DOCSLIB.ORG

Broadband Strategic Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Broadband Strategic Plan In Association with: September 30, 2016 TRANSMITTAL LETTER Mr. Peter Huber Board of Supervisors Pulaski County Administrator Pulaski County 143 Third Street, NW 143 Third Street, NW Pulaski, Virginia 24301 Pulaski, Virginia 24301 RE: Pulaski County, VA Community Broadband Telecommunications Strategic Planning Project Dear Mr. Huber and Pulaski County Board of Supervisors: Consulting Gateway Corporation (CGC) and Dewberry are pleased to provide the Community Broadband Telecommunications Planning Project study report for Pulaski County, VA. This report provides guidance to meet the established project milestones and expectations of the County while fulfilling the requirements of the Commonwealth of Virginia Rural Broadband Planning Initiative funded through the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) consisting of 1) Analyzing Existing Conditions, 2) Setting Broadband Goals, and 3) Identifying Needed Action to Achieve Goals. After examining the options and roles for the County to consider, it is our recommendation that the County can best meet their stated goal of enhancing and encouraging high speed Internet connectivity throughout the county by partnering with private sector providers in implementing a variety of proposed solutions presented in the report. Such a partnership is intended to use funds in a fiscally responsible manner, take advantage of the typical funding opportunities while minimizing the need for other long term funding. Four (4) options are presented for consideration that are not exclusive of each other and it is believed the most impactful solution may be a combination of some of the solutions presented. Details on these options are outlined in the study report. Last Mile Connectivity Solutions Considerations Information Provided Option No. 1: Marketing Existing & Least Risk, Effort, Expense, Six (6) Primary Sites have been Identified Potential Sites Impact & Time for Potential Wireless Solutions Option No. 2: Pulaski Internet Initiative- Liaison Between Customer & Significant and Relevant End-User & Communication Assistance Program Service Provider Provider Information was Collected Option No. 3: Network Extension Funding Provides Incentive for Private Numerous Typical Telecom Funding - Public Private Partnership Borrowing Opportunities Are Presented Option No. 4: Customer Premise Aids Low to Moderate Income Strategy to Financially Assist Potential Equipment Last Mile Cost Subsidy Households Customers get Service A significant catalyst in arriving at these options was direct input from the service providers providing broadband services within the study area, as well as feedback from the members of the Project Management Team. Service Provider Input The biggest obstacle stated to achieving connectivity (including Fiber) is the last mile cost and build. Pulaski County, VA Community Broadband Telecommunications Planning Study 1 Final Report: September 30, 2016 The best way the county can assist the service providers in enhancing Internet last mile connectivity is to share information collected through this study and assist in structuring low interest financing and cost sharing or structuring last mile connectivity solution options. A liaison (Pulaski County) between the end-users and the service providers could bridge the gap between lack of communication and/or knowledge of options available between the parties. Project Management Team Feedback The municipalities would prefer not to own or operate network infrastructure of facilities. While the county is probably willing to make some manageable investment into enhancing Internet access within the county, without being a service provider there would be little monetary return on such an investment in the County providing services and Broadband it is just one of many infrastructure projects needing funding. A sliding scale of options to address enhancing Internet Connectivity should be presented so the elected officials representing the county can consider their comfort level in moving forward. Other options, such as actual network building were not recommended at this time due to several concerns expressed by the Project Management Team members. By partnering with the private sector the County will minimize their investment and risk while meeting the need to address enabling broader service delivery. The most successful