Copyright Hawkins\Brown Architects No implied licence exists. This drawing should not be used to calculate areas for the purposes of valuation. Do not scale this drawing. All dimensions to be checked on the site by the contractor and such dimensions to be their A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. responsibility. All work must comply with relevant British Standards and Building Regulations 6706 2855 3001 7434 7125 3000 7190 7539 requirements. Drawing errors and omissions to be SH_04_RFL reported to the architect. To be read in conjunction with Architect's specification and other 36380 consultant information.

Rev Description Date SH-03-04 SH-03-04 SH-03-06 SH-03-04 T01 Stage 4a Issue-S2- For Information 02.02.18 Rooftop Play Area Rooftop Play Area Stair 2 Rooftop Play Area T02 D2 - Suitable for Tender 20.04.18

GENERAL NOTE: SH_03_FFL 32680 DESIGN INTENT ONLY. Refer to specification for submittals required for subcontractor design items. All dimensions approximate. Existing dimensions are based on Greenhatch survey. All dimensions to be verified by the Contractor on site. All SH-02-08 SH-02-07 SH-02-09 SH-02-13 SH-02-14 SH-02-19 SH-02-20 existing buildup and structure shown is Specialist Teaching Circulation WC Year 06 Classroom Year 06 Classroom Year 05 Classroom Year 05 Classroom assumed and should be verified on site by the Contractor/ Subcontractor. Landscape design indicative only. SH_02_FFL General Arrangement - refer to 00 series information. 28330 External facade - refer to 21 series information. Roofs - refer to 27 series Information. External window - refer to 31 series information. External performance requirements (thermal, airtightness SH-01-09 SH-01-08 SH-01-07 SH-01-11 SH-01-15 SH-01-16 SH-01-21 SH-01-22 etc) Group Room Storage Circulation WC Year 04 Classroom Year 04 Classroom Year 03 Classroom Year 03 Classroom - refer to 29 series information and MEP Engineer's report.

Internal wall - refer to 22 series information. SH_01_FFL Stairs - refer to 24 series information. Internal doors - refer to 32 series information. 24355 Floor build ups - refer to 33 series information. Ceiling information - refer to 35 series information. Floor finishes - refer to 43 series information. Room Data Sheets - refer to 77 series information. SH-00-19 SH-00-18 SH-00-15 SH-00-16 SH-00-28 SH-00-27 SH-00-33 SH-00-34 SEN Therapy Hygiene Circulation WC 2-3 Year Olds Nursery Reception Classroom Reception Classroom Fire strategy - refer to 29 series and Fire Engineer's report for fire requirements. Acoustics strategy - refer to Accoutician's report. SH_00_FFL CDM - refer to 99 series and CDM report. 20380

Section_AA_School_Long 1 1 : 100

Sim Stage 4a 1 24_603 01. 02. 03. 05. 06. 07. 08. 10. 11. 12. 13.

2619 2920 3320 8581 5594 5618

SH_04_RFL 36380

SH-03-03 SH-03-04 External Plant Space Rooftop Play Area

SH_03_FFL 32680

Staff PreparationSH-02-02 and SH-02-07 Social Circulation SH_02_FFL Project 28330 5361 5094 2830 CoLPAI 103 Golden Lane

SH-01-02 SH-01-07 HA_02_RFL London EC1Y 0TZ Staff Preparation and Circulation Social 25580 SH_01_FFL Drawing 24355 HA_01_RFL 23580 School Sections

SH-00-01 SH-00-15 HA-00-42 HA-00-39 Lobby Circulation Hall Kitchen SH_00_FFL HA_00_FFL Scale @ A1 Date 20380 20380 As indicated 02.02.18

Drawn By Checked By GJG GJG

Job Number Status - Purpose of Issue Section_BB_School_Short 17075 D2 - Suitable for Tender 2 1 : 100 Drawing No. Rev COL-HBA-B2-XX-DR-A-00_294 T02 Copyright Hawkins\Brown Architects No implied licence exists. This drawing should not be used to calculate areas for the purposes of 06. 08. valuation. Do not scale this drawing. All 07. dimensions to be checked on the site by the contractor and such dimensions to be their 5594 5618 responsibility. All work must comply with relevant British Standards and Building Regulations requirements. Drawing errors and omissions to be SH_04_RFL reported to the architect. To be read in 36380 conjunction with Architect's specification and other consultant information.

Rev Description Date SH-03-04 T01 Stage 4a Issue-S2- For Information 02.02.18 Rooftop Play Area T02 D2 - Suitable for Tender 20.04.18

SH_03_FFL GENERAL NOTE:

32680 DESIGN INTENT ONLY. Refer to specification for submittals required for subcontractor design items. All dimensions approximate. Existing dimensions are based on Greenhatch survey. All dimensions to be verified by the Contractor on site. All existing construction buildup and structure shown is SH-02-20 SH-02-18 Year 05 Classroom Circulation assumed and should be verified on site by the A.J. K. L. M. N. O. G. P. Contractor/ Subcontractor. Landscape design indicative only. SH_02_FFL 28330 General Arrangement - refer to 00 series information. External facade - refer to 21 series information. Roofs - refer to 27 series Information. 7000 4700 4500 4500 4500 4891 1532 External window - refer to 31 series information. External performance requirements (thermal, airtightness SH-01-22 SH-01-20 HA_02_RFL etc) Year 03 Classroom Circulation HA-01-24 - refer to 29 series information and MEP Engineer's report. 25580 Plant Deck SH_01_FFL Internal wall - refer to 22 series information. Stairs - refer to 24 series information. 24355 HA_01_RFL Internal doors - refer to 32 series information. Floor build ups - refer to 33 series information. 23580 Ceiling information - refer to 35 series information. Floor finishes - refer to 43 series information. Room Data Sheets - refer to 77 series information.

SH-00-35 SH-00-34 HA-00-36 HA-00-39 HA-00-42 HA-00-44 WC Reception Classroom Fire strategy - refer to 29 series and Fire Engineer's report Refuse Area Kitchen Hall Studio for fire requirements. SH_00_FFL HA_00_FFL Acoustics strategy - refer to Accoutician's report. CDM - refer to 99 series and CDM report. 20380 20380

Section_CC_School_Short 1 1 : 100 Section_DD_School_Short 2 1 : 100 Stage 4a

A. B. C. D.

6706 2855 3001 SH_04_RFL 36380

SH-03-02 Stair 1

SH_03_FFL 32680

10. 11. 12. 13. SH-02-03 SH-02-04 Year 02 Classroom Circulation

SH_02_FFL Project 28330 5361 5094 2830 CoLPAI

HA_02_RFL 103 Golden Lane SH-01-03 SH-01-04 HA-01-24 London EC1Y 0TZ Year 01 Classroom Circulation 25580 Plant Deck

SH_01_FFL HA_01_RFL 24355 Drawing 23580 School Sections

CateringHA-00-41 Staff WC andHA-00-56 HA-00-39 HA-00-38 SH-00-07 SH-00-10 Changing Catering Office Kitchen Kitchen Water Tank Head Office Circulation HA_00_FFL SH_00_FFL 20380 20380 Scale @ A1 Date As indicated 02.02.18

Drawn By Checked By GJG GJG

Section_FF_School_Short Job Number Status - Purpose of Issue 4 1 : 100 17075 D2 - Suitable for Tender Section_EE_School_Short Drawing No. Rev 3 1 : 100 COL-HBA-B2-XX-DR-A-00_295 T02

GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR GENERAL NOTES DRAWING SEE "37845-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-S-1000" 2. DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING. FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY SHALL BE USED. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO PBA FOR CLARIFICATION. IF IN DOUBT ASK. 3. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT 2 1 ARCHITECTS; SERVICE ENGINEERS; CIVIL ENGINEERS DRAWINGS AND SPECIALISTS 5148 DRAWINGS PLUS THE SPECIFICATIONS AND BILL OF QUANTITIES. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METERS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. ALL DIMENSION ARE TO BE CONFIRMED ON SITE BY CONTRACTOR BEFORE B A COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS ANY DEVIATIONS FOUND ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER / ARCHITECT. C4 C4 FINISHES TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS 250mm THK RC SLAB SSL +19.700 m TOC +19.850 m EPS VOID FORMER FINISHES TO FFL 300 WIDE RC UPSTAND FGL ARCHITECTS DETAILS WATERPROOFING KEY BEYOND 1200mm DEEP RC ELEMENT DESCRIPTION

425 300 WIDE RC UPSTAND PILECAP SSL +19.275 m TOF +19.275 m TOC +19.275 m DENOTES WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE SHOWN INDICATIVELY, REFER TO ARCHITECTS INFORMATION FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND EXTENT. MEMBRANE TO

275 PROVIDE TYPE 'A' PROTECTION TO BS8102 (2009) 300 DENOTES WATERTIGHT REINFORCED CONCRETE WATERPROOF CEMENTITIOUS CONSTRUCTION FORMED USING SIKA-WATERTIGHT SLURRY TO WATERPROOFING CONCRETE ADMIXTURE OR EQUIVALENT APPROVED. SPECIALISTS DETAILS 275mm THK RC SLAB PC2 ADMIXTURE TO PROVIDE TYPE 'B' PROTECTION TO BS SSL +18.350 m 8102 (2009) SSL +18.350 m 1050W X 1200 DEEP RC WATERPROOFING NOTES CAPPING BEAM 1. WATERPROOFING SYSTEMS SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY A SUITABLLY QUALIFIED SPECIALIST. E.G: CSSW QUALIFICATION

2. SUBMIT DETAILS OF WATERPROOFING STRATEGY TO WARRANTY PROVIDER FOR DPM TO WATERPROOFING APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. SPECIALISTS DETAILS 750Ø CONTIGUOUS PILES 600Ø PILE 600Ø PILE 3. ALL WATERPROOF SYSTEMS TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN GROUND CONDITIONS WHERE 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING SOLUBLE SULFATES ARE PRESENT WITH AN ACEC CLASSIFICATION AC-2 AND DESIGN SULFATE CLASS DS-2.

4. WATER BARS TO ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND PENETRATIONS IN WATERPROOF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION TO BE DETAILED BY WATERPROOFING SPECIALIST SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 8-8 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 9-9 PILE CAP FOUNDATION SCHEDULE 1 : 25 1 : 25 REF. SIZE Comments PC1 900x900x1200 DEEP PC2 2700x2459x1200 DEEP 3 PILE CAP PC3 2700x900x1200 DEEP 2 PILE CAP PC4 2700x2459x1500 DEEP 300mm PILE TO EDGE OF CAP CONC COVERAGE

GROUND BEAM SCHEDULE REF. SIZE (WIDTH x DEPTH) GB1 600 x 600mm DEEP

CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE REF. SIZE C1 400 x 400mm C2 450mmØ C3 350mmØ C4 300 x 900mm C5 250 x 900mm C7 500mmØ

ISOMETRIC VIEW

T01 ISSUED FOR COMMENT 13.04.18 RP MW Mark Revision Date Drawn Chkd SCALING NOTE: Do not scale from this drawing. If in doubt, ask. Drawing Issue Status S2 - TENDER ISSUE CITY OF LONDON PRIMARY ACADEMY ISLINGTON (CoLPAI) RESIDENTIAL TOWER SUBSTRUCTURE DETAILS

Client

Date of 1st Issue Designed Drawn 13.04.18 NC RP Offices throughout A1 Scale Checked Approved the UK and Europe As indicated MW DR www.peterbrett.com Drawing Number Revision © Peter Brett Associates LLP COL-PBA-B1-ZZ-DR-S-1303 T01 LONDON Tel: +44 (0) 20 3824 6600

C:\Users\rpparker\Documents\COL-PBA-B1-ZZ-M3-S-0001_rpparker.rvt 6 GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR GENERAL NOTES DRAWING SEE "37845-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-S-1000" 2. DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING. FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY SHALL BE USED. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO PBA FOR CLARIFICATION. IF IN DOUBT ASK.

C5 3. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT BEYOND ARCHITECTS; SERVICE ENGINEERS; CIVIL ENGINEERS DRAWINGS AND SPECIALISTS FINISHES TO A F DRAWINGS PLUS THE SPECIFICATIONS AND BILL OF QUANTITIES. FINISHES TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS ARCHITECTS DETAILS 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EPS VOID FORMER 150 WIDE RC UPSTAND FFL EPS VOID FORMER FFL FGL 5. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METERS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DPM TO WATERPROOFING 150 WIDE RC UPSTAND 6. ALL DIMENSION ARE TO BE CONFIRMED ON SITE BY CONTRACTOR BEFORE SPECIALISTS DETAILS COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS ANY DEVIATIONS FOUND ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE

0 ENGINEER / ARCHITECT. SSL +19.275 m 5 TOF +19.275 m

2

5

7 275 2 WATERPROOF CEMENTITIOUS WATERPROOFING KEY WATERPROOF SLURRY TO WATERPROOFING CEMENTITIOUS SLURRY

150 SPECIALIST DETAILS TO WATERPROOFING ELEMENT DESCRIPTION SPECIALIST DETAILS DENOTES WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE SHOWN 1050W X 1200 DEEP RC 1050W X 1200 DEEP RC INDICATIVELY, REFER TO ARCHITECTS INFORMATION 200 MM THK TARGET WALL LINER CAPPING BEAM FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND EXTENT. MEMBRANE TO CAPPING BEAM 200 MM THK TARGET WALL LINER & 2No. LAYERS A393 MESH & 2No. LAYERS A393 MESH PROVIDE TYPE 'A' PROTECTION TO BS8102 (2009) DENOTES WATERTIGHT REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION FORMED USING SIKA-WATERTIGHT CONCRETE ADMIXTURE OR EQUIVALENT APPROVED. 225

275 ADMIXTURE TO PROVIDE TYPE 'B' PROTECTION TO BS MAX TARGET WALL LINER 8102 (2009) 750Ø CONTIGUOUS PILES WATERPROOFING NOTES 750Ø CONTIGUOUS PILES 1. WATERPROOFING SYSTEMS SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY A SUITABLLY QUALIFIED

0

350 0 SPECIALIST. E.G: CSSW QUALIFICATION

9 TYPE A WATERPROOFING MAX TO WATERPROOFING 2. SUBMIT DETAILS OF WATERPROOFING STRATEGY TO WARRANTY PROVIDER FOR SPECIALISTS DETAILS APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 5-5 3. ALL WATERPROOF SYSTEMS TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN GROUND CONDITIONS WHERE SOLUBLE SULFATES ARE PRESENT WITH AN ACEC CLASSIFICATION AC-2 AND DESIGN 4No H16 DOWEL BARS PER PILE. SULFATE CLASS DS-2. SPACING AS NOTED. DOWELS 1 : 25

INTO CENTRE OF CONTIGUOUS 0 0 4. WATER BARS TO ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND PENETRATIONS IN WATERPROOF

9 PILES FIXED WITH HIT HY 200 CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION TO BE DETAILED BY WATERPROOFING SPECIALIST INJECTION MORTAR WITH 300mm MIN EMBEDMENT

PILE CAP FOUNDATION SCHEDULE

X

0

A

0

6 M REF. SIZE Comments PC1 900x900x1200 DEEP 7 1302 PC2 2700x2459x1200 DEEP 3 PILE CAP PC3 2700x900x1200 DEEP 2 PILE CAP

450 125 675 125 125 675 125 PC4 2700x2459x1500 DEEP 300mm PILE TO EDGE OF CAP CONC COVERAGE 600 250 1200 250 KICKER MAX WATERPROOF CEMENTITIOUS 0 TOF +15.000 m SSL +15.000 m SSL +15.000 m

5 SLURRY 1 HEIGHT MH COVER RECESS MH COVER RECESS

0 0

0 0

0

H25 DOWEL BARS FIXED WITH 300 3 3

5 GROUND BEAM SCHEDULE HIT HY 200 INJECTION MORTAR 2 OPENING OPENING WITH 300mm EMBEDMENT REF. SIZE (WIDTH x DEPTH) GB1 600 x 600mm DEEP

6

0

0

1302 0

0

4

CORDEK EPS 9

1

FILCOR 20 0 0

0 0

1200 CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE

3 3

675x675x125mm DP RECESS 1 1 IN BASEMENT SLAB, REF. SIZE CENTRAL ABOUT OPENING C1 400 x 400mm

0

5

2 C2 450mmØ SSL +13.400 m SSL +13.400 m C3 350mmØ 1700 C4 300 x 900mm 90mm CORDEK CELLCORE HXS 0 0

5 5

2 2 C5 250 x 900mm 9/13 HEAVE PROTECTION & 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING C7 500mmØ

250 1200 250 250 900 250 90mm CORDEK CELLCORE HXS 90mm CORDEK CELLCORE HXS 9/13 HEAVE PROTECTION & 9/13 HEAVE PROTECTION & SUBSTRUCTURE DETAIL A 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING 1 : 25 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 6-6 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 7-7 1 : 25 1 : 25 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 4-4 1 : 25

SSL +19.275 m 1050W X 1200 DEEP RC 200 CAPPING BEAM SSL +19.275 m MASS CONCRETE FROM BASEMENT FORMATION LEVEL (+13.500m) T01 ISSUED FOR COMMENT 13.04.18 RP MW UPTO 150mm ABOVE LINER WALL, KICKER HEIGHT (+15.300m) Mark Revision Date Drawn Chkd POLYURETHANE FOAM BETWEEN CONTIGUOUS PILES FROM THIS

LEVEL TO UNDERSIDE OF CAPPING BEAM MIN 200mm THK TARGET LINER WALL = SCALING NOTE: Do not scale from this drawing. If in doubt, ask.

