DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1512.03776V1 [Math.CV] 11 Dec 2015 NS AA M 59 Nvri´ Ai 3 France

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1512.03776V1 [Math.CV] 11 Dec 2015 NS AA M 59 Nvri´ Ai 3 France LOG-RIEMANN SURFACES K. Biswas, R. P´erez-Marco * Table of contents. Introduction: Motivations and contents. I. Geometric theory of log-Riemann surfaces. I.1) Definition of log-Riemann surfaces. I.1.1) Definition. I.1.2) Examples I.2) Euclidean metric and ramification points. I.2.1) Definition. I.2.2) Ramification points. I.2.3) Log-euclidean geometry and charts. I.2.3.1) Preliminaries. I.2.3.2) Constructions of charts. I.2.3.3) Other applications. I.2.3.4) The Kobayashi-Nevanlinna net. I.3) Topology of log-Riemann surfaces. I.3.1) The skeleton. I.3.2) Skeleton and fundamental group. I.4) Ramified coverings. I.4.1) Ramified coverings and formal Riemann surfaces. arXiv:1512.03776v1 [math.CV] 11 Dec 2015 I.4.2) Ramified coverings and log-Riemann surfaces. I.4.3) Ramified coverings of formal Riemann surfaces. I.4.4) Universal covering of log-Riemann surfaces. I.4.5) Ramified coverings and degree. I.5) Ramification surgery. I.5.1) Grafting of ramification points. I.5.2) Pruning of ramification points. * CNRS, LAGA, UMR 7539, Universit´eParis 13, France. 1 II. Analytic theory of log-Riemann surfaces. II.1) Type of log-Riemann surfaces. II.1.1) General facts. II.1.2) Kobayashi-Nevanlinna criterium. II.2) Boundary behaviour of the universal cover. II.3) Caratheodory theorem for log-Riemann surfaces. II.3.1) Kernel convergence. II.3.2) Caratheodory theorem. II.3.3) Conformal radius. II.3.4) Closure of algebraic log-Riemann surfaces. II.3.5) Stolz continuity. II.3.6) Functions holomorphic at ramification points. II.3.7) General Weierstrass theorem. II.4) Quasi-conformal theory of log-Riemann surfaces. II.4.1) Complex automorphisms of log-Riemann surfaces. II.4.2) Teichm¨uller distance. II.4.3) Teichm¨uller space of a finite log-Riemann surface. II.5) Uniformization of finite log-Riemann surfaces. II.5.1) A fundamental example. II.5.2) On the general case. II.5.3) Uniformization theorem. II.5.4) Uniformization and Schwarz-Christoffel formula. II.5.5) General uniformization theorem. II.6) Cyclotomic log-Riemann surfaces. II.6.1) Definition. II.6.2) Ramification values . II.6.3) Subordination of cyclotomic log-Riemann surfaces. II.6.4) Caratheodory limits of cyclotomic log-Riemann surfaces. II.6.5) Continued fraction expansion of the uniformizations. II.6.6) Relation to the incomplete Gamma function. II.6.7) Relation to Hermite polynomials. II.7) Uniformization of infinite log-Riemann surfaces. 2 III. Algebraic theory of log-Riemann surfaces. III.1) A ring of special functions. III.1.1) Definition. III.1.2) Asymptotics. III.1.3) Linear independence. III.1.4) Algebraic independence. III.1.5) Integrals. III.1.6) Differential ring structure. III.1.7) Picard-Vessiot extensions. III.1.8) Liouville classification. III.2) Refined analytic estimates. III.2.1) Decomposition of the end at infinity. III.2.2) Analytic estimates. III.3) Liouville theorem on log-Riemann surfaces. III.4) The structural ring. III.4.1) Definition. III.4.2) Points of ∗ as maximal ideals. S III.4.3) The ramificant determinant. III.4.4) Infinite ramification points. Bibliography. Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 30F99, 30D99 Key-Words : log-Riemann surfaces, entire functions, Dedekind-Weber theory, ramified coverings, exponential periods. date of compilation : 14-12-2015. 3 INTRODUCTION Historical motivation. Since the revolutionary ideas of Bernhard Riemann in the XIXth century the notion of Riemann surface has experienced dramatic changes. The motivation of Riemann’s fun- damental memoir [Ri1] is the study of Abelian Integrals which are in the XIXth century the ”new” transcendental functions attracting the attention since the work of Abel, Galois and Jacobi. The arithmetico-geometric history of transcendental functions is very instruc- tive. The first transcendental functions are associated to the geometry of the circle. These have been studied since the origins of Mathematics (the famous Babylonian clay tablet Plimpton 322, of the Plimpton collection, is a tabulation of arctangents for Pythagorean triangles, see [Fr] and [Va]). These