DOCSLIB.ORG

2018) Lpelr-45196(Sc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018) Lpelr-45196(Sc APGA v. OYE & ORS CITATION: (2018) LPELR-45196(SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria ON FRIDAY, 13TH JULY, 2018 Suit No: SC.718/2017 Before Their Lordships: OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR Justice of the Supreme Court MARY UKAEGO PETER-ODILI Justice of the Supreme Court JOHN INYANG OKORO Justice of the Supreme Court AMIRU SANUSI Justice of the Supreme Court SIDI DAUDA BAGE Justice of the Supreme Court Between ALL PROGRESSIVES GRAND ALLIANCE - Appellant(s) And 1. DR. VICTOR IKE OYE 2. INDEPENDENT(2018) NATIONAL LPELR-45196(SC) ELECTORAL COMMISSION (INEC) - Respondent(s) 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE 4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ENUGU STATE 5. COMRADE MIKE ALIOKE RATIO DECIDENDI 1. ACTION - NECESSARY PARTY(IES): Effect of failure to join a neccessary party in an action "The appellant had a question on the competence of the appeal which arguments thereof seem to me out of context in view of the record. To clear the air, the relevant Motion on Notice was filed 20th June, 2016 seeking leave to appeal and numbered as CA/E/358/M/2017. When the Record of Appeal from the trial Court was compiled and transmitted to the Court of appeal, the substantive appeal was numbered as CA/E/367/2017 and the order of the Court of Appeal dated 10th July, 2017 deeming the Records of Appeal as properly complied and transmitted which CA/E/367/2017 became the extant appeal number and took a retrospective effect, thereby regularizing the Notice of Appeal earlier filed with its fault lines. See Williams v. Mokwe (2005) 14 NWLR (Pt. 945) 249 at 267; Prince Biyi Poroye & Ors v. Makarfi & Ors (2017) LPELR-42738. Having settled the matter of competence of the appeal which was properly before Court, the next issue is whether the Court below was right in its decision. The matter at hand bears semblance to what was thrown up in the case of Okwu v. Umeh (2016) NWLR (Pt. 1501) (2015) LPELR-26042 SC per Okoro, JSC as follows:- "However, while it is the law that no cause or matter shall be defeated by reason of the misjoinder or non-joinder of any party, yet, in the absence of a proper party or necessary party before the Court, it appears an exercise in futility for the Court to make an order or decision which affects a STRANGER to the suit who was never heard or given an opportunity to defend himself. This will certainly be against the tenets and tenor of Section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as (amended)... This is sadly the lot in the case. See Olawoye v. Jimoh (2013) 3-4 SC (Pt. iv) 58, N.D.P. v. I.N.E.C. (2012) 12 SC (Pt. iv) 24". (Emphasis added). His Lordship continued: "the end result I have said above is that although the trial Court has jurisdiction to hear the suit as constituted, the judgment generated thereby which had massive impact on the activities of A.P.G.A. including ITS LEADERSHIP, cannot be allowed to stand. A plaintiff is not bound to sue a particular party. However, where the outcome of the suit will affect that party one way or the other, it will be fool hardly not to join him in the suit." (Emphasis ours) In the recent decision of this Court in Prince Biyi Poroye & Ors. v. Makarfi & Ors. (2017) LPELR-42738 it was held thus:- "...there is no doubt that a careful reading of the averments of the appellants in the affidavit in support of the originating summons for the above reliefs, shows that the rights of the 1st and 2nd respondents is affected adversely. The above reliefs were sought and granted by the trial Court in favour of the appellants behind the respondents. That is, without hearing their own side of the story. This, no doubt, is in breach of the constitutionally guaranteed right to fair hearing... it is clear from the record and in particular, in the affidavit evidence of the appellants in support of their claim in the originating summons that the Caretaker Committee is alleged to have been involved in various illegalities. And that this Caretaker Committee has as its Chairman and Secretary - Senators Ahmed Makarfi and Ben Obi, respectively. These persons are ordinarily entitled to be heard before any Court take any decision on the allegations that were raised against them and their Committee. They were not made parties in the action instituted by the appellants at the trial Court where the above reliefs were sought and granted... Who then is a necessary party to an action? A necessary party in an action has been held to be that person who is not only interested in the subject matter of the proceedings but also who in his absence, the proceedings could not be fairly dealt with. In other words, the question to be settled or determined in the action between the existing parties must be a question which cannot be properly and fairly settled unless he is a party to the action, instituted by the Plaintiff... in the instant matter, having regard to the claims of the appellants as plaintiffs at the trial Court, I am of the firm view that the interest of the respondents were affected, to the effect that the plaintiffs/appellants claim could not have been fairly, effectually and completely determined without them being joined as defendants. In other words, they were necessary parties to the suit instituted by the appellants. The Court below was therefore right to have, on the basis, set aside the judgment of the trial Court." The Court below following in the heels of those principles above enunciated