DOCSLIB.ORG

Sedimentological Control on the Reservoir and Caprock Properties Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sedimentological Control on the Reservoir and Caprock Properties Of Sedimentological control on the reservoir and caprock properties of a bleached palaeoreservoir in the Entrada Formation at Salt Wash Graben, Green River, Utah Environmental Modelling Programme Open Report OR/15/005 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/15/005 Sedimentological control on the reservoir and caprock properties of a bleached palaeoreservoir in the Entrada Formation at Salt Wash Graben, Green River, Utah Andrew J. Newell & Andrew S. Butcher Keywords Contributor/editor Entrada Formation, bleached palaeoreservoir, aeolian, Antoni Milodowksi reservoir, caprock. Front cover Bleached palaeoreservoir in the Entrada Formation, Utah Bibliographical reference NEWELL, ANDREW J & BUTCHER, ANDREW S. 2015. Sedimentological control on the reservoir and caprock properties of a bleached palaeoreservoir in the Entrada Formation at Salt Wash Graben, Green River, Utah. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/15/005. 45pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. © NERC 2015. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2015 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation. email [email protected] We publish an annual catalogue of our maps and other publications; this catalogue is available online or from any of the Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham BGS shops. NG12 5GG Tel 0115 936 3241 Fax 0115 936 3488 The British Geological Survey carries out the geological survey of email [email protected] Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the latter as an agency service for the government of Northern Ireland), and of the surrounding continental shelf, as well as basic research projects. Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA It also undertakes programmes of technical aid in geology in Tel 0131 667 1000 Fax 0131 668 2683 developing countries. email [email protected] The British Geological Survey is a component body of the Natural Environment Research Council. Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD Tel 020 7589 4090 Fax 020 7584 8270 Tel 020 7942 5344/45 email [email protected] Columbus House, Greenmeadow Springs, Tongwynlais, Cardiff CF15 7NE Tel 029 2052 1962 Fax 029 2052 1963 Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB Tel 01491 838800 Fax 01491 692345 Geological Survey of Northern Ireland, Colby House, Stranmillis Court, Belfast BT9 5BF Tel 028 9038 8462 Fax 028 9038 8461 www.bgs.ac.uk/gsni/ Parent Body Natural Environment Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN2 1EU Tel 01793 411500 Fax 01793 411501 www.nerc.ac.uk Website www.bgs.ac.uk Shop online at www.geologyshop.com OR/15/005 Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i Summary ....................................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Salt wash graben palaeoreservoir ............................................................................ 2 1.3 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 3 2 Geological background .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1 The Paradox basin .......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Stuctural setting of the salt wash graben palaeoreservoir ............................................... 6 2.3 Entrada Formation Stratigraphy ..................................................................................... 8 2.4 Depositional system ........................................................................................................ 9 3 Palaeoreservoir sedimentology ........................................................................................... 10 3.1 Logged sections ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Lithofacies of the Slick Rock Member – Reservoir sandstone .................................... 13 3.3 Lithofacies of the Earthy Member – the topseal ........................................................... 17 4 Evidence for fluid flow ......................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Distribution of the bleaching ........................................................................................ 18 4.2 Nature of the reducing fluids ........................................................................................ 22 4.3 Density of the reducing fluids ...................................................................................... 23 4.4 Regional Flow Pathways .............................................................................................. 24 4.5 Depth, temperature and age of bleaching ..................................................................... 26 4.6 CO2 Phase ..................................................................................................................... 26 4.7 Reservoir fracturing and the escape of reducing fluids ................................................ 26 5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 28 References .................................................................................................................................... 36 FIGURES Figure 1 Bleaching of red sandstones leaves evidence for the movement of reducing fluids along this fracture zone in the Entrada Formation of south central Utah. .................... 