elementary trigonometric functions, are also obtained by integration of elementary algebraic differentials. For instance, z dx arcsin z = . √1 x2 Z − These functions satisfy addition formulae as arcsin z + arcsin w = arcsin z 1 w2 + w 1 z2 . − − p p The close relation of trigonometric functions to the complex exponential was unveiled by L. Euler. J. Wallis (1655) attempted the computation of the arc-length of ellipses leading to Elliptic Integrals of the form z dx , P (x) Z where P is a polynomial of degree 3 or 4. Ellipticp Integrals form a new family of transcen- dental functions that are associated to the geometry of elliptic curves or genus 1 algebraic curves. Giulio Fagnano (1716) and L. Euler (1752, 1757) discovered addition theorems for them, as z dx w dx ξ dx + = , 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 (1 x )(1 k x ) 0 (1 x )(1 k x ) 0 (1 x )(1 k x ) Z − − Z − − Z − − where kpis the parameter of the ellipticp integral and ξ is determinedp by ξ(1 k2z2w2) = w (1 z2)(1 k2z2) + z (1 w2)(1 k2w2) . − − − − − Elliptic Integrals were laterp studied by A.M. Legendrep and C.F. Gauss, and later by N.H. Abel, C. Jacobi, Ch. Hermite,... who also studied more general Hyperelliptic Integrals of the form z R(x) dx , P (x) Z p 4 where R is a rational function and P is a polynomial of arbitrary degree. The next important progress was achieved by N.H. Abel who considered general Abelian Integrals of the general form z R(x,y) dx , Z where y is an algebraic function of x, i.e. satisfies an algebraic equation with polynomial coefficients in x or P (x,y)=0 for P (x,y) C[x,y]. Abel proved his famous general addition theorem for these Abelian integrals. The∈ sum x1 x2 xn R(x,y) dx + R(x,y) dx + ... + R(x,y) dx Z Z Z taken with extremes at (x1,...,xn), which are the intersection points of the curve P (x,y)=0 and a family of algebraic curves Q(x,y,a1,...,an)=0 , is a rational function plus logarithmic terms of (a1,...,am), the parameters that param- eterize the intersecting family of algebraic curves (the usual modern formulation of Abel theorem is only a weaker particular case of the original result). It is understandable the sensation that this result caused (even if it was ignored for some time): Abel’s result shows that the algebraic theory of these very general new tran- scendental functions is very rich. Abel’s result seems to have been also discovered inde- pendently by E.´ Galois, as can be found in the ”brouillons” left by Galois (see [Gal] p.187 and p.518). The corresponding geometry of general Abelian Integrals are general algebraic curves. These new transcendental functions motivated several fundamental theories. The close inspection of the manuscripts of Galois shows that his motivation to build what is now called Galois theory was well beyond the problem of resolution of algebraic equations. His ultimate goal was a full classification of transcendental functions. He did made important progress for Abelian Integrals dividing them into three kinds and studying their periods (see [Pi] volume III p.472). Riemann discovered that Abelian Integrals live naturally on Riemann surfaces spread over the Riemann sphere. Well before Riemann, Euler was well aware of the natural multivaluedness of algebraic and other important functions special functions (see [Eu] chapter I where he defines ”Functiones multiformes”, and his famous writings on the logarithm of negative numbers). The audacious idea of Riemann is to pass at once from 5 the ”multivaluedness” of the function to a geometric dissociation of the space were the function lives by imagining new sheets were each branch of the function is univalued. Riemann surfaces, as Riemann understood them, are abstract manifolds, in the sense that they are not embedded in any ambient space. Riemann had a clear understanding of the notion of abstract manifold as is demonstrated by his Inaugural Dissertation on the foundations of geometry (see [Ri2]). One cannot explain otherwise the consideration of non- Riemannian metrics. But Riemann surfaces, in the view of Riemann, are always spread over the complex plane C or the Riemann sphere C. These are called today Riemann domains. They come equipped with canonical coordinates or charts. This is why some schools, as the German or the Russian around the middle of the XXth century, gave them the name of ”concrete Riemann surfaces”. The equipment with canonical charts or coordinates enriches the Riemann surface structure. In particular it enables the link between the geometry and the transcendental functions. The modern notion of Riemann surface (we should say ”abstract Riemann surface”) does not come equipped with a preferred set of charts. This modern notion was conceived by T. Rado and H. Weyl (see [Wey]) and marks the origin of intrinsic differential geometry. The influence of Riemann’s ideas was deep in the Mathematics of the XIXth cen- tury. R. Dedekind assisted in 1855-1856, to Riemann’s lectures in G¨ottingen on Abelian Functions. They were close friends, and one may wonder how much of his achievements in Algebraic Number Theory were influenced by Riemann’s theory of algebraic curves. Dedekind’s theory of ideals, extending E. Kummer ”ideal numbers”, marks the birth point of Commutative Algebra. It allows the unification of the theory of Number Fields and that of Function Fields on algebraic curves (or compact Riemann surfaces). The culmination of this unification is his article with H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Half-Plane Capacity and Conformal Radius
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 142, Number 3, March 2014, Pages 931–938 S 0002-9939(2013)11811-3 Article electronically published on December 4, 2013 HALF-PLANE CAPACITY AND CONFORMAL RADIUS STEFFEN ROHDE AND CARTO WONG (Communicated by Jeremy Tyson) Abstract. In this note, we show that the half-plane capacity of a subset of the upper half-plane is comparable to a simple geometric quantity, namely the euclidean area of the hyperbolic neighborhood of radius one of this set. This is achieved by proving a similar estimate for the conformal radius of a subdomain of the unit disc and by establishing a simple relation between these two quantities. 1. Introduction and results Let H = {z ∈ C:Imz>0} be the upper half-plane. A bounded subset A ⊂ H is called a hull if H \ A is a simply connected region. The half-plane capacity of a hull A is the quantity hcap(A) := lim z [gA(z) − z] , z→∞ where gA : H \ A → H is the unique conformal map satisfying the hydrodynamic 1 →∞ normalization g(z)=z + O( z )asz . It appears frequently in connection with the Schramm-Loewner Evolution SLE, since it serves as the conformally natural parameter in the chordal Loewner equation; see [1]. In the study of SLE, one often needs estimates of hcap(A) in terms of geometric properties of A. The definition of hcap in terms of conformal maps (or in terms of Brownian motion as in [1]) does not immediately yield such estimates. The purpose of this note is to provide a geometric quantity that is comparable to hcap(A), via a simple relation between half-plane capacity and conformal radius.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.10 Conformal Mapping Methods for Interfacial Dynamics
    4.10 CONFORMAL MAPPING METHODS FOR INTERFACIAL DYNAMICS Martin Z. Bazant1 and Darren Crowdy2 1Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA 2Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London, UK Microstructural evolution is typically beyond the reach of mathematical analysis, but in two dimensions certain problems become tractable by complex analysis. Via the analogy between the geometry of the plane and the algebra of complex numbers, moving free boundary problems may be elegantly formu- lated in terms of conformal maps. For over half a century, conformal mapping has been applied to continuous interfacial dynamics, primarily in models of viscous fingering and solidification. Current developments in materials science include models of void electro-migration in metals, brittle fracture, and vis- cous sintering. Recently, conformal-map dynamics has also been formulated for stochastic problems, such as diffusion-limited aggregation and dielectric breakdown, which has re-invigorated the subject of fractal pattern formation. Although restricted to relatively simple models, conformal-map dynam- ics offers unique advantages over other numerical methods discussed in this chapter (such as the Level–Set Method) and in Chapter 9 (such as the phase field method). By absorbing all geometrical complexity into a time-dependent conformal map, it is possible to transform a moving free boundary problem to a simple, static domain, such as a circle or square, which obviates the need for front tracking. Conformal mapping also allows the exact representation of very complicated domains, which are not easily discretized, even by the most sophisticated adaptive meshes. Above all, however, conformal mapping offers analytical insights for otherwise intractable problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Universal Covering Space of the Twice Punctured Complex Plane
