Nutraceuticals for Major Depressive Disorder-More Is Not Merrier: an 8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Accepted Manuscript Nutraceuticals for Major Depressive Disorder- More is Not Merrier: an 8-week double-blind, randomized, controlled trial Jerome Sarris PhDMHSc , Gerard J Byrne MBBSPhD , Con Stough PhD , Chad Bousman PhDMPH , David Mischoulon MDPhD , Jenifer Murphy BPsych (hons)PhD , Patricia MacDonald BPsych (Hons) , Laura Adams BPsychMCouns , Sonia Nazareth MPsych , Georgina Oliver MSc , Lachlan Cribb BSci (Hons) , Karen Savage BPsych (Hons) , Ranjit Menon MD , Suneel Chamoli MD , Michael Berk MDPhD , Chee Ng MBBSMD PII: S0165-0327(18)31411-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.092 Reference: JAD 10310 To appear in: Journal of Affective Disorders Received date: 29 June 2018 Revised date: 18 October 2018 Accepted date: 12 November 2018 Please cite this article as: Jerome Sarris PhDMHSc , Gerard J Byrne MBBSPhD , Con Stough PhD , Chad Bousman PhDMPH , David Mischoulon MDPhD , Jenifer Murphy BPsych (hons)PhD , Patricia MacDonald BPsych (Hons) , Laura Adams BPsychMCouns , Sonia Nazareth MPsych , Georgina Oliver MSc , Lachlan Cribb BSci (Hons) , Karen Savage BPsych (Hons) , Ranjit Menon MD , Suneel Chamoli MD , Michael Berk MDPhD , Chee Ng MBBSMD , Nutraceu- ticals for Major Depressive Disorder- More is Not Merrier: an 8-week double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, Journal of Affective Disorders (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.092 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights: A combination nutraceutical treatment did not outperform placebo in treating symptoms of depression, and was in fact less effective Genetic polymorphisms and BDNF levels were not related to treatment response A very high placebo response rate may have warranted a placebo run-in design Future research may focus on precision-based approaches tailoring treatment to deficiencies, neurochemical abnormalities, or pharmacogenetic differences ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Nutraceuticals for Major Depressive Disorder- More is Not Merrier: an 8-week double-blind, randomized, controlled trial Jerome Sarris PhD, MHSc1,2, Gerard J Byrne MBBS PhD3, Con Stough PhD4, Chad Bousman PhD, MPH 5,6, David Mischoulon, MD, PhD7 Jenifer Murphy BPsych (hons), PhD2, Patricia MacDonald BPsych (Hons) 3, Laura Adams BPsych, MCouns, Sonia Nazareth MPsych 3, Georgina Oliver MSc2, Lachlan Cribb BSci (Hons)2, Karen Savage BPsych (Hons)2 Ranjit Menon MD6 Suneel Chamoli MD3, Michael Berk MD, PhD 6,8,9,10, Chee Ng, MBBS, MD6 1 NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University 2 The University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, Professorial Unit 3 The University of Queensland, Department of Psychiatry 4 Swinburne University of Technology, Centre for Human Psychopharmacology 5 University of Calgary, Departments of Medical Genetics, Psychiatry, and Physiology & Pharmacology, Calgary, AB, Canada 6 The University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Parkville 7 Depression Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School 8 Deakin University, IMPACT SRC, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong 9 Florey ACCEPTEDInstitute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, MANUSCRIPT The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 10 Orygen, The Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville Word Count: 4250 Figures and Tables: 6 2 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Correspondence: Professor Jerome Sarris NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, New South Wales [email protected] ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT Background: One of the most pressing questions in “Nutritional Psychiatry” is whether using combinations of different nutraceuticals with putative antidepressant activity may provide an enhanced synergistic antidepressant effect. Methods: A phase II/III, Australian multi-site, 8-week, double-blind, RCT involving 158 outpatients with a DSM-5 diagnosis of MDD. The intervention consisted of a nutraceutical combination: S-adenosyl methionine; Folinic acid; Omega-3 fatty acids; 5-HTP, Zinc picolinate, and relevant co-factors versus placebo. The primary outcome was change in MADRS scores, and hypothesis-driven analyses of potential moderators of response involving key SNPs, and BDNF. Results: Placebo was superior to the nutraceutical combination in reducing MADRS score (differential reduction -1.75 points), however a mixed linear model revealed a non-significant Group X Time interaction (p = 0.33). Response rates were 40% for the active intervention and 51% for the placebo; remission rates were 34% and 43% for active and placebo