solutions will likely consist of the County assuming a liaison role between the service providers and the customers, exchanging service provider commitments of infrastructure investment with commitments by potential customers to take service; as well as the County assisting with funding applications, potential middle and last mile cost subsidy or sharing, and working with service providers to gain access to County owned vertical assets/property perhaps at reduced rates and expedited approvals and permitting. Both wireless and wireline (fiber connectivity) solutions and hybrid of both, such as connecting wireless vertical assets with fiber optic connectivity should be pursued. The County could implement any of the proposed solutions with revising the costs to fit a budget they are comfortable with, and take a ‘wait and see’ approach as to the effectiveness over the next 1 -2 years. It is not recommended the county proceed with any of the proposed options without getting cooperation and buy-in from the areas service providers. The Commonwealth encourages rural municipalities to establish such partnerships with private providers to enhance broadband service delivery to businesses and citizens. There is a unique funding opportunity coming up (2016 Virginia Acts of Assembly- Chapter 780) in which seed money will be made available towards private sector network construction activity by working with the public sector (County). Pulaski County service providers expressed interest in this opportunity. Regardless of the elected officials’ decision on implementation, the Community Broadband Telecommunications Planning Study has collected, organized and mapped out significant data on the study area end-user perceptions, as well starting discussions with service providers’ on potential solutions and increased mapping of their infrastructure that will undoubtedly play a role in enhancing broadband and other telecommunications services in the future. CGC and Dewberry appreciate the opportunity to be an integrated partner in this important initiative and look forward to continuing to assist the County in bringing this vital infrastructure to the County’s Communities. Sincerely, Consulting Gateway Corporation Keith A. Hill, President VA P.E. #0402046171 [email protected] Enclosure: Pulaski County, VA Community Telecommunications Broadband Planning Study Pulaski County, VA Community Broadband Telecommunications Planning Study 2 Final Report: September 30, 2016 Table of Contents ES Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 7 ES1.0 Needs Assessment and Asset Inventory ............................................................................................................. 7 ES1.1 Highlights of Survey Response in the Study Area ...................................................................................... 9 ES2.0 Broadband Education Development Strategies and End User Application ........................................ 20 ES2.1 Gap Analysis with Broadband Education Development and Strategies ................................................ 20 ES2.2 Additional Strategies to Consider ..................................................................................................................... 25 ES2.3 Areas of Unmet Needs and/or Lack of Adequate Communication Infrastructure ............................. 26 ES3.0 Last Mile Connectivity Options .......................................................................................................................... 36 ES3.1 Service Provider Meeting Input: ...................................................................................................................... 36 ES3.2 County Meetings Observations Leaning Towards Potential Last Mile Solution Consideration .... 37 ES3.3 Collaboration Partners and Projects ............................................................................................................... 37 ES3.4 Last Mile Connectivity Considerations ........................................................................................................... 38 ES3.5 Last Mile Connectivity Solutions ................................................................................................................... 39 ES4.0 Preliminary Engineering, Design & Cost Estimates ................................................................................... 41 ES4.1 Proposed Last Mile Connectivity Solutions with Preliminary Cost Estimates ..................................... 