on the 16th August, 2017 held inter alia: "in the instant case, there is no doubt that the orders made by the Court below affected the right of the appellant who is said to have been suspended for misconduct and who was not given the opportunity of being heard before the decision of the Court. Where there is failure to hear all necessary parties to a dispute is before a decision is reached as in the case on appeal, there is a breach of Section 36 (1) of the Constitution as amended. The party affected by such a decision is entitled to have it set aside as such decision is null and void and without any legal effect. The learned trial judge seriously erred in law when he granted the orders sought by the 1st and 2nd respondents which tantamount to a recognition of Chief Martin Agbaso and upholding the alleged suspension of the appellant without affording him an opportunity of being heard. Issue 1 is resolved in favour of the appellant." I have no difficulty in agreeing with what the Court of Appeal did as a decision reached in the absence of an adjudged necessary party will be a nullity and an exercise in futility as the fair hearing principle has been breached since the 1st respondent was not taken along when his right was determined at least to hear him out. The decision such as the trial Court had taking in issuing the Mandamus was in clear violation of the 1st respondent's right to fair hearing and so liable to be set aside, which the Court of Appeal did and I agree with that. See Prince Biyi Poroye v. Makarfa (supra)."Per PETER-ODILI, J.S.C. (Pp. 57-62, Paras. A-C) - read in context 2. APPEAL - APPEAL BY INTERESTED PARTY: When will a person be joined in an appeal as an interested party "Irrespective of the colourised dimensions the parties arguments have taken in respect of issue one, the main contention to be resolved here remains "whether or not a miscarriage of justice has been occasioned by the lower Court in granting leave to the 1st Respondent to appeal as an interested party against the order for Mandamus made by the trial Court." The fact of this appeal relates to the order of mandamus which was granted against the 1st Respondent's interest. It is apparent that the order granted by the trial Court relates to the chairmanship of the Appellant. Although the 1st Respondent had allegedly been suspended, I am not in doubt that the whole issue revolves around his status, and the effect of the order of mandamus on his status. The 1st Respondent is a party that ought to have been joined in the suit, being one without which the Court cannot effectively or efficaciously decide the matter. The law is settled that where a necessary party who ought to be joined is not joined in an action, any judgment obtained against such a party is not a nullity but shall be to no avail. In AZUH v. UBN PLC (2014) LPELR-22913 (SC), this Court had reiterated the clear position of the law that non-joinder of a necessary party in a suit is an irregularity that does not affect the competence or jurisdiction of the Court to adjudicate on the matter before it. However, an order made against a person who was not a party to the action before the Court, though not a nullity, is to no avail. It cannot stand the test of time and is not binding on such non-party to the action. See: OKOYE v. NIGERIAN CONSTRUCTION & FURNITURE CO. LTD. & ORS. (1991) 7 SC (Pt. III) (REPRINT) 33 at 56; GREEN v. GREEN (1987) 3 NWLR (60) 480. See also UWAZURUIKE & ORS v. ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION (2013) 4-5 SC (Pt. 1) 90 at 119 Lines 16-21; (2013) LPELR-20392 (SC) 1 at 24, Per FABIYI, JSC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rise of Boko Haram in Nigeria Sgo.Sagepub.Com
    SGOXXX10.1177/2158244015576053SAGE OpenSuleiman and Karim 576053research-article2015 Article SAGE Open January-March 2015: 1 –11 Cycle of Bad Governance and Corruption: © The Author(s) 2015 DOI: 10.1177/2158244015576053 The Rise of Boko Haram in Nigeria sgo.sagepub.com Mohammed Nuruddeen Suleiman1 and Mohammed Aminul Karim1 Abstract This article argues that bad governance and corruption particularly in the Northern part of Nigeria have been responsible for the persistent rise in the activities of Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad (JASLWJ), Arabic for “people committed to the propagation of the tradition and jihad.” It is also known as “Boko Haram,” commonly translated as “Western education is sin.” Based on qualitative data obtained through interviews with Nigerians, this article explicates how poor governance in the country has created a vicious cycle of corruption, poverty, and unemployment, leading to violence. Although JASLWJ avows a religious purpose in its activities, it takes full advantage of the social and economic deprivation to recruit new members. For any viable short- or long-term solution, this article concludes that the country must go all-out with its anti- corruption crusade. This will enable the revival of other critical sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing, likely ensuring more employment. Should the country fail to stamp out corruption, it will continue to witness an upsurge in the activities of JASLWJ, and perhaps even the emergence of other violent groups. The spillover effects may be felt not only across Nigeria but also within the entire West African region. Keywords Nigeria, governance, corruption, militancy, Boko Haram, democracy Introduction own desired objectives and methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a New Type of Regime in Sub-Saharan Africa?