groups, respectively. No significant differences were found between groups on any other secondary depression, anxiety, psychosocial, or sleep outcome measures. Key SNPs and BDNF did not significantly moderate response. No significant differences occurred between groups for total adverse effects, aside from more nausea in the active group. Limitations: Very high placebo response rates suggest a placebo run-in design may have been valuable. Interpretation: The adoption of a nutraceutical „shotgun‟ approach to treating MDD was not supported, and appeared to be less effective than adding placebo to treatment as usual. Funding: NHMRC APP1048222 Trial Registration: ANZCTR 12613001300763 Key Words: Antidepressant, Nutraceutical, Nutrient, Depression, Clinical Trial, Pharmacogenomics RunningACCEPTED Header: Nutraceutical Combination Clinical MANUSCRIPT Trial in Major Depression 4 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction Widespread use of nutraceuticals (standardised, pharmaceutical-grade nutrient-based supplements) for diverse medical issues is normative. Indeed the nutraceutical market is almost a quarter the size of the global pharmaceutical market, expected to continue to grow markedly in the next 5 years. Yet the efficacy of most supplements and nutraceuticals is not established. Against this background, people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), a prevalent and highly disabling mental illness, causing marked occupational and social impairment and reduced quality of life, are frequent users of such agents (Donohue and Pincus, 2007). This is understandable as current treatment outcomes are inadequate, with around two-thirds of those treated with first-line antidepressants not reaching remission (Rush, 2007). MDD is a chronic condition for many, often requiring multiple treatment attempts. One potential approach to improving non-response to antidepressants is the use of adjunctive nutraceuticals (J Sarris et al., 2015c, 2015a). The biopathophysiology of MDD involves a range of abnormalities such as monoaminergic system disturbance, neuro-endocrine changes, reduced brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), and cytokine alterations (Antonijevic, 2006; Hindmarch, 2001; Plotsky et al., 1998; Raison et al., 2006; Ressler and Nemeroff, 2000). Several of these key neurobiological mechanisms may be modulated by nutraceuticals such as S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe), 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), zinc, and folic acid (either as folinic acid or methylfolate); with emerging evidence for the use of some of these nutraceuticals as adjunctive antidepressants (Sarris et al., 2016). While the conventional paradigm mandates the study of individual agents to avoid the confound of multiple interventions, this approach may not be beneficial in studying nutraceuticals. Nutrients commonly work in concert (Jacobs and Tapsell, 2007) and, as outlined above, a range of nutraceuticals modulate a range of key pathways involved with the pathogenesis of depression (see Figure 1). ACCEPTED ………………………. FigureMANUSCRIPT 1 About Here …………………… SAMe is an endogenous sulphur-containing compound that is a critical neurochemical component involved in the „one carbon‟ cycle responsible for the methylation of neurotransmitters that regulate 5 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT mood. SAMe may improve depressed mood via enhanced methylation of catecholamines and increased serotonin turnover, reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine, enhanced dopaminergic activity, decreased prolactin secretion, and increased phosphatidylcholine conversion (Bottiglieri and Hyland, 1994; Papakostas et al., 2003). Our previous 12-week 3-arm double-blind RCT (n=144) using SAMe monotherapy (1600mg/day) versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram (20mg) and placebo in adults with MDD found a significant difference between SAMe from baseline to week 12 (p=0.039) versus placebo in a subset of the parent study sample (Sarris et al., 2014). At week 12 endpoint, the remission rates on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D< 7) were 34% for SAMe, 23% for escitalopram and 6% for placebo, significantly in favour of SAMe (p=0.014). In addition, a 6-week double-blind RCT by colleagues Papakostas et al. (2010) involving 73 MDD patients non-responsive to SSRIs found response (HAM–D>50% reduction) and remission rates were significantly higher for patients treated with adjunctive SAMe (36.1% and 25.8% respectively) than adjunctive placebo (17.6% vs. 11.7% respectively). 5-HTP is an
Recommended publications
  • Plant-Based Medicines for Anxiety Disorders, Part 2: a Review of Clinical Studies with Supporting Preclinical Evidence