    The Universal Covering Space of the Twice Punctured Complex Plane Gustav Jonzon U.U.D.M. Project Report 2007:12 Examensarbete i matematik, 20 poäng Handledare och examinator: Karl-Heinz Fieseler Mars 2007 Department of Mathematics Uppsala University Abstract In this paper we present the basics of holomorphic covering maps be- tween Riemann surfaces and we discuss and study the structure of the holo- morphic covering map given by the modular function λ onto the base space C r f0; 1g from its universal covering space H, where the plane regions C r f0; 1g and H are considered as Riemann surfaces. We develop the basics of Riemann surface theory, tie it together with complex analysis and topo- logical covering space theory as well as the study of transformation groups on H and elliptic functions. We then utilize these tools in our analysis of the universal covering map λ : H ! C r f0; 1g. Preface First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to the supervisor of this paper, Karl-Heinz Fieseler, for suggesting the project and for his kind help along the way. I would also like to thank Sandra for helping me out when I got stuck with TEX and Daja for mathematical feedback. Contents 1 Introduction and Background 1 2 Preliminaries 2 2.1 A Quick Review of Topological Covering Spaces . 2 2.1.1 Covering Maps and Their Basic Properties . 2 2.2 An Introduction to Riemann Surfaces . 6 2.2.1 The Basic Definitions . 6 2.2.2 Elementary Properties of Holomorphic Mappings Between Riemann Surfaces .
    [Show full text]
  • Moduli Spaces of Riemann Surfaces
    MODULI SPACES OF RIEMANN SURFACES ALEX WRIGHT Contents 1. Different ways to build and deform Riemann surfaces 2 2. Teichm¨uller space and moduli space 4 3. The Deligne-Mumford compactification of moduli space 11 4. Jacobians, Hodge structures, and the period mapping 13 5. Quasiconformal maps 16 6. The Teichm¨ullermetric 18 7. Extremal length 24 8. Nielsen-Thurston classification of mapping classes 26 9. Teichm¨uller space is a bounded domain 29 10. The Weil-Petersson K¨ahlerstructure 40 11. Kobayashi hyperbolicity 46 12. Geometric Shafarevich and Mordell 48 References 57 These are course notes for a one quarter long second year graduate class at Stanford University taught in Winter 2017. All of the material presented is classical. For the softer aspects of Teichm¨ullertheory, our reference was the book of Farb-Margalit [FM12], and for Teichm¨ullertheory as a whole our comprehensive ref- erence was the book of Hubbard [Hub06]. We also used Gardiner and Lakic's book [GL00] and McMullen's course notes [McM] as supple- mental references. For period mappings our reference was the book [CMSP03]. For Geometric Shafarevich our reference was McMullen's survey [McM00]. The author thanks Steve Kerckhoff, Scott Wolpert, and especially Jeremy Kahn for many helpful conversations. These are rough notes, hastily compiled, and may contain errors. Corrections are especially welcome, since these notes will be re-used in the future. 2 WRIGHT 1. Different ways to build and deform Riemann surfaces 1.1. Uniformization. A Riemann surface is a topological space with an atlas of charts to the complex plane C whose translation functions are biholomorphisms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Measurable Riemann Mapping Theorem
