DOCSLIB.ORG

Yankee Fork Panther Creek Draft EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yankee Fork Panther Creek Draft EA DRAFT Environmental Assessment Yankee Fork and Panther Creek Chinook Salmon hatchery programs Upper Salmon River Basin January 15, 2019 Draft Section 1 - Introduction DRAFT | Do Not Cite or Distribute Yankee Fork/Panther Creek Hatcheries EA January 15, 2019 Draft Section 1 - Introduction DRAFT | Do Not Cite or Distribute Yankee Fork and Panther Creek Chinook Salmon Hatchery Programs Draft Environmental Assessment January 13, 2020 Lead Agency: National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Region National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Responsible Official: Barry Thom Regional Administrator, West Coast Region National Marine Fisheries Service For further information contact: Brett Farman 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100 Portland, OR 97232 503-231-6222 [email protected] Persons and Agencies Consulted Include name and agency of those consulted for information during the preparation of the EA. Preparers (note this section is optional and not required by CEQ NEPA regulations) Include name and agency DRAFT Yankee Fork/Panther Creek Hatcheries EA i January 15, 2019 Draft Section 1 - Introduction DRAFT | Do Not Cite or Distribute Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Project Area and Analysis Area ................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Relationship to Other Plans, Regulations, Agreements, Laws, Secretarial Orders, and Executive Orders ................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.3.1 Tribal Trust Responsibility under the Endangered Species Act ........................... 1-4 1.3.2 U.S. v. Oregon ................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.3 Northwest Power Act/Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program ............................... 1-5 2 Description of Alternatives ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Alternative 1, No Action ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Alternative 2, Proposed Action.................................................................................. 2-2 2.2.1 Yankee Fork Chinook Salmon ........................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Yankee Fork Chinook Salmon Production .......................................................... 2-4 2.2.3 Panther Creek Chinook Salmon ......................................................................... 2-7 2.2.4 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation .............................................................. 2-11 2.2.5 Operation and Maintenance .............................................................................. 2-11 2.3 Alternative 3, Reduced Production .......................................................................... 2-13 2.4 Alternative 4, Program Termination/No production ................................................. 2-13 2.5 Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in Detail ................................................ 2-13 2.5.1 Hatchery Programs with Increased Production Levels ...................................... 2-14 2.5.2 Hatchery Programs with Other Decreased Production Levels ........................... 2-14 2.5.3 Increased Harvest to Reduce Hatchery Fish on Spawning Grounds .................. 2-14 3 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Listed Species ........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 ESA-Listed Salmon and Steelhead Populations .................................................. 3-1 3.2 Non-listed Species .................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Fish Habitat .............................................................................................................. 3-4 3.3.1 Critical Habitat and Essential Fish Habitat ......................................................... 3-4 3.4 Tourism and recreation.............................................................................................. 3-6 3.5 Environmental Justice ............................................................................................... 3-7 3.6 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................... 3-8 3.6.1 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes .................................................................................. 3-9 3.6.2 Nez Perce Tribe ................................................................................................. 3-9 DRAFT Yankee Fork/Panther Creek Hatcheries EA ii January 15, 2019 Draft Section 1 - Introduction DRAFT | Do Not Cite or Distribute 3.6.3 Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation ..................................... 3-10 3.6.4 Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Reservation ........................................ 3-10 3.7 Socioeconomics ...................................................................................................... 3-12 3.8 Human Health and Safety........................................................................................ 3-14 3.9 Water Quality, Water Quantity, and Hydrology ....................................................... 3-14 3.9.1 Yankee Fork .................................................................................................... 3-14 3.9.2 Panther Creek Weir Facility ............................................................................. 3-16 3.10 Land Use and Ownership ........................................................................................ 3-17 3.10.1 Yankee Fork .................................................................................................... 3-17 3.10.2 Panther Creek Weir Facility ............................................................................. 