AND 2No LAYERS A393 MESH 350 SERVICE DUCTS CAST INTO CENTRE OF CAPPING DIMENSION FROM U/S OF Drawing Issue Status TYPE A WATERPROOFING TO CAPPING BEAM TO DOWEL BEAM. WATER BARS & WATERPROOFING DETAILS WATERPROOFING SPECIALISTS DETAILS MUST NOT EXCEED 275mm BY WATERPROOFING SPECIALIST S2 - TENDER ISSUE

0

0 A393 MESH 2 LAYERS 9 = CITY OF LONDON PRIMARY ACADEMY

0 ISLINGTON (CoLPAI)

4No. H16 DOWEL BARS 0 EVERY PILE 9 RESIDENTIAL TOWER E

0

0 SUBSTRUCTURE DETAILS

6 750Ø CONTIGUOUS PILES SSL +15.000 m 5 325 DIMENSION FROM TOP OF 1302 SLAB TO DOWEL MUST NOT Client EXCEED 600mm

350

TYPICAL CONTIGUOUS PILE WALL TYPICAL CAPPING BEAM Date of 1st Issue Designed Drawn NC RP Offices throughout TYPICAL CONTIGUOUS WALL PLAN ELEVATION PENETRATION DETAIL A1 Scale Checked Approved the UK and Europe As indicated MW DR www.peterbrett.com 1 : 25 1 : 50 1 : 25 Drawing Number Revision © Peter Brett Associates LLP COL-PBA-B1-ZZ-DR-S-1302 T01 LONDON Tel: +44 (0) 20 3824 6600

C:\Users\rpparker\Documents\COL-PBA-B1-ZZ-M3-S-0001_rpparker.rvt GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR GENERAL NOTES DRAWING SEE "37845-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-S-1000" 5 4 6 2. DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING. FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY SHALL BE USED. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO PBA FOR CLARIFICATION. IF IN DOUBT ASK. 5050 3. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT ARCHITECTS; SERVICE ENGINEERS; CIVIL ENGINEERS DRAWINGS AND SPECIALISTS DRAWINGS PLUS THE SPECIFICATIONS AND BILL OF QUANTITIES. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 250THK RC WALL 5. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METERS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BEYOND FINISHES TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS 6. ALL DIMENSION ARE TO BE CONFIRMED ON SITE BY CONTRACTOR BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS ANY DEVIATIONS FOUND ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE FFL EPS VOID FORMER ENGINEER / ARCHITECT. 150 WIDE RC UPSTAND 250THK RC WALL 250THK RC WALL 250THK RC WALL WATERPROOFING KEY FFL SSL +15.000 m RD_00_SSL SSL +19.275 m ELEMENT DESCRIPTION +19.275 m 300 275 WATERPROOF DENOTES WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE SHOWN CEMENTITIOUS SLURRY TO INDICATIVELY, REFER TO ARCHITECTS INFORMATION LIFT PIT WATERPROOFING 150 FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND EXTENT. MEMBRANE TO 350 350 SPECIALISTS DETAILS PROVIDE TYPE 'A' PROTECTION TO BS8102 (2009) CORDEK EPS MIN 1200 MIN DENOTES WATERTIGHT REINFORCED CONCRETE FILCOR 20 CORDEK EPS CONSTRUCTION FORMED USING SIKA-WATERTIGHT FILCOR 20 1050W X 1200 DEEP RC 200 MM THK TARGET WALL LINER CONCRETE ADMIXTURE OR EQUIVALENT APPROVED. CAPPING BEAM & 2No. LAYERS A393 MESH ADMIXTURE TO PROVIDE TYPE 'B' PROTECTION TO BS TOC +13.800 m 8102 (2009) WATERPROOFING NOTES 300 1. WATERPROOFING SYSTEMS SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY A SUITABLLY QUALIFIED POLYURETHANE FOAM SPECIALIST. E.G: CSSW QUALIFICATION 1500 50mm CONCRETE BETWEEN CONTIGUOUS PILES DPM TO WATERPROOFING 750Ø CONTIGUOUS PILES 2. SUBMIT DETAILS OF WATERPROOFING STRATEGY TO WARRANTY PROVIDER FOR BLINDING BY SPECIALIST SPECIALISTS DETAILS APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 350 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING MAX 3. ALL WATERPROOF SYSTEMS TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN GROUND CONDITIONS WHERE

1200 SOLUBLE SULFATES ARE PRESENT WITH AN ACEC CLASSIFICATION AC-2 AND DESIGN TYPE A WATERPROOFING SULFATE CLASS DS-2. TO WATERPROOFING SPECIALISTS DETAILS 4. WATER BARS TO ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND PENETRATIONS IN WATERPROOF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION TO BE DETAILED BY WATERPROOFING SPECIALIST

PILE CAP FOUNDATION SCHEDULE 600Ø PILE 600Ø PILE 600Ø PILE 600Ø PILE 600Ø PILE REF. SIZE Comments PC1 900x900x1200 DEEP PC2 2700x2459x1200 DEEP 3 PILE CAP PC3 2700x900x1200 DEEP 2 PILE CAP PC4 2700x2459x1500 DEEP 300mm PILE TO EDGE OF CAP CONC COVERAGE

SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 1-1 RD_B1_SSL GROUND BEAM SCHEDULE KICKER HEIGHT SSL +15.000 m TOF +15.000 m 150 1 : 25 +15.000 m REF. SIZE (WIDTH x DEPTH)

300 GB1 600 x 600mm DEEP WATERPROOF CEMENTITIOUS SLURRY TO WATERPROOFING SPECIALISTS DETAILS CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE CORDEK EPS FILCOR 20 REF. SIZE E D MASS CONCRETE INFILL C1 400 x 400mm BETWEEN CONTIGUOUS PILES 1200 1924 C2 450mmØ C3 350mmØ C4 300 x 900mm C5 250 x 900mm C7 500mmØ

90mm CORDEK CELLCORE HXS 9/13 HEAVE PROTECTION & 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING

RC LINER WALL WITH 600Ø PILE 2No. LAYERS A393 MESH

250THK RC WALL 250THK RC WALL POLYURETHANE FOAM BETWEEN CONTIGUOUS PILES BY SPECIALIST

WATERPROOF CEMENTITIOUS SSL +15.000 m SSL +15.000 m SLURRY TO WATERPROOFING FFL FFL SPECIALISTS DETAILS 300

750Ø CONTIGUOUS PILES

LIFT PIT CORDEK EPS 1200 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 3-3 FILCOR 20 350 350 1450 MIN MIN 1 : 25 1200

MASS CONCRETE INFILL TOF +13.800 m TOC +13.800 m BETWEEN CONTIGUOUS PILES T01 ISSUED FOR COMMENT 13.04.18 RP MW 300 Mark Revision Date Drawn Chkd SCALING NOTE: Do not scale from this drawing. If in doubt, ask. TYPE A WATERPROOFING Drawing Issue Status TO SPECIALISTS DETAILS S2 - TENDER ISSUE 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING 1200 CITY OF LONDON PRIMARY ACADEMY ISLINGTON (CoLPAI) RESIDENTIAL TOWER SUBSTRUCTURE DETAILS

600Ø PILE 600Ø PILE 600Ø PILE MAIN SCHOOL Client TOWER RESIDENTIAL

SCHOOL HALL Date of 1st Issue Designed Drawn SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 2-2 12.02.18 NC RP Offices throughout 1 : 25 A1 Scale Checked Approved the UK and Europe KEY PLAN As indicated MW DR www.peterbrett.com Drawing Number Revision © Peter Brett Associates LLP 1:750 COL-PBA-B1-ZZ-DR-S-1301 T01 LONDON Tel: +44 (0) 20 3824 6600

C:\Users\rpparker\Documents\COL-PBA-B1-ZZ-M3-S-0001_rpparker.rvt NOTES:

1. THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT DESIGN DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTATION.

2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES AND LEVELS IN METRES ABOVE LOCAL DATUM, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

TYPICAL MANHOLE DETAIL - TYPE 2 TYPICAL MANHOLE DETAIL - TYPE 2 (ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL) 3.ALL DIMENSIONS, LEVELS AND SURVEY GRID CO-ORDINATES ARE TO BE CHECKED ON SITE AND THE ENGINEER NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT MAXIMUM DEPTH FROM COVER LEVEL TO SOFFIT OF PIPE 3.0 m MAXIMUM DEPTH FROM COVER LEVEL TO SOFFIT OF PIPE 3.0 m OF THE WORKS. 600mm x 600mm CLEAR OPENING COVER COMPLYING 600mm x 600mm CLEAR OPENING COVER COMPLYING WITH BS EN 124 AND BS 7903 WITH BS EN 124 AND BS 7903 4.NO DEVIATION FROM THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING IS PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR SEE CLAUSE E2.32 OF "SEWERS FOR ADOPTION 7TH SEE CLAUSE E2.32 OF "SEWERS FOR ADOPTION 7TH PERMISSION FROM THE ENGINEER. MORTAR BEDDING AND HAUNCHING TO MORTAR BEDDING AND HAUNCHING TO COVER AND FRAME TO CLAUSE E6.7 EDITION" EDITION" COVER AND FRAME TO CLAUSE E6.7 OF 5.ALL CONCRETE AND CONCRETE PRODUCTS BELOW GROUND LEVEL SHALL BE CLASS DS-2 AND OF "SEWERS FOR ADOPTION 7TH EDITION" "SEWERS FOR ADOPTION 7TH EDITION" AC2 SULPHATE RESISTANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BRE SPECIAL DIGEST 1. MINIMUM 2 COURSES OF CLASS B MINIMUM 2 COURSES OF CLASS B ENGINEERING BRICKS OR PRECAST ENGINEERING BRICKS OR PRECAST 6.THE SETTING OUT OF THE DRAINAGE WORKS IS TO BE AGREED ON-SITE WITH THE ENGINEER, CONCRETE COVER FRAME SEATING RINGS CONCRETE COVER FRAME SEATING RINGS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS. MINIMUM CLEAR ACCESS 600mm MINIMUM CLEAR ACCESS 600mm 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT THE DRAINAGE 675mm MAXIMUM TO FIRST STEP RUNG FROM 675mm MAXIMUM TO FIRST WORKS FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. COVER LEVEL STEP RUNG FROM COVER LEVEL PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS AND COVER 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL OF THE APPROPRIATE STATUTORY UNDERTAKERS AND SLAB TO BE BEDDED WITH MORTAR, PLASTOMERIC OR PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS AND COVER ESTABLISH THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL SERVICES, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE ELASTOMERIC SEAL CONFORMING TO BS EN 1917 AND SLAB TO BE BEDDED WITH MORTAR, PLASTOMERIC OR WORKS, BY HAND DUG TRIAL PITS. LIFTING EYES IN CONCRETE RINGS TO BE BS 5911-3 LIFTING EYES IN CONCRETE ELASTOMERIC SEAL CONFORMING TO BS EN 1917 AND POINTED SEE CLAUSE E2.29 OF "SEWERS FOR ADOPTION 7TH RINGS TO BE POINTED BS 5911-3 CHAMBER WALL TO BE MINIMUM 125mm 9.ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE SOFFIT TO SOFFIT. CLAUSE B3.2.13 OF SEWERS FOR EDITION" ADOPTION 10.STATED COVER LEVELS ARE FOR GUIDANCE ONLY AND SHALL BE SET TO THE FINISH LEVELS OF 7TH EDITION FOR PC RING DIAMETER THE CARRIAGEWAY/FOOTWAY/VERGE. CLAUSE B3.2.13 OF SEWERS FOR ADOPTION 7TH EDITION FOR PC RING DIAMETER 150mm CONCRETE SURROUND 11.ALL PIPE SIZES STATED ARE NOMINAL INTERNAL DIAMETERS IN MILLIMETERS. IN-SITU CONCRETE TO BE GEN3 (DESIGNED TO BRE SPECIAL DIGEST 1 12.ALL SOFT SPOTS AND VOIDS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND REPLACED CONCRETE IN AGGRESSIVE GROUND) CHAMBER HEIGHT (NOT LESS THAN 900mm) CHAMBER HEIGHT (NOT LESS THAN 900mm) WITH SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL AS AGREED WITH THE ENGINEER.

13.ALL DRAINAGE WORKS TO BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT BRITISH STANDARDS, BUILDING REGULATION PART H AND SEWERS FOR ADOPTION WHERE RELEVANT.

BENCHING SLOPE TO BE 1:10 TO 1:30 SURFACE OF BENCHING AND 14.DRAINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING FLEXIBLY JOINTED VITRIFIED CLAY PIPES TO CHANNEL FORMED MONOLITHICALLY HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE TOPPING TO BE BS 65 "SUPER STRENGTH" SPECIFICATION & BS EN 295, IF EXISTING DRAINAGE RUN BEING WITH HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE BROUGHT UP TO A DENSE, SMOOTH FACE, DIVERTED IS FOUND TO BE VITRIFIED CLAY. IF EXISTING DRAINAGE IS FOUND TO BE UPVC THEN BASE OR A PROPRIETARY LINER BENCHING SLOPE TO BE 1:10 TO 1:30 NEATLY SHAPED AND FINISHED TO ALL THE BOTTOM PRECAST MANHOLE USE UPVC TO BS EN 1401. IF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE IS FOUND BE HDPE, THEN USE HDPE TO BS BRANCH CONNECTIONS RING TO BE BUILT INTO BASE EN 13244. DRAINAGE PIPES TO BE BEDDED AND BACKFILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE (MINIMUM THICKNESS 20mm) CONCRETE MINIMUM 75mm MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND THE SPECIFICATIONS. SELF-CLEANING TOE HOLES TO BE PROVIDED WHERE CHANNEL EXCEEDS 600mm WIDE 15.BACKFILLING OF DRAIN TRENCHES ADJACENT TO DWELLINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTION JOINT DISTANCE BETWEEN TOP OF PIPE PRECAST BASE UNIT TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING REGULATIONS PART H; DIAGRAM 8. SURFACE WATER AND UNDERSIDE OF PRECAST SECTION TO BE FROM PRIVATE AREAS IS NOT TO BE DISCHARGED ONTO THE PROPOSED HIGHWAY. MINIMUM 50mm TO MAXIMUM 300mm SELF-CLEANING TOE HOLES TO BE PROVIDED WHERE CHANNEL EXCEEDS 600mm WIDE 150mm TO UNDERSIDE OF CHANNEL CDM, HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES (DRG. 1100)

DENOTES THE LOCATION OF RISK. FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO RISK REFERENCE INVERTS TO BE FORMED USING CHANNEL 225mm TO UNDERSIDE OF CHANNEL AND DESCRIPTION PIPES IN ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS AND RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE FORM OF CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED ON THE DRAWINGS, THE FOLLOWING RESIDUAL RISKS SHOULD BE...

SEE CLAUSE E6.6.2 OF "SEWERS FOR &²&216758&7,216²,16(59,&(0$,17(1$1&('²'(&200,66,21,1*'(02/,7,21 ADOPTION 7TH EDITION" FOR ROCKER PIPE DETAILS RISK RISK JOINT TO BE AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO FACE SEE CLAUSE E6.6.2 OF "SEWERS FOR PREFIX REF. RISK DESCRIPTION RISK PHASE OF MANHOLE TO PERMIT SATISFACTORY ADOPTION 7TH EDITION" JOINT TO BE WITHIN CHAMBER WALL TO PBA 01 IF UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE IS DISCOVERED, STOP WORK IMMEDIATELY, C JOINT AND SUBSEQUENT MOVEMENT FOR ROCKER PIPE DETAILS PERMIT SATISFACTORY JOINT AND RESTRICT ACCESS AND INFORM THE POLICE. REFER TO UXO RISK SUBSEQUENT MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT UNDERTAKEN BY 1ST LINE OF DEFENCE FOR RISK MITIGATION MEASURES PBA 02 CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED IN PROXIMITY TO LIVE SITE SERVICES. PC TO C PIPE JOINT WITH CHANNEL TO BE LOCATED UNDERTAKE GPR SURVEY, TRIAL PITS, ETC TO CONFIRM LOCATION AND MINIMUM 100mm INSIDE FACE OF MANHOLE EXTENT PBA 03 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF LV/HV CABLE (TO BE DIVERTED BY UKPN). C REFER TO TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY DRG 23900_02_UG RECEIVED DOUBLE STEP RUNGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DOUBLE STEP RUNGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 20-10-16 BS EN 13101 SEE CLAUSE E2.33 OF "SEWERS BS EN 13101. SEE CLAUSE E2.33 OF "SEWERS PBA 04 DEEP EXCAVATIONS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE. PC TO ENSURE STABILITY C MINIMUM WIDTH OF BENCHING TO BE 225mm MINIMUM WIDTH OF BENCHING TO BE 225mm FOR ADOPTION 7TH EDITION" FOR DOUBLE FOR ADOPTION 7TH EDITION" FOR DOUBLE OF EXCAVATIONS DURING WORKS. CONSIDER BENCHING AND TEMP STEP DETAILS STEP DETAILS WORKS. PBA 05 EXCAVATION REQUIRED ADJACENT TO EXISTING MASONRY BOUNDARY C WALL. UNDERPINNING REQUIRED LOCALLY AS INDICATED IN THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. CARE TO BE TAKEN NOT TO UNDERMINE THE EXISTING FOUNDATION. RISK OF DAMAGE OR COLLAPSE.

PBA 06 RISK OF GROUND WATER INFLOW CONSIDERED LOW EXCEPT IN PERIODS C OF PROLONGED RAINFALL. CONSIDER DEWATERING MEASURES TO EXCAVATIONS. 500mm PBA 07 EXISTING SUB-STATION TO BE RETAINED AND PROTECTED UNTIL C 500mm MINIMUM FROM TEMPORARY SUB-STATION IS BUILT AND ENERGIZED. DECOMMISSIONING EDGE OF STEPPING AND REMOVAL OF SUB-STATION AS AGREED WITH UKPN. REFER TO MINIMUM FROM TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY DRG 23900_02_UG RECEIVED 20-10-16 EDGE OF STEPPING

T03 NOTE 5 AMENDED 11.05.18 IK KG PDS

T02 STAGE 4a - ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 27.04.18 IK KG PDS

NO JUNCTION LESS THAN 90º T01 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 29.03.18 IK KG PDS FROM OUTGOING SEWER Mark Revision Date Drawn Chkd Appd

SCALING NOTE: Do not scale from this drawing. If in doubt, ask. UTILITIES NOTE: The position of any existing public or private sewers, utility services, plant or apparatus shown on this drawing is believed to be correct, but no warranty to this is expressed or implied. Other such plant or apparatus may also RIGID PIPES BUILT INTO MANHOLE SHOULD HAVE be present but not shown. The Contractor is therefore advised to undertake his own investigation where the presence of PREFORMED SWEPT CHANNELS A FLEXIBLE JOINT AS CLOSE AS FEASIBLE TO THE any existing sewers, services, plant or apparatus may affect his operations. EXTERNAL FACE OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE LENGTH OF THE NEXT ROCKER PIPE SHOULD BE Drawing Issue Status AS SHOWN. D2 - TENDER ISSUE ROCKER PIPE REQUIRED FOR RIGID PIPES MAXIMUM NOMINAL DIAMETER (mm) EFFECTIVE LENGTH (m) CITY OF LONDON PRIMARY ACADEMY

150 - 600 0.6 ISLINGTON (COLPAI) PLOT DRAINAGE CONTRUCTION 601 - 750 1.00 DETAILS (SHEET 2 OF 6)

over 750 1.25 Client

ALL PIPES ENTERING THE BOTTOM OF THE MANHOLE TO HAVE SOFFITS LEVEL

Date of 1st Issue Designed Drawn 29.03.18 IK IK Offices throughout A1 Checked Approved the UK and Europe SECTIONAL PLAN AS SHOWN @ A1 KG PDS www.peterbrett.com Drawing Number Revision © Peter Brett Associates LLP TYPICAL ARRANGEMENT OF PIPE JUNCTIONS WITHIN MANHOLES LONDON COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0036 T03 Tel: 020 7566 8600 NOTES: IMPORTATNT NOTE REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PROPRIETARY HYDROPHILIC STRIPS MUST BE SOURCED FOR RC DETAILS OF MANHOLE RC DETAILS OF BASEMENT SLAB, 1. THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT DESIGN DRAWINGS, FROM THE SAME COMPANY AS THE SUPPLIER OF THE WATER CHAMBER. WATERPROOF CONCRETE SPECIFICATION SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTATION. PROOF CONCRETE. FAILURE TO CONFORM TO THIS AN HYDROPHILIC STRIP DETAILS . REQUIREMENT MAY INVALIDATE ANY WARRANTY PROVIDED FOR DRAINAGE INVERT LEVELS 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES AND LEVELS IN METRES ABOVE LOCAL DATUM, UNLESS AS PART OF THE OVERALL WATER PROOF CONCRETE (IL's) AND INCOMING / OUTGOING NOTED OTHERWISE. SYSTEM. PIPE ARRANGEMENTS, REFER TO DRAINAGE DRAWING No. 3.ALL DIMENSIONS, LEVELS AND SURVEY GRID CO-ORDINATES ARE TO BE CHECKED ON SITE AND COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0017 THE ENGINEER NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT ONE CORNER OF 925x925mm OF THE WORKS. RECESS TO LINE THROUGH WITH 4.NO DEVIATION FROM THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING IS PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR ONE CORNER OF CHAMBER BELOW. DUCTILE IRON (GRADE D400) PERMISSION FROM THE ENGINEER. OPENING TO BE LOCATED OVER MANHOLE COVER & FRAME TO BS EN 124

OUTGOING PIPE. A WITH 600x600mm CLEAR OPENING, 5.ALL CONCRETE AND CONCRETE PRODUCTS BELOW GROUND LEVEL SHALL BE CLASS DS-2 AND SET IN RECESS OF BASEMENT SLAB. COVER FRAME SET IN POLYESTER AC2 SULPHATE RESISTANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BRE SPECIAL DIGEST 1. RESIN MORTAR BED AND HAUNCH 925 x 925 x 125mm DP 250 900 250 125 675 125 125 675 125 (MAX. 25mm THICK). 6.THE SETTING OUT OF THE DRAINAGE WORKS IS TO BE AGREED ON-SITE WITH THE ENGINEER, RECESS IN BASEMENT HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS. SLAB, CENTRAL ABOUT FFL AS FFL AS TOPPING INFILL REQUIRED 125 125 OPENING. SHOWN IN GA SHOWN IN GA FFL AS SHOWN IN GA AROUND FRAME TO FINISHED LEVELS. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT THE DRAINAGE MH COVER RECESS MH COVER RECESS WORKS FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 250 300 300 OPENING OPENING 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL OF THE APPROPRIATE STATUTORY UNDERTAKERS AND ESTABLISH THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL SERVICES, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE

MAX 675 WORKS, BY HAND DUG TRIAL PITS. 100 125 400 125 175 A A 175 675x675mm STRUCTURAL TO FIRST RUNG 675x675mm OPENING. 9.ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE SOFFIT TO SOFFIT. OPENING IN POLYPROPYLENE BASEMENT 250 10.STATED COVER LEVELS ARE FOR GUIDANCE ONLY AND SHALL BE SET TO THE FINISH LEVELS OF INCOMING AND OUTGOING ENCAPSULATED DOUBLE STEP SLAB. THE CARRIAGEWAY/FOOTWAY/VERGE. PIPES, USING SHORT RUNGS (TO BS EN 13101), MIN

1700 1200 LENGTH ROCKER PIPES 280mm WIDTH AT MAX 250mm WITH JOINT AS CLOSE AS 11.ALL PIPE SIZES STATED ARE NOMINAL INTERNAL DIAMETERS IN MILLIMETERS.

'H2' 'H2' VERTICAL CENTRES. POSSIBLE TO OUTSIDE FACE

250 900 250 'H1' 250 1200 250 'H1' INCOMING / OUTGOING OF MANHOLE CHAMBER, TO 12.ALL SOFT SPOTS AND VOIDS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND REPLACED PIPES TO HAVE LEVEL BE CAST INTO SIDE WALL OF WITH SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL AS AGREED WITH THE ENGINEER. SOFFIT CONNECTIONS BENCHING TO BE A MINIMUM WIDTH MANHOLE CHAMBER WITH WITH MANHOLE UNLESS OF 225mm WIDE, AT 1:10-1:30 FALL HYDROPHILIC STRIP. 13.ALL DRAINAGE WORKS TO BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT BRITISH STATED OTHERWISE. TOWARD CHANNEL. STANDARDS, BUILDING REGULATION PART H AND SEWERS FOR ADOPTION WHERE RELEVANT.

250 14.DRAINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING FLEXIBLY JOINTED VITRIFIED CLAY PIPES TO BS 65 "SUPER STRENGTH" SPECIFICATION & BS EN 295, IF EXISTING DRAINAGE RUN BEING PIPE IL PIPE IL PIPE IL DIVERTED IS FOUND TO BE VITRIFIED CLAY. IF EXISTING DRAINAGE IS FOUND TO BE UPVC THEN (BIL +225mm) (BIL +225mm) (BIL +225mm) USE UPVC TO BS EN 1401. IF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE IS FOUND BE HDPE, THEN USE HDPE TO BS 150 KICKER 1400 150 KICKER BASE IL BASE IL BASE IL EN 13244. DRAINAGE PIPES TO BE BEDDED AND BACKFILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE (BIL) (BIL) (BIL) MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND THE SPECIFICATIONS. 225 225 15.BACKFILLING OF DRAIN TRENCHES ADJACENT TO DWELLINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES PLAN TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING REGULATIONS PART H; DIAGRAM 8. SURFACE WATER A 250 250 FROM PRIVATE AREAS IS NOT TO BE DISCHARGED ONTO THE PROPOSED HIGHWAY. DENOTES PROPRIETARY HYDROPHILIC STRIP TO BE CAST INTO ALL CDM, HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES (DRG. 1100) 1400 1700 CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND AROUND ALL INVERT TO BE FORMED USING CHANNEL BASE OF MANHOLE TO HAVE HIGH STRENGTH INCOMING AND OUTGOING PIPES. STRIPS CONCRETE TOPPING TO BE BROUGHT UP TO A PIPES. PIPE JOINT WITH CHANNEL TO BE DENOTES THE LOCATION OF RISK. FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO RISK REFERENCE TO BE PLACED CENTRALLY ABOUT DENSE SMOOTH FACE, NEATLY SHAPED AND MIN 100mm INSIDE FACE OF MANHOLE AND DESCRIPTION DEPTH/THICKNESS OF CONCRETE. CHAMBER. FINISHED TO ALL BRANCH CONNECTIONS SECTION A-A SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SECTION B-B INSITU RC MANHOLE (MINIMUM THICKNESS 20 mm) IN ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS AND RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE FORM OF SPECIFICATION. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED ON THE DRAWINGS, THE FOLLOWING RESIDUAL RISKS SHOULD BE... SCALE 1:20 &²&216758&7,216²,16(59,&(0$,17(1$1&('²'(&200,66,21,1*'(02/,7,21 TABLE FOR SIZES OF RC MANHOLES RISK RISK MH REFERENCE DIMENSION 'H1' (mm) DIMENSION 'H2' (mm) PREFIX REF. RISK DESCRIPTION RISK PHASE INSITU RC MANHOLE STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS PBA 01 IF UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE IS DISCOVERED, STOP WORK IMMEDIATELY, C R.FW-B 1025 800 675x675mm STRUCTURAL DUCTILE IRON (GRADE D400) SCALE 1:20 RESTRICT ACCESS AND INFORM THE POLICE. REFER TO UXO RISK R.FW-C 1025 800 OPENING. MANHOLE COVER & FRAME TO BS EN 124 ASSESSMENT UNDERTAKEN BY 1ST LINE OF DEFENCE FOR RISK COVER FRAME SET IN POLYESTER WITH 600x600mm CLEAR OPENING, MITIGATION MEASURES FW-PUMP N/A 1600 RESIN MORTAR BED AND HAUNCH SET IN RECESS OF BASEMENT SLAB. PBA 02 CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED IN PROXIMITY TO LIVE SITE SERVICES. PC TO C (MAX. 25mm THICK). HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE UNDERTAKE GPR SURVEY, TRIAL PITS, ETC TO CONFIRM LOCATION AND TOPPING INFILL REQUIRED EXTENT FFL AS SHOWN IN GA AROUND FRAME TO FINISHED LEVELS. PBA 03 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF LV/HV CABLE (TO BE DIVERTED BY UKPN). C REFER TO TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY DRG 23900_02_UG RECEIVED 20-10-16 PBA 04 DEEP EXCAVATIONS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE. PC TO ENSURE STABILITY C OF EXCAVATIONS DURING WORKS. CONSIDER BENCHING AND TEMP WORKS.

MAX 675 PBA 05 EXCAVATION REQUIRED ADJACENT TO EXISTING MASONRY BOUNDARY C ALARM TO FIRST RUNG WALL. UNDERPINNING REQUIRED LOCALLY AS INDICATED IN THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. CARE TO BE TAKEN NOT TO UNDERMINE THE ACCESS COVER TO BE LOCATED ABOVE BYPASS DOOR. EXISTING FOUNDATION. RISK OF DAMAGE OR COLLAPSE. PULL HANDLE ON END OF STEEL ROPE TO BE LOCATED 250 ASSIST START JUST UNDER MANHOLE COVER, SECURED IN PLACE PBA 06 RISK OF GROUND WATER INFLOW CONSIDERED LOW EXCEPT IN PERIODS C WITH EYE BRACKET 2"NB OF PROLONGED RAINFALL. CONSIDER DEWATERING MEASURES TO 600mm X 600 mm CLEAR OPENING DUTY START MORTAR BEDDING AND HAUNCHING COVER COMPLYING WITH EXCAVATIONS. TO COVER AND FRAME BS EN 124 AND BS 7903 96mmØ TYPE SH (MD5) PBA 07 EXISTING SUB-STATION TO BE RETAINED AND PROTECTED UNTIL C TO CLAUSE E6.7 HYDRO-BRAKE. DESIGN CRITERIA TEMPORARY SUB-STATION IS BUILT AND ENERGIZED. DECOMMISSIONING SEE CLAUSE E2.32 BOTH PUMPS OFF. HEAD = 0.80m AND REMOVAL OF SUB-STATION AS AGREED WITH UKPN. REFER TO MINIMUM 2 COURSES OF CLASS B FLOW = 5 l/s TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY DRG 23900_02_UG RECEIVED 20-10-16 PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE BASE IL ENGINEERING BRICKS OR PRECAST SECTIONS AND COVER SLAB TO BE 'B' (BIL) CONCRETE COVER FRAME SEATING RINGS BEDDED WITH MORTAR, PLASTOMERIC OR ELASTOMERIC SEAL CONFORMING TO INFLOW MINIMUM CLEAR ACCESS 600 mm BS EN 1917 AND BS 5911-3 T03 NOTE 5 AMENDED. 11.05.18 IK KG PDS SEE CLAUSE E2.29 150mmØ CONCRETE 675 mm MAXIMUM TO MOUNTING BLOCK T02 STAGE 4a - ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 27.04.18 IK KG PDS FIRST STEEL ROPE FOR STEP RUNG FROM OPERATING BYPASS BENCHING INSITU RC MANHOLE WITH PUMP T01 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 29.03.18 IK KG PDS COVER LEVEL DOOR ON HYDROBRAKE OUTLET SPIGOT CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Mark Revision Date Drawn Chkd Appd 'D' SCALE 1:20 HYDRO-BRAKE OUTFLOW SCALING NOTE: Do not scale from this drawing. If in doubt, ask.

PIVOTING 'E' UTILITIES NOTE: The position of any existing public or private sewers, utility services, plant or apparatus shown on this BYPASS OUTLET SPIGOT drawing is believed to be correct, but no warranty to this is expressed or implied. Other such plant or apparatus may also INFLOW DEPTH OF CATCHPIT 'H1' DOOR INFLOW be present but not shown. The Contractor is therefore advised to undertake his own investigation where the presence of OUTFLOW any existing sewers, services, plant or apparatus may affect his operations. 'H2' DEPTH OF CATCHPIT ('H1' + 335) 150mmØ SUMP 150mmØ OUTGOING PIPE Drawing Issue Status

3 X 150Ø mm D2 - TENDER ISSUE 60° 150mmØ OUTGOING PIPE NEOPRENE RUBBER GASKET 'E' HYDRO-BRAKE SECURED INSITU CONCRETE 'A' TO CONCRETE MOUNTING MOUNTING VIA MASONRY STUD CITY OF LONDON PRIMARY ACADEMY FLOW INTAKE 100 ANCHOR FIXING BOLTS ISLINGTON (COLPAI) DOUBLE STEP RUNGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BS EN 13101 PIVOTING BYPASS DOOR INFLOW SEE CLAUSE E2.33 FOR DOUBLE STEP DETAILS

'C' PLOT DRAINAGE CONTRUCTION 150mmØ 'F' DETAILS (SHEET 1 OF 6) PLAN ON FLOW CONTROL MANHOLE TYPICAL DETAIL FLOW CONTROL MANHOLE 'C' SCALE 1:20 SCALE 1:20 Client MIN. 335mm SUMP REQUIRED BELOW IL OF HYDRO-BRAKE DIMENSION TABLE - (ALL DIMENSIONS IN mm) OUTGOING PIPE HYDRO-BREAK HYDRO INTERNATIONAL MANHOLE REFERENCE 'A' 'B' 'C' 'D' 'E' 'F' REFERENCE HYDRO-BRAKE REFERENCE (MOUNTING BLOCK WIDTH) (MOUNTING BLOCK HEIGHT) (HYDRO-BRAKE WIDTH) (HYDRO-BRAKE DEPTH) (SUMP DEPTH) (SUMP WIDTH) FLOW INTAKE HYDRO-BRAKE FITTED TO 150mmØ OUTGOING PIPE Date of 1st Issue Designed Drawn S.SW - 1.4 HB 1 SHE-0081-3000-1100-3000 475 90 335 180 680 825 29.03.18 IK IK Offices throughout FLOW CONTROL MANHOLE A1 Checked Approved the UK and Europe R.SW - 1.3 HB 2 SHE-0119-7000-1300-7000 610 125 385 250 815 960 ELEVATION ON HYDRO-BRAKE AS SHOWN @ A1 KG PDS www.peterbrett.com Drawing Number Revision © Peter Brett Associates LLP LONDON COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0035 T03 Tel: 020 7566 8600 NOTES:

1. THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT DESIGN DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTATION.

2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES AND LEVELS IN METRES ABOVE LOCAL DATUM, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

3.ALL DIMENSIONS, LEVELS AND SURVEY GRID CO-ORDINATES ARE TO BE CHECKED ON SITE AND THE ENGINEER NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE 1370 x 850mm WORKS.