41 ES4.1A - OPTION NO. 1: MARKET EXISTING & POTENTIAL SITES/ASSETS ............................................................ 41 ES4.1B - OPTION NO. 2: PULASKI INTERNET INITIATIVE CAP ................................................................................. 41 ES4.1C - OPTION NO. 3: NETWORK EXTENSION FUNDING PPP .................................................................... 42 ES4.1E -FIBER AND/OR WIRELESS NETWORK BUILD .................................................................................................. 43 ES4.2 Last Mile Connectivity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shoreline Management Plan
    Claytor Project FERC No. 739 Shoreline Management Plan June 13, 2017* * includes revised language from Order Issuing New License dated December 27, 2011and Order Approving Amended Shoreline Management Plan issued January 7, 2014 Appalachian Power Company Claytor Project Shoreline Management Plan Table of Contents Table of Contents ………….………………………………………..………………. i List of Tables …………………………………………………..…………………….ii List of Figures ……………………………………………..………………………....ii Glossary…………………….…………………………..…………………………….iii 1.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………. 1 1.1 Purpose and Authority ……………………………………………… 1 1.2 Goals and Objectives ………………………………………………. 2 1.3 Project Area Description …………………………………………… 2 1.4 Consultation …………………………………………………………… 3 2.0 Methods and Planning Process ……………………………………………… 4 2.1 Data Collection 2.1.1 Land Use …………………………….……………………….4 2.1.2 Shoreline Condition and Stabilization …….…………………4 2.1.3 Ecological Resources ……………………………..………….4 2.1.4 Cultural Resources………………………………………..…..6 2.1.5 Bathymetric and Topographical Data… ……………… 7 2.1.6 Public and Private Recreation Facilities…………..………….7 2.1.7 Local, State, and Federal Regulations………………..………7 2.1.8 Recreation Use Density………………………………….…...7 2.1.9 Scenery Assessment……………………………………….…9 2.2 Mapping……………………………………………….………………..9 2.2.1 Mapping Revision Process…………………………..…..…10 2.3 Shoreline Classifications ……………………………………………...10 2.4 Parameters …………………………………………………………..…13 2.5 Regulations………….………………………………………………... 14 2.5.1 High Density Commercial ………………………………... 14 2.5.2 High Density Multi-Use
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Wild and Scenic Rivers
    7. Wild and Scenic Rivers Virginia Wild and Scenic Rivers Designation NEPAassist Maps Distance to Closest Wild and Scenic Rivers Downstream – Bluestone River WV Upstream – New River (So. Fork) NC New River Wild and Scenic River Study Executive Summary of Findings [2009] NEPAssist Map Distance by Direct Route NEPAssist Map Distance by Water Route Nationwide Rivers Inventory Inventory for Virginia NEPAssist Maps Distance to Little River Downstream by Direct Route Downstream by Water Route NEPAssist Maps Distance to Big Reed Island Crk Downstream by Direct Route Downstream by Water Route VA CDBG #15-15 Pulaski Kersey Bottom / Case Knife Road Revitalization Project Environmental Review Record 12/17/2015 Virginia HOME NATIONAL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT RESOURCES PUBLICATIONS CONTACT US KID'S SITE VIRGINIA Virginia has approximately 49,350 miles of river, but no designated wild & scenic rivers. Virginia does not have any designated rivers. Virginia Go Choose A River Go While progress should never come to a halt, there are many places it should never come to at all. — Paul Newman NATIONWIDE RIVERS INVENTORY KID'S SITE CONTACT US PRIVACY NOTICE Q & A SEARCH ENGINE SITE MAP http://www.rivers.gov/virginia.php 1/2 12/17/2015 NEPAssist NEPAssist Measure Find address or place Print Basemap Imagery Measure Draw Erase Identify | Miles 37.705532, ­79.542102 + Measurement Result 39.5 Miles – 0 10 20mi The project area is located approximately 39.5 miles (direct route) from the location where the Bluestone River, a designated Wild and Scenic River in West Virginia, flows into the New River. The project area is located on Peak Creek, which flows into the New River upstream from this point where the Bluestone River flows into the New River.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment a DA 19-526 Renewal of License Applications Accepted for Filing