    CHAPTER 1 The Measurable Riemann Mapping Theorem 1.1. Conformal structures on Riemann surfaces Throughout, “smooth” will always mean C 1. All surfaces are assumed to be smooth, oriented and without boundary. All diffeomorphisms are assumed to be smooth and orientation-preserving. It will be convenient for our purposes to do local computations involving metrics in the complex-variable notation. Let X be a Riemann surface and z x iy be a holomorphic local coordinate on X. The pair .x; y/ can be thoughtD C of as local coordinates for the underlying smooth surface. In these coordinates, a smooth Riemannian metric has the local form E dx2 2F dx dy G dy2; C C where E; F; G are smooth functions of .x; y/ satisfying E > 0, G > 0 and EG F 2 > 0. The associated inner product on each tangent space is given by @ @ @ @ a b ; c d Eac F .ad bc/ Gbd @x C @y @x C @y D C C C Äc a b ; D d where the symmetric positive definite matrix ÄEF (1.1) D FG represents in the basis @ ; @ . In particular, the length of a tangent vector is f @x @y g given by @ @ p a b Ea2 2F ab Gb2: @x C @y D C C Define two local sections of the complexified cotangent bundle T X C by ˝ dz dx i dy WD C dz dx i dy: N WD 2 1 The Measurable Riemann Mapping Theorem These form a basis for each complexified cotangent space. The local sections @ 1 Â @ @ Ã i @z WD 2 @x @y @ 1 Â @ @ Ã i @z WD 2 @x C @y N of the complexified tangent bundle TX C will form the dual basis at each point.
    [Show full text]
  • BIHOLOMORPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS 1. Introduction This Is a Short Overview for the Beginners
    BIHOLOMORPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS BUMA FRIDMAN AND DAOWEI MA 1. Introduction This is a short overview for the beginners (graduate students and advanced undergrad- uates) on some aspects of biholomorphic maps. A mathematical theory identifies objects that are \similar in every detail" from the point of view of the corresponding theory. For instance, in algebra we use the notion of isomorphism of algebraic objects (groups, rings, vector spaces, etc.), while in topology homeomorphic topological spaces are considered similar in every detail. The idea is to classify the objects under consideration. In complex analysis the corresponding notion is the biholomorphism of the main objects in the theory: complex manifolds. Two complex manifolds M1;M2 are biholomorphic if there is a bijective holomorphic map F : M1 ! M2. Like in those other theories one wants to find the biholomorphic classification of complex manifolds. This attempt is certainly an important motivation to study biholomorphic transformations. The classification problem appears to be a very difficult problem, and only partial results (though very important and highly interesting) are known. The Riemann Mapping Theorem states that any two proper simply connected domains in the complex plane are conformally equivalent. This is an exception. The general case is: for any n ≥ 1 in Cn any two \randomly" picked domains are not biholomorphic. We will mention three examples to support this viewpoint. We also are pointing out that in case n = 1 the classification problem is well researched and mostly understood. For n ≥ 2 it is way more complicated, and by now the pursuit of it has produced many very interesting and deep results and also created useful tools for SCV.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis Course Notes
    NOTES FOR MATH 520: COMPLEX ANALYSIS KO HONDA 1. Complex numbers 1.1. Definition of C. As a set, C = R2 = (x; y) x; y R . In other words, elements of C are pairs of real numbers. f j 2 g C as a field: C can be made into a field, by introducing addition and multiplication as follows: (1) (Addition) (a; b) + (c; d) = (a + c; b + d). (2) (Multiplication) (a; b) (c; d) = (ac bd; ad + bc). · − C is an Abelian (commutative) group under +: (1) (Associativity) ((a; b) + (c; d)) + (e; f) = (a; b) + ((c; d) + (e; f)). (2) (Identity) (0; 0) satisfies (0; 0) + (a; b) = (a; b) + (0; 0) = (a; b). (3) (Inverse) Given (a; b), ( a; b) satisfies (a; b) + ( a; b) = ( a; b) + (a; b). (4) (Commutativity) (a; b) +− (c;−d) = (c; d) + (a; b). − − − − C (0; 0) is also an Abelian group under multiplication. It is easy to verify the properties − f g 1 a b above. Note that (1; 0) is the identity and (a; b)− = ( a2+b2 ; a2−+b2 ). (Distributivity) If z ; z ; z C, then z (z + z ) = (z z ) + (z z ). 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 3 Also, we require that (1; 0) = (0; 0), i.e., the additive identity is not the same as the multi- plicative identity. 6 1.2. Basic properties of C. From now on, we will denote an element of C by z = x + iy (the standard notation) instead of (x; y). Hence (a + ib) + (c + id) = (a + c) + i(b + d) and (a + ib)(c + id) = (ac bd) + i(ad + bc).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Holomorphic Dynamics: Very Brief Notes