S.RE 1 4.NO DEVIATION FROM THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING IS PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR 150mmØ C-1.2 IL 18.850 1200mm MH PERMISSION FROM THE ENGINEER. CL 19.680 IL 17.850 SD RE Existing A7 (IL 17.670) 5.ALL CONCRETE AND CONCRETE PRODUCTS BELOW GROUND LEVEL SHALL BE CLASS DS-2 AND AC2 150mmØ S.SW-5.0 R.FW-1.0 SULPHATE RESISTANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BRE SPECIAL DIGEST 1. 450mm IC 450mm IC 150mmØ min. 1/120 CL 19.620 CL 19.700 Surface Water Drain at R.SS 6.THE SETTING OUT OF THE DRAINAGE WORKS IS TO BE AGREED ON-SITE WITH THE ENGINEER, PRIOR IL 18.820 IL 18.500 High Level of Basement 100mmØ LTD R.SW-1.0 IL 18.850 TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS. 450mm IC IL.19.625 F.RE 1 EXISTING COMBINED CL 19.620 A7 100mmØ DRAINAGE CONNECTION 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT THE DRAINAGE WORKS IL 18.618 RE IL 18.850 TO BE LINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 100mmØ min. 1/40 Foul Drainage at High Level of Basement

SD 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL OF THE APPROPRIATE STATUTORY UNDERTAKERS AND S-1 S.SW-4.0 1370 x 850mm S.FW 2.0a IL 19.705 S.FW-3.0a 450mm IC IL.19.625 S.RE 2 ESTABLISH THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL SERVICES, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORKS, 450mm IC LTD SWAN-DET S.FW 2.0 300mm IC CL 19.700 150mmØ CL 20.380 BY HAND DUG TRIAL PITS. SLEEVE 1200mm MH CL 19.700 IL 18.400 R.SS-14 RE IL 18.800 IL 19.409 CL 20.380 SS-7 IL 19.220 100mmØ IL 19.144 IL 19.450 IL 18.850 EXISTING COMBINED 9.ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE SOFFIT TO SOFFIT. 100mmØ 1/40 225mmØ 1/150 LTD SD DRAINAGE TAKEN

150mmØ 1/100 LTD 2.000 FROM THAMES WATER 225mmØ 1/150 10.STATED COVER LEVELS ARE FOR GUIDANCE ONLY AND SHALL BE SET TO THE FINISH LEVELS OF THE 150mmØ min. 1/100 F.RE 2 ASSET RECORDS 150mmØ 1/100 LTD 4.500 APPROXIMATE Surface Water Drain at 150mmØ CARRIAGEWAY/FOOTWAY/VERGE. LTD RE S.SW-2.5 S-9 LOCATION OF CRANE IL.19.625 High Level of Basement IL 18.850 1200mm MH IL 19.450 FOUNDATIONS (7.0x7.0m) 11.ALL PIPE SIZES STATED ARE NOMINAL INTERNAL DIAMETERS IN MILLIMETERS. CL 20.358 2.000 SSL = 19.250 S.SW-2.2 IL 18.764 S.FW-3.0 150mmØ min. 1/40 Foul Drainage 150mmØ 1/100 S.SW-2.3 4.500 at High Level of Basement SD 450mm IC 450mm IC 100mmØ 1/40 450mm IC IL.19.625 LTD 12.ALL SOFT SPOTS AND VOIDS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND REPLACED WITH

CL 20.344 CL 19.700 150mmØ 1/100 S.SW-2.1 CL 20.274 2.000 SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL AS AGREED WITH THE ENGINEER. 450mm IC IL 19.010 IL 18.890 SS-8 IL 19.134 2.000 A2 IL 19.034 S-8 CL 20.332 IL 19.450 LTD IL 19.133 100Ø 1/80 IL 19.073 150mmØ 1/100 SWAN-DET 4.500 13.ALL DRAINAGE WORKS TO BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT BRITISH STANDARDS, SWAN-DET S.RE 3 S.FW 2.0b 225Ø A2 SD 150mmØ BUILDING REGULATION PART H AND SEWERS FOR ADOPTION WHERE RELEVANT. 450mm IC SS-5 2.000 14.000 F.RE 3 IL 18.750 1370 x 850mm 150mmØ 1/100 CL 20.380 IL 19.095 150mmØ 80mmØ RISING MAIN 14.DRAINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING FLEXIBLY JOINTED VITRIFIED CLAY PIPES TO IL 19.393 SWAN-DET S.SW-5.1 IL 18.850 FROM BASEMENT LEVEL RE C-1.1 S.SW-2.4 225Ø 450mm IC A3 1200mm MH BS 65 "SUPER STRENGTH" SPECIFICATION & BS EN 295, IF EXISTING DRAINAGE RUN BEING DIVERTED IS 100mmØ 1/80 14.000 CL 19.600 S-2 450mm IC 225Ø CL 19.661 FOUND TO BE VITRIFIED CLAY. IF EXISTING DRAINAGE IS FOUND TO BE UPVC THEN USE UPVC TO BS EN 2.000 IL 18.589 RE CL 20.274 IL 18.724 150mmØ 1/100 R.FW-2.0 IL 19.811 S.FW-3.1 150mmØ min. 1/100 IL.19.625 IL 17.991 1401. IF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE IS FOUND BE HDPE, THEN USE HDPE TO BS EN 13244. DRAINAGE CAST-IN IL 18.837 450mm IC 450mm IC 100mmØ Surface Water Drain at PIPES TO BE BEDDED AND BACKFILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS SLEEVE S.FW-1.3a CL 19.700 CL:19.650 LTD CL 19.680 IL 18.980 CL:19.700 225Ø IL:18.315 High Level of Basement IL 18.500 AND THE SPECIFICATIONS. 450mm IC LTD IL:18.340 R.SS CL 20.360 19.625 100mmØ A1 S.SW-2.0 IL. IL 18.854 R.FW-2.0 IL 18.850 A3 450mm IC S.FW-1.2a 2x150Ø 150Ø 15.BACKFILLING OF DRAIN TRENCHES ADJACENT TO DWELLINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES 1200mm MH CL 20.350 450mm IC A6 1/100 SS-3 3x150Ø CL 19.680 R.FW-1.1 TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING REGULATIONS PART H; DIAGRAM 8. SURFACE WATER FROM IL 19.186 SD CL:19.680 LTD CL 20.380 LTD 100Ø 1/80 S.SW-2.7 150Ø 1/150 225mmØ 1/150 R.SW-1.3 IL 19.182 SS-4 TANK 2 - GEO-CELLULAR IL 18.400 450mm IC IL:18.240 PRIVATE AREAS IS NOT TO BE DISCHARGED ONTO THE PROPOSED HIGHWAY. IL 18.941 (CATCHPIT) S.SW-2.8 CL 19.680 H.B.2 (7l/s) IL 19.078 1200mm MH CRATES 0.8m DEEP, 87m³ LTD (CATCHPIT) IL 18.225 1200mm MH LTD S-3 CL 19.672 OF STORAGE 1200mm MH R.SW-1.2 2.500 2x150Ø CL 19.672 IL 19.672 IL 18.360 S.FW-1.3 CL 19.650 (CATCHPIT) C-1.0 IL 18.218 KEY: SWAN-DET IL 18.300 1500mm MH S-7 150Ø 1/150 600mm IC A6 1200mm MH SLEEVE SS-2 CL 19.604 CL 19.630 SITE BOUNDARY IL 19.189 IL 19.107 225mmØ 1/150 CL 20.350 20.500 S.FW-1.1c IL 18.773 S.SW-1.4 IL 18.412 2x150Ø IL 18.110 450mm IC S.FW-1.2 SD H.B.1 (3l/s) CL 20.380 1200mm MH 1500mm MH ASSUMED EXTENT OF PUBLIC HIGHWAY CL 20.360 150mmØ 1/150 IL 19.025 TANK 1 CL 19.700 TANK 3 - GEO-CELLULAR A1 S.FW-1.1b 150mmØ 1/150 IL 18.838 IL 18.238 GEO-CELLULAR CRATES 0.8m DEEP, 39m³ PROPOSED PRIVATE SURFACE WATER 450mm IC 150Ø 1/150 SD CRATES 0.8m CL:19.630 OF STORAGE CL 20.380 S.FW-1.1d S.SW-1.2 IL:18.300 SEWER AND INSPECTION CHAMBER LTD EXTENT OF SITE DEEP, 54.3m³ IL 19.025 450mm IC 450mm IC CL:19.670 2x150Ø SD CABINS SLAB TO BE OF STORAGE APPROX. S.FW-1.5 CL 20.380 CL 20.340 IL:18.250 PROPOSED PERFORATED SURFACE WATER IL 18.986 IL 18.520 DIAMOND CUT TO 11.000 LOCATION OF 600mm IC S.FW-1.1a S.SW-2.6 2.000 ALLOW CONSTRUCTION 225Ø TEMPORARY S/S CL 19.620 COLLECTOR PIPE AND INSPECTION CHAMBER 450mm IC 1200mm MH OF LANDSCAPE & STEPS IL 18.246 150mmØ 1/120 225Ø (4.0x4.0m) CL 20.380 CL 20.350 CL:19.590 IL 19.400 IL 18.522 225Ø PROPOSED PRIVATE FOUL WATER SEWER AND 150mmØ 1/100 APPROXIMATE IL:18.275 LTD 11.000 R.SW-15 150mmØ 1/150 LOCATION OF SITE 2.000 SD A5 225Ø CL:19.500 450mm IC INSPECTION CHAMBER CABINS SLAB IL:18.300 S.SW-3.0 225Ø CL 19.540 S.SW-1.1d SSL = 19.350 IL 18.570 450mm IC S.FW-1.1 225Ø PROPOSED COMBINED DRAINAGE SEWER 450mm IC 1.500 CL 20.350 600mm IC SD CL 20.380 S.SW-1.3a S.SW-1.4 PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SERVING IL 18.792 CL 20.360 150mmØ 1/100 IL 18.620 450mm IC SCHOOL WITH REFERENCE S.SW-1.4, 1500mm MANHOLE, IL 18.953 LTD CL 19.650 H.B.1 (3l/s) EXISTING COMBINED DRAINAGE TO BE RETAINED. S.SW-1.1c 18.000 S.SW-1.3 IL 18.400 COVER LEVEL 19.700 AND INVERT LEVEL 18.238. MANHOLE 450mm IC 1500mm MH LAYOUT OF SEWERS TAKEN FROM THAMES WATER (CATCHPIT) CL 20.380 CL 19.700 TO BE EQUIPPED WITH HYDRO-BRAKE SET AT 3.0l/s LTD 1200mm MH PPO ASSET RECORDS 100mmØ 1/80 S.SW-1.1b IL 18.620 A5 WHERE SSs AND Ss ARE ANNOTATED AS 'CAST-IN', THE (MAXIMUM DISCHARGE) 450mm IC CL 20.259 IL 18.238 S.FW-1.0 S.FW-1.0b IL 18.400 EXTENT OF SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAST THESE WITHIN THE 1200mm MH 450mm IC S.SW-1.1a CL 20.380 PPO PROPOSED PRIVATE SURFACE WATER IL 18.620 SD 150mmØ 1/84.5 CABINS SLAB TO BE CL 20.380 CL 20.380 LTD 450mm IC 2x150Ø DIAMOND CUT TO FOUNDATIONS AT THE INVERT LEVEL SHOWN. S.FW-1.4 PROPOSED FOUL WATER INSPECTION CHAMBER SERVING ATTENUATION IN THE FORM OF GEO-CELLULAR CRATES IL 19.122 IL 19.400 CL 20.380 ALLOW CONSTRUCTION 600mm IC SCHOOL WITH REFERENCE S.FW-1.4, 600mm INSPECTION S.SW-1.1 IL 18.620 OF LANDSCAPE R.SW-1.2 450mm IC CL 20.056 CHAMBER, COVER LEVEL 20.056 AND INVERT LEVEL PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SERVING SS-9 (CATCHPIT) CL 20.380 IL 18.621 18.621. LTD IL 19.700 RESIDENTIAL BLOCK WITH REFERENCE R.SW-1.2, 1200mm IL 18.782 1200mm MH SLEEVE MANHOLE, COVER LEVEL 19.604 AND INVERT LEVEL 18.412. S.FW-1.0a S.FW-1.4 WHERE SSs AND Ss ARE ANNOTATED AS 'SLEEVE', THE PROPOSED FOUL WATER INSPECTION CHAMBER SERVING CL 19.604 SS-10 R.FW-1.0 MANHOLE TO BE A CATCHPIT. 450mm IC 600mm IC CONTRACTOR SHALL CAST SLEEVES AT THE INVERT LEVEL RESIDENTIAL BLOCK WITH REFERENCE R.FW-1.0, 450mm IL 18.412 CL 20.380 IL 19.700 CL 20.056 450mm IC IL 19.400 LTD SLEEVE IL 18.621 SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. THE 'SLEEVE' DETAIL IS SHOWN CL 19.700 INSPECTION CHAMBER, COVER LEVEL 19.700 AND INVERT A4 IN THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. IL 18.500 LEVEL 18.500. R.SW-1.3 PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SERVING A4 H.B.2 (7l/s) RESIDENTIAL BLOCK WITH REFERENCE R.SW-1.3, 1200mm LTD RAINWATER PIPE (RWP) WITH 150mm CONNECTION. 1200mm MH MANHOLE, COVER LEVEL 19.672 AND INVERT LEVEL 18.218. SS-10 IL 19.700 CL 19.672 MANHOLE TO BE EQUIPPED WITH HYDRO-BRAKE SET AT 150mmØ 1/100 SLEEVE RAIN CHAIN (RWC) WITH 150mm CONNECTION. IL 18.218 7.0l/s (MAXIMUM DISCHARGE) LTD WHERE SSs ARE ANNOTATED AS 'SWAN-DET', THE SS-12 S-11 CONTRACTOR SHALL USE A SWAN PIPE DETAIL (GENTLE PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SERVING IL 19.700 IL 19.700 S.SW-1.3 LTD PIPE BENDS) TO AVOID THE PIPES FROM BEING CAST SLEEVE SLEEVE PERMEABLE PAVING OUTLET WITH 100mm CONNECTION (CATCHPIT) SCHOOL WITH REFERENCE S.SW-1.3, 1200mm MANHOLE, WITHIN THE FOUNDATIONS. THE 'SWAN-DET' IS DETAILED IN FG-1 1200mm MH COVER LEVEL 20.259 AND INVERT LEVEL 18.400. MANHOLE THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS IL 19.700 CL 20.259 TO BE A CATCHPIT. LTD SLEEVE COLLECTOR SURFACE WATER DRAIN RUNNING AT HIGH IL 18.400 RE REFER TO DRAWING NO. COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0021, 0022 LEVEL OF THE RESIDENTIAL BLOCK BASEMENT AND AND 0023 FOR DETAILS OF THE SECTIONS A1-A1 TO A7-A7 EQUIPPED WITH RODDING EYE AT THE START OF THE RUN T04 RESIDENTIAL BLOCK DRAINAGE ADDED 11.05.18 IK KG PDS S.SW-1.0 T03 STAGE 4a - ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 27.04.19 IK KG PDS 450mm IC REFER TO DRAWING NO. COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0037 AND CL 19.672 RE COLLECTOR FOUL WATER DRAIN RUNNING AT HIGH LEVEL IL 18.915 MEP DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER DETAILS OF THE DRAINAGE OF THE RESIDENTIAL BLOCK BASEMENT AND EQUIPPED T02 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 29.03.18 IK KG PDS AT HIGH LEVEL OF THE BASEMENT WITH RODDING EYE AT THE START OF THE RUN T01 WORK IN PROGRESS 22.02.18 IK KG PDS SS-7 IL 19.450 CDM, HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES (DRG. 1100) SANITARY POINT WITH 100mm CONNECTION AT MINIMUM Mark Revision Date Drawn Chkd Appd GRADIENT 1 IN 40. SCALING NOTE: Do not scale from this drawing. If in doubt, ask. DENOTES THE LOCATION OF RISK. FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO RISK REFERENCE UTILITIES NOTE: The position of any existing public or private sewers, utility services, plant or apparatus shown on this AND DESCRIPTION C.FW-1.0 drawing is believed to be correct, but no warranty to this is expressed or implied. Other such plant or apparatus may also PROPOSED COMBINED FOUL WATER AND SURFACE be present but not shown. The Contractor is therefore advised to undertake his own investigation where the presence of IN ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS AND RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE FORM OF 1200mm MH any existing sewers, services, plant or apparatus may affect his operations. WATER MANHOLE WITH REFERENCE C.FW-1.0, 1200mm CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED ON THE DRAWINGS, THE FOLLOWING RESIDUAL RISKS SHOULD BE... CL 19.630 IL 18.111 MANHOLE, COVER LEVEL 19.630 AND INVERT LEVEL 18.111. Drawing Issue Status &²&216758&7,216²,16(59,&(0$,17(1$1&('²'(&200,66,21,1*'(02/,7,21 D2 - TENDER ISSUE RISK RISK PROPOSED SLOT DRAIN CHANNEL WITH 100mm DIA. PREFIX REF. RISK DESCRIPTION RISK PHASE SD CONNECTION (REFER TO DRAWING NO. COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0021 FOR DETAILS) PBA 01 IF UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE IS DISCOVERED, STOP WORK IMMEDIATELY, C CITY OF LONDON PRIMARY ACADEMY RESTRICT ACCESS AND INFORM THE POLICE. REFER TO UXO RISK ASSESSMENT UNDERTAKEN BY 1ST LINE OF DEFENCE FOR RISK ISLINGTON (COLPAI) MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED LINEAR THRESHOLD DRAIN LTD TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS WITH 100mm DIA. CONNECTION PBA 02 CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED IN PROXIMITY TO LIVE SITE SERVICES. PC TO C PROPOSED DRAINAGE UNDERTAKE GPR SURVEY, TRIAL PITS, ETC TO CONFIRM LOCATION AND (REFER TO DRAWING NO. COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0039 FOR EXTENT DETAILS) AND SUB-STRUCTURE LAYOUT PBA 03 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF LV/HV CABLE (TO BE DIVERTED BY UKPN). C FLOOD EXCEDANCE ROUTES REFER TO TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY DRG 23900_02_UG RECEIVED Client 20-10-16 A4 LOCATION OF SECTION A4-A4 (SEE BOX NOTE FOR PBA 04 DEEP EXCAVATIONS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE. PC TO ENSURE STABILITY C A4 DRAWINGS SHOWING THESE DETAILS) OF EXCAVATIONS DURING WORKS. CONSIDER BENCHING AND TEMP WORKS. EXTENT OF PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB FOR SITE PBA 05 EXCAVATION REQUIRED ADJACENT TO EXISTING MASONRY BOUNDARY C CABINS, PROTECTION TO DRAINAGE TANKS, WALL. UNDERPINNING REQUIRED LOCALLY AS INDICATED IN THE FOUNDATIONS OF CRANE AND SUB-STATION STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. CARE TO BE TAKEN NOT TO UNDERMINE THE EXISTING FOUNDATION. RISK OF DAMAGE OR COLLAPSE. PC2 PROPOSED STRUCTURAL FOUNDATIONS Date of 1st Issue Designed Drawn 22.02.18 IK IK PBA 06 RISK OF GROUND WATER INFLOW CONSIDERED LOW EXCEPT IN PERIODS C Offices throughout WORKS WITHIN THIS AREA NOT INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE the UK and Europe OF PROLONGED RAINFALL. CONSIDER DEWATERING MEASURES TO A1 Checked Approved EXCAVATIONS. OF WORKS 1:200 KG PDS www.peterbrett.com PBA 07 EXISTING SUB-STATION TO BE RETAINED AND PROTECTED UNTIL C PROPOSED SLEEVE THROUGH FOUNDATION Drawing Number Revision © Peter Brett Associates LLP TEMPORARY SUB-STATION IS BUILT AND ENERGIZED. DECOMMISSIONING LONDON AND REMOVAL OF SUB-STATION AS AGREED WITH UKPN. REFER TO COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0016 T04 Tel: 020 7566 8600 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY DRG 23900_02_UG RECEIVED 20-10-16 user name: iris kalaci File Location: c:\users\ik-ce\documents\2. work\pba\37845 richard cloudesley school\5. drawings & models\cad\civils\col-pba-zz-xx-dr-c-0016 proposed drainage layout and sub-structure.dwg