    Plant-Based Medicines for Anxiety Disorders, Part 2: a Review of Clinical Studies with Supporting Preclinical Evidence

    CNS Drugs 2013; 24 (5) Review Article Running Header: Plant-Based Anxiolytic Psychopharmacology Plant-Based Medicines for Anxiety Disorders, Part 2: A Review of Clinical Studies with Supporting Preclinical Evidence Jerome Sarris,1,2 Erica McIntyre3 and David A. Camfield2 1 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Richmond, VIC, Australia 2 The Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 3 School of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia Correspondence: Jerome Sarris, Department of Psychiatry and The Melbourne Clinic, University of Melbourne, 2 Salisbury Street, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia. Email: [email protected], Acknowledgements Dr Jerome Sarris is funded by an Australian National Health & Medical Research Council fellowship (NHMRC funding ID 628875), in a strategic partnership with The University of Melbourne, The Centre for Human Psychopharmacology at the Swinburne University of Technology. Jerome Sarris, Erica McIntyre and David A. Camfield have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. 1 Abstract Research in the area of herbal psychopharmacology has revealed a variety of promising medicines that may provide benefit in the treatment of general anxiety and specific anxiety disorders. However, a comprehensive review of plant-based anxiolytics has been absent to date. Thus, our aim was to provide a comprehensive narrative review of plant-based medicines that have clinical and/or preclinical evidence of anxiolytic activity. We present the article in two parts. In part one, we reviewed herbal medicines for which only preclinical investigations for anxiolytic activity have been performed. In this current article (part two), we review herbal medicines for which there have been both preclinical and clinical investigations for anxiolytic activity.
  • Medicinal Cannabis and Psychoactive Plants for Mental Health and Addiction

    Medicinal Cannabis and Psychoactive Plants for Mental Health and Addiction

    Medicinal cannabis and psychoactive plants for mental health and addiction University of Melbourne Research Forum Friday 28 June 2019 Overview Since the establishment of legal access pathways in November 2016 over 8000 Australian patients have gained access to cannabis-based medicines for the treatment of a wide range of indications, most commonly chronic pain and cancer. However, there is now a growing interest in the use of medicinal cannabis for the treatment of psychiatric and substance use disorders. At the same time there is a resurgence of interest in a range of other psychoactive plants and related compounds for this same group of indications. New research programs have been established at eminent institutions such as Johns Hopkins, Imperial College London and NYU with researchers involved reporting remarkable early results. Both psilocybin and MDMA, for example, are now entering Phase 3 trials and have recently been granted breakthrough therapy status by the FDA on the basis of initial evidence indicating they may demonstrate a substantial improvement over existing therapies for treatment-resistant depression and PTSD respectively. To explore the latest research in this field, as well as regulatory frameworks being implemented internationally to enable medicinal access, the School of Social and Political Science and Department of Psychiatry at the University of Melbourne, in partnership with the Penington Institute, are holding a one-day research forum on this topic in June. The forum is for invited researchers, policy makers
  • Journal Pre-Proof

    Journal Pre-Proof

    Journal Pre-proof Ayahuasca Use and Reported Effects on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: An International Cross-Sectional Study of 11,912 Consumers Jerome Sarris , Daniel Perkins , Lachlan Cribb , Violeta Schubert , Emerita Opaleye , Jose´ Carlos Bouso , Milan Scheidegger , Helena Aicher , Hana Simonova , Miroslav Horak , Nicole Leite Galvao-Coelho˜ , David Castle , Lu´ıs Fernando Tofoli´ PII: S2666-9153(21)00025-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100098 Reference: JADR 100098 To appear in: Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Received date: 6 January 2021 Revised date: 20 January 2021 Accepted date: 28 January 2021 Please cite this article as: Jerome Sarris , Daniel Perkins , Lachlan Cribb , Violeta Schubert , Emerita Opaleye , Jose´ Carlos Bouso , Milan Scheidegger , Helena Aicher , Hana Simonova , Miroslav Horak , Nicole Leite Galvao-Coelho˜ , David Castle , Lu´ıs Fernando Tofoli´ , Ayahuasca Use and Reported Effects on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: An International Cross- Sectional Study of 11,912 Consumers, Journal of Affective Disorders Reports (2021), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100098 This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
  • Ayahuasca Use and Reported Effects on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms

    Ayahuasca Use and Reported Effects on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms

    Journal of Affective Disorders Reports 4 (2021) 100098 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Affective Disorders Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jadr Research Paper Ayahuasca use and reported effects on depression and anxiety symptoms: An international cross-sectional study of 11,912 consumers Jerome Sarris a,b,∗, Daniel Perkins c, Lachlan Cribb b, Violeta Schubert c, Emerita Opaleye d, José Carlos Bouso e, Milan Scheidegger f, Helena Aicher f, Hana Simonova g, Miroslav Horák h, Nicole Leite Galvão-Coelho a,i, David Castle j,k, Luís Fernando Tófoli d a NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, Australia b Professorial Unit, The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia c School of Social and Political Science, University of Melbourne d Department of Psychobiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil e Interdisciplinary Cooperation for Ayahuasca Research and Outreach (ICARO), University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil f Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychedelic Research & Therapy Development, University of Zurich, Switzerland g Private Psychology Practice h Mendel University Brno, Zemedelska, Czech Republic i Postgraduate Program in Psychobiology and Department of Physiology and Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal-RN, Brazil j St Vincent’s Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia k Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addictions and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Canada a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Keywords: Background: Ayahuasca is a psychoactive Amazonian brew which has emerging data indicating that it has an- Ayahuasca tidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
  • Download the Abstracts and Speaker Profiles (PDF, 3202.8