3-19 3.11 Transportation ......................................................................................................... 3-20 3.11.1 Yankee Fork .................................................................................................... 3-20 3.11.2 Panther Creek .................................................................................................. 3-21 4 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Listed Species ........................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Alternative 1 – No Action .................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.2 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action......................................................................... 4-6 4.1.3 Alternative 3 – Reduced Production ................................................................... 4-8 4.1.4 Alternative 4 – Program Termination ............................................................... 4-10 4.2 Non-listed Species .................................................................................................. 4-12 4.2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action ................................................................................ 4-12 4.2.2 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action....................................................................... 4-13 4.2.3 Alternative 3 – Reduced Production ................................................................. 4-14 4.2.4 Alternative 4 – Program Termination ............................................................... 4-14 4.3 Fish Habitat ............................................................................................................ 4-15 4.3.1 Alternative 1 – No Action ................................................................................ 4-15 4.3.2 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action....................................................................... 4-16 4.3.3 Alternative 3 – Reduced Production ................................................................. 4-16 4.3.4 Alternative 4 – Program Termination ............................................................... 4-16 4.4 Tourism and Recreation .......................................................................................... 4-16 4.4.1 Alternative 1 – No Action ................................................................................ 4-16 4.4.2 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action....................................................................... 4-17 4.4.3 Alternative 3 – Reduced Production ................................................................. 4-17 4.4.4 Alternative 4 – Program Termination ............................................................... 4-17 DRAFT Yankee Fork/Panther Creek Hatcheries EA iii January 15, 2019 Draft Section 1 - Introduction DRAFT | Do Not Cite or Distribute 4.5 Environmental Justice ............................................................................................. 4-17 4.5.1 Alternative 1 – No Action ................................................................................ 4-17 4.5.2 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management Area 12 South Fork Salmon River
    Chapter III South Fork Salmon River Management Area 12 III - 240 Chapter III South Fork Salmon River Management Area 12 Management Area 12 South Fork Salmon River MANAGEMENT AREA DESCRIPTION Management Prescriptions - Management Area 12 has the following management prescriptions (see map on preceding page for distribution of prescriptions). Percent of Management Prescription Category (MPC) Mgt. Area 1.2 – Recommended Wilderness 48 2.2 – Research Natural Areas 1 3.1 – Passive Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial & Hydrologic Resources 32 3.2 – Active Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial & Hydrologic Resources 16 4.1a - Undeveloped Recreation: Maintain Inventoried Roadless Areas 2 4.1c – Undeveloped Rec.: Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration 1 General Location and Description - Management Area 12 is comprised of lands administered by the Payette National Forest within the South Fork Salmon River drainage, excluding Wilderness lands, the Upper Secesh River, and the upper East Fork South Fork (see map, preceding page). Management Area 12 includes the area near the confluence of the South Fork Salmon River and the Main Salmon River known as Mackay Bar. The management area lies in Idaho and Valley Counties, and is part of the McCall and Krassel Ranger Districts. The management area is an estimated 362,800 acres, which includes several small private inholdings (about 1 percent of the area, total), most of which are along the river corridor. Management Area 12 does not include portions of the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, and the Upper Secesh River and Upper East Fork South Fork Watersheds that are also in the South Fork Salmon River drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport Monitoring of the Yankee Fork of the Salmon River Near Stanley, Idaho, 2012–15
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Sediment Transport Monitoring of the Yankee Fork of the Salmon River near Stanley, Idaho, 2012–15 Open-File Report 2018–1189 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Aerial image of dredge tailing piles at Yankee Fork of Salmon River, Idaho. Image © 2014 Google Earth. Inset photograph: U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic technicians sampling suspended-sediment at the streamgage site of Yankee Fork of the Salmon River near Stanley, Idaho. Photograph by Doug Ott, U.S. Geological Survey, May 23, 2016. Sediment Transport Monitoring of the Yankee Fork of the Salmon River near Stanley, Idaho, 2012–15 By James W. Johnsen Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Open-File Report 2018–1189 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in the Secesh River and Lake Creek, Idaho in 2005
    Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in the Secesh River and Lake Creek, Idaho Annual Report 2005 June 2006 DOE/BP-00020615-1 This Document should be cited as follows: Kucera, Paul, Rick Orme, "Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in the Secesh River and Lake Creek, Idaho", 2005 Annual Report, Project No. 199703000, 106 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00020615-1) Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in Lake Creek and Secesh River, Idaho in 2005 Annual Report January 2005 – December 2005 Prepared by: Paul A. Kucera and Rick W. Orme Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Lapwai, ID 83540 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208-3621 Project Number 199703000 Contract Number 00020615 June 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................. i CHAPTER 1 Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Program
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Program Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Department of Energy Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior Nez Perce Tribe July 1997 Final Environmental Impact Statement Responsible Agencies: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA); U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA); Nez Perce Tribe (NPT). Title of Proposed Action: Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Program. States Involved: Idaho. Abstract: Bonneville Power Administration, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the Nez Perce Tribe propose a supplementation program to restore chinook salmon to the Clearwater River Subbasin in Idaho. The Clearwater River is a tributary to the Snake River, which empties into the Columbia River. The Final EIS includes a new alternative suggested by commentors to the Draft EIS. In the Proposed Action, the Nez Perce Tribe would build and operate two central incubation and rearing hatcheries and six satellite facilities. Spring and fall chinook salmon would be reared and acclimated to different areas in the Subbasin and released at the hatchery and satellite sites or in other watercourses throughout the Subbasin. The supplementation program differs from other hatchery programs because the fish would be released at different sizes and would return to reproduce naturally in the areas where they are released. The Use of Existing Facilities Alternative proposes using existing production hatcheries and the proposed satellite facilities to meet the need. Facilities at Dworshak National Fish Hatchery, Kooskia National Fish Hatchery, and Hagerman National Fish Hatchery would be used as central incubation and rearing facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Subbasin Management Plan May 2004
    Salmon Subbasin Management Plan May 2004 Coeur d'Alene #S LEWIS WASHINGTON #SMoscow MONTANA NEZ Lewiston #S #S PERCE #S #S OREGON Boise Sun Valley # #S #S Grangeville #S Idaho Falls WYOMING S IDAHO #S a #S Pocatello l m Twin Falls o IDAHO n R i v e r r e v # i . Dixie R k F Salmon River n . Riggins o # N Towns # m l n a erlai S Counties r mb e ha Sa C lmon R v ek iver i re Major streams R C d i p Watershed (HUC) boundaries a L i Salmon R t t r l # e e Big LEMHI . v Cre S i e k k r e a F R k v New l . e i m n e S o r R L o m C e n l r n o m a Meadows R e # S h h t m i l v i n a e a R ADAMS r S P i VALLEY v # e Mid Fk r Yellow Lodge # Pine r e # iv R P n a Leadore o hs lm im a Challis e S ro k # i F R i id ve M r iver on R Stanley Salm # S r a e l v m i R o n n o R lm iv e a S r . k F . E CUSTER 100 1020304050Miles Galena # BLAINE Compiled by IDFG, CDC, 2001 Written by Ecovista Contracted by Nez Perce Tribe Watershed Division and Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Contract Entities and Plan Participants.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4 References
    4 References Agricultural Extension Office. 2000. Sedges. Available at: http://aquaplant.tamu.edu/Emergent%20Plants/Sedges/Sedges.htm Accessed April 2004 Allen, D.B., B.J. Flatter, J. Nelson and C. Medrow. 1998. Redband Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri Population and Stream Habitat Surveys in Northern Owyhee County and the Owyhee River and Its Tributaries. 1997. Idaho BLM Technical Bulletin No. 98-14. American Fisheries Society, Idaho Chapter (AFS). 2000. Fishes of Idaho. Available at < http://www.fisheries.org/idaho/fishes_of_idaho.htm>. Accessed November 2003. American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU). 1957. Check-list of North American Birds. 5th edition. American Ornithological Union, Washington, DC. Anderson, A. E., and O. C. Wallmo. 1984. Odocoileus hemionus. Mammalian Species 219:1– 9. Anderson, J. L., K. Bacon, and K. Denny. 2002. Salmon River Habitat Enhancement. Annual Report 2001. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Fort Hall, ID. 14 pp. Anderson, M., P. Bourgeron, M. T. Bryer, R. Crawford, L. Engelking, D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Gallyoun, K. Goodin, D. H. Grossman, S. Landaal, K. Metzler, K. D. Patterson, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, and A. S. Weakley. 1998. International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States. Volume II. The National Vegetation Classification System: List of Types. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. Arno, S. F. 1979. Forest Regions of Montana. Research Paper INT-218. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Arno, S.F. 1980. Forest Fire History in the Northern Rockies. Journal of Forestry 78:460–464. Aubry, K. B., Koehler, G. M., and J. R. Squires.