    Attachment A DA 19-526 Renewal of License Applications Accepted for Filing File Number Service Callsign Facility ID Frequency City State Licensee 0000072254 FL WMVK-LP 124828 107.3 MHz PERRYVILLE MD STATE OF MARYLAND, MDOT, MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMN. 0000072255 FL WTTZ-LP 193908 93.5 MHz BALTIMORE MD STATE OF MARYLAND, MDOT, MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 0000072258 FX W253BH 53096 98.5 MHz BLACKSBURG VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072259 FX W247CQ 79178 97.3 MHz LYNCHBURG VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072260 FX W264CM 93126 100.7 MHz MARTINSVILLE VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072261 FX W279AC 70360 103.7 MHz ROANOKE VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072262 FX W243BT 86730 96.5 MHz WAYNESBORO VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072263 FX W241AL 142568 96.1 MHz MARION VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072265 FM WVRW 170948 107.7 MHz GLENVILLE WV DELLA JANE WOOFTER 0000072267 AM WESR 18385 1330 kHz ONLEY-ONANCOCK VA EASTERN SHORE RADIO, INC. 0000072268 FM WESR-FM 18386 103.3 MHz ONLEY-ONANCOCK VA EASTERN SHORE RADIO, INC. 0000072270 FX W289CE 157774 105.7 MHz ONLEY-ONANCOCK VA EASTERN SHORE RADIO, INC. 0000072271 FM WOTR 1103 96.3 MHz WESTON WV DELLA JANE WOOFTER 0000072274 AM WHAW 63489 980 kHz LOST CREEK WV DELLA JANE WOOFTER 0000072285 FX W206AY 91849 89.1 MHz FRUITLAND MD CALVARY CHAPEL OF TWIN FALLS, INC. 0000072287 FX W284BB 141155 104.7 MHz WISE VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072288 FX W295AI 142575 106.9 MHz MARION VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072293 FM WXAF 39869 90.9 MHz CHARLESTON WV SHOFAR BROADCASTING CORPORATION 0000072294 FX W204BH 92374 88.7 MHz BOONES MILL VA CALVARY CHAPEL OF TWIN FALLS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cla Ytor Lake Festival Claytor Lake State
    In the Fall of 2014, FOCL was invited to partner with the local chapter of The U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary to teach a Boater/Water Safety Class at the Hensel Eckman YMCA in Pulaski. Allison Hunter, Director of the “Y”, Sharon Eifred of the Coast Guard Auxiliary, and Cheri Strenz from FOCL, developed a plan to introduce Boater and Water Safety to young children. Volunteer instructors from FOCL included, Laura Walters, Larry Bandolin, and Cheri Strenz. For six weeks, second grade students from the elementary schools in Pulaski County attend swim classes at the “Y”. One of these sessions is to teaching what a family should know before going out on a boat for the day. This includes the equipment required for boating, general rules of navigation, and how to identify and select a Coast Guard Approved life jacket. Many of these children have made numerous trips to Claytor Lake and are aware that a life jacket should be worn. Sadly, many did not know that a life jacket is required to be worn by all children 12 and under. They also learned, by trying on various sizes, that a properly fitted Coast Guard Approved lifejacket is essential to providing the proper amount of life saving protection. This critical information about boating and being around the water is important having a fun and safe day at Claytor Lake, or any other body of water. FOCL is looking forward to continued participation in this worthwhile program. This year the Pulaski County Chamber of Commerce awarded its first Non-Profit Award for outstanding work in the community at The Draper Claytor Lake Community Programs Community Lake Claytor Mercantile.
    [Show full text]
  • 530 CIAO BRAMPTON on ETHNIC AM 530 N43 35 20 W079 52 54 09-Feb
    frequency callsign city format identification slogan latitude longitude last change in listing kHz d m s d m s (yy-mmm) 530 CIAO BRAMPTON ON ETHNIC AM 530 N43 35 20 W079 52 54 09-Feb 540 CBKO COAL HARBOUR BC VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N50 36 4 W127 34 23 09-May 540 CBXQ # UCLUELET BC VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N48 56 44 W125 33 7 16-Oct 540 CBYW WELLS BC VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N53 6 25 W121 32 46 09-May 540 CBT GRAND FALLS NL VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N48 57 3 W055 37 34 00-Jul 540 CBMM # SENNETERRE QC VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N48 22 42 W077 13 28 18-Feb 540 CBK REGINA SK VARIETY CBC RADIO ONE N51 40 48 W105 26 49 00-Jul 540 WASG DAPHNE AL BLK GSPL/RELIGION N30 44 44 W088 5 40 17-Sep 540 KRXA CARMEL VALLEY CA SPANISH RELIGION EL SEMBRADOR RADIO N36 39 36 W121 32 29 14-Aug 540 KVIP REDDING CA RELIGION SRN VERY INSPIRING N40 37 25 W122 16 49 09-Dec 540 WFLF