DOCSLIB.ORG

Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for GEDI Transmit and Receive Waveform Processing for L1 and L2 Products

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for GEDI Transmit and Receive Waveform Processing for L1 and L2 Products Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for GEDI Transmit and Receive Waveform Processing for L1 and L2 Products Michelle Hofton1, J Bryan Blair2 Contributions by Sarah Story3, Donghui Yi3 1. University of Maryland, College Park, MD 2. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 3. KBR Greenbelt MD Version 1.0 Release date: December, 4th, 2019 Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD Authors: Principal Investigator: ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ Abstract The GEDI instrument consists of 3 lasers producing a total of 8 beam ground transects that are spaced approximately 600 m apart on the Earth’s surface in the cross-track direction. Each beam transect consists of ~30 m footprint samples approximately spaced every 60 m along track. The “coverage” laser is split into two transects that are then each dithered producing four ground transects. The other two lasers are dithered only, producing two ground transects each. The fundamental footprint observations made by the GEDI instrument are received waveforms of energy (number of photons) as a function of receive time. When combined with laser pointing and positioning information, these waveforms precisely georeference the 3-dimensional surface within each laser footprint relative to a reference ellipsoid. Within each waveform the vertical distribution of intercepted surfaces is captured (e.g., ground, canopy surfaces, ocean etc.). The relative locations of each reflecting surface within the footprint is identified during postprocessing, then combined with the geolocation of each waveform provided in the L1B product to generate the geolocation product in the L2 group. This ATBD details the algorithms and approaches used to determine various ranging and other metrics within the GEDI waveforms. Version 1.0 2 Foreword This document is the Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for the GEDI Transmit and Receive Waveform Processing for L1 and L2 Products. The GEDI Science Team assumes responsibility for this document and updates it, as required, as algorithms are refined. Reviews of this document are performed when appropriate and as needed updates to this document are made. This document is a GEDI ATBD controlled document. Changes to this document require prior approval of the project. Proposed changes shall be noted in the change log, as well as incrementing the document version number. Questions or comments concerning this document should be addressed to: Michelle Hofton University of Maryland, and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 61A [email protected] 301-286-4488 Version 1.0 3 Change History Log Revision Date Description of Change Level Approved 1.0 Major revision to focus ATBD on waveform analysis Nov 29 2019 congruent with the GEDI data products Version 1.0 4 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 2 Foreword ................................................................................................................................. 3 Change History Log .............................................................................................................. 4 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. 1 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 1.1 GEDI Data Products Overview ...................................................................................... 3 1.2 GEDI Configuration ......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Document Overview and Objective ............................................................................ 4 1.4 GEDI Waveform Overview ............................................................................................. 5 1.5 Algorithm Objectives ...................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Related Documentation ................................................................................................. 6 1.6.1 Parent Documents ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.6.2 Applicable Documents ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 GEDI Transmit Waveform Analysis and Generation of the Range Vector for input to the L1B ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Outline of the Procedure ............................................................................................... 7 2.2 Transmit Waveform Characterization....................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Waveform Maximum and Minimum Amplitudes ................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Transmit pulse peak amplitude location .................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Transmit Pulse Energy ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.4 Waveform background noise standard deviation ............................................................... 8 2.2.5 Saturation and Digitizer Artifacts ................................................................................................ 8 2.2.6 Ringing ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.7 Pulse flag ................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.8 Average pulse ......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Transmit Waveform Interpretation: Least Squares Gaussian Fitting ............... 10 2.3.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 10 2.3.2 Gaussian fit parameters.................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Transmit Waveform Interpretation: Least Squares Extended Gaussian Fitting 11 2.4.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.4.2 Extended Gaussian Fit Parameters........................................................................................... 11 2.5 Calculating Window Ranges for Subsequent Geolocation ...................................... 12 2.6 Required Inputs .............................................................................................................. 13 2.7 Summary of Parameters Output by the Transmit Waveform Processing ............ 13 3.0 Correcting Telemetered Transmit and Receive Waveforms for Known Artifacts ................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1 Outline of the Procedure ............................................................................................ 14 3.2 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 Mean noise level, mean ................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.2 Noise standard deviation, sd_corrected .................................................................................. 15 3.2.3 Corrected transmit and receive waveforms, Txwaveform and rxwaveform ....... 16 3.3 Required Inputs ............................................................................................................ 