20.26

18.38 20.13 Steps C'boxes

19.60 20.05 20.25 user name: CL 20.332 450mm IC Bo

CPS

IL 19.073 S.SW-2.1 20.39

O/head Canopy O/head

15.76 19.60 Post 20.25 DP 15.81 19.99

19.59 Gy 18.75 20.12

I/R ht 1.8m Boll

iris kalaci 20.24 15.79 MG +20.380 Boll TCL: 19.64 24.54

20.34

MG 20.04

Boll

20.16 20.32 TCL: 19.62 Gy 20.32 26.76 TCL:

22.32

MG 19.62

19.62

Planter SD 20.20

19.59 20.30 2

THL 20.13 19.63

450mm IC CL 20.350 0 S.SW-2.0 IL 19.186 1/100 150mmØ 150mmØ 1/100 19.22

Bo

19.61 Planter

20.28 20.11 20.26 20.31

19.16 36.81 Bo

19.53

19.62 1 Cycle Stands TCL:

19.60 m Gy Planter 2 Bo 0

Tarmac

20.08 G1.6 Post

19.61 Bo Planter DOMINGO STREET DOMINGO 19.61

+20.380 S No C IL 19.010 CL 20.344 S.SW-2.2

450mm IC 20.31 F: Post i

20.12 g

23.73 20.06 Planter 20.27 19.62 Bo

19.60 19.63 I /

R LTD

IL 19.811 SLEEVE CAST-IN S-2

19.62 450mm IC 19.62 CL 20.350 Bo

Gy

S.SW-3.0 THL 19.54 Shed IL 18.792

h SD Bo 20.22 SWAN-DET 20.11

LTD 20.04 Gy

t TT Wo

Flower 100 Bo 19.58 Bed

1 1/100 150mmØ IL 19.705 Planter SLEEVE

Planter

ICU

19.60

19.63 S-1 Planter 20.34

LTD

O/head Canopy O/head CTV 19.55 Planter CL 20.380 450mm IC S.FW-1.0a CL 20.380 450mm IC IL 18.782 S.SW-1.1 IL 19.400

Planter IL 19.672 SLEEVE SWAN-DET S-3 S.FW-1.1a CL 20.380 450mm IC 20.09 St

CPS

IL 19.400 19.61 Planter Skylight 19.58 Lp 450mm IC

CL 20.274

S.SW-2.3 IL 18.890 20.13 A4 20.31 20.05

1200mm MH LTD DP 19.51 20.13 CL 20.380 600mm IC I CL 20.360 S.FW-1.0 / IL 19.122 IL 18.953

S.FW-1.1 TT

Gy R DP MH B

Bo B Bo

B IC

B S.FW 2.0b CL 20.380 450mm IC BT

B 1/100 150mmØ IL 19.393 19.57 19.59 S/light S.FW-1.1b 450mm IC CL 20.380

IL 19.025 20.09 CTV CL 20.274 450mm IC Gas IL 19.409 S.SW-2.4 CL 20.380 S.FW 2.0a 450mm IC IL 18.837 A4

LTD IL 19.189 100mmØ 1/80 S/light LTD S-7 IL 19.400 CL 20.380 S.FW-1.0b 450mm IC 100mmØ 1/40 LTD St St IL 18.915 CL 19.672 S.SW-1.0 450mm IC St

LTD LTD 1/40 100mmØ

LTD LTD 150mmØ 1/100 20.18 S/light

150mmØ 1/120 IL 19.182 S.FW-1.1c 450mm IC CL 20.380 IL 19.025 IL 19.700 SLEEVE SS-10 SS-3

20.02 20.00 LTD IL 19.700 SLEEVE SS-12 19.96 IL 19.700 SLEEVE SS-9 IL 19.700 SLEEVE SS-10

20.08 Gy IL 18.724 IL 19.700 FG-1 SLEEVE SD Wall ht 2.3m IL 19.078 IL 19.700 SLEEVE S-11 150mmØ 1/150 SS-4 IL 19.107 SS-2 1200mm MH IL 19.144 CL 20.380 S.FW 2.0

S.FW-1.1d CL 20.380 450mm IC IL 18.986 1/100 150mmØ IL 18.620 CL 20.380 S.SW-1.1a 450mm IC LTD

20.24 1200mm MH IL 18.764 CL 20.358 S.SW-2.5

150mmØ 1/100

IL 19.034 20.15 100mmØ 1/80 100mmØ

LTD IL 18.620 CL 20.380 S.SW-1.1b 450mm IC IL 18.522 1200mm MH IL 19.133 CL 20.350 S.SW-2.6 SWAN-DET S-8 IL 18.941 CL 20.380 S.FW-1.2a 450mm IC

150Ø 1/150

SD LTD 1200mm MH IL 18.838 CL 20.360 S.FW-1.2 IL 19.095 SWAN-DET SS-5 IL 18.620 CL 20.380 S.SW-1.1c 450mm IC SWAN-DET IL 19.450 IL 19.450 SS-8

S-9 225mmØ 1/150 100mmØ LTD IL 18.620 CL 20.380 S.SW-1.1d 450mm IC LTD IL 19.450

SD SS-7 IL 18.854 CL 20.360 S.FW-1.3a 450mm IC 1200mm MH (CATCHPIT)

CL 20.259

S.SW-1.3 IL 18.400 IL 18.773 CL 20.350 600mm IC S.FW-1.3 150mmØ 1/150 150mmØ

LTD +19.450 100Ø 1/80

CL 19.700 450mm IC IL 18.520 CL 20.340 S.SW-1.2

450mm IC S.FW-3.0 IL 19.134 SD 1/100 150mmØ CL 19.700 450mm IC IL 18.980 S.FW-3.1 IL 19.220 CL 19.700 300mm IC S.FW-3.0a OF LANDSCAPE & STEPS ALLOW CONSTRUCTION

SD 1200mm MH (CATCHPIT) CABINS SLAB TO BE

CL 19.672

S.SW-2.7 IL 18.360 DIAMOND CUT TO IL 18.621 1/80 100Ø CL 20.056 S.FW-1.4 600mm IC EXTENT OF SITE LOCATION OF SITE

2x150Ø APPROXIMATE CABINS SLAB SSL = 19.350 BASTERFIELD SERVICE ROAD 4.500 IL 18.400 CL 19.700 S.SW-4.0 450mm IC

4.500

S.SW-1.3a CL 19.650 450mm IC 2.000

CRATES 0.8m DEEP, 87m³ 2x150Ø TANK 2 - GEO-CELLULAR IL 18.400

4.500 2.000

OF STORAGE

IL:18.340

2.000 CL:19.700 FOUNDATIONS (7.0x7.0m) LOCATION OF CRANE GEO-CELLULAR OF STORAGE CRATES 0.8m DEEP, 54.3m³ APPROXIMATE 450mm IC 225Ø CL 19.620 SSL = 19.250 R.SW-1.0 IL 18.618 TANK 1 450mm IC CL 19.620 S.SW-5.0 150mmØ 1/84.5 IL 18.820 225Ø

14.000 2.000 F:

BASTERFIELD HOUSE 18.000 14.000 35.56

+19.450 2.000 1200mm MH (CATCHPIT) CL 19.650 S.SW-2.8 IL 18.300 225Ø 11.000 PPO A6

3x150Ø 225Ø

11.000 150mmØ 1/100 150mmØ 1.500 A5 CL:19.650 A6 225Ø IL:18.315

1500mm MH CL:19.670 2.000

H.B.1 (3l/s) SD

CL 19.700 225Ø

IL:18.250 S.SW-1.4 IL 18.238 225Ø 1/150 150Ø

PREFIX IL 18.500

225Ø R.FW-1.0

CL 19.700 450mm IC A5 RISK 2.000

PBA PBA PBA PBA PBA PBA PBA CL:19.590

CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED ON THE DRAWINGS, FOLLOWING RESIDUAL RISKS SHOULD BE... IL:18.275 225Ø DIAMOND CUT TO EXTENT OF SITE OF LANDSCAPE CABINS SLAB TO BE 225mmØ 1/150 225mmØ ALLOW CONSTRUCTION 2.000 1200mm MH CL 19.680 CDM, HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES (DRG. 1100) R.FW-2.0 &²&216758&7,216²,16(59,&(0$,17(1$1&('²'(&200,66,21,1*'(02/,7,21 IL 18.400 A2 Residential Refuse

225Ø SD 19.90

IN ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS AND RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATED WITH FORM OF 100mmØ min. 1/40 Foul Drainage RISK REF.

07 06 05 04 03 02 1200mm MH (CATCHPIT) 01 2x150Ø 150mmØ 1/100 150mmØ at High Level of Basement 26 m² CL 19.604 R.SW-1.2 IL 18.412 DENOTES THE LOCATION OF RISK. FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO RISK REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IF UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE IS DISCOVERED, STOP WORK IMMEDIATELY, EXISTING SUB-STATION TO BE RETAINED AND PROTECTED UNTIL EXCAVATIONS. RISK OF GROUND WATER INFLOW CONSIDERED LOW EXCEPT IN PERIODS EXISTING FOUNDATION. RISK OF DAMAGE OR COLLAPSE. EXCAVATION REQUIRED ADJACENT TO EXISTING MASONRY BOUNDARY DEEP EXCAVATIONS REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE. PC TO ENSURE STABILITY REFER TO TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY DRG 23900_02_UG RECEIVED EXTENT UNDERTAKE GPR SURVEY, TRIAL PITS, ETC TO CONFIRM LOCATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES RESTRICT ACCESS AND INFORM THE POLICE. REFER TO UXO RISK OF PROLONGED RAINFALL. CONSIDER DEWATERING MEASURES TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. CARE TO BE TAKEN NOT UNDERMINE THE OF EXCAVATIONS DURING WORKS. CONSIDER BENCHING AND TEMP CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED IN PROXIMITY TO LIVE SITE SERVICES. PC TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY DRG 23900_02_UG RECEIVED 20-10-16 TEMPORARY SUB-STATION IS BUILT AND ENERGIZED. DECOMMISSIONING 20-10-16 WALL. UNDERPINNING REQUIRED LOCALLY AS INDICATED IN THE WORKS. AND REMOVAL OF SUB-STATION AS AGREED WITH UKPN. REFER TO APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF LV/HV CABLE (TO BE DIVERTED BY UKPN). ASSESSMENT UNDERTAKEN BY 1ST LINE OF DEFENCE FOR RISK PPO 150mmØ 1/150 CL:19.500 TEMPORARY S/S

IL:18.300 LOCATION OF

(4.0x4.0m) SD APPROX.

IL 18.589 CL 19.600 S.SW-5.1 450mm IC

LTD 1 Surface Water150mmØ Drain min. at 1/120 9 High Level of Basement . Generator

24 m² LTD SD

150mmØ min. 1/100 150mmØ min. 1/40 Foul DrainageSurface Water Drain at High Level of Basement 19.56 A2

SD Workspace 1 at High Level of Basement

FROM BASEMENT LEVEL CL:19.630 80mmØ RISING MAIN

17 m² Stair IL:18.300 2x150Ø Sub station 68 m²

CONTRACTOR SHALL CAST SLEEVES AT THE INVERT LEVEL 38 m² SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. 'SLEEVE' DETAIL IS WITHIN THE FOUNDATIONS. 'SWAN-DET' IS DETAILED IN 19.56 MEP DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER DETAILS OF THE DRAINAGE AND 0023 FOR DETAILS OF THE SECTIONS A1-A1 TO A7-A7

REFER TO DRAWING NO. COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0021, 0022 LTD CONTRACTOR SHALL USE A SWAN PIPE DETAIL (GENTLE REFER TO DRAWING NO. COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0037 AND WHERE SSs AND Ss ARE ANNOTATED AS 'CAST-IN', THE WHERE SSs AND Ss ARE ANNOTATED AS 'SLEEVE', THE RE UP PIPE BENDS) TO AVOID THE PIPES FROM BEING CAST IL 18.225 R.FW-1.1 CL 19.680 450mm IC WHERE SSs ARE ANNOTATED AS 'SWAN-DET', THE Surface Water150mmØ Drain min. at 1/100

High Level of Basement

CONTRACTOR SHALL CAST THESE WITHIN THE FOUNDATIONS AT THE INVERT LEVEL SHOWN. Workspace 2 19.57 RISK DESCRIPTION 100mmØ IL 18.850 IL 18.850 R.SS 150mmØ 1500mm MH

IL 18.110 CL 19.630 C-1.0 IL 18.850 100mmØ

63 m² F.RE 1

+19.450 No Signal 6"CI TFR 125PE In S.RE 1 150Ø 1/150 150Ø 19.78 IL 18.570 R.SW-15 CL 19.540 450mm IC

AT HIGH LEVEL OF THE BASEMENT

IN THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 1 0.30d THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS Workspace 3 19.65 IL 18.850 100mmØ R.SS-14 RE 0.70d 100mmØ 225mmØ 1/150 IL 18.850 R.SS 87 m²

A7 LTD 19.51 IL 18.246 19.57 CL 19.620 600mm IC S.FW-1.5 RE

150mmØ x

IL 18.850 Lobby F.RE 2

i 28 m² 19.61 :

RE t : : CRATES 0.8m DEEP, 39m³ : :

d TANK 3 - GEO-CELLULAR LTD : Wm

ICU

0.40d 0.30- : Z

: Wm

: EOT

0.70d 19.46 : 19.613 S2 150mmØ IL 18.850 F.RE 3

OF STORAGE

:

19.47 19.43 BT 1.00d

Signal No 19.45

20.500 RE 19.40

Z:

IL 17.850 1200mm MH (IL 17.670) LANE GOLDEN CL 19.680 C-1.2 19.66

:

19.67

LTD 19.37 :

A1 :

IL 18.500

R.FW-2.0 CL 19.680 450mm IC

Z 19.49

19.53

19.38 : Z

225mmØ 1/150 225mmØ 0.50d

: 19.65 AR

Z

150mmØ IL 18.800 19.52 S.RE 2

A3 Existing

Z 150mmØ

2.500 LTD

: BT DRAINAGE CONNECTION EXISTING COMBINED

TO BE LINED

19.39 125PE In 6"CI In 125PE

Z

RE 19.58

FROM THAMES WATER THAMES FROM Lp A1 19.54 EXISTING COMBINED 0.40d 0.30-

A3

Z

RISK PHASE

19.32 IL:18.240 DRAINAGE TAKEN

19.32ASSET RECORDS 1.00d 19.47

CL:19.680 150Ø 1/100 Z 850mm x 1370 BT IL 18.750 150mmØ S.RE 3

C C C C C C C I/R ht 1m ht I/R

19.35

Z

BT 19.29 19.27 Gy

19.28

Gy 4 . 19.48 2x150Ø 4 8 9

19.34 A7

Stands 19.31 Lp Cycle 19.35 19.35 0.40d 0.30- CTV DP 19.34 THL BT THL RE RE IL 17.991 1200mm MH

CL 19.661 C-1.1

Sp Gy

19.32 Gy EOT A4 850mm x 1370 19.59 1200mm MH IL 18.111 CL 19.630 C.FW-1.0 IL 18.500 IL 18.621 R.FW-1.0 CL 19.700 CL 20.056 S.FW-1.4 1500mm MH 600mm IC IL 18.238 450mm IC H.B.1 (3l/s) CL 19.700 S.SW-1.4 Elc PC2