PINE HILLS FL TALK FOX NEWSRADIO 93.1 N28 22 52 W081 47 31 18-Oct 540 WDAK COLUMBUS GA NEWS/TALK FOX NEWSRADIO 540 N32 25 58 W084 57 2 13-Dec 540 KWMT FORT DODGE IA C&W FOX TRUE COUNTRY N42 29 45 W094 12 27 13-Dec 540 KMLB MONROE LA NEWS/TALK/SPORTS ABC NEWSTALK 105.7&540 N32 32 36 W092 10 45 19-Jan 540 WGOP POCOMOKE CITY MD EZL/OLDIES N38 3 11 W075 34 11 18-Oct 540 WXYG SAUK RAPIDS MN CLASSIC ROCK THE GOAT N45 36 18 W094 8 21 17-May 540 KNMX LAS VEGAS NM SPANISH VARIETY NBC K NEW MEXICO N35 34 25 W105 10 17 13-Nov 540 WBWD ISLIP NY SOUTH ASIAN BOLLY 540 N40 45 4 W073 12 52 18-Dec 540 WRGC SYLVA NC VARIETY NBC THE RIVER N35 23 35 W083 11 38 18-Jun 540 WETC # WENDELL-ZEBULON NC RELIGION EWTN DEVINE MERCY R.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunkard's Bottom: Memories on the Virginia Landscape, 1745 to 1940
    DUNKARD’S BOTTOM: MEMORIES ON THE VIRGINIA LANDSCAPE, 1745 TO 1940 HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS FOR SITE 44PU164 AT THE CLAYTOR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PULASKI COUNTY, VIRGINIA FERC PROJECT NO. 739 Prepared for: Prepared by: Appalachian Power Company S&ME, Inc. 40 Franklin Road 134 Suber Road Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Columbia, South Carolina 29210 and and Kleinschmidt Associates, Inc. Harvey Research and Consulting 2 East Main Street 4948 Limehill Drive Strasburg, Pennsylvania 17579 Syracuse, New York 13215 Authors: Heather C. Jones, M.A., and Bruce Harvey, Ph.D. Final Report – July 2012 History of Dunkard’s Bottom Appalachian Power Company Claytor Hydroelectric Project July 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 DUNKARD‘S BOTTOM ............................................................................................................... 3 The Dunkards ......................................................................................................................................... 4 William Christian ................................................................................................................................. 12 The Cloyd Family
    [Show full text]
  • Pulaski County Serve Pulaski County Unserved Last Mile Broadband - Phase One
    Application to DHCD Submitted through CAMS Pulaski County Serve Pulaski County Unserved Last Mile Broadband - Phase One Application ID: 64508312019091002 Application Status: Pending Program Name: Virginia Telecommunications Initiative 2020 Organization Name: Pulaski County Organization Address: 143 Third St, NW Pulaski, VA 24301-4900 Profile Manager Name: Jared Linkous Profile Manager Phone: (540) 980-7710 Profile Manager Email: [email protected] Project Name: Serve Pulaski County Unserved Last Mile Broadband - Phase One Project Contact Name: Jonathan Sweet Project Contact Phone: (540) 980-7710 Project Contact Email: [email protected] Project Location: 143 Third Street Pulaski, VA 24301-4900 Project Service Area: Pulaski County Total Requested Amount: $612,475.00 Required Annual Audit Status: Pending Review 9/4/2019 1:50:08 PM Pages: 1 of 17 Application to DHCD Submitted through CAMS Pulaski County Serve Pulaski County Unserved Last Mile Broadband - Phase One Budget Information: Cost/Activity Category DHCD Request Other Funding Total Telecommunications $612,475.00 $410,000.00 $1,022,475.00 Construction $342,900.00 $235,600.00 $578,500.00 Construction Related Soft Costs $122,049.00 $80,400.00 $202,449.00 Other: Equipment, Redundancy $147,526.00 $94,000.00 $241,526.00 Total: $612,475.00 $410,000.00 $1,022,475.00 Budget Narrative: The total cost of the last mile broadband shovel ready project is $1,022,475. The project includes network design, engineering, and configuration for a cost of $ 100,000; Network Operations Center
    [Show full text]
  • 0915 2015 VA Radio Stations.Xlsx