16 3.4 Summary of Output Parameters............................................................................... 16 4.0 GEDI Receive Waveform Analysis..................................................................... 16 4.1 Outline of the Procedure ............................................................................................ 16 4.2 Receive Waveform Characterization ...................................................................... 17 4.2.1 Precise noise mean and noise standard deviation for each rxwaveform ............. 17 4.2.2 Maximum and minimum amplitudes of the waveform.................................................. 17 4.2.3 Location of maximum amplitude return within waveform ......................................... 17 4.2.4 Waveform amplitude clipping .................................................................................................... 17 4.2.5 Waveform total energy ................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.6 Mean signal value within the 10k range window ............................................................. 18 4.2.7 Laser shot used in measurement model calculations ....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effect of Moisture Distribution on Velocity and Waveform of Ultrasonic-Wave Propagation in Mortar
    materials Article Effect of Moisture Distribution on Velocity and Waveform of Ultrasonic-Wave Propagation in Mortar Shinichiro Okazaki 1,* , Hiroma Iwase 2, Hiroyuki Nakagawa 3, Hidenori Yoshida 1 and Ryosuke Hinei 4 1 Faculty of Engineering and Design, Kagawa University, 2217-20 Hayashi, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0396, Japan; [email protected] 2 Chuo Consultants, 2-11-23 Nakono, Nishi-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 451-0042, Japan; [email protected] 3 Shikoku Research Institute Inc., 2109-8 Yashima, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0113, Japan; [email protected] 4 Building Engineering Group, Civil Engineering and Construction Department, Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc., 2-5 Marunouchi, Takamatsu, Kagawa 760-8573, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Considering that the ultrasonic method is applied for the quality evaluation of concrete, this study experimentally and numerically investigates the effect of inhomogeneity caused by changes in the moisture content of concrete on ultrasonic wave propagation. The experimental results demonstrate that the propagation velocity and amplitude of the ultrasonic wave vary for different moisture content distributions in the specimens. In the analytical study, the characteristics obtained experimentally are reproduced by modeling a system in which the moisture content varies between the surface layer and interior of concrete. Keywords: concrete; ultrasonic; water content; elastic modulus Citation: Okazaki, S.; Iwase, H.; 1. Introduction Nakagawa, H.; Yoshida, H.; Hinei, R. Effect of Moisture Distribution on As many infrastructures deteriorate at an early stage, long-term structure management Velocity and Waveform of is required. If structural deterioration can be detected as early as possible, the scale of Ultrasonic-Wave Propagation in repair can be reduced, decreasing maintenance costs [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Noise Radar and Its Waveforms
    sensors Article Introduction to Noise Radar and Its Waveforms Francesco De Palo 1, Gaspare Galati 2 , Gabriele Pavan 2,* , Christoph Wasserzier 3 and Kubilay Savci 4 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Tor Vergata University of Rome, now with Rheinmetall Italy, 00131 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Electronic Engineering, Tor Vergata University and CNIT-Consortium for Telecommunications, Research Unit of Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 3 Fraunhofer Institute for High Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques FHR, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany; [email protected] 4 Turkish Naval Research Center Command and Koc University, Istanbul, 34450 Istanbul,˙ Turkey; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 7 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: In the system-level design for both conventional radars and noise radars, a fundamental element is the use of waveforms suited to the particular application. In the military arena, low probability of intercept (LPI) and of exploitation (LPE) by the enemy are required, while in the civil context, the spectrum occupancy is a more and more important requirement, because of the growing request by non-radar applications; hence, a plurality of nearby radars may be obliged to transmit in the same band. All these requirements are satisfied by noise radar technology. After an overview of the main noise radar features and design problems, this paper summarizes recent developments in “tailoring” pseudo-random sequences plus a novel tailoring method aiming for an increase of detection performance whilst enabling to produce a (virtually) unlimited number of noise-like waveforms usable in different applications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physics of Sound 1
    The Physics of Sound 1 The Physics of Sound Sound lies at the very center of speech communication. A sound wave is both the end product of the speech production mechanism and the primary source of raw material used by the listener to recover the speaker's message. Because of the central role played by sound in speech communication, it is important to have a good understanding of how sound is produced, modified, and measured. The purpose of this chapter will be to review some basic principles underlying the physics of sound, with a particular focus on two ideas that play an especially important role in both speech and hearing: the concept of the spectrum and acoustic filtering. The speech production mechanism is a kind of assembly line that operates by generating some relatively simple sounds consisting of various combinations of buzzes, hisses, and pops, and then filtering those sounds by making a number of fine adjustments to the tongue, lips, jaw, soft palate, and other articulators. We will also see that a crucial step at the receiving end occurs when the ear breaks this complex sound into its individual frequency components in much the same way that a prism breaks white light into components of different optical frequencies. Before getting into these ideas it is first necessary to cover the basic principles of vibration and sound propagation. Sound and Vibration A sound wave is an air pressure disturbance that results from vibration. The vibration can come from a tuning fork, a guitar string, the column of air in an organ pipe, the head (or rim) of a snare drum, steam escaping from a radiator, the reed on a clarinet, the diaphragm of a loudspeaker, the vocal cords, or virtually anything that vibrates in a frequency range that is audible to a listener (roughly 20 to 20,000 cycles per second for humans).