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce Tribe Nacó'x ̣(Chinook Salmon) and Héeyey (Steelhead
    Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (Steelhead) Adult Escapement and Spawning Ground Survey 2010 Summary Report Prepared by: Adult Technical Team Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Fisheries Research Division Lapwai, ID 83540 May 2011 Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) Adult Escapement and Spawning Ground Survey 2010 Summary Report Prepared by: Adult Technical Team Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Fisheries Research Division Lapwai, ID 83540 This document should be cited as follows: Adult Technical Team. 2011. Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) adult escapement and spawning ground survey 2010 summary report. Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management, Fisheries Research Division. Lapwai, ID INTRODUCTION This document summarizes adult spring, summer, and fall Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) population estimates and spawning ground survey information collected on streams surveyed by the Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management (DFRM) during 2010. The purpose of this document is to provide resource assessment information to co-managers on a timely basis. Data collection is conducted under multiple contracts with specific project objectives and study designs. Methods have been standardized to assure accurate characterization of basic performance measures (Beasley et al. 2008). The reader is directed to project specific annual reports for a detailed description of methods used for calculation of performance measures. Adult spring and summer Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) escapement estimates are presented from six streams where adult monitoring sites are located. Age 3 to 5 adult Chinook salmon are considered adults for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the South Fork Salmon River Steelhead Trout Fishery
    U.S. FISH&WILDLIFE SERVICE Completion Report Evaluation of the South Fork Salmon River Steelhead Trout Fishery Restoration Program Performed for US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan Contract No. 14-16-0001-86505 Period Covered: March 1, 1984 to February 28, 1986 Russ Thurow Senior Fishery Research Biologist May 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.....................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................2 DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA ...................................3 OBJECTIVES .................................................. 3 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................6 METHODS .....................................................7 Adult Steelhead Movements ...............................7 Spawning Area Surveys ..................................7 Fry Emergence Studies .................................. 7 Rearing Densities of Fish ..............................8 South Fork and East Fork South Fork Salmon River..... 8 Tributaries ......................................... 9 Age and Growth .........................................9 Creel Census .......................................... 10 Genetic Analysis .................................... 11 RESULTS .................................................... 12 Fisheries Resources ................................... 12 Steelhead Life History and Movements ................... 12 Steelhead Spawning Characteristics ..................... 16 South Fork
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon River Management Plan, Idaho
    Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis National Forests Record of Decision Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Frank Church – River of No Return Wilderness Revised Wilderness Management Plan and Amendments for Land and Resource Management Plans Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis NFs Located In: Custer, Idaho, Lemhi, and Valley Counties, Idaho Responsible Agency: USDA - Forest Service Responsible David T. Bull, Forest Supervisor, Bitterroot NF Officials: Bruce E. Bernhardt, Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce NF Mark J. Madrid, Forest Supervisor, Payette NF Lesley W. Thompson, Acting Forest Supervisor, Salmon- Challis NF The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital and family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Person with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ROD--II Table of Contents PREFACE ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Res-Thurow1985 Evaluation of the South Fork Salmon River Steelhead