1 Figure 2 Site location (black rectangle) adjacent to the Salt Wash Graben (major faults are shown in red). The town of Green River is just to the north of the map and the Green River itself meanders from north to south. The site is located on Middle Jurassic Entrada Formation, which crops as a small sliver on the northern footwall of the Salt Wash Graben. To the northeast of the site, the Entrada Formation passes upwards through a stepped series of scarps and dip slopes into the younger Morrison, Cedar Mountain and Mancos Shale formations. The southwest deflection of the outcrop i OR/15/005 trace in the western half of the map results from the development of the Green River Anticline which plunges to the north and is truncated by the Little Grand Wash Fault. Geology and fault patterns are from the digital version of the Utah Geological Survey Map 180 (Doelling 2001). ............................................................................................. 2 Figure 3 Map showing the extent of data capture and some of the key geological features. Thick white arrows indicate the general dip direction, note the four way structural closure around the bleached (pale grey) palaeoreservoir. White stars indicate the location of the west (left) and east (right) logged sections. .......................................... 4 Figure 4 Burial and thermal history of the Paradox Basin since the end Jurassic at Green River, Utah (Nuccio and Condon 1996). Red dashed line indicates the approximate burial path of the Entrada Formation. Note the rapid exhumation of the formation from 37Ma onwards associated with uplift and erosion of the Colorado Plateau. Green dashed line indicates the temperature of the fluids thought to have caused the bleaching of the Entrada Formation. ............................................................................. 5 Figure 5 Map showing the location of major fold (blue) and fault (red) structures. Note the coalignment of the majority of faults and folds, with the Salt Wash Graben and Little Grand Wash Faults being notable exceptions. The Salt Wash Graben forms a northwestern extension of the Moab Fault Zone. Geological structures are from Utah Geological Survey Map 180 (Doelling 2001). .............................................................. 6 Figure 6 Two views of the northern bounding fault of the Salt Wash Graben Fault along the southern perimeter of the palaeoreservoir. The fault juxtaposes south-dipping Cretaceous Morrison/Cedar Mountain Formation in the hanging wall against north- dipping, partially bleached, Jurassic Entrada Formation on the footwall. ...................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cyclicity, Dune Migration, and Wind Velocity in Lower Permian Eolian Strata, Manitou Springs, CO
    Cyclicity, Dune Migration, and Wind Velocity in Lower Permian Eolian Strata, Manitou Springs, CO by James Daniel Pike, B.S. A Thesis In Geology Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES Approved Dustin E. Sweet Chair of Committee Tom M. Lehman Jeffery A. Lee Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2017 Copyright 2017, James D. Pike Texas Tech University, James Daniel Pike, August 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my greatest thanks to my advisor Dr. Dustin Sweet, who was an excellent advisor during this research. Dr. Sweet was vital throughout the whole process, be it answering questions, giving feedback on figures, and imparting his extensive knowledge of the ancestral Rocky Mountains on me; for this I am extremely grateful. Dr. Sweet allowed me to conduct my own research without looking over my shoulder, but was always available when needed. When I needed a push, Dr. Sweet provided it. I would like to thank my committee memebers, Dr. Lee and Dr. Lehman for providing feedback and for their unique perspectives. I would like to thank Jenna Hessert, Trent Jackson, and Khaled Chowdhury for acting as my field assistants. Their help in taking measurements, collecting samples, recording GPS coordinates, and providing unique perspectives was invaluable. Thank you to Melanie Barnes for allowing me to use her lab, and putting up with the mess I made. This research was made possible by a grant provided by the Colorado Scientific Society, and a scholarship provided by East Texas Geological Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Elements in Sedimentary Rocks of the Colorado Plateau a Preliminary Report
    Distribution of Elements in Sedimentary Rocks of the Colorado Plateau A Preliminary Report GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-F Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Distribution of Elements in Sedimentary Rocks of the Colorado Plateau A Preliminary Report By WILLIAM L. NEWMAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-F Prepared on behalf of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. CONTENTS Page Abstract____________________________-__-__-_---_-___-___ 337 Introduction ______________________________________________________ 339 Physical features of sedimentary rocks------_--__----_------------__- 339 Precambrian sedimentary rocks.________________________________ 341 Cambrian system____________________________________________ 342 Ordovician system..___________________________________________ 344 Devonian system._____________________________________________ 344 Mississippian system.._________________________________________ 346 Pennsylvanian system________________________________________ 346 Permian system _______________________________________________ 349 Triassic system______________________________________________ 352 Moenkopi formation _______________________________________ 352 Chinle formation..._______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Stratigraphy Column