    Towards a New Type of Regime in Sub-Saharan Africa? DEMOCRATIC TRANSITIONS BUT NO DEMOCRACY Marc-Antoine Pérouse de Montclos cahiers & conférences travaux & recherches les études The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non- profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. The Sub-Saharian Africa Program is supported by: Translated by: Henry Kenrick, in collaboration with the author © Droits exclusivement réservés – Ifri – Paris, 2010 ISBN: 978-2-86592-709-8 Ifri Ifri-Bruxelles 27 rue de la Procession Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – France 1000 Bruxelles – Belgique Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tél. : +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Internet Website : Ifri.org Summary Sub-Saharan African hopes of democratization raised by the end of the Cold War and the decline in the number of single party states are giving way to disillusionment.
    [Show full text]
  • First Election Security Threat Assessment
    SECURITY THREAT ASSESSMENT: TOWARDS 2015 ELECTIONS January – June 2013 edition With Support from the MacArthur Foundation Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Security Threat Assessment for North Central III. Security Threat Assessment for North East IV. Security Threat Assessment for North West V. Security Threat Assessment for South East VI. Security Threat Assessment for South South VII. Security Threat Assessment for South West Executive Summary Political Context The merger between the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), All Nigerian Peoples Party (ANPP) and other smaller parties, has provided an opportunity for opposition parties to align and challenge the dominance of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). This however will also provide the backdrop for a keenly contested election in 2015. The zoning arrangement for the presidency is also a key issue that will define the face of the 2015 elections and possible security consequences. Across the six geopolitical zones, other factors will define the elections. These include the persisting state of insecurity from the insurgency and activities of militants and vigilante groups, the high stakes of election as a result of the availability of derivation revenues, the ethnic heterogeneity that makes elite consensus more difficult to attain, as well as the difficult environmental terrain that makes policing of elections a herculean task. Preparations for the Elections The political temperature across the country is heating up in preparation for the 2015 elections. While some state governors are up for re-election, most others are serving out their second terms. The implication is that most of the states are open for grab by either of the major parties and will therefore make the electoral contest fiercer in 2015 both within the political parties and in the general election.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of Grand Corruption with Reference to International Human Rights and International Criminal Law: the Case of Nigeria
    Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Doctoral Applied Arts 2017-4 A Critical Analysis of Grand Corruption with Reference to International Human Rights and International Criminal Law: The Case of Nigeria Florence Anaedozie Technological University Dublin Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/appadoc Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Anaedozie, F. (2017) A Critical Analysis of Grand Corruption with Reference to International Human Rights and International Criminal Law: The Case of Nigeria. Doctoral thesis, 2017. doi:10.21427/D7V983 This Theses, Ph.D is brought to you for free and open access by the Applied Arts at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License A Critical Analysis of Grand Corruption with Reference to International Human Rights and International Criminal Law: The Case of Nigeria By Florence Anaedozie, BA, LL.B, LL.M School of Languages, Law and Social Sciences College of Arts and Tourism Dublin Institute of Technology A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lead Supervisor: Dr Stephen Carruthers Advisory Supervisor: Dr Kevin Lalor April 2017 Abstract Grand corruption remains a domestic crime that is not directly addressed by the international human rights and international criminal law regulatory frameworks. Scholars argue that the right to a society free of corruption is an inherent human right because dignity, equality and participation significantly depend upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019) Lpelr-47037(Sc
    DANJUMA v. STATE CITATION: (2019) LPELR-47037(SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria ON FRIDAY, 15TH MARCH, 2019 Suit No: SC.655/2016 Before Their Lordships: MUSA DATTIJO MUHAMMAD Justice of the Supreme Court KUMAI BAYANG AKA'AHS Justice of the Supreme Court CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE Justice of the Supreme Court AMIRU SANUSI Justice of the Supreme Court SIDI DAUDA BAGE Justice of the Supreme Court Between YOHANNA DANJUMA - Appellant(s) And THE STATE(2019) LPELR-47037(SC)- Respondent(s) RATIO DECIDENDI 1. APPEAL - INTERFERENCE WITH CONCURRENT FINDING(S) OF FACT(S):Attitude of the Supreme Court to interference with concurrent finding(s) of fact(s) of Lower Courts "The law is settled that if there are concurrent findings of fact made by the High Court and Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court will not readily set them aside or substitute its own views unless there is no evidence to support the findings. See Re: MOGAJI (1986) 1 NWLR (Pt.19) 759; SALAMI VS THE STATE (1988) 3 NWLR (Pt.85) 670; MBENU VS THE STATE (1988) 3 NWLR (Pt.84) 615."Per Akaahs, JSC. (P. 18, Paras. D-F). See also MINI LODGE LTD VS NGEI (2009) 18 NWLR (Pt.1173) 254 Per Musdapher, JSC (p.33, Paras. B-D)."Per BAGE, J.S.C. (Pp. 22-23, Paras. E-B) - read in context 2. APPEAL - INTERFERENCE WITH CONCURRENT FINDING(S) OF FACT(S): Instances where an appellate Court will not interfere with concurrent findings of fact(s) made by Lower Courts "It must be emphasized that the appeal is against the concurrent findings of facts by the two Courts below which, except where shown by the appellant to be perverse, has to prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Panel of the National Judicial Council Holden at Abuja
    IN THE PANEL OF THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL HOLDEN AT ABUJA IN THE PETITIONS OF ALLEGED FINANCIAL IMPROPRIETY, INFIDELITY TO THE CONSTITUION AND OTHER ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES RELATED LAWS BY THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION AGAINST HON. JUSTICE WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN, GCON WRITTEN ADDRESS SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSEL TO THE RESPONDENT Respondent’s Counsel R.A. Lawal-Rabana, SAN Okon Nkanu Efut, SAN J.U.K. Igwe, SAN George Ibrahim,Esq Victoria Agi, Esq Orji Ude Ekumankama, Esq Opeyemi Origunloye, Esq Temitayo Fiki, Esq For Service On Counsel For the Petitioner Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Rotimi Oyedepo, Esq [email protected] 1 IN THE PANEL OF THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL HOLDEN AT ABUJA IN THE PETITIONS OF ALLEGED FINANCIAL IMPROPRIETY, INFIDELITY TO THE CONSTITUION AND OTHER ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES RELATED LAWS BY THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION AGAINST HON. JUSTICE WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN, GCON 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission sent two (2) petitions to the Chairman, National Judicial Council through the office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria against The Hon. Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen, GCON, Chief Justice of Nigeria. 1.2 The first petition is dated 4th February, 2019 vide reference EFCC/EC/GC/31/2253 while the second petition is dated 5th March 2019 vide reference EFCC/EC/CJN/05/59. 1.3 The petition was forwarded to the Hon. Chief Justice of Nigeria by the National Judicial Council vide a memo dated 11th February 2019 reference NJC/F1/SC.3/1/570 following the 17th Emergency meeting of the Council held the same 11th February 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Machiavellianism: the Godfathers and the Godsons in Nigeria
    International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research 7(3):91-99, July-Sept., 2019 © SEAHI PUBLICATIONS, 2019 www.seahipaj.org ISSN: 2354-2926 Machiavellianism:© SEAHI PUBLICATIONS, 2018 The www.seahipaj.org Godfathers and ISSN: the 2354 Godsons-2926 in Nigeria (1999-2015) Okoh, Kelechi Department of Public Administration, Federal Polytechnic of Oil and Gas Ekowe Bayelsa State, Nigeria Author’s E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +2348065817812 ABSTRACT This paper critically investigated the preference for Machiavellianism among politicians in Nigeria. The study specifically aimed to explain the nature of politics in Nigeria. It also set out to describe the role of godfathers in ensuring that their godsons acquire political power. In addition, it sought to explore the godsons-godfathers relationship after acquisition of political power in Nigeria. Relevant data were obtained through secondary method and were analysed. The study revealed that the nature of politics in