    [Show full text]
  • Airspace: Seeing Sound Grades
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration GRADES K-8 Seeing Sound airspace Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate Museum in a BO SerieXs www.nasa.gov MUSEUM IN A BOX Materials: Seeing Sound In the Box Lesson Overview PVC pipe coupling Large balloon In this lesson, students will use a beam of laser light Duct tape to display a waveform against a flat surface. In doing Super Glue so, they will effectively“see” sound and gain a better understanding of how different frequencies create Mirror squares different sounds. Laser pointer Tripod Tuning fork Objectives Tuning fork activator Students will: 1. Observe the vibrations necessary to create sound. Provided by User Scissors GRADES K-8 Time Requirements: 30 minutes airspace 2 Background The Science of Sound Sound is something most of us take for granted and rarely do we consider the physics involved. It can come from many sources – a voice, machinery, musical instruments, computers – but all are transmitted the same way; through vibration. In the most basic sense, when a sound is created it causes the molecule nearest the source to vibrate. As this molecule is touching another molecule it causes that molecule to vibrate too. This continues, from molecule to molecule, passing the energy on as it goes. This is also why at a rock concert, or even being near a car with a large subwoofer, you can feel the bass notes vibrating inside you. The molecules of your body are vibrating, allowing you to physically feel the music. MUSEUM IN A BOX As with any energy transfer, each time a molecule vibrates or causes another molecule to vibrate, a little energy is lost along the way, which is why sound gets quieter with distance (Fig 1.) and why louder sounds, which cause the molecules to vibrate more, travel farther.
    [Show full text]
  • 33600A Series Trueform Waveform Generators Generate Trueform Arbitrary Waveforms with Less Jitter, More Fidelity and Greater Resolution
    DATA SHEET 33600A Series Trueform Waveform Generators Generate Trueform arbitrary waveforms with less jitter, more fidelity and greater resolution Revolutionary advances over previous generation DDS 33600A Series waveform generators with exclusive Trueform signal generation technology offer more capability, fidelity and flexibility than previous generation Direct Digital Synthesis (DDS) generators. Use them to accelerate your development Trueform process from start to finish. – 1 GSa/s sampling rate and up to 120 MHz bandwidth Better Signal Integrity – Arbs with sequencing and up to 64 MSa memory – 1 ps jitter, 200x better than DDS generators – 5x lower harmonic distortion than DDS – Compatible with Keysight Technologies, DDS Inc. BenchVue software Over the past two decades, DDS has been the waveform generation technology of choice in function generators and economical arbitrary waveform generators. Reduced Jitter DDS enables waveform generators with great frequency resolution, convenient custom waveforms, and a low price. <1 ps <200 ps As with any technology, DDS has its limitations. Engineers with exacting requirements have had to either work around the compromised performance or spend up to 5 times more for a high-end, point-per-clock waveform generator. Keysight Technologies, Inc. Trueform Trueform technology DDS technology technology offers an alternative that blends the best of DDS and point-per-clock architectures, giving you the benefits of both without the limitations of either. Trueform technology uses an exclusive digital 0.03%
    [Show full text]
  • The Oscilloscope and the Function Generator: Some Introductory Exercises for Students in the Advanced Labs
    The Oscilloscope and the Function Generator: Some introductory exercises for students in the advanced labs Introduction So many of the experiments in the advanced labs make use of oscilloscopes and function generators that it is useful to learn their general operation. Function generators are signal sources which provide a specifiable voltage applied over a specifiable time, such as a \sine wave" or \triangle wave" signal. These signals are used to control other apparatus to, for example, vary a magnetic field (superconductivity and NMR experiments) send a radioactive source back and forth (M¨ossbauer effect experiment), or act as a timing signal, i.e., \clock" (phase-sensitive detection experiment). Oscilloscopes are a type of signal analyzer|they show the experimenter a picture of the signal, usually in the form of a voltage versus time graph. The user can then study this picture to learn the amplitude, frequency, and overall shape of the signal which may depend on the physics being explored in the experiment. Both function generators and oscilloscopes are highly sophisticated and technologically mature devices. The oldest forms of them date back to the beginnings of electronic engineering, and their modern descendants are often digitally based, multifunction devices costing thousands of dollars. This collection of exercises is intended to get you started on some of the basics of operating 'scopes and generators, but it takes a good deal of experience to learn how to operate them well and take full advantage of their capabilities. Function generator basics Function generators, whether the old analog type or the newer digital type, have a few common features: A way to select a waveform type: sine, square, and triangle are most common, but some will • give ramps, pulses, \noise", or allow you to program a particular arbitrary shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Tektronix Signal Generator
    Signal Generator Fundamentals Signal Generator Fundamentals Table of Contents The Complete Measurement System · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 5 Complex Waves · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15 The Signal Generator · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 6 Signal Modulation · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15 Analog or Digital? · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 7 Analog Modulation · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15 Basic Signal Generator Applications· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8 Digital Modulation · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 15 Verification · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8 Frequency Sweep · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 16 Testing Digital Modulator Transmitters and Receivers · · 8 Quadrature Modulation · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 16 Characterization · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8 Digital Patterns and Formats · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 16 Testing D/A and A/D Converters · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 8 Bit Streams · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 17 Stress/Margin Testing · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 9 Types of Signal Generators · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 17 Stressing Communication Receivers · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 9 Analog and Mixed Signal Generators · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 18 Signal Generation Techniques
    [Show full text]
  • Robust Signal-To-Noise Ratio Estimation Based on Waveform Amplitude Distribution Analysis
    Robust Signal-to-Noise Ratio Estimation Based on Waveform Amplitude Distribution Analysis Chanwoo Kim, Richard M. Stern Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Language Technologies Institute Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 {chanwook, rms}@cs.cmu.edu speech and background noise are independent, (2) clean Abstract speech follows a gamma distribution with a fixed shaping In this paper, we introduce a new algorithm for estimating the parameter, and (3) the background noise has a Gaussian signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of speech signals, called WADA- distribution. Based on these assumptions, it can be seen that if SNR (Waveform Amplitude Distribution Analysis). In this we model noise-corrupted speech at an unknown SNR using algorithm we assume that the amplitude distribution of clean the Gamma distribution, the value of the shaping parameter speech can be approximated by the Gamma distribution with obtained using maximum likelihood (ML) estimation depends a shaping parameter of 0.4, and that an additive noise signal is uniquely on the SNR. Gaussian. Based on this assumption, we can estimate the SNR While we assume that the background noise can be by examining the amplitude distribution of the noise- assumed to be Gaussian, we will demonstrate that this corrupted speech. We evaluate the performance of the algorithm still provides better results than the NIST STNR WADA-SNR algorithm on databases corrupted by white algorithm, even in the presence of other types of maskers such noise, background music, and interfering speech. The as background music or interfering speech, where the WADA-SNR algorithm shows significantly less bias and less corrupting signal is clearly not Gaussian.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutorial for Acoustic Analysis Using Raven
    Seminars for Teachers SP 09 Sound Analysis Tutorial Tutorial for Acoustic Analysis using Raven This tutorial is designed to familiarize you with the basics of computer-based sound analysis. It will take you through many of the basic steps of sound analysis using some pre-recorded sample sounds. It should not be a big leap from completing this tutorial to conducting your own analyses of natural sounds. We will be using the computer program Raven, which is produced by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Raven v. 1.3 is currently loaded on 27 iMac computers in PLS 1121. Please note that this computer lab is a shared resource; please be considerate of others working in the room while working with sounds. I. Basics controls for Raven 1.3: 1. Opening Raven: Double click on the Raven icon on the desktop or in the dock to start the application. You will see a small application window that can be expanded by clicking in the appropriate button on the top of the window. 2. Opening files: Under the <File> menu go to <Open Sound Files> and select the 2000Hz.aif file in the Examples folder. Click OK on the next dialog window to open the entire sound. 3. Default views: You will now see two panels open with representations of the sound. You can again expand these views to fill the window by clicking on their top left button. What are these? Their names are indicated in the pane on the left labelled <views>. Only one of these views is active at a time- the active view is highlighted in the views window and has a blue bar on its left edge.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2004.08347V4 [Gr-Qc] 30 Jun 2020