    Radio Stations in the Commonwealth of Virginia (sorted by District) District Outlet Email Outlet Topic Media Type Address Line 1 Address Line 2 City State Postal Code 1 WESR-FM [email protected] Music; News; Pop Music; Oldies Radio Station 22479 Front St Accomac Virginia 23301-1641 1 WESR-AM [email protected] Music; News; Pop Music; Rock Music Radio Station 22479 Front St Accomac Virginia 23301-1641 1 WESR-FM [email protected] Music; News; Pop Music; Oldies Radio Station 22479 Front St Accomac Virginia 23301-1641 1 WESR-AM [email protected] Music; News; Pop Music; Rock Music Radio Station 22479 Front St Accomac Virginia 23301-1641 1 WCTG-FM [email protected] Music; News Radio Station 6455 Maddox Blvd Ste 3 Chincoteague Virginia 23336-2272 1 WCTG-FM [email protected] Music; News Radio Station 6455 Maddox Blvd Ste 3 Chincoteague Virginia 23336-2272 1 WCTG-FM [email protected] Music; News Radio Station 6455 Maddox Blvd Ste 3 Chincoteague Virginia 23336-2272 1 WVES-FM [email protected] Country, Folk, Bluegrass; Music; News Radio Station 27214 Mutton Hunk Rd Parksley Virginia 23421-3238 2 WFOS-FM [email protected] Music; News Radio Station 1617 Cedar Rd Chesapeake Virginia 23322 2 WNOR-FM [email protected] Music; News; Rock Music Radio Station 870 Greenbrier Cir Ste 399 Chesapeake Virginia 23320-2671 2 WNOR-FM [email protected] Music; News; Rock Music Radio Station 870 Greenbrier Cir Ste 399 Chesapeake Virginia 23320-2671 2 WJOI-AM [email protected] Music; News; Oldies Radio Station 870 Greenbrier Cir Ste 399 Chesapeake Virginia 23320-2671
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Claytor Lake Fisheries Report from the Department of Wildlife
    Claytor Lake: More than a Wide Spot in the New River John R. Copeland, Fisheries Biologist, Blacksburg Office April 1, 2020 Imagine yourself on a waterbody that is more like a wide river than a lake. When you do, you have a picture of Claytor Lake. Claytor Lake, a 4,363 acre reservoir, stretches northeastward from Allisonia across the Pulaski County countryside for about 21 miles to its dam near Radford. From Claytor Lake State Park, visitors view a sparkling lake, bustling with boating activity, with the top of Claytor Lake dam in the distance. Visitors who want to explore can ride 15 miles upstream to Allisonia, where the New River enters the lake. Claytor Lake is shallow in areas upstream from Lighthouse Bridge, the only bridge that crosses the main lake (Pulaski County Route 672), so be cautious if you roam upstream from the bridge. Near the midpoint of Claytor Lake, the only major tributary, Peak Creek, enters the lake. If you are not familiar with Claytor Lake’s key locations, refer to the lake overview map on the last page of this report. View of Claytor Lake dam from Claytor Lake State Park’s boat ramp. American Electric Power Company (now known as Appalachian Power Company) constructed Claytor Dam in 1939 to produce hydroelectric power from the incessant flow of the New River, installing 4 hydroelectric turbines to produce electricity. Because Claytor Lake is a main stem impoundment with a large watershed upstream, water passes through more quickly than in most large Virginia reservoirs. As a result, Claytor Lake has different temperature and oxygen 1 levels than other nearby reservoirs like Smith Mountain Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Bald Eagle Population Along Claytor Lake, Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks CCB Technical Reports Center for Conservation Biology (CCB) 2007 An assessment of the bald eagle population along Claytor Lake, Virginia B. D. Watts The Center for Conservation Biology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccb_reports Recommended Citation Watts, B. D., "An assessment of the bald eagle population along Claytor Lake, Virginia" (2007). CCB Technical Reports. 370. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccb_reports/370 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Conservation Biology (CCB) at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in CCB Technical Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BALD EAGLE POPULATION ALONG CLAYTOR LAKE, VIRGINIA January, 2008 Bryan D. Watts, PhD Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795 Recommended Citation: Watts, B. D. 2007. An assessment of the bald eagle population along Claytor Lake, Virginia. Center for Conservation Biology Technical Report Series, CCBTR-07- 12. College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA. 13 p. A Cooperative Project By: Normandeau Associates, Inc. & Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary BACKGROUND Context The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) originally listed the Bald Eagle as federally endangered on 11 March 1967 under The Endangered Species Protection Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668aa-668cc) and subsequently under The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq). The primary reason cited for the original listing was broad-scale population declines linked to dichloro-dephenyl- trichloroethane (DDT) and associated reproductive failure.