IL 19.450

SS-7

Bp

LTD 19.41 SD

DP 19.49 Ramp No Signal 6"CI TFR 125PE In 19.44 CTV

IL 18.218 1200mm MH H.B.2 (7l/s) R.SW-1.3 CL 19.672 TT 19.35 Concrete

Paving 19.29 Slabs A4 Canopy O/head

Gy I/R ht 1.8m St

19.52

Bp 1370 x 850mm x 1370 19.37

THL

18.621. INSPECTION CHAMBER, COVER LEVEL 19.700 AND INVERT PROPOSED STRUCTURAL FOUNDATIONS FOUNDATIONS OF CRANE AND SUB-STATION EXTENT OF PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB FOR SITE DRAWINGS SHOWING THESE DETAILS) FLOOD EXCEDANCE ROUTES DETAILS) PROPOSED LINEAR THRESHOLD DRAIN PROPOSED SLOT DRAIN CHANNEL WITH 100mm DIA. 1m PROPOSED COMBINED FOUL WATER AND SURFACE ht I/R EQUIPPED WITH RODDING EYE AT THE START OF RUN PERMEABLE PAVING OUTLET WITH 100mm CONNECTION RAIN CHAIN (RWC) WITH 150mm CONNECTION. RAINWATER PIPE (RWP) WITH 150mm CONNECTION. RESIDENTIAL BLOCK WITH REFERENCE R.FW-1.0, 450mm PROPOSED FOUL WATER INSPECTION CHAMBER SERVING PROPOSED FOUL WATER INSPECTION CHAMBER SERVING PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SERVING LOCATION OF SECTION A4-A4 (SEE BOX NOTE FOR (REFER TO DRAWING NO. COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0039 FOR MANHOLE, COVER LEVEL 19.630 AND INVERT 18.111. LEVEL OF THE RESIDENTIAL BLOCK BASEMENT AND LEVEL 18.500. (MAXIMUM DISCHARGE) OF WORKS CABINS, PROTECTION TO DRAINAGE TANKS, COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0021 FOR DETAILS) CONNECTION (REFER TO DRAWING NO. GRADIENT 1 IN 40. SANITARY POINT WITH 100mm CONNECTION AT MINIMUM OF THE RESIDENTIAL BLOCK BASEMENT AND EQUIPPED COLLECTOR FOUL WATER DRAIN RUNNING AT HIGH LEVEL COLLECTOR SURFACE WATER DRAIN RUNNING AT HIGH CHAMBER, COVER LEVEL 20.056 AND INVERT SCHOOL WITH REFERENCE S.FW-1.4, 600mm INSPECTION COVER LEVEL 19.700 AND INVERT 18.238. MANHOLE SCHOOL WITH REFERENCE S.SW-1.4, 1500mm MANHOLE, TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS WITH 100mm DIA. CONNECTION TO BE EQUIPPED WITH HYDRO-BRAKE SET AT 3.0l/s 19.46 WORKS WITHIN THIS AREA NOT INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE WATER MANHOLE WITH REFERENCE C.FW-1.0, 1200mm WITH RODDING EYE AT THE START OF RUN

19.17 THL 6 Wo

Sp

19.22 DP 19.33 BT 19.15 Gy Gy

Tarmac

St TT 19.29 Gy 19.30 19.17 Gy

IC

19.30

19.31

19.29 19.43 Drainage Duct Drainage 19.30 Cvr Cvr G0.5 Gy

19.43 St 19.24 19.47 CTV

19.17 19.29

IC

19.07 19.28

Gas 19.46 19.40 19.52 Bt 19.37 160 19.38 19.33 Wm IC THL Lp BT

19.55 CTV St

19.19 Gy 19.35 CTV

Tarmac 19.50 Elec Stands

Gy Cycle DP

19.30 19.53 19.06 Gy

19.45 19.23

19.14 Gy 19.22 CTV 19.18

St MH

IC Concrete

TT BT

19.20

19.26 19.06 Lp Elec

19.32

IB BT 19.54 Sp

Elec IB

Concrete THL 19.17

Paving 18.98 Slabs

Gy 19.15 Gy

Sp

19.03 IC 19.29 Sap Cvr I/R ht 1.3m ht I/R

IC 19.02

BT THL 19.01 19.45 Gas 19.41

19.39

IC

Concrete

19.54 O/head Canopy O/head 19.14 19.01 BT

Bo

Booth 19.21 F: 36.89 Ticket

Sp 19.46

TT

19.02

19.55 18.98 19.30

Sp 19.21 19.22 TT

19.28

Bo Elc 19.08 IC

BP 19.23

Tarmac

Lp 19.22 BT

18.95 Gas 19.15 19.22 Elc

Gy 19.24

R: TT BT BT 38.13

Fh 19.14 Cycle Hire Stands Hire Cycle E: St 37.93 IC Cbox

Elc

18.93

18.80 19.21

19.08 19.38

Cvr

19.17

Tarmac

19.05

19.22 19.12 Gy 19.31 IC Lp

Bo I/R ht 1.3m ht I/R 19.14

19.07 Cvr 18.97 Mark A1 Date of 1st Issue UTILITIES NOTE: be present but not shown. The Contractor is therefore advised to undertake his own investigation where the presence of SCALING NOTE: any existing sewers, services, plant or apparatus may affect his operations. drawing is believed to be correct, but no warranty this expressed or implied. Other such plant apparatus may also T01 T02 T03 Drawing Number T04 Drawing Issue Status Client PROPOSED DRAINAGE LAYOUT ISLINGTON (COLPAI) CITY OF LONDON PRIMARY ACADEMY COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-C-0015 15.BACKFILLING OF DRAIN TRENCHES ADJACENT TO DWELLINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES 1401. IF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE IS FOUND TO BE HDPE, THEN USE HDPE BS EN 13244. 14.DRAINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING FLEXIBLY JOINTED VITRIFIED CLAY PIPES 13.ALL DRAINAGE WORKS TO BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT BRITISH STANDARDS, 12.ALL SOFT SPOTS AND VOIDS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION REPLACED WITH 11.ALL PIPE SIZES STATED ARE NOMINAL INTERNAL DIAMETERS IN MILLIMETERS. 10.STATED COVER LEVELS ARE FOR GUIDANCE ONLY AND SHALL BE SET TO THE FINISH OF 1. THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT DESIGN DRAWINGS, FOUND TO BE VITRIFIED CLAY. IF EXISTING DRAINAGE IS UPVC THEN USE BS EN FOR THE DURATION OF CONTRACT. PRIVATE AREAS IS NOT TO BE DISCHARGED ONTO THE PROPOSED HIGHWAY. PIPES TO BE BEDDED AND BACKFILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS BS 65 "SUPER STRENGTH" SPECIFICATION & EN 295, IF EXISTING DRAINAGE RUN BEING DIVERTED IS BUILDING REGULATION PART H AND SEWERS FOR ADOPTION WHERE RELEVANT. BY HAND DUG TRIAL PITS. ESTABLISH THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL SERVICES, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT WORKS, PERMISSION FROM THE ENGINEER. ENGINEER NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT NOTES: OTHERWISE. SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL AS AGREED WITH THE ENGINEER. CARRIAGEWAY/FOOTWAY/VERGE. 9.ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE SOFFIT TO SOFFIT. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL OF THE APPROPRIATE STATUTORY UNDERTAKERS AND 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT THE DRAINAGE WORKS 6.THE SETTING OUT OF THE DRAINAGE WORKS IS TO BE AGREED ON-SITE WITH ENGINEER, PRIOR SULPHATE RESISTANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BRE SPECIAL DIGEST 1. 5.ALL CONCRETE AND PRODUCTS BELOW GROUND LEVEL SHALL BE CLASS DC-2 AC2 3.ALL DIMENSIONS, LEVELS AND SURVEY GRID CO-ORDINATES ARE TO BE CHECKED ON SITE THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTATION. TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING REGULATIONS PART H; DIAGRAM 8. SURFACE WATER FROM TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES AND LEVELS METRES ABOVE LOCAL DATUM, UNLESS NOTED 4.NO DEVIATION FROM THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING IS PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR WORKS. AND THE SPECIFICATIONS. KEY: RESIDENTIAL BLOCK DRAINAGE ADDED Revision WORK IN PROGRESS ISSUED FOR APPROVAL STAGE 4a - ISSUED FOR APPROVAL 22.02.18 1200mm MH 1200mm MH IL 18.400 IL 18.218 H.B.2 (7l/s) R.SW-1.3 (CATCHPIT) CL 20.259 S.SW-1.3 CL 19.672 1200mm MH IL 18.412 R.SW-1.2 CL 19.604 (CATCHPIT) 1:200 File Location: Do The position of any existing public or private sewers, utility services, plant apparatus shown on this not scale from this drawing. If in doubt, ask. c:\users\ik-ce\documents\2. work\pba\37845 richard cloudesley school\5. drawings & models\cad\civils\col-pba-zz-xx-dr-c-0015 proposed drainage layout.dwg INSPECTION CHAMBER PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SERVING MANHOLE TO BE EQUIPPED WITH HYDRO-BRAKE SET AT MANHOLE, COVER LEVEL 19.672 AND INVERT 18.218. RESIDENTIAL BLOCK WITH REFERENCE R.SW-1.3, 1200mm PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SERVING MANHOLE TO BE A CATCHPIT. MANHOLE, COVER LEVEL 19.604 AND INVERT 18.412. RESIDENTIAL BLOCK WITH REFERENCE R.SW-1.2, 1200mm PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SERVING PROPOSED PRIVATE SURFACE WATER EXISTING COMBINED DRAINAGE TO BE RETAINED. PROPOSED COMBINED DRAINAGE SEWER PROPOSED PRIVATE FOUL WATER SEWER AND PROPOSED PERFORATED SURFACE WATER PROPOSED PRIVATE SURFACE WATER LAYOUT OF SEWERS TAKEN FROM THAMES WATER COVER LEVEL 20.259 AND INVERT 18.400. MANHOLE SCHOOL WITH REFERENCE S.SW-1.3, 1200mm MANHOLE, 7.0l/s (MAXIMUM DISCHARGE) COLLECTOR PIPE AND INSPECTION CHAMBER SEWER AND INSPECTION CHAMBER SITE BOUNDARY TO BE A CATCHPIT. ATTENUATION IN THE FORM OF GEO-CELLULAR CRATES ASSET RECORDS ASSUMED EXTENT OF PUBLIC HIGHWAY Checked Designed D2 - TENDER ISSUE KG IK Approved Drawn T04 PDS Revision IK © Peter Brett Associates LLP www.peterbrett.com Tel: 020 7566 8600 the UK and Europe Offices throughout 22.02.18 29.03.18 27.04.18 11.05.18 Date LONDON Drawn IK IK IK IK Chkd KG KG KG KG Appd PDS PDS PDS PDS

GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR GENERAL NOTES DRAWING SEE "COL-PBA-ZZ-XX-DR-S-1000" 08 C B A 2. DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING. FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY SHALL BE USED. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO PBA FOR CLARIFICATION. IF IN DOUBT ASK. 3. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELEVANT EXTERNAL MASONRY FINISHES TO ARCHITECTS; SERVICE ENGINEERS; CIVIL ENGINEERS DRAWINGS AND SPECIALISTS AND CAVITY TO FINISHES TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS DRAWINGS PLUS THE SPECIFICATIONS AND BILL OF QUANTITIES. ARCHITECT'S DETAILS ARCHITECTS DETAILS INSULATION TO 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EXTERNAL FINISHES TO C6 ARCHITECTS DETAILS INSULATION TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS 5. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METERS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ARCHITECTS DETAILS 6. ALL DIMENSION ARE TO BE CONFIRMED ON SITE BY CONTRACTOR BEFORE SERVICE VOID FFL FFL COMMENCEMENT OF WORKS ANY DEVIATIONS FOUND ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE SSL +20.205 m SSL +20.205 m ENGINEER / ARCHITECT.

SUBGRADE TO CIVIL 275 275 TOF +19.930 m ENGINEERS DETAILS WATERPROOFING KEY

DPM TO WATERPROOFING ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 200 200 DPM TO WATERPROOFING SPECIALISTS DETAILS GB3 SPECIALISTS DETAILS DENOTES WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE SHOWN SSL +19.380 m 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING SSL +19.380 m INDICATIVELY, REFER TO ARCHITECTS INFORMATION 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND EXTENT. MEMBRANE TO PROVIDE TYPE 'A' PROTECTION TO BS8102 (2009) 200 DENOTES WATERTIGHT REINFORCED CONCRETE 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING GB1 CONSTRUCTION FORMED USING SIKA-WATERTIGHT CONCRETE SERVICE TRENCH PC3 BEYOND CONCRETE ADMIXTURE OR EQUIVALENT APPROVED. CONCRETE SERVICE TRENCH BEYOND ADMIXTURE TO PROVIDE TYPE 'B' PROTECTION TO BS DPM TO WATERPROOFING 8102 (2009) SPECIALISTS DETAILS WATERPROOFING NOTES 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING 1. WATERPROOFING SYSTEMS SHOULD BE DESIGNED BY A SUITABLLY QUALIFIED 450Ø PILES 450Ø PILES SPECIALIST. E.G: CSSW QUALIFICATION 2. SUBMIT DETAILS OF WATERPROOFING STRATEGY TO WARRANTY PROVIDER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION.

3. ALL WATERPROOF SYSTEMS TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN GROUND CONDITIONS WHERE SOLUBLE SULFATES ARE PRESENT WITH AN ACEC CLASSIFICATION AC-2 AND DESIGN SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 3-3 SULFATE CLASS DS-2.

SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 1-1 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 2-2 1 : 25 4. WATER BARS TO ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND PENETRATIONS IN WATERPROOF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION TO BE DETAILED BY WATERPROOFING SPECIALIST 1 : 25 1 : 25

GROUND BEAM SCHEDULE I I REF. SIZE (WIDTH x DEPTH) GB1 750 x 750mm DP R.C GROUND BEAM FINISHES TO EXTERNAL MASONRY GB2 1200 x 1000mm DP R.C GROUND BEAM FINISHES TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS AND CAVITY TO GB3 600 x 600mm DP R.C GROUND BEAM 08 08 ARCHITECTS DETAILS C3 BEYOND ARCHITECT'S DETAILS 380 INSULATION TO GB4 750 x 780mm DP R.C GROUND BEAM C3 ARCHITECTS DETAILS INSULATION TO LGS INNER LEAF AND LINING TO LGS INNER LEAF AND LINING TO EXTERNAL MASONRY ARCHITECTS DETAILS ARCHITECT'S DETAILS AND ARCHITECT'S DETAILS AND AND CAVITY TO FFL FFL PILE CAP FOUNDATION SCHEDULE EXTERNAL MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION. GLULAM CANOPY MANUFACTURER'S POSTS TO SPECIALIST ARCHITECT'S DETAILS SSL +20.205 m MASONRY AND FINISHES TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS SPECIFICATION. SSL +20.205 m EXTERNAL MASONRY AND REF. SIZE Comments CAVITY TO DESIGN AND DETAIL GLULAM CANOPY CAVITY TO ARCHITECT'S DETAILS FINISHES TO ARCHITECTS DETAILS PC1 950x950x1200 DEEP ARCHITECT'S INSULATION TO POSTS TO SPECIALIST 275mm THK RC ARCHITECTS DETAILS INSULATION TO 275 275 SLAB PC2 2100x750x1200 DEEP 2 PILE CAP DETAILS 100 DESIGN & DETAIL FFL FGL FFL FFL ARCHITECTS DETAILS PC3 2100x900x1200 DEEP 2 PILE CAP SSL +20.205 m SSL +20.205 m 300THK RC WALL TOC +20.180 m COLUMN SHOE TO +20.180 m PC4 2100x950x1200 DEEP 2 PILE CAP SPECIALIST DETAILS FGL +19.575 m DPM TO WATERPROOFING FGL +19.575 m PC5 2100x1919x1200 DEEP 3 PILE CAP GB4 SPECIALISTS DETAILS 275 TOF +19.930 m 275 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING PAD FOUNDATION SCHEDULE PF1 TOF +19.150 m DPM TO WATERPROOFING DPM TO WATERPROOFING 50mm COMPRESSIBLE REF. TYPE SPECIALISTS DETAILS PF1 SPECIALISTS DETAILS GB1 BOARD PF1 600x600x1000 DEEP PAD FOUNDATION 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING DPM TO WATERPROOFING GB1 GB3 BEYOND SPECIALISTS DETAILS PC3 PC2 BEYOND 1200 GAUGE POLYTHENE 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING PC1 SLIP MEMBRANE

TOF +17.950 m

450Ø PILES 450Ø PILES

450Ø PILES SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 4-4 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 5-5 1 : 25 1 : 25 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 6-6 SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 7-7 1 : 25 1 : 25

07 06 5594 T04 ISSUED FOR TENDER 24.05.18 RP MW 75 T03 VE UPDATE - CHANGED PILES FROM 600Ø TO 450Ø 29.03.18 RP MW FINISHES TO T02 LEVELS REDUCED AND HEAVE PROTECTION REMOVED 26.02.18 RP MW ARCHITECTS DETAILS EXISTING PARTY WALL T01 ISSUED FOR COMMENT 12.02.18 RP MW INSULATION TO 140THK BLOCKWORK WALL TO Mark Revision Date Drawn Chkd C2 ARCHITECTS DETAILS ARCHITECTS DETAILS C1 BEYOND C3 BEYOND SCALING NOTE: Do not scale from this drawing. If in doubt, ask. FFL ALLOW MIN 50mm COMPRESSION BOARD Drawing Issue Status BETWEEN EXISTING PARTY WALL AND NEW SSL +20.205 m BLOCKWORK WALL E.G CORDEK CLAYMASTER D2 - TENDER ISSUE

TOF +19.930 m 275 TOC +19.930 m FGL +19.900 m CITY OF LONDON PRIMARY ACADEMY

1200 GAUGE POLYTHENE SLIP MEMBRANE ISLINGTON (CoLPAI) DPM TO WATERPROOFING SPECIALISTS DETAILS TBC MAIN SCHOOL 50mm CONCRETE BLINDING PC2 SUB-STRUCTURE DETAILS - SHEET 1 TBC

PC5 ASSUMED MASONRY CORBELLED Client GB1 BEYOND CANTILEVER GROUND GB1 FOOTING TO BE CONFIRMED MAIN SCHOOL BEAM BEYOND FOLLOWING SITE INVESTIGATION LOCAL UNDERPINNING WORKS MAY BE REQUIRED

450Ø PILES 450Ø PILES 450Ø PILES TOWER

RESIDENTIAL Date of 1st Issue Designed Drawn SCHOOL HALL 05.09.2017 NC RP Offices throughout A1 Scale Checked Approved the UK and Europe SUBSTRUCTURE SECTION 8-8 As indicated MW DR www.peterbrett.com KEY PLAN Drawing Number Revision © Peter Brett Associates LLP 1 : 25 1:750 COL-PBA-B2-ZZ-DR-S-2301 T04 LONDON Tel: +44 (0) 20 3824 6600

C:\Users\rpparker\Documents\COL-PBA-B2-ZZ-M3-S-0002_rpparker.rvt

RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Appendices

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 57 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Appendix A – Context Register Context Description / Interpretation Length Width No Depth Trench 1 2101 Paving slabs 2.30m 2.30m 0.08m 2102 Rubble foundation 2.30m 2.30m 0.08m 2103 Rubble packing 2.30m 2.30m 0.12m 2104 Dark greyish-brown sandy silt. Made ground. 2.30m 2.30m 0.31m 2105 Concrete rubble. 2.30m 2.30m 0.09m 2106 Firm, dark greyish-brown sandy silt. Made ground 2.30m 2.30m 0.41m 2107 Made ground, fill of cut [2108] 0.70m 0.64m 0.62m

2108 Cut filled by (2107) 0.70m 0.64m 0.62m

Hard, medium to light greyish brown, sandy silt. 0.70m 0.64m 0.03m 2109 Rubble layer

Firm, dark greyish-brown sandy silt. Made ground/ 0.70m 0.64m 0.51m 2110 wall packing.