    Aspects of multimode Kerr ringdown fitting Gregory B. Cook∗ Department of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109 (Dated: July 2, 2020) A black hole that is ringing down to quiescence emits gravitational radiation of a very specific nature that can inform us of its mass and angular momentum, test the no-hair theorem for black holes, and perhaps even give us additional information about its progenitor system. This paper provides a detailed description of, and investigation into the behavior of, multimode fitting of the ringdown signal provided by numerical simulations. We find that there are at least three well- motivated multimode fitting schemes that can be used. These methods are tested against a specific numerical simulation to allow for comparison to prior work. I. INTRODUCTION the mass and angular momentum of the black hole, the unique nonvanishing eigenvalue is the maximum overlap Gravitational wave ringdown signals will be a generic value, and the associated eigenvector yields the linear feature of any dynamical scenario that ends in an iso- least-squares solution to the linear fitting problem. The lated compact object. The experimental study of such nonlinear problem of extracting the mass and angular ringdown signals has already begun[1{3], and while this momentum from the gravitational wave signal becomes is certainly the most exciting new area of study, the study a three-dimensional search where we maximize the value of ringdown signals in numerical simulations remains an of the overlap. important area of research[4{7]. In this paper, we will Recently, Geisler et al.[6] demonstrated the importance explore the multimode fitting of numerically simulated of QNM overtones up to n = 7 in fitting ringdown sig- Kerr ringdown signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Sine Wave Ac Power
    CHARACTERISTICS OF BY: VIJAY SHARMA SINE WAVE AC POWER: ENGINEER DEFINITIONS OF ELECTRICAL CONCEPTS, specifications & operations Excerpt from Inverter Charger Series Manual CHARACTERISTICS OF SINE WAVE AC POWER 1.0 DEFINITIONS OF ELECTRICAL CONCEPTS, SPECIFICATIONS & OPERATIONS Polar Coordinate System: It is a two-dimensional coordinate system for graphical representation in which each point on a plane is determined by the radial coordinate and the angular coordinate. The radial coordinate denotes the point’s distance from a central point known as the pole. The angular coordinate (usually denoted by Ø or O t) denotes the positive or anti-clockwise (counter-clockwise) angle required to reach the point from the polar axis. Vector: It is a varying mathematical quantity that has a magnitude and direction. The voltage and current in a sinusoidal AC voltage can be represented by the voltage and current vectors in a Polar Coordinate System of graphical representation. Phase, Ø: It is denoted by"Ø" and is equal to the angular magnitude in a Polar Coordinate System of graphical representation of vectorial quantities. It is used to denote the angular distance between the voltage and the current vectors in a sinusoidal voltage. Power Factor, (PF): It is denoted by “PF” and is equal to the Cosine function of the Phase "Ø" (denoted CosØ) between the voltage and current vectors in a sinusoidal voltage. It is also equal to the ratio of the Active Power (P) in Watts to the Apparent Power (S) in VA. The maximum value is 1. Normally it ranges from 0.6 to 0.8. Voltage (V), Volts: It is denoted by “V” and the unit is “Volts” – denoted as “V”.
    [Show full text]
  • HP 33120A User's Guide
    User’s Guide Part Number 33120-90005 August 1997 For Safety information, Warranties, and Regulatory information, see the pages behind the Index. © Copyright Hewlett-Packard Company 1994, 1997 All Rights Reserved. HP 33120A Function Generator / Arbitrary Waveform Generator Note: Unless otherwise indicated, this manual applies to all Serial Numbers. The HP 33120A is a high-performance 15 MHz synthesized function generator with built-in arbitrary waveform capability. Its combination of bench-top and system features makes this function generator a versatile solution for your testing requirements now and in the future. Convenient bench-top features • 10 standard waveforms • Built-in 12-bit 40 MSa/s arbitrary waveform capability • Easy-to-use knob input • Highly visible vacuum-fluorescent display • Instrument state storage • Portable, ruggedized case with non-skid feet Flexible system features • Four downloadable 16,000-point arbitrary waveform memories • HP-IB (IEEE-488) interface and RS-232 interface are standard • SCPI (Standard Commands for Programmable Instruments) compatibility • Optional HP 34811A BenchLink/Arb Waveform Generation Software for Microsoft® WindowsTM HP 33120A Function Generator / Arbitrary Waveform Generator The Front Panel at a Glance 1 Function / Modulation keys 5 Recall / Store instrument state key 2 Menu operation keys 6 Enter Number key 3 Waveform modify keys 7 Shift / Local key 4 Single / Internal Trigger key 8 Enter Number “units” keys (Burst and Sweep only) 2 Front-Panel Number Entry You can enter numbers from the front-panel using one of three methods. Use the knob and the arrow keys to modify the displayed number. Use the arrow keys to edit individual digits. Increments the flashing digit.
    [Show full text]