    [Show full text]
  • FM-1949-07.Pdf
    MM partl DIRECTORY BY OPL, SYSTEMS COUNTY U POLICE 1S1pP,TE FIRE FORESTRYOpSp `p` O COMPANIES TO REVISED LISTINGS 1, 1949 4/ka feeZ means IessJnterference ... AT HEADQUARTERS THE NEW RCA STATION RECEIVER Type CR -9A (152 -174 Mc) ON THE ROAD THE NEW RCA CARFONE Mobile 2 -way FM radio, 152 -174 Mc ...you get the greatest selectivity with RCA's All -New Communication Equipment You're going to hear a lot about selectivity from potentially useful channels for mobile radio communi- now on. In communication systems, receiver selectiv- cation systems. ity, more than any other single factor, determines the For degree of freedom from interference. complete details on the new RCA Station Re- This is impor- ceiver type CR -9A, tant both for today and for the future. and the new RCA CARFONE for mobile use, write today. RCA engineers are at your Recognizing this fact, RCA has taken the necessary service for consultation on prob- steps to make its all -new communication equipment lems of coverage, usage, or com- the most selective of any on the market today. To the plex systems installations. Write user, this means reliable operation substantially free Dept. 38 C. from interference. In addition, this greater selectivity Free literature on RCA's All -New now rhakes adjacent -channel operation a practical Communication Equipment -yours possibility - thereby greatly increasing the number of for the asking. COMMUN /CAT/ON SECT/ON RADIO CORPORATION of AMERICA ENGINEERING PRODUCTS DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN, N.J. In Canada: R C A VICTOR Company limited, Montreal Á#ofher s with 8(11(011' DlNews ERIE'S FIRST TV STATION Says EDWARD LAMB, publisher of "The Erie Dis- telecasting economics.
    [Show full text]
  • TV Channel 5-6 Radio Proposal
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Promoting Diversification of Ownership ) MB Docket No 07-294 in the Broadcasting Services ) ) 2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of ) MB Docket No. 06-121 the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and ) Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of ) the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review – Review of ) MB Docket No. 02-277 the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and ) Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of ) the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) Cross-Ownership of Broadcast Stations and ) MM Docket No. 01-235 Newspapers ) ) Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership ) MM Docket No. 01-317 of Radio Broadcast Stations in Local Markets ) ) Definition of Radio Markets ) MM Docket No. 00-244 ) Ways to Further Section 257 Mandate and To Build ) MB Docket No. 04-228 on Earlier Studies ) To: Office of the Secretary Attention: The Commission BROADCAST MAXIMIZATION COMMITTEE John J. Mullaney Mark Lipp Paul H. Reynolds Bert Goldman Joseph Davis, P.E. Clarence Beverage Laura Mizrahi Lee Reynolds Alex Welsh SUMMARY The Broadcast Maximization Committee (“BMC”), composed of primarily of several consulting engineers and other representatives of the broadcast industry, offers a comprehensive proposal for the use of Channels 5 and 6 in response to the Commission’s solicitation of such plans. BMC proposes to (1) relocate the LPFM service to a portion of this spectrum space; (2) expand the NCE service into the adjacent portion of this band; and (3) provide for the conversion and migration of all AM stations into the remaining portion of the band over an extended period of time and with digital transmissions only.
    [Show full text]