Nigeria is that of winner-take-all. The results also show that the godfathers operate by scheming to acquire political power for their godsons. The findings further showed that after the godsons had acquired political power in Nigeria conflict of interest often occur between the godson and the godfather. The study concluded that there is misapplication and misinterpretation of Machiavellianism among politicians in Nigeria. Recommendations were made as followed: introduction of power sharing arrangement that will address the current winner-take-all system, attention should be given to morality in politics, emphasis to be placed on the good aspect of Machiavelli‟s counsel, desperate power seekers should be checked, and the need to have morally sound cum patriotic leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and the Hegemony of Corruption in Nigeria (1999-2017)
    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 9 , No. 3, March, 2019, E-ISSN: 2222 -6990 © 2019 HRMARS Nigerian Conundrum: Democracy and the Hegemony of Corruption in Nigeria (1999-2017) Emmanuel Chimezie Eyisi To Link this Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i3/5673 DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i3/5673 Received: 21 Feb 2019, Revised: 08 March 2019, Accepted: 18 March 2019 Published Online: 21 March 2019 In-Text Citation: (Eyisi, 2019) To Cite this Article: Eyisi, E. C. (2019). Nigerian Conundrum: Democracy and the Hegemony of Corruption in Nigeria (1999-2017). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 251– 267. Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s) Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com) This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode Vol. 9, No. 3, 2019, Pg. 251 - 267 http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS JOURNAL HOMEPAGE Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/publication-ethics 251 International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 9 , No. 3, March, 2019, E-ISSN: 2222 -6990 © 2019 HRMARS Nigerian Conundrum: Democracy and the Hegemony of Corruption in Nigeria (1999-2017) Emmanuel Chimezie Eyisi (Ph.D) Department of Sociology/Psychology/Criminology, Faculty of Management and Social Sciences Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu-alike Ikwo, Ebonyi State.
    [Show full text]
  • “Development and Accountability of Nigeria's Anti-Corruption Initiatives.”
    Running Head: Development and Accountability of Nigeria’s Anti-Corruption Initiatives “Development and Accountability of Nigeria’s Anti-Corruption Initiatives.” Chioma F. Nwogu, ABD Doctoral Candidate [email protected] Adrian M. Velazquez Vazquez, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Public Administration 1950 Third Street, CBPM 118 Department of Public and Health Administration College of Business and Public Management University of La Verne La Verne, CA 91750 909.448.4107 [email protected] Preliminary Draft Manuscript Not for Citation without Express Permission from the Authors Paper prepared for delivery at the International Institute of Administrative Sciences’ 2018 IIAS International Congress Tunis, Tunisia – June 25-29, 2018 Development and Accountability of Nigeria’s Anti-Corruption Initiatives Introduction In 2015, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was drafted during the meetings celebrating the 70th anniversary of the United Nations (United Nations, 2015). As part of adopting a “historic decision on a comprehensive, far-reaching and people-centered set of universal and transformative goals and targets” (United Nations, 2015, p. 3), the many actors who participated in drafting this agenda for the future recognized, amongst other goals, the need to “promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels” (United Nations, 2015, p. 14). As part of this initiative, the United Nations also articulated, along with other specific objectives to fulfill that goal, the need to: “- Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all. - By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Security Situation in Rivers State: an Open Letter from Amnesty International to Peter Odili, State Governor of Rivers State