2111 Firm, dark greyish-brown sandy silt. Wall cut fill. Unknown Unknown 0.5m

2112 Wall Unknown Unknown 0.46m

Sharp, steep, sharp, concave. Construction cut for Unknown 0.51m 2113 Unknown wall.

2114 Firm, dark greyish-brown sandy silt. Subsoil. 2.30m 2.30m Unknown

2115 Modern pipe. 0.70m 0.64m 0.13m

2116 Made ground 0.70m 0.64m 0.22m

2117 Made ground 0.70m 0.64m 0.22m

2118 Made ground 0.70m 0.64m 0.18m

2119 Made ground 0.70m 0.64m 0.22m

2120 Made ground 0.70m 0.64m 0.22m

2121 Made ground 0.70m 0.64m 0.18m

2122 Firm, dark greyish-brown sandy silt. MADE GROUND 2.30m 2.30m 0.15m

2123 Same as 2106

Trench 2

2201 Paving slabs (0.05m) and bedding sand (0.04m). 2.00m 2.00m 0.09m Modern surface.

Concrete slab (0.05m) and black grit layer (crushed 2202 tarmac?) (0.09m). Former surface (modern) 2.00m 2.00m 0.14m

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 58 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Context Description / Interpretation Length Width No Depth Brick lumps and crushed concrete/ broken slab. Made 2203 ground. 2.00m 2.00m 0.1m

Dark brown sandy silt with occasional brick. Made 2204 ground. 2.00m 2.00m 0.1-0.2m

Compacted sandy clay with moderate brick and 2205 concrete rubble. Made ground. 2.00m 2.00m 0.10m

Yellow-brown sand and crushed brick (much thinner 2206 on N side). Made ground 2.00m 2.00m 0.22m

Loose rubble with lots of concrete and rebar and 2207 modern 20th century brick. Made ground. 2.00m 2.00m >0.7m

Trench 3 2301 2.00m Tarmac. Made ground surface 1.80m 0.13m

2302 Gritty grey sand bedding layer 2.00m 1.80m 0.10m 2303 Thin layer of concrete 2.00m 1.80m 0.06m 2304 Grey, sandy deposit with CBM 2.00m 1.15m 0.15m V well compacted, hard deposit of sand, silt and 2305 2.00m 1.80m gravel. Modern made ground. 0.28m

Compacted mid-brown clay silt, demolition deposit or 2306 0.55m 0.55m made ground 0.23m

Red brick, stepped wall foundations running ne-sw. 2307 1.72m >0.20m Post-med red brick wall foundations. 0.25m

2308 Build up layer for wall <2307> >0.57m 0.42m 0.07m Ashy, light brownish-grey sandy silt deposit with v 2309 frequent mortar lumps and frequent CBM rubble. 2.00m 0.60m 0.3m Industrial waste deposit

Medium brownish-grey sandy silt with occasional 2310 2.00m 0.60m mortar flecks. Industrial waste deposit 0.04m

2311 Industrial waste deposit. 2.00m 0.64m >0.14m? As 2306 but slightly lighter (mid-grey brown) and 2312 0.25m 0.25m sandier. Occasional chalk and brick lumps. 0.1m

Hard, very well compacted, dark brown silty sand with 2313 0.25m 0.25m very few inclusions. 0.07m

Foundation cut for <2315>. >2m long x 0.4m-0.5m 2314 2.00m 0.50m wide (to north of wall) x 0.6m deep. 0.6m

Yellow brick wall running NE-SW with pale brown 2315 2.00m 0.22m mortar. Early 20th century yellow brick wall. 0.8m

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 59 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Context Description / Interpretation Length Width No Depth Medium greyish-brown sandy silt with frequent CBM 2316 and mortar inclusions. Not fully excavated. Fill of 2.00m 0.42m >0.79m construction cut <2314> for wall <2315>

Compacted layer sealing backfill of [2314] – same as 2317 1.45m 0.5m 0.13- 2306? 0.32m Mid brown, sandy silt with frequent tile/ CBM backfill 2318 2.00m 0.72m of [2314]. Backfill of [2314] >0.12m

Mid brown-grey silt with occasional to moderate 2319 1.00m 0.40m inclusions. Backfill of [2314] 0.06m

Ashy, pale grey deposit containing mortar. 2320 Redeposited post-med material in backfill of 2.00m 0.48m 0.27m construction cut.

Modern deposit of orange sand. Service/ levelling 2321 1.00m 0.68m layer. 0.20m

Thin band of clay and stones with occasional rubble 2322 2.00m 0.96m over wall <2315>. Modern post-demolition layer. 0.10m

Trench 4

2401 Paving slab (0.05m) and beige sand (0.07m). Modern 2.00m 2.00m 0.12m surface and underlay

2402 Black grit. Made ground (underlay for 2401) 2.00m 2.00m 0.1m Concrete slab – on SW side of trench only. Modern 2403 2.00m 0.50m surface 0.15m

2404 Dark brown sandy silt. Modern made ground. 2.00m 2.00m 0.48m 2405 Dark black-brown sandy silt. Modern made ground. 2.00m 2.00m 0.1m Additional sand of mid-brown silty sand on NE side of 2406 2.00m 0.2m trench. Modern made ground. 0.10m

Loose modern brick and concrete rubble. Modern 2407 2.00m 2.00m made ground. >0.5m

Trench 5 2501 Paving slabs and orange sand. Modern surface 2.00m 2.00m 0.1m

2502 Grey-brown sand. Bedding layer for (2501) 2.00m 2.00m 0.1m Dark brown sandy silt with stones and occasional 2503 CBM. Modern made ground 2.00m 2.00m 0.15m

Mid-brown silty sand and crushed rubble Modern 2504 made ground. 2.00m 2.00m 0.22m

2505 V loose modern rubble deposit of brick, concrete and 2.00m 2.00m >0.8m mid orange-brown sand/ crushed brick. Modern made

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 60 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Context Description / Interpretation Length Width No Depth ground.

Trench 6 Concrete slab and thin layer of tarmac underneath. 2601 4.60m 2.00m 0.25m Modern surface

2602 Gravel and orange sand. Bedding layer for (2601) 4.60m 2.00m 0.20m

Thin layer of concrete becoming paving slab/brick. 2603 4.60m 2.00m 0.1m Old surface (modern).

Brick and rubble deposit with mid brown silt and sand 2604 4.60m 2.00m 0.3 (on N of pit).

2605 V loose brick rubble deposit. 4.60m 2.00m 0.35m

2606 Yellow brick structure with vertical beam (2607) 2.75m 0.48m >1m

2607 Vertical iron beam in SW corner of trench 0.50m 0.25m >1.3m

Trench 7

2701 Tarmac and sand/grit bedding layer. Modern surface 3.40m 1.30m 0.20m

2702 Concrete. Old ground surface 3.40m 1.30m 0.08m

Dark brown sandy silt with stones and occasional 2703 3.40m 1.30m 0.11m CBM. Modern made ground

Grit-sand layer (including additional concrete on w 2704 3.40m 1.30m 0.11m side). Made ground

Loose brick and concrete rubble. Demolition rubble 2705 1.60m 1.00m >1m (post WWII.

Sandstone block forming upper part of wall (2707). 2706 0.84m 0.28m 0.18m Later footpad utilising earlier brick walls

Yellow brick wall beneath (2706) at NE end of trench. 2707 1.00m 0.15m >0.35m Former building

Yellow brick wall across SE corner of trench. Former 2708 0.71m 0.35m >0.68m building

Wall of yellow brick running along side of trench. 2709 2.75m 0.48m >0.80m Former building

2710 NW-SE offshoot of wall <2709>. Former building. 0.88m 1.10m >0.66m

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 61 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Appendix B – Specialist Reports

Ceramic Building Material

Les Capon Introduction An assemblage of brick, tile and other building materials was collected from the excavations. The assemblage is predominantly of post-medieval date, but there is one Roman piece, several fragments of Tudor date and 17th century fragments, as well as examples of more modern, 19th and 20th century materials. The entire assemblage weighs 4,777g and comprises 66 pieces. Roman A single piece of Roman building material is probably a fragment of brick rather than imbrex or tegula. It is 32mm thick and manufactured of a fine sandy clay fabric (708). Medieval One brick fragment may be of late medieval date (308). At only 53mm thick, this is indicative of a relatively early date, and may be from the 15th or 16th century. Of the roof tile, most is likely to be of post-medieval date, but two pieces may be of medieval date (1506 and 311), while a third piece has the impression – probably accidental – of a seed head, on the back (710). Post-medieval Three fragments of the brick assemblage are thin enough to indicate a 17th century date. Their fabric is fine sandy clay (313, 2309). Nine other fragments are generally post-medieval in date without being diagnostic (403, 1607, 305, 314, 1507, 2316). One piece (810) has a fragment of clay tobacco pipe embedded in it, and another a complete oyster shell (2316). One buff-coloured fragment has a burnt surface (2316). Most of the peg-tile is of post-medieval date (1600-1900), and where no peg-hole is apparent it is likely that the roof tile is peg-tile too. This is present in contexts 2311, 2316, 309, 711, 1511, 1518 and 1607. Tile from several deposits (202, 309, 307, 2123) appears to be slightly earlier: a fine clay sand fabric with crushed flint may be 16th century. Lime mortar was also collected. It is not precisely datable, but it is indicative of use in buildings constructed before the 19th century (1507, 2316, 905, 2309). There is also a piece of render or stucco (2123). 19th and 20th century Several pieces from yellow stock bricks are manufactured in a coarse fabric; these post-date 1780 and are more likely late 19th or early 20th century (contexts 605, 1306, 505, 403 and 1389). There are also fragments of a brick in a coarse pink fabric, likely to be the London Brick Company Phorpres product (contexts 505, 1408). Also, of relatively late date are fragments of an overfired, reddish purple fabric (2311, 2316, 811, 403). Cement mortar is also present, indicative of a date after c.1850 (505, 2709). One piece of a salt-glazed drainpipe is manufactured after c.1850 (102). Other One piece of building material in a baked, pale, orange sandy clay, may be daub or oven furniture, but is formless, with no surface (311). Conclusions The dates of the building material should be allied to the site narrative, to aid dating, and in turn, use the other finds evidence to refine the post-medieval fabrics if possible. This will enable an informed statement on the residuality of the building material, particularly the early pieces. Recommendations

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 62 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

It is recommended that all except the 19th and 20th century materials be retained, in the event of further work on site, the assemblage can be assessed as part of a larger collection.

Table B1: CBM by context Context Form Weight Breadth Depth Date Comments

305 brick 43 PM sandy red fabric, grits

308 brick 116 53 EPM orange fabric, quite fine, white fine lime mortar 311 brick 13 ?? formless. Could be anything, even daub. Orange fabric 313 brick 166 60 C17 red fabric, curved. Could be by boring tool not historically round 313 brick 291 60 C17 red fabric,

314 brick 24 PM red, 4x fragments undiagnostic 403 brick 450 65 ? orange fabric. Seems water-worn. Gritty. worn frog 403 brick 355 67 LC19 overfired, squared frog 403 brick 250 LC19 yellow stock 505 brick 35 C20 yellow 505 brick 40 C20 yellow with cement mortar 505 brick 28 C20 LBC Phorpress 605 brick 116 1780+ 5 fragments, yellow stock brick? 708 brick 91 32 Roman nice clayey fabric 810 brick 30 PM orange red, pale lime mortar, CTP? Frag incl 811 brick 48 PM coarse, overfired red 1306 brick 39 1780+ yellow stock x 2 1389 brick 107 58 LC19 dense yellow fabric. Could be firebrick but has some heat damage, worn frog with H : ? 1408 brick 128 64 C20 Phorpress with cement mortar

1507 brick 15 PM fragment 1607 brick 29 ?PM red, fine fabric lime mortar, 2309 brick 503 62 C17 red fabric with grey lime mortar 2311 brick 23 PM coarse, overfired red 2311 brick 64 PM coarse, overfired red 2316 brick 99 PM coarse, overfired red 2316 brick 40 PM buff, burned, lime mortar 2316 brick 32 PM coarse, overfired red 2316 brick 18 PM orange red 2316 brick 108 PM Oyster filled with dark red brick, must be a coarse component in the clay mix 505 cement 25 C20 cement mortar 602 clinker 16 ? probably fire waste 102 drain 102 16 C19 salt glazed 905 mortar 22 pale grey lime mortar, quite fine, clean 1507 mortar 11 PM lime mortar, hard, 1mm grits 1507 mortar 121 PM lime mortar, hard, 1mm grits

2309 mortar 56 light, quite coarse

2309 mortar 71 light, quite coarse

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 63 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Context Form Weight Breadth Depth Date Comments

2316 mortar 14 PM lime mortar, hard, 1mm grits

2709 mortar 59 C20 could be render or stucco

2123 pegtile 24 12.5 EPM orange red, hand smoothed, hint of crushed flint 2123 pegtile 24 12.5 EPM orange red, hand smoothed, hint of crushed flint 2311 pegtile 78 PM orange fabric, sandy fabric hand smoothed, round peg 2311 pegtile 108 PM orange fabric, sandy fabric hand smoothed, round peg 2311 pegtile 98 PM orange fabric, sandy fabric hand smoothed, lime mortar 2316 pegtile 359 157 12.5 PM orange fabric, sandy fabric 2123 render 40 LPM could be stucco 202 tile 45 18 M/EPM thicker than usual, rounded edge, flat, sandy orange 307 tile 17 12.5 EPM orange fabric 309 tile 13 12.5 ?? slightly underfired. Orange fabric 311 tile 47 15 ?? thicker than usual, but the fabric is like 309 710 tile 48 LM/EPM ?flower impression? 711 tile 42 PM hard fabric,. Fine 1506 tile 36 16 ? thicker than usual, but the fabric is like 309 1511 tile 7 12.5 PM orange fabric 1511 tile 11 12.5 PM dull red fabric 1518 tile 22 12.5 PM sandy fabric, gritty base 1607 tile 91 12.5 PM orange fabric, poorly made round peg hole

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 64 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

The Pottery Kylie McDermott Introduction A small assemblage of pottery from 99 Golden Lane (GDL18) was assessed. With the exception of one medieval sherd, the pottery is post-medieval, with a wide date range of 16th to 19th century. Methodology The assemblage in this report has been quantified using sherd count and weight (g), was identified with reference to the Museum of London Code Expansions (medieval and post medieval pottery codes) and recorded on an excel spreadsheet, to be included with the site archive. Discussion Medieval A single sherd (8g) of medieval pottery was recovered. The sherd, found in context (2123) has been identified as Coarse Border Ware, with a date range of 1270-1500 (Table 1). Post-Medieval The post-medieval pottery assemblage (Table 1) is represented by domestic items from the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th centuries. The assemblage is dominated by Post-Medieval Red ware vessels (PMR, PMSRG, PMBL) (1480-1900), including jugs, bowls and flower pots. A number of Border Ware sherds are also present in the assemblage including yellow (BORDY, 1550-1700), green (BORDG, 1550-1700) and brown (BORDB, 1600-1700) glazed vessels. Only a small quantity of stonewares were identified (6, 105g) all of which are German (GERST, 1480-1900) including one sherd of a Raeren (RAER, 1, 23g) jug with moulded lettering ([…]SHENE’DEN 1 5 8 4[…) and the feet and legs portion of a human figural scene. Tin-glazed earthenware (TGW) vessels include sherds of polychrome chargers (TGW POLY) and plates (PLAT) (1570-1846). The later 18th and 19th century fabrics include cream ware, pearlware, English Porcelain, Undecorated (REFW), Transfer-printed (TPW) and flow blue (TPW FLOW) white wares.