    Capitol Reef National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geology “Geology knows no such word as forever.” —Wallace Stegner Capitol Reef National Park’s geologic story reveals a nearly complete set of Mesozoic-era sedimentary layers. For 200 million years, rock layers formed at or near sea level. About 75-35 million years ago tectonic forces uplifted them, forming the Waterpocket Fold. Forces of erosion have been sculpting this spectacular landscape ever since. Deposition If you could travel in time and visit Capitol Visiting Capitol Reef 180 million years ago, Reef 245 million years ago, you would not when the Navajo Sandstone was deposited, recognize the landscape. Imagine a coastal you would have been surrounded by a giant park, with beaches and tidal flats; the water sand sea, the largest in Earth’s history. In this moves in and out gently, shaping ripple marks hot, dry climate, wind blew over sand dunes, in the wet sand. This is the environment creating large, sweeping crossbeds now in which the sediments of the Moenkopi preserved in the sandstone of Capitol Dome Formation were deposited. and Fern’s Nipple. Now jump ahead 20 million years, to 225 All the sedimentary rock layers were laid million years ago. The tidal flats are gone and down at or near sea level. Younger layers were the climate supports a tropical jungle, filled deposited on top of older layers. The Moenkopi with swamps, primitive trees, and giant ferns. is the oldest layer visible from the visitor center, The water is stagnant and a humid breeze with the younger Chinle Formation above it.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Correlation Chart for Western Colorado and Northwestern New Mexico
    New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 32nd Field Conference, Western Slope Colorado, 1981 75 STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION CHART FOR WESTERN COLORADO AND NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO M. E. MacLACHLAN U.S. Geological Survey Denver, Colorado 80225 INTRODUCTION De Chelly Sandstone (or De Chelly Sandstone Member of the The stratigraphic nomenclature applied in various parts of west- Cutler Formation) of the west side of the basin is thought to ern Colorado, northwestern New Mexico, and a small part of east- correlate with the Glorieta Sandstone of the south side of the central Utah is summarized in the accompanying chart (fig. 1). The basin. locations of the areas, indicated by letters, are shown on the index map (fig. 2). Sources of information used in compiling the chart are Cols. B.-C. shown by numbers in brackets beneath the headings for the col- Age determinations on the Hinsdale Formation in parts of the umns. The numbers are keyed to references in an accompanying volcanic field range from 4.7 to 23.4 m.y. on basalts and 4.8 to list. Ages where known are shown by numbers in parentheses in 22.4 m.y. on rhyolites (Lipman, 1975, p. 6, p. 90-100). millions of years after the rock name or in parentheses on the line The early intermediate-composition volcanics and related rocks separating two chronostratigraphic units. include several named units of limited areal extent, but of simi- No Quaternary rocks nor small igneous bodies, such as dikes, lar age and petrology—the West Elk Breccia at Powderhorn; the have been included on this chart.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Stratigraphy at Durango, Colorado
    160 New Mexico Geological Society, 56th Field Conference Guidebook, Geology of the Chama Basin, 2005, p. 160-169. LUCAS AND HECKERT MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY AT DURANGO, COLORADO SPENCER G. LUCAS AND ANDREW B. HECKERT New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Rd. NW, Albuquerque, NM 87104 ABSTRACT.—A nearly 3-km-thick section of Mesozoic sedimentary rocks is exposed at Durango, Colorado. This section con- sists of Upper Triassic, Middle-Upper Jurassic and Cretaceous strata that well record the geological history of southwestern Colorado during much of the Mesozoic. At Durango, Upper Triassic strata of the Chinle Group are ~ 300 m of red beds deposited in mostly fluvial paleoenvironments. Overlying Middle-Upper Jurassic strata of the San Rafael Group are ~ 300 m thick and consist of eolian sandstone, salina limestone and siltstone/sandstone deposited on an arid coastal plain. The Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation is ~ 187 m thick and consists of sandstone and mudstone deposited in fluvial environments. The only Lower Cretaceous strata at Durango are fluvial sandstone and conglomerate of the Burro Canyon Formation. Most of the overlying Upper Cretaceous section (Dakota, Mancos, Mesaverde, Lewis, Fruitland and Kirtland units) represents deposition in and along the western margin of the Western Interior seaway during Cenomanian-Campanian time. Volcaniclastic strata of the overlying McDermott Formation are the youngest Mesozoic strata at Durango. INTRODUCTION Durango, Colorado, sits in the Animas River Valley on the northern flank of the San Juan Basin and in the southern foothills of the San Juan and La Plata Mountains. Beginning at the northern end of the city, and extending to the southern end of town (from north of Animas City Mountain to just south of Smelter Moun- tain), the Animas River cuts in an essentially downdip direction through a homoclinal Mesozoic section of sedimentary rocks about 3 km thick (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU Honors Projects Honors College Spring 2014 Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado Joanna Hamilton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Paleobiology Commons Repository Citation Hamilton, Joanna, "Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado" (2014). Honors Projects. 116. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/116 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Analysis of a Sponge Bioherm from the Hermosa Group, Molas Lake Area, Colorado Joanna Hamilton Bowling Green State University Department of Geology April 2013 Introduction: The Hermosa Group The Hermosa Group is a Pennsylvanian (~310 Ma) rock unit found in the southwestern San Juan Mountains and the Paradox Basin. The Paradox Basin is a northwest-southeast trending basin related to the Uncompahgre Uplift in the north, salt deposition and movement throughout, and a Precambrian fault system in the underlying basement rocks (Brown 2002, Trudgill and Arbuckle 2009). The Uncompahgre Uplift occurred in response to the Ouachita – Marathon Orogeny (related to the Ancestral Rocky Mountains Orogeny) caused by the collision of North America and South America-Africa during the Late Mississippian (~ 320 Ma) (Trudgill and Arbuckle 2009, Pazzaglia et al. 1999). The Paradox Basin formed as a complimentary subsidence basin alongside the uplifted area (Brown 2002). When the basin subsided, smaller structural features formed within it, including step-down grabens close to the uplift and folded areas further away (Baars and Stevenson 1981, Brown 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive All Theses and Dissertations 2016-12-01 Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah: Facies Analysis and Regional Implications of Interfingered Sabkha and Fluvial Terminal Splay Sediments Jeffery Michael Valenza Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Valenza, Jeffery Michael, "Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah: Facies Analysis and Regional Implications of Interfingered Sabkha and Fluvial Terminal Splay Sediments" (2016). All Theses and Dissertations. 6112. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/6112 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah: Facies Analysis and Regional Implications of Interfingered Sabkha and Fluvial Terminal Splay Sediments Jeffery Michael Valenza A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Thomas H. Morris, Chair Jani Radebaugh Sam Hudson Scott M. Ritter Department of Geological Sciences Brigham Young University Copyright © 2016 Jeffery Michael Valenza All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah: Facies Analysis and Regional Implications of Interfingered Sabkha and Fluvial Terminal Splay Sediments Jeffery Michael Valenza Department of Geological Sciences, BYU Master of Science First distinguished from other sedimentary successions in 1928, the Entrada Sandstone has been the subject of numerous studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Plays Ute Moutnain Ute Reservation, Colorado and New Mexico
    Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation Cortez R18W Karle Key Xu R17W T General Setting Mine Xu Xcu 36 Can y on N Xcu McElmo WIND RIVER 32 INDIAN MABEL The Ute Mountain Ute Reservation is located in the northwest RESERVATION MOUNTAIN FT HALL IND RES Little Moude Mine Xcu T N ern portion of New Mexico and the southwestern corner of Colorado UTE PEAK 35 N R16W (Fig. UM-1). The reservation consists of 553,008 acres in Montezu BLACK 666 T W Y O M I N G MOUNTAIN 35 R20W SLEEPING UTE MOUNTAIN N ma and La Plata Counties, Colorado, and San Juan County, New R19W Coche T Mexico. All of these lands belong to the tribe but are held in trust by NORTHWESTERN 34 SHOSHONI HERMANO the U.S. Government. Individually owned lands, or allotments, are IND RES Desert Canyon PEAK N MESA VERDE R14W NATIONAL GREAT SALT LAKE W Marble SENTINEL located at Allen Canyon and White Mesa, San Juan County, Utah, Wash Towaoc PARK PEAK T and cover 8,499 acres. Tribal lands held in trust within this area cov Towaoc River M E S A 33 1/2 N er 3,597 acres. An additional forty acres are defined as U.S. Govern THE MOUND R15W SKULL VALLEY ment lands in San Juan County, Utah, and are utilized for school pur TEXAS PACIFIC 6-INCH OIL PIPELINE IND RES UNITAH AND OURAY INDIAN RESERVATION Navajo poses. W Ramona GOSHUTE 789 The Allen Canyon allotments are located twelve miles west of IND RES T UTAH 33 Blanding, Utah, and adjacent to the Manti-La Sal National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithology and Subdivisions of the Jurassic Stump Formation in Southeastern Idaho and Adjoining Areas
    Lithology and Subdivisions of the, . „ - nj,Jurassic ~ - -' - - - - Stump- - - - JL": •-Formation - - - - - in Southeastern Idaho and dning iGEOLOGlCAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1035-C Lithology and Subdivisions of the Jurassic Stump Formation in Southeastern Idaho and Adjoining Areas By GEORGE N. PIPIRINGOS and RALPH W. IMLAY UNCONFORMITIES, CORRELATION, AND NOMENCLATURE OF SOME TRIASSIC AND JURASSIC ROCKS, WESTERN INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1035-C Marked rapid lateral changes in lithology, fossil content, and thickness of the Stump Formation are due principally to erosion associated with the Cretaceous (K) and Jurassic (]-4) unconformities UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Pipiringos, George Nicholas, 1918- Lithology and subdivisions of the Jurassic stump formation in southeastern Idaho and adjoining areas. (Unconformities, correlation, and nomenclature of some Triassic and Jurassic rocks, western interior United States) (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1035-C) Bibliography: p. 25 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Jurassic. 2. Geology Idaho. 3. Geology The West. 4. Petrology Idaho. 5. Petrology-The West. I. Imlay, Ralph Willard, 1908-joint author. II. Title. HI. Series. IV. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1035-C. QE681.P49 551.7'6 78-1687 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