    Introduction to Holomorphic Dynamics: Very Brief Notes Saeed Zakeri Last modified: 5-8-2003 Lecture 1. (1) A Riemann surface X is a connected complex manifold of dimension 1. This means that X is a connected Hausdorff space, locally homeomorphic to R2, which is equipped with a complex structure f(Ui; zi)g. Here each Ui is an open subset of X, S =» the union Ui is X, each local coordinate zi : Ui ¡! D is a homeomorphism, and ¡1 whenever Ui \ Uj 6= ; the change of coordinate zjzi : zi(Ui \ Uj) ! zj(Ui \ Uj) is holomorphic. In the above definition we have not assumed that X has a countable basis for its topology. But this is in fact true and follows from the existence of a complex structure (Rado’s Theorem). (2) A map f : X ! Y between Riemann surfaces is holomorphic if w ± f ± z¡1 is a holomorphic map for each pair of local coordinates z on X and w on Y for which this composition makes sense. We often denote this composition by w = f(z).A holomorphic map f is called a biholomorphism or conformal isomorphism if it is a homeomorphism, in which case f ¡1 is automatically holomorphic. (3) Examples of Riemann surfaces: The complex plane C, the unit disk D, the Riemann b sphere C, complex tori T¿ = C=(Z © ¿Z) with Im(¿) > 0, open connected subsets of Riemann surfaces such as the complement of a Cantor set in C. (4) The Uniformization Theorem: Every simply connected Riemann surface is confor- mally isomorphic to Cb, C, or D.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Loewner Evolution
    Quantum Loewner evolution The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Miller, Jason, and Scott Sheffield. “Quantum Loewner Evolution.” Duke Mathematical Journal 165, 17 (November 2016): 3241–3378 © 2016 Duke University Press As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00127094-3627096 Publisher Duke University Press Version Original manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/116004 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Quantum Loewner Evolution Jason Miller and Scott Sheffield Abstract What is the scaling limit of diffusion limited aggregation (DLA) in the plane? This is an old and famously difficult question. One can generalize the question in two ways: first, one may consider the dielectric breakdown model η-DBM, a generalization of DLA in which particle locations are sampled from the η-th power of harmonic measure, instead of harmonic measure itself. Second, instead of restricting attention to deterministic lattices, one may consider η-DBM on random graphs known or believed to converge in law to a Liouville quantum gravity (LQG) surface with parameter γ [0; 2]. 2 In this generality, we propose a scaling limit candidate called quantum Loewner evolution, QLE(γ2; η). QLE is defined in terms of the radial Loewner equation like radial SLE, except that it is driven by a measure valued diffusion νt derived from LQG rather than a multiple of a standard Brownian motion. We formalize the dynamics of νt using an SPDE. For each γ (0; 2], there are two or three special values of η for which we establish 2 the existence of a solution to these dynamics and explicitly describe the stationary law of νt.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables
    Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables A whirlwind tour of the subject Jiríˇ Lebl October 11, 2018 (version 2.4) . 2 Typeset in LATEX. Copyright c 2014–2018 Jiríˇ Lebl License: This work is dual licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License and the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of these licenses, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-sa/4.0/ or https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. You can use, print, duplicate, share this book as much as you want. You can base your own notes on it and reuse parts if you keep the license the same. You can assume the license is either the CC-BY-NC-SA or CC-BY-SA, whichever is compatible with what you wish to do, your derivative works must use at least one of the licenses. Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Debraj Chakrabarti, Anirban Dawn, Alekzander Malcom, John Treuer, Jianou Zhang, Liz Vivas, Trevor Fancher, and students in my classes for pointing out typos/errors and helpful suggestions. During the writing of this book, the author was in part supported by NSF grant DMS-1362337. More information: See https://www.jirka.org/scv/ for more information (including contact information). The LATEX source for the book is available for possible modification and customization at github: https://github.com/jirilebl/scv . Contents Introduction 5 0.1 Motivation, single variable, and Cauchy’s formula ..................5 1 Holomorphic functions in several variables 11 1.1 Onto several variables ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conformal Invariants in Simply Connected Domains
    Computational Methods and Function Theory (2020) 20:747–775 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40315-020-00351-8 Conformal Invariants in Simply Connected Domains Mohamed M. S. Nasser1 · Matti Vuorinen2 Received: 22 February 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published online: 4 November 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract This paper studies the numerical computation of several conformal invariants of sim- ply connected domains in the complex plane including, the hyperbolic distance, the reduced modulus, the harmonic measure, and the modulus of a quadrilateral. The used method is based on the boundary integral equation with the generalized Neumann ker- nel. Several numerical examples are presented. The performance and accuracy of the presented method is validated by considering several model problems with known analytic solutions. Keywords Conformal mappings · Hyperbolic distance · Reduced modulus · Harmonic measure · Quadrilateral domains Mathematics Subject Classification 65E05 · 30C85 · 31A15 · 30C30 1 Introduction Classical function theory studies analytic functions and conformal maps defined on subdomains of the complex plane C . Most commonly, the domain of definition of the functions is the unit disk D ={z ∈ C ||z| < 1}. The powerful Riemann mapping theorem says that a given simply connected domain G with non-degenerate boundary can be mapped conformally onto the unit disk and it enables us to extend results In memoriam Professor Stephan Ruscheweyh. Communicated by Elias Wegert. B MohamedM.S.Nasser [email protected] Matti Vuorinen vuorinen@utu.fi 1 Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland 123 748 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformal Loop Ensembles: the Markovian Characterization and The
    Conformal loop ensembles: the Markovian characterization and the loop-soup construction Scott Sheffield∗ and Wendelin Werner† Abstract For random collections of self-avoiding loops in two-dimensional domains, we define a simple and natural conformal restriction property that is conjecturally satisfied by the scaling limits of interfaces in models from statistical physics. This property is basically the combination of conformal invariance and the locality of the interaction in the model. Unlike the Markov property that Schramm used to characterize SLE curves (which involves conditioning on partially generated interfaces up to arbitrary stopping times), this property only involves conditioning on entire loops and thus appears at first glance to be weaker. Our first main result is that there exists exactly a one-dimensional family of random loop collections with this property—one for each κ (8/3, 4]—and that ∈ the loops are forms of SLEκ. The proof proceeds in two steps. First, uniqueness is established by showing that every such loop ensemble can be generated by an “exploration” process based on SLE. Second, existence is obtained using the two-dimensional Brownian loop-soup, which is a Poissonian random collection of loops in a planar domain. When the intensity parameter c of the loop-soup is less than 1, we show that the outer boundaries of the loop clusters are disjoint simple loops (when c> 1 there is a.s. only one cluster) that satisfy the conformal restriction axioms. We prove various results about loop-soups, cluster sizes, and the c = 1 phase transition. arXiv:1006.2374v3 [math.PR] 28 Sep 2011 Taken together, our results imply that the following families are equivalent: 1.
    [Show full text]