Table B2: Pottery by context context fabric form dec shd env weight comments E-L Dates Ctx Spot no (g) date PMR 1 1 44 1580-1900 202 1580-1900 PMR 1 1 7 1580-1900 PMR? 8 1 34 1580-1900 309 1580-1900 PMR FLP 1 1 6 1580-1900 312 PMR FLP 2 1 6 1580-1900 1580-1900 PMR 1 1 12 1580-1900 707 1805-1900 REFW 1 1 9 1805-1900 710 PMR FLP 1 1 7 1580-1900 1590-1900 GERST 1 1 3 1480-1900 1515 1550-1700 BORDG 1 1 1 1550-1700 1607 TPW3 1 1 6 "[…]1873[..]" 1873-1900 1873-1900 RAER JUG 1 1 23 "[…]SCHNE'DEN 1 5 1584 8 4" with figures

2123 PMR FLP 1 1 24 1580-1900 u/s

TPW flat WIL 2 2 3 1780-1900

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 65 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

context fabric form dec shd env weight comments E-L Dates Ctx Spot no (g) date TPW flat WIL 1 1 1 makers mark 1780-1900 "[…]PHIL[…]" TPW CUP 1 1 1 1780-1900

TPW BOWL 1 1 4 1830-1900 FLOW REFW 1 1 1 1873-1900

TGW PLATE 1 1 51 1570-1846

PMBL BOWL 1 1 37 1580-1700

ENPO TBOWL 1 1 27 1745-1900

BORDY 2 2 36 1550-1700

BORDG DISH 1 1 27 1550-1700

BORDB DISH 1 1 13 1600-1700

TGW CHAR POLY 4 3 39 1570-1846

CBW 1 1 8 1270-1500

TGW 1 1 6 1570-1846

PMR 21 12 481 1580-1900

GERST 4 4 79 1480-1900

CREA 2 1 7 1740-1830

PMSRG JUG 1 1 12 1480-1650

PEAR 1 1 4 1770-1840

ENPO FIGU 2 2 23 1745-1900 2305 1745-1900 PMR 1 1 15 1580-1900

Conclusion The pottery assemblage is post-medieval in date with the exception of the single sherd of medieval coarse border ware (CBW). The pottery should be retained for the present, in the event of further work, after which a strategy for discard will be agreed with the archaeological monitor and archive. The Clay Tobacco Pipes

Kylie McDermott Introduction A small assemblage of clay tobacco pipe fragments have been examined for this report. Whilst the majority of fragments in the assemblage were pipe stems, a number of bowls, providing dating evidence, were also recovered. The bowls in the assemblage are representative of typical 17th century London types. Methodology The clay tobacco pipe fragments have been quantified using number of fragments, weight (g), type (i.e. bowl, stem) whilst the complete bowls have been identified and dated using the and Oswald (1969) London typology (AO). The suffix “v” will be used for pipes bowls that are a variant of the standard type.

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 66 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

The Bowls All of the clay tobacco pipe bowls were recovered from Trench 1 with the exception of the AO Type 13v (707) (Table 3).

Context Count Weight Type Date Comments 707 1 15 AO13v 1610‐1680 2123 1 12 AO8 1610‐1640 2123 1 9 AO10 1640‐1660 2123 1 16 AO13 1610‐1680 2123 2 8 incomplete 2123 1 12 AO13 1610‐1680 2123 1 10 incomplete Table B3: The Clay Tobacco Pipe Bowls

Stems A total of eighty-nine stems (336g) were recovered from six contexts; (106), (202), (309), (2123), (2311), (2316) and (2323). The majority (78, 296g) of the pipe stems were from made ground context (2123). One stem (1,3g) from context (2123) is decorated with milled cross hatching, more commonly found on pipes in the 17th century, though can be found on 18th century pipe stems. Conclusion As the majority of the pipe bowls are from made ground context (2123); no further work is recommended, and it is suggested that the stem fragments be discarded. Bibliography Atkinson, D. and Oswald, A. (1969). London Clay Tobacco Pipes. Journal of the British Archaeological Association, 3rd Series Vol. 32 The Glass

Kylie McDermott The assemblage of glass is small and fragmentary, mostly composed of bottle glass. All of the glass is of post-medieval date. One (1g) sherd of green glass has a small patch of gold guilt on its exterior surface. Whilst the sherd is too small to be diagnostic, it is likely from a post medieval finial. Also present are two (8g) fragments of colourless moulded glass and one fragment (7g) of turquoise glass from a square bottle. All of these fragments are from made ground (2323). The only complete bottle in the assemblage (1,523g) was recovered from context (2705). The bottle is a colourless, early 20th century milk bottle with moulded lettering. The body of the vessel reads “Hitchmans”, with the initials “HD” on the base. One small sherd of (1g) of window glass was also present from made ground context (2323). The Metalwork by Kylie McDermott The metalwork assemblage is small, consisting of one coin (6g) <1> from context (2306) and one small unidentified copper alloy fragment (2309) (<1g). The coin <1> is heavily corroded and would need to be cleaned by a conservator for it to be identifiable. The Human Remains

Rebecca Watts Summary

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 67 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

This report presents the results of the osteological analysis of the fragmentary human bone recovered from Richard Cloudesley School, 99 Golden Lane, London during excavations that took place in January and February 2018. Post-excavation analysis confirmed that fragments of bone recovered from context (2309) were human and that the remains represented a minimum of one adult individual. The small quantity of bone recovered meant that it was not possible to provide an estimate of sex, or provide a more precise age-at-death. Pathological changes indicative of either trauma or degenerative joint disease were observed on a second metatarsal. Introduction A watching brief was conducted at Richard Cloudesley School, 99 Golden Lane, London between the 8th January and 13th February 2018 to monitor geotechnical investigations ahead of development of the site. The analysis aimed to determine the minimum number of individuals recovered from the site as well as providing as estimate of individual age and sex. A gauge of bone surface preservation was also undertaken and evidence for any pathological changes was recorded wherever possible. Methods Analysis of the human bone followed BABAO / IFA guidelines (Brickley & McKinley 2004) and included the production of an inventory of bones present prior to determination of individual age-at-death, and in adults, sex determination. Any pathological changes were also documented and discussed. Preservation and Completeness Bone preservation was evaluated according to the guidance suggested by McKinley (2004), which assigns grades (0-5) to the cortical surface according to damage by taphonomic agents, i.e. root damage and bone abrasion. In addition, bone surface preservation was categorised according to the Museum of London (Connell & Rauxloh 2003; Powers 2007) recording scheme using the following criteria: 1 = Bone surface is in good condition with no erosion, fine surface detail such a coarse woven bone deposition would be clearly visible (if present) to the naked eye. 2 = Bone surface is in moderate condition with some post-mortem erosion on long bone shafts but the margins of the articular surfaces are eroded and some prominences are eroded. 3 = Bone surface is in poor condition with extensive post-mortem erosion resulting in pitted and eroded cortical surfaces and long bones with articular surfaces missing or severely eroded. Sex Determination Sexually dimorphic features of the pelvis and cranium develop during puberty. These features can be examined and recorded to provide an estimate of sex in adult individuals. It is extremely difficult to determine the sex of non-adult skeletons without the use of destructive biomolecular analyses. Surviving bone from various regions of the pelvis and cranium was recorded to provide an estimate of sex in each adult skeleton. The female pelvis is typically more gracile than the male pelvis, but is broader, due to the needs of childbirth (Buikstra & Uberlaker 1994; Bass 1995). Sex differences in soft tissue attachments in the pelvic region can also be recorded, including the ventral arc, ischio-pubic ramus ridge and the sub-pubic concavity. The regions of the cranium that display sexually dimorphic features include the supra-orbital brow ridges (glabella), the supra-orbital margins, the mastoid processes, the nuchal crest and the inion protuberance, as well as the shape of the forehead, eye orbits and mandible. The assessment of these regions for the determination of sex followed the methods of Buikstra & Uberlaker (1994, 20) and Brickley & McKinley (2004). There are five possible classifications of sex: male, probable male, indeterminate probable female, female. Age Determination

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 68 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Osteological methods to determine adult age-at-death are based on degenerative changes to the pubic symphysis (Brooks & Suchey 1990), the auricular surfaces of the pelves (Lovejoy et al. 1985) and the sternal ends of the ribs (Iscan et al. 1984; 1985). Non-adult age-at-death estimation relies on the sequential mineralisation and eruption of the deciduous and permanent dentition (Moorrees et al. 1963; Ubelaker 1978), as well as the maturation and size of various skeletal elements (Scheuer & Black 2000). Skeletal age-at-death estimates are presented using broad age categories as it is often not possible to provide an exact age in years (Brickely & McKinley 2004). The age categories used in the current analysis followed the Museum of London recording protocol and are displayed in Table 4.

Table B4: Age-at-death categories used in the analysis of human remains

Age category Age range Description

1 Perinate Intrauterine – neonate

2 1-6 months Early post-natal infant

3 7-11 months Late post-natal infant

4 1-5 years Early childhood

5 6-11 years Late Childhood

6 12-17 years Adolescent

7 18-25 years Young adult

8 26-35 years Middle adult A

9 36-45 years Middle adult B

10 46+ years Mature adult

11 Adult 18+ years

12 Sub-adult < 18 years

Pathology Pathological changes on the bones and teeth were recorded following IFA / BABAO guidelines (Brickley & McKinley, 2004) as well as standard osteological references (Brothwell, 1981; Hillson, 1996; Aufderheide & Rodrigues-Martin, 1998; Ortner, 2003; Roberts & Manchester, 2005). Results The inventory of human remains recovered from context (2309) is provided in Table 5. A right second metatarsal and fragments of a thoracic vertebra were positively identified. As there were no duplicate fragments the minimum number of individuals represented by the fragmentary remains is given as one. Bone preservation was classed as Grade 2, reflecting moderate post-mortem erosion on long bone surfaces with damage to the margins of the articular surfaces and some prominences.

Table B5: Human Bone Inventory

Identified fragment Side Sex Age

Thoracic vertebra - - Adult

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 69 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Metatarsal 2 Right - Adult

Both bones had completed epiphyseal fusion and were thus identified as adult. As there are no identifiable sexually dimorphic features on these bones it was not possible to provide an estimate of sex for this individual. A small osteophyte (4mm in diameter) was observed on the medial aspect of the juxta-articular area of the head of the metatarsal. Osteophytes form as a result of degenerative joint disease but may also occur following trauma. Due to the small quantity of material recovered it was not possible to identify the aetiological factors responsible. Discussion The osteological analysis of the fragmentary bone from Richard Cloudesley School confirms the presence of human remains at the site. The remains represent a minimum of one adult individual, of indeterminable age or sex. There was a small osteophyte on the head of the metatarsal, which may be suggestive of either trauma or degenerative joint disease. The discovery of human remains at Richard Cloudesley School suggests that burial activity may have taken place in or around the site. It is possible that the remains are associated with one of the large medieval cemeteries that lay to the north and west of the site. Bibliography Aufderheide, AC. & Rodrigues-Martin, C. 1998. The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Human Paleopathology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Bass, W.M. 1995. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. Missouri Archaeological Society Inc, Missouri. Brickley, M. & McKinley, JI. (eds.) 2004. Guidelines to the standards for recording human remains: Institute of Field Archaeologists Technical paper no. 7. BABAO / IFA, Reading. Brooks, S. & Suchey, JM. 1990. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: a comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Human Evolution 5: 227-238. Brothwell, D. 1981. Digging up Bones. Third edition. Cornell University Press, New York. Buikstra J. & Ubelaker D.H. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey Series Nr 44. Connell B. & Rauxloh P. 2003. A Rapid Method for Recording Human Skeletal Data. Oracle Manual. Museum of London Archaeology Service/Museum of London. Hillson, S. 1996. Dental Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Iscan, MY. & loth, SR. 1984. Determination of age from the sterna rib in white males. A test of the phase method. Journal of Forensic Sciences 31: 122-132. Iscan, MY., Loth, SR. & Scheuerman, EH. 1985. Determination of age from the sterna rib in white females. A test of the phase method. Journal of Forensic Sciences 31: 990-999. Lovejoy, CO., Mendl, RS., Pryzbeck, TR. & Mensforth, RP. 1985. Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: a new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68: 15-28. McKinley, J. 2004. Compiling a skeletal inventory: cremated human bone. In: Brickley, M & McKinley, JI. (eds.) 2004. Guidelines to the standards for recording human remains: Institute of Field Archaeologists Technical paper no. 7. BABAO / IFA, Reading. pp. 9-12.

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 70 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Moorrees, CFA., Fanning, EA. & Hunt, EE. 1963a. Formation and resorption of three deciduous teeth in children. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 21: 205-213. Moorrees, CFA., Fanning, EA. & Hunt, EE. 1963b. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. Journal of Dental Research 42: 1490-1502. Ortner, DJ. 2003. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. Smithsonian institution Press, Washington DC. Powers N. 2007. A Rapid Method for Recording Human Skeletal Data. Oracle Manual. Second Edition. Museum of London Archaeology Service/Museum of London. Roberts, C. & Manchester, K. 2005. The Archaeology of Disease. Third edition. Suttn Publishing Limited, Stroud. Scheuer, L. & Black, S. 2000. Developmental Juvenile Osteology. San Diego, Academic Press. Ubelaker, DH. 1978. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis and Interpretation. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC. The Animal Bone By Matilda Holmes A very small assemblage of animal bone was recovered. It was in good condition, though with some fresh breaks that occurred during or following excavation. Only one fragment had been gnawed by dogs, suggesting that much of the material was buried fairly quickly following discard. A single sheep/goat metatarsal had butchery marks consistent with the disarticulation of the lower leg. The assemblage was dominated by the loose teeth/mandibles and lower leg bones (metapodials and phalanges) of cattle and sheep/goat (Table 1), which typically implies primary butchery or skin-processing waste. However, in such a small sample, alongside other bones that do not comply to this trend (sheep/goat femur and radius, and rabbit/hare pelvis) it is a possibility that must be treated with caution. A single porous sheep/goat metacarpal came from a lamb, suggesting that either sheep were bred in the vicinity, or that lambs were marketed to the town. Several oyster shells (left and right sides), and a whelk shell imply the consumption of shellfish by those living in the area.

Table B6: Animal bone: Species representation by context

Rabbit/ Context Cattle Sheep/goat Sheep Pig hare Oyster Whelk Unidentified 202 1 707 1 6 710 1 1515 1 2123 5 10 2 1 7 1 18 2305 1 1

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 71 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Appendix C - OASIS Form

OASIS ID: aocarcha1-305118

Project details

Project name Richard Cloudesley School, 99 Golden Lane, London, EC1Y 0TZ

The site comprises up to 4m depth of made ground with finds from the Roman and medieval periods in the lower levels, and post-medieval period in the upper horizons. In several locations, household rubbish pits were present, whilst the earliest foundation encountered used 16th century bricks. In the Short description of western end of the site, remains were dominated by the basements and walls of tenements built the project during the post medieval period, which stood until bombed during the Second World War. In the east end of the site, the remains of a Foundry and Cooperage were revealed, both 19th century, and demolished in the early 20th century.

Project dates Start: 09-01-2018 End: 31-01-2018

Previous/future No / Not known work

Any associated project reference 33605 - Contracting Unit No. codes

Any associated project reference GDL 17 - Sitecode codes

Type of project Field evaluation

Site status Local Authority Designated Archaeological Area

Current Land use Community Service 1 - Community Buildings

Monument type FOUNDRY Post Medieval

Monument type COOPERAGE Post Medieval

Monument type TENEMENT Post Medieval

Significant Finds NONE None

Methods & ''Sample Trenches'' techniques

Development type Public building (e.g. school, church, hospital, medical centre, law courts etc.)

Development type Urban residential (e.g. flats, houses, etc.)

Prompt Direction from - PPS

Position in the Pre-application planning process

Project location

Country England

GREATER LONDON ISLINGTON ISLINGTON Richard Cloudesley School, 99 Golden Lane, Site location London,

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 72 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Postcode EC1Y 0TZ

Study area 0.4 Hectares

Site coordinates TQ 32189 82187 51.522612156351 -0.094402810242 51 31 21 N 000 05 39 W Point

Height OD / Depth Min: 15.45m Max: 16.44m

Project creators

Name of AOC Archaeology Organisation

Project brief GLAAS originator

Project design AOC Archaeology originator

Project Catherine Edwards director/manager

Project supervisor Suzanne Westall

Type of sponsor/funding developer body

Project archives

Physical Archive LAARC recipient

Physical Archive ID GDL 17

Physical Contents ''Animal Bones'',''Ceramics'',''Glass'',''Human Bones'',''Metal''

Physical Archive held at AOC until transfer notes

Digital Archive LAARC recipient

Digital Archive ID GDL 17

Digital Contents ''Animal Bones'',''Ceramics'',''Glass'',''Human Bones'',''Stratigraphic'',''Survey''

Digital Media ''Images raster / digital photography'',''Images vector'',''Survey'',''Text'' available

Digital Archive held at AOC until transfer notes

Paper Archive LAARC recipient

Paper Archive ID GDL 17

Paper Contents ''Animal Bones'',''Ceramics'',''Glass'',''Human Bones'',''Metal'',''Stratigraphic'',''Survey''

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 73 | www.aocarchaeology.com RICHARD CLOUDSLEY SCHOOL, 99 GOLDEN LANE, CITY OF LONDON AND LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

Paper Media ''Context sheet'',''Drawing'',''Photograph'',''Plan'',''Report'',''Section'',''Survey '',''Unpublished Text'' available

Paper Archive notes held at AOC until transfer

Project bibliography 1

Publication type Grey literature (unpublished document/manuscript)

Richard Cloudesley School, 99 Golden Lane, City of London and London Borough of Islington: An Title Archaeological Report

Author(s)/Editor(s) Westall, S.

Date 2018

Issuer or publisher AOC Archaeology

Place of issue or London publication

Description A4, 78 pages, 6 figures, 23 plates

Entered by les capon ([email protected])

Entered on 20 March 2018

© AOC Archaeology 2018 | PAGE 74 | www.aocarchaeology.com

AOC Archaeology Group, Unit 7, St Margarets Business Centre, Moor Mead Road, Twickenham TW1 1JS tel: 020 8843 7380 | fax: 020 8892 0549 | e-mail: [email protected]