    SPEAKER PROFILES AND PRESENTATION ABSTRACTS NICM HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE SYMPOSIUM 12 AUGUST 2021 MEDICINAL CANNABIS: RESEARCH, REGULATION AND EDUCATION Health Research Institute NICM HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE – MEDICINAL CANNABIS RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 2021 1 PROFESSOR DENNIS CHANG WELCOME ADDRESS Director, NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University Dennis Chang is the Director of NICM Health Research Institute and a Professor of Pharmacology. He is also the lead of NICM Health Research Institute’s Healthy Hearts Research Program. His research interests include clinical and pharmacological studies of herbal medicine and other complementary medicine interventions at the Institute. As the leading investigator of several significant clinical trials, Professor Chang’s research projects have centred around evaluating herbal medicine, yoga and tai chi for the treatment of dementia, mild cognitive impairment, coronary heart disease, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. He has also linkedin.com/in/prof-dennis-chang been involved in preclinical research to evaluate molecular mechanisms and synergistic interactions of active components of herbal medicine. Professor Chang’s research has been published in a broad range of high-quality peer-reviewed journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Drug, and Journal of Translational Medicine. His research has been supported by various competitive funding agencies, governments and industry totalling $7M. Prior to joining NICM Health Research Institute, Professor Chang served a number of academic leadership roles within Western Sydney University including Research Director of School of Science and Health, and Associate Head of School of Biomedical and Health Science. He initially trained in medicine and received postgraduate training in pharmacology.
  • Medicinal Psychedelics for Mental Health

    Medicinal Psychedelics for Mental Health

    998785ANP ANZJP PerspectivesPerkins et al. Viewpoint Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1 –7 Medicinal psychedelics for mental https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867421998785DOI: 10.1177/0004867421998785 © The Royal Australian and health and addiction: Advancing New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2021 Article reuse guidelines: research of an emerging paradigm sagepub.com/journals-permissions journals.sagepub.com/home/anp Daniel Perkins1 , Jerome Sarris2,3 , Susan Rossell4,5 , Yvonne Bonomo6,7, David Forbes8, Christopher Davey8, Daniel Hoyer9,10, Colleen Loo11,12 , Greg Murray4, Sean Hood13 , Violeta Schubert1, Nicole Leite Galvão-Coelho14, Meaghen O’Donnell8, Olivia Carter15, Paul Liknaitzky16,17 , Martin Williams18, Dan Siskind19,20 , David Penington21, Michael Berk8,22,23,24 and David Castle25 Abstract The medical use of psychedelic substances (e.g. psilocybin, ayahuasca, lysergic acid diethylamide and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) is attracting renewed interest, driven by a pressing need for research and development of novel therapies for psychiatric disorders, as well as promising results of contemporary studies. In this Viewpoint, we reflect upon the ‘Clinical Memorandum on Psychedelics’ recently released by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists and note subsequent developments including the application for down- scheduling of psilocybin and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine presently being considered by the Therapeutic Goods Administration and approvals for access via the Special Access Scheme.
  • Beatriz Caiuby Labate Clancy Cavnar Editors Ayahuasca Healing and Science Ayahuasca Healing and Science Beatriz Caiuby Labate • Clancy Cavnar Editors

    Beatriz Caiuby Labate Clancy Cavnar Editors Ayahuasca Healing and Science Ayahuasca Healing and Science Beatriz Caiuby Labate • Clancy Cavnar Editors

    Beatriz Caiuby Labate Clancy Cavnar Editors Ayahuasca Healing and Science Ayahuasca Healing and Science Beatriz Caiuby Labate • Clancy Cavnar Editors Ayahuasca Healing and Science Editors Beatriz Caiuby Labate Clancy Cavnar Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant Medicines Medicines San Francisco, CA, USA San Francisco, CA, USA ISBN 978-3-030-55687-7 ISBN 978-3-030-55688-4 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55688-4 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations.