.4 million people in the United States had a substance use disorder related to prescription opioids in 2019.1 However, only a fraction of people with prescription opioid use disorders receive tailored treatment (22 percent in 2019).1 Overdose deaths involving prescription opioids more than quadrupled from 1999 through 2016 followed by significant declines reported in both 2018 and 2019.2,3 Besides overdose, consequences of the opioid crisis include a rising incidence of infants born dependent on opioids because their mothers used these substances during pregnancy4,5 and increased spread of infectious diseases, including HIV and hepatitis C (HCV), as was seen in 2015 in southern Indiana.6 Effective prevention and treatment strategies exist for opioid misuse and use disorder but are highly underutilized across the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam Msc and Allister Vale MD
    Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam MSc and Allister Vale MD February 2016 CONTENTS General Toxicology 9 Metals 38 Management 21 Pesticides 41 Drugs 23 Chemical Warfare 42 Chemical Incidents & 32 Plants 43 Pollution Chemicals 33 Animals 43 CURRENT AWARENESS PAPERS OF THE MONTH How toxic is ibogaine? Litjens RPW, Brunt TM. Clin Toxicol 2016; online early: doi: 10.3109/15563650.2016.1138226: Context Ibogaine is a psychoactive indole alkaloid found in the African rainforest shrub Tabernanthe Iboga. It is unlicensed but used in the treatment of drug and alcohol addiction. However, reports of ibogaine's toxicity are cause for concern. Objectives To review ibogaine's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, mechanisms of action and reported toxicity. Methods A search of the literature available on PubMed was done, using the keywords "ibogaine" and "noribogaine". The search criteria were "mechanism of action", "pharmacokinetics", "pharmacodynamics", "neurotransmitters", "toxicology", "toxicity", "cardiac", "neurotoxic", "human data", "animal data", "addiction", "anti-addictive", "withdrawal", "death" and "fatalities". The searches identified 382 unique references, of which 156 involved human data. Further research revealed 14 detailed toxicological case reports. Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology is produced monthly for the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology by the Birmingham Unit of the UK National Poisons Information Service, with contributions from the Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Newcastle Units. The NPIS is commissioned by Public Health England Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam MSc and Allister Vale MD February 2016 Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology is produced monthly for the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology by the Birmingham Unit of the UK National Poisons Information Service, with contributions from the Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Newcastle Units.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Overdose – Use of Naloxone
    CHAPTER: 41.3.1 Page 1 of 4 NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS MANUAL CHAPTER: 41.3.1 TITLE: OPIOID OVERDOSE – USE OF NALOXONE EFFECTIVE: 10/22/2017 REVISED: 06/24/2018 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to set forth guidelines with respect to the appropriate field administration of Naloxone (Narcan) kits by members of New Orleans Police Department in suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents. POLICY STATEMENT 1. Commissioned members of the NOPD are often the first emergency responders to the scene of a medical, suspected medical and overdose incident. Recognizing this, the NOPD has adopted this Chapter with the following goals: (a) To provide a framework for training in the field use of Naloxone, (b) To provide a framework on the proper field administration of Naloxone, and (c) To facilitate life-saving intervention in suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents where NOPD officers are the first to arrive on the scene. 2. All commissioned and/or civilian members who have been trained in the use and administration of the department’s Naloxone nasal administration kits for suspected opiate / opioid overdose incidents are authorized to carry, use and administer the kits. 3. All members responding to medical calls, including suspected opioid overdoses, shall use universal precautions. DEFINITIONS: Definitions related to this Chapter include: Administration—Nasal administration of approved Naloxone 2mg kits with atomizer; 1mg (1/2 dose) to be administered in each nostril. Naloxone—A narcotic analgesic antagonist, used in the reversal of acute narcotic analgesic respiratory depression. Naloxone is effectively an antidote to opioid overdose and may completely reverse the effects of an opioid overdose if administered in time.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title Page Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7
    JPET Fast Forward. Published on December 31, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000189 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. JPET-AR-2020-000189R1: Obeng et al. Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine: In Vitro Affinity and Efficacy for Mu-Opioid Receptor and Morphine-Like Discriminative-Stimulus Effects in Rats. Title Page Pharmacological Comparison of Mitragynine and 7-Hydroxymitragynine: In Vitro Affinity and Efficacy for Mu-Opioid Receptor and Opioid-Like Behavioral Effects in Rats Samuel Obeng1,2,#, Jenny L. Wilkerson1,#, Francisco León2, Morgan E. Reeves1, Luis F. Restrepo1, Lea R. Gamez-Jimenez1, Avi Patel1, Anna E. Pennington1, Victoria A. Taylor1, Nicholas P. Ho1, Tobias Braun1, John D. Fortner2, Morgan L. Crowley2, Morgan R. Williamson1, Victoria L.C. Pallares1, Marco Mottinelli2, Carolina Lopera-Londoño2, Christopher R. McCurdy2, Lance R. McMahon1, and Takato Hiranita1* Downloaded from Departments of Pharmacodynamics1 and Medicinal Chemistry2, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida jpet.aspetjournals.org #These authors contributed equally Recommended section: Behavioral Pharmacology at ASPET Journals on September 29, 2021 Correspondence: *Takato Hiranita, Ph.D. Department of Pharmacodynamics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida 1345 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610 Email: [email protected] Phone: +1.352.294.5411 Fax: +1.352.273.7705 Keywords: kratom, mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, morphine, opioid, discriminative stimulus Conflicts of Interests or Disclaimers: None Manuscript statistics: Number of text pages: 56 Number of tables: 7 Number of figures: 10 Number of supplementary Tables: 4 Number of supplementary figures: 7 1 JPET Fast Forward. Published on December 31, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.120.000189 This article has not been copyedited and formatted.