    [Show full text]
  • Front Cover.Pub
    PENNSYLVANIAN-PERMIAN VEGETATIONAL CHANGES IN TROPICAL EURAMERICA William A. DiMichele, C. Blaine Cecil, Dan S. Chaney, Scott D. Elrick, Spencer G. Lucas, Richard Lupia, W. John Nelson, and Neil J. Tabor INTRODUCTION Vegetational changes across the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary are recorded in several largely terrestrial basins across the Euramerican portions of equatorial Pangea. For the purposes of this paper, these include the Bursum-Abo Formation transition and its equivalents in several small basins in New Mexico, the Halgaito Formation of southeastern Utah, Markley Formation of the eastern shelf of the Midland Basin in north-central Texas, Council Grove Group of northern Oklahoma and southern Kansas, and Dunkard Group of the central Appalachian Basin. This transition also is recorded in numerous basins in Europe, reviewed by Roscher and Schneider (2006), based on paleoclimate indicators preserved in those regions. Collectively, these deposits form a west-to-east transect across the Pangean paleotropics and thus provide a paleogeographic setting for examination of both temporal and spatial changes in vegetation across the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary (Figures 1 and 2). The Pennsylvanian-Permian transition records the change from wetland vegetation as the predominant assemblages found in the plant fossil record, to seasonally dry vegetation. This has often been called the “Paleophytic-Mesophytic” transition, a concept that is flawed Figure 1. Continental configuration at the Pennsylvanian-Permian boundary. Yellow ovals indicate the principal areas discussed herein: Left – New Mexico and Utah, Center – Texas and Oklahoma, Right – Central Appalachians/Dunkard. Map courtesy of Ron Blakey, Northern Arizona University. DiMichele, W. A., Cecil, C. B., Chaney, D. S., Elrich, S.
    [Show full text]
  • "Simulations of Paradox Salt Basin."
    &>.; -A , - f %' . _ / I SIMULATIONS OF PARADOX SALT BASIN Ellen J. Quinn and Peter M. Ornstein 8402060151 620824 PDR WASTE WM-16PD 3104.1/EJQ/82/08/09/0 - 1 - Purpose This report documents the preliminary NRC in-house modeling of a bedded salt site. The exercise has several purposes: 1) to prepare for receipt of the site characterization report by analyzing one of the potential salt sites; 2) to gain experience using the salt related options of the SWIFT code; and 3) to determine the information and level of detail necessary to realistically model the site. Background The Department of Energy is currently investigating several salt deposits as potential repository horizons. The sites include both salt beds and salt domes located in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Utah. Site investigations will be occuring in all locations until receipt of the Site Characterization Report. In order to narrow the scope of this preliminary modeling effort, the staff decided to focus their analysis on the Paradox Basin. The site was chosen principally because of the level of information available about the site. At the time this work began, two reports on the Paradox had just been received by NRC: Permianland: A Field Symposium Guidebook of the Four Corners Geological Society (D. L. Baars, 1979), and Geology of the 3104.1/EJQ/82/08/09/0 - 2 - Paradox Basin, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists (DL Wiegand, 1981). This in conjunction with the data information from topographic map of Paradox area (USGS Topographic Maps) and the Geosciences Data Base Handbook (Isherwood, 1981) provided the base data necessary for the modeling exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Portion of the Fish Lake Plateau, Utah
    GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE FISH LAKE PLATEAU, UTAH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State - University By DONALD PAUL MCGOOKEY, B.S., M.A* The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by Edmund M." Spieker Adviser Department of Geology CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION. ................................ 1 Locations and accessibility ........ 2 Physical features ......... _ ................... 5 Previous w o r k ......... 10 Field work and the geologic map ........ 12 Acknowledgements.................... 13 STRATIGRAPHY........................................ 15 General features................................ 15 Jurassic system......................... 16 Arapien shale .............................. 16 Twist Gulch formation...................... 13 Morrison (?) formation...................... 19 Cretaceous system .............................. 20 General character and distribution.......... 20 Indianola group ............................ 21 Mancos shale. ................... 24 Star Point sandstone................ 25 Blackhawk formation ........................ 26 Definition, lithology, and extent .... 26 Stratigraphic relations . ............ 23 Age . .............................. 23 Price River formation...................... 31 Definition, lithology, and extent .... 31 Stratigraphic relations ................ 34 A g e .................................... 37 Cretaceous and Tertiary systems . ............ 37 North Horn formation. ..........
    [Show full text]