    STATE OF IDAHO Department of Fish and Game Jerry M. Conley, Director EVALUATION OF THE SOUTH FORK SALMON RIVER STEELHEAD FISHERY RESTORATION PROGRAM Period: September 1, 1984 to January 31, 1985 United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Contract 14-16-0001-84132 Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Office By Russ Thurow Senior Fisheries Research Biologist TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe ABSTRACT ........................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................... 2 OBJECTIVES ...................................................... 3 METHODS ......................................................... 3 Adult Steelhead Movements ................................... 3 Spawning Area Surveys ....................................... 4 Rearing Densities of Fish .................................... 4 South Fork and East Fork South Fork Salmon River......... 5 Tributaries ............................................ 5 Creel Census ................................................ 5 Genetic Analysis ............................................ 6 RESULTS ......................................................... 6 Steelhead Life History and Movements ........................ 6 Steelhead Spawning Characteristics .......................... 7 South Fork Salmon River ................................. 7 Tributaries ............................................ 7 Fish Distribution and Abundance ............................. 9 South Fork Salmon River ................................. 9 Tributaries
    [Show full text]
  • Rearing of Chinook Salmon in Tributaries of the South Fork Salmon River, Idaho
    REARING OF CHINOOK SALMON IN TRIBUTARIES OF THE SOUTH FORK SALMON RIVER, IDAHO William S. Platts Fred E. Partridge USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-205 INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION FOREST SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE THE AUTHORS WILLIAM S. PLATTS is a Research Fishery Biologist for the Intermountain Station at Boise, Idaho. He received his B. S. (Conservation-Education) degree in 1955 from Idaho State University, and his M. S. (Fisheries) degree in 1957 and Ph. D. (Fisheries) degree in 1972 from Utah State Uni- versity. From 1957 through 1966 he worked as a Regional Fishery Biologist and Supervisor, Enforcement, with the Idaho Fish and Game Department. From 1966 through 1976 he was the Idaho Zone Fishery Biologist for the Intermoun- tain Region and consulted with the SEAM program. FRED E. PARTRIDGE is a Biological-Technician for the Inter- mountain Station at Boise, Idaho. He received his B. S. (Fisheries) degree in 1975 from Humboldt State University, and is presently completing requirements for an M. S. in Fisheries there. From 1969 to 1975 he worked as a Biological-Aid for the California Fish and Game Depart- ment and in 1976 worked as a Biological-Aid on stream surveys for the Montana Fish and Game Department. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-205 May 1978 REARING OF CHINOOK SALMON IN TRIBUTARIES OF THE SOUTH FORK SALMON RIVER, IDAHO William S. Platts and Fred E. Partridge INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Ogden, Utah 84401 RESEARCH SUMMARY Fish populations in 23 tributaries of the South Fork Salmon River were sampled in 1971, 1972, and 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Yankee Fork Salmon River Chinook Salmon Run Report
    2013 Yankee Fork Salmon River Chinook Salmon Run Report Lytle P. Denny, William S. Youmans, and David J. Evans Shoshone‐Bannock Tribes 2013 Yankee Fork Salmon River Chinook Salmon Run Report Annual Report Prepared by: Lytle P. Denny, William S. Youmans, and David J. Evans Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Fish and Wildlife Department 3rd and B Avenue Fort Hall, Idaho (208) 239-4560 Prepared for: United States Fish and Wildlife Service Lower Snake River Compensation Plan – Office 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Suite 343 Boise, Idaho 83709 Cooperative Agreement F13AC00031 October 1, 2012 – September 30, 2013 March 1, 2014 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ V ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ VI PROGRAM PERSONNEL .......................................................................................................................VII AUTHORS .................................................................................................................................................VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................VII INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]