    [Show full text]
  • Failed Trials for Central Nervous System Disorders Do Not Necessarily
    CORRESPONDENCE LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE funding often outweighs the efforts required to rigorously challenge the novel findings; Failed trials for central nervous system thus, verification in an independent laboratory is unlikely. disorders do not necessarily invalidate As the costs of clinical studies are so much higher than those of preclinical development, preclinical models and drug targets one might assume that pharmaceutical com- panies would conduct robust replications of key findings. This is indeed the case during Anton Bespalov, Thomas Steckler, Bruce Altevogt, Elena Koustova, Phil Skolnick, lead optimization, candidate selection, test- Daniel Deaver, Mark J. Millan, Jesper F. Bastlund, Dario Doller, Jeffrey Witkin, ing different administration routes and the Paul Moser, Patricio O’Donnell, Ulrich Ebert, Mark A. Geyer, Eric Prinssen, use of primary preclinical disease models. Theresa Ballard and Malcolm Macleod However, this is far less common for stud- ies in the more complex disease models that are used in late stages of development and A recent article identified five key technical modest effects on survival. Numerous other are potentially more relevant for predicting determinants that make substantial contribu- drug candidates have reported efficacy in a clinical efficacy. tions to the outcome of drug R&D projects superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) mouse model In general, the rigorousness with which (Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca’s of ALS (one of the common animal models preclinical data is obtained — and the result- drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework. for this disease), but none of these candidates ing robustness of the data — is quite low; Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 419–431 (2014))1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opioid Epidemic: Crisis and Solutions
    PA58CH09-Skolnick ARI 18 November 2017 9:40 Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology The Opioid Epidemic: Crisis and Solutions Phil Skolnick Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Santa Monica, California 09401, USA; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018. 58:143–59 Keywords First published as a Review in Advance on heroin, overdose, naloxone, vaccines, medication-assisted therapies, pain October 2, 2017 The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology Abstract by [email protected] on 01/16/18. For personal use only. is online at pharmtox.annualreviews.org The widespread abuse of prescription opioids and a dramatic increase in https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox- the availability of illicit opioids have created what is commonly referred to 010617-052534 as the opioid epidemic. The magnitude of this epidemic is startling: About Copyright c 2018 by Annual Reviews. 4% of the adult US population misuses prescription opioids, and in 2015, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018.58:143-159. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org All rights reserved more than 33,000 deaths were attributable to overdose with licit and illicit opioids. Increasing the availability of medication-assisted treatments (such as buprenorphine and naltrexone), the use of abuse-deterrent formulations, and ANNUAL REVIEWS Further the adoption of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention prescribing Click here to view this article's guidelines all constitute short-term approaches to quell this epidemic. How- online features: • Download figures as PPT slides ever, with more than 125 million Americans suffering from either acute or • Navigate linked references • Download citations chronic pain, the development of effective alternatives to opioids, enabled at • Explore related articles • Search keywords least in part by a fuller understanding of the neurobiological bases of pain, offers the best long-term solution for controlling and ultimately eradicating this epidemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Antagonists As Potential Therapeutics for Ischemic Stroke
    Progress in Neurobiology 182 (2019) 101679 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Neurobiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pneurobio Perspective article Opioid antagonists as potential therapeutics for ischemic stroke T ⁎ ⁎ Nadia Peyraviana,b, Emre Dikicia,b, Sapna Deoa,b, Michal Toboreka,b, , Sylvia Daunerta,b,c, a Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, USA b Dr. JT Macdonald Foundation Biomedical Nanotechnology Institute of the University of Miami, USA c University of Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Chronic use of prescription opioids exacerbates risk and severity of ischemic stroke. Annually, 6 million people Ischemic stroke die from stroke worldwide and there are no neuroprotective or neurorestorative agents to improve stroke out- Opioid antagonist comes and promote recovery. Prescribed opioids such as morphine have been shown to alter tight junction Blood brain barrier protein expression, resulting in the disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB), ultimately leading to stroke Neuroprotection pathogenesis. Consequently, protection of the BBB has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy for ischemic Naloxone stroke. This perspective addresses the deficiency in stroke pharmacological options and examines a novel ap- Naltrexone plication and repurposing of FDA-approved opioid antagonists as a prospective neuroprotective therapeutic strategy to minimize BBB damage, reduce stroke severity, and promote neural recovery. Future directions discuss potential drug design and delivery methods to enhance these novel therapeutic targets. 1. Introduction modulate resulting microglia and macrophage activation in the is- chemic region to reduce neuroinflammation and prevent secondary As of 2017, the US government declared the opioid epidemic as a neurodegeneration resulting from phagocytosis of viable neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • Naloxone FAQ What Is Naloxone?