    The security situation in Rivers State: an open letter from Amnesty International to Peter Odili, State Governor of Rivers State Ref.: AFR 44/027/2004 15 September 2004 Dear State Governor Peter Odili, Amnesty International is writing to express its deep concerns for the protection of human rights of civilians living in and around Port Harcourt in relation to the increasingly alarming security situation in Rivers State, due to fighting allegedly between rival armed groups. Amnesty International has learnt that the Joint Security Force with a mandate to combat the problems of these rival armed groups, set up in June 2004, following your request to the Federal authorities in Abuja for reinforcement, has subsequently been dissolved and replaced by a special joint task force named ‘Operation Flush out 3’, under the command of Brigadier General Zakariah Yaduma, as announced on 9 September by the Federal Defence Quarters. Following this and after the emergency security meeting called by yourself in Port Harcourt on Monday 6 September 2004, resulting in a 24-hour ultimatum to the armed groups to surrender and reorganization of the security forces, Amnesty International has received reports that an unspecified number of additional troops, including armed forces, the navy, the air force, and mobile police, have been deployed to the area in order to restore law and order. The organization is seriously concerned that the reported order to ‘use maximum force’ in order to combat the problem without the necessary training or instructions could be misinterpreted and lead to human rights violations and abuses. Last weekend it was reported to the organization that air raids discriminately targeting areas known to be heavily populated were used in order to pursue this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019) Lpelr-47039(Sc
    SULE & ORS v. ORISAJIMI CITATION: (2019) LPELR-47039(SC) In the Supreme Court of Nigeria ON FRIDAY, 15TH MARCH, 2019 Suit No: SC.46/2006 Before Their Lordships: MUSA DATTIJO MUHAMMAD Justice of the Supreme Court KUMAI BAYANG AKA'AHS Justice of the Supreme Court CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE Justice of the Supreme Court AMIRU SANUSI Justice of the Supreme Court SIDI DAUDA BAGE Justice of the Supreme Court Between 1. ALHAJI A. R. SULE 2. REGISTRAR, KWARA STATE POLYTECHNIC - Appellant(s) 3. KWARA STATE POLYTECHNIC (2019) LPELR-47039(SC)And MR. J. ORISAJIMI - Respondent(s) RATIO DECIDENDI 1. APPEAL - INTERFERENCE WITH CONCURRENT FINDING(S) OF FACT(S): Instances where the Supreme Court will not interfere with concurrent findings of fact(s) made by Lower Courts <span style="font-size: 12px;">"I acknowledge the submission of the Appellants wherein the learned Appellants' Counsel urged us to disturb the concurrent findings of the two Courts down the stairs of our judicial hierarchy. This Court cannot disturb concurrent finding of fact by the trial Court and Court below contrary to the supposition of the Appellants. The law is trite and well established that an appellate Court may interfere with findings of a trial Court when such findings have been made on legally inadmissible evidence, or they are perverse or are indeed not based on any evidence before the Court. See the cases of SELE VS THE STATE (1993) 1 NWLR (Pt.267) P.276 at 282 and IYARO VS THE STATE (1998) 1 NWLR (Pt.69) P.256. See also Re: MOGAJI (1986) 1 NWLR (Pt.19) 759; SALAMI VS THE STATE (1988) 3 NWLR (Pt.85) 670; MBENU VS THE STATE (1988) 3 NWLR (Pt.84) 615.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks by Dr
    Remarks by Dr. Paden: Author of Muslim Civic Culture and Conflict Resolution: The Challenge of Democratic Federalism in Nigeria. Let me welcome you all here this evening, and thank Brookings institution and the Saban Center for facilitating this book launch. In particular, let me thank Peter Singer and Rabab Fayad, who have worked tirelessly on the arrangements. I would also like to thank my Nigerian colleagues who have assisted in the launch, especially Ahmad Abubakar and Lawal Idris. I am especially honored by the participation of the panel here tonight. General Muhammadu Buhari has flown in from Nigeria to be our special guest of honor. As former head of state in Nigeria, and as major political challenger of the current administration in Abuja, he has shown that it is possible to use the judicial system to seek redress of election grievances. He has also shown that it is possible to accept the results of the Supreme Court decision last July, out of respect for the judicial system, while still remaining critical of the process of elections in Nigeria. His respect for the principles of the Fourth Republic, and his leadership of the peaceful opposition parties in Nigeria, make him one of the great statesmen of contemporary democratic systems. I am also grateful for the presence here tonight of Dr. Ibrahim Gambari, currently undersecretary general/ political of the United Nations, who has just returned from international travel and made a special point of coming down from New York for this occasion. He is one of my oldest friends in Nigeria, and a wise counselor to all who believe in a peaceful and democratic Nigeria.
    [Show full text]