    1 Naloxone FAQ What is naloxone? An FDA approved opioid antagonist prescription medication that reverses opioid overdoses. Two of the most common ways that naloxone is administered are intranasally (nasal spray) and the auto-injector. Naloxone is available under the names of” naloxone,” an injectable that, with attachments can also be used as a nasal spray; “NARCAN,” an already assembled and easy to administer nasal spray; and, finally “EVZO,” a prefilled auto-injector. How does it work? It stops or reverses the effects of an opioid overdose and restores breathing within two (2) to eight (8) minutes. The naloxone effect lasts from 20 to 90 minutes, and can be safely readministered as indicated. Is it safe? Yes. It cannot be used to get high and it is non-addictive . Where do I find an approved training? Free in-person NARCAN administration training is available at Prevention Point Philadelphia. Where do I find an approved online training and how long does training take? www.getnaloxonenow.org https://www.pavtn.net/act-139-training http://prescribetoprevent.org/patient-education/videos/ Training takes approximately 20 minutes. Does Act 139 under Provision of Good Samaritan cover provider agencies? Yes. How do we obtain naloxone? Providers will have to purchase by prescription. Individuals may do so by prescription or by standing order issued by Pennsylvania’s Physician General, Dr. Rachel Levine. Some pharmacies keep this standing order on file. NALOXONE/NARCAN FAQ Page 1 2 Naloxone FAQ (continued) Does Medical Assistance require prior authorization for any of the naloxone products? The Evzio Auto-Injector is covered by Medical Assistance, but requires prior authorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Receptorsreceptors
    OPIOIDOPIOID RECEPTORSRECEPTORS defined or “classical” types of opioid receptor µ,dk and . Alistair Corbett, Sandy McKnight and Graeme Genes encoding for these receptors have been cloned.5, Henderson 6,7,8 More recently, cDNA encoding an “orphan” receptor Dr Alistair Corbett is Lecturer in the School of was identified which has a high degree of homology to Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow the “classical” opioid receptors; on structural grounds Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, this receptor is an opioid receptor and has been named Glasgow G4 0BA, UK. ORL (opioid receptor-like).9 As would be predicted from 1 Dr Sandy McKnight is Associate Director, Parke- their known abilities to couple through pertussis toxin- Davis Neuroscience Research Centre, sensitive G-proteins, all of the cloned opioid receptors Cambridge University Forvie Site, Robinson possess the same general structure of an extracellular Way, Cambridge CB2 2QB, UK. N-terminal region, seven transmembrane domains and Professor Graeme Henderson is Professor of intracellular C-terminal tail structure. There is Pharmacology and Head of Department, pharmacological evidence for subtypes of each Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical receptor and other types of novel, less well- Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, characterised opioid receptors,eliz , , , , have also been Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. postulated. Thes -receptor, however, is no longer regarded as an opioid receptor. Introduction Receptor Subtypes Preparations of the opium poppy papaver somniferum m-Receptor subtypes have been used for many hundreds of years to relieve The MOR-1 gene, encoding for one form of them - pain. In 1803, Sertürner isolated a crystalline sample of receptor, shows approximately 50-70% homology to the main constituent alkaloid, morphine, which was later shown to be almost entirely responsible for the the genes encoding for thedk -(DOR-1), -(KOR-1) and orphan (ORL ) receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • 5892 Cisco Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721
    Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) P. Faltstrom, Ed. Request for Comments: 5892 Cisco Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721 The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) Abstract This document specifies rules for deciding whether a code point, considered in isolation or in context, is a candidate for inclusion in an Internationalized Domain Name (IDN). It is part of the specification of Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications 2008 (IDNA2008). Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5892. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrillische Schrift Für Den Computer
    Hanna-Chris Gast Kyrillische Schrift für den Computer Benennung der Buchstaben, Vergleich der Transkriptionen in Bibliotheken und Standesämtern, Auflistung der Unicodes sowie Tastaturbelegung für Windows XP Inhalt Seite Vorwort ................................................................................................................................................ 2 1 Kyrillische Schriftzeichen mit Benennung................................................................................... 3 1.1 Die Buchstaben im Russischen mit Schreibschrift und Aussprache.................................. 3 1.2 Kyrillische Schriftzeichen anderer slawischer Sprachen.................................................... 9 1.3 Veraltete kyrillische Schriftzeichen .................................................................................... 10 1.4 Die gebräuchlichen Sonderzeichen ..................................................................................... 11 2 Transliterationen und Transkriptionen (Umschriften) .......................................................... 13 2.1 Begriffe zum Thema Transkription/Transliteration/Umschrift ...................................... 13 2.2 Normen und Vorschriften für Bibliotheken und Standesämter....................................... 15 2.3 Tabellarische Übersicht der Umschriften aus dem Russischen ....................................... 21 2.4 Transliterationen veralteter kyrillischer Buchstaben ....................................................... 25 2.5 Transliterationen bei anderen slawischen
    [Show full text]